Randomised, placebo controlled trial of effect of a leukotriene receptor antagonist, montelukast, on tapering inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic patients

Development of Adaptive Immunity and Its Role in Lung Remodeling

Asthma is characterized by airflow limitations resulting from bronchial closure, which can be either reversible or fixed due to changes in airway tissue composition and structure, also known as remodeling. Airway remodeling is defined as increased presence of mucins-producing epithelial cells, increased thickness of airway smooth muscle cells, angiogenesis, increased number and activation state of fibroblasts, and extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition. Airway inflammation is believed to be the main cause of the development of airway remodeling in asthma. In this chapter, we will review the development of the adaptive immune response and the impact of its mediators and cells on the elements defining airway remodeling in asthma.

Current state and future prospect of the therapeutic strategy targeting cysteinyl leukotriene metabolism in asthma

Asthma is an allergic disorder with dominant type 2 airway inflammation, and its prevalence is increasing worldwide. Inhalation of corticosteroids is the primary treatment for asthma along with add-on drugs, including long-acting β2 agonists and/or cysteinyl leukotriene (cys-LT) receptor antagonists, in patients with poorly controlled asthma. Cys-LTs are composed of leukotriene C4 (LTC₄), LTD₄, and LTE₄, which are enzymatically metabolized from arachidonic acid. These molecules act as inflammatory mediators through different types of high-affinity receptors, namely, CysLT₁, CysLT₂, and CysLT₃ (also named as GPR99). CysLT₁ antagonists possessing anti-inflammatory and bronchodilatory effects can be orally administered to patients with asthma. Recently, molecular biology-based studies have revealed the mechanism of inflammatory responses via other receptors, such as CysLT₂ and CysLT₃, as well as the importance of upstream inflammatory regulators, including type 2 cytokines (e.g., interleukins 4 and 5), in controlling cys-LT metabolism. These findings indicate the therapeutic potential of pharmacological agents targeting cys-LT metabolism-related receptors and enzymes, and antibody drugs neutralizing or antagonizing type 2 cytokines. This review focuses on the current state and future prospect of the therapeutic strategy targeting cys-LT metabolism.

Asthma

This review provides an evidence-based guide for the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of patients with asthma. It addresses typical questions that arise in the clinic-based care of patients with asthma and provides a basic and comprehensive resource for asthma care.

Comparison of Effect of Leukotriene Biosynthesis Blockers and Inhibitors of Phosphodiesterase Enzyme in Patients with Bronchial Hyperreactivity

AIM

Blocking effect of leukotriene biosynthesis-zileuton and blocking the effect of phosphodiesterase enzyme-diprophylline in the treatment of patients with bronchial asthma and bronchial increased reactivity, and tiotropium bromide as an antagonist of the muscarinic receptor studied in this work.

METHODS

Parameters of the lung function are determined with Body plethysmography. The resistance of the airways (Raw) was registered and measured was intrathoracic gas volume (ITGV), and specific resistance (SRaw) was also calculated. For the research, administered was zileuton (tabl. 600 mg) and diprophylline (tabl. 150 mg).

RESULTS

Two days after in-house administration of leukotriene biosynthesis blocker-zileuton (4 x 600 mg orally), on the day 3 initial values of patients measured and afterwards administered 1 tablet of zileuton, and again measured was Raw and ITGV, after 60, 90 and 120 min. and calculated was SRaw; (p < 0.01). Diprophylline administered 7 days at home in a dose of (2 x 150 mg orally), on the day 8 to same patients administered 1 tablet of diprophylline, and performed measurements of Raw, ITGV, after 60, 90 and 120 min, and calculated the SRaw (p < 0.05). Treatment of the control group with tiotropium bromide - antagonist of the muscarinic receptor (2 inh. x 0.18 mcg), is effective in removal of the increased bronchomotor tonus, by also causing the significant decrease of the resistance (Raw), respectively of the specific resistance (SRaw), (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Effect of zileuton in blocking of leukotriene biosynthesis is not immediate after oral administration, but the effect seen on the third day of cys-LTs' inhibition, and leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and A4 (LTA4) in patients with bronchial reactivity and bronchial asthma, which is expressed with a high significance, (p < 0.01). Blockage of phosphodiesterase enzyme-diprophylline decreases the bronchial reactivity, which is expressed with a moderate significance, (p < 0.05).

Addition of anti-leukotriene agents to inhaled corticosteroids for adults and adolescents with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma management guidelines recommend low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first-line therapy for adults and adolescents with persistent asthma. The addition of anti-leukotriene agents to ICS offers a therapeutic option in cases of suboptimal control with daily ICS.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of anti-leukotriene agents added to ICS compared with the same dose, an increased dose or a tapering dose of ICS (in both arms) for adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older with persistent asthma. Also, to determine whether any characteristics of participants or treatments might affect the magnitude of response.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified relevant studies from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials, which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and the trial registries clinicaltrials.gov and ICTRP from inception to August 2016.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adults and adolescents 12 years of age and older on a maintenance dose of ICS for whom investigators added anti-leukotrienes to the ICS and compared treatment with the same dose, an increased dose or a tapering dose of ICS for at least four weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. The primary outcome was the number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (except when both groups tapered the dose of ICS, in which case the primary outcome was the % reduction in ICS dose from baseline with maintained asthma control). Secondary outcomes included markers of exacerbation, lung function, asthma control, quality of life, withdrawals and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in the review 37 studies representing 6128 adult and adolescent participants (most with mild to moderate asthma). Investigators in these studies used three leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs): montelukast (n = 24), zafirlukast (n = 11) and pranlukast (n = 2); studies lasted from four weeks to five years. Anti-leukotrienes and ICS versus same dose of ICSOf 16 eligible studies, 10 studies, representing 2364 adults and adolescents, contributed data. Anti-leukotriene agents given as adjunct therapy to ICS reduced by half the number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (risk ratio (RR) 0.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.29 to 0.86; 815 participants; four studies; moderate quality); this is equivalent to a number needed to treat for additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) over six to 16 weeks of 22 (95% CI 16 to 75). Only one trial including 368 participants reported mortality and serious adverse events, but events were too infrequent for researchers to draw a conclusion. Four trials reported all adverse events, and the pooled result suggested little difference between groups (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.22; 1024 participants; three studies; moderate quality). Investigators noted between-group differences favouring the addition of anti-leukotrienes for morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), asthma symptoms and night-time awakenings, but not for reduction in β2-agonist use or evening PEFR. Anti-leukotrienes and ICS versus higher dose of ICSOf 15 eligible studies, eight studies, representing 2008 adults and adolescents, contributed data. Results showed no statistically significant difference in the number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.39; 1779 participants; four studies; moderate quality) nor in all adverse events between groups (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.89 to 1.03; 1899 participants; six studies; low quality). Three trials reported no deaths among 834 participants. Results showed no statistically significant differences in lung function tests including morning PEFR and FEV1 nor in asthma control measures including use of rescue β2-agonists or asthma symptom scores. Anti-leukotrienes and ICS versus tapering dose of ICSSeven studies, representing 1150 adults and adolescents, evaluated the combination of anti-leukotrienes and tapering-dose of ICS compared with tapering-dose of ICS alone and contributed data. Investigators observed no statistically significant difference in % change from baseline ICS dose (mean difference (MD) -3.05, 95% CI -8.13 to 2.03; 930 participants; four studies; moderate quality), number of participants with exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20 to 1.04; 542 participants; five studies; low quality) or all adverse events (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; 1100 participants; six studies; moderate quality). Serious adverse events occurred more frequently among those taking anti-leukotrienes plus tapering ICS than in those taking tapering doses of ICS alone (RR 2.44, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.92; 621 participants; two studies; moderate quality), but deaths were too infrequent for researchers to draw any conclusions about mortality. Data showed no improvement in lung function nor in asthma control measures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For adolescents and adults with persistent asthma, with suboptimal asthma control with daily use of ICS, the addition of anti-leukotrienes is beneficial for reducing moderate and severe asthma exacerbations and for improving lung function and asthma control compared with the same dose of ICS. We cannot be certain that the addition of anti-leukotrienes is superior, inferior or equivalent to a higher dose of ICS. Scarce available evidence does not support anti-leukotrienes as an ICS sparing agent, and use of LTRAs was not associated with increased risk of withdrawals or adverse effects, with the exception of an increase in serious adverse events when the ICS dose was tapered. Information was insufficient for assessment of mortality.

