1
|
Korolkova A, Ndukwe SO, Dee L, Deeks SG, Peluso MJ, Hoh R, Rodriguez A, Sugarman J, Rodriguez Garcia L, Dubé K, Sauceda JA. Recall and Appraisal of the Risks, Benefits, and Objectives of Interrupting HIV Treatment in an HIV Cure-Related Study. AIDS Behav 2024:10.1007/s10461-024-04485-x. [PMID: 39287733 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04485-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
The goal of HIV cure research is to either eliminate HIV from the body or durably suppress it in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART). This research often requires participants to interrupt ART. However, there are numerous risks associated with ART interruptions and therefore it is critical to understand how people with HIV (PWH) who participate recall the elements of consent, to safeguard their rights and welfare. Participants were recruited from the SCOPE Analytic Treatment Interruption (SCOPE-ATI: NCT04359186) study at the University of California San Francisco. We interviewed 12 SCOPE-ATI participants to assess their recall of informed consent elements and therapeutic misconception, using the Brief Informed Consent Evaluation Protocol (BICEP). Interviewees were primarily older adults, male, White, and non-Hispanic/Latinx. Their responses indicated that they understood the primary purpose of the SCOPE-ATI study to be scientific research. Nearly all participants demonstrated high recall of key elements of consent and no therapeutic misconception. We also found that the role of study staff was a major factor in participants' appraisal of risks and that associated psychosocial risks of pausing ART were of minimal concern (e.g., anxiety off ART, possible forward HIV transmission to sex partners). As HIV cure research expands, it is important to reiterate the duty of the investigative team to clearly communicate with participants about the associated risks and to assess their understanding throughout these studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Korolkova
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Samuel O Ndukwe
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Engagement Coordinator, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Steven G Deeks
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael J Peluso
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca Hoh
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Antonio Rodriguez
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Karine Dubé
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La Jolla, CA, USA
- Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John A Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Department of Medicine, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Division of Prevention Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, 550 16th Street, #3172, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dubé K, Ndukwe SO, Korolkova A, Dee L, Sugarman J, Sauceda JA. Participant experiences in a combination HIV cure-related trial with extended analytical treatment interruption in San Francisco, United States. HIV Res Clin Pract 2024; 25:2312318. [PMID: 38348830 PMCID: PMC10951555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited systematic information available about the perspectives of participants enrolled in intensive combination HIV cure-related trials inclusive of an extended analytical treatment interruption (ATI). OBJECTIVE To assess and understand experiences of people with HIV involved in a combination HIV cure-related trial with an extended ATI. METHODS The trial included five interventions and was followed by an ATI lasting up to 52 wk. From 2022 - 2023, we conducted in-depth interviews with study participants following their extended ATIs. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed via conventional thematic analysis. RESULTS We interviewed seven participants. The majority were male, White, and non-Hispanic, with a median age of 37 years. Trust in the research team, scientific altruism and hope of becoming a post-intervention controller were key motivators for joining the trial. Interviewees reported being satisfied with their decision to participate in the trial and the extended ATI. Most recounted feelings of worry related to viral rebound during the ATI. Participants reported both defeat and relief with ART restart. Four faced challenges with protecting partners from HIV during their ATI, such as trying to find out if their partner(s) were using pre-exposure prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate potential improvements for future ATI trial participant experiences, such as more robust resources for psychosocial support and partner protections. Dedicating greater effort to understanding participant ATI experiences can inform the design of future participant-centered HIV cure trial protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health
(IDGPH), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La
Jolla, CA, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samuel O. Ndukwe
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health
(IDGPH), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La
Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ana Korolkova
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health
(IDGPH), Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego (UCSD), La
Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community
Engagement Coordinator, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore,
MD, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Science, Center for AIDS Prevention
Studies (CAPS), San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barton K, Ferguson JM, Deveson IW, Falcinelli SD, James KS, Kirchherr J, Ramirez C, Gay CL, Hammond JM, Bevear B, Carswell SL, Margolis DM, Smith MA, Adimora AA, Archin NM. HIVepsilon-seq-scalable characterization of intact persistent proviral HIV reservoirs in women. J Virol 2023; 97:e0070523. [PMID: 37843370 PMCID: PMC10688329 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00705-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The lack of a reliable method to accurately detect when replication-competent HIV has been cleared is a major challenge in developing a cure. This study introduces a new approach called the HIVepsilon-seq (HIVε-seq) assay, which uses long-read sequencing technology and bioinformatics to scrutinize the HIV genome at the nucleotide level, distinguishing between defective and intact HIV. This study included 30 participants on antiretroviral therapy, including 17 women, and was able to discriminate between defective and genetically intact viruses at the single DNA strand level. The HIVε-seq assay is an improvement over previous methods, as it requires minimal sample, less specialized lab equipment, and offers a shorter turnaround time. The HIVε-seq assay offers a promising new tool for researchers to measure the intact HIV reservoir, advancing efforts towards finding a cure for this devastating disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirston Barton
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Serology and Virology Division (SAViD), NSW Health Pathology, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James M. Ferguson
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ira W. Deveson
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shane D. Falcinelli
- Department of Microbiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- UNC HIV Cure Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine S. James
- UNC HIV Cure Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jennifer Kirchherr
- UNC HIV Cure Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Catalina Ramirez
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cynthia L. Gay
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jillian M. Hammond
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brent Bevear
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shaun L. Carswell
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - David M. Margolis
- Department of Microbiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- UNC HIV Cure Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Martin A. Smith
- The Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- CHU Sainte-Justine Research Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Adaora A. Adimora
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nancie M. Archin
- UNC HIV Cure Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Noorman MAJ, de Wit JBF, Marcos TA, Stutterheim SE, Jonas KJ, den Daas C. The Importance of Social Engagement in the Development of an HIV Cure: A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives. AIDS Behav 2023; 27:3789-3812. [PMID: 37329470 PMCID: PMC10589186 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-023-04095-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
As research into the development of an HIV cure gains prominence, assessing the perspectives of stakeholders becomes imperative. It empowers stakeholders to determine priorities and influence research processes. We conducted a systematic review of the empirical literature on stakeholder perspectives. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for empirical, peer-reviewed articles, published before September 2022. Our analysis of 78 papers showed that stakeholders could be divided into three categories: people with HIV, key populations, and professionals. Following thematic synthesis, two main themes were distinguished: stakeholders' perspectives on HIV cure research and stakeholders' perspectives on HIV cure. Research on perspectives on HIV cure research showed that stakeholders' hypothetical willingness to participate (WTP) in HIV cure research was relatively high, while actual WTP was found to be lower. Studies also identified associated (individual) characteristics of hypothetical WTP, as well as facilitators and barriers to hypothetical participation. Additionally, we reported research on experiences of actual HIV cure research participation. Our analysis of stakeholder perceptions of HIV cure showed that most stakeholders preferred a cure that could eliminate HIV and outlined positive associated impacts. Furthermore, we observed that most included studies were conducted among PWHIV, and in the Global North. To empower stakeholders, we recommend that future research include an even greater diversity of stakeholders and incorporate theories of behavior to further explore how stakeholders decide to meaningfully engage in every stage of HIV cure research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maaike A J Noorman
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - John B F de Wit
- Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Utrecht University, PO Box 80140, 3508 TC, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tamika A Marcos
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sarah E Stutterheim
- Department of Health Promotion and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kai J Jonas
- Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Chantal den Daas
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Health Psychology Group, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bilger A, Plenn E, Barg FK, Rendle KA, Carter WB, Lamour-Harrington A, Jones N, Peterson B, Sauceda JA, Tebas P, Mounzer K, Metzger D, Montaner LJ, Dubé K. Participant experiences in HIV cure-directed trial with an extended analytical treatment interruption in Philadelphia, United States. HIV Res Clin Pract 2023; 24:2267825. [PMID: 37837376 PMCID: PMC10634456] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A feature of HIV cure trials is the need to interrupt treatment to test the efficacy of experimental interventions-a process known as analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs). OBJECTIVES We report the experiences of participants after they completed an extended ATI. METHODS From April to November 2022, we conducted post-ATI in-depth interviews with BEAT2 clinical trial (NCT03588715) participants who stopped ART while receiving an immunotherapy regimen. We used conventional content analysis to code the data. RESULTS We conducted interviews with 11 Black/African American and three White/Caucasian participants (11 males, two females, and one transgender woman). The mean ATI was 38 weeks. Participants noted several significant experiences surrounding the interventions' side effects, ATI, and returning to medication. Some participants had positive experiences with their ATI. Other participants were nervous during the ATI. Rising viral loads led some to feel a sense of failure. Although trial experiences were heterogeneous, participants unanimously had positive interactions with the clinical trial staff which facilitated their retention in the trial. Participants shared their experiences with the trial, including changes in expectations, experiences with experimental interventions and procedures, compensation as a measure of respect, effort, transportation, and effects of COVID-19 during the trial. Based on these results, we provide considerations for the conduct of future HIV cure-directed clinical trials involving ATIs. CONCLUSIONS Managing expectations, focusing on participants' contributions, and providing support to reduce feelings of having failed the research team and/or the HIV community following viral rebound should be part of HIV cure trial design. Discussing the mental health impact of rebound during consent, distinct from risk, is needed. Continued efforts to understand how people with HIV experience ATIs will improve future designs of HIV cure clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bilger
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Eion Plenn
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Frances K. Barg
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Katharine A. Rendle
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - William B. Carter
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Nora Jones
- BEAT-HIV Delaney Collaboratory Community Advisory Board, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - John A. Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Department of Medicine, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Pablo Tebas
- Hospital of the University of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Karam Mounzer
- Philadelphia FIGHT Community Health Centers, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Metzger
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | | | - Karine Dubé
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Neergaard R, Jones NL, Roebuck C, Rendle KA, Barbati Z, Peterson B, Tebas P, Mounzer K, Metzger D, Montaner LJ, Dube K, Barg FK. "I Know That I Was a Part of Making a Difference": Participant Motivations for Joining a Cure-Directed HIV Trial with an Analytical Treatment Interruption. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2023; 39:414-421. [PMID: 35979886 PMCID: PMC10389247 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2022.0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Analytical treatment interruption (ATI), defined as a closely monitored clinical pause in antiretroviral therapy (ART), is a core component of many HIV cure-directed clinical studies. ATIs may cause significant physical and psychosocial risks for people living with HIV and, as a result, integrating participant and community perspectives into clinical trial designs that include an ATI is crucial to ensuring a successful and person-centered trial. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants enrolling in the BEAT-2 cure-directed trial (NCT03588715). Interviews elicited participant motivations and decision-making processes for trial participation along with participants' perceptions of the ATI. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a directed content analysis. Fourteen of 15 trial participants completed interviews. The majority were Black (79%) cisgender male (79%). Participants noted several significant motivating factors contributing to their desire to enroll in the HIV cure-directed clinical trial, the most prominent being a desire to find a cure for HIV and help others in the HIV community. HIV care teams were the most commonly identified resource for patients when making the decision to enroll in the trial, and family, friends, and romantic partners also played a significant role. Altruism was a primary motivation for participation, although participants also shared interest in learning about HIV science and research. Participants had a strong understanding of trial procedures and displayed significant trust in the study team to keep them informed and healthy during their participation. The ATI was a significant source of anxiety for participants. Their primary worry was that their prior antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen would no longer be effective once they resumed ART. Despite these concerns, participants shared considerable excitement for continued participation in the trial and being a part of the search toward an HIV cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Neergaard
