1
|
Davila-Piñón P, Nogueira-Rodríguez A, Díez-Martín AI, Codesido L, Herrero J, Puga M, Rivas L, Sánchez E, Fdez-Riverola F, Glez-Peña D, Reboiro-Jato M, López-Fernández H, Cubiella J. Optical diagnosis in still images of colorectal polyps: comparison between expert endoscopists and PolyDeep, a Computer-Aided Diagnosis system. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1393815. [PMID: 38846970 PMCID: PMC11153726 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1393815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background PolyDeep is a computer-aided detection and classification (CADe/x) system trained to detect and classify polyps. During colonoscopy, CADe/x systems help endoscopists to predict the histology of colonic lesions. Objective To compare the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and expert endoscopists for the optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps on still images. Methods PolyDeep Image Classification (PIC) is an in vitro diagnostic test study. The PIC database contains NBI images of 491 colorectal polyps with histological diagnosis. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of PolyDeep and four expert endoscopists for neoplasia (adenoma, sessile serrated lesion, traditional serrated adenoma) and adenoma characterization and compared them with the McNemar test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to assess the overall discriminatory ability, comparing the area under the curve of endoscopists and PolyDeep with the chi- square homogeneity areas test. Results The diagnostic performance of the endoscopists and PolyDeep in the characterization of neoplasia is similar in terms of sensitivity (PolyDeep: 89.05%; E1: 91.23%, p=0.5; E2: 96.11%, p<0.001; E3: 86.65%, p=0.3; E4: 91.26% p=0.3) and specificity (PolyDeep: 35.53%; E1: 33.80%, p=0.8; E2: 34.72%, p=1; E3: 39.24%, p=0.8; E4: 46.84%, p=0.2). The overall discriminative ability also showed no statistically significant differences (PolyDeep: 0.623; E1: 0.625, p=0.8; E2: 0.654, p=0.2; E3: 0.629, p=0.9; E4: 0.690, p=0.09). In the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps, we found that PolyDeep had a significantly higher sensitivity and a significantly lower specificity. The overall discriminative ability of adenomatous lesions by expert endoscopists is significantly higher than PolyDeep (PolyDeep: 0.582; E1: 0.685, p < 0.001; E2: 0.677, p < 0.0001; E3: 0.658, p < 0.01; E4: 0.694, p < 0.0001). Conclusion PolyDeep and endoscopists have similar diagnostic performance in the optical diagnosis of neoplastic lesions. However, endoscopists have a better global discriminatory ability than PolyDeep in the optical diagnosis of adenomatous polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Davila-Piñón
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Investigación Biomédica Galicia Sur, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Sergas, Ourense, Spain
| | - Alba Nogueira-Rodríguez
- Department of Computer Science, Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Informática (ESEI), CINBIO, University of Vigo, Ourense, Spain
- Next Generation Computer Systems Group (SING) Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Ourense, Spain
| | - Astrid Irene Díez-Martín
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Investigación Biomédica Galicia Sur, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Sergas, Ourense, Spain
| | - Laura Codesido
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Investigación Biomédica Galicia Sur, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense, Sergas, Ourense, Spain
| | - Jesús Herrero
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Ourense, Spain
| | - Manuel Puga
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Ourense, Spain
| | - Laura Rivas
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Ourense, Spain
| | - Eloy Sánchez
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Ourense, Spain
| | - Florentino Fdez-Riverola
- Department of Computer Science, Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Informática (ESEI), CINBIO, University of Vigo, Ourense, Spain
- Next Generation Computer Systems Group (SING) Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Ourense, Spain
| | - Daniel Glez-Peña
- Department of Computer Science, Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Informática (ESEI), CINBIO, University of Vigo, Ourense, Spain
- Next Generation Computer Systems Group (SING) Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Ourense, Spain
| | - Miguel Reboiro-Jato
- Department of Computer Science, Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Informática (ESEI), CINBIO, University of Vigo, Ourense, Spain
- Next Generation Computer Systems Group (SING) Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Ourense, Spain
| | - Hugo López-Fernández
- Department of Computer Science, Escuela Superior de Ingenieria Informática (ESEI), CINBIO, University of Vigo, Ourense, Spain
- Next Generation Computer Systems Group (SING) Research Group, Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IIS Galicia Sur), Ourense, Spain
| | - Joaquín Cubiella
- Research Group in Gastrointestinal Oncology Ourense, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Ourense, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Universitario de Ourense, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Ourense, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bonander C, Westerberg M, Chauca Strand G, Forsberg A, Strömberg U. Colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical testing or primary colonoscopy: inequities in diagnostic yield. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae043. [PMID: 38830030 PMCID: PMC11187582 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of colorectal cancer screening are well documented, but the implications on inequities in health gain remain unclear. METHODS Sixty-year-olds were randomly recruited from the Swedish population between March 2014 and March 2020 and invited to undergo either 2 rounds of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) 2 years apart (n = 60 137) or primary colonoscopy just once (n = 30 400). By linkage to Statistics Sweden's registries, we obtained socioeconomic data. In each defined socioeconomic group, we estimated the cumulative yield of advanced neoplasia in each screening arm (intention-to-screen analysis). In the biennial FIT arm, we predicted the probability of exceeding the yield in the primary colonoscopy arm by linear extrapolation of the cumulative yield to (hypothetical) additional rounds of FIT. RESULTS In the lowest income group, the yield of advanced neoplasia was 1.63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.35% to 1.93%) after 2 rounds of FIT vs 1.93% (95% CI = 1.49% to 2.40%) in the primary colonoscopy arm. Extrapolation to a third round of FIT implied a 86% probability of exceeding the yield in the primary colonoscopy arm. In the highest income group, we found a more pronounced yield gap between the 2 screening strategies-2.32% (95% CI = 2.15% to 2.49%) vs 3.71% (95% CI = 3.41% to 4.02%)- implying a low (2%) predicted probability of exceeding yield after a third round of FIT. CONCLUSIONS Yield of advanced neoplasia from 2 rounds of FIT 2 years apart was poorer as compared with primary colonoscopy, but the difference was less in lower socioeconomic groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02078804.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl Bonander
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Marcus Westerberg
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Gabriella Chauca Strand
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Forsberg
- Department of Medicine K2, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Ulf Strömberg
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dantas AAG, de Oliveira NPD, Costa GAB, Martins LFL, Dos Santos JEM, Migowski A, de Camargo Cancela M, de Souza DLB. Multilevel analysis of social determinants of advanced stage colorectal cancer diagnosis. Sci Rep 2024; 14:9667. [PMID: 38671078 PMCID: PMC11053035 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60449-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The advanced stage at diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) may be related to individual factors, socioeconomic conditions, and healthcare service availability. The objective of the study was to analyze the prevalence of advanced stage CRC at the time of diagnosis and its association with individual, contextual, socioeconomic, and healthcare service indicators. An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted, analyzing cases of malignant neoplasms of the colon and rectum in individuals of both sexes, aged between 18 and 99 years, diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 in Brazil (n = 69,047). Data were collected from the Hospital Cancer Registry (HCR), Atlas of Human Development in Brazil, and from the National Registry of Health Institutions (NRHI). A Multilevel Poisson Regression model with random intercept was used. The prevalence of advanced stage CRC at diagnosis was 65.6%. Advanced stage was associated with older age groups prevalence ratio (PR) 4.40 and younger age groups (PR 1.84), low Human Development Index (HDI) (PR 1.22), and low density of family health strategy teams (PR 1.10). The study highlights the unequal distribution of social determinants of health in the diagnosis CRC in Brazil, revealing the need to evaluate and redirect public policies aimed at improving early detection and prevention of CRC in the country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Guilherme Augusto Barcello Costa
- Graduate Program in Oncology, Research and Innovation Coordination, National Cancer Institute (INCA), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Luís Felipe Leite Martins
- Surveillance and Situation Analysis Division, Prevention and Surveillance Coordination (CONPREV), National Cancer Institute (INCA), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Jonas Eduardo Monteiro Dos Santos
- Surveillance and Situation Analysis Division, Prevention and Surveillance Coordination (CONPREV), National Cancer Institute (INCA), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Arn Migowski
- Epidemiology Unit. Education and Research Coordination, National Institute of Cardiology (INCA), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
- Prevention and Surveillance Coordination (CONPREV), National Cancer Institute (INCA), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Marianna de Camargo Cancela
- Graduate Program in Oncology, Research and Innovation Coordination, National Cancer Institute (INCA), Ministry of Health, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Dyego Leandro Bezerra de Souza
- Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte - UFRN, Natal, RN, Brazil.
- Methodology, Methods, Models and Results in Health and Social Sciences Research Group (M3O), Faculty of Health Sciences and Well-Being. Health and Social Care Research Center (CESS), University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain.
- Public Health Department, Graduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, 1787 Senador Salgado Filho Ave., Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59010-000, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leong W, Guo JQ, Ning C, Luo FF, Jiao R, Yang DY. Should we perform sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer screening in people under 45 years? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1248-1255. [PMID: 38660667 PMCID: PMC11037058 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The strategy for preventing colorectal cancer is screening by colonoscopy, which offers a direct way for detection and removal of adenomatous polyps (APs). American College of Gastroenterology guidelines recommend that people aged ≥ 45 years should undergo colonoscopy; however, how to deal with people aged ≤ 45 years is still unknown. AIM To compare the prevalence of APs and high-grade neoplasia between the left and right colon in patients ≤ 45 years. METHODS A retrospective observational study was conducted at a single tertiary III hospital in China. This study included patients aged 18-45 years with undergoing initial colonoscopy dissection and pathological diagnosis AP or high-grade neoplasia between February 2014 and January 2021. The number of APs in the entire colon while screening and post-polypectomy surveillance in following 1-3 years were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 3053 cases were included. The prevalence of APs in the left and right colon was 55.0% and 41.6%, respectively (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.6-2.4; P < 0.05). For APs with high-grade neoplasia, the prevalence was 2.7% and 0.9%, respectively (OR 3.0, 95%CI 2.0-4.6; P < 0.05). Therefore, the prevalence of APs and high-grade neoplasia in the left colon was significantly higher than in the right colon in patients aged ≤ 45 years. There were 327 patients who voluntarily participated in post-polypectomy surveillance in following 1-3 years, and APs were found in 216 cases (66.1%); 170 cases had 1-3 polyps (52.0%) and 46 cases had > 3 polyps (14.1%; OR 0.3, 95%CI 0.1-0.6; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION This study suggests that flexible sigmoidoscopy would be an optimal approach for initial screening in people aged ≤ 45 years and would be a more cost-effective and safe strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waiian Leong
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
- Department of Accident & Emergency, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jia-Qi Guo
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Chun Ning
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Fei-Fei Luo
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Rui Jiao
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Dong-Ye Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
- Endoscopy Center, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518053, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lopes SR, Martins C, Santos IC, Teixeira M, Gamito É, Alves AL. Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 16:1119-1133. [PMID: 38660635 PMCID: PMC11037045 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v16.i4.1119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, being the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Despite the progress in screening, early diagnosis, and treatment, approximately 20%-25% of CRC patients still present with metastatic disease at the time of their initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the burden of disease is still expected to increase, especially in individuals younger than 50 years old, among whom early-onset CRC incidence has been increasing. Screening and early detection are pivotal to improve CRC-related outcomes. It is well established that CRC screening not only reduces incidence, but also decreases deaths from CRC. Diverse screening strategies have proven effective in decreasing both CRC incidence and mortality, though variations in efficacy have been reported across the literature. However, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal screening method, age intervals and periodicity. Moreover, adherence to CRC screening remains globally low. In recent years, emerging technologies, notably artificial intelligence, and non-invasive biomarkers, have been developed to overcome these barriers. However, controversy exists over the actual impact of some of the new discoveries on CRC-related outcomes and how to effectively integrate them into daily practice. In this review, we aim to cover the current evidence surrounding CRC screening. We will further critically assess novel approaches under investigation, in an effort to differentiate promising innovations from mere novelties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Ramos Lopes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal 2910-446, Portugal
| | - Claudio Martins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal 2910-446, Portugal
| | - Inês Costa Santos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal 2910-446, Portugal
| | - Madalena Teixeira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal 2910-446, Portugal
| | - Élia Gamito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal 2910-446, Portugal
| | - Ana Luisa Alves
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar de Setúbal, Setúbal 2910-446, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali H, Ishtiaq R, Tedder B, Zweigle J, Nomigolzar R, Dahiya DS, Moond V, Humza Sohail A, Patel P, Basuli D, Tillmann HL. Trends in mortality from gastrointestinal, hepatic, and pancreatic cancers in the United States: A comprehensive analysis (1999-2020). JGH Open 2024; 8:e13064. [PMID: 38623490 PMCID: PMC11017855 DOI: 10.1002/jgh3.13064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Background and Aim This study investigates temporal trends in gastrointestinal cancer-related mortality in the United States between 1999 and 2020, focusing on differences by sex, age, and race. Methods We investigated the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research multiple causes of death database (Years 1999-2020) for gastrointestinal cancer-related mortality with a focus on the underlying cause of death. Results A total of 3 115 243 gastrointestinal cancer-related deaths occurred from 1999 to 2020. The overall age-adjusted mortality rate decreased from 46.7 per 100 000 in 1999 to 38.4 per 100 000 in 2020. The average annual percent change (AAPC) for the study period was -0.9% (95% CI: -1.0%, -0.9%, P < 0.001), with no significant difference in AAPC between the sexes but some difference between races and related to individual cancers. African Americans and Asian Americans, and Pacific Islanders experienced a greater decrease in mortality compared with Whites. Mortality rates for American Indian and Alaskan Native populations also decreased significantly from 1999 to 2020 (P < 0.001). There were significant declines in esophageal, stomach, colon, rectal, and gallbladder cancer-related mortality but increases in the small bowel, anal, pancreatic, and hepatic cancer-related mortality (P < 0.001), with variation across different sexes and racial groups. Conclusion While overall gastrointestinal cancer-related mortality declined significantly in the United States from 1999 to 2020, mortality from some cancers increased. Furthermore, differences between sexes and racial groups underscore crucial differences in gastrointestinal cancer mortality, highlighting areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassam Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition ECU Health Medical Center, Brody School of Medicine Greenville North Carolina USA
