Process quality of diabetes care under favorable access to healthcare: a 2-year longitudinal study using claims data in Japan

Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on diagnosing, monitoring, and prescribing in people with diabetes and strategies for diabetes service recovery internationally

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused major disruptions in clinical services for people with chronic long-term conditions. In this narrative review, we assess the indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on diabetes services globally and the resulting adverse effects on rates of diagnosing, monitoring, and prescribing in people with type 2 diabetes. We summarise potential practical approaches that could address these issues and improve clinical services and outcomes for people living with diabetes during the recovery phase of the pandemic.

Assessment of Quality of Diabetic Care in Teaching Hospitals in Ethiopia: In Comparison to International Guidelines

Background

Comprehensive high quality of care is critical in preventing diabetic complications and improving quality of life. This needs compliance with guidelines and focused therapy. There is no data in Ethiopia evaluating the quality of diabetes care using standard guidelines (American diabetic association and international diabetic federation) as a reference.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted at Yekatit 12 Hospital Medical College (YHMC) to assess the process and outcome quality indicators of diabetic patients. Data were collected from outpatient clinics between May and July 2022 over a period of 3 months. Diabetic patients with at least one year since diagnosis were selected using systematic random sampling. Both the process and outcome of diabetic quality care indicators were measured and compared with standard guidelines (ADA and IDF). Both descriptive statistics and logistic regression were used for data analysis. The P-value <0.05 was used as statistical significance.

Results

About 250 diabetic patients with a mean age of 53±15 were included. The majority were type 2 diabetes mellitus (83.2%). HbA1c was determined for 128 (51.2%) patients with the recent mean value of 8±1.6. Only 52 (40.6%) of patients achieved target HbA1c. Annual comprehensive feet examination, urine albuminuria test, and retinal examination were done for 54 (21.6%), 52 (20.8%), and 122 (48.8%), respectively. Single marital status (AOR = 5.76; 95% CI; 1.02-32.36) P = 0.047, determining HbA1c level at least twice a year (AOR = 6.27; 95% CI; 2.18-17.73) P = 0.001, and medication adherence (AOR = 7.1; 95% CI; 2.61-19.01)P = 0.001, were significantly associated with good glycemic control.

Conclusion

The overall quality of diabetic care was found suboptimal both in process and outcome quality indicators. Thus, awareness creation about quality indicators for caregivers, compliance with guidelines, wise resource utilization, and cooperation with different stakeholders like hospital management teams, and government officials is needed.

Status of screening and preventive efforts against diabetic kidney disease between 2013 and 2018: analysis using an administrative database from Kyoto-city, Japan

Background

Japan has the second highest prevalence of dialysis use in the world. Approximately 40% of patients who begin dialysis have diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Local governments and medical facilities are required to provide preventive measures against worsening diabetes mellitus (DM). However, the percentage of patients with DM who receive such screening or interventions for DKD is unclear. This study aimed to reveal to what extent screening for DKD and preventive measures against worsening DKD are performed in patients with DM, using an administrative database in a municipality.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study that used the Kyoto-city's administrative medical and long-term care database. Patients with a diagnosis of DM and receiving antidiabetic medication between 2013 and 2018 were defined as patients with DM and included. Patients with DKD were defined as those diagnosed with diabetic nephropathy or those with chronic kidney disease. We described the characteristics of patients with DM, diabetic complications, and extent of DKD screenings and preventive efforts against worsening of DM by fiscal year.

Results

Across fiscal years, 25.8% to 27.5% of patient with DM had DKD. More than 3% of patients were on dialysis due DM in each fiscal year; approximately 15% started receiving dialysis that year. The percentage of patients who were regularly prescribed antidiabetic medication and received glycosylated hemoglobin testing ranged from 64.0% to 67.2% and from 30.6% to 36.5%, respectively. Urine microalbuminuria testing at least once a year occurred in 9.3% to 10.0%. The percentage of patients who received nutritional guidance ranged from 19.0% to 21.0%. Approximately 1% of patients received guidance for preventing DM from progressing to a disease that requires dialysis each fiscal year.

Conclusion

This study from Japan, where a super-aging society has developed, using an administrative database in a municipality covering most of the elderly population clearly demonstrated an evidence-practice gap in efforts to prevent worsening of DKD. Strengthening cooperation between government and medical facilities and support for providing preventive measures against DKD are urgently needed.

