1
|
Ma N, Pan B, Ge L, Li M, Zhu H, Deng X, Li D, Wang X, Wu L, Xiao J, Lai H, Tian J, Niu J, Yang K. Efficacy and safety of Tanreqing injection for cough caused by acute trachea-bronchitis disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY 2024; 321:117429. [PMID: 38007165 DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.117429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE Tanreqing injection (TRQI) is an intravenous herbal preparation derived from 5 types of traditional Chinese medicines including Scutellariae Radix, Lonicerae Japonicae Flos, Forsythiae Fructus, bear bile powder and goral horn, incorporating baicalin, chlorogenic acid, ursodeoxycholic acid, and goose deoxycholic acid and other compounds known for anti-inflammatory properties, is widely used in China to treat cough caused by acute trachea-bronchitis disease (ATB). AIM OF THE STUDY To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of Tanreqing injection (TRQI) with and without Western medicine (WM) for cough caused by acute trachea-bronchitis (ATB). MATERIALS AND METHODS We systematically searched eight databases, including CENTRAL, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, Wiley, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and WanFang, from inception to August 2023 for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on TRQI for cough caused by ATB. The critical outcomes of interest were time to symptom disappearance, including time for cough symptom to disappear and time to improve cough and sputum production. Important outcomes included symptom disappearance rate, adverse events (AEs) and lung function. We carried out random-effects meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.4 and assessed the certainty of evidence utilizing the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. RESULTS A total of 2872 citations were identified by our search, of which 26 eligible RCTs enrolled 2731 participants. Low to moderate certainty evidence showed that when compared with WM, TRQI plus WM treatment was associated with a favorable effect on the time for cough symptom to disappear (MD -2.21 d, 95% CI -2.64 to -1.78), time to improve cough and sputum production (MD -0.68 d, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.53), symptom disappearance rate (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.55), forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (MD 0.38 L, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.50; MD 2.92%, 95% CI 1.29 to 4.56, respectively). In terms of AEs, there was no association between TRQI plus WM and WM (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.21; low-certainty evidence). Very low certainty evidence showed that TRQI alone was associated with reduced time to improve cough and sputum (MD -0.14 d, 95% CI -0.26 to -0.02) and increased symptom disappearance rate (RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.88; low certainty evidence) compared to WM. CONCLUSIONS The overall efficacy of TRQI or WM for ATB cough is better than that of WM, and TRQI also effectively improve symptoms in patients with similar adverse events. However, due to the lack of methodological rigor of included studies, the present findings should be interpreted with caution. We advocate better high-quality and convincing clinical studies to be performed to prove the effectiveness and safety of TRQIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ning Ma
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Bei Pan
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Long Ge
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Mengting Li
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Hongfei Zhu
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Xiyuan Deng
- Department of Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Gansu Provincial Maternity and Child-care Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Dan Li
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Xiaoman Wang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Lei Wu
- Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, 510006, China
| | - Jingmin Xiao
- Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangdong Provincial, Guangzhou, 510120, China
| | - Honghao Lai
- Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Jinhui Tian
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China
| | - Junqiang Niu
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China; The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Evidence-Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, 730000, China; Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Little P, Becque T, Hay AD, Francis NA, Stuart B, O'Reilly G, Thompson N, Hood K, Moore M, Verheij T. Predicting illness progression for children with lower respiratory infections in primary care: a prospective cohort and observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2023; 73:e885-e893. [PMID: 37957022 PMCID: PMC10664149 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for children with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), fuelling antibiotic resistance, and there are few prognostic tools available to inform management. AIM To externally validate an existing prognostic model (STARWAVe) to identify children at low risk of illness progression, and if model performance was limited to develop a new internally validated prognostic model. DESIGN AND SETTING Prospective cohort study with a nested trial in a primary care setting. METHOD Children aged 6 months to 12 years presenting with uncomplicated LRTI were included in the cohort. Children were randomised to receive amoxicillin 50 mg/kg per day for 7 days or placebo, or if not randomised they participated in a parallel observational study to maximise generalisability. Baseline clinical data were used to predict adverse outcome (illness progression requiring hospital assessment). RESULTS A total of 758 children participated (n = 432 trial, n = 326 observational). For predicting illness progression the STARWAVe prognostic model had moderate performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.50 to 0.77), but a new, internally validated model (seven items: baseline severity; respiratory rate; duration of prior illness; oxygen saturation; sputum or a rattly chest; passing urine less often; and diarrhoea) had good discrimination (bootstrapped AUROC 0.83, 95% CI = 0.74 to 0.92) and calibration. A three-item model (respiratory rate; oxygen saturation; and sputum or a rattly chest) also performed well (AUROC 0.81, 95% CI = 0.70 to 0.91), as did a score (ranging from 19 to 102) derived from coefficients of the model (AUROC 0.78, 95% CI = 0.67 to 0.88): a score of <70 classified 89% (n = 600/674) of children having a low risk (<5%) of progression of illness. CONCLUSION A simple three-item prognostic score could be useful as a tool to identify children with LRTI who are at low risk of an adverse outcome and to guide clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Little
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Taeko Becque
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Nick A Francis
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gilly O'Reilly
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalie Thompson
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Theo Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vivaldi G, Pfeffer PE, Talaei M, Basera TJ, Shaheen SO, Martineau AR. Long-term symptom profiles after COVID-19 vs other acute respiratory infections: an analysis of data from the COVIDENCE UK study. EClinicalMedicine 2023; 65:102251. [PMID: 38106559 PMCID: PMC10721552 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Long COVID is a well recognised, if heterogeneous, entity. Acute respiratory infections (ARIs) due to other pathogens may cause long-term symptoms, but few studies compare post-acute sequelae between SARS-CoV-2 and other ARIs. We aimed to compare symptom profiles between people with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, people with previous non-COVID-19 ARIs, and contemporaneous controls, and to identify clusters of long-term symptoms. Methods COVIDENCE UK is a prospective, population-based UK study of ARIs in adults. We analysed data for 16 potential long COVID symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), reported between January 21 and February 15, 2021, by participants unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. We classified participants as having previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or previous non-COVID-19 ARI (≥4 weeks prior) or no reported ARI. We compared symptoms by infection status using logistic and fractional regression, and identified symptom clusters using latent class analysis (LCA). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04330599. Findings We included 10,171 participants (1311 [12.9%] with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 472 [4.6%] with non-COVID-19 ARI). Both types of infection were associated with increased prevalence/severity of most symptoms and decreased HRQoL compared with no infection. Participants with SARS-CoV-2 infection had increased odds of problems with taste/smell (odds ratio 19.74, 95% CI 10.53-37.00) and lightheadedness or dizziness (1.74, 1.18-2.56) compared with participants with non-COVID-19 ARIs. Separate LCA models identified three symptom severity groups for each infection type. In the most severe groups (representing 22% of participants for both SARS-CoV-2 and non-COVID-19 ARI), SARS-CoV-2 infection presented with a higher probability of problems with taste/smell (probability 0.41 vs 0.04), hair loss (0.25 vs 0.16), unusual sweating (0.38 vs 0.25), unusual racing of the heart (0.43 vs 0.33), and memory problems (0.70 vs 0.55) than non-COVID-19 ARI. Interpretation Both SARS-CoV-2 and non-COVID-19 ARIs are associated with a wide range of symptoms more than 4 weeks after the acute infection. Research on post-acute sequelae of ARIs should extend from SARS-CoV-2 to include other pathogens. Funding Barts Charity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Vivaldi
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Paul E. Pfeffer
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohammad Talaei
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Tariro Jayson Basera
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Seif O. Shaheen
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Adrian R. Martineau
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tydeman F, Pfeffer PE, Vivaldi G, Holt H, Talaei M, Jolliffe D, Davies G, Lyons RA, Griffiths C, Kee F, Sheikh A, Shaheen SO, Martineau AR. Rebound in asthma exacerbations following relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions: a longitudinal population-based study (COVIDENCE UK). Thorax 2023; 78:752-759. [PMID: 36423925 PMCID: PMC10359556 DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The imposition of restrictions on social mixing early in the COVID-19 pandemic was followed by a reduction in asthma exacerbations in multiple settings internationally. Temporal trends in social mixing, incident acute respiratory infections (ARI) and asthma exacerbations following relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions have not yet been described. METHODS We conducted a population-based longitudinal study in 2312 UK adults with asthma between November 2020 and April 2022. Details of face covering use, social mixing, incident ARI and severe asthma exacerbations were collected via monthly online questionnaires. Temporal changes in these parameters were visualised using Poisson generalised additive models. Multilevel logistic regression was used to test for associations between incident ARI and risk of asthma exacerbations, adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS Relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions from April 2021 coincided with reduced face covering use (p<0.001), increased frequency of indoor visits to public places and other households (p<0.001) and rising incidence of COVID-19 (p<0.001), non-COVID-19 ARI (p<0.001) and severe asthma exacerbations (p=0.007). Incident non-COVID-19 ARI associated independently with increased risk of asthma exacerbation (adjusted OR 5.75, 95% CI 4.75 to 6.97) as did incident COVID-19, both prior to emergence of the omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 (5.89, 3.45 to 10.04) and subsequently (5.69, 3.89 to 8.31). CONCLUSIONS Relaxation of COVID-19 restrictions coincided with decreased face covering use, increased social mixing and a rebound in ARI and asthma exacerbations. Associations between incident ARI and risk of severe asthma exacerbation were similar for non-COVID-19 ARI and COVID-19, both before and after emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 omicron variant. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04330599.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florence Tydeman
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Paul E Pfeffer
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Giulia Vivaldi
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Hayley Holt
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Mohammad Talaei
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - David Jolliffe
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gwyneth Davies
- Department of Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Ronan A Lyons
- Department of Population Data Science, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Christopher Griffiths
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Frank Kee
- Northern Health and Social Care Trust and Queens University Belfast, Queens University, Belfast, UK
| | - Aziz Sheikh
- Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Seif O Shaheen
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Adrian R Martineau
- Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
- Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Little P, Francis NA, Stuart B, O'Reilly G, Thompson N, Becque T, Hay AD, Wang K, Sharland M, Harnden A, Yao G, Raftery J, Zhu S, Little J, Hookham C, Rowley K, Euden J, Harman K, Coenen S, Read RC, Woods C, Butler CC, Faust SN, Leydon G, Wan M, Hood K, Whitehurst J, Richards-Hall S, Smith P, Thomas M, Moore M, Verheij T. Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection in children presenting in primary care: ARTIC-PC RCT. Health Technol Assess 2023; 27:1-90. [PMID: 37436003 DOI: 10.3310/dgbv3199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Antimicrobial resistance is a global health threat. Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for children with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections, but there is little randomised evidence to support the effectiveness of antibiotics in treating these infections, either overall or relating to key clinical subgroups in which antibiotic prescribing is common (chest signs; fever; physician rating of unwell; sputum/rattly chest; shortness of breath). Objectives To estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of amoxicillin for uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections in children both overall and in clinical subgroups. Design Placebo-controlled trial with qualitative, observational and cost-effectiveness studies. Setting UK general practices. Participants Children aged 1-12 years with acute uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections. Outcomes The primary outcome was the duration in days of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse (measured using a validated diary). Secondary outcomes were symptom severity on days 2-4 (0 = no problem to 6 = as bad as it could be); symptom duration until very little/no problem; reconsultations for new or worsening symptoms; complications; side effects; and resource use. Methods Children were randomised to receive 50 mg/kg/day of oral amoxicillin in divided doses for 7 days, or placebo using pre-prepared packs, using computer-generated random numbers by an independent statistician. Children who were not randomised could participate in a parallel observational study. Semistructured telephone interviews explored the views of 16 parents and 14 clinicians, and the data were analysed using thematic analysis. Throat swabs were analysed using multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Results A total of 432 children were randomised (antibiotics, n = 221; placebo, n = 211). The primary analysis imputed missing data for 115 children. The duration of moderately bad symptoms was similar in the antibiotic and placebo groups overall (median of 5 and 6 days, respectively; hazard ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.42), with similar results for subgroups, and when including antibiotic prescription data from the 326 children in the observational study. Reconsultations for new or worsening symptoms (29.7% and 38.2%, respectively; risk ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.58 to 1.05), illness progression requiring hospital assessment or admission (2.4% vs. 2.0%) and side effects (38% vs. 34%) were similar in the two groups. Complete-case (n = 317) and per-protocol (n = 185) analyses were similar, and the presence of bacteria did not mediate antibiotic effectiveness. NHS costs per child were slightly higher (antibiotics, £29; placebo, £26), with no difference in non-NHS costs (antibiotics, £33; placebo, £33). A model predicting complications (with seven variables: baseline severity, difference in respiratory rate from normal for age, duration of prior illness, oxygen saturation, sputum/rattly chest, passing urine less often, and diarrhoea) had good discrimination (bootstrapped area under the receiver operator curve 0.83) and calibration. Parents found it difficult to interpret symptoms and signs, used the sounds of the child's cough to judge the severity of illness, and commonly consulted to receive a clinical examination and reassurance. Parents acknowledged that antibiotics should be used only when 'necessary', and clinicians noted a reduction in parents' expectations for antibiotics. Limitations The study was underpowered to detect small benefits in key subgroups. Conclusion Amoxicillin for uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections in children is unlikely to be clinically effective or to reduce health or societal costs. Parents need better access to information, as well as clear communication about the self-management of their child's illness and safety-netting. Future work The data can be incorporated in the Cochrane review and individual patient data meta-analysis. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN79914298. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Little
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nick A Francis
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gilly O'Reilly
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalie Thompson
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Taeko Becque
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kay Wang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Sharland
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University, London, UK
| | - Anthony Harnden
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Guiqing Yao
- Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - James Raftery
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Joseph Little
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Charlotte Hookham
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Rowley
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanne Euden
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Kim Harman
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Samuel Coenen
- Department of Family Medicine & Population Health and Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Robert C Read
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Catherine Woods
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Saul N Faust
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Geraldine Leydon
