A diagnostic model for chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Advanced Imaging and Occupational History in the Diagnosis of Bird Fancier's Lung: A Case Report

Bird fancier's lung (BFL) is a subtype of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) resulting from the repeated inhalation of avian proteins found in bird droppings, feathers, and serum. Diagnosing BFL is challenging due to nonspecific symptoms that overlap with other ILDs like idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and sarcoidosis. This complexity is heightened during pandemics such as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), where respiratory symptoms may be misattributed to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, leading to diagnostic anchoring and delays in appropriate management. High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is pivotal in detecting subtle pulmonary changes, characteristic of HP, surpassing standard chest radiographs. We present the case of a 43-year-old male pigeon keeper with an eight-week history of progressive dyspnea on exertion and intermittent chest pain. Despite unremarkable chest X-rays, HRCT revealed bilateral diffuse centrilobular nodules, patchy ground-glass opacities, and a mosaic attenuation pattern without fibrosis, consistent with acute HP. A thorough occupational history uncovered significant avian antigen exposure, and a family history suggested genetic susceptibility. The patient was diagnosed with BFL and treated with a tapering regimen of oral corticosteroids, starting at 40 mg/day. He was advised to cease pigeon keeping and avoid future avian exposure. Significant symptomatic improvement occurred within three months. Follow-up imaging over one year confirmed stable lung parenchyma with no disease progression or recurrence. This case underscores the importance of incorporating detailed occupational histories and utilizing advanced imaging modalities like HRCT when standard imaging is inconclusive. Early identification and intervention are crucial to prevent progression to chronic HP and irreversible fibrosis. Management should focus on reducing inflammation with corticosteroids and implementing strict environmental controls to prevent re-exposure. Long-term follow-up is essential to monitor for recurrence and maintain remission. Clinicians should remain vigilant for alternative diagnoses during pandemics to avoid diagnostic anchoring. This case contributes to the evidence supporting HRCT's critical role in early HP detection and emphasizes heightened clinical awareness of occupational lung diseases. A multidisciplinary approach involving pulmonologists, radiologists, and occupational medicine specialists is key to optimizing outcomes in HP and other ILDs.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis radiologic features in interstitial lung diseases

BACKGROUND

The radiologic criteria of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) guidelines focus on four HP compatible features (HPCF) in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT): ground glass opacities, mosaic attenuation, air-trapping, and centrilobular nodules. However, evidence to support these criteria are limited.

METHODS

Consecutive interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients who underwent HRCT between 2016 and 2021 in three medical centers were included. We assessed the prevalence of HPCF in each ILD and their association with HP diagnosis. We evaluated the impact of HPCF amount for HP diagnosis and the performance of the radiologic criteria by the ATS/JRS/ALAT and CHEST HP guidelines.

RESULTS

436 patients with ILD were included (mean age 66, 48 % females), of them, 56 (13 %) with HP. All four HPCF were more prevalent in HP than in non-HP ILD (p < 0.001 for all). In multivariate analysis, air-trapping was the strongest independent predictor (AOR 4.1, 95 % CI 2-8.4, p < 0.001). Centrilobular nodules were present almost exclusively in HP and smoking-related ILD. The amount of HPCF in HRCT had an excellent predictive ability for HP diagnosis (receiver operating characteristic AUC 0.85, 95 % CI 0.80-0.90). The radiologic criteria of both guidelines had high specificity for "typical HP" and high sensitivity for "compatible with HP", although with low positive predictive values. Our findings remained robust even when including only patients that had a diagnostic biopsy.

CONCLUSION

The presence and amount of HPCF in HRCT predicted HP diagnosis in real-life settings. While current HP radiologic criteria demonstrated good diagnostic performance, our findings highlight areas for future improvement.

[Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis - S2k Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology]

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) in sensitized individuals caused by a large variety of inhaled antigens. The clinical form of acute HP is often misdiagnosed, while the chronic form, especially the chronic fibrotic HP, is difficult to differentiate from other fibrotic ILDs. The present guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of HP replaces the former German recommendations for the diagnosis of HP from 2007 and is amended explicitly by the issue of the chronic fibrotic form, as well as by treatment recommendations for the first time. The evidence was discussed by a multidisciplinary committee of experts. Then, recommendations were formulated for twelve questions on important issues of diagnosis and treatment strategies. Recently published national and international guidelines for ILDs and HP were considered. Detailed background information on HP is useful for a deeper insight into HP and the handling of the guideline.

Validation of a computed tomography diagnostic model for differentiating fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) from other interstitial lung diseases, particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), is often difficult. This study aimed to examine computed tomography (CT) findings that were useful for differentiating between fHP and IPF and to develop and validate a radiological diagnostic model.

METHODS

In this study, 246 patients (fHP, n = 104; IPF, n = 142) from two institutions were included and randomly divided into the test (n = 164) and validation (n = 82) groups (at a 2:1 ratio). Three radiologists evaluated CT findings, such as pulmonary fibrosis, small airway disease, and predominant distribution, and compared them between fHP and IPF using binomial logistic regression and multivariate analysis. A prognostic model was developed from the test group and validated with the validation group.

RESULTS

Ground-glass opacity (GGO) with traction bronchiectasis (TB), honeycombing, hypoattenuation area, three-density pattern, diffuse craniocaudal distribution, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were more common in fHP than in IPF. In multivariate analysis, GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were significant features. The area under the curve of the fHP diagnostic model with the three aforementioned CT features was 0.733 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.655-0.811, p < 0.001) in the test group and 0.630 (95% CI, 0.504-0.755, p < 0.047) in the validation group.

CONCLUSION

GGO with TB, peribronchovascular opacities in the upper lung, and random distribution were important CT features for differentiating fHP from IPF.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: application of a new diagnostic algorithm to a time series of the disease

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic criteria for Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) have changed over time. Our aim is to apply a recent diagnostic algorithm to a historical series of patients diagnosed with HP to assess its distribution according to current diagnostic criteria and the diagnostic confidence achieved.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Application to each patient the algorithm criteria. The diagnosis was HP (≥90%), provisional high (70-89%) or low confidence (51-69%) or non-HP (unlikely) (≤50%); or HP, provisional or non-HP, if they had lung biopsy.

