Recurrence of hepatitis B and delta hepatitis after orthotopic liver transplantation

Hepatitis D virus reactivation in liver-transplanted patients receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulin

Background

The utility of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) in hepatitis D virus (HDV)-reactivation prophylaxis remains contentious. This study compared liver transplant (LT) patients based on whether they received perioperative HBIg to assess its protective effect against HDV reactivation.

Methods

Fifty-seven recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HBV/HDV, who were at least 1 year posttransplantation as of January 1, 2021, were enrolled in this single-center study. Tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HDV antibody, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for HBV DNA and HDV RNA were performed. Interviews were conducted to assess compliance with the nucleos(t) ide analogue (NA) regimen and to document preoperative HBV/HDV status. Liver function tests were also carried out. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was utilized to determine statistical significance, with P<0.05 considered significant. Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software.

Results

The prevalence of HDV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg, and anti-HDV positivity in the HBIg group (n=23) was 4.3% (n=1), 17.4% (n=4), 8.7% (n=2), and 95.7% (n=22), respectively. In the non-HBIg group (n=34), these rates were 5.9% (n=2), 8.8% (n=3), 11.8% (n=4), and 97.1% (n=33), respectively. Interviews revealed that all reactivations occurred in patients who were noncompliant with their NA regimen. Eleven of the 13 patients initially reported to be monoinfected with HBV pretransplantation were anti-HDV-positive.

Conclusions

No HDV replication occurred in either group due to spontaneous reactivation. High-efficacy NAs appear to be effective in sustaining HDV suppression post-LT. Most recrudescent cases of chronic hepatitis D are mild and self-limiting, typically resolving after 1-2 years of replication, as evidenced by liver function tests.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on hepatitis delta virus

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a defective virus that requires the hepatitis B virus to complete its life cycle and cause liver damage in humans. HDV is responsible for rare acute and chronic liver diseases and is considered the most aggressive hepatitis virus. Acute infection can cause acute liver failure, while persistent infection typically causes a severe form of chronic hepatitis which is associated with rapid and frequent progression to cirrhosis and its end-stage complications, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Major diagnostic and therapeutic innovations prompted the EASL Governing Board to commission specific Clinical Practice Guidelines on the identification, virologic and clinical characterisation, prognostic assessment, and appropriate clinical and therapeutic management of HDV-infected individuals.

Transplanting hepatitis B surface antigen-positive livers in the United States: Outcomes and opportunities

Livers from donors with positive hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg+) have been used to expand the donor pool; however, outcome data are limited. We aim to evaluate survival following liver transplant (LT) from HBsAg+ donors. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, we identified HBsAg+ donors used for LT from 2009 to 2020. We used Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards regression to compare post-LT survival in hepatitis B virus-negative recipients who utilized HBsAg+ donors to propensity-matched cohorts who utilized other types of donors. From 2009-2020, 70 patients received HBsAg+ livers, and 58 of them did not carry a diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus. The 1- and 3-year post-LT survival for hepatitis B virus-negative patients who received livers from HBsAg+ donors were 96.6% and 91.4%, respectively, with no statistical differences compared with patients who received livers from hepatitis C virus viremic donors (96.5%/93.0%, P = .961/.427), donation after cardiac death donors (93.0%/86.0%, P = .651/.598), average-risk donors (89.5%/86.0%, P = 0.264/0.617), and a combination of extended-criteria donors, including donation after cardiac death, donor age over 70, and graft with greater than 30% steatosis (93.0%/91.2%, P = .621/.785). Recipients of HBsAg+ livers have similar post-LT survival compared with those receiving other types of grafts. Increasing the utilization of HBsAg+ livers could safely expand the donor pool.

Update on liver transplantation-newer aspects

Liver transplantation (LT) remains the only therapeutic option offering gold standard treatment for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) and acute liver failure (ALF), as well as for certain early-stage liver tumors. Currently, the greatest challenge facing LT is the simple fact that there are not enough adequate livers for all the potential patients that could benefit from LT. Despite efforts to expand the donor pool to include living and deceased donors, organ shortage is still a major problem in many countries. To solve this problem, the use of marginal liver grafts has become an inevitable choice. Although the definition of marginal grafts or criteria for expanded donor selection has not been clarified yet, they are usually defined as grafts that may potentially cause primary nonfunction, impaired function, or late loss of function. These include steatotic livers, older donors, donors with positive viral serology, split livers, and donation after cardiac death (DCD). Therefore, to get the best outcome from these liver grafts, donor-recipient selection should be vigilant. Alcohol- related liver disease (ALD) is one of the most common indications for LT in Europe and North America. Traditionally, LT for alcoholic liver disease was kept limited for patients who have achieved 6 months of abstinence, in part due to social and ethical concerns regarding the use of a limited resource. However, the majority of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis who fail medical therapy will not live long enough to meet this requirement. Besides, the initial results of early liver transplantation (ELT) without waiting for 6 months of abstinence period are satisfactory in severe alcoholic hepatitis (SAH). It will be important to take care of these patients from a newer perspective.

Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin discontinuation in long-term liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)-as a monotherapy or combined with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUCs)-has effectively lowered Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. However, it is associated with high costs and viral resistance. HBIG-free prophylaxis with novel NUCs (tenofovir, entecavir) composes a viable alternative. We evaluated reinfection rate, histological changes, and outcome associated with HBIG discontinuation.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of patients undergoing liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease at our center since 1988. A controlled HBIG discontinuation was conducted between 2015 and 2017 in 65 patients. Recurrent infection was determined by HbsAg values. Fibrosis and inflammation were evaluated by routine biopsy. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was compared to a control population on HBIG for prophylaxis.

