Effects of theophylline and ipratropium bromide on exercise performance in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Palliative Medicine Review of the Disease, Its Therapies, and Drug Interactions

Despite significant advances in treatment, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a chronic and progressive disease that frequently leads to premature mortality. COPD is associated with a constellation of significant symptoms, including dyspnea, cough, wheezing, pain, fatigue, anxiety, depression, and insomnia, and is associated with increased morbidity. Palliative care is appropriate to support these patients. However, historically, palliative care has focused on supporting patients with malignant disease, rather than progressive chronic diseases such as COPD. Therapies for COPD often result in functional and symptomatic improvements, including health-related quality of life (HRQL), and palliative care may further improve symptoms and HRQL. Provision of usual palliative care therapies for this patient population requires understanding the pathogenesis of COPD and common disease-targeted pharmacotherapies, as well as an approach to balancing life-prolonging and HRQL care strategies. This review describes COPD and current targeted therapies and their effects on symptoms, exercise tolerance, HRQL, and survival. It is important to note that medications commonly used for symptom management in palliative care can interact with COPD medications resulting in increased risk of adverse effects, enhanced toxicity, or changes in clearance of medications. To address this, we review pharmacologic interactions with and precautions related to use of COPD therapies in conjunction with commonly used palliative care medications.

Effect of theophylline on exercise capacity in COPD patients treated with combination long-acting bronchodilator therapy: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease continue to experience significant functional limitation despite the use of both long-acting anticholinergic and beta-agonist inhalers. Theophylline is a widely available medication which may further improve lung function and exercise performance. Previous studies evaluating the effects of theophylline on exercise capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have demonstrated heterogeneous results.

METHODS

We performed a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind pilot study assessing the effects of theophylline on constant load exercise duration and lung function, involving 24 COPD patients already treated with long-acting inhaled beta-agonist and long-acting anti-cholinergic bronchodilator therapy.

RESULTS

Analyzable data was available in 10 of 12 subjects in the treatment arm and 11 of 12 subjects in the control arm. Theophylline was associated with a 26.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -17.3-69.5) improvement in exercise duration compared to placebo. Four of 10 treated patients demonstrated an improvement in exercise duration exceeding the minimum clinically important difference of 33%, compared to 1 of 11 controls (P = 0.15). Furthermore, peak ventilation was reduced by 11.1%, (95% CI: 0.77-21.5) which may suggest improvements in gas exchange. There were no significant observed differences in resting lung function nor measures of dyspnea between the two treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a trend, but not a statistically significant improvement in exercise duration and a reduction in peak ventilation with theophylline. Based on the observed mean differences and standard deviations in this pilot study, a randomized controlled trial would require 45 subjects in each arm to detect a significant change in exercise duration.

[Individually-tailored treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a proposed change]

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a highly prevalent but poorly defined disease and there is wide confusion regarding its treatment. The available knowledge should allow guidelines for specific treatment to be established according to each patient's clinical features. The present article describes a proposal for individually-tailored treatment. Long-acting bronchodilators, alone or in various combinations, would be the basis of treatment and inhaled corticosteroids (IC) should be used in a subgroup with well-defined characteristics. The latest studies indicate that the benefits of IC are limited in COPD and that the risks are not inconsiderable. Consequently, these drugs should be limited to "responders" and should always be administered in association with a long-acting beta(2) bronchodilator. The pathogenesis of this disease should be studied in greater depth and patients should be classified according to their severity, the frequency of acute exacerbations, their reversibility, comorbidity and concomitant medication in order to choose the most appropriate treatment.

Effect of add-on therapy of tiotropium in COPD treated with theophylline

BACKGROUND

Although combination therapy with bronchodilators is recommended for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there is insufficient evidence for the efficacy of some combinations of long-acting bronchodilators.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the effects of a combination therapy with tiotropium and theophylline in COPD patients.

METHODS

In a 12-week, open-labeled, parallel-group randomized study, pulmonary functions and dyspnea scores were compared between the combination and theophylline alone therapy at baseline, and 4 and 8 weeks after randomization in COPD.