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nora L. Jones
- Center for Urban Bioethics, Temple University Ringgold Standard Institution, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- BEAT-HIV Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Roebuck
- BEAT-HIV Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Anthropology, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA
| | - Katharine A. Rendle
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Zoe Barbati
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Beth Peterson
- BEAT-HIV Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Pablo Tebas
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karam Mounzer
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - David Metzger
- University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luis J. Montaner
- BEAT-HIV Collaboratory Community Advisory Board (CAB), Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Karine Dube
- UNC Gillings School of Global Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Frances K. Barg
- Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Okumu EA, Henderson GE, Golin C, Kuczynski K, Ormsby NQ, Peay HL. HIV remission trial investigators' attitudes towards risk and risk mitigation in trials that include treatment interruption. J Virus Erad 2023; 9:100331. [PMID: 37416088 PMCID: PMC10319831 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2023.100331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Early-phase HIV remission ("cure") trials aim to test interventions developed to eradicate HIV or to sustainably control HIV without antiretroviral treatment (ART). Many remission trials include analytic treatment interruption (ATI) to evaluate interventions, which increases the risk to participants and their sexual partners. We conducted an online questionnaire of international HIV remission trial investigators and other study team members to assess their expectations regarding the time to achieve long-term control of HIV replication without treatment (functional cure) or complete eradication of replication-competent HIV virus (sterilizing cure); attitudes toward HIV remission research and the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of six HIV transmission risk mitigation strategies during trials with ATI of fixed duration. Nearly half of respondents (47%) reported expecting a functional cure for HIV to be achieved in 5-10 years, and one-third (35%) reported 10-20 years for a sterilizing cure to be achieved. On a scale of -3 to 3, mean scores indicated greater respondent concern about the risk of HIV transmission to partners during ATI (Time to rebound Mean: 0.4 and Fixed duration Mean: 11), compared to participant health risks from ATI (Time to Rebound Mean: -.9 and Fixed duration Mean: 0.0). With regard to feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy respectively, mitigation efforts rated positively included: requiring counseling for potential participants (Means: 2.3; 2.1; and 1.1), providing partner referrals for PrEP (Means: 1.3; 1.3; 1.5), providing pre-exposure proxylaxis directly to partners (Means: 1.0; 1.5; 1.6), and monitoring participants for new sexually transmitted disease acquisition (Means: 1.9; 1.4; 1.0). Respondents were less positive about requiring that participants' sexual partner(s) participate in risk counseling or limiting participation to those who commit to abstaining from sex during the entire ATI period. Our study demonstrates that HIV remission trial investigators and study team members are concerned about the risk of transmission to sexual partners during ATI. Separating the assessment of risk mitigation strategies for transmission risk into feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy allows the discovery of strategies that may best achieve all three outcomes. Additional research is needed to compare these more fine-grained assessments with views held by other investigators, people living with HIV, and trial participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunice Akinyi Okumu
- Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Gail E. Henderson
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Carol Golin
- Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Department of Health Behavior, Gillings Global School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Kriste Kuczynski
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Nuchanart Q. Ormsby
- Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dubé K, Shelton B, Patel H, Ndukwe SO, Concha-Garcia S, Dullano C, Solso S, Hendrickx S, Kaytes A, Taylor J, Villa TJ, Little SJ, Riggs PK, Lessard D, Arora AK, Costiniuk CT, Eskaf S, Smith DM, Gianella S. Perceived risks and benefits of enrolling people with HIV at the end of life in cure research in Southern California, United States. J Virus Erad 2023; 9:100328. [PMID: 37440872 PMCID: PMC10334343 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2023.100328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although current antiretroviral therapy allows most people with HIV (PWH) to experience normal longevity with a good quality of life, an HIV cure remains elusive due to HIV reservoir formation within deep tissues. An HIV cure remains highly desirable to the community of PWH. This study reports on the perceived risks and benefits of participation in the Last Gift study, a study aimed at characterizing HIV reservoirs via post-mortem autopsy, among PWH at the end of life (EOL) and their next-of-kin (NOK)/loved ones. Methods Last Gift participants (PWH with a terminal illness and/or near the end of life) and their NOK/loved ones were surveyed for perceptions of risks, benefits, and meaning for participation in the Last Gift study. Results The average age of the 17 Last Gift participants was 66.6 years, 3 were females, 1 person identified as Hispanic, and 15 as Caucasian. The average age of the 17 NOK/loved ones was 56.7 years, and relationships to Last Gift participants included partner/spouse, sibling, friend, child, parent, grandparent, and nephew. The only perceived personal risk of the Last Gift among participants was the blood draws (3/17). NOK/loved ones perceived the following risks: blood draws (2/17), physical pain (3/17), worry that something bad will happen (2/17), and unpleasant side effects (1/17). Participants in Last Gift and NOK/loved ones indicated the study had various positive social effects. For both participants and NOK/loved ones, the most frequent perceived personal benefit of the Last Gift was the satisfaction of supporting HIV cure research. Discussion Participants perceived minimal personal and societal risks and valued the altruistic benefits of participating in the Last Gift study. Last Gift participants and NOK/loved ones were cautious about possible personal risks of EOL HIV cure research but still viewed that the emotional, psychological and societal benefits of participation outweighed potential risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Brittany Shelton
- Department of Public Health, College of Education, Health and Human Sciences, University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Samuel O. Ndukwe
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Susanna Concha-Garcia
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Cheryl Dullano
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Stephanie Solso
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Steven Hendrickx
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AntiViral Research Center Community Advisory Board, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AntiViral Research Center Community Advisory Board, San Diego, CA, USA
- HIV+Aging Research Project-Palm Springs (HARP-PS), Palm Springs, CA, USA
| | - Thomas J. Villa
- Reversing Immune Dysfunction (RID) Martin Delaney Collaboratory for HIV Cure Research Community Advisory Board, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Susan J. Little
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Patricia K. Riggs
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
| | - David Lessard
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center (MUCH), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Mentorship Chair in Innovative Clinical Trials, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Anish K. Arora
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Mentorship Chair in Innovative Clinical Trials, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Center for Outcome Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Cecilia T. Costiniuk
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Chronic Viral Illness Service, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center (MUCH), Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Infectious Diseases and Immunity in Global Health Program, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shadi Eskaf
- Public Health Research Consultant, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Davey M. Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sara Gianella
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, CA, USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shrestha R, Fisher C, Wickersham JA, Khati A, Kim R, Azwa I, Mistler C, Goldsamt L. Privacy and Confidentiality Concerns Related to the Use of mHealth Apps for HIV Prevention Efforts Among Malaysian Men Who Have Sex With Men: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e28311. [PMID: 34924355 PMCID: PMC8726055 DOI: 10.2196/28311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of mobile health (mHealth), including smartphone apps, can improve the HIV prevention cascade for key populations such as men who have sex with men (MSM). In Malaysia, where stigma and discrimination toward MSM are high, the mHealth platform has the potential to open new frontiers for HIV prevention efforts. However, little guidance is available to inform researchers about privacy and confidentiality concerns unique to the development and implementation of app-based HIV prevention programs. OBJECTIVE Given the lack of empirical data in this area, we aim to understand the privacy and confidentiality concerns associated with participation in a hypothetical app-based research study for HIV prevention efforts. METHODS A cross-sectional, web-based survey was conducted between June and July 2020 among 355 Malaysian MSM. The survey included demographic and sexual health questions and a series of short videos describing a hypothetical app-based HIV prevention program, followed by questions related to privacy and confidentiality concerns in each step of the app-based program (ie, recruitment, clinical interaction, risk assessment, and weekly reminder). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the correlates of willingness to use such an app-based program. RESULTS Most of the participants (266/355, 74.9%) indicated their willingness to participate in a hypothetical mHealth app-based HIV prevention program. Participants expressed concerns about privacy, confidentiality, data security, and risks and benefits of participating in all stages of the app-based HIV research process. Multivariate analyses indicated that participants who had a higher degree of perceived participation benefits (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.873; 95% CI 1.274-2.755; P=.001) were more willing to participate. In contrast, participants who had increased concerns about app-based clinical interaction and e-prescription (aOR 0.610; 95% CI 0.445-0.838; P=.002) and those who had a higher degree of perceived risks of participating (aOR 0.731; 95% CI 0.594-0.899; P=.003) were less willing to participate. CONCLUSIONS Overall, our results indicate that mHealth app-based HIV prevention programs are acceptable for future research on Malaysian MSM. The findings further highlighted the role of privacy and confidentiality, as well as the associated risks and benefits associated with participation in such a program. Given the ever-evolving nature of such technological platforms and the complex ethical-legal landscape, such platforms must be safe and secure to ensure widespread public trust and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roman Shrestha
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Celia Fisher
- Center for Ethics Education, Fordham University, New York, NY, United States
| | | | - Antoine Khati
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Rayne Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Iskandar Azwa
- Department of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Colleen Mistler
- Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States
| | - Lloyd Goldsamt
- Rory Meyers School of Nursing, New York University, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hsu DC, Mellors JW, Vasan S. Can Broadly Neutralizing HIV-1 Antibodies Help Achieve an ART-Free Remission? Front Immunol 2021; 12:710044. [PMID: 34322136 PMCID: PMC8311790 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.710044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Many broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) targeting the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein are being assessed in clinical trials as strategies for HIV-1 prevention, treatment, and antiretroviral-free remission. BnAbs can neutralize HIV-1 and target infected cells for elimination. Concerns about HIV-1 resistance to single bnAbs have led to studies of bnAb combinations with non-overlapping resistance profiles. This review focuses on the potential for bnAbs to induce HIV-1 remission, either alone or in combination with latency reversing agents, therapeutic vaccines or other novel therapeutics. Key topics include preliminary activity of bnAbs in preclinical models and in human studies of HIV-1 remission, clinical trial designs, and antibody design strategies to optimize pharmacokinetics, coverage of rebound-competent virus, and enhancement of cellular immune functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise C Hsu
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.,Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - John W Mellors
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Sandhya Vasan
- U.S. Military HIV Research Program, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, United States.,Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Analytical Treatment Interruption in HIV Trials: Statistical and Study Design Considerations. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2021; 18:475-482. [PMID: 34213731 PMCID: PMC8251690 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-021-00569-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Analytical treatment interruption (ATI) remains an essential component in clinical studies investigating novel agents or combination treatment strategies aiming to induce HIV treatment-free remission or long-term viral control. We provide an overview on key study design aspects of ATI trials from the perspective of statisticians. Recent Findings ATI trial designs have evolved towards shorter treatment interruption phases and more frequent viral load monitoring aiming to reduce prolonged viremia risks. Criteria for ART resumption have evolved as well. Common outcome measures in modern ATI trials include time to viral rebound, viral control, and viral set point. Summary Design of the ATI component in HIV clinical trials is driven by the scientific question and the mechanism of action of the intervention being investigated.
