1
|
Eriksson M, Blomberg K, Arvidsson E, Van Poel E, Ares-Blanco S, Astier-Peña MP, Collins C, Gabrani J, Stylianou N, Tkachenko V, Willems S. Did the organization of primary care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic influence quality and safety? - an international survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:737. [PMID: 38877434 PMCID: PMC11179335 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11173-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Changes in demographics with an older population, the illness panorama with increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases, and the shift from hospital care to home-based care place demand on primary health care, which requires multiprofessional collaboration and team-based organization of work. The COVID-19 pandemic affected health care in various ways, such as heightened infection control measures, changing work practices, and increased workload. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate the association between primary care practices' organization, and quality and safety changes during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Data were collected from 38 countries in a large online survey, the PRICOV-19 study. For this paper, the participating practices were categorized as "Only GPs", comprising practices with solely general practitioners (GPs) and/or GP trainees, without any other health care professionals (n = 1,544), and "Multiprofessional," comprising practices with at least one GP or GP trainee and one or more other health professionals (n = 3,936). RESULTS Both categories of practices improved in infection control routines when compared before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. A larger proportion of the multiprofessional practices changed their routines to protect vulnerable patients. Telephone triage was used in more "Multiprofessional" practices, whereas "Only GPs" were more likely to perform video consultations as an alternative to physical visits. Both types of practices reported that the time to review new guidelines and scientific literature decreased during the pandemic. However, both had more meetings to discuss directives than before the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS Multiprofessional teams were keener to introduce changes to the care organization to protect vulnerable patients. However, practices with only GPs were found to be more aligned with video consultations, perhaps reflecting the close patient-doctor relationship. In contrast, telephone triage was used more in multiprofessional teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mats Eriksson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
| | - Karin Blomberg
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Eva Arvidsson
- Futurum, Region Jönköping County, Jönköping, Sweden
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Esther Van Poel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sara Ares-Blanco
- Federica Montseny Health Centre, Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Maria Pilar Astier-Peña
- Healthcare Quality Territorial Unit, Territorial Health Directorate, Institute of Health of Catalonia, Camp de Tarragona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Claire Collins
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Neophytos Stylianou
- Department of data analysis, NS Intelligence Solutions Ltd, Nicosia, Cyprus
- Akesis Home Care, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Victoria Tkachenko
- Department of Family Medicine, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Sara Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Månsson Sandberg H, Tjulin Å, Brulin E, Landstad BJ. How general practitioners used job crafting strategies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:276-286. [PMID: 38315554 PMCID: PMC11003318 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2309633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE General practitioners (GPs) played a crucial role in limiting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and many GPs experienced they did not have the prerequisites to provide adequate care. However, GPs developed approaches that helped them to provide care to patients through various job crafting strategies. The aim of this study is to identify how job crafting strategies were deployed by GPs at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden and the significance of the strategies on their work situation. DESIGN A qualitative design with semi-structured interviews. The data was analysed using qualitative content analysis with job crafting as the conceptual framework for the analysis process. SETTING Primary healthcare in five healthcare regions in Sweden. SUBJECTS Fourteen GPs participated in individual interviews. RESULTS In their endeavours to organise and provide care, GPs shaped the task, relational and cognitive boundaries of their work. GPs felt proud about finding new ways of working when given room to manoeuvre. Intensified collaboration between healthcare professionals made GPs more confident in their clinical work. GPs expressed that they consequently felt stronger in their professional role through what they accomplished in the organisation of care. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS The results suggest that the job crafting strategies GPs used were meaningful to them in clinical practice. Knowledge about how GPs' job crafting strategies were deployed might be useful for healthcare organisations in preparing for future health crises. Taking advantage of GPs' experiences and strategies is considered important for promoting sustainable working conditions for GPs in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Månsson Sandberg
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa Tjulin
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Emma Brulin
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bodil J. Landstad
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