Development and operationalization of a data framework to assess quality of integrated diabetes care in the fragmented data landscape of Belgium

BACKGROUND

To assess the quality of integrated diabetes care, we should be able to follow the patient throughout the care path, monitor his/her care process and link them to his/her health outcomes, while simultaneously link this information to the primary care system and its performance on the structure and organization related quality indicators. However the development process of such a data framework is challenging, even in period of increasing and improving health data storage and management. This study aims to develop an integrated multi-level data framework for quality of diabetes care and to operationalize this framework in the fragmented Belgium health care and data landscape.

METHODS

Based on document reviews, iterative working group discussions and expert consultations, theoretical approaches and quality indicators were identified and assessed. After mapping and assessing the validity of existing health information systems and available data sources through expert consultations, the theoretical framework was translated in a data framework with measurable quality indicators. The construction of the data base included sampling procedures, data-collection, and several technical and privacy-related aspects of linking and accessing Belgian datasets.

RESULTS

To address three dimensions of quality of care, we integrated the chronic care model and cascade of care approach, addressing respectively the structure related quality indicators and the process and outcome related indicators. The corresponding data framework is based on self-collected data at the primary care practice level (using the Assessment of quality of integrated care tool), and linked health insurance data with lab data at the patient level.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we have described the transition of a theoretical quality of care framework to a unique multilevel database, which allows assessing the quality of diabetes care, by considering the complete care continuum (process and outcomes) as well as organizational characteristics of primary care practices.

High-frequency HbA1c testing among older patients with diabetes in Japan: a longitudinal analysis using medical claims data

Aims

We aimed to determine the rate of high-frequency HbA1c testing among older Japanese patients (≥ 75 years) with type 2 diabetes who did not have diabetic complications and were not using insulin, and to explore its influencing factors and association with the number of hospital admissions.

Methods

A retrospective, longitudinal observation study design based on medical claims data between 2015 and 2020 was adopted. We tracked patients for 3 years to describe the annual rate and determine factors associated with high-frequency HbA1c testing using a hierarchical logistical model. We employed a zero-inflated Poisson model to examine the association between frequency of HbA1c testing and the number of hospitalizations.

Results

Among 6594 patients included (mean age 80.4 years), the rates of high-frequency HbA1c testing in the first, second, and third year were 10.2%, 4.8%, and 4.7%, respectively. Follow-up year [odds ratio (OR) = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.49-0.59];insulin use (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.26-2.11); multi facility for HbA1c testing (OR = 5.51, 95% CI = 4.66-6.51); more than 48 outpatient days per year (OR = 2.13, 95% CI = 1.81-2.51); hospitalizations (OR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.55-0.79); two or more classes of antidiabetic agents at baseline (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.11-1.56); and dementia at baseline (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.51-0.97) were significantly associated with high-frequency HbA1c testing. No significant association between frequent HbA1c testing and the number of all-cause hospitalizations was found.

Conclusions

We revealed a high rate of HbA1c testing among older Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes in ambulatory care and indicated that high-frequency HbA1c testing was more likely to result from the decentralized healthcare system and its structure.

Understanding the quality of diabetes care in Japan: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Among chronic diseases, diabetes is a frequent focus of performance measurement. Disease-specific indicators based on evidence-based clinical guidelines have been used to evaluate the quality of care. There are worldwide efforts to improve the quality of diabetes care. Measuring the gap is an essential first step toward improving the quality of care.

METHODS

In order to better understand the status of quality of diabetes care in Japan, a country with a universal healthcare system, we performed a literature search looking for all studies reporting on quality indicators. In this review, we summarized the studies that have looked at the status of the quality of diabetes care over the last decade.

RESULTS

There were a total of 6 studies that reported on process including HbA1c, blood pressure, lipid screening, retinopathy and nephropathy screening and intermediate clinical measures which included percentages of patients reaching targets for HbA1c, blood pressure and LDL-C. Overall, the process measures continue to improve, however the clinical intermediate outcome measures remain suboptimal.

CONCLUSION

Despite the improvement in diabetes related process measures, there is limited data on clinical measures. It is necessary to shed more light on the assessment of the quality of diabetes care.

Impact of COVID-19 restrictions on diabetes health checks and prescribing for people with type 2 diabetes: a UK-wide cohort study involving 618 161 people in primary care

Objective

To compare rates of performing National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-recommended health checks and prescribing in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), before and after the first COVID-19 peak in March 2020, and to assess whether trends varied by age, sex, ethnicity and deprivation.

