Hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants

The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.

Assessing the Non-tumorous Liver: Implications for Patient Management and Surgical Therapy

INTRODUCTION

Hepatic resection is performed for various benign and malignant liver tumors. Over the last several decades, there have been improvements in the surgical technique and postoperative care of patients undergoing liver surgery. Despite this, liver failure following an extended hepatic resection remains a critical potential postoperative complication. Patients with underlying parenchymal liver diseases are at particular risk of liver failure due to impaired liver regeneration with an associated mortality risk as high as 60 to 90%. In addition, live donor liver transplantation requires a thorough presurgical assessment of the donor liver to minimize the risk of postoperative complications.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Recently, cross-sectional imaging assessment of diffuse liver diseases has gained momentum due to its ability to provide both anatomical and functional assessments of normal and abnormal tissues. Various imaging techniques are being employed to assess diffuse liver diseases including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasound (US). MRI has the ability to detect abnormal intracellular and molecular processes and tissue architecture. CT has a high spatial resolution, while US provides real-time imaging, is inexpensive, and readily available. We herein review current state-of-the-art techniques to assess the underlying non-tumorous liver. Specifically, we summarize current approaches to evaluating diffuse liver diseases including fatty liver alcoholic or non-alcoholic (NAFLD, AFLD), hepatic fibrosis (HF), and iron deposition (ID) with a focus on advanced imaging techniques for non-invasive assessment along with their implications for patient management. In addition, the role of and techniques to assess hepatic volume in hepatic surgery are discussed.

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy in postliver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C virus infection

Posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence is universal in chronic hepatitis C recipients. Antiviral therapy is suggested after liver transplant to halt disease progression. Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy remains the standard of care in many areas where direct antiviral agents are poorly accessible. This study aimed to assess the treatment efficacy and safety of the regimen for Taiwanese patients with post-transplant HCV recurrence. Nine patients with HCV recurrence postliver transplantation were allocated. Patients received either pegylated interferon α-2a 180 μg/wk or pegylated interferon α-2b 1.5 mg/kg/wk plus ribavirin for 24-48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the achievement of sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA throughout 6 months of follow-up after the end of treatment. The safety profiles were also documented. The rates of rapid virological response, early virological response, end-of-treatment virological response, and SVR were 33%, 63%, 75%, and 56% respectively. Of the four patients who failed antiviral treatment, the treatment responses were nonresponse (n = 1), loss of follow-up (n = 1), and relapse (n = 2). Three patients terminated therapy early due to severe adverse events, including severe anemia, intra-abdomen infection, and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. One of the three patients who terminated treatment early at Week 6 experienced rapid virological response followed by SVR. Pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination allowed a chance for cure with a fair SVR rate in Taiwanese chronic hepatitis C patients postliver transplantation. Early identification of side effects and careful monitoring during therapy might enhance the treatment efficacy.

Pretransplant model for end-stage liver disease score as a predictor of postoperative complications after liver transplantation

The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) is used to determine organ allocation priorities for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), although its value to predict posttransplantation mortality and morbility is controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze postoperative courses and (to evaluate the relationships between MELD score and postoperative) complications. We retrospectively examined the courses of 242 patients including 186 males and 56 females of overall mean age of 53 +/- 10 years who underwent primary liver transplantation. The classification of Dindo-characterized 5 grades of severity to evaluate postoperative events. The data showed that 171 patients (70.7%) experienced complications, while 71 (29.3%) had none. We observed that MELD score and complications were related (P < .05). Patients with complicated courses post-OLT displayed a 22.80 mean value of the MELD score, while those without complications showed a 17.64 mean value. The MELD score was also significantly associated with the time of intensive care unit stay and in hospital. Finally, we noted that MELD score and mortality were significantly correlated (P < .05). In conclusion, MELD score can be considered to be an objective system to predict the prevalence and severity of postoperative complications after liver transplantation.

Chronic rejection of the liver: the role of immunosuppression

Liver transplantation is now widely recognised as an effective treatment option for patients with advanced liver disease. Many units now achieve greater than 85% survival at 1 year, with the majority of patients having a high quality of life. The maintenance of a high quality of life requires careful clinical management to ensure that the continued maintenance of excellent liver graft function is not achieved at the expense of immunosuppressive drug complications or morbidity. Acute liver rejection will occur in between 30 to 45% of patients, although with modern immunosuppressive protocols, usually combining one of the calcineurin agents, either cyclosporin or tacrolimus, with both azathioprine and corticosteroids (prednisolone) ensures that relatively few grafts are lost from severe acute rejection. While the incidence and severity of acute rejection may be one factor in raising the risk of chronic rejection, it may not be the principal one in many patients. It is important to recognise that the frequency of rejection also varies with the primary underlying liver disease, with patients with hepatitis B or alcoholic liver disease having relatively low rejection rates, compared with patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), which range between 20 to 70%. Chronic rejection will account for some 5% of grafts lost in the first 3 to 5 years. Indeed, there is some evidence that the incidence of chronic rejection is actually declining over the past few years. While the reason for this apparent decline is uncertain, and it could relate to better immunosuppression management, or more likely to the growing recognition that chronic graft dysfunction may be due to recurrent liver disease, such as autoimmune hepatitis, PBC, PSC, or recurrent hepatitis C. The differentiation of recurrent primary liver disease from chronic rejection can prove to be very difficult in clinical practice. Thus, the clinician must carefully monitor liver and graft function, evaluate any biochemical changes, and try to reach a clear diagnosis before considering any modification of immunosuppressive schedules.

Hepatitis C and liver transplantation

Cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C is the leading indication for liver transplantation in Europe, United States and Japan. Reinfection after liver transplantation is universal and chronic liver disease develops in at least 70% of patients at 3 years, with an accelerated course compared to the nontransplant setting. These facts underscore the need for a better understanding of hepatitis C infection and the various treatment modalities. This paper attempts a brief review of the scope of the disease, as well as the different treatment modalities, with special emphasis given to orthotopic liver transplantation.

Influence of donor age on survival in liver transplantation due to hepatitis C virus

Cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) is one of the most frequent indications for liver transplantation. During recent years, the age of donors has increased, which has led to a worse prognosis for persons undergoing transplantations because of this virus. In this study, we analyzed the 93 transplantations performed during a 6-year period (2000-2005) due to HCV, dividing them into 2 groups according to donor age: <60 years (group A) and >/=60 years (group B). We examined graft and recipient survivals with a mean follow-up of 34 months. Recipient survival among group A was 61% compared with 57% among Group B, the difference being greater if we excluded the initial months after transplantation, since this eliminated the complications inherent to the intervention. Graft survival, according to the Knodell histological activity index, was summarized as: 55.7% histological recurrence, 16.7% fibrosis, and 21% cirrhosis among group A versus 65.6%, 25%, and 18.7%, respectively, among group B. In conclusion, there was improved survival and disease progression was slower among group A compared with group B, suggesting that donor age was an important factor; patient and graft survivals fell progressively with increased donor age.