Collapse
|
12
|
Dubé K, Kanazawa J, Taylor J, Dee L, Jones N, Roebuck C, Sylla L, Louella M, Kosmyna J, Kelly D, Clanton O, Palm D, Campbell DM, Onaiwu MG, Patel H, Ndukwe S, Henley L, Johnson MO, Saberi P, Brown B, Sauceda JA, Sugarman J. Ethics of HIV cure research: an unfinished agenda. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:83. [PMID: 34193141 PMCID: PMC8243312 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00651-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The pursuit of a cure for HIV is a high priority for researchers, funding agencies, governments and people living with HIV (PLWH). To date, over 250 biomedical studies worldwide are or have been related to discovering a safe, effective, and scalable HIV cure, most of which are early translational research and experimental medicine. As HIV cure research increases, it is critical to identify and address the ethical challenges posed by this research. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of the growing HIV cure research ethics literature, focusing on articles published in English peer-reviewed journals from 2013 to 2021. We extracted and summarized key developments in the ethics of HIV cure research. Twelve community advocates actively engaged in HIV cure research provided input on this summary and suggested areas warranting further ethical inquiry and foresight via email exchange and video conferencing. DISCUSSION Despite substantial scholarship related to the ethics of HIV cure research, additional attention should focus on emerging issues in six categories of ethical issues: (1) social value (ongoing and emerging biomedical research and scalability considerations); (2) scientific validity (study design issues, such as the use of analytical treatment interruptions and placebos); (3) fair selection of participants (equity and justice considerations); (4) favorable benefit/risk balance (early phase research, benefit-risk balance, risk perception, psychological risks, and pediatric research); (5) informed consent (attention to language, decision-making, informed consent processes and scientific uncertainty); and (6) respect for enrolled participants and community (perspectives of people living with HIV and affected communities and representation). CONCLUSION HIV cure research ethics has an unfinished agenda. Scientific research and bioethics should work in tandem to advance ethical HIV cure research. Because the science of HIV cure research will continue to rapidly advance, ethical considerations of the major themes we identified will need to be revisited and refined over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7469 USA
| | - John Kanazawa
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7469 USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- HIV + Aging Research Project – Palm Springs (HARP–PS), Palm Springs, CA USA
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC) Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Diego, CA USA
- Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Nora Jones
- BEAT-HIV Collaboratory CAB, Philadelphia, PA USA
| | | | | | | | - Jan Kosmyna
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee (CSS) Ethics Working Group, Nationwide, USA
| | - David Kelly
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee (CSS) Ethics Working Group, Nationwide, USA
| | - Orbit Clanton
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group Global CAB, Washington, D.C. USA
| | - David Palm
- Collaboratory of AIDS Researchers for Eradication (CARE) CAB, Chapel Hill, NC USA
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases HIV Treatment and Prevention CAB, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC USA
| | - Danielle M. Campbell
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Francisco, CA USA
- Charles R. Drew College of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Morénike Giwa Onaiwu
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Subcommittee (CSS) Ethics Working Group, Nationwide, USA
- Center for the Study of Women, Gender, and Sexuality (School of Humanities), Rice University, Houston, TX USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7469 USA
| | - Samuel Ndukwe
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7469 USA
| | - Laney Henley
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, 4108 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7469 USA
| | - Mallory O. Johnson
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Parya Saberi
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Diepstra KL, Barr L, Palm D, Hogg E, Mollan KR, Henley L, Stover AM, Simoni JM, Sugarman J, Brown B, Sauceda JA, Deeks S, Fox L, Gandhi RT, Smith D, Li JZ, Dubé K. Participant Perspectives and Experiences Entering an Intensively Monitored Antiretroviral Pause: Results from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5345 Biomarker Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2021; 37:489-501. [PMID: 33472545 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2020.0222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) A5345 study included an intensively monitored antiretroviral pause (IMAP), during which a cohort of participants temporarily stopped antiretroviral treatment during chronic HIV infection. We surveyed participant perceptions and understanding of A5345 using a cross-sectional sociobehavioral questionnaire. Participants completed the baseline questionnaire either before or after initiating the study's IMAP. Questionnaire responses were linked to existing demographic data. Quantitative responses were analyzed overall and stratified by IMAP status. Open-ended responses were analyzed using conventional content analysis. Thirty-two participants completed the baseline sociobehavioral questionnaire. Half (n = 16) completed it before (i.e., pre-IMAP initiation group) and half (n = 16) after IMAP initiation (i.e., post-IMAP initiation group). Eight pre-IMAP initiation respondents (50%) and 11 post-IMAP respondents (69%) responded "yes" when asked if they perceived any direct benefits from participating in A5345. Perceived societal-level benefits included furthering HIV cure-related research and helping the HIV community. Perceived personal-level benefits included the opportunity to learn about the body's response to IMAP and financial compensation. The majority of respondents-13 from each group (81% of each)-reported risks from participation, for example, viral load becoming detectable. A5345 participants perceived both societal- and personal-level benefits of study participation. While the majority of survey respondents perceived participatory risks, nearly one in five did not. Key messages pertaining to study-related risks and benefits may need to be clarified or reiterated periodically throughout follow-up in HIV cure-related studies with IMAPs. Clinical Trail Registration Number: NCT03001128.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L. Diepstra
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Liz Barr
- AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - David Palm
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Evelyn Hogg
- Social & Scientific Systems, a DLH Company, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - Katie R. Mollan
- Center for AIDS Research (CFAR), School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Laney Henley
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Angela M. Stover
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jane M. Simoni
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Global Health and Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Steven Deeks
- Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases and Global Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Lawrence Fox
- National Institute of Health (NIH) Division of AIDS (DAIDS), Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Davey Smith
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Health, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jonathan Z. Li
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Henderson GE, Rennie S, Corneli A, Peay HL. Cohorts as collections of bodies and communities of persons: insights from the SEARCH010/RV254 research cohort. Int Health 2021; 12:584-590. [PMID: 33165552 PMCID: PMC7650957 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Longitudinal research cohorts are uniquely suited to answer research questions about morbidity and mortality. Cohorts may be comprised of individuals identified by specific conditions or other shared traits. We argue that research cohorts are more than simply aggregations of individuals and their associated data to meet research objectives. They are social communities comprised of members, investigators and organizations whose own interests, identities and cultures interact and evolve over time. The literature describes a range of scientific and ethical challenges and opportunities associated with cohorts. To advance these deliberations, we report examples from the literature and our own research on the Thai SEARCH010/RV254 cohort, comprising individuals diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during acute infection. We reflect on the impact of cohort experiences and identity, and specifically how people incorporate cohort participation into meaning making associated with their diagnosis, the influence of cohort participation on decision making for early-phase clinical trials recruited from within the cohort, and the impact of the relationships that exist between researchers and participants. These data support the concept of cohorts as communities of persons, where identity is shaped, in part, through cohort experiences. The social meanings associated with cohorts have implications for the ethics of cohort-based research, as social contexts inevitably affect the ways that ethical concerns manifest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail E Henderson
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 347A MacNider, 333 South Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA
| | - Stuart Rennie
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 347A MacNider, 333 South Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA
| | - Amy Corneli
- Departments of Population Health Sciences and Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701
| | - Holly L Peay
- RTI International, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Peay HL, Ormsby NQ, Henderson GE, Jupimai T, Rennie S, Siripassorn K, Kanchawee K, Isaacson S, Cadigan RJ, Kuczynski K, Likhitwonnawut U. Recommendations from Thai stakeholders about protecting HIV remission ('cure') trial participants: report from a participatory workshop. Int Health 2021; 12:567-574. [PMID: 33165551 PMCID: PMC7650909 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The social/behavioral HIV Decision-Making Study (DMS) assesses informed consent and trial experiences of individuals in HIV remission trials in Thailand. We convened a 1-d multi-stakeholder participatory workshop in Bangkok. We provide a meeting summary and reactions from DMS investigators. Methods Workshop members viewed de-identified interview excerpts from DMS participants. They deliberated on the findings and made recommendations regarding informed choice for remission trials. Notes and recordings were used to create a summary report, which was reviewed by members and refined. Results Workshop members’ recommendations included HIV education and psychosocial support to establish the basis for informed choice, key trial information to be provided in everyday language, supportive decision-making processes and psychosocial care during and after the trial. Concerns included participant willingness to restart antiretrovirals after trial-mandated treatment interruption, unintended influence of the research team on decision-making and seemingly altruistic motivations for trial participation that may signal attempts to atone for stigmatized behavior. Conclusions The workshop highlighted community perspectives and resulted in recommendations for supporting informed choice and psychosocial and physical health. These are the first such recommendations arising from a deliberative process. Although some elements are rooted in the Thai context, most are applicable across remission trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nuchanart Q Ormsby
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA
| | - Gail E Henderson
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA
| | - Thidarat Jupimai
- Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccines Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand
| | - Stuart Rennie
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Bioethics, USA
| | | | - Kunakorn Kanchawee
- Center of Excellence in Research on Gender, Sexuality and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Thailand
| | - Sinéad Isaacson
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Epidemiology, USA
| | - R Jean Cadigan
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA.,University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Center for Bioethics, USA
| | - Kriste Kuczynski
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Social Medicine, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
De Scheerder MA, van Bilsen WPH, Dullaers M, Martinez-Picado J, Davidovich U, Vandekerckhove L. Motivations, barriers and experiences of participants in an HIV reservoir trial. J Virus Erad 2021; 7:100029. [PMID: 33598311 PMCID: PMC7868726 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2021.100029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives We aimed to investigate the motives, barriers and experiences of HIV-STAR study participants. The HIV-STAR study was an analytical HIV treatment interruption trial (ATI) aiming to evaluate the origin of viral rebound, conducted in Ghent, Belgium. Methods A mixed-method study was performed among 11 participants of the HIV-STAR study. Two self-administered questionnaires with 32 and 23 items, respectively, assessed motives, barriers and experiences of the research participants. In-depth interviews were conducted to further explore and understand topics that had emerged from these surveys. Results Motives of ATI study participants were primarily related to the improvement of their own health perspectives and to their contribution to find an HIV cure. Barriers for ATI participation mostly related to practical issues, such as difficulty in planning study visits. Ten out of 11 participants reported a very high overall satisfaction and were willing to participate in another ATI. This satisfaction was predominantly linked to clear communication and guidance. Invasive sampling during the ATI was less of a burden than anticipated by participants. However, most participants underestimated the emotional impact of HIV treatment interruption, which was associated with feelings of uncertainty and loss of control. Risk of HIV transmission because of viral rebound was also mentioned as burdensome during this phase. Conclusions Involvement in an ATI was positively evaluated by HIV-STAR participants. Contributing to HIV cure research outweighed the burden of study participation for most participants. The latter aspects were attenuated by mutual decision making and the experience of empathy from the research team. Still, issues regarding privacy and the psychosocial impact of treatment interruption, including sexuality and HIV transmissibility, should be addressed in a better way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ward P H van Bilsen
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Javier Martinez-Picado
- IRSICaixa AIDS Research Institute, Badalona, Spain.,University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), Vic, Spain.,Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Udi Davidovich
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Linos Vandekerckhove
- Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dubé K, Patel H, Concha-Garcia S, Perry KE, Mathur K, Javadi SS, Taylor J, Kaytes A, Brown B, Sauceda JA, Little S, Hendrickx S, Rawlings SA, Smith DM, Gianella S. Perceptions of Next-of-Kin/Loved Ones About Last Gift Rapid Research Autopsy Study Enrolling People with HIV/AIDS at the End of Life: A Qualitative Interview Study. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2020; 36:1033-1046. [PMID: 32449624 PMCID: PMC7703245 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2020.0025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
