1
|
Hahn EA, Pugh SL, Lu HL, Vela AM, Gillespie EF, Nichols EM, Wright JL, MacDonald SM, Cahlon O, Baas C, Braunstein LZ, Fang LC, Freedman GM, Jimenez RB, Kesslering CM, Mishra MV, Mutter RW, Ohri N, Rosen LR, Urbanic JJ, Jagsi R, Mitchell SA, Bekelman JE, Cella D. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer Receiving Comprehensive Nodal Irradiation in the RadComp Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:149-161. [PMID: 38739047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to evaluate the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used in the ongoing RadComp pragmatic randomized clinical trial (PRCT). METHODS AND MATERIALS The deidentified and blinded data set included 774 English-speaking female participants who completed their 6-month posttreatment assessment. Eleven PRO measures were evaluated, including the Trial Outcome Index from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B), Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes, the BREAST-Q, and selected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) measures. PROs were measured at 3 timepoints: baseline, completion of radiation therapy (RT), and 6 months post-RT. Ten variables were used as validity anchors. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated between PROs and convergent validity indicators. Mean PRO differences between clinically distinct categories were compared with analysis of variance methods (known-groups validity). PRO change scores were mapped to change in other variables (sensitivity to change). RESULTS Most correlations between PROs and validity indicators were large (≥0.5). Mean score for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes was higher (better) for those with a lumpectomy compared with those with a mastectomy (P < .001). Mean scores for the FACT-B Trial Outcome Index and for PROMIS Fatigue and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities were better for those with good baseline performance status compared with those with poorer baseline performance status (P < .05). At completion of RT and post-RT, mean scores for Satisfaction with Breast Cosmetic Outcomes and BREAST-Q Radiation were significantly different (P < .001) across categories for all Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy -Treatment Satisfaction - General items. There were medium-sized correlations between change scores for FACT-B Trial Outcome Index, Fatigue, Anxiety, and Ability to Participate in Social Roles and change scores in the Visual Analog Scale. CONCLUSIONS For patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer receiving radiation in the RadComp PRCT, our findings demonstrate high reliability and validity for important PRO measures, supporting their psychometric strength and usefulness to reflect the effect of RT on health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A Hahn
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Hien L Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Alyssa M Vela
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Elizabeth M Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jean L Wright
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Carole Baas
- Alamo Breast Cancer Foundation, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - L Christine Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pharmacology, Mayo Clinic Axis School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Willis-Knighton Health System, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - James J Urbanic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Reshma Jagsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sandra A Mitchell
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Justin E Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Belkacemi Y, Moran MS, Ozden BC, Masannat Y, Geara F, Albashir M, To NH, Debbi K, El Tamer M. Post-mastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: from historic dogmas to practical expert agreements based on a large literature review of surgical and radiation therapy considerations. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 200:104421. [PMID: 38876160 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2023] [Revised: 06/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Breast reconstruction (BR) after mastectomy is important to consider for a woman's body image enhancement and psychological well-being. Although post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) significantly improves the outcome of patients with high-risk breast cancer (BC), PMRT after BR may affect cosmetic outcomes and may compromise the original goal of improving quality of life (QoL). With the lack of practical guidelines, it seems essential to work on a consensus and provide some "expert agreements" to offer patients the best option for PMRT after BR. We report a global "expert agreement" that results from a critical review of the literature on BR and PMRT during the 6th international multidisciplinary breast conference in March 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazid Belkacemi
- AP-HP, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital. University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), INSERM U955, i-Biot, UPEC, Créteil, France.
| | - Meena S Moran
- Smilow Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine. Department of Therapeutic Radiology, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - Yazan Masannat
- Broomfield Hospital, Mid and South Essex NHS Trust, England, UK
| | - Fady Geara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
| | - Mohamed Albashir
- Levantine Medical Center, Ain Alkhaleej Hospital and Burjeel Royal Hospital, Alain, United Arab Emirates
| | - Nhu Hanh To
- AP-HP, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital. University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), INSERM U955, i-Biot, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Kamel Debbi
- AP-HP, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor University Hospital. University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), France; Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (IMRB), INSERM U955, i-Biot, UPEC, Créteil, France
| | - Mahmoud El Tamer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Medical College at Cornell University, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Loap P, Vu-Bezin J, De Marzi L, Kirova Y. Proton therapy reduces the effective dose to immune cells in breast cancer patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02263-1. [PMID: 39060636 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02263-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effective dose to circulating immune cells (EDIC) is associated with survival in lung and esophageal cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the benefit of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for EDIC reduction as compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (BC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Ten BC patients treated with locoregional VMAT after breast-conserving surgery were included. Mean dose to the heart (MHD), lungs (MLD), and liver (MlD), as well as the integral dose to the body (ITD), were retrieved, and we calculated EDIC as 0.12 × MLD + 0.08 × MHD + 0.15 × 0.85 × √(n/45) × MlD + (0.45 + 0.35 × 0.85 × √(n/45)) × ITD/(62 × 103), where n is the number of fractions. EDIC was compared between VMAT and IMPT plans. RESULTS Median EDIC was reduced from 3.37 Gy (range: 2.53-5.99) with VMAT to 2.13 Gy (1.31-3.77) with IMPT (p < 0.01). For left-sided BC patients, EDIC was reduced from 3.15 Gy (2.53-3.78) with VMAT to 1.65 Gy (1.31-3.77) with IMPT (p < 0.01). For right-sided BC patients, EDIC was reduced from 5.60 Gy (5.06-5.99) with VMAT to 3.38 Gy (3.10-3.77) with IMPT (p < 0.01). Right-sided BC patients had a higher EDIC irrespective of the technique. Integral dose reduction was the main driver of EDIC reduction with IMPT and was associated with lung sparing for left-sided BC patients or liver sparing for right-sided BC patients. CONCLUSION IMPT significantly reduced EDIC in BC patients undergoing locoregional adjuvant radiotherapy. Integral total dose reduction, associated with improved lung sparing in left-sided BC patients or liver sparing in right-sided BC patients, mainly drove EDIC reduction with IMPT. The emergence of dynamic models taking into account the circulatory kinetics of immune cells may improve the accuracy of the estimate of the dose received by the immune system compared to calculation of the EDIC, which is based solely on static dosimetric data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| | - Jeremi Vu-Bezin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
- Inserm U1288, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hartsell WF, Simone CB, Godes D, Maggiore J, Mehta MP, Frank SJ, Metz JM, Choi JI. Temporal Evolution and Diagnostic Diversification of Patients Receiving Proton Therapy in the United States: A Ten-Year Trend Analysis (2012 to 2021) From the National Association for Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1069-1077. [PMID: 38163519 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The National Association for Proton Therapy conducted 8 surveys of all operational United States proton centers (2012-2021) and analyzed the patients treated, diagnoses, and treatment complexity to evaluate trends and diversification of patients receiving proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS Detailed surveys were sent in 2015, which requested data from 2012 to 2014, and then annually thereafter to active proton centers in the United States. The numbers of patient treated at each center for the preceding calendar year(s) were collated for tumors in the following categories: central nervous system, intraocular, pituitary, skull base/skeleton, head/neck, lung, retroperitoneal/soft tissue sarcoma, pediatric (solid tumors in children of age ≤18), gastrointestinal tract, urinary tract, female pelvic, prostate, breast, and "other." Complexity levels were assessed using Current Procedural Terminology codes 77520-77525. RESULTS Survey response rates were excellent (100% in 2015 to 94.9% in 2021); additional publicly available information provided near-complete information on all centers. Trend comparisons between 2012 and 2021 showed that the total annual number of patients treated with protons gradually increased from 5377 to 15,829. The largest numeric increases were for head/neck (316 to 2303; 7.3-fold), breast (93 to 1452; 15.6-fold), and gastrointestinal tumors (170 to 1259; 7.4-fold). Patient numbers also increased significantly for central nervous system (598 to 1743; 2.9-fold), pediatric (685 to 1870; 2.7-fold), and skull base tumors (179 to 514; 2.9-fold). For prostate cancer, the percentage of proton-treated patients decreased from 43.4% to 25.0% of the total. Simple compensated treatments decreased from 43% in 2012 to 7% in 2021, whereas intermediate complexity treatments increased from 45% to 73%. CONCLUSIONS The number of patients treated with protons is gradually increasing, with a substantial proportionate decline in patients with prostate cancer receiving proton therapy. The number of patients treated for "commonly accepted" indications for protons (eg, pediatric, central nervous system, and skull base tumors) is gradually increasing. Greater proportional increases were observed for breast, lung, head/neck, and gastrointestinal tumors. Treatment complexity is gradually increasing over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Hartsell
- Ascension Alexian Brothers Medical Center, Elk Grove Village, Illinois; Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - James M Metz
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arbab M, Frame R, Alluri P, Parsons D, Lin MH, Cleaton J, Rahimi A. Master Breast Radiation Planning: Simple Guide for Radiation Oncology Residents. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101476. [PMID: 38690296 PMCID: PMC11059315 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
This article focuses on various aspects of breast radiation treatment planning, from simulation to field design. It covers the most common techniques including tangents, mono isocentric, dual isocentric, electron-photon match, and VMAT. This can serve as a guide for radiation oncology residents and medical students to advance their understanding of key aspects of breast radiation treatment and planning processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Arbab
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Romona Frame