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mandy Wan
- Evelina Pharmacy, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Jane Whitehurst
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands, Coventry, UK
| | - Samantha Richards-Hall
- Southampton Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Smith
- Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Thomas
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Theo Verheij
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Albrecht U, Stefenelli U, Stange R. A combination of Tropaeolum majus herb and Armoracia rusticana root for the treatment of acute bronchitis. PHYTOMEDICINE : INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOTHERAPY AND PHYTOPHARMACOLOGY 2023; 116:154838. [PMID: 37167822 DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tropaeolum majus herb (nasturtium) and Armoracia rusticana root (horseradish) produce three different isothiocyanates as secondary metabolites, which exert antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulatory functions in humans. PURPOSE Combined in the medicinal product ANGOCIN® Anti-Infekt N, the two natural components demonstrated promising effects against acute bronchitis. STUDY DESIGN A randomized, two-armed, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase IV study revealed the healing fostering effect of the two herbal plant components METHODS: This study included 384 patients, with 195 in the treatment and 189 in the placebo group. The 'bronchitis severity score' (BSS) was utilized as primary endpoint. This score sums the ratings for five significant bronchitis symptoms, which are established at the patient's visits to the clinic. RESULTS Compared to placebo intake, the group of patients treated with the phytomedicine showed statistically significant accelerated healing of bronchitis symptoms after three days of treatment, with reductions in coughing, mucous production, and chest pain. This beneficial effect persisted for the entire duration of treatment until day ten. CONCLUSION In conclusion, a combination of Tropaeolum majus herb and Armoracia rusticana root promotes an elevated improvement of bronchitis symptomatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rainer Stange
- Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health Economics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Immanuel Hospital Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yan Y, Sun J, Ji K, Guo J, Han L, Li F, Sun Y. High incidence of the virus among respiratory pathogens in children with lower respiratory tract infection in northwestern China. J Med Virol 2023; 95:e28367. [PMID: 36458544 PMCID: PMC9877598 DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) is one of the major reasons for childhood mortality that threaten the health of the public. We aimed to investigate the epidemiological pathogens and their infection analysis among children with LRTI. Sputum specimens were collected for polymerase chain reaction detection and microbiological tests to identify the viral infection and bacterial infection. The serological specimens were separated from venous blood using for Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydia pneumoniae detection. The virus was confirmed in 86.2% of the children. Human rhinovirus (38.3%), respiratory syncytial virus (32.1%), and parainfluenza virus type 3 (27.2%) were the most frequently identified pathogens. Patients with viral and bacterial coinfection showed younger age (p = 0.032), a higher proportion of wheezing rales (p = 0.032), three depressions sign (p = 0.028), and tachypnea (p = 0.038), and more likely associated with severe pneumonia (p = 0.035). Additionally, older children were more susceptible to viral-atypical bacterial coinfection (p = 0.032). Vomiting (p = 0.011) and fever (p = 0.003) were more likely to occur in children with viral-atypical bacterial coinfection. Attention should be paid to the virus infection of LRTI, as viral-bacterial coinfection and viral-atypical bacterial co-infection may have a detrimental impact on the gravity of LTRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Yan
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical ScienceNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanChina
| | - Jinhan Sun
- Department of Clinical MedicineNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanChina
| | - Kai Ji
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical ScienceNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanChina
| | - Jianhui Guo
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical ScienceNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanChina
| | - Lei Han
- Clinical Laboratory of Yinchuan Women and Children Healthcare HospitalYinchuanChina
| | - Fang Li
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanChina
| | - Yuning Sun
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Basic Medical ScienceNingxia Medical UniversityYinchuanChina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Antibiotic effectiveness for children with lower respiratory infections: prospective cohort and trial in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 2022; 73:e156-e163. [PMID: 36823052 PMCID: PMC9762762 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2022.0239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for children with chest infections but there is little randomised evidence and trials commonly recruit selected populations, which undermines their applicability. AIM To document the effectiveness of antibiotics for chest infections in children. DESIGN AND SETTING This was a prospective cohort study with nested trial in primary care. METHOD Children aged 1-12 years presenting with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections were included in the cohort. Children were either randomised to receive amoxicillin 50 mg/kg per day for 7 days or placebo, or participated in a parallel observational study, where propensity scores controlled for confounding by indication. The outcomes were duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse (primary outcome) and illness progression requiring hospital assessment. RESULTS A total of 764 children participated (438 trial, 326 observational), and children were more unwell than in previous cohorts (more sputum, fever, shortness of breath). Children had been unwell for a median of 5-6 days, and symptoms rated moderately bad or worse lasted another 6 days when no antibiotics were given.With antibiotics there was a non-significant reduction of approximately 1 day in duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse for the whole cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.41), similar to the trial alone (HR 1.13, 95% CI = 0.90 to 1.43). The effect of antibiotic treatment on secondary outcomes was also non-significant. CONCLUSION Antibiotics for uncomplicated chest infections, even in a sample of more unwell children, are unlikely to be clinically very effective.
Collapse
|
9
|
Little P, Read RC, Becque T, Francis NA, Hay AD, Stuart B, O'Reilly G, Thompson N, Hood K, Faust S, Wang K, Moore M, Verheij T. Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection in children presenting in primary care (ARTIC-PC): the predictive value of molecular testing. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 28:1238-1244. [PMID: 35289295 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to assess whether the presence of bacteria or viruses in the upper airway of children presenting with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) predicts the benefit of antibiotics. METHODS Children between 6 months and 12 years presenting to UK general practices with an acute LRTI were randomized to receive amoxicillin 50 mg/kg/d for 7 days or placebo. Children not randomized (ineligible or clinician/parental choice) could participate in a parallel observational study. The primary outcome was the duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse. Throat swabs were taken and analyzed for the presence of bacteria and viruses by multiplex PCR. RESULTS Swab results were available for most participants in the trial (306 of 432; 71%) and in the observational (182 of 326; 59%) studies. Bacterial pathogens potentially sensitive to amoxicillin (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae) were detected among 51% of the trial placebo group and 49% of the trial antibiotic group. The median difference in the duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse between antibiotic and placebo was similar when potentially antibiotic-susceptible bacteria were present (median: -1 day; 99% CI, -12.3 to 10.3) or not present (median: -1 day; 99% CI, -4.5 to 2.5). Furthermore, bacterial genome copy number did not predict benefit. There were similar findings for all secondary outcomes and when including the data from the observational study. DISCUSSION There was no clear evidence that antibiotics improved clinical outcomes conditional on the presence or concentration of bacteria or viruses in the upper airway. Before deploying microbiologic point-of-care tests for children with uncomplicated LRTI in primary care, rigorous validating trials are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Little
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Robert C Read
- National Institute for Health Research, Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Taeko Becque
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Nick A Francis
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gilly O'Reilly
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalie Thompson
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Saul Faust
- National Institute for Health Research, Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK; Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kay Wang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Theo Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Horemheb-Rubio G, Eggeling R, Schmeiβer N, Pfeifer N, Lengauer T, Gärtner BC, Prifert C, Kochanek M, Scheid C, Adams O, Kaiser R. Respiratory viruses dynamics and interactions: ten years of surveillance in central Europe. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1167. [PMID: 35690802 PMCID: PMC9187845 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13555-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Lower respiratory tract infections are among the main causes of death. Although there are many respiratory viruses, diagnostic efforts are focused mainly on influenza. The Respiratory Viruses Network (RespVir) collects infection data, primarily from German university hospitals, for a high diversity of infections by respiratory pathogens. In this study, we computationally analysed a subset of the RespVir database, covering 217,150 samples tested for 17 different viral pathogens in the time span from 2010 to 2019. Methods We calculated the prevalence of 17 respiratory viruses, analysed their seasonality patterns using information-theoretic measures and agglomerative clustering, and analysed their propensity for dual infection using a new metric dubbed average coinfection exclusion score (ACES). Results After initial data pre-processing, we retained 206,814 samples, corresponding to 1,408,657 performed tests. We found that Influenza viruses were reported for almost the half of all infections and that they exhibited the highest degree of seasonality. Coinfections of viruses are frequent; the most prevalent coinfection was rhinovirus/bocavirus and most of the virus pairs had a positive ACES indicating a tendency to exclude each other regarding infection. Conclusions The analysis of respiratory viruses dynamics in monoinfection and coinfection contributes to the prevention, diagnostic, treatment, and development of new therapeutics. Data obtained from multiplex testing is fundamental for this analysis and should be prioritized over single pathogen testing. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-13555-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gibran Horemheb-Rubio
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany.,Department of Infectious Diseases, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas Y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.,DZIF, Center for Infection Research, partner site Cologne Bonn, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ralf Eggeling
- Methods in Medical Informatics, Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Nico Pfeifer
- Methods in Medical Informatics, Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Center for Infection Research, Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Thomas Lengauer
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany.,Computational Biology, Max Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarland Informatics Campus, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Barbara C Gärtner
- Institute of Medicine Microbiology and Hygiene, University of the Saarland Kirrberger Homburg/Saar, Homburg, Germany
| | - Christiane Prifert
- Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Virology and Immunobiology, Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kochanek
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christoph Scheid
- University of Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology, Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ortwin Adams
- University of Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Institute for Virology, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rolf Kaiser
- Institute of Virology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany. .,DZIF, Center for Infection Research, partner site Cologne Bonn, Cologne, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fawsitt CG, Lucey D, Harrington P, Jordan K, Marshall L, O'Brien KK, Teljeur C. A cost-effectiveness and budget impact analysis of C-reactive protein point-of-care testing to guide antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care settings in Ireland: a decision-analytic model. Fam Pract 2022; 39:389-397. [PMID: 34591966 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmab123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 60% of antibiotics issued in primary care are for acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs), which are largely self-limiting and do not require antibiotics. Point-of-care testing (POCT) devices that measure C-reactive protein (CRP)-a biomarker for infection-can be used to guide prescribing decisions. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of a national CRP POCT program to guide antibiotic prescribing for acute RTIs in primary care in Ireland. METHODS We compared CRP POCT with and without enhanced communication skills training of general practitioners against usual care. A probabilistic decision tree was used to investigate cost-effectiveness from the perspective of the healthcare system. The model considered outcomes for the Irish population over a 5-year time horizon. Inputs were synthesized from published studies. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using an incremental cost per prescription avoided. RESULTS CRP POCT with and without communication training were more costly but more effective than usual care over 5 years. CRP POCT alone was dominated, while the combined intervention had a cost per prescription avoided of €111 (95% CI: €45-243) versus usual care. The budget impact was costly over 5 years, but potential budget savings were available depending on the implementation scenario. The findings were largely robust to sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS CRP POCT reduces antibiotic prescribing, but increases healthcare costs. The most cost-effective program of CRP POCT includes enhanced communication skills training. Further research on the impact of CRP POCT beyond 5 years is warranted, as well as the potential impact on antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Fawsitt
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Des Lucey
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Patricia Harrington
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Karen Jordan
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Liam Marshall
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Kirsty K O'Brien
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| | - Conor Teljeur
- Health Technology Assessment Directorate, Health Information and Quality Authority, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Little P, Francis NA, Stuart B, O'Reilly G, Thompson N, Becque T, Hay AD, Wang K, Sharland M, Harnden A, Yao G, Raftery J, Zhu S, Little J, Hookham C, Rowley K, Euden J, Harman K, Coenen S, Read RC, Woods C, Butler CC, Faust SN, Leydon G, Wan M, Hood K, Whitehurst J, Richards-Hall S, Smith P, Thomas M, Moore M, Verheij T. Antibiotics for lower respiratory tract infection in children presenting in primary care in England (ARTIC PC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2021; 398:1417-1426. [PMID: 34562391 PMCID: PMC8542731 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01431-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antibiotic resistance is a global public health threat. Antibiotics are very commonly prescribed for children presenting with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs), but there is little evidence from randomised controlled trials of the effectiveness of antibiotics, both overall or among key clinical subgroups. In ARTIC PC, we assessed whether amoxicillin reduces the duration of moderately bad symptoms in children presenting with uncomplicated (non-pneumonic) LRTI in primary care, overall and in key clinical subgroups. METHODS ARTIC PC was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial done at 56 general practices in England. Eligible children were those aged 6 months to 12 years presenting in primary care with acute uncomplicated LRTI judged to be infective in origin, where pneumonia was not suspected clinically, with symptoms for less than 21 days. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive amoxicillin 50 mg/kg per day or placebo oral suspension, in three divided doses orally for 7 days. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was the duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse (measured using a validated diary) for up to 28 days or until symptoms resolved. The primary outcome and safety were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN79914298). FINDINGS Between Nov 9, 2016, and March 17, 2020, 432 children (not including six who withdrew permission for use of their data after randomisation) were randomly assigned to the antibiotics group (n=221) or the placebo group (n=211). Complete data for symptom duration were available for 317 (73%) patients; missing data were imputed for the primary analysis. Median durations of moderately bad or worse symptoms were similar between the groups (5 days [IQR 4-11] in the antibiotics group vs 6 days [4-15] in the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR] 1·13 [95% CI 0·90-1·42]). No differences were seen for the primary outcome between the treatment groups in the five prespecified clinical subgroups (patients with chest signs, fever, physician rating of unwell, sputum or chest rattle, and short of breath). Estimates from complete-case analysis and a per-protocol analysis were similar to the imputed data analysis. INTERPRETATION Amoxicillin for uncomplicated chest infections in children is unlikely to be clinically effective either overall or for key subgroups in whom antibiotics are commonly prescribed. Unless pneumonia is suspected, clinicians should provide safety-netting advice but not prescribe antibiotics for most children presenting with chest infections. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Nick A Francis
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Gilly O'Reilly
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Natalie Thompson
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Taeko Becque
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Kay Wang
