1
|
Adams R, Jordan RE, Maher A, Adab P, Barrett T, Bevan S, Cooper L, DuRand I, Edwards F, Hardy P, Harris C, Heneghan NR, Jolly K, Jowett S, Marshall T, O'Hara M, Poyner C, Rai K, Rickards H, Riley R, Ives N, Sadhra S, Tearne S, Walters G, Sapey E. Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2024; 12:1-105. [PMID: 39192689 DOI: 10.3310/kdst3869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/29/2024]
Abstract
Background Staff sickness absenteeism and presenteeism (attending work while unwell) incur high costs to the NHS, are associated with adverse patient outcomes and have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The main causes are mental and musculoskeletal ill health with cardiovascular risk factors common. Objectives To undertake a feasibility study to inform the design of a definitive randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of a health screening clinic in reducing absenteeism and presenteeism amongst the National Health Service staff. Design Individually randomised controlled pilot trial of the staff health screening clinic compared with usual care, including qualitative process evaluation. Setting Four United Kingdom National Health Service hospitals from two urban and one rural Trust. Participants Hospital employees who had not previously attended a pilot health screening clinic at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham. Interventions Nurse-led staff health screening clinic with assessment for musculoskeletal health (STarT musculoskeletal; STarT Back), mental health (patient health questionnaire-9; generalised anxiety disorder questionnaire-7) and cardiovascular health (NHS health check if aged ≥ 40, lifestyle check if < 40 years). Screen positives were given advice and/or referral to services according to UK guidelines. Main outcome measures The three coprimary outcomes were recruitment, referrals and attendance at referred services. These formed stop/go criteria when considered together. If any of these values fell into the 'amber' zone, then the trial would require modifications to proceed to full trial. If all were 'red', then the trial would be considered unfeasible. Secondary outcomes collected to inform the design of the definitive randomised controlled trial included: generalisability, screening results, individual referrals required/attended, health behaviours, acceptability/feasibility of processes, indication of contamination and costs. Outcomes related to the definitive trial included self-reported and employee records of absenteeism with reasons. Process evaluation included interviews with participants, intervention delivery staff and service providers. Descriptive statistics were presented and framework analysis conducted for qualitative data. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, outcomes were captured up to 6 months only. Results Three hundred and fourteen participants were consented (236 randomised), the majority within 4 months. The recruitment rate of 314/3788 (8.3%) invited was lower than anticipated (meeting red for this criteria), but screening identified that 57/118 (48.3%) randomised were eligible for referral to either general practitioner (81%), mental health (18%) and/or physiotherapy services (30%) (green). Early trial closure precluded determination of attendance at referrals, but 31.6% of those eligible reported intending to attend (amber). Fifty-one of the 80 (63.75%) planned qualitative interviews were conducted. Quantitative and qualitative data from the process evaluation indicated that the electronic database-driven screening intervention and data collection were efficient, promoting good fidelity, although needing more personalisation at times. Recruitment and delivery of the full trial would benefit from a longer development period to better understand local context, develop effective strategies for engaging with underserved groups, provide longer training and better integration with referral services. Delivery of the pilot was limited by the impact of COVID-19 with staff redeployment, COVID-research prioritisation and reduced availability of community and in-house referral services. While recruitment was rapid, it did not fully represent ethnic minority groups and truncated follow-up due to funding limitations prevented full assessment of attendance at recommended services and secondary outcomes. Conclusions There is both a clinical need (evidenced by 48% screened eligible for a referral) and perceived benefit (data from the qualitative interviews) for this National Health Service staff health screening clinic. The three stop/go criteria were red, green and amber; therefore, the Trial Oversight Committee recommended that a full-scale trial should proceed, but with modifications to adapt to local context and adopt processes to engage better with underserved communities. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN10237475. Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/42/42) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 23. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Adams
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Rachel E Jordan
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alisha Maher
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peymane Adab
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Timothy Barrett
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sheriden Bevan
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Lucy Cooper
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Florence Edwards
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Ciara Harris
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicola R Heneghan
