Evaluation of jet nebulisers for use with gentamicin solution

Nebulisation of Paclitaxel, Sotatercept and Iloprost for pulmonary hypertension for lung cancer. From In vitro to In vivo

Background: Pulmonary hypertension is common symptom among several diseases. The consequences are severe for several organs. Pulmonary hypertension is usually under-diagnosed and the main symptom observed is dyspnea with or without exercise. Currently we have several treatment modalities administered orally, via inhalation, intravenously and subcutaneously. In advanced disease then heart or lung transplantation is considered. The objective of the study was to investigate the optimum method of aerosol production for the drugs: iloprost, paclitaxel and the novel sotatercept. Materials and Methods: In our experiment we used the drugs iloprost, paclitaxel and the novel sotatercept, in an experimental concept of nebulization. We performed nebulization experiments with 3 jet nebulizers and 3 ultrasound nebulizers with different combinations of residual cup designs, and residual cup loadings in order to identify which combination produces droplets of less than 5μm in mass median aerodynamic diameter. Results: We concluded that paclitaxel cannot produce small droplets and is also still very greasy and possible dangerous for alveoli. However; iloprost vs sotatercept had smaller droplet size formation at both inhaled technologies (1.37<2.23 and 1.92<3.11, jet and ultrasound respectively). Moreover; residual cup designs C and G create the smallest droplet size in both iloprost and sotatercept. There was no difference for the droplet formation between the facemask and cone mouthpieces. Discussion: Iloprost and sotatercept can be administered as aerosol in any type of nebulisation system and they are both efficient with the residual cups loaded with small doses of the drug (2.08 and 2.12 accordingly).

Inhaled nintentanib, pirfenidone and macitentan for pulmonary fibrosis: a laboratory experiment

Aim: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis is a rare disease with few efficient drugs in the market. The consequences of this disease are mainly respiratory failure and pulmonary hypertension. Materials & methods: In our experiment we used the drugs pirfenidone, nintetanib and macitentan. We performed nebulization experiments with three jet nebulizers and three ultrasound nebulizers with different combinations of residual cup designs, and residual cup loadings in order to identify which combination produces droplets of less than 5 μm in mass median aerodynamic diameter. Results: Pirfenidone versus nintetanib had smaller droplet size formation at both inhaled technologies (1.37 < 2.23 and 1.92 < 3.11, jet and ultrasound respectively). Discussion: Pirfenidone and nintetanib can be administered as aerosol in any type of nebulization system.

Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis

Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond.

Inhaled chemotherapy adverse effects: mechanisms and protection methods

Lung cancer is still diagnosed at a late stage due to a lack of symptoms. Although there are novel therapies, many patients are still treated with chemotherapy. In an effort to reduce adverse effects associated with chemotherapy, inhaled administration of platinum analogs has been investigated. Inhaled administration is used as a local route in order to reduce the systemic adverse effects; however, this treatment modality has its own adverse effects. In this mini review, we present drugs that were administered as nebulized droplets or dry powder aerosols for non-small-cell lung cancer. We present the adverse effects and methods to overcome them.

Inhaled Cisplatin for NSCLC: Facts and Results

Although we have new diagnostic tools for non-small cell lung cancer, diagnosis is still made in advanced stages of the disease. However, novel treatments are being introduced in the market and new ones are being developed. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have brought about a bloom in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Still we have to find ways to administer drugs in a more efficient and safe method. In the current review, we will focus on the administration of inhaled cisplatin based on published data.

Recent advances in aerosolised drug delivery

Pulmonary route is extensively studied for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary and extra pulmonary disease conditions such as asthma, tuberculosis, emphysema, and bronchitis. Formulation design, inhalation device and particle size play key role in determining the aerosol performance. The lack of desired clinical outcome along with the problem regarding efficacy or any adverse drug effect may arise due to improper training and education in use of the device to control the actuation and aerosol inhalation. This review summarizes the difference in the mechanistic features of current marketed aerosol delivery devices with respect to mechanism of aerosol generation with possible advancements in the aerosol design. The delivery options in the pulmonary route and its merits together with the limitations are also discussed. An update is provided regarding the current research and clinical outcome of the use of inhalational technology.

Clinical Considerations in the Use of Inhalation Delivery Devices

Medications delivered through oral inhalation represent the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Several options exist as methods of delivering aerosols to the lung, including metered-dose inhalers, metered-dose inhalers attached to spacers or valved holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers. Delivery of aerosols to the lung is affected by numerous factors including characteristics of aerosol particles, patients’ ventilatory patterns, and physical condition of the lung. It has become increasingly clear that the device used to deliver the medication is an important factor in the extent of deposition and the ultimate therapeutic effect. Further, the same therapeutic agent may exhibit differing effects depending on which delivery device is used. Each inhalation device has specific instructions for use, and the techniques for use vary significantly among the available products. In each case, patients should be instructed and observed to ensure that they have the proper technique of use to achieve an optimal effect.

Inhaled tyrosine kinase inhibitors for pulmonary hypertension: a possible future treatment

Pulmonary hypertension is a disease with severe consequences for the human body. There are several diseases and situations that induce pulmonary hypertension and are usually underdiagnosed. Treatments include conventional medical therapies and oral, inhaled, intravenous, and subcutaneous options. Depending on its severity, heart or lung transplant may also be an option. A possible novel treatment could be tyrosine kinase inhibitors. We conducted experiments with three jet nebulizers and three ultrasound nebulizers with erlotinib, gefitinib, and imatinib. Different residual cup designs and residual cup loadings were used in order to identify the best combination to produce droplets of less than 5 μm in mass median aerodynamic diameter. We found that gefitinib could not be transformed into a powder, so conversion to an aerosol form was not possible. Our experiments indicated that imatinib is superior to erlotinib with regard to small droplet size formation using both inhaled technologies (1.37 μm <2.23 μm and 1.92 μm <3.11 μm, jet and ultrasound, respectively) and, at jet devices (1.37 μm <1.92 μm). Cup designs C and G contribute best to small droplet creation uniquely supporting and equally well the activity of both drugs. The disadvantage of the large droplets formed for erlotinib was offset when combined with residual cup C (1.37 μm instead of 2.23 μm). At a 2 mL dose, the facemask and cone mouthpieces performed best and evenly; the facemask and low dose were the best choice (2.08 μm and 2.12 μm, respectively). Erlotinib and imatinib can be administered as an aerosols, and further in vivo experimentation is necessary to investigate the positive effects of these drugs in the treatment of pulmonary hypertension.

Optimization of nebulized delivery of linezolid, daptomycin, and vancomycin aerosol

BACKGROUND

At this time, several antibiotics have been investigated as possibilities for aerosol administration, but local therapy has been found to be more efficient in several diseases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The drugs linezolid (Zyvox), vancomycin (Voncon), and daptomycin (Cubicin) were tested with three jet nebulizers with seven different residual cups and different loadings. Moreover, three ultrasound nebulizers were again tested with these drugs, with different loadings and mouthpiece attachments.