- Unit of Research, Education and Development, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Appel H, Sanatkar S. Systematic Search and Scoping Review of Physicians' Intolerance of Uncertainty and Medical Decision-Making Uncertainties During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Summary of the Literature and Directions for Future Research. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2024; 31:338-358. [PMID: 37932520 PMCID: PMC11102404 DOI: 10.1007/s10880-023-09974-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Pandemic-related uncertainties and intolerance of uncertainty (IU) could negatively affect physicians' well-being and functioning, being associated with experiences of distress and problematic decision-making processes. To summarize the available quantitative and qualitative evidence of physicians' IU and decisional uncertainty during COVID-19 and problems associated with it, a systematic search was conducted to identify all relevant articles describing physician uncertainty with regard to medical decision making and well-being in COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Medical, psychological, and preprint databases were searched. Ten articles met all eligibility criteria, with eight describing quantitative and two describing qualitative research outcomes, assessed primarily in European regions and via online surveys. Associations between IU and symptoms of poor mental health and mental health risk factors were widespread, but inconsistencies emerged. Qualitative studies emphasized decisional uncertainty as a stressor for physicians, and quantitative studies suggest it may have fostered more unproven treatment choices. While the prevalence and impact of physician uncertainty under COVID-19 conditions requires further investigation, sighting available literature indicates that IU coincided with experiences of poor mental health and, at least towards the beginning of the pandemic, with willingness to endorse unproven treatments. Efforts to reduce uncertainty-related problems for physicians seem warranted, for example, through normalizing experiences of uncertainty or reducing avoidable uncertainty through maintaining open and timely communication channels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helmut Appel
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tureck F, Chioro A, Tofani LFN, Lima CL, Vieira ADCS, Andreazza R. Innovations produced in Primary Health Care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative literature review. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2024; 29:e07022023. [PMID: 38896673 DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232024296.07022023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Primary Health Care (PHC) proved to be an important part of the prevention, control and treatment measures against COVID-19, a situation in which it was challenged to keep up its provision of regular services as well. This article identifies the main arrangements made to provide PHC care in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. An integrative literature review of articles found in PubMed, SciELO and LILACS databases was performed using the descriptors "Primary Health Care" and "COVID-19". Findings were analyzed considering three questions: Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), Organizations of Work Processes and Non-COVID Chronic Diseases. The use of different forms of ICT to provide PHC is highlighted regarding patients with respiratory symptoms and chronic patients. Changes in team composition, service flows, physical spaces and working hours were also introduced. Although strategies aimed at monitoring chronic patients and at remote care may have helped minimize deterioration of their health, the decrease in the number of visits performed during this period could have resulted in an increased demand for PHC in post-pandemic years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Tureck
- Escola de Medicina, Universidade do Contestado. Av. Nereu Ramos 1071, Jardim do Moinho. 89300-000 Mafra SC Brasil.
| | - Arthur Chioro
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo SP Brasil
| | - Luís Fernando Nogueira Tofani
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo SP Brasil
| | - Carolina Loyelo Lima
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo SP Brasil
| | - Amanda da Cruz Santos Vieira
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo SP Brasil
| | - Rosemarie Andreazza
- Departamento de Medicina Preventiva, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo. São Paulo SP Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ribeiro S, Takahashi EM, de Souza KL, Yamamoto TT, Leite RR, Fernandes H, Okuno MFP, Bertolozzi MR, de Figueiredo TMRM, Gonzales RIC, Hino P. Primary Health Care and Tuberculosis Detection during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Crucial Actions for Intensifying Efforts. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 21:540. [PMID: 38791749 PMCID: PMC11121364 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21050540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tuberculosis has been considered a global emergency since 1993, and controlling it has become even more challenging since 2020 due to the health and social crisis resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aimed to identify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on tuberculosis case detection activities within primary health Care in the largest city in Brazil. METHODS This is a cross-sectional and analytical study on the provision of tuberculosis detection actions in primary healthcare units during the pandemic period. A descriptive analysis was performed for characterization, and Generalized Mixed Models were used for evaluating associations, with a Bonferroni post hoc test applied. RESULTS The study sample comprised 80 health units in the municipality. There was a moderate alteration level in the provision of consultations for individuals with signs and symptoms of tuberculosis in 2020 (13.8%) and in 2021 (15.1%). Statistical significance (p < 0.05) was found between the pandemic period and detection actions, with a lower alteration level in 2022. CONCLUSIONS Tuberculosis detection activities underwent changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic, mainly in 2020, which was associated with alterations in consultation and case notification provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Ribeiro
- Department of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil; (E.M.T.); (H.F.); (M.F.P.O.); (P.H.)
| | - Erika Mayumi Takahashi
- Department of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil; (E.M.T.); (H.F.); (M.F.P.O.); (P.H.)
| | - Katia Lacerda de Souza
- Department of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil; (E.M.T.); (H.F.); (M.F.P.O.); (P.H.)
| | - Thais Tiemi Yamamoto
- Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo, Health Surveillance Coordination, São Paulo 01223-010, São Paulo, Brazil (R.R.L.)
| | - Raquel Russo Leite
- Municipal Health Secretariat of São Paulo, Health Surveillance Coordination, São Paulo 01223-010, São Paulo, Brazil (R.R.L.)
| | - Hugo Fernandes
- Department of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil; (E.M.T.); (H.F.); (M.F.P.O.); (P.H.)
| | - Meiry Fernanda Pinto Okuno
- Department of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil; (E.M.T.); (H.F.); (M.F.P.O.); (P.H.)