| | - Rizwan Ishtiaq
- Department of Internal Medicine University of Connecticut Health Center Farmington Connecticut USA
| | - Brandon Tedder
- Department of Internal Medicine ECU Health Medical Center, Brody School of Medicine Greenville North Carolina USA
| | - Joshua Zweigle
- Department of Internal Medicine ECU Health Medical Center, Brody School of Medicine Greenville North Carolina USA
| | | | - Dushyant S Dahiya
- Department of Internal Medicine Central Michigan College of Medicine Saginaw Michigan USA
| | - Vishali Moond
- Department of Internal Medicine Saint Peter's University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick New Jersey USA
| | | | - Pratik Patel
- Department of Gastroenterology Mather Hospital, Hofstra University Zucker School of Medicine Port Jefferson New York USA
| | - Debargha Basuli
- Department of Internal Medicine ECU Health Medical Center, Brody School of Medicine Greenville North Carolina USA
| | - Hans L Tillmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition ECU Health Medical Center, Brody School of Medicine Greenville North Carolina USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Martiny FHJ, Bie AKL, Jauernik CP, Rahbek OJ, Nielsen SB, Gram EG, Kindt I, Siersma V, Bang CW, Brodersen JB. Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening-A systematic review with meta-analyses. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0295900. [PMID: 38483910 PMCID: PMC10939197 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer screening programmes (CRCSPs) are implemented worldwide despite recent evidence indicating more physical harm occurring during CRCSPs than previously thought. Therefore, we aimed to review the evidence on physical harms associated with endoscopic diagnostic procedures during CRCSPs and, when possible, to quantify the risk of the most serious types of physical harm during CRCSPs, i.e. deaths and cardiopulmonary events (CPEs). METHODS Systematic review with descriptive statistics and random-effects meta-analyses of studies investigating physical harms following CRCSPs. We conducted a systematic search in the literature and assessed the risk of bias and the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS We included 134 studies for review, reporting findings from 151 unique populations when accounting for multiple screening interventions per study. Physical harm can be categorized into 17 types of harm. The evidence was very heterogeneous with inadequate measurement and reporting of harms. The risk of bias was serious or critical in 95% of assessments of deaths and CPEs, and the certainty of the evidence was very low in all analyses. The risk of death was assessed for 57 populations with large variation across studies. Meta-analyses indicated that 3 to 23 deaths occur during CRCSPs per 100,000 people screened. Cardiopulmonary events were assessed for 55 populations. Despite our efforts to subcategorize CPEs into 17 distinct subtypes, 41% of CPE assessments were too poorly measured or reported to allow quantification. We found a tendency towards lower estimates of deaths and CPEs in studies with a critical risk of bias. DISCUSSION Deaths and CPEs during CRCSPs are rare, yet they do occur during CRCSPs. We believe that our findings are conservative due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the evidence. A standardized system for the measurement and reporting of the harms of screening is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO Registration number CRD42017058844.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Handberg Juul Martiny
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Katrine Lykke Bie
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Patrick Jauernik
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Or Joseph Rahbek
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigrid Brisson Nielsen
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emma Grundtvig Gram
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice in Region Zealand, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Isabella Kindt
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Volkert Siersma
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christine Winther Bang
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Brandt Brodersen
- Department of Public Health, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Research Unit for General Practice in Region Zealand, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Research Unit for General Practice, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Thiele M, Kamath PS, Graupera I, Castells A, de Koning HJ, Serra-Burriel M, Lammert F, Ginès P. Screening for liver fibrosis: lessons from colorectal and lung cancer screening. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024:10.1038/s41575-024-00907-2. [PMID: 38480849 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-024-00907-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Abstract
Many countries have incorporated population screening programmes for cancer, such as colorectal and lung cancer, into their health-care systems. Cirrhosis is more prevalent than colorectal cancer and has a comparable age-standardized mortality rate to lung cancer. Despite this fact, there are no screening programmes in place for early detection of liver fibrosis, the precursor of cirrhosis. In this Perspective, we use insights from colorectal and lung cancer screening to explore the benefits, challenges, implementation strategies and pathways for future liver fibrosis screening initiatives. Several non-invasive methods and referral pathways for early identification of liver fibrosis exist, but in addition to accurate detection, screening programmes must also be cost-effective and demonstrate benefit through a reduction in liver-related mortality. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this. Future randomized screening trials should evaluate not only the screening tests, but also interventions used to halt disease progression in individuals identified through screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Thiele
- Centre for Liver Research, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Patrick S Kamath
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Isabel Graupera
- Liver Unit Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Antoni Castells
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Miquel Serra-Burriel
- Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Frank Lammert
- Department of Medicine II, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg, Germany
- Hannover Medical School (MHH), Hannover, Germany
| | - Pere Ginès
- Liver Unit Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Centro de Investigación en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Juul FE, Cross AJ, Schoen RE, Senore C, Pinsky PF, Miller EA, Segnan N, Wooldrage K, Wieszczy-Szczepanik P, Armaroli P, Garborg KK, Adami HO, Hoff G, Kalager M, Bretthauer M, Holme Ø, Løberg M. Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240007. [PMID: 38421651 PMCID: PMC10905314 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Randomized clinical screening trials have shown that sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy has largely replaced sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening, but long-term results from randomized trials on colonoscopy screening are still lacking. Objective To estimate the additional screening benefit of colonoscopy compared with sigmoidoscopy. Design, Setting, and Participants This comparative effectiveness simulation study pooled data on 358 204 men and women randomly assigned to sigmoidoscopy screening or usual care in 4 randomized sigmoidoscopy screening trials conducted in Norway, Italy, the US, and UK with inclusion periods in the years 1993 to 2001. The primary analysis of the study was conducted from January 19 to December 30, 2021. Intervention Invitation to endoscopic screening. Main Outcomes and Measures Primary outcomes were CRC incidence and mortality. Using pooled 15-year follow-up data, colonoscopy screening effectiveness was estimated assuming that the efficacy of colonoscopy in the proximal colon was similar to that observed in the distal colon in the sigmoidoscopy screening trials. The simulation model was validated using data from Norwegian participants in a colonoscopy screening trial. Results This analysis included 358 204 individuals (181 971 women [51%]) aged 55 to 64 years at inclusion with a median follow-up time ranging from 15 to 17 years. Compared with usual care, colonoscopy prevented an estimated 50 (95% CI, 42-58) CRC cases per 100 000 person-years, corresponding to 30% incidence reduction (rate ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66-0.75]), and prevented an estimated 15 (95% CI, 11-19) CRC deaths per 100 000 person-years, corresponding to 32% mortality reduction (rate ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.61-0.76]). The additional benefit of colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy was 12 (95% CI, 10-14) fewer CRC cases and 4 (95% CI, 3-5) fewer CRC deaths per 100 000 person-years, corresponding to percentage point reductions of 6.9 (95% CI, 6.0-7.9) for CRC incidence and 7.6 (95% CI, 5.7-9.6) for CRC mortality. The number needed to switch from sigmoidoscopy to colonoscopy screening was 560 (95% CI, 486-661) to prevent 1 CRC case and 1611 (95% CI, 1275-2188) to prevent 1 CRC death. Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this comparative effectiveness study assessing long-term follow-up after CRC screening suggest that there was an additional preventive effect on CRC incidence and mortality associated with colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy screening, but the additional preventive effect was less than what was achieved by introducing sigmoidoscopy screening where no screening existed. The results probably represent the upper limit of what may be achieved with colonoscopy screening compared with sigmoidoscopy screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik E. Juul
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Amanda J. Cross
- Cancer Screening & Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Robert E. Schoen
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Carlo Senore
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Paul F. Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Eric A. Miller
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Nereo Segnan
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Kate Wooldrage
- Cancer Screening & Prevention Research Group, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paulina Wieszczy-Szczepanik
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paola Armaroli
- University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Kjetil K. Garborg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Health Trust, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tonini V, Zanni M. Why is early detection of colon cancer still not possible in 2023? World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:211-224. [PMID: 38314134 PMCID: PMC10835528 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i3.211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is a fundamental tool in the prevention and early detection of one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers. Over the years, screening, particularly in those settings where it is well organized, has succeeded in reducing the incidence of colon and rectal cancer and improving the prognosis related to them. Despite considerable advancements in screening technologies and strategies, the effectiveness of CRC screening programs remains less than optimal. This paper examined the multifaceted reasons behind the persistent lack of effectiveness in CRC screening initiatives. Through a critical analysis of current methodologies, technological limitations, patient-related factors, and systemic challenges, we elucidated the complex interplay that hampers the successful reduction of CRC morbidity and mortality rates. While acknowledging the advancements that have improved aspects of screening, we emphasized the necessity of addressing the identified barriers comprehensively. This study aimed to raise awareness of how important CRC screening is in reducing costs for this disease. Screening and early diagnosis are not only important in improving the prognosis of patients with CRC but can lead to an important reduction in the cost of treating a disease that is often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Spending more sooner can mean saving money later.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valeria Tonini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
| | - Manuel Zanni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna 40138, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Robles J, Prakash A, Vizcaíno JA, Casal JI. Integrated meta-analysis of colorectal cancer public proteomic datasets for biomarker discovery and validation. PLoS Comput Biol 2024; 20:e1011828. [PMID: 38252632 PMCID: PMC10833860 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The cancer biomarker field has been an object of thorough investigation in the last decades. Despite this, colorectal cancer (CRC) heterogeneity makes it challenging to identify and validate effective prognostic biomarkers for patient classification according to outcome and treatment response. Although a massive amount of proteomics data has been deposited in public data repositories, this rich source of information is vastly underused. Here, we attempted to reuse public proteomics datasets with two main objectives: i) to generate hypotheses (detection of biomarkers) for their posterior/downstream validation, and (ii) to validate, using an orthogonal approach, a previously described biomarker panel. Twelve CRC public proteomics datasets (mostly from the PRIDE database) were re-analysed and integrated to create a landscape of protein expression. Samples from both solid and liquid biopsies were included in the reanalysis. Integrating this data with survival annotation data, we have validated in silico a six-gene signature for CRC classification at the protein level, and identified five new blood-detectable biomarkers (CD14, PPIA, MRC2, PRDX1, and TXNDC5) associated with CRC prognosis. The prognostic value of these blood-derived proteins was confirmed using additional public datasets, supporting their potential clinical value. As a conclusion, this proof-of-the-concept study demonstrates the value of re-using public proteomics datasets as the basis to create a useful resource for biomarker discovery and validation. The protein expression data has been made available in the public resource Expression Atlas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Robles
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain
- Protein Alternatives SL, Tres Cantos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ananth Prakash
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory—European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory—European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J. Ignacio Casal
- Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chauca Strand G, Strömberg U, Forsberg A, Bonander C. Impact of organised colorectal cancer screening on age-specific population incidences: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in Sweden. Eur J Epidemiol 2024; 39:87-96. [PMID: 38177571 PMCID: PMC10810926 DOI: 10.1007/s10654-023-01073-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) incurs a significant disease burden globally. Organised CRC screening programmes have been widely implemented for early detection and prevention. To understand the public health impact of these programmes, quantitative evidence of changes in overall and age-specific population incidences is fundamental. We aimed to provide such evidence by exploiting a time lag in the implementation of organised screening in Sweden: two out of 21 regions (these two regions comprise nearly 20% of the total Swedish population) have offered organised screening since 2008; the other regions have offered CRC screening since 2021. Using registry data on diagnosed CRC cases and socio-demographics for all regions in Sweden over the period 1970-2019, Bayesian structural time series modelling and difference-in-differences were applied to analyse the impact of screening on age-specific population incidences over time (CRC cases per 100.000 persons/year). After inviting birth-year cohorts aged 60-69 years for stool-based testing, the incidence rate in the 70-74-year age group decreased significantly over time, with an average reduction of - 44·40 (95% CI - 58·15 to - 31·31) from 2011 to 2019 in the intervention regions. In the overall population aged 60-74 years, there was a net incidence decrease of - 7·99 (95% CI - 13·85 to - 2·39) since the initiation of organised screening in the intervention regions (2008-2019). Organised CRC screening for 60-69-year-olds generated a change in age-specific incidence patterns with a long-lasting incidence decrease in the 70-74-year-old population, implying reductions in the excess mortality and burden of the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Chauca Strand
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, PO Box 469, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Ulf Strömberg
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, PO Box 469, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Forsberg
- Department of Medicine K2, Solna, 171 76, Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden
| | - Carl Bonander
