1
|
Auyezkhankyzy D, Khojakulova U, Yessirkepov M, Qumar AB, Zimba O, Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS. Nurses' roles, interventions, and implications for management of rheumatic diseases. Rheumatol Int 2024; 44:975-983. [PMID: 38693254 PMCID: PMC11108871 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05603-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
Nurses have become integral members of multidisciplinary teams in managing rheumatic diseases, departing from their traditional patient care roles. This article provides a comprehensive review of nurses' roles, interventions, and impacts in several rheumatic diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, spondyloarthritis, gout, systemic lupus erythematosus, and polymyalgia rheumatica. It has been demonstrated that care under nursing supervision is effective and safe, with benefits including disease management, quality of life, and treatment adherence. In addition, nurses play a crucial role in promoting health, educating patients, and administering biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the significance of telehealth services and nurses' role in delivering remote care. However, nursing education and training challenges persist, particularly in standardization and access to postgraduate education. Efforts to enhance the role of nurses in rheumatology care are necessary to optimize patient outcomes and meet the evolving needs of individuals with rheumatic diseases. Collaboration across healthcare institutions, professional groups, and educational facilities is necessary for promoting the continual growth and advancement of rheumatology nurse practice. By equipping nurses with the requisite knowledge, expertise, and resources to deliver top-notch care, we can enhance the well-being of individuals with rheumatic diseases and foster improved overall health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Auyezkhankyzy
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Nursing, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
| | - Umida Khojakulova
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Nursing, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
| | - Marlen Yessirkepov
- Department of Biology and Biochemistry, South Kazakhstan Medical Academy, Shymkent, Kazakhstan
| | - Ainur B Qumar
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Olena Zimba
- Department of Rheumatology, Immunology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital in Krakow, Kraków, Poland
- National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Internal Medicine N2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Burhan Fatih Kocyigit
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Health Sciences, Adana City Research and Training Hospital, Adana, Türkiye
| | - Mazlum Serdar Akaltun
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitaton, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Türkiye.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bertoni G, Marchesini E, Zanchettin FE, Crestini M, Testa M, Battista S. Use of audience response systems (ARS) in physiotherapists' training: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073025. [PMID: 37607795 PMCID: PMC10445375 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the experience of using audience response systems (ARS) in postgraduate physiotherapy training. DESIGN Qualitative interview study following the 'reflexive thematic analysis' by Braun and Clarke. SETTING Higher education university. PARTICIPANTS Ten Italian students (60% men, N=6; 40% women, N=4) agreed to partake in the interviews. RESULTS We generated four themes. Specifically, the ARS were perceived: (1) as a 'Shared Compass' (theme 1) between the student and the lecturers to monitor and modify the ongoing students' learning journey; (2) useful to 'Come Out of Your Shell' (theme 2) as they help students to overcome shyness and build a team with peers; (3) as 'A Square Peg in a Round Hole' (theme 3) as they should not be used in situations that do not suit them; (4) as 'Not Everyone's Cup of Tea' (theme 4) as mixed opinions among ARS' utilities were found under some circumstances (eg, memorisation process and clinical reasoning). CONCLUSION Physiotherapy lecturers must use ARS critically, respecting when (eg, not at the end of the lesson) and how to propose them, keeping in mind that some skills (eg, practical ones) might not benefit from their use. Moreover, they need to consider that the ARS are not a tool for everyone, so ARS must be integrated into a multimodal teaching paradigm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Bertoni
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Evelin Marchesini
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Elena Zanchettin
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Michele Crestini
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Battista S, Furri L, Pellegrini V, Giardulli B, Coppola I, Testa M, Dell'Isola A. Which lecturers' characteristics facilitate the learning process? A qualitative study on students' perceptions in the rehabilitation sciences. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2023; 23:431. [PMID: 37308863 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04308-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In education, lecturers play a crucial role in facilitating students' learning process. However, only a few studies explored which lecturers' characteristics can facilitate this process in higher education for rehabilitation healthcare professionals. Starting from students' perspectives, our qualitative study investigated the lecturers' characteristics that facilitate students' learning process in the rehabilitation sciences. METHODS A qualitative interview study. We enrolled students attending the 2nd year of the Master of Science (MSc) degree in 'Rehabilitation Sciences of Healthcare Professions'. Different themes were generated following a 'Reflexive Thematic Analysis'. RESULTS Thirteen students completed the interviews. From their analysis, we generated five themes. Specifically, a lecturer that facilitates students' learning process should be: 1) 'A Performer who Interacts with the Classroom', 2) A Flexible Planner who Adopts Innovative Teaching Skills', 3) 'A Motivator who Embraces Transformational Leadership', 4) 'A Facilitator Who Encourages a Constructive Learning Context' and 5) 'A Coach who Devises Strategies to Reach Shared Learning Goals'. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study underscore the importance for lecturers in rehabilitation to cultivate a diverse set of skills drawn from the arts and performance, education, team building and leadership to facilitate students' learning process. By developing these skills, lecturers can design lessons that are worth attending not only for their relevant content but also for their value in human experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Orthopaedics, Lund, Wigerthuset, Remissgatan, Sweden
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, 37135, Italy
| | - Laura Furri
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, 37135, Italy
| | - Valeria Pellegrini
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, 37135, Italy
| | - Benedetto Giardulli
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Ilaria Coppola
- Department of Education Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Dell'Isola
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Orthopaedics, Lund, Wigerthuset, Remissgatan, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Risetti M, Gambugini R, Testa M, Battista S. Management of non-specific thoracic spine pain: a cross-sectional study among physiotherapists. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:398. [PMID: 37202740 PMCID: PMC10197218 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06505-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The thoracic area has mainly been neglected in research compared to the lumbar and cervical regions. No clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for non-specific thoracic spine pain (TSP) have been compiled. Therefore, it can be argued that the absence of specific CPGs raises questions about the management of non-specific TSP. Hence, this study aimed at determining the management of non-specific TSP among physiotherapists in Italy. METHODS A web cross-sectional survey investigating physiotherapists' management of non-specific TSP was conducted. The survey instrument was divided into three sections. The first section obtained participants' characteristics. The second section determined participants' agreement with 29 statements regarding the clinical management of non-specific TSP utilising a five-point Likert scale. Participants who partially or completely agreed (scores 4-5) were considered to agree with the statements. A ≥ 70% of agreement with a statement was considered as consensus according to previous literature. The third section asked the participants to indicate how often they adopted several treatments to manage non-specific TSP with a 5-point scale (always - often - sometimes - rarely - never). The frequencies of answers were calculated, and a visual representation through a bar chart was reported. The online version of the survey instrument was delivered through the newsletter of the Italian Association of Physiotherapists and the postgraduate master's degree in Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation of the University of Genova (Genova, Italy). RESULTS In total, 424 physiotherapists (mean age (SD): 35.1 years (10.5); 50% female) completed the survey. In the second section, physiotherapists achieved consensus for 22/29 statements. Those statements addressed the importance of psychosocial factors, exercise, education, and manual therapy techniques in managing non-specific TSP. In the third section, 79.7% of participants indicated they would always adopt a multimodal treatment (education, therapeutic exercise, manual therapy), followed by education and information (72.9%), therapeutic exercise (62.0%), soft tissue manual therapy (27.1%), and manual therapy (16.5%). CONCLUSIONS Study participants considered fundamentally using a multimodal programme based on education, exercise and manual therapy to manage non-specific TSP. This approach aligns with the CPGs for other chronic musculoskeletal pain than non-specific TSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Risetti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, SV, Italy
| | - Riccardo Gambugini
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, SV, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, SV, Italy.
| | - Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Via Magliotto 2, Savona, 17100, SV, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ritschl V, Sperl L, Andrews MR, Björk M, Boström C, Cappon J, Davergne T, de la Torre-Aboki J, de Thurah A, Domján A, Dragoi RG, Estévez-López F, Ferreira RJO, Fragoulis GE, Grygielska J, Kõrve K, Kukkurainen ML, Madelaine-Bonjour C, Marques A, Meesters J, Moe RH, Moholt E, Mosor E, Naimer-Stach C, Ndosi M, Pchelnikova P, Primdahl J, Putrik P, Rausch Osthoff AK, Smucrova H, Testa M, van Bodegom-Vos L, Peter WF, Zangi HA, Zimba O, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Stamm TA. Educational readiness among health professionals in rheumatology: low awareness of EULAR offerings and unfamiliarity with the course content as major barriers-results of a EULAR-funded European survey. RMD Open 2023; 9:e003120. [PMID: 37230762 PMCID: PMC10230966 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ongoing education of health professionals in rheumatology (HPR) is critical for high-quality care. An essential factor is education readiness and a high quality of educational offerings. We explored which factors contributed to education readiness and investigated currently offered postgraduate education, including the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) offerings. METHODS AND PARTICIPANTS We developed an online questionnaire, translated it into 24 languages and distributed it in 30 European countries. We used natural language processing and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation to analyse the qualitative experiences of the participants as well as descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression to determine factors influencing postgraduate educational readiness. Reporting followed the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys guideline. RESULTS The questionnaire was accessed 3589 times, and 667 complete responses from 34 European countries were recorded. The highest educational needs were 'professional development', 'prevention and lifestyle intervention'. Older age, more working experience in rheumatology and higher education levels were positively associated with higher postgraduate educational readiness. While more than half of the HPR were familiar with EULAR as an association and the respondents reported an increased interest in the content of the educational offerings, the courses and the annual congress were poorly attended due to a lack of awareness, comparatively high costs and language barriers. CONCLUSIONS To promote the uptake of EULAR educational offerings, attention is needed to increase awareness among national organisations, offer accessible participation costs, and address language barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Ritschl
- Institute for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Lisa Sperl
- Institute for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margaret Renn Andrews
- Institute for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | - Mathilda Björk
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Carina Boström
- Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Physiotherapy, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jeannette Cappon
- Department of Pediatric Rehabillitation, Reade Centre for Rehabillitation and Rheumatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Davergne
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Paris, France
| | | | - Annette de Thurah
- Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Århus N, Denmark
- Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Andrea Domján
- Department of Rheumatology, University of Debrecen, Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Razvan Gabriel Dragoi
- Department of Balneology, Rehabilitation and Rheumatology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Victor Babes Timisoara, Timisoara, Romania
| | - Fernando Estévez-López
- Department of Social and Behavioral Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ricardo J O Ferreira
- Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - George E Fragoulis
- Joint Rheumatology Programme, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Katti Kõrve
- Center of Rheumatology, East Tallinn Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | | | | | - Andréa Marques
- Health Sciences Research Unit Nursing, Higher School of Nursing of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Jorit Meesters
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Rikke Helene Moe
- NKRR, REMEDY, Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Moholt
- NKRR, REMEDY, Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erika Mosor
- Institute for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Mwidimi Ndosi
- School of Health and Social Wellbeing, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
- Academic Rheumatology, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Jette Primdahl
- Danish Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark
- Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Syddanmark, Denmark
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Rheumatology, Internal Medicine, MUMC and Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Kathrin Rausch Osthoff
- Institute of Physiotherapy, Zurich University of Applied Sciences; School of Health Professions, Winterthur, Switzerland
- Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hana Smucrova
- Center of Medical Rehabilitation, Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfred F Peter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heidi A Zangi
- NKRR, REMEDY, Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Rheumatology and Research, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Olena Zimba
- Department of Clinical Rheumatology and Immunology, University Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland
- Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Outcomes Research, Centre for Medical Data Science, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Liem SIE, Vliet Vlieland TPM, van de Ende CH, Dittmar S, Schriemer MR, Bodegom-Vos LV, Peter WFH, Vries-Bouwstra JKD. Consensus-based recommendations on communication and education regarding primary care physical therapy for patients with systemic sclerosis. Musculoskeletal Care 2023; 21:45-55. [PMID: 35689435 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop recommendations for communication and postgraduate education regarding primary care physical therapy for systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients. METHODS A virtual Nominal Group Technique was used with tasks forces for communication (n = 18) and education (n = 21). Both included rheumatologists, physical therapists (PTs) in primary, secondary or tertiary care, rheumatology nurses, advanced nurse practictioners and patient representatives. Three online meetings were organised for each task force to discuss (1) current bottlenecks; (2) potential solutions; and (3) the resulting draft recommendations. After the final adjustments, participants rated their level of agreement with each recommendation on a scale from 0 (not at all agree) to 100 (totally agree), using an online questionnaire. RESULTS 19 and 34 recommendations were formulated for communication and education, respectively. For communication the main recommendations concerned the provision of an overview of primary care physical therapists with expertise in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases to patients and rheumatologists, the inclusion of the indication by the rheumatologist in the referral to the physical therapist and low-threshold communication with the rheumatologist in case of questions or concerns of the physical therapist. For postgraduate education three types of "on demand" educational offerings were recommended with varying levels of content and duration, to match the competencies and preferences of individual primary care physical therapists. CONCLUSION Using a systematic qualitative approach, two multi-stakeholder task forces developed practical recommendations for primary care physical therapists' communication with hospital-based care providers and postgraduate education regarding the treatment of SSc patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie I E Liem
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia H van de Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sonja Dittmar
- NVLE, Dutch Patient Organization for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marisca R Schriemer
- NVLE, Dutch Patient Organization for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Wilfred F H Peter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kiltz U, Kiefer D, Braun J, Rausch-Osthoff AK, Herbold S, Klinger M, Kocher A, Nell-Duxneuner V, Reichenbach S, Stamm T, Steffens-Korbanka P, Niedermann K. [Translation of the 2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis and linguistic validation in German-speaking countries with healthcare professionals]. Z Rheumatol 2023; 82:12-21. [PMID: 34633501 PMCID: PMC9832076 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-021-01078-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regular physical activity is beneficial for people with rheumatic diseases and one of the cornerstones in its management. Based on the international recommendations of the World Health Organization for the general population, the "2018 EULAR recommendations for physical activity in people with inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis" provide evidence-based recommendations on the prescription, performance, and implementation of physical activity exercises in this population for the first time. AIM Translation of the 2018 EULAR recommendations into German and linguistic validation in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. METHODS A professional translation of the EULAR recommendations into the German language was performed and revised by German-speaking experts from all three countries. The translation was validated by healthcare professionals consisting of rheumatologists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, nurses, and medical assistants in a field test. In each of the three countries, eight structured interviews were conducted on comprehensibility, wording, completeness, and feasibility. The experts then discussed changes until consensus was reached and indicated the level of agreement with the final translation. RESULTS The translation of the EULAR recommendations was substantially revised. Based on the results of the cognitive test, formulations were adapted in order to increase comprehensibility. The level of agreement between 10 (SD 0.0) and 8.9 (SD 1.5) was very high. DISCUSSION The final German version of the EULAR recommendations is comprehensible and accepted across all three German-speaking countries. It can help to improve the structure and clarity of the handling of physical activity and promote physical activity for healthcare providers and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uta Kiltz