RESULTS

129 patients [mean age 64 ± 12 years; 79 (61.2%) women] were included of which 16 (12.4%) were diagnosed on the basis of high clinical suspicion. After applying the algorithm, 106 patients (82.2%) could be evaluated and 83 (78.3%) had a diagnosis of HP or high confidence. Lung biopsy was able to establish a diagnosis of certainty in another 21 patients and a provisional diagnosis in 9 more [total, 113 (87.6%)]. The 16 patients without strict diagnostic criteria for HP had a low confidence diagnosis. A total of 56 lung biopsies (64.4%) could have been avoided according to the new guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of this algorithm achieves a high diagnostic yield in HP, significantly reducing the number of lung biopsies required.

Serum Specific Antibodies Do Not Seem to Have an Additional Role in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to investigate the contribution of serum IgG testing to the history of exposure in the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study including 63 patients pathologically diagnosed with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in line with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society. Descriptive statistics were presented and Kappa statistic was performed to evaluate the compatibility between panel and the history of exposure.

RESULTS

The median age was 63 (22-81) years and 34 (54%) were male. Forty-six patients (73%) had a positive history of exposure. Thirty-nine patients (61.9%) had a positive HP/Avian panel. The most common exposure agent was mold (34.9%), followed by parakeet (31.7%). The antibody detected the most was penicillium chrysogenum lgG (36.5%), followed by aspergillus fumigatus (31.8%). There was no compatibility between HP/Avian panel and history of exposure (kappa coefficient= 0.18, p= 0.14). When the exposure was only assessed based on the history, 4 (6.35%) patients were diagnosed as fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis with low confidence, 6 (9.52%) with moderate confidence, 11 (17.46%) with high confidence and 42 (66.67%) with definite confidence; whereas 4 (6.35%) patients were diagnosed as fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis with low confidence, 6 (9.52%) with moderate confidence, 9 (14.29%) patients with high confidence and 44 (69.84%) patients with definite confidence if exposure was evaluated with history and/or panel.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum specific precipitating antibody panel does not seem to provide additional value to the history of exposure in the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Effect of the 2020 hypersensitivity pneumonitis guideline on the pathologic diagnosis of interstitial pneumonia

It was reported that the 2020 guideline for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) might result in the overdiagnosis of fibrotic HP (fHP). fHP and other types of interstitial pneumonias have several overlapping characteristics, and a high diagnostic concordance rate of fHP is rarely obtained. Therefore, we investigated the impact of the 2020 HP guideline on the pathological diagnosis of cases previously diagnosed as interstitial pneumonia. We identified 289 fibrotic interstitial pneumonia cases from 2014 to 2019 and classified them into four categories according to the 2020 HP guideline: typical, probable, and indeterminate for fHP and alternative diagnosis. The original pathological diagnosis of 217 cases were compared to their classification as either typical, probable, or indeterminate for fHP according to the 2020 guideline. The clinical data, including serum data and pulmonary function tests, were compared among the groups. Diagnoses changed from non-fHP to fHP for 54 (25%) of the 217 cases, of which, 8 were typical fHP and 46 were probable fHP. The ratio of typical and probable fHP cases to the total number of VATS cases was significantly lower when using transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (p < 0.001). The clinical data of these cases bore a more remarkable resemblance to those diagnosed as indeterminate for fHP than to those diagnosed as typical or probable. The pathological criteria in the new HP guidelines increase the diagnosis of fHP. However, it is unclear whether this increase leads to overdiagnosis, and requires further investigation. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy may not be helpful when using the new criteria to impart findings for fHP diagnosis.

5-methyladenosine regulators play a crucial role in development of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

5-methyladenosine (m5C) modification regulates gene expression and biological functions in oncologic areas. However, the effect of m5C modification in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remains unknown. Expression data for 12 significant m5C regulators were obtained from the interstitial lung disease dataset. Five candidate m5C regulators, namely tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2, NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 5, Y-box binding protein 1, tRNA aspartic acid methyltransferase 1, and NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase 3 were screened using random forest and nomogram models to predict risks of pulmonary fibrosis. Next, we applied the consensus clustering method to stratify the samples with different m5C patterns into two groups (cluster A and B). Finally, we calculated immune cell infiltration scores via single-sample gene set enrichment analysis, then compared immune cell infiltration, related functions as well as the expression of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1, PDCD1) and programmed death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1, CD274) between the two clusters. Principal component analysis of m5C-related scores across the 288 samples revealed that cluster A had higher immune-related expression than B. Notably, T helper cell (Th) 2 type cytokines and Th1 signatures were more abundant in clusters A and B, respectively. Our results suggest that m5C is associated with and plays a crucial role in development of pulmonary fibrosis. These m5C patterns could be potential biomarkers for identification of CHP and IPF, and guide future development of immunotherapy or other new drugs strategies for pulmonary fibrosis.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Pictorial Review Based on the New ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline for Radiologists and Pulmonologists

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complicated and heterogeneous interstitial lung disease (ILD) caused by an excessive immune response to an inhaled antigen in susceptible individuals. Accurate diagnosis of HP is difficult and necessitates a detailed exposure history, as well as a multidisciplinary discussion of clinical, histopathologic, and radiologic data. We provide a pictorial review based on the latest American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ALAT) guidelines for diagnosing HP through demonstrating new radiologic terms, features, and a new classification of HP which will benefit radiologists and pulmonologists.

Relevance of RNA N6-Methyladenosine Regulators for Pulmonary Fibrosis: Implications for Chronic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modification plays a pivotal role in post-transcriptionally regulating gene expression and biological functions. Nonetheless, the roles of m6A modification in the regulation of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) remain unclear. Twenty-two significant m6A regulators were selected from differential gene analysis between the control and treatment groups from the GSE150910 dataset. Five candidate m6A regulators (insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3, YTH domain-containing protein 1, zinc finger CCCH domain-containing protein 13, and methyltransferase-like 3) were screened by the application of a random forest model and nomogram model to predict risks of pulmonary fibrosis. The consensus clustering method was applied to divide the treatment samples into two groups with different m6A patterns (clusters A and B) based on the 22 m6A regulators. Our study performed principal component analysis to obtain the m6A-related score of the 288 samples to quantify the two m6A patterns. The study reveals that cluster A was linked to T helper cell (Th) 2-type cytokines, while the immune infiltration of Th1 cytokines was higher in cluster B. Our results suggest that m6A cluster A is likely related to pulmonary fibrosis, indicating m6A regulators play notable roles in the occurrence of pulmonary fibrosis. The m6A patterns could be considered as biomarkers to identify CHP and IPF, which will be helpful to develop immunotherapy strategies for pulmonary fibrosis in the future.