The safety of mepolizumab for the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is an airway disease characterized by airway inflammation. It is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and costs to the healthcare system and society. Interleukin-5 (IL-5) was identified for its role in eosinophil development, maturation, and survival in tissues, which has been related to disease severity and airway eosinophilia. Areas covered: In this review, we will present the pharmacokinetics and dynamics of mepolizumab in addition to efficacy and safety data. Expert Opinion: Mepolizumab is novel, new, first-in-class therapy targeting IL-5. It has been found to be particularly effective in the management of patients with asthma whose peripheral blood eosinophil count is at a well-defined cut point within the normative range. This easily available biomarker, along with a history of asthma exacerbations, has translated into a clinically significant reduction in asthma exacerbations and the dose of oral corticosteroids in patients who previously have been prednisone-dependent. The pivotal studies indicate that mepolizumab was well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events being headache, nasopharyngitis, worsening of asthma, and local injection reactions. These study investigators did not report any deaths or anaphylaxis related to mepolizumab.

Montelukast, current indications and prospective future applications

INTRODUCTION

Montelukast is recommended for the treatment of asthma, exercise -induced bronchospasm and allergic rhinitis. Several trials demonstrated potential therapeutic effects in other respiratory conditions, and different animal-model-based studies explored potential pharmacological actions in non-respiratory conditions.

AREAS COVERED

Clinical investigations on the pharmacotherapeutic effects of montelukast, in addition to in-vivo studies on animal models of non-respiratory diseases. The data discussed in this review were mainly obtained from clinical randomized trials, real-life studies, and studies based on animal models as approve of concept. As a condition, all of the discussed articles were published in journals cited by Pubmed. Expert commentary: The current clinical data are in favor of montelukast use in the management of chronic asthma as an add-on or alternative therapy to the inhaled corticosteroids. Further clinical trials are required to confirm the effectiveness and feasibility of montelukast for the treatment of conditions other than the current clinical indications.

Efficacy and Safety of Modified Pranlukast (Prakanon(®)) Compared with Pranlukast (Onon(®)): A Randomized, Open-Label, Crossover Study

INTRODUCTION

Pranlukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) that is used as an additional controller of mild to moderate asthma. This study compared the efficacy and side effects of two bioequivalent preparations of pranlukast: original pranlukast (Onon(®); Ono Pharmaceutical, Japan) and a modified formulation of pranlukast (Prakanon(®); Yuhan Co, Korea) in patients with mild to moderate asthma.

METHODS

Of the 34 subjects screened, 30 patients who were using standard medication to control asthma and scored less than 20 points on the Asthma Control Test(™) (ACT) were assigned randomly to one of the two groups in a prospective, open label, crossover study: group 1 received Prakanon(®) (150 mg/day) and group 2 received Onon(®) (450 mg/day) for 8 weeks each; after a 1-week rest period, the groups were switched to the alternative medication for further 8 weeks and monitored for 2 more weeks without study medication. Evaluation parameters included the ACT, quality of life questionnaire adult Korean asthmatics (QLQAKA), pulmonary function tests, peripheral blood tests, vital signs, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled and 21 completed the trial: 10 in group 1 and 11 in group 2. The baseline data of the two groups did not differ. No statistical significant differences were observed in efficacy and lung function at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two kinds of pranlukast. The final asthma control rate was 81% with Prakanon(®) and 76% with Onon(®). There were no differences in vital signs and laboratory data at each time and in changes from baseline value between the two drugs. There were no differences in adverse events between the two drugs. The most common side effect was abdominal pain. Drug compliance was high, without differences between the two drugs.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that Prakanon(®) which is an improved formulation of pranlukast at a lower dose than the original formulation, Onon(®), has a similar efficacy and side effect profile in the control of persistent asthma.

Beliefs about medication predict the misattribution of a common symptom as a medication side effect--Evidence from an analogue online study

OBJECTIVE

Some perceived medication side effects may be 'normal' symptoms that patients misattribute to the medication. Using an analogue approach, we tested if medication beliefs predict whether participants misattribute a headache as a side effect and subsequently intend to stop medication.

METHODS

We recruited 690 participants, 223 reporting a past asthma diagnosis. They received information about asthma and Molair, a fictitious asthma treatment modeled on a licensed treatment (montelukast). We varied the description of efficacy and side effects (which did not include headache). Pre-exposure to this information, participants completed the Beliefs about Medicine Questionnaire (BMQ)-General and the Perceived Sensitivity to Medicines Scale (PSM), post-exposure they completed the BMQ-Specific. Participants were asked to imagine they experienced a headache while taking Molair. Finally, they rated whether the headache was a side effect (misattribution) and if they would stop taking Molair (behavioral intention).

RESULTS

Nearly a quarter (170) of participants misattributed the headache to Molair and 69 (10%) subsequently intended to stop Molair. Both outcomes were predicted by general and specific medication beliefs. Odds of misattribution (m) and behavioral intention (i) increased with higher General Harm (ORm=1.90, ORi=2.72), General Overuse (ORm=1.74, ORi=1.56) and Molair Concern beliefs (ORm=1.52, ORi=1.78, all p<.01), but decreased with General Benefit (ORm=0.72, ORi=0.53) and Molair Necessity beliefs (ORm=0.72, ORi=0.70, all p<.05).

CONCLUSION

Symptom misattribution and subsequent intentions to stop Molair were predicted by pre-exposure beliefs about medicines in general and post-exposure beliefs about Molair. Patients with negative medication beliefs may be prone to misattribute symptoms and subsequently stop medication.

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists versus placebo in the treatment of asthma in adults and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are recommended as an alternative treatment in patients with mild asthma, but their effect compared with placebo is unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine the benefits and harms of LTRAs as monotherapy or in combination with inhaled corticosteroids compared with placebo in adults and adolescents with asthma.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception through June 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

Peer-reviewed, English-language, randomized, controlled trials in patients with asthma that reported the effect of LTRAs versus placebo on measures of asthma control.

DATA EXTRACTION

Three researchers extracted data on study population, interventions, outcome measures, and adverse events. One researcher assessed risk of bias.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Of the 2008 abstracts that were screened, 50 trials met eligibility criteria. Random-effects meta-analyses of 6 trials of LTRA monotherapy showed that LTRAs reduced the risk for an exacerbation (summary risk ratio [RR], 0.60 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.81]). In 4 trials of LTRAs as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids, the summary RR for exacerbation was 0.80 (CI, 0.60 to 1.07). Leukotriene-receptor antagonists either as monotherapy or as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids increased FEV1, whereas FEV1 percentage of predicted values was improved only in trials of LTRA monotherapy. Adverse event rates were similar in the intervention and comparator groups.

