Neurologic Manifestations and Complications of COVID-19

Timing matters in the use of renin-angiotensin system modulators and COVID-related cognitive and cerebrovascular dysfunction

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modulators, including Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), are effective medications for controlling blood pressure. Cognitive deficits, including lack of concentration, memory loss, and confusion, were reported after COVID-19 infection. ARBs or ACEI increase the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2), a functional receptor that allows binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for cellular invasion. To date, the association between the use of RAS modulators and the severity of COVID-19 cognitive dysfunction is still controversial.

PURPOSE

This study addressed the following questions: 1) Does prior treatment with RAS modulator worsen COVID-19-induced cerebrovascular and cognitive dysfunction? 2) Can post-treatment with RAS modulator improve cognitive performance and cerebrovascular function following COVID-19? We hypothesize that pre-treatment exacerbates COVID-19-induced detrimental effects while post-treatment displays protective effects.

METHODS

Clinical study: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between May 2020 and December 2022 were identified through the electronic medical record system. Inclusion criteria comprised a documented medical history of hypertension treated with at least one antihypertensive medication. Subsequently, patients were categorized into two groups: those who had been prescribed ACEIs or ARBs before admission and those who had not received such treatment before admission. Each patient was evaluated on admission for signs of neurologic dysfunction. Pre-clinical study: Humanized ACE-2 transgenic knock-in mice received the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein via jugular vein injection for 2 weeks. One group had received Losartan (10 mg/kg), an ARB, in their drinking water for two weeks before the injection, while the other group began Losartan treatment after the spike protein injection. Cognitive functions, cerebral blood flow, and cerebrovascular density were determined in all experimental groups. Moreover, vascular inflammation and cell death were assessed.

RESULTS

Signs of neurological dysfunction were observed in 97 out of 177 patients (51%) taking ACEIs/ARBs prior to admission, compared to 32 out of 118 patients (27%) not receiving ACEI or ARBs. In animal studies, spike protein injection increased vascular inflammation, increased endothelial cell apoptosis, and reduced cerebrovascular density. In parallel, spike protein decreased cerebral blood flow and cognitive function. Our results showed that pretreatment with Losartan exacerbated these effects. However, post-treatment with Losartan prevented spike protein-induced vascular and neurological dysfunctions.

CONCLUSION

Our clinical data showed that the use of RAS modulators before encountering COVID-19 can initially exacerbate vascular and neurological dysfunctions. Similar findings were demonstrated in the in-vivo experiments; however, the protective effects of targeting the RAS become apparent in the animal model when the treatment is initiated after spike protein injection.

Mendelian randomization supports causality between COVID-19 and glaucoma

To determine whether there is a causal relationship between Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and glaucoma, a 2-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) design was applied with the main analysis method of inverse-variance-weighted. The reliability of the results was checked using the heterogeneity test, pleiotropy test, and leave-one-out method. Four sets of instrumental variables (IVs) were used to investigate the causality between COVID-19 and glaucoma risk according to data from the IEU Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS). The results showed that 2 sets of COVID-19(RELEASE) were significantly associated with the risk of glaucoma [ID: ebi-a-GCST011071, OR (95% CI) = 1.227 (1.076-1.400), P = .002259; ID: ebi-a-GCST011073: OR (95% CI) = 1.164 (1.022-1.327), P = .022450; 2 sets of COVID-19 hospitalizations were significantly associated with the risk of glaucoma (ID: ebi-a-GCST011081, OR (95% CI) = 1.156 (1.033-1.292), P = .011342; ID: ebi-a-GCST011082: OR (95% CI) = 1.097 (1.007-1.196), P = .034908)]. The sensitivity of the results was acceptable (P > .05) for the 3 test methods. In conclusion, this MR analysis provides preliminary evidence of a potential causal relationship between COVID-19 and glaucoma.