High-resolution computed tomography in the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A review

Aim. Assess the detection of rare computed tomographic features and their combination to detect cases of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). A retrospective analysis of data from high-resolution computed tomography of the lungs was performed in 52 patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP), in whom the clinical diagnosis was confirmed by morphological examination of lung biopsy. The analysis of the identified changes was carried out by qualitative and quantitative methods. The study included signs common to non-fibrotic and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis of HP, including ground glass symptom, mosaic density, centrilobular lesions, and emphysema. Separately, features related to pulmonary fibrosis in fHP, such as reticular changes, traction bronchiectasis, and honeycombing, were analyzed. In addition, the distribution parameters of these signs were determined separately in the cranio-caudal direction and in the axial plane. To search for combinations of tomographic features that are significant in the diagnosis, a correlation analysis of the identified changes was carried out. Materials and methods. The revealed CT-signs of fHP in most cases correspond to the clinical recommendations for the diagnosis of HP. However, in fHP, signs were found with a high frequency that did not correspond to the typical picture of HP, in particular, the "ground glass" symptom. On the contrary, a relatively low percentage of occurrence was observed in relation to centrilobular lesions and "mosaic density", which were also an important part of the typical HP pattern. Emphysema, which is not included in any of the HP patterns, was noted with a relatively high frequency, and in some cases was combined with the "honeycomb lung" symptom. The greatest strength of the correlation was found in such combinations of signs as "frosted glass" + reticular changes; "frosted glass" + "mosaic density"; reticular changes + "mosaic density"; emphysema + centrilobular foci, as well as reticular changes + bronchiectasis. These combinations occurred with a relatively high frequency among the examined patients. Results. Most of the identified changes correspond to current recommendations for the diagnosis of HP. A weak correlation between the signs does not allow us to identify combinations of signs with sufficient reliability that can help in the early diagnosis of HP.

Mosaic attenuation in non-fibrotic areas as a predictor of non-usual interstitial pneumonia pathologic diagnosis

The new radiological diagnostic criteria for diagnosing idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) seek to optimize the indications for surgical lung biopsy (SLB). We applied the new criteria to a retrospective series of patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) who underwent SLB in order to analyse the correlation between the radiological findings suggestive of another diagnosis (especially mosaic attenuation and its location with respect to fibrotic areas) and the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pathologic diagnosis. Two thoracic radiologists reviewed the HRCT images of 83 patients with ILD and SLB, describing the radiological findings and patterns based on the new criteria. The association of each radiological finding with radiological patterns and histology was analysed. Mosaic attenuation is highly prevalent in both the UIP and non-UIP pathologic diagnosis and with similar frequency (80.0% vs. 78.6%). However, the presence of significant mosaic attenuation (≥ 3 lobes) only in non-fibrotic areas was observed in 60.7% of non-UIP pathologic diagnosis compared to 20.0% in UIP. This finding was associated with other diagnoses different from IPF, mostly connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). In our series of pathologically confirmed ILD, mosaic attenuation in non-fibrotic areas was a predictor of non-UIP pathologic diagnosis, and was associated with other diagnoses different from UIP, mostly CTD-ILD and HP. If confirmed in larger series, this finding could constitute a valuable tool for improving the interpretation of radiological patterns.

Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Review and Summary of American College of Chest Physicians Statement

Assessment of lung biopsies for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is one of the most difficult diagnostic problems for surgical pathologists. It is a form of interstitial lung disease resulting from an immune reaction provoked by an inhaled antigen in susceptible individuals. Although this definition sounds simple, in practice, the diagnosis of HP can be challenging. To address these issues, the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) has recently published a guideline for the diagnosis of HP. In this review, we will explore the multidisciplinary diagnostic evaluation of HP with a focus on the pathologic features as outlined in the CHEST guidelines. The histologic criteria are divided into 4 diagnostic categories: (1) Typical nonfibrotic HP or fibrotic HP; (2) Compatible with nonfibrotic HP or fibrotic HP; (3) Indeterminate for nonfibrotic or fibrotic HP; and (4) Alternative Diagnosis. It is important to emphasize that patterns 1 to 3 do not represent discrete histologic entities or pathologic diagnoses. Rather, these categories are meant to serve as a practical guide for organizing a complex set of overlapping histologic patterns into an integrated diagnostic framework for facilitating multidisciplinary discussion. High-resolution computed tomography features are also summarized, emphasizing how the correlation of lung biopsies with computed tomography findings can help to favor the diagnosis, particularly in cases where biopsies are not typical for HP. This review highlights details of the histologic spectrum of HP as well as the utility of different types of biopsies and bronchoalveolar lavage. We also emphasize the importance of multidisciplinary discussion and the complex differential diagnosis.

Antigen avoidance and outcome of nonfibrotic and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Background

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is classified into nonfibrotic and fibrotic phenotypes. Patients with nonfibrotic HP often experience recurrence and develop fibrosis, whereas those with fibrotic HP have a poor prognosis. Although antigen avoidance has long been the first line of treatment for HP, its impact on prognosis has been poorly reported.

Methods

Medical records of 121 patients with HP diagnosed by new diagnostic criteria of American Thoracic Society/Japanese Respiratory Society/Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) guidelines and treated at our institution in Saitama, Japan, were retrospectively analysed. HP was classified into nonfibrotic and fibrotic phenotypes and six HP subtypes: summer-type, bird-related, home-related and occupational HP, humidifier lung, and hot tub lung. Achievement of reduced exposure to inciting agents was divided into complete antigen avoidance (CAA) and incomplete antigen avoidance (IAA) by HP subtype.

Results

Of the 74 patients with nonfibrotic HP, 30 achieved CAA and experienced no recurrence or development of fibrosis. In the remaining 44 patients with IAA, 24 (54.5%) experienced recurrence and/or development of fibrosis. The all-cause 5-year mortality rate in the 47 patients with fibrotic HP was 47.8%. Negative prognostic factors of HP-related mortality in these patients were <50% lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and honeycombing. Multivariate analysis showed a tendency for IAA to be related to poorer survival (hazard ratio 3.452, 95% CI 0.964–12.359, p=0.057).

Conclusions

In the patients with nonfibrotic HP, CAA resulted in no recurrence or development of fibrosis and longer survival. In the patients with fibrotic HP, <50% lymphocytes in BAL and honeycombing were negative prognostic factors for mortality.