LIMITATION

Variation in definitions and reporting of outcomes, high risk of bias in some studies, heterogeneity of findings, possible selective outcome reporting bias, and inability to assess the effect of asthma severity on summary estimates.

CONCLUSION

Leukotriene-receptor antagonists as monotherapy improved asthma control compared with placebo, but which patients are most likely to respond to treatment with LTRAs remains unclear.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institutes of Health.

Different approaches in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases

Advances in drug formulation, inhalation device design and disease management are generating new opportunities for patients suffering from obstructive pulmonary diseases. This article provides a comprehensive review of the different promising pulmonary drug delivery technologies in the treatment of obstructive pulmonary diseases, particularly with regard to the treatment of asthma and chronic pulmonary diseases (COPD), which are increasing day by day due to increasing environmental pollution and its harmful and toxic contaminants. In the recent years, a better knowledge has been gained regarding the mechanism of action of glucocorticoids and how they suppress the chronic inflammation. New etiology has been brought into light regarding the inactivity of glucocorticoids in some patients having asthma and COPDs even though the inflammatory genes are triggered by similar molecules in both the diseases. This new knowledge has given a new platform to improve glucocorticoids and their resistance also how other combination therapy can be used for these diseases. It has also led to the quest for improving and developing other alternatives such as anti-leukotriene agents, muscarinic inhibitors, combination therapy, as well as biologic immune-modulators in the treatment of the different pulmonary diseases. Several new combinations of glucocorticoids are available in the global market for the use in pulmonary diseases especially asthma although their availability fluctuates between continents. There has been several studies done regarding the variation of effectiveness of the different inhaled glucocorticoids and hence it is important to take into consideration the different delivery systems and the methods which are used to treat the patients.

Stepping down from inhaled corticosteroids with leukotriene inhibitors in asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risks of using leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) as part of a strategy for stepping down inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of asthma exacerbation in individuals with stable asthma who start LTRA when stopping ICS or reducing ICS dose.

METHODS

We identified articles from a systematic review of English and non-English articles by using a number of data bases. We included randomized controlled trials with a stable asthma run-in period of 4 weeks or more and a follow-up period of at least 3 months. We included studies of individuals with stable asthma who stopped ICS and substituted LTRA (versus continuing ICS) and who reduced ICS while starting LTRA (versus placebo).

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 1132 potential articles, of which 52 were reviewed at the full-text level, and four met criteria for inclusion. The single article that met the inclusion criteria for substitution of LTRA for ICS as a step-down strategy found a statistically increased risk of treatment failure of 30.3% for substituting LTRA compared with 20.2% for continuing ICS. The three articles that met the inclusion criteria for comparing LTRA versus placebo in patients with stable asthma who reduce ICS found a modestly decreased risk ratio that favored LTRA of 0.57 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.90; I(2) = 0%) in studies that only included individuals >15 years old.

CONCLUSION

Only one study addressed the risk of substitution of LTRA for ICS in stable asthma, which limited any strong conclusions about this step-down strategy.

Structure based virtual screening of ligands to identify cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist

Montelukast and Zafirlukast are known leukotriene receptor antagonists prescribed in asthma treatment. However, these fall short as mono therapy and are frequently used in combination with inhaled glucocorticosteroids with or without long acting beta 2 agonists. Therefore, it is of interest to apply ligand and structure based virtual screening strategies to identify compounds akin to lead compounds Montelukast and Zafirlukast. Hence, compounds with structures having 95% similarity to these compounds were retrieved from NCBI׳s PubChem database. Compounds similar to lead were grouped and docked at the antagonist binding site of cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1. This exercise identified compounds UNII 70RV86E50Q (Pub Cid 71587778) and Sure CN 9587085 (Pub Cid 19793614) with higher predicted binding compared to Montelukast and Zafirlukast. It is shown that the compound Sure CN 9587085 showed appreciable ligand receptor interaction compared to UNII 70RV86E50Q. Thus, the compound Sure CN 9587085 is selected as a potent antagonist to cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 for further consideration in vitro and in vivo validation.

SQ HDM SLIT-tablet (ALK) in treatment of asthma--post hoc results from a randomised trial

INTRODUCTION

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (EudraCT identifier: 2006-001795-20), the standardised quality (SQ) house dust mite (HDM) sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-tablet (ALK, Denmark) was investigated.

METHOD

The trial included 604 subjects, ≥14 years, with mild-moderate HDM allergic asthma. Subjects were randomised 1:1:1:1 to 1, 3 or 6 SQ-HDM or placebo once daily. The primary endpoint was reduction in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) after one year. ICS reduction, asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) and asthma control questionnaire (ACQ) score was analysed post hoc in a subgroup with daily ICS use of 400-800 μg and ACQ score of 1-1.5, corresponding to partly controlled asthma (N = 108).

RESULTS

The trial met its primary endpoint. In the subgroup, the difference between placebo and 6 SQ-HDM in change from baseline in daily ICS use was 327 μg (p < 0.0001), while it was 0.52 (p = 0.010) for AQLQ. The treatment effect on ICS reduction and AQLQ was increased for the subgroup versus the residual population (ICS reduction: p < 0.001); AQLQ: p = 0.044).

CONCLUSION

In this subgroup, including only patients with partly controlled asthma, the benefit of 1 year of treatment with SQ HDM SLIT-tablet was significantly higher than for the less severe full population, both in terms of increased asthma control and improved quality of life.

Effectiveness of montelukast administered as monotherapy or in combination with inhaled corticosteroid in pediatric patients with uncontrolled asthma: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Asthma is the most common chronic disease of childhood and a leading cause of childhood morbidity. The aim of the current study was to assess the effectiveness of montelukast administered as monotherapy or in combination with current inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in pediatric patients with uncontrolled asthma as per the Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines.

METHODS

Twelve-week, multicentre, open-label, observational study. Primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of patients achieving asthma control (Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score ≤0.75) at weeks 4 and 12.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients with uncontrolled asthma (ACQ > 0.75) were enrolled with mean ± SD age of 6.9 ± 3.4 years. Among these, 76 (23.2%) were treated with montelukast monotherapy and 252 (76.8%) with montelukast combined with ICS. By 4 weeks of treatment 61.3% and 52.9% of the patients in the monotherapy and combination group, respectively, achieved asthma control. These proportions increased to 75.0% and 70.9%, respectively, at 12 weeks. Within the monotherapy group, clinically significant improvements in the ACQ score (mean ± SD of 1.67 ± 0.69, 0.71 ± 0.70 and 0.50 ± 0.52 at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks, respectively; p < 0.001) and the PACQLQ score (mean ± SD of 5.34 ± 1.14, 6.32 ± 0.89 and 6.51 ± 0.85 at baseline, 4 and 12 weeks, respectively; p < 0.001) were observed. In the combination group, the mean ± SD ACQ score significantly improved from 2.02 ± 0.83 at baseline to 0.90 ± 0.86 at 4 weeks and 0.64 ± 0.86 at 12 weeks (p < 0.001), while the PACQLQ score improved from 4.42 ± 1.35 at baseline to 5.76 ± 1.30 at 4 weeks and 6.21 ± 1.03 at 12 weeks (p < 0.001). After a 12-week montelukast add-on therapy, 22.6% of patients reduced their ICS dosage. Similar results were observed among preschool- and school-aged patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Montelukast as monotherapy or in combination with ICS represents an effective treatment strategy for achieving asthma control in pediatric patients and improving caregivers' quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov: NCT00832455.