| | - Maria Rita Bertolozzi
- Department of Public Health Nursing, School of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil;
| | | | | | - Paula Hino
- Department of Collective Health, Paulista School of Nursing, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo 04024-002, São Paulo, Brazil; (E.M.T.); (H.F.); (M.F.P.O.); (P.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Van Poel E, Vanden Bussche P, Pétré B, Ponsar C, Collins C, De Jonghe M, Donneau AF, Gillain N, Guillaume M, Willems S. Quality of care in Belgian general practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of the cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 24:282. [PMID: 38443780 PMCID: PMC10916333 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02305-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic immensely impacted care provision, including quality of care in general practice. This paper aimed: (1) to assess how Belgian general practices acted upon the six dimensions of quality of care during COVID-19; (2) to study differences between the three Belgian regions; and (3) to benchmark the performance of the Belgian practices against the performance in other European countries. METHODS The data collected from 479 Belgian practices during 2020-2021 using an online survey as part of the international cross-sectional PRICOV-19 study were analyzed. Hereby, descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and binary logistic regression analyses were performed. Thirty-four survey questions related to the six dimensions of quality of care were selected as outcome variables. The adjusted regression models included four practice characteristics as covariates: practice type, being a teaching practice for GP trainees, multidisciplinarity of the team, and payment system. RESULTS Belgian practices made important organizational changes to deliver high-quality care during COVID-19. Most practices (n = 259; 56.1%) actively reached out to vulnerable patients. Limitations to the practice building or infrastructure threatened high-quality care in 266 practices (55.5%). Infection prevention measures could not always be implemented during COVID-19, such as using a cleaning protocol (n = 265; 57.2%) and providing a separate doctor bag for infection-related home visits (n = 130; 27.9%). Three hundred and sixty practices (82.0%) reported at least one safety incident related to a delayed care process in patients with an urgent condition. The adjusted regression analysis showed limited significant differences between the Belgian regions regarding the quality of care delivered. Belgian practices demonstrated varied performance compared to other European countries. For example, they excelled in always checking the feasibility of isolation at home but reported more patient safety incidents related to timely care than at least three-quarters of the other European countries. CONCLUSIONS Future studies using different design methods are crucial to investigate which country and practice characteristics are associated with delivering high-quality care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Van Poel
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
- Quality and Safety Ghent, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Pierre Vanden Bussche
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Quality and Safety Ghent, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Benoît Pétré
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Cécile Ponsar
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Louvain, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Claire Collins
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Research Centre, Irish College of General Practitioners, Dublin, D02 XR68, Ireland
| | - Michel De Jonghe
- Centre Académique de Médecine Générale, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Nicolas Gillain
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Michèle Guillaume
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Sara Willems
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Quality and Safety Ghent, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wachtler C, Bergqvist M, Holmgren K, Mannheimer S, Bastholm-Rahmner P, Schmidt-Mende K. "Returning to the core tasks": a qualitative interview study about how general practitioners in home health care solved problems during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scand J Prim Health Care 2024; 42:91-100. [PMID: 38095568 PMCID: PMC10851823 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2291676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Optimizing care at home, or home health care (HHC), is necessary as the population of care-dependent older people receiving care at home steadily increases. The COVID-19 pandemic tested Swedish primary care professionals as they provided HHC for a population of very frail older homebound people, but a better understanding of what healthcare workers did to manage the crisis may be useful for the further development of HHC. In this study, we aimed to understand how HHC physicians solved the problems of providing home healthcare during the pandemic to learn lessons on how to improve future HHC. METHODS This is a qualitative study of individual interviews with 11 primary care physicians working in HHC (8 women) from 7 primary care practices in Region Stockholm, Sweden. Interviews were conducted between 1 December 2020, and 11 March 2021. The data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS We generated an overarching theme in our analysis: Physicians focus on core tasks and professional values in response to crisis. This theme incorporated three underlying subthemes describing this response: physicians prioritize and resolve ethically challenging situations in new ways, cultivate the patient perspective, and build on existing teams. CONCLUSION This study indicates that a healthcare system that gives HHC physicians agency to focus on core tasks and professional values could promote person-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Wachtler
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Monica Bergqvist
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Stockholm Region, Sweden
| | - Katarina Holmgren
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Stockholm Region, Sweden
| | - Stina Mannheimer
- Institute of Health and Care Sciences, Sahlgrenska Akademin, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Västra Götaland Region, Sweden
| | - Pia Bastholm-Rahmner
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Stockholm Region, Sweden
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Katharina Schmidt-Mende