RESULTS

From 1988 to 2013, 352 patients underwent liver transplantation due to HBV-induced liver disease. 169 patients could be included for analysis. 104 (51.5%) patients continued a prophylaxis containing HBIG. HBIG was discontinued in 65 (38.5%) patients in a controlled manner, maintaining an oral NUC. None of those patients showed HBV reinfection or graft dysfunction. No significant changes of inflammation grades (P = .067) or fibrosis stages (P = .051) were detected. The survival of patients after HBIG discontinuation was comparable to the control (P = .95).

CONCLUSION

HBIG withdrawal under continuation of oral NUC therapy is safe and not related to graft dysfunction, based on blood tests and histology. HBIG-free prophylaxis is not associated with a worse outcome and displays a financial relief as well as a logistic simplification during long-term follow-up.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis in a kidney transplant recipient with hepatitis C virus

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a fatal disorder that presents as a progressive deterioration of liver function over a period of several weeks to several months. It is caused by the direct cytotoxic effect of the over-expression of viral antigens on hepatocytes in immunosuppressed patients. Our patient was a 59-year-old man with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection of genotype 2a who had suffered from end-stage renal disease due to diabetic nephropathy and underwent kidney transplantation. His serum total bilirubin levels gradually increased to 20 mg/dl and liver atrophy progressed during several weeks after kidney transplantation, which was initially difficult to distinguish from drug-induced liver injury. We diagnosed the condition as FCH on the basis of pathological findings and increased HCV viral load, and treated the patient with Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir. However, the patient died of refractory hemorrhagic gastric ulcer and liver failure. Currently, it is possible to treat infections of all genotypes of HCV, even with end-stage renal disease, with direct acting antivirals. Furthermore, it is preferable to treat HCV before kidney transplantation considering the risk of FCH due to immunosuppressive therapy.

Liver transplantation for Hepatitis-B-associated liver disease - Three decades of experience

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B (HBV)-associated end-stage liver disease used to be a relevant indication for liver transplantation (LT). After transplantation, HBV-reinfection remains a serious issue. Different strategies to prevent HBV-reinfection range from the single application of immunoglobulins (HBIG), to the use of modern nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NUC) in combination with HBIG, followed by HBIG-discontinuation. The aim of this analysis was to compare different strategies and to sum up the results of 30 years at a high-volume transplant center and deliver additional information on the histopathological level.

METHODS

Data of 372 liver transplantations performed for the HBV-induced liver disease in 352 patients were extracted from a prospectively organized database. HBV-reinfection was determined in the entire cohort, according to the mode of HBV-prophylaxis. Differences in survival rates were analyzed in patients with successful prophylaxis, untreated and controlled HBV-reinfection. Histopathological results were obtained from protocol biopsies in 151 patients.

RESULTS

HBV-reinfection was significantly associated with the type of prophylaxis, presence of HBs-Antigen at the moment of LT, transplant year and influencing the overall survival before 2005. After the introduction of modern NUCs, HBV-reinfection stopped to impact HBV-associated transplant loss and survival. Controlled HBV-infection prevents from HBV-associated transplant hepatitis and fibrosis development. The role of HBIG declines in favor of NUCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled HBV-reinfection does not occur any more. Even in the presence of Hbs-antigen, transplant fibrosis does not develop. The most reliable mode to prevent HBV-recurrence remains the combination of NUCs with a high genetic barrier and HBIG. However, HBIG can safely be discontinued after LT.

Pre- and Post-Transplant Antiviral Therapy (HBV, HCV)

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated liver cirrhosis is a major indication for liver transplantation. This concise review gives an overview about current interferon (IFN)-free treatment options before and after liver transplantation in HBV- or HCV-associated liver disease.

METHODS

A PubMed database search using the terms hepatitis B, hepatitis C, cirrhosis, and liver transplantation was performed to identify significant clinical studies as well as national and international guidelines.

RESULTS

Studies investigating IFN-free treatment in patients with decompensated HBV as well as in HCV-associated cirrhosis are scarce. Hepatic recompensation during antiviral therapy seems more frequent in patients with HBV than in those with HCV-associated cirrhosis. Graft hepatitis B or C is characterized by an accelerated and unfavorable course. Graft infection prophylaxis is safe and efficacious in HBV-related liver transplantation. Eradication of HCV prior to liver transplantation prevents HCV graft infection, and IFN-free treatment of established HCV graft infection is safe and associated with high sustained virologic response rates.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HBV-associated cirrhosis should be treated prior to liver transplantation, and receive a continuing graft infection prophylaxis thereafter. Patients with HCV-associated decompensated cirrhosis may be considered as candidates for antiviral therapy prior to liver transplantation or may be treated subsequently.

Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients' condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.

Initiation of liver transplantation in bangladesh: report on the first two successful cases

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Chronic liver disease due to many causes is prevalent in a significant percentage of the Bangladeshi population. Until recently, liver transplantation facilities were not available, and ESLD patients were dying without treatment. Liver transplantation is a complex procedure that requires integrated and organized approach by a multidisciplinary team. The initiation of liver transplantation in Bangladesh has faced many difficulties. These difficulties have been encountered and overcome in phases. We have successfully performed the first two living-donor liver transplantations (LDLTs) in Bangladesh. The recipient of the first LDLT was a 42-year man with cryptogenic cirrhosis, and the second one was a male of 35 years, suffering from HBV cirrhosis. Both the recipients and donors are doing well and relishing the prospect of a normal life. These two successful liver transplantations are milestones in the development of liver transplantation services in Bangladesh.