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Michael Sharland
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, St George's University London, London, UK
| | - Anthony Harnden
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Guiqing Yao
- Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - James Raftery
- Health Economics Analysis Team, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Health Economics Analysis Team, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Joseph Little
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Charlotte Hookham
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Kate Rowley
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Joanne Euden
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Kim Harman
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Samuel Coenen
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health and Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Robert C Read
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; National Institute of Health Research Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Catherine Woods
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Saul N Faust
- Faculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; National Institute of Health Research Southampton Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Geraldine Leydon
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mandy Wan
- Evelina Pharmacy, Guy's and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Samantha Richards-Hall
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Peter Smith
- Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Thomas
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- Primary Care Research Centre, Primary Care Population Sciences and Medical Education Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Theo Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
De Burghgraeve T, Henrard S, Verboven B, Van Pottelbergh G, Vaes B, Mathei C. The incidence of lower respiratory tract infections and pneumococcal vaccination status in adults in flemish primary care. Acta Clin Belg 2021; 76:335-345. [PMID: 32149595 DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2020.1735113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Pneumococcal vaccination coverage of adults at risk for pneumococcal disease is below recommended levels. There is no observational data on pneumococcal vaccination and the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections in a general adult population. The current study had the objective to explore the incidence of lower respiratory tract infections and the pneumococcal vaccine coverage in function of age, influenza vaccination status and risk status, in Flanders, Belgium. We used data from Intego, ageneral practice-based morbidity registration network in Flanders (Belgium). We gathered data on pneumococcal vaccinations, influenza vaccination (in 2014) and ICPC2-coded diagnoses of pneumonia and acute bronchitis (2015). First, we divided the population into three groups along the risk status for developing apneumococcal infection according to the recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination in adults by the Belgian High Council of Health. 28.6% from our total adult study population are considered the target group for vaccination. Second, we found that the average pneumococcal vaccination coverage in this targeted population was 18.7%. Third, we found asignificantly higher incidence of LRTI in patients previously vaccinated against pneumococcal disease and/or influenza across the majority of subgroups. Pneumococcal vaccination coverage in Flanders is quantitatively low but observed to be qualitatively high in terms of reaching the most at risk population. Our findings are likely to be highly relevant to addressing future vaccination strategies in Flanders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tine De Burghgraeve
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Séverine Henrard
- Louvain Drug Research Institute, Institut de Recherche Santé Et Société, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium
| | - Bart Verboven
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gijs Van Pottelbergh
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bert Vaes
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Catharina Mathei
- Academic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vyse A, Campling J, Czudek C, Ellsbury G, Mendes D, Reinert RR, Slack M. A review of current data to support decision making for introduction of next generation higher valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccination of immunocompetent older adults in the UK. Expert Rev Vaccines 2021; 20:1311-1325. [PMID: 34550850 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2021.1984888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The burden of pneumococcal disease in older UK adults remains substantial. Higher valency pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) are currently in development with adult formulations for two of these anticipated to become available in 2022. This article collates and reviews relevant candidate data now available that may be used to support cost effectiveness assessments of vaccinating immunocompetent UK adults aged ≥65-years with PCVs. AREAS COVERED This article uses published data from surveillance systems, randomized controlled trials and observational studies. It focuses on local data from the UK but where these are either limited or not available relevant global data are considered. EXPERT OPINION The body of relevant data now available suggests the UK is well placed to assess the cost effectiveness of vaccinating immunocompetent ≥65-year olds with new generation higher valency PCVs. Recent contemporary data provide important new and robust insights into the epidemiology of pneumococcal disease in older UK adults and help to address much of the uncertainty and data gaps associated with previous analyses. Using these data to make informed decisions about use of new higher valency PCVs for routine use in older adults will be important for public health in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Vyse
- Medical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK
| | - James Campling
- Medical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK
| | - Carole Czudek
- Medical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK
| | - Gillian Ellsbury
- Medical Affairs, Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK
| | - Diana Mendes
- Health & Value, Pfizer Ltd, Walton Oaks, Tadworth, KT20 7NS, UK
| | | | - Mary Slack
- School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Queensland 4222, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Morrell L, Buchanan J, Roope LSJ, Pouwels KB, Butler CC, Hayhoe B, Tonkin-Crine S, McLeod M, Robotham JV, Holmes A, Walker AS, Wordsworth S. Public preferences for delayed or immediate antibiotic prescriptions in UK primary care: A choice experiment. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003737. [PMID: 34460825 PMCID: PMC8439451 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed (or "backup") antibiotic prescription, where the patient is given a prescription but advised to delay initiating antibiotics, has been shown to be effective in reducing antibiotic use in primary care. However, this strategy is not widely used in the United Kingdom. This study aimed to identify factors influencing preferences among the UK public for delayed prescription, and understand their relative importance, to help increase appropriate use of this prescribing option. METHODS AND FINDINGS We conducted an online choice experiment in 2 UK general population samples: adults and parents of children under 18 years. Respondents were presented with 12 scenarios in which they, or their child, might need antibiotics for a respiratory tract infection (RTI) and asked to choose either an immediate or a delayed prescription. Scenarios were described by 7 attributes. Data were collected between November 2018 and February 2019. Respondent preferences were modelled using mixed-effects logistic regression. The survey was completed by 802 adults and 801 parents (75% of those who opened the survey). The samples reflected the UK population in age, sex, ethnicity, and country of residence. The most important determinant of respondent choice was symptom severity, especially for cough-related symptoms. In the adult sample, the probability of choosing delayed prescription was 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50 to 0.56, p < 0.001) for a chesty cough and runny nose compared to 0.30 (0.28 to 0.33, p < 0.001) for a chesty cough with fever, 0.47 (0.44 to 0.50, p < 0.001) for sore throat with swollen glands, and 0.37 (0.34 to 0.39, p < 0.001) for sore throat, swollen glands, and fever. Respondents were less likely to choose delayed prescription with increasing duration of illness (odds ratio (OR) 0.94 (0.92 to 0.96, p < 0.001)). Probabilities of choosing delayed prescription were similar for parents considering treatment for a child (44% of choices versus 42% for adults, p = 0.04). However, parents differed from the adult sample in showing a more marked reduction in choice of the delayed prescription with increasing duration of illness (OR 0.83 (0.80 to 0.87) versus 0.94 (0.92 to 0.96) for adults, p for heterogeneity p < 0.001) and a smaller effect of disruption of usual activities (OR 0.96 (0.95 to 0.97) versus 0.93 (0.92 to 0.94) for adults, p for heterogeneity p < 0.001). Females were more likely to choose a delayed prescription than males for minor symptoms, particularly minor cough (probability 0.62 (0.58 to 0.66, p < 0.001) for females and 0.45 (0.41 to 0.48, p < 0.001) for males). Older people, those with a good understanding of antibiotics, and those who had not used antibiotics recently showed similar patterns of preferences. Study limitations include its hypothetical nature, which may not reflect real-life behaviour; the absence of a "no prescription" option; and the possibility that study respondents may not represent the views of population groups who are typically underrepresented in online surveys. CONCLUSIONS This study found that delayed prescription appears to be an acceptable approach to reducing antibiotic consumption. Certain groups appear to be more amenable to delayed prescription, suggesting particular opportunities for increased use of this strategy. Prescribing choices for sore throat may need additional explanation to ensure patient acceptance, and parents in particular may benefit from reassurance about the usual duration of these illnesses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Morrell
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Laurence S. J. Roope
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Koen B. Pouwels
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Monsey McLeod
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Pharmacy Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie V. Robotham
- Modelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom
| | - Alison Holmes
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - A. Sarah Walker
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mas-Dalmau G, Villanueva López C, Gorrotxategi Gorrotxategi P, Argüelles Prendes E, Espinazo Ramos O, Valls Duran T, Gonzalo Alonso ME, Cortés Viana MP, Menéndez Bada T, Vázquez Fernández ME, Pérez Hernández AI, Muñoz Ortiz L, Little P, de la Poza Abad M, Alonso-Coello P. Delayed Antibiotic Prescription for Children With Respiratory Infections: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 2021; 147:peds.2020-1323. [PMID: 33574163 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-1323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness and safety of delayed antibiotic prescription (DAP) compared to immediate antibiotic prescription (IAP) and no antibiotic prescription (NAP) in children with uncomplicated respiratory infections. METHODS Randomized clinical trial comparing 3 antibiotic prescription strategies. The participants were children with acute uncomplicated respiratory infections attended to in 39 primary care centers. Children were randomly assigned into prescription arms as follows: (1) DAP, (2) IAP, or (3) NAP. Primary outcomes were symptom duration and severity. Secondary outcomes were antibiotic use, parental satisfaction, parental beliefs, additional primary care visits, and complications at 30 days. RESULTS In total, 436 children were included in the analysis. The mean (SD) duration of severe symptoms was 10.1 (6.3) for IAP, 10.9 (8.5) for NAP, and 12.4 (8.4) for DAP (P = .539), although the differences were not statistically significant. The median (interquartile range) of the greatest severity for any symptom was similar for the 3 arms (median [interquartile range] score of 3 [2-4]; P = .619). Antibiotic use was significantly higher for IAP (n = 142 [96%]) compared to DAP (n = 37 [25.3%]) and NAP (n = 17 [12.0%]) (P < .001). Complications, additional visits to primary care, and satisfaction were similar for all strategies. Gastrointestinal adverse effects were higher for IAP. CONCLUSIONS There was no statistically significant difference in symptom duration or severity in children with uncomplicated respiratory infections who received DAP compared to NAP or IAP strategies; however, DAP reduced antibiotic use and gastrointestinal adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Mas-Dalmau
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, and.,Nursing Care Reserch Group, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Laura Muñoz Ortiz
- Agency for Health Quality and Assessment of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Paul Little
- Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pablo Alonso-Coello
- Iberoamerican Cochrane Center, and .,CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Willcox M, Simpson C, Wilding S, Stuart B, Soilemezi D, Whitehead A, Morgan A, Wrixon E, Zhu S, Yao G, Webley F, Yan R, Bostock J, Bell M, Griffiths G, Leydon G, Little P, Butler C, Hay AD, Moore M. Pelargonium sidoides root extract for the treatment of acute cough due to lower respiratory tract infection in adults: a feasibility double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised trial. BMC Complement Med Ther 2021; 21:48. [PMID: 33514367 PMCID: PMC7845084 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-021-03206-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pelargonium sidoides DC (Geraniaceae) root extract, EPs®7630 or "Kaloba®", is a widely used herbal remedy for respiratory infections, with some evidence of effectiveness for acute bronchitis. However, it is not yet widely recommended by medical professionals in the UK. There is a need to undertake appropriately designed randomised trials to test its use as an alternative to antibiotics. The aim was to assess the feasibility of conducting a double-blind randomised controlled trial of Pelargonium sidoides root extract for treatment of acute bronchitis in UK primary care, investigating intervention compliance, patient preference for dosage form and acceptability of patient diaries. STUDY DESIGN Feasibility double-blind randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS We aimed to recruit 160 patients with cough (≤ 21 days) caused by acute bronchitis from UK general practices. Practices were cluster-randomised to liquid or tablet preparations and patients were individually randomised to Kaloba® or placebo. We followed participants up for 28 days through self-reported patient diaries with telephone support and reviewed medical records at one month. Outcomes included recruitment, withdrawal, safety, reconsultation and symptom diary completion rates. We also assessed treatment adherence, antibiotic prescribing and consumption, mean symptom severity (at days 2-4 after randomisation) and time to symptom resolution. We interviewed 29 patients and 11 health professionals to identify barriers and facilitators to running such a randomised trial. RESULTS Of 543 patients screened, 261 were eligible, of whom 134 (51%) were recruited and 103 (77%) returned a completed diary. Overall, 41% (41/100) of patients took antibiotics (Kaloba® liquid group: 48% [15/31]; placebo liquid group: 23% [6/26]; Kaloba® tablet group: 48% [9/21]; placebo tablet group: 50% [11/22]). Most patients adhered to the study medication (median 19 out of 21 doses taken in week 1, IQR 18-21 - all arms combined). There were no serious adverse events relating to treatment. Most patients interviewed found study recruitment to be straightforward, but some found the diary too complex. CONCLUSIONS It was feasible and acceptable to recruit patients from UK primary care to a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of herbal medicine (Kaloba®) for the treatment of acute bronchitis, with good retention and low data attrition. TRIAL REGISTRATION HATRIC was registered on the ISRCTN registry ( ISRCTN17672884 ) on 16 August 2018, retrospectively registered. The record can be found at http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN17672884 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merlin Willcox
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Catherine Simpson
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Sam Wilding
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Dia Soilemezi
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Amy Whitehead
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Alannah Morgan
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Emma Wrixon
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Shihua Zhu
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Guiqing Yao
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Fran Webley
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Ruiyang Yan
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Jennifer Bostock
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Margaret Bell
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Gareth Griffiths
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Geraldine Leydon
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Paul Little
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| | - Christopher Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alastair D. Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
C-reactive protein cut-offs used for acute respiratory infections in Danish general practice. BJGP Open 2020; 5:bjgpopen20X101136. [PMID: 33234515 PMCID: PMC7960524 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpopen20x101136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background GPs can use the C-reactive protein (CRP) point-of-care test (POCT) to assist when deciding whether to prescribe antibiotics for patients with acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs). Aim To estimate the CRP cut-off levels that Danish GPs use to guide antibiotic prescribing for patients presenting with different signs and symptoms of RTIs. Design & setting A cross-sectional study conducted in general practice in Denmark. Method During the winters of 2017 and 2018, 143 GPs and their staff registered consecutive patients with symptoms of an RTI according to the Audit Project Odense (APO) method. CRP cut-offs were estimated as the lowest level at which half of the patients were prescribed an antibiotic. Results In total, 7813 patients were diagnosed with an RTI, of whom 4617 (59%) had a CRP test performed. At least 25% of the patients were prescribed an antibiotic when the CRP level was >20 mg/L, at least 50% when CRP was >40 mg/L, and at least 75% when CRP was >50 mg/L. Lower thresholds were identified for patients aged ≥65 years and those presenting with a fever, poor general appearance, dyspnoea, abnormal lung auscultation, or ear/facial pain, and if the duration of symptoms was either short (≤1 day) or long (>14 days). Conclusion More than half of patients presenting to Danish general practice with symptoms of an RTI have a CRP test performed. At CRP levels >40 mg/L, the majority of patients have an antibiotic prescribed.