RESULTS

When drugs are combined with particular cup designs, they significantly lower the droplet size to 1.60 and 1.80 μm, which represents the best combination of Zyvox and cup G and Cubicin and cup D, respectively. Cup design D is suggested as the most effective cup for lowering the droplet size (2.30 μm) when considering a higher loading level (8 mL).

CONCLUSION

Modification of current drugs from dry powder to solution is possible, and the residual cup design plays the most important role in droplet size production when the nebulization systems have the same properties.

Experimentation with inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Inhaled bronchodilators and corticosteroids have been used for decades with different production systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The following jet-nebulizers: (a) Invacare, (b) Sunmist, (c) Maxineb and ultrasound nebulizers: (a) GIMA, (b) OMRON and (c) EASY NEB II were used as production systems. The jet-nebulizers were used with different residual cups and volume filling, while the ultrasound nebulizers with different volume fillings and face mask versus inlet.

RESULTS

Inhalation and ultrasound process detect significant differences between the factors and interactions considered, but each technique follows a specific pattern of magnitude effect. Thus the inhaled mechanism ranks the factor effects in decreasing order: residual cup>drug>nebulizer>loading (2, 3, 4 ml) and also drug>residual cup>nebulizer (loading 8 ml). The ultrasound mechanism orders as follows: nebulizer>drug>loading. In fact, varying micro environmental conditions created during the performance of the devices in both processes alternate the magnitude of factor significance allowing for unique capacities.

CONCLUSIONS

PULMICORT, MAXINEB, design cup J and loading 6 ml are the best options for the inhaled process. Optimal combinations are provided by FLIXOTIDE and cup B and also by MAXINEB and cup J. The incorporation of large residual cups suggests one out of six drugs, the SUNMIST nebulizer and design D as the best choices. Ultrasound performance informs for other optimal conditions: ZYLOREN, MAXINEB, 4 ml load and MAXINEB×loading 4 ml.

Further experimentation of inhaled; LANTUS, ACTRAPID and HUMULIN with todays' production systems

BACKGROUND

Several aerosol production systems have been used for aerosol insulin production. However; since the first studies several new models of jet-nebulizers and ultrasound nebulizers have been introduced in the market.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different models of jet-nebulizers (different brands, same properties) and three different ultrasound nebulizers (different brands, same properties). Six residual cups (2 small ≤ 6 ml and 3 large ≤ 8 ml) were used for the jet-nebulizers. The ultrasound nebulizers were used with their facemasks or with their inlets which were included in the purchase package.

RESULTS

Ultrasound nebulizers; LANTUS produces by far the lowest mean droplets (2.44) half the size of the other two drugs (4.43=4.97). GIMA nebulizer is the most efficient producing one third of the droplet size of SHIMED and one second of EASYNEB (2.06<3.15<6.62). Finally, the 4 ml loading concentration is more suitable for supporting the production of smaller droplets (3.65<4.24). Drugs and nebulizers act interactively yielding very large droplets when ACTRAPID and HUMULIN are administered in joint with SHIMED nebulizer (9.59=7.72). Jet-nebulizers; HUMULIN again is the least preferred insulin since it hardly reaches the low but equal performance of others at the loading level of 6 ml. Residual cups E and B produce uniquely lower mean droplets at loading level 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound nebulizers; the best suggested combination should be LANTUS insulin, GIMA nebulizer administered at loading dose of 4 ml jet-nebulizers. A global review can give the best combination: the lowest mean droplets are produced when the drugs LANTUS (mostly) and ACTRAPID are administered, applying the SUNMIST nebulizer in concert with residual cup B at loading levels of 6 ml.

Clinical experimentation with aerosol antibiotics: current and future methods of administration

Currently almost all antibiotics are administered by the intravenous route. Since several systems and situations require more efficient methods of administration, investigation and experimentation in drug design has produced local treatment modalities. Administration of antibiotics in aerosol form is one of the treatment methods of increasing interest. As the field of drug nanotechnology grows, new molecules have been produced and combined with aerosol production systems. In the current review, we discuss the efficiency of aerosol antibiotic studies along with aerosol production systems. The different parts of the aerosol antibiotic methodology are presented. Additionally, information regarding the drug molecules used is presented and future applications of this method are discussed.

Internal mouthpiece designs as a future perspective for enhanced aerosol deposition. Comparative results for aerosol chemotherapy and aerosol antibiotics

BACKGROUND

In an effort to identify factors producing a finest mist from Jet-Nebulizers we designed 2 mouthpieces with 4 different internal designs and 1-3 compartments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten different drugs previous used with their "ideal" combination of jet-nebulizer, residual-cup and loading were used. For each drug the mass median aerodynamic diameter size had been established along with their "ideal" combination.

RESULTS

For both mouthpiece, drug was the most important factor due the high F-values (Flarge=251.7, p<0.001 and Fsmall=60.1, p<0.001) produced. The design affected the droplet size but only for large mouthpiece (Flarge=5.99, p=0.001, Fsmall=1.72, p=0.178). Cross designs create the smallest droplets (2.271) so differing from the other designs whose mean droplets were greater and equal ranging between 2.39 and 2.447. The number of compartments in the two devices regarding the 10 drugs was found not statistically significant (p-values 0.768 and 0.532 respectively). Interaction effects between drugs and design were statistically significant for both devices (Flarge=8.87, p<0.001, Fsmall=5.33, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Based on our experiment we conclude that further improvement of the drugs intended for aerosol production is needed. In addition, the mouthpiece design and size play an important role in further enhancing the fine mist production and therefore further experimentation is needed.

New insights in the production of aerosol antibiotics. Evaluation of the optimal aerosol production system for ampicillin-sulbactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam

BACKGROUND

Several aerosol antibiotics are on the market and several others are currently being evaluated. Aim of the study was to evaluate the aerosol droplet size of five different antibiotics for future evaluation as an aerosol administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The nebulizers Sunmist(®), Maxineb(®) and Invacare(®) were used in combination with four different "small <6 ml" residual cups and two "large <10 ml" with different loadings 2-4-6-8 ml (8 ml only for large residual cups) with five different antibiotic drugs (ampicilln-sulbactam, meropenem, ceftazidime, cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam). The Mastersizer 2000 (Malvern) was used to evaluate the produced droplet size from each combination

RESULTS

Significant effect on the droplet size produced the different antibiotic (F=96.657, p<0.001) and the residual cup design (F=68.535, p<0.001) but not the different loading amount (p=0.127) and the nebulizer (p=0.715). Interactions effects were found significant only between antibiotic and residual cup (F=16.736, p<0.001). No second order interactions were found statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Our results firstly indicate us indirectly that the chemical formulation of the drug is the main factor affecting the produced droplet size and secondly but closely the residual cup design.