High Frequency of Autoantibodies in COVID-19 Patients with Central Nervous System Complications: a Multicenter Observational Study

We present a panel of central nervous system (CNS) complications associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and their clinical characteristics. We aim to investigate associations between neurological autoantibodies and COVID-19 patients with predominant CNS complications. In this retrospective multi-center study, we analyze neurologic complications associated with COVID-19 patients from Dec. 2022 to Feb. 2023 at four tertiary hospitals in China. CSF and/or serum in the enrolled patients were tested for autoantibodies using tissue-based assays (TBAs) and cell-based assays (CBAs). A total of 34 consecutive patients (median age was 40.5 years [range 15-83], 50% were female) were enrolled. CNS syndromes included encephalitis (n=15), encephalopathies (n=6), meningoencephalitis (n=3), ADEM (n=2), depression (n = 2), Alzheimer's disease (n=2), Parkinson disease (n=1), and central nervous system vasculitis (n=1). Twenty-eight specimens (of 44 tested; 11/27 [40.7%] CSF, 13/17 [76.5%] serums) were confirmed by TBAs to be autoantibodies positive. However, only a few autoantibodies (1 with MOG and 1 with NMDAR) were detected by CBAs assays. Twenty-four patients received immunotherapy. After a mean time of 7.26 months of follow-up, 75.8% (25/33) of patients had good outcome (mRS score ≤2). Although no significant difference was observed between the two groups, the proportion of positive CSF autoantibodies in the poor outcomes group was higher than that in the good outcomes group (57.1% vs 31.5%, P = 0.369). Autoantibodies were frequently observed in COVID-19-associated CNS complications. The identification of these autoantibody-positive COVID-19 cases is important as they respond favorably to immunotherapy.

Bilateral Vocal Cord Paralysis Requiring Long-term Tracheostomy After SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Bilateral vocal cord paralysis can cause obstruction of glottic airflow, resulting in respiratory distress and the need for a surgical airway. We report a case of acute onset bilateral vocal cord paralysis in a healthy adolescent patient 9 days after a mild severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. This 15-year-old patient presented with dyspnea, tachypnea, and stridor. A fiberoptic laryngoscopy revealed bilateral vocal fold paralysis with limited vocal cord abduction causing respiratory distress. A detailed set of diagnostic test results, including blood work, imaging, and a lumbar puncture, were all negative other than her new onset diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. The patient underwent tracheostomy placement with the subsequent resolution of her symptoms. Her vocal cord function remains impaired, and the patient continues to be tracheostomy-dependent 13 months after the initial presentation. SARS-CoV-2 infection has multiple well-established neurologic complications in children. The current case suggests that vocal cord paralysis may be an additional neuropathic sequela of the virus. Vocal cord pathology should be an important consideration when constructing a differential for children presenting with voice, swallowing, or breathing complaints after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

A Characterization of Neurology Consults for Inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection Compared to Other Respiratory Viruses

Introduction: Neurological consultation for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is common; it is currently unknown whether the neurologist's approach to inpatient consultation of patients with SARS-CoV-2 should differ from the paradigm used to evaluate hospitalized patients with similar respiratory viruses. The goal of the present study is to determine if the preponderance of new neurologic diagnoses differs between inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 and similar non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses for whom neurology is consulted. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart analysis of inpatient neurologic consultations at three major Philadelphia-based hospitals. We compared the final neurologic diagnosis of 152 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 to 54 patients with a similar ubiquitous non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory virus (influenza A, influenza B, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus, or adenovirus, the most commonly tested respiratory viruses at our institution). Secondary metrics included age, sex, level of care, prior neurologic diagnoses, and mortality. A multinomial logistic regression model was utilized to evaluate the relative difference between diagnostic category groups on all metrics. Results: The proportion of patients with seizure who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) was significantly higher than those who were admitted to a medical-surgical floor. SARS-CoV-2 was also associated with increased risk for ICU admission compared to other common respiratory viruses. SARS-CoV-2 inpatients requiring neurologic consultation were also more likely to be older and female as compared to the non-SARS-CoV-2 cohort. In other domains, the proportion of neurologic diagnoses between SAR-CoV-2 and non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viruses showed no significant difference. Conclusion: Patients requiring inpatient neurologic consultation with a diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection or another respiratory virus were found to be remarkably similar in terms of their ultimate neurologic diagnosis, with the exception of a larger preponderance of seizure in critical-care-level patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our study suggests that the neurological approach to patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 should be similar to that for patients with similar common respiratory infections, noting that seizure was seen more frequently in critically ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2.