A growing number of people living with HIV/AIDS are participating in HIV cure-related research at the end of life (EOL). Due to the novelty of EOL HIV cure-related research, there is a need to understand how their next-of-kin (NOK) perceive such research. We conducted in-depth interviews with NOK of the Last Gift study participants at the University of California, San Diego. The Last Gift study occurs in the context of the EOL and involves a full body donation. NOK completed two interviews: (1) shortly after the participants' enrollment in the study and (2) following death. We applied thematic analysis to analyze qualitative data. NOK included seven individuals (five males and two females), including two spouses, one ex-partner, one sister, a grandmother/grandfather, and a close friend. Thematic analysis revealed five key themes: (1) NOK viewed the Last Gift program in a positive light and had an accurate overall understanding of the study; (2) NOK identified factors that motivated participants to donate their body to science; (3) NOK identified benefits of the Last Gift program for both the donors and themselves; (4) NOK did not perceive any physical risks or decisional regrets of study but wanted to minimize psychosocial impacts and ensure the dignity of participants at all times; and (5) NOK noted elements that remained essential to the successful implementation of EOL HIV cure-related research, such as early involvement and clear communication. Our study uniquely contributes to increased understanding and knowledge of what is important from the point of view of supportive NOK to ensure successful implementation of EOL HIV cure-related research. More research will be needed to understand perspectives of less supportive NOK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Public Health Leadership Program, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- Public Health Leadership Program, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan Concha-Garcia
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Kelly E. Perry
- Public Health Leadership Program, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kushagra Mathur
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sogol Stephanie Javadi
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AntiViral Research Center Community Advisory Board, San Diego, California, USA
- HIV+Aging Research Project–Palm Springs (HARP-PS), Palm Springs, California, USA
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AntiViral Research Center Community Advisory Board, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, California, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Susan Little
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Steven Hendrickx
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Stephen A. Rawlings
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Davey M. Smith
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Sara Gianella
- AntiViral Research Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lau JSY, Smith MZ, Allan B, Martinez C, Power J, Lewin SR, McMahon JH. Acceptability, motivation and the prospect of cure for people living with HIV and their healthcare providers in HIV cure-focused treatment interruption studies. AIDS Res Ther 2020; 17:65. [PMID: 33168019 PMCID: PMC7653743 DOI: 10.1186/s12981-020-00321-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Analytical treatment interruptions (ATI) are commonly used clinical endpoints to assess interventions aimed at curing HIV or achieving antiretroviral therapy (ART)-free HIV remission. Understanding the acceptability of ATI amongst people living with HIV (PLHIV) and their HIV healthcare providers (HHP) is limited. Methods Two online surveys for PLHIV and HHP assessed awareness and acceptability of ATI, and understanding of the prospect for HIV cure in the future. Responses were collected from July 2017–January 2018. A descriptive analysis was performed and similar questions across the two surveys were compared using χ squared test. Results 442 PLHIV and 144 HHP completed the survey. 105/400 (26%) PLHIV had ever interrupted ART, 8% of which were in a clinical trial. Altruistic motivations were drivers of participation of PLHIV in cure related research. 81/135 (60%) HHP would support their patients wishing to enrol in an HIV cure-focused trial, but fewer would promote and allow such participation (25% and 31% respectively). Compared to HHP, PLHIV were more likely to believe that an HIV cure would be achievable within 10 years (55% vs. 19%, p < 0.001), had less awareness of ATI (46% vs. 62%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to have had experience of either participation or enrolment in an ATI study (5% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) Conclusion PLHIV were more optimistic about the potential for HIV cure. HHP had more direct experience with HIV cure-focused studies. Educational strategies are required for both groups to increase understanding around ATIs in HIV cure research but should be tailored specifically to each group.
Collapse
|
19
|
Lau JS, Smith MZ, Allan B, Dubé K, Young AT, Power J. Time for revolution? Enhancing meaningful involvement of people living with HIV and affected communities in HIV cure-focused science. J Virus Erad 2020; 6:100018. [PMID: 33251026 PMCID: PMC7646668 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2020.100018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Involving affected communities and people living with HIV (PLHIV) in HIV cure-focused clinical trials has ethical and practical benefits. However, there can be barriers to meaningful involvement of 'lay people' in scientific research meaning community consultation is often limited or tokenistic. This paper reports on an Australian project, the INSPIRE project (Improve, Nurture and Strengthen education, collaboration, and communication between PLHIV and Researchers), which aimed to explore barriers and enablers to enactment of the principles of meaningful involvement of PLHIV (MIPA) and affected communities in HIV cure-focused research. METHODS The project involved a workshop attended by 40 stakeholders involved in HIV care, research or advocacy including PLHIV, community organizations, basic scientists, and clinicians. The workshop involved a facilitated discussion about community involvement in a hypothetical HIV cure-focused clinical trial. Data were collected through notetaking and video recordings. Qualitative, thematic analysis was undertaken to organize the data and identify core themes related to MIPA. RESULTS Workshop discussions revealed community stakeholders often feel their involvement in HIV clinical research is undervalued, evidenced by limited financial remuneration and minimal capacity to influence the research design or processes. Building long-term, formal and informal relationships between community organizations, PLHIV, researchers and research teams or laboratories was identified as a strategy to support MIPA at all stages of a clinical trial, from design to dissemination of findings. CONCLUSIONS Enacting MIPA principles in HIV cure-focused research requires a better understanding of the potential to improve research outcomes and ensure quality in the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miranda Z. Smith
- Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brent Allan
- International Council of AIDS Service Organizations, Toronto, Canada
| | - Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - A. Toni Young
- District of Columbia Centre for AIDS Research, Community Education Group, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Jennifer Power
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dubé K, Perry KE, Mathur K, Lo M, Javadi SS, Patel H, Concha-Garcia S, Taylor J, Kaytes A, Dee L, Campbell D, Kanazawa J, Smith D, Gianella S, Auerbach JD, Saberi P, Sauceda JA. Altruism: Scoping review of the literature and future directions for HIV cure-related research. J Virus Erad 2020; 6:100008. [PMID: 33294210 PMCID: PMC7695811 DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2020.100008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The question of what motivates people to participate in research is particularly salient in the HIV field. While participation in HIV research was driven by survival in the 1980's and early 1990's, access to novel therapies became the primary motivator with the advent of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) in the late 1990s. In the HIV cure-related research context, the concept of altruism has remained insufficiently studied. METHODS We conducted a scoping review to better contextualize and understand how altruism is or could be operationalized in HIV cure-related research. We drew from the fields of altruism in general, clinical research, cancer, and HIV clinical research-including the HIV prevention, treatment, and cure-related research fields. DISCUSSION Altruism as a key motivating factor for participation in clinical research has often been intertwined with the desire for personal benefit. The cancer field informs us that reasons for participation usually are multi-faceted and complex. The HIV prevention field offers ways to organize altruism-either by the types of benefits achieved (e.g., societal versus personal), or the origin of the values that motivate research participation. The HIV treatment literature reveals the critical role of clinical interactions in fostering altruism. There remains a dearth of in-depth knowledge regarding reasons surrounding research participation and the types of altruism displayed in HIV cure-related clinical research. CONCLUSION Lessons learned from various research fields can guide questions which will inform the assessment of altruism in future HIV cure-related research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kelly E. Perry
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kushagra Mathur
- University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Megan Lo
- University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sogol S. Javadi
- University of California San Diego (UCSD) School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Hursch Patel
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Susanna Concha-Garcia
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), USA, San Diego, CA, USA
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- AVRC Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Diego, CA, USA
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
- HIV + Aging Research Project – Palm Springs (HARP – PS), Palm Springs, CA, USA
| | - Andy Kaytes
- AVRC Community Advisory Board (CAB), San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, CA, USA
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE), CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Danielle Campbell
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE), CAB, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Kanazawa
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - David Smith
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), USA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sara Gianella
- AntiViral Research Center (AVRC), USA, San Diego, CA, USA
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Judith D. Auerbach
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Parya Saberi
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - John A. Sauceda
- Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), Division of Prevention Sciences, UCSF, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Henderson GE, Rennie S, Corneli A, Meagher K, Cadigan RJ, Kroon E, Ananworanich J, Peay HL. Parallel but connected: Nuances of conducting behavioral and social science research alongside ethically challenging HIV remission trials. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2020; 19:100594. [PMID: 32617433 PMCID: PMC7322675 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Collaborations between clinical investigators and behavioral and social science researchers (BSSR) produce many benefits, but also may generate challenges and complexities. Ongoing relationships between teams may affect the research carried out by the BSSR team and the way they interpret their findings. Here we describe our experiences conducting the HIV Remission ('Cure') Trials Decision-Making Study (DMS), in Thailand; these trials include potentially risky interventions and interruption of standard antiretroviral treatment, with little personal benefit. The DMS is a longitudinal study of the experiences of individuals recruited to such early-phase trials, and conducted alongside these trials. It originated in clinical investigators' concerns about the ability of those recruited to make voluntary and informed decisions about scientifically complex studies, and is led by an independent group of BSSR and ethics researchers. In conducting this study, we experienced three overarching challenges to achieving a successful and dynamic collaboration: managing emerging findings as data were collected alongside clinical trial participation; evolving interconnectedness and shifting partnership boundaries among investigators; and the process of incorporating new research questions. By describing these challenges, we provide experiential evidence on how to manage multidimensional aspects of these collaborations. We describe how our research teams came together as well as the challenges and opportunities we experienced along the way. Our aim is to raise awareness of the scientific, practical, and ethical complexities of establishing and maintaining this kind of broad multidisciplinary collaboration over time. By describing our experiences, we hope to advance an agenda for others who undertake similar partnerships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail E. Henderson
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stuart Rennie
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Amy Corneli
- Departments of Population Health Sciences and Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Karen Meagher
- Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - R. Jean Cadigan
- Department of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Eugène Kroon
- The Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, 104 Rajdumri Road Krung Thep Maha Nakhon 10330 Krung Thep Maha Nakhon, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Jintanat Ananworanich
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, and Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Meibergdreef 9, 1105, AZ, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Protiere C, Fressard L, Mora M, Meyer L, Préau M, Suzan-Monti M, Lelièvre JD, Lambotte O, Spire B. Characterization of Physicians That Might Be Reluctant to Propose HIV Cure-Related Clinical Trials with Treatment Interruption to Their Patients? The ANRS-APSEC Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8020334. [PMID: 32585921 PMCID: PMC7350235 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
HIV cure-related clinical trials (HCRCT) with analytical antiretroviral treatment interruptions (ATIs) have become unavoidable. However, the limited benefits for participants and the risk of HIV transmission during ATI might negatively impact physicians’ motivations to propose HCRCT to patients. Between October 2016 and March 2017, 164 French HIV physicians were asked about their level of agreement with four viewpoints regarding HCRCT. A reluctance score was derived from their answers and factors associated with reluctance identified. Results showed the highest reluctance to propose HCRCT was among physicians with a less research-orientated professional activity, those not informing themselves about cure trials through scientific literature, and those who participated in trials because their department head asked them. Physicians’ perceptions of the impact of HIV on their patients’ lives were also associated with their motivation to propose HCRCT: those who considered that living with HIV means living with a secret were more motivated, while those worrying about the negative impact on person living with HIV’s professional lives were more reluctant. Our study highlighted the need to design a HCRCT that minimizes constraints for participants and for continuous training programs to help physicians keep up-to-date with recent advances in HIV cure research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christel Protiere
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, 13005 Marseille, France; (L.F.); (M.M.); (M.S.-M.); (B.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Lisa Fressard
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, 13005 Marseille, France; (L.F.); (M.M.); (M.S.-M.); (B.S.)