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Stockholm Region, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Månsson Sandberg H, Landstad BJ, Tjulin Å, Brulin E. COVID-19- related work, managerial factors and exhaustion among general practitioners in Sweden: a cross-sectional study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2023; 24:269. [PMID: 38087223 PMCID: PMC10717449 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-023-02228-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION A significant number of international studies show that general practitioners (GPs) suffered from burnout when working during the COVID-19 pandemic. A Swedish study found that more than 16% of GPs had exhaustion in spring 2021. Exhaustion can be regarded as an initial stage of burnout. A knowledge gap remains on GPs´ working conditions, the impact of management during the pandemic and how it was associated with exhaustion. This study aims to explore the association between severe symptoms of exhaustion and COVID-19 pandemic-related work and managerial factors among Swedish GPs and whether managerial factors have an impact on the association between exhaustion and COVID-19-related work factors. METHODS Cross-sectional data was drawn from the Longitudinal Occupational Health survey in Health Care Sweden (LOHHCS), which included a representative sample of practicing doctors in Sweden. The sample consisted of 6699 doctors with a response rate of 41.2%. This study constitutes a sample of doctors who reported working in primary care facilities at the time of data collection, i.e. 1013 GPs. The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) was used to assess severe symptoms of exhaustion. Questions were also asked about pandemic-related work and managerial factors. The data was analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression to identify the association between exhaustion, work and managerial factors. RESULTS The multivariate analysis showed that GPs who managed COVID-19 patients were about twice as likely to report severe symptoms of exhaustion. Further, GPs who reported that management was unsupportive, provided unsatisfactory working conditions and unsatisfactory policies for patient prioritisation were between two and four times more likely to report severe symptoms of exhaustion. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19-related work and managerial factors had a significant impact on the mental health of GPs. Furthermore, the potentially protective effect that satisfactory management actions had on mental health was limited. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic and in preparation for future major crises that have a high impact on healthcare, there is a need to investigate the measures that can be taken to enable GPs to carry out their work, while maintaining their wellbeing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helena Månsson Sandberg
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Bodil J Landstad
- Faculty of Human Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
- Unit of Research, Education and Development, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Åsa Tjulin
- Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden
| | - Emma Brulin
- Unit of Occupational Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Herzig van Wees S, Stålgren M, Viberg N, Puranen B, Ekström AM, Larsson EC. "Who is Anders Tegnell?" Unanswered questions hamper COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A qualitative study among ethnic minorities in Sweden. Vaccine 2023; 41:7476-7481. [PMID: 37953100 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite high COVID-19 vaccination coverage in many European countries, vaccination uptake has been lower among ethnic minorities, including in Sweden. This is in spite of the increased risk of contracting the virus and targeted efforts to vaccinate among first and second generation migrants. The aim of this study was to understand this dilemma by investigating ethnic minorities' perceptions and their experience of accessing the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS This is a qualitative study drawing on 18 semi-structured interviews with health volunteers working in ethnic minority communities and with participants from the two largest ethnic minorities in Sweden (Syria and Somalia). Deductive qualitative analysis was completed using the 3C model by WHO (Complacency, Confidence and Convenience). RESULTS Complacency does not appear to be a barrier to intention to vaccinate. Participants are well aware of COVID-19 risk and the benefits of the vaccine. However, confidence in vaccine poses a barrier to uptake and there are a lot of questions and concerns about vaccine side effects, efficacy and related rumors. Confidence in health providers, particularly doctors is high but there was a sense of conflicting information. Accessing individually tailored health information and health providers is not convenient and a major reason for delaying vaccination or not vaccinating at all. Trust in peers, schools and faith-leaders is high and constitute pathways for effective health information sharing. CONCLUSION Ethnic minorities in Sweden are willing to get vaccinated against COVID-19. However, to increase vaccination uptake, access to individually tailored and face to face health information to answer questions about vaccine safety, efficacy, conflicting information and rumors is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Stålgren
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nina Viberg
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Center of Excellence for Sustainable Health (CESH), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bi Puranen
- World Values Survey Association, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Mia Ekström
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Infectious Diseases, South Central Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Elin C Larsson
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Women and Childrens' Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Parent-Lamarche A, Hallée Y. Exploring the effects of predominantly female jobs on demands and resources at work and consequently on health and performance in the Province of Québec, Canada. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2023; 96:1267-1281. [PMID: 37599309 DOI: 10.1007/s00420-023-02005-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Predominantly female jobs are undervalued because the importance of the skills (e.g., empathy, meticulousness, patience) they require is underestimated. Based on a sample of 1831 workers, this cross-sectional study aimed to determine the effect of predominantly female jobs on demands and resources at work. It also aimed to evaluate if demands and resources at work played a mediating role in the relationship between female jobs and psychological well-being, psychological distress, insomnia, and intention to quit. METHODS Mediation analysis to test indirect effects was conducted using MPlus software. RESULTS Predominantly female jobs were directly associated with lower recognition and higher skill utilization and emotional demands. Also, predominantly female jobs were indirectly associated with health and performance via their effects on demands and resources at work. Therefore, these workers appear to face higher demands and lower resources, which in turn is harmful to them. CONCLUSION Consequently, we might conclude that in addition to the pay inequity that is still present between men and women, those who hold predominantly female jobs (mostly women) are more vulnerable to health and performance problems because of the working conditions (demands and resources) of these jobs. At the societal level, increased knowledge of predominantly female jobs could also be achieved by, for example, popularizing the training and skills they require. Information campaigns (not just to attract people but also to eliminate misunderstanding of these jobs) could be initiated by unions, professional associations, schools, private companies, guidance or employment counselors, government, etc. At the organizational level, action could be taken in terms of human resource management practices, including job evaluation and remuneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annick Parent-Lamarche
- Department of Human Resources Management, École de gestion, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, 3351, boul. des Forges, C.P. 500, Trois-Rivières, QC, G9A 5H7, Canada.