Strategies for the prevention of recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an international public health concern, and chronic infection can lead to the development of cirrhosis, liver failure, or hepatocellular carcinoma as well as the need for liver transplantation. The recurrence of HBV infection following liver transplantation was disproportionately high prior to the introduction of proper prophylactic treatment. Risk factors associated with the recurrence of HBV infection post-transplant include hepatitis B e antigen positivity, high levels of serum HBV DNA, and the presence of an antiviral drug-resistant strain prior to transplantation. The prevention of HBV recurrence began with the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in the early 1 990s. Nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) antiviral drugs were next to be introduced and, in combination with HBIG, are considered to be extremely effective for the prevention of recurrence. Because of concerns with HBIG, whether HBIG can be used for a short time or discontinued altogether is under debate. All of the NA antiviral drugs have been proven to be effective against HBV, at least in the pretransplant setting, and can be used safely posttransplant. Further investigation is still needed to standardize treatment in the posttransplant setting.

Hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: a single center experiences and review the literature

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, liver transplantation (LT) remains the only hope for many patients with end-stage liver diseases resulting from HBV.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of HBV recurrence in cases that had undergone LT due to the HBV related liver cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients who underwent LT due to HBV related cirrhosis since 2001 to 2009 in Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center were enrolled in the present study. They were asked to complete the planned questionnaire and also to sign the informed consent in order to take part in this study. Post-transplant prophylaxis protocol against HBV recurrence was based on a hundred milligrams of lamivudine daily plus intramuscular injections of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) with appropriate dosage to keep anti-HBs antibody titer above 300 IU/L and 100 IU/L in the first six months and afterwards, respectively. Blood samples were obtained and checked for HBsAg, HBeAg, and the titers of Anti -HBsAb as well as Anti- HBeAb with ELISA. A quantitative HBV DNA assay was also done on all samples (GENE-RAD® Real-time PCR).

RESULTS

There were 91.8% males and 8.2% females enrolled in the study. The duration of post-transplant prophylaxis ranged from 3 months to 8 years (mean 18.9 ± 19.3 months). HBsAg and HBeAg were positive in 24.5% and 2% of cases, respectively. Real-time PCR for HBV DNA were zero copies/mL in 91.8% of patients, none of which represented a positive value for HBV recurrence (Positive > 10,000 copies/mL). The mean Anti-HBs Ab titer was 231.7 ± 135.9 IU/L; it was above 100 IU/L in 71.4% of patients. Thirty-seven (75.5%) of the patients were taking tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil, 6 (12.2%) were on cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil, and 6 (12.2%) were taking sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil. HBsAg was detectable in seven patients taking tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (18.9%), in four patients taking cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil (66.7%), and in one patient among the six who were taking sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (16.7%). There was no significant statistical correlation between the presence of a positive value for HBsAg and the immunosuppression regimen or Anti HBsAb titer (P ˃ 0.05). Presence of a positive value for HBsAg was not predictive of a positive HBV DNA or its level in blood (P ˃ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant HBV prophylaxis with lamivudine and intramuscular HBIG with appropriate dosage to keep anti-HBs antibody titer above 300 IU/L in the first six months and above 100 IU/L afterwards is effective for prevention of HBV recurrence after LT.

Rapid early HDV RNA decline in the peripheral blood but prolonged intrahepatic hepatitis delta antigen persistence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Chronic HDV infection is an inflammatory liver disease and liver transplantation (LTX) remains the only curative treatment option for most patients. The hepatitis D virus (HDV) uses HBsAg as its surface protein, however, it is controversial to what extend HDV may be detected independently of HBsAg in blood and liver after LTX. The aims of this study were to investigate kinetics of HDV RNA and HBsAg early after LTX, to apply the data to a mathematical model and to study long-term persistence of HDV after LTX.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 26 patients with chronic hepatitis delta who underwent LTX between 1994 and 2009. Blood samples were obtained every 1-3 days during the first 14 days after LTX. Data were applied to a mathematical model to study viral kinetics. Available liver biopsy samples were stained for HBV and HDV viral antigens and tested for HBV DNA/cccDNA.

RESULTS

HBsAg and HDV RNA became negative after a median of 5 days (range 1-13) and 4 days (range 1-10), respectively. Early HDV RNA and HBsAg decline paralleled almost exactly in all patients; however the mathematical model showed a high variability of virion death. HDAg stained positive in transplanted livers in six patients in the absence of liver HBV DNA/cccDNA, serum-HBsAg, and HDV RNA for up to 19 months after LTX.

CONCLUSIONS

HDV RNA and HBsAg decline follow almost identical kinetic patterns within the first days after LTX. Nevertheless, intrahepatic latency of HDAg has to be considered when exploring novel concepts to withdraw HBIG.

Viral persistence after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis to prevent recurrent HBV infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients has evolved over time, and we manage patients who receive lamivudine monoprophylaxis, lamivudine with HBV immunoglobulin (HBIg), and lamivudine and adefovir with HBIg.

METHODS

Serum was examined with sensitive assays to detect the persistence of HBV, and to identify mutations that might confer resistance to the antiviral prophylaxis. Forty patients were studied, and sera were collected 20 days to 13.3 years after LT.

RESULTS

Overall, HBV DNA was detected in serum of 67.5% of patients (8 of 10 of lamivudine monoprophylaxis patients, 15 of 24 of those receiving lamivudine and HBIg, and 4 of 6 of those receiving lamivudine, adefovir and HBIg). Thus, HBV infection persists for most of the patients despite successful prophylaxis after LT. Of those patients with detectable serum HBV DNA, three of eight of the lamivudine monoprophylaxis group had sequences associated with resistance to lamivudine (YMDD mutants), compared with only 1 of 15 of the lamivudine and HBIg cohort. Three of the lamivudine and HBIg cohort had the I126A Hepatitis B surface antigen escape variant. In those serum HBV DNA-positive patients who were receiving lamivudine, adefovir, and HBIg, only one of four had YMDD mutant, and none had Hepatitis B surface antigen escape variants. None of the 40 patients suffered clinical HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations imply that the selection of resistant virus may be essential, but is not sufficient to cause overt failure of prophylaxis with development of clinical disease. It seems likely that the patients' immune response contributes, at least partially, to the long-term control of infection in these patients.