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Prasanna Alluri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mu-Han Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jennifer Cleaton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Asal Rahimi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loap P, Vu Bezin J, De Marzi L, Kirova Y. Determinants of radiation dose to immune cells during breast radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2024:10.1007/s00066-024-02240-8. [PMID: 38801448 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02240-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The immune system has been identified as an organ at risk in esophageal and lung cancers. However, the dosimetric impact of radiotherapy on immune system exposure in patients treated for breast cancer has never been studied. METHODS A monocentric retrospective dosimetric study included 163 patients treated at the Institut Curie (Paris, France) between 2010 and 2016 with locoregional helical tomotherapy after conservative surgery or total mastectomy. The effective dose to the immune system (EDIC) was calculated based on diverse dosimetric parameters. The clinical and volumetric determinants of EDIC in adjuvant radiotherapy of breast cancer were analyzed. RESULTS The median EDIC for the population was 4.23 Gy, ranging from 1.82 to 6.19 Gy. Right-sided radiotherapy and regional lymph node irradiation were associated with significantly higher EDIC in univariate (4.38 Gy vs. 3.94 Gy, p < 0.01, and 4.27 Gy vs. 3.44 Gy, p < 0.01, respectively) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01). Liver overexposure was the main contributor to EDIC increase in right-sided breast cancer patients (+0.38 Gy [95%CI: +0.30; +0.46]), while the integral total dose increase was the main contributor to EDIC increase in cases of regional node irradiation (+0.63 Gy [95%CI: +0.42; +0.85]). CONCLUSION The EDIC score during adjuvant radiotherapy after breast cancer was statistically significantly higher in the case of right-sided radiotherapy and regional lymph node irradiation. Liver irradiation is the main contributor to immune system exposure in adjuvant irradiation of right-sided breast cancer. Populations in which an association between EDIC and survival would exist have yet to be identified but could potentially include patients treated for triple-negative breast cancer with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| | - Jeremi Vu Bezin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fatima H, Abbas P, Alshehri SM. Balancing Innovation and Patient Care in Breast Cancer: Integrating Hypofractionated Proton Therapy With Breast Reconstruction Outcomes. Cureus 2024; 16:e58056. [PMID: 38738134 PMCID: PMC11088419 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This review aims to assess the application of hypofractionated proton therapy in breast cancer reconstruction, analyzing its advantages, challenges, and broader implications for patient care. The goal is to comprehensively understand how this innovative approach can be integrated into breast cancer treatment. Proton therapy exhibits superior target coverage and safety, reducing radiation-induced complications and sparing critical organs, but skin toxicity outcomes differ from photon therapy. Tissue expanders are vital in breast reconstruction, employing innovative planning for positive long-term outcomes and highlighting the importance of balancing cancer treatment effectiveness with cosmetic outcomes. Hypofractionated proton therapy and breast cancer reconstruction present promising innovations with notable advantages in target coverage and organ sparing. However, variations in skin toxicity outcomes and the need for a careful balance between treatment effectiveness and cosmetic outcomes underscore ongoing challenges. Future directions should focus on refining treatment protocols, optimizing patient selection criteria, and integrating emerging technologies to enhance therapeutic outcomes while minimizing adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadia Fatima
- Radiation Oncology Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Paras Abbas
- Oncology Department, Atomic Energy Cancer Hospital, Nuclear Medicine Oncology and Radiotherapy Institute, Islamabad, PAK
| | - Salem M Alshehri
- Radiation Oncology Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, SAU
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bonaccorsi SG, Tessonnier T, Hoeltgen L, Meixner E, Harrabi S, Hörner-Rieber J, Haberer T, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Mairani A. Exploring Helium Ions' Potential for Post-Mastectomy Left-Sided Breast Cancer Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:410. [PMID: 38254899 PMCID: PMC10814201 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy presents a promising modality for treating left-sided breast cancer due to its unique dose distribution. Helium ions provide increased conformality thanks to a reduced lateral scattering. Consequently, the potential clinical benefit of both techniques was explored. An explorative treatment planning study involving ten patients, previously treated with VMAT (Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy) for 50 Gy in 25 fractions for locally advanced, node-positive breast cancer, was carried out using proton pencil beam therapy with a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 and helium therapy with a variable RBE described by the mMKM (modified microdosimetric kinetic model). Results indicated that target coverage was improved with particle therapy for both the clinical target volume and especially the internal mammary lymph nodes compared to VMAT. Median dose value analysis revealed that proton and helium plans provided lower dose on the left anterior descending artery (LAD), heart, lungs and right breast than VMAT. Notably, helium therapy exhibited improved ipsilateral lung sparing over protons. Employing NTCP models as available in the literature, helium therapy showed a lower probability of grade ≤ 2 radiation pneumonitis (22% for photons, 5% for protons and 2% for helium ions), while both proton and helium ions reduce the probability of major coronary events with respect to VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Line Hoeltgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dumane V, Ohri N, Choi JI, Chhabra A, Lin H. Editorial: Advances in treatment planning, optimization and delivery for radiotherapy of breast cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 13:1354731. [PMID: 38260841 PMCID: PMC10800783 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1354731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Vishruta Dumane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Jehee Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Arpit Chhabra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Haibo Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gao RW, Mullikin TC, Aziz KA, Afzal A, Smith NL, Routman DM, Gergelis KR, Harmsen WS, Remmes NB, Tseung HSWC, Shiraishi SS, Boughey JC, Ruddy KJ, Harless CA, Garda AE, Waddle MR, Park SS, Shumway DA, Corbin KS, Mutter RW. Postmastectomy Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy: 5-Year Oncologic and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:846-856. [PMID: 37244627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report oncologic, physician-assessed, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for a group of women homogeneously treated with modern, skin-sparing multifield optimized pencil-beam scanning proton (intensity modulated proton therapy [IMPT]) postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS We reviewed consecutive patients who received unilateral, curative-intent, conventionally fractionated IMPT PMRT between 2015 and 2019. Strict constraints were applied to limit the dose to the skin and other organs at risk. Five-year oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Patient-reported outcomes were evaluated as part of a prospective registry at baseline, completion of PMRT, and 3 and 12 months after PMRT. RESULTS A total of 127 patients were included. One hundred nine (86%) received chemotherapy, among whom 82 (65%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 4.1 years. Five-year locoregional control was 98.4% (95% CI, 93.6-99.6), and overall survival was 87.9% (95% CI, 78.7-96.5). Acute grade 2 and 3 dermatitis was seen in 45% and 4% of patients, respectively. Three patients (2%) experienced acute grade 3 infection, all of whom had breast reconstruction. Three late grade 3 adverse events occurred: morphea (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and seroma (n = 1). There were no cardiac or pulmonary adverse events. Among the 73 patients at risk for PMRT-associated reconstruction complications, 7 (10%) experienced reconstruction failure. Ninety-five patients (75%) enrolled in the prospective PRO registry. The only metrics to increase by >1 point were skin color (mean change: 5) and itchiness (2) at treatment completion and tightness/pulling/stretching (2) and skin color (2) at 12 months. There was no significant change in the following PROs: bleeding/leaking fluid, blistering, telangiectasia, lifting, arm extension, or bending/straightening the arm. CONCLUSIONS With strict dose constraints to skin and organs at risk, postmastectomy IMPT was associated with excellent oncologic outcomes and PROs. Rates of skin, chest wall, and reconstruction complications compared favorably to previous proton and photon series. Postmastectomy IMPT warrants further investigation in a multi-institutional setting with careful attention to planning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Khaled A Aziz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Arslan Afzal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Na L Smith
- Sanford Cancer Center, Sioux Falls, South Dakota
| | - David M Routman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Judy C Boughey
- Division of Breast and Melanoma Surgical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Allison E Garda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark R Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Dean A Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mutter RW, Giri S, Fruth BF, Remmes NB, Boughey JC, Harless CA, Ruddy KJ, McGee LA, Afzal A, Gao RW, Shumway DA, Vern-Gross TZ, Villarraga HR, Kenison SL, Kang Y, Wong WW, Stish BJ, Merrell KW, Yan ES, Park SS, Corbin KS, Vargas CE. Conventional versus hypofractionated postmastectomy proton radiotherapy in the USA (MC1631): a randomised phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:1083-1093. [PMID: 37696281 PMCID: PMC10591844 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00388-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton therapy is under investigation in breast cancer as a strategy to reduce radiation exposure to the heart and lungs. So far, studies investigating proton postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) have used conventional fractionation over 25-28 days, but whether hypofractionated proton PMRT is feasible is unclear. We aimed to compare conventional fractionation and hypofractionation in patients with indications for PMRT, including those with immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS We did a randomised phase 2 trial (MC1631) at Mayo Clinic in Rochester (MN, USA) and Mayo Clinic in Arizona (Phoenix, AZ, USA) comparing conventional fractionated (50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy [relative biological effectiveness of 1·1]) and hypofractionated (40·05 Gy in 15 fractions of 2·67 Gy [relative biological effectiveness of 1·1]) proton PMRT. All patients were treated with pencil-beam scanning. Eligibility criteria included age 18 years or older, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and breast cancer resected by mastectomy with or without immediate reconstruction with indications for PMRT. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either conventional fractionation or hypofractionation, with presence of immediate reconstruction (yes vs no) as a stratification factor, using a biased-coin minimisation algorithm. Any patient who received at least one fraction of protocol treatment was evaluable for the primary endpoint and safety analyses. The primary endpoint was 24-month complication rate from the date of first radiotherapy, defined as grade 3 or worse adverse events occurring from 90 days after last radiotherapy or unplanned surgical interventions in patients with immediate reconstruction. The inferiority of hypofractionation would not be ruled out if the upper bound of the one-sided 95% CI for the difference in 24-month complication rate between the two groups was greater than 10%. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02783690, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS Between June 2, 2016, and Aug 23, 2018, 88 patients were randomly assigned (44 to each group), of whom 82 received protocol treatment (41 in the conventional fractionation group and 41 in the hypofractionation group; median age of 52 years [IQR 44-64], 79 [96%] patients were White, two [2%] were Black or African American, one [1%] was Asian, and 79 [96%] were not of Hispanic ethnicity). As of data cutoff (Jan 30, 2023), the median follow-up was 39·3 months (IQR 37·5-61·2). The median mean heart dose was 0·54 Gy (IQR 0·30-0·72) for the conventional fractionation group and 0·49 Gy (0·25-0·64) for the hypofractionation group. Within 24 months of first radiotherapy, 14 protocol-defined complications occurred in six (15%) patients in the conventional fractionation group and in eight (20%) patients in the hypofractionation group (absolute difference 4·9% [one-sided 95% CI 18·5], p=0·27). The complications in the conventionally fractionated group were contracture (five [12%] of 41 patients]) and fat necrosis (one [2%] patient) requiring surgical intervention. All eight protocol-defined complications in the hypofractionation group were due to infections, three of which were acute infections that required surgical intervention, and five were late infections, four of which required surgical intervention. All 14 complications were in patients with immediate expander or implant-based reconstruction. INTERPRETATION After a median follow-up of 39·3 months, non-inferiority of the hypofractionation group could not be established. However, given similar tolerability, hypofractionated proton PMRT appears to be worthy of further study in patients with and without immediate reconstruction. FUNDING The Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, the Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA, and the US National Cancer Institute.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| | - Sharmila Giri