| | - Yves Hallée
- Industrial Relations Department, Université Laval, 1030, av. des Sciences-Humaines, Ste-Foy, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kraus M, Stegner C, Reiss M, Riedel M, Børsch AS, Vrangbaek K, Michel M, Turmaine K, Cseh B, Dózsa CL, Dandi R, Mori AR, Czypionka T. The role of primary care during the pandemic: shared experiences from providers in five European countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1054. [PMID: 37784101 PMCID: PMC10546726 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09998-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated wide-ranging adaptations to the organisation of health systems, and primary care is no exception. This article aims to collate insights on the role of primary care during the pandemic. The gained knowledge helps to increase pandemic preparedness and resilience. METHODS The role of primary care during the pandemic in five European countries (Austria, Denmark, France, Hungary, Italy) was investigated using a qualitative approach, namely case study, based on document analysis and semi-structured interviews. In total, 31 interviews were conducted with primary care providers between June and August 2022. The five country case studies were subjected to an overarching analysis focusing on successful strategies as well as gaps and failures regarding pandemic management in primary care. RESULTS Primary care providers identified disruptions to service delivery as a major challenge emerging from the pandemic which led to a widespread adoption of telehealth. Despite the rapid increase in telehealth usage and efforts of primary care providers to organise face-to-face care delivery in a safe way, some patient groups were particularly affected by disruptions in service delivery. Moreover, primary care providers perceived a substantial propagation of misinformation about COVID-19 and vaccines among the population, which also threatened patient-physician relationships. At the same time, primary care providers faced an increased workload, had to work with insufficient personal protective equipment and were provided incongruous guidelines from public authorities. There was a consensus among primary care providers that they were mostly sidelined by public health policy in the context of pandemic management. Primary care providers tackled these problems through a diverse set of measures including home visits, implementing infection control measures, refurbishing used masks, holding internal meetings and relying on their own experiences as well as information shared by colleagues. CONCLUSION Primary care providers were neither well prepared nor the focus of initial policy making. However, they implemented creative solutions to the problems they faced and applying the learnings from the pandemic could help in increasing the resilience of primary care. Attributes of an integrated health system with a strong primary care component proved beneficial in addressing immediate effects of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Kraus
- Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria.
| | - Christoph Stegner
- Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria
| | - Miriam Reiss
- Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria
| | - Monika Riedel
- Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria
| | - Anne Sofie Børsch
- University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen K, 1353, Denmark
| | - Karsten Vrangbaek
- University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Copenhagen K, 1353, Denmark
| | - Morgane Michel
- Université Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, 10 avenue de Verdun, Inserm, Paris, 75010, France
- Unité d'épidémiologie clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Robert Debré, 48 boulevard Sérurier, Paris, 75019, France
| | - Kathleen Turmaine
- Université Paris Cité, ECEVE, UMR 1123, 10 avenue de Verdun, Inserm, Paris, 75010, France
| | - Borbála Cseh
- University of Miskolc, Egyetem út 1, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, 3515, Hungary
| | - Csaba László Dózsa
- University of Miskolc, Egyetem út 1, Miskolc-Egyetemváros, 3515, Hungary
| | - Roberto Dandi
- Luiss Business School, Via Nomentana 216, Roma, 00162, RM, Italy
| | - Angelo Rossi Mori
- Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Via Palestro 32, Roma, 00185, Italy
| | - Thomas Czypionka
- Institute for Advanced Studies (IHS), Josefstädter Straße 39, Vienna, 1080, Austria
- London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Simões de Almeida R, Costa A, Teixeira I, Trigueiro MJ, Dores AR, Marques A. Healthcare Professionals' Resilience During the COVID-19 and Organizational Factors That Improve Individual Resilience: A Mixed-Method Study. Health Serv Insights 2023; 16:11786329231198991. [PMID: 37736335 PMCID: PMC10510343 DOI: 10.1177/11786329231198991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers are a susceptible population to be psychologically affected during health crises, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Resilience has been pointed out in the literature as a possible protective factor against psychological distress in crisis situations. This can be influenced by internal and external factors, such as individual characteristics and organizational factors. Thus, this study aims to characterize the overall resilience levels among healthcare professionals in Portugal and to understand the perspectives of this healthcare workers regarding organizational factors that improve individual resilience. This is a mixed-method study: a first quantitative study using a cross-sectional design to administer the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) to 271 healthcare professionals (Mage 33.90, SD = 9.59 years, 90.80% female), followed by a qualitative study through 10 in-depth interviews. The mean score for the total RSA was 178.17 (SD = 22.44) out of a total of 231. Qualitative analysis showed 4 major themes on factors that enhance resilience: "Professional's Training," "Support and Wellbeing Measures," "Reorganization of Services" and "Professional Acknowledgment." The findings may contribute to the development of targeted interventions and support systems to enhance resilience and well-being among healthcare workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Costa
- LabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Inês Teixeira
- LabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | | | - Artemisa Rocha Dores
- LabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory of Neuropsychophysiology, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - António Marques
- LabRP-CIR, ESS, Polytechnic University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Putri NK, Melania MKN, Fatmawati SMY, Lim YC. How does the work-life balance impact stress on primary healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic? BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:730. [PMID: 37408024 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09677-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most studies in advanced care settings reported that the increasing workload increases the work-life imbalance and harms the mental health of health workers. The COVID-19 Pandemic's tracing, testing, treatment, and mass vaccination also have multiplied the primary healthcare workers' workload. Nevertheless, studies on primary care workers are scarce. This study aimed to investigate how the COVID-19-related work-life balance impact stress on primary healthcare workers in the third years of the pandemic. METHODS The study was a cross-sectional, web-based survey conducted on primary healthcare workers in Kediri Regency, Indonesia, with the highest Omicron case surge worldwide. It was conducted right after the surge between July and August 2022, the third year of the COVID-19 pandemic hit Indonesia. Under coordination with the local government health officials, primary healthcare workers were invited to participate in an online survey. The respondents were asked to evaluate their sociodemography, work conditions, personal life, and perceived stress (using the Perceived Stress Scale) during the pandemic. Their work-life balance was evaluated using the Work/Non-work Interference and Enhancement Scale. We used several hierarchical linear regression models to determine which variables contribute to work stress among primary healthcare workers. RESULTS Sociodemographic characteristics, including gender, age, marital status, years of professional experience, and educational level, were not significantly associated with stress levels among our respondents. Separately, work conditions and personal life variables did not associate with stress levels. However, primary healthcare workers' work and personal lives interfere with each other during the pandemic and are associated with their higher stress. CONCLUSION During the pandemic, the work life of primary health workers interferes with their personal life more than the interference of personal life on their work life. At the same time, the work life's enhancement on the personal life and vice versa were lower than its interference. Those conditions are associated with higher perceived stress of primary health workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuzulul Kusuma Putri
- Health Policy and Administration Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
- The Airlangga Centre for Health Policy, Surabaya, Indonesia.
| | - M Karomah Nastiti Melania
- Health Policy and Administration Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
| | - Sia Mawan Yulia Fatmawati
- Health Policy and Administration Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia
- Kediri Regency Health Office, Kediri, Indonesia
| | - Yin Cheng Lim
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jonsdottir J, Santoyo-Medina C, Kahraman T, Kalron A, Rasova K, Moumdjian L, Coote S, Tacchino A, Grange E, Smedal T, Arntzen EC, Learmonth Y, Pedulla L, Quinn G, Kos D. Changes in physiotherapy services and use of technology for people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 71:104520. [PMID: 36724646 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.104520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has led to reorganization or reduction of neurorehabilitation services for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). The aim of this study was to explore the changes in the organizational framework and technology usage in physiotherapy services for PwMS during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS This international cross-sectional survey study was designed, developed, and disseminated by RIMS European Network for Best Practice and Research in Multiple Sclerosis Rehabilitation. Physiotherapists from nine countries (Australia, Belgium, Czech Republic, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Norway, Spain, Turkey) who provided physiotherapy services to PwMS, were invited to complete an online survey to compare physiotherapy delivery to PwMS prior to and during the pandemic period. RESULTS The survey was completed by 215 physiotherapists. Accessibility, the average number, length and perceived effectiveness of physiotherapy sessions provided to PwMS were significantly reduced during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.001). Physiotherapists increased the advice of mobile apps, recorded videos for rehabilitation and exercise websites during the pandemic (p<0.001) while the use of telerehabilitation and virtual reality technology did not change. CONCLUSION There was of a reduction in the number, duration and perceived effectiveness of rehabilitation sessions for people with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic while use of remote technologies for physiotherapy did not change. To ensure the continuity of physiotherapy for PwMS with complex healthcare needs also during pandemics, the provision of guidelines and training in telehealth technologies in professional education becomes crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Carme Santoyo-Medina
- Neurology-Neuroimmunology Department & Neurorehabilitation Unit, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Barcelona, Spain; Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, C/ Josep Trueta sn, 08195 Sant Cugat del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Turhan Kahraman
- Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - Alon Kalron
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel-Aviv University, Israel; Multiple Sclerosis Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Kamila Rasova
- Department of Rehabilitation, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Lousin Moumdjian
- UMSC Hasselt, Pelt, Belgium; REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium; IPEM Institute of Psychoacoustics and Electronic Music, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Susan Coote
- Centre of Physical Activity for Health, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Ireland and Physical Activity for Health Research Centre, Ireland.