Antileukotriene agents for the treatment of lung disease

Leukotrienes (LTs) C4, D4, and E4, collectively termed cysteinyl LTs (cysLTs), are lipid mediators formed by the 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) pathway of arachidonic acid metabolism. Originally recognized for their potent bronchoconstrictor actions, they were subsequently determined also to promote inflammation, microvascular permeability, and mucus secretion. These actions that are so central to asthma pathophysiology are mediated to a significant extent by ligation of the cysLT receptor 1 (CysLT1). Antagonism of CysLT1 and inhibition of 5-LO have both been shown to have clinical use in the management of asthma, but substantial interindividual heterogeneity is observed in the response to these agents. In this article, we review the biologic actions of LTs, their biosynthetic pathways and cognate receptors, the pharmacology of available anti-LT agents, and the clinical evidence for the use of anti-LT agents as monotherapy and combination therapy in asthma. We also consider heterogeneity of response, the possible roles of cysLT receptors other than CysLT1, the role of another class of LT, LTB4, and the potential role of LTs in lung diseases other than asthma.

Treatment of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) describes the transient narrowing of the airways during, and particularly after exercise and occurs commonly in asthmatic individuals. Limitation of exercise capacity is a frequent complaint in all age groups, and severity of EIB ranges from mild impairment of performance to severe bronchospasm and a large reduction in FEV1. Treatment of EIB varies from daily to less frequent therapy, depending on the level of activity. In this article, the authors evaluate the treatment possibilities before, during, and after exercise. They also review medications currently used to treat EIB.

Montelukast in asthma: a review of its efficacy and place in therapy

Many studies have been published in the last 10 years on the efficacy and safety of montelukast in asthma since this drug entered the market. Experimental studies, in vitro and in vivo, and clinical studies on large numbers of patients with asthma of different severity have clearly demonstrated that montelukast is able to modify the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease, and to improve to some extent the clinical and functional manifestations of asthma. Studies of montelukast as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, mainly inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), versus different comparator drugs have contributed to the positioning of montelukast in the different levels of asthma treatment, according to the Global Initiative for Asthma Guidelines. Montelukast may be used as monotherapy as an alternative to low-dose ICS (particularly in a step-down strategy) or in addition to ICS for improving clinical manifestations by an increase in anti-inflammatory effects and a sparing of corticosteroids. The heterogeneity of asthma has received a large amount of attention in the last few years in order to better tailor treatment according to the different clinical and biological phenotypes of asthma. Montelukast has proven to be particularly effective in exercise-induced asthma and in asthma associated with allergic rhinitis. Other phenotypes where montelukast is effective include asthma in obese patients, asthma in smokers, aspirin-induced asthma and viral-induced wheezing episodes. The safety profile of montelukast is very good, and the suspicions of increased risk of Churg-Strauss syndrome or suicide have not been confirmed.

Anti-leukotriene agents compared to inhaled corticosteroids in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children

BACKGROUND

Anti-leukotrienes (5-lipoxygenase inhibitors and leukotriene receptors antagonists) serve as alternative monotherapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in the management of recurrent and/or chronic asthma in adults and children.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the safety and efficacy of anti-leukotrienes compared to inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy in adults and children with asthma and to provide better insight into the influence of patient and treatment characteristics on the magnitude of effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Dec 2010), EMBASE (1980 to Dec 2010), CINAHL (1982 to Dec 2010), the Cochrane Airways Group trials register, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Dec 2010), abstract books, and reference lists of review articles and trials. We contacted colleagues and the international headquarters of anti-leukotrienes producers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised trials that compared anti-leukotrienes with inhaled corticosteroids as monotherapy for a minimum period of four weeks in patients with asthma aged two years and older.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the methodological quality of trials and extracted data. The primary outcome was the number of patients with at least one exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids. Secondary outcomes included patients with at least one exacerbation requiring hospital admission, lung function tests, indices of chronic asthma control, adverse effects, withdrawal rates and biological inflammatory markers.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty-five trials met the inclusion criteria for this review. Fifty-six trials (19 paediatric trials) contributed data (representing total of 10,005 adults and 3,333 children); 21 trials were of high methodological quality; 44 were published in full-text. All trials pertained to patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma. Trial durations varied from four to 52 weeks. The median dose of inhaled corticosteroids was quite homogeneous at 200 µg/day of microfine hydrofluoroalkane-propelled beclomethasone or equivalent (HFA-BDP eq). Patients treated with anti-leukotrienes were more likely to suffer an exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids (N = 6077 participants; risk ratio (RR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17, 1.96). For every 28 (95% CI 15 to 82) patients treated with anti-leukotrienes instead of inhaled corticosteroids, there was one additional patient with an exacerbation requiring rescue systemic corticosteroids. The magnitude of effect was significantly greater in patients with moderate compared with those with mild airway obstruction (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.41, 2.91 versus RR 1.25, 95% CI 0.97, 1.61), but was not significantly influenced by age group (children representing 23% of the weight versus adults), anti-leukotriene used, duration of intervention, methodological quality, and funding source. Significant group differences favouring inhaled corticosteroids were noted in most secondary outcomes including patients with at least one exacerbation requiring hospital admission (N = 2715 participants; RR 3.33; 95% CI 1.02 to 10.94), the change from baseline FEV(1) (N = 7128 participants; mean group difference (MD) 110 mL, 95% CI 140 to 80) as well as other lung function parameters, asthma symptoms, nocturnal awakenings, rescue medication use, symptom-free days, the quality of life, parents' and physicians' satisfaction. Anti-leukotriene therapy was associated with increased risk of withdrawals due to poor asthma control (N = 7669 participants; RR 2.56; 95% CI 2.01 to 3.27). For every thirty one (95% CI 22 to 47) patients treated with anti-leukotrienes instead of inhaled corticosteroids, there was one additional withdrawal due to poor control. Risk of side effects was not significantly different between both groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

As monotherapy, inhaled corticosteroids display superior efficacy to anti-leukotrienes in adults and children with persistent asthma; the superiority is particularly marked in patients with moderate airway obstruction. On the basis of efficacy, the results support the current guidelines' recommendation that inhaled corticosteroids remain the preferred monotherapy. 

Asthma in elite athletes

Asthma is frequently found among elite athletes performing endurance sports such as swimming, rowing and cross-country skiing. Although these athletes often report symptoms while exercising, they seldom have symptoms at rest. Moreover, compared with nonathletic asthmatic individuals, elite athletes have been shown to have a different distribution of airway inflammation and unequal response to bronchial provocative test. Elite athletes display signs of exercise-induced symptoms, for example, nonasthmatic inspiratory wheeze, vocal cord dysfunction and cardiac arrhythmias, which could limit their physical capacity. Elite athletes should undergo comprehensive assessment to confirm an asthma diagnosis and determine its degree of severity. Treatment should be as for any other asthmatic individual, including the use of β2-agonist, inhaled steroid as well as leukotriene-antagonist. It should, however, be noted that daily use of β-agonists could expose elite athletes to the risk of developing tolerance towards these drugs. Use of β2-agonist should be replaced with daily inhaled corticosteroid treatment, the most important treatment of exercise-induced asthma. All physicians treating asthma should be aware of the doping aspects. Systemic β2-agonist intake is strictly prohibited, whereas inhaled treatment is allowed in therapeutic doses when asthma is documented and dispensation has been granted when needed.

