Benefits of β blockers in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: network meta-analysis

Efficacy of spinal cord stimulation as an adjunctive therapy in heart failure: A systematic review

Neuromodulation therapy, like spinal cord stimulation (SCS), benefits individuals with chronic diseases, improving outcomes of patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of SCS when used as an adjunctive therapy in HF. A systematic analysis of all studies that included SCS therapy in human participants with HF was conducted. After excluding studies not meeting specific criteria, 4 studies involving a total of 125 participants were selected. All participants had heart failure with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification ranging from 2.2 ± 0.4 to 3. The primary endpoints for assessment included the impact of SCS in HF-related symptoms, Left ventricular function, VO2 max, and NT-proBNP. All the studies could demonstrate safety and feasibility of SCS therapy, although the outcomes varied. Two studies reported improvement in NYHA classification, MLHFQ and QoL parameters after SCS. Concerning LVEF and VO2 max, only one study indicated positive changes. None of the studies found a significant change of NT-proBNP following SCS therapy. Given methodological variation, discrepancies in the results could be attributed to the diversity of the induction technique. Further studies are needed to develop a solid approach for employing SCS in human patients with HF.

Better Respiratory Function in Heart Failure Patients With Use of Central-Acting Therapeutics

Background

Diaphragm atrophy can contribute to dyspnea in patients with heart failure (HF) with its link to central neurohormonal overactivation. HF medications that cross the blood-brain barrier could act centrally and improve respiratory function, potentially alleviating diaphragmatic atrophy. Therefore, we compared the benefit of central- vs peripheral-acting HF drugs on respiratory function, as assessed by a single cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) and outcomes in HF patients.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted of 624 ambulatory adult HF patients (80% male) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% and a complete CPET, followed at a single institution between 2001 and 2017. CPET parameters, and the outcomes all-cause death, a composite endpoint (all-cause death, need for left ventricular assist device, heart transplantation), and all-cause and/or HF hospitalizations, were compared in patients receiving central-acting (n = 550) vs peripheral-acting (n = 74) drugs.

Results

Compared to patients who receive peripheral-acting drugs, patients who receive central-acting drugs had better respiratory function (peak breath-by breath oxygen uptake [VO2], P = 0.020; forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], P = 0.007), and ventilatory efficiency (minute ventilation / carbon dioxide production [VE/VCO2], P < 0.001; end-tidal carbon dioxide tension [PETCO2], P = 0.015; and trend for forced vital capacity [FVC], P = 0.056). Many of the associations between the CPET parameters and drug type remained significant after multivariate adjustment. Moreover, patients receiving central-acting drugs had fewer composite events (P = 0.023), and HF hospitalizations (P = 0.044), although significance after multivariant correction was not achieved, despite the hazard ratio being 0.664 and 0.757, respectively.

Conclusions

Central-acting drugs were associated with better respiratory function as measured by CPET parameters in HF patients. This could extend to clinically meaningful composite outcomes and hospitalizations but required more power to be definitive in linking to drug effect. Central-acting HF drugs show a role in mitigating diaphragm weakness.

Heart failure management with β-blockers: can we do better?

Heart failure (HF) is associated with disabling symptoms, poor quality of life, and a poor prognosis with substantial excess mortality in the years following diagnosis. Overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system is a key feature of the pathophysiology of HF and is an important driver of the process of adverse remodelling of the left ventricular wall that contributes to cardiac failure. Drugs which suppress the activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, including β-blockers, are foundation therapies for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and despite a lack of specific outcomes trials, are also widely used by cardiologist in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Today, expert opinion has moved away from recommending that treatment for HF should be guided solely by the LVEF and interventions should rather address signs and symptoms of HF (e.g. oedema and tachycardia), the severity of HF, and concomitant conditions. β-blockers improve HF symptoms and functional status in HF and these agents have demonstrated improved survival, as well as a reduced risk of other important clinical outcomes such as hospitalisation for heart failure, in randomised, placebo-controlled outcomes trials. In HFpEF, β-blockers are anti-ischemic and lower blood pressure and heart rate. Moreover, β-blockers also reduce mortality in the setting of HF occurring alongside common comorbid conditions, such as diabetes, CKD (of any severity), and COPD. Higher doses of β-blockers are associated with better clinical outcomes in populations with HF, so that ensuring adequate titration of therapy to their maximal (or maximally tolerated) doses is important for ensuring optimal outcomes for people with HF. In principle, a patient with HF could have combined treatment with a β-blocker, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor/neprilysin inhibitor, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and a SGLT2 inhibitor, according to tolerability.

β-blockers are not all the same: pharmacologic similarities and differences, potential combinations and clinical implications

β-blockers are a heterogeneous class, with individual agents distinguished by selectivity for β1- vs. β2- and α-adrenoceptors, presence or absence of partial agonist activity at one of more β-receptor subtype, presence or absence of additional vasodilatory properties, and lipophilicity, which determines the ease of entry the drug into the central nervous system. Cardioselectivity (β1-adrenoceptor selectivity) helps to reduce the potential for adverse effects mediated by blockade of β2-adrenoceptors outside the myocardium, such as cold extremities, erectile dysfunction, or exacerbation of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. According to recently updated guidelines from the European Society of Hypertension, β-blockers are included within the five major drug classes recommended as the basis of antihypertensive treatment strategies. Adding a β-blocker to another agent with a complementary mechanism may provide a rational antihypertensive combination that minimizes the adverse impact of induced sympathetic overactivity for optimal blood pressure-lowering efficacy and clinical outcomes benefit.

Anti-Arrhythmic Effects of Heart Failure Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy and Their Role in the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: From Beta-Blockers to Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Beyond

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) accounts for a substantial proportion of mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), frequently triggered by ventricular arrhythmias (VA). This review aims to analyze the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying VA and SCD in HFrEF and evaluate the effectiveness of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in reducing SCD. Beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have shown significant efficacy in reducing SCD risk. While angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers exert beneficial impacts on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, their direct role in SCD prevention remains less clear. Emerging treatments like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors show promise but necessitate further research for conclusive evidence. The favorable outcomes of those molecules on VA are notably attributable to sympathetic nervous system modulation, structural remodeling attenuation, and ion channel stabilization. A multidimensional pharmacological approach targeting those pathophysiological mechanisms offers a complete and synergy approach to reducing SCD risk, thereby highlighting the importance of optimizing GDMT for HFrEF. The current landscape of HFrEF pharmacotherapy is evolving, with ongoing research needed to clarify the full extent of the anti-arrhythmic benefits offered by both existing and new treatments.

Prediction of adverse outcomes in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy: A CMR-based nomogram

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a novel nomogram score to predict outcomes in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) over a long follow-up period.

METHODS

A total of 335 consecutive NIDCM patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging were retrospectively enrolled. Comprehensive clinical evaluation and imaging investigation were obtained, including measurements of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and feature tracking (FT) images. All patients were followed up for a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) including all-cause mortality and heart transplantation. These patients were randomly divided into development and validation cohorts (7:3).

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 87 (37.2%) out of 234 patients in the development cohort, and in 31 (30.7%) out of 101 patients in the validation cohort. Five variables including NYHA class III-IV, NT-proBNP, beta-blocker medication, LGE presence, and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) were found to be significantly associated with MACE and were used for constructing the nomogram. The nomogram achieved good discrimination with C-indexes in development and validation cohorts respectively. The calibration curve for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probability also showed high coherence between the predicted and actual probability of MACE. Decision curve analysis identified the model was significantly better net benefit in predicting MACE.

CONCLUSION

A novel nomogram score of a predictive model that incorporates clinical factors and imaging features was constructed, which could be conveniently used to facilitate risk evaluation in patients with NIDCM.

Guideline-based audit of the hospital management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Heart failure is a major burden in Australia in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare expenditure. Multiple evidence-based therapies are recommended for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but data on physician adherence to therapy guidelines are limited.

AIM

To compare use of HFrEF therapies against current evidence-based guidelines in an Australian hospital inpatient population.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients admitted with a principal diagnosis of HFrEF across six metropolitan hospitals in Sydney, Australia, between January 2015 and June 2016. Use of medical and device therapies was compared with guideline recommendations using individual patient indications/contraindications. Readmission and mortality data were collected for a 1-year period following the admission.