| | - Andrea Tacchino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genova, Italy.
| | - Erica Grange
- CRRF "Mons. L. Novarese", Moncrivello (VC), Italy
| | - Tori Smedal
- Department of Physiotherapy, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Bergen, Bergen, Norway,; Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Competence Centre, Haukeland University Hospital, Helse Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | - Yvonne Learmonth
- Discipline of Exercise Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia; Centre for Molecular Medicine and Innovative Therapeutics, Centre for Healthy Ageing, Health Futures Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia; Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Science, Nedlands, Australia.
| | - Ludovico Pedulla
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy.
| | - Gillian Quinn
- Physiotherapy Department, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Daphne Kos
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven 1501-3001, Belgium; National MS Center, Melsbroek, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
COVID-19 Continues to Burden General Practitioners: Impact on Workload, Provision of Care, and Intention to Leave. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11030320. [PMID: 36766895 PMCID: PMC9914234 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
General practitioners (GPs), already in a profession with a high workload, have been at the frontline of providing COVID-19-related healthcare in addition to routine care. Our study examined the impact of pandemic-related consultations and changes in practice organization on GPs' current workload and provision of healthcare in summer 2021 (May 2021-July 2021) and early 2022 (January 2022-February 2022). In total, 143 German GPs participated in an online survey in the summer of 2021. Of these, 51 GPs participated in the follow-up survey in 2022. Most GPs perceived an increase in consultation frequency, consultation times, and workload since the pandemic outbreak. Increased consultation times were related to the reduced provision of medical care to other patients with chronic diseases. More SARS-CoV-2 vaccination consultations were associated with reduced home visits, acute consultation times, and cancer screenings. A quarter of GPs considered leaving their job. Pandemic-related bureaucracy, restricted access to therapy and rehabilitation services specialized on COVID-19, unreliable vaccine deliveries, mandatory telematics-infrastructure implementation, and frequent changes in official regulations were the main reasons reported for dissatisfaction. Our results provide insights into how the pandemic continues to burden GPs' work routines and how better working conditions in times of high demand could be achieved in future pandemics.
Collapse
|
16
|
Health Consequences of the COVID-19 Pandemic among Health-Care Workers: A Comparison between Groups Involved and Not Involved in COVID-19 Care. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10122540. [PMID: 36554064 PMCID: PMC9778037 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Health consequences have been reported among health-care workers (HCWs) exposed to COVID-19. Sweden chose to manage the pandemic with a lower and more equal long-lasting work strain and shorter periods of recovery than in other countries. Few studies have examined the health consequences among HCWs working in such conditions. This study compared the health consequences after the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic between HCWs involved in the care of COVID-19 patients and other HCWs and between occupational groups working in COVID-19 care. Multinomial logistic regression and univariate general linear models were used to identify differences. The levels of depression, emotional and physical fatigue, sleep quality, and general health were measured 6 months after the onset of the pandemic in 3495 HCW employed in Sweden. HCWs directly involved in COVID-19 care reported significantly poorer sleep quality and higher scores on emotional and physical exhaustion than those not involved in such care. Health consequences did not differ significantly between different occupational groups involved in COVID-19 care except for specialist nurses/midwives. HCWs more frequently involved in COVID-19 care reported higher levels of emotional and physical fatigue and poorer sleep but less severe than those reported in more severely affected countries.
Collapse
|
17
|
Aslanyan L, Arakelyan Z, Atanyan A, Abrahamyan A, Karapetyan M, Sahakyan S. Primary healthcare providers challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2022; 23:310. [PMID: 36463103 PMCID: PMC9719166 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01923-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Primary healthcare (PHC) providers are widely acknowledged for putting the most efficient and long-lasting efforts for addressing community health issues and promoting health equity. This study aimed to explore PHC providers' experiences with coronavirus pandemic preparedness and response in Armenia. METHODS We applied a qualitative study design using semi-structured in-depth interviews and structured observation checklists. Study participants were recruited using theoretical and convenience sampling techniques throughout Armenia. Inductive conventional content analysis was utilized to analyze the in-depth interviews. Nineteen in-depth interviews were conducted with 21 participants. Observations took place in 35 PHC facilities. The data collected during the observations was analyzed using the "SPSS22.0.0.0" software. RESULTS Five main themes of primary healthcare providers' experiences were drawn out based on the study findings: 1) the gap in providers' risk communication skills; 2) uneven supply distributions; 3) difficulties in specimen collection and testing processes; 4) providers challenged by home visits; 5) poor patient-provider relationships. The results revealed that primary care providers were affected by uneven supply distribution throughout the country. The lack of proper laboratory settings and issues with specimen collection were challenges shaping the providers' experiences during the pandemic. The study highlighted the health systems' unpreparedness to engage providers in home visits for COVID-19 patients. The findings suggested that it was more challenging for healthcare providers to gain the trust of their patients during the pandemic. The study results also underlined the need for trainings to help primary care providers enhance their risk communication expertise or assign other responsible bodies to carry out risk communication on PHC providers' behalf. CONCLUSION The study discovered that PHC providers have a very important role in healthcare system's preparedness and response to handle public health emergencies such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on the findings the study team recommends prioritizing rural PHC development, ensuring appropriate supply distributions, developing comprehensive protocols on safe home visits and specimen collection and testing processes, and trainings PHC providers on risk communication, patient-centeredness, as well as proper use of personal protective equipment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lusine Aslanyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Zaruhi Arakelyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Astghik Atanyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Arpine Abrahamyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Manya Karapetyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019 Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Serine Sahakyan
