Biomarkers of autonomic regulation for predicting psychological distress and functional recovery following road traffic injuries: protocol for a prospective cohort study

The importance of self-regulation and mental health for effective recovery after traffic injuries: A comprehensive network analysis approach

OBJECTIVE

Traffic injuries significantly impact people's psychological, physical and social wellbeing, and involve complex self-regulation responses. Psychological impacts are seldom recognized and addressed holistically. This study employs network analysis to investigate the interconnectedness between different dimensions that influence mental health vulnerability and recovery after traffic injuries.

METHODS

120 adults with mild-to-moderate traffic injuries and 112 non-injured controls were recruited. The network investigation employed two main approaches. Four cross-sectional networks examined the interrelationships between self-regulation responses (cognitive and autonomic) and various health dimensions (psychological, physical, social) over time (1, 3, 6, 12 months). Three predictive networks explored influences of acute self-regulation responses (1 month) on long-term outcomes. Network analyses focused on between-group differences in overall connectivity and centrality measures (nodal strength).

RESULTS

An overall measure of psychological wellbeing consistently emerged as the most central (strongest) node in both groups' networks. Injured individuals showed higher overall connectivity and differences in the centrality of self-regulation nodes compared to controls, at 1-month and 12-months post-injury. These patterns were similarly observed in the predictive networks, including differences in cognitive and autonomic self-regulation influences.

CONCLUSIONS

Network analyses highlighted the crucial role of psychological health and self-regulation, in promoting optimal wellbeing and effective recovery. Post-traffic injury, increased connectivity indicated prolonged vulnerability for at least a year, underscoring the need of ongoing support beyond the initial improvements. A comprehensive approach that prioritizes psychological health and self-regulation through psychologically informed services, early psychological screening, and interventions promoting cognitive and autonomic self-regulation is crucial for mitigating morbidity and facilitating recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

IMPRINT study, ACTRN 12616001445460.

Current practices and challenges in application of trauma-informed care for accidentally injured patients: An exploratory qualitative study

AIM

To explore the Chinese nurses' current practices and challenges to trauma-informed care (TIC) for accidentally injured patients, which can provide the way forward of improvement in the future.

DESIGN

A qualitative study.

METHODS

Sixteen Chinese nurses who had experience working with accidentally injured patients were invited into the semi-structured interviews. Following each interview, the dialogue was transcribed verbatim. Subsequently, we analysed the data in accordance with the principles of thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four common themes emerged from the analysis: (a) Awareness of patients' psychological trauma; (b) Recognition of psychological trauma; (c) Response to psychological trauma; (d) Perceived barriers to implementing TIC. This research indicated an urgent need for interventions in the future, such as TIC education and training, time constraints, heavy workload, emotional exhaustion and mood self-regulation, giving policy incentives, strengthening leadership support and internal cooperation. Identifying those factors of TIC practice among accidentally injured patients helps promote TIC development in hospitals.

The contribution of pre-injury vulnerability to risk of psychiatric morbidity in adults injured in a road traffic crash: Comparisons with non-injury controls

People who sustain injury in a road traffic crash (RTC) have significant risk of psychiatric morbidity, but effective screening for identifying at-risk individuals soon after the RTC is lacking. We investigated whether pre-injury vulnerability can assist as an early screen to manage this risk. We recruited 120 adults who sustained physical injury in a RTC and admitted to an emergency department (ED). They were comprehensively assessed for acute and long-term presence of psychiatric disorder/morbidity and disability over 12-months after the injury, with comparisons to a non-injury control. Propensity matching based on six pre-injury vulnerability factors (age, sex, education, socioeconomic status, prior mental health, prior physical health) with the control group was used to determine membership of high vulnerability (HV) and low vulnerability (LV) injury sub-groups. Compared to the LV sub-group and controls that had similar pre-injury vulnerability, the HV sub-group had a worrying post-RTC recovery profile, with significantly higher rates of long-term psychiatric morbidity (42.2% vs. 23.1% and 15.9% respectively, p = .002) including post-traumatic stress disorder and/or depression, and poorer psychological adjustment over the 12-months. In contrast, the HV and LV sub-groups were similar in injury-related characteristics and post-injury physical (pain, fatigue, physical functioning) and participation outcomes. Findings provide preliminary evidence that pre-injury vulnerability, primarily prior mental health status, is a promising screen for early identification of people at risk of psychiatric morbidity post-RTC. It is suggested this screen could be implemented in ED to prevent chronicity and improve recovery following a traumatic injury. Further research is warranted to enhance the screen's effectiveness.

The role of stress reactivity and pre-injury psychosocial vulnerability to psychological and physical health immediately after traumatic injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic injuries can have long-term negative impacts on health, especially psychological health. A biopsychosocial approach is recommended to identify those likely to experience psychosocial stress, however large individual differences exist in stress reactivity and post-injury health that remain unexplored. Therefore, we investigated autonomic nervous system (ANS) stress responses and pre-existing psychosocial vulnerability as contributors to health in individuals who sustained a traffic-related injury.

METHODS

120 adults with traffic-related injury and 112 non-injury controls underwent an integrative ANS (cardiac and skin conductance) assessment and a health-related assessment at 3-6 weeks post-injury. Propensity score matching based on six pre-injury psychosocial vulnerability factors (age, sex, education, prior mental/physical health, socioeconomic status) guided the definition of high vulnerability (HV) and low vulnerability (LV) injury subgroups, with the LV subgroup having similar propensity scores to non-injury controls. A three-group comparative analysis of ANS responsivity (baseline, reactivity, recovery/rebound) and post-injury health was performed.

RESULTS

The HV subgroup exhibited the most negative immediate post-injury mental health profile and less adaptive ANS response patterns, indicating greater stress vulnerability/reactivity. Significant differences were found for psychological health (elevated psychological distress and catastrophizing), but not physical health (injury factors, pain, fatigue, physical wellbeing). HV participants showed sympathetic predominance at resting baseline (lower parasympathetic activity and/or elevated heart rate) compared to the LV and control groups, as well as smaller parasympathetic decrease during a cognitive task compared to controls. Despite preserved capacity for restoring initial homeostasis in both injury subgroups during recovery, there was some indication of blunted post-task sympathetic deactivation (larger sympathetic decrease) and reduced overall ANS adaptability (reduction in total power of heart rate variability spectrum), suggesting relative reduced capacity to face stressors compared to controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that baseline resting ANS regulation, particularly parasympathetic activity, and pre-injury psychosocial factors are key contributors to individual psycho-biological responses following traumatic injury, and are therefore potential stress vulnerability markers. Post-stress recovery patterns may represent a novel physiological signature for a "biological intrinsic" vulnerability early after the injury. These findings provide direction for improved early identification and management of injured individuals, including innovative preventive interventions that target ANS regulation.