A randomised trial of ondansetron for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea

Rome Foundation Working Team Report on overlap in disorders of gut-brain interaction

In patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI), overlapping non-gastrointestinal conditions such as fibromyalgia, headaches, gynaecological and urological conditions, sleep disturbances and fatigue are common, as is overlap among DGBI in different regions of the gastrointestinal tract. These overlaps strongly influence patient management and outcome. Shared pathophysiology could explain this scenario, but details are not fully understood. This overlap has been shown to be of great relevance for DGBI. In addition, symptoms considered to be caused by a DGBI could have a detectable organic cause, and in patients with a diagnosed organic gastrointestinal disease, symptoms not clearly explained by the pathology defining this organic disease are common. Thus, the aims of this Rome Foundation Working Team Report were to review the literature on overlapping conditions among patients with paediatric and adult DGBI and, based on the available epidemiological and clinical evidence, make recommendations for the current diagnostic and therapeutic approach, and for future research. Specifically, we focused on other DGBI in the same or different gastrointestinal anatomical region(s), DGBI overlap with organic bowel diseases in remission, and DGBI overlap with non-gastrointestinal, non-structural conditions.

And after surgery, what's new for the rectal cancer survivor?

Low anterior resection syndrome is a common but underestimated complication after rectal cancer surgery that significantly impacts the quality of life of the surviving patient. It is characterised by symptoms such as faecal incontinence and voiding dysfunction and affects up to 90% of patients undergoing low anterior rectal resection. The aetiology of the syndrome is multifactorial with no clear determining factor. It includes the use of preoperative radiotherapy, the indication for a protective ileostomy, sphincteric lesions, nerve damage to the rectal autonomic plexuses, and changes in left colon motor function. Although various therapeutic modalities have been shown to be effective in the management of the symptoms of the syndrome, there is still no standard treatment or patient selection pattern. In this article, a critical review of the therapeutic possibilities for patients who have survived rectal surgery will be made.

Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders in patients with cirrhosis

Neurogastroenterology and motility disorders are complex gastrointestinal conditions that are prevalent worldwide, particularly affecting women and younger individuals. These conditions significantly impact the quality of life of people suffering from them. There is increasing evidence linking these disorders to cirrhosis, with a higher prevalence compared to the general population. However, the link between neurogastroenterology and motility disorders and cirrhosis remains unclear due to undefined mechanisms. In addition, managing these conditions in cirrhosis is often limited by the adverse effects of drugs commonly used for these disorders, presenting a significant clinical challenge in the routine management of patients with cirrhosis. This review delves into this connection, exploring potential pathophysiological links and clinical interventions between neurogastroenterology disorders and cirrhosis.

Review article: The role of the gut-brain axis in inflammatory bowel disease and its therapeutic implications

BACKGROUND

Treatments targeting the gut-brain axis (GBA) are effective at reducing symptom burden in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The prevalence of common mental disorders and IBS-type symptom reporting is significantly higher in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) than would be expected, suggesting potential GBA effects in this setting. Manipulation of the GBA may offer novel treatment strategies in selected patients with IBD. We present a narrative review of the bi-directional effects of the GBA in IBD and explore the potential for GBA-targeted therapies in this setting.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant articles published by March 2024.

RESULTS

The bi-directional relationship between psychological well-being and adverse longitudinal disease activity outcomes, and the high prevalence of IBS-type symptom reporting highlight the presence of GBA-mediated effects in IBD. Treatments targeting gut-brain interactions including brain-gut behavioural treatments, neuromodulators, and dietary interventions appear to be useful adjunctive treatments in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychological morbidity is prevalent in patients with IBD. The relationship between longitudinal disease activity outcomes, IBS-type symptom reporting, and poor psychological health is mediated via the GBA. Proactive management of psychological health should be integrated into routine care. Further clinical trials of GBA-targeted therapies, conducted in selected groups of patients with co-existent common mental disorders, or those who report IBS-type symptoms, are required to inform effective integrated models of care in the future.

[The proven and the new in the pharmacotherapy of irritable bowel syndrome]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disease of the digestive tract that is characterised by decades-long chronicity. At the same time, it is particularly challenging to treat since successful treatment often requires a combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological measures. The pathomechanisms of IBS have only just started to be elucidated, meaning that causally effective treatments are largely lacking. In contrast to earlier notions of a "psychosomatic disorder", IBS is an organic disease in the vast majority of cases. The predominant symptoms are usually intestinal cramps or abdominal pain, meteorism/flatulence, constipation, and diarrhea. The patient should be fully included in a joint treatment concept from the outset. Given the lack of causal treatment methods, each treatment approach is initially by way of trial; if there is no effect, treatment should be discontinued after 3 months at the latest. Effective treatments can be continued, adapted, and/or combined with other procedures as an on-demand or permanent treatment. Supplementing the targeted drug treatment of the dominant individual symptoms with somewhat unspecific but often relevantly effective basic or accompanying treatments has proven useful. Such a multimodal treatment strategy, in which general measures as well as nutritional, psychological, and pharmacotherapies are individually combined, is significantly superior to drug monotherapy. This article describes first- and second-line drug treatments in addition to options for refractory symptoms. The choice of drug therapy is primarily determined by the dominant symptoms. Depending on the symptom constellation, it may be beneficial to combine different drugs.

Effects of ondansetron on symptoms during a gastric emptying study and enteral lipid challenge and on daily symptoms in diabetic gastroenteropathy

BACKGROUND

This study compared the effects of ondansetron and placebo in patients with diabetes mellitus and symptoms of dyspepsia (diabetic gastroenteropathy [DGE]).

METHODS

We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of ondansetron tablets (8 mg) three times daily for 4 weeks in DGE patients. Symptoms were assessed with the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index daily diaries. Gastric emptying (GE) of solids (scintigraphy) and duodenal lipid infusions (300 kcal over 2 h) were each assessed twice, with placebo and ondansetron. Drug effects on GE, symptoms during the GE study and during lipid infusion, and daily symptoms were analyzed.

KEY RESULTS

Of 41 patients, 37 completed both GE studies and one completed 1; 31 completed both lipid infusions and four only placebo; and all 35 randomized patients completed 4 weeks of treatment. Compared to placebo, ondansetron reduced the severity of fullness (p = 0.02) and belching (p = 0.049) during lipid infusion but did not affect GE T1/2. Both ondansetron and placebo improved daily symptoms versus the baseline period (p < 0.05), but the differences were not significant. In the analysis of covariance of daily symptoms during the treatment period, the interaction term between treatment and the acute effect of ondansetron on symptoms during lipid challenge was significant (p = .024).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Ondansetron significantly reduced fullness during enteral lipid infusion in patients with DGE. Overall, ondansetron did not improve daily symptoms versus placebo. But patients in whom ondansetron improved symptoms during enteral lipid challenge were perhaps more likely to experience symptom relief during daily treatment.

The Effect of Ondansetron on Improvement of Symptoms in Patients with Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea Domination: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Diarrhea-dominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) is a deliberating and chronic condition that can impair social activities. Determining proper medication with satisfactory outcomes has been a challenge. The 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3 RA) drugs have demonstrated favorable outcomes on IBS-D in the last 3 decades. Ondansetron, also a 5-HT3 RA is known as an antiemetic. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ondansetron in IBS-D.

Methods

In this single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial, patients with IBS-D were recruited. Patients were randomized on a 1:1 ratio and assigned into two groups: imipramine 25 mg/daily plus ondansetron 4 mg/3 times per day and imipramine 25 mg/daily plus placebo. The primary endpoint was the frequency of diarrhea per day after 8 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints consisted of changes in the frequency of defecation urgency per day, the number of days with gastrointestinal pain and bloating, and the patients' overall satisfaction regarding bowel habits after 8 weeks of the treatment.