Collapse
|
19
|
Morrell L, Buchanan J, Roope LSJ, Pouwels KB, Butler CC, Hayhoe B, Moore MV, Tonkin-Crine S, McLeod M, Robotham JV, Walker AS, Wordsworth S. Delayed Antibiotic Prescription by General Practitioners in the UK: A Stated-Choice Study. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:E608. [PMID: 32947965 PMCID: PMC7558347 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9090608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Delayed antibiotic prescription in primary care has been shown to reduce antibiotic consumption, without increasing risk of complications, yet is not widely used in the UK. We sought to quantify the relative importance of factors affecting the decision to give a delayed prescription, using a stated-choice survey among UK general practitioners. Respondents were asked whether they would provide a delayed or immediate prescription in fifteen hypothetical consultations, described by eight attributes. They were also asked if they would prefer not to prescribe antibiotics. The most important determinants of choice between immediate and delayed prescription were symptoms, duration of illness, and the presence of multiple comorbidities. Respondents were more likely to choose a delayed prescription if the patient preferred not to have antibiotics, but consultation length had little effect. When given the option, respondents chose not to prescribe antibiotics in 51% of cases, with delayed prescription chosen in 21%. Clinical features remained important. Patient preference did not affect the decision to give no antibiotics. We suggest that broader dissemination of the clinical evidence supporting use of delayed prescription for specific presentations may help increase appropriate use. Establishing patient preferences regarding antibiotics may help to overcome concerns about patient acceptance. Increasing consultation length appears unlikely to affect the use of delayed prescription.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liz Morrell
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; (J.B.); (L.S.J.R.); (K.B.P.); (S.W.)
| | - James Buchanan
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; (J.B.); (L.S.J.R.); (K.B.P.); (S.W.)
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Laurence S. J. Roope
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; (J.B.); (L.S.J.R.); (K.B.P.); (S.W.)
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Koen B. Pouwels
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; (J.B.); (L.S.J.R.); (K.B.P.); (S.W.)
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Benedict Hayhoe
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK;
| | - Michael V. Moore
- Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK;
| | - Sarah Tonkin-Crine
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK
| | - Monsey McLeod
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare-Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK;
- Centre for Medication Safety and Service Quality, Pharmacy Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W2 1NY, UK
- NIHR Imperial Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Julie V. Robotham
- Modelling and Economics Unit, National Infection Service, Public Health England, London SE1 8UG, UK;
| | - A. Sarah Walker
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
- Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7BN, UK
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK; (J.B.); (L.S.J.R.); (K.B.P.); (S.W.)
- NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (C.C.B.); (S.T.-C.); (A.S.W.)
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
O'Connor S, Huseyin OR, Whyte EF, Lacey P. A 2-year prospective study of injuries and illness in an elite national junior tennis program. PHYSICIAN SPORTSMED 2020; 48:342-348. [PMID: 31928289 DOI: 10.1080/00913847.2020.1714512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Injury and illness in elite national tennis programs can limit players' current and future performance. This study aimed to prospectively examine injuries and illnesses in an Irish elite national junior tennis program over 2 years. Methods: All injuries and illnesses that led to missed tennis training and match play in the Irish national junior tennis program (n = 82) over 2 years were collected in a prospective cohort study. Injury and illness prevalence and rates were calculated and reported with respect to gender and age group. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the type of illness and the region, location, type, nature, mechanism, and severity of injury. Results: Over the course of the study, 54% of players became injured, with 9.0% receiving more than one injury. Injuries were most frequent in the under-16 age group (12.93 injuries per 1,000 athletic exposures), compared to younger age groups (4.13 [U10], 3.43 [U12], 4.63 [U14] injuries per 1,000 athletic exposures) and seniors (1.98 injuries per 1,000 athletic exposures). Lower (49.5%) and upper limb (35.9%) injuries were frequent and mostly occurred due to overextension (35.9%). No significant differences in males and females injury rates were noted. However, females received a greater proportion of shoulder injuries (23.5% vs 10.9%), with more knee injuries in males (29.1% vs 7.8%). 0.52 illnesses per 1,000 athletic exposures were reported, with respiratory/cardiorespiratory (43.5%) most frequent. Injuries lead to greater average sessions lost (6.77 ± 11.56) than illness (1.83 ± 1.11). Conclusion: These findings can inform injury and illness preventative strategies to minimize absence from tennis play and should be prioritized in the under-16 group. Due to the different injury profiles between males and females, tailored preventative programs should be developed for males and females individually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhán O'Connor
- School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University , Dublin, Ireland
| | - Oktay R Huseyin
- National Tennis Centre, Tennis Ireland, Dublin City University , Dublin, Ireland
| | - Enda F Whyte
- School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University , Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peter Lacey
- School of Health and Human Performance, Dublin City University , Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Meier GC, Watkins J, McEwan P, Pockett RD. Resource use and direct medical costs of acute respiratory illness in the UK based on linked primary and secondary care records from 2001 to 2009. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0236472. [PMID: 32760071 PMCID: PMC7410242 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies have shown that influenza is associated with a substantial healthcare burden in the United Kingdom (UK), but more studies are needed to evaluate the resource use and direct medical costs of influenza in primary care and secondary care. Methods A retrospective observational database study in the UK to describe the primary care and directly-associated secondary care resource use, and direct medical costs of acute respiratory illness (ARI), according to age, and risk status (NCT Number: 01521416). Patients with influenza, ARI or influenza-related respiratory infections during 9 consecutive pre-pandemic influenza peak seasons were identified by READ codes in the linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) dataset. The study period was from 21st January 2001 to 31st March 2009. Results A total of 156,193 patients had ≥1 general practitioner (GP) episode of ARI, and a total of 82,204 patients received ≥1 GP prescription, at a mean of 2.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 3.0) prescriptions per patient. The total cost of GP consultations and prescriptions equated to £462,827 per year per 100,000 patients. The yearly cost of prescribed medication for ARI was £319,732, at an estimated cost of £11,596,350 per year extrapolated to the UK, with 40% attributable to antibiotics. The mean cost of hospital admissions equated to a yearly cost of £981,808 per 100,000 patients. The total mean direct medical cost of ARI over 9 influenza seasons was £21,343,445 (SD: £10,441,364), at £136.65 (SD: £66.85) per case. Conclusions Extrapolating to the UK population, for pre-pandemic influenza seasons from 2001 to 2009, the direct medical cost of ARI equated to £86 million each year. More studies are needed to assess the costs of influenza disease to help guide public health decision-making for seasonal influenza in the UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Watkins
- Public Health Medicine, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Phil McEwan
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
| | - Rhys D. Pockett
- Swansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Schneider JE, Boehme C, Borisch B, Dittrich S. Application of a simple point-of-care test to reduce UK healthcare costs and adverse events in outpatient acute respiratory infections. J Med Econ 2020; 23:673-682. [PMID: 32259465 DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2020.1736872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Background: Acute respiratory infection (ARI) accounts for over two-thirds of total antibiotic prescriptions although most are caused by viruses that do not benefit from antibiotics. Most antibiotics are prescribed in the outpatients setting. Antibiotic overuse leads to antibiotic-related adverse events (AEs), inclusive of secondary infections, resistance, and increased costs. Point-of-care tests (POCT) may reduce unnecessary antibiotics. A cost analysis was performed to assess diagnostic POCT options to identify patients with an ARI that may benefit from antibiotics in a United Kingdom (UK) outpatient setting.Methods: Healthcare savings were estimated using a budget impact analysis based on UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) data and direct costs (antibiotics, AEs, POCTs) derived from published literature. Otitis media, sinusitis, pharyngitis and bronchitis were considered the most common ARIs. Antibiotic-related AE costs were calculated using re-consultation costs for anaphylaxis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, allergies/diarrhea/nausea, C. difficile infection (CDI). Potential cost-savings from POCTs was assessed by evaluating NICE guideline-referenced POCTs (CRP, FebriDx, Sarasota, FL) as well as a target product profile (TPP).Results: Fifty-percent (7,718,283) of ARI consultations resulted in antibiotics while guideline-based prescribing suggest appropriate antibiotic prescriptions are warranted 9% (1,444,877) of ARI consultations. Direct antibiotic costs for actual ARI consultations associated with antibiotics was £24,003,866 vs. £4,493,568 for guideline-based, "appropriate" antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotic-related AEs and re-consultations for actual vs. appropriate prescribing totaled £302,496,486 vs. £63,854,269. ARI prescribing plus AE costs totaled £326,729,943 annually without the use of delayed prescribing practices or POCT while the addition of delayed prescribing plus POCT totaled £60,114,564-£78,148,933 depending on the POCT.Conclusions: Adding POCT to outpatient triage of ARI can reduce unnecessary antibiotics and antibiotic-related AEs, resulting in substantial cost savings. Further, near patient diagnostic testing can benefit health systems and patients by avoiding exposure to unnecessary drugs, side effects and antibiotic resistant pathogens.Key points for decision makersMany patients are unnecessarily treated with antibiotics for respiratory infections.Antibiotic misuse leads to unnecessary adverse events, secondary infections, re-consultations, antimicrobial resistance and increased costs.Point-of-care diagnostic tests used to guide antibiotic prescriptions will avoid unnecessary adverse health effects and expenses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Catharina Boehme
- FIND (Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostic), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bettina Borisch
- Institute for Global Health, University Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Dittrich
- FIND (Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostic), Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Assessment of the Efficacy and Safety of Ivy Leaf ( Hedera helix) Cough Syrup Compared with Acetylcysteine in Adults and Children with Acute Bronchitis. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2020; 2020:1910656. [PMID: 32454850 PMCID: PMC7222538 DOI: 10.1155/2020/1910656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Acute bronchitis is defined as a sudden inflammation of the bronchial tubes in the lung mainly caused by viral infection. It is characterized by a persistent cough which can be productive or dry. It is the most common disease in industrialized countries, and thus herbal expectorants enjoy a high popularity in many European countries due to their favorable risk-benefit ratio. Objective The present noninterventional study was intended to gain further data on the application of a cough syrup containing ivy leaf extract EA 575® by evaluating its efficacy and safety in children and adults with symptoms of acute bronchitis. Acetylcysteine (ACC) was chosen as comparator drug (common mono preparations). Material and Methods. The study was conducted at 25 medical practices throughout Switzerland as prospective, open, noninterventional study. Results At entry visit, all clinical assessments including coughing fits, sputum, dyspnoea, rales, severity of the diseases, and coughing quality were rated with moderate intensity in both groups. At the final visit after seven days of treatment, there was a comparable improvement in both groups for all assessments except dyspnoea and number of cough attacks which showed a higher improvement in the EA 575® group compared with ACC. Further, cough-associated sleeping disorders improved more in the EA 575® group. Both, physicians and patients described the efficacy of EA 575® comparable with acetylcysteine. Observations of the tolerability were comparable for both products. The study results indicate that ivy leaf extract might be an effective alternative to acetylcysteine with respect to the improvement of respiratory function in children and adults at a slightly better evaluation of efficacy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Morley VJ, Firgens EPC, Vanderbilt RR, Zhou Y, Zook M, Read AF, MacGeorge EL. Factors associated with antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis at a university health center. BMC Infect Dis 2020; 20:177. [PMID: 32102652 PMCID: PMC7045376 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-020-4825-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Antibiotics are not indicated for treating acute bronchitis cases, yet up to 70% of adult acute bronchitis medical visits in the USA result in an antibiotic prescription. Reducing unnecessary antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis is a key antibiotic stewardship goal set forth by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Understanding what factors influence prescribing for bronchitis cases can inform antimicrobial stewardship initiatives. The goal of this study was to identify factors associated with antibiotic prescribing at a high-volume student health center at a large US university. The Pennsylvania State University Health Services offers on-campus medical care to a population of over 40,000 students and receives over 50,000 visits every year. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of acute bronchitis visits for the 2015–2016 academic year and used a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify variables associated with antibiotic prescribing. Results Findings during lung exams increased the likelihood of an antibiotic prescription (rales OR 13.95, 95% CI 3.31–80.73; rhonchi OR 5.50, 95% CI 3.08–10.00; percussion abnormality OR 13.02, 95% CI 4.00–50.09). Individual clinicians had dramatically different rates of prescribing (OR range 0.03–12.3). Male patients were more likely than female patients to be prescribed antibiotics (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.17–2.41). Patients who reported longer duration since the onset of symptoms were slightly more likely to receive prescriptions (OR 1.04 per day, 95% CI 1.03–1.06), as were patients who reported worsening symptoms (OR 1.78, 95% CI 1.03–3.10). Visits with diagnoses or symptoms associated with viral infections or allergies were less likely to result in prescriptions (upper respiratory tract infection (URI) diagnosis OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.18–0.58; sneezing OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.86; vomiting OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.10–0.83). An exam finding of anterior cervical lymphadenopathy was associated with antibiotic prescribing (tender OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.70–8.83; general OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.25–5.54). Conclusions Suspicious findings during lung examinations (rales, rhonchi, percussion abnormality) and individual healthcare providers were important factors influencing antibiotic prescribing rates for acute bronchitis visits. Patient gender, worsening symptoms, duration of illness, symptoms associated with viral infections or allergies, and anterior cervical lymphadenopathy also influenced prescribing rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valerie J Morley
- Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA
| | - Emily P C Firgens
- Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA
| | - Rachel R Vanderbilt
- Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA
| | - Yanmengqian Zhou
- Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA
| | - Michelle Zook
- University Health Services, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA
| | - Andrew F Read
- Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.,Huck Institutes for the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.,Department of Entomology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA
| | - Erina L MacGeorge
- Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, State College, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cots JM, Moragas A, García-Sangenís A, Morros R, Gomez-Lumbreras A, Ouchi D, Monfà R, Pera H, Pujol J, Bayona C, de la Poza-Abad M, Llor C. Effectiveness of antitussives, anticholinergics or honey versus usual care in adults with uncomplicated acute bronchitis: a study protocol of an open randomised clinical trial in primary care. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028159. [PMID: 31101700 PMCID: PMC6530348 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the frequent use of therapies in acute bronchitis, the evidence of their benefit is lacking, since only a few clinical trials have been published, with low sample sizes, poor methodological quality and mainly in children. The objective of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three symptomatic therapies (dextromethorphan, ipratropium or honey) associated with usual care and the usual care in adults with acute bronchitis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This will be a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, open randomised trial. Patients aged 18 or over with uncomplicated acute bronchitis, with cough for less than 3 weeks as the main symptom, scoring ≥4 in either daytime or nocturnal cough on a 7-point Likert scale, will be randomised to one of the following four groups: usual care, dextromethorphan 30 mg three times a day, ipratropium bromide inhaler 20 µg two puffs three times a day or honey 30 mg (a spoonful) three times a day, all taken for up to 14 days. The exclusion criteria will be pneumonia, criteria for hospital admission, pregnancy or lactation, concomitant pulmonary disease, associated significant comorbidity, allergy, intolerance or contraindication to any of the study drugs or admitted to a long-term residence. SAMPLE 668 patients. The primary outcome will be the number of days with moderate-to-severe cough. All patients will be given a paper-based symptom diary to be self-administered. A second visit will be scheduled at day 2 or 3 for assessing evolution, with two more visits at days 15 and 29 for clinical assessment, evaluation of adverse effects, re-attendance and complications. Patients still with symptoms at day 29 will be called 6 weeks after the baseline visit. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the Ethical Board of IDIAP Jordi Gol (reference number: AC18/002). The findings of this trial will be disseminated through research conferences and peer-review journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03738917; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josep M Cots
- Primary Healthcare Centre La Marina, Barcelona, Spain, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Ana Moragas
- Primary Healthcare Centre Jaume I, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Catalonia
| | - Ana García-Sangenís
- Medicines Research Unit, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Catalonia
- UICEC IDIAP Jordi Gol, Plataforma SCReN, Barcelona, Catalonia
| | - Rosa Morros
- Medicines Research Unit, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Catalonia
- Departament de Farmacologia i Terapèutica, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Catalonia
| | - Ainhoa Gomez-Lumbreras
- Medicines Research Unit, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Catalonia
| | - Dan Ouchi
- Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Catalonia
| | - Ramon Monfà
- Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària (IDIAP) Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Catalonia
| | - Helena Pera
- Medicines Research Unit, Institut Universitari d’Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, Catalonia
- UICEC IDIAP Jordi Gol, Plataforma SCReN, Barcelona, Catalonia
| | | | | | | | - Carl Llor
- Primary Healthcare Centre Barcelona-2B (via Roma), Barcelona, Catalonia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Relationship between neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and short-term prognosis in the chronic obstructive pulmonary patients with acute exacerbation. Biosci Rep 2019; 39:BSR20190675. [PMID: 31015366 PMCID: PMC6522720 DOI: 10.1042/bsr20190675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
We retrospectively collected data from a large sample size of population and explore the relationship between neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and adverse outcomes, and assessed the clinical prognostic utility of NLR in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary patients with acute exacerbation (AECOPD). We reviewed 3 years medical case records, 622 patients were identified including 48 died and 574 alive. Compared with alive group, the died group had significantly elevated neutrophils, lymphocyte, and NLR level (P<0.001). The high-sensitive C-protein level of died group was also higher compared with alive group (7.48 ± 4.2 vs 1.26 ± 0.56, vs P<0.001). The univariate logistic regression indicated that elevated NLR level was associated with the increased of adverse outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 4.59, 95% CI: 2.27–8.94, P<0.001). After adjusted potential confounding factors, the elevated NLR level was still associated with adverse outcomes in the chronic obstructive pulmonary patients with acute exacerbation (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.21–3.48, P=0.008). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for death at 90 days was 0.742 (95% CI: 0.554–0.881). NLR cutoff of >4.19 had a sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 74.2%. Our results suggested that NLR, as a rapid, inexpensive and easily obtained blood routine index was associated with short-term adverse outcomes in patients with AECOPD. The elevated NLR predicted the increased the risk of 90-day mortality in patients with AECOPD.
Collapse
|
27
|
Moore M, Stuart B, Lown M, Van den Bruel A, Smith S, Knox K, Thompson MJ, Little P. Predictors of Adverse Outcomes in Uncomplicated Lower Respiratory Tract Infections. Ann Fam Med 2019; 17:231-238. [PMID: 31085527 PMCID: PMC6827627 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Revised: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Presentation with acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in primary care is common. The aim of this study was to help clinicians treat patients presenting with LRTI in primary care by identifying those at risk of serious adverse outcomes (death, admission, late-onset pneumonia). METHODS In a prospective cohort study of patients presenting with LRTI symptoms, patient characteristics and clinical findings were recorded and adverse events identified over 30 days by chart review. Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified predictors of adverse outcomes. RESULTS Participants were recruited from 522 UK practices in 2009-2013. The analysis was restricted to the 28,846 adult patients not referred immediately to the hospital. Serious adverse outcomes occurred in 325/28,846 (1.1%). Eight factors were independently predictive; these characterized symptom severity (absence of coryza, fever, chest pain, and clinician-assessed severity), patient vulnerability (age >65 years, comorbidity), and physiological impact (oxygen saturation <95%, low blood pressure). In aggregate, the 8 features had moderate predictive value (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.71, 95% CI, 0.68-0.74); the 4% of patients with ≥5 features had an approximately 1 in 17 (5.7%) risk of serious adverse outcomes, the 35% with 3 or 4 features had an intermediate risk (1 in 50, 2.0%), and the 61% with ≤2 features had a low (1 in 200, 0.5%) risk. CONCLUSIONS In routine practice most patients presenting with LRTI in primary care can be identified as at intermediate or low risk of serious outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Moore
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Beth Stuart
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Lown
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Ann Van den Bruel
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sue Smith
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Kyle Knox
- University of Oxford, Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Paul Little
- University of Southampton, Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Falcon M, Iberico C, Guerra F, Reyes I, Felix E, Flores M, de los Ríos J, Diaz ME, Casas A, Sanchez-Gambetta S, Carrasco R. A pilot study of safety of sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and guaifenesin in pediatric and adult patients with acute bronchitis. BMC Res Notes 2019; 12:119. [PMID: 30832720 PMCID: PMC6399863 DOI: 10.1186/s13104-019-4150-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This exploratory study assessed the safety of the combination of sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim and guaifenesin (STG) in adult and pediatric patients with acute bronchitis according to local labelling in Peru. RESULTS We enrolled 51 pediatric and 52 adult participants diagnosed with acute bronchitis and indication of STG. The mean ages were 7.6 years (SD ± 3.2 years) and 42.8 years (SD ± 16.1) and the proportion of female patients were 51% and 65%, respectively. The duration of treatment in pediatric patients was < 5 days in 2% of patients, 5 days in 13.7%, 6-7 days, in 82.4% and > 7 days in 2% while in adults patients it was < 5 days in 17%, 5 days in 69.2%; 6-7 days in 28.8% of patients. Adverse events (AEs) were registered in 9.6% and 19.2% of pediatric and adult patients, respectively. These AEs had definite relation of causality with the study drugs in 2 adults (20% of AEs) and possible causality with the study drugs in 4 pediatric (80% of AEs) and 2 adult cases (20% of AEs). Our results provide valuable data to develop trials of pharmacovigilance where different statistical parameters should be considered to calculate an adequate sample size in studies evaluating STG in pediatric or adult patients. Trial registration NCT02879981 and NCT02902640.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayer Falcon
- Clínica Internacional, Av. Guardia Civil #385, San Borja, Lima 41, Peru
| | - Carlos Iberico
- Clínica Providencia, Calle Carlos Gonzalez # 250, San Miguel, Lima 32, Peru
| | - Frances Guerra
- Clínica Anglo-Americana, Calle Alfredo Salazar #350, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru
| | - Isabel Reyes
- Hospital de Emergencias Pediátricas, Prolongación Huamanga #138, La Victoria, Lima 13, Peru
| | - Efraín Felix
- Clínica San Borja, Av. Guardia Civil 337, Lima 41, Peru
| | - Mónica Flores
- Clínica de Especialidades Médicas, Jr.Eduardo Ordoñez #468, Lima 41, Peru
| | - Jorge de los Ríos
- Hospital de Apoyo María Auxiliadora, Av. Miguel Iglesias #968, Lima 29, Peru
| | - Maria E. Diaz
- Roche–Peru, Av Dionisio Derteano #144, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru
| | - Alberto Casas
- Roche–Peru, Av Dionisio Derteano #144, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru
| | | | - Roberto Carrasco
- Roche–Peru, Av Dionisio Derteano #144, San Isidro, Lima 27, Peru
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Viruses Causing Acute Respiratory Tract Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev 2018; 32:32/1/e00042-18. [PMID: 30541871 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00042-18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Respiratory viral infections are associated with a wide range of acute syndromes and infectious disease processes in children and adults worldwide. Many viruses are implicated in these infections, and these viruses are spread largely via respiratory means between humans but also occasionally from animals to humans. This article is an American Society for Microbiology (ASM)-sponsored Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology (PGCM) document identifying best practices for diagnosis and characterization of viruses that cause acute respiratory infections and replaces the most recent prior version of the ASM-sponsored Cumitech 21 document, Laboratory Diagnosis of Viral Respiratory Disease, published in 1986. The scope of the original document was quite broad, with an emphasis on clinical diagnosis of a wide variety of infectious agents and laboratory focus on antigen detection and viral culture. The new PGCM document is designed to be used by laboratorians in a wide variety of diagnostic and public health microbiology/virology laboratory settings worldwide. The article provides guidance to a rapidly changing field of diagnostics and outlines the epidemiology and clinical impact of acute respiratory viral infections, including preferred methods of specimen collection and current methods for diagnosis and characterization of viral pathogens causing acute respiratory tract infections. Compared to the case in 1986, molecular techniques are now the preferred diagnostic approaches for the detection of acute respiratory viruses, and they allow for automation, high-throughput workflows, and near-patient testing. These changes require quality assurance programs to prevent laboratory contamination as well as strong preanalytical screening approaches to utilize laboratory resources appropriately. Appropriate guidance from laboratorians to stakeholders will allow for appropriate specimen collection, as well as correct test ordering that will quickly identify highly transmissible emerging pathogens.
