1
|
Amin M, Martínez-Heras E, Ontaneda D, Prados Carrasco F. Artificial Intelligence and Multiple Sclerosis. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2024; 24:233-243. [PMID: 38940994 PMCID: PMC11258192 DOI: 10.1007/s11910-024-01354-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
In this paper, we analyse the different advances in artificial intelligence (AI) approaches in multiple sclerosis (MS). AI applications in MS range across investigation of disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. A subset of AI, Machine learning (ML) models analyse various data sources, including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), genetic, and clinical data, to distinguish MS from other conditions, predict disease progression, and personalize treatment strategies. Additionally, AI models have been extensively applied to lesion segmentation, identification of biomarkers, and prediction of outcomes, disease monitoring, and management. Despite the big promises of AI solutions, model interpretability and transparency remain critical for gaining clinician and patient trust in these methods. The future of AI in MS holds potential for open data initiatives that could feed ML models and increasing generalizability, the implementation of federated learning solutions for training the models addressing data sharing issues, and generative AI approaches to address challenges in model interpretability, and transparency. In conclusion, AI presents an opportunity to advance our understanding and management of MS. AI promises to aid clinicians in MS diagnosis and prognosis improving patient outcomes and quality of life, however ensuring the interpretability and transparency of AI-generated results is going to be key for facilitating the integration of AI into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moein Amin
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eloy Martínez-Heras
- Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Laboratory of Advanced Imaging in Neuroimmunological Diseases, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Daniel Ontaneda
- Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Ferran Prados Carrasco
- e-Health Center, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
- Queen Square MS Centre, Department of Neuroinflammation, UCL Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK.
- Center for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at UCL and UCLH, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dipietro L, Gonzalez-Mego P, Ramos-Estebanez C, Zukowski LH, Mikkilineni R, Rushmore RJ, Wagner T. The evolution of Big Data in neuroscience and neurology. JOURNAL OF BIG DATA 2023; 10:116. [PMID: 37441339 PMCID: PMC10333390 DOI: 10.1186/s40537-023-00751-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Neurological diseases are on the rise worldwide, leading to increased healthcare costs and diminished quality of life in patients. In recent years, Big Data has started to transform the fields of Neuroscience and Neurology. Scientists and clinicians are collaborating in global alliances, combining diverse datasets on a massive scale, and solving complex computational problems that demand the utilization of increasingly powerful computational resources. This Big Data revolution is opening new avenues for developing innovative treatments for neurological diseases. Our paper surveys Big Data's impact on neurological patient care, as exemplified through work done in a comprehensive selection of areas, including Connectomics, Alzheimer's Disease, Stroke, Depression, Parkinson's Disease, Pain, and Addiction (e.g., Opioid Use Disorder). We present an overview of research and the methodologies utilizing Big Data in each area, as well as their current limitations and technical challenges. Despite the potential benefits, the full potential of Big Data in these fields currently remains unrealized. We close with recommendations for future research aimed at optimizing the use of Big Data in Neuroscience and Neurology for improved patient outcomes. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40537-023-00751-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paola Gonzalez-Mego
- Spaulding Rehabilitation/Neuromodulation Lab, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, MA USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Timothy Wagner
- Highland Instruments, Cambridge, MA USA
- Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bouhouita-Guermech S, Gogognon P, Bélisle-Pipon JC. Specific challenges posed by artificial intelligence in research ethics. Front Artif Intell 2023; 6:1149082. [PMID: 37483869 PMCID: PMC10358356 DOI: 10.3389/frai.2023.1149082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The twenty first century is often defined as the era of Artificial Intelligence (AI), which raises many questions regarding its impact on society. It is already significantly changing many practices in different fields. Research ethics (RE) is no exception. Many challenges, including responsibility, privacy, and transparency, are encountered. Research ethics boards (REB) have been established to ensure that ethical practices are adequately followed during research projects. This scoping review aims to bring out the challenges of AI in research ethics and to investigate if REBs are equipped to evaluate them. Methods Three electronic databases were selected to collect peer-reviewed articles that fit the inclusion criteria (English or French, published between 2016 and 2021, containing AI, RE, and REB). Two instigators independently reviewed each piece by screening with Covidence and then coding with NVivo. Results From having a total of 657 articles to review, we were left with a final sample of 28 relevant papers for our scoping review. The selected literature described AI in research ethics (i.e., views on current guidelines, key ethical concept and approaches, key issues of the current state of AI-specific RE guidelines) and REBs regarding AI (i.e., their roles, scope and approaches, key practices and processes, limitations and challenges, stakeholder perceptions). However, the literature often described REBs ethical assessment practices of projects in AI research as lacking knowledge and tools. Conclusion Ethical reflections are taking a step forward while normative guidelines adaptation to AI's reality is still dawdling. This impacts REBs and most stakeholders involved with AI. Indeed, REBs are not equipped enough to adequately evaluate AI research ethics and require standard guidelines to help them do so.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon
- School of Public Health, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Okeibunor JC, Jaca A, Iwu-Jaja CJ, Idemili-Aronu N, Ba H, Zantsi ZP, Ndlambe AM, Mavundza E, Muneene D, Wiysonge CS, Makubalo L. The use of artificial intelligence for delivery of essential health services across WHO regions: a scoping review. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1102185. [PMID: 37469694 PMCID: PMC10352788 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1102185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) is a broad outlet of computer science aimed at constructing machines capable of simulating and performing tasks usually done by human beings. The aim of this scoping review is to map existing evidence on the use of AI in the delivery of medical care. Methods We searched PubMed and Scopus in March 2022, screened identified records for eligibility, assessed full texts of potentially eligible publications, and extracted data from included studies in duplicate, resolving differences through discussion, arbitration, and consensus. We then conducted a narrative synthesis of extracted data. Results Several AI methods have been used to detect, diagnose, classify, manage, treat, and monitor the prognosis of various health issues. These AI models have been used in various health conditions, including communicable diseases, non-communicable diseases, and mental health. Conclusions Presently available evidence shows that AI models, predominantly deep learning, and machine learning, can significantly advance medical care delivery regarding the detection, diagnosis, management, and monitoring the prognosis of different illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anelisa Jaca
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | - Ngozi Idemili-Aronu
- Department of Sociology/Anthropology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
| | - Housseynou Ba
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| | - Zukiswa Pamela Zantsi
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Asiphe Mavis Ndlambe
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Edison Mavundza
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| | | | - Charles Shey Wiysonge
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- HIV and Other Infectious Diseases Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Durban, South Africa
| | - Lindiwe Makubalo
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Republic of Congo
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kallweit U, Marson AG. Neurology beyond big data - the ninth Congress of the EAN. Nat Rev Neurol 2023:10.1038/s41582-023-00837-8. [PMID: 37393314 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-023-00837-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Kallweit
- Department of Health, University of Witten/Herdecke, Witten, Germany
| | - Anthony G Marson
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
- The Walton Centre, NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Awidi M, Bagga A. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in colorectal cancer. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 3:31-43. [DOI: 10.37126/aige.v3.i3.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous illness characterized by various epigenetic and microenvironmental changes and is the third-highest cause of cancer-related death in the US. Artificial intelligence (AI) with its ability to allow automatic learning and improvement from experiences using statistical methods and Deep learning has made a distinctive contribution to the diagnosis and treatment of several cancer types. This review discusses the uses and application of AI in CRC screening using automated polyp detection assistance technologies to the development of computer-assisted diagnostic algorithms capable of accurately detecting polyps during colonoscopy and classifying them. Furthermore, we summarize the current research initiatives geared towards building computer-assisted diagnostic algorithms that aim at improving the diagnostic accuracy of benign from premalignant lesions. Considering the evolving transition to more personalized and tailored treatment strategies for CRC, the review also discusses the development of machine learning algorithms to understand responses to therapies and mechanisms of resistance as well as the future roles that AI applications may play in assisting in the treatment of CRC with the aim to improve disease outcomes. We also discuss the constraints and limitations of the use of AI systems. While the medical profession remains enthusiastic about the future of AI and machine learning, large-scale randomized clinical trials are needed to analyze AI algorithms before they can be used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Awidi
- Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, MA 01805, United States
| | - Arindam Bagga
- Internal Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA 02111, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Simonet C, Noyce AJ. Domotics, Smart Homes, and Parkinson's Disease. JOURNAL OF PARKINSON'S DISEASE 2022; 11:S55-S63. [PMID: 33612494 PMCID: PMC8385512 DOI: 10.3233/jpd-202398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Technology has an increasing presence and role in the management of Parkinson’s disease. Whether embraced or rebuffed by patients and clinicians, this is an undoubtedly growing area. Wearable sensors have received most of the attention so far. This review will focus on technology integrated into the home setting; from fixed sensors to automated appliances, which are able to capture information and have the potential to respond in an unsupervised manner. Domotics also have the potential to provide ‘real world’ context to kinematic data and therapeutic opportunities to tackle challenging motor and non-motor symptoms. Together with wearable technology, domotics have the ability to gather long-term data and record discrete events, changing the model of the cross-sectional outpatient assessment. As clinicians, our ultimate goal is to maximise quality of life, promote autonomy, and personalise care. In these respects, domotics may play an essential role in the coming years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Simonet
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Alastair J Noyce