Immunophenotyping characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 patients: peripheral blood CD8+T cell as a prognostic biomarker for patients with Nirmatrelvir

Background

Nirmatrelvir has been authorized for the treatment of both hospitalized and non-hospitalized COVID-19 patients. However, the association between T lymphocyte subsets and the outcome of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with oral Nirmatrelvir has not been investigated. The objective of this study was to examine whether lymphocyte subsets could serve as biomarkers to assess the risk of mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing Nirmatrelvir treatment, with the aim of enhancing medication management for COVID-19 patients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at the Xiangya Hospital of Central South University in China between December 5, 2022 and January 31, 2023. The study reported demographic, clinical, T lymphocyte subsets, and inflammatory cytokine data of COVID-19 patients. We evaluated the associations of T lymphocyte subsets on admission with the composite outcome or death of patients using univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses with hazards ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

We identified 2118 hospitalized COVID-19 patients during the study period, and conducted a follow-up of up to 38 days. Of these, 131 patients received Nirmatrelvir, with 56 (42.7%) in the composite outcome group, and 75 (57.3%) in the non-composite outcome group. Additionally, 101 (77.1%) patients were discharged, while 30 (22.9%) died. Our results showed a significant decrease in the CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T cell counts of patients in the composite outcome group and mortality group compared to the non-composite outcome group and discharged group, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the significant decrease in CD8+ T cell count in peripheral blood was independently associated with the composite outcome in COVID-19 patients treated with Nirmatrelvir, with an HR of 1.96 (95%CI: 1.01-3.80). The significant decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts in peripheral blood increased the hazard of developing mortality, with HRs of 6.48 (95%CI: 1.47-28.63) and 3.75 (95%CI: 1.27-11.11), respectively.

Conclusion

Our study revealed a significant positive correlation between a decrease in CD8+ T cell counts and progression and mortality of hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with Nirmatrelvir. Lower counts (/μL) of CD8+ T cell (<201) were associated with a higher risk of in-hospital severity and death. Our findings may provide valuable references for physicians in optimizing the use of Nirmatrelvir.

Organoids as a novel tool in modelling infectious diseases

Infectious diseases worldwide affect human health and have important societal impacts. A better understanding of infectious diseases is urgently needed. In vitro and in vivo infection models have brought notable contributions to the current knowledge of these diseases. Organoids are multicellular culture systems resembling tissue architecture and function, recapitulating many characteristics of human disease and elucidating mechanisms of host-infectious agent interactions in the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems, the central nervous system and the skin. Here, we discuss the applicability of the organoid technology for modeling pathogenesis, host response and features, which can be explored for the development of preventive and therapeutic treatments.

Clinical characteristics of unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated children with neurological manifestations due to SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection

Omicron generally causes milder disease than previous strains of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), especially in fully vaccinated individuals. However, incompletely vaccinated children may develop Omicron-related complications such as those affecting the central nervous system. To characterize the spectrum of clinical manifestations of neuro-COVID and to identify potential biomarkers associated with clinical outcomes, we recruited 15 children hospitalized for Omicron-related neurological manifestations in three hospitals in Hong Kong (9 boys and 6 girls aged 1-13 years). All were unvaccinated or incompletely vaccinated. Fourteen (93.3%) were admitted for convulsion, including benign febrile seizure (n = 7), complex febrile seizure (n = 2), seizure with fever (n = 3), and recurrent breakthrough seizure (n = 2), and the remaining nonconvulsive patient developed encephalopathic state with impaired consciousness. None of the seven children with benign febrile seizure and six of eight children with other neurological manifestations had residual deficits at 9-month follow-up. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was undetectable in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens of seven patients who underwent lumbar puncture. Spike-and-wave/sharp waves affecting the frontal lobes were detected in four of seven (57.1%) patients who underwent electroencephalogram. Children with Omicron-related neurological manifestations had significantly higher blood levels of IL-6 (p < 0.001) and CHI3L1 (p = 0.022) than healthy controls, and higher CSF levels of IL-6 (p = 0.002) than children with non-COVID-19-related febrile illnesses. Higher CSF-to-blood ratios of IL-8 and CHI3L1 were associated with longer length of stay, whereas higher ratios of IL-6 and IL-8 were associated with higher blood tau level. The role of CSF:blood ratio of IL-6, IL-8, and CHI3L1 as prognostic markers for neuro-COVID should be further evaluated.