Collapse
|
30
|
Gal M, Francis NA, Hood K, Villacian J, Goossens H, Watkins A, Butler CC. Matching diagnostics development to clinical need: Target product profile development for a point of care test for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infection. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0200531. [PMID: 30067760 PMCID: PMC6070214 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Point of care tests (POCTs) are increasingly being promoted for guiding the primary medical care of community acquired lower respiratory tract infections (CA-LRTI). POCT development has seldom been guided by explicitly identified clinical need and requirements of the intended users. Approaches for identifying POCT priorities and developing target product profiles (TPPs) for POCTs in primary medical care are not well developed, and there is no published TPP for a CA-LRTI POCT aimed at developed countries. Methods We conducted workshops with expert stakeholders and a survey with primary care clinicians to produce a target product profile (TPP) to guide the development of a clinically relevant and technologically feasible POCT for CA-LRTI. Results Participants with clinical, academic, industrial, technological and basic scientific backgrounds contributed to four expert workshops, and 45 practicing primary care clinicians responded to an online survey and prioritised community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) as the CA-LRTI where a new POCT was most urgently needed. Consensus was reached on a TPP document that included information on the intended niche in the clinical pathway in primary medical care; diagnostic product specification (intended use statement and test concept), and minimum and ideal user specifications. Clinicians minimum requirements of a CA-LRTI POCT included the use of minimally invasive samples, a result in less than 30 minutes, no more than a single preparation step, minimum operational requirements, and detection of common respiratory pathogens and their resistance to commonly prescribed antibiotics. Conclusions This multidisciplinary, multistage partnership approach generated a clinically-driven TPP for guiding the development of a new POCT, and this approach as well as the TPP itself may be useful to others developing a new POCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micaela Gal
- Division of Population Medicine, Medical School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Nicholas A. Francis
- Division of Population Medicine, Medical School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | - Herman Goossens
- Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Angela Watkins
- Division of Population Medicine, Medical School, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher C. Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Clinical relevance of bacterial resistance in lower respiratory tract infection in primary care: secondary analysis of a multicentre European trial. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e627-e632. [PMID: 30061194 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x698333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of antimicrobial resistance on clinical outcomes in patients with lower respiratory tract infection in primary care is largely unknown. AIM To determine the illness course of infections with resistant bacteria in adults presenting to primary care with acute cough. DESIGN AND SETTING Secondary analysis of a multicentre European trial in primary care. METHOD A total of 2061 adults with acute cough (lasting ≤28 days) were recruited from primary care and randomised to amoxicillin or placebo. To reflect the natural course of disease, only patients in the placebo group (n = 1021) were eligible. Nasopharyngeal flocked swabs and/or sputa (when available) were analysed at baseline and Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae isolates underwent susceptibility testing. Patients recorded their symptoms in a diary every day for 4 weeks. Patients with and without resistant bacterial infection were compared with regards to symptom severity, duration of symptoms, worsening of illness, and duration of interference with normal activities or work. RESULTS Of the 834 patients with diary records, 104 showed S. pneumoniae and/or H. influenzae infection. Of this number, 54 (52%) were resistant to antibiotics, while seven (7%) were resistant to penicillin. For the duration of symptoms rated 'moderately bad or worse' (hazard ratio 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.67 to 2.44), mean symptom severity (difference -0.48, 95% CI = -1.17 to 0.21), and worsening of illness (odds ratio 0.31, 95% CI = 0.07 to 1.41), there was no statistically significant difference between the antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-sensitive groups. CONCLUSION The illness course of antibiotic-resistant lower respiratory tract infection does not differ from that caused by antibiotic-sensitive bacteria.
Collapse
|
32
|
Infections of the Upper and Middle Airways. PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE OF PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2018. [PMCID: PMC7152082 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-40181-4.00028-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
|
33
|
Ahmed SMAZ, Abdelrahman SS, Saad DM, Osman IS, Osman MG, Khalil EAG. Etiological Trends and Patterns of Antimicrobial Resistance in Respiratory Infections. Open Microbiol J 2018; 12:34-40. [PMID: 29785214 PMCID: PMC5897982 DOI: 10.2174/1874285801812010034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Revised: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 03/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Respiratory infections are one of the commonest causes of morbidity and mortality related to infectious diseases worldwide. The emergence of antimicrobial resistance is a major global health problem which is well established in developing countries. Good clinical suspicion and correct laboratory identification of respiratory infection causing organisms followed by the appropriate management are needed to compact both community-acquired and nosocomial infection respiratory infections. OBJECTIVES A retrospective study was carried out to elucidate the etiology of respiratory infections in Sudan, as well as to guide the physician to the best antimicrobial alternatives used in the treatment of respiratory infection. METHOD Respiratory isolates that have been morphologically identified and biologically characterized were subjected to antibiotic susceptibility testing. RESULTS A total of 1481 respiratory specimens were examined, recovering 377 organisms from 350 culture positive samples [225(59.7%) sputum, 94(24.9%) broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL), 58(15.4%) Pleural fluid], the commonest organisms were Klebsiella ssp. (25.20%) and mycobacterium tuberculosis (25.20%), followed by Staphylococcus aureus(19.89%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa(8.49%). High rate of resistance of bacterial isolates was observed to Co-trimoxazole (BA), Ampicillin sulbactam (AS), Cefotaxime (CF) and Tetracycline (TE), being 80%, 72.3%, 68.8% and 66.9% respectively; on the other hand, very low resistance rate was found to Amikacin (AK) and Levofloxacin (LE), being 4.6% and 8.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION Guided prescription of antimicrobial agents must be implemented and controlled to limit further spread of antimicrobial resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma M. Al-Zain Ahmed
- Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
- Address correspondence to this author at the Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan; Tel: +249927790916; E-mail:
| | | | - Doua M. Saad
- Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Isra S. Osman
- Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Moore M, Stuart B, Little P, Smith S, Thompson MJ, Knox K, van den Bruel A, Lown M, Mant D. Predictors of pneumonia in lower respiratory tract infections: 3C prospective cough complication cohort study. Eur Respir J 2017; 50:50/5/1700434. [PMID: 29167296 PMCID: PMC5724402 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00434-2017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The aim was to aid diagnosis of pneumonia in those presenting with lower respiratory tract symptoms in routine primary care. A cohort of 28 883 adult patients with acute cough attributed to lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) was recruited from 5222 UK practices in 2009–13. Symptoms, signs and treatment were recorded at presentation and subsequent events followed-up for 30 days by chart review. The predictive value of patient characteristics, presenting symptoms and clinical findings for the diagnosis of pneumonia in the first 7 days was established. Of the 720 out of 28 883 (2.5.%) radiographed within 1 week of the index consultation, 115 (16.0%; 0.40% of 28 883) were assigned a definite or probable pneumonia diagnosis. The significant independent predictors of radiograph-confirmed pneumonia were temperature >37.8°C (RR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5–4.8), crackles on auscultation (RR 1.8; 1.1–3.0), oxygen saturation <95% (RR 1.7; 1.0–3.1) and pulse >100·min–1 (RR 1.9; 1.1–3.2). Most patients with pneumonia (99/115, 86.1%) exhibited at least one of these four clinical signs; the positive predictive value of having at least one of these signs was 20.2% (95% CI 17.3–23.1). In routine practice, radiograph-confirmed pneumonia as a short-term complication of LRTI is very uncommon (one in 270). Pulse oximetry may aid the diagnosis of pneumonia in this setting. Pulse oximetry probably has a role in the diagnosis of pneumonia in the communityhttp://ow.ly/QpWc30fVM2j
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Moore
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Paul Little
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - Sue Smith
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kyle Knox
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Anne van den Bruel
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton, UK
| | - David Mant
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Leydon GM, McDermott L, Thomas T, Halls A, Holdstock-Brown B, Petley S, Wiseman C, Little P. 'Well, it literally stops me from having a life when it's really bad': a nested qualitative interview study of patient views on the use of self-management treatments for the management of recurrent sinusitis (SNIFS trial). BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017130. [PMID: 29101134 PMCID: PMC5695339 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the experience and perceptions of illness, the decision to consult a general practitioner and the use of self-management approaches for chronic or recurrent sinusitis. DESIGN Qualitative semistructured interview study. SETTING UK primary care. PARTICIPANTS 32 participants who had been participating in the 'SNIFS' (Steam inhalation and Nasal Irrigation For recurrent Sinusitis) trial in the South of England. METHOD Thematic analysis of semistructured telephone interviews. RESULTS Participants often reported dramatic impact on both activities and their quality of life. Participants were aware of both antibiotic side effects and resistance, but if they had previously been prescribed antibiotics, many patients believed that they would be necessary for the future treatment of sinusitis. Participants used self-help treatments for short and limited periods of time only. In the context of the trial, steam inhalation used for recurrent sinusitis was described as acceptable but is seen as having limited effectiveness. Nasal irrigation was viewed as acceptable and beneficial by more patients. However, some participants reported that they would not use the treatment again due to the uncomfortable side effects they experienced, which outweighed any symptom relief, which may have resulted had they continued. CONCLUSIONS Steam inhalation is acceptable but seen as having limited effectiveness. Nasal irrigation is generally acceptable and beneficial for symptoms, but detailed information on the correct procedure and potential benefits of persisting may increase acceptability and adherence in those patients who find it uncomfortable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN 88204146.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geraldine M Leydon
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Lisa McDermott
- Primary Care and Public Health Sciences, King's College, 614, 6th Floor, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London, SE1 3QD, UK
| | - Tammy Thomas
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Amy Halls
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Ben Holdstock-Brown
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Stephen Petley
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Clare Wiseman
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Paul Little
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Aldermoor Close, Southampton, SO16 5ST, UK
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Osborne V, Layton D, Fogg C, Tong E, Shakir SAW. Safety of Atrovent ® CFC-free inhaler: respiratory events reported from an observational cohort study in England. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2017; 26:356-363. [PMID: 28990234 DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to identify any unexpected clinical events associated with starting the new CFC-free formulation of Atrovent® MDI in general practice in England. METHODS An active surveillance cohort study was conducted with a focus on selected clinical events, including respiratory symptoms, in past users of Atrovent® CFC MDI ('switchers') and Atrovent® naïve users. Incidence density rate ratios (with 99% confidence intervals) for events occurring in the first 3 months of exposure (risk period-ID1-3 ) compared to 3 months prior to starting treatment (reference period-IDR ) were calculated. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 13 211 patients (median age 70 years, 50.1% female; 63.5% prior users of Atrovent® CFC MDI ('switchers')). Common respiratory events occurred at higher rates after starting treatment than before for switchers, for example lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) [ID1 /IDR = 1.45 (99% CI: 1.17, 1.81)] and worsening asthma [ID1 /IDR = 1.58 (99% CI: 1.00, 2.51)]. Of these events only LRTI was significant for Atrovent® naïve patients [ID1 /IDR = 1.42 (99% CI: 1.04, 1.95)]. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study suggest effect modification of risk as a result of prior Atrovent® CFC MDI use. Overall, Atrovent® CFC-free MDI appeared to be reasonably well tolerated in the immediate postmarketing period and the safety profile appeared similar to that of the CFC formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Osborne
- Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Deborah Layton
- Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.,School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Carole Fogg
- Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.,School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | - Saad A W Shakir
- Drug Safety Research Unit, Southampton, UK.,School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Emergency Medicine Evaluation of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: History, Examination, Imaging and Laboratory Assessment, and Risk Scores. J Emerg Med 2017; 53:642-652. [PMID: 28941558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2017] [Revised: 05/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pneumonia is a common infection, accounting for approximately one million hospitalizations in the United States annually. This potentially life-threatening disease is commonly diagnosed based on history, physical examination, and chest radiograph. OBJECTIVE To investigate emergency medicine evaluation of community-acquired pneumonia including history, physical examination, imaging, and the use of risk scores in patient assessment. DISCUSSION Pneumonia is the number one cause of death from infectious disease. The condition is broken into several categories, the most common being community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis centers on history, physical examination, and chest radiograph. However, all are unreliable when used alone, and misdiagnosis occurs in up to one-third of patients. Chest radiograph has a sensitivity of 46-77%, and biomarkers including white blood cell count, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein provide little benefit in diagnosis. Biomarkers may assist admitting teams, but require further study for use in the emergency department. Ultrasound has shown utility in correctly identifying pneumonia. Clinical gestalt demonstrates greater ability to diagnose pneumonia. Clinical scores including Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI); Confusion, blood Urea nitrogen, Respiratory rate, Blood pressure, age 65 score (CURB-65); and several others may be helpful for disposition, but should supplement, not replace, clinical judgment. Patient socioeconomic status must be considered in disposition decisions. CONCLUSION The diagnosis of pneumonia requires clinical gestalt using a combination of history and physical examination. Chest radiograph may be negative, particularly in patients presenting early in disease course and elderly patients. Clinical scores can supplement clinical gestalt and assist in disposition when used appropriately.