Establishing the optimal nebulization system for paclitaxel, docetaxel, cisplatin, carboplatin and gemcitabine: back to drawing the residual cup

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy drugs have still the major disadvantage of non-specific cytotoxic effects. Although, new drugs targeting the genome of the tumor are already in the market, doublet chemotherapy regimens still remain the cornerstone of lung cancer treatment. Novel modalities of administration are under investigation such as; aerosol, intratumoral and intravascular.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the present study five chemotherapy drugs; paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, carboplatin and cisplatin were nebulized with three different jet nebulizers (Maxineb(®), Sunmist(®), Invacare(®)) and six different residual cups at different concentrations. The purpose of the study was to identify the "ideal" combination of nebulizer-residual cup design-drug-drug loading for a future concept of aerosol chemotherapy in lung cancer patients. The Mastersizer(®) 2000 was used to evaluate the aerosol droplet mass median aerodynamic diameter.

RESULTS

The drug, nebulizer and residual cup design greatly influences the producing droplet size (p<0.005, in each case). However; the design of the residual cup is the most important factor affecting the produced droplet size (F=834.6, p<0.001). The drug loading plays a vital role in the production of the desired droplet size (F=10.42, p<0.001). The smallest droplet size was produced at 8 ml loading (1.26 μm), while it remained the same at 2, 4 and 6 mls of drug loading.

CONCLUSION

The ideal nebulizer would be Maxineb(®), with a large residual cup (10 ml maximum loading capacity) and 8 mls loading and the drug with efficient pulmonary deposition would be docetaxel.

The effects of particle size on measurement of airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine

BACKGROUND

The effect of particle size on methacholine provocation concentration causing a decrease in forced expiratory volume of 1 second (FEV1) of 20% (PC20) is debatable.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the functional effects of 3 different particle size nebulizers on methacholine PC20.

METHODS

Participants were randomly assigned to have 3 methacholine challenges on 3 separate days. Nebulizer mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) was provided by manufacturers. The Wright nebulizer (MMAD, 1.0 μm), Aeroneb (MMAD, 3 μm), and Aeroneb (MMAD, 5 μm) were calibrated, and the nebulizer outputs were calculated to administer 0.26 mL of methacholine over 120, 112, and 83 seconds, respectively. After each inhalation, spirometry was performed and the test was terminated when the PC20 was achieved.

RESULTS

Eight nonsmoking patients with mild asthma (4 male and 4 female) completed the study. The mean (SD) age was 25 (13.9) years, and the mean (SD) baseline FEV1 was 88% (11.3%). Patients using the Aeroneb (MMAD, 5 μm) nebulizer had the lowest PC20 (bronchoconstricted at lowest methacholine concentration), with a PC20 geometric mean of 0.62 mg/mL compared with patients using the Aeroneb (MMAD, 3.0 μm), who had a PC20 of 1.76 mg/mL, and patients using the Wright nebulizer (MMAD, 1.0 μm), who had a PC20 of 6.32 mg/mL. There was a significant difference in PC20 across all particle sizes (P < .001). The pairwise differences revealed a P < .001 between 3 μm and 1 μm and between 5 μm and 1 μm and a P = .008 between 5 μm and 3 μm.

CONCLUSION

Our results reveal a variability in methacholine PC20 using 3 different nebulizers, despite adjusting the nebulizers' outputs. Our results are consistent with the previous reports, which recommended using larger particle size nebulizers in the assessment of airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00529477.

In vitro deposition properties of nebulized formoterol fumarate: effect of nebulization time, airflow, volume of fill and nebulizer type

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate in vitro the delivery of a new long-acting beta2-agonist (LABA) drug formoterol fumarate inhalation solution (20 microg/2 mL) nebulized with and without ipratropium bromide (0.5 mg/2.5 mL) at different administration times (2.5-22.5 min), airflows (5-28.3 L/min), nebulizer fill volumes (2-6 mL),and nebulizer brands (Pari LC+, Ventstream and DeVilbiss).

METHOD

Formoterol fumarate with and without ipratropium bromide was aerosolized at different administration times, airflows, nebulizer fill volumes, and nebulizer brands. The drug deposited on the throat, filter and stage plates was collected and analyzed by HPLC to determine the aerodynamic profiles of the nebulized drugs under each variable.

RESULTS

In addition to altering the aerosol characteristics,increasing the nebulizer fill volume including the addition of ipratropium bromide produced a significant(p50.05) increase in the drug output. As expected, sputtering time was significantly longer at low airflows, and vice versa at higher airflows but with a significant loss of drug delivered presumably due to greater solvent evaporation at higher airflows. Airflows between 10 and 28.3 L/min and a nebulization time of approximately 10 min appear sufficient for producing aerosols within the respirable range (1-5 mm MMAD) with the nebulizer/compressor combination used.While the drug output varied significantly (p50.05) among the three brands of nebulizers tested, the LC+ nebulizer appears to produce aerosols (2.7 0.1 microm MMAD) capable of penetrating more deeply into the lung than the other nebulizers evaluated under the current test conditions. This study did not attempt to evaluate different nebulizer/compressor combinations. Also, the cascade impaction data may not necessarily reflect aerosol deposition in the airways in vivo, which may be different depending on the health status of the patient.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrated that administration of nebulized formoterol fumarate require proper selection of a delivery system/method for safe and effective therapy of the medication with and without ipratropium bromide.

Rapid pulmonary delivery of inhaled tobramycin for Pseudomonas infection in cystic fibrosis: a pilot project

BACKGROUND

Patients with cystic fibrosis spend as much 30 min a day inhaling tobramycin. Could a new rapid system deposit the equivalent amount of tobramycin faster?

METHODS

Six healthy adult males inhaled 5 ml (300 mg) of tobramycin from a breath enhanced nebulizer and either 125 mg (n = 3) or 150 mg (n = 3) from a vibrating membrane system with a large or small aerosol mixing chamber respectively. A radiolabel was added to the solution and shown to "track" with the tobramycin. Imaging was done with a dual headed gamma camera. Because the radiolabel will be cleared by mucociliary action during administration, algorithms were developed to allow the comparison of a slower system to a faster one.

RESULTS

Both formulations were well tolerated. The lung deposition was 16.6 +/- 3.2% (mean +/- SD) of the charge dose delivered in 10.9 +/- 1.0 min for the breath enhanced nebulizer versus 32.0 +/- 5.1% delivered in 2.5 +/- 0.4 min from the vibrating membrane system. The absolute pulmonary delivery of tobramycin was 49.9 +/- 9.6 versus 43.9 +/- 4.8 mg for the two systems respectively, differences that were statistically significant (pair t-test) but unlikely to be clinically significant. There was a similar deposition of tobramycin for the 125 and 150 mg dose.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to deliver an equivalent amount of tobramycin in a shorter period of time with the new vibrating membrane system and a more concentrated formulation. These data will allow the design of a comparison in patients with CF.