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Briant F Fruth
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Arslan Afzal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Robert W Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Dean A Shumway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Yixiu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - William W Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Bradley J Stish
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth S Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ruan H, Okamoto M, Ohno T, Li Y, Zhou Y. Particle radiotherapy for breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1107703. [PMID: 37655110 PMCID: PMC10467264 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1107703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant tumor in female patients. Along with surgery, radiotherapy is one of the most commonly prescribed treatments for breast cancer. Over the past few decades, breast cancer radiotherapy technology has significantly improved. Nevertheless, related posttherapy complications should not be overlooked. Common complications include dose-related coronary toxicity, radiation pneumonia, and the risk of second primary cancer of the contralateral breast. Particle radiotherapy with protons or carbon ions is widely attracting interest as a potential competitor to conventional photon radiotherapy because of its superior physical and biological characteristics. This article summarizes the results of clinical research on proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy for treating breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanguang Ruan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Masahiko Okamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Ohno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yuan Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gunma University, Maebashi, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, Gunma University, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yu A, White C, Zhang Z, Liu J, Gillespie E, McCormick B, Khan A, Steingart R, Powell S, Cahlon O, Braunstein L. Regional nodal irradiation for breast cancer using volumetric modulated arc therapy: Echocardiographic functional outcomes. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-2908730. [PMID: 37333127 PMCID: PMC10274959 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2908730/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for breast cancer yields improvements in disease outcomes, yet comprehensive target coverage often increases cardiac radiation (RT) dose. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) may mitigate high-dose cardiac exposure, although often increases the volume of low-dose exposure. The cardiac implications of this dosimetric configuration (in contrast to historic 3D conformal techniques) remains uncertain. Methods Eligible patients receiving adjuvant RNI using VMAT for locoregional breast cancer were prospectively enrolled on an IRB-approved study. Echocardiograms were performed prior to RT, at the conclusion of RT, and 6-months following RT. Echocardiographic parameters were measured by a single reader (AY) and measures were compared pre- and post-RT via the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Changes in echocardiographic parameters over time were compared to mean and max heart doses via the Spearman correlation test. Results Among 19 evaluable patients (median age 38), 89% (n=17) received doxorubicin and 37% (n=7) received trastuzumab/pertuzumab combination therapy. All patients received VMAT-based whole-breast/chest-wall and regional nodal irradiation. Average mean heart dose was 456cGy (range 187-697cGy) and average max heart dose was 3001cGy (1560-4793cGy). Among salient echocardiographic parameters, no significant decrement in cardiac function was observed when comparing pre-RT to 6-months post-RT: mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 61.8 (SD 4.4) pre-RT and 62.7 (SD 3.8) 6-months post-RT (p=0.493); mean global longitudinal strain (GLS) was -19.3 (SD 2.2) pre-RT and -19.6 (SD 1.8) 6-months post-RT (p=0.627). No individual patient exhibited reduced LVEF or sustained decrement in GLS. No correlations were observed for changes in LVEF or GLS when compared to mean or maximum heart doses (p>0.1 for all). Conclusions VMAT for left-sided RNI yielded no significant early decrement in echocardiographic parameters of cardiac function, including LVEF and GLS. No patient exhibited significant LVEF changes, and none exhibited sustained decrements in GLS. VMAT may be a reasonable approach to cardiac avoidance in patients requiring RNI, including those receiving anthracyclines and HER2-directed therapy. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up will be needed to validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Atif Khan
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Nangia S, Burela N, Noufal MP, Patro K, Wakde MG, Sharma DS. Proton therapy for reducing heart and cardiac substructure doses in Indian breast cancer patients. Radiat Oncol J 2023; 41:69-80. [PMID: 37403349 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Indians have a higher incidence of cardiovascular diseases, often at a younger age, than other ethnic groups. This higher baseline risk requires consideration when assessing additional cardiac morbidity of breast cancer treatment. Superior cardiac sparing is a critical dosimetric advantage of proton therapy in breast cancer radiotherapy. We report here the heart and cardiac-substructure doses and early toxicities in breast cancer patients treated post-operatively with proton therapy in India's first proton therapy center. MATERIALS AND METHODS We treated twenty breast cancer patients with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) from October 2019 to September 2022, eleven after breast conservation, nine following mastectomy, and appropriate systemic therapy, when indicated. The most prescribed dose was 40 GyE to the whole breast/chest wall and 48 GyE by simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor bed and 37.5 GyE to appropriate nodal volumes, delivered in 15 fractions. RESULTS Adequate coverage was achieved for clinical target volume (breast/chest wall), i.e., CTV40, and regional nodes, with 99% of the targets receiving 95% of the prescribed dose (V95% > 99%). The mean heart dose was 0.78 GyE and 0.87 GyE for all and left breast cancer patients, respectively. The mean left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose, LAD D0.02cc, and left ventricle dose were 2.76, 6.46, and 0.2 GyE, respectively. Mean ipsilateral lung dose, V20Gy, V5Gy, and contralateral breast dose (Dmean) were 6.87 GyE, 14.6%, 36.4%, and 0.38 GyE, respectively. CONCLUSION The dose to heart and cardiac substructures is lower with IMPT than published photon therapy data. Despite the limited access to proton therapy at present, given the higher cardiovascular risk and coronary artery disease prevalence in India, the cardiac sparing achieved using this technique merits consideration for wider adoption in breast cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sapna Nangia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Nagarjuna Burela
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - M P Noufal
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Kartikeswar Patro
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Manoj Gulabrao Wakde
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Dayanada S Sharma
- Department of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Loap P, Goudjil F, Servois V, Kirov K, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Radiation Exposure of Cardiac Conduction Nodes During Breast Proton Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2023; 10:59-64. [PMID: 37823017 PMCID: PMC10563662 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-22-00038.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The exposition of cardiac conduction system during breast radiation therapy has never been studied, despite the increasing use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy, which exposes larger volume to low-dose bath. We evaluated conduction node exposure during breast irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy and estimated the potential dosimetric benefit with intensity-modulated proton therapy. Materials and Methods Atrioventricular (AVN) and sinoatrial (SAN) nodes were retrospectively delineated according to published guidelines on the simulation computed tomography scans of 12 breast cancer patients having undergone conserving surgery and adjuvant locoregional volumetric modulated arc therapy. Intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment was replanned on the simulation computed tomography scans for all breast cancer patients. Mean and maximum doses delivered to the SAN and the AVN were retrieved and compared. Correlation coefficients were calculated between doses to the SAN or the AVN and the whole heart. Results Average mean doses delivered to the SAN and AVN were 2.8 and 2.3 Gy, respectively, for left-sided irradiation and 9.6 and 3.6 Gy, respectively, for right-sided irradiation. Average maximum doses to the SAN and AVN were 3.5 Gy and 2.8 Gy, respectively, for left-sided irradiation and 13.1 and 4.6 Gy, respectively, for right-sided irradiation. Intensity-modulated proton therapy significantly reduced mean and maximum doses to the SAN and AVN. Correlations between doses to the SAN or AVN and whole heart were usually significant. Conclusion SAN and AVN can be substantially exposed during breast volumetric modulated arc therapy, especially for right-sided irradiation. Cardiotoxicity studies evaluating conduction node exposure might define dose constraints and criteria for additional cardiac-sparing techniques, such as respiratory techniques or proton therapy, which could benefit patients with underlying rhythmic or conduction disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Krassen Kirov
- Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Alain Fourquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shen J, Gu P, Wang Y, Wang Z. Advances in automatic delineation of target volume and cardiac substructure in breast cancer radiotherapy (Review). Oncol Lett 2023; 25:110. [PMID: 36817059 PMCID: PMC9932716 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2023.13697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of patients with breast cancer. With the continuous development of radiotherapeutic technologies, the requirements for radiotherapeutic accuracy are increasingly high. The accuracy of target volume and organ at risk delineation significantly affects the effect of radiotherapy. Automatic delineation software has been continuously developed for the automatic delineation of target areas and organs at risk. Automatic segmentation based on an atlas and deep learning is a hot topic in current clinical research. Automatic delineation can not only reduce the workload and delineation times, but also establish a uniform delineation standard and reduce inter-observer and intra-observer differences. In patients with breast cancer, especially in patients who undergo left breast radiotherapy, the protection of the heart is particularly important. Treating the whole heart as an organ at risk cannot meet the clinical needs, and it is necessary to limit the dose to specific cardiac substructures. The present review discusses the importance of automatic delineation of target volume and cardiac substructure in radiotherapy for patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Shen
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Peihua Gu
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Yun Wang
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China
| | - Zhongming Wang
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China,Correspondence to: Dr Zhongming Wang, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Shidong Hospital Affiliated to University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 999 Shiguang Road, Shanghai 200438, P.R. China, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Madias JE. Right versus left breast radiation and coronary artery disease: is there a differential? Acta Cardiol 2023; 78:5-12. [PMID: 36378524 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2141431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