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, PO Box 469, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jodal HC, Bretthauer M, Løberg M. [Colorectal cancer screening also for younger adults?]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LEGEFORENING 2023; 143:23-0553. [PMID: 38088289 DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.23.0553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
|
14
|
Persaud N, Sabir A, Woods H, Sayani A, Agarwal A, Chowdhury M, de Leon-Demare K, Ibezi S, Jan SH, Katz A, LaFortune FD, Lewis M, McFarlane T, Oberai A, Oladele Y, Onyekwelu O, Peters L, Wong P, Lofters A. Recommandations pour des soins préventifs pour promouvoir l’équité en matière de santé. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1674-E1701. [PMID: 38081626 PMCID: PMC10718275 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230237-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Contexte: Malgré des investissements importants dans un système de soins de santé public qui comprend des services préventifs, on continue d’observer des disparités évitables en matière de santé au Canada. L’équipe avait pour objectif de formuler des recommandations pour des soins de santé préventifs qui puissent améliorer l’équité en matière de santé par la priorisation des interventions efficaces à l’intention des groupes défavorisés. Méthodes: La ligne directrice a été élaborée par un comité composé de spécialistes en soins primaires et de membres de la patientèle, avec la contribution d’un groupe de patientes-et patientspartenaires ayant vécu diverses expériences. Après avoir sélectionné les sujets à prioriser, nous avons recensé les revues systématiques, les essais randomisés et contrôlés récents sur les méthodes de dépistage et d’autres études pertinentes sur l’efficacité du dépistage et de la prise en charge. Nous avons utilisé l’approche GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) pour formuler les recommandations et avons suivi le guide AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) pour rédiger le rapport. Il en a été de même avec les principes du Guidelines International Network pour la gestion des intérêts concurrents. Les recommandations ont été passées en revue par un comité externe d’experts en contenu avant d’être distribuées à des intervenants à l’échelle nationale pour approbation. Recommandations: Nous avons formulé 15 recommandations concernant le dépistage et d’autres soins préventifs et 1 recommandation de nature politique visant à améliorer l’accès aux soins primaires. Ainsi, nous recommandons de prioriser une stratégie de communication pour le dépistage du cancer colorectal à partir de l’âge de 45 ans et pour l’évaluation du risque de maladie cardiovasculaire pour lutter contre les iniquités en matière de santé et promouvoir la santé. Les interventions particulières qui devraient être déployées pour lutter contre les iniquités comprennent l’autodépistage du virus du papillome humain (VPH) et du VIH, et le test de libération de l’interféron γ pour l’infection tuberculeuse. Le dépistage de la dépression, de la toxicomanie, de la violence conjugale et de la pauvreté devrait également permettre aux personnes touchées d’accéder plus facilement à des interventions éprouvées. Nous recommandons une prise de contact systématique avec des professionnels de la santé en soins primaires pour les personnes défavorisées. Interprétation: Les interventions préventives éprouvées peuvent aider à combattre les iniquités en matière de santé si la priorité est accordée aux personnes défavorisées. Les médecins, les organisations de santé et les gouvernements devraient adopter des mesures fondées sur des données probantes et en faire le suivi s’ils veulent promouvoir l’équité en matière de santé partout au Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nav Persaud
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont.
| | - Areesha Sabir
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Hannah Woods
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Ambreen Sayani
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Muna Chowdhury
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Kathleen de Leon-Demare
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Somtochukwu Ibezi
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Saadia Hameed Jan
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Alan Katz
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Frantz-Daniel LaFortune
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Melanie Lewis
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Trudy McFarlane
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Anjali Oberai
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Yinka Oladele
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Onyema Onyekwelu
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Lisa Peters
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Patrick Wong
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Aisha Lofters
- Centre MAP pour des solutions de santé urbaine (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud, Lofters), Université de Toronto; Département de médecine familiale et communautaire (Persaud), Hôpital St. Michael, Réseau universitaire de santé de Toronto; Institut de recherche de l'Hôpital Women's College (Sayani, Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Centre Peter Gilgan pour les cancers féminins (Lofters), Hôpital Women's College, Toronto, Ont.; Division de médecine générale interne (Agarwal), Département de médecine, Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Département des méthodes, données et incidence de la recherche en santé (Agarwal), Université McMaster, Hamilton, Ont.; Université Dalhousie (Chowdhury), Halifax, N.-É.; École de sciences infirmières (de Leon-Demare), Faculté de sciences de la santé Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Département de médecine familiale (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Département de médecine familiale (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), Université McGill, Montréal, Qc; Sciences de la santé communautaire et médecine familiale (Katz), Faculté de médecine Max Rady, Université du Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Centre de santé de Port Elgin et des régions environnantes, Réseau de santé Horizon (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, N.-B.; Association des médecins noirs de l'Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; École de médecine du Nord de l'Ontario (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; organisme African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alb.; Centre de santé communautaire Parkdale Queen West (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bretthauer M, Wieszczy P, Løberg M, Kaminski MF, Werner TF, Helsingen LM, Mori Y, Holme Ø, Adami HO, Kalager M. Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:1196-1203. [PMID: 37639247 PMCID: PMC10463170 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
Importance Cancer screening tests are promoted to save life by increasing longevity, but it is unknown whether people will live longer with commonly used cancer screening tests. Objective To estimate lifetime gained with cancer screening. Data Sources A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomized clinical trials with more than 9 years of follow-up reporting all-cause mortality and estimated lifetime gained for 6 commonly used cancer screening tests, comparing screening with no screening. The analysis included the general population. MEDLINE and the Cochrane library databases were searched, and the last search was performed October 12, 2022. Study Selection Mammography screening for breast cancer; colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for colorectal cancer; computed tomography screening for lung cancer in smokers and former smokers; or prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer. Data Extraction and Synthesis Searches and selection criteria followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data were independently extracted by a single observer, and pooled analysis of clinical trials was used for analyses. Main Outcomes and Measures Life-years gained by screening was calculated as the difference in observed lifetime in the screening vs the no screening groups and computed absolute lifetime gained in days with 95% CIs for each screening test from meta-analyses or single randomized clinical trials. Results In total, 2 111 958 individuals enrolled in randomized clinical trials comparing screening with no screening using 6 different tests were eligible. Median follow-up was 10 years for computed tomography, prostate-specific antigen testing, and colonoscopy; 13 years for mammography; and 15 years for sigmoidoscopy and FOBT. The only screening test with a significant lifetime gain was sigmoidoscopy (110 days; 95% CI, 0-274 days). There was no significant difference following mammography (0 days: 95% CI, -190 to 237 days), prostate cancer screening (37 days; 95% CI, -37 to 73 days), colonoscopy (37 days; 95% CI, -146 to 146 days), FOBT screening every year or every other year (0 days; 95% CI, -70.7 to 70.7 days), and lung cancer screening (107 days; 95% CI, -286 days to 430 days). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that current evidence does not substantiate the claim that common cancer screening tests save lives by extending lifetime, except possibly for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paulina Wieszczy
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michal F. Kaminski
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Clinical Oncology, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Oncological Gastroenterology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Lise M. Helsingen
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Yuichi Mori
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Department for Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Golder AM, Conlan O, McMillan DC, Mansouri D, Horgan PG, Roxburgh CS. Adverse Tumour and Host Biology May Explain the Poorer Outcomes Seen in Emergency Presentations of Colon Cancer. Ann Surg 2023; 278:e1018-e1025. [PMID: 37036099 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between tumor/host factors (including the systemic inflammatory response), mode of presentation, and short/long-term outcomes in patients undergoing curative resectional surgery for TNM I to III colon cancer. BACKGROUND Emergency presentations of colon cancer are associated with worse long-term outcomes than elective presentations despite adjustment for TNM stage. A number of differences in tumor and host factors have been identified between elective and emergency presentations and it may be these factors that are associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS Patients undergoing curative surgery for TNM I to III colon cancer in the West of Scotland from 2011 to 2014 were identified. Tumor/host factors independently associated with the emergency presentation were identified and entered into a subsequent survival model to determine those that were independently associated with overall survival/cancer-specific survival (OS/CSS). RESULTS A total of 2705 patients were identified. The emergency presentation was associated with a worse 3-year OS and CSS compared with elective presentations (70% vs 86% and 91% vs 75%). T stage, age, systemic inflammatory grade, anemia (all P < 0.001), N stage ( P = 0.077), extramural venous invasion ( P = 0.003), body mass index ( P = 0.001), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification classification ( P = 0.021) were independently associated with emergency presentation. Of these, body mass index [hazard ratio (HR), 0.82], American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (HR, 1.45), anemia (HR, 1.29), systemic inflammatory grade (HR. 1.11), T stage (HR, 1.57), N stage (HR, 1.80), and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 0.47) were independently associated with OS. Similar results were observed for CSS. CONCLUSIONS Within patients undergoing curative surgery for colon cancer, the emergency presentation was not independently associated with worse OS/CSS. Rather, a combination of tumor and host factors account for the worse outcomes observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allan M Golder
- Academic Unit of Surgery-Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kindt IS, Martiny FHJ, Gram EG, Bie AKL, Jauernik CP, Rahbek OJ, Nielsen SB, Siersma V, Bang CW, Brodersen JB. The risk of bleeding and perforation from sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review and meta-analyses. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0292797. [PMID: 37906565 PMCID: PMC10617695 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Physical harm from Colorectal Cancer Screening tends to be inadequately measured and reported in clinical trials. Also, studies of ongoing Colorectal Cancer Screening programs have found more frequent and severe physical harm from screening procedures, e.g., bleeding and perforation, than reported in previous trials. Therefore, the objectives of the study were to systematically review the evidence on the risk of bleeding and perforation in Colorectal Cancer Screening. DESIGN Systematic review with descriptive statistics and random-effects meta-analyses. METHODS We systematically searched five databases for studies investigating physical harms related to Colorectal Cancer Screening. We assessed the internal and the external validity using the ROBINS-I tool and the GRADE approach. Harm estimates was calculated using mixed Poisson regression models in random-effect meta-analyses. RESULTS We included 89 studies. Reporting and measurement of harms was inadequate in most studies. In effect, the risk of bias was critical in 97.3% and serious in 98.3% of studies. All GRADE ratings were very low. Based on severe findings with not-critical risk of bias and 30 days follow-up, the risk of bleedings per 100,000 people screened were 8 [2;24] for sigmoidoscopy, 229 [129;408] for colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test, 68 [39;118] for once-only colonoscopy, and 698 [443;1045] for colonoscopy following any screening tests. The risk of perforations was 88 [56;138] for colonoscopy following fecal immunochemical test and 53 [25;112] for once-only colonoscopy. There were no findings within the subcategory severe perforation with long-term follow-up for colonoscopy following any screening tests and sigmoidoscopy. DISCUSSION Harm estimates varied widely across studies, reporting and measurement of harms was mostly inadequate, and the risk of bias and GRADE ratings were very poor, collectively leading to underestimation of harm. In effect, we consider our estimates of perforation and bleeding as conservative, highlighting the need for better reporting and measurement in future studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number: CRD42017058844.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Skaarup Kindt
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Frederik Handberg Juul Martiny
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Emma Grundtvig Gram
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Research Unit for General Practice in Region Zealand, Region Zealand, Denmark
| | - Anne Katrine Lykke Bie
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Patrick Jauernik
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Or Joseph Rahbek
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sigrid Brisson Nielsen
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Volkert Siersma
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christine Winther Bang
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - John Brandt Brodersen
- The Centre of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The Research Unit for General Practice in Region Zealand, Region Zealand, Denmark
- The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Selva A, Mosconi G, Cacitti S, Odone A, Pylkkanen L, Solà I, Torà N, Russo S, Cadum E, Deandrea S. Participants' satisfaction with colorectal cancer screening programs: A systematic review. Prev Med 2023; 175:107706. [PMID: 37722458 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since satisfaction with cancer screening experience can increase adherence to programs and contribute to reduce morbidity and mortality, its assessment is crucial for programs´ effectiveness. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review about satisfaction of participants with organized colorectal cancer screening. METHODS We searched relevant scientific databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) from inception to May 2022. We selected cross-sectional studies and clinical trials reporting a quantitative survey-based measure of satisfaction towards CRC screening. RESULTS A total of 15 studies were included, being published from 1992 to 2019 for an overall number of 21 surveys. Of those, 16 (76%) investigated satisfaction with screening tests (fecal occult blood test, fecal immunochemical test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, computed tomographic colonography), 4 (19%) with colonoscopy as assessment test after suspicious findings, and 2 (10%) with both the screening and assessment phase. None of the included surveys used a validated questionnaire. Most surveys reported a high level of satisfaction for both screening and further assessment phases. Temporary pain, discomfort, embarrassment, and anxiety while waiting for results were the commonest negative aspects perceived, with some variability across studies and considered procedures. CONCLUSIONS Satisfaction with the information and communication about screening was generally good, but some authors reported participants' sub-optimal understanding of informative material. Satisfaction with CRC screening is generally high, but its evaluation is performed using non-validated instruments, which limits the interpretation of results and prevents comparability of the current body of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Selva
- Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Clinical Epidemiology and Cancer Screening, Parc Taulí Hospital Universitari. Institut i Innovació Parc Taulí (I3PT_CERCA). Univesitat Autònoma de Barcelona., Sabadell, Spain.