RESULTS

Sixty-one COPD patients completed the trial (31 combination therapy, 30 theophylline alone; mean age 70 years; 58 males; mean dyspnea score 2.0 and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.5 L [62.5% predicted]). FEV1 in the combination group, but not in the theophylline alone, was significantly increased at 4 (1.56 +/- 0.13 L, p < 0.001) and 8 weeks (1.60 +/- 0.13 L, p < 0.001) from the baseline (1.40 +/- 0.12 L). In the combination group, but not the theophylline alone group, the dyspnea score was significantly improved after 4 (p < 0.01) and 8 weeks (p <0.05) compared with baseline. In 17 patients who did not receive theophylline at screening, treatment with 4 or 8 weeks of theophylline alone did not improve dyspnea score or FEV1.

CONCLUSION

Addition of tiotropium therapy to theophylline treatment can improve dyspnea and pulmonary function in COPD. Although this study did not assess whether there was any benefit of adding theophylline to patients treated with tiotropium, tiotropium can be a useful addition in COPD already treated with theophylline.

Tiotropium bromide

Therapy with bronchodilators forms the pharmacologic foundation of the treatment of patients with COPD. Bronchodilators can significantly lessen dyspnea, increase airflow, improve quality of life, and enhance exercise performance. While bronchodilators decrease airway resistance and lessen dynamic hyperinflation in patients with COPD, they have not been shown to alter the rate of decline in FEV₁ over time, or improve patient survival. Fairly recently, a long-acting, once-daily anticholinergic medication, tiotropium bromide, has been developed which may improve symptom management in COPD patients. This paper reviews anticholinergic pharmacologic therapy for patients with COPD focusing on tiotropium bromide, and discusses treatment strategies based on disease stage. It is important to recognize that while bronchodilators improve symptoms, a multimodality treatment approach including respiratory and rehabilitative therapy, nutrition services, psychosocial counseling, and surgical care, is often necessary for the best possible care of patients with COPD.

Medical therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in 2007

Medical treatment for patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has evolved significantly over the past 2 decades. Current World Health Organization recommendations suggest a stepwise approach to therapy depending upon disease severity. As-needed use of short-acting bronchodilators is recommended for patients with mild disease. Scheduled dosing of bronchodilators is recommended for patients with more advanced disease. Inhaled beta-agonists and anti-cholinergic agents in combination have proved to be more effective than either agent alone. Long-acting preparations are associated with better disease control and have not been associated with tachyphylaxis. Inhaled corticosteroids are useful for reducing the frequency of exacerbations in patients who experience one or more episodes per year. Oxygen therapy is clearly beneficial in patients with advanced COPD and chronic respiratory failure, and its potential benefits in less severe disease are currently being studied. Pulmonary rehabilitation benefits patients with mild-to-severe disease, although the greatest benefits have been demonstrated in those with moderate COPD. New ultra-long-acting inhaled bronchodilators, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and retinoids intended to promote tissue regeneration are currently being evaluated in clinical trials as future therapeutic agents.

A meta-analysis on the efficacy of oral theophylline in patients with stable COPD

Background

Theophylline is a nonspecific inhibitor of phosphodiesterases that, despite exerting bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory effects, is a third-line therapy rarely used to treat chronic airflow limitation. We wished to evaluate the efficacy of oral theophylline as measured by improvements in trough (pre-dose) or peak (post-dose) FEV₁ and FVC in patients with clinically stable COPD.

Design

Meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials reported as of June 2005 in which theophylline was orally administered to stable COPD patients and the functional evaluations included pre- and post-theophylline values for FEV₁ and FVC.

Results

A total of 18 trials were included in the meta-analysis. The weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for improvement over placebo in trough FEV₁ and FVC were 0.108L (0.053–0.163) and 0.186L (0.036–0.336), respectively, while peak FEV₁ and FVC improved by 0.096L (0.044–0.147) and 0.242L (0.11–0.374), respectively.

Conclusions

Treatment with oral theophylline improves both trough and peak FEV₁ and FVC in clinically stable COPD patients. These results support previously reported benefits of theophylline in COPD.