There is literature supporting the view that chest radiation (CR) for the management of primary or metastatic cancer of the mediastinum and chest, including breast cancer is associated with all types of heart disease, including coronary artery disease (CAD), manifesting during long-term follow-up. This review explores the literature about the association of CR for the management of cancer and CAD, particularly focussing on breast cancer, and further on the differential between CR for right versus left breast cancer. The balk of the literature suggests that there is higher incidence of CAD in patients undergoing left versus right-CR for breast cancer, and that cardiologists and oncologists need to become involved systematically in their assessment prior to CR and at subsequent follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Madias
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.,Division of Cardiology, Elmhurst Hospital Center, Elmhurst, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sayan M, Hathout L, Kilic SS, Jan I, Gilles A, Hassell N, Kowzun M, George M, Potdevin L, Kumar S, Sinkin J, Agag R, Haffty BG, Ohri N. Reconstructive complications and early toxicity in breast cancer patients treated with proton-based postmastectomy radiation therapy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1067500. [PMID: 36741008 PMCID: PMC9895832 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1067500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) decreases the risk of locoregional recurrence and increases overall survival rates in patients with high-risk node positive breast cancer. While the number of breast cancer patients treated with proton-based PMRT has increased in recent years, there is limited data on the use of proton therapy in the postmastectomy with reconstruction setting. In this study, we compared acute toxicities and reconstructive complications in patients treated with proton-based and photon-based PMRT. Methods A retrospective review of our institutional database was performed to identify breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy with implant or autologous reconstruction followed by PMRT from 2015 to 2020. Baseline clinical, disease, and treatment related factors were compared between the photon-based and proton-based PMRT groups. Early toxicity outcomes and reconstructive complications following PMRT were graded by the treating physician. Results A total of 11 patients treated with proton-based PMRT and 26 patients treated with photon-based PMRT were included with a median follow-up of 7.4 months (range, 0.7-33 months). Six patients (55%) in the proton group had a history of breast cancer (3 ipsilateral and 3 contralateral) and received previous RT 38 months ago (median, range 7-85). There was no significant difference in mean PMRT (p = 0.064) and boost dose (p = 0.608) between the two groups. Grade 2 skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity in both groups (55% and 73% in the proton and photon group, respectively) (p = 0.077). Three patients (27%) in the proton group developed grade 3 skin toxicity. No Grade 4 acute toxicity was reported in either group. Reconstructive complications occurred in 4 patients (36%) in the proton group and 8 patients (31%) in photon group (p = 0.946). Conclusions Acute skin toxicity remains the most frequent adverse event in both proton- and photon-based PMRT. In our study, reconstructive complications were not significantly higher in patients treated with proton- versus photon-based PMRT. Longer follow-up is warranted to assess late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mutlay Sayan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States,Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States,*Correspondence: Mutlay Sayan,
| | - Lara Hathout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Sarah S. Kilic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Imraan Jan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Ambroise Gilles
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Natalie Hassell
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Maria Kowzun
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Mridula George
- Departments of Medicine, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Lindsay Potdevin
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Shicha Kumar
- Departments of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Jeremy Sinkin
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Richard Agag
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Departments of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Bruce G. Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| | - Nisha Ohri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gupta R, Lin M, Freedman GM, Sundlof DW, Fadlon CS. Proton beam therapy causing pericarditis – a rare case of radiation induced cardiotoxicity. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY 2022; 8:9. [PMID: 35436973 PMCID: PMC9014645 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-022-00135-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
AbstractAcute pericarditis is caused by the inflammation of the pericardium which can result in an effusion around the heart. Proton beam therapy causing radiation-induced pericarditis is not a well-known cause of pericarditis. We present a case of a patient with Li-Fraumeni Syndrome who developed acute onset pericarditis, presumed to be secondary to proton beam therapy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bazan JG, Khan AJ. Target Volume Delineation and Patterns of Recurrence in the Modern Era. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:254-269. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
21
|
Lin H, Dong L, Jimenez RB. Emerging Technologies in Mitigating the Risks of Cardiac Toxicity From Breast Radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2022; 32:270-281. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2022.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
22
|
Upshaw JN, Mohanty S, Rastogi A. Cardioprotection of High-Risk Individuals. Heart Fail Clin 2022; 18:385-402. [PMID: 35718414 PMCID: PMC10984350 DOI: 10.1016/j.hfc.2022.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Targeting cardioprotective strategies to patients at the highest risk for cardiac events can help maximize therapeutic benefits. Dexrazoxane, liposomal formulations, continuous infusions, and neurohormonal antagonists may be useful for cardioprotection for anthracycline-treated patients at the highest risk for heart failure. Prevalent cardiovascular disease is a risk factor for cardiac events with many cancer therapies, including anthracyclines, anti-human-epidermal growth factor receptor-2 therapy, radiation, and BCR-Abl tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and may be a risk factor for cardiac events with other therapies. Although evidence for cardioprotective strategies is sparse for nonanthracycline therapies, optimizing cardiac risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular disease may improve outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenica N Upshaw
- Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | - Sharanya Mohanty
- Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| | - Akash Rastogi
- Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, 800 Washington St, Boston, MA 02111, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Post-Mastectomy Radiation Therapy: Applications and Advancements. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00449-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
24
|
Liu C, Bradley JA, Zheng D, Vega RBM, Beltran CJ, Mendenhall N, Liang X. RBE-weighted dose and its impact on the risk of acute coronary event for breast cancer patients treated with intensity modulated proton therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13527. [PMID: 35060317 PMCID: PMC8992952 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the relative biological effectiveness (RBE)-weighted dose to the heart and to estimate RBE uncertainties when assuming a constant RBE of 1.1, for breast cancer patients receiving intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Further, to study the impact of RBE uncertainties on the risk of an acute coronary event (ACE). MATERIAL AND METHODS We analyzed 20 patients who received IMPT to either the left breast (n = 10) or left chest wall (n = 10) and regional lymph nodes. The Monte Carlo simulation engine, MCsquare, was used to simulate the dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) map. The RBE-weighted dose to the heart and its substructures was calculated using three different RBE models. The risk of ACE was estimated per its linear relationship with mean heart dose (MHD) as established by Darby et al. RESULTS The median MHD increased from 1.33 GyRBE assuming an RBE of 1.1 to 1.64, 1.87, and 1.99 GyRBE when using the RBE-weighted dose models. The median values (and ranges) of the excess absolute risk of ACE were 0.4% (0.1%-0.8%) when assuming an RBE of 1.1, and 0.6% (0.2%-1.0%), 0.6% (0.2%-1.1%), and 0.7% (0.2%-1.1%) with the RBE-weighted models. For our patient cohort, the maximum excess absolute risk of ACE increased by 0.3% with the RBE-weighted doses compared to the constant RBE of 1.1, reaching an excess absolute ACE risk of 1.1%. The interpatient LETd variation was small for the relevant high-dose regions of the heart. CONCLUSION All three RBE models predicted a higher biological dose compared to the clinical standard dose assuming a constant RBE of 1.1. An underestimation of the biological dose results in underestimation of the ACE risk. Analyzing the voxel-by-voxel biological dose and the LET map alongside clinical outcomes is warranted in the development of a more accurate normal-tissue complication probability model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunbo Liu
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy InstituteJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Julie A. Bradley
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Dandan Zheng
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Nebraska Medical CenterOmahaNebraskaUSA
| | - Raymond B. Mailhot Vega
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Chris J. Beltran
- Mayo ClinicDepartment of Radiation OncologyJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Nancy Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Florida College of MedicineJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Mayo ClinicDepartment of Radiation OncologyJacksonvilleFloridaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
The Role of Cardioprotection in Cancer Therapy Cardiotoxicity: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol 2022; 4:19-37. [PMID: 35492815 PMCID: PMC9040117 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.01.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiotoxicity is a relatively frequent and potentially serious side effect of traditional and targeted cancer therapies. Both general measures and specific pharmacologic cardioprotective interventions as well as imaging- and biomarker-based surveillance strategies to identify patients at high risk have been tested in randomized controlled trials to prevent or attenuate cancer therapy-related cardiotoxic effects. Although meta-analyses including early trials suggest an overall beneficial effect, there is substantial heterogeneity in results. Recent randomized controlled trials of neurohormonal inhibitors in patients receiving anthracyclines and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-targeted therapies have shown a lower rate of cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction than previously reported and a modest or no sustained effect of the interventions. Data on preventive cardioprotective strategies for novel cancer drugs are lacking. Larger, prospective multicenter randomized clinical trials testing traditional and novel interventions are required to more accurately define the benefit of different cardioprotective strategies and to refine risk prediction and identify patients who are likely to benefit.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme
- ADT, androgen deprivation therapy
- ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker
- CMR, cardiovascular magnetic resonance
- CTRCD, cancer therapy–related cardiac dysfunction
- GLS, global longitudinal strain
- GnRH, gonadotropin-releasing hormone
- HER2 therapy
- HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
- LV, left ventricular
- LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction
- MRA, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist
- RR, risk ratio
- anthracycline
- cardiomyopathy
- prevention
Collapse
|
26
|