| | - Marion Mora
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, 13005 Marseille, France; (L.F.); (M.M.); (M.S.-M.); (B.S.)
| | - Laurence Meyer
- INSERM, U1018, Université Paris-Sud 11, AP-HP, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Département D’épidémiologie, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France;
| | - Marie Préau
- GRePS, Lyon 2 Université, 69676 Bron, France;
| | - Marie Suzan-Monti
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, 13005 Marseille, France; (L.F.); (M.M.); (M.S.-M.); (B.S.)
| | - Jean-Daniel Lelièvre
- INSERM, U955, Equipe 16, Université Paris Est, Faculté de médecine, Vaccine Research Institute, 94000 Créteil, France;
| | - Olivier Lambotte
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Médecine Interne et Immunologie Clinique, INSERM, U1184, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France;
- Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases, Université Paris Sud, UMR 1184, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- CEA, DSV/iMETI, IDMIT, 92260 Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Bruno Spire
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, 13005 Marseille, France; (L.F.); (M.M.); (M.S.-M.); (B.S.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pasipanodya EC, Kohli M, Fisher CB, Moore DJ, Curtis B. Perceived risks and amelioration of harm in research using mobile technology to support antiretroviral therapy adherence in the context of methamphetamine use: a focus group study among minorities living with HIV. Harm Reduct J 2020; 17:41. [PMID: 32527276 PMCID: PMC7288402 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-020-00384-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methamphetamine use poses a barrier to antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Black and Hispanic men who have sex with men living with HIV (PLWH) shoulder much of the health burden resulting from the methamphetamine and HIV syndemic. Smartphones are nearly ubiquitous in the USA and may be promising vehicles for delivering interventions for ART adherence and drug use cessation. However, the acceptability of using applications to collect sensitive information and deliver feedback in this population has not been adequately explored. OBJECTIVE This study examined minority PLWH's appraisals of the risks of participating in smartphone-based research to promote ART adherence in the context of methamphetamine use and explored their views on appropriate steps to mitigate perceived risks of participation. METHODS Three focus groups were conducted among Black and Hispanic PLWH who use methamphetamine. Of the 13 participants, 5 had previously participated in a smartphone-based observational study of ART adherence and substance use. Discussants provided feedback on smartphone-based research, including receiving probes for HIV medication adherence, mood, and substance use as well as feedback on passive location-tracking for personalized messages. Transcribed audio-recordings were thematically coded and analyzed using the qualitative software MAXQDA. RESULTS Participants expressed confidentiality concerns related to potential unintentional disclosure of their HIV status and methamphetamine use and to possible legal consequences. They additionally expressed concerns around the invasiveness of daily assessments and the potential of methamphetamine use questions to trigger cravings. To mitigate these concerns, they suggested maintaining participant privacy by indirectly asking sensitive questions, focusing on positive behaviors (e.g., number of days sober), allowing user-initiated reporting of location to tailor messages, and ensuring adequate data protections. In addition to financial compensation, participants cited altruism (specifically, continuing a tradition of volunteerism in HIV research) as a motivator for potentially engaging in such research. CONCLUSIONS Minority PLWH have concerns regarding the use of smartphones for ART adherence and methamphetamine sobriety intervention research. However, minority PLWH are likely to participate if studies include appropriate protections against risks to confidentiality and experimental harm and are designed to offer future benefit to themselves and other PLWH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maulika Kohli
- San Diego State University/University of California, San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, 92093, USA.,HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA
| | - Celia B Fisher
- Fordham University Center for Ethics Education, Fordham University, New York, NY, 10023, USA
| | - David J Moore
- HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program, University of California, San Diego, CA, 92103, USA.
| | - Brenda Curtis
- Technology and Translational Research Unit, National Institute of Drug and Alcohol Abuse Intramural, Baltimore, MD, 21224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Eyal N, Deeks SG. Risk to Nonparticipants in HIV Remission Studies With Treatment Interruption: A Symposium. J Infect Dis 2020; 220:S1-S4. [PMID: 31264687 PMCID: PMC6603969 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2019] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Ethical guidelines and recommendations for human subjects research typically focus on protecting the individuals who directly participate in that research. However, additional people, including sex partners of research participants, can also face harms and burdens from medical studies. In human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) cure–related research, a persistent ethical and practical challenge surrounds the use of analytical antiretroviral treatment interruptions. The challenge is usually discussed in relation to risks to study participants, but serious dangers accrue to nonparticipants, including sex partners of study participants. This multidisciplinary supplement relays the risks for nonparticipating sex partners in HIV cure–related studies and addresses the ethical dilemmas raised by these studies, with recommendations for researchers, advocates, sponsors, and oversight bodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Eyal
- Center for Population-Level Bioethics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Steven G Deeks
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dubé K, Dee L. Willingness to risk death endpoint in HIV cure-related research with otherwise healthy volunteers is misleading. J Virus Erad 2020; 6:81-84. [PMID: 32405426 PMCID: PMC7213068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This viewpoint article critiques two recent articles examining 'willingness to risk death' to advance HIV cure-related research. The 'willingness to risk death' endpoint sends the wrong signal to the HIV cure-related research community about ongoing research in otherwise healthy volunteers living with HIV. Socio-behavioural scientists have examined the acceptability of a 99% risk of death scenario, which is unrealistic and would not be acceptable by current regulatory and ethical standards. We believe that the field needs robust and relevant socio-behavioural research reflecting ongoing biomedical HIV cure-related trials. These studies will need to withstand regulatory and ethical scrutiny if cure or remission regimens are to proceed to the licensing stage. The HIV cure-related research community must continue to protect the public trust in the HIV cure-related research field and sustain societal value generated by such research. We call for the utmost prudence in designing biomedical HIV cure trials as well as in setting up socio-behavioural research experiments related to these complex trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- Public Health Leadership Program,
UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health,
Chapel Hill,
NC,
USA
| | - Lynda Dee
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise Community Advisory Board (CAB),
Baltimore,
MD,
USA
- amfAR Institute for HIV Cure Research CAB,
Baltimore,
MD,
USA
- AIDS Action Baltimore,
MD,
USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kratka A, Ubel PA, Scherr K, Murray B, Eyal N, Kirby C, Katz MN, Holtzman L, Pollak K, Freedburg K, Blumenthal-Barby J. HIV Cure Research: Risks Patients Expressed Willingness to Accept. Ethics Hum Res 2020; 41:23-34. [PMID: 31743627 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Despite doing well on antiretroviral therapy, many people living with HIV have expressed a willingness to accept substantial risks for an HIV cure. To date, few studies have assessed the specific quantitative maximal risk that future participants might take; probed whether, according to future participants, the risk can be offset by the benefits; and examined whether taking substantial risk is a reasonable decision. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 22 people living with HIV and used standard gamble methodology to assess the maximum chance of death a person would risk for an HIV cure. We probed participants' reasoning behind their risk-taking responses. Conventional inductive content analysis was used to categorize key themes regarding decision-making. We found that some people would be willing to risk even death for an HIV cure, and some of their reasons were plausible and went far beyond the health-related utility of an HIV cure. We contend that people's expressed willingness to take substantial risk for an HIV cure should not be dismissed out of hand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Kratka
- Internal medicine resident at Brigham and Women's Hospital
| | - Peter A Ubel
- Professor in the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University
| | | | | | - Nir Eyal
- Directs the Center for Population-Level Bioethics at Rutgers University
| | - Christine Kirby
- Program coordinator in the Center for Health Equity Research at Northern Arizona University
| | - Madelaine N Katz
- MPH candidate at the Gillings School of Global Public Health at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Lisa Holtzman
- Program manager in the Department of Global Health and Population at the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health
| | - Kathryn Pollak
- Professor in Population Health Sciences and is the associate director of population sciences in the Duke Cancer Institute at Duke University
| | - Kenneth Freedburg
- Director of the Medical Practice Evaluation Center and is a professor of medicine in the Divisions of General Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
| | - Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby
- Associate director and Cullen associate professor in the Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy at Baylor College of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Dubé K, Hosey L, Starr K, Barr L, Evans D, Hoffman E, Campbell DM, Simoni J, Sugarman J, Sauceda J, Brown B, Diepstra KL, Godfrey C, Kuritzkes DR, Wohl DA, Gandhi R, Scully E. Participant Perspectives in an HIV Cure-Related Trial Conducted Exclusively in Women in the United States: Results from AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5366. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 2020; 36:268-282. [PMID: 32160755 DOI: 10.1089/aid.2019.0284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Women remain underrepresented in HIV research. The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) 5366 study was the first HIV cure-related trial conducted exclusively in women. Our multidisciplinary team integrated participant-centered reports into the ACTG 5366 protocol to elicit their perspectives. We nested mixed-methods surveys at the enrollment and final study visits to assess ACTG 5366 participants' perceptions and experiences. Of 31 participants enrolled in the ACTG 5366, 29 study agreed to complete the entry questionnaire and 27 completed the exit survey. The majority of study participants were nonwhite. We identified societal and personal motivators for participation, understanding of risks and benefits, and minor misconceptions among some trial participants. Stigma was pervasive for several women who joined the study, and served as a motivator for study participation. Reimbursements to defray costs of study participation were reported to facilitate involvement in the trial by about one-third of participants. Almost all respondents reported positive experiences participating in the ACTG 5366 trial. The ACTG 5366 study showed that it is possible to recruit and retain women in HIV cure-related research and to embed participant-centered outcomes at strategic time points during the study. The findings could help in the design, implementation, recruitment, and retention of women in HIV cure-related research and highlight the value of assessing psychosocial factors in HIV cure-related research participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Lara Hosey