Results

Data from 98 patients were analyzed. Ondansetron, compared to placebo, improved the primary outcome, and the stool consistency was increased significantly (3.29±1.19 vs 4.55±1.17, P<0.001). Moreover, the response rate for the diarrhea frequency was significantly higher in the ondansetron group compared to the placebo (77.5% vs 34.7%, P<0.001). In the ondansetron group, fewer urgencies were experienced, and pain severity and feeling of bloating declined as well (P<0.01).

Conclusion

Ondansetron can mitigate almost all IBS-D-related symptoms, which may indicate it as a drug of choice; however, further evidence is required to ascertain its safety.

Effects of oral administration of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on anxiety-related behaviors and colonic hypercontractility in repeated stress-induced mice

PURPOSE

Chronic psychological stress develops and exacerbates irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) via activation of intestinal 5-HT3 receptors involves impairment of intestinal functions. This study aimed to investigate the effects of ondansetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, on locomotor activity, anxiety-related behaviors, and colonic functions in repeated water avoidance stress.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Food intake and fecal pellet output (FPO) of sham stress (SS), water avoidance stress (WS), and water avoidance stress with oral administration of ondansetron (1 mg/kg BW) (WA) groups were monitored along the water avoidance stress protocol for 10 consecutive days. On day 11, locomotor activity and anxiety-related behaviors were determined using an open field test. Contractile properties of colonic tissues in response to KCl and a cumulative dose of carbachol (CCh) were determined using in vitro organ bath technique.

RESULTS

FPO was significantly increased in the WS group after 7 days of water avoidance stress, which was reversed in WA group. WS group decreased unsupported rearing behavior compared to WS group, which was not altered in the WA group. The colon of the WS group had a higher tonic contraction in response to CCh than the SS and WA groups, which was reversed with ondansetron pre-incubation.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral administration of ondansetron prevented increased FPO but did not affect anxiety-related behavior in repeated stress model. Colonic hypercontractility in the stressed mice was related to increased responses to cholinergic-induced contractions, which involved 5-HT3 receptors. Our findings suggest the modulatory roles of 5-HT3 receptors to mediate stress-induced colonic dysfunction.

Review article: A practical approach to persistent gastrointestinal symptoms in inflammatory bowel disease in remission

BACKGROUND

Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms are prevalent in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), even when endoscopic remission is reached. These symptoms can have profound negative effects on the quality of life of affected patients and can be difficult to treat. They may be caused by IBD-related complications or comorbid disorders, but they can also be explained by irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms.

AIMS

To provide a practical step-by-step guide to diagnose and treat persistent gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBD in remission via a personalised approach.

METHODS

We scrutinised relevant literature on causes, diagnostics and treatment of persistent gastrointestinal symptoms (abdominal pain or discomfort, bloating, abdominal distension, diarrhoea, constipation and faecal incontinence) in patients with IBD in remission.

RESULTS

A graphical practical guide for several steps in diagnosing, identifying potential triggers and adequate treatment of persistent gastrointestinal symptoms in IBD in remission is provided based on supporting literature. The first part of this review focuses on the diagnostic and treatment approaches for potential IBD-related complications and comorbidities. The second part describes the approach to IBS-like symptoms in IBD in remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent gastrointestinal symptoms in IBD in remission can be traced back to potential pathophysiological mechanisms in individual patients and can be treated adequately. For both IBD-related complications and comorbidities and IBS-like symptoms in IBD in remission, pharmacological, dietary, lifestyle or psychological treatments can be effective. A systematic and personalised approach is required to reduce the burden for patients, healthcare systems, and society.

Mechanisms underlying the laxative effect of lactulose: A randomized placebo-controlled trial showing increased small bowel water and motility unaltered by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, ondansetron

BACKGROUND

Lactulose is a laxative which accelerates transit and softens stool. Our aim was to investigate its mechanism of action and use this model of diarrhea to investigate the anti-diarrheal actions of ondansetron.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover study of the effect of ondansetron 8 mg in 16 healthy volunteers. Serial MRI scans were performed fasted and 6 h after a meal. Participants then received lactulose 13.6 g twice daily and study drug for a further 36 h. On Day 3, they had further serial MRI scans for 4 h. Measurements included small bowel water content (SBWC), colonic volume, colonic gas, small bowel motility, whole gut transit, and ascending colon relaxation time (T1AC), a measure of colonic water content.

KEY RESULTS

Lactulose increased area under the curve (AUC) of SBWC from 0 to 240 min, mean difference 14.2 L · min (95% CI 4.1, 24.3), p = 0.009, and substantially increased small bowel motility after 4 h (mean (95% CI) 523 (457-646) a.u. to 852 (771-1178) a.u., p = 0.007). There were no changes in T1AC after 36 h treatment. Ondansetron did not significantly alter SBWC, small bowel motility, transit, colonic volumes, colonic gas nor T1AC, with or without lactulose.

CONCLUSION & INFERENCES

Lactulose increases SBWC and stimulates small bowel motility; however, unexpectedly it did not significantly alter colonic water content, suggesting its laxative effect is not osmotic but due to stimulation of motility. Ondansetron's lack of effect on intestinal water suggests its anti-diarrheal effect is not due to inhibition of secretion but more likely altered colonic motility.

Amylose content controls the V-type structural formation and in vitro digestibility of maize starch-resveratrol complexes and their effect on human gut microbiota

The chain structure of starch affects its interaction with polyphenol molecules which in turn determines the nutritional function of starch. In this study, starch with different amylose content including waxy maize starch (WMS), normal maize starch (NMS) and G50 high-amylose maize starch (G50) were selected to complex with resveratrol (RA) in high-pressure homogenization (HPH) environment, and structural changes of the complexes, together with their effects on in vitro digestibility and gut microbiota were discussed. The results showed that with increasing amylose content, RA could form more inclusion complex with starch through non-covalent bonds accompanied by the increased single helix structure, V-type crystalline structure, compact nano-aggregates and total ordered structure content, which thus endowed the complex lower digestibility and intestinal probiotic function. Notably, when RA addition reached 3 %, the resistant starch (RS) content of HP-G50-3 % rose to 29.2 %, correspondingly increased the relative abundance of beneficial gut microbiota such as Megamonas and Bifidobacterium, as well as the total short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) content. Correlation analysis showed that V-type crystalline structure positively correlated with the growth of Pediococcu and Blautia (p < 0.05) for producing SCFAs. These findings provided feasible ideas for the development of personalized nutritional starch-based foods.

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Lectureship Dubai 2022 : Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Diarrhea

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea (IBS-D) affects ~1% of the general population and is characterized by abdominal pain associated with diarrhea. IBS-D symptoms significantly impact the quality of life of patients. Major uncertainties remain regarding the optimal management of these patients. Several therapies have been investigated over the years for the treatment of IBS-D. In the initial management, commonly prescribed approaches with an effect on global IBS symptoms include a low Fermentable Oligo-, Di-, Mono-Saccharides and Polyols diet and probiotics, while antispasmodics are used for targeting abdominal pain and loperamide for diarrhea only. Additional therapeutic options for the relief of global IBS symptoms include rifaximin, 5-HT 3 antagonists, gut-directed psychological therapies, and eluxadoline, while tricyclic antidepressants can target abdominal pain and bile acid sequestrants diarrhea. Promising evidence exists for the use of mesalazine and fecal microbiota transplantation in IBS-D, although further evidence is needed for definitive conclusions regarding their efficacy.

Drugs of the future for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: an overview of current investigational drugs

INTRODUCTION

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) has a significant impact on society and quality of life. Current treatments are ineffective, and new investigational drugs are necessary.

AREAS COVERED

Numerous potential therapies are developing, targeting different areas such as cannabinoid signaling, opioid receptors, tachykinin (NK2) receptors, β3-adrenergic receptors, intestinal microbiota, inflammation, and 5HT receptors. Clinical trial evidence has shown that loperamide, eluxadoline, alosetron, ramosetron, bile acid sequestrants, and rifaximin can modulate GI alterations and benefit patients with IBS-D. Among the potential therapies, ibodutant, ibudilast, blautix, BOS-589, solabegron, vibegron, olorinab, ebastine, and ORP-101 have demonstrated possible effects but remain confirmed.