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The benefits and risks of antibiotics for acute bronchitis remain unclear despite it being one of the most common illnesses seen in primary care. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of antibiotics in improving outcomes and to assess adverse effects of antibiotic therapy for people with a clinical diagnosis of acute bronchitis. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL 2016, Issue 11 (accessed 13 January 2017), MEDLINE (1966 to January week 1, 2017), Embase (1974 to 13 January 2017), and LILACS (1982 to 13 January 2017). We searched the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP) and ClinicalTrials.gov on 5 April 2017. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials comparing any antibiotic therapy with placebo or no treatment in acute bronchitis or acute productive cough, in people without underlying pulmonary disease. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality. MAIN RESULTS We did not identify any new trials for inclusion in this 2017 update. We included 17 trials with 5099 participants in the primary analysis. The quality of trials was generally good. At follow-up there was no difference in participants described as being clinically improved between the antibiotic and placebo groups (11 studies with 3841 participants, risk ratio (RR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99 to 1.15). Participants given antibiotics were less likely to have a cough (4 studies with 275 participants, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.85; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 6) and a night cough (4 studies with 538 participants, RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.83; NNTB 7). Participants given antibiotics had a shorter mean cough duration (7 studies with 2776 participants, mean difference (MD) -0.46 days, 95% CI -0.87 to -0.04). The differences in presence of a productive cough at follow-up and MD of productive cough did not reach statistical significance.Antibiotic-treated participants were more likely to be improved according to clinician's global assessment (6 studies with 891 participants, RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79; NNTB 11) and were less likely to have an abnormal lung exam (5 studies with 613 participants, RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.70; NNTB 6). Antibiotic-treated participants also had a reduction in days feeling ill (5 studies with 809 participants, MD -0.64 days, 95% CI -1.16 to -0.13) and days with impaired activity (6 studies with 767 participants, MD -0.49 days, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.04). The differences in proportions with activity limitations at follow-up did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant trend towards an increase in adverse effects in the antibiotic group (12 studies with 3496 participants, RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.36; NNT for an additional harmful outcome 24). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There is limited evidence of clinical benefit to support the use of antibiotics in acute bronchitis. Antibiotics may have a modest beneficial effect in some patients such as frail, elderly people with multimorbidity who may not have been included in trials to date. However, the magnitude of this benefit needs to be considered in the broader context of potential side effects, medicalisation for a self limiting condition, increased resistance to respiratory pathogens, and cost of antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan M Smith
- RCSI Medical SchoolHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice123 St Stephens GreenDublin 2Ireland
| | - Tom Fahey
- RCSI Medical SchoolHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice123 St Stephens GreenDublin 2Ireland
| | - John Smucny
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, Dublin CenterDublinCaliforniaUSA
| | - Lorne A Becker
- SUNY Upstate Medical UniversityDepartment of Family Medicine475 Irving AveSuite 200SyracuseNew YorkUSA13210
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Teo E, Lockhart K, Purchuri SN, Pushparajah J, Cripps AW, van Driel ML. Haemophilus influenzae oral vaccination for preventing acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 6:CD010010. [PMID: 28626902 PMCID: PMC6481520 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd010010.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are serious conditions in which patients are predisposed to viral and bacterial infections resulting in potentially fatal acute exacerbations. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is defined as a lung disease characterised by obstruction to lung airflow that interferes with normal breathing. Antibiotic therapy has not been particularly useful in eradicating bacteria such as non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) because they are naturally occurring flora of the upper respiratory tract in many people. However, they can cause opportunistic infection. An oral NTHi vaccine has been developed to protect against recurrent infective acute exacerbations in chronic bronchitis. OBJECTIVES To assess the effectiveness of an oral, whole-cell NTHi vaccine in protecting against recurrent episodes of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and COPD in adults. To assess the effectiveness of NTHi vaccine in reducing NTHi colonising the respiratory tract during recurrent episodes of acute exacerbations of COPD. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to January 2017), Embase (1974 to January 2017), CINAHL (1981 to January 2017), LILACS (1985 to January 2017), and Web of Science (1955 to January 2017). We also searched trials registries and contacted authors of trials requesting unpublished data. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials comparing the effects of an oral monobacterial NTHi vaccine in adults with recurrent acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or COPD when there was overt matching of the vaccine and placebo groups on clinical grounds. The selection criteria considered populations aged less than 65 years and those older than 65 years. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data from original records and publications for incidence and severity of bronchitis episodes and carriage rate of NTHi measured in the upper respiratory tract, as well as data relevant to other primary and secondary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS We identified six placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials with a total of 557 participants. These trials investigated the efficacy of enteric-coated, killed preparations of H influenzae in populations prone to recurrent acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or COPD. The vaccine preparation and immunisation regimen in all trials consisted of at least three courses of formalin-killed H influenzae in enteric-coated tablets taken at intervals (e.g. days 0, 28, and 56). Each course generally consisted of two tablets taken after breakfast over three consecutive days. In all cases the placebo groups took enteric-coated tablets containing glucose. Risk of bias was moderate across the studies, namely due to the lack of information provided about methods and inadequate presentation of results.Meta-analysis of the oral NTHi vaccine showed a small, non-statistically significant reduction in the incidence of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or COPD (risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57 to 1.10; P = 0.16). There was no significant difference in mortality rate between the vaccine and placebo groups (odds ratio (OR) 1.62, 95% CI 0.63 to 4.12; P = 0.31).We were unable to meta-analyse the carriage levels of NTHi in participants as each trial reported this result using different units and tools of measurement. Four trials showed no significant difference in carriage levels, while two trials showed a significant decrease in carriage levels in the vaccinated group compared with the placebo group.Four trials assessed severity of exacerbations measured by requirement for antibiotics. Three of these trials were comparable and when meta-analysed showed a statistically significant 80% increase in antibiotic courses per person in the placebo group (RR 1.81, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.44; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to hospital admission rates (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.13 to 7.04; P = 0.97). Adverse events were reported in five trials but were not necessarily related to the vaccine; a point estimate is suggestive that they occurred more frequently in the vaccine group, however this result was not statistically significant (RR 1.43, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.92; P = 0.87). Quality of life was not meta-analysed but was reported in two trials, with results at six months showing an improvement in quality of life in the vaccinated group (scoring at least two points better than placebo). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Analyses demonstrate that NTHi oral vaccination of people with recurrent exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or COPD does not yield a significant reduction in the number and severity of exacerbations. Evidence was mixed, and the individual trials that showed a significant benefit of the vaccine are too small to advocate widespread oral vaccination of people with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Teo
- Concord Repatriation General HospitalEmergency DepartmentHospital RoadConcordSydneyNew South WalesAustralia2137
- Griffith UniversitySchool of MedicineGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
- The University of QueenslandSchool of MedicineBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia
| | - Kathleen Lockhart
- Townsville Hospital100 Angus Smith DriveDouglasQueenslandAustralia4814
| | | | | | - Allan W Cripps
- Griffith UniversitySchool of Medicine, Menzies Health Institute QueenslandUniversity DriveMeadowbrookQueenslandAustralia4121
| | - Mieke L van Driel
- The University of QueenslandPrimary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of MedicineBrisbaneQueenslandAustralia4029
- Bond UniversityCentre for Research in Evidence‐Based Practice (CREBP)Gold CoastQueenslandAustralia4229
- Ghent UniversityDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care1K3, De Pintelaan 185GhentBelgium9000
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Little P, Stuart B, Smith S, Thompson MJ, Knox K, van den Bruel A, Lown M, Moore M, Mant D. Antibiotic prescription strategies and adverse outcome for uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infections: prospective cough complication cohort (3C) study. BMJ 2017; 357:j2148. [PMID: 28533265 PMCID: PMC5439222 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j2148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess the impact on adverse outcomes of different antibiotic prescribing strategies for lower respiratory tract infections in people aged 16 years or more.Design Prospective cohort study.Setting UK general practice.Participants 28 883 patients with lower respiratory tract infection; symptoms, signs, and antibiotic prescribing strategies were recorded at the index consultation.Main outcome measures The main outcomes were reconsultation with symptoms of lower respiratory tract infection in the 30 days after the index consultation, hospital admission, or death. Multivariable analysis controlled for an extensive list of variables related to the propensity to prescribe antibiotics and for clustering by doctor.Results Of the 28 883 participants, 104 (0.4%) were referred to hospital for radiographic investigation or admission, or both on the day of the index consultation, or were admitted with cancer. Of the remaining 28 779, subsequent hospital admission or death occurred in 26/7332 (0.3%) after no antibiotic prescription, 156/17 628 (0.9%) after prescription for immediate antibiotics, and 14/3819 (0.4%) after a prescription for delayed antibiotics. Multivariable analysis documented no reduction in hospital admission and death after immediate antibiotics (multivariable risk ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 1.81, P=0.84) and a non-significant reduction with delayed antibiotics (0.81, 0.41 to 1.64, P=0.61). Reconsultation for new, worsening, or non-resolving symptoms was common (1443/7332 (19.7%), 4455/17 628 (25.3%), and 538/3819 (14.1%), respectively) and was significantly reduced by delayed antibiotics (multivariable risk ratio 0.64, 0.57 to 0.72, P<0.001) but not by immediate antibiotics (0.98, 0.90 to 1.07, P=0.66).Conclusion Prescribing immediate antibiotics may not reduce subsequent hospital admission or death for young people and adults with uncomplicated lower respiratory tract infection, and such events are uncommon. If clinicians are considering antibiotics, a delayed prescription may be preferable since it is associated with a reduced number of reconsultations for worsening illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Little
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, PCPS Unit, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Beth Stuart
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, PCPS Unit, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Sue Smith
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Kyle Knox
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Ann van den Bruel
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| | - Mark Lown
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, PCPS Unit, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - Michael Moore
- University of Southampton, Primary Care Medical Group, PCPS Unit, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton SO16 5ST, UK
| | - David Mant
- Nuffield Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Woźniak W, Kozińska A, Ciostek P, Sitkiewicz I. Susceptibility of Vascular Implants to Colonization in vitro by Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pol J Microbiol 2017; 66:125-129. [DOI: 10.5604/17331331.1235001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared association of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus faecalis with nine vascular implants after co-culture. Vascular implants were composed of various materials such as warp knitted polyester (with or without gelatin and silver ions), expanded polytetrafluoroethylene and biological materials – surface treated porcine pericardial patch and Omniflow II. The lowest overall number of associated bacteria was detected for polytetrafluoroethylene implants and porcine pericardial patch. The highest overall number of associated bacteria was detected for Omniflow II implant. The major source of variation, i.e. primary factor influencing colonization, is the implant type (56.22%), bacterial species is responsible for only 1.81%, and interaction of those two factors – 13.09% of variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Witold Woźniak
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Kozińska
- Department of Epidemiology and Clinical Microbiology, National Institute of Medicines, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Piotr Ciostek
- Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Second Faculty of Medicine with the English Division and the Physiotherapy Division, Medical University of Warsaw, Warszawa, Poland
| | - Izabela Sitkiewicz
- Department of Molecular Microbiology, National Institute of Medicines, Warszawa, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Butler MW, Keane MP. Bronchitis, Bronchiectasis. Infect Dis (Lond) 2017. [PMCID: PMC7150028 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7020-6285-8.00027-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
|
43
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The clinical benefits of vitamin D therapy have received substantial attention over the past decade. Recently, several trials looked to clarify the optimal vitamin D dose or serum level needed to promote human health. The purpose of this review is to highlight selected studies published since January 2015. RECENT FINDINGS Several recent trials challenge whether serum vitamin D levels at least 30 ng/ml promote human health. In postmenopausal women with 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels 21 ± 3 ng/ml, high-dose vitamin D for 1 year increased calcium absorption by 1%, without changes in bone mineral density, physical function, or falls when compared with low-dose vitamin D and placebo. High-dose vitamin D increased risk of falling in 200 adults 78 ± 5 years old with baseline 25(OH)D levels of ∼19 ± 9 ng/ml. High-dose vitamin D in adults increased the number and duration of upper respiratory tract infections compared with placebo. Asthma patients achieving 25(OH)D levels more than 30 ng/ml during a trial experienced more respiratory infections than those not achieving such levels. SUMMARY Recent studies are congruent with the Institute of Medicine's conclusion that humans are vitamin D replete when their serum 25(OH)D levels are at least 20 ng/ml. Higher levels seem to promote falls and respiratory infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen E Hansen
- Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Marchello C, Dale AP, Thai TN, Han DS, Ebell MH. Prevalence of Atypical Pathogens in Patients With Cough and Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Meta-Analysis. Ann Fam Med 2016; 14:552-566. [PMID: 28376442 PMCID: PMC5389400 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 06/02/2016] [Accepted: 07/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), acute cough, bronchitis, and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) are often caused by infections with viruses or Streptococcus pneumoniae. The prevalence of atypical pathogens Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila, and Bordetella pertussis among patients with these illnesses in the ambulatory setting has not been previously summarized. We set out to derive prevalence information from the existing literature. METHODS We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE for prospective, consecutive-series studies reporting the prevalence of M pneumoniae, C pneumoniae, L pneumophila and/or B pertussis in outpatients with cough, acute bronchitis, LRTI, or CAP. Articles were independently reviewed by 2 authors for inclusion and abstraction of data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus discussion. A meta-analysis was performed on each pathogen to calculate the pooled prevalence estimates using a random effects model of raw proportions. RESULTS Fifty studies met our inclusion criteria. While calculated heterogeneity was high, most studies reported prevalence for each pathogen within a fairly narrow range. In patients with CAP, the overall prevalences of M pneumoniae and C pneumoniae were 10.1% (95% CI, 7.1%-13.1%) and 3.5% (95% CI, 2.2%-4.9%), respectively. Consistent with previous reports, M pneumoniae prevalence peaked in roughly 6-year intervals. Overall prevalence of L pneumophila was 2.7% (95% CI, 2.0%-3.4%), but the organism was rare in children, with only 1 case in 1,765. In patients with prolonged cough in primary care, the prevalence of B pertussis was 12.4% (95% CI, 4.9%-19.8%), although it was higher in studies that included only children (17.6%; 95% CI, 3.4%-31.8%). CONCLUSIONS Atypical bacterial pathogens are relatively common causes of lower respiratory diseases, including cough, bronchitis, and CAP. Where surveillance data were available, we found higher prevalences in studies where all patients are tested for these pathogens. It is likely that these conditions are underreported, underdiagnosed, and undertreated in current clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Marchello
