A hospital-based observational cohort study exploring pain and biomarkers in patients with hand osteoarthritis in Norway: The Nor-Hand protocol

Hand osteoarthritis phenotypes based on a biopsychosocial approach, and their associations with cross-sectional and longitudinal pain

OBJECTIVE

Hand osteoarthritis (OA) pain is characterized as heterogeneous and multifactorial. Differences in pain may be explained by underlying phenotypes, which have not been previously explored DESIGN: Latent class analysis determined classes of participants with hand OA from the Nor-Hand study baseline examination (2016-17) based on a biopsychosocial framework. Outcomes were hand and overall bodily pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10) at baseline and follow-up (2019-21), The relations of the classes to pain outcomes at baseline, follow-up, and change over time were analysed in separate models by linear regression, using the overall healthiest class as reference.

RESULTS

Five classes differing in radiographic hand OA burden and OA burden in the lower extremities by ultrasound, demographic factors, psychosocial burden and pain sensitization was identified. Persons with the least severe OA but higher burden of biopsychosocial factors reported the most hand pain (beta 3.65, 95% CI 2.53, 4.75). Pain was less pronounced in persons with the most severe hand OA but low burden of biopsychosocial factors (beta 1.03, 95% CI 0.41, 1.65). Results were similar for overall bodily pain and at follow-up. Changes in pain were small, but the association between a separate class defined by higher levels of biopsychosocial burden and pain changes was significant.

CONCLUSION

The five hand OA phenotypes were associated with pain at baseline and 3.5 years later. The phenotype with the least OA severity, but higher burden of biopsychosocial factors reported more pain than the phenotype with the most severe OA, reflecting the symptom-structure discordance of the hand OA pain experience.

Associations between pain sensitization and measures of physical function in people with hand osteoarthritis: Results from the Nor-Hand study

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether pain sensitization is associated with hand and lower extremity function in people with hand osteoarthritis (OA) in the Nor-Hand study.

DESIGN

Pain sensitization was assessed by pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and temporal summation (TS). Hand function was assessed by Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) (range: 0-36), grip strength and Moberg pick-up test, and lower extremity function was assessed by Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (range: 0-68), 30-s chair stand test, and 40-m walk test. We examined whether sex-standardized PPT and TS values were cross-sectionally associated with measures of physical function using linear regression analyses. Beta coefficients were presented per sex-specific standard deviation of PPT and TS. The mediating effect of pain was examined by causal-inference based mediation analysis.

RESULTS

In 206 participants, higher PPTs at/near the hand, indicative of less peripheral and/or central pain sensitization, were associated with greater grip strength and better self-reported hand function (beta for PPT at finger joint on AUSCAN function: -1.41, 95% CI -2.40, -0.42). Higher PPTs at/near the hand, near the knee and at trapezius were associated with lower extremity function, although not statistically significant for all outcomes. Self-reported pain severity mediated the effect of PPT on self-reported function. TS was not associated with hand or lower extremity function.

CONCLUSION

Peripheral sensitization, and possibly central sensitization, was associated with impaired function. Effects of PPTs on self-reported function were mediated by self-reported pain, whereas there might be a direct effect of sensitization or effects through other mediators on performance-based function.

Comorbidities in people with hand OA and their associations with pain severity and sensitization: Data from the longitudinal Nor-Hand study

Objective

To determine whether the comorbidity burden and co-existing comorbidities are cross-sectionally and/or longitudinally associated with pain and pain sensitization in a cohort study of people with hand OA.

Design

We examined whether comorbidity burden and individual comorbidities based on the self-administered Comorbidity Index (range: 0-42) at baseline were associated with pain outcomes at baseline and 3 years follow-up. Pain outcomes included hand and overall bodily pain (range: 0-10) as well as pressure pain thresholds at the tibialis anterior muscle (kg/cm²) and temporal summation (distal radioulnar joint) as measures of central pain sensitization. We performed linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, physical exercise and education.