The Challenges of Quantitative Measurement of Lung Deposition Using 99mTc-DTPA from Delivery Systems with Very Different Delivery Times

In quantifying aerosol delivery, the drug is often mixed with a radiolabel such as (99m)Tc-DTPA whose deposition is used as a proxy for the drug. (99m)Tc-DTPA deposited in the lung is cleared by a combination of absorption into the pulmonary circulation and mucociliary clearance. If administration is not instantaneous, the image will not include that clearance during administration, a problem raised if comparing devices with different administration times. However, if rates of clearance are measured, it will be possible to "correct" the initial image for the clearance that occurred during administration and before counting. Five adult males inhaled a 5-mL solution containing (99m)Tc-DTPA from a breath enhanced jet nebulizer (LC Plus)over the course of 10 min and a 1.25-mL solution from a vibrating membrane device (eFlow), which was delivered in 2.5 min. Quality assurance was the radioactivity count balance (RCB) defined as the difference in the total radioactivity pre-nebulization less post, divided by pre, and expressed as a percentage. Attenuation calculations used a (57)Co flood source (Macey and Marshall). The "correction" for the clearance of (99m)Tc-DTPA was 0.91 +/- 0.04 (mean +/- SD) for the LC Plus) and 0.96 +/- 0.02 for the eFlow). RCB was -0.6 +/- 3.5% for the LC Plus and -4.7 +/- 6.4% for the eFlow, implying acceptable accuracy. For the LC Plus, lung deposition was 15.9(13.4, 18.4)% (mean and 95% CI) of the charge dose, and for the eFlow it was 32.0(29.0, 35.0)%. This technique gave an acceptable level of accuracy for quantitative planar imaging and allowed the comparison of delivery from devices with very different rates of delivery.

The influence of fluid physicochemical properties on vibrating-mesh nebulization

In this study, the effect of fluid physicochemical properties and the vibrating-mesh mechanism on the aerosols generated from vibrating-mesh nebulizers have been evaluated using fluids having a range of viscosity, surface tension and ion concentration. Two nebulizers were investigated: the Omron MicroAir NE-U22 (passively vibrating) and the Aeroneb Pro (actively vibrating) mesh nebulizers. For both devices, the total aerosol output was generally unaffected by fluid properties. Increased viscosity or ion concentration resulted in a decrease in droplet volume median diameter (VMD) and an increase in fine particle fraction (FPF). Moreover, increased viscosity resulted in prolonged nebulization and reduced output rate, particularly for the Omron nebulizer. Both nebulizers were unsuitable for delivery of viscous fluids since nebulization was intermittent or completely ceased at >1.92cP. The presence of ions reduced variability particularly for the Aeroneb Pro nebulizer. No clear effect of surface tension was observed on the performance of nebulizers employing a vibrating-mesh technology. However, when viscosity was low, reduced surface tension seemed advantageous in shortening the nebulization time and increasing the output rate, but for the Omron nebulizer this also increased the droplet VMD and decreased the FPF. This study has shown that vibrating-mesh nebulization was highly dependent on fluid characteristics and nebulizer mechanism of operation.

Calculating expected lung deposition of aerosolized administration of AAV vector in human clinical studies

BACKGROUND

Cystic fibrosis is an autosomal recessive disease affecting approximately 1 in 2500 live births. Introducing the cDNA that codes for normal cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) to the small airways of the lung could result in restoring the CFTR function. A number of vectors for lung gene therapy have been tried and adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors offer promise. The vector is delivered to the lung using a breath-actuated jet nebulizer. The purpose of this project was to determine the aerosolized AAV (tgAAVCF) particle size distribution (PSD) in order to calculate target doses for lung delivery.

METHODS

A tgAAVCF solution was nebulized using the Pari LC Plus (n = 3), and the PSD was determined by coupling laser diffraction and inertial impaction (NGI) techniques. The NGI allowed for quantification of the tgAAVCF at each stage of impaction, ensuring that rAAV-CFTR vector is present and not empty particles. Applying the results to mathematical algorithms allowed for the calculation of expected pulmonary deposition.

RESULTS

The mass median diameter (MMD) for the tgAAVCF was 2.78 +/- 0.43 microm. If the system works ideally and the patient only receives aerosol on inspiration, the patient would receive 47 +/- 0% of the initial dose placed in the nebulizer, with 72 +/- 0.73% of this being deposited beyond the vocal cords.

CONCLUSIONS

This technology for categorizing the pulmonary delivery system for lung gene therapy vectors can be adapted for advanced aerosol delivery systems or other vectors.

Paediatric pulmonary drug delivery: considerations in asthma treatment

Aerosol therapy, the preferred route of administration for glucocorticosteroids and short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonists in the treatment of paediatric asthma, may be given via nebulisers, metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers. For glucocorticosteroids, therapy with aerosolised medication results in higher concentrations of drug at the target organ with minimal systemic side effects compared with oral treatments. The dose of drug that reaches the airways in children with asthma is dependent on both the delivery device and patient-related factors. Factors that affect aerosol drug delivery are reviewed briefly. Advantages and disadvantages of each device and device-specific factors that influence patient preferences are examined. Although age-based device recommendations have been made, the optimal choice for drug delivery is the one that the patient or caregiver prefers to use, can use correctly and is most likely to use consistently.

Design and in vitro performance testing of multiple air classifier technology in a new disposable inhaler concept (Twincer) for high powder doses

Dry powder inhalation of antibiotics in cystic fibrosis (CF) therapy may be a valuable alternative for wet nebulisation, because it saves time and it improves lung deposition. In this study, it is shown that the use of multiple air classifier technology enables effective dispersion of large amounts of micronised powder (up to 25mg). X(50)-values of the aerosol from laser diffraction analysis obtained with the Twincer disposable inhaler concept (containing multiple air classifier technology) are practically the same as that for the pure drug in the range of dose weights between 0 and 25mg. Only for the highest dose weights, a minor fraction (5-7.5%) of small agglomerates (5-15microm) is released from the inhaler. Moreover, the size distribution of the aerosol is practically the same at 1 and 4kPa. Cascade impactor results confirm the good performance of the multiple classifier concept. Unprocessed micronised particles or soft spherical agglomerates can be used, and special particle engineering processes are not necessary. Only a minor fraction of coarse sweeper crystals in the formulation is desired to reduce the total inhaler losses for colistin sulfomethate to less than 5-6% at 4kPa. The classifiers can be designed to retain these crystals with more than 95% efficiency.

Aerosolised antibiotics: a critical appraisal of their use

Aerosolised antimicrobial agents have been used in clinical practice since the 1950s. The main advantage of this route of administration is the targeted drug delivery to the site of infection in the lung. Exploitation of this targeted delivery can yield high concentrations at the site of infection/colonisation while minimising systemic toxicities. It is important to note that the ability of a drug to reach the target area in the lung effectively is dependent on a number of variables, including the nebuliser, patient technique, host anatomy and disease-specific factors. The most convincing data to support the use of aerosolised antimicrobials has been generated with tobramycin solution for inhalation (TOBI, Chiron Corp.) for maintenance treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis. In addition to cystic fibrosis, the use of aerosolised antimicrobials has also been studied for the treatment or prevention of a number of additional disease states including non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, ventilator-associated pneumonia and prophylaxis against pulmonary fungal infections. Key studies evaluating the benefits and shortcomings of aerosolised antimicrobial agents in these areas are reviewed. Although the theory behind aerosolised administration of antibiotics seems to be sound, there are limited data available to support the routine use of this modality. Owing to the gaps still existing in our knowledge base regarding the routine use of aerosolised antibiotics, caution should be exercised when attempting to administer antimicrobials via this route in situations falling outside clearly established indications such as the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis or Pneumocystis pneumonia.