EXPERT OPINION

Individuals with IBS-D require cost-effective treatment options that do not impede their productivity or that of their caregivers. This is necessary for consistent healthcare and improved quality of life. Therefore, we should focus on developing new, efficient, and affordable medications for IBS-D. The government, insurers, and society must recognize this need and collaborate to ensure its fulfillment.

Treatment of non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome with the histamine 1 receptor antagonist ebastine: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the histamine 1 receptor antagonist ebastine as a potential treatment for patients with non-constipated irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 study.

METHODS

Non-constipated patients with IBS fulfilling the Rome III criteria were randomly assigned to 20 mg ebastine or placebo for 12 weeks. Subjects scored global relief of symptoms (GRS) and abdominal pain intensity (API). A subject was considered a weekly responder for GRS if total or obvious relief was reported and a responder for API if the weekly average pain score was reduced by at least 30% vs baseline. The primary endpoints were the proportion of subjects who were weekly responders for at least 6 out of the 12 treatment weeks for both GRS and API ('GRS+API', composite endpoint) and for GRS and API separately.

RESULTS

202 participants (32±11 years, 68% female) were randomly allocated to receive ebastine (n=101) or placebo (n=101). Treatment with ebastine resulted in significantly more responders (12%, 12/92) for GRS+API compared with placebo (4%, 4/87, p=0.047) while the proportion of responders for GRS and API separately was higher for ebastine compared with placebo, although not statistically significant (placebo vs ebastine, GRS: 7% (6/87) vs 15% (14/91), p=0.072; API: 25% (20/85) vs 37% (34/92), p=0.081).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study shows that ebastine is superior to placebo and should be further evaluated as novel treatment for patients with non-constipated IBS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of each study site (EudraCT number: 2013-001199-39; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01908465).

Ondansetron for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over, Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine the efficacity and safety of ondansetron, a serotonin receptor antagonist, to treat patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).

BACKGROUND

LARS after rectal resection is common and debilitating. Current management strategies include behavioral and dietary modifications, physiotherapy, antidiarrheal drugs, enemas, and neuromodulation, but the results are not always satisfactory.

METHODS

This is a randomized, multicentric, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, and cross-over study. Patients with LARS (LARS score >20) no longer than 2 years after rectal resection were randomized to receive either 4 weeks of ondansetron followed by 4 weeks of placebo (O-P group) or 4 weeks of placebo followed by 4 weeks of ondansetron (P-O group). The primary endpoint was LARS severity measured using the LARS score; secondary endpoints were incontinence (Vaizey score) and irritable bowel syndrome quality of life (IBS-QoL questionnaire). Patients' scores and questionnaires were completed at baseline and after each 4-week treatment period.

RESULTS

Of 46 randomized patients, 38 were included in the analysis. From baseline to the end of the first period, in the O-P group, the mean (SD) LARS score decreased by 25% [from 36.6 (5.6) to 27.3 (11.5)] and the proportion of patients with major LARS (score >30) went from 15/17 (88%) to 7/17 (41%), ( P =0.001). In the P-O group, the mean (SD) LARS score decreased by 12% [from 37 (4.8) to 32.6 (9.1)], and the proportion of major LARS went from 19/21 (90%) to 16/21 (76%). After crossover, LARS scores deteriorated again in the O-P group receiving placebo, but further improved in the P-O group receiving ondansetron. Mean Vaizey scores and IBS QoL scores followed a similar pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

Ondansetron is a safe and simple treatment that appears to improve both symptoms and QoL in LARS patients.

Efficacy of the Enteroadsorbent Silicol®gel in Adults with Irritable Bowel Syndrome Subtypes IBS-D or Mixed: Observational Open-Label Study

Background

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common chronic gut-brain interaction disorder with limited effective treatment options. Intestinal adsorbents have a high adsorption capacity for gut irritants and may provide nonpharmacological alternatives.

Objectives

This post marketing study is aimed at providing up-to-date evidence to support the safety and efficacy in normal use of an established medical device for IBS treatment.

Methods

In this open-label, observational study, adults with IBS with predominant diarrhoea (IBS-D) or IBS with mixed bowel habits (IBS-M), according to Rome IV criteria, received 4 weeks of treatment with the enteroadsorbent Silicol®gel, a CE-certified, licenced, medical device containing colloidal silicic acid. Eligible participants were assessed at baseline (visit 1; in-clinic) and after 1 (visit 2; telephone), 2 (visit 3; telephone), and 4 (visit 4; in-clinic) weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with an overall reduction in the IBS severity scoring system (IBS SSS) > 50, representing clinically meaningful improvement. Key secondary endpoints were a reduction in common IBS symptoms and improved quality of life (QoL).

Results

Among the 67 treated participants (IBS-D: 37; IBS-M: 30), 65 completed the study. At visit 4, 83.6% (56/67) of participants achieved a reduction in IBS SSS > 50. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) IBS SSS was 323.4 (55.7) at visit 1 and 160.3 (90.3) at visit 4 (overall change: -163.1 (101.7); 95% confidence interval [CI] 138.3, 187.9, p < 0.001). Compared with visit 1, significant reductions in the severity of all key IBS symptoms and overall improvement in QoL were observed at visit 4 (p < 0.001), with improvements observed from visits 1 and 2.

Conclusions

In this open-label study of participants with IBS-D and IBS-M, Silicol®gel provided clinically significant improvement in IBS symptoms, demonstrating that enteroadsorbents may be clinically beneficial in this population.

Pilot Study of Ondansetron in Improvement of Pediatric Colonoscopy Preparation Outcomes at an Urban Academic Center

Objectives

To gather initial data on the effectiveness and tolerability of the addition of Ondansetron to bowel preparation regimens to justify a funded, larger, placebo-controlled study.

Methods

Design, Setting, and Participants:: A total of 41 pediatric and young adult (age 2-22) patients participated in a single center, open label, parallel randomized trial, with simple randomization. All patients were recruited as outpatients, and all procedures occurred as outpatient procedures, with both recruitment and procedures occurring at a low-resource urban academic medical center in Brooklyn.Interventions and Outcome Measures:: The intervention studied was a single dose of oral-dissolving tablet Ondansetron provided before initiation of bowel preparation using a standardized prep of Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl. There were 2 arms, a study arm using typical preparation (Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl) and Ondansetron, and a control arm (Polyethylene Glycol 3350 and Bisacodyl). Patients received standard weight-based dosing. The primary outcome measure assessed was the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) to assess efficacy of preparation. Secondary objectives included evaluation of patient satisfaction via a survey answered by each patient. The questionnaire assessed the presence of the following symptoms during bowel prep: abdominal pain, nausea, bloating, vomiting, scale of ease/difficulty, and if the entire bowel prep was completed.

Results

No benefit to BBPS from the addition of Ondansetron to bowel preparation was observed. Statistically significant improvement in reports of abdominal pain (35% decrease in Ondansetron arm) was noted with a P = 0.019. No statistically significant improvement was noted in other symptoms although all domains showed nonsignificant improvement in the Ondansetron arm.

Conclusion

No benefit to efficacy of preparation as measured by the BBPS was observed. A single dose of Ondansetron before bowel preparation reduced reports of abdominal pain by 35%, with other symptomatic improvements suggesting possible improvements to be confirmed by a higher-powered study. Trial registration: NCT05439772.

Pharmacotherapy for gastric and intestinal cramping pain: ‎ current and emerging therapies

INTRODUCTION

Acute gastrointestinal cramping pain (GICP) is a debilitating condition that affects many people worldwide, significantly reducing their quality of life. As such, prompt treatment is crucial.