Results

We included 300 and 196 participants in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively. Using baseline data, the burden of comorbidities was associated with greater pain in hands (beta ​= ​0.61, 95% CI 0.37, 0.85) and overall body (beta ​= ​0.60, 95% CI 0.37, 0.87). Similar strength of associations was found between comorbidity burden (baseline) and follow-up pain. Among the individual comorbidities, back pain and depression were associated with nearly one unit higher pain score in hands and overall body at both baseline and follow-up. Only back pain was related to lower pressure pain thresholds at follow up (beta ​= ​-0.24, 95% CI -0.50, -0.001).

Conclusion

People with hand OA and greater comorbidity burden, co-existing back pain or depression reported greater pain severity than their counterparts, also 3 years later. These results acknowledge the relevance of accounting for comorbidities in the pain experience in people with hand OA.

Patients with clinically diagnosed hand OA not fulfilling the ACR classification criteria are in an earlier disease phase and more often have thumb base OA

Objective

To investigate the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria for hand osteoarthritis.

Design

Longitudinal data up to four years from a cohort of consecutive patients with primary hand osteoarthritis diagnosed by their rheumatologist (Hostas study) were used to classify presence or absence of hand osteoarthritis according to the 1990 ACR criteria (traditional format: one major and 4 minor ACR criteria) (ACR⁺/ACR^-). Demographics, Australian/Canadian osteoarthritis hand index (AUSCAN) pain and function were obtained. Hand radiographs were scored according to Kellgren-Lawrence; radiographic osteoarthritis was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence ≥2 in ≥1 CMC1 joint or ≥2 DIP/PIP/MCP joints.

Results

Of 538 patients (mean age 61 years, 86.1% women) 485 (90.1%) fulfilled ACR criteria at baseline. Except for the minor criterion swelling of <3 MCP joints, all criteria differed between the groups. ACR^- patients were younger, with higher BMI, a shorter time since diagnosis, and less bony enlargements, joint deformities and radiographic osteoarthritis, except for radiographic CMC1 osteoarthritis which was seen more often in ACR^- patients. No difference in AUSCAN pain or function was seen between ACR^- versus ACR⁺ patients. After follow-up 37/53 (69.8%) converted to ACR⁺, 2/53 (3.8%) did not, and 14/53 (26.4%) were lost to follow-up.

Conclusions

In clinical practice the majority of patients fulfill the ACR classification criteria, but those in an earlier disease phase, with less signs of hand osteoarthritis or with primarily thumb base osteoarthritis are less likely to fulfill them. New classification criteria also including earlier disease stages and with attention for hand osteoarthritis subtypes are required.

Associations between joint pathologies and central sensitization in persons with hand osteoarthritis: results from the Nor-Hand study

OBJECTIVE

Pain sensitization is associated with pain severity in persons with hand OA. What contributes to pain sensitization is unclear. This study explores whether hand OA pathologies and symptom duration are related to central sensitization.

METHOD

Participants with hand OA in the Nor-Hand study underwent bilateral hand radiography and US examination. Central sensitization was assessed with pressure pain thresholds (PPT) at remote sites (wrist, trapezius and tibialis anterior muscles) and temporal summation. We examined whether hand OA pathologies, independent of each other, including structural severity (Kellgren-Lawrence sum score, presence of erosive hand OA), inflammatory severity (greyscale synovitis and power Doppler activity sum scores) and symptom duration, were related to central sensitization, adjusting for age, sex, BMI, comorbidities and OA-severity of knee/hip.

RESULTS

In 291 participants (88% women, median age 61 years, interquartile range 57-66 years) Kellgren-Lawrence, greyscale synovitis and power Doppler activity sum scores were not associated with lower PPTs at remote sites. Persons with erosive hand OA had lower PPTs at the wrist (adjusted beta -0.75, 95% CI -1.32, -0.19) and tibialis anterior (adjusted beta -0.82, 95% CI -1.54, -0.09) and had greater temporal summation (adjusted beta 0.56, 95% CI 0.12, 1.01) compared with persons with non-erosive disease. No associations were found for symptom duration.