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649 Herne, Deutschland
| | - David Kiefer
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649 Herne, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen Braun
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649 Herne, Deutschland
| | - Anne-Kathrin Rausch-Osthoff
- grid.19739.350000000122291644Institut für Physiotherapie, Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Winterthur, Schweiz
| | - Susanne Herbold
- grid.5570.70000 0004 0490 981XRheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649 Herne, Deutschland
| | - Meike Klinger
- grid.452084.f0000 0001 1018 1376Departement Gesundheitswissenschaften, Fachhochschule Campus Wien, Wien, Österreich
| | - Agnes Kocher
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642Institut für Pflegewissenschaft, Medizinische Fakultät, Departement Public Health, Universität Basel, Basel, Schweiz
| | - Valerie Nell-Duxneuner
- Medizinischer Dienst, Österreichische Gesundheitskasse, Wien, Österreich ,grid.491977.5Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Wien, Österreich
| | - Stefan Reichenbach
- grid.411656.10000 0004 0479 0855Klinik für Rheumatologie und Immunologie, Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern, Bern, Schweiz
| | - Tanja Stamm
- grid.491977.5Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Wien, Österreich ,grid.22937.3d0000 0000 9259 8492Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Wien, Österreich
| | | | - Karin Niedermann
- grid.19739.350000000122291644Institut für Physiotherapie, Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften, Winterthur, Schweiz
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Battista S, Manoni M, Dell'Isola A, Englund M, Palese A, Testa M. Giving an account of patients' experience: A qualitative study on the care process of hip and knee osteoarthritis. Health Expect 2022; 25:1140-1156. [PMID: 35266257 PMCID: PMC9122415 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the publication of clinical practice guidelines, the quality of the care process as experienced by patients with osteoarthritis (OA) appears suboptimal. Hence, this study investigates how patients with OA experience their disease and care process, highlighting potential elements that can enhance or spoil it, to optimise their quality of care. METHODS A qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews. Patients with hip and knee OA in Italy were interviewed. The interview guide was created by a pool of health professionals and patients. The interviews were analysed through a theme-based analysis following a philosophy of descriptive phenomenological research. RESULTS Our analysis revealed seven main themes: (1) Experiencing a sense of uncertainty, as interviewees perceived treatment choices not to be based on medical evidence; (2) Establishing challenging relationships with the self and the other, as they did not feel understood and felt ashamed or hopeless about their condition; (3) Being stuck in one's own or the health professionals' beliefs about the disease management, as a common thought was the perception of movement as something dangerous together with a frequent prescription of passive therapies; (4) Dealing with one's own attitudes towards the disease; Understanding (5) the barriers to and (6) the facilitators of the adherence to therapeutic exercise, which revolve around the therapy cost, the time needed and the patients' willingness to change their life habits and (7) Developing an uneasy relationship with food since the diet was considered as something that "you force yourself to follow" and overeating as a way "to eat your feelings". CONCLUSION The lack of clear explanations and a negative attitude towards first-line nonsurgical treatments (mainly physical exercise), which are considered as a way to fill the time while waiting for surgery, underlines the importance of providing patients with adequate information about OA treatments and to better explain the role of first-line intervention in the care of OA. This will enhance patient-centred and shared decision-making treatments. PATIENT CONTRIBUTION Patients with hip and knee OA participated in creating the interview and contributed with their experience of their care process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mattia Manoni
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy
| | - Andrea Dell'Isola
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Martin Englund
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Alvisa Palese
- Department of Medical Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Savona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Medical students' perspective on incorporating a rheumatology expert patient program in their curriculum: a cross-sectional survey-based study. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:899-903. [PMID: 35262774 PMCID: PMC8905006 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-022-05105-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the rheumatic diseases patient expert program and assess the students' perspective on its implementation into the medical school's curriculum. During the 4th year, small groups of medical students participated in a 2-h session with a rheumatic disease patient expert and a rheumatologist. The students had the opportunity to learn about the patient's journey, manifestations, shared thoughts, and asked questions. The patient demonstrated the hand musculoskeletal exam. At the end of the academic year, an online survey was sent to 88 students and they were asked to fill out a 19-item questionnaire using a Likert-scale response. The voluntary response rate was 67%, and 64.4% were females. Overall, most participants had a favorable experience with the program (strongly agree/agree response). 93% were satisfied with the communication they had with the patient, 93% felt the patient was active in their teaching, and 89% were engaged in meaningful learning. The vast majority of the students would recommend the program to their fellow students and they strongly believe that it should be a part of the medical school's curriculum. The findings of this study indicate the patient expert program is a novel educational activity that had a favorable impact on medical students' education and a positive perspective of implementing it to the medical school curriculum. The program's implementation will raise awareness for RMD, attract more students in the field of rheumatology, and promote the patient-centered care approach.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fernández-Ávila DG, Patino-Hernandez D, Kowalskii S, Vargas-Caselles A, Sapag AM, Cachafeiro-Vilar A, Meléndez B, Santiago-Pastelín C, Graf C, Rossetto C, Palleiro D, Trincado D, Fernández-Ávila DC, Arrieta D, Reyes G, Baez JT, Ugarte-Gil MF, Cardiel M, Colman N, Chávez N, Burgos PI, Montufar R, Sandino S, Fuentes-Silva Y, Soriano ER. Rheumatology Training in Latin America: A Collaborative Study by the Pan American League of Associations for Rheumatology. J Clin Rheumatol 2022; 28:e440-e443. [PMID: 34348368 DOI: 10.1097/rhu.0000000000001774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE Demand for rheumatology care has steadily increased in recent years. The number of specialists in this field, however, seems insufficient. No recent studies have diagnosed the attributes of rheumatology training in Latin America. METHODS This is a descriptive cross-sectional study. We obtained data on each country through local rheumatologists of the Pan-American League Against Rheumatism, who acted as principal investigators for participating countries. Our sample was analyzed and described through means and standard deviations or through frequencies and percentages, depending on the variable. RESULTS Countries with the most rheumatology-training programs were Brazil (n = 50), Argentina (n = 18), and Mexico (n = 15). Ecuador, Honduras, and Nicaragua do not have rheumatology-training programs. The countries with the most available slots for rheumatology residents were Brazil (n = 126) and Argentina (n = 36). To be admitted into rheumatology training, candidates were required to have completed graduate studies in internal medicine in 42.1% of the programs. In 8 countries (42.1%), residents are not required to pay tuition; the median cost of tuition in the remaining countries is US $528 (interquartile range, US $2153). CONCLUSIONS Conditions associated with rheumatology training in Latin America vary. Significant differences exist in income and tuition fees for residents, for example, and 4 countries in Latin America do not currently offer programs. Information collected in this study will be useful when comparing the status of rheumatology services offered in Latin America with those in other countries. Most countries require a wider offering of rheumatology-training programs, as well as more available slots.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Fernández-Ávila