Asthma in elite athletes: pathogenesis, diagnosis, differential diagnoses, and treatment

Elite athletes have a high prevalence of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Although respiratory symptoms can be suggestive of asthma, the diagnosis of asthma in elite athletes cannot be based solely on the presence or absence of symptoms; diagnosis should be based on objective measurements, such as the eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea test or exercise test. When considering that not all respiratory symptoms are due to asthma, other diagnoses should be considered. Certain regulations apply to elite athletes who require asthma medication for asthma. Knowledge of these regulations is essential when treating elite athletes. This article is aimed at physicians who diagnose and treat athletes with respiratory symptoms. It focuses on the pathogenesis of asthma and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes and how the diagnosis can be made. Furthermore, treatment of elite athletes with asthma, anti-doping regulations, and differential diagnoses such as exercise-induced laryngomalacia are discussed.

Montelukast for the treatment of asthma in the adult population

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a complex process that results from airway inflammation and manifests as bronchoconstriction. Infiltration of the airway mucosa and lumen by activated inflammatory cells, along with release of mediators, can occur extensively. Chemical mediators known as leukotrienes are believed to play a major role in this process. At present, inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the pharmacologic cornerstone of asthma management. However, asthma control may remain suboptimal when relying on ICS because of problems with compliance, poor inhaler technique and concerns about the side effects of steroids; additional agents are often required to control symptoms. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA), namely montelukast, provide a safe and effective additional anti-inflammatory treatment option. There is particular benefit for patients with asthma and concomitant allergic rhinitis.

AREAS COVERED

Montelukast has been well studied through rigorous clinical trials. A thorough review of the literature has been undertaken to assess the evidence supporting the use of LTRAs. This review focuses on the role of montelukast not only as monotherapy but also as add-on therapy to ICS in the adult asthma population, as well as adult asthmatics with concomitant allergic rhinitis. In addition, there is often some discrepancy between the evidence generated in the idealized asthma patients recruited into randomized clinical trials and results obtained in the real-life setting. This review assesses recent clinical trials evaluating the real-life evaluation of montelukast, achieved mainly through open-label observational studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Oral LTRA bring remarkable ease of anti-inflammatory treatment administration and symptom improvement with minimal side effects to the management of adult asthma. Basic asthma mechanisms and much-valued scientific groundwork has been identified by exploring target asthma treatment with anti-leukotriene therapy. This will have a significant impact in the future development of targeted asthma therapies as well as the current management of asthma and other inflammatory medical conditions.

Anti-leukotrienes in Childhood Asthma

Bronchial asthma is an inflammatory condition. The inflammatory actions of leukotrienes (LT) B4, C4, D4, and E4 have been shown experimentally to play a role in inflammatory mechanisms, producing asthma. Antileukotrienes (ALT) or leukotrienes antagonists (LA) is a new class of anti-asthma drugs with anti-inflammatory role. LT modifiers from the groups of 5 lipoxygenase inhibitor and Cys LT1 receptor antagonists, are found useful in asthma therapy. LAs are of main use in young infants and toddler with recurrent wheezing, children with moderate to severe chronic asthma on steroid therapy and in allergic rhinitis. In chronic asthma they are required to be used for prolonged periods with other anti-asthma agents. Except for Montelukast and Zafirlukast, which can be used in children above two and six years of age respectively, the paediatric use of other agents is yet to be established. However, these agents are essentially safe. The cost of LAs is reasonably high. At present, with available evidence, these drugs are considered promising in management of asthma in children. However, there is need to do more long term clinical trials for ascertaining their effectivity in different types of asthma to compare their effects with long acting B2 agnoists and chromones, so as to optimally explore their utility.

Pharmacotherapy of patients with mild persistent asthma: strategies and unresolved issues

In studies comparing regular versus on-demand treatment for patients with mild persistent asthma, on-demand treatment seems to have a similar efficacy on clinical and functional outcomes, but it does not suppress chronic airway inflammation or airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) associated with asthma. Data on the efficacy of a continuous treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in preventing the progression of asthma are conflicting. There is the possibility that patients without a regular treatment with ICS may develop a more severe asthma associated with airway structural changes (remodeling) and a progressive loss of lung function. However, the possible clinical and functional consequences of persistent, not controlled, airway inflammation in patients with asthma have to be established. Assessment of asthma control should include inflammatory outcomes, such as fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophil counts. Until the relationships between symptoms, lung function tests, AHR, airway inflammation, exacerbations, and airway remodeling are clarified, regular treatment seems to be generally more appropriate than on-demand treatment to warrant a greater control of asthma. Select subgroups of patients with mild asthma who are well controlled by regular treatment might adopt the on-demand treatment plan as an intermediate step toward the suspension of controller medication. The increasing evidence for heterogeneity of asthma, the growing emphasis on asthma subphenotypes, including molecular phenotypes identified by omics technologies, and their possible implications for different asthma severity and progression and therapeutic response, are changing the paradigm of treating patients with asthma only based on classification of their disease severity to a pharmacological strategy more focused on the individual asthmatic patient. Pharmacological treatment of asthma is going toward a personalized approach.

[Montelukast in the treatment of mild to moderate persistent asthma]

INTRODUCTION

Anti-inflammatory preventive treatment is recommended in cases of persistent asthma. Besides inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), which represent the mainstay of treatment, other therapeutic options are available, of which only antileukotrienes are approved for all age groups.

BACKGROUND

Given as a substitute of low-dose ICS, montelukast prevents exacerbations as efficiently and for a longer period than long-acting β2-agonists. Montelukast is as efficient as doubling the dose of ICS on asthma symptoms in cases of inadequate control with low-dose ICS. Combined with ICS, it can lead to better control of asthma and potentially to ICS sparing.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the efficacy, tolerance and long-term treatment compliance of montelukast in mild persistent asthma in adults and children, montelukast, given as a substitute or combined with ICS, could contribute to enhanced control of asthma, especially in children.

The efficacy and tolerability of inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone compared with mometasone alone in patients with chronic asthma

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of oral montelukast in chronic asthma is well established. Montelukast is also an effective adjunctive therapy to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma uncontrolled on ICS alone. Inhaled montelukast was recently shown to provide significant bronchodilation compared with placebo in patients with chronic asthma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled montelukast added to inhaled mometasone.

METHODS

This was an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing once-daily inhaled montelukast 1 mg plus inhaled mometasone 220 μg (delivered by separate dry powder inhalers) with placebo plus inhaled mometasone 220 μg. Men and women aged 15-85 years with chronic asthma, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) 50-80% of the predicted value, and β-agonist reversibility ≥12% were eligible. Patients were required to meet a minimum symptom threshold while receiving open-label inhaled mometasone during a 3-week prestudy/run-in period. Patients received blinded (montelukast vs. placebo) treatment for 2 weeks, entered a 1-week washout period, then crossed over to the other treatment for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the average change from baseline in FEV(1) over the 2-week treatment period. Secondary endpoints included daytime and nighttime symptom scores. Other endpoints included short-acting β-agonist (SABA) use, asthma exacerbations, asthma control, peak expiratory flow (PEF), and blood eosinophil count.

RESULTS

A total of 134 patients were randomized. For the primary endpoint, change from baseline in FEV(1), inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone was significantly more effective than placebo plus inhaled mometasone (least squares mean 0.22 L vs. 0.17 L; p = .033 [two-sided at α = 0.05]). Inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone was also significantly more effective than placebo plus inhaled mometasone in improving daytime asthma symptom scores (p = .005) and nighttime asthma symptom scores (p = .015), increasing the percentage of days with asthma control (p = .004), decreasing the percentage of days with asthma exacerbations (p ≤ .001), and decreasing the blood eosinophil count (p = .013). Differences were not significant on AM or PM PEF or SABA use, although the latter approached significance (p = .073). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Inhaled montelukast plus inhaled mometasone was significantly more effective than placebo plus inhaled mometasone in improving FEV(1), symptoms, asthma control, and blood eosinophil count.