CONCLUSIONS

A person's overall amount of structural or inflammatory hand OA pathologies was not associated with central sensitization. Although persons with erosive hand OA showed greater signs of central sensitization, the small differences suggest that central sensitization is mainly explained by factors other than joint pathologies.

Associations of Body Mass Index With Pain and the Mediating Role of Inflammatory Biomarkers in People With Hand Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association of body mass index (BMI) with pain in people with hand osteoarthritis (OA), and explore whether this association, if causal, is mediated by systemic inflammatory biomarkers.

METHODS

In 281 Nor-Hand study participants, we estimated associations between BMI and hand pain, as measured by the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN; range 0-20) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; range 0-10); foot pain, as measured by NRS (range 0-10); knee/hip pain, as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC; range 0-20); painful total body joint count; and pain sensitization. We fit natural-effects models to estimate natural direct and natural indirect effects of BMI on pain through inflammatory biomarkers.

RESULTS

Each 5-unit increase in BMI was associated with more severe hand pain (on average increased AUSCAN by 0.64 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.23, 1.08]), foot pain (on average increased NRS by 0.65 [95% CI 0.36, 0.92]), knee/hip pain (on average increased WOMAC by 1.31 [95% CI 0.87, 1.73]), generalized pain, and pain sensitization. Mediation analyses suggested that the effects of BMI on hand pain and painful total body joint count were partially mediated by leptin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), respectively. Effect sizes for mediation by leptin were larger for the hands than for the lower extremities, and were statistically significant for the hands only.

CONCLUSION

In people with hand OA, higher BMI is associated with greater pain severity in the hands, feet, and knees/hips. Systemic effects of obesity, measured by leptin, may play a larger mediating role for pain in the hands than in the lower extremities. Low-grade inflammation, measured by hsCRP, may contribute to generalized pain in overweight/obese individuals.

Use of machine learning in osteoarthritis research: a systematic literature review

Objective

The aim of this systematic literature review was to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview of the use of machine learning (ML) in the clinical care of osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

A systematic literature review was performed in July 2021 using MEDLINE PubMed with key words and MeSH terms. For each selected article, the number of patients, ML algorithms used, type of data analysed, validation methods and data availability were collected.

Results

From 1148 screened articles, 46 were selected and analysed; most were published after 2017. Twelve articles were related to diagnosis, 7 to prediction, 4 to phenotyping, 12 to severity and 11 to progression. The number of patients included ranged from 18 to 5749. Overall, 35% of the articles described the use of deep learning And 74% imaging analyses. A total of 85% of the articles involved knee OA and 15% hip OA. No study investigated hand OA. Most of the studies involved the same cohort, with data from the OA initiative described in 46% of the articles and the MOST and Cohort Hip and Cohort Knee cohorts in 11% and 7%. Data and source codes were described as publicly available respectively in 54% and 22% of the articles. External validation was provided in only 7% of the articles.

Conclusion

This review proposes an up-to-date overview of ML approaches used in clinical OA research and will help to enhance its application in this field.

Associations of pain sensitisation with tender and painful joint counts in people with hand osteoarthritis: results from the Nor-Hand study

Objective

To examine associations of pain sensitisation with tender and painful joint counts and presence of widespread pain in people with hand osteoarthritis (OA).

Methods

Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) at a painful finger joint and the tibialis anterior muscle, and temporal summation (TS) were measured in 291 persons with hand OA. We examined whether sex-standardised PPT and TS values were associated with assessor-reported tender hand joint count, self-reported painful hand and total body joint counts and presence of widespread pain using linear and logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, education and OA severity.

Results

People with lower PPTs at the painful finger joint (measure of peripheral and/or central sensitisation) had more tender and painful hand joints than people with higher PPTs. PPT at tibialis anterior (measure of central sensitisation) was associated with painful total body joint count (beta=−0.82, 95% CI −1.28 to –0.35) and presence of widespread pain (OR=0.57, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.77). The associations between TS (measure of central sensitisation) and joint counts in the hands and the total body were statistically non-significant.