Suitability of Caspofungin for Aerosol Delivery

BACKGROUND

Aerosolized antifungal therapy is a promising route of drug delivery for pulmonary aspergillosis due to attainment of high localized concentrations. Caspofungin, a new antifungal agent with proven efficacy against invasive aspergillosis, has ideal potential for aerosolization.

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To examine in vitro the suitability of caspofungin for aerosol administration by characterizing factors that influence efficacy and airway tolerance of aerosol delivery: physicochemical properties, aerodynamics of drug particles, and efficiency of nebulizing systems.

DESIGN

Physicochemical characteristics of caspofungin solutions (10 mg/mL and 30 mg/mL) were analyzed: osmolality, pH, viscosity, and surface tension. A time-of-flight aerosol spectrometer API Aerosizer was used to determine aerosol particle size and distribution. Drug output was quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography assay. Nebulizer efficiency was measured by drug output and respirable fraction (percentage of aerosolized particles with a 1 to 5 mum aerodynamic diameter) and compared among three jet nebulizer/compressor systems: device 1, Micromist (Hudson RCI; Temecula, CA)/Pulmo-Aide (model 5650D; DeVilbiss; Somerset, PA); device 2, Sidestream MS 2400/Envoy model IRC 1192 (Invacare; Elyria, OH); and device 3, Pari LC Star/Proneb Ultra (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Midlothian, VA).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Caspofungin requires 0.9% NaCl rather than sterile water as the diluent and addition of 0.3N NaOH buffer to adjust acidity of solutions (pH 6.17 to 6.26) in order to achieve optimal physicochemical properties for airway tolerability (osmolality, 150 to 550 milliosmol per kilogram; chloride ion, 31 to 300 mmol/L; and pH 7.4). The drug output rate increased with higher concentrations of drug solution: device 1, 4.0 mg/min vs 12.5 mg/min; device 2, 5.4 mg/min vs 14.7 mg/min; and device 3, 2.3 mg/min vs 12 mg/min, respectively. The percentage of particles within the respirable range varies depending on device and concentration of drug solutions (10 mg/mL vs 30 mg/mL): device 1, 85% vs 38%; device 2, 44% vs 57%; and device 3, 83% vs 93%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Caspofungin solution with adjustments appears to have physicochemical and aerodynamic characteristics suitable for aerosolization when used with either the Pari LC Star/Proneb Ultra or Micromist/Pulmo-Aide devices. Further in vivo testing is warranted.

Comparison of Breath-Enhanced to Breath-Actuated Nebulizers for Rate, Consistency, and Efficiency

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate differences between three new-generation nebulizers-Pari LC Star (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Mississauga, ON, Canada), AeroEclipse (Trudell Medical International, London, ON, Canada), and Halolite (Medic-Aid Limited, West Sussex, UK)-in terms of rate and amount of expected deposition as well as the consistency of the doses delivered.

METHODS

The in vitro performance characteristics were determined and then coupled to the respiratory pattern of seven patients with cystic fibrosis (age range, 4 to 18 years) in order to calculate expected deposition. The Pari LC Star and AeroEclipse were characterized while being driven by the Pari ProNeb Ultra compressor (Pari Respiratory Equipment) for home use, and by a 50-psi medical air hospital source. The Halolite has its own self-contained compressor. Algorithms for the rate of output for the inspiratory flow were developed for each device. Patient flow patterns were divided into 5-ms epochs, and the expected deposition for each epoch was calculated from the algorithms. Summed over a breath, this allowed the calculation of the estimated deposition for each patient's particular pattern of breathing.

RESULTS

The rate of deposition was highest for the Pari LC Star and lowest for the Halolite. Rate of deposition was independent of respiratory pattern for the Pari LC Star and AeroEclipse, but proportional to respiratory rate for the Halolite. The differences between the Pari LC Star and AeroEclipse were less when driven by the 50-psi source. The AeroEclipse had the least amount of drug wastage. As designed, the Halolite delivered a predetermined amount of drug very accurately, whereas expected deposition when run to dryness of the other two devices had significant variations.

CONCLUSIONS

To minimize treatment time, the Pari LC Star would be best. To minimize drug wastage, the AeroEclipse would be best. To accurately deliver a specific drug dose, the Halolite would be best.

Pulmonary drug delivery. Part II: the role of inhalant delivery devices and drug formulations in therapeutic effectiveness of aerosolized medications

Research in the area of pulmonary drug delivery has gathered momentum in the last several years, with increased interest in using the lung as a means of delivering drugs systemically. Advances in device technology have led to the development of more efficient delivery systems capable of delivering larger doses and finer particles into the lung. As more efficient pulmonary delivery devices and sophisticated formulations become available, physicians and health professionals will have a choice of a wide variety of device and formulation combinations that will target specific cells or regions of the lung, avoid the lung's clearance mechanisms and be retained within the lung for longer periods. It is now recognized that it is not enough just to have inhalation therapy available for prescribing; physicians and other healthcare providers need a basic understanding of aerosol science, inhaled formulations, delivery devices, and bioequivalence of products to prescribe these therapies optimally.

Perfluorocarbon species and nebulizer type influence aerosolization rate and particle size of perfluorocarbon aerosol

PURPOSE

Aerosolization of perfluorocarbons (PFC) has been proven beneficial in vivo. The present in vitro study was performed to investigate, how PFC-aerosolization is affected by type of nebulizer and PFC properties.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Aerosolization rate was studied of 4 different PFC that were nebulized using 3 different jet nebulizers (operating at different flows: 4.1; 7.1; 13 l/min) and one ultrasonic nebulizer. Distribution of aerosol particle size was determined with a laser diffraction device.

RESULTS

Between the studied nebulizers, considerable differences in the aerosolization rate were found. Aerosolization rate was significantly lower for PFOB (0.48-1.24 mL/min), when compared with PF 5080, RM 101 and FC 77 (1.33-4.75 mL/min). The ultrasonic nebulizer did not generate an aerosol but rather PFC vapor. Lowest mass median diameter (MMD) was found for PFOB and varied between the jet nebulizers from 2.2 and 3.7 microm, with a small range in particle size (maximum of 7.3 microm). FC 77 had highest MMD (3.5 to 9.2 microm) and greatest range of particle size of up to 13 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our in vitro data show that aerosolization rate depends mainly on density of PFC and the flow of nebulizer. Particle size distribution is affected by PFC properties. Our result may explain controversial results of published in vivo studies.