RESULTS

Of the 1028 HFrEF patients identified, 39 were being managed with palliative intent, leaving 989 patients for the primary analysis. Use of beta-blockers (87.7% actual use/93.6% recommended use) and diuretics (88.4%/99.3%) was high among eligible patients. There were large evidence-practice gaps for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB; 66.4%/89.0%) and aldosterone antagonists (41.0%/77.1%). In absolute terms, use of these therapies each increased by over 11% from admission. Ivabradine (11.5%/21.2%), automated internal cardiac defibrillators (29.5%/66.1%) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (13.1%/28.7%) were used in a minority of eligible patients. Over the 1-year follow-up period, the mortality rate was 14.8%, and 44.2% of patients were readmitted to hospital at least once.

CONCLUSION

Hospitalisation is a key mechanism for initiation of HFrEF therapies. The large evidence-practice gaps for ACEI/ARB and aldosterone antagonists represent potential avenues for improved HFrEF management.

Different Continuous Training Intensities Improve Echocardiographic Parameters, Quality of Life, and Functional Capacity in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background

Multiple comorbidities and physiological changes play a role in a range of heart failure conditions and influence the most effective approach to exercise-based rehabilitation. This research aimed to examine and compare the outcomes of continuous training at three different intensities, focusing on left ventricular (LV) remodeling, functional capacity, and quality of life among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

Methods

In this randomized control trial, a total of 60 male patients (average age: 54.33 ±2.35 years) with HFrEF were randomly allocated into three groups: 1) High-intensity continuous training group (HICT), 2) Moderate-intensity continuous training group (MICT), and 3) Low-intensity continuous training group (LICT). All the training was performed on a bicycle ergometer 3 times/week for 12 weeks. Echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, left ventricular end-systolic dimension, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), quality of life (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire), and functional capacity (6-minute walking test) were assessed before and the end of the study.

Results

The HICT group demonstrated the greatest improvements in all measured variables when compared to the other two groups (P < 0.05). These findings were consistent across all measured outcomes.

Conclusion

It was determined that HICT appears to yield the most favorable outcomes in enhancing echocardiographic measures, NT-proBNP levels, quality of life, and functional capacity among HFrEF patients.

Investigating the effects of beta-blockers on circadian heart rhythm using heart rate variability in ischemic heart disease with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure is characterized by sympathetic activation and parasympathetic withdrawal leading to an abnormal autonomic modulation. Beta-blockers (BB) inhibit overstimulation of the sympathetic system and are indicated in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction. However, the effect of beta-blocker therapy on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. ECGs of 73 patients with HFpEF > 55% were recruited. There were 56 patients in the BB group and 17 patients in the without BB (NBB) group. The HRV analysis was performed for the 24-h period using a window size of 1,4 and 8-h. HRV measures between day and night for both the groups were also compared. Percentage change in the BB group relative to the NBB group was used as a measure of difference. RMSSD (13.27%), pNN50 (2.44%), HF power (44.25%) and LF power (13.53%) showed an increase in the BB group relative to the NBB group during the day and were statistically significant between the two groups for periods associated with high cardiac risk during the morning hours. LF:HF ratio showed a decrease of 3.59% during the day. The relative increase in vagal modulated RMSSD, pNN50 and HF power with a decrease in LF:HF ratio show an improvement in the parasympathetic tone and an overall decreased risk of a cardiac event especially during the morning hours that is characterized by a sympathetic surge.

National Heart Center/Saudi Heart Association 2023 Guidelines on the Management of Hypertension

Background

Hypertension is a highly prevalent disease in Saudi Arabia with poor control rates. Updated guidelines are needed to guide the management of hypertension and improve treatment outcomes.

Methodology

A panel of experts representing the National Heart Center (NHC) and the Saudi Heart Association (SHA) reviewed existing evidence and formulated guidance relevant to the local population, clinical practice and the healthcare system. The recommendations were reviewed to ensure scientific and medical accuracy.

Recommendations

Hypertension was defined and a new classification was proposed as relevant to the Saudi population. Recommendations on diagnosis, clinical evaluation, cardiovascular assessment were detailed, along with guidance on measurement modalities and screening/follow-up. Non-pharmacological management is the first line of hypertension treatment. Pharmacological therapy should be used appropriately as needed. Treatment priority is to control blood pressure regardless of the drug class used. The choice of treatment should be tailored to the patient profile in order to achieve treatment targets and ensure patient compliance. Recommendations were provided on pharmacological options available in Saudi Arabia, as well as guidance on the treatment of special conditions.

Conclusion

Hypertension management should be based on appropriate screening, timely diagnosis and lifestyle changes supplemented with pharmacological therapy, as needed. Clinical management should be individualized, and careful consideration should be given to special conditions and patient groups.

Reducing the Risk of Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review

In 2020, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the fifth leading cause of death in the United States excluding COVID-19, and its mortality burden has been rising since the 1980s. Smoking cessation, long-term oxygen therapy, noninvasive ventilation, and lung volume reduction surgery have had a beneficial effect on mortality; however, until recently, the effects of pharmacologic therapies on all-cause mortality have been unclear. Inhaled pharmacologic treatments for patients with COPD include combinations of long-acting muscarinic receptor antagonists (LAMAs), long-acting-β_2-agonists (LABAs), and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). The recent IMPACT and ETHOS clinical trials reported mortality benefits with ICS/LAMA/LABA triple therapy compared with LAMA/LABA dual therapy. In IMPACT, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol therapy significantly reduced the risk of on-/off-treatment all-cause mortality vs umeclidinium/vilanterol (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P=.042). The ETHOS trial found a reduction in the risk of on-/off-treatment all-cause mortality in patients treated with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol vs glycopyrrolate/formoterol (hazard ratio, 0.51 [0.33 to 0.80]; nominal P=.0035). Both trials included populations of patients with symptomatic COPD at high risk of future exacerbations, and a post hoc analysis of the final retrieved vital status data suggested that the observed mortality benefits are conferred by the ICS component. In conclusion, triple therapy reduces the risk of mortality in patients with symptomatic COPD characterized by moderate or severe airflow obstruction and a recent history of moderate or severe exacerbations. This benefit is likely to be driven by reductions in exacerbations. Future research efforts should focus on improving the long-term prognosis of patients living with COPD.

Combination of Nicorandil and Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Real-World Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The effect of combined nicorandil and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (BBs) compared with that of BBs alone on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains undetermined.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed. Adult patients who had been hospitalized for CAD and treated for angina with a combination of nicorandil and BBs or BBs alone were included. The effect of different treatments on the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and their components within a follow-up duration of 2.5 years were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust for the possible effect of confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 137,714 patients were screened, of whom 16,912 individuals (mean age: 61.5 years, men: 67.1%) were successfully enrolled. Among the enrolled participants, 4669 received the combined treatment of nicorandil and BBs, while 12,243 received BBs alone. After IPTW, the results demonstrated that the combined treatment was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% conidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.87) and stroke (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.42-0.54) but not of MI (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64-1.37). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined antiangina treatment of nicorandil and BBs may be more effective than treatment of BBs alone in reducing the long-term incidence of MACE in patients with CAD.

Dosing of basic pharmacotherapy and its effect on the prognosis of patients hospitalized for heart failure

BACKGROUND

We analyzed the prescription and dosage of essential pharmacotherapy in chronic heart failure (HF) at the time of discharge from the hospitalization for cardiac decompensation and how it may have influenced the prognosis of the patients.

METHODS

We followed 4097 patients [mean age 70.7, 60.2% males] hospitalized for HF between 2010 and 2020. The vital status we ascertained from the population registry, other circumstances from the hospital information system.

RESULTS

The prescription of beta-blockers (BB) was 77.5% (or only 60.8% of BB with evidence in HF), 79% of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, and 45.3% of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA). Almost 87% of patients were treated with furosemide at the time of discharge, while only ≈53% of patients with ischemic etiology of HF took a statin. The highest target dose of BB was recommended in ≈11% of patients, RAS blockers in ≈ 24%, and MRA in ≈ 12% of patients. In patients with concomitant renal insufficiency, the prescription of BB and MRA was generally less frequent and on a significantly lower dosage. In contrast, the opposite was true for the RAS blocker (however statistically insignificant). In patients with EF ≤ 40%, the prescription of BB and RAS blockers were more frequent but in a significantly lower dosage. On the contrary, MRAs were recommended in these patients more often and in higher doses. In terms of mortality risk, patients treated only with a reduced dose of RAS blockers showed a 77% higher risk of death within one year (or 42% within five years). A significant relationship was also found between mortality and the recommended dose of furosemide.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription and dosage of essential pharmacotherapy are far from optimal, and in the case of RAS blockers, this affected the patient's prognosis as well.