- Social and Scientific Systems (S-3), Silver Spring, Maryland
| | - Kate Starr
- ACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Columbus, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Liz Barr
- ACTG Community Scientific Sub-Committee, Columbus, Ohio and Baltimore, Maryland
- Department of Gender, Women's and Sexuality Studies, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, Maryland
| | - David Evans
- Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise (DARE) Community Advisory Board (CAB), New York City, New York
| | - Erin Hoffman
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | | | - Jane Simoni
- Department of Global Health and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
- Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - John Sauceda
- Division of Prevention Sciences, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies (CAPS), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Brandon Brown
- Department of Social Medicine, Population and Public Health, Center for Healthy Communities, University of California, Riverside School of Medicine, Riverside, California
| | - Karen L. Diepstra
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Catherine Godfrey
- HIV Research Branch, National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - David A. Wohl
- Institute of Global Health and Infectious Diseases (IGHID), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Rajesh Gandhi
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Eileen Scully
- John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Power J, Dowsett GW, Westle A, Tucker JD, Hill S, Sugarman J, Lewin SR, Brown G, Lucke J. The significance and expectations of HIV cure research among people living with HIV in Australia. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229733. [PMID: 32130262 PMCID: PMC7055878 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Most people living with HIV (PLHIV) with reliable access to antiretroviral treatment (ART) have a life expectancy similar to uninfected populations. Despite this, HIV can negatively affect their social and psychological wellbeing. This study aimed to enhance understanding of the expectations PLHIV hold for HIV cure research and the implications this has for HIV cure research trials. We interviewed 20 Australian PLHIV about their expectations for HIV cure research outcomes and the impact a potential cure for HIV may have on their everyday lives. Data were analysed thematically, using both inductive and deductive approaches. The significance of a cure for HIV was expressed by participants as something that would offer relief from their sense of vigilance or uncertainty about their health into the future. A cure was also defined in social terms, as alleviation from worry about potential for onward HIV transmission, concerns for friends and family, and the negative impact of HIV-related stigma. Participants did not consider sustained medication-free viral suppression (or remission) as a cure for HIV because this did not offer certainty in remaining virus free in a way that would alleviate these fears and concerns. A cure was seen as complete elimination of HIV from the body. There is an ethical need to consider the expectations of PLHIV in design of, and recruitment for, HIV cure-related research. The language used to describe HIV cure research should differentiate the long-term aspiration of achieving complete elimination of HIV from the body and possible shorter-term therapeutic advances, such as achieving medication free viral suppression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Power
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gary W. Dowsett
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Andrew Westle
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Joseph D. Tucker
- Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Sharon R. Lewin
- The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Graham Brown
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Research in Health, UNSW Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jayne Lucke
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Steel R. Reconceptualising risk-benefit analyses: the case of HIV cure research. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2020; 46:212-219. [PMID: 31732681 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Modern antiretroviral therapies (ART) are capable of suppressing HIV in the bloodstream to undetectable levels. Nonetheless, people living with HIV must maintain lifelong adherence to ART to avoid the re-emergence of the infection. So despite the existence and efficacy of ART, there is still substantial interest in development of a cure. But HIV cure trials can be risky, their success is as of yet unlikely, and the medical gain of being cured is limited against a baseline of ART access. The medical prospect associated with participation in cure research thus look poor. Are the risks and burdens that HIV cure research places on participants so high that it is unethical, at present, to conduct it? In this paper, I answer 'no'. I start my argument by describing a foundational way of thinking about the ethical justification for regulatory limits on research risk; I then apply this way of thinking to HIV cure trials. In offering this analysis, I confine my attention to studies enrolling competent adults and I also do not consider risks research may pose to third parties or society. Rather, my concern is to engage with the thought that some trials are so risky that performing them is an ethically unacceptable way to treat the participants themselves. I reject this thought and instead argue that there is no level of risk, no matter how high, that inherently mistreats a participant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Steel
- Clinical Center Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
HIV infection can be effectively treated by lifelong administration of combination antiretroviral therapy, but an effective vaccine will likely be required to end the HIV epidemic. Although the majority of current vaccine strategies focus on the induction of neutralizing antibodies, there is substantial evidence that cellular immunity mediated by CD8+ T cells can sustain long-term disease-free and transmission-free HIV control and may be harnessed to induce both therapeutic and preventive antiviral effects. In this Review, we discuss the increasing evidence derived from individuals who spontaneously control infection without antiretroviral therapy as well as preclinical immunization studies that provide a clear rationale for renewed efforts to develop a CD8+ T cell-based HIV vaccine in conjunction with B cell vaccine efforts. Further, we outline the remaining challenges in translating these findings into viable HIV prevention, treatment and cure strategies. Recently, antibody-mediated control of HIV infection has received considerable attention. Here, the authors discuss the importance of CD8+ T cells in HIV infection and suggest that efforts to develop vaccines that target these cells in conjunction with B cells should be renewed.
Collapse
|
31
|
Elliott T, Sanders EJ, Doherty M, Ndung'u T, Cohen M, Patel P, Cairns G, Rutstein SE, Ananworanich J, Brown C, Fidler S. Challenges of HIV diagnosis and management in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), test and start and acute HIV infection: a scoping review. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22:e25419. [PMID: 31850686 PMCID: PMC6918508 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Knowledge of HIV status relies on accurate HIV testing, and is the first step towards access to HIV treatment and prevention programmes. Globally, HIV-status unawareness represents a significant challenge for achieving zero new HIV infections and deaths. In order to enhance knowledge of HIV status, the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends a testing strategy that includes the use of HIV-specific antibody point-of-care tests (POCT). These POCTs do not detect acute HIV infection, the stage of disease when viral load is highest but HIV antibodies are undetectable. Complicating things further, in the presence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), other currently available testing technologies, such as viral load detection for diagnosis of acute HIV infection, may yield false-negative results. In this scoping review, we evaluate the evidence and discuss alternative HIV testing algorithms that may mitigate diagnostic dilemmas in the setting of increased utilization of ART for immediate treatment and prevention of HIV infection. DISCUSSION Missed acute HIV infection prevents people living with HIV (PLHIV) from accessing early treatment, increases likelihood of onward transmission, and allows for inappropriate initiation or continuation of PrEP, which may result in HIV drug resistance. While immediate ART is recommended for all PLHIV, studies have shown that starting ART in the setting of acute HIV infection may result in a delayed or complete absence of development of HIV-specific antibodies, posing a diagnostic challenge that is particularly pertinent to resource-limited, high HIV burden settings where HIV-antibody POCTs are standard of care. Similarly, ART used as PrEP or PEP may supress HIV RNA viral load, complicating current HIV testing algorithms in resource-wealthy settings where viral detection is included. As rollout of PrEP continues, HIV testing algorithms may need to be modified. CONCLUSIONS With increasing use of PrEP and ART in acute infection we anticipate diagnostic challenges using currently available HIV testing strategies. Research and surveillance are needed to determine the most appropriate assays and optimal testing algorithms that are accurate, affordable and sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Elliott
- Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Eduard J Sanders
- Kenya Medical Research Institute‐Wellcome Trust Research ProgrammeKilifiKenya
- Nuffield Department of MedicineUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Meg Doherty
- Department of HIV and Global Hepatitis ProgrammeWHOGenevaSwitzerland
| | - Thumbi Ndung'u
- Africa Health Research InstituteDurbanSouth Africa
- HIV Pathogenesis ProgrammeDoris Duke Medical Research InstituteUniversity of KwaZulu‐NatalDurbanSouth Africa
- The Ragon Institute of Massachusetts General HospitalMassachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard UniversityCambridgeMAUSA
- Max Planck Institute for Infection BiologyBerlinGermany
| | - Myron Cohen
- Department of Internal MedicineDivision of Infectious DiseasesUNC School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina At Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Pragna Patel
- Division of Global HIV and TBCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaGAUSA
| | - Gus Cairns
- NAM AidsmapLondonUnited Kingdom
- PrEP in Europe InitiativeLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Sarah E Rutstein
- Department of Internal MedicineDivision of Infectious DiseasesUNC School of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina At Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Jintanat Ananworanich
- U.S. Military HIV Research ProgramWalter Reed Army Institute of ResearchSilver SpringMDUSA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Colin Brown
- National Infection Service, Public Health EnglandLondonUnited Kingdom
- Department of InfectionRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Sarah Fidler
- Imperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
- Imperial College NIHR BRCLondonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rennie S, Day S, Mathews A, Gilbertson A, Luseno WK, Tucker JD, Henderson GE. The Role of Inclusion Benefits in Ethics Committee Assessment of Research Studies. Ethics Hum Res 2019; 41:13-22. [PMID: 31108576 DOI: 10.1002/eahr.500015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The relationship between risks and benefits is central to the ethics of research involving human participants. Traditionally, to be ethically justifiable, risks should be reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits (if any) to subjects and to the potential social benefits resulting from research. This calculus is being further complicated by findings from an increasing number of social science studies that reveal that prospective and actual research participants frequently describe various types of inclusion benefits (for example, personal benefits such as access to or improved health care, increased knowledge about their disease or condition, and greater solidarity with the local community) as important to them. What is the ethical significance of such inclusion benefits, particularly those nonmedical in nature, for research ethics committees' risk-benefit assessment of research studies? We argue that, unless participants are clearly mistaken in their perceptions, ethics committees should take these types of inclusion benefits into account, and we suggest a few ways this might look in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Rennie