Antiviral treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation

End stage liver disease due to hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT) worldwide. Regretfully, infection of the graft by HCV occurs almost universally after LT, causing chronic hepatitis and early progression to cirrhosis in a significant proportion of recipients. Moreover, graft and patient survival are significantly worse in patients undergoing LT for HCV-related cirrhosis than in those transplanted for other indications. Therefore, many LT centers consider antiviral treatment with interferon and ribavirin the mainstay of managing recurrent HCV disease in LT recipients. The optimal time to start treatment is unclear. In most instances, treatment is initiated when histological evidence of disease recurrence, either at protocol or on-demand liver biopsies, is observed after LT. However, antiviral treatment initiated before LT is a potential option for some patients for two reasons: first, clearing or suppressing HCV before LT may reduce or eliminate the risk of recurrent hepatitis C in the transplanted liver and thereby improve survival; second, clearing HCV in cirrhotic patient may halt disease progression and avoid the need for transplantation. In this article, the results obtained by pre-transplant antiviral regimens administered to HCV-positive cirrhotic patients awaiting LT are discussed.

Differential expression of viral PAMP receptors mRNA in peripheral blood of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection

BACKGROUND

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMP) receptors play a key role in the early host response to viruses. In this work, we determined mRNA levels of two members of the Toll-like Receptors family, (TLR3 and TLR7) and the helicase RIG-I, all of three recognizing viral RNA products, in peripheral blood of healthy donors and hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients, to observe if their transcripts are altered in this disease.

METHODS

IFN-alpha, TLR3, TLR7 and RIG-I levels in peripheral blood from healthy controls (n = 18) and chronic HCV patients (n = 18) were quantified by real-time polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Our results show that IFN-alpha, TLR3, TLR7 and RIG-I mRNA levels are significantly down-regulated in patients with chronic HCV infection when compared with healthy controls. We also found that the measured levels of TLR3 and TLR7, but not RIG-I, correlated significantly with those of IFN-alpha

CONCLUSION

Monitoring the expression of RNA-sensing receptors like TLR3, TLR7 and RIG-I during the different clinical stages of infection could bring a new source of data about the prognosis of disease.

An assessment of interactions between hepatitis C virus and herpesvirus reactivation in liver transplant recipients using molecular surveillance

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been proposed to have immunomodulatory effects in transplant recipients and may promote herpesvirus reactivation. To assess this, we compared the incidence of herpesvirus reactivation in HCV-positive and HCV-negative liver transplant recipients. Quantitative viral load testing was performed at regular intervals posttransplantation for cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpesviruses (HHV) 6, 7, and 8, and varicella zoster virus (VZV) in 177 liver transplant patients who were HCV-positive (n=60) or HCV-negative (n=117). The incidence of CMV disease, CMV viremia, and the peak CMV viral load was not significantly different in HCV-positive vs. HCV-negative patients. Similarly, no differences in HHV-6 or EBV reactivation were observed. HHV-8 or VZV viremia was not detected in any patient in the study. A lower incidence of HHV-7 infection occurred in HCV-positive patients vs. HCV-negative patients (47.6% vs. 72.7%; P=0.006). In conclusion, these results suggest that HCV infection does not appear to promote herpesvirus reactivation after liver transplantation.

Clinical management of patients with recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is indicated in end-stage chronic viral liver disease, but unless adequate prophylaxis is administered, the patient will in most cases develop recurrent hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) virus infection. Today, patients receiving prophylaxis using nucleoside analogue drugs with or without specific immune globulin drugs in connection with orthotopic liver transplantation for HBV related cirrhosis, present low risk of relapse and high 5-10 year survival rates. Lamivudine was the first drug used in the prophylactic treatment, but this drug has increasingly been combined with or replaced by adefovir due to the low genetic barrier, which causes viral resistance. Most patients develop viral recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation for HCV related cirrhosis, and in an elevated number of cases, cirrhosis and hepatic insufficiency set in after a few years. Prophylaxis before transplantation and pre-emptive treatment using interferon and ribavirin present numerous side effects resulting in reduction of doses and suspension of therapy, with consequently low sustained virological remission rates and risk of rejection.The treatment is better tolerated by patients with histologically confirmed chronic disease, but also in these patients virological remission rates are low. This pathology requires new therapeutic protocols and/or new drugs in order to obtain better compliance and better responses.

Antihepatitis C virus therapy in liver transplanted patients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) management in the transplant setting is still an open issue. The therapeutic strategies being addressed include: (a) pre-transplant prophylaxis (to prevent the infection of the transplanted organ); (b) post-transplant prophylaxis (to reduce the possibility of developing acute hepatitis); (c) management once the chronic disease has already set in and stabilized. Combination therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin seems to play an important role for patients with established recurrent hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C virus reactivation in anti-hepatitic C virus-positive renal transplant recipients

From 1992 to 2001 hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia was studied in 53 renal transplant recipients anti-HCV+ with at least 3 months follow-up posttransplant using a quantitative retrotranscriptase-PCR method. HCV-RNA was detected in 45 (85%): 29 of the 34 recipients treated with azathioprine-based therapy and 15 of 18 treated with mycophenolate mofetil. Immunosuppressive therapy type did not affect HCV replication. Three different patterns of HCV-RNA evolution were detected: 13 (28.8%) patients with high RNA-HCV levels; 21 (46.7%) patients with low levels; and 11 (24.4%) patients with viremia elevation. In 10 (90%) of 11 of the last group, HCV viremia was detected before 15 days posttransplantation, significantly earlier than in the other two groups. Thus, replication during the first 15 days after transplantation leads to a high RNA-HCV viral load. No clinical symptoms were related to HCV.