AREAS COVERED

This article will explore relevant literature from databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Additionally, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO ICTRP database for the latest clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Consensus dictates that antispasmodics such as hyoscine-N-butyl bromide and mebeverine should be the primary treatment for GICP. If these prove ineffective, patients can switch to an antispasmodic with a different mode of action or add acetaminophen/NSAIDs for more severe cases. Currently, several antispasmodics are undergoing clinical trials, including drotaverine, alverine, pinaverium, otilonium bromide, fenoverine, tiropramide, otilonium bromide, trimebutine, and peppermint oil. Well-designed head-to-head studies are necessary to evaluate current antispasmodics' safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacoeconomics profiles. Recent studies have shown that fixed-dose combinations of antispasmodics + NSAIDs or two different antispasmodics can improve patient compliance and synergistically reduce GICP. Therefore, it is recommended that the global availability and accessibility of these products be enhanced.

Ondansetron-induced QT prolongation among various age groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron is a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 serotonin-receptor antagonist with antiemetic properties used inadvertently in the emergency department for controlling nausea. However, ondansetron is linked with a number of adverse effects, including prolongation of the QT interval. Therefore, the purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the occurrence of QT prolongation in pediatric, adult, and elderly patients receiving oral or intravenously administered ondansetron.

METHODS

A thorough electronic search was conducted on PubMed (Medline) and Cochrane Library from the databases' inception to August 10, 2022. Only those studies were considered in which ondansetron was administered orally or intravenously to participants for the treatment of nausea and vomiting. The prevalence of QT prolongation in multiple predefined age groups was the outcome variable. Analyses were conducted using Review manager 5.4 (Cochrane collaboration, 2020).

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies involving 687 ondansetron group participants were statistically analyzed. The administration of ondansetron was associated with a statistically significant prevalence of QT prolongation in all age groups. An age-wise subgroup analysis was conducted which revealed that the prevalence of QT prolongation among participants younger than 18 years was not statistically significant, whereas it was statistically significant among participants aged 18-50 years and among patients older than 50 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis provides further evidence that oral or intravenous administration of Ondansetron may lead to QT prolongation, particularly among patients older than 18 years of age.

An overview of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists as a treatment option for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea

INTRODUCTION

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain, discomfort, and altered bowel habits, which affects the quality of life of approximately 10% of the worldwide population. IBS is classified into three types: IBS-D (diarrhea-predominant), IBS-C (constipation-predominant), and mixed or alternating IBS (IBS-M). Among potential interventions for IBS-D, the antagonism of the serotonin 5-HT₃ receptor has recently emerged as an effective treatment option. Serotonin (5-HT) is a neurotransmitter and an immunoregulatory factor which plays a key role in physiological and pathological processes of the human body, having an impact on intestinal motility and gland secretion, which assist in maintaining intestinal homeostasis.

AREAS COVERED

In this paper, the concept of 5-HT₃ antagonists in the treatment of individuals with IBS-D is discussed, with particular focus on mechanism of action and pre-clinical and clinical data. This study is based on pertinent papers that were retrieved by a selective search using relevant keywords in PubMed and ScienceDirect databases.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent clinical trial data has confirmed beyond doubt the value of 5-HT₃ antagonists. As for future directions, weak partial 5-HT₃ receptor agonism appears to be an appealing alternative to a silent antagonist for the treatment of IBS-D.

Understanding and managing patients with overlapping disorders of gut-brain interaction

Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are frequently encountered in clinical practice, and recommendations for diagnosis and management are well established. In a large subset of patients, more than one DGBI diagnosis is present. This group of patients with more than one DGBI diagnosis have higher symptom severity and impact than patients with only one DGBI diagnosis, and the management approach is not well established for those with overlapping diagnoses. This Review aims to guide clinicians to understand, recognise, and manage overlapping DGBI by identifying causes and pitfalls of overlap conditions, and presenting potential practical approaches to diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Several clinical factors can contribute to finding overlapping DGBI, including the anatomical basis of the Rome diagnostic criteria, the potential confusion of symptom descriptors, and patients' biases towards higher symptom intensity ratings. Overlapping DGBI could also be caused by mechanistic factors such as pathophysiological mechanisms involving multiple gastrointestinal segments, and the effect of disorders in one segment on sensorimotor function in remote gastrointestinal parts, through neural or hormonal signalling. Key initial steps in the management of overlapping DGBI are detailed history taking, which can be facilitated using pictograms; carefully assessing the relative timing and cohesion of different symptoms; and recognising associated psychosocial dysfunction. Unnecessary technical investigations and complex combination treatment schedules should be avoided. Based on the identification of the dominant symptom pattern and putative underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, a single treatment modality should preferably be initiated, considering the efficacy spectrum of different therapies. Follow-up of the patient's condition allows the therapeutic approach to be adjusted as needed, while avoiding unnecessary additional technical investigations.

Randomised, placebo-controlled trial and meta-analysis show benefit of ondansetron for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: The TRITON trial

BACKGROUND

Ondansetron may be beneficial in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D).

AIM

To conduct a 12-week parallel group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ondansetron 4 mg o.d. (titrated up to 8 mg t.d.s.) in 400 IBS-D patients.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

% responders using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) composite endpoint. Secondary and mechanistic endpoints included stool consistency (Bristol Stool Form Scale) and whole gut transit time (WGTT). After literature review, results were pooled with other placebo-controlled trials in a meta-analysis to estimate relative risks (RR), 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and number needed to treat (NNT).

RESULTS

Eighty patients were randomised. On intention-to-treat analysis, 15/37 (40.5%; 95% CI 24.7%-56.4%) met the primary endpoint on ondansetron versus 12/43 (27.9%; 95% CI 14.5%-41.3%) on placebo (p = 0.19). Ondansetron improved stool consistency compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.7; 95% CI -1.0 to-0.3, p < 0.001). Ondansetron increased WGTT between baseline and week 12 (mean (SD) difference 3.8 (9.1) hours, versus placebo -2.2 (10.3) hours, p = 0.01). Meta-analysis of 327 patients from this, and two similar trials, demonstrated ondansetron was superior to placebo for the FDA composite endpoint (RR of symptoms not responding = 0.86; 95% CI 0.75-0.98, NNT = 9) and stool response (RR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.52-0.82, NNT = 5), but not abdominal pain response (RR = 0.95; 95% CI 0.74-1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Although small numbers meant the primary endpoint was not met in this trial, when pooled with other similar trials meta-analysis suggests ondansetron improves stool consistency and reduces days with loose stool and urgency. Trial registration - http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17508514.

Update on treatment of abdominal pain in irritable bowel syndrome: A narrative review

The objectives of this narrative review are to update readers on the current state-of-the-art regarding diverse approaches for the treatment of pain, global symptoms, or adequate relief in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The article appraises medications, dietary interventions including low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet, fecal microbial transplantation (FMT), electrical approaches, and behavioral therapies including cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), gut-directed hypnotherapy (GDH), mindfulness, and open-label placebo. Current evidence demonstrates only modest benefit in global IBS symptoms and pain relief. A future approach that identifies pathophysiological mechanisms of IBS through validated biomarkers has the potential to individualize treatment of patients rather than sequential therapeutic trial and error approaches.

Italian guidelines for the management of irritable bowel syndrome: Joint Consensus from the Italian Societies of: Gastroenterology and Endoscopy (SIGE), Neurogastroenterology and Motility (SINGEM), Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO), Digestive Endoscopy (SIED), General Medicine (SIMG), Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pediatric Nutrition (SIGENP) and Pediatrics (SIP)

The irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic disorder of gut-brain interaction. IBS is still associated with areas of uncertainties, especially regarding the optimal diagnostic work-up and the more appropriate management. Experts from 7 Italian Societies conducted a Delphi consensus with literature summary and voting process on 27 statements. Recommendations and quality of evidence were evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Consensus was defined as >80% agreement and reached for all statements. In terms of diagnosis, the consensus supports a positive diagnostic strategy with a symptom-based approach, including the psychological comorbidities assessment and the exclusion of alarm symptoms, together with the digital rectal examination, full blood count, C-reactive protein, serology for coeliac disease, and fecal calprotectin assessment. Colonoscopy should be recommended in patients with alarm features. Regarding treatment, the consensus strongly supports a dietary approach for patients with IBS, the use of soluble fiber, secretagogues, tricyclic antidepressants, psychologically directed therapies and, only in specific IBS subtypes, rifaximin. A conditional recommendation was achieved for probiotics, polyethylene glycol, antispasmodics, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and, only in specific IBS subtypes, 5-HT3 antagonists, 5-HT4 agonists, bile acid sequestrants.