Leukotriene modifiers for asthma treatment

Leukotrienes (LTs), including cysteinyl LTs (CysLTs) and LTB(4) , are potent lipid mediators that have a role in the pathophysiology of asthma. At least two receptor subtypes for CysLTs, CysLT(1) and CysLT(2) , have been identified. The activation of the CysLT(1) receptor is responsible for most of the pathophysiological effects of CysLTs in asthma, including increased airway smooth muscle activity, microvascular permeability, and airway mucus secretion. LTB(4) might have a role in severe asthma, asthma exacerbations, and the development of airway hyperresponsiveness. CysLT(1) receptor antagonists can be given orally as monotherapy in patients with mild persistent asthma, but these drugs are generally less effective than inhaled glucocorticoids. Combination of CysLT(1) receptor antagonists and inhaled glucocorticoids in patients with more severe asthma may improve asthma control and enable the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids to be reduced while maintaining similar efficacy. The identification of subgroups of asthmatic patients who respond to CysLT(1) receptor antagonists is relevant for asthma management as the response to these drugs is variable. CysLT(1) receptor antagonists have a potential anti-remodelling effect that might be important for preventing or reversing airway structural changes in patients with asthma. This review discusses the role of LTs in asthma and the role of LT modifiers in asthma treatment.

Anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid drugs: reflections after 60 years

This review considers the problem of the serious concomitant side effects of powerful anti-inflammatory drugs modelled upon the principal human glucocorticoid hormone, cortisol. The very nature of the original bio-assays to validate their cortisol-like hormonal and anti-inflammatory activities ensured that pleiotropic toxins were selected for clinical studies. Other complicating factors have been (1) considerable reliance on bio-assays conducted in laboratory animals that primarily secrete corticosterone, not cortisol, as their principal anti-inflammatory adrenal hormone; (2) some differences in the binding of xenobiotic cortisol analogues (vis á vis cortisol) to transport proteins, detoxifying enzymes and even some intra-cellular receptors; (3) the "rogue" properties of these hormonal xenobiotics, acting independently of--but still able to suppress--hormonal mechanisms regulating endogenous cortisol; and (4) problems of intrinsic/acquired "steroid resistance", diminishing their clinical efficacy, but not necessarily all their toxicities. The rather gloomy conclusion is that devising new drugs to reproduce the effect of multi-potent hormones may be a recipe for disaster, in contexts other than simply remedying an endocrine deficiency. Promising new developments include "designed" combination therapies that allow some reduction in total steroid doses (and hopefully their side effects); sharpening strategies to limit the actual duration of steroid administration; and resurgent interest in searching for more selective analogues (both steroidal and non-steroid) with less harmful side effects. Some oversights and neglected areas of research are also considered. Overall, it now seems timely to engage in some drastic rethinking about (retaining?) these "licensed toxins" as fundamental therapies for chronic inflammation.

Churg-Strauss syndrome with severe granulomatous angiitis and crescentic glomerulonephritis, which developed during therapy with a leukotriene receptor antagonist

A 77-year-old Japanese female developed Churg-Strauss syndrome (CSS), showing fever and numbness in bilateral hands. She was being treated for bronchial asthma with combination inhalant of corticosteroid with beta(2)-agonist, and an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA), montelukast, for 15 months. She presented fever up to 38°C with microscopic hematuria and proteinuria, serum creatinine level of 0.7 mg/dl, and C-reactive protein of 11 mg/dl. After referral to our hospital, eosinophilia and high myeloperoxidase (MPO)-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) level were observed together with hematuria and proteinuria; renal biopsy examination was performed to clarify the disorder. Renal biopsy specimens showed necrotizing crescent formation, severe granulomatous angiitis in an interlobular artery, and interstitial eosinophilic infiltration. It was noted that nearly intact glomeruli were infiltrated with eosinophils. After treatment with oral prednisolone at initial dose of 40 mg (1 mg/kg body weight), urinary findings rapidly became normal with mild elevation of serum creatinine to 1.5 mg/dl and trace level of serum C-reactive protein in 1 month. Because she was previously treated with montelukast without oral corticosteroid, linkage between CSS and LTRA was highly suspected.

Role of Leukotrienes and Leukotriene Modifiers in Asthma

Leukotrienes (LTs), including cysteinyl LTs (CysLTs) and LTB₄, are potent lipid mediators that are pivotal in the pathophysiology of asthma phenotypes. At least two receptor subtypes for CysLTs - CysLT1 and CysLT₂ - have been identified. Most of the pathophysiological effects of CysLTs in asthma, including increased airway smooth muscle activity, microvascular permeability and airway mucus secretion, are mediated by the activation of the CysLT1 receptor. LTB₄ may have a role in the development of airway hyperresponsiveness, severe asthma and asthma exacerbations. Although generally less effective than inhaled glucocorticoids, CysLT₁ receptor antagonists can be given orally as monotherapy in patients with persistent mild asthma. In patients with more severe asthma, CysLT₁ receptor antagonists can be combined with inhaled glucocorticoids. This therapeutic strategy improves asthma control and enables the dose of inhaled glucocorticoids to be reduced, while maintaining similar efficacy. The identification of subgroups of patients with asthma who respond to CysLT₁ receptor antagonists is relevant for asthma management, as the response to these drugs is variable. The potential anti-remodeling effect of CysLT₁ receptor antagonists might be important for preventing or reversing airway structural changes in patients with asthma. This review discusses the role of LTs in asthma and the therapeutic implications of the pharmacological modulation of the LT pathway for asthma.

Down-titration from high-dose combination therapy in asthma: Removal of long-acting beta(2)-agonist

BACKGROUND

Asthma guidelines recommend reducing inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) to the minimum effective dose, but the timing of long-acting beta(2)-agonist (LABA) withdrawal is unclear. Recent FDA guidelines recommend LABA withdrawal once asthma is well-controlled. This 13-month double-blind study of patients taking high-dose combination therapy investigated the effect of discontinuation of LABA before ICS down-titration.

METHODS

Adults using salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) 50/500 microg bd were randomized to SFC 50/500 microg bd or fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 microg bd, with subsequent ICS down-titration 8-weekly using a clinical algorithm. The primary outcome was mean daily FP dose, including ICS for exacerbations.

RESULTS

82 subjects were randomized. Asthma was well-controlled at baseline, with mean FEV(1) 84.8% predicted and Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score 0.9. There was no significant difference in mean daily FP dose (SFC: 721 microg, FP:816 microg, p = 0.3), but final dose was lower with SFC (534 microg cf. 724 microg, p = 0.005). ICS dose was reduced by >or=80% in 41% SFC and 15% FP patients. Ambulatory lung function was significantly higher with SFC, but there were no differences between groups in rescue beta(2)-agonist use, clinic spirometry, airway responsiveness, ACQ, sputum eosinophils or FeNO. Baseline airway responsiveness, and pre-reduction blood eosinophils, were significant predictors of mean daily FP dose and dose reduction failure respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Many patients prescribed high-dose combination therapy may be over-treated. Substantial reductions in dose can be achieved with a clinical algorithm, reaching lower FP doses with SFC than FP without losing asthma control or increasing disease activity.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was commenced before mandatory registration of clinical trials.