| | - Giansanto Mosconi
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Anna Odone
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Ivan Solà
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Institute of Biomedical Research, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Núria Torà
- Cancer Screening Programs, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial Universitària de Manresa, Manresa, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Sara Russo
- Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ennio Cadum
- Health Protection Agency of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Persaud N, Sabir A, Woods H, Sayani A, Agarwal A, Chowdhury M, de Leon-Demare K, Ibezi S, Jan SH, Katz A, LaFortune FD, Lewis M, McFarlane T, Oberai A, Oladele Y, Onyekwelu O, Peters L, Wong P, Lofters A. Preventive care recommendations to promote health equity. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1250-E1273. [PMID: 37748784 PMCID: PMC10519166 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.230237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Avoidable disparities in health outcomes persist in Canada despite substantial investments in a publicly funded health care system that includes preventive services. Our objective was to provide preventive care recommendations that promote health equity by prioritizing effective interventions for people experiencing disadvantages. METHODS The guideline was developed by a primary care provider-patient panel, with input from a patient-partner panel with diverse lived experiences. After selecting priority topics, we searched for systematic reviews and recent randomized controlled trials of screening and other relevant studies of screening accuracy and management efficacy. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to develop recommendations and followed the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) reporting guidance. We managed competing interests using the Guideline International Network principles. The recommendations were externally reviewed by content experts and circulated for endorsement by national stakeholders. RECOMMENDATIONS We developed 15 screening and other preventive care recommendations and 1 policy recommendation on improving access to primary care. We recommend prioritized outreach for colorectal cancer screening starting at age 45 years and for cardiovascular disease risk assessment, to help address inequities and promote health. Specific interventions that should be rolled out in ways that address inequities include human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing, HIV self-testing and interferon-γ release assays for tuberculosis infection. Screening for depression, substance use, intimate partner violence and poverty should help connect people experiencing specific disadvantages with proven interventions. We recommend automatic connection to primary care for people experiencing disadvantages. INTERPRETATION Proven preventive care interventions can address health inequities if people experiencing disadvantages are prioritized. Clinicians, health care organizations and governments should take evidence-based actions and track progress in promoting health equity across Canada.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nav Persaud
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont.
| | - Areesha Sabir
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Hannah Woods
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Ambreen Sayani
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Arnav Agarwal
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Muna Chowdhury
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Kathleen de Leon-Demare
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Somtochukwu Ibezi
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Saadia Hameed Jan
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Alan Katz
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Frantz-Daniel LaFortune
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Melanie Lewis
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Trudy McFarlane
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Anjali Oberai
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Yinka Oladele
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Onyema Onyekwelu
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Lisa Peters
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Patrick Wong
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| | - Aisha Lofters
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (Persaud, Sabir, Woods); Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud, Lofters), University of Toronto; Department of Family and Community Medicine (Persaud), St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto; Women's College Hospital Research Institute (Sayani, Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers (Lofters), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ont.; Division of General Internal Medicine (Agarwal), Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact (Agarwal), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Dalhousie University (Chowdhury), Halifax, NS; College of Nursing (de Leon-Demare), Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Department of Family Medicine (Ibezi), Saskatoon, Sask.; Department of Family Medicine (Jan, LaFortune, Onyekwelu), McGill University, Montréal, Que.; Community Health Sciences and Family Medicine (Katz), Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Man.; Port Elgin & Region Health Centre, Horizon Health Network (Lewis Peters), Port Elgin, NB; Black Physicians' Association of Ontario (McFarlane), Brampton, Ont.; Northern Ontario School of Medicine University (Oberai), Sudbury, Ont.; African Cancer Support Group (Oladele), Calgary, Alta.; Parkdale Queen West Community Health Centre (Wong), Toronto, Ont
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Duzkoylu Y, Kılavuz H, Demircioglu MK, Arıkan S, Sarı S. Colonoscopy following the positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan in patients with incidental colorectal uptake: what is the most effective management? REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA (1992) 2023; 69:e20230302. [PMID: 37729363 PMCID: PMC10508895 DOI: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer is one of the most common malignancies. Survival rates are directly related to the stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis, emphasizing the value of early diagnosis. Positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose is the gold standard imaging technique in staging, monitoring after treatment, and follow-up. We aimed to assess the importance of incidental 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake by colon and rectum in positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging to determine a significant cutoff value for further investigation using colonoscopy and histopathological assessment. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with both 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan and colonoscopy during 1 year and included the cases who had undergone a colonoscopy within 3 months following the positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan due to an incidental positive finding. Patients with a diagnosed colorectal malignancy or with a history of previous colorectal operations were excluded. RESULTS A total of 81 patients were included in this study. Among 81 colonoscopic evaluations, histopathology revealed malignancy in 8 patients, and the prevalence of incidental colorectal cancer 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was found to be 9.87%. SUVmax was found to be significantly related to malignancy and other colonoscopic findings (p<0.001). SUVmax cutoff value to suggest colorectal cancer was found to be median [7.9 (4.1-12.7)] (p<0.001). CONCLUSION Regarding the studies determining a significant cutoff value, incidental colonic 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography should lead the clinician to further investigation with colonoscopic biopsy, although the cutoff values for SUVmax are not certain and different in almost every published study, and negative positron emission tomography.computed tomography findings should not completely rule out malignancy, especially in high-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yigit Duzkoylu
- Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery – Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Kılavuz
- Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of General Surgery – Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Soykan Arıkan
- Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of Surgical Oncology – Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Serkan Sarı
- Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Department of General Surgery – Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
López Salas M, De Haro Gázquez D, Fernández Sánchez B, Amador Muñoz ML. Knowledge, Compliance, and Inequities in Colon Cancer Screening in Spain: An Exploratory Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:2475. [PMID: 37761672 PMCID: PMC10530971 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In Spain, inequities exist in implementing colorectal cancer (CRC) tests with the target population-adults aged 50 to 69-as part of population-based CRC screening programs. This research aims to further our understanding of the target population's awareness, attitudes, and perceptions of these test-based screening programs. A survey was carried out using an online panel representative of the target population, with a sample collected from 5313 individuals. Data collection took place in June 2022. Descriptive and bivariate analyses were carried out using contingency tables, the Chi-square test, and Cramer's V statistics. The sample was also segmented based on key variables. Finally, the results were analyzed using logistic regression. In the sample population, 62.5% had taken the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), 72.5% reported receiving the invitation letter to participate in the screening program, and 86.8% had prior knowledge of the FOBT. Noncompliance was mainly due to lack of symptoms (40%), non-receipt of invitation letters (39.7%), and forgetfulness or neglect (28.5%). On the contrary, receipt of the letter of invitation (OR 7.35, p < 0.01) and prior knowledge of FOBT (OR 6.32, p < 0.01) were the main variables that increased the probability of test uptake. Other significant variables included frequency of primary care visits (OR 1.71, p < 0.01) and being older (65-69 years old) (OR 1.52, p < 0.01) There is still a pressing need for greater awareness of both CRC risk factors and the benefits of early detection, as well as for overcoming the common misconception that detection should only be sought when symptoms are present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario López Salas
- Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer, Teniente Coronel Noreña, 30, 28045 Madrid, Spain; (D.D.H.G.); (B.F.S.); (M.L.A.M.)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pokharel R, Lin YS, McFerran E, O'Mahony JF. A Systematic Review of Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Europe: Have Studies Included Optimal Screening Intensities? APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:701-717. [PMID: 37380865 PMCID: PMC10403417 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00819-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the range of strategies analysed in European cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with respect to the screening intervals, age ranges and test cut-offs used to define positivity, to examine how this might influence what strategies are found to be optimal, and compare them with the current screening policies with a focus on the screening interval. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus for peer-reviewed, model-based CEAs of CRC screening. We included studies on average-risk European populations using the guaiac faecal occult blood test (gFOBT) or faecal immunochemical test (FIT). We adapted Drummond's ten-point checklist to appraise study quality. RESULTS We included 39 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Biennial screening was the most frequently used interval which was analysed in 37 studies. Annual screening was assessed in 13 studies, all of which found it optimally cost-effective. Despite this, 25 of 26 European stool-based programmes use biennial screening. Many CEAs did not vary the age range, but the 14 that did generally found broader ranges optimal. Only 11 studies considered alternative FIT cut-offs, 9 of which found lower cut-offs superior. Conflicts between current policy and CEA evidence are less clear regarding age ranges and cut-offs. CONCLUSIONS The existing CEA evidence indicates that the widely adopted biennial frequency of stool-based testing in Europe is suboptimal. It is likely that many more lives could be saved throughout Europe if programmes could be offered with more intensive annual screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajani Pokharel
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Yi-Shu Lin
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ethna McFerran
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Thomsen MK, Nicolaisen SK, Pedersen L, Lash TL, Erichsen R, Sørensen HT, Mikkelsen EM. Effect of a FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program on Mortality Estimated by the Regression Discontinuity Design. Am J Epidemiol 2023; 192:1475-1484. [PMID: 37073406 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwad096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) has been implemented in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, but effect evaluations are lacking. We evaluated the effect of a positive FIT on all-cause and CRC mortality using the regression discontinuity design. The Danish CRC screening program invites all residents 50-74 years old, using a 20-μg hemoglobin/g feces cutoff for colonoscopy referral. In this cohort study, we followed all first-time screening participants from 2014-2019 until 2020. We estimated the local effect of screening results, of just above the cutoff vs. just below, as hazard ratios (HRs) between models fitted at each side of the cutoff. We conducted the analysis within a narrow hemoglobin range (≥17 and <23, n = 16,428) and a wider range (≥14 and <26, n = 35,353). Those screened just above the cutoff had lower all-cause mortality compared with below (HR = 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.69; 1.10), estimated from the narrow range. The CRC mortality analysis had few outcomes. In the wider range, those with a FIT just above the cutoff had a lower hazard of CRC mortality compared with just below the cutoff (HR = 0.49, 95% confidence interval: 0.17; 1.41). A FIT result just above the cutoff, leading to referral to colonoscopy, pointed towards reduced all-cause and CRC mortality compared with just below the cutoff.