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kate Jolly
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sue Jowett
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tom Marshall
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Margaret O'Hara
- Public and Patient Involvement and Engagement, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Christopher Poyner
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Kiran Rai
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Hugh Rickards
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Centre for Mental Health, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ruth Riley
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Natalie Ives
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Steven Sadhra
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sarah Tearne
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Elizabeth Sapey
- Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Respiratory Medicine and General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burch AE. Factors responsible for healthcare avoidance among rural adults in the Eastern Region of North Carolina. J Community Health 2022; 47:737-744. [PMID: 35675005 PMCID: PMC9174619 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01106-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
3
|
Bruninx A, Scheenstra B, Dekker A, Maessen J, van 't Hof A, Kietselaer B, Bermejo I. Using clinical prediction models to personalise lifestyle interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention: A systematic literature review. Prev Med Rep 2022; 25:101672. [PMID: 35127352 PMCID: PMC8800044 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to systematically review the use of clinical prediction models (CPMs) in personalised lifestyle interventions for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. We searched PubMed and PsycInfo for articles describing relevant studies published up to August 1, 2021. These were supplemented with items retrieved via screening references of citations and cited by references. In total, 32 studies were included. Nineteen different CPMs were used to guide the intervention. Most frequently, a version of the Framingham risk score was used. The CPM was used to inform the intensity of the intervention in five studies (16 %), and the intervention's type in 31 studies (97 %). The CPM was supplemented with relative risk estimates for additional risk factors in three studies (9 %), and relative risk estimates for intervention effects in four (13 %). In addition to the estimated risk, the personalisation was determined using criteria based on univariable risk factors in 18 studies (56 %), a lifestyle score in three (9 %), and a physical examination index in one (3 %). We noted insufficient detail in reporting regarding the CPM's use in 20 studies (63 %). In 15 studies (47 %), the primary outcome was a CPM estimate. A statistically significant effect favouring the intervention to the comparator arm was reported in four out of eight analyses (50 %), and a statistically significant improvement compared to baseline in five out of seven analyses (71 %). Due to the design of the included studies, the effect of the use of CPMs is still unclear. Therefore, we see a need for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anke Bruninx
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart Scheenstra
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jos Maessen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Arnoud van 't Hof
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Kietselaer
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - Iñigo Bermejo
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Merom D, Stanaway F, Gebel K, Sweeting J, Tiedemann A, Mumu S, Ding D. Supporting active ageing before retirement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions targeting older employees. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e045818. [PMID: 34193489 PMCID: PMC8246361 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the growing representation of older adults in the workforce, the health and fitness of older employees are critical to support active ageing policies. This systematic review aimed to characterise and evaluate the effects on physical activity (PA) and fitness outcomes of workplace PA interventions targeting older employees. DESIGN We searched Medline, PreMedline, PsycInfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) for articles published from inception to 17 February 2020. Eligible studies were of any experimental design, included employees aged ≥50 years, had PA as an intervention component and reported PA-related outcomes. RESULTS Titles and abstracts of 8168 records were screened, and 18 unique interventions were included (3309 participants). Twelve studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Seven interventions targeted multiple risk factors (n=1640), involving screening for cardiovascular disease risk factors, but had a non-specific description of the PA intervention. Four interventions targeted nutrition and PA (n=1127), and seven (n=235) focused only on PA. Interventions overwhelmingly targeted aerobic PA, compared with only four interventions targeting strength and/or balance (n=106). No studies involved screening for falls/injury risk, and only two interventions targeted employees of low socioeconomic status. Computation of effect sizes (ESs) was only possible in a maximum of three RCTs per outcome. ESs were medium for PA behaviour (ES=0.25 95% CI -0.07 to 0.56), muscle strength (ES=0.27, 95% CI -0.26 to 0.80), cardiorespiratory fitness (ES=0.28, 95% CI -22 to 0.78), flexibility (ES=0.50, 95% CI -0.04 to 1.05) and balance (ES=0.74, 95% CI -0.21 to 1.69). Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria-rated quality of evidence was 'low' due to high risk of bias, imprecision and inconsistency. CONCLUSIONS The lack of high-quality effective workplace PA interventions contrasts the importance and urgency to improve the health and fitness in this population. Future interventions should incorporate strength and balance training and screening of falls/injury risk in multi risk factors approaches. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018084863. (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=84863).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafna Merom