Effect of arotinolol on chronic heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Heart failure is the end stage of all cardiovascular diseases, which brings a heavy burden to the global health network. Arotinolol, as a new type of β Receptor blocker, has a good antihypertensive effect. Many clinical trials have observed the clinical efficacy of arotinolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. However, so far, there has been no systematic evaluation on the efficacy and safety of arotinolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure.

Objective

The purpose of this review was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of arotinolol in patients with chronic heart failure.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of arotinolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure were retrieved from seven databases according to the Cochrane manual, including CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wan fang database, VIP database, PubMed, Sinomed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The main outcomes were the effective rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac index, stroke volume (SV), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 17 trials met the qualification criteria, which included 1,717 patients with heart failure. Most trials had uncertain risks in terms of random sequence generation, allocation hiding, patient loss, and result evaluation. Meta analysis showed that arotinolol significantly improved the treatment efficiency of patients with heart failure (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 4.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.89, 5.72], p = 0.00, I ² = 0), LVEF (SMD = 1.59, 95% CI [0.99, 2.19], p = 0.000 0, I ² = 95.8%), cardiac index (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.11, 0.53], p = 0.03), I ² = 0), SV (SMD = 2.00, 95% CI [1.57, 2.34], p = 0.000, I ² = 64.2%), lower BNP (SMD = -0.804, 95% CI [-0.97, -0.64], p = 0.000, I ² = 94.4%), and LVEDV (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.05], p = 0.015, I ² = 0). There was no statistical significance for blood pressure (SMD_{systolic pressure} = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.69, 0.51], p = 0.775, I ² _{systolic pressure} = 90.2%; SMD_{diastolic pressure} = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.79, 0.48], P = 0.632, I ² _{diastolic pressure} = 91.2%), heart rate (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI [-1.00, 0.75], P = 0.787, I ² = 96.1%), Hs-CRP (SMD = -1.52, 95% CI [-3.43, 0.40], P = 0.121, I ² = 98.3%), and LVEDD (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.90, 0.76], P = 0.870, I ² = 96.5%).

Conclusion

Arotinolol can safely and effectively improve the effective rate of patients with chronic heart failure, increase LVEF, increase CI and SV, and reduce BNP and LVEDV. However, because of the low overall quality of the included randomized controlled trials, these findings need to be considered carefully. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for further verification, to provide a more scientific basis for the safety and effectiveness of arotinolol in the clinical treatment of heart failure.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=371214], identifier [CRD:420223371214].

Heart Failure is Associated with Early Medical and Surgery-Related Complications Following Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Scored Analysis

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of literature that examines how heart failure (HF) impacts surgery-related complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that patients who had HF will be at increased risk of early medical- and surgery-related complications following THA.

METHODS

Patients who had HF and underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2019 were identified using a large national insurance database. Ninety-day incidence of various medical complications, surgery-related complications, and hospital utilizations were evaluated for patients who did and did not have HF, as well as subgroup analyses were performed on patients who were prescribed mortality-benefitting medications for HF 1 year prior to THA. Propensity score matching resulted in 34,000 HF patients who underwent primary THA and 340,000 matching patients.

RESULTS

The HF cohort was associated with a higher 90-day incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), transfusion, pneumonia, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarction (MI), sepsis, acute post hemorrhagic anemia, acute renal failure (ARF), and urinary tract infection (UTI), as well as 1-year risk of revision THA, periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), aseptic loosening, and dislocation compared to controls. The HF cohort was associated with a higher 90-day incidence of emergency department visits, readmissions, lengths of stay (LOS), and 1-year costs of care. The medication cohort was at decreased risk of PE, DVT, CVA, return to ED, readmission and MI within 90 days of surgery, and 1-year risk of revision THA and aseptic loosening.

DISCUSSION

These findings may help to better risk-stratify patients who have HF and are scheduled to undergo THA, as well as call for additional surveillance of these patients in the immediate and early postoperative period. This study also helps surgeons and internists understand how chronic medications used to treat HF can impact medical- and surgery-related outcomes following THA.

Prevention of sudden death in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: do we still need an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for primary prevention?

Sudden death is a devastating complication of heart failure (HF). Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for prevention of sudden death in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) specifically those with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% after at least 3 months of optimized HF treatment. The benefit of ICD in patients with symptomatic HFrEF caused by coronary artery disease has been well documented; however, the evidence for a benefit of prophylactic ICD implantation in patients with HFrEF of non-ischaemic aetiology is less strong. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers (BB), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) block the deleterious actions of angiotensin II, norepinephrine, and aldosterone, respectively. Neprilysin inhibition potentiates the actions of endogenous natriuretic peptides that mitigate adverse ventricular remodelling. BB, MRA, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) have a favourable effect on reduction of sudden cardiac death in HFrEF. Recent data suggest a beneficial effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in reducing serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death in patients with HFrEF. So, in the current era of new drugs for HFrEF and with the optimal use of disease-modifying therapies (BB, MRA, ARNI and SGLT2i), we might need to reconsider the need and timing for use of ICD as primary prevention of sudden death, especially in HF of non-ischaemic aetiology.

Sacubitril/Valsartan for heart failure: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sacubitril-valsartan has been shown to have superior effects over angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the effects of sacubitril-valsartan have never been systematically evaluated. Therefore, we performed a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril-valsartan in patients with HF.

METHODS

We selected 8 databases, including PubMed, the Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Chinese Science Journal Database, Wanfang Data, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database. The search time was from database establishment to March 2022. Two reviewers will screen the records and include quality studies according to inclusion criteria independently. Two reviewers will assess the risk of bias of the included studies by the "Risk of Bias Assessment Tool" of the Cochrane Handbook for randomized controlled trials. Statistical analysis will be performed with Review Manager software 5.3.

RESULTS

A synthesis of current evidence of sacubitril-valsartan for treating HF will be provided in this protocol.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study will provide a theoretical basis for the clinical use of sacubitril-valsartan to treat HF.

Prognostic value of 6-min walk test compared to cardiopulmonary exercise test in patients with severe heart failure

AIMS

The 6-min walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) are both predictive in heart failure (HFrEF). Although 6MWT substitutes for CPET in HFrEF patients, as submaximal testing may be preferable, its prognostic superiority still needs to be verified, particularly in regard to beta blockers (BBs). We aimed to compare the prognostic role of CPET and 6MWT and investigate whether BB therapy influences the predictive value.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective study. Advanced HFrEF patients were followed up for 3 years: events were cardiovascular death or urgent heart transplantation. We analyzed the predictive capacity of CPET and 6MWT in patients, and subdivided according to use of BBs.

RESULTS

In a group of 251 HFrEF patients, we found a correlation between meters and peak VO2 (r2 = 0.94). Over the 3-year follow-up, 74 events were recorded. Both CPET and 6MWT variables were correlated with outcome at univariate analysis (meter and VE/VCO2 slope, peak VO2, VO2 at ventilatory anaerobic threshold, percentage predicted of peak VO2), but only percentage predicted of peak VO2 (pppVO2) was an independent predictor. In 103 HFrEF patients on BBs (23 nonsurvivors), neither pppVO2 nor meter were predictive, while in 148 patients not treated with BB (51 with events) pppVO2 was selected as an independent prognostic parameter (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

6MWT is a valid alternative to CPET, although the percentage of predicted of peak VO2 emerged as the strongest predictor. Nonetheless, our results suggest that both functional derived parameters are not predictive among those patients treated with BBs. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Role of CCR2-Positive Macrophages in Pathological Ventricular Remodelling

Even with recent advances in care, heart failure remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, which urgently needs new treatments. One of the major antecedents of heart failure is pathological ventricular remodelling, the abnormal change in the size, shape, function or composition of the cardiac ventricles in response to load or injury. Accumulating immune cell subpopulations contribute to the change in cardiac cellular composition that occurs during ventricular remodelling, and these immune cells can facilitate heart failure development. Among cardiac immune cell subpopulations, macrophages that are recognized by their transcriptional or cell-surface expression of the chemokine receptor C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2), have emerged as playing an especially important role in adverse remodelling. Here, we assimilate the literature that has been generated over the past two decades describing the pathological roles that CCR2+ macrophages play in ventricular remodelling. The goal is to facilitate research and innovation efforts in heart failure therapeutics by drawing attention to the importance of studying the manner by which CCR2+ macrophages mediate their deleterious effects.