A widely available method for the assessment of aerosol delivery in cystic fibrosis

Whilst nebulisers are commonly used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF), nebulised aerosol lung deposition in individual patients is not routinely assessed in clinical practice. The present study was designed to evaluate whether a comparative measurement of aerosol lung deposition from nebulisers using a widely available scintigraphic method could be employed to assist the selection of the best system for individual patients. Lung deposition of the radiolabelled aerosol from the Pari LC Plus (Pari Medical Ltd) nebuliser and the HaloLite Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) system (Profile Therapeutics Ltd) was measured using planar scintigraphy in 10 healthy volunteers and 6 CF patients. The HaloLite AAD delivered on average 2.1 times (P=0.003) as much aerosol to the lungs compared with Pari LC Plus. Only two subjects had higher lung deposition from Pari LC Plus than HaloLite AAD system. There was marked inter-individual variation in the deposition pattern in CF patients. The aerosol deposition from HaloLite AAD had higher central distribution than that obtained with the Pari LC Plus. The overall intersubject variability of the delivered dose was 56% with Pari LC Plus and 24% with HaloLite AAD (P<0.05). The measurement of aerosol deposition from nebulisers can be performed using a simple and widely available methodology, and may improve nebuliser selection in CF patients.

Nebulized antibiotics in cystic fibrosis

Nebulization is a useful administration route in cystic fibrosis (CF) as it delivers antibiotics directly to the endobronchial site of infection and is associated with decreased toxicity because of limited systemic absorption. It is assumed that the concentration of antibiotics in bronchial secretions should be as high as 10 times the minimum inhibiting concentration to allow penetration of antibiotics into biofilms, suppress inhibitory factors and promote bactericidal effectiveness. However, effective aerosol delivery is compromised by nebulizers with limited capacity to produce particles of a size in the respirable range. Three antibiotics are commonly used for inhalation: tobramycin, amikacin and colistin (colomycin). Placebo-controlled studies evaluating antibiotic aerosol maintenance in stable patients chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa indicate a significant improvement of lung function and a reduction of the number of hospital admissions for an acute exacerbation of CF. TOBI is a recently marketed preservative- and sulfate-free formula of tobramycin, specially designed for diffusion in the bronchioles and optimal tolerance. A wide-scope study involving 520 patients compared TOBI (300 mg twice daily; n = 258) with placebo (n = 262) for three 28-day cycles with each cycle separated by a 28-day period of no treatment. Respiratory function was significantly improved as early as in the second week and remained so for the rest of the trial even during periods without aerosol treatment. There was also a parallel decrease in the relative risk of hospitalization, the number of days of hospitalization and the number of days on intravenous antipyocyanic treatment. Toxicity studies carried out so far have shown no renal or ototoxicity with nebulized tobramycin. Introduction or selection of resistant bacteria is relatively rare but remains a matter of concern. Aerosol maintenance treatment with an appropriate antibiotic in a high enough dosage can be recommended for patients with CF who are chronically infected with P. aeruginosa.

Production of radioactive particles for use in environmental studies

This paper presents an aerosol generation technique developed to produce dry aerosol particles of various sizes from aqueous solutions of salt. The technique was tested with sodium chloride, lithium carbonate and uranyl acetate at various aqueous concentrations which produced particles in the size range of 0.13-1.37 microm Mass Median Diameter (MMD). The generated aerosols were acceptably monodisperse with a geometric standard deviation of 1.4-2. Both MMD and Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) increased significantly (p<0.001) with increased concentration of the salt in solution. The technique can also be used to generate aerosols of different chemical species. The results obtained indicate that the system is convenient for use with various aerosol-forming materials, with a stable particle size distribution being maintained for a long period of steady operation. The technique was successfully applied in wind tunnel studies to simulate the release of submicron radioactive particles and their interception by crops, grass and tree canopies. The relevance and application of the technique in other areas of environmental assessment studies is discussed.

Management of acute pediatric asthma

Pediatric asthma prevalence, morbidity, and severity are increasing. Direct costs associated with providing emergency department and inpatient care account for more than 40% of overall dollars spent for this disease in the United States. Physicians in many health care settings may be required to treat a child in severe respiratory distress caused by acute asthma. This article reviews the pathophysiology, evaluation, and treatment of severe asthma exacerbations, or status asthmaticus.

Evaluation of four breath-enhanced nebulizers for home use

The objective of this study was to evaluate relative efficiency in vitro of four reusable breath-enhanced nebulizers (Pari LC Star, Medic-Aid Ventstream, Devilbiss PermaNeb, Salter Ultramist), and to integrate the in vitro performance data of the nebulizers with the respiratory patterns of four cystic fibrosis (CF) patients to compare efficiency in vivo of each device for each individual patient. Six nebulizers of each type were used to nebulize a solution of 2.5 mg (0.5 mL) albuterol with 3.5 mL of 0.9% saline. Total albuterol output and the rate of albuterol output of each device were measured until end-nebulization and for 4 min, respectively, using entrained flows from 0 to 20 L/min through the inspiratory valve of the device. Particle size distributions and the respirable fraction (RF) were evaluated by laser diffraction technique. Regression analysis of the change in rate of output and change in RF values with inspiratory flows was done to characterize each nebulizer's performance over the complete range of interest. Actual breath tracings of four CF patients were integrated with the equations specific to the in vitro performance of each nebulizer and in vivo nebulizer efficiency was calculated. The change in efficiency in vitro from 0 to 20 L/min flow, respectively, was highest for the Star (44-57%) and lowest for the Ultramist (13-15%). The mean predicted efficiency in vivo for the Star was threefold that of the Ultramist. Although all four nebulizers are breath-enhanced in design, clearly there are measurable differences in the performance and efficiency of each type. The Pari LC Star nebulizer has proven to be the nebulizer of choice among the devices tested.

The equivalence of compressor pressure-flow relationships with respect to jet nebulizer aerosolization characteristics

Manufacturers of aerosolized medications, approved by the Food and Drug Administration, specify the nebulizer(s) and compressor to be used with their product, in an attempt to achieve efficacy comparable to that obtained in the clinical trials. The need to limit the compressor to that used in the trials has not been investigated in detail. We suggest a technique to determine the equivalency of different compressors such that a chosen nebulizer's performance is not significantly altered. Aerosol particle size (MMD) was measured with a laser; compressor flow and pressure were measured with a mass flow meter and pressure gauge, respectively. For all models of nebulizer, increased flow or driving pressure caused a decrease in aerosol MMD. The flow resistance of nebulizer models varied, and the flow output of compressors decreased as imposed nebulizer resistance increased. However, for any specific compressor-nebulizer combination there is a unique flow and pressure, and the nebulizer generates a given MMD. We demonstrate methods to choose alternate compressors that may be used to drive a nebulizer and yet keep the nebulizer's MMD and performance within predetermined limits. Once an acceptable range of variance in a nebulizer's MMD is defined, alternate compressors may be safely chosen. We recommend that these techniques be used by manufacturers of medications and of compressors to safely determine the acceptability of several rather than a single model compressor to drive a chosen nebulizer. The techniques assure consistency of the nebulizer's clinically demonstrated performance characteristics.