Demystifying radiation oncology clinical trial concerns for protocol scientific review and institutional review board committee members. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 27:100911. [PMID: 35345873 PMCID: PMC8956792 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials are essential for evaluating advanced technologies and treatment approaches involving radiation therapy to improve outcomes for cancer patients. Clinical trials at cancer centers with designation from the National Cancer Institute must undergo scientific review in additional to Institutional Review Board approval. Given the highly specialized nature and rapidly advancing technologies of radiation therapy, and the small number of radiation oncology investigators at some centers, a lack of radiation oncology expertise among reviewers may present challenges at some cancer centers. This commentary aims to provide an overview of radiation therapy and special considerations for radiation oncology research that will serve as a helpful resource in the scientific review of clinical trials involving cancer patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Fuglsang Jensen M, Stick LB, Høyer M, Kronborg CJS, Lorenzen EL, Mortensen HR, Nyström PW, Petersen SE, Randers P, Thai LMH, Yates ES, Offersen BV. Proton therapy for early breast cancer patients in the DBCG proton trial: planning, adaptation, and clinical experience from the first 43 patients. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:223-230. [PMID: 34632922 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1986229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Danish Breast Cancer Group (DBCG) Proton Trial randomizes breast cancer patients selected on high mean heart dose (MHD) or high lung dose (V20Gy/V17Gy) in the photon plan between photon and proton therapy. This study presents the proton plans and adaptation strategy for the first 43 breast cancer patients treated with protons in Denmark. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-four proton plans (one patient with bilateral cancer) were included; 2 local and 42 loco-regional including internal mammary nodes (IMN). Nineteen patients had a mastectomy and 25 a lumpectomy. The prescribed dose was either 50 Gy in 25 fractions (n = 30) or 40 Gy in 15 fractions (n = 14) wherefrom five received simultaneous integrated boost to the tumor bed. Using 2-3 en face proton fields, single-field optimization, robust optimization and a 5 cm range shifter ensured robustness towards breathing motion, setup- and range uncertainties. An anatomical evaluation was performed by evaluating the dose after adding/removing 3 mm and 5 mm tissue to/from the body-outline and used to define treatment tolerances for anatomical changes. RESULTS The nominal and robust criteria were met for all patients except two. The median MHD was 1.5 Gy (0.5-3.4 Gy, 50 Gy) and 1.1 Gy (0.0-1.5 Gy, 40 Gy). The anatomical evaluations showed how 5 mm shrinkage approximately doubled the MHD while 5 mm swelling reduced target coverage of the IMN below constraints. Ensuring 3-5 mm robustness toward swelling was prioritized but not always achieved by robust optimization alone emphasizing the need for a distal margin. Twenty-eight patients received plan adaptation, eight patients received two, and one received five. CONCLUSION This proton planning strategy ensured robust treatment plans within a pre-defined level of acceptable anatomical changes that fulfilled the planning criteria for most of the patients and ensured low MHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Morten Høyer
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Petra Witt Nyström
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Pia Randers
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Linh My Hoang Thai
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Boersma L, Sattler M, Maduro J, Bijker N, Essers M, van Gestel C, Klaver Y, Petoukhova A, Rodrigues M, Russell N, van der Schaaf A, Verhoeven K, van Vulpen M, Schuit E, Langendijk J. Model-Based Selection for Proton Therapy in Breast Cancer: Development of the National Indication Protocol for Proton Therapy and First Clinical Experiences. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2022; 34:247-257. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
29
|
Chang JS, Chang JH, Kim N, Kim YB, Shin KH, Kim K. Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer: An Updated Review. J Breast Cancer 2022; 25:349-365. [DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e37] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Hyun Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hwan Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Loap P, De Marzi L, Almeida CE, Barcellini A, Bradley J, de Santis MC, Dendale R, Jimenez R, Orlandi E, Kirova Y. Hadrontherapy techniques for breast cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 169:103574. [PMID: 34958916 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays a key role in breast cancer treatment, and recent technical advances have been made to improve the therapeutic window by limiting the risk of radiation-induced toxicity or by increasing tumor control. Hadrontherapy is a form a radiotherapy relying on particle beams; compared with photon beams, particle beams have specific physical, radiobiological and immunological properties, which can be valuable in diverse clinical situations. To date, available hadrontherapy techniques for breast cancer irradiation include proton therapy, carbon ion radiation therapy, fast neutron therapy and boron neutron capture therapy. This review analyzes the current rationale and level of evidence for each hadrontherapy technique for breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France.
| | | | - Carlos Eduardo Almeida
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Julie Bradley
- University of Florida Health Proton Therapy Institute, Jacksonville, FL, United States
| | | | - Remi Dendale
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Ester Orlandi
- National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Pavia, Italy
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Proton Therapy Center, Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zamora PL, Baran G, Nagle C, Hammoud A, Dominello M. Tangential Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 12:e339-e343. [PMID: 34902636 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular toxicity from breast radiotherapy is a concern to patients and providers. Here we present a cardiac-sparing strategy utilizing tangential VMAT (tVMAT) in comparison to standard 3DCRT. Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant RT covering breast, axillary, and supraclavicular nodal regions were selected for the study. For each patient two plans were created: 1) a dual-isocenter three-field 3DCRT plan and 2) a monoisocentric tVMAT plan. The prescription for both techniques was 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the breast and nodal target volumes. Compared to 3DCRT, tVMAT provided more uniform coverage to breast and regional lymph nodes (mean conformity index was 1.42 for tVMAT versus 2.42 for 3DCRT, p<0.01) and the max point dose for tVMAT was lower on average (112.8% for tVMAT versus 121.5% for 3DCRT, p<0.001). Coverage to lymph nodes was superior for tVMAT (average minimum-coverage to 95% of entire nodal target volumes was 99.5% of the prescribed dose for tVMAT versus 94.9% for 3DCRT, p <0.001). OAR sparing was improved with tVMAT, with a lower average V20Gy for the left lung (15.0% for tVMAT versus 24.6% for 3DCRT, p<0.01), and lower mean heart dose (156 cGy for tVMAT versus 200 cGy for 3DCRT, p<0.01). In conclusion, tangential VMAT is a promising technique for the treatment of intact breast and regional lymphatics and may improve target coverage and OAR avoidance compared to 3D conformal techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro L Zamora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI.
| | - Geoffrey Baran
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Christopher Nagle
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Ahmad Hammoud
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Michael Dominello
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Zhu M, Langen K, Nichols EM, Lin Y, Flampouri S, Godette KD, Dutta SW, McDonald MW, Patel SA. Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Treatment Planning for Postmastectomy Patients with Metallic Port Tissue Expanders. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 7:100825. [PMID: 34805622 PMCID: PMC8590033 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Proton beam therapy can significantly reduce cardiopulmonary radiation exposure compared with photon-based techniques in the postmastectomy setting for locally advanced breast cancer. For patients with metallic port tissue expanders, which are commonly placed in patients undergoing a staged breast reconstruction, dose uncertainties introduced by the high-density material pose challenges for proton therapy. In this report, we describe an intensity modulated proton therapy planning technique for port avoidance through a hybrid single-field optimization/multifield optimization approach. Methods and Materials In this planning technique, 3 beams are utilized. For each beam, no proton spot is placed within or distal to the metal port plus a 5 mm margin. Therefore, precise modeling of the metal port is not required, and various tissue expander manufacturers/models are eligible. The blocked area of 1 beam is dosimetrically covered by 1 or 2 of the remaining beams. Multifield optimization is used in the chest wall target region with blockage of any beam, while single-field optimization is used for remainder of chest wall superior/inferior to the port. Results Using this technique, clinical plans were created for 6 patients. Satisfactory plans were achieved in the 5 patients with port-to-posterior chest wall separations of 1.5 cm or greater, but not in the sixth patient with a 0.7 cm separation. Conclusions We described a planning technique and the results suggest that the metallic port-to-chest wall distance may be a key parameter for optimal plan design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyao Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katja Langen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Elizabeth M Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Maryland University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Karen D Godette
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sunil W Dutta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark W McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sagar A Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mutter RW, Choi JI, Jimenez RB, Kirova YM, Fagundes M, Haffty BG, Amos RA, Bradley JA, Chen PY, Ding X, Carr AM, Taylor LM, Pankuch M, Vega RBM, Ho AY, Nyström PW, McGee LA, Urbanic JJ, Cahlon O, Maduro JH, MacDonald SM. Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Breast Cancer Subcommittee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:337-359. [PMID: 34048815 PMCID: PMC8416711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Recent years have seen improvements in breast cancer survival and a greater appreciation of potential long-term morbidity associated with the dose and volume of irradiated organs. Proton therapy reduces the dose to nontarget structures while optimizing target coverage. However, there remain additional financial costs associated with proton therapy, despite reductions over time, and studies have yet to demonstrate that protons improve upon the treatment outcomes achieved with photon radiation therapy. There remains considerable heterogeneity in proton patient selection and techniques, and the rapid technological advances in the field have the potential to affect evidence evaluation, given the long latency period for breast cancer radiation therapy recurrence and late effects. In this consensus statement, we assess the data available to the radiation oncology community of proton therapy for breast cancer, provide expert consensus recommendations on indications and technique, and highlight ongoing trials' cost-effectiveness analyses and key areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Marcio Fagundes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Richard A Amos
- Proton and Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Peter Y Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Antoinette M Carr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Leslie M Taylor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | | | - Alice Y Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Petra Witt Nyström
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden and the Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - James J Urbanic
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, Encinitas, California
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jung JW, Mille MM, Ky B, Kenworthy W, Lee C, Yeom YS, Kwag A, Bosch W, MacDonald S, Cahlon O, Bekelman JE, Lee C. Application of an automatic segmentation method for evaluating cardiac structure doses received by breast radiotherapy patients. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2021; 19:138-144. [PMID: 34485719 PMCID: PMC8397890 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Atlas-based method for contouring heart substructures on breast radiotherapy CT. Excellent agreement between automatic and manual contours for most patients. Dice similarity coefficient for LAD was low (0.06) because a narrow, long structure. Doses derived from automatic and manual contours agree within observer variability. For left breast treatment, right ventricle and LAD dose most senstive to contour shift.