- Preventive Neurology Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van der Stouwe AMM, Tuitert I, Giotis I, Calon J, Gannamani R, Dalenberg JR, van der Veen S, Klamer MR, Telea AC, Tijssen MAJ. Next move in movement disorders (NEMO): developing a computer-aided classification tool for hyperkinetic movement disorders. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e055068. [PMID: 34635535 PMCID: PMC8506849 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Our aim is to develop a novel approach to hyperkinetic movement disorder classification, that combines clinical information, electromyography, accelerometry and video in a computer-aided classification tool. We see this as the next step towards rapid and accurate phenotype classification, the cornerstone of both the diagnostic and treatment process. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The Next Move in Movement Disorders (NEMO) study is a cross-sectional study at Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen. It comprises patients with single and mixed phenotype movement disorders. Single phenotype groups will first include dystonia, myoclonus and tremor, and then chorea, tics, ataxia and spasticity. Mixed phenotypes are myoclonus-dystonia, dystonic tremor, myoclonus ataxia and jerky/tremulous functional movement disorders. Groups will contain 20 patients, or 40 healthy participants. The gold standard for inclusion consists of interobserver agreement on the phenotype among three independent clinical experts. Electromyography, accelerometry and three-dimensional video data will be recorded during performance of a set of movement tasks, chosen by a team of specialists to elicit movement disorders. These data will serve as input for the machine learning algorithm. Labels for supervised learning are provided by the expert-based classification, allowing the algorithm to learn to predict what the output label should be when given new input data. Methods using manually engineered features based on existing clinical knowledge will be used, as well as deep learning methods which can detect relevant and possibly new features. Finally, we will employ visual analytics to visualise how the classification algorithm arrives at its decision. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been obtained from the relevant local ethics committee. The NEMO study is designed to pioneer the application of machine learning of movement disorders. We expect to publish articles in multiple related fields of research and patients will be informed of important results via patient associations and press releases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Madelein van der Stouwe
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Tuitert
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ioannis Giotis
- ZiuZ Visual Intelligence BV, Gorredijk, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Calon
- ZiuZ Visual Intelligence BV, Gorredijk, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rahul Gannamani
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle R Dalenberg
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sterre van der Veen
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marrit R Klamer
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- ZiuZ Visual Intelligence BV, Gorredijk, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alex C Telea
- Department of Information and Computing Sciences, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marina A J Tijssen
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vinny PW, Vishnu VY, Padma Srivastava MV. Artificial Intelligence shaping the future of neurology practice. Med J Armed Forces India 2021; 77:276-282. [PMID: 34305279 DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurology practice has faced many challenges since Jean-Martin Charcot established its sacred tenets. Artificial Intelligence (AI) promises to revolutionize the time-tested neurology practice in unimaginable ways. AI can now diagnose stroke from CT/MRI scans, detect papilledema and diabetic retinopathy from retinal scans, interpret electroencephalogram (EEG) to prognosticate coma, detect seizure well before ictus, predict conversion of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's dementia, classify neurodegenerative diseases based on gait and handwriting. Clinical practice would likely change in near future to accommodate AI as a complementary tool. The clinician should be prepared to change the perception of AI from nemesis to opportunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P W Vinny
- Associate Professor, Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
| | - V Y Vishnu
- Assistant Professor (Neurology), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - M V Padma Srivastava
- Professor & Head (Neurology), All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mitsala A, Tsalikidis C, Pitiakoudis M, Simopoulos C, Tsaroucha AK. Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. A New Era. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:1581-1607. [PMID: 33922402 PMCID: PMC8161764 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The development of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms has permeated the medical field with great success. The widespread use of AI technology in diagnosing and treating several types of cancer, especially colorectal cancer (CRC), is now attracting substantial attention. CRC, which represents the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy in both men and women, is considered a leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Our review herein aims to provide in-depth knowledge and analysis of the AI applications in CRC screening, diagnosis, and treatment based on current literature. We also explore the role of recent advances in AI systems regarding medical diagnosis and therapy, with several promising results. CRC is a highly preventable disease, and AI-assisted techniques in routine screening represent a pivotal step in declining incidence rates of this malignancy. So far, computer-aided detection and characterization systems have been developed to increase the detection rate of adenomas. Furthermore, CRC treatment enters a new era with robotic surgery and novel computer-assisted drug delivery techniques. At the same time, healthcare is rapidly moving toward precision or personalized medicine. Machine learning models have the potential to contribute to individual-based cancer care and transform the future of medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athanasia Mitsala
- Second Department of Surgery, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece; (C.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +30-6986423707
| | - Christos Tsalikidis
- Second Department of Surgery, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece; (C.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Michail Pitiakoudis
- Second Department of Surgery, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece; (C.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Constantinos Simopoulos
- Second Department of Surgery, University General Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece; (C.T.); (M.P.); (C.S.)