- Associate professor in the Department of Social Medicine and the Center for Bioethics at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Suzanne Day
- Postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Social Medicine and the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Allison Mathews
- Postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Social Medicine and Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Adam Gilbertson
- Postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Social Medicine and the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and an associate research scientist at Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
| | - Winfred K Luseno
- Research scientist at the Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation
| | - Joseph D Tucker
- Associate professor at the Institute for Global Health and Infectious Diseases at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Gail E Henderson
- Professor in the Department of Social Medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dubé K, Auerbach JD, Stirratt MJ, Gaist P. Applying the Behavioural and Social Sciences Research (BSSR) Functional Framework to HIV Cure Research. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22:e25404. [PMID: 31665568 PMCID: PMC6820877 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The search for an HIV cure involves important behavioural and social processes that complement the domains of biomedicine. However, the field has yet to tap into the full potential of behavioural and social sciences research (BSSR). In this article, we apply Gaist and Stirratt's BSSR Functional Framework to the field of HIV cure research. DISCUSSION The BSSR Functional Framework describes four key research domains: (1) basic BSSR (understanding basic behavioural and social factors), (2) elemental BSSR (advancing behavioural and social interventions), (3) supportive BSSR (strengthening biomedically focused clinical trials), and (4) integrative BSSR (building multi-disciplinary combination approaches for real-world implementation). In revisiting and applying the BSSR Functional Framework, we clarify the importance of BSSR in HIV cure research by drawing attention to such things as: how language and communication affect the meaning of "cure" to people living with HIV (PLHIV) and broader communities; how cure affects the identity and social position of PLHIV; counselling and support interventions to address the psychosocial needs and concerns of study participants related to analytical treatment interruptions (ATIs); risk reduction in the course of ATI study participation; motivation, acceptability, and decision-making processes of potential study participants related to different cure strategies; HIV care providers' perceptions and attitudes about their patients' participation in cure research; potential social harms or adverse social events associated with cure research participation; and the scalability of a proven cure strategy in the context of further advances in HIV prevention and treatment. We also discuss the BSSR Functional Framework in the context of ATIs, which involve processes at the confluence of the BSSR domains. CONCLUSIONS To move HIV cure regimens through the translational research pathway, attention will need to be paid to both biomedical and socio-behavioural elements. BSSR can contribute an improved understanding of the human and social dimensions related to HIV cure research and the eventual application of HIV cure regimens. The BSSR Functional Framework provides a way to identify advances, gaps and opportunities to craft an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach at all stages of cure research to ensure the real-world applicability of any strategy that shows promise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karine Dubé
- UNC Gillings School of Global Public HealthUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Judith D Auerbach
- School of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCAUSA
| | - Michael J Stirratt
- Division of AIDS Research (DAR)National Institute of Mental HealthNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| | - Paul Gaist
- Office of AIDS ResearchDivision of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic InitiativesOffice of the DirectorNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMDUSA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Fiorentino M, Protière C, Sagaon-Teyssier L, Mimi M, Fressard L, Arnold MP, Lambotte O, Barbot J, Fainzang S, Meyer L, Goujard C, Préau M, Spire B, Suzan-Monti M. What is the effect of self-identified HIV activism in willingness to participate in HIV cure-related clinical trials? Results from the ANRS-APSEC study. J Virus Erad 2019; 5:152-162. [PMID: 31700661 PMCID: PMC6816119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Enrolling people living with HIV with undetectable viral load into HIV cure-related clinical trials (HCRCT) is challenging. Few data are currently available about the individual factors that influence willingness to participate in HCRCT (WPHCRCT). We hypothesised that WPHCRCT would be more frequent among people living with HIV considering themselves HIV activists. The objective of this study was to investigate the individual characteristics associated with both WPHCRCT and self-identification as an HIV activist. METHODS The study enrolled 195 long-term ART-treated and virologically suppressed people living with HIV, followed-up in 19 French HIV services, 2016-2017. A Bayesian model averaging approach was used to assess correlates of both outcomes i.e. WPHCRCT and self-identified HIV activism. RESULTS WPHCRCT was reported by 43% of participants and was positively associated with self-identification as an HIV activist (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.90 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-3.63], P<0.05) and self-confidence as an HIV positive person (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.99-1.35, P<0.1). Self-identified HIV activists (56% of participants) were more likely to have a higher 'relationship with others' score using the post-traumatic growth inventory (aOR 1.10, 95% CI 0.99-1.20, P<0.1), to obtain information about HIV from a greater number of sources (aOR 1.35 [95% CI 1.00-1.68], P<0.1), and to feel greatly affected by mandatory daily treatment (aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.27-3.03, P<0.1). All associations had relative importance weight>0.75, indicating strong evidence. CONCLUSIONS WPHCRCT is strongly related to HIV activism, and also to positive psychosocial characteristics as a person living with HIV, especially regarding relationships with others. The desire to contribute to the fight against HIV for the sake of the HIV community and society should be taken into account to improve participation in upcoming HCRCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Fiorentino
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France,Corresponding author: Marion Fiorentino,
SESSTIM Faculté de médecine,
27 bd Jean Moulin,
13005Marseille,
France
| | - Christel Protière
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France
| | - Luis Sagaon-Teyssier
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France
| | - Mohamed Mimi
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France
| | - Lisa Fressard
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France
| | | | - Olivier Lambotte
- INSERM, U1184, Université Paris-Sud , Hôpital de Bicêtre, Service de Médecine Interne,
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre,
France
| | - Janine Barbot
- INSERM, Centre d’étude des mouvements sociaux,
Paris,
France
| | - Sylvie Fainzang
- Centre for Research in Medicine, Science, Health, Mental Health, and Society,
Villejuif,
France
| | - Laurence Meyer
- INSERM, U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Department of Epidemiology,
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre,
France
| | - Cécile Goujard
- INSERM, U1018, Université Paris-Sud, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Department of Epidemiology,
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre,
France
| | | | - Bruno Spire
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France
| | - Marie Suzan-Monti
- Aix Marseille University, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Economic and Social Health Sciences and Medical Information Processing,
Marseille,
France,Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur,
Marseille,
France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Turriff A, Blain D, Similuk M, Biesecker B, Wiley H, Cukras C, Sieving PA. Motivations and Decision Making Processes of Men With X-linked Retinoschisis Considering Participation in an Ocular Gene Therapy Trial. Am J Ophthalmol 2019; 204:90-96. [PMID: 30885710 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2019.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the motivations, expectations, and other factors men with X-linked retinoschisis (XLRS) consider when making decisions to participate in an early phase ocular gene therapy clinical trial. DESIGN Qualitative interview study. METHODS Men with XLRS who were considering participation in a phase I/IIa ocular gene therapy clinical trial at the National Eye Institute were eligible for this study. Trial participants (n = 9) were interviewed prior to receiving the gene transfer and then at 3 and 12 months later. Trial participation decliners (n = 2) were interviewed at an initial visit and 12 months later. Those screened for the trial and found ineligible (n = 2) were interviewed at an initial visit only. Interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed thematically. RESULTS Interview participants described decision making factors as risk-benefit assessments, personal intuition, trust in the study team, and religious faith. Altruism and the potential for therapeutic benefit were the main motives for trial participation, whereas the uncertainty of risks and benefits was the reason 2 men declined participation. Although most participants hoped for direct benefit, no one expected to benefit. Almost all interview participants considered their decision straightforward and were satisfied with their decision when interviewed over time. Meaningful relationships with the study team and perceived secondary benefits to participation contributed to positive trial experiences. CONCLUSIONS Engaging prospective research participants in a discussion about their hopes, expectations, and personal factors provides a more complete understanding of patient decision making and may help support informed choices to participate in clinical trials for XLRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Turriff
- Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | - Delphine Blain
- Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Morgan Similuk
- Laboratory of Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Barbara Biesecker
- Social and Behavioral Research Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Henry Wiley
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine Cukras
- Division of Epidemiology and Clinical Applications, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Paul A Sieving
- National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has enabled tremendous progress in suppressing HIV replication in infected patients. However, ART alone cannot eradicate HIV and its latent, persisting reservoirs. Novel approaches are needed to eradicate the virus or achieve functional cure in the absence of ART. RECENT FINDINGS Adoptive T-cell therapies were initially tested in HIV-infected individuals with limited efficiency. Benefiting from new and improved methodologies, an increasing array of CAR T-cell therapies has been successfully developed in the cancer immunotherapy field, demonstrating promising new avenues that could be applied to HIV. Numerous studies have characterized various HIV-specific CAR constructs, types of cytolytic effector cells, and CAR-expressing cells' trafficking to the reservoir compartments, warranting further in-vivo efforts. Notably, the ability of CAR cells to persist and function in low-antigen environments in vivo, that is, in ART-suppressed patients, remains unclear. SUMMARY Despite promising results in preclinical studies, only a handful of clinical trials have been initiated worldwide. Several obstacles remain prior to successful application of HIV-specific CAR T-cell therapies in patients. In this review, we survey the current state of the field, and address paths towards realizing the goal of an efficacious HIV CAR T-cell product.