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis: clinicopathologic spectrum, diagnosis and pathogenesis

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (FCH) is a rapidly progressive, sometimes fatal form of liver injury. Though originally reported in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis B, it has now been recognized frequently in chronic hepatitis B or C patients who are under immunosuppression. The histopathologic hallmarks in the liver include marked hepatocytic injury, severe cholestasis, and periportal and pericellular fibrosis. The pathogenesis is largely unknown. The aim of this review is to describe the spectrum of clinical conditions in which FCH occurs, common histopathologic findings, features unique to certain underlying diseases, factors to be considered in differential diagnosis, and our current understanding of pathogenesis of this disease.

HBsAg level at time of liver transplantation determines HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase and affects HBV DNA decrease during early immunoglobulin administration

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) initially after liver transplantation of hepatitis B patients is considered important to prevent reinfection reliably. However, dosing schedules differ considerably between centers. We measured HBsAg, anti-HBs and HBV DNA kinetics to create a rational basis for dosing schemes.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (group A) received 10,000 IU HBIG in the anhepatic phase followed by 10,000 IU daily until HBsAg became negative, whereas five patients (group B) received 20,000 IU followed by 5000 IU every 30 min.

RESULTS

HBsAg levels at time of transplantation ranged from 0.12 to 12,990 IU/ml. Correlations between initial HBsAg and HBIG required to decrease HBsAg below 1 IU/ml were high in groups A and B (r=0.97, p<0.001; r=1.00, p<0.001), as were correlations between initial HBsAg and HBIG required to raise anti-HBs above 1000 IU/l (r=0.94, p<0.001; r=1.00, p<0.001). In 11 HBV DNA-positive patients, DNA levels became negative in seven, and dropped by 2.5 log10 (mean) in the other four patients during immunoglobulin administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, required HBIG doses to decrease HBsAg and raise anti-HBs are determined by HBsAg levels at time of transplantation, not by HBV DNA levels. Shortened HBIG dosing intervals accelerate HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase. HBV DNA decreases rapidly during HBIG administration in most patients.

Hepatitis B in liver transplant recipients

1. The use of low-dose immunosuppressive therapy along with pre- and posttransplantation nucleos(t)ide therapy and posttransplantation hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) has yielded marked improvements in survival. 2. Lamivudine (Epivir-HBV), adefovir (Hepsera), entecavir (Baraclude), tenofovir (Viread), emtricitabine (Emtriva), and the combination drugs tenofovir + emtricitabine (Truvada) and abacavir + lamivudine (Epzicom) are effective nucleos(t)ide antiviral agents that, in some cases, may help reverse liver disease sufficiently to avoid transplant. 3. In posttransplantation patients, virus suppression with some combination of HBIG and the nucleos(t)ide agents may prevent graft loss and death or the need for a second transplant. 4. In both the pre- and posttransplantation setting, the goal of hepatitis B virus management is complete virus suppression. 5. The use of low-dose intramuscular HBIG is evolving, with studies showing that dosing and cost can be reduced by 50-300% with a customized approach. 6. Elimination of HBIG from the treatment paradigm is currently under evaluation and may be possible with the use of newer medications that have no or low resistance rates. 7. Although there is growing evidence that some types of combination therapy may decrease the chance that drug resistance will develop and increase the likelihood of long-term success in preventing graft loss and death, additional research will be required to determine which combinations will work well in the long term, and which will not.

Improved outcome of chronic hepatitis B after heart transplantation by long-term antiviral therapy

Chronic hepatitis B progresses to cirrhosis in the majority of immunosuppressed patients. The outcome of long-term antiviral therapy in HBV-infected organ transplant recipients is unknown. In 1996, we included 20 heart transplant (HT) recipients in a pilot trial to treat chronic hepatitis B with famciclovir. At that time, bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis was evident in 15 individuals (75%). From 1998 onwards, patients were switched to lamivudine in case of primary or secondary virological nonresponse to famciclovir. Adefovir or tenofovir became available at our centre for HT recipients in 2002. After 103 months, one patient was still on famciclovir showing a complete virological response. Sixteen patients were switched to lamivudine after 0.5-4 years of famciclovir therapy. Six of those showed a long-term response to lamivudine therapy lasting for up to 7 years. Lamivudine resistance developed in the remaining 10 patients (63%), in 4 of them successful rescue therapy (adefovir n = 3, tenofovir n = 1) could be initiated. Only one hepatocellular carcinoma developed, which was successfully treated by locoregional ablative therapy. Nine patients died (45%), with lamivudine-resistance-related liver failure as the cause of death in five cases. Significant improvement of Ishak fibrosis scores could be demonstrated in six of the seven patients with more than two sequential liver biopsies available. Long-term antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis B can lead to regression of liver cirrhosis in patients after organ transplantation, unless viral resistance occurs. This study demonstrates the urgent need for further antivirals to overcome antiviral resistance.