Improvement of pulmonary function and dyspnea by tiotropium in COPD patients using a transdermal β2-agonist

BACKGROUND

A combination of bronchodilators may be effective in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We examined the effect of adding a long-acting anti-cholinergic agent (tiotropium) to a transdermal-type beta(2)-agonist (tulobuterol) on dyspnea as well as pulmonary function.

METHODS

In a multicentre, randomized, parallel design study, 60 COPD patients treated with the transdermal beta(2)-agonist tulobuterol were divided into a tiotropium added group (Tulo+Tio group, n=40) or transdermal beta(2)-agonist tulobuterol alone group (Tulo group, n=20), and then treated for 4 weeks after a 2 week run-in period. Pulmonary function and a dyspnea (Medical Research Council (MRC)) scale were assessed before and after the treatment. Daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) monitoring was also performed.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks, the Tulo+Tio group showed a significant increase in pulmonary function compared with the Tulo group; DeltaFVC (0.31+/-0.06 L vs. 0.06+/-0.05 L, p< 0.01), DeltaFEV(1) (0.15+/-0.03 L vs. -0.02+/-0.02 L, p<0.0001), and DeltaPEF (41.0+/-5.1 L/min vs. 0.5+/-3.5 L/min, p<0.0001). The MRC dyspnea scale was also significantly improved in Tulo+Tio, but not in Tulo group.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that tiotropium caused a significant improvement in both pulmonary function and dyspnea in COPD patients already treated with the transdermal beta(2)-agonist tulobuterol.

Responsiveness of patient-reported breathlessness during exercise in persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to examine the responsiveness of a computerized system whereby the patient reports spontaneously any change in the intensity of breathlessness during exercise. The hypotheses were that hypercapnia would increase and hyperoxia would decrease the slope of power production-breathlessness ratings compared with a control condition during cycle ergometry.

METHODS

Thirty adult subjects (15 women and 15 men) with persistent asthma (mean [+/- SD] FEV(1)/FVC ratio, 57 +/- 10%) completed an initial familiarization visit and three study visits. All subjects inhaled two puffs of albuterol (180 microg) in order to standardize lung function prior to exercise. At visits 2 to 4, subjects breathed one of the three gas mixtures administered in a random order while performing a ramp exercise test. The experimental conditions were as follows: hypercapnia (5% carbon dioxide); hyperoxia (40% oxygen); and control (room air).

RESULTS

Lung function was the same before and after exercise with the three experimental conditions. With hypercapnia, peak ventilation was increased, peak oxygen consumption, and power production were reduced, the slope of power-breathlessness was increased, and 25 patients (83%) reported breathlessness as the limiting symptom. With hyperoxia, peak ventilation was decreased, peak power production and the slope of power-breathlessness were unchanged, and 16 patients (53%) reported leg discomfort as the limiting symptom.

CONCLUSIONS

Breathing 5% carbon dioxide altered physiologic responses and the slope of power production-breathlessness during exercise. The responses to hyperoxia were inconsistent. The continuous method for patient-reported breathlessness was responsive to hypercapnia, but not to hyperoxia, during incremental exercise.

Canadian Thoracic Society recommendations for management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - 2007 update

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major respiratory illness in Canada that is both preventable and treatable. Our understanding of the pathophysiology of this complex condition continues to grow and our ability to offer effective treatment to those who suffer from it has improved considerably. The purpose of the present educational initiative of the Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) is to provide up to date information on new developments in the field so that patients with this condition will receive optimal care that is firmly based on scientific evidence. Since the previous CTS management recommendations were published in 2003, a wealth of new scientific information has become available. The implications of this new knowledge with respect to optimal clinical care have been carefully considered by the CTS Panel and the conclusions are presented in the current document. Highlights of this update include new epidemiological information on mortality and prevalence of COPD, which charts its emergence as a major health problem for women; a new section on common comorbidities in COPD; an increased emphasis on the meaningful benefits of combined pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies; and a new discussion on the prevention of acute exacerbations. A revised stratification system for severity of airway obstruction is proposed, together with other suggestions on how best to clinically evaluate individual patients with this complex disease. The results of the largest randomized clinical trial ever undertaken in COPD have recently been published, enabling the Panel to make evidence-based recommendations on the role of modern pharmacotherapy. The Panel hopes that these new practice guidelines, which reflect a rigorous analysis of the recent literature, will assist caregivers in the diagnosis and management of this common condition.

Enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica

Treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has underwent a very important advance in the last five years. It has been developed a new long-lasting anticholynergic drug, tiotrope bromure, which has been found to improve lung function and exercise capacity and to decrease relapses. Also the combined treatment of long lasting beta 2 adrenergics with inhaled steroids (salmeterol/fluticasone and formoterol/budesonide) has proven similar results. However, the response to these new drugs is not the same in all patients. Individual characteristics such as gravity, degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness, frequency of relapses, comorbidity, etc will determine the response to several agents. Thus, it is necessary to perform a detailed diagnostic study in COPD patients in order to select the best treatment in an individualized form. In the future, new specific antiinflammatories such as phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors or agents with a potential action in tissue regeneration could lead to new perspectives, as well as to new questions, in COPD treatment.

Responsiveness of Continuous Ratings of Dyspnea during Exercise in Patients with COPD

PURPOSE

To examine the responsiveness of a new computerized method for patients to provide continuous ratings of dyspnea during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind study the effects of an inhaled bronchodilator (BD), albuterol/ipratropium bromide solution, were compared with normal saline (NS) in 30 patients with COPD (age, 66+/-9 yr; forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 48+/-14% pred). At visit 1, patients were familiarized with the cycle ergometer and computer, monitor, and mouse system to provide continuous ratings of dyspnea during exercise. At subsequent visits 2-3 d apart, patients performed pulmonary function tests followed by incremental ramp (15 W.min-1) and, 1 h later, constant work (at 55% of maximal work capacity) exercise tests.

RESULTS

During incremental exercise the slopes of VO2:dyspnea and VE:dyspnea regressions were significantly lower, and patients exercised longer (Delta=0.4 min; P=0.003) with BD therapy compared with NS. During constant work exercise there was a significant reduction in dyspnea at the same exercise duration (5.0+/-2.8 vs 6.2+/-2.8 units on the 0-10 category-ratio scale; P=0.02) and patients exercised longer (Delta=0.9 min; P=0.04) with BD therapy. Changes in lung function at rest did not correlate significantly with changes in dyspnea ratings during exercise.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous ratings of dyspnea were responsive to inhaled bronchodilator therapy during both incremental and constant work exercise tests in patients with symptomatic COPD.

Eletrocardiographic Monitoring in COPD Patients Receiving Tiotropium

Tiotropium is a once-daily, inhaled anticholinergic for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease that acts as a prolonged antagonist of the M3-receptor. To ascertain whether electrophysiologic effects can be detected following tiotropium treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, serial electrocardiograms were incorporated into multiple placebo-controlled clinical trials including long-term (6 and 12-month) trials with tiotropium 18 mcg daily (n=2,128) and a 4-week dose-ranging study with tiotropium up to 36 mcg daily (n= 169). In addition, 24-hour electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring was performed as part of a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial with tiotropium 18 mcg daily (n= 121). Electrocardiograms were performed before and up to 6 times during treatment in the 12-month trials, and before and at the end of treatment in the 6-month trials. For both the 12 and 6-month trials, electrocardiograms were recorded as adverse events if significant changes occurred, and were retrospectively sent for centralized analysis. During the 6-week trial, Holter monitoring was performed prior to the first dose and following 6 weeks of treatment. In all of these trials, no significant differences were observed in any of the electrocardiogram or Holter outcome parameters compared to placebo. Specifically, there was no clinically relevant difference in heart rate, atrio-ventricular conduction or the occurrence of ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias. In conclusion, tiotropium was not associated with any signs of cardiac safety concerns as defined by electrocardiographic evaluations in placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Redefining Treatment in COPD