Complete antigen avoidance reduces the recurrence and development of fibrosis in patients with nonfibrotic HP and may be related to longer survival in patients with fibrotic HPhttps://bit.ly/3E5EVLR

Prognostic Implication of Diagnostic Confidence Level in Patients with Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) has various clinical courses and outcomes, but the prognostic factors are not well-defined. Vasakova et al. [Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Sep;196(6):680-9] have proposed a diagnostic algorithm that categorized suspected patients according to the level of confidence in the diagnosis. This study aimed to investigate whether the confidence level of clinical diagnosis has prognostic implication in patients with fibrotic HP.

METHODS

This study included 101 biopsy-proven fibrotic HP patients diagnosed between 2002 and 2017. The patients were retrospectively classified into confident, probable, possible, and unlikely chronic HP, according to the confidence level in the diagnostic criteria/algorithm. The survival and forced vital capacity (FVC) changes were compared between the groups. Risk factors for mortality were analysed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 67.6 months. The mean age was 60.4 years, and percentages of women were 60.4%. When classified based on the diagnostic criteria/algorithm, possible HP was the most common (51.5%), followed by probable (26.7%), confident (9.9%), and unlikely HP (6.9%). Distinctive survival curves were found according to the diagnostic confidence level, showing the worst outcome in unlikely chronic HP (median survival, 30.2 months). In a multivariable Cox analysis, unlikely HP was a significant predictor of poor survival (hazard ratio, 4.652; 95% confidence interval, 1.231-17.586; p = 0.023), after adjustment for age, body mass index, FVC, and diffusing capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic confidence level may predict clinical outcomes in patients with HP. Unlikely HP was shown to have a significantly poorer survival than other diagnostic confidence levels.

Derivation and validation of a prediction model for histopathologic fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Clinical differentiation of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (f-HP) remains challenging given variable and overlapping presentations with other fibrotic interstitial lung disease (f-ILD).

OBJECTIVE

We derived a multivariable model for predicting histopathologic f-HP to better inform multidisciplinary team discussion (MDD) diagnosis, particularly when biopsy may be unsafe or cannot be achieved.

METHODS

Patients with histopathologically-defined f-HP and other overlapping f-ILD were reviewed for distinguishing clinical and radiological variables. Using elastic net logistic regression, a penalized regression approach to minimize overfitting, a clinical model built on non-invasive assessments was derived for the prediction of histopathologic f-HP. This model was then validated in an independently derived external cohort from three sites.

RESULTS

The derivation and validation cohorts consisted of 248 (84 cHP and 164 other f-ILD) and 157 (82 f-HP and 75 other f-ILD) histopathologically-defined patients, respectively (total study N = 405). Variables retained from the elastic net model included age in years (regression coefficient 0.033), male sex (-1.109), positive exposure history (1.318), percent predicted forced vital capacity (-0.021), radiologic peribronchovascular axial ILD distribution (0.199), mid (-0.22) or lower lobe (-0.839) craniocaudal or patchy (0.287) ILD distribution, upper (1.188) or equivalent upper and lower lobe (0.237) traction bronchiectasis, mosaic attenuation (1.164), and centrilobular nodules (2.045). Bias corrected AUC was 0.84 (standard error = 0.02) for the derivation cohort and 0.80 (CI 0.73-0.87) for the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This multivariable model demonstrated good predictive performance for delineating histopathologically-defined f-HP from other f-ILD as a means of avoiding or justifying biopsy and supporting MDD diagnostic confidence.

Questionnaires or Serum Immunoglobulin G Testing in the Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis among Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

Rationale: Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) results from exposure to a variety of stimuli, which are challenging to identify. Questionnaires and serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) testing are methods to identify potentially causative exposures.Objectives: To perform a systematic review to determine the usefulness of questionnaires and serum IgG testing in identifying exposures that may have caused HP.Methods: This systematic review informed an international, multidisciplinary panel that developed a clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis of HP for the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax. MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from January 1946 to October 2019 for studies that used a questionnaire or serum IgG testing to identify exposures that may have caused HP. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to appraise the quality of the evidence.Results: Searches identified 1,141 and 926 potentially relevant articles for questionnaires and serum IgG testing, respectively. The full texts of 32 and 49 articles, respectively, were reviewed. Two observational studies for questionnaires and 15 accuracy studies for serum IgG testing were selected. Questionnaires were better at detecting potentially relevant exposures than clinical history (100% vs. 26%; risk ratio [RR], 3.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.79-8.06) and serum IgG testing (100% vs. 63%; RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.12-2.23) but did not differ from serum IgG testing plus bronchial challenge testing (59% vs. 65%; RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.65-1.24). Longer, detailed questionnaires were more likely to lead to identification of potential exposures. Only 70% of potential exposures identified by questionnaires were subsequently confirmed by environmental testing. Serum IgG testing distinguished HP from healthy exposed and unexposed control subjects with high sensitivity (90% and 92%, respectively) and high specificity (91% and 100%, respectively) but did not distinguish HP as effectively from interstitial lung diseases (ILDs; sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 68%).Conclusions: Using a questionnaire may help clinicians identify potentially relevant exposures when evaluating a patient with newly identified ILD for HP. Serum IgG testing may also lead to identification of potentially relevant exposures, but its usefulness for distinguishing HP from other types of ILD is poor.

Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this analysis is to provide evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus. A diagnostic algorithm is provided, using supporting data from the recommendations where possible, along with expert consensus to help physicians gauge the probability of HP.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Criteria are presented to facilitate diagnosis of HP. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Executive Summary: Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this summary is to provide a synopsis of evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations, and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Role of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) in Assessing Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Background

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an increasingly recognized form of diffuse parenchymal lung disease. Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) is now classified as a human MUC1 mucin protein, and regenerating type II pneumocytes are the primary cellular source of KL-6/MUC1 in the affected lungs of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). Serum KL-6/MUC1 levels have been demonstrated to be useful for the evaluation of various ILD. To determine the role of circulating KL-6 in evaluating the disease activity and management of HP.

Methods

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted on 51 patients with HP and 20 healthy controls. Serum KL-6 levels were measured in both groups. Patients were further assessed based on chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), pulmonary function test, 6-minute walk test, echocardiography, bronchioalveolar lavage, and/or transbronchial biopsy. Patients were divided into the fibrotic and non-fibrotic groups according to the HRCT findings.

Results

The median serum KL-6 levels were significantly higher in HP patients as compared to the control group. The median serum KL-6 levels were found to be higher in the non-fibrotic HP group (1,900 IU/mL) as compared to the fibrotic group (1,200 IU/mL). There was a significant inverse correlation between serum KL-6 serum level and the dose of steroids as well as the duration of steroid therapy.

