What matters for health? Public views from eight countries

Changes in public awareness of the social determinants of health over 15 years in Wisconsin, United States

Objective

To investigate 15-year changes in public awareness of the social determinants of health (SDoH) between 2007 and 2023.

Methods

A 2007 survey of 1172 Wisconsin, U.S. adults is compared to a 2023 survey of 1631 Wisconsin adults. In both surveys, respondents were asked to rate 16 factors regarding how strongly each impacts health. Regression analyses examine how demographic factors differentiate responses in both survey years.

Results

In both 2007 and 2023, the four most highly rated factors affecting health were: personal health practices, stress, health insurance, and access to affordable health care. Between 2007 and 2023, there was little or no increase, and even some decrease, in endorsement of many social determinants of health like income, education, housing, and social support. Older adults, women, and those with lower income were generally more likely to endorse the SDoH in both years. Party identification was the demographic factor that most strongly differentiated responses, with Democrats rating more highly many of the social determinants of health than either Republicans or Independents in both years. This differentiation by party identification was even stronger in 2023 than 2007.

Conclusions

Despite consistent research documenting the social determinants of health, growing health care and policy attention to the social determinants of health, and population exposure to a variety of social determinants during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is little or no increase in public recognition of the social determinants of health, and notable increasing partisan divides.

Mental Health and U.S. Attitudes Toward Social Determinants of Health Policies

INTRODUCTION

Research has suggested that individual health may influence policy attitudes, yet the relationship between mental health and policy support is understudied. Clarifying this relationship may help inform policies that can improve the population mental health. To address this gap, this study measures national support for 5 social determinants of health policy priorities and their relation to mental health and political affiliation.

METHODS

This study assessed support for 5 policy priorities related to the social determinants of health using a nationally representative survey of US adults (n=2,430) conducted in March-April 2023. Logistic regression was used to estimate the predicted probability of identifying each priority as important, test differences in support by self-rated mental health, and evaluate whether partisanship modified these relationships. Analyses were conducted in 2023.

RESULTS

The majority of US adults, across partisan identities, supported 5 policy priorities related to improving the economy (84%), healthcare affordability (77%), improving K-12 education (76%), housing affordability (68%), and childcare affordability (61%). Worse mental health predicted significantly greater support for addressing housing affordability (73.9% vs 66.2%), and partisanship modified the relationship between mental health and support for improving the economy, improving K-12 education, and housing affordability.

CONCLUSIONS

In 2023, there was substantial bipartisan support for federal policy action to address the social determinants of health, and worse mental health was related to greater policy support, particularly among Democrats. Federal policymakers have a broad consensus to take action to address the social determinants of health, which may improve the population mental health.

Perceptions of the determinants of health across income and urbanicity levels in eight countries

BACKGROUND

A clear understanding of public perceptions of the social determinants of health remains lacking. This paper aimed to describe the relationship between income and urbanicity levels and public views of the determinants of health in eight middle-and high-income countries that varied across multiple characteristics.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional online survey in Brazil, China, Germany, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and the United States. Respondents were asked to select what they considered to be most important for health out of a list of ten determinants. We stratified the results by income and urbanicity levels and tested significance of differences between groups using two-tailed χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression models tested associations between demographic factors and the likelihood of respondents selecting the genetics, healthcare, income and wealth, or social support determinants.

RESULTS

Here we show 8753 respondents across eight countries. Rankings of determinants are similar across income groups, except for two determinants. Respondents in the highest income group rank genetics in higher proportions (32.4%, 95%CI: 29.0%,35.8%) compared to other income groups. Conversely, those in lowest income group rank social support more frequently (27.9%, 95%CI: 25.3%,30.7%) than other income groups. Those living in urban settings rank healthcare in higher proportions (61.2%, 95%CI: 59.0%,63.4%) compared to non-urban respondents; meanwhile, higher proportions (26.6%, 95%CI: 24.9%,28.3%) of non-urban respondents rank social support as important for health compared to urban respondents.

CONCLUSION

Demographic factors play a role in shaping public views of what affects health. Advancing public understanding about determinants of health requires tailoring public health messaging to account for socioeconomic position within a population.

Identifying Physician Public Health Competencies to Address Healthcare Needs in Underserved, Border, and Outer Island Areas of Indonesia: A Rapid Assessment

Phenomenon: Most medical schools in Indonesia have developed innovations to integrate public health content into the curricula. However, ensuring that all schools meet appropriate standards regarding the quality of subjects, content relevancy, and course delivery takes time and effort. Approach: This study employed a rapid assessment procedure to identify the current knowledge and competencies required to practice medicine effectively in underserved, border, and outer island areas of Indonesia. Ninety-three participants from six remote districts were involved in 12 focus group discussions. Qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis using the social determinants of health as a guiding framework. Findings: Under decentralized health system governance, the local socio-geographical context is critical to understanding the current public health landscape. Medical education with respect to public health must emphasize physicians' ability to advocate and encourage the coordination of healthcare services in responding to disasters, as well as community-based surveillance and other relevant data for synergistic disease control. As part of a healthcare facility management team, prospective doctors should be able to apply systems thinking and provide critical input to improve service delivery at local health facilities. Also, recognizing underlying factors is essential to realizing effective interprofessional collaboration practices and aligning them with leadership skills. Insights: This study outlines recommendations for medical schools and relevant colleges in formulating compulsory block or integrated public health curricula. It also provides a public health learning topic that may aid medical schools in training their students to be competent for practice in underserved, border, and outer island areas. Medical schools should offer initiatives for students to acquire the necessary public health competencies merited by the population's health needs.

