Bisphosphonates in the treatment of malignant bone disease

Antiresorptive drug-related changes of the mandibular bone densitiy in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw patients

OBJECTIVES

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a well known side-effect of anti-resorptive drugs. Changes in bone density might potentially constitute the development of ONJ. This study aimed to investigate, to which degree bisphosphonates (bp) and denosumab (db) induce changes in bone density that can be determined from routine diagnostic CT.

METHODS

CT scans of 101 patients were investigated. MRONJ was present in 61 patients (n = 26: db-treated; n = 35 bp-treated). 40 patients were included as a reference group. Bone density was measured at two distinct locations in the mandible (M1: anterior of the mental foramen; M2: retromolar), each on the contralateral side to the necrosis.

RESULTS

The bone density values measured at both locations were found to be significantly higher in the bp-group compared to the db-group (p = 0.027) and to the reference-group (p = 0.016). Almost no difference (p = 0.84) in bone density value was found between the db- and reference-groups.Investigating the effect of duration of treatment, none of the measured values showed significant differences in both locations of db- and bp-group.

CONCLUSION

The findings from this study suggest that that bisphosphonates change the microarchitecture of the alveolar bone by being embedded in the mandible, which may subsequently lead to a bp-specific corticalization, and a decrease in vascularization of the lower jaw. This process may be distinctive for bp-treatment and seems to induce the congestion of cancellous bone rather rapidly after the first administrations. This effect could not be determined in denosumab-treated patients.

Development of Antiresorptive Agent-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw After Dental Implant Removal: A Case Report

Dental implant treatment is a highly predictable therapy, but when potentially lethal symptoms or complications occur, dentists must remove the implant fixture. Recently, reports on antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw have increased in the field of dental implants, although the relationship between dental implant treatment and antiresorptive agents remains unclear. Here, we report a case of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw that developed after dental implant removal. A 67-year-old Japanese woman with a medical history of osteoporosis and 7 years of oral bisphosphonate treatment was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of painful right mandibular bone exposure. A family dentist removed the dental implants from the right mandible using a trephine drill without flap elevation in August 2016. However, the healing was impaired; she was referred to our hospital 3 months after the procedure. We performed a sequestrectomy of the mandible under general anesthesia. In conclusion, this patient's course has two important implications: First, the removal of dental implants from patients who are prescribed oral bisphosphonates for long durations can cause antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw. Second, meticulous procedures are required to prevent and treat the development of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after dental implant removal.

Anti-inflammatory effect of polydeoxyribonucleotide on zoledronic acid-pretreated and lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells

Bisphosphonates are generally used as therapeutic agents for bone diseases. However, previous reports on bisphosphonates-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) demonstrated that inflammation triggers and worsens the disease. Recently, polydeoxynucleotide (PDRN), an A_2A receptor agonist, has been suggested for the treatment of various diseases and broadly studied for its anti-inflammatory effect. The present study aimed to measure the effect of PDRN on macrophage cells treated with zoledronic acid (ZA) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Macrophage cells were cultured with ZA for 24 h, following which they were stimulated with LPS in the presence or absence of varying concentrations of PDRN for 24 h. The cell viability and nitric oxide (NO) production of the cells were analyzed. In addition, protein expression levels were quantified by western blotting. Cell viability was compromised and NO was overexpressed by ZA and LPS stimulation. However, under ZA and LPS stimulation cell viability was enhanced, and NO production, and inducible nitric oxide synthase, interleukin (IL)-1β, -6, and tumor necrosis factor-α overexpression were suppressed on exposure to PDRN. A_2A receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression levels increased following PDRN treatment. These results indicate that PDRN treatment of macrophages inhibits the inflammatory cytokines induced by ZA and LPS stimulation. It was hypothesized that the inflammatory cytokines were inhibited through A_2A activation by PDRN. In addition, increased VEGF expression may contribute to increased vascularization and subsequently improve the pathological condition in BRONJ. As inflammation and LPS may stimulate the occurrence of BRONJ, the present study postulated that PDRN is possibly a candidate for the therapeutic management of BRONJ by decreasing inflammation and increasing vascularization.