Conclusion

The presence of higher KL-6 levels in the non-fibrotic HP group implies its enhanced production by regenerating pneumocytes in response to alveolar injury. The significant association between serum KL-6 levels and the dose and the duration of steroid therapy emphasizes the significant role of steroids in the stabilization of the disease.

An update on hypersensitivity pneumonitis: what a clinician wants to know

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A recent international collaboration has updated the clinical definition and diagnostic recommendations for hypersensitivity pneumonitis, focusing on fibrotic and non-fibrotic phenotypes. However, how these transfer to clinical practice and their impact upon clinical management and prognosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis is unclear. This review will focus on recent advances in the understanding of the clinical aspects of hypersensitivity pneumonitis, predominantly its epidemiology, diagnosis, classification and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a rare disease within the general population, with variable geographical incidence because of environmental, cultural and occupational factors. Confidence in diagnosis relies upon the presence of clinical features with a temporal relationship to an associated exposure, radiological and histopathological features, bronchiolo-alveolar lavage lymphocytosis and precipitating antibodies/specific immunoglobulin G to antigens. Although emerging evidence regarding nintedanib use in progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease is promising, the majority of therapies (corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents) used traditionally in hypersensitivity pneumonitis lack a robust evidence base.

SUMMARY

With a clear definition of fibrotic and nonfibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis phenotypes now established, clinical research trials (predominantly randomized controlled trials) should clarify and resolve the discussion regarding antigen avoidance, corticosteroid therapy, immunosuppressive therapy and antifibrotic therapy in fibrotic and nonfibrotic subtypes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis.

Diagnosis of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis in Adults. An Official ATS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline

Background: This guideline addresses the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). It represents a collaborative effort among the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.Methods: Systematic reviews were performed for six questions. The evidence was discussed, and then recommendations were formulated by a multidisciplinary committee of experts in the field of interstitial lung disease and HP using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.Results: The guideline committee defined HP, and clinical, radiographic, and pathological features were described. HP was classified into nonfibrotic and fibrotic phenotypes. There was limited evidence that was directly applicable to all questions. The need for a thorough history and a validated questionnaire to identify potential exposures was agreed on. Serum IgG testing against potential antigens associated with HP was suggested to identify potential exposures. For patients with nonfibrotic HP, a recommendation was made in favor of obtaining bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid for lymphocyte cellular analysis, and suggestions for transbronchial lung biopsy and surgical lung biopsy were also made. For patients with fibrotic HP, suggestions were made in favor of obtaining BAL for lymphocyte cellular analysis, transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, and surgical lung biopsy. Diagnostic criteria were established, and a diagnostic algorithm was created by expert consensus. Knowledge gaps were identified as future research directions.Conclusions: The guideline committee developed a systematic approach to the diagnosis of HP. The approach should be reevaluated as new evidence accumulates.

Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: Diagnosis and Management

Fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex interstitial lung disease that is not entirely understood. In its chronic and fibrotic form, hypersensitivity pneumonitis is one of the main mimickers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Distinguishing between these two conditions is challenging but is of particular clinical relevance. Two approved therapies are available for IPF, and a considerable number of clinical trials are now exploring newer pharmacological options. This impressive research effort is a consequence of new pathogenetic understanding, updated diagnostic criteria and a long history of pharmacological trials. Conversely, current knowledge gaps on pathogenesis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, coupled with lack of validated diagnostic criteria, make the management of this disease an unsolved clinical challenge. This also reflects the paucity of therapeutic clinical trials in this field. In this review, we describe the current evidence and the possible future options to approach this complex disease.

Diagnostic approach of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases of unknown origin

Interstitial lung diseases encompass a broad range of numerous individual conditions, some of them characterized histologically by fibrosis, especially idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia, interstitial lung disease associated with connective tissue diseases, and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease. The diagnostic approach relies mainly on the clinical evaluation, especially assessment of the patient's demographics, history, smoking habits, occupational or domestic exposures, use of drugs, and on interpretation of high-quality HRCT of the chest. Imaging is key to the initial diagnostic approach, and often can confirm a definite diagnosis, particularly a diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis when showing a pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia in the appropriate context. In other cases, chest HRCT may orientate toward an alternative diagnosis and appropriate investigations to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Autoimmune serology helps diagnosing connective disease. Indications for bronchoalveolar lavage and for lung biopsy progressively become more restrictive, with better considerations for their discriminate value, of the potential risk associated with the procedure, and of the anticipated impact on management. Innovative techniques and genetics are beginning to contribute to diagnosing interstitial lung disease and to be implemented routinely in the clinic. Multidisciplinary discussion, enabling interaction between pulmonologists, chest radiologists, pathologists and often other healthcare providers, allows integration of all information available. It increases the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis prediction, proposes a first-choice diagnosis, may suggest additional investigations, and often informs the management. The concept of working diagnosis, which can be revised upon additional information being made available especially longitudinal disease behaviour, helps dealing with diagnostic uncertainty inherent to interstitial lung diseases and facilitates management decisions. Above all, the clinical approach and how thoroughly the patient's history and possible exposures are assessed determine the possibility of an accurate diagnosis.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Occupational Lung Diseases

Ordering the appropriate diagnostic imaging for occupational lung disease requires a firm understanding of the relationship between occupational exposure and expected lower respiratory track manifestation. Where particular inorganic dust exposures typically lead to nodular and interstitial lung disease, other occupational exposures may lead to isolated small airway obstruction. Certain workplace exposures, like asbestos, increase the risk of malignancy, but also produce pulmonary findings that mimic malignancy. This publication aims to delineate the common and special considerations associated with occupational lung disease to assist the ordering physician in selecting the most appropriate imaging study, while still stressing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Current Diagnosis and Management of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis (HP) one of the most common interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) is characterized by exposure to an inhaled inciting antigen that leads to a host immunologic reaction determining interstitial inflammation and architectural distortion. The underlying pathogenetic mechanisms are unclear. The absence of international shared diagnostic guidelines and the lack of a "gold-standard" test for HP combined with the presence of several clinical and radiologic overlapping features makes it particularly challenging to differentiate HP from other ILDs, also in expert contests. Radiology is playing a more crucial role in this process; recently the headcheese sign was recognized as a more specific for chronic-HP than the extensive mosaic attenuation. Several classification proposals and diagnostic models have been advanced by different groups, with no prospective validation. Therapeutic options for HP have been limited to antigen avoidance and immunosuppressant drugs over the last decades. Several questions about this condition remain unanswered and there is a need for more studies.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis and (Idiopathic) Pulmonary Fibrosis Due to Feather Duvets and Pillows

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to feather bedding may be an unnoticed cause of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Thus, an in-depth clinical study of the diagnosis of patients with suspected HP and IPF is required in order to determine their etiologies. The objective of the present study is to raise awareness of HP and pulmonary fibrosis due to exposure to feather bedding, and to study the prevalence and describe long-term outcomes.