COPD is a growing international health concern and it is estimated that by the year 2020 it will rank fifth as a cause of disability worldwide. In response to this problem, the World Health Organization and the US National Institutes of Health convened a panel of experts to draft a consensus strategy to treat patients with COPD. Called the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guidelines, they are designed to define and stage the severity of COPD, make recommendations for treatment, and to expand global awareness of the disease. The GOLD guidelines describe a multimodality approach to provide optimal care for the COPD patient population. This includes respiratory and rehabilitative therapy, nutrition services, psychosocial counseling, and surgical care. Bronchodilators form the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment for COPD. These medications can significantly lessen dyspnea, enhance quality of life, increase airflow, and improve exercise performance. While bronchodilators decrease airway resistance and lessen hyperinflation in patients with COPD, they have not been shown to influence the decline in FEV1 over time or improve survival in this patient population. Recently, long-acting beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (beta2-agonists) such as formoterol and salmeterol and anticholinergic medications including tiotropium bromide have been developed which may further improve symptom management in COPD patients. This article discusses bronchodilator pharmacologic therapy for patients with COPD focusing on beta2-agonists, anticholinergics, and methylxanthines in the light of the recent GOLD consensus statements.

A Role for Anabolic Steroids in the Rehabilitation of Patients With COPD? *

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Skeletal muscle weakness commonly occurs in patients with COPD. Long-term use of systemic glucocorticosteroids further contributes to muscle weakness. Anabolic steroids could be an additional mode of intervention to improve outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation by increasing physiologic functioning, possibly mediated by increasing erythropoietic function.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We randomly assigned 63 male patients with COPD to receive on days 1, 15, 29, and 43 a deep IM injection of 50 mg of nandrolone decanoate (ND) [Deca-Durabolin; N.V. Organon; Oss, The Netherlands] in 1 mL of arachis oil, or 1 mL of arachis oil alone (placebo) in a double-blind design. All patients participated in a standardized pulmonary rehabilitation program. Outcome measures were body composition by deuterium and bromide dilution, respiratory and peripheral muscle function, incremental exercise testing, and health status by the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Treatment with ND relative to placebo resulted in higher increases in fat-free mass (FFM; mean, 1.7 kg [SD, 2.5] vs 0.3 kg [SD, 1.9]; p = 0.015) owing to a rise in intracellular mass (mean, 1.8 kg [SD, 3.1] vs - 0.5 kg [SD, 3.1]; p = 0.002). Muscle function, exercise capacity, and health status improved in both groups to the same extent. Only after ND were increases in erythropoietic parameters seen (erythropoietin: mean, 2.08 U/L [SD, 5.56], p = 0.067; hemoglobin: mean, 0.29 mmol/L [SD, 0.73], p = 0.055). In the total group, the changes in maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax) and peak workload were positively correlated with the change in hemoglobin (r = 0.30, p = 0.032, and r = 0.34, p = 0.016, respectively), whereas the change in isokinetic leg work was correlated with the change in erythropoietin (r = 0.38, p = 0.013). In the patients receiving maintenance treatment with low-dose oral glucocorticosteroids (31 of 63 patients; mean, 7.5 mg/24 h [SD, 2.4]), greater improvements in PImax (mean, 6.0 cm H(2)O [SD, 8.82] vs - 2.18 cm H(2)O [SD, 11.08], p = 0.046), and peak workload (mean, 20.47 W [SD, 19.82] vs 4.80 W [SD, 7.74], p = 0.023) were seen after 8 weeks of treatment with ND vs placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, a short-term course of ND had an overall positive effect relative to placebo on FFM without expanding extracellular water in patients with COPD. In the total group, the improvements in muscle function and exercise capacity were associated with improvements in erythropoietic parameters. The use of low-dose oral glucocorticosteroids as maintenance medication significantly impaired the response to pulmonary rehabilitation with respect to respiratory muscle function and exercise capacity, which could be restored by ND treatment.

A comparison of the effects of salbutamol and ipratropium bromide on exercise endurance in patients with COPD

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line pharmacotherapy against COPD. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of beta(2)-agonists and anticholinergic agents on the exercise capacity of patients with COPD.

METHODS

A total of 67 stable patients with COPD were recruited at the Kyoto University Hospital. After inhaling 400 micro g salbutamol, 80 micro g ipratropium bromide, or an identical placebo in a randomized, double-blind, crossover fashion, the patients performed cycle endurance tests at a constant workload of 80% of the maximum work rate reached on progressive cycle ergometry, and the endurance time was recorded.