Methods

We studied 618 161 people with T2D followed between March and December 2020 from 1744 UK general practices registered with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. We focused on six health checks: haemoglobin A1c, serum creatinine, cholesterol, urinary albumin excretion, blood pressure and body mass index assessment. Regression models compared observed rates in April 2020 and between March and December 2020 with trend-adjusted expected rates derived from 10-year historical data.

Results

In April 2020, in English practices, rates of performing health checks were reduced by 76%–88% when compared with 10-year historical trends, with older people from deprived areas experiencing the greatest reductions. Between May and December 2020, the reduced rates recovered gradually but overall remained 28%–47% lower, with similar findings in other UK nations. Extrapolated to the UK population, there were ~7.4 million fewer care processes undertaken March–December 2020. In England, rates for new medication fell during April with reductions varying from 10% (95% CI: 4% to 16%) for antiplatelet agents to 60% (95% CI: 58% to 62%) for antidiabetic medications. Overall, between March and December 2020, the rate of prescribing new diabetes medications fell by 19% (95% CI: 15% to 22%) and new antihypertensive medication prescribing fell by 22% (95% CI: 18% to 26%), but prescribing of new lipid-lowering or antiplatelet therapy was unchanged. Similar trends were observed across the UK, except for a reduction in new lipid-lowering therapy prescribing in the other UK nations (reduction: 16% (95% CI: 10% to 21%)). Extrapolated to the UK population, between March and December 2020, there were ~31 800 fewer people with T2D prescribed a new type of diabetes medication and ~14 600 fewer prescribed a new type of antihypertensive medication.

Conclusions

Over the coming months, healthcare services will need to manage this backlog of testing and prescribing. We recommend effective communications to ensure patient engagement with diabetes services, monitoring and opportunities for prescribing, and when appropriate use of home monitoring, remote consultations and other innovations in care.

Sex Disparities in Cardiovascular Risk Factor Assessment and Screening for Diabetes-Related Complications in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review

Background

Insight in sex disparities in the detection of cardiovascular risk factors and diabetes-related complications may improve diabetes care. The aim of this systematic review is to study whether sex disparities exist in the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications.

Methods

PubMed was systematically searched up to April 2020, followed by manual reference screening and citations checks (snowballing) using Google Scholar. Observational studies were included if they reported on the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors (HbA1c, lipids, blood pressure, smoking status, or BMI) and/or screening for nephropathy, retinopathy, or performance of feet examinations, in men and women with diabetes separately. Studies adjusting their analyses for at least age, or when age was considered as a covariable but left out from the final analyses for various reasons (i.e. backward selection), were included for qualitative analyses. No meta-analyses were planned because substantial heterogeneity between studies was expected. A modified Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies was used to assess risk of bias.

Results

Overall, 81 studies were included. The majority of the included studies were from Europe or North America (84%).The number of individuals per study ranged from 200 to 3,135,019 and data were extracted from various data sources in a variety of settings. Screening rates varied considerably across studies. For example, screening rates for retinopathy ranged from 13% to 90%, with half the studies reporting screening rates less than 50%. Mixed findings were found regarding the presence, magnitude, and direction of sex disparities with regard to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications, with some evidence suggesting that women, compared with men, may be more likely to receive retinopathy screening and less likely to receive foot exams.

Conclusion

Overall, no consistent pattern favoring men or women was found with regard to the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and screening for diabetes-related complications, and screening rates can be improved for both sexes.

Preoperative fundus examination in patients with diabetes scheduled for surgery

This study aimed to show the proportion of fundus examinations in patients with diabetes who were scheduled for surgery. We retrospectively analyzed 455 consecutive patients with diabetes admitted for surgery. Just 49% had fundus examinations before hospitalization. The decision tree analysis showed that the type of family doctor was the first split associated with fundus examination; patients treated by a diabetes specialist were more likely to receive the examination. In this subgroup, glycated hemoglobin levels ≥8.0% and age ≥71 years were associated with a lower proportion of receiving the examination. In patients whose family doctor was not a diabetes specialist, glycated hemoglobin levels <7.2% and body mass index <27.4 kg/m² without severe comorbidities were associated with a higher proportion of receiving the examination. In conclusion, half of patients scheduled for surgery did not receive fundus examinations. A high‐risk population for not receiving the examination varied with the consultation setting.

What methods are being used to create an evidence base on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown unwarranted variation in test ordering among GP practices and regions, which may lead to patient harm and increased health care costs. There is currently no robust evidence base to inform guidelines on monitoring long-term conditions.