Successful treatment of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis using adefovir dipivoxil in a patient with cirrhosis and renal insufficiency

Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis is a deleterious manifestation of hepatitis B virus infection in immunocompromised patients. Without treatment, this condition is usually fatal within weeks of onset. Liver retransplantation has not been successfully performed to date, and treatment intervention was generally unsuccessful before the advent of adefovir dipivoxil. However, concerns have been expressed about the use of this agent in patients who are renally compromised. A 40-year-old liver transplant recipient with hepatitis B virus reinfection, resistance to lamivudine, and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis complicated by terminal renal impairment and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was treated with adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg after every dialysis. Since initiating treatment with adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg, a dramatic virologic and clinical improvement was observed in this patient. The patient returned to work full-time within 6 months of starting adefovir dipivoxil without the need for liver retransplantation. Serum HBV DNA (Amplicor HBV; Roche Diagnostics, Basle, Switzerland) decreased by 6 log(10) copies/mL and became negative (< 400 copies/mL) within 8 weeks of treatment and remains negative at the last available assessment. The patient continues to require renal dialysis, but is generally well. Creatinine clearance improved from 8 mL/min to 16 mL/min during the course of treatment. No adverse events related to adefovir dipivoxil were observed. Adefovir dipivoxil resulted in significant clinical improvement in this patient with hepatitis B virus-induced fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, despite the presence of renal impairment and lamivudine resistance.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis B infection in liver transplant recipients

1. Therapeutic decisions are guided by a patient's clinical status (severity of disease and presence of comorbidities) and previous drug-exposure history. 2. Lamivudine is safe and effective in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection caused by wild-type virus or failure of hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapy. Lamivudine resistance, developing in approximately 25% after 12 months of therapy, is its main limitation. 3. Famciclovir is safe in liver transplant recipients; however, virological and clinical responses are less consistent than with lamivudine. Thus, lamivudine is favored over famciclovir as first-line therapy in transplant recipients with no previous exposure to nucleoside analogues. 4. Although limited in availability, adefovir dipivoxil appears safe and effective in treating liver transplant recipients with lamivudine-resistant HBV disease. Close monitoring of renal function is recommended, with dose adjustment in patients with reduced creatinine clearances. 5. Limited data suggest that intravenous ganciclovir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and interferon alfa may be useful as rescue therapies for patients with lamivudine- or famciclovir-resistant HBV disease. 6. Antiviral therapy with two or more suitable agents may minimize the chance for viral resistance; therefore, future therapeutic strategies likely will use combination therapy in the long-term management of recurrent HBV disease.

Diagnostic issues in liver transplantation pathology

Liver biopsy is used to determine the pathogenesis of liver dysfunction after liver transplantation. One or more causative factors may be identified on biopsy. The pathologist must be familiar with the histopathology of acute rejection to differentiate it from other potential complications, including biliary obstruction, intercurrent cytomegalovirus hepatitis, or recurrent disease. Consensus documents from the Banff international panel provide useful guidelines for the appropriate grading of acute and chronic rejection.

Lamivudine and low-dose hepatitis B immune globulin for prophylaxis of hepatitis B reinfection after liver transplantation possible role of mutations in the YMDD motif prior to transplantation as a risk factor for reinfection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Reinfection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with an unfavourable clinical course. Lamivudine/hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) combination treatment reduces reinfection rates. However, it is unclear at what time point lamivudine should be started and which HBIG doses are sufficient.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients receiving combination treatment were studied. Lamivudine was started up to 16.5 months before OLT and continued thereafter. HBIG was started intraoperatively and continued according to anti-HBs-titers. Median follow-up after OLT was 20 months.

RESULTS

Eleven patients received lamivudine pretreatment for >2 (median 6) months due to initial HBV-DNA-positivity (median 749 pg/ml). After initial lamivudine response HBV-DNA increased in two of them to concentrations above 10 pg/ml prior to OLT. Both had developed mutations in the YMDD motif and suffered from HBV reinfection 13 and 75 days postoperatively. Individual HBIG consumption was highly variable (range 787-4,766 lU/month). Twenty-two percent of anti-HBs titers measured before HBIG administration were below 100 IU/l.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined reinfection prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG is effective in patients with controlled viral replication at the time of OLT. However, pretransplantation lamivudine resistance is a risk factor for reinfection. Low dose HBIG maintenance therapy individualized according to anti-HBs-titers appears to be tenable.

Lamivudine without HBIg for prevention of graft reinfection by hepatitis B: long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

This open, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamivudine prophylaxis given to chronic hepatitis B virus-(HBV) infected patients before and after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We now present long-term data that follow our previous short-term report.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients were treated with lamivudine (100 mg orally, daily); 13 (57%), were serum HBV DNA positive (Abbott Genostics, Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, IL) at study entry. Patients received lamivudine for at least 4 weeks before OLT, and for up to 50 months (median 25 months) after OLT.

RESULTS

Of the 23 treated patients, 17 survived to undergo OLT. Eleven patients (65%) survived up to 4 years (median 36 months) after OLT. One of the survivors stopped lamivudine because of a possible adverse reaction 9 months post-OLT, and prophylaxis with HBV immune globulin was then established. Ten survivors continue lamivudine. Eight long-term survivors have normal liver function without evidence of HBV reinfection. Of the 17 transplanted patients, 6 died. Four patients died (3 days to 5 months post-OLT) without evidence of graft reinfection. Two further patients died at 19 and 23 months post-OLT from graft failure. Both patients had YMDD variant detected at 12 months post-OLT. Two other patients with YMDD-variant HBV remain alive on lamivudine, 9 and 15 months after development of the variant.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamivudine, given before and after OLT, prevents significant graft reinfection for the majority of treated patients. The study has also shown that lamivudine is extremely well tolerated by liver failure patients and for a prolonged period after transplantation.

Viral hepatitis in the liver transplant recipient

Understanding and management of HBV and HCV infection in the OLT recipient has evolved rapidly in the last decade. The spontaneous risk for viral recurrence after transplantation is high, but has been decreased effectively in hepatitis B-positive recipients with the use of HBIG and lamivudine. HCV recurrence as defined by histologic injury is almost universal, although graft or patient outcomes for the first 8 years after OLT do not appear to be limited by HCV serostatus. However, effective prophylactic regimens that alter the natural history of HCV reinfection do not currently exist, and with longer follow-up into the second decade, the prevalence of HCV-related graft failure is likely to increase.