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Purpose of review Several promising experimental pathways exist for long-term control of HIV in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (HIV ‘remission’) and are now being tested in early clinical studies. These studies can be invasive and pose a host of distinctive risks to participants, as well as to nonparticipants, especially to participants’ fetuses, and sexual partners. Recent findings Ethical analyses of these studies have mainly focused on the risks to study participants. They recommend, and some investigators implement, procedures to mitigate risks for participants or to offset them with direct, indirect, and nonmedical benefits. They also suggest ways to keep participants’ consent highly voluntary and informed. Rarely do ethicists propose keeping the social value of studies high. Of these recommended responses, only the latter, rarer proposals help address the risk to nonparticipants, as would some novel ways to address that risk. Summary HIV remission studies pose a number of ethical dilemmas. Many current investigative approaches put the participant at significant risk, but well established guidelines exist for mitigating this risk. Ethical issues that are not being fully addressed include risk to nonparticipants and the need to consider the societal value of studies, for example, their prospective impact on the global HIV burden. Video abstract
Collapse
|
38
|
Julg B, Dee L, Ananworanich J, Barouch DH, Bar K, Caskey M, Colby DJ, Dawson L, Dong KL, Dubé K, Eron J, Frater J, Gandhi RT, Geleziunas R, Goulder P, Hanna GJ, Jefferys R, Johnston R, Kuritzkes D, Li JZ, Likhitwonnawut U, van Lunzen J, Martinez-Picado J, Miller V, Montaner LJ, Nixon DF, Palm D, Pantaleo G, Peay H, Persaud D, Salzwedel J, Salzwedel K, Schacker T, Sheikh V, Søgaard OS, Spudich S, Stephenson K, Sugarman J, Taylor J, Tebas P, Tiemessen CT, Tressler R, Weiss CD, Zheng L, Robb ML, Michael NL, Mellors JW, Deeks SG, Walker BD. Recommendations for analytical antiretroviral treatment interruptions in HIV research trials-report of a consensus meeting. Lancet HIV 2019; 6:e259-e268. [PMID: 30885693 PMCID: PMC6688772 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3018(19)30052-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 143] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2018] [Revised: 01/11/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
Analytical antiretroviral treatment interruption (ATI) is an important feature of HIV research, seeking to achieve sustained viral suppression in the absence of antiretroviral therapy (ART) when the goal is to measure effects of novel therapeutic interventions on time to viral load rebound or altered viral setpoint. Trials with ATIs also intend to determine host, virological, and immunological markers that are predictive of sustained viral control off ART. Although ATI is increasingly incorporated into proof-of-concept trials, no consensus has been reached on strategies to maximise its utility and minimise its risks. In addition, differences in ATI trial designs hinder the ability to compare efficacy and safety of interventions across trials. Therefore, we held a meeting of stakeholders from many interest groups, including scientists, clinicians, ethicists, social scientists, regulators, people living with HIV, and advocacy groups, to discuss the main challenges concerning ATI studies and to formulate recommendations with an emphasis on strategies for risk mitigation and monitoring, ART resumption criteria, and ethical considerations. In this Review, we present the major points of discussion and consensus views achieved with the goal of informing the conduct of ATIs to maximise the knowledge gained and minimise the risk to participants in clinical HIV research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Julg
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Infectious Disease Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Lynda Dee
- AIDS Action Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Dan H Barouch
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Katharine Bar
- Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA, USA
| | - Marina Caskey
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunology, Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Donn J Colby
- Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Center, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Liza Dawson
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fishers ln Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Krista L Dong
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Karine Dubé
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joseph Eron
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John Frater
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Rajesh T Gandhi
- Infectious Disease Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Philip Goulder
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | - Daniel Kuritzkes
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan Z Li
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Javier Martinez-Picado
- AIDS Research Institute IrsiCaixa, Barcelona, Spain; Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies, Barcelona, Spain; University of Vic-Central University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Luis J Montaner
- The Montaner Laboratory, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Douglas F Nixon
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, NY, USA
| | - David Palm
- Global HIV Prevention, and Treatment Clinical Trials Unit, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Giuseppe Pantaleo
- Service Immunology and Allergy, and Swiss Vaccine Research Institute, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Holly Peay
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Deborah Persaud
- Pediatrics Infectious Disease, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Karl Salzwedel
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fishers ln Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Timothy Schacker
- Division of Infectious Disease and International Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Virginia Sheikh
- Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Ole S Søgaard
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Serena Spudich
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Kathryn Stephenson
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jeff Taylor
- Collaboratory for AIDS Researchers for Eradication, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Pablo Tebas
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Caroline T Tiemessen
- Cell Biology Research Laboratory, Centre for HIV and STIs, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, Johannesburg, South Africa; Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Randall Tressler
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Fishers ln Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Carol D Weiss
- Division of Antiviral Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Lu Zheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Merlin L Robb
- US Military HIV Research Program, Henry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nelson L Michael
- US Military HIV Research Program, Henry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John W Mellors
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Steven G Deeks
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bruce D Walker
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Henderson GE, Waltz M, Meagher K, Cadigan RJ, Jupimai T, Isaacson S, Ormsby NQ, Colby DJ, Kroon E, Phanuphak N, Ananworanich J, Peay HL. Going off antiretroviral treatment in a closely monitored HIV "cure" trial: longitudinal assessments of acutely diagnosed trial participants and decliners. J Int AIDS Soc 2019; 22:e25260. [PMID: 30869203 PMCID: PMC6416664 DOI: 10.1002/jia2.25260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The South East Asia Research Collaboration in HIV (SEARCH) RV411 clinical trial in Thailand was a systematic investigation of analytic treatment interruption (ATI) in individuals diagnosed and treated since Fiebig stage I acute HIV infection. Here, we explore decision-making processes and perceptions of trial participation in a phase I trial that raised important ethical considerations, to identify potential areas of improvement in this relatively new field of HIV research. Similar considerations apply to other HIV phase I trials, especially those involving ATI, making this trial a model to identify challenges and opportunities in promoting informed choice. METHODS Using longitudinal semi-structured interviews and a validated questionnaire, we examined how decisions to join or decline the trial were made, whether there was evidence of decisional conflict, and reactions to the trial outcomes. We also explored contrasting views and experiences in this small trial cohort. We report analyses of data from these questionnaires and interviews, conducted from February through December of 2016 with the 14 SEARCH cohort participants who either joined (n = 8) or declined (n = 6) participation in RV411. RESULTS The eight participants and six decliners had low overall decisional conflict, which remained low over time. Decision making was more difficult for decliners than participants, at least initially. While all interviewees described being satisfied with their decisions, our study identified important negative consequences for a few individuals, including seroconversion, negative experiences with optional procedures and disappointment due to rapid viral rebound. CONCLUSIONS Although our results reflect the experiences of a small group invited to join this trial, our overall finding of low decisional conflict even while some individuals reported negative experiences provides lessons for clinical trial investigators. We developed points-to-consider in helping participants make informed choices, to support participants during the trial and to support decliners in their decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gail E Henderson
- Social MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Margaret Waltz
- Social MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Karen Meagher
- Biomedical Ethics Research ProgramMayo ClinicRochesterMNUSA
| | - R Jean Cadigan
- Social MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Thidarat Jupimai
- Center of Excellence in Pediatric Infectious Diseases and VaccinesChulalongkorn UniversityBangkokThailand
| | - Sinéad Isaacson
- Social MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Nuchanart Q Ormsby
- Social MedicineUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillNCUSA
| | - Donn J Colby
- SEARCH, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research CentreBangkokThailand
| | - Eugène Kroon
- SEARCH, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research CentreBangkokThailand
| | | | - Jintanat Ananworanich
- SEARCH, Thai Red Cross AIDS Research CentreBangkokThailand
- U.S. Military HIV Research ProgramWalter Reed Army Institute of ResearchSilver SpringMDUSA
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military MedicineBethesdaMDUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Power J, Westle A, Dowsett GW, Lucke J, Tucker JD, Sugarman J, Lewin SR, Hill S, Brown G, Wallace J, Richmond J. Perceptions of HIV cure research among people living with HIV in Australia. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202647. [PMID: 30142171 PMCID: PMC6108463 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2017] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Participation in HIV cure-related clinical trials that involve antiretroviral treatment (ART) interruption may pose substantial individual risks for people living with HIV (PLHIV) without any therapeutic benefit. As such, it is important that the views of PLHIV are considered in the design of HIV cure research trials. Examining the lived experience of PLHIV provides unique and valuable perspectives on the risks and benefits of HIV cure research. In this study, we interviewed 20 PLHIV in Australia about their knowledge and attitudes toward clinical HIV cure research and explored their views regarding participation in HIV cure clinical trials, including those that involve ART interruption. Data were analysed thematically, using both inductive and deductive coding techniques, to identity themes related to perceptions of HIV cure research and PLHIV's assessment of the possible risks and benefits of trial participation. Study findings revealed interviewees were willing to consider participation in HIV cure research for social reasons, most notably the opportunity to help others. Concerns raised about ART interruption related to the social and emotional impact of viral rebound, including fear of onward HIV transmission and anxiety about losing control. These findings reveal the ways in which PLHIV perspectives deepen our understanding of HIV cure research, moving beyond a purely clinical assessment of risks and benefits in order to consider the social context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Power
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Andrew Westle
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Gary W. Dowsett
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jayne Lucke
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joseph D. Tucker
- UNC Project-China, University of North Carolina, Guangzhou, China
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jeremy Sugarman
- Berman Institute of Bioethics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Sharon R. Lewin
- The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, University of Melbourne and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sophie Hill
- Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Graham Brown
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Centre for Social Research in Health, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jack Wallace
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Jacqui Richmond
- Australian Research Centre in Sex, Health and Society, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eyal N. What can the lived experience of participating in risky HIV cure-related studies establish? JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2018; 44:277-278. [PMID: 29321219 PMCID: PMC6093613 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/04/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
This response to Gail Henderson et al argues that they were right that interviewees' appraisals of cure study participation should inform (future) protocol review decisions, but wrong to take these appraisals at face value.
Collapse
|
42
|
Preau M, Doumergue M, Protiere C, Goujard C, Mora M, Meyer L, Lelievre JD, Raffi F, Spire B, Lambotte O, Suzan-Monti M. Acceptability of HIV cure-related trials: the challenges for physicians and people living with HIV (ANRS-APSEC). AIDS Care 2018; 30:914-920. [PMID: 29347826 DOI: 10.1080/09540121.2018.1426825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Essential HIV cure-related clinical trials (HCRCT) have a potentially high-risk profile in terms of participants' health, which could hinder enrollment by people living with HIV (PLWH) and healthcare professionals (HP). The ANRS-APSEC survey is part of the IAS "Towards an HIV cure" initiative, which promotes multidisciplinary research for a safe, affordable and scalable cure. The study objectives were to understand the psychosocial mechanisms underlying PLWH and HP viewpoints about future HCRCT. Six focus group discussions (three with PLWH (n = 21) and three with HP (n = 30)) were held in three French infectious disease units. From these, three perspectives on HCRCT were identified. The first involved beliefs and knowledge associating HCRCT with poorer health and quality of life for PLWH. The second concerned perceptions of HCRCT as a biological and epidemiological flashback to a situation when HIV infection was left uncontrolled. The third was characterized by aspects of historical HIV culture that embrace innovation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Preau
- a GRePS Lyon 2 Université , Bron , France.,b Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale , Marseille , France
| | | | - Christel Protiere
- b Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale , Marseille , France.,c ORS PACA , Marseille , France
| | - Cécile Goujard
- d Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Médecine Interne et Immunologie clinique , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France.,e AP-HP, Service de Santé publique, et INSERM 1018, Centre de recherche en Épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP) , Université Paris-Sud , Villejuif , France
| | - Marion Mora
- b Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale , Marseille , France.,c ORS PACA , Marseille , France
| | - Laurence Meyer
- e AP-HP, Service de Santé publique, et INSERM 1018, Centre de recherche en Épidémiologie et Santé des Populations (CESP) , Université Paris-Sud , Villejuif , France
| | - Jean-Daniel Lelievre
- f INSERM U955, Université Paris 12, and Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Groupe Henri-Mondor Albert-Chenevier, Immunologie Clinique , Créteil , France
| | | | - Bruno Spire
- b Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale , Marseille , France.,c ORS PACA , Marseille , France
| | - Olivier Lambotte
- d Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Bicêtre, Service de Médecine Interne et Immunologie clinique , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France.,h Université Paris Sud, UMR 1184 , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France.,i CEA, DSV/iMETI, IDMIT , Fontenay-aux-Roses , France.,j INSERM, U1184, Immunology of Viral Infections and Autoimmune Diseases , Le Kremlin-Bicêtre , France
| | - Marie Suzan-Monti
- b Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale , Marseille , France.,c ORS PACA , Marseille , France
| |
Collapse
|