Conclusion

This cross-sectional study suggested that pain sensitisation (ie, lower PPTs) was associated with joint counts and widespread pain in hand OA. This knowledge may be used for improved pain phenotyping of people with hand OA, which may contribute to better pain management through more personalised medicine. Further studies are needed to assess whether a reduction of pain sensitisation leads to a decrease in tender and painful joint counts.

Study protocol for the follow-up examination of the Nor-Hand study: A hospital-based observational cohort study exploring pain and biomarkers in people with hand osteoarthritis

Objective

This study aims to increase the understanding of pain mechanisms in hand OA and explore potential risk factors for pain development or worsening in a biopsychosocial framework. Another important aim is to validate potential soluble and imaging OA biomarkers.

Design

The follow-up examination of the Nor-Hand hospital-based observational cohort study started in October 2019 and was completed in May 2021. In total, 212 of the 300 participants with hand OA who were examined at baseline attended the follow-up study. The participants underwent clinical joint examinations, medical and functional assessments, quantitative sensory testing, fluorescence optical imaging, ultrasound of the hands, acromioclavicular joints, feet, knees and hips, conventional radiographs of the hands and feet and magnetic resonance imaging of the dominant hand. Blood and urine samples were collected, and all participants answered questions about demographic factors and OA-related questionnaires. Associations between disease variables and symptoms will be examined in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Longitudinal analyses will be performed to assess the predictive value of baseline variables on hand OA outcomes.

Conclusion

Current knowledge about predictors for disease progression in hand OA is limited, but with longitudinal data we will be able to explore the predictive value of baseline variables on hand OA outcomes, such as changes in patient-reported outcomes or changes in soluble and imaging biomarkers. This provides a unique opportunity to gain more knowledge about the natural disease course of hand OA.

Reliability and agreement of proton density-weighted vs. gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI in hand osteoarthritis. An OMERACT MRI special interest group reliability exercise

OBJECTIVES

To compare reliabilities of assessing synovitis in hand osteoarthritis (OA) using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) with/without gadolinium (Gd).

METHODS

Three readers scored synovitis on non-enhanced two-dimensional (2D) proton density (PD)-weighted MRI and Gd-enhanced (3D) MRI of hand joints in 20 patients. Inter-reader reliabilities were examined.

RESULTS

Reliability was good for Gd-enhanced MRI, but poor for non-enhanced PD-weighted MRI (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.83 and 0.21, respectively). Agreement between the two sequences was poor (weighted kappa 0.18).

CONCLUSION

Gd-enhanced MRI was more reliable than PD-weighted MRI for assessing synovitis. Gd-enhancement, but also resolution and tissue contrast, might have contributed to this.

Associations between Fluorescence Optical Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging and symptoms in hand osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether Fluorescence Optical Imaging (FOI) enhancement and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-defined synovitis are associated with pain and physical function in hand osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

METHODS

Bilateral FOI scans and MRI of the dominant hand were available for 221 patients. Finger joints were examined for tenderness on palpation. Pain in individual finger joints during the last 24 h and last 6 weeks and hand pain intensity by the Australian/Canadian hand index and Numeric Rating Scale were self-reported. On joint level, we applied logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to examine whether FOI enhancement and MRI-defined synovitis were associated with pain in the same joint. On subject level, we applied linear regression to assess whether FOI and MRI sum scores were associated with pain intensity and physical function.

RESULTS

Metacarpophalangeal and thumb base joints were excluded from analyses due to little/no FOI enhancement. Finger joints with FOI enhancement on the composite image had higher odds (95% confidence interval) of pain during the last 6 weeks (grade 1: 1.4 (1.2-1.6), grade 2-3: 2.1 (1.7-2.6)). Similar results were found for joint pain during the last 24 h and joint tenderness in fingers. Numerically stronger associations were found between MRI-defined synovitis and finger joint pain/tenderness. FOI and MRI sum scores demonstrated no/weak associations with hand pain and physical function.

