Five models for child and adolescent data linkage in the UK: a review of existing and proposed methods

Tracing Tomorrow: young people's preferences and values related to use of personal sensing to predict mental health, using a digital game methodology

BACKGROUND

Use of personal sensing to predict mental health risk has sparked interest in adolescent psychiatry, offering a potential tool for targeted early intervention.

OBJECTIVES

We investigated the preferences and values of UK adolescents with regard to use of digital sensing information, including social media and internet searching behaviour. We also investigated the impact of risk information on adolescents' self-understanding.

METHODS

Following a Design Bioethics approach, we created and disseminated a purpose-built digital game (www.tracingtomorrow.org) that immersed the player-character in a fictional scenario in which they received a risk assessment for depression Data were collected through game choices across relevant scenarios, with decision-making supported through clickable information points.

FINDINGS

The game was played by 7337 UK adolescents aged 16-18 years. Most participants were willing to personally communicate mental health risk information to their parents or best friend. The acceptability of school involvement in risk predictions based on digital traces was mixed, due mainly to privacy concerns. Most participants indicated that risk information could negatively impact their academic self-understanding. Participants overwhelmingly preferred individual face-to-face over digital options for support.

CONCLUSIONS

The potential of digital phenotyping in supporting early intervention in mental health can only be fulfilled if data are collected, communicated and actioned in ways that are trustworthy, relevant and acceptable to young people.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

To minimise the risk of ethical harms in real-world applications of preventive psychiatric technologies, it is essential to investigate young people's values and preferences as part of design and implementation processes.

Structural Sequelae of the COVID Pandemic: The Youth Mental Health Crisis

A year ago, 17-year-old "Alex" was brought into the emergency department after a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Neither his primary care doctor nor his psychologist were aware of his first attempt 6 months previously. Unfortunately, this attempt was successful. It occurred in front of his home, and in front of his mother who was just seconds too late to stop him. In the aftermath, we wondered why the medical system that he had access to could not intervene in time.

Editorial: Global Widening of the Inequitable Child and Adolescent Mental Health Care Chasm During COVID-19

The long-standing and inequitable chasm between clinical need and child and adolescent mental health care has likely widened during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially for children and adolescents in developing low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Internationally, the risk for suicidal behaviors among young people rose, while timely access to care worsened.1 People in LMICs are envisioned to be precariously positioned within a perfect storm characterized by greater exposure to life-threatening COVID-19-related social determinants of health that also pose higher risk of new and recurrent mental disorders.2 In this issue of the Journal, the study by Wong et al.3 is the first international study to report a substantial rise in emergency department (ED) visits for any psychiatric disorder and self-harm among children and adolescents after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using a retrospective cohort study design, ED visits for any psychiatric disorder and self-harm were compared between March-April of 2019 (prepandemic), 2020 (early pandemic), and 2021 (later pandemic), with the most recent time interval corresponding to the "third wave of the pandemic worldwide." The total sample included 8,174 psychiatric ED visits to 62 emergency units in 25 countries, including developing countries with lower-middle, upper-middle, and high incomes as well as developed countries with upper-middle and high incomes. Of these, 3,865 psychiatric ED visits in 13 countries had data for all time intervals. Using the complete data, compared with March-April 2019, the rate of ED visits for any psychiatric disorder was lower in March-April 2020, consistent with the abrupt drop reported in the United States that broadly aligns with statewide school closures and shelter in place orders.4,5 However, when comparing early pandemic with later pandemic time intervals matched by months, the rates for any psychiatric and self-harm ED visits were twice as high. Despite the sharp drop following the onset of the pandemic, when compared with the prepandemic time interval, the overall rates of ED visits for any psychiatric diagnosis and self-harm during the later pandemic were 50% and 70% higher, respectively. Girls were also at greater risk for self-harm ED visits following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compared with the prepandemic time interval matched by months, girls had almost twice the odds of a self-harm ED visit in March-April 2021. The international rise in self-harm ED visits likely driven by the increases among girls is also consistent with prior US studies.4,5.

Rapid systematic review to identify key barriers to access, linkage, and use of local authority administrative data for population health research, practice, and policy in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND

Improving data access, sharing, and linkage across local authorities and other agencies can contribute to improvements in population health. Whilst progress is being made to achieve linkage and integration of health and social care data, issues still exist in creating such a system. As part of wider work to create the Cambridge Child Health Informatics and Linked Data (Cam-CHILD) database, we wanted to examine barriers to the access, linkage, and use of local authority data.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted of scientific databases and the grey literature. Any publications reporting original research related to barriers or enablers of data linkage of or with local authority data in the United Kingdom were included. Barriers relating to the following issues were extracted from each paper: funding, fragmentation, legal and ethical frameworks, cultural issues, geographical boundaries, technical capability, capacity, data quality, security, and patient and public trust.