Social Determinants of Health and Cancer Care: An ASCO Policy Statement

ASCO's new policy statement on SDOH supports practices that sustain and advance cancer health equity.

Pandemic stressors and mental health indicators in eight countries

PURPOSE

The Covid-19 pandemic has exacted a significant physical, financial, social, and emotional toll on populations throughout the world. This study aimed to document the association between pandemic stressors and mental health during the pandemic across countries that differ in cultural, geographic, economic, and demographic factors.

METHODS

We administered an online survey randomly in Brazil, China, Germany, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, and the United States from September 2020 to November 2020. This survey included questions on Covid-19-related stressors as well as the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 and the Primary Care PTSD Checklist to screen for depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, respectively. We performed bivariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess the prevalence and odds ratios of overall depression symptoms and probable PTSD and in relation to stressors across countries.

RESULTS

Among 8754 respondents, 28.9% (95% CI 27.5-30.0%) experienced depression symptoms, and 5.1% (95% CI 4.5-6.0%) experienced probable PTSD. The highest prevalence of depression symptoms was in Egypt (41.3%, 95% CI 37.6-45.0%) and lowest in the United States (24.9%, 95% CI 22.3-27.7%). The highest prevalence of probable PTSD was in Brazil (7.3%, 95% CI 5.6-9.4%) and the lowest in China (1.2%, 95% CI 0.7-2.0%). Overall, experiencing six or more Covid-19-related stressors was associated with both depression symptoms (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.46-2.48) and probable PTSD (OR 13.8, 95% CI 9.66-19.6).

CONCLUSION

The association between pandemic related stressors and the burden of adverse mental health indicators early in the Covid-19 pandemic transcended geographic, economic, cultural, and demographic differences between countries. The short-term and long-term impacts of the pandemic on mental health should be incorporated in efforts to tackle the consequences of Covid-19.

Child-TRACH: Management of tracheostomy in children, a Yo-IFOS survey

OBJECTIVES

The number of tracheostomies in children has increased the last twenty years thanks to neonatal and pediatric intensive care improvement. As it is often a difficult situation to deal with for children and their caregivers, we wished to draw up the inventory of the management protocols of pediatric tracheostomies around the world.

METHODS

We performed an online international survey for ENTs managing children with tracheostomies. The survey was in English and diffused through ENT national and international societies (International Federation of Otorhinolaryngologists Societies, IFOS and French Society of Otorhinolaryngologists, SFORL). Answers were anonymized and collected online between September 2021 and January 2022. All data were analyzed as a whole and according to the continent.

RESULTS

119 ENTs from the different continents responded to the survey: Europe (45.4 %), Asia (16 %), North America (14.3 %), South America (10.9 %), Africa (6.7 %) and Oceania (6.7 %). The most common indication for tracheostomy was laryngeal obstruction (77.3 %). Once initial management and surgical procedure performed, the majority of children returned home with their tracheostomy; tracheostomy was a contraindication for only 1.7 % of the responders. Concerning patient autonomy on daily care of the cannula at home, it was acquired in only 27.7 % of the cases, no difference was observed between countries (p = 0.22). Therapeutic patient education (TPE) was offered for 86.9 % of the patients taken care by the responders: it was dedicated to training the parents (96.8 %), with no differences between countries; however, in some countries, TPE for could also be offered to other caregivers. The mean delay between surgery and first change of cannula was 27.3 days (1-100) but varied depending on the country (4 days in Nigeria, 20 days in north America, 40 days in Europe, Asia and south America).

CONCLUSION

Although tracheostomies in children can encompass several indications, practices across the world are similar and aim to offer a life as normal as possible for these children.

Data to Improve Global Health Equity-Key Challenges

This JAMA Forum discusses how to use data to help achieve global health equity, the challenges in using data to narrow health gaps, and ways to work toward a world with fewer health gaps.

The biomedical securitization of global health

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 outbreak has shifted the course in the global health debate further towards health security and biomedical issues. Even though global health had already played a growing role in the international policy agenda, the pandemic strongly reinforced the interest of the media, the general public and the community in cross-border infectious diseases. This led to a strengthening of the already dominant biomedical understanding of global health and the securitization of health in foreign policy.

METHODS

This paper critically provides a narrative, iterative review of the health security literature available to date, with a special focus on the development of the currently prevailing concept of health security and the dual trend towards the securitization and biomedicalization of global health.

FINDINGS

In a world increasingly determined by power asymmetries, unequal distribution of opportunities and resources, and inadequate governance structures, securitizing health has become a key feature of global governance. Health security is predominantly based on a concept that neglects the global burden of disease determined by non-communicable conditions rather than by infectious diseases. Moreover, it exhibits a trend towards biomedical solutions and neglects root causes of global health crises.

CONCLUSIONS

As important as health security is, the underlying concept driven by biomedical and technocratic reductionism falls short. It widely neglects the social, economic, political, commercial and environmental determination of health. Beyond improved health care and prevention, health-in-all policies are ultimately required for ensuring health security and reducing one of its main challenges, health inequalities within and between countries. Global health security must first and foremost seek to guarantee the universal right to health and therefore emphasise the social, economic, commercial and political determination of health.