CONCLUSION

FOI enhancement and MRI-defined synovitis were associated with pain in the same finger joint. None of the imaging modalities demonstrated consistent associations with pain, stiffness and physical function on subject level.

Get a Grip on Factors Related to Grip Strength in Persons With Hand Osteoarthritis: Results From an Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare levels of grip strength in individuals with hand osteoarthritis (OA) with normative values, and to examine how hand OA severity and other biopsychosocial factors are associated with grip strength.

METHODS

Levels of grip strength across age groups were compared with normative values from the general population in sex-stratified analyses using 2-sample t-tests. Associations between radiographic hand OA severity (Kellgren/Lawrence sum score) in different joint groups and grip strength of the same hand were examined in 300 individuals from the Nor-Hand study using linear regression. Analyses were repeated using markers of pain, demographic factors, comorbidities, and psychological and social factors as independent variables. We adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index.

RESULTS

Individuals with hand OA had lower grip strength than the general population, especially in individuals age <60 years. In thumb base joints, increasing radiographic severity (range 0-8) and the presence of pain were associated with lower grip strength (β = -0.83 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) -1.12, -0.53] and β = -2.15 [95% CI -3.15, -1.16], respectively). Negative associations with grip strength were also found for women, low education, higher comorbidity index, and higher resting heart rate.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with hand OA have lower grip strength than the general population. Our results support the idea that studies on thumb base OA should include grip strength as an outcome measure. However, other biopsychosocial factors should also be considered when the grip strength is being interpreted, because other factors such as sex, socioeconomic factors, physical fitness, and comorbidities are negatively associated with grip strength.

Associations Between Radiographic and Ultrasound-Detected Features in Hand Osteoarthritis and Local Pressure Pain Thresholds

OBJECTIVE

Pain sensitization contributes to the complex osteoarthritis (OA) pain experience. The relationship between imaging features of hand OA and clinically assessed pain sensitization is largely unexplored. This study was undertaken to examine the association of structural and inflammatory features of hand OA with local pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in the Nor-Hand study.

METHODS

The cross-sectional relationship of severity of structural radiographic features of hand OA (measured according to the Kellgren/Lawrence scale [grade 0-4] and the absence or presence of erosive joint disease) as well as ultrasound-detected hand joint inflammation (assessed by gray-scale synovitis [grade 0-3] and the absence or presence of power Doppler activity) to the PPTs of 2 finger joints was examined by multilevel regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index, using beta values with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 570 joints in 285 participants included in the Nor-Hand study were assessed. Greater structural and inflammatory severity was associated with lower PPTs, with adjusted beta values of -0.5 (95% CI -0.6, -0.4) per Kellgren/Lawrence grade increase, -1.4 (95% CI -1.8, -0.9) for erosive versus non-erosive joints, -0.7 (95% CI -0.9, -0.6) per gray-scale synovitis grade increase, and -1.5 (95% CI -1.8, -1.1) for joints with power Doppler activity on ultrasound versus those without.

CONCLUSION

Greater severity of structural pathologic features and hand joint inflammation was associated with lower PPTs in the finger joints of patients with hand OA, indicating pain sensitization. Our results indicate that pain sensitization might be driven by structural and inflammatory pathology in hand OA.

Validity and diagnostic performance of fluorescence optical imaging measuring synovitis in hand osteoarthritis: baseline results from the Nor-Hand cohort

OBJECTIVE

Fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) demonstrates enhanced microcirculation in finger joints as a sign of inflammation. We wanted to assess the validity and diagnostic performance of FOI measuring synovitis in persons with hand OA, comparing it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and ultrasound-detected synovitis.

METHODS

Two hundred and twenty-one participants with hand OA underwent FOI and ultrasound (gray-scale synovitis and power Doppler activity) of the bilateral hands and contrast-enhanced MRI examination of the dominant hand. Fifteen joints in each hand were scored on semi-quantitative scales (grade 0-3) for all modalities. Four FOI images were evaluated: one composite image (Prima Vista Mode (PVM)) and three images representing phases of fluorescent dye distribution. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between sum scores of FOI, MRI, and ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for FOI using MRI or ultrasound as reference.