RESULTS

Both salbutamol and ipratropium bromide significantly improved the endurance time by 29 s (15%; p < 0.001) and 27 s (14%; p < 0.001), respectively, in comparison with the placebo. However, there was no statistically significant difference between them (p = 0.71). The dyspnea ratios were also similarly reduced by both bronchodilators. The difference in the endurance time between therapy with salbutamol and placebo was significantly, but moderately, related to the difference between therapy with ipratropium bromide and placebo. In addition, there were no relationships, or only weakly significant relationships, between the change in FEV(1) and the change in the endurance time, the highest oxygen uptake, and the highest minute ventilation for both salbutamol and ipratropium bromide.

CONCLUSIONS

Therapy with both salbutamol and ipratropium bromide improved exercise capacity, as evaluated by the endurance time, and reduced dyspnea similarly in patients with COPD. In addition, the effects of the different bronchodilators on exercise capacity varied within individuals, and a complex mechanism may be responsible for the different effects of these two bronchodilators on exercise capacity vs airflow limitation. These results support the conclusion that both types of inhaled bronchodilators can be used as first-line drugs for the treatment of stable patients with COPD.

Efficacy and safety of oxitropium bromide, theophylline and their combination in COPD patients: a double-blind, randomized, multicentre study (BREATH Trial)

We compare the efficacy including spirometry, peak expiratory flow (PEFR) and quality of life and safety of an 8-week treatment with inhaled oxitropium, theophylline or their combination in patients with mild-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conducted a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy randomized, parallel-group study at 29 Italian outpatients clinics. A group of 236 patients with mild-to-severe COPD (baseline FEV1 < or = 70% of predicted value) were recruited. Treatments were as follows: Inhaled oxitropium bromide 200 microg (N=75), sustained-release oral theophylline 300 mg (N=81) or their combination (N=80), taken twice daily. Spirometry (FEV1 and FVC) was evaluated every 4 weeks, and morning and evening PEFR (before and 2-4 h after drug intake) was measured daily. Symptoms, cough and dysponea, were recorded daily. Health status was evaluated at baseline and week 8 using the disease specific St George' Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). Any adverse event occurring during the treatment period was recorded on a diary card. FEV1 and FVC improved in all the groups at 4 and 8 weeks, but the difference between treatment groups did not reach statistically significant levels. Differences between groups in pre-dosing morning and evening PEFR were not significant. Post-dosing morning and evening PEFR were increased and the largest increase was seen in patients treated with both drugs. However, differences between groups was significant only for evening values (P=0.008). The proportion of patients who experienced a decrease in symptoms was high in all groups but no differences among groups were observed. SGRQ total scores decreased in all treatment groups after 8 weeks, particularly in the oxitropium and combination groups. Clinically significant change (> or = 4 units) was only observed in patients treated with oxitropium bromide whether with or without theophylline. Adverse events related to treatments were higher in the group treated with theophylline alone (P < 0.02). We conclude that inhaled oxitropium bromide alone was associated with an improvement in FEV1, PEFR and symptoms in patients with COPD that was not statistically different from that of oral theophylline alone or of the combination of both drugs. Oxitropium bromide in combination with theophylline provided a greater improvement in evening post-dosing PEFR. Oxitropium bromide alone or in combination with theophylline improved the quality of life better than theophylline alone.

Effects of formoterol (Oxis Turbuhaler) and ipratropium on exercise capacity in patients with COPD