Treatment of hepatitis C

Hepatitis C virus is a leading cause of chronic liver disease, with over 170 million people infected worldwide. It is also the leading indication for liver transplantation. Complications from chronic hepatitis C infection include cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and hepatocellular carcinoma. As a result, treatment strategies to prevent such complications have been widely researched, although many questions remain unanswered. To date, the standard therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection is the combination of peginterferon and ribavirin. Treatment strategies differ based on factors such as genotype and liver biopsy results. Other strategies must be considered for special groups, such as patients with acute hepatitis C infection, hepatitis C/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, and prior nonresponse to interferon or relapse after its use. The goal of therapy is to achieve a sustained virologic response (ie, no detectable hepatitis C ribonucleic acid 6 months after completion of therapy). The substantial adverse effects associated with both interferon alfa and ribavirin often make it difficult for patients to continue with their therapies.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis C virus: systematic review of antiviral therapy

Antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation is increasingly used. This systematic review presents both viral and histological response in three areas: pretransplant (5 studies/180 patients), preemptive therapy soon after transplant (10 studies/417 patients), and therapy for established disease (75 studies/2027 patients). There were only 16 randomized studies (543 patients). Significant dose reductions and drug stoppage rates occurred. The data on histological improvement and risk of rejection are conflicting. Even the best antiviral therapy (pegylated interferon/ribavirin) is neither easily used nor reasonably effective. The best strategy will be pretransplant treatment, most likely with newer agents.

Liver transplantation in HIV-infected recipients

Liver transplantation is being evaluated as a therapeutic option for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with end-stage liver disease, but experience is still scarce. We describe the outcome of 4 HIV-infected patients who underwent liver transplantation in our hospital between July 2002 and April 2003. HIV-infected liver transplant recipients meet the same standard criteria for transplantation as do HIV-negative candidates. In addition, HIV infected persons are required to have a CD4 T-cell count greater than 100/mL (CD4 T-cells are targets for HIV infection). Immunosuppressive regimens, perioperative surgical prophylaxis, and prophylaxis for opportunistic infections are standard in the Liver Transplantation Unit in our hospital. Four patients, including 3 former intravenous drug users, received a liver transplant (2 from deceased donors and 2 from living donors), with a median follow-up of 510 days. Three patients (75%) are alive, with 1 death occurring 17 months posttransplantation in a patient who developed fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Rejection occurred in 1 patient, and was managed with no complications. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence occurred in 3 patients. HIV-infection has remained under control with antiretroviral treatment. A combination of 3 nucleoside analogs was used in 3 patients, with no need for drug adjustments. No opportunistic infections or other significant infectious complications developed. In conclusion, orthotopic liver transplantation seems a safe therapeutic option in the short term for HIV-infected persons with end stage liver disease, including patients with a history of drug abuse. If indicated, an antiretroviral regimen consisting of 3 nucleosides could be used to avoid interactions with immunosuppressive drugs.

Outcomes of acute rejection after interferon therapy in liver transplant recipients

Interferon alfa has been increasingly used against recurrent hepatitis C (HCV) disease in post-liver transplant (LT) recipients. A serious potential adverse effect is acute rejection. We reviewed our experience using interferon-based therapy (interferon or pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin) for treating recurrent HCV in LT recipients. Forty-four LT recipients were treated with interferon for recurrent HCV. Five of the 44 patients developed acute rejection during interferon-based therapy. These 5 patients started treatment of 42.4 +/- 33.89 months (mean +/- SD) after LT. Mean (+/- SD) histological activity index and fibrosis scores before initiating antiviral therapy were 8.8 (+/- 1.92) and 2.6 (+/- 0.55), respectively. Patients were treated for 3.3 +/- 2.28 months (mean +/- SD) prior to rejection. At the time of rejection, HCV load was not detectable in 4 of the 5 recipients. All 5 patients had tolerated interferon therapy, and none had stopped therapy because of adverse effects. The rejection was successfully treated in 3 patients. In 2 of those 3 patients, cirrhosis eventually developed. In the 2 patients who did not respond to rejection treatment, immediate graft failure occurred, leading to re-LT in 1 patient and death from sepsis in the other. In conclusion, the results indicate that further studies are needed to assess the safety of interferon in LT recipients. Interferon-based therapy may lead to acute rejection and subsequent graft loss and should therefore be used with caution. Treated recipients may also develop progressive cirrhosis despite achieving a sustained virological response.

[Liver transplantation: is it possible in HIV/HCV co-infected patients?]

The prognosis of HIV infection has been modified by antiretroviral therapy. However, the morbidity and the mortality of HCV co-infection increase and may be a major problem of health service. Up to now co-infected patients are excluded of transplantation due to complexity, the ethical aspects, the immunodeficiency and the co-infection. This study tries to estimate the feasibility in this population. Between December 1999 and March 2002, seven patients were transplanted. The average of CD4 was 332/ml; the viral load was <50 copies/ml. Before transplantation, no patient had experienced opportunist infection and all patients received antiretroviral therapy adapted to their history. The average follow-up is of 14 months: one patient died 3 months after transplantation, the other one presented a candida in oesophagus, the average of CD4 was 280/ml, and viral load was <50 copies/ml in five patients. A relapse of HVC was observed in all patients. Interferon/rivabirine therapy was proposed for four patients. Every patient received tacrolimus and corticoids. HAART were modified four times for toxicity and one time for virological failure. We observed two cases of transient renal insufficiency, two cases of diabetes, two cases of pancreatitis, and abnormalities of the respiratory mitochondrial chain in four patients. Finally, liver transplantation in HIV-HCV co-infected patients seems to be feasible when strict criteria of selection are taken into account. This still experimental strategy requires a multidisciplinary partnership.

Trasplante hepático en pacientes con infección por el VIH: una realidad en el año 2004

According to current estimates, there are 60,000 to 80,000 HIV and HCV coinfected individuals in Spain, and 5,000 to 10,000 HIV and HBV coinfected individuals. Among these patients, 10% to 15% have liver cirrhosis. Thus, end-stage liver disease is one of the major causes of death in our country. Liver transplantation is the only therapeutic option for these patients. Accumulated experience in North America and Europe in the last five years indicates that three-year survival in HIV-positive liver transplant recipients is similar to that of HIV-negative recipients. The selection criteria for HIV transplant candidates includes the following: no history of opportunistic infections, CD4 lymphocyte count higher than 100 cells/mm3, and HIV viral load suppressible with antiretroviral treatment. In Spain, where the majority of patients are former drug abusers, complete abstinence from heroin or cocaine use during two years is also required, with the possibility of the patient being in a methadone program. To date 26 hepatic transplants have been performed in the same number of patients, with only two deaths (7%) after a median follow-up of eight months (1-28). The main problems in the post-transplantation period in all the series has been recurrent HCV infection, which is the principle cause of post-transplantation mortality, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between the antiretroviral and immunosuppressive agents. There is little experience with pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment in this population.