RESULTS

FOI did not demonstrate enhancement in the thumb base, and the joint was excluded from further analyses. FOI sum scores showed poor to fair correlations with MRI (rho 0.01-0.24) and GS synovitis sum scores (rho 0.12-0.25). None of the FOI images demonstrated both good sensitivity and specificity, and the AUC ranged from 0.50-0.61 and 0.51-0.63 with MRI and GS synovitis as reference, respectively. FOI demonstrated similar diagnostic performance with PD activity and GS synovitis as reference.

CONCLUSION

FOI enhancement correlated poorly with synovitis assessed by more established imaging modalities, questioning the value of FOI for the evaluation of synovitis in hand OA.

Peripheral and Central Sensitization of Pain in Individuals With Hand Osteoarthritis and Associations With Self-Reported Pain Severity

OBJECTIVE

Pain sensitization, an important osteoarthritis (OA) pain mechanism, has not been substantially investigated in patients with hand OA. It is unknown how peripheral and central sensitization are related to self-reported hand pain.

METHODS

Individuals with verified hand OA in the Nor-Hand study underwent quantitative sensory testing of pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) locally (painful and nonpainful finger joints) and remotely (wrist, trapezius, and tibialis anterior muscles), and testing of temporal summation (TS), a manifestation of central sensitization. We examined cross-sectional associations of PPT tertiles and TS with hand pain using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) (range 0-10) and the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) pain subscale (range 0-20). Linear regression models were adjusted for demographics, psychosocial factors, and radiographic severity.

RESULTS

This study included 282 participants (88% female) with a median age of 61 years (interquartile range [IQR] 57-66). Participants with the lowest PPTs in their finger joints and in most remote locations reported higher NRS pain values, compared to patients with the highest PPTs, with adjusted β values ranging from 0.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.0, 1.2) to 0.9 (95% CI 0.3, 1.5). The 118 participants (42%) with TS reported higher mean ± SD NRS pain values compared to those without TS (4.1 ± 2.4 versus 3.1 ± 1.7; adjusted β = 0.6 [95% CI 0.2, 1.1]). Neither PPTs nor the presence of TS were associated with AUSCAN pain.

CONCLUSION

Central sensitization was common in patients with hand OA. Lower local and widespread PPTs and the presence of TS were associated with higher hand pain intensity, even after adjustment for demographics, psychosocial factors, and radiographic severity. Sensitization may therefore represent a possible treatment target.

Validation of the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain Questionnaire in Patients with Hand Osteoarthritis: Results from the Nor-Hand Study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the validity of a modified Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire for assessment of pain in hand osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

The modified ICOAP-hand questionnaire was administered to 300 patients [89% female, median (interquartile range) age: 61 (57-66) yrs] in the Nor-Hand observational cohort study. The questionnaire was completed twice by 31 patients and test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for sum scores and weighted κ scores for individual items. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient and item-total correlations. Correlations between the ICOAP-hand questionnaire, the Australian/Canadian Hand OA Index (AUSCAN) hand pain subscale, and pain on a numerical rating scale (NRS) were analyzed using Spearman correlation analyses.

RESULTS

We found a substantial overlap between constant and intermittent pain (46% reporting constant + intermittent pain and 33% reporting no pain). Test-retest reliability analysis of ICOAP-hand showed an ICC of 0.89 for the total scale and weighted κ values between 0.39-0.70 for the individual items. Principal component analysis revealed one component with an eigenvalue of 7.9, explaining 72% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient values > 0.93 and strong item-total correlations proved high internal consistency. ICOAP-hand was strongly correlated with NRS hand pain and the AUSCAN pain subscale.

CONCLUSION

ICOAP-hand is a reliable pain index that correlates with other available pain questionnaires. However, our results indicate that constant and intermittent pain do not represent separate constructs in hand OA, questioning the usefulness of the 2 subscales. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03083548].