Effects of ondansetron treatment on outcomes of critically ill patients with myocardial infarction partly through its anti-inflammatory activity

Background: Patients with myocardial infarction (MI) in intensive care units (ICU) are at high risk of death. Whether treatment with ondansetron (OND) at an early stage plays a protective role in critically ill patients with MI and its underlying mechanism remains unclear. Methods: A total of 4486 patients with MI were enrolled in the study cohort from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database and divided into OND-medication groups or not. Propensity score matching (PSM) and regression analysis were performed to investigate the effect of OND on patients, accompanied by sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of the results. Integrated with causal mediation analysis (CMA), we investigated the potential causal pathway mediated by the palate-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) between early OND treatment and clinical outcomes. Results: Among patients with MI, 976 of them were treated with OND at the early stage while 3510 patients were not. The all-cause in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the OND-medication group (5.6% vs 7.7%), accompanied by lower 28-day mortality (7.8% vs 11.3%) and 90-day mortality (9.2% vs 13.1%) rates. PSM analysis further confirmed the results for in-hospital mortality (5.7% vs 8.0%), 28-day mortality (7.8% vs 10.8%), and 90-day mortality (9.2% vs 12.5%). After adjusting for confounders, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that OND was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.49-0.91), and Cox regression confirmed the results for 28-day mortality and 90-day mortality with HR = 0.71 and 0.73, respectively. Most importantly, CMA demonstrated that the protective effect of OND on patients with MI was mediated by its anti-inflammatory effect through the regulation of PLR. Conclusion: Early use of OND in critically ill patients with MI may exert protective effects by reducing in-hospital mortality and 28- and 90-day mortality. The beneficial effects of OND on these patients were exerted through anti-inflammatory effects, at least in part.

Gut microbiota alteration after cholecystectomy contributes to post-cholecystectomy diarrhea via bile acids stimulating colonic serotonin

Post-cholecystectomy diarrhea (PCD) is highly prevalent among outpatients with cholecystectomy, and gut microbiota alteration is correlated with it. However, how and to what extent changed fecal bacteria contributes to diarrhea are still unrevealed. Humanized gut microbiome mice model by fecal microbiota transplantation was established to explore the diarrhea-inducible effects of gut microbiota. The role of microbial bile acids (BAs) metabolites was identified by UPLC/MS and the underlying mechanisms were investigated with selective inhibitors and antagonists as probes. These mice transplanted with fecal microbiome of PCD patients (PCD mice) exhibited significantly enhanced gastrointestinal motility and elevated fecal water content, compared with these mice with fecal microbiome of NonPCD patients and HC. In analyzing gut microbiota, tryptophan metabolism was enriched in PCD microbiome. In addition, overabundant serotonin in serum and colon, along with elevated biosynthesis gene and reduced reuptake gene, and highly expressed 5-HT receptors (5-HTRs) in colon of PCD mice were found, but not in small intestine. Notably, diarrheal phenotypes in PCD mice were depleted by tryptophan hydroxylase 1 inhibitor (LX1606) and 5-HTRs selective antagonists (alosetron and GR113808). Furthermore, increased microbial secondary BAs metabolites of DCA, HDCA and LCA were revealed in feces of PCD mice and they were found responsible for stimulating 5-HT level in vitro and in vivo. Intriguingly, blocking BAs-conjugated TGR5/TRPA1 signaling pathway could significantly alleviate PCD. In conclusion, altered gut microbiota after cholecystectomy contributes to PCD by promoting secondary BAs in colon, which stimulates colonic 5-HT and increases colon motility.

Double-blinded randomised placebo controlled trial of enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) for the treatment of IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D)

OBJECTIVE

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) is a common and challenging condition that significantly reduces quality of life. Enterosgel (polymethylsiloxane polyhydrate) is an intestinal adsorbent which sequesters harmful molecules and is safe and effective in acute infective diarrhoea. This randomised controlled multicentre trial aimed to investigate its safety and efficacy in patients with IBS-D.

DESIGN

After a 2-week screening phase, participants were randomised into an 8-week double-blind phase, followed by an 8-week open-label and follow-up phase. Participants recorded stool consistency, pain and global symptoms in e-diaries and questionnaires. The primary outcome was the percentage of responders on a composite abdominal pain (≥30% decrease in the weekly score) and stool consistency (50% reduction in days per week with at least one stool of BSFS type 6 or 7) score during at least 4 weeks of the treatment period.

RESULTS

440 patients with IBS-D were randomised to the double-blind phase with 393 continuing to the open-label phase. The Primary outcome responder rate by intention-to-treat for enterosgel versus placebo was 37.4% vs 24.3% (OR 1.95, NNT 8, p=0.002). Enterosgel also improved stool consistency (48.5% vs 32.5%, p<0.0001) abdominal pain (53.3% vs 40.2%, p=0.003), stool frequency (treatment effect -0.32 (-0.62 to -0.02)) and urgency (treatment effect -0.59 (-0.85 to -0.33)). 60% of patients reported adequate relief of symptoms after open-label treatment. Adverse event frequency was similar in both groups, with no serious events attributable to enterosgel.

CONCLUSION

Enterosgel is safe and effective in IBS-D, providing an alternative to the limited current treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN17149988.

Current and Future Therapeutic Options for Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Diarrhea and Functional Diarrhea

Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea are disorders of gut-brain interaction presenting with chronic diarrhea; they have significant impact on quality of life. The two conditions may exist as a continuum and their treatment may overlap. Response to first-line therapy with antispasmodics and anti-diarrheal agents is variable, leaving several patients with suboptimal symptom control and need for alternative therapeutic options. Our aim was to discuss current pharmacologic options and explore alternative therapeutic approaches and future perspectives for symptom management in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea. We conducted a search of PubMed, Cochrane, clinicaltrial.gov, major meeting abstracts for publications on current, alternative, and emerging drugs for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea. Currently approved therapeutic options for patients with first-line refractory irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea include serotonin-3 receptor antagonists, eluxadoline and rifaximin. Despite their proven efficacy, cost and availability worldwide impact their utilization. One-third of patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction with diarrhea have bile acid diarrhea and may benefit from drugs targeting bile acid synthesis and excretion. Further understanding of underlying pathophysiology of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea and functional diarrhea related to bile acid metabolism, gastrointestinal transit, and microbiome has led to evaluation of novel therapeutic approaches, including fecal microbiota transplantation and enterobacterial "crapsules". These opportunities to treat disorders of gut-brain interaction with diarrhea should be followed with formal studies utilizing large samples of well-characterized patients at baseline and validated response outcomes as endpoints for regulatory approval.

Practical approach to irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea beyond low-FODMAP diet

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and altered defecation, usually accompanied by abdominal bloating or distension. The integrated model of bidirectional interaction between the central, autonomic, enteric nervous system, the microbiome, and the gut barrier allows a better understanding of the pathophysiology of IBS, as well as consideration of potential therapeutic strategies. IBS with predominant diarrhea (IBS-D) represents a therapeutic challenge. Dietary changes or restrictions are most commonly used by patients in an attempt at symptom control. Therefore, a number of diets, especially low-FODMAP diet, have increasingly gained interest as a therapy for IBS-D or mixed IBS. However, this kind of diet, while effective, is not exempt of problems. It is therefore necessary that other therapeutic options be considered while bearing pathophysiological mechanisms and general symptom management in mind.

Global Research Trends in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Bibliometric and Visualized Study

Background

There are about 10–23% of adults worldwide suffering from irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Over the past few decades, there are many aspects of uncertainty regarding IBS leading to an ongoing interest in the topic as reflected by a vast number of publications, whose heterogeneity and variable quality may challenge researchers to measure their scientific impact, to identify collaborative networks, and to grasp actively researched themes. Accordingly, with help from bibliometric approaches, our goal is to assess the structure, evolution, and trends of IBS research between 2007 and 2022.