Background and purpose Quantifying radiation dose to cardiac substructures is important for research on the etiology and prevention of complications following radiotherapy; however, segmentation of substructures is challenging. In this study we demonstrate the application of our atlas-based automatic segmentation method to breast cancer radiotherapy plans for generating radiation doses in support of late effects research. Material and methods We applied our segmentation method to contour heart substructures on the computed tomography (CT) images of 70 breast cancer patients who received external photon radiotherapy. Two cardiologists provided manual segmentation of the whole heart (WH), left/right atria, left/right ventricles, and left anterior descending artery (LAD). The automatically contours were compared with manual delineations to evaluate similarity in terms of geometry and dose. Results The mean Dice similarity coefficient between manual and automatic segmentations was 0.96 for the WH, 0.65 to 0.82 for the atria and ventricles, and 0.06 for the LAD. The mean average surface distance was 1.2 mm for the WH, 3.4 to 4.1 mm for the atria and ventricles, and 6.4 mm for the LAD. We found the dose to the cardiac substructures based on our automatic segmentation agrees with manual segmentation within expected observer variability. For left breast patients, the mean absolute difference in mean dose was 0.1 Gy for the WH, 0.2 to 0.7 Gy for the atria and ventricles, and 1.8 Gy for the LAD. For right breast patients, these values were 0.0 Gy, 0.1 to 0.4 Gy, and 0.4 Gy, respectively. Conclusion Our automatic segmentation method will facilitate the development of radiotherapy prescriptive criteria for mitigating cardiovascular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Won Jung
- Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, United States
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States
| | - Bonnie Ky
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Walter Kenworthy
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Choonik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | - Yeon Soo Yeom
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States
| | - Aaron Kwag
- Department of Neuroscience, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, United States
| | - Walter Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130, United States
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Justin E. Bekelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States
- Corresponding author at: Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Harris EER. Breast Radiation and the Heart: Cardiac Toxicity and Cardiac Avoidance. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 21:492-496. [PMID: 34474986 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this invited review is to discuss the most recent and relevant outcome studies assessing the risk of late cardiac toxicity in women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer and to describe the evidence-based technical factors associated with late cardiac toxicity. This review will also discuss the common radiation techniques for reducing radiation dose to the heart, which will lead to better outcomes and lower rates of late toxicity that can cause morbidity and mortality in women who have been cured of their breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor E R Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seidman Cancer Center University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University Medical School, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kaidar-Person O, Offersen BV, Boersma L, Meattini I, Dodwell D, Wyld L, Aznar M, Major T, Kuehn T, Strnad V, Palmu M, Hol S, Poortmans P. Tricks and tips for target volume definition and delineation in breast cancer: Lessons learned from ESTRO breast courses. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:185-194. [PMID: 34302915 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Revised: 07/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Delineation of target and 'organ at risk' volumes is a critical part of modern radiation therapy planning, the next essential step after deciding the indication, patient discussion and image acquisition. Adoption of volume-based treatment planning for non-metastatic breast cancer has increased greatly along with the use of improved planning techniques, essential for modern therapy. However, identifying the volumes on a planning CT is no easy task. The current paper is written by ESTRO's breast course faculty, providing tricks and tips for target volume definition and delineation for optimal postoperative breast cancer irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Orit Kaidar-Person
- Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
| | - Birgitte V Offersen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Liesbeth Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, The Netherlands
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence & Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - David Dodwell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Lynda Wyld
- Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Marianne Aznar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Tibor Major
- Center of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary & Department of Oncology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Thorsten Kuehn
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Klinikum Esslingen, Germany
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Miika Palmu
- European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology, UK
| | - Sandra Hol
- Instituut Verbeeten, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sharma A, Tarbox L, Kurc T, Bona J, Smith K, Kathiravelu P, Bremer E, Saltz JH, Prior F. PRISM: A Platform for Imaging in Precision Medicine. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2021; 4:491-499. [PMID: 32479186 PMCID: PMC7328100 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Precision medicine requires an understanding of individual variability, which can only be acquired from large data collections such as those supported by the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). We have undertaken a program to extend the types of data TCIA can support. This, in turn, will enable TCIA to play a key role in precision medicine research by collecting and disseminating high-quality, state-of-the-art, quantitative imaging data that meet the evolving needs of the cancer research community. METHODS A modular technology platform is presented that would allow existing data resources, such as TCIA, to evolve into a comprehensive data resource that meets the needs of users engaged in translational research for imaging-based precision medicine. This Platform for Imaging in Precision Medicine (PRISM) helps streamline the deployment and improve TCIA's efficiency and sustainability. More importantly, its inherent modular architecture facilitates a piecemeal adoption by other data repositories. RESULTS PRISM includes services for managing radiology and pathology images and features and associated clinical data. A semantic layer is being built to help users explore diverse collections and pool data sets to create specialized cohorts. PRISM includes tools for image curation and de-identification. It includes image visualization and feature exploration tools. The entire platform is distributed as a series of containerized microservices with representational state transfer interfaces. CONCLUSION PRISM is helping modernize, scale, and sustain the technology stack that powers TCIA. Repositories can take advantage of individual PRISM services such as de-identification and quality control. PRISM is helping scale image informatics for cancer research at a time when the size, complexity, and demands to integrate image data with other precision medicine data-intensive commons are mounting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lawrence Tarbox
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | | | - Jonathan Bona
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | - Kirk Smith
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| | | | | | | | - Fred Prior
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Dhir AA, Sawant SP. Cardiac morbidity & mortality in patients with breast cancer: A review. Indian J Med Res 2021; 154:199-209. [PMID: 35295010 PMCID: PMC9131763 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_879_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and breast cancer cause substantial morbidity and mortality in women and are major public health concerns. Breast cancer survivors are at a greater risk for CVD-related mortality compared to women without breast cancer. Breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases share a number of common risk factors. Breast cancer treatments like anthracycline based chemotherapy, novel targeted therapy and radiation therapy can cause cardiotoxicity. With improvements in breast cancer prevention and treatment, there is a significant improvement in survival and this shifts focus from disease control to long term effects of treatment and quality of life. Assessing CVD and minimizing complications from cancer therapy are important treatment goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aruna Alahari Dhir
- Department of Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Sheela Prashant Sawant
- Department of Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India,For correspondence: Dr Sheela Prashant Sawant, Department of Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, Maharashtra, India e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Prasanna PG, Rawojc K, Guha C, Buchsbaum JC, Miszczyk JU, Coleman CN. Normal Tissue Injury Induced by Photon and Proton Therapies: Gaps and Opportunities. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 110:1325-1340. [PMID: 33640423 PMCID: PMC8496269 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite technological advances in radiation therapy (RT) and cancer treatment, patients still experience adverse effects. Proton therapy (PT) has emerged as a valuable RT modality that can improve treatment outcomes. Normal tissue injury is an important determinant of the outcome; therefore, for this review, we analyzed 2 databases: (1) clinical trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and (2) the literature on PT in PubMed, which shows a steady increase in the number of publications. Most studies in PT registered with ClinicalTrials.gov with results available are nonrandomized early phase studies with a relatively small number of patients enrolled. From the larger database of nonrandomized trials, we listed adverse events in specific organs/sites among patients with cancer who are treated with photons and protons to identify critical issues. The present data demonstrate dosimetric advantages of PT with favorable toxicity profiles and form the basis for comparative randomized prospective trials. A comparative analysis of 3 recently completed randomized trials for normal tissue toxicities suggests that for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, no meaningful comparison could be made between stereotactic body RT and stereotactic body PT due to low accrual (NCT01511081). In addition, for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, a comparison of intensity modulated RTwith passive scattering PT (now largely replaced by spot-scanned intensity modulated PT), PT did not provide any benefit in normal tissue toxicity or locoregional failure over photon therapy. Finally, for locally advanced esophageal cancer, proton beam therapy provided a lower total toxicity burden but did not improve progression-free survival and quality of life (NCT01512589). The purpose of this review is to inform the limitations of current trials looking at protons and photons, considering that advances in technology, physics, and biology are a continuum, and to advocate for future trials geared toward accurate precision RT that need to be viewed as an iterative process in a defined path toward delivering optimal radiation treatment. A foundational understanding of the radiobiologic differences between protons and photons in tumor and normal tissue responses is fundamental to, and necessary for, determining the suitability of a given type of biologically optimized RT to a patient or cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pataje G Prasanna
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Kamila Rawojc
- The University Hospital in Krakow, Department of Endocrinology, Nuclear Medicine Unit, Krakow, Poland
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Justyna U Miszczyk