Although long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonists improve various outcome measures in COPD, no double-blind study has yet shown a significant effect of these drugs on exercise capacity. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, patients received formoterol (4, 5, 9, or 18 micrograms b.i.d. via Turbuhaler), ipratropium bromide (80 micrograms t.i.d. via pMDI with spacer), or placebo for 1 week. Main endpoint was time to exhaustion (TTE) in an incremental cycle ergometer test. Secondary endpoints were Borg dyspnoea score during exercise, lung function, and adverse events. Thirty-four patients with COPD were included, mean age 64.8 years, FEV1 55.6% predicted, reversibility 6.1% predicted. All doses of formoterol, and ipratropium significantly improved TTE, FEV1, FEF25-75%, FRC, IVC, RV and sGAW compared with placebo. A negative dose-response relationship was observed with formoterol. Ipratropium increased time to exhaustion more compared with formoterol, 18 micrograms, but not with formoterol, 4.5 and 9 micrograms. No changes in Borg score were found. There was no difference in the adverse event profile between treatments. In conclusion, 1 week of treatment with formoterol and ipratropium significantly improved exercise capacity and lung function compared with placebo. However, a negative dose-response relation for formoterol was unexpected and needs further investigation.

A systematic review of the effects of bronchodilators on exercise capacity in patients with COPD

One of the major goals of bronchodilator therapy in patients with COPD is to decrease airflow limitation in the airways and, as a consequence, improve dyspnea and exercise tolerance. The focus of this systematic review is to assess the effects of treatment with beta-agonists, anticholinergics, and theophyllines on dyspnea, and steady-state and incremental exercise capacity. Thirty-three, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies written in English were selected. This review shows that approximately half of the studies showed a significant effect of bronchodilator therapy on exercise capacity. Anticholinergic agents have significant beneficial effects in the majority of studies, especially when measured by steady-state exercise protocols. There is a trend toward a better effect of high-dose compared to low-dose anticholinergics. Short-acting beta(2)-mimetics have favorable effects on exercise capacity in more than two thirds of the studies; surprisingly, the situation is less clear for long-acting beta(2)-agents. The majority of the results of the published reports on theophyllines and their effects on exercise are negative. Direct comparisons of different classes of bronchodilators have not been made in a sufficient number of studies for a rational preference. The addition of a second bronchodilator has no proven advantage for improving exercise test results, but this has not been studied extensively and not in sufficiently large studies. The majority of studies reporting a measure of dyspnea found improvements, even in the absence of improvement in exercise capacity.

Oral theophylline for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Oral theophylline has, for many years, been used as a bronchodilator in patients with COPD. Despite the introduction of new drugs, and its narrow therapeutic index, theophylline is still recommended for COPD treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of oral theophylline when compared to placebo in patients with stable COPD.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Airways Review Group and Cochrane Controlled Clinical Registers were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were independently abstracted and the methodological quality assessed by two reviewers.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Concomitant therapy varied from none to any other bronchodilator plus corticosteroid (oral and inhaled). The following outcomes were significantly different when compared to placebo. FEV1 improved with treatment: Weighted Mean Difference (WMD) 100 ml; 95% Confidence Interval (95%CI) 40, 160 ml. Similarly for FVC: WMD 210 ml 95%CI 100, 320. Two studies reported an improvement in VO2max; WMD 195 ml/min, 95%CI 113,27). At rest, PaO2 and PaCO2 both improved with treatment (WMD 3.2 mmHg; 95%CI = 1.2, 5., and WMD -2.4 mmHg; 95%CI = -3.5, -1.2, respectively). Walking distance tests did not improve (4 studies, Standardised Mean Difference 0.30, 95%CI -0.01, 0.62), neither did Visual Analogue Score for breathlessness isn two small studies (WMD 3.6, 95%CI -4.6, 11.8). The Relative Risk (RR) of nausea was greater with theophylline (RR 7.7; 95%CI 1.5, 39.9). However, patients' preference for theophylline was greater than that for placebo (RR 2.27; 95%CI = 1.26, 4.11). Very few patient withdrew from these studies for any reason.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Theophylline has a modest effect on FEV1 and FVC and slightly improves arterial blood gas tensions in moderate to severe COPD. These benefits were seen in patients receiving a variety of different concomitant therapies. Improvement in exercise performance depended on the method of testing. There was a very low dropout rate in the studies that could be included in this review, which suggests that recruited patients may have been known by the investigators to be theophylline tolerant. This may limit the generalisability of these studies.

Salmeterol plus theophylline combination therapy in the treatment of COPD

BACKGROUND

Patients with COPD often require multiple therapies to improve lung function and decrease symptoms and exacerbations. Salmeterol and theophylline are indicated for the treatment of COPD, but the use of these agents in combination has not been extensively studied.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol plus theophylline vs either agent alone in COPD.