- Turpanjian College of Health Sciences, American University of Armenia, 40 Marshal Baghramian Ave, 0019 Yerevan, Armenia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heltveit-Olsen SR, Lunde L, Brænd AM, Spehar I, Høye S, Skoglund I, Sundvall PD, Fossum GH, Straand J, Risør MB. Experiences and management strategies of Norwegian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic: a longitudinal interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care 2022; 41:2-12. [PMID: 36350846 PMCID: PMC10088916 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2022.2142796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE When the COVID-19 pandemic reached Norway, primary health care had to reorganize to ensure safe patient treatment and maintain infection control. General practitioners (GPs) are key health care providers in the municipalities. Our aim was to explore the experiences and management strategies of Norwegian GPs during the COVID-19 pandemic - over time, and in the context of a sudden organizational change. DESIGN Longitudinal qualitative interview study with two interview rounds. The first round of interviews was conducted from September-December 2020, the second round from January-April 2021. In the first interview round, we performed eight semi-structured interviews with GPs from eight municipalities in Norway. In the second round, five of the GPs were re-interviewed. Consecutive interviews were performed 2-4 months apart. To analyze the data, we used thematic analysis. RESULTS The COVID-19 pandemic required GPs to balance several concerns, such as continuity of care and their own professional efforts. Several GPs experienced challenges in the collaboration with the municipality and in relation to defining their own professional position. Guided by The Norwegian Association of General practitioners, The Norwegian College of General Practice and collegial support, they found viable solutions and ended up with a feeling of having adapted to a new normal. CONCLUSIONS Although our study demonstrates that the GPs adapted to the changing conditions, the current municipal health care models are not ideal. There is a need for clarification of responsibilities between GPs and the municipality to facilitate a more coordinated future pandemic response.Key PointsFacing the COVID-19 pandemic, the primary health care service in Norway had to reorganize to ensure safe patient treatment and maintain infection control.Several GPs experienced challenges in collaboration with the municipalities.There is a need for clarification of responsibilities between GPs and the municipality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen
- The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lene Lunde
- Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anja Maria Brænd
- Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ivan Spehar
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Psychology, Oslo New University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigurd Høye
- The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ingmarie Skoglund
- General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden
| | - Pär-Daniel Sundvall
- General Practice/Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Research, Education, Development and Innovation, Primary Health Care, Region Västra Götaland, Sweden
| | - Guro Haugen Fossum
- The Antibiotic Centre for Primary Care, Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- General Practice Research Unit (AFE), Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jørund Straand
- General Practice Research Unit (AFE), Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Bech Risør
- The Research Unit for General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The General Practice Research Unit, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Moral, Ethical, Personal, and Professional Challenges Faced by Physicians during the COVID-19 Pandemic. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19095641. [PMID: 35565036 PMCID: PMC9103076 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19095641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic, apart from the main problems concerning the health and life of patients, sparked a discussion about physicians’ moral and social professional attitudes. During a pandemic, physicians have the same ethical, moral, and medical responsibilities, however, the situation is different since they are self-exposed to a danger, which may influence their willingness to work. The problem of the professional moral attitudes of health care workers, recurring in ethical discussions, prompts us to define the limits of the duties of physicians in the event of a pandemic, hence this research aimed to assess these duties from an ethical perspective and to define their boundaries and scope. The study was conducted in May and June 2020 in the city of Lublin, covering all medical centers, and the questionnaire was completed by 549 physicians. The research was conducted in four areas: emergency standby in the event of a disaster, even if it is not requested; willingness to work overtime in the event of a disaster, even without payment; willingness to take health risks by caring for people who are infectious or exposed to hazardous substances; readiness to be transferred to other departments in the event of a disaster. Although most of the respondents declared to be agreed on personal sacrifices in the performance of professional duties, they were not prepared for a high level of personal risk when working in a pandemic. Excessive workload, its overwhelming nature, and personal risk are not conducive to readiness to work overtime, especially without pay. Research shows how important it is to respect the rights and interests of all parties involved in a pandemic. Physicians’ duty to care for a patient is also conditioned by the duty to protect themselves and should not be a tool for intimidating and depersonalizing their social and professional lives.
Collapse
|