Infection with chronic hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation: a role for interferon therapy before transplantation

An analysis of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Liver Transplant Registry data shows that the greater the viral load at the time of transplantation, the more rapidly clinically evident posttransplantation hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease recurs. These data suggest that aggressive pretransplantation treatment of HCV might delay recurrent posttransplantation HCV disease and enhance posttransplantation survival. We have taken an aggressive approach to treating HCV infection pretransplantation with the use of high-dose (5 MU) daily interferon alpha(2b) in an effort to clear the virus before transplantation. A total of 27 patients with HCV-induced cirrhosis were seen and underwent transplantation at Loyola University Medical Center (Maywood, IL) between February 1997 and December 2001. There were 22 men and five women, with a mean age of 56 +/- 2 years. The majority had genotype 1 disease (67%). Of the 27 patients, 7 had a baseline platelet count <50,000/mm(3) and were excluded from interferon therapy. The remaining 20 were treated for a mean of 14 +/- 2.5 (range, 0.5 to 33.5) months before orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Twelve (60%) responded to the therapy with serologic clearance of HCV before OLT. The mean time from initiation of therapy to the first negative qualitative polymerase chain reaction was 4.5 +/- 1.5 (range, 0.5 to 12) months. Four of the 12 patients in whom the virus cleared did not have evidence of HCV recurrence after OLT, representing 20% of those treated and 33% of those who had HCV clearance before OLT. The duration of post-OLT freedom from HCV infection in these individuals has been 33.6 +/- 11.3 (range, 0 to 47.4) months. These data suggest that with careful supervision, cirrhotic patients can tolerate high-dose interferon. In addition, a viral clearance can be achieved in a significant number of cirrhotic patients with high-dose interferon. One third of patients, in whom the HCV cleared before OLT, did not have evidence of disease recurrence after OLT. It is thus anticipated that with early and aggressive pre-OLT HCV therapy, possibly with the use of pegylated interferon, even better results may be obtained.

Pathophysiology of Hepatitis C and HIV Coinfection

Hepatitis C infection is the most common cause of chronic hepatitis that can lead to cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer. Hepatitis C virus infects approximately 70 million people worldwide. Hepatitis C is usually transmitted by injection drug use and blood transfusion. Hepatitis C is prevalent in HIV-infected individuals. Coinfection complicates the treatment of these two distinct viral infections. Understanding the normal functions of the liver and the pathophysiological effects of coinfection enables health care professionals to provide the highest level of care for these individuals.

Hepatitis C positive grafts may be used in orthotopic liver transplantation: a matched analysis

Hepatitis C (HCV)-positive liver grafts have been increasingly used in patients with decompensated liver disease from HCV because of critical shortage of available organs. Fifty-nine recipients of HCV-positive grafts were matched to patients who received HCV-negative grafts. All recipients were transplanted for HCV liver disease. Matching variables were (1) status, (2) pre-transplant creatinine, (3) recipient age, (4) donor age, (5) warm ischemia time, and (6) year of transplantation. Both unmatched and matched analyses were performed on patient survival, graft survival, and time to HCV recurrence. There was no significant statistical difference in patient, graft, or HCV recurrence-free survival between recipients of HCV-positive and HCV-negative grafts with matched and unmatched analyses (p > 0.05). The 3-year estimates of HCV disease-free survival were 12% (+/- 9%) and 19% (+/- 7%) using HCV-positive and -negative grafts, respectively. The use of HCV-positive grafts in recipients with HCV does not appear to affect patient survival, graft survival, or HCV recurrence when compared with the use of HCV-negative grafts. Our results suggest that HCV-positive grafts can be used in a HCV liver transplant recipient.

Treatment of graft-versus-host disease after liver transplantation with basiliximab followed by bowel resection

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a serious complication with mortality rates over 80%. Two patients with established GVHD after OLT were treated with Basiliximab, a chimeric murine human monoclonal antibody which binds to the alpha-chain of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R). Two males, aged 45 and 56 years, presented after OLT with a clinical picture consistent with GVHD. Quantitative measurements of recipient peripheral blood donor lymphocyte chimerism were carried out by flow cytometric analysis, and showed peak chimerism levels of 5% and 8%, respectively. Treatment comprised 3 doses of 1 g methyl prednisolone followed by 2 doses of 20 mg of Basiliximab. In both, treatment resulted in complete disappearance of macro-chimerism in blood. There was resolution of skin rash by day 7; however, diarrhea persisted. White cell scan showed increased uptake in the terminal ileum and small-bowel resection was performed in both patients. One patient is alive and well 36 months after OLT. The other patient had resolution of GVHD, but died of recurrent hepatitis C 1 year after OLT. The combination of immunological and surgical treatment for GVHD following solid organ transplantation has not previously been described.

Recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplant: diagnosis, natural history, and therapeutic options

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) related cirrhosis is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Updated data suggest worse long-term outcomes for those transplanted with HCV than those transplanted for other indications. Re-infection with HCV post-OLT is universal, therefore diagnosis of recurrence should be based on histological findings in the setting of persistent viremia. Variables associated with worse outcome of recurrent disease include early recurrence, degree of immunosuppression, and donor age. Antiviral therapy has been used in the prevention and treatment of recurrent disease, and can be initiated prior to transplantation, prophylactically after transplantation, and during recurrence. Preliminary studies of pre-transplantation treatment demonstrate virological responses, but tolerance is common. Higher efficacy has been associated with combination therapy for recurrent disease. Adverse effects limit its widespread use.

Pretransplant MELD score as a predictor of outcome after liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis C

The Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, an accurate predictor of mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation (OLTX), did not predict graft or patient survival in the post-transplant setting. Our aim was to test the model in patients who underwent OLTX for chronic hepatitis C. Two hundred and eighty-seven adult patients who underwent primary OLTX for chronic hepatitis C between December 1993 and September 1999 were studied from a prospectively maintained database. The group was stratified by MELD scores of less than 15, 15-24, and greater than 24. Patient survival, graft survival, and interval liver biopsy pathology were reviewed. Both patient and graft survival at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly lower in the higher MELD score groups, as was patient survival at 24 months (p-values, 0.01-0.05). The difference in survival between the low, medium, and high MELD score groups increases in time. The survival without bridging fibrosis in the allograft at 1 year post-transplant was significantly lower with higher MELD scores (p = 0.037). The decrease in survival seen in hepatitis C patients with MELD scores greater than 24 raises questions of transplant suitability for these patients. Therapeutic modalities to decrease post-transplant graft injury in these patients should be explored.