Long-term maintenance of pediatric asthma: focus on budesonide/formoterol inhalation aerosol

Current national and international asthma guidelines recommend treatment of children with asthma towards achieving and maintaining asthma control. These guidelines provide more stringent recommendations to increase therapy for patients with uncontrolled asthma in order to reduce asthma-related morbidity and mortality. Newer combination agents such as budesonide and formoterol have been shown to be safe and effective in treatment of asthma in children. Use of long-term controller agents like this in combination with improved compliance and treatment of co-morbid conditions have been successful in this endeavor. This review discusses control of pediatric asthma with focus on the use of budesonide in combination with formoterol.

Montelukast in guidelines and beyond

In all asthma guidelines, preventive anti-inflammatory treatment is essential in all patients with persistent asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment in the control of asthma, but other treatments may be used as a monotherapy in patients with mild asthma or as an add-on treatment in those with moderate-to-severe asthma. Leukotriene modifiers are the only validated preventive treatment for all age groups. This review discusses the place of montelukast, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, using guidelines and consensus reports on asthma and rhinitis: the US National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP); the British Guideline on the Management of Asthma; the Global Initiative on Asthma (GINA); and Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA). This review includes new studies that have not yet been considered in guidelines.

Analysis of 927T > C CYSLTR1 and -444A > C LTC4S polymorphisms in children with asthma

INTRODUCTION

The cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) are potent inflammatory mediators in asthma. It has been suggested that the different response of patients to Cys-LTs inhibitors could be due to the presence of polymorphisms in the genes implicated in this pathway.

METHODS

In this study, polymorphisms 927T > C CYSLTR1 and -444A > C LTC4S were analysed in a Spanish population of 188 individuals (109 asthmatic children and 79 controls). Standardised history, skin prick tests and lung function measurements were performed in all patients. Genotypes were determined by sequencing after PCR amplification.

RESULTS

Differences were observed in 927T > C CYSLTR1, regarding the severity of asthma in males. A greater presence of allele C in the population with persistent asthma versus the control group (Fisher's p-value = 0.001; Monte Carlo p-value = 0.003; OR: 12.35; 95 %CI: 2.18-70.00) was observed. Differences were also detected in the combined study of both polymorphisms, among controls and asthmatic patients (Monte Carlo p-value = 0.0002). In the group of males with asthma, an increase of AC variant (-444A LTC4S and 927C CYSLTR1) and a reduction in the AT genetic combination were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined study of polymorphisms in genes of the leukotriene pathway could explain the differences observed in the studies reported on polymorphism -444A < C LTC4S individually analysed.

Leukotriene inhibition in small animal medicine

Leukotrienes are important mediators of inflammatory and allergic conditions in people and are suspected to play an important role in tumorigenesis and tumor growth of several different tumor types. Based on this, researchers are making great progress in identifying novel pharmacologic targets for several human diseases. Leukotriene inhibition has resulted in therapeutic benefit in clinical trials involving people with osteoarthritis, allergic asthma, and atopic dermatitis. Despite this progress and the possibility that leukotriene inhibition may also play an important therapeutic role in veterinary patients, parallel advances have not yet been made in veterinary medicine. This article summarizes leukotriene function and synthesis. It also reviews the published literature regarding potential therapeutic applications of leukotriene inhibition in both human and veterinary medicine, focusing primarily on osteoarthritis, NSAID induced gastrointestinal mucosal damage, allergic asthma, atopic dermatitis, and cancer.

Azithromycin or montelukast as inhaled corticosteroid-sparing agents in moderate-to-severe childhood asthma study

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials in children with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma are limited.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether azithromycin or montelukast are inhaled corticosteroid sparing.

METHODS

The budesonide dose (with salmeterol [50 microg] twice daily) necessary to achieve control was determined in children 6 to 17 years of age with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. After a budesonide-stable period of 6 weeks, children were randomized in a double-masked, parallel, multicenter study to receive once-nightly azithromycin, montelukast, or matching placebos plus the established controlling dose of budesonide (minimum, 400 microg twice daily) and salmeterol twice daily. Primary outcome was time from randomization to inadequate asthma control after sequential budesonide dose reduction.

RESULTS

Of 292 children screened, only 55 were randomized. Inadequate adherence to study medication (n = 80) and improved asthma control under close medical supervision (n = 49) were the major reasons for randomization failure. A futility analysis was requested by the Data Safety Monitoring Board. In data available for analyses, no differences were noted for either treatment compared with placebo in time to inadequate control status (median: azithromycin, 8.4 weeks [95% confidence limit, 4.3-17.3]; montelukast, 13.9 weeks [95% confidence limit, 4.7-20.6]; placebo, 19.1 weeks [95% confidence limit, 11.7-infinity]), with no difference between the groups (log-rank test, P = .49). The futility analysis indicated that even if the planned sample size was reached, the results of this negative study were unlikely to be different, and the trial was prematurely terminated.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, neither azithromycin nor montelukast is likely to be an effective inhaled corticosteroid-sparing alternative in children with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.

Corticosteroids as inhibitors of cysteinyl leukotriene metabolic and signaling pathways

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroids (CCSs) do not influence secretion of cysteinyl leukotrienes (CysLTs) that occurs on cellular activation during allergic reactions nor do they modulate bronchospastic responses to inhalation challenges with leukotrienes (LTs).

OBJECTIVES

We speculated that CCSs might modulate pathways responsible for CysLT production and diminish the ability of cellular activation to cause their release. Similarly, CCSs could reduce expression of CysLT receptor 1 (CysLTR1) and CysLT receptor 2 (CysLT2R) and modulate their responsiveness.

METHODS

We investigated influences of fluticasone on expression of mRNA for LTC(4) synthase (LTC(4)S), CysLT1R, and CysLT2R within T lymphocytes, monocytes, and eosinophils by means of quantitative PCR. Effects on receptor protein expression were evaluated by means of flow cytometry.

RESULTS

Circulating immune cells (T cells, monocytes, and eosinophils) express low levels of LTC(4)S mRNA, and this was not influenced by CCSs. However, IL-4 induced transcripts in T lymphocytes, and this was prevented by fluticasone. Paradoxically, CCSs synergized with IL-4 to increase LTC(4)S expression in monocytes. Although not influencing basal or IL-4-stimulated CysLT1R expression, fluticasone inhibited basal CysLT2R transcript expression on monocytes and IL-4-induced expression in all 3 cell types.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to not blocking the acute release of CysLTs on cellular activation, CCSs do not diminish the capacity of cells to synthesize these compounds. CCSs do not diminish CysLT1R expression, consistent with their lack of influence on bronchospasm, which is mediated through this receptor.

Cysteinyl-leukotrienes and their receptors in asthma and other inflammatory diseases: critical update and emerging trends

Cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cysteinyl-LTs), that is, LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4, trigger contractile and inflammatory responses through the specific interaction with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) belonging to the purine receptor cluster of the rhodopsin family, and identified as CysLT receptors (CysLTRs). Cysteinyl-LTs have a clear role in pathophysiological conditions such as asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR), and have been implicated in other inflammatory conditions including cardiovascular diseases, cancer, atopic dermatitis, and urticaria. Molecular cloning of human CysLT1R and CysLT2R subtypes has confirmed most of the previous pharmacological characterization and identified distinct expression patterns only partially overlapping. Interestingly, recent data provide evidence for the immunomodulation of CysLTR expression, the existence of additional receptor subtypes, and of an intracellular pool of CysLTRs that may have roles different from those of plasma membrane receptors. Furthermore, genetic variants have been identified for the CysLTRs that may interact to confer risk for atopy. Finally, a crosstalk between the cysteinyl-LT and the purine systems is being delineated. This review will summarize and attempt to integrate recent data derived from studies on the molecular pharmacology and pharmacogenetics of CysLTRs, and will consider the therapeutic opportunities arising from the new roles suggested for cysteinyl-LTs and their receptors.