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Fiona Stanaway
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Klaus Gebel
- School of Public Health Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Joanna Sweeting
- Cardio Genomics Program, Centenary Institute, Newtown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anne Tiedemann
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Shirin Mumu
- School of Health Sciences, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ding Ding
- School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Willis JR, Ali FS, Argente B, Domalpally A, Gannon J, Gao SS, Grover S, Kanodia P, Russell-Puleri S, Sun D, Thrasher C, Tsougarakis C, Hopkins JJ. Feasibility Study of a Multimodal, Cloud-Based, Diabetic Retinal Screening Program in a Workplace Environment. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2021; 10:20. [PMID: 34111266 PMCID: PMC8131994 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.10.6.20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the feasibility of capturing and interpreting retinal images in a workplace environment using a multimodal, cloud-based, diabetic retinal screening program combined with electronic self-reported questionnaires. The burden of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and other retinal conditions, healthcare utilization, and visual function were also assessed. Methods A cross-sectional feasibility study was conducted at the Genentech, Inc., Campus Health Center. Eyes of participants were imaged using ultra-widefield (UWF) color fundus photography (CFP) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). A cloud-based platform was used for the automated, seamless transfer of images to a remote reading center for evaluation for DR and other retinal pathologies. Electronic surveys collected participants’ self-reported medical histories, healthcare utilization, and visual function data. Results Among 100 participants (mean age, 43.9 years; 44% male), 33% of them self-reported diabetes. Eye examinations within the past 12 months were reported by 71% of all participants (n = 71/100) and by 85% (n = 28/33) of those with self-reported diabetes. Among participants with complete screening images from both UWF-CFP and SD-OCT, 20% (n = 6/30) of those with self-reported diabetes and 8.5% (n = 5/59) of participants with no history of diabetes were unaware they had mild/moderate nonproliferative DR. Among all participants, 20% (20/100) had a retinal finding, on either UWF-CFP or SD-OCT, or both, which prompted a referral for further evaluation. Conclusions A retinal screening program deployed via a secure, scalable, and interoperable cloud-based platform was feasible and conveniently integrated into the workplace. Translational Relevance Cloud-based platforms could be used to promote a secure, scalable, and interoperable system for retinal screening in nontraditional environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Amitha Domalpally
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Simon S Gao
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Diana Sun
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lim KK, Lim C, Kwan YH, Chan SY, Fong W, Low LL, Tay HY, Østbye T, Tan CS. Association between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening among populations with low socioeconomic status (SES) in Singapore. Prim Health Care Res Dev 2019; 20:e98. [PMID: 32800019 PMCID: PMC6609976 DOI: 10.1017/s1463423619000318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2018] [Revised: 03/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low socioeconomic status (SES) is a barrier for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk screening and a determinant of poor CVD outcomes. This study examined the associations between access to health-promoting facilities and participation in a CVD risk screening program among populations with low SES residing in public rental flats in Singapore. METHODS Data from Health Mapping Exercises conducted from 2013 to 2015 were obtained, and screening participation rates of 66 blocks were calculated. Negative binomial regression was used to test for associations between distances to four nearest facilities (i.e., subsidized private clinics, healthy eateries, public polyclinics, and parks) and block participation rate in CVD screening. We also investigated potential heterogeneity in the association across regions with an interaction term between distance to each facility and region. RESULTS The analysis consisted of 2069 participants. The associations were only evident in the North/North-East region for subsidized private clinic and park. Specifically, increasing distance to the nearest subsidized private clinic and park was significantly associated with lower [incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80-0.98] and higher (IRR = 1.93, 95%CI: 1.15-3.25) screening participation rates respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our findings could potentially inform the planning of future door-to-door screenings in urban settings for optimal prioritization of resources. To increase participation rates in low SES populations, accessibility to subsidized private clinics and parks in a high population density region should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Keat Lim
- Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Charmaine Lim
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Yu Heng Kwan
- Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Sui Yung Chan
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Warren Fong
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Lian Leng Low
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
- Department of Family Medicine & Continuing Care, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Hung Yong Tay
- Singapore Heart Foundation, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Truls Østbye
- Programme in Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| | - Chuen Seng Tan
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Employee perceptions of a workplace HIV testing intervention. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WORKPLACE HEALTH MANAGEMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.1108/ijwhm-03-2018-0030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
8
|
Cheong AT, Khoo EM, Tong SF, Liew SM. To Check or Not to Check? A Qualitative Study on How the Public Decides on Health Checks for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0159438. [PMID: 27415432 PMCID: PMC4945067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 07/01/2016] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background More than half of the general population does not attend screening for cardiovascular diseases (CVD) hence they are unaware of their risks. The objective of this study was to explore the views and experiences of the public in deciding to undergo health checks for CVD prevention. Methods This was a qualitative study utilising the constructivist grounded theory approach. A total of 31 individuals aged 30 years and above from the community were sampled purposively. Eight interviews and six focus groups were involved, using a semi-structured topic guide. Results A conceptual framework was developed to explain the public’s decision-making process on health check participation for CVD prevention. The intention to participate in health checks was influenced by the interplay between perceived relevance and the individual’s readiness to face the outcome of health checks. Health checks were deemed relevant if people perceived themselves to be at risk of CVD and there was an advantage in knowing their cardiovascular status. People were ready to face the outcome of health checks if they wanted to know the results and were prepared to deal with the subsequent management. The decision to participate in health checks was also influenced by external factors such as the views of significant others, and the accessibility and availability of resources including time and finances. Conclusions The intention to screen for CVD is motivated by two internal factors: the perceived relevance of the disease and readiness to face screening outcomes. Strategies targeting the internal decision-making process may prove to be key in improving the uptake of screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ai Theng Cheong
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya Primary Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
| | - Ee Ming Khoo
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, University of Malaya Primary Care Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- * E-mail:
| | - Seng Fah Tong
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Su May Liew
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Determinants of Mean Blood Pressure and Hypertension among Workers in West Africa. Int J Hypertens 2016; 2016:3192149. [PMID: 26949543 PMCID: PMC4754493 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3192149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Revised: 01/03/2016] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. This review was undertaken to estimate the mean blood pressure and evaluate its determinants as well as the determinants of hypertension among workers in West Africa. Methods. In a follow-up to an earlier study, a systematic search for articles published between 1980 and August 2015 was undertaken using major databases. Results. A total of 55 articles involving 34,919 different cadres of workers from six countries were retrieved. The mean systolic blood pressure (BP) ranged from 116.6 ± 1.3 mmHg to 151.7 ± 13.6 mmHg while the mean diastolic BP ranged from 69.6 ± 11.0 mmHg to 97.1 ± 9.1 mmHg. Population-wide prehypertension was common. The major determinants of mean BP and hypertension were similar and included male sex, older age group, higher socioeconomic status, obesity, alcohol consumption, plasma glucose, and sodium excretion. Ethnicity and educational level were inconsistently associated with hypertension. Workers at higher risk of cardiovascular event did not perceive themselves as such. Conclusion. The prevailing mean prehypertensive BP, low perception of risk, and clustering of risk factors call for interventions such as healthy diets, improved physical activity, and a favourable work environment. Successful models for improving the cardiovascular health of sedentary informal sector workers in Africa are urgently needed.
Collapse
|