Impact of donor infections on outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation

Infection occurs when microbial agents enter the host, either through airborne transmission or by direct contact of a substance carrying the infectious agent with the host. Human body fluids, solid organs, or other tissues often are ideal vectors to support microbial agents and can transmit infections efficiently from donor to recipient. In the case of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, the main consequence of such a transmission is infection of the recipient. However, in the case of solid-organ transplantation, and particularly for liver transplantation, donor infections are not only transmitted to the recipient, the donor infection also may affect the donated liver's preservability and subsequent function in the recipient irrespective of the systemic consequences of the infection. In addition, solid organ recipients of infected organs are less able to respond to the infectious agent because of their immunosuppressive treatment. Thus, transmission of infections from organ donor to liver recipient represents serious potential risks that must be weighed against a candidate's mortality risk without the transplant. However, the ever-increasing gap between the number of donors and those waiting for liver grafts makes consideration of every potential donor, regardless of the infection status, essential to minimize waiting list mortality. In this review, we will focus on assessing the risk of transmission of bacterial, fungal, viral, and parasitic infectious agents from cadaveric liver donors to recipients and the effect such a transmission has on liver function, morbidity, and mortality. We will also discuss risk-benefit deliberations for using organs from infected donors for certain types of recipients. These issues are critically important to maximize the use of donated organs but also minimize recipient morbidity and graft dysfunction.

Long term histological improvement and clearance of intrahepatic hepatitis C virus RNA following sustained response to interferon-ribavirin combination therapy in liver transplanted patients with hepatitis C virus recurrence

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

A proportion of liver transplanted patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis have a sustained virological response to combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin. However, the long term benefit of antiviral therapy with regard to hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA clearance remains unknown in patients with HCV recurrence. This study examined the long term biochemical, virological, and histological outcome in transplanted patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis who had a sustained virological response to antiviral therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty four patients with recurrent hepatitis C were treated with antiviral therapy involving induction by combination therapy (interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin) for six months and maintenance ribavirin therapy for 12 months. Fourteen patients who had recurrent chronic hepatitis and sustained virological response to antiviral therapy were followed for three years after the end of antiviral therapy. Serum alanine aminotransferases were assessed every three months during the observation period. Serum hepatitis C RNA detected by polymerase chain reaction was evaluated every six months during follow up, and protocol biopsy procedures were performed routinely every year. Semiquantitative histopathological assessment of allograft hepatitis was performed using the Knodell score and HCV was also detected by polymerase chain reaction on frozen graft tissue samples.

RESULTS

At the end of antiviral therapy, the sustained response rate was 26%. A complete response (normal serum alanine aminotransferase level and undetectable serum HCV RNA) was achieved in 13/14 (93%) patients three years after the end of treatment. A comparison of liver histology findings before and after a mean of three years after antiviral therapy showed a clear improvement in 12/14 (86%) patients. In 5/14 (36%) patients, the last biopsy showed normal or near normal histological findings. After three years of follow up, the total Knodell score was 3.2 (range 1-8) versus 8.3 (range 5-12) before treatment (p=0.001). Graft HCV RNA was detectable before treatment in all 14 patients and was undetectable at the end of follow up in 13/14 (93%) patients tested.

CONCLUSION

In patients with biochemical and virological responses induced by ribavirin and interferon, a complete response was sustained in 93% for at least three years after cessation of therapy. This long term response was associated with absence of detectable intrahepatic hepatitis C RNA and marked histological improvement.

Liver transplantation in haemophilia

We report our UK single-centre experience of liver transplantation in haemophilia patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Between March 1990 and March 2001, 16 patients were referred for transplant assessment and 11 (mean age 46 years: nine haemophilia A, two haemophilia B) have been transplanted. Factor concentrate replacement was administered using a continuous infusion regimen following initial bolus dosing. Concentrate infusion was discontinued at a median of 36 h (range 24-72 h) post transplant. Nine patients remain alive at a median of 5 years post transplant (6 months to 11 years). One patient died 6 years post transplant from myocardial infarction. The other patient died of liver failure as a consequence of HCV infection 3 months following a second transplant, having developed HCV cirrhosis within 1 year of receiving his initial graft. Five of the seven patients who have had annual liver biopsy surveillance have developed histological changes of HCV hepatitis at a median of 3 years post transplant (1 year to 9 years). One of these patients progressed to cirrhosis at 3 years 5 months post transplant. Two patients have shown no evidence of HCV hepatitis at 2 years 8 months and 9 years post transplant respectively. The outcome of liver transplantation in haemophilic patients is good and is associated with relatively little morbidity.

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Relatively few patients (< or =20%) with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response after interferon-alpha monotherapy. Hence, alternative treatment strategies such as the addition of the broad spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin to interferon-alpha-2b have been investigated. Combination therapy with subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2b [3 million units (MU) three times per week] plus oral ribavirin (1000 to 1200 mg/day) has proven effective in several well designed trials of 24 to 48 weeks' duration in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C. Compared with interferon-alpha-2b (3 or 6 MU three times per week) with or without placebo, combination treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin significantly enhanced end-of-treatment and sustained virological and biochemical response rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients [sustained virological response rates in treatment-naive recipients (6 to 19% vs 31 to 43% of patients); sustained overall (virological plus biochemical) response rates in nonresponders to (1 vs 14%) or relapsers (4 to 5% vs 30 to 44%) after previous interferon-alpha monotherapy]. Forty-eight weeks of combination therapy was superior to 24 weeks in treatment-naive patients infected with hepatitis virus C (HCV) genotype 1, whereas response rates were similar at 24 and 48 weeks in those infected with other HCV genotypes. Furthermore, there were marked improvements in histological inflammatory scores in patients who responded to treatment with either interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin or interferon-alpha-2b alone. Although adverse events associated with either drug during combination therapy occurred frequently, these were generally mild to moderate in intensity and were consistent with those reported for each individual agent. Twenty-six percent of patients required dosage modifications of one or both drugs during combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is an efficacious first- and second-line therapy in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C, significantly improving sustained virological and biochemical responses versus interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy. The tolerability profile of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy is consistent with the individual profiles of these agents with no evidence of additive effects. The place of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in relation to newer agents, including pegylated interferons-alpha and other multidrug regimens, remains to be determined in this rapidly evolving area of therapeutic management. Currently, combination therapy with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated liver disease, and is an option for use as second-line therapy in those who have relapsed after, or failed to respond to, previous treatment with interferon-alpha.