Recurrent hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and combined hepatitis B and C in liver allografts: a comparative pathological study

Although recurrence of viral hepatitis in liver transplants is common, data comparing recurrent hepatitis B (HB), hepatitis C (HC), and co-existing dual hepatitis B and C (HB&C) are sparse. Posttransplantation liver biopsies, along with molecular, serological, immunohistochemical, and clinical data from 27 patients with pretransplantation diagnosis of chronic viral hepatitis, were reviewed. The patients were placed into 4 groups: Group I, with pretransplantation HB (n = 8); group II, with pretransplantation HC (n = 10); group III with pretransplantation HC and anti-HB surface or core antibody (n = 4); and group IV, with pretransplantation HB&C (n = 5). The histopathologic findings and patient outcome were compared in the 4 groups. A high rate of recurrence of viral hepatitis was seen for all 4 groups: Group I = 100%, group II = 90%, Group III = 100%, and group IV = 80%, with the mean (median) recurrence time of 308 (224), 82 (52), 61 (64), and 125 (70) days, respectively. The number of deaths (their median survival times) were: group I = 4 (374 days), group II = 4 (794 days), group III = 1 (1,143 days), and group IV = 5 (448 days). The earliest histological findings of lobular injury was the presence of acidophil bodies and Kupffer cell hyperplasia, the latter being more prominent in recurrent HC cases. Recurrent HB presented in 2 forms: early (before 150 days) with poor survival and with either severe necroinflammatory histology or with features of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, and delayed (after 150 days), with mild necro-inflammatory activity and prolonged survival. HC with or without anti-HB antibodies had early recurrence, but the course was slowly progressive. Patients with HB&C had recurrence of both viruses; however, the course was dictated by HB virus.

Liver transplantation and HBsAg-positive postnecrotic cirrhosis: adequate immunoprophylaxis and delta virus co-infection as the significant determinants of long-term prognosis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The place of liver transplantation in hepatitis B viral (HBV)-related diseases remains controversial because of the high rate of reinfection. The aim of this study was to define the determinants of long-term prognosis after transplantation.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients were transplanted during the period February 1984-September 1996. Six patients died during the early (< 3 months) posttransplant period from causes unrelated to HBV infection. All 52 long-term (> 3 months) survivors were evaluated in relation to the mode of presentation, viral replication at time of transplantation, absence of hepatocellular cancer at time of transplantation and use of adequate immunoprophylaxis (IP). Adequate immunoprophylaxis, defined as maintenance of anti-HBs levels over 100 mUI/ml, was introduced in December 1989. Intention-to-treat IP analysis compared patients transplanted before and after this date. The median follow-up was 74 months (range 4 to 131). Forty-seven patients (90%) had a minimal follow-up of 3 years.

RESULTS

Five-year actuarial survival rates of 58 patients and of 52 long-term survivors were 72 +/- 6% and 80 +/- 6%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that delta co-infection (n = 25) significantly improved survival (p < 0.001) [96 +/- 4% vs 63 +/- 10% in HBV patients (n = 27) at 5 years] as did absence of hepatocellular cancer (n = 36) (p = 0.020) [89 +/- 5% vs 61 +/- 12% in 16 non-cancer patients]. IP, however, significantly influenced 5-year survival in the HBV-patient group (n = 17) (p = 0.001) [85 +/- 10% vs 30 +/- 14% in 10 patients without IP). Multivariate analysis selected delta co-infection (p = 0.002) and IP (p = 0.01) as the significant determinants of prognosis independently influencing survival. Uni- and multivariate analyses showed that survival without reinfection was significantly influenced by IP (p = 0.002) [73 +/- 8% (n = 31) versus 33 +/- 12% in 15 non-treated patients).

CONCLUSIONS

Delta virus co-infection and immunoprophylaxis are the most important prognostic factors after transplantation for postnecrotic HBsAg-positive cirrhosis. Transplantation can be proposed as a therapeutic tool only if life-long adequate adjuvant therapy can be achieved. Under this condition good results can even be obtained if there is viral replication at the time of transplantation.

Prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation using combination lamivudine and hepatitis B immune globulin

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease are prone to recurrence. The mainstay of prophylaxis has been passive immunotherapy with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG). Antiviral therapy with lamivudine has proven effective in lowering hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and improving histology in patients with hepatitis B infection; its role in prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation is under investigation. Viral breakthrough and resistance, however, are a significant problem with monotherapy with either HBIG or lamivudine. The efficacy of combination lamivudine/HBIG prophylaxis has not been reported. Fourteen patients underwent transplantation for decompensated liver disease owing to hepatitis B. Lamivudine (150 mg p.o./d) was begun before transplantation in 10 patients, including 4 who were HBV DNA-positive. In addition, 1 patient was HBV DNA-positive when transplanted. HBIG was given perioperatively and continued thereafter; treatment with lamivudine was maintained or initiated at the time of transplantation and continued indefinitely. The median follow-up was 387 days. Actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival was 93% (1 patient died of unrelated causes). At a median interval of 28 days following lamivudine treatment, all 5 HBV DNA-positive patients cleared HBV DNA from the serum; 1 went on to clear hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), before transplantation, at day 148 of lamivudine treatment. By the highly sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR), at a median of 346 days (range, 130-525 days) following transplantation, all 13 surviving patients had no detectable serum HBV DNA. Lamivudine suppresses HBV replication in patients awaiting liver transplantation. At a median follow-up of 1.1 years, combination prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIG prevented hepatitis B recurrence following liver transplantation.