METHODS

We describe a series of 33 patients diagnosed with HP and pulmonary fibrosis due to feather bedding exposure and followed over a 10-year period. The patients were from a subgroup of 127 individuals with HP undergoing in-depth evaluation using a diagnostic protocol at a regional referral center.

RESULTS

Eleven (33%) patients were clinically diagnosed with acute HP and 22 (67%) with chronic HP. Ten (45%) chronic HP patients showed a high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) with suspected IPF. The prevalence of HP was 6.2/100 000 feather bedding users (compared with 54.6 per 100 000 bird-breeders). The survival rates of patients over the 10-year period was 100% for acute HP and 64% for chronic HP.

CONCLUSIONS

In a series of HP patients, the diagnosis was attributed to feather bedding exposure in 26%. UIP pattern on HRCT was present in nearly half of the chronic cases. The survival of patients with chronic HP at ten years was 64%, despite avoiding further exposure.

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the southeastern United States: an assessment of how clinicians reached the diagnosis

Background

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP) is a disease caused by exposure to inhaled environmental antigens. Diagnosis of cHP is influenced by the awareness of the disease prevalence, which varies significantly in different regions, and how clinicians utilize relevant clinical information. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate how clinicians in the Southeast United States, where the climate is humid favoring mold growth, diagnosed cHP using items identified in the international modified Delphi survey of experts, i.e., environmental exposure, CT imaging and lung pathology,

Methods

We searched Duke University Medical Center database for patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of cHP (ICD-9 code: 495) between Jan. 1, 2008 to Dec. 31, 2013 using a query tool, Duke Enterprise Data Unified Content Explorer (DEDUCE).

Results

Five hundred patients were identified and 261 patients had cHP confirmed in clinic notes by a pulmonologist or an allergist. About half of the patients lived in the Research Triangle area where our medical center is located, giving an estimated prevalence rate of 6.5 per 100,000 persons. An exposure source was mentioned in 69.3% of the patient. The most common exposure sources were environmental molds (43.1%) and birds (26.0%). We used Venn diagram to evaluate how the patients met the three most common cHP diagnostic criteria: evidence of environmental exposures (history or precipitin) (E), chest CT imaging (C) and pathology from lung biopsies (P). Eighteen patients (6.9%) met none of three criteria. Of the remaining 243 patients, 135 patients (55.6%) had one (E 35.0%, C 3.3%, P 17.3%), 81 patients (33.3%) had two (E + C 12.3%, E + P 17.3%, C + P 4.9%), and 27 patients (11.1%) had all three criteria (E + C + P). Overall, 49.4% of patients had pathology from lung biopsy compared to 31.6% with CT scan.

Conclusions

Environmental mold was the most common exposure for cHP in the Southeast United States. Lung pathology was available in more than half of cHP cases in our tertiary care center, perhaps reflecting the complexity of referrals. Differences in exposure sources and referral patterns should be considered in devising future diagnostic pathways or guidelines for cHP.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a population-based study in China

Backgrounds:

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is an immune-mediated interstitial lung disease (ILD) that develops in response to the inhalation of various antigens. The clinical pathologies are very complex and undetermined. The clinical features and outcomes of HP have not been fully elucidated. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence, clinical features, and outcomes of HP patients and construct a simple clinical model for diagnosing chronic HP (CHP).

Methods:

The cohort study included 101 patients with HP admitted to the Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital from January 2009 to December 2017. The patients were categorized into acute HP (AHP, n = 72) and CHP (n = 29) groups according to the updated international criteria. The clinical, imaging, treatment, and follow-up data were retrospectively reviewed. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2017. Statistical analysis was performed, and a clinical scoring system for CHP was constructed by SPSS 20.0 software.

Results:

The incidence of HP was 2.4% in ILD inpatients in our center. Patients in the CHP group were older (t = −2.212, P = 0.029), had more smokers (χ² = 8.428, P = 0.004), and longer duration of symptoms (t = −4.852, P < 0.001) than those in the AHP group. Weight loss, crackles, digital clubbing, and cyanosis were more common in the CHP group than those in the AHP group (χ² = 5.862, P < 0.001; χ² = 8.997, P = 0.003; χ² = 11.939, P = 0.001; and χ² = 4.025, P = 0.045, respectively). On chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), reticular patterns, traction bronchiectasis, and accompanying honeycombing were more common in CHP cases than those in AHP cases (χ² = 101.000, P < 0.001; χ² = 32.048, P < 0.001; and χ² = 36.568, P < 0.001, respectively). The clinical scoring system for CHP was established based on the clinical variables (age [A], duration of symptoms [D], smoking history [S], unidentified exposure [U], and chest HRCT [C]; ADSUC) (area under the curve 0.935, 95% confidence interval: 0.883–0.987, P < 0.001). Eleven patients (15.3%) in the AHP group developed CHP, and unidentified exposure was an independent risk factor for the progression of disease (P = 0.038). The survival of patients with CHP, smoking history, unidentified antigens and fibrosis on Chest HRCT were significantly worse (P = 0.011, P = 0.001, P = 0.005, and P = 0.011, respectively) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox multivariate regression analysis revealed that unidentified exposure and total lung volume (TLC pred%) were independent prognostic predictors for HP patients (P = 0.017 and P = 0.017, respectively).

Conclusions:

The clinical features and outcomes of the CHP patients differ from those of the AHP patients. ADSUC is a simple and feasible clinical model for CHP. Unidentified exposure is an independent risk factor for the progression of AHP to CHP. Unidentified exposure and a low baseline TLC pred% are independent predictors for survival in HP patients.

Identifying causation in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a British perspective

Background

Establishing whether patients are exposed to a 'known cause' is a key element in both the diagnostic assessment and the subsequent management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP).

Objective

This study surveyed British interstitial lung disease (ILD) specialists to document current practice and opinion in relation to establishing causation in HP.

Methods

British ILD consultants (pulmonologists) were invited by email to take part in a structured questionnaire survey, to provide estimates of demographic data relating to their service and to rate their level of agreement with a series of statements. A priori 'consensus agreement' was defined as at least 70% of participants replying that they 'Strongly agree' or 'Tend to agree'.