- From the Unidad de Reumatología, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio-Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Unidad de Investigación PANLAR
| | - Daniela Patino-Hernandez
- Departamento de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio-Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Sergio Kowalskii
- Universidade Federal do Paraná, Unidad de Investigación PANLAR, Paraná, Brasil
| | | | | | | | - Belia Meléndez
- Hospital de la Policía Nacional N1 Quito, Quito, Ecuador
| | | | - Cesar Graf
- Sociedad Argentina de Reumatología, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Daniel Palleiro
- Instituto Nacional de Reumatología del Uruguay-Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Daniela Trincado
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Inmunología Clínica y Reumatología, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | | | - Dina Arrieta
- Hospital México, Caja Costarricense del Seguro Social, San José de Costa Rica, Costa Rica
| | - Gil Reyes
- Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de La Habana, La Habana, Cuba
| | | | - Manuel F Ugarte-Gil
- Hospital Guillermo Almenara Irigoyen-Universidad Científica del Sur, Lima, Perú
| | - Mario Cardiel
- Centro de Investigación Clínica de Morelia, Morelia, México
| | - Nelly Colman
- Hospital de Clínicas-Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay
| | - Nilmo Chávez
- Universidad San Carlos de Guatemala-Instituto Guatemalteco de Seguridad Social, Ciudad de Guatemala, Guatemala
| | - Paula I Burgos
- Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Departamento de Inmunología Clínica y Reumatología, Santiago de Chile, Chile
| | - Ruben Montufar
- Consultorio de Especialidades del Instituto Salvadoreño del Seguro Social, San Salvador, El Salvador
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cutolo R, Battista S, Testa M. Actual and Perceived Level of Scientific English across Italian Physiotherapy Courses: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9091135. [PMID: 34574909 PMCID: PMC8465386 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9091135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 08/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The knowledge of the English language is fundamental for the application of evidence-based practice. Hence, this study explores, through an online survey, the (1) perceived and (2) actual level of Scientific English among Italian undergraduate (UGs) and postgraduate (PGs) physiotherapists. As for (1), the participants expressed their agreement with 10 statements regarding the attitude towards Scientific English through a 1–4 Likert-type scale, with consensus set at ≥70%. As for (2), an ad-hoc 10-point questionnaire was developed through a Delphi procedure, with a pass score set at ≥60%. The survey was completed by 421 participants (UG: 47%; PG: 53%). As for (1), consensus was achieved in both groups in 4 out of 10 statements, specifically the ones addressing the capability to fully understand a scientific paper and physiotherapy-specific language in English. As for (2), the mean score reached by both groups was below 60%. The participants who had studied or were studying at a university in southern Italy presented 2.56 [1.54; 4.24] times higher odds to fail the test. New strategies to bridge the gap in the knowledge of Scientific English in Italy should be developed, through the creation of a unique syllabus tailored to the needs of future physiotherapists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Cutolo
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Verona, 37135 Verona, Italy;
| | - Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, 17100 Savona, Italy;
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, 17100 Savona, Italy;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-019-860250
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Scott DL, Ibrahim F, Hill H, Tom B, Prothero L, Baggott RR, Bosworth A, Galloway JB, Georgopoulou S, Martin N, Neatrour I, Nikiphorou E, Sturt J, Wailoo A, Williams FMK, Williams R, Lempp H. Intensive therapy for moderate established rheumatoid arthritis: the TITRATE research programme. PROGRAMME GRANTS FOR APPLIED RESEARCH 2021. [DOI: 10.3310/pgfar09080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Background
Rheumatoid arthritis is a major inflammatory disorder and causes substantial disability. Treatment goals span minimising disease activity, achieving remission and decreasing disability. In active rheumatoid arthritis, intensive management achieves these goals. As many patients with established rheumatoid arthritis have moderate disease activity, the TITRATE (Treatment Intensities and Targets in Rheumatoid Arthritis ThErapy) programme assessed the benefits of intensive management.
Objectives
To (1) define how to deliver intensive therapy in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis; (2) establish its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in a trial; and (3) evaluate evidence supporting intensive management in observational studies and completed trials.
Design
Observational studies, secondary analyses of completed trials and systematic reviews assessed existing evidence about intensive management. Qualitative research, patient workshops and systematic reviews defined how to deliver it. The trial assessed its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in moderate established rheumatoid arthritis.
Setting
Observational studies (in three London centres) involved 3167 patients. These were supplemented by secondary analyses of three previously completed trials (in centres across all English regions), involving 668 patients. Qualitative studies assessed expectations (nine patients in four London centres) and experiences of intensive management (15 patients in 10 centres across England). The main clinical trial enrolled 335 patients with diverse socioeconomic deprivation and ethnicity (in 39 centres across all English regions).
Participants
Patients with established moderately active rheumatoid arthritis receiving conventional disease-modifying drugs.
Interventions
Intensive management used combinations of conventional disease-modifying drugs, biologics (particularly tumour necrosis factor inhibitors) and depot steroid injections; nurses saw patients monthly, adjusted treatment and provided supportive person-centred psychoeducation. Control patients received standard care.
Main outcome measures
Disease Activity Score for 28 joints based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR)-categorised patients (active to remission). Remission (DAS28-ESR < 2.60) was the treatment target. Other outcomes included fatigue (measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale), disability (as measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire), harms and resource use for economic assessments.
Results
Evaluation of existing evidence for intensive rheumatoid arthritis management showed the following. First, in observational studies, DAS28-ESR scores decreased over 10–20 years, whereas remissions and treatment intensities increased. Second, in systematic reviews of published trials, all intensive management strategies increased remissions. Finally, patients with high disability scores had fewer remissions. Qualitative studies of rheumatoid arthritis patients, workshops and systematic reviews helped develop an intensive management pathway. A 2-day training session for rheumatology practitioners explained its use, including motivational interviewing techniques and patient handbooks. The trial screened 459 patients and randomised 335 patients (168 patients received intensive management and 167 patients received standard care). A total of 303 patients provided 12-month outcome data. Intention-to-treat analysis showed intensive management increased DAS28-ESR 12-month remissions, compared with standard care (32% vs. 18%, odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.28 to 3.68; p = 0.004), and reduced fatigue [mean difference –18, 95% confidence interval –24 to –11 (scale 0–100); p < 0.001]. Disability (as measured on the Health Assessment Questionnaire) decreased when intensive management patients achieved remission (difference –0.40, 95% confidence interval –0.57 to –0.22) and these differences were considered clinically relevant. However, in all intensive management patients reductions in the Health Assessment Questionnaire scores were less marked (difference –0.1, 95% confidence interval –0.2 to 0.0). The numbers of serious adverse events (intensive management n = 15 vs. standard care n = 11) and other adverse events (intensive management n = 114 vs. standard care n = 151) were similar. Economic analysis showed that the base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was £43,972 from NHS and Personal Social Services cost perspectives. The probability of meeting a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 was 17%. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreased to £29,363 after including patients’ personal costs and lost working time, corresponding to a 50% probability that intensive management is cost-effective at English willingness-to-pay thresholds. Analysing trial baseline predictors showed that remission predictors comprised baseline DAS28-ESR, disability scores and body mass index. A 6-month extension study (involving 95 intensive management patients) showed fewer remissions by 18 months, although more sustained remissions were more likley to persist. Qualitative research in trial completers showed that intensive management was acceptable and treatment support from specialist nurses was beneficial.
