1
|
Milanesi S, De Nicolao G. Correction of Italian under-reporting in the first COVID-19 wave via age-specific deconvolution of hospital admissions. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0295079. [PMID: 38060513 PMCID: PMC10703316 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
When the COVID-19 pandemic first emerged in early 2020, healthcare and bureaucratic systems worldwide were caught off guard and largely unprepared to deal with the scale and severity of the outbreak. In Italy, this led to a severe underreporting of infections during the first wave of the spread. The lack of accurate data is critical as it hampers the retrospective assessment of nonpharmacological interventions, the comparison with the following waves, and the estimation and validation of epidemiological models. In particular, during the first wave, reported cases of new infections were strikingly low if compared with their effects in terms of deaths, hospitalizations and intensive care admissions. In this paper, we observe that the hospital admissions during the second wave were very well explained by the convolution of the reported daily infections with an exponential kernel. By formulating the estimation of the actual infections during the first wave as an inverse problem, its solution by a regularization approach is proposed and validated. In this way, it was possible to compute corrected time series of daily infections for each age class. The new estimates are consistent with the serological survey published in June 2020 by the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT) and can be used to speculate on the total number of infections occurring in Italy during 2020, which appears to be about double the number officially recorded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Milanesi
- Department of Mathematics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Nicolao
- Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Division of Infectious Diseases I, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sariyer G, Kahraman S, Sözen ME, Ataman MG. Fiscal responses to COVID-19 outbreak for healthy economies: Modelling with big data analytics. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS 2023; 64:191-198. [PMID: 36590330 PMCID: PMC9793960 DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2021] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Fiscal responses to the COVID-19 crisis have varied a lot across countries. Using a panel of 127 countries over two separate subperiods between 2020 and 2021, this paper seeks to determine the extent that fiscal responses contributed to the spread and containment of the disease. The study first documents that rich countries, which had the largest total and health-related fiscal responses, achieved the lowest fatality rates, defined as the ratio of COVID-related deaths to cases, despite having the largest recorded numbers of cases and fatalities. The next most successful were less developed economies, whose smaller total fiscal responses included a larger health-related component than emerging market economies. The study used a promising big data analytics technology, the random forest algorithm, to determine which factors explained a country's fatality rate. The findings indicate that a country's fatality ratio over the next period can be almost entirely predicted by its economic development level, fiscal expenditure (both total and health-related), and initial fatality ratio. Finally, the study conducted a counterfactual exercise to show that, had less developed economies implemented the same fiscal responses as the rich (as a share of GDP), then their fatality ratios would have declined by 20.47% over the first period and 2.59% over the second one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gorkem Sariyer
- Department of Business Administration, Yaşar University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Mert Erkan Sözen
- Budget Planning and Information Responsible, Izmir Metro Company, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Gokalp Ataman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Izmir Bakırçay University Çiğli Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bhattacharyya R, Burman A, Singh K, Banerjee S, Maity S, Auddy A, Rout SK, Lahoti S, Panda R, Baladandayuthapani V. Role of multiresolution vulnerability indices in COVID-19 spread in India: a Bayesian model-based analysis. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e056292. [PMID: 36396323 PMCID: PMC9676421 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES COVID-19 has differentially affected countries, with health infrastructure and other related vulnerability indicators playing a role in determining the extent of its spread. Vulnerability of a geographical region to COVID-19 has been a topic of interest, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries like India to assess its multifactorial impact on incidence, prevalence or mortality. This study aims to construct a statistical analysis pipeline to compute such vulnerability indices and investigate their association with metrics of the pandemic growth. DESIGN Using publicly reported observational socioeconomic, demographic, health-based and epidemiological data from Indian national surveys, we compute contextual COVID-19 Vulnerability Indices (cVIs) across multiple thematic resolutions for different geographical and spatial administrative regions. These cVIs are then used in Bayesian regression models to assess their impact on indicators of the spread of COVID-19. SETTING This study uses district-level indicators and case counts data for the state of Odisha, India. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE We use instantaneous R (temporal average of estimated time-varying reproduction number for COVID-19) as the primary outcome variable in our models. RESULTS Our observational study, focussing on 30 districts of Odisha, identified housing and hygiene conditions, COVID-19 preparedness and epidemiological factors as important indicators associated with COVID-19 vulnerability. CONCLUSION Having succeeded in containing COVID-19 to a reasonable level during the first wave, the second wave of COVID-19 made greater inroads into the hinterlands and peripheral districts of Odisha, burdening the already deficient public health system in these areas, as identified by the cVIs. Improved understanding of the factors driving COVID-19 vulnerability will help policy makers prioritise resources and regions, leading to more effective mitigation strategies for the present and future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupam Bhattacharyya