Results

54 consultants took part in the survey from 27 ILD multidisciplinary teams. Participants estimated that 20% of the patients in their ILD service have HP, and of these, a cause is identifiable in 32% of cases. For patients with confirmed HP, an estimated 40% have had a bronchoalveolar lavage for differential cell counts, and 10% a surgical biopsy. Consensus agreement was reached for 25 of 33 statements relating to causation and either the assessment of unexplained ILD or management of confirmed HP.

Conclusions

This survey has demonstrated that although there is a degree of variation in the diagnostic approach for patients with suspected HP in Britain, there is consensus opinion for some key areas of practice. There are several factors in clinical practice that currently act as potential barriers to identifying the cause for British HP patients.

Clinical features of chronic summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis and proposition of diagnostic criteria

BACKGROUND

Trichosporon asahii (T. asahii) causes chronic summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis (C-SHP); however, little is known about the clinical features of this condition. We aimed to elucidate the clinical features of C-SHP and propose practical diagnostic criteria for C-SHP based on the presence of serum anti-T. asahii antibody (TaAb).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with C-SHP and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) between January 2010 and May 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical findings were compared between the two groups. Criteria for C-SHP were proposed on the basis of significant characteristics and applied to the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients with C-SHP and 26 with TaAb-negative IPF were identified. C-SHP patients were more likely to live in wooden houses; their serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and serum surfactant protein-D (SP-D) levels were higher than those of IPF patients. C-SHP patients were more likely to have subpleural consolidation, micronodules, and extensive ground-glass opacification on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). The following 3 items were considered to have diagnostic value: I) TaAb positivity; II) an HRCT pattern consistent with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, including mosaic attenuation or micronodules; and III) elevated serum biomarker levels (KL-6 > 1500 U/mL or SP-D > 250 ng/mL). We defined cases satisfying I) and II) as "probable C-SHP" and those satisfying all 3 criteria as "confident clinical diagnosis of C-SHP". The areas under the receiver-operating curve were 0.965 and 0.993 in the development and validation cohorts, respectively, which suggested that these criteria had good discriminative ability in clinical evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical features could be useful for distinguishing C-SHP from IPF and other etiologies of ILDs.

Variable utility of mosaic attenuation to distinguish fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Mosaic attenuation on computed tomography (CT) has been identified in international guidelines as an important diagnostic feature of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (FHP) as opposed to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, mosaic attenuation comprises several different radiological signs (low-density lobules, preserved lobules, air trapping and the so-called "headcheese sign") which may have differing diagnostic utility. Furthermore, the extent of mosaic attenuation required to distinguish these two diagnoses is uncertain and thresholds of mosaic attenuation from international guidelines have not been validated.

METHODS

Inspiratory and expiratory CT scans were evaluated by two readers in 102 patients (IPF n=57; FHP n=45) using a semiquantitative scoring system for mosaic attenuation. Findings were validated in an external cohort from a secondary referral institution (IPF n=34; FHP n=28).

RESULTS

Low-density lobules and air trapping were a frequent finding in IPF, present in up to 51% of patients. A requirement for increasing extent of low-density lobules and air trapping based on guidelines (American Thoracic Society and Fleischner Society) was associated with increased specificity for the diagnosis of FHP (0.96 and 0.98, respectively) but reduced sensitivity (0.16 and 0.20, respectively). The headcheese sign was found to be highly specific (0.93) and moderately sensitive (0.49) for a high-confidence diagnosis of FHP. The high specificity of the headcheese sign was maintained in the validation cohort and when patients with other CT features of FHP were excluded.

CONCLUSION

Mosaic attenuation is a frequent finding in IPF. However, the headcheese sign can be confidently considered as being inconsistent with a diagnosis of IPF and specific for FHP.

Epidemiology of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis among an Insured Population in the United States: A Claims-based Cohort Analysis

RATIONALE

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is a complex lung disease resulting from repeated inhalation of a variety of antigens. Limited data exist regarding its epidemiology.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the trends in the annual incidence and prevalence of hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the United States.

METHODS

We developed novel claims-based coding algorithms to identify hypersensitivity pneumonitis, chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis cases using the 2004 to 2013 MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental healthcare claims databases. Algorithm validity and reliability were assessed with clinical data from National Jewish Health. We calculated yearly cumulative incidence and prevalence overall and by age. For the subgroup with vital status, Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyze survival stratified by evidence of fibrosis.

RESULTS

We identified 7,498 cases that met our hypersensitivity pneumonitis definition over the 10-year study period, including 3,902 with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis and 1,852 with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. On the basis of the clinical-radiological adjudication of the validation sample, 38 cases (95%) were confirmed as hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The mean age was 52 years, and 58% were women. The 1-year prevalence rates for hypersensitivity pneumonitis ranged from 1.67 to 2.71 per 100,000 persons, and 1-year cumulative incidence rates ranged from 1.28 to 1.94 per 100,000 persons. The prevalence increased with age, ranging from 0.95 per 100,000 among 0- to 9-year-olds to 11.2 per 100,000 among those aged 65 years and older. Between 56 and 68% of hypersensitivity pneumonitis cases in each year were classified as chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (prevalence, 0.91-1.70 per 100,000 persons; cumulative incidence, 0.63-1.08 per 100,000 persons). Fewer had fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (prevalence, 0.41-0.80 per 100,000 persons; cumulative incidence: 0.29-0.43 per 100,000 persons). Most cases (74%) were classified as unspecified hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Older age, male sex, and fibrosis were associated with higher mortality rates in unadjusted analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Using U.S. administrative claims-based data, we developed an algorithm with a high sensitivity and specificity for hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Between 2004 and 2013, hypersensitivity pneumonitis was more common among women and those older than 65 years. Most cases were classified as chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Approximately one-fourth met our criteria for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis, which was associated with a higher mortality rate.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis: Clinical manifestations - Prospective data from the interstitial lung disease-India registry

Context

Multiple environmental factors are associated with development of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), and diagnostic algorithms for the diagnosis of HP have been proposed in recent perspectives.

Aims

We analyzed the data of patients with HP from interstitial lung disease (ILD)-India registry. The analysis was performed to (1) find the prevalence of HP, (2) reclassify HP as per a recently proposed classification criterion to assess the level of diagnostic certainty, and (3) identify the causative agents for HP.

Setting and Designs

This was a prospective multicenter study of consecutive, consenting adult patients with new-onset ILD from 27 centers across India (March 2012-April 2015).