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Ariella Perry Dale
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Thuy Nhu Thai
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Duk Soo Han
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| | - Mark H Ebell
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Teepe J, Broekhuizen BDL, Loens K, Lammens C, Ieven M, Goossens H, Little P, Butler CC, Coenen S, Godycki-Cwirko M, Verheij T. Disease Course of Lower Respiratory Tract Infection With a Bacterial Cause. Ann Fam Med 2016; 14:534-539. [PMID: 28376440 PMCID: PMC5389387 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Revised: 04/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Bacterial pathogens are assumed to cause an illness course different from that of nonbacterial causes of acute cough, but evidence is lacking. We evaluated the disease course of lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) with a bacterial cause in adults with acute cough. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter European trial in which 2,061 adults with acute cough (28 days' duration or less) were recruited from primary care and randomized to amoxicillin or placebo. For this analysis only patients in the placebo group (n = 1,021) were included, reflecting the natural course of disease. Standardized microbiological and serological analyses were performed at baseline to define a bacterial cause. All patients recorded symptoms in a diary for 4 weeks. The disease course between those with and without a bacterial cause was compared by symptom severity in days 2 to 4, duration of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse, and a return consultation. RESULTS Of 1,021 eligible patients, 187 were excluded for missing diary records, leaving 834 patients, of whom 162 had bacterial LRTI. Patients with bacterial LRTI had worse symptoms at day 2 to 4 after the first office visit (P = .014) and returned more often for a second consultation, 27% vs 17%, than those without bacterial LRTI (P = .004). Resolution of symptoms rated moderately bad or worse did not differ (P = .375). CONCLUSIONS Patients with acute bacterial LRTI have a slightly worse course of disease when compared with those without an identified bacterial cause, but the relevance of this difference is not meaningful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolien Teepe
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Berna D L Broekhuizen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Katherine Loens
- University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Christine Lammens
- University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Margareta Ieven
- University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Herman Goossens
- University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paul Little
- University of Southampton Medical School, Primary Care Medical Group, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher C Butler
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Cwm Taf University Health Board, Abercynon, United Kingdom
| | - Samuel Coenen
- University of Antwerp, Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine & Infectious Diseases Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Antwerp, Belgium.,University of Antwerp, Centre for General Practice, Department of Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (ELIZA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Theo Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Park JY, Park S, Lee SH, Lee MG, Park YB, Oh KC, Lee JM, Kim DI, Seo KH, Shin KC, Yoo KH, Ko Y, Jang SH, Jung KS, Hwang YI. Microorganisms Causing Community-Acquired Acute Bronchitis: The Role of Bacterial Infection. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0165553. [PMID: 27788254 PMCID: PMC5082923 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although acute bronchitis is quite common, there is relatively limited information regarding the microorganisms that are involved in this illness. METHODS We performed a prospective study of acute bronchitis at 31 hospitals and clinics in Korea from July 2011 to June 2012. Sputum specimens were collected for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and culture of microorganisms. RESULTS Of the 811 enrolled patients, 291 had acceptable sputum specimens that were included for analysis of the etiologic distribution. With multiplex PCR testing, viruses were identified in 36.1% (105/291), most commonly rhinovirus (25.8%) and coronavirus (3.8%). Typical bacteria were isolated in 126/291 (43.3%) patients. Among these patients Haemophilus influenzae (n = 39) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (n = 30) were isolated most commonly; atypical bacteria were identified in 44 (15.1%) patients. Bacteria-only, virus-only, and mixed infections (bacteria plus virus) accounted for 36.7% (98/291), 17.2% (50/291), and 18.9% (55/291) of infections, respectively. In particular, 52.4% of patients with viral infection had a concurrent bacterial infection, and rhinovirus was the most common virus in mixed infections (40/55). Additionally, infections with typical bacteria were more common in patients with chronic lung disease (p = 0.029), and typical bacterial infections showed a trend towards a higher prevalence with older age (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Bacteria were associated with almost half of community-acquired acute bronchitis cases. Additional studies are required to further illuminate the role of bacteria and to identify patient groups most likely to benefit from antibiotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Young Park
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sunghoon Park
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Hwa Lee
- Seegene Medical Foundation, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Goo Lee
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Bum Park
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kil Chan Oh
- Myeongmun Clinic of Internal Medicine, Yongin, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Myung Lee
- Leejaemyung Clinic of Internal Medicine, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Do Il Kim
- Rapha Clinic of Otolaryngology, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Hyun Seo
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyeong-Cheol Shin
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Ha Yoo
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Konkuk University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yongchun Ko
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Gwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hun Jang
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Ki-Suck Jung
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Il Hwang
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Teepe J, Broekhuizen BDL, Loens K, Lammens C, Ieven M, Goossens H, Little P, Butler CC, Coenen S, Godycki-Cwirko M, Verheij TJM. Predicting the presence of bacterial pathogens in the airways of primary care patients with acute cough. CMAJ 2016; 189:E50-E55. [PMID: 27777252 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.151364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 08/16/2016] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bacterial testing of all patients who present with acute cough is not feasible in primary care. Furthermore, the extent to which easily obtainable clinical information predicts bacterial infection is unknown. We evaluated the diagnostic value of clinical examination and testing for C-reactive protein and procalcitonin for bacterial lower respiratory tract infection. METHODS Through a European diagnostic study, we recruited 3104 adults with acute cough (≤ 28 days) in primary care settings. All of the patients underwent clinical examination, measurement of C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in blood, and chest radiography. Bacterial infection was determined by conventional culture, polymerase chain reaction and serology, and positive results were defined by the presence of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Bordetella pertussis or Legionella pneumophila. Using multivariable regression analysis, we examined the association of diagnostic variables with the presence of bacterial infection. RESULTS Overall, 539 patients (17%) had bacterial lower respiratory tract infection, and 38 (1%) had bacterial pneumonia. The only item with diagnostic value for lower respiratory tract infection was discoloured sputum (area under the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54-0.59). Adding C-reactive protein above 30 mg/L increased the area under the ROC curve to 0.62 (95% CI 0.59-0.65). For bacterial pneumonia, comorbidity, fever and crackles on auscultation had diagnostic value (area under ROC curve 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.77). Adding C-reactive protein above 30 mg/L increased the area under the ROC curve to 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.87). Procalcitonin did not add diagnostic information for any bacterial lower respiratory tract infection, including bacterial pneumonia. INTERPRETATION In adults presenting with acute lower respiratory tract infection, signs, symptoms and C-reactive protein showed diagnostic value for a bacterial cause. However, the ability of these diagnostic indicators to exclude a bacterial cause was limited. Procalcitonin added no clinically relevant information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolien Teepe
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Berna D L Broekhuizen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Katherine Loens
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Christine Lammens
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Margareta Ieven
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Herman Goossens
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Paul Little
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Chris C Butler
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Samuel Coenen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maciek Godycki-Cwirko
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Theo J M Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care (Teepe, Broekhuizen, Verheij), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO) (Loens, Lammens, Ieven, Goossens, Coenen), and Centre for General Practice, Primary and Interdisciplinary Care (Coenen), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; Primary Care Medical Group (Little), University of Southampton Medical School, Southampton, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Butler), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Faculty of Health Sciences (Godycki-Cwirko), Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Catherinot E, Rivaud E, Bron C, Couderc LJ. Neumonía aguda extrahospitalaria. EMC - TRATADO DE MEDICINA 2016. [PMCID: PMC7147127 DOI: 10.1016/s1636-5410(16)79472-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
La neumonía aguda extrahospitalaria sigue estando asociada a una elevada morbimortalidad. Durante estos últimos años, y gracias al desarrollo de técnicas de biología molecular, se han realizado importantes progresos en los métodos diagnósticos. Estas técnicas permiten mejorar la detección de bacterias atípicas y de virus respiratorios estacionales. Han permitido asimismo subrayar el lugar de los virus respiratorios en su aparición. El protocolo terapéutico se basa siempre en la instauración precoz de una antibioticoterapia que casi siempre es empírica. Las recomendaciones europeas para el tratamiento de las neumonías extrahospitalarias han sido puestas al día en 2011, como también lo han sido recientemente las pautas vacunales frente al neumococo. En este artículo, se resumen las etiologías de las neumonías, su diagnóstico, las escalas que permiten evaluar su gravedad y orientar el tratamiento del paciente, los datos sobre la sensibilidad a los antibióticos y las recomendaciones terapéuticas resultantes, así como las estrategias de prevención.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Catherinot
- Service de pneumologie, Pôle des maladies des voies respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, 40, rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
- Laboratoire de pharmacologie respiratoire UPRES EA220, Hôpital Foch, 11, rue Guillaume-Lenoir, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - E. Rivaud
- Service de pneumologie, Pôle des maladies des voies respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, 40, rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - C. Bron
- Service de pneumologie, Pôle des maladies des voies respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, 40, rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
- Unité de formation et de recherches Sciences de la santé Simone-Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, 2, avenue de la Source-de-la-Bièvre, 78180 Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| | - L.-J. Couderc
- Service de pneumologie, Pôle des maladies des voies respiratoires, Hôpital Foch, 40, rue Worth, 92150 Suresnes, France
- Laboratoire de pharmacologie respiratoire UPRES EA220, Hôpital Foch, 11, rue Guillaume-Lenoir, 92150 Suresnes, France
- Unité de formation et de recherches Sciences de la santé Simone-Veil, Université Versailles Saint-Quentin, 2, avenue de la Source-de-la-Bièvre, 78180 Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Minnaard MC, van de Pol AC, Hopstaken RM, van Delft S, Broekhuizen BDL, Verheij TJM, de Wit NJ. C-reactive protein point-of-care testing and associated antibiotic prescribing. Fam Pract 2016; 33:408-13. [PMID: 27230745 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmw039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In clinical trials, the potential of point-of-care (POC) C-reactive protein (CRP) tests was demonstrated in decreasing antibiotic prescribing in adults with acute cough in general practice, but effects of implementation are unknown. OBJECTIVE To determine the overall effect of POC CRP testing on antibiotic prescribing rate in general practice. METHODS In an observational study, GPs were instructed to use POC CRP in adults with acute cough following current guidelines. After routine history taking and physical examination, they reported whether they intended to prescribe antibiotics ('pre-test decision'). They reported their revised decision after receiving the POC CRP test result ('post-test decision'). Primary outcome was the percentage of patients in whom the GP changed his or her decision to prescribe antibiotics. Secondary outcome was the difference between 'pre-test' and 'post-test' antibiotic prescribing % at group level. RESULTS A total of 40 GPs enrolled 939 patients, 78% of whom were tested for CRP. GPs changed their decision after POC CRP testing in 200 patients (27%). Antibiotic prescribing before and after CRP testing did not differ ('pre-test' 31%, 'post-test' 28%; 95% confidence interval of difference -7 to 1). In 41% of the tested patients, the indication for testing was in accordance with the guidelines. CONCLUSION POC CRP influenced GPs to change their decision about antibiotic prescribing in patients with acute cough. POC CRP testing does not reduce overall antibiotic prescribing by GPs who already have a low antibiotic prescribing rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaretha C Minnaard
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands and
| | - Alma C van de Pol
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands and
| | | | - Sanne van Delft
- Saltro Diagnostic Center for Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Berna D L Broekhuizen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands and
| | - Theo J M Verheij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands and
| | - Niek J de Wit
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands and
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pneumococcus and the Elderly in Italy: A Summary of Available Evidence Regarding Carriage, Clinical Burden of Lower Respiratory Tract Infections and On-Field Effectiveness of PCV13 Vaccination. Int J Mol Sci 2016; 17:ijms17071140. [PMID: 27428964 PMCID: PMC4964513 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2016] [Revised: 07/07/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Streptococcus pneumoniae is currently the leading cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in adults, elderly and high-risk subjects worldwide. The clear benefits of pneumococcal conjugate vaccination in childhood have been accompanied by a decrease of vaccine-serotype invasive diseases among adults in several countries, mainly due to the herd effect mediated by the reduction of vaccine-serotype nasopharyngeal colonization in both age groups, but this reduction in the incidence of pneumonia has not been observed. The "Community Acquired Pneumonia Immunization Trial in Adults" (CAPITA) study provided conclusive evidence about 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) efficacy in preventing CAP in adults and led Western countries to issue new recommendations for pneumococcal immunization targeting subjects >50 years and high-risk groups, with marked differences with respect to age and/or risk groups immunized, eligibility for reimbursement and national, regional or local implementation. Several Italian regions implemented PCV13 immunization programs in adults and interesting data have been come available in the last years, especially from Liguria, a Northern region with a high and long-lasting pneumococcal vaccine immunological pressure in infants. In this review, currently available evidence from Italy and Liguria regarding pneumococcal carriage, burden of CAP and LRTI, and on-field effectiveness of PCV13 immunization in adults and elderly will be summarized.
Collapse
|