The Vascular-Dependent and -Independent Actions of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide in Cardiovascular Disease

The treatment of hypertension and heart failure remains a major challenge to healthcare providers. Despite therapeutic advances, heart failure affects more than 26 million people worldwide and is increasing in prevalence due to an ageing population. Similarly, despite an improvement in blood pressure management, largely due to pharmacological interventions, hypertension remains a silent killer. This is in part due to its ability to contribute to heart failure. Development of novel therapies will likely be at the forefront of future cardiovascular studies to address these unmet needs. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a 37 amino acid potent vasodilator with positive-ionotropic and -chronotropic effects. It has been reported to have beneficial effects in hypertensive and heart failure patients. Interestingly, changes in plasma CGRP concentration in patients after myocardial infarction, heart failure, and in some forms of hypertension, also support a role for CGRP on hemodynamic functions. Rodent studies have played an important role thus far in delineating mechanisms involved in CGRP-induced cardioprotection. However, due to the short plasma half-life of CGRP, these well documented beneficial effects have often proven to be acute and transient. Recent development of longer lasting CGRP agonists may therefore offer a practical solution to investigating CGRP further in cardiovascular disease in vivo. Furthermore, pre-clinical murine studies have hinted at the prospect of cardioprotective mechanisms of CGRP which is independent of its hypotensive effect. Here, we discuss past and present evidence of vascular-dependent and -independent processes by which CGRP could protect the vasculature and myocardium against cardiovascular dysfunction.

Beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death globally. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), 7.4 million people died from ischaemic heart disease in 2012, constituting 15% of all deaths. Beta-blockers are recommended and are often used in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. However, it is currently unclear whether beta-blockers should be used in patients without heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Previous meta-analyses on the topic have shown conflicting results. No previous systematic review using Cochrane methods has assessed the effects of beta-blockers in patients without heart failure after acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of beta-blockers compared with placebo or no treatment in patients without heart failure and with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) greater than 40% in the non-acute phase after myocardial infarction.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, Science Citation Index - Expanded, BIOSIS Citation Index, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration, Turning Research Into Practice, Google Scholar, and SciSearch from their inception to February 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised clinical trials assessing effects of beta-blockers versus control (placebo or no treatment) in patients without heart failure after myocardial infarction, irrespective of publication type and status, date, and language. We excluded trials randomising participants with diagnosed heart failure at the time of randomisation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed our published protocol, with a few changes made, and methodological recommendations provided by Cochrane and Jakobsen and colleagues. Two review authors independently extracted data. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and major cardiovascular events (composite of cardiovascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial reinfarction). Our secondary outcomes were quality of life, angina, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction during follow-up. We assessed all outcomes at maximum follow-up. We systematically assessed risks of bias using seven bias domains and we assessed the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 trials randomising a total of 22,423 participants (mean age 56.9 years). All trials and outcomes were at high risk of bias. In all, 24 of 25 trials included a mixed group of participants with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-ST myocardial infarction, and no trials provided separate results for each type of infarction. One trial included participants with only ST-elevation myocardial infarction. All trials except one included participants younger than 75 years of age. Methods used to exclude heart failure were various and were likely insufficient. A total of 21 trials used placebo, and four trials used no intervention, as the comparator. All patients received usual care; 24 of 25 trials were from the pre-reperfusion era (published from 1974 to 1999), and only one trial was from the reperfusion era (published in 2018). The certainty of evidence was moderate to low for all outcomes. Our meta-analyses show that beta-blockers compared with placebo or no intervention probably reduce the risks of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.81, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.90; I² = 15%; 22,085 participants, 21 trials; moderate-certainty evidence) and myocardial reinfarction (RR 0.76, 98% CI 0.69 to 0.88; I² = 0%; 19,606 participants, 19 trials; moderate-certainty evidence). Our meta-analyses show that beta-blockers compared with placebo or no intervention may reduce the risks of major cardiovascular events (RR 0.72, 97.5% CI 0.69 to 0.84; 14,994 participants, 15 trials; low-certainty evidence) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.73, 98% CI 0.68 to 0.85; I² = 47%; 21,763 participants, 19 trials; low-certainty evidence). Hence, evidence seems to suggest that beta-blockers versus placebo or no treatment may result in a minimum reduction of 10% in RR for risks of all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction. However, beta-blockers compared with placebo or no intervention may not affect the risk of angina (RR 1.04, 98% CI 0.93 to 1.13; I² = 0%; 7115 participants, 5 trials; low-certainty evidence). No trials provided data on serious adverse events according to good clinical practice from the International Committee for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH-GCP), nor on quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blockers probably reduce the risks of all-cause mortality and myocardial reinfarction in patients younger than 75 years of age without heart failure following acute myocardial infarction. Beta-blockers may further reduce the risks of major cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality compared with placebo or no intervention in patients younger than 75 years of age without heart failure following acute myocardial infarction. These effects could, however, be driven by patients with unrecognised heart failure. The effects of beta-blockers on serious adverse events, angina, and quality of life are unclear due to sparse data or no data at all. All trials and outcomes were at high risk of bias, and incomplete outcome data bias alone could account for the effect seen when major cardiovascular events, angina, and myocardial infarction are assessed. The evidence in this review is of moderate to low certainty, and the true result may depart substantially from the results presented here. Future trials should particularly focus on patients 75 years of age and older, and on assessment of serious adverse events according to ICH-GCP and quality of life. Newer randomised clinical trials at low risk of bias and at low risk of random errors are needed if the benefits and harms of beta-blockers in contemporary patients without heart failure following acute myocardial infarction are to be assessed properly. Such trials ought to be designed according to the SPIRIT statement and reported according to the CONSORT statement.

Perspective on the role of four beta-blockers in heart failure

BACKGROUND

The current recommendations of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and a previous Bayesian analysis clearly show a mortality benefit with the use of β- blockers in chronic HF, especially for bisoprolol, carvedilol, and sustained-release metoprolol succinate.

OBJECTIVE

The main objective was to report the evidence on the use of the afore-mentioned β-blockers in subjects with heart failure and to characterize the stages of heart failure in response to the four different β-blockers. Furthermore, it shed light on the patient's satisfaction and improved quality of life using the afore-mentioned β-blockers in subjects with heart failure.

METHOD

The current perspective presented the clinical outcomes, including hospitalization, morbidity, mortality, patient's satisfaction, and quality of life, of four beta (β)-blockers, namely bisoprolol, carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, and nebivolol in different stages of heart failure.

RESULTS

The use of these three agents should be recommended for all stable subjects with current or previous symptoms of heart failure and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction unless there is any contraindication. The fore-mentioned β-blockers (bisoprolol, carvedilol, and metoprolol succinate) can be initiated early, even in stable and symptom-free (at rest) subjects with heart failure. β-blockers in heart failure should be commenced at small doses and then titrated upward as tolerated to achieve the desired clinical effects on heart rate and symptom control.

CONCLUSION

Cardiologists should weigh the benefit-risk in subjects with heart failure and other co-existing cardiovascular problems such as atrial fibrillation and diabetes.

Comparative cardioprotective effects of carvedilol versus atenolol in a rat model of cardiorenal syndrome type 4

The incidence of chronic kidney disease is escalating; cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) type 4 is gaining a major health concern causing significant morbidity and mortality, putting major burdens on the healthcare system. This study was designed to compare the cardioprotective effects of carvedilol versus atenolol against CRS type 4 induced by subtotal 5/6 nephrectomy in rats and to explore the underlying mechanisms. Immediately after surgery, carvedilol (20 mg/kg/day) or atenolol (20 mg/kg/day) was added to drinking water for 10 weeks. Carvedilol was more effective than atenolol in improving kidney functions, decreasing elevated blood pressures, attenuating cardiac hypertrophy, reducing serum brain natriuretic peptide, and diminished cardiac fibrous tissue deposition. However, carvedilol was equivalent to atenolol in modulating β1-adrenergic receptors (β1ARs) and cardiac diacylglycerol (DAG) signaling, but carvedilol was superior in modulating β-arrestin2, phosphatidyl inositol 4,5 bisphosphates (PIP2), and caspase 3 levels. Carvedilol has superior cardioprotective effects than atenolol in a rat model of CRS type 4. These protective effects are mediated through modulating cardiac β1ARs/β-arrestin2/PIP2/DAG as well as abating cardiac apoptotic signaling pathways (caspase3/pS473 protein kinase B (Akt)).