OBJECTIVES

To map the extent and nature of research that provides evidence on the use of laboratory tests to monitor long-term conditions in primary care, and to identify gaps in existing research.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review-a relatively new approach for mapping research evidence across broad topics-using data abstraction forms and charting data according to a scoping framework. We searched CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE to April 2019. We included studies that aimed to optimize the use of laboratory tests and determine costs, patient harm or variation related to testing in a primary care population with long-term conditions.

RESULTS

Ninety-four studies were included. Forty percent aimed to describe variation in test ordering and 36% to investigate test performance. Renal function tests (35%), HbA1c (23%) and lipids (17%) were the most studied laboratory tests. Most studies applied a cohort design using routinely collected health care data (49%). We found gaps in research on strategies to optimize test use to improve patient outcomes, optimal testing intervals and patient harms caused by over-testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Future research needs to address these gaps in evidence. High-level evidence is missing, i.e. randomized controlled trials comparing one monitoring strategy to another or quasi-experimental designs such as interrupted time series analysis if trials are not feasible.

Higher Participation Rate for Specific Health Checkups Concerning Simultaneous Ophthalmic Checkups

Background

Improving the specific health checkups participation rate is an essential task nationwide; however, studies on measures to accomplish this are limited. This study aimed to examine the influence of ophthalmic checkups on the specific health checkups’ participation rate.

Methods

We conducted a postal questionnaire survey on 1,741 countrywide municipalities in Japan from January to February 2019. The questionnaire specifically addressed health checkup participation rates of 2017, health checkups formats (group, individual, or both), simultaneous cancer screenings, simultaneous ophthalmic checkups, and the state of implementation of ophthalmic checkups. We used multiple linear regression analyses to calculate the partial regression coefficients (βs) and their 95% confidential intervals (CIs) to identify the influence of simultaneous ophthalmic checkups on specific health checkup participation rates.

Results

There was a significant association between specific health checkup participation rates and simultaneous ophthalmic checkups (β: +2.5%; 95% CI, 1.3–3.8) after adjusting for covariates. The fundus photos of all applicants, fundus photos with restrictions, and ophthalmology consultation for all applicants were associated with a significant increase in the specific health checkup participation rate (β: +2.8%, 95% CI, 1.2–4.4; β: +2.0%, 95% CI, 0.2–3.9; β: +7.4%, 95% CI, 1.2–13.6 respectively).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that additional simultaneous ophthalmic checkups as specific health checkups could increase the specific health checkup participation rate.

Exploring geographic variation of and influencing factors for utilization of four diabetes management measures in Swiss population using claims data

INTRODUCTION

Four strongly recommended diabetes management measures are biannual glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing, annual eye examination, kidney function examination, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) testing in patients below 75 years. We aimed to describe regional variation in the utilization of the four measures across small regions in Switzerland and to explore potential influencing factors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of adult patients with drug-treated diabetes in 2014 using claims data. Four binary outcomes represented adherence to the recommendations. Possible influencing factors included sociodemographics, health insurance preferences, and clinical characteristics. We performed multilevel modeling with Medstat regions as the higher level. We calculated the median odds ratio (MOR) and checked spatial autocorrelation in region level residuals using Moran's I statistic. When significant, we further conducted spatial multilevel modeling.

RESULTS

Of 49 198 patients with diabetes (33 957 below 75 years), 69.6% had biannual HbA1c testing, 44.3% each had annual eye examination and kidney function examination, and 55.5% of the patients below 75 years had annual LDL testing. The effects of health insurance preferences were substantial and consistent. Having any supplementary insurance (ORs across measures were between 1.08 and 1.28), having supplementary hospital care insurance (1.08-1.30), having chosen a lower deductible level (eg, SFr2500 compared with SFr300: 0.57-0.69), and having chosen a managed care model (1.04-1.17) were positively associated with recommendations adherence. The MORs (1.27-1.33) showed only moderate unexplained variation, and we observed inconsistent spatial patterns of unexplained variation across the four measures.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that the uptake of strongly recommended measures in diabetes management could possibly be optimized by providing further incentives to patients and care providers through insurance scheme design. The absence of marked regional variation implies limited potential for improvement by targeted regional intervention, while provider-specific promotion may be more impactful.

Variation in process quality measures of diabetes care by region and institution in Japan during 2015-2016: An observational study of nationwide claims data

AIMS

To calculate process quality measures of diabetes care in Japan using nationwide exclusive claims database.