RESULTS

Twenty eight articles were identified for inclusion in this review. Issues relating to technical capacity and data quality were cited most often. This was followed by those relating to legal and ethical frameworks. Issue relating to public and patient trust were cited the least, however, there is considerable overlap between this topic and issues relating to legal and ethical frameworks.

CONCLUSIONS

This rapid review is the first step to an in-depth exploration of the barriers to data access, linkage and use; a better understanding of which can aid in creating and implementing effective solutions. These barriers are not novel although they pose specific challenges in the context of local authority data.

Data sharing in the age of predictive psychiatry: an adolescent perspective

BACKGROUND

Advances in genetics and digital phenotyping in psychiatry have given rise to testing services targeting young people, which claim to predict psychiatric outcomes before difficulties emerge. These services raise several ethical challenges surrounding data sharing and information privacy.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate young people's interest in predictive testing for mental health challenges and their attitudes towards sharing biological, psychosocial and digital data for such purpose.

METHODS

Eighty UK adolescents aged 16-18 years took part in a digital role-play where they played the role of clients of a fictional predictive psychiatry company and chose what sources of personal data they wished to provide for a risk assessment. After the role-play, participants reflected on their choices during a peer-led interview.

FINDINGS

Participants saw multiple benefits in predictive testing services, but were highly selective with regard to the type of data they were willing to share. Largely due to privacy concerns, digital data sources such as social media or Google search history were less likely to be shared than psychosocial and biological data, including school grades and one's DNA. Participants were particularly reluctant to share social media data with schools (but less so with health systems).

CONCLUSIONS

Emerging predictive psychiatric services are valued by young people; however, these services must consider privacy versus utility trade-offs from the perspective of different stakeholders, including adolescents.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Respecting adolescents' need for transparency, privacy and choice in the age of digital phenotyping is critical to the responsible implementation of predictive psychiatric services.

Study protocol: the OxWell school survey investigating social, emotional and behavioural factors associated with mental health and well-being

INTRODUCTION

Improving our understanding of the broad range of social, emotional and behavioural factors that contribute to mental health outcomes in adolescents will be greatly enhanced with diverse, representative population samples. We present a protocol for a repeated self-report survey assessing risk and protective factors for mental health and well-being in school pupils aged 8-18 years with different socioeconomic backgrounds in England. The survey will provide a comprehensive picture of mental health and associated risks at the community level to inform the development of primary and secondary prevention and treatment strategies in schools.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol is for a large-scale online repeated self-report survey, representative of children and adolescents aged 8-18 years attending schools or further education colleges in participating counties in England. The survey consists of around 300 questions, including validated measures of mental health and well-being, risk and protective factors, and care-seeking behaviour and preferences. Additional questions each year vary to address current events and novel hypotheses, developed by the research team, collaborators and stakeholders. Primary analyses will investigate current and changing risk and protective factors, care-seeking behaviour and attitudes to allowing linkage of their sensitive data to other databases for research, and will compare measures of mental health to measures of well-being.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the University of Oxford Research Ethics Committee (Reference: R62366). Tailored data summaries will be provided to participating schools and stakeholders within 3 months of data collection. The main findings will be presented at scientific meetings, published in peer-reviewed journals and shared via digital and social media channels. At the end of the study, other researchers will be able to apply for access to anonymous data extracts.

Young People Who Meaningfully Improve Are More Likely to Mutually Agree to End Treatment

Objective: Symptom improvement is often examined as an indicator of a good outcome of accessing mental health services. However, there is little evidence of whether symptom improvement is associated with other indicators of a good outcome, such as a mutual agreement to end treatment. The aim of this study was to examine whether young people accessing mental health services who meaningfully improved were more likely to mutually agree to end treatment.

Methods: Multilevel multinomial regression analysis controlling for age, gender, ethnicity, and referral source was conducted on N = 8,995 episodes of care [Female = 5,469, 61%; meanAge = 13.66 (SD = 2.87) years] using anonymised administrative data from young people's mental health services.

Results: Compared to young people with no change in mental health difficulties, those showing positive meaningful changes in mental health difficulties were less likely to have case closure due to non-mutual agreement (Odds Ratio or OR = 0.58, 95% Confidence Interval or CI = 0.50–0.61). Similarly, they were less likely to transfer (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49–0.74) or end treatment for other reasons (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.50–0.70) than by case closure due to mutual agreement.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that young people accessing mental health services whose symptoms meaningfully improve are more likely to mutually agree to end treatment, adding to the evidence that symptom improvement may be appropriate to examine as an indicator of a good outcome of accessing mental health services.