Impact of cytomegalovirus infection, year of transplantation, and donor age on outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatitis C

Recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT) is almost universal. However, variables that hasten the progression of allograft injury have not been fully defined. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common infection post-LT, and its impact on the course of post-LT HCV infection remains unclear. We investigated the impact of CMV infection on patient and graft outcomes in 93 consecutive HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Data were collected prospectively, with surveillance cultures for CMV and protocol liver biopsies. CMV infection (defined as isolation of CMV from blood and treatment with ganciclovir) occurred in 25 patients (26.9%). Graft failure (defined as cirrhosis, relisting for LT, re-LT, or death) was significantly more common in CMV-positive compared with CMV-negative patients (52% v 19.1%; P =.002). Fibrosis stage 2 or greater on the 4-month liver biopsy specimen was more common in CMV-infected patients (45% v 16.4%; P =.01). Patients who underwent LT in more recent years had an increased risk for graft failure. Donor and recipient age, CMV infection, and mycophenolate mofetil use were significantly associated with graft failure in a stepwise multivariate analysis. CMV infection occurs in approximately one quarter of HCV-infected liver transplant recipients and is an independent risk factor for graft failure in these patients. Whether CMV mediates this by inducing increased immunosuppression or directly enhancing HCV replication requires further study.

Outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C

Recurrence of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is universal. The published studies suggest that the short-term outcome is good in these patients, but the long-term prognosis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with HCV undergoing OLT in a single center and to analyze the risk factors associated with poor outcome. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcome of 58 OLT patients with proven HCV who underwent OLT between February 1990 and April 1997 at our institution. The median follow-up time was 36.9 months. Recurrent posttransplant HCV hepatitis was confirmed by liver biochemistry, histology, and persistent HCV RNA in the serum. The patient and graft survival of patients with HCV was compared to that of 42 primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and 41 primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients transplanted during the same period. Following OLT, biochemical evidence of recurrent HCV hepatitis was absent in 46%. Forty percent of patients had recurrent HCV hepatitis and 14% had clinical evidence of recurrent HCV. Thirty-one patients were on cyclosporine, 22 patients on tacrolimus, and 5 patients had cyclosporine switched to tacrolimus or vice versa. The recurrence rate of HCV chronic hepatitis was similar in patients who had cyclosporine (35.5%) or tacrolimus (45.5%) based immunosuppression. Eleven patients (19%) died and five patients (8.6%) were retransplanted for chronic rejection (two), mismatch (one), or primary graft nonfunction (two). The cumulative patient survival rates of one, three, and five years were 94.8%, 84.1%, and 62.2%, respectively. The severity of liver disease progressed with time; 8% of patients developed cirrhosis within two years. The survival rate did not show any relation between HCV recurrence and the type of immunosuppression. In conclusion, although the survival of patients with HCV was not statistically significant compared to those with PBC or PSC, there was a trend towards a lower five-year survival in HCV.

Liver transplantation for chronic liver disease: advances and controversies in an era of organ shortages

Since liver transplantation was first performed in 1968 by Starzl et al, advances in case selection, liver surgery, anaesthetics, and immunotherapy have significantly increased the indications for and success of this operation. Liver transplantation is now a standard therapy for many end stage liver disorders as well as acute liver failure. However, while demand for cadaveric organ grafts has increased, in recent years the supply of organs has fallen. This review addresses current controversies resulting from this mismatch. In particular, methods for increasing graft availability and difficulties arising from transplantation in the context of alcohol related cirrhosis, primary liver tumours, and hepatitis C are reviewed. Together these three indications accounted for 42% of liver transplants performed for chronic liver disease in the UK in 2000. Ethical frameworks for making decisions on patients' suitability for liver transplantation have been developed in both the USA and the UK and these are also reviewed.

Outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C

Recurrence of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is universal. The published studies suggest that the short-term outcome is good in these patients, but the long-term prognosis remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with HCV undergoing OLT in a single center and to analyze the risk factors associated with poor outcome. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcome of 58 OLT patients with proven HCV who underwent OLT between February 1990 and April 1997 at our institution. The median follow-up time was 36.9 months. Recurrent posttransplant HCV hepatitis was confirmed by liver biochemistry, histology, and persistent HCV RNA in the serum. The patient and graft survival of patients with HCV was compared to that of 42 primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and 41 primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) patients transplanted during the same period. Following OLT, biochemical evidence of recurrent HCV hepatitis was absent in 46%. Forty percent of patients had recurrent HCV hepatitis and 14% had clinical evidence of recurrent HCV. Thirty-one patients were on cyclosporine, 22 patients on tacrolimus, and 5 patients had cyclosporine switched to tacrolimus or vice versa. The recurrence rate of HCV chronic hepatitis was similar in patients who had cyclosporine (35.5%) or tacrolimus (45.5%) based immunosuppression. Eleven patients (19%) died and five patients (8.6%) were retransplanted for chronic rejection (two), mismatch (one), or primary graft nonfunction (two). The cumulative patient survival rates of one, three, and five years were 94.8%, 84.1%, and 62.2%, respectively. The severity of liver disease progressed with time; 8% of patients developed cirrhosis within two years. The survival rate did not show any relation between HCV recurrence and the type of immunosuppression. In conclusion, although the survival of patients with HCV was not statistically significant compared to those with PBC or PSC, there was a trend towards a lower five-year survival in HCV.

A 10-year experience of liver transplantation for hepatitis C: analysis of factors determining outcome in over 500 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the factors affecting the outcome of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for end-stage liver disease caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) and to identify models that predict patient and graft survival.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The national epidemic of HCV infection has become the leading cause of hepatic failure that requires OLT. Rapidly increasing demands for OLT and depleted donor organ pools mandate appropriate selection of patients and donors. Such selection should be guided by a better understanding of the factors that influence the outcome of OLT.

METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective review of 510 patients who underwent OLT for HCV during the past decade. Seven donor, 10 recipient, and 2 operative variables that may affect outcome were dichotomized at the median for univariate screening. Factors that achieved a probability value less than 0.2 or that were thought to be relevant were entered into a stepdown Cox proportional hazard regression model.

RESULTS

Overall patient and graft survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years were 84%, 68%, and 60% and 73%, 56%, and 49%, respectively. Overall median time to HCV recurrence was 34 months after transplantation. Neither HCV recurrence nor HCV-positive donor status significantly decreased patient and graft survival rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis. However, use of HCV-positive donors reduced the median time of recurrence to 22.9 months compared with 35.7 months after transplantation of HCV-negative livers. Stratification of patients into five subgroups, based on time of recurrence, revealed that early HCV recurrence was associated with significantly increased rates of patient death and graft loss. Donor, recipient, and operative variables that may affect OLT outcome were analyzed. On univariate analysis, recipient age, serum creatinine, donor length of hospital stay, donor female gender, United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) status of recipient, and presence of hepatocellular cancer affected the outcome of OLT. Elevation of pretransplant HCV RNA was associated with an increased risk of graft loss. Of 15 variables considered by multivariate Cox regression analysis, recipient age, UNOS status, donor gender, and log creatinine were simultaneous significant predictors for patient survival. Simultaneously significant factors for graft failure included log creatinine, log alanine transaminase, log aspartate transaminase, UNOS status, donor gender, and warm ischemia time. These variables were therefore entered into prognostic models for patient and graft survival.