Limitations
The main limitations comprised (1) using single time point remissions rather than sustained responses, (2) uncertainty about benefits of different aspects of intensive management and differences in its delivery across centres, (3) doubts about optimal treatment of patients unresponsive to intensive management and (4) the lack of formal international definitions of ‘intensive management’.
Conclusion
The benefits of intensive management need to be set against its additional costs. These were relatively high. Not all patients benefited. Patients with high pretreatment physical disability or who were substantially overweight usually did not achieve remission.
Future work
Further research should (1) identify the most effective components of the intervention, (2) consider its most cost-effective delivery and (3) identify alternative strategies for patients not responding to intensive management.
Trial registration
Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN70160382.
Funding
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme and will be published in full in Programme Grants for Applied Research; Vol. 9, No. 8. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David L Scott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Fowzia Ibrahim
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Harry Hill
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brian Tom
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Louise Prothero
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Rhiannon R Baggott
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | | | - James B Galloway
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Sofia Georgopoulou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Naomi Martin
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Isabel Neatrour
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Department of Adult Nursing, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Allan Wailoo
- ScHARR Health Economics and Decision Science, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Frances MK Williams
- Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, School of Life Course Sciences, King’s College London, St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ruth Williams
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Heidi Lempp
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liem S, van Leeuwen NM, Vliet Vlieland T, Boerrigter G, van den Ende C, de Pundert L, Schriemer MR, Spierings J, Vonk MC, de Vries-Bouwstra JK. Physical therapy in patients with systemic sclerosis: physical therapists' perspectives on current delivery and educational needs. Scand J Rheumatol 2021; 51:394-401. [PMID: 34263718 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1937306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To assess the perspectives of physical therapists treating patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) on their current practice and educational needs.Method: In July 2019, 405 SSc patients attending a multidisciplinary SSc programme received a survey on physical therapy. Patients who indicated having received physical therapy in the past 2 years were asked to invite their treating physical therapist to complete a questionnaire including sociodemographic characteristics, referral process, content of treatment, perceived knowledge and skills, and educational needs (mostly yes/no answers).Results: Forty-eight of 80 possibly eligible physical therapists treating SSc patients returned the questionnaire [median age 44 years (interquartile range 35-58); 52% female; median number of SSc patients currently treated: 1 (range 1-4)]. Eighty-one per cent (n = 39) of physical therapists had received a referral, with 69% (n = 27/39) judging its content as insufficient. The most often provided types of exercises were range of motion (96%), muscle-strengthening (85%), and aerobic (71%) exercises, followed by hand (42%) and mouth (10%) exercises. Concerning manual treatment, 65% performed either massage or passive mobilization. Regarding competences, 65% indicated feeling capable of treating SSc patients. Nevertheless, 85% expressed the need for an information website on physical therapy in SSc, and 77% for postgraduate education on SSc.Conclusion: Primary care physical therapists treating patients with SSc used a wide range of treatment modalities. Although most stated that they treated very few patients, the majority felt capable of treating SSc patients. Nevertheless, the large majority expressed a need for additional information and educational activities concerning SSc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sie Liem
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - N M van Leeuwen
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tpm Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopedics, Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gmw Boerrigter
- Department of Physical Therapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chm van den Ende
- Department of Rheumatology, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laj de Pundert
- Department of Physical Therapy, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - M R Schriemer
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,NVLE, Dutch Patient Organization for Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J Spierings
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M C Vonk
- Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J K de Vries-Bouwstra
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Battista S, Salvioli S, Millotti S, Testa M, Dell'Isola A. Italian physiotherapists' knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis clinical practice guidelines: a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:380. [PMID: 33892692 PMCID: PMC8067645 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04250-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to manage musculoskeletal conditions among physiotherapists appears suboptimal. Osteoarthritis is one of the most disabling conditions worldwide and several studies showed a lack of knowledge of and adherence to osteoarthritis CPGs in physiotherapists' clinical practice. However, those studies are not conclusive, as they examine the knowledge of and adherence to CPGs only in isolation, or only by focussing on a single treatment. Thus, analysis of the knowledge of and adherence to CPGs in the same sample would allow for a better understanding of the evidence-to-practice gap, which, if unaddressed, can lead to suboptimal care for these patients. This study aims at assessing Italian physiotherapists' evidence-to-practice gap in osteoarthritis CPGs. METHODS An online survey divided into two sections investigating knowledge of and adherence to CPGs was developed based on three high-quality, recent and relevant CPGs. In the first section, participants had to express their agreement with 24 CPG statements through a 1 (completely disagree) to 5 (completely agree) scale. We defined a ≥ 70% agreement with a statement as consensus. In the second section, participants were shown a clinical case, with different interventions to choose from. Participants were classified as 'Delivering' (all recommended interventions selected), 'Partially Delivering' (some recommended interventions missing) and 'Non-Delivering' (at least one non-recommended interventions selected) the recommended intervention, depending on chosen interventions. RESULTS 822 physiotherapists (mean age (SD): 35.8 (13.3); female 47%) completed the survey between June and July 2020. In the first section, consensus was achieved for 13/24 statements. In the second section, 25% of the participants were classified as 'Delivering', 22% as 'Partially Delivering' and 53% as 'Non-Delivering'. CONCLUSIONS Our findings revealed an adequate level of knowledge of osteoarthritis CPGs regarding the importance of exercise and education. However, an adequate level of adherence has yet to be reached, since many physiotherapists did not advise weight reduction, but rest from physical activity, and often included secondary treatments (e.g. manual therapy) supported by low-level evidence. These results identify an evidence-to-practice gap, which may lead to non-evidence based practice behaviours for the management of patients with osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Battista
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Genova, Italy
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Stefano Salvioli
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Genova, Italy
| | - Serena Millotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Testa
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health, University of Genova, Campus of Savona, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Dell'Isola