Central nervous system reactivation of herpesviridae family in patients with COVID-19

The objective of this study is to describe our COVID-19 patients with herpesviridae reactivation in the central nervous system (CNS). Four patients were described including two with acute encephalitis and two with acute encephalomyelitis. Three of four patients had abnormal findings on neuroimaging studies. One of four patients died, one survived with major neurological sequelae, and two others fully recovered. Herpesviridae reactivation in the CNS in patients with COVID-19 is a rare but serious coincidence. The optimal therapeutic management has not been investigated and until more information is available, it is prudent to treat these patients with appropriate antivirals with or without anti-inflammatory agents.

Study of Coagulation Disorders and the Prevalence of Their Related Symptoms among COVID-19 Patients in Al-Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Introduction: The coronavirus (COVID-19) has affected millions of people around the world. COVID-19 patients, particularly those with the critical illness, have coagulation abnormalities, thrombocytopenia, and a high prevalence of intravascular thrombosis. Objectives: This work aims to assess the prevalence of coagulation disorders and their related symptoms among COVID-19 patients in the Al-Jouf region of Saudi Arabia. Subjects and methods: We conducted a retrospective study on 160 COVID-19 patients. Data were collected from the medical records department of King Abdulaziz Specialist Hospital, Sakaka, Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia. The socio-demographic data, risk factors, coagulation profile investigation results, symptom and sign data related to coagulation disorders, and disease morbidity and mortality for COVID-19 patients were extracted from medical records, and the data were stored confidentially. Results: Males represented the highest prevalence of COVID-19 infection at 65%; 29% were aged 60 or over; 28% were smokers; and 36% were suffering from chronic diseases, with diabetes mellitus representing the highest prevalence. Positive D-dimer results occurred in 29% of cases, with abnormal platelet counts in 26%. Conclusion: Our findings confirm that the dysregulation of the coagulation cascade and the subsequent occurrence of coagulation disorders are common in coronavirus infections. The results show absolute values, not increases over normal values; thus, it is hard to justify increased risk and presence based on the presented data.

Cognition Before and After COVID-19 Disease in Older Adults: An Exploratory Study

BACKGROUND

Older age is a major risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease which has been associated with a variety of neurologic complications, both acutely and chronically.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine whether milder COVID-19 disease in older vulnerable individuals is also associated with cognitive and behavioral sequelae.

METHODS

Neuropsychological, behavioral, and clinical outcomes before and after contracting COVID-19 disease, were compared in members of two ongoing longitudinal studies, the Arizona APOE Cohort and the national Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (ADRC).

RESULTS

152 APOE and 852 ADRC cohort members, mean age overall roughly 70 years, responded to a survey that indicated 21 APOE and 57 ADRC members had contracted COVID-19 before their ensuing (post-COVID) study visit. The mean interval between test sessions that preceded and followed COVID was 2.2 years and 1.2 years respectively for the APOE and ADRC cohorts. The magnitude of change between the pre and post COVID test sessions did not differ on any neuropsychological measure in either cohort. There was, however, a greater increase in informant (but not self) reported cognitive change in the APOE cohort (p = 0.018), but this became nonsignificant after correcting for multiple comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Overall members of both cohorts recovered well despite their greater age-related vulnerability to more severe disease.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan of the Brain After Mild COVID-19 Infection

PURPOSE

There have been several reports of central nervous system impairments associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection on head magnetic resonance imaging and angiography (MRI/A). However, head MRI/A is rarely performed in mild cases, and there have been few reports on intracranial changes after COVID-19 infection in these cases. Here, we report a comparative examination of the findings seen in common head MRI/A sequences in mild cases of COVID-19.