METHODS

Using the National Database of health insurance claims during 2015-2016, the proportions of outpatients who received recommended examinations at least annually among those with regular antidiabetic medication were calculated as quality indicators, reported altogether and by prefecture and institutional certification (from the Japan Diabetes Society). Distributions of institutional-level quality indicators were also reported.

RESULTS

Among 4,154,452 outpatients, 96.7% underwent HbA1c or glycated albumin examination. Retinopathy examination was conducted among 46.5% of patients [prefecture (range): 37.5%-51.0%, institutional certification: 44.8% (without) vs. 59.8% (with)]. Urinary qualitative examination was conducted among 67.3% of patients at institutions with <200 beds (prefecture: 54.1%-81.9%, institutional certification: 66.8% vs. 92.8%), whereas urinary quantitative albumin or protein examination was conducted among 19.4% of patients (prefecture: 10.8%-31.6%, institutional certification: 18.7% vs. 54.8%). Distributions of institutional-level quality indicators showed that most institutions without institutional certification seldomly order urinary quantitative examination.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the quality indicator for glycaemic control examination was favourable, some aspects of diabetes care were suboptimal and varied greatly by prefecture and institution; individual and organisational efforts to improve quality of diabetes care would be needed in Japan.

Pattern of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients with acute respiratory tract infections in Japan, 2013-15: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

In this age of antimicrobial resistance, unnecessary use of antibiotics to treat non-bacterial acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) and inappropriate use of antibiotics in treating bacterial ARTIs are public health concerns.

PURPOSE

Our aim is to identify the pattern of oral antibiotic prescriptions for outpatients with ARTIs in Japan.

METHODS

We analysed health insurance claims data of patients (aged ≤74 years) from 2013 to 2015, to determine the pattern of antibiotic prescriptions for outpatient ARTIs and calculated the proportion of each antibiotic.

RESULTS

Data on 4.6 million antibiotic prescriptions among 1559394 outpatients with ARTIs were analysed. The most commonly prescribed classes of antibiotics included cephalosporins (41.9%), macrolides (32.8%) and fluoroquinolones (14.7%). The proportion of first-, second- and third-generation cephalosporins was 1.0%, 1.7% and 97.3%, respectively. Fluoroquinolones accounted for a quarter of the prescriptions for ARTIs in patients aged >20 years. In contrast, penicillins accounted for just 8.0% of the total number of antibiotic prescriptions for ARTIs.

CONCLUSIONS

According to clinical guidelines, penicillins are first-line antibiotics against ARTIs. However, third-generation cephalosporins, macrolides and fluoroquinolones are more frequently prescribed in Japan. Although we could not assess the extent to which appropriate antibiotics are selected, our results support the necessity of improving antibiotic choices in the treatment of ARTIs.

Changes in the quality of diabetes care in Japan between 2007 and 2015: A repeated cross-sectional study using claims data

AIM

To assess the temporal changes in the quality indicators pertaining to the process measures of diabetes care during a recent decade in Japan.

METHODS

A five-fold repeated cross-sectional study was conducted using health insurance claims data provided by the Japan Medical Data Center between April 2006 and March 2016. We identified 46,631 outpatients with antidiabetic medication who regularly visited hospitals or clinics at least every three months. We evaluated the quality indicators pertaining to glycemic control monitoring, lipid profile monitoring, retinopathy screening, nephropathy screening, and appropriate medication choice. The proportions of patients who received appropriate examinations/prescriptions, by observation period and either the type of antidiabetic medication or facility type were estimated using generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with multiple covariate adjustments.

RESULTS

The quality indicator values for appropriate medication choice and nephropathy screening improved between 2007 and 2015, whereas those for glycemic control monitoring and retinopathy screening remained suboptimal. Patients prescribed medications in larger hospitals were likelier to undergo the recommended examinations (e.g. retinopathy screening: 36.1% (95% CI: 35.4-36.7%) for clinic, 40.6% (95% CI: 39.1-42.2%) for smaller hospital, and 46.0% (95% CI: 44.8-47.2%) for larger hospital in 2015).

CONCLUSIONS

Several process measures of diabetes care remained suboptimal in Japan.

Treatment patterns, persistence and adherence rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To determine real-world trends in antidiabetic drug use, and persistence and adherence, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

DESIGN

Retrospective evaluation of administrative claims data (2011-2015) using the Japan Medical Data Center (JMDC) and Medical Data Vision (MDV) databases.