β-Arrestin-Biased Allosteric Modulator Potentiates Carvedilol-Stimulated β Adrenergic Receptor Cardioprotection

β ₁ adrenergic receptors (β ₁ARs) are central regulators of cardiac function and a drug target for cardiac disease. As a member of the G protein-coupled receptor family, β ₁ARs activate cellular signaling by primarily coupling to Gs proteins to activate adenylyl cyclase, cAMP-dependent pathways, and the multifunctional adaptor-transducer protein β-arrestin. Carvedilol, a traditional β-blocker widely used in treating high blood pressure and heart failure by blocking β adrenergic receptor-mediated G protein activation, can selectively stimulate Gs-independent β-arrestin signaling of β adrenergic receptors, a process known as β-arrestin-biased agonism. Recently, a DNA-encoded small-molecule library screen against agonist-occupied β ₂ adrenergic receptors (β ₂ARs) identified Compound-6 (Cmpd-6) to be a positive allosteric modulator for agonists on β ₂ARs. Intriguingly, it was further discovered that Cmpd-6 is positively cooperative with the β-arrestin-biased ligand carvedilol at β ₂ARs. Here we describe the surprising finding that at β ₁ARs unlike β ₂ARs, Cmpd-6 is cooperative only with carvedilol and not agonists. Cmpd-6 increases the binding affinity of carvedilol for β ₁ARs and potentiates carvedilol-stimulated, β-arrestin-dependent β ₁AR signaling, such as epidermal growth factor receptor transactivation and extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation, whereas it does not have an effect on Gs-mediated cAMP generation. In vivo, Cmpd-6 enhances the antiapoptotic, cardioprotective effect of carvedilol in response to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury. This antiapoptotic role of carvedilol is dependent on β-arrestins since it is lost in mice with myocyte-specific deletion of β-arrestins. Our findings demonstrate that Cmpd-6 is a selective β-arrestin-biased allosteric modulator of β ₁ARs and highlight its potential clinical utility in enhancing carvedilol-mediated cardioprotection against ischemic injury. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study demonstrates the positive cooperativity of Cmpd-6 on β₁ARs as a β-arrestin-biased positive allosteric modulator. Cmpd-6 selectively enhances the affinity and cellular signaling of carvedilol, a known β-arrestin-biased β-blocker for β₁ARs, whereas it has minimal effect on other ligands tested. Importantly, Cmpd-6 enhances the β-arrestin-dependent in vivo cardioprotective effect of carvedilol during ischemia/reperfusion injury-induced apoptosis. The data support the potential therapeutic application of Cmpd-6 to enhance the clinical benefits of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiac disease.

Role of β-Adrenergic Receptors and Estrogen in Cardiac Repair after Myocardial Infarction: An Overview

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with an intense inflammatory response that is critical for cardiac repair but is also involved in the pathogenesis of adverse cardiac remodeling, i.e., the set of size, geometry, and structure changes that represent the structural substrate for the development of post-MI heart failure. Deciphering the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cardiac repair after MI is, therefore, critical to favorably regulate cardiac wound repair and to prevent development of heart failure. Catecholamines and estrogen play an active role in regulating the inflammatory response in the infarcted area. For example, stress-induced catecholamines alter recruitment and trafficking of leukocytes to the heart. Additionally, estrogen affects rate of cardiac rupture during the acute phase of MI, as well as infarct size and survival in animal models of MI. In this review, we will summarize the role of β-adrenergic receptors and estrogen in cardiac repair after infarction in preclinical studies.

Autonomic nervous system activity changes in patients with hypertension and overweight: role and therapeutic implications

The incidence and prevalence of hypertension is increasing worldwide, with approximately 1.13 billion of people currently affected by the disease, often in association with other diseases such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia/hypercholesterolemia, and obesity. The autonomic nervous system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension, and treatments targeting the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), a key component of the autonomic nervous system, have been developed; however, current recommendations provide little guidance on their use. This review discusses the etiology of hypertension, and more specifically the role of the SNS in the pathophysiology of hypertension and its associated disorders. In addition, the effects of current antihypertensive management strategies, including pharmacotherapies, on the SNS are examined, with a focus on imidazoline receptor agonists.

Robustness and pragmatism of the evidence supporting the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of follicular lymphoma

Background: Results of randomized clinical trials may not be entirely applicable to clinical practice. The present manuscript aims to explore the pragmatism and robustness of the evidence that supports the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) follicular lymphoma (FL) guidelines.Methods & design: Analysis of all trials used to support positive, therapeutic, oncological recommendations in the 2020 ESMO FL guidelines. Predefined data points were extracted from each trial. Pragmatism was assessed by means of the PRECIS-2 tool, the difference in overall survival in the interventions compared and the source of funding. Robustness was assessed by means of the fragility index and the p value.Results: 28 trials were included. The full protocol or a protocol summary was provided for 12 (43%). Based on the PRECIS-2 domains, trials were considered pragmatic in organization, analysis and flexibility and explanatory in eligibility. Robustness was high, with 4/24 (17%) trials with p values between 0.05 and 0.005 and a median fragility index of 18.Conclusions: Results of trials to support ESMO recommendations in FL were robust. Pragmatism was high in some domains but modest to low in others and the pattern was similar across trials. Transparency in the publication of trial protocols was suboptimal.

Model-based meta-analysis of changes in circulatory system physiology in patients with chronic heart failure

To characterize and compare various medicines for chronic heart failure (CHF), changes in circulatory physiological parameter during pharmacotherapy were investigated by a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) of circulatory physiology. The clinical data from 61 studies mostly in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), reporting changes in heart rate, blood pressure, or ventricular volumes after treatment with carvedilol, metoprolol, bisoprolol, bucindolol, enalapril, aliskiren, or felodipine, were analyzed. Seven cardiac and vasculature function indices were estimated without invasive measurements using models based on appropriate assumptions, and their correlations with the mortality were assessed. Estimated myocardial oxygen consumption, a cardiac load index, correlated excellently with the mortality at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment initiation, and it explained differences in mortality across the different medications. The analysis based on the present models were reasonably consistent with the hypothesis that the treatment of HFrEF with various medications is due to effectively reducing the cardiac load. Assessment of circulatory physiological parameters by using MBMA would be insightful for quantitative understanding of CHF treatment.

Metal-based nanoparticles: Promising tools for the management of cardiovascular diseases

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. A search for more effective treatments of CVD is increasingly needed. Major advances in nanotechnology opened new avenues in CVD therapeutics. Owing to their special properties, iron oxide, gold and silver nanoparticles (NPs) could exert various effects in the management and treatment of CVD. The role of iron oxide NPs in the detection and identification of atherosclerotic plaques is receiving increased attention. Moreover, these NPs enhance targeted stem cell delivery, thereby potentiating the regenerative capacity at the injured sites. In addition to their antioxidative and antihypertrophic capacities, gold NPs have also been shown to be useful in the identification of plaques and recognition of inflammatory markers. Contrary to first reports suggestive of their cardio-vasculoprotective role, silver NPs now appear to exert negative effects on the cardiovascular system. Indeed, these NPs appear to negatively modulate inflammation and cholesterol uptake, both of which exacerbate atherosclerosis. Moreover, silver NPs may precipitate bradycardia, conduction block and sudden cardiac death. In this review, we dissect the cellular responses and toxicity profiles of these NPs from various perspectives including cellular and molecular ones.

Beta-blockers in hypertension: overview and meta-analysis of randomized outcome trials

BACKGROUND

Meta-analyses from randomized outcome-based trials have challenged the role of beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension. However, because they often include trials on diseases other than hypertension, the role of these drugs in the choice of the blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment strategies remains unclear.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared beta-blockers vs. placebo/no-treatment/less-intense treatment (BP-lowering trials) or beta-blockers vs. other antihypertensive agents in patients with or without hypertension (comparison trials). Among BP-lowering trials and according to baseline comorbidity, we separately considered trials in hypertension, trials without chronic heart failure or acute myocardial infarction, and trials with either chronic heart failure or acute myocardial infarction. Seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes were calculated (random-effects model) for BP-lowering or comparison trials.

RESULTS

A total of 84 BP-lowering or comparison trials (165 850 patients) were eligible. In 67 BP-lowering trials (68 478 patients; mean follow-up 2.5 years; baseline SBP/DBP, 136/82 mmHg), beta blockers were associated with a lower incidence of major cardiovascular events [risk ratio 0.85 and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.78-0.92] and all-cause death (risk ratio 0.81 and 95% CI 0.75-0.86). Restriction of the analysis to five trials recruiting exclusively hypertensive patients (18 724 patients; mean follow-up 5.1 years; baseline SBP/DBP 163/94 mmHg), a -10.5/-7.0 mmHg BP decrease was accompanied by reduction of major cardiovascular events by 22% (95% CI, 6-34). In 24 comparison trials (103 764 patients, 3.92 years of mean follow-up), beta-blockers compared with other agents were less protective for stroke and all-cause death in all trials and in trials conducted exclusively in hypertensive patients (averaged risk ratio increase 20 and 6%, respectively, for both cases).