METHODS

Of the 15,376 patients who underwent head MRI/A examination called "Brain Dock" between June 2020 and June 2021, 746 patients who received a COVID-19 antibody test were evaluated. Positive and negative patients were comparatively examined for head MRI/A findings such as cerebral white matter lesions, ischemic changes, cerebral microbleeds, cerebral aneurysms, arterial stenosis, sinusitis, and other abnormal findings.

RESULTS

Overall, 31 (4.2%) patients were COVID-19 positive, and all of them had mild infections not requiring hospitalization. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and head MRI/A findings between positive and negative patients. All positive patients showed no particular abnormalities in the nasal findings such as olfactory bulb atrophy or thickening of the olfactory mucosa.

CONCLUSION

Intracranial lesions in mild patients do not show a clear difference from those in negative patients. This indicates that findings seen in common MRI/A sequences of severe patients are not likely in mild patients, supporting that there is relatively no damage to the central nervous system in mild patients.

Psychiatric and neurological complications of long COVID

COVID-19 was primarily considered a pulmonary disease with extrapulmonary manifestations. As the pandemic spread, there has been growing evidence that the disease affects various organs/systems, including the central and peripheral nervous systems. Accumulation of clinical data demonstrates that in a large population of survivors impairments in the function of one or more organs may persist for a long time, a phenomenon commonly known as post COVID or long COVID. Fatigue and cognitive dysfunction, such as concentration problems, short-term memory deficits, general memory loss, a specific decline in attention, language and praxis abilities, encoding and verbal fluency, impairment of executive functions, and psychomotor coordination, are amongst the most common and debilitating features of neuropsychatric symptoms of post COVID syndrome. Several patients also suffer from compromised sleep, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Patients with long COVID may demonstrate brain hypometabolism, hypoperfusion of the cerebral cortex and changes in the brain structure and functional connectivity. Children and adolescents represent a minority of COVID-19 cases, so not surprisingly data on the long-term sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infections in these age groups are scarce. Although the pathogenesis, clinical characteristics, epidemiology, and risk factors of the acute phase of COVID-19 have been largely explained, these areas are yet to be explored in long COVID. This review aims to provide an update on what is currently known about long COVID effects on mental health.

Hospitalisation for COVID-19 predicts long lasting cerebrovascular impairment: A prospective observational cohort study

Human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has multiple neurological consequences, but its long-term effect on brain health is still uncertain. The cerebrovascular consequences of COVID-19 may also affect brain health. We studied the chronic effect of COVID-19 on cerebrovascular health, in relation to acute severity, adverse clinical outcomes and in contrast to control group data. Here we assess cerebrovascular health in 45 patients six months after hospitalisation for acute COVID-19 using the resting state fluctuation amplitudes (RSFA) from functional magnetic resonance imaging, in relation to disease severity and in contrast with 42 controls. Acute COVID-19 severity was indexed by COVID-19 WHO Progression Scale, inflammatory and coagulatory biomarkers. Chronic widespread changes in frontoparietal RSFA were related to the severity of the acute COVID-19 episode. This relationship was not explained by chronic cardiorespiratory dysfunction, age, or sex. The level of cerebrovascular dysfunction was associated with cognitive, mental, and physical health at follow-up. The principal findings were consistent across univariate and multivariate approaches. The results indicate chronic cerebrovascular impairment following severe acute COVID-19, with the potential for long-term consequences on cognitive function and mental wellbeing.

Dendrimer nanotherapy for severe COVID-19 attenuates inflammation and neurological injury markers and improves outcomes in a phase2a clinical trial