- Department of Experimental Physics of Complex Systems, Institute of Nuclear Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow, Poland
| | - C Norman Coleman
- Radiation Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Loap P, Tkatchenko N, Goudjil F, Ribeiro M, Baron B, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Cardiac substructure exposure in breast radiotherapy: a comparison between intensity modulated proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy. Acta Oncol 2021; 60:1038-1044. [PMID: 33788665 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2021.1907860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proton therapy for breast cancer treatment reduces cardiac radiation exposure. Left-sided breast cancer patients with indication for internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation are most at risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity. This study aims to evaluate in this situation the potential dosimetric benefit of intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) over volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) at the cardiac substructure level. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cardiac substructures were retrospectively delineated according to ESTRO guidelines on the simulation CT scans of fourteen left-sided breast cancer patients having undergone conserving surgery and adjuvant locoregional free-breathing (FB-) or deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH-) VMAT with internal mammary chain irradiation. IMPT treatment was re-planned on the simulation CT scans. Mean doses to cardiac substructures were retrieved and compared between VMAT treatment plans and IMPT simulation plans. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between mean doses delivered to cardiac substructures using these two techniques. RESULTS Mean doses to all cardiac substructures were significantly lower with IMPT than with VMAT. Regardless of the irradiation technique, the most exposed cardiac substructure was the mid segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LADCA). Pearson correlation coefficients between mean doses to cardiac substructures were usually weak and statistically non-significant for IMPT; mean heart dose (MHD) only correlated with mean doses delivered to the right ventricle, to the mid segment of the right coronary artery (RCA) and, to a lesser extent, to the LADCA. CONCLUSION The dosimetric benefit of IMPT over conformal photon therapy was consistently observed for all cardiac substructures. MHD may not be a reliable dosimetric parameter for precise cardiac exposure evaluation when planning IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| | | | - Farid Goudjil
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Madison Ribeiro
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Brian Baron
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Alain Fourquet
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Institut Curie, Department of Radiation Oncology, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Current Situation of Proton Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: From Expectations to Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13153746. [PMID: 34359647 PMCID: PMC8345146 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13153746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Consolidative radiation therapy (RT) is of prime importance for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) management since it significantly increases progression-free survival (PFS). Nevertheless, first-generation techniques, relying on large irradiation fields, delivered significant radiation doses to critical organs-at-risk (OARs, such as the heart, to the lung or the breasts) when treating mediastinal HL; consequently, secondary cancers, and cardiac and lung toxicity were substantially increased. Fortunately, HL RT has drastically evolved and, nowadays, state-of-the-art RT techniques efficiently spare critical organs-at-risks without altering local control or overall survival. Recently, proton therapy has been evaluated for mediastinal HL treatment, due to its possibility to significantly reduce integral dose to OARs, which is expected to limit second neoplasm risk and reduce late toxicity. Nevertheless, clinical experience for this recent technique is still limited worldwide. Based on current literature, this critical review aims to examine the current practice of proton therapy for mediastinal HL irradiation.
Collapse
|
42
|
DeCesaris CM, Mossahebi S, Jatczak J, Rao AD, Zhu M, Mishra MV, Nichols E. Outcomes of and treatment planning considerations for a hybrid technique delivering proton pencil-beam scanning radiation to women with metal-containing tissue expanders undergoing post-mastectomy radiation. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:289-298. [PMID: 34280402 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Following mastectomy, immediate breast reconstruction often involves the use of temporary tissue expanders (TEs). TEs contain metallic ports (MPs), which complicate proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) planning. A technique was implemented for delivering PBS post-mastectomy radiation (PMRT) to patients with TEs and MPs. METHODS A protocol utilizing a hybrid single- and multi-field optimization (SFO, MFO) technique was developed. Plans were robustly optimized using a Monte Carlo algorithm. A CTV_eval structure including chest wall (CW) and regional nodal (RNI) targets and excluding the TE was evaluated. Organ at risk (OAR) dosimetry and acute toxicities were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-nine women were treated with this technique. A 2-field SFO technique was used superior and inferior to the MP, with a 3 or 4-field MFO technique used at the level of the MP. Virtual blocks were utilized so that beams did not travel through the MP. A port-to-CW distance of 1 cm was required. Patients underwent daily image-guidance to ensure the port remained within a 0.5 cm internal planning volume (ITV). Median RT dose to CTV_eval was 50.4 Gy (45.0-50.4). Median 95% CTV_eval coverage was 99.5% (95-100). Optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) readings were available for 8 patients and correlated to the dose measurements in the treatment planning system (TPS); median OSLD ratio was 0.99 (range, 0.93-1.02). CONCLUSIONS Delivering PMRT with PBS for women with metal-containing TEs using a hybrid SFO/MFO technique is feasible, reproducible, and achieves excellent dose distributions. Specialized planning and image-guidance techniques are required to safely utilize this treatment in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina M DeCesaris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, United States.
| | - Sina Mossahebi
- Division of Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Jenna Jatczak
- Maryland Proton Treatment Center, Baltimore, United States
| | - Avani D Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, United States
| | - Mingyao Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
| | - Mark V Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| | - Elizabeth Nichols
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Loap P, Loirat D, Berger F, Cao K, Ricci F, Jochem A, Raizonville L, Mosseri V, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. Combination of Olaparib with radiotherapy for triple-negative breast cancers: One-year toxicity report of the RADIOPARP Phase I trial. Int J Cancer 2021; 149:1828-1832. [PMID: 34270809 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells are sensitive to PARP1 inhibitors in vitro. The combination of Olaparib and radiotherapy for TNBC is currently evaluated in the Phase I RADIOPARP trial. RADIOPARP is a monocentric prospective open-label Phase I dose-escalation trial evaluating the combination of breast radiotherapy and Olaparib in TNBC patients with inflammatory, locoregionally advanced or metastatic disease, or with residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Olaparib was orally given at increasing dose levels (50, 100, 150 or 200 mg twice a day [BID]); radiotherapy consisted of 50 Gy to the breast or chest wall with or without lymph node irradiation. Twenty-four TNBC patients were enrolled between September 2017 and November 2019. Olaparib was escalated to 200 mg BID without dose-limiting toxicities. At 1-year follow-up, no treatment-related grade ≥3 toxicity was observed. One patient (4.2%) had persistent grade 2 adverse events (breast pain, fibrosis and deformity). There was no cardiac, pulmonary or digestive toxicity related to treatment. The 1-year follow-up report of the RADIOPARP Phase I trial, evaluating Olaparib associated with breast radiotherapy in TNBC patients, consequently demonstrated an excellent toxicity profile of this combination with few low-grade adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Delphine Loirat
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | - Kim Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Francesco Ricci
- Department of Clinical Investigations, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Anne Jochem
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Alain Fourquet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ell P, Martin JM, Cehic DA, Ngo DTM, Sverdlov AL. Cardiotoxicity of Radiation Therapy: Mechanisms, Management, and Mitigation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:70. [PMID: 34110500 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-021-00868-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Radiation therapy is a key component of modern-day cancer therapy and can reduce the rates of recurrence and death from cancer. However, it can increase risk of cardiovascular (CV) events, and our understanding of the timeline associated with that risk is shorter than previously thought. Risk mitigation strategies, such as different positioning techniques, and breath hold acquisitions as well as baseline cardiovascular risk stratification that can be undertaken at the time of radiotherapy planning should be implemented, particularly for patients receiving chest radiation therapy. Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), as appropriate, should be used before, during, and after radiation treatment in order to minimize the risks. Opportunistic screening for subclinical coronary disease provides an attractive possibility for primary/secondary CVD prevention and thus mitigation of long-term CV risk. More data on long-term clinical usefulness of this strategy and development of appropriate management pathways would further strengthen the evidence for the implementation of such screening. Clear guidelines in initial cardiovascular screening and cardiac aftercare following radiotherapy need to be formulated in order to integrate these measures into everyday clinical practice and policy and subsequently improve post-treatment morbidity and mortality for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Ell
- GenesisCare, Lake Macquarie Private Hospital, Gateshead, NSW, Australia
| | - J M Martin
- GenesisCare, Lake Macquarie Private Hospital, Gateshead, NSW, Australia.,Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia.,College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
| | - D A Cehic
- GenesisCare, Buildings 1&11, The Mill, 41-43 Bourke Road, Alexandria, NSW, 2015, Australia
| | - D T M Ngo
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.,Hunter Cancer Research Alliance, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia
| | - A L Sverdlov