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Orthopedics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Huijbrechts EJ, Dekker J, Tenten-Diepenmaat M, Gerritsen M, van der Leeden M. Clinical guidance for podiatrists in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders: evaluation of an educational programme for podiatrists using a mixed methods design. J Foot Ankle Res 2021; 14:15. [PMID: 33632287 PMCID: PMC7908782 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00435-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Foot and ankle problems are common in rheumatic disorders and often lead to pain and limitations in functioning, affecting quality of life. There appears to be large variability in the management of foot problems in rheumatic disorders across podiatrists. To increase uniformity and quality of podiatry care for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and gout a clinical protocol has been developed. Research objectives [1] to evaluate an educational programme to train podiatrists in the use of the protocol and [2] to explore barriers and facilitators for the use of the protocol in daily practice. Method This study used a mixed method design and included 32 podiatrists in the Netherlands. An educational programme was developed and provided to train the podiatrists in the use of the protocol. They thereafter received a digital questionnaire to evaluate the educational programme. Subsequently, podiatrists used the protocol for three months in their practice. Facilitators and barriers that they experienced in the use of the protocol were determined by a questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were held to get more in-depth understanding. Results The mean satisfaction with the educational programme was 7.6 (SD 1.11), on a 11 point scale. Practical knowledge on joint palpation, programme variation and the use of practice cases were valued most. The protocol appeared to provide support in the diagnosis, treatment and evaluation of foot problems in rheumatic disorders and the treatment recommendations were clear and understandable. The main barrier for use of the protocol was time. The protocol has not yet been implemented in the electronic patient file, which makes it more time consuming. Other experienced barriers were the reimbursement for the treatment and financial compensation. Conclusions The educational programme concerning the clinical protocol for foot problems in rheumatic disorders appears to be helpful for podiatrists. Podiatrists perceived the protocol as being supportive during patient management. Barriers for use of the protocol were identified and should be addressed prior to large scale implementation. Whether the protocol is also beneficial for patients, needs to be determined in future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J Huijbrechts
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Fontys University of applied sciences
- Department of allied health professionals, Fontys Paramedische Hogeschool, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
| | - J Dekker
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M Tenten-Diepenmaat
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Saxion University of applied sciences
- department of healthcare, Saxion, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M Gerritsen
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M van der Leeden
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Centre
- Reade, Dr. Jan van Breemenstraat 2, PO 58271, 1040, HG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Joyce C, Rajak R. A clinical audit into the adherence of foot health management standards of rheumatoid arthritis compared with the foot health management standards of diabetes mellitus in North-East London. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2021; 5:rkab006. [PMID: 33818577 PMCID: PMC8008102 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkab006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives RA has an affinity for smaller joints, thus its effect on the foot/ankle is widely known. Despite this, there is lack of adherence to foot management standards by podiatrists. This research aimed to audit the adherence to these standards and compare them with well-established adherence to management standards in the diabetic foot. Methods In this clinical audit, data were obtained via six National Health Service (NHS) podiatry departments in North-East London on service provision, management, treatment and professional development on both RA and diabetic foot health via foot management clinical audit tools. Descriptive analyses were conducted and analysed to identify patterns and trends, with set standard compliance conditions calculated on the Net Promotor Score (NPS) metric to allow for multi-comparison. Results All areas of RA foot health management were found to have poor compliance when compared with diabetes foot health management. When using NPS, no trust audited met the majority of foot health standards in RA, with only two having a positive score (meeting the minimum standards), compared with all trusts posting a positive NPS on diabetes foot health standards. Conclusion Our results indicate that poor compliance to RA foot health standards is prevalent across the audited region and might be resulting in worsening foot outcomes despite a paradigm shift in other areas of RA management. Enhanced training and knowledge are required for better adherence to the standards set out and to improve foot health management in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Joyce
- Department of Podiatric Medicine and Surgery, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
| | - Rizwan Rajak
- Department of Rheumatology, Croydon Health Service NHS Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Organisation and content of supervised group exercise for people with axial spondyloarthritis in The Netherlands. Rheumatol Int 2020; 41:391-401. [PMID: 33244645 PMCID: PMC7835145 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-020-04742-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Supervised group exercise (SGE) is recommended for people with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). Recent literature suggests that its contents and dosage must probably be revised. As a first step towards renewal, this study examined the current SGE organisation and content for people with axSpA in The Netherlands. A pen-and-paper survey was sent to the boards of the 82 local patient associations affiliated with the Dutch Arthritis Society in 2016. One member of each board was asked to complete questions on the nature and organisation of SGE and one of the supervising therapists to complete questions on the SGE supervision and contents. The questionnaire was returned by representatives of 67/82 (82%) local patient associations, of which 17 (25%) provided axSpA-specific SGE (16/17 SGE programmes with both land-based exercise and hydrotherapy and 1/17 with only hydrotherapy). These involved in total 56 groups with 684 participants and 59 supervisors, of whom 54 were physical therapists and 21 had had postgraduate education on rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). Besides mobility and strengthening exercises and sports (17/17), most programmes included aerobic exercise (10/17), but rarely with heart rate monitoring (1/17), patient education (8/17), periodic assessments (2/17), or exercise personalisation (1/17). In the Netherlands, a quarter of local patient associations organised axSpA-specific SGE, mostly containing land-based exercises combined with sports and hydrotherapy. Most supervisors lacked postgraduate education on RMDs and most programmes lacked intensity monitoring, patient education, periodic assessments, and personalisation, which are needed for optimising exercise programmes according to current scientific insights.
Collapse
|
18
|
Ahmed S, Zimba O, Gasparyan AY. Moving towards online rheumatology education in the era of COVID-19. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:3215-3222. [PMID: 32939569 PMCID: PMC7494363 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05405-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has unsettled conventional medical education, hastening a switch to digital platforms and open-access publishing. Rheumatology is a fast evolving academic discipline that stands to gain by this switch. Most rheumatology textbooks are now available in digital formats, and these are complemented with live updating educational hubs such as UpToDate and ClinicalKey. Emerging topics of COVID-19 on these proprietary platforms are now freely available to all specialists. Social media channels, particularly Twitter, are becoming major players in the era of COVID-19 by offering online journal clubs, enabling fast dissemination of influential articles, and facilitating interactive education. Indexed rheumatology journals, in turn, aid online education by opening access to recommendations and other materials that are rapidly changing research and practice worldwide. Research peer review additionally offers learning experience to novice and seasoned researchers and authors. Global rheumatology societies have online learning resources, which are changing their format and geographic reach to meet the changing needs in the times of pandemic. While online teaching lacks emotional connections between mentors and mentees, switch to a more interactive format of education and regular contacts may partly solve the issue. Rheumatologists can take the lead in these challenging times and contribute more to online scholarly activities which are aimed to maintain and enrich education. Key Points • Disparities in rheumatology education are likely to be widened during the COVID-19 pandemic. • Barriers to rheumatology education include limited number of instructors and their limited experience in online teaching. • Online textbooks, didactic materials of indexed rheumatology journals, and frequently updated online educational hubs such as UpToDate serve as a foundation of online rheumatology education. • Online rheumatology education is enriched by peer review and social media activities, which are becoming major players in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakir Ahmed
- Department of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), KIIT University, Bhubaneswar, 751024 India
| | - Olena Zimba
- Department of Internal Medicine No. 2, Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University, Lviv, Ukraine