Methods

The documents exclusively focusing on IBS from 2007 to 2022 were retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection. The annual productivity of IBS research, and the most prolific countries or regions, authors, journals and resource-, intellectual- and knowledge-sharing in IBS research, as well as co-citation analysis of references and keywords were analyzed through Microsoft Office Excel 2019, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer.

Results

In total, 4,092 publications were reviewed. The USA led the list of countries with the most publications (1,226, 29.96%). Mayo Clinic contributed more publications than any other institution (193, 4.71%). MAGNUS SIMREN stood out as the most active and impactful scholar with the highest number of publications and the greatest betweenness centrality value. The most high-yield journal in this field was Neurogastroenterology and motility: the official journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society (275, 6.72%). Gastroenterology had the most co-citations (3,721, 3.60%). Keywords with the ongoing strong citation bursts were chromogranin A, rat model, peptide YY, gut microbiota, and low-FODMAP diet, etc.

Conclusion

Through bibliometric analysis, we gleaned deep insight into the current status of literature investigating IBS for the first time. These findings will be useful to scholars interested in understanding the key information in the field, as well as identifying possible research frontiers.

Serotonin type 3 receptor subunit gene polymorphisms associated with psychosomatic symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome: A multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the serotonin type 3 receptor subunit (HTR3) genes have been associated with psychosomatic symptoms, but it is not clear whether these associations exist in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

AIM

To assess the association of HTR3 polymorphisms with depressive, anxiety, and somatization symptoms in individuals with IBS.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 623 participants with IBS were recruited from five specialty centers in Germany, Sweden, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Ireland. Depressive, anxiety, and somatization symptoms and sociodemographic characteristics were collected. Four functional SNPs - HTR3A c.-42C>T, HTR3B c.386A>C, HTR3C c.489C>A, and HTR3E c.*76G>A - were genotyped and analyzed using the dominant and recessive models. We also performed separate analyses for sex and IBS subtypes. SNP scores were calculated as the number of minor alleles of the SNPs above. The impact of HTR3C c.489C>A was tested by radioligand-binding and calcium influx assays.

RESULTS

Depressive and anxiety symptoms significantly worsened with increasing numbers of minor HTR3C c.489C>A alleles in the dominant model (F depressive = 7.475, P depressive = 0.006; F anxiety = 6.535, P anxiety = 0.011). A higher SNP score (range 0-6) was linked to a worsened depressive symptoms score (F = 7.710, P-linear trend = 0.006) in IBS. The potential relevance of the HTR3C SNP was corroborated, showing changes in the expression level of 5-HT3AC variant receptors.

CONCLUSION

We have provided the first evidence that HTR3C c.489C>A is involved in depressive and anxiety symptoms in individuals with IBS. The SNP score indicated that an increasing number of minor alleles is linked to the worsening of depressive symptoms in IBS.

Adult enteric Dclk1-positive glial and neuronal cells reveal distinct responses to acute intestinal injury

Intestinal ganglionic cells in the adult enteric nervous system (ENS) are continually exposed to stimuli from the surrounding microenvironment and need at times to respond to disturbed homeostasis following acute intestinal injury. The kinase DCLK1 and intestinal Dclk1-positive cells have been reported to contribute to intestinal regeneration. Although Dclk1-positive cells are present in adult enteric ganglia, their cellular identity and response to acute injury have not been investigated in detail. Here, we reveal the presence of distinct Dclk1-tdTom+/CD49b+ glial-like and Dclk1-tdTom+/CD49b- neuronal cell types in adult myenteric ganglia. These ganglionic cells demonstrate distinct patterns of tracing over time yet show a similar expansion in response to elevated serotonergic signaling. Interestingly, Dclk1-tdTom+ glial-like and neuronal cell types appear resistant to acute irradiation injury-mediated cell death. Moreover, Dclk1-tdTom+/CD49b+ glial-like cells show prominent changes in gene expression profiles induced by injury, in contrast to Dclk1-tdTom+/CD49b- neuronal cell types. Finally, subsets of Dclk1-tdTom+/CD49b+ glial-like cells demonstrate prominent overlap with Nestin and p75NTR and strong responses to elevated serotonergic signaling or acute injury. These findings, together with their role in early development and their neural crest-like gene expression signature, suggest the presence of reserve progenitor cells in the adult Dclk1 glial cell lineage.NEW & NOTEWORTHY The kinase DCLK1 identifies glial-like and neuronal cell types in adult murine enteric ganglia, which resist acute injury-mediated cell death yet differ in their cellular response to injury. Interestingly, Dclk1-labeled glial-like cells show prominent transcriptional changes in response to injury and harbor features reminiscent of previously described enteric neural precursor cells. Our data thus add to recently emerging evidence of reserve cellular plasticity in the adult enteric nervous system.

Comparison of five diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) rat models in the brain-gut-microbiota axis

The brain-gut-microbiota (BGM) axis is known to be essential for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). In order to evaluate the effects of IBS-D rat models (the central sensitization model, the peripheral sensitization model and the compound model) on the BGM axis, five models were induced in Wistar rats with 4% acetic acid (AD, dissolved 0.4 ml of AD in 9.6 ml of ultrapure water) + wrap restrain stress (WRS), 4% AD, colorectal distention (CRD), WRS, and neonatal maternal separation (NMS). Abdominal withdrawal reflex (AWR) scale scores and the moisture content of feces (MCF) were evaluated on the day of completing modeling. Body weight was measured every 7 days during modeling. Brain gut peptides, cytokine levels, the activity of spinal cord neurons, intestinal mucosal barrier function, and gut microbiota were determined after induction of IBS-D. We found intervention with 4% AD + WRS, 4% AD, CRD, WRS, and NMS induced a similar course of effects on the BGM axis. Among the five models, AWR scores (60 mmHg, 80 mmHg) were all increased. The levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine, corticotropin-releasing factor, substance P, and calcitonin gene-related protein in serum rapidly increased, whereas that of neuropeptide Y decreased. C-fos in the spinal cord showed increased neuronal activity. The intestinal permeability was increased and the composition and structure of gut microbiota were changed. In conclusion, the five models could cause changes in BGM axis, but the 4% AD + WRS model was closer to the changes BGM axis of post-inflammatory models of IBS-D.

Treatment of Gastrointestinal Disorders-Plants and Potential Mechanisms of Action of Their Constituents

The worldwide prevalence of gastrointestinal diseases is about 40%, with standard pharmacotherapy being long-lasting and economically challenging. Of the dozens of diseases listed by the Rome IV Foundation criteria, for five of them (heartburn, dyspepsia, nausea and vomiting disorder, constipation, and diarrhoea), treatment with herbals is an official alternative, legislatively supported by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). However, for most plants, the Directive does not require a description of the mechanisms of action, which should be related to the therapeutic effect of the European plant in question. This review article, therefore, summarizes the basic pharmacological knowledge of synthetic drugs used in selected functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) and correlates them with the constituents of medicinal plants. Therefore, the information presented here is intended as a starting point to support the claim that both empirical folk medicine and current and decades-old treatments with official herbal remedies have a rational basis in modern pharmacology.

Linaclotide for treating patients with irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation: a multicentre study of real-world data in China

INTRODUCTION

Linaclotide, a guanylate cyclase C agonist that improves the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome with predominant constipation (IBS-C), has been recently approved for IBS-C treatment. This study aimed to report real-world data on linaclotide treatment in China.