CONCLUSION

Compared with other antihypertensive agents, beta-blockers appear to be substantially less protective against stroke and overall mortality. However, they exhibit a substantial risk-reducing ability for all events when prescribed to lower BP in patients with modest or more clear BP elevations, and therefore can be used as additional agents in hypertensive patients.

Therapeutic Properties of Highly Selective β-blockers With or Without Additional Vasodilator Properties: Focus on Bisoprolol and Nebivolol in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

Bisoprolol and nebivolol are highly selective β₁-adrenoceptor antagonists, with clinical indications in many countries within the management of heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF), ischaemic heart disease (IHD), and hypertension. Nebivolol has additional vasodilator actions, related to enhanced release of NO in the vascular wall. In principle, this additional mechanism compared with bisoprolol might lead to more potent vasodilatation, which in turn might influence the effectiveness of nebivolol in the management of HFrEF, IHD and hypertension. In this article, we review the therapeutic properties of bisoprolol and nebivolol, as representatives of “second generation” and “third generation” β-blockers, respectively. Although head-to-head trials are largely lacking, there is no clear indication from published studies of an additional effect of nebivolol on clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF or the magnitude of reductions of BP in patients with hypertension.

β-Blockade for Patients with Hypertension, Ischemic Heart Disease or Heart Failure: Where are We Now?

β-blockers are a heterogeneous class of drugs, with varying selectivity/specificity for β1 vs β2 receptors, intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA), and vasodilatory properties (through β2 stimulation, α receptor blockade or nitric oxide release). These drugs are indicated for the management of arterial hypertension, heart failure or ischemic heart disease (IHD; eg angina pectoris or prior myocardial infarction). Most of the benefit of β-blockade in these conditions arises from blockade of the β1 receptor, and, in practice, the addition of ISA appears to reduce the potential for improved clinical outcomes in people with heart failure or IHD. Aspects of the benefit/risk balance of β-blockers remain controversial, and recent meta-analyses have shed new light on this issue. We have reviewed the current place of cardioselective β-blockade in hypertension, IHD and heart failure, with special reference to the therapeutic profile of a highly selective β1-adrenoceptor blocker, bisoprolol.

Relief of Ischemia in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Ischemic heart disease is among the most common causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. In its stable manifestation, obstructing coronary artery stenoses prevent myocardial blood flow from matching metabolic needs of the heart under exercise conditions, which manifests clinically as dyspnea or chest pain. Prolonged bouts of ischemia may result in permanent myocardial dysfunction, heart failure, and eventually reduced survival. The aim of the present work is to review currently available approaches to provide relief of ischemia in stable coronary artery disease (CAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Several pharmacological and interventional approaches have proven effectiveness in reducing the burden of ischemia in stable CAD and allow for symptom control and quality of life improvement. However, substantial evidence in favor of improved survival with ischemia relief is lacking, and recently published randomized controlled trial suggests that only selected groups of patients may substantially benefit from this approach. Pharmacological treatments aimed at reducing ischemia were shown to significantly reduce ischemic symptoms but failed to provide prognostic benefit. Myocardial revascularization is able to re-establish adequate coronary artery flow and was shown to improve survival in selected groups of patients, i.e., those with significant left main CAD or severe left ventricular dysfunction in multivessel CAD. Outside the previously mentioned categories, revascularization appears to improve symptoms control over medical therapy, but does not confer prognostic advantage. More studies are needed to elucidate the role of systematic invasive functional testing to identify individuals more likely to benefit from revascularization and to evaluate the prognostic role of chronic total occlusion recanalization.

Impact of Clinical Audit on Adherence to the Guidelines Directed Medical Therapy in Patients Admitted with Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

The adoption of guideline recommendations of pharmacotherapy to improve the clinical course of Heart Failure (HF) remains below par. Our objective is to evaluate the impact of clinical audit on adherence to the Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in patients admitted with acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (EF).

METHODS

A prospective interventional study was conducted over a period of 12 months from June 2018 to May 2019 in all patients admitted with acute heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The discharge prescriptions of patients who met the inclusion criteria were audited for appropriateness in the usage of neurohormonal blockers and Ivabradine, by a clinical pharmacist on a monthly basis. Audit results were presented to the practicing physicians every month and feedback was given.

RESULTS

Discharge prescriptions of 716 patients who presented with HF were audited for the reasonable or unreasonable omission of neurohormonal blocking drugs. The first-month audit revealed that the unreasonable omission of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/ Angiotensin Receptor Blockers/ Angiotensin Receptor Neprilisin Inhibitors ( ACEI/ARB/ARNI), Betablockers and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) were 24.5%, 13.1%, and 9.09% respectively, which reduced to nil at the end of the study period (p=0.00). Initiation of Ivabradine before prescribing or achieving the target dose of Betablocker was noted in 38.18% of patients in the first month, which was also reduced to nil (p=0.00) at the end of the study.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals that periodic clinical audit improves adherence to GDMT in patients admitted with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Non-adherence to heart failure medications predicts clinical outcomes: assessment in a single spot urine sample by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (results of a prospective multicentre study)

AIMS

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is an objective new technique to assess non-adherence to medications. We used this method to study the prevalence, predictors and outcomes of non-adherence in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This study included 1296 patients with HFrEF from BIOSTAT-CHF, a study that aimed to optimise guideline-recommended therapies. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, β-blockers and loop diuretics were measured in a single spot urine sample at 9 months using LC-MS/MS. The relationship between medication non-adherence and the composite endpoint of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalisation, over a median follow-up of 21 months, was evaluated. Non-adherence to at least one prescribed medication was observed in 45.9% of patients. The strongest predictor of non-adherence was non-adherence to any of the other medication classes (P < 0.0005). Regional differences within Europe were observed. On multivariable analyses, non-adherence to ACEi/ARBs and β-blockers was associated with an increased risk of the composite endpoint [hazard ratio (HR) 1.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.09-1.95, P = 0.008 and HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.12-1.96, P = 0.006, respectively). Non-adherence to β-blockers was also associated with an increased risk of death (HR 2.48, 95% CI 1.67-3.68, P < 0.0005). Patients who were non-adherent to loop diuretics were healthier and had a decreased risk of the composite endpoint (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.93, P = 0.014). Non-adherence to mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was not related to any clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Non-adherence to medications, assessed by a single urine test, is common and predicts clinical outcomes in patients with HFrEF.

β-Adrenergic receptor, an essential target in cardiovascular diseases

β-Adrenergic receptors (βARs) belong to a large family of cell surface receptors known as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They are coupled to Gs protein (Gαs) for the activation of adenylyl cyclase (AC) yielding cyclic AMP (_CAMP), and this provides valuable responses, which can affect the cardiac function such as injury. The binding of an agonist to βAR enhances conformation changes that lead to the Gαs subtype of heterotrimeric G protein which is the AC stimulatory G protein for activation of _CAMP in the cells. However, cardiovascular diseases (CVD) have been reported as having an increased rate of death and β1AR, and β2AR are a promising tool that improves the regulatory function in the cardiovascular system (CVS) via signaling. It increases the Gα level, which activates βAR kinase (βARK) that affects and enhances the progression of heart failure (HF) through the activation of cardiomyocyte βARs. We also explained that an increase in GPCR kinases (GRKs) would practically improve the HF pathogenesis and this occurs via the desensitization of βARs, which causes the loss of contractile reserve. The consistency or overstimulation of catecholamines contributes to CVD such as stroke, HF, and cardiac hypertrophy. When there is a decrease in catecholamine responsiveness, it causes aging in old people because the reduction of βAR sensitivity and density in the myocardium enhances downregulation of βARs to AC in the human heart.