Characterization of aerosol output from various nebulizer/compressor combinations

OBJECTIVES

Different commercially available nebulizers and compressors are available. However, the optimal combination for drug delivery is unknown.

METHODS

Flow rates of five different compressors (n = 3/compressor) tested alone and in combination with five different commercial nebulizers (n = 9 of each brand of nebulizer) were evaluated. Thereafter, the performances of the different nebulizers were evaluated using 2.5 mg albuterol solution (0.5 mL) added to 2.5 mL saline at flow rates of 2, 3, 4, and 5 L/minute using a laser particle analyzer. Volume median diameter and percentage of particles in the respirable range (1-5 microm) were calculated from this data. Time for nebulization (in seconds) and residual volume (in milliliters) were also recorded.

RESULTS

The mean flow rates for the compressors evaluated without a nebulizer attached ranged from 6.6 L/minute (LifeCare Freedom-neb; LifeCare International, Lafayette, CO) to 12.2 L/minute (DeVilbiss Pulmo-Aide; DeVilbiss Health Care, Somerset, PA). Flow rates for the nebulizer/compressor combinations ranged from 2.08 L/minute (Pari LC Jet Proneb; Pari Respiratory Equipment, Richmond, VA) to 5.42 L/minute (Puritan Bennett Raindrop; Puritan Bennett, Lenexa, KS/Omron Compare; Omron, Health Care,Vernon Hills, IL). Using the repeated measure ANOVA model, the interaction between flow rate and device was significant (P < 0.001) for both percentage of particles in the respirable range and log volume median diameter. It was observed that the percentage of particles in the respirable range for the Pari LC Jet did not increase across flow rates in contrast to the other 4 nebulizers. All comparisons to the Pari LC Jet at 2 L/minute were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Marked variability exists in the flow rates among different commercially available compressors used for home nebulization of inhaled pulmonary medications. Different nebulizer/compressor combinations have markedly different performance characteristics which could result in different efficacy and safety profiles of the medications being administered via these devices. We recommend that this type of information be used as a starting point for selecting different nebulizer/compressor combinations. Further clinical evaluation is warranted.

Effect of size and disease on estimated deposition of drugs administered using jet nebulization in children with cystic fibrosis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To develop a model that quantified the nebulizer output that was inhaled by subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) in order to predict the amount of drug likely to enter the upper airway contained in particles small enough to be deposited in the lower respiratory tract of individual patients.

DESIGN

Forty-three patients (age, 6 to 18 years) with CF, with FEV(1) of 26 to 124% of predicted, breathed through a nebulizer circuit with a pneumotachograph in place at the distal end. Algorithms were developed from the measured flows through the pneumotachograph, allowing partitioning of inspiration into undiluted aerosol and fresh gas. In order to validate the algorithms, argon was added to the nebulizing gas flow and then its concentration was analyzed at the mouth by mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Predictions of the concentration of argon at the mouth were concordant with that measured by mass spectrometry, thus validating the model. Combining data from the model with in vitro nebulizer performance data, predictions for estimates for lung deposition for individuals were possible. Total estimate was independent of patient size or FEV(1). The respiratory duty cycle was 0.44 +/- 0.05 (mean +/- SD) and correlated (r = 0.91, p < 0.001) with estimated deposition and minute ventilation (r = 0.60, p < 0.01). However, when expressed in milligrams per kilogram of body weight, the estimated deposition in smaller children was fourfold higher than in larger children.

CONCLUSIONS

If the effect of patient size and pattern of breathing on estimated drug deposition are not considered when prescribing drugs given by nebulization, the result may be overdosing younger children, underdosing older children, or both.

Nebulizer choice for inhaled colistin treatment in cystic fibrosis

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To develop practical ways of nebulizing colistin by determining the rate of drug output, total drug output, and particle-size distribution of two commercially available jet nebulizers, the disposable Hudson 1730 Updraft II (Hudson Respiratory Care; Temecula, CA) and the reusable Pari LC Star breath-enhanced nebulizer (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Midlothian, VA).

METHODS

The nebulizers contained colistin, 75 mg, in 4 mL of isotonic solution. Particle-size distribution was measured by helium-neon laser diffraction, allowing calculation of the respirable fraction (RF), the mass of aerosol comprised of droplets < 5 microm.

RESULTS

The mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) total rate of output of the Updraft II was 2.6 mg/min (2.0, 3.1; n = 4) with 1.3 mg/min (1.0, 1.5) mg/min within the RF. The rate of output of the LC Star increased in a quadratic relationship to the inspiratory flow, delivering 1.8 mg/min (0.7, 2.0; n = 4) with 1.4 mg/min (1.3, 1.6) within the RF, and 6.2 mg/min (5.6, 6.8) with 5.3 mg/min (4.8, 5.7) within the RF, at 0 L/min and 20 L/min inspiratory flows, respectively. Efficiency, as the rate of expected pulmonary deposition divided by rate of total output, was then calculated. The LC Star estimated 56% (51, 61) efficiency, with pulmonary delivery of 29% (26, 32) of the charge of the nebulizer, compared to the Updraft II at 22% (22, 23) efficiency and expected pulmonary deposition of 10% (10, 10) of the dose.

CONCLUSIONS

Colistin can be successfully nebulized with both nebulizers tested. This study provides an estimate of in vivo efficiency and expected pulmonary deposition that may be used in future trials.

Do sinusoidal models of respiration accurately reflect the respiratory events of patients breathing on nebulizers?

The amount of drug that is delivered by nebulization is a combination of the physical properties of the agent being nebulized, the performance of the nebulizer, and the pattern of breathing of the patient. To avoid biological variation, mechanical models of breathing are frequently employed during the evaluation of the performance of a device. For simplicity, many investigators use sinusoidal models of breathing to calculate the expected inhaled mass, although some use square waves and other more complex models. Most assume that the duration of inspiration (Ti) is half of the total respiratory time (Ttot). This study compared the calculated inhaled mass from which the expected pulmonary deposition was estimated from the actual pattern of breathing of 43 children with cystic fibrosis (CF) breathing from an unvented nebulizer with a low dead volume and appropriate particle size distribution with that from a sinusoidal pattern of breathing using the same tidal volume (VT) and respiratory rate. The respiratory duty cycle (Ti/Ttot) was 0.45 +/- 0.05, which meant that less time was spent during inspiration than that found in a pure sinusoidal pattern. The difference between the predicted deposition from the actual pattern of breathing and that calculated from the sinusoidal model was 12 +/- 7%, which correlated with the respiratory rate (r = 0.67, P < 0.001). The degree of lung disease did not influence the discrepancy between the two values. In general, the actual VTs and respiratory rates were less in the patients than those employed in mechanical models of pediatric breathing. Although some patients had respiratory patterns that could be represented accurately with a sinusoidal model, most did not, and there were wide variations from child to child. These results suggest that there are both systematic and random errors arising from the use of a sinusoidal waveform to mimic respiratory events in patients.