Collapse
|
24
|
Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Rossol S, Schramm W, Krauth C. Is there a place for sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening? A systematic review and critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness models. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0290353. [PMID: 37594967 PMCID: PMC10438011 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is effective in reducing both incidence and mortality. Colonoscopy and stool tests are most frequently used for this purpose. Sigmoidoscopy is an alternative screening measure with a strong evidence base. Due to its distinct characteristics, it might be preferred by subgroups. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening compared to other screening methods and to identify influencing parameters. METHODS A systematic literature search for the time frame 01/2010-01/2023 was conducted using the databases MEDLINE, Embase, EconLit, Web of Science, NHS EED, as well as the Cost-Effectiveness Registry. Full economic analyses examining sigmoidoscopy as a screening measure for the general population at average risk for CRC were included. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. All included studies were critically assessed based on a questionnaire for modelling studies. RESULTS Twenty-five studies are included in the review. Compared to no screening, sigmoidoscopy is a cost-effective screening strategy for CRC. When modelled as a single measure strategy, sigmoidoscopy is mostly dominated by colonoscopy or modern stool tests. When combined with annual stool testing, sigmoidoscopy in 5-year intervals is more effective and less costly than the respective strategies alone. The results of the studies are influenced by varying assumptions on adherence, costs, and test characteristics. CONCLUSION The combination of sigmoidoscopy and stool testing represents a cost-effective screening strategy that has not received much attention in current guidelines. Further research is needed that goes beyond a narrow focus on screening technology and models different, preference-based participation behavior in subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Siegbert Rossol
- Department of Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt/M, Germany
| | - Wendelin Schramm
- GECKO Institute for Medicine, Informatics and Economics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
de Haro Gázquez D, Fernández Sánchez B, María Luz AM. [Actitudes e imágenes sociales sobre el cribado de cáncer colorrectal. Una aproximación exploratoria mediante grupos de discusión.]. Rev Esp Salud Publica 2023; 97:e202308063. [PMID: 37970927 PMCID: PMC10541245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) through the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) has achieved high implementation in Spain, although participation rates are still not optimal. At the same time, available data show significant differences in participation both among autonomous communities and among different sociodemographic groups, which raises various equity issues. This study aimed to conduct an exploratory analysis from a qualitative perspective on the attitudes, perceptions, and social images that the target population for colorectal cancer screenings holded regarding them, as well as the barriers and areas for improvement identified through these. METHODS This study was designed using a qualitative research approach, through the conduct of four focus groups in May 2022, with a total of twenty-six participants (equal number of men and women) aged fifty to sixty-nine years. The participants were residents of the Community of Madrid, Catalonia, Andalusia, and the Basque Country (in both large and small cities), with varying educational levels and different previous experiences of participation in the CRC screening program. RESULTS Different conceptualizations of prevention were identified, but none that encompassed cancer (especially colorectal cancer) as an element to be incorporated into daily practices since its occurrence is primarily associated with chance. In addition to the lack of knowledge about CRC compared to other types of cancer (such as breast or prostate cancer), various attitudinal barriers to participation in the CRC screening program were perceived. These included the rejection of being part of the older age group (targeted by the test), fear of waiting for the results, lack of reliability, or the sense of being able to postpone the moment. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the need for interventions aimed at promoting the attitude with which the invitation to participate is received and interpreted. It also emphasizes the importance of incorporating colon cancer into the dominant framework of concerns, raising awareness about the significance of early detection, and addressing potential sources of inequity. These interventions should address the broader conceptualization of the role of prevention observed among individuals with higher cultural capital and the greater normalization of screening programs found among women due to their previous experience with breast cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego de Haro Gázquez
- Asociación Española Contra el CáncerAsociación Española Contra el CáncerMadridSpain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hu Y, Chen X, Zhai C, Yu X, Liu G, Xiong Z, Wang Z, Cai S, Li W, Kong X, Xiao Q, Wang C, Tao Z, Niu L, Men J, Wang Q, Wei S, Hu J, Yang T, Peng J, Jiang G, Lv N, Chen Y, Zheng S, Gu Y, Ding K. Clinical evaluation of a multitarget fecal immunochemical test-sDNA test for colorectal cancer screening in a high-risk population: a prospective, multicenter clinical study. MedComm (Beijing) 2023; 4:e345. [PMID: 37576863 PMCID: PMC10422070 DOI: 10.1002/mco2.345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major malignancy threatening the health of people in China and screening could be effective for preventing the occurrence and reducing the mortality of CRC. We conducted a multicenter, prospective clinical study which recruited 4,245 high-risk CRC individuals defined as having positive risk-adapted scores or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) results, to evaluate the clinical performance of the multitarget fecal immunochemical and stool DNA (FIT-sDNA) test for CRC screening. Each participant was asked to provide a stool sample prior to bowel preparation, and FIT-sDNA test and FIT were performed independently of colonoscopy. We found that 186 (4.4%) were confirmed to have CRC, and 375 (8.8%) had advanced precancerous neoplasia among the high CRC risk individuals. The sensitivity of detecting CRC for FIT-sDNA test was 91.9% (95% CI, 86.8-95.3), compared with 62.4% (95% CI, 54.9-69.3) for FIT (P < 0.001). The sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous neoplasia was 63.5% (95% CI, 58.3-68.3) for FIT-sDNA test, compared with 30.9% (95% CI, 26.3-35.6) for FIT (P < 0.001). Multitarget FIT-sDNA test detected more colorectal advanced neoplasia than FIT. Overall, these findings indicated that in areas with limited colonoscopy resources, FIT-sDNA test could be a promising further risk triaging modality to select patients for colonoscopy in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye‐Ting Hu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China)The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouZhejiangChina
| | - Xiao‐Feng Chen
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital)NanjingChina
| | - Chun‐Bao Zhai
- Department of Anorectal SurgeryShanxi Provincial People's HospitalTaiyuanChina
| | - Xiao‐Tian Yu
- Hangzhou New Horizon Health Technology Co., Ltd.HangzhouChina
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of General SurgeryTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Zhi‐Guo Xiong
- Department of Gastrointestinal surgeryHubei Cancer HospitalWuhanChina
- Colorectal Cancer Medical Research Center of HubeiWuhanChina
| | - Zi‐Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - San‐Jun Cai
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
| | - Wen‐Cai Li
- Department of PathologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Xiang‐Xing Kong
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China)The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouZhejiangChina
| | - Qian Xiao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China)The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouZhejiangChina
| | - Cai‐Hua Wang
- Department of GastroenterologyThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
| | - Zhi‐Hua Tao
- Department of Clinical LaboratoryThe Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
| | - Li‐Yun Niu
- Department of Anorectal SurgeryShanxi Provincial People's HospitalTaiyuanChina
| | - Jian‐Long Men
- Department of General SurgeryTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Qing Wang
- Department of General SurgeryTianjin Medical University General HospitalTianjinChina
| | - Shao‐Zhong Wei
- Department of Gastrointestinal surgeryHubei Cancer HospitalWuhanChina
- Colorectal Cancer Medical Research Center of HubeiWuhanChina
| | - Jun‐Jie Hu
- Department of Gastrointestinal surgeryHubei Cancer HospitalWuhanChina
- Colorectal Cancer Medical Research Center of HubeiWuhanChina
| | - Ting‐Han Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduChina
| | - Jun‐Jie Peng
- Department of Colorectal SurgeryFudan University Shanghai Cancer CenterShanghaiChina
| | - Guo‐Zhong Jiang
- Department of PathologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
| | - Ning Lv
- Hangzhou New Horizon Health Technology Co., Ltd.HangzhouChina
| | - Yi‐You Chen
- Hangzhou New Horizon Health Technology Co., Ltd.HangzhouChina
| | - Shu Zheng
- Cancer Institute, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, Ministry of Education, The Second Affiliated HospitalZhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouChina
| | - Yan‐Hong Gu
- Department of OncologyThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University (Jiangsu Province Hospital)NanjingChina
| | - Ke‐Feng Ding
- Department of Colorectal Surgery and Oncology (Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Medical Sciences, Zhejiang Province, China)The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of MedicineHangzhouZhejiangChina
- Center for Medical Research and Innovation in Digestive System TumorsHangzhouChina
- Zhejiang Provincial Clinical Research Center for CANCERHangzhouChina
- Cancer Center of Zhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shamseddine A, Chehade L, Al Mahmasani L, Charafeddine M. Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Middle East: What, Why, Who, When, and How? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390520. [PMID: 37163709 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the Middle East is increasing, especially among those younger than 50 years. Risk factors including obesity, sedentary lifestyle, and dietary changes are associated with the epidemiologic shift and are a result of socioeconomic changes happening in the region. Worldwide, CRC screening is associated with decreased incidence and mortality of CRC, but screening uptake is still low in the Middle East because of cultural barriers and lack of awareness; in addition, most countries do not have national screening programs. Knowledge of CRC screening and participation rates vary among different countries, but overall they are low. Both primary and secondary prevention approaches are needed in the Middle East, and cost-effectiveness is important in choosing screening modalities. Although colonoscopy is considered the most robust screening method, stool-based testing may be an acceptable screening strategy in resource-limited settings, and focusing on high-risk individuals such as those with hereditary CRC might be the most cost-effective strategy. In addition to financial limitations in many countries in the Middle East, human displacement places an extra toll on cancer control strategies in the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Shamseddine
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laudy Chehade
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Layal Al Mahmasani
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Maya Charafeddine
- Naef K. Basile Cancer Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Riad El Solh, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pecere S, Ciuffini C, Chiappetta MF, Petruzziello L, Papparella LG, Spada C, Gasbarrini A, Barbaro F. Increasing the accuracy of colorectal cancer screening. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:583-591. [PMID: 37099725 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2207828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major health issue, being responsible for nearly 10% of all cancer-related deaths. Since CRC is often an asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic disease until it reaches advanced stages, screening is crucial for the diagnosis of preneoplastic lesions or early CRC. AREAS COVERED The aim of this review is to summarize the literature evidence on currently available CRC screening tools, with their pros and cons, focusing on the level of accuracy reached by each test over time. We also provide an overview of novel technologies and scientific advances that are currently being investigated and that in the future may represent real game-changers in the field of CRC screening. EXPERT OPINION We suggest that best screening modalities are annual or biennial FIT and colonoscopy every 10 years. We believe that the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI)-tools in the CRC screening field could lead to a significant improvement of the screening efficacy in reducing CRC incidence and mortality in the future. More resources should be put into implementing CRC programmes and support research project to further increase accuracy of CRC screening tests and strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Pecere
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Cristina Ciuffini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Michele Francesco Chiappetta
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Lucio Petruzziello
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Luigi Giovanni Papparella
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| | - Federico Barbaro
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome
- Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Rome
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jayasinghe M, Prathiraja O, Caldera D, Jena R, Coffie-Pierre JA, Silva MS, Siddiqui OS. Colon Cancer Screening Methods: 2023 Update. Cureus 2023; 15:e37509. [PMID: 37193451 PMCID: PMC10182334 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.37509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. National screening guidelines have been implemented to identify and remove precancerous polyps before they become cancer. Routine CRC screening is advised for people with average risk starting at age 45 because it is a common and preventable malignancy. Various screening modalities are currently in use, ranging from stool-based tests (fecal occult blood test (FOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and FIT-DNA test), radiologic tests (computed tomographic colonography (CTC), double contrast barium enema), and visual endoscopic examinations (flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE)) with their varying sensitivity and specificity. Biomarkers also play a vital role in assessing the recurrence of CRC. This review offers a summary of the current screening options, including biomarkers available to detect CRC, highlighting the benefits and challenges encompassing each screening modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rahul Jena
- Neurology/Internal Medicine, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College/Bharati Hospital, Pune, IND
| | | | | | - Ozair S Siddiqui
- Medicine, GMERS Medical College and Hospital, Dharpur-Patan, Patan, IND
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zheng S, Schrijvers JJA, Greuter MJW, Kats-Ugurlu G, Lu W, de Bock GH. Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071948. [PMID: 37046609 PMCID: PMC10093633 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The aim of this study was to pool and compare all-cause and colorectal cancer (CRC) specific mortality reduction of CRC screening in randomized control trials (RCTs) and simulation models, and to determine factors that influence screening effectiveness. (2) Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched for eligible studies. Multi-use simulation models or RCTs that compared the mortality of CRC screening with no screening in general population were included. CRC-specific and all-cause mortality rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by a bivariate random model. (3) Results: 10 RCTs and 47 model studies were retrieved. The pooled CRC-specific mortality rate ratios in RCTs were 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) and 0.76 (0.68, 0.84) for guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (gFOBT) and single flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening, respectively. For the model studies, the rate ratios were 0.45 (0.39, 0.51) for biennial fecal immunochemical tests (FIT), 0.31 (0.28, 0.34) for biennial gFOBT, 0.61 (0.53, 0.72) for single FS, 0.27 (0.21, 0.35) for 10-yearly colonoscopy, and 0.35 (0.29, 0.42) for 5-yearly FS. The CRC-specific mortality reduction of gFOBT increased with higher adherence in both studies (RCT: 0.78 (0.68, 0.89) vs. 0.92 (0.87, 0.98), model: 0.30 (0.28, 0.33) vs. 0.92 (0.51, 1.63)). Model studies showed a 0.62-1.1% all-cause mortality reduction with single FS screening. (4) Conclusions: Based on RCTs and model studies, biennial FIT/gFOBT, single and 5-yearly FS, and 10-yearly colonoscopy screening significantly reduces CRC-specific mortality. The model estimates are much higher than in RCTs, because the simulated biennial gFOBT assumes higher adherence. The effectiveness of screening increases at younger screening initiation ages and higher adherences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Senshuang Zheng
- Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle J A Schrijvers
- Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel J W Greuter
- Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
- Robotics and Mechatronics (RaM) Group, Technical Medical Centre, Faculty of Electrical Engineering Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Twente, 7522 NH Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Gürsah Kats-Ugurlu
- Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pathology, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Wenli Lu
- Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Balcerak G, Garrett M, Greiner BH, Hartwell M. Trends of colorectal cancer screening methods: an analysis of Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2018-2020. J Osteopath Med 2023; 123:317-323. [PMID: 36959778 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2022-0167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a high mortality rate and a large financial burden. Therefore, it is imperative to screen appropriately for this disease. By evaluating trends in different CRC screening methods and evaluating screening methods based on sex and race, improvements in screening can be made. OBJECTIVES By analyzing data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), our primary objective was to evaluate trends in CRC screening methods from 2018 through 2020. Our secondary objectives were to investigate deviations in screening rates by sex and race/ethnicity. METHODS A cross-sectional design was utilized to analyze trends in CRC screening methods utilizing data from the BRFSS for the years 2018 through 2020. Sex and race were also analyzed to evaluate for deviations in screening rates. RESULTS All race/ethnicity groups most often completed colonoscopies, with all but individuals identifying as Hispanic having higher than 56% completion rates. Individuals reporting as Hispanic received more blood stool tests than other races at 23.4%. Average CRC screening among all methods showed that 89.7% of individuals who reported as being White completed screening, with 91.3% of individuals reporting as Black, and 81.9% with race not listed, completed screening. Individuals identifying as Asian (74.4%), American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN [79.2%]) and Hispanic (78.1%) had lower rates of screening overall. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that trends in CRC screening were similar across years for individuals who reported as being White or Black. We also found that those identifying as Asian, AI/AN, Hispanic, and those whose identifying race was not listed deviated across years. These latter groups were also less likely to have received colonoscopies, the gold standard of screening. Because CRC is oftentimes a preventable disease, the importance of appropriate screening cannot be emphasized enough.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Balcerak
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Morgan Garrett
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| | - Benjamin H Greiner
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Micah Hartwell
- Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abbes S, Baldi S, Sellami H, Amedei A, Keskes L. Molecular methods for colorectal cancer screening: Progress with next-generation sequencing evolution. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:425-442. [PMID: 37009313 PMCID: PMC10052664 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i3.425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/02/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Currently, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the third most common malignancy and the second most deadly cancer worldwide, with a higher incidence in developed countries. Like other solid tumors, CRC is a heterogeneous genomic disease in which various alterations, such as point mutations, genomic rearrangements, gene fusions or chromosomal copy number alterations, can contribute to the disease development. However, because of its orderly natural history, easily accessible onset location and high lifetime incidence, CRC is ideally suited for preventive intervention, but the many screening efforts of the last decades have been compromised by performance limitations and low penetrance of the standard screening tools. The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has both facilitated the identification of previously unrecognized CRC features such as its relationship with gut microbial pathogens and revolutionized the speed and throughput of cataloguing CRC-related genomic alterations. Hence, in this review, we summarized the several diagnostic tools used for CRC screening in the past and the present, focusing on recent NGS approaches and their revolutionary role in the identification of novel genomic CRC characteristics, the advancement of understanding the CRC carcinogenesis and the screening of clinically actionable targets for personalized medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Abbes
- Laboratory of Parasitic and Fungal Molecular Biology, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| | - Simone Baldi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Hayet Sellami
- Drosophila Research Unit-Parasitology and Mycologie Laboratory, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| | - Amedeo Amedei
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence 50134, Italy
- SOD of Interdisciplinary Internal Medicine, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50134, Italy
| | - Leila Keskes
- Laboratory of Human Molecular Genetic, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ploukou S, Birtsou C, Gavana M, Tsakiridou K, Dandoulakis M, Symintiridou D, Moraiti E, Parisis A, Smyrnakis E. General Practitioners’ attitudes and beliefs on barriers to
colorectal cancer screening: A qualitative study. POPULATION MEDICINE 2023. [DOI: 10.18332/popmed/161128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2023] Open
|
34
|
Johansson M. The questionable value of colorectal cancer screening. BMJ 2023; 380:200. [PMID: 36707088 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.p200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Minna Johansson
- Global Center for Sustainable Healthcare, 45152 Uddevalla, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cheng CY, Calderazzo S, Schramm C, Schlander M. Modeling the Natural History and Screening Effects of Colorectal Cancer Using Both Adenoma and Serrated Neoplasia Pathways: The Development, Calibration, and Validation of a Discrete Event Simulation Model. MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683221145701. [PMID: 36698854 PMCID: PMC9869210 DOI: 10.1177/23814683221145701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Existing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening models mostly focus on the adenoma pathway of CRC development, overlooking the serrated neoplasia pathway, which might result in overly optimistic screening predictions. In addition, Bayesian inference methods have not been widely used for model calibration. We aimed to develop a CRC screening model accounting for both pathways, calibrate it with approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) methods, and validate it with large CRC screening trials. Methods. A discrete event simulation (DES) of the CRC natural history (DECAS) was constructed using the adenoma and serrated pathways in R software. The model simulates CRC-related events in a specific birth cohort through various natural history states. Calibration took advantage of 74 prevalence data points from the German screening colonoscopy program of 5.2 million average-risk participants using an ABC method. CRC incidence outputs from DECAS were validated with the German national cancer registry data; screening effects were validated using 17-y data from the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening sigmoidoscopy trial and a German screening colonoscopy cohort study. Results. The Bayesian calibration rendered 1,000 sets of posterior parameter samples. With the calibrated parameters, the observed age- and sex-specific CRC prevalences from the German registries were within the 95% DECAS-predicted intervals. Regarding screening effects, DECAS predicted a 41% (95% intervals 30%-51%) and 62% (95% intervals 55%-68%) reduction in 17-y cumulative CRC mortality for a single screening sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy, respectively, falling within 95% confidence intervals reported in the 2 clinical studies used for validation. Conclusions. We presented DECAS, the first Bayesian-calibrated DES model for CRC natural history and screening, accounting for 2 CRC tumorigenesis pathways. The validated model can serve as a valid tool to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of CRC screening strategies. Highlights This article presents a new discrete event simulation model, DECAS, which models both adenoma-carcinoma and serrated neoplasia pathways for colorectal cancer (CRC) development and CRC screening effects.DECAS is calibrated based on a Bayesian inference method using the data from German screening colonoscopy program, which consists of more than 5 million first-time average-risk participants aged 55 years and older in 2003 to 2014.DECAS is flexible for evaluating various CRC screening strategies and can differentiate screening effects in different parts of the colon.DECAS is validated with large screening sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy clinical study data and can be further used to evaluate the (cost-)effectiveness of German colorectal cancer screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Yuan Cheng
- Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany,Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Silvia Calderazzo
- Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Schramm
- Clinics of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Transplantation Medicine, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Schlander
- Michael Schlander, Division of Health Economics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany; ()
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brinkmann M, Diedrich L, Hemmerling M, Krauth C, Robra BP, Stahmeyer JT, Dreier M. Heterogeneous Preferences for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Germany: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 26:104-114. [PMID: 36031478 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests differ in benefits, harms, and processes, making individual informed decisions preference based. The objective was to analyze the preferences of insurees in Germany for characteristics of CRC screening modalities. METHODS A generic discrete choice experiment with 2-alternative choice sets and 6 attributes (CRC mortality, CRC incidence, complications, preparation, need for transportation, and follow-up; 3 levels each) depicting characteristics of fecal testing, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy was generated. Participants completed 8 choice tasks. Internal validity was tested using a within-set dominated pair. Between June and October 2020, written questionnaires were sent to a stratified random sample (n = 5000) of 50-, 55-, and 60-year-old insurees of the AOK (Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse) Lower Saxony, who had previously received an invitation to participate in the organized screening program including evidence-based information. Preferences were analyzed using conditional logit, mixed logit, and latent-class model. RESULTS From 1282 questionnaires received (26% [1282 of 4945]), 1142 were included in the analysis. Approximately 42% of the respondents chose the dominated alternative in the internal validity test. Three heterogeneous preference classes were identified. Most important attributes were preparation (class 1; n = 505, 44%), CRC mortality (class 2; n = 347, 30%), and CRC incidence (class 3; n = 290, 25%). Contrary to a priori expectations, a higher effort was preferred for bowel cleansing (class 1) and accompaniment home (classes 1 and 2). CONCLUSION Internal validity issues of choice data need further research and warrant attention in future discrete choice experiment surveys. The observed preference heterogeneity suggests different informational needs, although the underlying reasons remained unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernt-Peter Robra
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Jona T Stahmeyer
- Health Services Research Unit, AOK Niedersachsen, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ladabaum U, Shepard J, Mannalithara A. Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates at Screening Colonoscopy for Ages 45-49 Years vs Older Ages Since the Introduction of New Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2895-2904.e4. [PMID: 35580769 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.04.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS All major U.S. guidelines now endorse average-risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening at 45-49 years of age. Concerns exist that endoscopic capacity may be strained, that low-risk persons may self-select for screening, and that calculations of the adenoma detection rate may be diluted. We analyzed age-specific screening colonoscopy volumes and lesion detection rates before vs after the endorsement of CRC screening at 45-49 years of age. METHODS We compared colonoscopy volumes and lesion detection rates in our healthcare system during period 1 (October 2017 to December 2018), before the first change in guidelines, vs period 2 (January 2019 to August 2021), the era of new guidelines. RESULTS The proportion of first-time screening colonoscopies performed in 45- to 49-year-olds increased from 3.5% to 11.6% (relative risk, 3.36; 95% CI, 2.45-4.61). The period 2 detection rates for adenoma, advanced adenoma, sessile serrated lesion, advanced sessile serrated lesion, adenomas per colonoscopy, and lesions per colonoscopy were very similar for 45- to 49-year-olds (34.3%, 6.3%, 8.6%, 2.9%, 0.58, and 0.69, respectively) and 50- to 54-year-olds (38.2%, 5.8%, 9.4%, 3.0%, 0.63, and 0.76, respectively) at first-time screening, and for 60- to 64-year-olds at rescreening (33.4%, 6.1%, 7.2%, 2.3%, 0.61, and 0.70, respectively). All detection rates, adenomas per colonoscopy, and lesions per colonoscopy increased from period 1 to period 2 (eg, overall adenoma detection rate 35.1% vs 42.6%; P < .0001), without any decreases among 45- to 49-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS In our healthcare system, a lower CRC screening initiation age has modestly affected colonoscopy volume by age without compromising screening yield. Lesion detection rates, including for advanced adenomas, in average-risk 45- to 49-year-olds approximate those in 50- to 54-year-olds at first-time screening and 60- to 64-year-olds at rescreening. National monitoring is needed to assess fully the impact of lowering the CRC screening initiation age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
| | - John Shepard
- Critical Care Quality and Strategic Initiatives, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, California
| | - Ajitha Mannalithara
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Alvandi E, Wong WKM, Joglekar MV, Spring KJ, Hardikar AA. Short-chain fatty acid concentrations in the incidence and risk-stratification of colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2022; 20:323. [PMID: 36184594 PMCID: PMC9528142 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02529-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The beneficial role of gut microbiota and bacterial metabolites, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), is well recognized, although the available literature around their role in colorectal cancer (CRC) has been inconsistent. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the associations of fecal SCFA concentrations to the incidence and risk of CRC. Data extraction through Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was carried out from database conception to June 29, 2022. Predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria led to the selection of 17 case-control and six cross-sectional studies for quality assessment and analyses. Studies were categorized for CRC risk or incidence, and RevMan 5.4 was used to perform the meta-analyses. Standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Studies lacking quantitation were included in qualitative analyses. RESULTS Combined analysis of acetic, propionic, and butyric acid revealed significantly lower concentrations of these SCFAs in individuals with a high-risk of CRC (SMD = 2.02, 95% CI 0.31 to 3.74, P = 0.02). Additionally, CRC incidence was higher in individuals with lower levels of SCFAs (SMD = 0.45, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.72, P = 0.0009), compared to healthy individuals. Qualitative analyses identified 70.4% of studies reporting significantly lower concentrations of fecal acetic, propionic, butyric acid, or total SCFAs in those at higher risk of CRC, while 66.7% reported significantly lower concentrations of fecal acetic and butyric acid in CRC patients compared to healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS Overall, lower fecal concentrations of the three major SCFAs are associated with higher risk of CRC and incidence of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehsan Alvandi
- Diabetes and Islet Biology Group, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.,Medical Oncology Group, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia
| | - Wilson K M Wong
- Diabetes and Islet Biology Group, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.,Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Mugdha V Joglekar
- Diabetes and Islet Biology Group, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia.,Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kevin J Spring
- Diabetes and Islet Biology Group, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia. .,South-West Sydney Clinical Campuses, UNSW Medicine & Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Liverpool Clinical School, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.