CONCLUSION

The earlier the recurrence of HCV, the greater the impact on patient and graft survival. The use of HCV-positive donors may accelerate HCV recurrence, and they should be used judiciously. Patient survival at the time of transplantation is predicted by donor gender, UNOS status, serum creatinine, and recipient age. Graft survival is affected by donor gender, warm ischemia time, and pretransplant patient condition. The authors' current survival prognostic models require further multicenter validation.

Liver transplantation for alcoholic cirrhosis: long term follow-up and impact of disease recurrence

BACKGROUND

Alcoholic liver disease has emerged as a leading indication for hepatic transplantation, although it is a controversial use of resources. We aimed to examine all aspects of liver transplantation associated with alcohol abuse.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of 123 alcoholic patients with a median of 7 years follow-up at one center.

RESULTS

In addition to alcohol, 43 (35%) patients had another possible factor contributing to cirrhosis. Actuarial patient and graft survival rates were, respectively, 84% and 81% (1 year); 72% and 66% (5 years); and 63% and 59% (7 years). After transplantation, 18 patients (15%) manifested 21 noncutaneous de novo malignancies, which is significantly more than controls (P=0.0001); upper aerodigestive squamous carcinomas were overrepresented (P=0.03). Thirteen patients had definitely relapsed and three others were suspected to have relapsed. Relapse was predicted by daily ethanol consumption (P=0.0314), but not by duration of pretransplant sobriety or explant histology. No patient had alcoholic hepatitis after transplantation and neither late onset acute nor chronic rejection was significantly increased. Multiple regression analyses for predictors of graft failure identified major biliary/vascular complications (P=0.01), chronic bile duct injury on biopsy (P=0.002), and pericellular fibrosis on biopsy (P=0.05); graft viral hepatitis was marginally significant (P=0.07) on univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Alcoholic liver disease is an excellent indication for liver transplantation in those without coexistent conditions. Recurrent alcoholic liver disease alone is not an important cause of graft pathology or failure. Potential recipients should be heavily screened before transplantation for coexistent conditions (e.g., hepatitis C, metabolic diseases) and other target-organ damage, especially aerodigestive malignancy, which are greater causes of morbidity and mortality than is recurrent alcohol liver disease.

Prevention of fungal and hepatitis virus infections in liver transplantation

Invasive fungal infections, especially those caused by Candida albicans, and recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after transplantation are common complications in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients. Candida species account for >50% of all invasive fungal infections, which occur in 10%--15% of OLT recipients. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of invasive fungal infections are unique to each type of organism. Fluconazole is effective and safe in the prevention of Candida infection after OLT. Preventive measures against Aspergillus or Cryptococcus remain ill defined. Both HBV and HCV recur almost universally after OLT in infected individuals. The natural course of HBV and HCV, leading to end-stage liver damage, is accelerated. In OLT patients, administration of immunoglobulin with high titers against HBV, alone and/or in combination with lamivudine, immediately after transplantation reduces the recurrence of HBV. The combination of interferon and ribavirin is mildly effective in OLT patients who have evidence of recurrent hepatitis, and additional alternatives are being evaluated.

Management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection is almost universal in patients transplanted for HCV-related cirrhosis. The medium-term survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is similar to other transplanted patients, but the long-term survival remains uncertain. The prevention and an effective treatment of progressive liver disease are the primary aims in HCV recurrence. Interferon and ribavirin, as monotherapy or in combination, have been tried to treat or prevent HCV recurrence. Preliminary studies suggest a better chance of initial HCV clearance and better results in preventing HCV recurrence with combination therapy. IFN or ribavirin, as monotherapy, may normalize liver enzymes, but only gives rise to a transient virological response, without histological improvement. Combination IFN and ribavirin may be able to prevent progression of HCV-related graft disease, but indications and duration of treatment need further evaluation. No clear association between type and dose of immunosuppressive and outcome of post-transplant HCV recurrence has been found. Strategies to minimize the effects of immunosuppressive drugs include dose reduction of all agents and the selective discontinuation of individual agents. Initial immunosuppression with a single drug may inhibit or delay the severe fibrosis, and further investigation with a single immunosuppressive regimen to evaluate the outcome of recurrent hepatitis C should be performed. The recent evidence that mycophenolate may have an antiviral effect needs a clinical confirmation. Retransplantation survival is better with early retransplantation, and for indications not directly related to viral recurrence.

Treatment of progressive hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation with combination interferon plus ribavirin

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is common, although the majority of cases are mild. A subset of transplant recipients develops progressive allograft injury, including cirrhosis and allograft failure. Minimal data are available on the safety and efficacy of antiviral treatment in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to review our experience in the treatment of moderate to severe HCV recurrence with combination interferon-alpha2b and ribavirin (IFN/RIB). Between October 1993 and October 1999, a total of 197 patients underwent OLT for HCV-related liver failure. This study describes 12 transplant recipients with moderate to severe recurrence treated with IFN/RIB. All patients met at least 1 of the following inclusion criteria: (1) moderate to severe inflammation (grade III to IV) on allograft biopsy, (2) bridging fibrosis on allograft biopsy, or (3) severe cholestasis attributable solely to HCV recurrence. Two patients had undergone re-OLT for allograft cirrhosis secondary to HCV recurrence and now had evidence of progressive HCV in their second allografts. Appropriate dose reductions of both IFN and RIB, as well as initiation of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), for marked leukopenia were recorded. IFN/RIB therapy was started 60 to 647 days post-OLT, and duration of therapy ranged from 39 to 515 days. Seven patients were administered G-CSF to successfully treat leukopenia. Six of the 12 patients (50%) became HCV RNA negative by polymerase chain reaction. One of these 6 patients (no. 1) was HCV RNA negative at 6 months but chose to discontinue therapy because of intolerable side effects, experienced a relapse, and was HCV RNA positive at 12 months. Two of the remaining 5 patients were HCV RNA negative at 2 and 9 months off therapy. For the entire group, there was a statistically significant decrease in serum biochemical indices assessed at initiation of therapy and 1, 3, and 6 months into therapy. Most patients required dose reductions of both IFN and RIB. Five patients died; 3 patients died of liver-related complications that included severe intrahepatic biliary cholestasis, severe HCV recurrence, and chronic rejection with profound cholestasis. In the subset of HCV-positive liver transplant recipients with moderate to severe recurrence, combination IFN/RIB therapy resulted in complete virological response (serum RNA negative) in 6 of 12 patients ( approximately 50%). However, only 1 of 12 patients (8.3%) had sustained virological clearance after cessation of IFN/RIB therapy. Dose reductions of both IFN and RIB were required in most patients. The use of G-CSF (sometimes preemptively) allowed correction of leukopenia and full-dose antiviral therapy. Multicenter trials using combination therapy to identify factors predictive of response are needed in the subset of patients with progressive allograft injury.