- College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia. .,Hunter Cancer Research Alliance, Waratah, NSW, 2298, Australia. .,Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ko H, Chang JS, Moon JY, Lee WH, Shah C, Shim JSA, Han MC, Baek JG, Park RH, Kim YB, Kim JS. Dosimetric Comparison of Radiation Techniques for Comprehensive Regional Nodal Radiation Therapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer: A Treatment Planning Study. Front Oncol 2021; 11:645328. [PMID: 33912459 PMCID: PMC8072050 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.645328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose How modern cardiac sparing techniques and beam delivery systems using advanced x-ray and proton beam therapy (PBT) can reduce incidental radiation exposure doses to cardiac and pulmonary organs individually or in any combination is poorly investigated. Methods Among 15 patients with left-sided breast cancer, partial wide tangential 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) delivered in conventional fractionation (CF) or hypofractionated (HF) schedules; PBT delivered in a CF schedule; and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivered in an HF schedule, each under continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and free-breathing (FB) conditions, were examined. Target volume coverage and doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were calculated for each technique. Outcomes were compared with one-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test, with p-values <0.05 considered significant. Results Target volume coverage was within acceptable levels in all interventions, except for the internal mammary lymph node D95 (99% in PBT, 90% in VMAT-CPAP, 84% in VMAT-FB, and 74% in 3DCRT). The mean heart dose (MHD) was the lowest in PBT (<1 Gy) and VMAT-CPAP (2.2 Gy) and the highest in 3DCRT with CF/FB (7.8 Gy), respectively. The mean lung dose (MLD) was the highest in 3DCRT-CF-FB (20 Gy) and the lowest in both VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT (approximately 5-6 Gy). VMAT-HF-CPAP and PBT delivered a comparable maximum dose to the left ascending artery (7.2 and 6.13 Gy, respectively). Conclusions Both proton and VMAT in combination with CPAP can minimize the radiation exposure to heart and lung with optimal target coverage in regional RT for left-sided breast cancer. The clinical relevance of these differences is yet to be elucidated. Continued efforts are needed to minimize radiation exposures during RT treatment to maximize its therapeutic index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heejoo Ko
- College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jee Suk Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Young Moon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Won Hee Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chirag Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | | | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jong Geol Baek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ryeong Hwang Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yong Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cunningham L, Penfold S, Giles E, Le H, Short M. Impact of Breast Size on Dosimetric Indices in Proton Versus X-ray Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11040282. [PMID: 33917818 PMCID: PMC8068250 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11040282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) radiotherapy is a technique used to manage early stage left-sided breast cancer. This study compared dosimetric indices of patient-specific X-ray versus proton therapy DIBH plans to explore differences in target coverage, radiation doses to organs at risk, and the impact of breast size. Radiotherapy plans of sixteen breast cancer patients previously treated with DIBH radiotherapy were re-planned with hybrid inverse-planned intensity modulated X-ray radiotherapy (h-IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). The total prescribed dose was 40.05 Gy in 15 fractions for all cases. Comparisons between the clinical, h-IMRT, and IMPT evaluated doses to target volumes, organs at risk, and correlations between doses and breast size. Although no differences were observed in target volume coverage between techniques, the h-IMRT and IMPT were able to produce more even dose distributions and IMPT delivered significantly less dose to all organs at risk than both X-ray techniques. A moderate negative correlation was observed between breast size and dose to the target in X-ray techniques, but not IMPT. Both h-IMRT and IMPT produced plans with more homogeneous dose distribution than forward-planned IMRT and IMPT achieved significantly lower doses to organs at risk compared to X-ray techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Cunningham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; (L.C.); (S.P.); (H.L.)
| | - Scott Penfold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; (L.C.); (S.P.); (H.L.)
| | - Eileen Giles
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5000, Australia; (L.C.); (S.P.); (H.L.)
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-8-83022089
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Loap P, Beddok A, Cao KI, Goudjil F, Fourquet A, Dendale R, Kirova Y. Clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy: A single-centre experience from selection to treatment. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:358-365. [PMID: 33676830 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Breast protontherapy efficiently limits cardiac, lung and contralateral breast exposure, which may clinically translate into better late tolerance profile compared with classic photon techniques. While breast protontherapy is already implemented in the United States and in some European countries, clinical experience of breast cancer protontherapy is currently limited in France. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical practice of breast cancer protontherapy at the Institut Curie in order to implement this technique at a larger scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from all breast cancer patients that have been addressed to the protontherapy centre of Orsay (CPO, Institut Curie) for adjuvant breast protontherapy were retrieved. We analysed why these patients were ultimately treated with protontherapy or not. RESULTS Between November 2019 and November 2020, eleven breast cancer patients have been evaluated for adjuvant protontherapy at the CPO. Two of them were ultimately treated with proton beams; adjuvant breast protontherapy therapy was well tolerated. The nine other patients were not treated with protontherapy due to lack of availability of protontherapy treatment rooms in acceptable time limits, at the time of patient evaluation. CONCLUSION Despite dosimetric advantages and excellent clinical tolerance, lack of availability of protontherapy machines currently limits wider implementation of breast protontherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Loap
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Beddok
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - K I Cao
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - F Goudjil
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - A Fourquet
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - R Dendale
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Department of radiation oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Beltran C, Amos RA, Rong Y. We are ready for clinical implementation of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in the United States. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2020; 21:6-9. [PMID: 33319499 PMCID: PMC7769388 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Richard A Amos
- Proton and Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Assessing the Need for Adjusted Organ-at-Risk Planning Goals for Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer with Proton Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:108-118. [PMID: 33109494 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locally advanced breast cancer requires surgical management via lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without systemic therapy followed by chest wall or breast (CW) and comprehensive nodal irradiation (CNI). Radiation (RT) dose constraints for the heart and ipsilateral lung have been developed based on photon RT. Proton therapy (PBT) can deliver significantly lower doses of RT to these organs-at-risk (OARs) and may warrant adjustments to OAR planning goals. METHODS AND MATERIALS The RT plans of consecutive patients undergoing adjuvant CW-CNI RT with PBT within a single center were reviewed. A inital treatment volume, comprised of CW/intact breast + CNI (CTV_init) structure, including the CW and CNI but excluding any boost plans was analyzed. Frequency distributions were generated based on doses received by the heart, lungs, and esophagus for validated dosimetric parameters. Frequency distributions were generated and then stratified by laterality and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The 75th, 85th, and 95th percentiles for each dosimetric parameter were calculated, overall and by laterality. The 75th percentile (Q3), was used as a suggested primary goal, and the 95th percentile was used as a suggested secondary goal. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-two plans were analyzed. Forty-nine plans were right-sided, 107 were left-sided, and 16 were bilateral. The overall Q3 of the mean and V25 of the heart were 1.5 Gy and 1.7%, respectively. The mean and V25 to the heart differed significantly by laterality. Pulmonary values were similar to current recommendations. For all lateralites, the median volume of the esophagus receiving 70% prescription dose was ≤1 cm3. CONCLUSIONS We present the first dosimetric study providing complete OAR dose-volume histograms data for patients undergoing adjuvant pencil-beam scanning-PBT for locally advanced breast cancer, with detailed information on central tendencies, ranges and distributions of data. We have provided suggested planning goals and metrics for the lungs, heart, and esophagus; the latter 2 differing significantly from current Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints and classical photon goals.
Collapse
|
50
|
Chang S, Liu G, Zhao L, Dilworth JT, Zheng W, Jawad S, Yan D, Chen P, Stevens C, Kabolizadeh P, Li X, Ding X. Feasibility study: spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:232. [PMID: 33028378 PMCID: PMC7542109 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01676-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the feasibility and potential clinical benefit of utilizing a new proton treatment technique: Spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy for left-sided whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) to further reduce radiation dose to healthy tissue and mitigate the probability of normal tissue complications compared to conventional intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). METHODS Eight patients diagnosed with left-sided breast cancer and treated with breast-preserving surgery followed by whole breast irradiation without regional nodal irradiation were included in this retrospective planning. Two proton treatment plans were generated for each patient: vertical intensity-modulated proton therapy used for clinical treatment (vIMPT, gantry angle 10°-30°) and SPArc for comparison purpose. Both SPArc and vIMPT plans were optimized using the robust optimization of ± 3.5% range and 5 mm setup uncertainties. Root-mean-square deviation dose (RMSD) volume histograms were used for plan robustness evaluation. All dosimetric results were evaluated based on dose-volume histograms (DVH), and the interplay effect was evaluated based on the accumulation of single-fraction 4D dynamic dose on CT50. The treatment beam delivery time was simulated based on a gantry rotation with energy-layer-switching-time (ELST) from 0.2 to 5 s. RESULTS The average D1 to the heart and LAD were reduced to 53.63 cGy and 82.25 cGy compared with vIMPT 110.38 cGy (p = 0.001) and 170.38 cGy (p = 0.001), respectively. The average V5Gy and V20Gy of ipsilateral lung was reduced to 16.77% and 3.07% compared to vIMPT 25.56% (p = 0.001) and 4.68% (p = 0.003). Skin3mm mean and maximum dose were reduced to 3999.38 cGy and 4395.63 cGy compared to vIMPT 4104.25 cGy (p = 0.039) and 4411.63 cGy (p = 0.043), respectively. A significant relative risk reduction (RNTCP = NTCPSPArc/NTCPvIMPT) for organs at risk (OARs) was obtained with SPArc ranging from 0.61 to 0.86 depending on the clinical endpoint. The RMSD volume histogram (RVH) analysis shows SPArc provided better plan robustness in OARs sparing, including the heart, LAD, ipsilateral lung, and skin. The average estimated treatment beam delivery times were comparable to vIMPT plans when the ELST is about 0.5 s. CONCLUSION SPArc technique can further reduce dose delivered to OARs and the probability of normal tissue complications in patients treated for left-sided WBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei Province, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA.,Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong, University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430023, China.,School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei, China
| | - Lewei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Joshua T Dilworth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Weili Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Saada Jawad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Di Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Peter Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Craig Stevens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Peyman Kabolizadeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Xiaoqiang Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, MI, 48074, USA.
| |
Collapse
|