Bisphosphonates in Oncology: Physiopathologic Bases and Clinical Activity

Osteoclastic activation is the ultimate way of bone resorption in neoplasia, induced by the combined effects of tumor-secreted humoral factors (especially parathyroid hormone-related peptides) and osteoclastic-osteoblastic interaction. Bisphosphonates inhibit the osteoclast activity and reduce bone resorption and are a valuable supportive measure for bone disease of neoplasms. Experimental models also suggest an activity of bisphosphonates against cancer cells. Controlled studies, especially in advanced breast cancer and multiple myeloma, indicate different effectiveness against the distinct skeletal-related events. Intravenous clodronate and, especially, pamidronate and zoledronate are the first-choice drugs for hypercalcemia, and they play a significant role in reducing metastatic bone pain. Their prolonged use delays, without hampering, the progression of bone disease, including the appearance of osteolysis and the occurrence of pathologic fractures. This effect is probably more valuable when bisphosphonates are administered early in the course of the disease. The evidence that adjuvant bisphosphonates improve survival needs to be confirmed in ongoing studies. Although poorly absorbed by the gastrointestinal tract, oral bisphosphonates are effective in preventing and treating cancer-induced osteoporosis in long-living patients with operable breast cancer. At present, there is little hope that newer bisphosphonates are more effective than those currently used.

The influence of zoledronate and teriparatide on gamma delta T cells in mice

Background/purpose

Few studies have investigated the possibility that bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) might reflect an immune response; however, gamma delta T cells have been shown to significantly decline in the blood of BRONJ patients. Additionally, there have been some reports of teriparatide usage for the treatment of BRONJ. In this study, we compared the effects of zoledronate and teriparatide on lymphocyte populations and inflammatory cytokine production in mice.

Materials and methods

Thirty female ICR mice were divided into three groups (n = 10 each): a vehicle, a zoledronate, and a teriparatide group. Drugs were administered for 8 weeks in each group. Lymphocytes in the blood and thymus were analyzed and femurs were used for histological observation and lymphocytes analysis of bone marrow. Cytokines were measured in separated serum using Milliplex^® multiplex immunoassay analysis.

Results

Zoledronate decreased the T cell number in the bone marrow. Additionally, serum levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-7, IL-12, IL-15 and RANTES, which are cytokines that affect T cell activation, differentiation and/or proliferation, were significantly lower in zoledronate treated mice. Conversely, teriparatide treatment induced an increase in gamma delta T cells in peripheral blood.

Conclusion

Gamma delta T cells in the bone marrow are expected to decrease with zoledronate treatment and increase with teriparatide treatment. If BRONJ involves a loss of gamma delta T cells in the circulation or bone marrow, then the increase in gamma delta T cells that is induced by teriparatide may account for its ability to resolve BRONJ.

Targeting to the Bone: Alendronate-Directed Combretastatin A-4 Bearing Antiangiogenic Polymer-Drug Conjugates

Selective targeting of tumor site with chemotherapeutic agents appears to be one of the most effective methods to address many of the problems encountered with conventional chemotherapy. In this work, poly(oligoethylene glycol)methacrylate (POEGMA) based bone-targeting polymers bearing an antiangiogenic drug combretastatin A4 (CA4) were synthesized using free radical polymerization. Targeted and nontargeting copolymers were evaluated for their bone targeting efficiency, cytotoxicities against endothelial cells, namely, HUVECs and U2-OS and Saos-2 cancerous cell lines, as well as their antiangiogenic activity against endothelial cell tube formation by HUVECs. It is observed that the drug conjugated polymers conjugated with the bisphosphonate groups containing drug alendronate (ALN) have remarkably high affinity for bone mineral when compared to the polymer-drug conjugates devoid of the bisphosphonate groups. Both targeted and nontargeted polymer-drug conjugates show a sustained drug release in rat plasma with an overall release of 80-93% over 5 days. In vitro studies revealed high levels of cytotoxicity of the polymer-drug conjugates against HUVECs and U2-OS, and moderate cytotoxicity toward Saos-2. Importantly, the CA4 conjugated copolymers displayed excellent level of antiangiogenic activity as deduced from in vitro endothelial cell tube formation assay using HUVECs. Overall, a novel bone-targeting antiangiogenic polymer-drug conjugate that can be further elaborated to carry additional anticancer drugs is disclosed.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Exacerbates the Severity of Osteonecrosis of the Jaws (ONJ) in Mice. A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Animal Study