Hyperinflammation triggered by SARS-CoV-2 is a major cause of disease severity, with activated macrophages implicated in this response. OP-101, a hydroxyl-polyamidoamine dendrimer-N-acetylcysteine conjugate that specifically targets activated macrophages, improves outcomes in preclinical models of systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, adaptive phase 2a trial, we evaluated safety and preliminary efficacy of OP-101 in patients with severe COVID-19. Twenty-four patients classified as having severe COVID-19 with a baseline World Health Organization seven-point ordinal scale of ≥5 were randomized to receive a single intravenous dose of placebo (n = 7 patients) or OP-101 at 2 (n = 6), 4 (n = 6), or 8 mg/kg (n = 5 patients). All study participants received standard of care, including corticosteroids. OP-101 at 4 mg/kg was better than placebo at decreasing inflammatory markers; OP-101 at 4 and 8 mg/kg was better than placebo at reducing neurological injury markers, (neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein). Risk for the composite outcome of mechanical ventilation or death at 30 and 60 days after treatment was 71% (95% CI: 29%, 96%) for placebo and 18% (95% CI: 4%, 43%; P = 0.021) for the pooled OP-101 treatment arms. At 60 days, 3 of 7 patients given placebo and 14 of 17 OP-101-treated patients were surviving. No drug-related adverse events were reported. These data show that OP-101 was well tolerated and may have potential to treat systemic inflammation and neuronal injury, reducing morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.

Young COVID-19 Patients Show a Higher Degree of Microglial Activation When Compared to Controls

The severe acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of human coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since its identification in late 2019 SARS-CoV-2 has spread rapidly around the world creating a global pandemic. Although considered mainly a respiratory disease, COVID-19 also encompasses a variety of neuropsychiatric symptoms. How infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to brain damage has remained largely elusive so far. In particular, it has remained unclear, whether signs of immune cell and / or innate immune and reactive astrogliosis are due to direct effects of the virus or may be an expression of a non-specific reaction of the brain to a severe life-threatening disease with a considerable proportion of patients requiring intensive care and invasive ventilation activation. Therefore, we designed a case-control-study of ten patients who died of COVID-19 and ten age-matched non-COVID-19-controls to quantitatively assess microglial and astroglial response. To minimize possible effects of severe systemic inflammation and / or invasive therapeutic measures we included only patients without any clinical or pathomorphological indication of sepsis and who had not been subjected to invasive intensive care treatment. Our results show a significantly higher degree of microglia activation in younger COVID-19 patients, while the difference was less and not significant for older COVID-19 patients. The difference in the degree of reactive gliosis increased with age but was not influenced by COVID-19. These preliminary data warrants further investigation of larger patient cohorts using additional immunohistochemical markers for different microglial phenotypes.

Hyper/neuroinflammation in COVID-19 and suicide etiopathogenesis: Hypothesis for a nefarious collision?

Accumulating scientific and clinical evidence highlighted pathological hyperinflammation as a cardinal feature of SARS-CoV-2 infection and acute COVID-19 disease. With the emergence of long COVID-19 syndrome, several chronic health consequences, including neuropsychiatric sequelae, have gained attention from the public and medical communities. Since inflammatory mediators have also been accredited as putative biomarkers of suicidal ideations and behaviors, hyper- and neuroinflammation might share some colliding points, overlapping and being interconnected in the context of COVID-19. This review aims to provide a summary of current knowledge on the molecular and cellular mechanisms of COVID-19-associated hyper/neuroinflammation with focus on their relevance to the inflammatory hypothesis of suicide development. Subsequently, strategies to alleviate COVID-19 hyper/neuroinflammation by immunomodulatory agents (many of which at experimental stages) as well as psychopharmacologic/psychotherapeutic approaches are also mentioned. While suicide risk in COVID-19 survivors - until now little known - needs further analysis through longitudinal studies, current observations and mechanistic postulates warrant additional attention to this possibly emerging mental health concern.

COVID-19 Critical Illness: A Data-Driven Review

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed unprecedented challenges in critical care medicine, including extreme demand for intensive care unit (ICU) resources and rapidly evolving understanding of a novel disease. Up to one-third of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 experience critical illness. The most common form of organ failure in COVID-19 critical illness is acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, which clinically presents as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in three-quarters of ICU patients. Noninvasive respiratory support modalities are being used with increasing frequency given their potential to reduce the need for intubation. Determining optimal patient selection for and timing of intubation remains a challenge. Management of mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 largely mirrors that of non-COVID-19 ARDS. Organ failure is common and portends a poor prognosis. Mortality rates have improved over the course of the pandemic, likely owing to increasing disease familiarity, data-driven pharmacologics, and improved adherence to evidence-based critical care.