| | - Alexandra K. Tsaroucha
- Laboratory of Experimental Surgery & Surgical Research, Democritus University of Thrace Medical School, Dragana, 68100 Alexandroupolis, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gannamani R, van der Veen S, van Egmond M, de Koning TJ, Tijssen MAJ. Challenges in Clinicogenetic Correlations: One Phenotype - Many Genes. Mov Disord Clin Pract 2021; 8:311-321. [PMID: 33816658 PMCID: PMC8015914 DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In the field of movement disorders, what you see (phenotype) is seldom what you get (genotype). Whereas 1 phenotype was previously associated to 1 gene, the advent of next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has facilitated an exponential increase in disease‐causing genes and genotype–phenotype correlations, and the “one‐phenotype‐many‐genes” paradigm has become prominent. Objectives To highlight the “one‐phenotype‐many‐genes” paradigm by discussing the main challenges, perspectives on how to address them, and future directions. Methods We performed a scoping review of the various aspects involved in identifying the underlying molecular cause of a movement disorder phenotype. Results The notable challenges are (1) the lack of gold standards, overlap in clinical spectrum of different movement disorders, and variability in the interpretation of classification systems; (2) selecting which patients benefit from genetic tests and the choice of genetic testing; (3) problems in the variant interpretation guidelines; (4) the filtering of variants associated with disease; and (5) the lack of standardized, complete, and up‐to‐date gene lists. Perspectives to address these include (1) deep phenotyping and genotype–phenotype integration, (2) adherence to phenotype‐specific diagnostic algorithms, (3) implementation of current and complementary bioinformatic tools, (4) a clinical‐molecular diagnosis through close collaboration between clinicians and genetic laboratories, and (5) ongoing curation of gene lists and periodic reanalysis of genetic sequencing data. Conclusions Despite the rapidly emerging possibilities of NGS, there are still many steps to take to improve the genetic diagnostic yield. Future directions, including post‐NGS phenotyping and cohort analyses enriched by genotype–phenotype integration and gene networks, ought to be pursued to accelerate identification of disease‐causing genes and further improve our understanding of disease biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahul Gannamani
- Department of Neurology University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Department of Genetics University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Sterre van der Veen
- Department of Neurology University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Martje van Egmond
- Department of Neurology University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| | - Tom J de Koning
- Department of Genetics University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Pediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University Lund Sweden
| | - Marina A J Tijssen
- Department of Neurology University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands.,Expertise Centre Movement Disorders Groningen University Medical Centre Groningen Groningen The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Seccia R, Romano S, Salvetti M, Crisanti A, Palagi L, Grassi F. Machine Learning Use for Prognostic Purposes in Multiple Sclerosis. Life (Basel) 2021; 11:life11020122. [PMID: 33562572 PMCID: PMC7914671 DOI: 10.3390/life11020122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
The course of multiple sclerosis begins with a relapsing-remitting phase, which evolves into a secondarily progressive form over an extremely variable period, depending on many factors, each with a subtle influence. To date, no prognostic factors or risk score have been validated to predict disease course in single individuals. This is increasingly frustrating, since several treatments can prevent relapses and slow progression, even for a long time, although the possible adverse effects are relevant, in particular for the more effective drugs. An early prediction of disease course would allow differentiation of the treatment based on the expected aggressiveness of the disease, reserving high-impact therapies for patients at greater risk. To increase prognostic capacity, approaches based on machine learning (ML) algorithms are being attempted, given the failure of other approaches. Here we review recent studies that have used clinical data, alone or with other types of data, to derive prognostic models. Several algorithms that have been used and compared are described. Although no study has proposed a clinically usable model, knowledge is building up and in the future strong tools are likely to emerge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruggiero Seccia
- Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering “Antonio Ruberti”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.)
| | - Silvia Romano
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (S.R.); (M.S.)
| | - Marco Salvetti
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Sensory Organs, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (S.R.); (M.S.)
- Mediterranean Neurological Institute Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
| | - Andrea Crisanti
- Department of Physics, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy;
| | - Laura Palagi
- Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering “Antonio Ruberti”, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; (R.S.); (L.P.)
| | - Francesca Grassi
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|