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), an autoimmune inflammatory disorder, results in persistent synovitis with severe bone and cartilage destruction. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are often utilized in RA patients to reduce bone destruction and manage osteoporosis. However, BPs, especially at high doses, are associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). Here, utilizing previously published ONJ animal models, we are exploring interactions between RA and ONJ incidence and severity. DBA1/J mice were divided into four groups: control, zoledronic acid (ZA), collagen-induced arthritis (CIA), and CIA-ZA. Animals were pretreated with vehicle or ZA. Bovine collagen II emulsified in Freund's adjuvant was injected to induce arthritis (CIA) and the mandibular molar crowns were drilled to induce periapical disease. Vehicle or ZA treatment continued for 8 weeks. ONJ indices were measured by micro-CT (µCT) and histological examination of maxillae and mandibles. Arthritis development was assessed by visual scoring of paw swelling, and by µCT and histology of interphalangeal and knee joints. Maxillae and mandibles of control and CIA mice showed bone loss, periodontal ligament (PDL) space widening, lamina dura loss, and cortex thinning. ZA prevented these changes in both ZA and CIA-ZA groups. Epithelial to alveolar crest distance was increased in the control and CIA mice. This distance was preserved in ZA and CIA-ZA animals. Empty osteocytic lacunae and areas of osteonecrosis were present in ZA and CIA-ZA but more extensively in CIA-ZA animals, indicating more severe ONJ. CIA and CIA-ZA groups developed severe arthritis in the paws and knees. Interphalangeal and knee joints of CIA mice showed advanced bone destruction with cortical erosions and trabecular bone loss, and ZA treatment reduced these effects. Importantly, no osteonecrosis was noted adjacent to areas of articular inflammation in CIA-ZA mice. Our data suggest that ONJ burden was more pronounced in ZA treated CIA mice and that RA could be a risk factor for ONJ development. © 2016 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Radiographic progression of vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Nearly 70% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) experience vertebral fracture. As a consequence, these patients suffer significantly poorer quality of life. However, no studies have characterized the natural progression of these fractures.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the progression of MM-associated vertebral fractures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A consecutive retrospective chart review at a single tertiary-care center was carried out.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with MM and pathologic vertebral fracture with at least one follow-up between January 2007 and December 2013 were included. Radiographic measurements were recorded until last follow-up (LFU) or until surgical intervention or patient death. Patients with a history of vertebral fracture not associated with MM were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was change in height of the fractured vertebrae. Fractures were characterized by Genant grade and morphology.

METHODS

At baseline and each follow-up, anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body heights were measured from midline sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Student t tests and Fisher exact tests were performed to identify variables associated with fracture progression.

RESULTS

Among 33 patients, 67 fractures were followed. Sixty-four percent of patients were female, with a mean age of 66. Baseline mean anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body height losses were 30%, 36%, and 15%, respectively. Forty-three percent of fractures were Genant grade 3, and 57% were biconcave. Mean time to LFU was 40 months. At LFU, mean anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body height losses increased to 47% (p<.01), 49% (p<.01), and 28% (p<.01), respectively. More fractures became Genant grade 3 (75%, p<.01) and wedge (54%, p=.03). On average, patients lost 0.83% in vertebral body height per month, with initial Genant grade 1 fractures progressing most rapidly (1.69%/month, p<.01). Patients treated with bisphosphonates suffered less additional height loss compared with untreated patients (14% vs. 24%, p=.07).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed significant fracture progression despite high utilization of bisphosphonates. Patients lost nearly 1% of additional vertebral body height per month, with the least severe presenting fractures progressing most rapidly, highlighting the necessity for early referral to spine specialists and evidence-based guidelines for surveillance and treatment in the myeloma population.