Materials and Methods

The diagnoses were based on prespecified working clinical criteria and multidisciplinary discussions. To assess strength of diagnosis based on available clinical information, patients with HP were subclassified into definite HP, HP with high level of confidence, and HP with low level of confidence using a recent classification scheme.

Results

Five hundred and thirteen of 1084 patients with new-onset ILD were clinically diagnosed with HP and subclassified as HP with high level of confidence (380, 74.1%), HP with low level of confidence (106, 20.7%), and definite HP (27, 5.3%). Exposures among patients with HP were birds (odds ratios [OR]: 3.52, P < 0.001), air-conditioners (OR: 2.23, P < 0.001), molds (OR: 1.79, P < 0.001), rural residence (OR: 1.64, P < 0.05), and air-coolers (OR: 1.45, P < 0.05).

Conclusions

About 47.3% of patients with new-onset ILD in India were diagnosed with HP, the majority of whom were diagnosed as HP with a high level of confidence. The most common exposures were birds, cooling devices, and visible molds.

Development and validation of a radiological diagnosis model for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) may be useful for diagnosing hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Here, we develop and validate a radiological diagnosis model and model-based points score.Patients with interstitial lung disease seen at the University of Michigan Health System (derivation cohort) or enrolling in the Lung Tissue Research Consortium (validation cohort) were included. A thin-section, inspiratory HRCT scan was required. Thoracic radiologists documented radiological features.The derivation cohort comprised 356 subjects (33.9% hypersensitivity pneumonitis) and the validation cohort comprised 424 subjects (15.5% hypersensitivity pneumonitis). An age-, sex- and smoking status-adjusted logistic regression model identified extent of mosaic attenuation or air trapping greater than that of reticulation ("MA-AT>Reticulation"; OR 6.20, 95% CI 3.53-10.90; p<0.0001) and diffuse axial disease distribution (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.31-4.16; p=0.004) as hypersensitivity pneumonitis predictors (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.814). A model-based score >2 (1 point for axial distribution, 2 points for "MA-AT>Reticulation") has specificity 90% and positive predictive value (PPV) 74% in the derivation cohort and specificity 96% and PPV 44% in the validation cohort. Similar model performance is seen with population restriction to those reporting no exposure (score >2: specificity 91%).When radiological mosaic attenuation or air trapping are more extensive than reticulation and disease has diffuse axial distribution, hypersensitivity pneumonitis specificity is high and false diagnosis risk low (<10%), but PPV is diminished in a low-prevalence setting.

Clinical behaviour of patients exposed to organic dust and diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) patients experience a worse survival compared with chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP), organic dust exposure is a known risk factor for both IPF and CHP.

METHODS

We divided patients diagnosed with IPF, based on their exposure to moulds/birds (absent: group A; present: group B). We retrospectively compared pulmonary function and survival between groups A and B, and a separate CHP cohort (group C).

RESULTS

A total of 293 patients were included (group A: n = 171, group B: n = 73, group C: n = 49). Demographics and baseline pulmonary function did not differ between groups A and B, but significant differences were seen between groups B and C. Median survival of group B was 84 months, which was longer than group A (43 months, P = 0.002), but lower than group C (157 months, P = 0.04), in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Antifibrotic treatment resulted in a better outcome in group A (hazard ratio (HR): 0.44) and group B (HR: 0.12) without interaction between exposure and antifibrotic use (P = 0.20). Forced vital capacity (FVC) decline was not associated with mould/bird exposure in this cohort.

CONCLUSION

Group B patients experienced a better outcome compared with (non-exposed) IPF patients, although worse compared with CHP patients. Antifibrotic treatment in group B resulted in a similar beneficial effect compared with group A. Further research is needed to ascertain the diagnostic designation in this exposed usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) patient group without other CHP features.

Biopsy-proven recurrent, acute, familial hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A case report and literature review

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is characterized by inflammation of the lung parenchyma that is induced by exposure to an inhaled organic antigen. We present a case of recurrent, acute HP caused by repeated transient exposure to a down sleeping bag in a patient with a family history of chronic bird-associated hypersensitivity pneumonitis. The patient's recurrent symptoms, changes in physiology, and radiographic findings coincided with repeated exposure to this source. It was later confirmed that the patient's sister had also developed chronic HP from recurrent exposure to household birds. This case highlights recent studies implicating gene-exposure interactions in the development of HP.

Current and emerging techniques for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is the result of an immunologically induced inflammation of the lung parenchyma in response to inhalation exposure to a large variety of antigens in genetically susceptible individuals. HP shares clinical and radiological features with other acute and chronic interstitial lung diseases and is sometimes difficult to diagnose if exposure to an antigenic agent is not detected. Several classifications and diagnostic criteria have been proposed but are not currently recommended by guidelines from any scientific society. However, advances have been made over the past ten years in improving the diagnosis of HP. Areas covered: This article will provide a summary of the different classification and diagnostic criteria proposed in acute and chronic forms of HP. In addition, we review current diagnostic procedures including antigen detection, high resolution computed tomography, histopathology and provide an overview of emerging techniques. Expert commentary: Important changes are occurring in the field of HP and knowledge of the disease will likely progress enormously in the coming 5 to 10 years as many techniques continue to be developed, including genomic signature and diagnostic biomarkers.

Personalized medicine in interstitial lung diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A number of recent studies have explored the possibility to apply personalized medicine to interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), particularly idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the most common and deadly of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. In our review, we summarize and discuss the most recent literature on personalized medicine in IPF as well as hypersensitivity pneumonitis and sarcoidosis, with emphasis on patient subgroups for which a personalized approach to disease prognostication and management may become a reality in the near future.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most of the studies that have explored the applicability of personalized medicine to ILDs have been conducted in patients with IPF. Such studies have suggested the existence of several distinct disease subgroups defined by similar genetic profiles, molecular pathways, exposures and individual lifestyles. Personalized medicine in hypersensitivity pneumonitis is in its infancy. The development and applicability of personalized medicine to sarcoidosis, on the other hand, remains problematic for several reasons, including the lack of a diagnostic gold standard, the highly variable and unpredictable disease course, particularly across patients of different ethnicities, the poor correlation between disease activity and disease severity and the lack of a validated management algorithm.

SUMMARY

A number of distinct patient subgroups have been identified in ILDs. Although available data need to be validated longitudinally, the possibility to study homogeneous groups of patients may allow prediction of disease behavior and response to treatment with dramatic clinical implications.