Healthcare utilisation and costs associated with adding montelukast to current therapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and co-morbid allergic rhinitis: PRAACTICAL study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the healthcare resource use and costs associated with adding montelukast to therapy in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma and co-morbid seasonal allergic rhinitis whose asthma is inadequately controlled by their current asthma therapy.

METHODS

A multicentre, pre-post retrospective cohort study was conducted in three European countries (Italy, Poland and Spain). Consecutive patients who were receiving inhaled corticosteroid therapy (monotherapy or combination therapy with long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists) and who started concomitant treatment with montelukast between January 1999 and December 2002 were identified from clinical charts. Asthma/seasonal allergic rhinitis-related concomitant medications and asthma-related outpatient care, ED visits and hospitalisations for the periods 12 months before and 12 months after montelukast initiation were recorded from patient charts and combined with country-specific published unit costs (adjusted to 2004 values). The analysis was performed from a third-party-payer perspective and thus direct healthcare resource utilisation due to asthma/seasonal allergic rhinitis and associated costs for each country were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 98 physicians provided data for 696 asthmatic patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (Italy: n = 158; Poland: n = 334; and Spain: n = 204). The mean age of patients was 32.7 years, 57.5% were female and patients had asthma that was considered either mild-persistent (54.5%) or moderate-persistent (45.5%) according to the Global Initiative for Asthma classifications. The introduction of montelukast (10 mg/day daily cost range euro0.8-1.68) was associated with increases in the total annual mean healthcare cost per patient of 11.9%, 60.4% and 5.5% for Italy, Poland and Spain, respectively. However, mean annual costs for asthma-related outpatient care, ED visits and hospitalisations dropped significantly in all three countries (Italy: from euro805.00 to euro281.60 [p < 0.01]; Poland: from euro127.10 to euro99.00 [p < 0.01]; and Spain: from euro463.40 to euro119.70 [p < 0.01]).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of montelukast to therapy in patients with mild to moderate asthma and concomitant seasonal allergic rhinitis whose asthma was inadequately controlled by current asthma therapy significantly reduced the use of concomitant asthma-allergy medications, ED visits, outpatient care visits and hospitalisation. The total direct healthcare cost obtained after the addition of montelukast increased only as a result of the montelukast treatment cost.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes synergize with growth factors to induce proliferation of human bronchial fibroblasts

BACKGROUND

Cysteinyl leukotrienes (cys-LTs) are potent asthma-related mediators that function through their G protein-coupled receptors, cys-LT receptor type 1 (CysLT1R) and cys-LT receptor type 2 (CysLT2R).

OBJECTIVE

Because many G protein-coupled receptors transactivate the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) through metalloprotease-mediated ligand shedding, we investigated the effects of cys-LTs on signal transduction and proliferation of bronchial fibroblasts.

METHODS

Human bronchial fibroblasts were grown from biopsy specimens of healthy subjects. Mitogenesis was assessed on the basis of tritiated methylthymidine incorporation.

RESULTS

Leukotriene (LT) D(4) alone did not increase mitogenesis but dose-dependently increased thymidine incorporation and cell proliferation in the presence of epidermal growth factor (EGF). The enhancement was not prevented by CysLT1R antagonists (MK-571 and montelukast) or by a dual antagonist (BAY u9773), which is consistent with the lack of detectable mRNA for CysLT1R and CysLT2R in bronchial fibroblasts. LTD(4) did not cause EGFR transphosphorylation nor was the synergism blocked by the metalloprotease inhibitor GM6001. The EGFR-selective kinase inhibitor AG1478 suppressed the synergy between LTD(4) and EGF but had no effect on synergistic interactions of LTD(4) with other receptor tyrosine kinase growth factors. The effect of LTD(4) involved a pertussis toxin-sensitive and protein kinase C-mediated intracellular pathway, leading to sustained growth factor-dependent phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and protein kinase B (PKB/Akt).

CONCLUSION

Cys-LTs do not transactivate EGFR but have a broader capability to synergize with receptor tyrosine kinase pathways.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

This study implies a critical role of cys-LTs in airway fibrosis in asthma and other chronic airway diseases, which might not be blocked by therapy with current LT receptor antagonists.

Montelukast in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Allergic rhinitis is common. This systematic review outlines the evidence regarding montelukast in allergic rhinitis and provides a meta-analysis of its efficacy. The evidence suggests that montelukast does reduce nasal symptom score by 3.4% (95% CI: 2.5% to 4.2%) when compared with placebo. Montelukast is not as effective as topical nasal steroids or antihistamines and should therefore be regarded as second line therapy. When used, montelukast should be used in combination with an antihistamine.

The right tools at the right time

Asthma is underdiagnosed and undertreated or inappropriately treated, even though approximately 300 million people worldwide currently have the disease. While asthma in most patients can be controlled using currently available medications, in practice this rarely happens. Despite the wide availability of treatment guidelines, there are clear discrepancies between recommendations and the reality of treatment. There is excessive use of relief medications, particularly among patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma, coupled with a marked underuse of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). This underuse by patients is likely to be related to anxiety about side effects and a misunderstanding about asthma. Many patients overestimate their degree of control and have a perceived lack of need for medication. Early therapeutic intervention, with optimal antiinflammatory therapy and a stepwise approach, has a positive impact on long-term outcomes, achieving suppression of airway inflammation, prompt symptom control, and restoration of pulmonary function. Even at low doses, ICS rapidly improve clinical symptoms and measures of lung function, while their long-term use markedly reduces the frequency and severity of exacerbations and asthma mortality. Although ICS monotherapy achieves successful control of persistent asthma in a significant proportion of patients, add-on therapy with a long-acting beta2-agonist provides control for most patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. Fixed combination inhalers (ICS plus a long-acting beta2-agonist) have become popular, but these have drawbacks and there is the potential for overuse. In conclusion, ICS are the cornerstone of therapy for persistent asthma of all degrees of severity in adults and children, and early therapeutic intervention is recommended for optimal long-term outcome.

A critical appraisal of methods used in early clinical development of novel drugs for the treatment of asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disorder characterized by chronic airway inflammation, hyperresponsiveness and remodeling. Being the hallmark of asthma, airway inflammation has become the most important target for therapeutic agents. Consequently, during the past decade various semi-and non-invasive methods have been explored to sample the airway inflammation in asthma. In this review, we provide a practical overview of the current status of various sampling techniques including sputum induction, exhaled breath analysis, and bronchoprovocation tests (BPTs). We focus on their applicability for monitoring in clinical practice and in intervention trials in asthma.

Treatment of asthma with antileukotrienes: first line or last resort therapy?

Twenty five years after the structure elucidation of slow reacting substance of anaphylaxis, antileukotrienes are established as a new therapeutic modality in asthma. The chapter reviews the biochemistry and pharmacology of leukotrienes and antileukotrienes with particular focus on the different usage of antileukotrienes for treatment of asthma and rhinitis in Europe and the US. Further research needs and new areas for leukotriene involvement in respiratory diseases are also discussed.