SETTING

Analysis of two administrative claims databases for Japanese patients with T2DM.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (aged ≥18 years) with an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code of T2DM and at least one antidiabetic drug prescription.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Treatment patterns in untreated (UT) or previously treated (PT) patients receiving antidiabetic therapy; persistence with treatment at 12 months; adherence to treatment at 12 months.

RESULTS

40 908 and 90 421 patients were included from the JMDC and MDV databases, respectively. The most frequently prescribed therapy at the index (first prescription) date was dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) in UT patients (JMDC: 44.0%, MDV: 54.8%) and combination therapy in PT patients (74.6%, 81.1%). Most common combinations were DPP-4i plus: biguanide (BG; 11.4%, 10.9%), sulfonylurea (SU; 8.4%, 11.0%) or BG+SU (7.8%, 9.1%). In UT or PT patients from either database whose index prescription was for any antidiabetic drug class(es) other than DPP-4i, the most frequent add-on or switch was to DPP-4i. 12-month persistence with index monotherapy was highest with DPP-4i and BG. Adherence was high (≥80%) for all monotherapy schedules, except insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist, and for the five most frequent two-drug and three-drug combinations. Persistence was greater in elderly UT patients and in those receiving ≤5 medications, but comparatively worse in UT patients with ≥3 index antidiabetic drug classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that DPP-4i is the most commonly used antidiabetic drug class in Japanese patients with T2DM, and persistence and adherence to this antidiabetic drug class are high.

Association between rapid antigen detection tests and antibiotics for acute pharyngitis in Japan: A retrospective observational study

The application and clinical impact of rapid antigen detection test (RADT) in the treatment of acute pharyngitis is unknown in Japan. We aimed to examine the proportions of RADT usage to identify Group A β-hemolytic Streptococcus (GAS) in outpatients with acute pharyngitis and evaluate the association between RADT and antibiotic treatment. We analyzed health insurance claims data from 2013 to 2015. Logistic regression models were used to analyze associated factors with RADT, overall antibiotic prescription, or penicillin use. We analyzed 1.27 million outpatient visits with acute pharyngitis, in which antibiotics were prescribed in 59.3% of visits. Of the total visits, 5.6% of patients received RADT, and 10.8% of the antibiotics were penicillin. Penicillin selection rates were higher in cases with RADT (25.4%) than those without RADT (9.7%). Compared to large-scale facilities, antibiotic prescription rates were higher in physicians' offices. For factor analysis, age (3-15 years), diagnosis code (streptococcal pharyngitis), size of the medical facility (large-scale hospitals), and physician's specialty (pediatrics) were associated with RADT use. Penicillin selection rate increased with RADT implementation (25.4% vs. 9.7%: adjusted odds ratio 1.55; 95% CI, 1.50-1.60). At 63% of the facilities, the RADT implementation rate was <5% of acute pharyngitis visits prescribed antibiotics. In conclusion, the proportion of RADT usage for outpatients with acute pharyngitis was low in Japan. With appropriate indication and evaluation, we expect that more utilization of RADT can help promote antimicrobial stewardship for outpatients with acute pharyngitis by prompting penicillin therapy. Further investigation with detailed clinical data are warranted.

Influence of comorbidities on the implementation of the fundus examination in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

AIMS

To investigate the influence of comorbidities on undergoing a diabetic eye examination in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using data from health insurance claims made between January 2005 and March 2013 in Japan. The primary outcome was implementation of the fundus examination that includes fundus photography, ophthalmoscopy and optical coherence tomography by a doctor within one year of initial drug therapy for Type2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). We used multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for demographic parameters to investigate the influence of comorbidities (hypertension and/or hyperlipidemia) on patients with T2DM receiving fundus examinations. We conducted an additional analysis to investigate whether the site of treatment might influence the performance of fundus examinations in patients with T2DM.

RESULTS

A total of 6,492 patients were eligible for this analysis, of which 1,044 (16.1%) had comorbidities and 2,212 (34.1%) received the fundus examination. In the multivariable analysis, there was a significant association between comorbidities and a lower proportion of examination implementation (odds ratio [OR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.68; P<0.001). The implementation proportion for patients treated for comorbidities and T2DM in the same facility was also low (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43-0.63; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the proportion of taking fundus examination is low among patients with comorbidities, especially in patients treated at the same facility for comorbidities and T2DM. This may help to increase the proportion of T2DM patients receiving fundus examinations.