Current results and evolving indications for liver transplantation in children

Liver transplantation continues to be successful and effective treatment for acute and chronic liver failure, and many important lessons have been learned. The development of innovative operative techniques has much reduced the waiting list mortality rate and has extended transplantation to younger and sicker children and to those with functionally normal livers who may benefit from auxiliary liver transplantation. The incidence and range of postoperative complications have improved with increased medical and surgical expertise. As information on long-term outcome for liver transplantation is gained, it is clear that many children will benefit from early elective liver transplantation before the development of significant growth or psychosocial retardation. Early transplantation is also indicated in children with cirrhosis and intrapulmonary shunting or cystic fibrosis with moderate lung disease. During the same period, evolving medical therapy has altered the natural history, patient selection, and timing of transplantation in children with tyrosinaemia type I, primary bile acid disorders, neonatal haemochromatosis, and potentially, cystic fibrosis. It is now clear that children with significant multisystem disease, such as mitochondrial disorders or severe systemic oxalosis, are no longer suitable candidates for liver transplantation. The successful development of liver transplantation has brought good quality life to many children and their families. There are still many lessons to learn and there are future challenges such as the ever-increasing problems of donor scarcity and the search for potent but less toxic immunosuppressive agents.

Nucleoside analogue therapy in fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis--a case report in an HBsAg positive renal transplant recipient

A 45-year-old HBsAg carrier (HBeAb positive with normal liver function tests) underwent renal transplantation for mesangioproliferative glomerulonephritis. Sixteen months later he developed jaundice. Investigations showed he remained HBeAb positive, but HBV-DNA levels were 99 pg/ml, indicating active replication of a HBV pre-core mutant. He was commenced on lamivudine therapy with a subsequent rapid fall in HBV-DNA levels to 2.8 pg/ml, but liver function tests continued to deteriorate and he developed hepatorenal failure. Liver biopsy showed fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. He underwent liver transplantation, which was complicated by lactic acidosis. Lamivudine was withdrawn and HBV prophylaxis with HB immunoglobulin was commenced. Unfortunately he died 38 days post-transplant of surgical complications with no evidence of HBV recurrence. We discuss the use of nucleoside analogues in fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and review the literature.

Histopathology and pathobiology of hepatotropic virus-induced liver injury

The present report concerns current knowledge regarding immunopathogenesis that can be applied in the interpretation of histopathological changes in acute and chronic viral hepatitis. The histopathological features of viral hepatitis have not been changed and light microscopic examination remains essential for making a diagnosis and classification of chronic hepatitis and for the provision of objective parameters on grading and staging. However, new understanding and knowledge of viral pathogenesis, host immune responses, the biological behaviour of the causative viral agents and, in particular, viral interference in multiple hepatotropic viral infections must be taken into consideration in the interpretation of histopathological and immunopathological findings of liver tissues. This report also presents some histopathological analyses on multiple hepatotropic viral infections. It can be concluded that the diagnostic histological criteria for acute hepatitis remain applicable in such settings. However, the cause of acute flare up in chronic hepatitis could not be determined without clinical, virological and serological information. Routine histopathology cannot distinguish a new infection from an acute exacerbation due to a high level of viral replication or mutant virus. A repertoire of immunocytochemical stainings for viral antigens is helpful, but caution must be exercised in suggesting a specific viral aetiology due to the fact that suppression of pre-existing viral antigens can be pronounced when the new or concurrent infection is hepatitis C virus related.

Clinical chemistry and post-liver-transplant monitoring

Liver transplantation is an accepted therapy for end-stage liver disease. After allografting, a variety of clinical problems may require laboratory involvement for accurate and timely diagnosis and intervention. Critical factors in the choice of a laboratory test menu to support a transplant program include turnaround times that support clinical decisionmaking, real diagnostic value, and real value for money. Particular clinical problems, whose early presentation must be anticipated, include graft ischemia, primary nonfunction, and hepatic artery thrombosis. Acute rejection is common at 5-10 days posttransplantation, the principal target being the biliary tree. Longer-term problems are associated with the therapeutic drug measurement of cyclosporin A and, increasingly, tacrolimus (FK506); the side effects of immunosuppressant therapy also require monitoring. A successful liver transplant program can be adequately supported with a simple battery of automated tests that are cheap, fast, and available at all times.

Prophylaxis and treatment strategies for chronic viral hepatitis in liver transplant patients

This article highlights the importance of hepatotropic viruses as pathogens in patients undergoing liver transplantation, their contribution to morbidity and mortality after transplantation, and the approach to treatment of these pathogens when they cause disease. Although many advances have been made in the management of viral hepatitis in the transplant setting, there remain unanswered questions about the long-term natural history of the disease. An understanding of the pathogenesis of infection in the setting of transplantation is emerging slowly but requires further investigation. New approaches to treating disease in patients with either HBV or HCV infection are under development and will likely focus on the use of combinations of antiviral and immunomodulatory agents.

Transcription of hepatitis B virus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from persistently infected patients

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) has been reported to exist in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC), but it is not clear whether it replicates there. A precondition for replication should be the formation of covalently closed viral DNA and transcription of all essential viral mRNAs. The mRNAs of HBV form a nested box with common 3' ends. In order to detect even low levels of potential replication, we developed a quantitative reverse transcription-PCR method for detection of a smaller HBV mRNA species in the presence of the larger ones. All three highly viremic patients tested so far had mRNAs for the large and the small surface proteins and the X protein of the virus within PBMC but not in the virus from their sera. Furthermore, we detected by PCR covalently closed viral DNA in their PBMC. These data suggest that HBV may be not only taken up but also replicated by mononuclear blood cells and that these cells may be an extrahepatic site of viral persistence. X mRNA was detected in the largest amount. Possibly, X protein interferes with functions of the mononuclear cells during the immune response against the virus.

Hepatitis B virus sequence changes evolving in liver transplant recipients with fulminant hepatitis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Patients undergoing liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV) related liver cirrhosis are at major risk of developing HBV recurrence, and occasionally fulminant hepatitis. Here we tested in a longitudinal study whether specific viral variants are associated with fulminant HBV infection in the graft.