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Anik Burman
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Sayantan Banerjee
- Operations Management and Quantitative Techniques Area, Indian Institute of Management Indore, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
| | - Subha Maity
- Department of Statistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Arnab Auddy
- Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sarit Kumar Rout
- Indian Institute of Public Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Supriya Lahoti
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Rajmohan Panda
- Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dhar MS, Marwal R, VS R, Ponnusamy K, Jolly B, Bhoyar RC, Sardana V, Naushin S, Rophina M, Mellan TA, Mishra S, Whittaker C, Fatihi S, Datta M, Singh P, Sharma U, Ujjainiya R, Bhatheja N, Divakar MK, Singh MK, Imran M, Senthivel V, Maurya R, Jha N, Mehta P, A V, Sharma P, VR A, Chaudhary U, Soni N, Thukral L, Flaxman S, Bhatt S, Pandey R, Dash D, Faruq M, Lall H, Gogia H, Madan P, Kulkarni S, Chauhan H, Sengupta S, Kabra S, Gupta RK, Singh SK, Agrawal A, Rakshit P. Genomic characterization and epidemiology of an emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant in Delhi, India. Science 2021; 374:995-999. [PMID: 34648303 PMCID: PMC7612010 DOI: 10.1126/science.abj9932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 167] [Impact Index Per Article: 55.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Delhi, the national capital of India, experienced multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks in 2020 and reached population seropositivity of >50% by 2021. During April 2021, the city became overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases and fatalities, as a new variant, B.1.617.2 (Delta), replaced B.1.1.7 (Alpha). A Bayesian model explains the growth advantage of Delta through a combination of increased transmissibility and reduced sensitivity to immune responses generated against earlier variants (median estimates: 1.5-fold greater transmissibility and 20% reduction in sensitivity). Seropositivity of an employee and family cohort increased from 42% to 87.5% between March and July 2021, with 27% reinfections, as judged by increased antibody concentration after a previous decline. The likely high transmissibility and partial evasion of immunity by the Delta variant contributed to an overwhelming surge in Delhi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robin Marwal
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Bani Jolly
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Rahul C. Bhoyar
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Viren Sardana
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Salwa Naushin
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Mercy Rophina
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Thomas A. Mellan
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Swapnil Mishra
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Whittaker
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saman Fatihi
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Meena Datta
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | | | - Uma Sharma
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Rajat Ujjainiya
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Nitin Bhatheja
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Mohit Kumar Divakar
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | - Mohamed Imran
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Vigneshwar Senthivel
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Ranjeet Maurya
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Neha Jha
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Priyanka Mehta
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Vivekanand A
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Pooja Sharma
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Arvinden VR
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | - Namita Soni
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Lipi Thukral
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Seth Flaxman
- Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Samir Bhatt
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rajesh Pandey
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Debasis Dash
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Mohammed Faruq
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Hemlata Lall
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Hema Gogia
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Preeti Madan
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Shantanu Sengupta
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | - The Indian SARS-CoV-2 Genomics Consortium (INSACOG)‡
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease (CITIID), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | - Ravindra K. Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease (CITIID), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | | | - Anurag Agrawal
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dhar MS, Marwal R, Vs R, Ponnusamy K, Jolly B, Bhoyar RC, Sardana V, Naushin S, Rophina M, Mellan TA, Mishra S, Whittaker C, Fatihi S, Datta M, Singh P, Sharma U, Ujjainiya R, Bhatheja N, Divakar MK, Singh MK, Imran M, Senthivel V, Maurya R, Jha N, Mehta P, A V, Sharma P, Vr A, Chaudhary U, Soni N, Thukral L, Flaxman S, Bhatt S, Pandey R, Dash D, Faruq M, Lall H, Gogia H, Madan P, Kulkarni S, Chauhan H, Sengupta S, Kabra S, Gupta RK, Singh SK, Agrawal A, Rakshit P, Nandicoori V, Tallapaka KB, Sowpati DT, Thangaraj K, Bashyam MD, Dalal A, Sivasubbu S, Scaria V, Parida A, Raghav SK, Prasad P, Sarin A, Mayor S, Ramakrishnan U, Palakodeti D, Seshasayee ASN, Bhat M, Shouche Y, Pillai A, Dikid T, Das S, Maitra A, Chinnaswamy S, Biswas NK, Desai AS, Pattabiraman C, Manjunatha MV, Mani RS, Arunachal Udupi G, Abraham P, Atul PV, Cherian SS. Genomic characterization and epidemiology of an emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant in Delhi, India. Science 2021; 374:995-999. [PMID: 34648303 DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.02.21258076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Delhi, the national capital of India, experienced multiple severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) outbreaks in 2020 and reached population seropositivity of >50% by 2021. During April 2021, the city became overwhelmed by COVID-19 cases and fatalities, as a new variant, B.1.617.2 (Delta), replaced B.1.1.7 (Alpha). A Bayesian model explains the growth advantage of Delta through a combination of increased transmissibility and reduced sensitivity to immune responses generated against earlier variants (median estimates: 1.5-fold greater transmissibility and 20% reduction in sensitivity). Seropositivity of an employee and family cohort increased from 42% to 87.5% between March and July 2021, with 27% reinfections, as judged by increased antibody concentration after a previous decline. The likely high transmissibility and partial evasion of immunity by the Delta variant contributed to an overwhelming surge in Delhi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robin Marwal
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Bani Jolly
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Rahul C Bhoyar
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Viren Sardana
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Salwa Naushin
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Mercy Rophina
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Thomas A Mellan
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Swapnil Mishra
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Charles Whittaker
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Saman Fatihi
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Meena Datta
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | | | - Uma Sharma
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Rajat Ujjainiya
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Nitin Bhatheja
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Mohit Kumar Divakar
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | - Mohamed Imran
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Vigneshwar Senthivel
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Ranjeet Maurya
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Neha Jha
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Priyanka Mehta
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
| | - Vivekanand A
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Pooja Sharma
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Arvinden Vr
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | - Namita Soni
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Lipi Thukral
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Seth Flaxman
- Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Samir Bhatt
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Jameel Institute, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Rajesh Pandey
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Debasis Dash
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Mohammed Faruq
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | - Hemlata Lall
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Hema Gogia
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | - Preeti Madan
- National Centre for Disease Control, Delhi, India
| | | | | | - Shantanu Sengupta
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | - Ravindra K Gupta
- Department of Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease (CITIID), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Africa Health Research Institute, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
| | | | - Anurag Agrawal
- CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India
- Academy for Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, India
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yadav S, Yadav PK, Yadav N. Impact of COVID-19 on life expectancy at birth in India: a decomposition analysis. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:1906. [PMID: 34670537 PMCID: PMC8528662 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11690-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quantifying excess deaths and their impact on life expectancy at birth (e0) provide a more comprehensive understanding of the burden of coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) on mortality. The study aims to comprehend the repercussions of the burden of COVID-19 disease on the life expectancy at birth and inequality in age at death in India. METHODS The mortality schedule of COVID-19 disease in the pandemic year 2020 was considered one of the causes of death in the category of other infectious diseases in addition to other 21 causes of death in the non-pandemic year 2019 in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) data. The measures e0 and Gini coefficient at age zero (G0) and then sex differences in e0 and G0 over time were analysed by assessing the age-specific contributions based on the application of decomposition analyses in the entire period of 2010-2020. RESULTS The e0 for men and women decline from 69.5 and 72.0 years in 2019 to 67.5 and 69.8 years, respectively, in 2020. The e0 shows a drop of approximately 2.0 years in 2020 when compared to 2019. The sex differences in e0 and G0 are negatively skewed towards men. The trends in e0 and G0 value reveal that its value in 2020 is comparable to that in the early 2010s. The age group of 35-79 years showed a remarkable negative contribution to Δe0 and ΔG0. By causes of death, the COVID-19 disease has contributed - 1.5 and - 9.5%, respectively, whereas cardiovascular diseases contributed the largest value of was 44.6 and 45.9%, respectively, to sex differences in e0 and G0 in 2020. The outcomes reveal a significant impact of excess deaths caused by the COVID-19 disease on mortality patterns. CONCLUSIONS The COVID-19 pandemic has negative repercussions on e0 and G0 in the pandemic year 2020. It has severely affected the distribution of age at death in India, resulting in widening the sex differences in e0 and G0. The COVID-19 disease demonstrates its potential to cancel the gains of six to eight years in e0 and five years in G0 and has slowed the mortality transition in India.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suryakant Yadav
- Department of Development Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, 400088, India.