METHODS

This was a prospective multicentre study of the effectiveness of linaclotide treatment in patients with IBS-C from 10 primary medical institutions. Changes in defecation, abdominal symptoms, the IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS), IBS quality of life questionnaire (IBS-QOL), Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and Self-Rating Depression Scale in patients were evaluated to determine the drug's clinical efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

We enrolled 97 patients (mean age: 52.39 ± 13.99 years), 55 of whom were women (56.7%). In terms of efficacy, the number of the patients' defecation per week and Bristol stool form scale scores significantly increased at week 4 and week 12 compared with the values at the baseline. The baseline average IBS-SSS score was 211.01 ± 81.23. Of the patients, 24 had severe IBS-C, and their IBS-SSS scores at week 4 (51.81 ± 54.42) and week 12 (9.3 ± 30.39) significantly decreased and showed a pronounced improvement. The IBS-QOL total scores at week 4 and week 12 gradually decreased compared with that at the baseline and the QOL significantly improved. Treatment satisfaction rate was 79.3% in week 4 and 100% in week 12, showing a gradually increased satisfaction and significant differences. However, 11 cases (11.3%) had diarrhoea.

CONCLUSION

Linaclotide has proved to be a safe and effective drug to improve IBS-C symptoms and severity.

Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Review of Their Therapeutic Role

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic collection of symptoms and lowers the quality of life. The management of such patients has always involved mitigating the symptoms produced by this disorder. This article reviews the role of probiotics in IBS by compiling various studies to deduce the possible symptomatic relief that probiotics may provide to IBS patients. Given the encouraging part of probiotics in abundant other gastrointestinal conditions, this article focuses on understanding the specific functional effects (if any) that are brought about by adding probiotics in patients with different types of IBS such as IBS with predominant constipation, IBS with predominant diarrhea, and even the unclassified type of IBS. The purpose of analyzing the role of probiotics is to study the changes brought about by them at the level of the gut microbiota in patients suffering from IBS, as this may prove to be of prime importance in managing such conditions with time. This article has also furnished an overview of the pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria, treatment modalities, sources of probiotics, and their therapeutic significance in IBS patients.

Improvement in constipation and diarrhea is associated with improved abdominal pain in patients with functional bowel disorders

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain is a bothersome and lifestyle limiting symptom in patients with functional bowel disorders. It is associated with decreased quality of life in affected individuals, as well as significant annual healthcare expenditure. Knowledge of specific factors that predict improvement in abdominal pain in those with functional bowel disorders is thus far limited.

METHODS

Consecutive patients presenting for outpatient care at a major academic medical center between October 2017 and March 2020 completed an electronic symptom survey prior to initial clinic visit, and again after 3 months. The Rome IV questionnaires for functional dyspepsia, irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and functional diarrhea were all included. Additionally, all subjects completed the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Anxiety, Depression, and sleep disturbance questionnaires. Patients with a diagnosis of a Rome IV functional gastrointestinal disorder without any organic cause for symptoms were identified based on both chart review as well as survey response data. Univariable and multivariable analysis was used to assess predictors of improved abdominal pain after 3 months.

KEY RESULTS

180 patients with a mean age of 45.3 years were included in the final analysis. 78.3% of patients were female, and 77.2% met Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome. On multivariable analysis, improvement in constipation and diarrhea were both independent predictors of improved abdominal pain after 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

Improvement in constipation and diarrhea both predicted improvement in abdominal pain, suggesting that addressing these factors is central to the management of abdominal pain in functional gastrointestinal disorders.

Small bowel water content assessed by MRI in health and disease: a collation of single-centre studies

BACKGROUND

New developments in MRI have allowed the non-invasive, accurate measurement of the small bowel water content (SBWC).

AIMS

To collate studies measuring SBWC following ingestion of a range of foods in both health and disease to provide data for adequately powering future studies in this area.

METHODS

This collation brings together 29 studies including 954 participants (530 healthy, 54 diverticulosis, 255 IBS, 53 functional constipation, 12 cystic fibrosis, 15 Crohn's disease, 20 coeliac disease, 15 scleroderma) which have been carried out in a single centre using comparable study designs.

RESULTS

Fasting SBWC (mean 82 [SD 65] mL) shows high variability with a small decline with advancing age (healthy volunteers only; individual patient data). Fasting values are increased in untreated coeliac disease (202 [290] mL, P = 0.004). Post-prandial SBWC shows less intra-individual variability than fasting values in healthy volunteers. SBWC is increased by eating, most markedly by high fat meals but also by fibre, both viscous and particulate. Indigestible residue accumulates in late post-prandial period but empties soon after ingestion of a high calorie meal which produces a significant drop (by 50 [52] mL) in healthy volunteers. The associated fall in SBWC is abnormal in people with cystic fibrosis (SBWC reduced by 10 [121] mL, P = 0.002) and in people with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (SBWC reduced by 17 [43] mL, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

SBWC as assessed by MRI is a valuable biomarker indicating the balance of secretion and absorption in health and disease and the impact of treatments.

[Irritable bowel syndrome and functional dyspepsia : Diagnosis and treatment]

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and functional dyspepsia are chronic diseases of the digestive tract that challenge both patients and physicians due to their difficult diagnosis and limited treatment options. The international Rome IV diagnostic criteria are commonly used for research purposes. For IBS, the diagnostic criteria based on the German S3 guideline offer a less complicated alternative for everyday clinical practice. A thorough history and basic diagnostic work-up are essential for diagnosis, as reliable biomarkers are still lacking. Clinical manifestations of both disorders are variable, and it has been useful to allocate subtypes based on leading symptom clusters; these may facilitate the choice of diagnostic tests as well as symptomatic treatment approaches. Used correctly, the combination of available drug (mostly off-label) and non-drug options can help to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life.

The serotonin receptor 3E variant is a risk factor for female IBS-D

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a gut-brain disorder of multifactorial origin. Evidence of disturbed serotonergic function in IBS accumulated for the 5-HT₃ receptor family. 5-HT₃Rs are encoded by HTR3 genes and control GI function, and peristalsis and secretion, in particular. Moreover, 5-HT₃R antagonists are beneficial in the treatment of diarrhea predominant IBS (IBS-D). We previously reported on functionally relevant SNPs in HTR3A c.-42C > T (rs1062613), HTR3C p.N163K (rs6766410), and HTR3E c.*76G > A (rs56109847 = rs62625044) being associated with IBS-D, and the HTR3B variant p.Y129S (rs1176744) was also described within the context of IBS. We performed a multi-center study to validate previous results and provide further evidence for the relevance of HTR3 genes in IBS pathogenesis. Therefore, genotype data of 2682 IBS patients and 9650 controls from 14 cohorts (Chile, Germany (2), Greece, Ireland, Spain, Sweden (2), the UK (3), and the USA (3)) were taken into account. Subsequent meta-analysis confirmed HTR3E c.*76G > A (rs56109847 = rs62625044) to be associated with female IBS-D (OR = 1.58; 95% CI (1.18, 2.12)). Complementary expression studies of four GI regions (jejunum, ileum, colon, sigmoid colon) of 66 IBS patients and 42 controls revealed only HTR3E to be robustly expressed. On top, HTR3E transcript levels were significantly reduced in the sigma of IBS patients (p = 0.0187); more specifically, in those diagnosed with IBS-D (p = 0.0145). In conclusion, meta-analysis confirmed rs56109847 = rs62625044 as a risk factor for female IBS-D. Expression analysis revealed reduced HTR3E levels in the sigmoid colon of IBS-D patients, which underlines the relevance of HTR3E in the pathogenesis of IBS-D.

Review article: current and future treatment approaches for pain in IBS

BACKGROUND

Abdominal pain is a core symptom of IBS and a primary driver of care seeking. Visceral hypersensitivity is a key pathophysiological mechanism and therapeutic target for pain in IBS, with components of peripheral and central sensitisation and psychological factors.

AIM

To review current and future treatment approaches specifically for the pain component of IBS.

METHODS

Pubmed search terms included combinations of irritable bowel, pain, visceral hypersensitivity, novel, new, emerging, future and advances.