METHODS

The complete HBV genomes isolated from the sera of three patients with HBV and HBV and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) coinfection during chronic infection before and during fulminant reinfection after transplantation were amplified and directly sequenced.

RESULTS

Twenty, 25 and 19 mutations, distributed over the entire genome, were identified which differed between the HBV genomes isolated from each patient during chronic and fulminant infection, respectively. This reflects a much higher rate of nucleotide sequence changes than expected from the natural variation of HBV. No common HBV mutation emerged in any of the three cases during fulminant infection. However, precore defective viruses were found to be present in all three patients at the time of fulminant infection and in two of the patients before fulminant infection. Two of the patients had preS2-defective HBVs both before and after transplantation. A point mutation in the 'a'-determinant of the surface protein emerged in one case after transplantation under treatment with polyclonal HBV specific immunoglobulins.

CONCLUSIONS

Many new, but no specific common mutations emerged during fulminant HBV reinfection. Although HBeAg defective variants were found in all cases studied, the presence of these variants also during chronic infection in two cases demonstrates that they are not sufficient to cause fulminant hepatitis. Thus, other factors than the emergence of a specific viral strain seem to contribute to the development of fulminant reinfection in a liver graft.

Review: hepatitis B and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients is very commonly followed by recurrence of infection in the transplanted liver. Most recipients with HBV recurrence will develop chronic hepatitis that follows a more aggressive course than is seen in non-immuno-compromized subjects and this frequently results in graft failure. The presence of hepatitis B e antigen or significant levels of HBV-DNA in the serum is highly predictive of recurrence and this has led to the view that patients, whose serum is positive for these conventional markers of replication, should be excluded from transplantation. The key to improving the results of transplantation in patients with HBV infection lies in the development of effective strategies to prevent reinfection. High dose anti-HBs immunoglobulin is effective in patients who are coinfected with hepatitis D, those transplanted for fulminant hepatitis and cirrhotic patients who have very low levels of viral replication prior to transplantation. Unfortunately, immunoprophylaxis does not seem to influence the outcome in those patients with higher levels of replication. There are several new orally active nucleoside analogues that and potent inhibitors of hepatitis B replication that may be effective for both the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease. The most promising are lamivudine (2',3',dideoxy,3',thiacytidine) and famciclovir (a guanosine analogue). Both agents have been extensively evaluated in animal models of HBV and have been shown to rapidly suppress viral replication. The initial experience with these agents in liver transplant recipients has been promising and a number of studies are currently underway to determine whether these drugs, used alone or in combination with immunoprophylaxis, are able to prevent recurrence in those patients at highest risk of post-transplant HBV recurrence.

Improved outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B cirrhosis with aggressive passive immunization

Passive immunization with hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) is important to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation for chronic HBV cirrhosis. Hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) dosing regimens have been poorly defined, utilize numerous routes of administration, and result in a high rate of HBV relapse and mortality. Twenty-five of 27 (93%) patients transplanted (four retransplants) for chronic HBV cirrhosis show no evidence of recurrent HBV (range, 2-55 months). Anti-HBs titers necessary to minimize the risk of hepatitis B surface antigen detectability were >500 IU/L for days 0 to 7, >250 IU/L for days 8 to 90, and >100 IU/L thereafter. Pretransplant HBV E antigen (HBeAG)-positive patients required more HBIG to achieve these goals than HBeAG-negative individuals. The elimination of anti-HBs changed continually for the initial 3 posttransplant months. The anti-HBs half-life increased from 0.7 days to 14.1 days. Anti-HBs elimination was significantly different in HBeAG+ and HBeAG- patients for the first week, but was subsequently indistinguishable after week 1. After 3 months, the half-life was statistically less for HBeAG+ patients, but the difference did not influence the clinical treatment regimens. Quantitative hepatitis B DNA levels did not predict the amount of HBIG required. HBV recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation can be reduced by aggressive passive immunization. Pharmacokinetic analysis of anti-Hbs elimination can improve immunoglobulin therapy and prevent recurrence of clinical hepatitis.

Famciclovir therapy for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Between November 1993 and June 1995 18 patients received oral famciclovir (3 x 500 mg) for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation. Reinfection was defined as the reoccurrence of HBsAg in the serum. In the first 15 patients, famciclovir therapy was initiated after clinical signs of graft hepatitis, whereas the last 3 patients received treatment immediately after HBV-DNA was detected. Famciclovir was well-tolerated in all patients. HBV-DNA values were decreased to undetectable levels in 8 out of 18 patients. Clinical status improved in 7 patients, whereas 5 patients remained unchanged and 6 patients progressed to deteriorating graft function and death. When famciclovir was initiated early after reinfection, a response rate of approximately 66% was observed. Late onset of therapy in patients with fulminant hepatitis generally failed to provide any clinical benefit.

Should liver transplantation be performed for patients with chronic hepatitis B? Yes!

The use of passive immunoprophylaxis to prevent HBV reinfection of the allograft following liver transplantation has led to a dramatic improvement in the outcome of patients who undergo transplantation for chronic hepatitis B. Hepatitis B previously was not one of our favorite diseases for which to perform liver transplantation. However, we now regard patients with this disease as good candidates for liver transplantation. I hope I have presented a compelling argument that no patient with hepatitis B, regardless of serological status, should be a priori denied liver transplantation. Studies from both the U.S. and Europe have shown that HBV reinfection can be prevented in almost all patients at a cost not out of line with other accepted indications for liver transplantation. Thus, I once again, ask the question, "Should patients with chronic hepatitis B undergo liver transplantation?" At our institution, the answer is an emphatic Yes!