| | - Anandwardhan A Hardikar
- Diabetes and Islet Biology Group, School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia. .,Translational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, NSW, Australia. .,Department of Science and Environment, Roskilde University Copenhagen, Roskilde, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marzo-Castillejo M, Bartolomé-Moreno C, Bellas-Beceiro B, Melús-Palazón E, Vela-Vallespín C. [PAPPS Expert Groups. Cancer prevention recommendations: Update 2022]. Aten Primaria 2022; 54 Suppl 1:102440. [PMID: 36435580 PMCID: PMC9705215 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Tobacco use, unhealthy diet, and physical inactivity are some of the lifestyle risk factors that have led to an increase in cancer. This article updates the evidence and includes recommendations for prevention strategies for each of the cancers with the highest incidence. These are based on the reduction of risk factors (primary prevention) and early diagnosis of cancer through screening and early detection of signs and symptoms, in medium-risk and high-risk populations. This update of the 2022 PAPPS has taken into account the vision of the National Health System Cancer Strategy, an update approved by the Interterritorial Council of the National Health System on January 2021 and the European Strategy (Europe's Beating Cancer Plan) presented on 4 February 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mercè Marzo-Castillejo
- Unitat de Suport a la Recerca Metropolitana Sud, IDIAP Jordi Gol, Direcció d'Atenció Primària Costa de Ponent, Institut Català de la Salut, Barcelona, España.
| | - Cruz Bartolomé-Moreno
- Centro de Salud Parque Goya de Zaragoza y Unidad Docente de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Sector Zaragoza I, Servicio Aragonés de Salud, Zaragoza, España
| | - Begoña Bellas-Beceiro
- Unidad Docente de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria La Laguna-Tenerife Norte, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Canarias, La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - Elena Melús-Palazón
- Centro de Salud Actur Oeste de Zaragoza y Unidad Docente de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Sector Zaragoza I, Servicio Aragonés de Salud, Zaragoza, España
| | - Carmen Vela-Vallespín
- ABS del Riu Nord i Riu Sud, Institut Català de la Salut, Santa Coloma de Gramenet, Barcelona, España
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Brinkmann M, Fricke LM, Diedrich L, Robra BP, Krauth C, Dreier M. Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2022; 12:49. [PMID: 36136248 PMCID: PMC9494881 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-022-00394-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The SIGMO study (Sigmoidoscopy as an evidence-based colorectal cancer screening test - a possible option?) examines screening eligible populations' preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Germany using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Attribute identification and selection are essential for the construction of choice tasks and should be evidence-based. As a part of the SIGMO study this systematic review provides an overview of attributes included in studies eliciting stated preferences for CRC screening tests and their relative importance for decision-making. METHODS Systematic search (November 2021) for English-language studies published since January 2000 in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Biomedical Reference Collection: Corporate Edition, LIVIVO and PsycINFO. DCEs and conjoint analysis ranking or rating tasks on screening eligible populations' preferences for stool testing, sigmoidoscopy, and/or colonoscopy were included. Attributes were extracted and their relative importance was calculated and ranked. Risk of bias (RoB) of included studies was assessed using a modified GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. Study selection and RoB rating were carried out independently by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one reviewer and checked by another one. RESULTS A total of 23 publications on 22 studies were included. Overall RoB was rated as serious/critical for 21 studies and as moderate for 2 studies. Main reasons for high RoB were non-random sampling, low response rates, lack of non-responder analyses, and, to a lesser extent, weaknesses in the measurement instrument and data analysis. Extracted attributes (n = 120) referred to procedure-related characteristics (n = 42; 35%), structural characteristics of health care (n = 24; 20%), test characteristics (n = 23; 19%), harms (n = 16; 13%), benefits (n = 13; 11%), and level of evidence (n = 2; 2%). Most important attributes were reduction in CRC mortality (and incidence) (n = 7), test sensitivity (n = 7), out-of-pocket costs (n = 4), procedure (n = 3), and frequency (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS Health preference studies on CRC were found to have a high RoB. The composition of choice tasks revealed a lack of attributes on patient-important outcomes (like incidence reduction), while attributes not considered relevant for individual screening decisions (like sensitivity) were frequently used. Future studies eliciting stated preferences in cancer screening should apply the principles of informed decision-making in attribute identification and selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Lara Marleen Fricke
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Bernt-Peter Robra
- Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Liu Y, Chen J. Expression Levels and Clinical Significance of Serum miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:3541403. [PMID: 35993056 PMCID: PMC9388305 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3541403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The objective of the current study was to look at the levels of blood micro ribonucleic acid- (miR-) 497, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 24-2, and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as the clinical importance of these markers in CRC patients. The serum levels of miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg were compared between 60 patients with CRC (observation group) and another 60 patients with colorectal polyps (control group). The 4 indicators in patients with lymph node metastasis and liver metastasis were compared. The diagnostic effects of 4 detection methods and the combined detection were analyzed, and the influence of 4 indicators on the 5-year cumulative survival rate of patients was discussed. The results showed that the serum levels of miR-497 and HBsAg were lower, and the levels of CEA and CA24-2 were higher in the observation group (P < 0.05). The combined detection had the best diagnostic effect, and CEA alone had the best prediction effect. The serum level of miR-497 was significantly lower in patients with lymphatic metastasis, with the significantly higher levels of CEA and CA24-2 (P < 0.05). The HBsAg level of patients with liver metastases was greatly lower than that of patients without liver metastases (P < 0.05). The 5-year cumulative survival rate of patients with high levels of CEA and CA24-2 was significantly lower than that of patients with low level of CEA. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was lower in patients with low level of HBsAg, but the difference was small. The 5-year cumulative survival rate of patients with elevated serum miR-497 was observably lower. In conclusion, combined detection could diagnose CRC more accurately. Serum miR-497, CEA, and CA24-2 were important in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of CRC. HBsAg did a better job of predicting liver metastases in CRC patients. High level of CEA significantly reduced the cumulative survival rate of CRC patients and could predict the long-term survival rate of patients. Serum levels of miR-497, CEA, CA24-2, and HBsAg played a positive role in the diagnosis and evaluation of CRC and could identify lymph node and liver metastases, having a high clinical guidance value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liu
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jie Chen
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Akwiwu EU, Klausch T, Jodal HC, Carvalho B, Løberg M, Kalager M, Berkhof J, H. Coupé VM. A progressive three-state model to estimate time to cancer: a likelihood-based approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22:179. [PMID: 35761181 PMCID: PMC9235269 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-022-01645-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To optimize colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and surveillance, information regarding the time-dependent risk of advanced adenomas (AA) to develop into CRC is crucial. However, since AA are removed after diagnosis, the time from AA to CRC cannot be observed in an ethically acceptable manner. We propose a statistical method to indirectly infer this time in a progressive three-state disease model using surveillance data. Methods Sixteen models were specified, with and without covariates. Parameters of the parametric time-to-event distributions from the adenoma-free state (AF) to AA and from AA to CRC were estimated simultaneously, by maximizing the likelihood function. Model performance was assessed via simulation. The methodology was applied to a random sample of 878 individuals from a Norwegian adenoma cohort. Results Estimates of the parameters of the time distributions are consistent and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) have good coverage. For the Norwegian sample (AF: 78%, AA: 20%, CRC: 2%), a Weibull model for both transition times was selected as the final model based on information criteria. The mean time among those who have made the transition to CRC since AA onset within 50 years was estimated to be 4.80 years (95% CI: 0; 7.61). The 5-year and 10-year cumulative incidence of CRC from AA was 13.8% (95% CI: 7.8%;23.8%) and 15.4% (95% CI: 8.2%;34.0%), respectively. Conclusions The time-dependent risk from AA to CRC is crucial to explain differences in the outcomes of microsimulation models used for the optimization of CRC prevention. Our method allows for improving models by the inclusion of data-driven time distributions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1186/s12874-022-01645-2).