RESULTS

Established non-pharmacological treatments for IBS pain include the low FODMAP diet, probiotics and psychological interventions, especially hypnotherapy. Tricyclics remain the best evidenced pharmacological approach with GCC agonists, tenapanor, lubiprostone, eluxadoline and 5HT3 antagonists second line according to patient characteristics and availability. Less well-evidenced current options include anti-spasmodics, peppermint oil, SSRIs, SNRIs, alpha 2 delta ligands, melatonin and histamine antagonists. Patients are vulnerable to iatrogenesis and harmful approaches to be avoided include opioids and unwarranted surgical interventions. For severe pain, the concept of augmentation with combined gut-brain neuromodulators and psychotherapy in a multi-disciplinary setting is considered. A plethora of molecular targets and ligands are emerging from pre-clinical studies, together with early clinical evidence for a range of pharmacological, dietary, neurostimulation and novel psychological treatment delivery methods which are reviewed. The history of such emerging approaches, however, merits both caution and optimism in equal measure.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good in-roads and emerging options, the management of abdominal pain remains one of the biggest challenges and research priorities for patients with IBS.

Review Article: Current and future treatment approaches for IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and IBS mixed pattern (IBS-M)

BACKGROUND

Irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhoea (IBS-D) and IBS-mixed stool pattern (IBS-M) are disorders of gut-brain interaction characterised by abdominal pain associated with diarrhoea or both diarrhoea and constipation respectively. The pathophysiology of IBS-D/M is multifactorial and not completely understood; thus, treatment is aimed at multiple mechanisms such as altering gut microbiota, visceral hypersensitivity, intestinal permeability, gut-brain interaction and psychological strategies.

AIM

The goal of this article was to provide an up-to-date review of the current evidence for both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options in IBS-D and IBS-M. Future treatments for IBS-D and IBS-M will also be discussed.

METHODS

Medline and Embase database searches (through April 30 2021) to identify clinical studies in subjects with IBS-D in which dietary modification, alternative treatments (probiotics, acupuncture, exercise) as well as FDA-approved medications were used.

RESULTS

Dietary modification is often the first line of therapy. Furthermore, lifestyle treatments include complementary alternative medications (CAM), probiotics and peppermint oil are useful adjuncts but have not specifically been described in IBS-D/M. Evidence strongly supports psychotherapy in the treatment of IBS. Beyond over-the counter anti-diarrhoeals, anti-spasmodics and anti-depressants, pharmacological treatment now includes treating for bile acid malabsorption and the FDA-approved medications rifaximin, eluxadoline and alosetron.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of IBS-D/M ideally involves a multidisciplinary approach of primary care, gastroenterologist and psychologist. Treatment often involves both non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies. Future therapies may include faecal microbial transplant, Crofelemer and serotonin antagonists, but further studies are needed.

Diarrhea-Predominant and Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Current Prescription Drug Treatment Options

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a heterogenous disease with a variety of therapeutic options, including eight prescription drugs approved for use in IBS in the USA. Choosing among the myriad treatment options requires attention to patient preferences both on clinical outcomes and costs associated with treatment. We performed a narrative review of the literature to summarize these important determinants of treatment choice including: labeled indications; clinical profiles of efficacy, safety, and tolerability of prescription drugs; and cost-effectiveness for diarrhea-predominant IBS drugs (IBS-D: alosetron, eluxadoline, and rifaximin) and constipation-predominant IBS drugs (IBS-C: linaclotide, lubiprostone, plecanatide, tegaserod, and tenapanor). We then review the standard model of shared decision-making aimed at guiding an informed, patient-centered discussion to integrate comparative clinical and cost outcomes toward choosing an IBS treatment in practice.

Medical Therapies for Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder that manifests with abdominal pain and diarrheal bowel patterns, without structural explanation. Diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome is a heterogeneous condition resulting from diverse pathophysiologic processes. Treatment strategies with varied mechanisms of action are beneficial in its management. The clinician must become familiar with a multi-dimensional approach to irritable bowel syndrome. The 3 approved medications are central to disease management. Effective treatment uses off-label medications and emerging therapies and a growing number of over-the-counter and supplemental agents to optimize symptom improvement for the patient with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.

Psychopharmacologic Therapies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Psychopharmacologic therapies are beneficial in reducing symptoms when treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Noradrenaline, serotonin, and dopamine are neurotransmitters of key importance in psychopharmacology and pain-reduction mechanisms. The first-line (tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors) and second-line (atypical antipsychotics, delta-ligand agents, low-dose naltrexone) neuromodulator treatment options are recommended when IBS-associated abdominal pain is of moderate or severe intensity and is persistent. To understand the implementation strategy, the multidimensional clinical profile as a template is used for presenting 3 case scenarios involving painful IBS and DGBI of varying complexity.

The alternative serotonin transporter promoter P2 impacts gene function in females with irritable bowel syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a gut-brain disorder in which symptoms are shaped by serotonin acting centrally and peripherally. The serotonin transporter gene SLC6A4 has been implicated in IBS pathophysiology, but the underlying genetic mechanisms remain unclear. We sequenced the alternative P2 promoter driving intestinal SLC6A4 expression and identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with IBS in a discovery sample. Identified SNPs built different haplotypes, and the tagging SNP rs2020938 seems to associate with constipation-predominant IBS (IBS-C) in females. rs2020938 validation was performed in 1978 additional IBS patients and 6,038 controls from eight countries. Meta-analysis on data from 2,175 IBS patients and 6,128 controls confirmed the association with female IBS-C. Expression analyses revealed that the P2 promoter drives SLC6A4 expression primarily in the small intestine. Gene reporter assays showed a functional impact of SNPs in the P2 region. In silico analysis of the polymorphic promoter indicated differential expression regulation. Further follow-up revealed that the major allele of the tagging SNP rs2020938 correlates with differential SLC6A4 expression in the jejunum and with stool consistency, indicating functional relevance. Our data consolidate rs2020938 as a functional SNP associated with IBS-C risk in females, underlining the relevance of SLC6A4 in IBS pathogenesis.

The 5-HT3 Receptor Affects Rotavirus-Induced Motility

Rotavirus infection is highly prevalent in children, and the most severe effects are diarrhea and vomiting. It is well accepted that the enteric nervous system (ENS) is activated and plays an important role, but knowledge of how rotavirus activates nerves within ENS and to the vomiting center is lacking. Serotonin is released during rotavirus infection, and antagonists to the serotonin receptor subtype 3 (5-HT₃ receptor) can attenuate rotavirus-induced diarrhea. In this study, we used a 5-HT₃ receptor knockout (KO) mouse model to investigate the role of this receptor in rotavirus-induced diarrhea, motility, electrolyte secretion, inflammatory response, and vomiting reflex. The number of diarrhea days (P = 0.03) and the number of mice with diarrhea were lower in infected 5-HT₃ receptor KO than wild-type pups. In vivo investigation of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-dextran transit time showed that intestinal motility was lower in the infected 5-HT₃ receptor KO compared to wild-type mice (P = 0.0023). Ex vivo Ussing chamber measurements of potential difference across the intestinal epithelia showed no significant difference in electrolyte secretion between the two groups. Immediate early gene cFos expression level showed no difference in activation of the vomiting center in the brain. Cytokine analysis of the intestine indicated a low effect of inflammatory response in rotavirus-infected mice lacking the 5-HT₃ receptor. Our findings indicate that the 5-HT₃ receptor is involved in rotavirus-induced diarrhea via its effect on intestinal motility and that the vagus nerve signaling to the vomiting center occurs also in the absence of the 5-HT₃ receptor. IMPORTANCE The mechanisms underlying rotavirus-induced diarrhea and vomiting are not yet fully understood. To better understand rotavirus pathophysiology, characterization of nerve signaling within the ENS and through vagal efferent nerves to the brain, which have been shown to be of great importance to the disease, is necessary. Serotonin (5-HT), a mediator of both diarrhea and vomiting, has been shown to be released from enterochromaffin cells in response to rotavirus infection and the rotavirus enterotoxin NSP4. Here, we investigated the role of the serotonin receptor 5-HT₃, which is known to be involved in the nerve signals that regulate gut motility, intestinal secretion, and signal transduction through the vagus nerve to the brain. We show that the 5-HT₃ receptor is involved in rotavirus-induced diarrhea by promoting intestinal motility. The findings shed light on new treatment possibilities for rotavirus diarrhea.