| | - Pawan Kumar Yadav
- Department of Development Studies, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, 400088, India
| | - Neha Yadav
- Centre of Social Medicine and Community Health, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi, 110067, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Justo Arevalo S, Zapata Sifuentes D, J Huallpa C, Landa Bianchi G, Castillo Chávez A, Garavito-Salini Casas R, Uribe Calampa CS, Uceda-Campos G, Pineda Chavarría R. Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 mutations reveals regional-specificity and similar trends of N501 and high-frequency mutation N501Y in different levels of control measures. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17755. [PMID: 34493762 PMCID: PMC8423746 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97267-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This disease has spread globally, causing more than 161.5 million cases and 3.3 million deaths to date. Surveillance and monitoring of new mutations in the virus' genome are crucial to our understanding of the adaptation of SARS-CoV-2. Moreover, how the temporal dynamics of these mutations is influenced by control measures and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is poorly understood. Using 1,058,020 SARS-CoV-2 from sequenced COVID-19 cases from 98 countries (totaling 714 country-month combinations), we perform a normalization by COVID-19 cases to calculate the relative frequency of SARS-CoV-2 mutations and explore their dynamics over time. We found 115 mutations estimated to be present in more than 3% of global COVID-19 cases and determined three types of mutation dynamics: high-frequency, medium-frequency, and low-frequency. Classification of mutations based on temporal dynamics enable us to examine viral adaptation and evaluate the effects of implemented control measures in virus evolution during the pandemic. We showed that medium-frequency mutations are characterized by high prevalence in specific regions and/or in constant competition with other mutations in several regions. Finally, taking N501Y mutation as representative of high-frequency mutations, we showed that level of control measure stringency negatively correlates with the effective reproduction number of SARS-CoV-2 with high-frequency or not-high-frequency and both follows similar trends in different levels of stringency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Justo Arevalo
- Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima, Peru.
- Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | - César J Huallpa
- Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Agraria la Molina, Lima, Peru
| | | | | | | | | | - Guillermo Uceda-Campos
- Department of Biochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo, Lambayeque, Peru
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the magnitude of under‐reporting the number of deaths due to COVID‐19 in Brazil in 2020, previously shown to occur due to low rate of laboratory testing for SARS‐CoV‐2, reporting delay, inadequate access to medical care, and its poor quality, leading to the low sensitivity of epidemiological surveillance and poor outcomes, often without laboratory confirmation of the cause of death. Methods Excess mortality due to COVID‐19 was estimated directly based on various data sources, and indirectly, based on the difference between the observed and expected number of deaths from serious acute respiratory infection (SARI) and all‐natural causes in 2020 had there been no COVID‐19. The absence of laboratory testing for SARS‐CoV‐2 was adjusted based on the proportion of those who tested positive among the tested individuals whose death was attributed to COVID‐19. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (lasso) were used to improve prediction of likely mortality without COVID‐19 in 2020. Results Under‐reporting of COVID‐19 deaths was 22.62%, with a corresponding mortality rate per 100 000 inhabitants of 115 by the direct method, 71–76 by the indirect methods based on the excess SARI mortality and 95–104 by excess mortality due to natural causes. COVID‐19 was the third cause of mortality that contributed directly with 18%, and indirectly with additional 10–11% to all deaths in Brazil in 2020. Conclusions Underestimation of COVID‐19 mortality between 1:5 and 1:4 is likely its lower bound. Timely and accurate surveillance of death causes is of the essence to evaluate the COVID‐19 burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emil Kupek
- Department of Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|