Collapse
|
43
|
Njor SH, Larsen MB, Søborg B, Andersen B. Colorectal cancer mortality after randomized implementation of FIT-based screening - a nationwide cohort study. J Med Screen 2022; 29:241-248. [DOI: 10.1177/09691413221102212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Objective Evidence of reduction in colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality following CRC screening based on the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is insufficient. This study aimed to analyse if CRC mortality was reduced after implementing FIT-based screening. Setting The Danish national CRC screening programme. Methods This nationwide cohort study included residents aged 50–71 years invited to the prevalence round of the screening programme. Invitation order was decided by randomising on birth month; the first two birth months to be invited were classified as invited and the five last were classified as not-yet-invited and given a pseudo invitation data. Follow-up was from (pseudo)invitation date until 31 December 2017, emigration or death. Relative risk (RR) of CRC death was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 897,812 residents were included (29% invited and 71% not-yet-invited). The median follow-up was 3.3 years. The RR of CRC death at end of follow-up was 0.83 (95% CI 0.66; 1.03) among those invited to screening compared with those not yet invited. For men aged 60–71 years, this RR was 0.68 (95% CI 0.49; 0.94). For those participating in screening compared with a similar group of not-yet-invited residents, the RR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.46–1.08). For male participants aged 60–71 years, this RR was 0.49 (95% CI 0.27−0.89). For women and men aged 50–59 years, RRs were small and statistically non-significant. Conclusion This nationwide study showed that even within a median follow-up of only 3.3 years, implementing FIT-based CRC screening reduced CRC mortality among older men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisse Helle Njor
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Bo Søborg
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Cancer Screening, Randers Regional Hospital, Randers, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Malmqvist J, Siersma VD, Hestbech MS, Bang CW, Nicolaisdóttir DR, Brodersen J. Short and long-term psychosocial consequences of participating in a colorectal cancer screening programme: a matched longitudinal study. BMJ Evid Based Med 2022; 27:87-96. [PMID: 34083210 PMCID: PMC8961773 DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the psychosocial consequences of receiving a false-positive (no abnormalities) result or being diagnosed with polyps compared with receiving a negative result in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a longitudinal study nested in the roll-out of the Danish CRC screening programme that targets all individuals aged 50-74 years. PARTICIPANTS In the inclusion period (April-September 2017), all positive screenees (n=1854) were consecutively enrolled and matched 2:1:1 on sex, age (±2 years), municipality and screening date with negative screenees (n=933) and individuals not yet invited to screening (n=933).Questionnaires were sent by mail to all eligible participants in Region Zealand, Denmark, after the screening result, 2 months and 12 months after the final result.Positive screenees who did not receive the follow-up procedure were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcomes were psychosocial consequences. Outcomes were measured with the CRC screening-specific questionnaire Consequences of screening in CRC with 11 outcomes after the screening result and with 21 outcomes at the two later assessments. RESULTS After receiving the screening result, individuals with no abnormalities, low-risk and medium-risk and high-risk polyps scored significantly worse on 8 of 11 outcomes compared with the negative screenee group. At the 12-month follow-up, the differences were still significant in 8 of 21 outcomes (no abnormalities), 4 of 21 outcomes (low-risk polyps) and 10 of 21 outcomes (medium-risk and high-risk polyps). The negative screenee group and the group not yet invited to screening differed psychosocially on 5 of 11 outcomes after the screening result, but on none of the 21 outcomes at the 2 months and 12 months follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The study showed that there are both short-term and long-term psychosocial consequences associated with receiving a no abnormalities result or being diagnosed with polyps. The consequences were worst for individuals diagnosed with medium-risk and high-risk polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Malmqvist
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark
| | - Volkert Dirk Siersma
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Mie Sara Hestbech
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Christine Winther Bang
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Dagný Rós Nicolaisdóttir
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - John Brodersen
- The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
- Primary Health Care Research Unit, Region Zealand, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jain S, Maque J, Galoosian A, Osuna-Garcia A, May FP. Optimal Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2022; 23:474-493. [PMID: 35316477 PMCID: PMC8989803 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-022-00962-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) imposes significant morbidity and mortality, yet it is also largely preventable with evidence-based screening strategies. In May 2021, the US Preventive Services Task Force updated guidance, recommending screening begin at age 45 for average-risk individuals to reduce CRC incidence and mortality in the United States (US). The Task Force recommends screening with one of several screening strategies: high-sensitivity guaiac fecal occult blood test (HSgFOBT), fecal immunochemical test (FIT), multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) test, computed tomographic (CT) colonography (virtual colonoscopy), flexible sigmoidoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy with FIT, or traditional colonoscopy. In addition to these recommended options, there are several emerging and novel CRC screening modalities that are not yet approved for first-line screening in average-risk individuals. These include blood-based screening or “liquid biopsy,” colon capsule endoscopy, urinary metabolomics, and stool-based microbiome testing for the detection of colorectal polyps and/or CRC. In order to maximize CRC screening uptake in the US, patients and providers should engage in informed decision-making about the benefits and limitations of recommended screening options to determine the most appropriate screening test. Factors to consider include the invasiveness of the test, test performance, screening interval, accessibility, and cost. In addition, health systems should have a programmatic approach to CRC screening, which may include evidence-based strategies such as patient education, provider education, mailed screening outreach, and/or patient navigation, to maximize screening participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shailavi Jain
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Jetrina Maque
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Artin Galoosian
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA
| | - Antonia Osuna-Garcia
- Louise M. Darling Biomedical Library, University of California, Los Angeles, Center for Health Sciences, 12-077, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1798, USA
| | - Folasade P May
- Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, 757 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. .,Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA. .,Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. .,UCLA Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Equity, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 650 S. Charles E Young Drive, Center for Health Sciences, Suite A2-125, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Ladabaum U, Church TR, Feng Z, Ransohoff DF, Schoen RE. Counting Advanced Precancerous Lesions as True Positives When Determining Colorectal Cancer Screening Test Specificity. J Natl Cancer Inst 2022; 114:1040-1043. [PMID: 35134969 PMCID: PMC9275773 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djac027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The landmark Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) decision memo on blood-based biomarkers to screen for colorectal cancer (CRC) sets thresholds of 74% or higher for sensitivity and 90% or higher for specificity for CRC. This approach does not consider detection of advanced precancerous lesions as true positives. We contrasted the impact of counting advanced precancerous lesions as true vs false positives and projected CRC outcomes under contrasting tests in a validated model. A test with the threshold performance set by CMS decreased CRC incidence by 30% and CRC mortality by 48% in individuals aged 45 years. If this test also detected advanced precancerous lesions with 30% sensitivity, CRC incidence decreased by 45% and mortality by 58%, but the CRC specificity of the test of only 88% would not satisfy the CMS threshold. CMS should reconsider its definition of threshold specificity for CRC screening biomarkers. Future coverage determinations on biomarkers to screen for cancer should consider detection of relevant precursor lesions and projected outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Ladabaum
- Correspondence to: Uri Ladabaum, MD, MS, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 430 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, 3rd Floor C-326, Redwood City, CA 94063-6341, USA (e-mail: )
| | - Timothy R Church
- Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota School of Public Health and Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Ziding Feng
- Biostatistics Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David F Ransohoff
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Robert E Schoen
- Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jodal HC, Klotz D, Herfindal M, Barua I, Tag P, Helsingen LM, Refsum E, Holme Ø, Adami HO, Bretthauer M, Kalager M, Løberg M. Long-term colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal in women and men. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2022; 55:412-421. [PMID: 34716941 DOI: 10.1111/apt.16686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 09/17/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women and men with colorectal adenomas are at increased risk of colorectal cancer and colonoscopic surveillance is recommended. However, the long-term cancer risk remains unknown. AIMS To investigate colorectal cancer incidence and mortality after adenoma removal in women and men METHODS: We identified all individuals who had adenomas removed in Norway from 1993 to 2007, with follow-up through 2018. We calculated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and incidence-based mortality ratios (SMR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for colorectal cancer in women and men using the female and male population for comparison. We defined high-risk adenomas as ≥2 adenomas, villous component, or high-grade dysplasia. RESULTS The cohort comprised 40 293 individuals. During median follow-up of 13.0 years, 1079 women (5.5%) and 866 men (4.2%) developed colorectal cancer; 328 women (1.7%) and 275 men (1.3%) died of colorectal cancer. Colorectal cancer incidence was more increased in women (SIR 1.64, 95% CI 1.54-1.74) than in men (SIR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19). Colorectal cancer mortality was increased in women (SMR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02-1.26) and reduced in men (SMR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89). Women with high-risk adenomas had an increased risk of colorectal cancer death (SMR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.57); women with low-risk adenomas (SMR 0.90, 95% CI 0.76-1.07) and men with high-risk adenomas had a similar risk (SMR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76-1.04), while men with low-risk adenomas had reduced risk (SMR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.84). CONCLUSIONS After adenoma removal, women had an increased risk of colorectal cancer death, while men had reduced risk, compared to the general female and male populations. Sex-specific surveillance recommendations after adenoma removal should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henriette C Jodal
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dagmar Klotz
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Pathology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnhild Herfindal
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ishita Barua
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Petter Tag
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital Bodø, Bodø, Norway
| | - Lise M Helsingen
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erle Refsum
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Diedrich L, Brinkmann M, Dreier M, Schramm W, Krauth C. Additional offer of sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening in Germany: rationale and protocol of the decision-analytic modelling approach in the SIGMO study. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e050698. [PMID: 34992106 PMCID: PMC8739067 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In Germany, statutory insured persons are entitled to a stool test (faecal immunochemical test (FIT)) or colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, depending on age and sex, yet participation rates are rather low. Sigmoidoscopy is a currently not available screening measure that has a strong evidence base for incidence and mortality reduction. Due to its distinct characteristics, it might be preferred by some, who now reject colonoscopy. The objective of this study is to estimate the economic consequences of the additional offer of sigmoidoscopy for CRC screening in Germany compared with the present screening practice while considering the preferences of the general population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A decision-analytic modelling approach will be developed that compares the present CRC screening programme in Germany (FIT, colonoscopy) with a programme extended by sigmoidoscopy from a societal perspective. A decision tree and Markov model will be combined to assess both short-term and long-term effects, such as CRC and adenoma detection rates, the number of CRC cases, CRC mortality as well as complications. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained for each alternative will be calculated. The model will incorporate the general population's preferences based on a discrete choice experiment. Further, input parameters will be taken from the literature, the German cancer registry and health insurance claims data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Hannover Medical School (ID: 8671_BO_K_2019). The findings of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and/or international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER DRKS00019010.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| | - Wendelin Schramm
- GECKO Institute for Medicine, Informatics and Economics, Heilbronn University, Heilbronn, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
McFerran E, O’Mahony JF, Naber S, Sharp L, Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Kee F. Colorectal Cancer Screening within Colonoscopy Capacity Constraints: Can FIT-Based Programs Save More Lives by Trading off More Sensitive Test Cutoffs against Longer Screening Intervals? MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683221097064. [PMID: 35573867 PMCID: PMC9091364 DOI: 10.1177/23814683221097064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention programs using
fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) in screening rely on colonoscopy for
secondary and surveillance testing. Colonoscopy capacity is an important
constraint. Some European programs lack sufficient capacity to provide optimal
screening intensity regarding age ranges, intervals, and FIT cutoffs. It is
currently unclear how to optimize programs within colonoscopy capacity
constraints. Design. Microsimulation modeling, using the
MISCAN-Colon model, was used to determine if more effective CRC screening
programs can be identified within constrained colonoscopy capacity. A total of
525 strategies were modeled and compared, varying 3 key screening parameters:
screening intervals, age ranges, and FIT cutoffs, including previously
unevaluated 4- and 5-year screening intervals (using a lifetime horizon and 100%
adherence). Results were compared with the policy decisions taken in Ireland to
provide CRC screening within available colonoscopy capacity. Outcomes estimated
net costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and required colonoscopies. The
optimal strategies within finite colonoscopy capacity constraints were
identified. Results. Combining a reduced FIT cutoff of 10 µg Hb/g,
an extended screening interval of 4 y and an age range of 60–72 y requires 6%
fewer colonoscopies, reduces net costs by 23% while preventing 15% more CRC
deaths and saving 16% more QALYs relative to a strategy (FIT 40 µg Hb/g,
2-yearly, 60–70 year) approximating current policy. Conclusion.
Previously overlooked longer screening intervals may optimize cancer prevention
with finite colonoscopy capacity constraints. Changes could save lives, reduce
costs, and relieve colonoscopy capacity pressures. These findings are relevant
to CRC screening programs across Europe that employ FIT-based testing, which
face colonoscopy capacity constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethna McFerran
- Queen’s University Belfast, Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Royal Victoria Hospital, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, UK
| | - James F. O’Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Ann G. Zauber
- Department of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Frank Kee
- Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Brinkmann M, von Holt I, Diedrich L, Krauth C, Seidel G, Dreier M. Attributes Characterizing Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests That Influence Preferences of Individuals Eligible for Screening in Germany: A Qualitative Study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2022; 16:2051-2066. [PMID: 35975173 PMCID: PMC9375991 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s365429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This qualitative study is part of the SIGMO study, which evaluates general populations' preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Germany using a discrete choice experiment. Attribute identification and selection are essential in the construction of choice tasks and should be evidence-based ensuring that attributes are relevant to potential beneficiaries and contribute to overall utility. Therefore, this qualitative study aims to identify relevant attributes characterizing CRC screening tests from the perspective of those eligible for screening in Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS Individuals aged 50 to 60 were purposively selected. A questioning route was developed and piloted. Four focus groups (FG) (n=20) were conducted (November 2019) with two moderators and one observer each. FGs were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Attributes were deductively assigned based on a priori identified attribute categories, and inductively derived. RESULTS Across FGs, 24 attributes (n=293 codes) were discussed, five of which (sedation, inability to work, transportation home, predictive values, waiting time for screening colonoscopy) were inductively derived (n=76 codes). Four attributes identified a priori were not addressed in any FG. The most frequently discussed attribute category was procedural characteristics, followed by measures of screening test validity, benefits, harms, and structural characteristics of health care. The most commonly addressed attributes were preprocedural bowel cleansing, kind of procedure, and predictive values. CONCLUSION Newly identified attributes characterizing CRC screening tests from an individual's perspective, and a priori identified attributes not addressed by any FG stress the added value of qualitative research and thereby the importance of applying a mix of methods in identifying and selecting attributes for the construction of choice tasks. This study meets the requirements for a transparent and detailed presentation of the qualitative methods used in this process, which has rarely been the case before.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie Brinkmann
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Correspondence: Melanie Brinkmann, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, Email
| | - Isabell von Holt
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Leonie Diedrich
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christian Krauth
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Gabriele Seidel
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Maren Dreier
- Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|