| | - Armen Yuri Gasparyan
- Departments of Rheumatology and Research and Development, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust (Teaching Trust of the University of Birmingham, UK), Pensnett Road, Dudley, West Midlands DY1 2HQ UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Curran ML, Hayward K, Mehta J. Online Resources for Enhancing Clinical Knowledge and Skills. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2019; 46:37-60. [PMID: 31757286 DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2019.09.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
"E-learning" refers to instruction occurring via digital media and ideally uses an engaging and learner-centered approach. Advantages of e-learning methods include (1) they can enable consistent messages, (2) they may use novel instructional methods, and (3) they enable documentation of usage and assessment. This article discusses principles for and challenges to developing e-learning materials. The authors provide a collection of available e-learning materials used to teach adult and pediatric rheumatology developed by individuals, professional societies, and private companies. Finally, they discuss challenges to using e-learning materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan L Curran
- Section of Rheumatology, Children's Hospital of Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 13123 East 16th Street, Box 311, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - Kristen Hayward
- Division of Rheumatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington, School of Medicine, 4800 Sand Point Way Northeast, M/S MA.7.110, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Jay Mehta
- Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3501 Civic Center Boulevard, CTRB 10109, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Fragoulis GE, Edelaar L, Vliet Vlieland TPM, Iagnocco A, Schäfer VS, Haines C, Schoones J, Nikiphorou E. Development of generic core competences of health professionals in rheumatology: a systematic literature review informing the 2018 EULAR recommendations. RMD Open 2019; 5:e001028. [PMID: 31749985 PMCID: PMC6827818 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify generic competences on the desired knowledge, skills and of health professionals in rheumatology (HPRs) to inform the respective EULAR recommendations. Methods A systematic literature review was performed on the generic core competences (defined as knowledge, skills or attitudes) of HPRs (nurses, physical therapists (PTs) or occupational therapists (OTs)). Literature was obtained from electronic databases, published EULAR recommendations and via personal communication with representatives of national rheumatology societies and experts in the field. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies were included, and their methodological quality was scored using appropriate instruments. Results From 766 references reviewed, 79 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty studies addressed competences of multiple HPRs: 15 were of qualitative design, 1 quantitative, 1 mixed-methods, 2 systematic reviews and 1 opinion paper. The methodological quality of most studies was medium to high. Five studies concerned the development of a comprehensive set of competences. Key competences included: basic knowledge of rheumatic diseases, holistic approach to patient management, effective communication with colleagues and patients and provision of education to patients. The proposed competences were confirmed in studies focusing on one or more specific competences, on a rheumatic disease or on a specific profession (nurses, PTs or OTs). Conclusion Generic competences were identified for HPRs. Data were mostly derived from qualitative studies. All identified studies varied and were at national level, highlighting the need for the harmonisation of HPR competences across Europe. These findings underpin the development of EULAR recommendations for the core competences of HPRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George E Fragoulis
- Institute of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Glasgow School of Medicine, Glasgow, UK
| | - Lisa Edelaar
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, J11, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Amsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Reade, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theodora P M Vliet Vlieland
- Department of Orthopaedics, Rehabilitation and Physical Therapy, J11, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Annamaria Iagnocco
- Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli Studi di Torino, Rome, Italy
| | - Valentin Sebastian Schäfer
- Medical Clinic III, Department of Oncology, Hematology and Rheumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Catherine Haines
- EULAR, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Clinical Education, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Jan Schoones
- Walaeus Library, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Rheumatology Research, Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
- Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Edelaar L, Nikiphorou E, Fragoulis GE, Iagnocco A, Haines C, Bakkers M, Barbosa L, Cikes N, Ndosi M, Primdahl J, Prior Y, Pchelnikova P, Ritschl V, Schäfer VS, Smucrova H, Storrønning I, Testa M, Wiek D, Vliet Vlieland TPM. 2019 EULAR recommendations for the generic core competences of health professionals in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:53-60. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Revised: 07/25/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Background/objectivesTo maintain and optimise the quality of care provided by health professionals in rheumatology (HPRs), adequate educational offerings are needed. This task force (TF) aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations for the generic core competences of HPRs, with specific reference to nurses, physical therapists (PTs) and occupational therapists (OTs) to serve as a basis for their postgraduate education.MethodsThe EULAR standardised operating procedures for the development of recommendations were followed. A TF including rheumatologists, nurses, PTs, OTs, patient-representatives, an educationalist, methodologists and researchers from 12 countries met twice. In the first TF meeting, 13 research questions were defined to support a systematic literature review (SLR). In the second meeting, the SLR evidence was discussed and recommendations formulated. Subsequently, level of evidence and strength of recommendation were assigned and level of agreement (LoA) determined (0–10 rating scale).ResultsThree overarching principles were identified and 10 recommendations were developed for the generic core competences of HPRs. The SLR included 79 full-text papers, 20 of which addressed the competences, knowledge, skills, attitudes and/or educational needs of HPRs from multiple professions. The average LoA for each recommendation ranged from 9.42 to 9.79. Consensus was reached both on a research and educational agenda.ConclusionEvidence and expert opinion informed a set of recommendations providing guidance on the generic core competences of HPRs. Implementation of these recommendations in the postgraduate education of HPRs at the international and national level is advised, considering variation in healthcare systems and professional roles.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bech B, Primdahl J, van Tubergen A, Voshaar M, Zangi HA, Barbosa L, Boström C, Boteva B, Carubbi F, Fayet F, Ferreira RJO, Hoeper K, Kocher A, Kukkurainen ML, Lion V, Minnock P, Moretti A, Ndosi M, Pavic Nikolic M, Schirmer M, Smucrova H, de la Torre-Aboki J, Waite-Jones J, van Eijk-Hustings Y. 2018 update of the EULAR recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:61-68. [DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 06/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
To update the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of chronic inflammatory arthritis (CIA) using the most up to date evidence. The EULAR standardised operating procedures were followed. A task force of rheumatologists, health professionals and patients, representing 17 European countries updated the recommendations, based on a systematic literature review and expert consensus. Higher level of evidence and new insights into nursing care for patients with CIA were added to the recommendation. Level of agreement was obtained by email voting. The search identified 2609 records, of which 51 (41 papers, 10 abstracts), mostly on rheumatoid arthritis, were included. Based on consensus, the task force formulated three overarching principles and eight recommendations. One recommendation remained unchanged, six were reworded, two were merged and one was reformulated as an overarching principle. Two additional overarching principles were formulated. The overarching principles emphasise the nurse’s role as part of a healthcare team, describe the importance of providing evidence-based care and endorse shared decision-making in the nursing consultation with the patient. The recommendations cover the contribution of rheumatology nursing in needs-based patient education, satisfaction with care, timely access to care, disease management, efficiency of care, psychosocial support and the promotion of self-management. The level of agreement among task force members was high (mean 9.7, range 9.6-10.0). The updated recommendations encompass three overarching principles and eight evidence-based and expert opinion-based recommendations for the role of the nurse in the management of CIA.