Increased Renal Dysfunction, Apoptosis, and Fibrogenesis Through Sympathetic Hyperactivity After Focal Cerebral Infarction

Sympathetic nervous system plays an important role in secondary injury of diseases. Accumulating evidence has observed association between ischemic stroke and renal dysfunction, but the mechanisms are incompletely clear. In this study, we investigated whether sympathetic hyperactivity can cause the development of renal dysfunction, apoptosis, and fibrogenesis after focal cerebral infarction. To determine the renal consequences of focal cerebral ischemia, we subjected a mice model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion (tMCAO) and examined systolic blood pressure, heart rate, renal structure and function, serum catecholamine, and cortisol levels, and the expression of active caspase-3 bcl-2, bax, and phosphorylated p38 MAPK after 8 weeks. We also analyzed the relationship between insular cortex infarction and acute kidney injury (AKI) in 172 acute anterior circulation ischemic stroke (ACIS) patients. Transient right middle cerebral artery occlusion induced sympathetic hyperactivity, renal dysfunction, upregulation of apoptosis, and fibrogenesis in kidneys of mice. Metoprolol treatment relieves the development of renal injury. Study in stroke patients demonstrated that insular cortex infarction, especially the right insular cortex infarction, is an independent risk factor of AKI. Focal cerebral ischemia in mice leads to the development of renal injury driven by sympathetic hyperactivity. Right insular cortex infarction is an independent risk factor of AKI in older patients. Understanding the brain-kidney interaction after stroke would have clinical implications for the treatment and overall patient outcome.

β-blocker use and risk of all-cause mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: effect modification by serum vitamin A

AIMS 

Blockade of β-adrenoceptors reduces sympathetic nervous system activity and improves survival in patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, any improvement in longevity among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) but without HFrEF remains uncertain. Vitamin A has been linked to the activation of tyrosine hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the catecholamine synthesis pathway. We investigated if vitamin A status modified the association of β-blocker use with the risk of all-cause mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS 

A total of 4118 patients undergoing elective coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris, of whom the majority had normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were studied. Hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality comparing treatment vs. non-treatment of β-blockers according to the tertiles of serum vitamin A were explored in Cox proportional hazards regression models. During a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 897 patients (21.8%) died. The overall LVEF was 65% and 283 (6.9%) had anamnestic HF. After multivariable adjustments for traditional risk factors, medical history, and drug therapies of cardiovascular disease, β-blocker treatment was inversely associated with the risk of all-cause mortality [HR : 0.84; 95% CI (confidence interval), 0.72-0.97]. However, the inverse association was generally stronger among patients in the upper serum vitamin A tertile (HR :0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.86; Pinteraction = 0.012), which remained present after excluding patients with LVEF < 40%.

CONCLUSION 

In patients with suspected CHD, β-blocker treatment was associated with improved survival primarily among patients with high serum vitamin A levels.

Comparative effectiveness of bisoprolol and carvedilol among patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis

Background

Despite widespread use, there is no trial evidence to inform β-blocker's (BB) relative safety and efficacy among patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD). We herein compare health outcomes associated with carvedilol or bisoprolol use, the most commonly prescribed BBs in these patients.

Methods

We created a cohort study of 9305 HD patients who initiated bisoprolol and 11 171 HD patients who initiated carvedilol treatment between 2004 and 2011. We compared the risk of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) between carvedilol and bisoprolol users during a 2-year follow-up.

Results

Bisoprolol initiators were younger, had shorter dialysis vintage, were women, had common comorbidities of hypertension and hyperlipidemia and were receiving statins and antiplatelets, but they had less heart failure and digoxin prescriptions than carvedilol initiators. During our observations, 1555 deaths and 5167 MACEs were recorded. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox model, bisoprolol initiation was associated with a lower all-cause mortality {hazard ratio [HR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-0.73]} compared with carvedilol initiation. After accounting for the competing risk of death, bisoprolol use (versus carvedilol) was associated with a lower risk of MACEs [HR 0.85 (95% CI 0.80-0.91)] and attributed to a lower risk of heart failure [HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.77-0.91)] and ischemic stroke [HR 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.97)], but not to differences in the risk of acute myocardial infarction [HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.93-1.15)]. Results were confirmed in propensity score matching analyses, stratified analyses and analyses that considered prescribed dosages or censored patients discontinuing or switching BBs.

Conclusions

Relative to carvedilol, bisoprolol initiation by HD patients was associated with a lower 2-year risk of death and MACEs, mainly attributed to lower heart failure and ischemic stroke risk.

Heart failure medication after a first hospital admission and risk of heart failure readmission, focus on beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system medication: A retrospective cohort study in linked databases

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the association between heart failure (HF) medication (angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI)/angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB), beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonists (MRA) and diuretics) and HF readmissions in a real-world unselected group of patients after a first hospital admission for HF. Furthermore we analysed readmission rates for ACEI versus ARB and for carvedilol versus β1-selective BB and we investigated the effect of HF medication in relation to time since discharge.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Medication at discharge was determined with dispensing data from the Dutch PHARMO Database Network including 22,476 patients with HF between 2001 and 2015. After adjustment for age, gender, number of medications and year of admission no associations were found for users versus non-users of ACEI/ARB (hazard ratio, HR = 1.01; 95%CI 0.96-1.06), BB (HR = 1.00; 95%CI 0.95-1.05) and readmissions. The risk of readmission for patients prescribed MRA (HR = 1.11; 95%CI 1.05-1.16) or diuretics (HR = 1.17; 95%CI 1.09-1.25) was higher than for non-users. The HR for ARB relative to ACEI was 1.04 (95%CI 0.97-1.12) and for carvedilol relative to β1-selective BB 1.33 (95%CI 1.20-1.46). Post-hoc analyses showed a protective effect shortly after discharge for most medications. For example one month post discharge the HR for ACEI/ARB was 0.77 (95%CI 0.69-0.86). Although we did try to adjust for confounding by indication, probably residual confounding is still present.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were prescribed carvedilol have a higher or at least a similar risk of HF readmission compared to β1-selective BB. This study showed that all groups of HF medication -some more pronounced than others- were more effective immediately following discharge.

Beta-blockers provide a differential survival benefit in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing contemporary post-percutaneous coronary intervention management

Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers are used in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) to reduce the harmful effects of excessive adrenergic activation on the heart. However, there is limited evidence regarding the benefit of beta-blockers in the context of contemporary management following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We used the nationwide South Korea National Health Insurance database to identify 87,980 patients with a diagnosis of either acute myocardial infarction (AMI; n = 38,246) or angina pectoris (n = 49,734) who underwent PCI between 2013 and 2017, and survived to be discharged from hospital. Beta-blockers were used in a higher proportion of patients with AMI (80.6%) than those with angina (58.9%). Over a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range 1.2-3.3 years) with the propensity-score matching analysis, the mortality risk was significantly lower in patients treated with a beta-blocker in the AMI group (HR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.69-0.87; p < 0.001). However, the mortality risk was comparable regardless of beta-blocker use (HR: 1.07; 95% CI 0.98-1.16; p = 0.10) in the angina group. The survival benefit associated with beta-blocker therapy was most significant in the first year after the AMI event.

The role of β-adrenergic system remodeling in human heart failure: A mechanistic investigation

β-adrenergic receptor antagonists (β-blockers) are extensively used to improve cardiac performance in heart failure (HF), but the electrical improvements with these clinical treatments are not fully understood. The aim of this study was to analyze the electrophysiological effects of β-adrenergic system remodeling in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and the underlying mechanisms. We used a combined mathematical model that integrated β-adrenergic signaling with electrophysiology and calcium cycling in human ventricular myocytes. HF remodeling, both in the electrophysiological and signaling systems, was introduced to quantitatively analyze changes in electrophysiological properties due to the stimulation of β-adrenergic receptors in failing myocytes. We found that the inotropic effect of β-adrenergic stimulation was reduced in HF due to the altered Ca²⁺ dynamics resulting from the combination of structural, electrophysiological and signaling remodeling. Isolated cells showed proarrhythmic risk after sympathetic stimulation because early afterdepolarizations appeared, and the vulnerability was greater in failing myocytes. When analyzing coupled cells, β-adrenergic stimulation reduced transmural repolarization gradients between endocardium and epicardium in normal tissue, but was less effective at reducing these gradients after HF remodeling. The comparison of the selective activation of β-adrenergic isoforms revealed that the response to β₂-adrenergic receptors stimulation was blunted in HF while β₁-adrenergic receptors downstream effectors regulated most of the changes observed after sympathetic stimulation. In conclusion, this study was able to reproduce an altered β-adrenergic activity on failing myocytes and to explain the mechanisms involved. The derived predictions could help in the treatment of HF and guide in the design of future experiments.

Guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure does not exist: a non-judgmental framework for describing the level of adherence to evidence-based drug treatments for patients with a reduced ejection fraction

Numerous guideline documents have issued recommendations to clinicians concerning the treatment of chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. However, guidelines do not describe what constitutes an acceptable standard of care, and thus, practitioners who adhere to only a small fraction of the recommendations might claim that they are treating patients 'in accordance with the guidelines'. As a result, <1% of patients with heart failure are receiving all life-prolonging treatments at trial-proven doses. A major impediment to the widespread adoption of trial-based treatments is a lack of any existing framework that would allow physicians to describe the adequacy of care. To address this deficiency, we propose a novel simple approach that would ask practitioners if a patient had been treated using the dosing algorithm that had been shown to be effective for each drug class. The proposed framework recognizes that all landmark survival trials in heart failure were 'strategy trials', i.e. the studies mandated a standardized forced-titration treatment plan that required timely uptitration to specified target dose unless patients experienced clinically meaningful, intolerable or serious adverse events, which persisted or recurred despite adjustment of other medications. Adherence to trial-proven regimens might be improved if physicians were asked to describe the degree to which a patient's treatment adhered to or deviated from the strategies that had been used to demonstrate the survival benefits of neurohormonal antagonists. The proposed framework should also promote practitioner self-awareness about the lack of evidence supporting the current widespread use of subtarget doses that are non-adherent with trial-proven forced-titration strategies.

Treatment optimization of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure therapy

Although evidence based guidelines recommend optimal use of beta blockers in all patients with chronic heart failure unless contraindicated, they are often underutilized and/or prescribed below the recommended dosage in the majority of patients with heart failure. To our knowledge, however, the optimal use of beta-blockers in chronic heart failure is not investigated in Ethiopia. Therefore, the aim of our study was to investigate the utilization and optimization of beta blockers in the management of patients with chronic heart failure in Ethiopia. A prospective observational study was conducted among ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure in Ethiopia. We included adult patients with a diagnosis of heart failure with a baseline left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% who had been on follow-up for at least 6 months. Patients were recruited into the study during their appointment for medication refilling using simple random sampling technique. All patients were followed for at least 6 months to determine the optimal use of beta blockers. The optimal use of beta blockers was determined according to evidence based guidelines. After explaining the purpose of the study, we obtained written informed consent from all participants. Data were collected through patient interview and review of patients' medical records. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with utilization of beta blockers. A total of 288 patients were included in the study. Out of the total, 67% of the patients were receiving beta blockers. Among the patients who received beta blockers, 34.2% were taking guideline recommended beta blockers while 65.8% were taking atenolol, which is not guideline recommended beta blocker. Among the patients who received guideline recommended beta blockers, only 3% were taking optimal dose. Prior hospitalization [Adjusted Odds ratio (AOR) 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.19-0.76], dose of furosemide > 40 mg (AOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.76), ischemic heart disease (AOR 3.27, 95% CI 1.66-6.45), atrial fibrillation (AOR 4.41, 95% CI 1.38-14.13) were significantly associated with the utilization of beta-blockers. Despite proven benefit, beta blockers were not optimally used in most of the participants in this study. The presence of ischemic heart disease and atrial fibrillation were positively associated with the utilization of beta blockers while hospitalization and higher diuretic dose were negatively associated with the utilization of beta blockers. Clinicians should attempt to use evidence based beta blockers at guideline recommended target doses that have been shown to have morbidity and mortality benefit in chronic heart failure. Moreover, more effort needs to be done to minimize the potentially modifiable risk factors for underutilization of beta blocker in chronic heart failure therapy.

Carvedilol Alters Circulating MiR-1 and MiR-214 in Heart Failure

Introduction

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are recognized as major contributors in various cardiovascular diseases, such as heart failure (HF). These small noncoding RNAs that posttranscriptionally control target genes are involved in regulating different pathophysiological processes including cardiac proliferation, ifferentiation, hypertrophy, and fibrosis. Although carvedilol, a β-adrenergic blocker, and a drug of choice in HF produce cytoprotective actions against cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, the mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we proposed that the expression of hypertrophic-specific miRNAs (miR-1, miR-133, miR-208, and miR-214) might be linked to beneficial effects of carvedilol.

Methods

The levels of four hypertrophic-specific miRNAs were measured in the sera of 35 patients with systolic HF receiving carvedilol (treated) and 20 HF patients not receiving any β-blockers (untreated) as well as 17 nonHF individuals (healthy) using quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Systolic HF was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction <50% by transthoracic echocardiography.

Results

We demonstrated that miR-1 and miR-214 were significantly upregulated in the treated group compared to the untreated group (P=0.014 and 5.3-fold, 0.033 and 4.2-fold, respectively). However, miR-133 and miR-208 did not show significant difference in expression between these two study groups. MiR-1 was significantly downregulated in the untreated group compared with healthy individuals (P=0.019 and 0.14-fold).

Conclusion

In conclusion, it might be postulated that one of the mechanisms by which carvedilol may exert its cardioprotective effects can be through increasing miR-1 and miR-214 expressions which may also serve as a potential therapeutic target in patients with systolic HF in future.

Targeting Ca2 + Handling Proteins for the Treatment of Heart Failure and Arrhythmias

Diseases of the heart, such as heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias, are a growing socio-economic burden. Calcium (Ca²⁺) dysregulation is key hallmark of the failing myocardium and has long been touted as a potential therapeutic target in the treatment of a variety of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). In the heart, Ca²⁺ is essential for maintaining normal cardiac function through the generation of the cardiac action potential and its involvement in excitation contraction coupling. As such, the proteins which regulate Ca²⁺ cycling and signaling play a vital role in maintaining Ca²⁺ homeostasis. Changes to the expression levels and function of Ca²⁺-channels, pumps and associated intracellular handling proteins contribute to altered Ca²⁺ homeostasis in CVD. The remodeling of Ca²⁺-handling proteins therefore results in impaired Ca²⁺ cycling, Ca²⁺ leak from the sarcoplasmic reticulum and reduced Ca²⁺ clearance, all of which contributes to increased intracellular Ca²⁺. Currently, approved treatments for targeting Ca²⁺ handling dysfunction in CVD are focused on Ca²⁺ channel blockers. However, whilst Ca²⁺ channel blockers have been successful in the treatment of some arrhythmic disorders, they are not universally prescribed to heart failure patients owing to their ability to depress cardiac function. Despite the progress in CVD treatments, there remains a clear need for novel therapeutic approaches which are able to reverse pathophysiology associated with heart failure and arrhythmias. Given that heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias are closely associated with altered Ca²⁺ homeostasis, this review will address the molecular changes to proteins associated with both Ca²⁺-handling and -signaling; their potential as novel therapeutic targets will be discussed in the context of pre-clinical and, where available, clinical data.

With our powers combined: Does the pooled analysis of existing randomized data regarding treatment of atrial fibrillation in heart failure settle the case for catheter ablation?

Collapse

Beta-blockers for congestive heart failure in children

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers are an essential part of standard therapy in adult congestive heart failure and therefore, are expected to be beneficial in children. However, congestive heart failure in children differs from that in adults in terms of characteristics, aetiology, and drug clearance. Therefore, paediatric needs must be specifically investigated. This is an update of a Cochrane review previously published in 2009.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of beta-adrenoceptor-blockers (beta-blockers) in children with congestive heart failure.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS up to November 2015. Bibliographies of identified studies were checked. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised, controlled, clinical trials investigating the effect of beta-blocker therapy on paediatric congestive heart failure.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted and assessed data from the included trials.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified four new studies for the review update; the review now includes seven studies with 420 participants. Four small studies with 20 to 30 children each, and two larger studies of 80 children each, showed an improvement of congestive heart failure with beta-blocker therapy. A larger study with 161 participants showed no evidence of benefit over placebo in a composite measure of heart failure outcomes. The included studies showed no significant difference in mortality or heart transplantation rates between the beta-blocker and control groups. No significant adverse events were reported with beta-blockers, apart from one episode of complete heart block. A meta-analysis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and fractional shortening (LVFS) data showed a very small improvement with beta-blockers. However, there were vast differences in the age, age range, and health of the participants (aetiology and severity of heart failure; heterogeneity of diagnoses and co-morbidities); there was a range of treatments across studies (choice of beta-blocker, dosing, duration of treatment); and a lack of standardised methods and outcome measures. Therefore, the primary outcomes could not be pooled in meta-analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is not enough evidence to support or discourage the use of beta-blockers in children with congestive heart failure, or to propose a paediatric dosing scheme. However, the sparse data available suggested that children with congestive heart failure might benefit from beta-blocker treatment. Further investigations in clearly defined populations with standardised methodology are required to establish guidelines for therapy. Pharmacokinetic investigations of beta-blockers in children are also required to provide effective dosing in future trials.