Anti-hepatitis C virus core IgM antibodies correlate with hepatitis C recurrence and its severity in liver transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The significance of immunoglobulin (Ig) M antibody to hepatitis C virus (HCV) core antigen was studied in 60 patients with HCV infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction.

METHODS

Patients were followed up for a mean of 28 months after transplantation. Sera collected three months before transplantation, and one and 12 months after transplantation were analysed for anti-HCV core IgM (HCV-IgM EIA 2.0 assay). After OLT protocol biopsies, procedures were performed routinely every six months. Semiquantitative histopathological assessment of allograft hepatitis was performed using Knodell's score. The results were correlated with clinical features, liver histology findings, and virological features, such as genotype and viraemic levels assessed by a branched DNA assay.

RESULTS

One year after liver transplantation, 29/60 (48%) patients had chronic hepatitis on graft biopsy. The presence of anti-HCV core IgM one month (p=0.004) and 12 months (p=0.003) after OLT was positively correlated with recurrence of chronic hepatitis. The positive predictive value of anti-HCV core IgM detected one month after transplantation was 0.88. A significant relationship was observed between severity of graft disease and presence of anti-HCV core IgM 12 months after transplantation. The mean Knodell score was 8.9 in anti-HCV core IgM positive patients compared with 3.6 in those who were anti-HCV core IgM negative (p=0.001). The presence of IgM anti-HCV did not correlate with serum HCV RNA level or HCV genotype.

CONCLUSION

We confirm that the presence of anti-HCV core IgM after OLT is a marker of HCV induced graft damage. The recurrence and severity of HCV hepatitis in patients undergoing OLT for HCV cirrhosis is related to the presence of anti-HCV core IgM after liver transplantation. These findings have diagnostic relevance and confirm that measurement of IgM anti-HCV core may help to better monitor the treatment of HCV recurrence after transplantation.

HCV infection in Poland

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is one of the most prevalent infectious diseases in the world. In 1997, hepatitis C became a statutorily noticeable disease in Poland. Nevertheless, to date, only a few notable studies on the prevalence of HCV infection have been carried out in Poland. Therefore, a study to determine the prevalence of HCV infection markers in an unselected population of Polish subjects was performed.

METHODS

After several advertisements (in the print media and on television, radio, and other public media) concerning free testing for all volunteers in a hospital laboratory, serum samples of 2,561 subjects (765 men and 1,796 women), with a mean age of 43 years (range 1-88 years), were collected and assessed. In the samples, we first tested for the presence of IgG anti-HCV antibodies using the third generation enzyme immunoassay Anti-HCV EIA Cobas(R) Core Test (Hoffmann La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The determination of HCV-RNA was then performed on anti-HCV IgG-positive samples by qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) by automatic Cobas Amplicor (Roche Molecular Systems Hepatitis C Virus Test 2.0, Roche Molecular Systems, Nutley, NJ, USA).

RESULTS

The presence of anti-HCV IgG was detected in a total of 48 cases (1.9%). Prevalence was significantly higher in men (2.3%) than in women (1.7%) (p = 0.0057), but was not significantly related to the subject's age (p = 0.51) or domicile (p = 0.35). The presence of HCV-RNA was detected in 31 (65%) anti-HCV-positive cases tested, with no significant relationship to either the age (p = 0.15), domicile (p = 0.24), or gender (p = 0.79) of the subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest study on the prevalence of HCV infection in the general population in Poland. The study has several limitations, such as, the use of a nonrandomized population. Nevertheless, the results obtained may be more realistic and applicable to the general population in Poland than those obtained previously (i.e., in voluntary blood donors).

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C is now the commonest indication for liver transplantation in Western Europe and in the United States. Graft reinfection is almost universal. The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis in a few months or years. Different virus and host immune factors are involved in the pathogenesis of hepatitis and are determinants of the outcome. The association between immunosuppression and severity of HCV recurrence is conflicting and remains to be evaluated fully. The treatment of recurrent HCV disease with IFN or ribavirin, as monotherapy, is ineffective. Preliminary results from combination therapy, however, are encouraging. Currently, a reasonable approach would be to treat patients with histological and clinical disease progression. New approaches for the prophylaxis of recurrent hepatitis C are under evaluation but whether this treatment will influence the severity of liver disease or the outcome of recurrence is still unknown.

Chronic viral hepatitis C: management update

The management of chronic viral hepatitis C is evolving rapidly. Monotherapy with interferon, the accepted standard of treatment until recently, achieves only a modest sustained virological response rate of 15%. Combination treatment with alpha-2b interferon and ribavirin has been shown to increase sustained response rates to 40% in patients who have never been treated with interferon and to 50% in those who have relapsed following monotherapy with interferon. However, side effects, which have led to the discontinuation of combination treatment in a significant proportion of patients, must be carefully monitored. Treatment with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin has now been approved in Canada, but the selection and monitoring of patients suitable for combination treatment requires special expertise. Although improvements in current therapeutic options may be possible with more frequent, higher doses or long-acting forms of interferon together with ribavirin, low sustained response rates (i.e., below 30%) for patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 emphasize the need for novel antiviral medications that will target the functional sites of the HCV genome.

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection is now the most common indication for liver transplantation in Western Europe and the United States. In the absence of effective prophylaxis, recurrent hepatitis C virus infection is almost inevitable. Although the natural history and intermediate-term outcome of recurrent infection with hepatitis C virus are now better documented, factors that may influence the recurrence of hepatitis and consequent progression of graft disease remain unclear. Interferon used as a single agent for the treatment of recurrent infection has proven unsatisfactory. Early intervention for recurrent infection with the combination of interferon and ribavirin appears promising, and this approach may prevent or delay progression of hepatitis C virus-related graft disease after liver transplantation.