There should always be a free lunch: the impact of COVID-19 lockdown suspension of the mid-day meal on nutriture of primary school children in Karnataka, India

Impact of free school lunch program on nutritional status and academic outcomes among school children in India: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Mid-day meal programmes (MDM) were introduced in India to improve school attendance, nutritional status and educational outcomes of school children. Numerous primary studies have examined the impact of the MDM programmes on both nutritional and educational outcomes in various settings across the country. However, synthesising the findings from these studies has been challenging. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review to assess the effects of MDM programmes on the nutritional and academic outcomes of school children in India.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, and relevant studies published between 1997 and 2022 were included. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The results were synthesised descriptively.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 31 studies. Among them, 16 studies focused on academic outcomes, while 18 studies reported children's nutritional status. Studies on MDM Scheme (MDMS) in children show mixed results on nutritional outcomes. While some studies show marginal improvements in height and weight measurements, others show no significant improvement. Regular MDMS access improves enrollment, attendance and retention rates for children, with lower dropout rates and higher academic achievement. However, its impact on academic performance remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

The MDM programme in India was effective in improving the academic achievement and a few nutritional outcomes of school children, underscoring the importance of sustaining MDM programmes in India.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023391776). Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023391776.

Analysis of anthropometric outcomes in Indian children during the COVID-19 pandemic using National Family Health Survey data

BACKGROUND

Disruptions in food, health, and economic systems during the COVID-19 pandemic may have adversely affected child health. There is currently limited research on the potential effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on stunting, wasting, and underweight status of young children.

METHODS

We examine the short-term associations between the pandemic and anthropometric outcomes of under-5 children (n = 232,920) in India, using data from the National Family Health Survey (2019-2021). Children surveyed after March 2020 are considered as the post-COVID group, while those surveyed earlier are considered as pre-COVID. Potential biases arising from differences in socioeconomic characteristics of the two groups are mitigated using propensity score matching methods.

RESULTS

Post-COVID children surveyed in 2020 and 2021 have 1.2% higher underweight rates, 1.2% lower wasting rates, 0.1 lower height-for-age z-scores (HAZ), and 0.04 lower weight-for-height z-scores as compared with matched pre-COVID children. Post-COVID children surveyed in 2020 have 1.6%, 4.6%, and 2.4% higher stunting, underweight, and wasting rates, respectively, and 0.07 lower HAZ, as compared with matched pre-COVID children. Reductions in nutritional status are largest among children from households in the poorest wealth quintiles.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate a trend towards a recovery in child anthropometric outcomes in 2021 after the initial post-pandemic reductions. The resilience of health and food systems to shocks such as COVID-19 should be strengthened while immediate investments are required to decrease child malnutrition and improve broader child health outcomes.

Childhood and Adolescent Anemia Burden in India: The Way Forward

The burden of anemia in Indian children, based on capillary blood sampling, is believed to be profound and worsening (67.1%) according to the successive National Family Health Surveys (NFHS). This might be an overestimate. The recent Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey of Indian children, that used venous blood sampling, found only less than half (30.7%) the NFHS prevalence, of which only one third was due to iron deficiency (ID). Unfortunately, the apparently worsening NFHS anemia burden estimate has been interpreted as an inadequacy of the present iron supplementation policy. This has led to additional iron supply through mandatory rice fortification. However, the lack of efficacy of iron supplementation appears inevitable, if the true prevalence of iron deficiency anemia is only about 10%. Thus, etiology is a critical consideration when devising appropriate and effective prevention policies. Future policies must focus on precision, thoughtfulness, restraint, and community engagement.