METHODS

Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group trial in 943 patients with COPD. After an open-label theophylline titration period (serum levels, 10 to 20 microg/mL), patients were randomly assigned to receive salmeterol (42 microg bid) plus theophylline, salmeterol (42 microg bid), or theophylline for 12 weeks. Serial pulmonary function tests were completed on day 1 and treatment week 12. Patients kept diary cards and noted their peak flow rates, symptom scores, and albuterol use, and periodically completed quality-of-life and dyspnea questionnaires.

RESULTS

All three groups significantly improved compared with baseline. Combination treatment with salmeterol plus theophylline provided significantly (p < or = 0.045) greater improvements in pulmonary function; significantly (p < or = 0.048) greater decreases in symptoms, dyspnea, and albuterol use; and significantly fewer COPD exacerbations (p = 0.023 vs theophylline). In general, treatment with salmeterol provided greater improvement in lung function and satisfaction with treatment compared with theophylline. Salmeterol treatment was also associated with significantly fewer drug-related adverse events (p < or = 0.042) than either treatment that included theophylline. The safety profile (adverse events, vital signs, and ECG findings) of the two treatments that included theophylline were similar.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COPD may benefit from combination treatment with salmeterol plus theophylline, without a resulting increase in adverse events or other adverse sequelae.

The effects of oxitropium bromide on exercise performance in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A comparison of three different exercise tests

The purpose of the present study was to compare the characteristics of three different exercise tests in evaluating the effects of oxitropium bromide on exercise performance. Thirty-eight males with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV(1) = 40.8 +/- 16.5% predicted; mean +/- SD) completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies for each exercise test. The exercise tests were performed 60 min after the inhalation of either oxitropium bromide 400 microg or placebo. The patients performed 6-min walking tests (6MWT) on Days 1 and 2, progressive cycle ergometry (PCE) on Days 3 and 4, and cycle endurance tests at 80% of the maximal workload of PCE on Days 5 and 6. Spirometry was conducted before and at 45 and 90 min after the inhalation. Oxitropium bromide significantly increased FEV(1) as compared with placebo. Oxitropium bromide increased the endurance time significantly, by 19% (p < 0.001), and caused a small but significant increase in the 6-min walking distance by 1% (p < 0.05), but induced no significant increase in maximal oxygen consumption (V O(2)max) in PCE. The responses in these three exercise tests were different, and we conclude that the endurance test was the most sensitive in detecting the effects of inhaled anticholinergic agents on exercise performance in patients with stable COPD. An endurance procedure may be performed to detect clinical changes in evaluating the effects of oxitropium bromide on exercise performance.

Bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This paper reviews new developments in bronchodilator therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Most patients with COPD respond to bronchodilators, but we have no reliable way to predict which patients will respond. When responsiveness is assessed, changes in lung volume as well as improvements in FEV1 should be considered. The combination of a beta-agonist and an anticholinergic agent produces greater improvement than either agent alone. Anticholinergic agents have few adverse side effects in patients with COPD, but concern remains about the possible cardiac side effects of beta-agonists. No clear answer exists about whether new, long-acting beta-agonists, such as salmeterol, should supplant anticholinergic agents as "first-line" therapy in COPD.

Novel therapy for COPD

The incidence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is increasing throughout the world. Much less is known about the pathogenesis of COPD than that of asthma and there is little response to current therapy. Most patients with COPD have acquired their lung disease through smoking cigarettes, and the major step in management is to minimise further damage by stopping this habit. A number of therapies are being developed for the treatment of COPD; including new bronchodilators such as tiotropium bromide, agents to block inflammation induced by neutrophils and macrophages, as well as strategies to combat proteases and oxidants. The long-term goal is to provide therapy that retards the accelerated loss of lung function occurring in COPD. Development of novel therapies for COPD requires reliable Phase II decision making before entering large scale Phase III studies. The patient with COPD is often overlooked compared to their asthmatic counterpart, who benefit from an urgent need to identify novel targets and better therapy.