Collapse
|
23
|
Armuzzi A, Avedano L, Greveson K, Kang T. Nurses are Critical in Aiding Patients Transitioning to Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Education and Communication Strategies. J Crohns Colitis 2019; 13:259-266. [PMID: 30285235 PMCID: PMC6357893 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The increasing prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease and the high costs associated with biologic therapies suggest that biologics with lower costs, but no compromise on efficacy and safety, should be considered when developing a treatment plan for inflammatory bowel disease. Biosimilars offer a more cost-effective alternative, and although the European Medicines Agency has approved the use of biosimilars for many indications, including inflammatory bowel disease, patients may be concerned about the safety and efficacy of these agents. The updated Nurses-European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation statements, published in March 2018, recommend that inflammatory bowel disease nurses facilitate patient choice of biologic or biosimilar therapy. Nurses are pivotal in managing the challenges associated with patients transitioning to biosimilars. However, there is limited information available on how inflammatory bowel disease nurses can communicate the concept of biosimilars to patients and also on how best to support them before and during the switch from originators. This review article will focus on patients' concerns regarding biosimilars and describe considerations for nurses when supporting patients transitioning from originators to biosimilars. Through nurse-led patient education and the use of structured communication strategies, as well as investment in managed switching programmes, patients will become more confident and adherent to their biosimilar therapy, and this may lead to overall reductions in health-care expenditure for inflammatory bowel disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Armuzzi
- IBD Unit, Presidio Columbus Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS – Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Avedano
- European Federation of Crohn’s and Colitis Association, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kay Greveson
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Taegyun Kang
- Samsung Bioepis Co., Ltd, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dejaco C, Putrik P, Unger J, Aletaha D, Bianchi G, Bijlsma JW, Boonen A, Cikes N, Finckh A, Gossec L, Kvien TK, Madruga Dias J, Matteson EL, Sivera F, Stamm TA, Szekanecz Z, Wiek D, Zink A, Ramiro S, Buttgereit F. EULAR 'points to consider' for the conduction of workforce requirement studies in rheumatology. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000780. [PMID: 30714579 PMCID: PMC6336096 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Current methods used for forecasting workforce requirements in rheumatology are disparate, as are the parameters incorporated into workforce projection studies. The objective of these European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR points to consider (PTC) is to guide future workforce studies in adult rheumatology in order to produce valid and reliable manpower estimates. METHODS The EULAR Standardised Operating Procedures were followed. A multidisciplinary task force with experts including patients with rheumatic diseases from 11 EULAR countries and the USA was assembled. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to retrieve workforce models in rheumatology and other medical fields. PTC were based on expert opinion informed by the SLR, followed by group discussions with consensus obtained through informal voting. The level of agreement with the PTC was voted anonymously. RESULTS A total of 10 PTC were formulated. The task force recommends models integrating supply (=workforce available in rheumatology), demand (=health services requested by the population) and need (=health services that are considered appropriate to serve the population). In general, projections of workforce requirements should consider all factors relevant for current and future workload in rheumatology inside and outside of direct patient care. Forecasts of workforce supply should consider demography and attrition of rheumatologists, as well as the effects of new developments in healthcare. Predictions of future need/demand should take demographic, sociocultural and epidemiological development of the population into account. CONCLUSION These EULAR-endorsed PTC will provide guidance on the methodology and the parameters to be applied in future national and international workforce requirement studies in rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Dejaco
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital of Bruneck, Bruneck, Italy
| | - Polina Putrik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julia Unger
- Department of Health Studies, FH JOANNEUM, University of Applied Sciences, Bad Gleichenberg, Austria
| | - Daniel Aletaha
- Division of Rheumatology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gerolamo Bianchi
- Division of Rheumatology, ASL3-Azienda Sanitaria Genovese, Genova, Italy
| | - Johannes W Bijlsma
- Department of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Nada Cikes
- Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine Specialities, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Laure Gossec
- Rheumatology Department, Pitié Salpêtrière hospital, APHP, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joao Madruga Dias
- Department of Rheumatology, Centro Hospitalar Médio Tejo, Torres Novas, Portugal
| | - Eric L Matteson
- Division of Rheumatology and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, United States
| | - Francisca Sivera
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital General Universitario de Elda, Elda, Spain
| | - Tanja A Stamm
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Zoltan Szekanecz
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Dieter Wiek
- EULAR Standing Committee of PARE, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Angela Zink
- Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charitè University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sofia Ramiro
- Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Buttgereit
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charitè University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geenen R, Overman CL, Christensen R, Åsenlöf P, Capela S, Huisinga KL, Husebø MEP, Köke AJA, Paskins Z, Pitsillidou IA, Savel C, Austin J, Hassett AL, Severijns G, Stoffer-Marx M, Vlaeyen JWS, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Ryan SJ, Bergman S. EULAR recommendations for the health professional's approach to pain management in inflammatory arthritis and osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:797-807. [PMID: 29724726 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2017] [Revised: 03/21/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Pain is the predominant symptom for people with inflammatory arthritis (IA) and osteoarthritis (OA) mandating the development of evidence-based recommendations for the health professional's approach to pain management. A multidisciplinary task force including professionals and patient representatives conducted a systematic literature review of systematic reviews to evaluate evidence regarding effects on pain of multiple treatment modalities. Overarching principles and recommendations regarding assessment and pain treatment were specified on the basis of reviewed evidence and expert opinion. From 2914 review studies initially identified, 186 met inclusion criteria. The task force emphasised the importance for the health professional to adopt a patient-centred framework within a biopsychosocial perspective, to have sufficient knowledge of IA and OA pathogenesis, and to be able to differentiate localised and generalised pain. Treatment is guided by scientific evidence and the assessment of patient needs, preferences and priorities; pain characteristics; previous and ongoing pain treatments; inflammation and joint damage; and psychological and other pain-related factors. Pain treatment options typically include education complemented by physical activity and exercise, orthotics, psychological and social interventions, sleep hygiene education, weight management, pharmacological and joint-specific treatment options, or interdisciplinary pain management. Effects on pain were most uniformly positive for physical activity and exercise interventions, and for psychological interventions. Effects on pain for educational interventions, orthotics, weight management and multidisciplinary treatment were shown for particular disease groups. Underpinned by available systematic reviews and meta-analyses, these recommendations enable health professionals to provide knowledgeable pain-management support for people with IA and OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rinie Geenen
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cécile L Overman
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robin Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Susana Capela
- Rheumatology and Metabolic Bone Diseases Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon, Portugal.,Rheumatology Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Karen L Huisinga
- Department of Rheumatology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Mai Elin P Husebø
- Norwegian National Unit for Rehabilitation for Rheumatic Patients with Special Needs, NBRR, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Albère J A Köke
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Zoe Paskins
- Research Institute for Primary Care and Health Sciences, Keele University, Keele, UK.,Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Irene A Pitsillidou
- EULAR Patient Research Partner, Cyprus League Against Rheumatism, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Carine Savel
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU, Clermont Ferrand, Clermont Ferrand, France
| | - Judith Austin
- Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Afton L Hassett
- Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Pain Research, Chronic Pain & Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Harbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Guy Severijns
- EULAR Social Leagues Patients' Representative, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michaela Stoffer-Marx
- Section for Outcomes Research, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences FH Campus Wien, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johan W S Vlaeyen
- Research group Health Psychology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Behavioral Medicine Research, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - César Fernández-de-Las-Peñas
- Department Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Alcorcón, Spain
| | - Sarah J Ryan
- Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, Haywood Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Stefan Bergman
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Primary Health Care Unit, Institute of Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|