Aerosolized antimicrobial therapy in acutely ill patients

Recent data are sparking renewed interest in therapy with aerosolized antimicrobials in critically ill patients as well as other populations such as those with neutropenia, human immunodeficiency virus infection, and cystic fibrosis. Pneumonia is a common complication in these patients and is associated with substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Clinical trials evaluated aerosolized antimicrobials for the prevention and treatment of pneumonia in hospitalized patients. In addition, factors that affect the pulmonary deposition of aerosolized drugs in mechanically ventilated patients were identified.

Influence of formulation on jet nebulisation quality of alpha 1 protease inhibitor

As foam appears during solution constitution and nebulisation of alpha 1 protease inhibitor (alpha 1 PI), we selected in a previous work, antifoams likely to be associated with an alpha 1 PI solution to be nebulised: span 65 at a 0.025% concentration and cetyl alcohol at a 0.05% concentration associated with tyloxapol at 0.025% concentration. The purpose of this study was, on the one hand to study the influence of the formulation on nebulisation quality by relating physicochemical properties and nebulisation capacity, and on the other hand, to define the alpha 1 PI that will be retained for a clinical study. The properties of the different alpha 1 PI formulations are compared: surface tension, viscosity, time required to constitute the protein solution and pH. Nebulisation quality is evaluated under different operating conditions by measuring the droplet size, the quantity of alpha 1 PI nebulised, nebulisation time and the quantity of alpha 1 PI likely to reach the lungs which was subjected to statistical analysis. The statistical analysis of results indicates that the addition of the cetyl alcohol/tyloxapol mixture improves nebulisation effectiveness by significantly increasing the quantity of drug nebulised and therefore the quantity of alpha PI likely to reach the lungs. It is this formulation that will be retained for clinical trials. We check that the nebuliser and operating conditions influence all the parameters, that is to say the respirable fraction, the quantity nebulised and the nebulisation time. Although there is no interaction between the nebuliser and the formulation, nebulisation quality is the combined result of the formulation, the nebuliser and the operating conditions.

Four hours of continuous albuterol nebulization

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Continuous albuterol nebulization (CAN) is a therapeutic modality available to treat status asthmaticus. Currently, CAN may be administered using a large-volume nebulizer (LVN) or a small-volume nebulizer attached to an infusion pump or refilled as needed. Few data are available regarding the reproducibility of aerosol characteristics during CAN. In this study, we determined the aerodynamic profile, drug output (DO), DO in respirable range (RD), solution output (SO), and changes in reservoir's albuterol concentration (AR) hourly during 4 hours of CAN.

DESIGN

A modified Puritan-Bennett 1600 jet nebulizer was tested with a large reservoir (LR; 250 mL), medium reservoir (MR; 45 mL), and small reservoir with infusion pump (SRP; 18 mL). We used 100-, 40-, and 4-mL initial fill volumes (with 10-mL/h infusion for SRP) of 1 mg/mL albuterol solution for the LR, MR, and SRP, respectively. Particle size distribution and DO consistency were determined by impaction and spectrophotometric analysis (275 nm). We also determined albuterol mass output. The SO was determined by gravimetric technique.

RESULTS

The PBsj produced a heterodisperse aerosol with a median mass aerodynamic diameter range of 1.8 to 2.2 microm. DO and RD paralleled SO. The LR had the highest SO, DO, and RD (8.03+/-2.36 vs 5.73+/-2.48 and 5.85+/-0.51 mg/h for MR and SRP, respectively). The AR showed no statistically significant changes.

CONCLUSIONS

The PBsj demonstrated consistent and adequate aerosol production during 4 hours of CAN. These bench data support the widespread use of a LVN for CAN.

Effects of repetitive use and cleaning techniques of disposable jet nebulizers on aerosol generation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Patients with cystic fibrosis use disposable jet nebulizers for the self-administration of antibiotics, DNase, and bronchodilators several times per day. Most patients elect to reuse their disposable nebulizers. The purpose of this study was to determine if significant changes in particle size distribution or output (mL/min) occurred with reuse.

DESIGN

In vitro studies were performed using four disposable models and one durable jet nebulizer for up to 100 runs; measurements of particle size and output were obtained at 10 run intervals, using saline solution alone, tobramycin, gentamicin, or a mixture of albuterol and cromolyn. Particle size determinations were made with a laser diffraction analyzer.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the baseline performance of the four disposable models and the durable Pari LC, when measuring particle size distribution of the aerosol; the Pari LC had an output rate two to three times higher than the four disposable models. For each of the four solutes tested, there was no clinically significant change in performance for up to 100 cycles, when the nebulizers were properly cleaned between uses. Unwashed units containing tobramycin started to fail by 40 runs.

CONCLUSIONS

When properly maintained, there was no trend of deterioration of performance with repeated use of disposable nebulizers. Microbial contamination was not addressed in this study and must be considered prior to recommendations for the reuse of disposable nebulizers.

A comparison of the availability of tobramycin for inhalation from vented vs unvented nebulizers

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare drug output from a vented nebulizer (Pari LC Jet Plus) with a traditional unvented nebulizer (Hudson 1730 T Up-Draft 11) using aerosolized tobramycin, which is frequently used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis.

DESIGN

Six nebulizers of each type were filled with a 4 mL tobramycin (80 mg) solution and were driven by a compressor (Pulmo-Aide). Various inspiratory flows (VI) (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 L/min for the Pari LC Jet Plus and 0, 5, and 10 L/min for the Hudson 1730, all at 40% relative humidity) were directed through each nebulizer. Drug output was measured from changes in weight and concentration (assessed by changes in osmometry) within the nebulizer. Particle size distributions were determined by laser diffraction allowing the calculation of the amount of aerosol output in the respirable range (<5 microm). The nebulizers were first run until end-nebulization to establish total drug output and then for either 4 or 5 min to determine the rate of drug output (mg/min) before intermittent aerosol output.

RESULTS

The total drug output without VI for both the unvented and the vented nebulizers was not significantly different, 55 (51, 60) mg for the Hudson 1730 vs 51 (49, 53) mg for the Pari LC Jet Plus (mean [95% confidence limits]). Inspiratory flow had no effect on the unvented Hudson 1730 nebulizer but significantly increased the rate of total drug output and the rate of drug output in the respirable range for the vented Pari LC Jet Plus nebulizer (VI=0, 3.35 [2.84, 3.85] and 1.72 [1.48, 1.96] compared with VI=20, 9.87 [9.03, 10.70] and 6.11 [5.33, 6.88] mg/min).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that the increase in the rate of drug output with VI for the vented nebulizer would result in shorter nebulization times and a relative decrease in drug loss during the expiratory phase.