Identification of Risk Factors for Bisphosphonate-Associated Atypical Femoral Fractures and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in a Pharmacovigilance Database

BACKGROUND

Atypical femoral fractures (AFs) and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) are well-known adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with bisphosphonates. To prevent these ADRs and to aid in the search for pathogenic mechanisms, knowledge of risk factors can be helpful.

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for bisphosphonate-related ONJ and AF.

METHODS

In this case-control study of reports of bisphosphonate-related ADRs from February 16, 1984, to October 16, 2013, in the Swedish national database of ADRs, we compared characteristics for cases of ONJ (n = 167) and AF (n = 55) with all other bisphosphonate-related ADRs (n = 565) with regard to demographic variables, clinical characteristics, and concomitant drug treatments. We adjusted for multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction.

RESULTS

Time to onset of ADRs differed statistically significantly between cases of AF and controls (2156 vs 111 days). For ONJ versus controls, differences were statistically significant for time to onset (1240 vs 111 days), intravenous administration (40% vs 20%), dental procedures (49% vs 0.2%) and prostheses (5% vs 0%), cancer disease (44% vs 12%), multiple myeloma (21% vs 1%), rheumatoid arthritis (14% vs 5%), and treatment with antineoplastic agents and oxycodone.

CONCLUSION

These results lend further evidence to previously identified risk factors for ONJ-that is, intravenous bisphosphonate administration; invasive dental procedures and dental prostheses; cancer disease, in particular multiple myeloma; and possibly, long-term bisphosphonate treatment. A putative further risk factor is rheumatoid arthritis. Only long-term bisphosphonate treatment was more common among AF cases. The lack of overlap of risk factors between ONJ and AF suggests different pathogenic mechanisms.

Radiologic and clinical characteristics of vertebral fractures in multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Nearly 80% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) have bony lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These lesions may progress to debilitating vertebral fractures. No studies have quantitatively characterized these fractures or identified predictors of fracture burden and severity.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to characterize the clinical and radiologic features of these fractures and to identify independent predictors of fracture burden and severity.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A consecutive retrospective chart review was conducted from January 2007 to December 2013 at a single tertiary-care institution.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients with diagnoses of both MM and vertebral fracture were included in this study. Those with a history of non-MM vertebral fracture were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measure was height loss of the fractured vertebral body, whereas secondary outcome measures included number of fractures and morphology.

METHODS

Data were collected at fracture presentation. Radiologic data were obtained from T1-weighted MRI. Anterior, middle, and posterior vertebral body height losses were recorded, and a Genant grading was made. Multivariable Poisson and logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of fracture burden and severity.

RESULTS

Among 50 patients presenting with vertebral fracture, 124 fractures were observed. The majority (76%) of these patients did not have a previous MM diagnosis. The most common presenting symptom was back pain (84%), followed by neurologic (54%) and constitutional (50%) symptoms. The mean anterior, middle, and posterior height losses of the fractured vertebral body were 30%, 37%, and 16%, respectively. Twenty percent of fractures were Genant Grade 1 (mild), whereas 32% and 48% were grades 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe). Fifty-five percent of fractures were biconcave, whereas 32% and 13% were wedge and crush fractures. Lower body mass index and albumin and increased myeloma protein, light chains, and creatinine predicted an increased number of fractures at presentation. Increased β2-microglobulin and creatinine predicted more severe vertebral fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, 124 fractures were observed among 50 patients. These fractures were generally severe, biconcave, and in the thoracic spine. Laboratory signs of advanced MM predict greater fracture burden and severity. In the future, monitoring of these predictors may raise suspicion for an MM-associated vertebral fracture.

Zoledronic acid exerts its antitumor effect in multiple myeloma interfering with the bone marrow microenvironment

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by an excess of monotypic plasma cells which localize almost exclusively in the bone marrow provoking bone destruction via the activation of the osteoclasts. The bone marrow microenvironment, mainly through stromal cells, is strictly involved in the evolution of the disease supporting MM cell growth and survival [1]. MM plasma cells reside in the bone marrow by binding to adhesion molecule of extracellular matrix (ECM) and stromal cells. The activation of some signaling pathways within the stromal cells increases the production of several cytokines which in turn favors the myeloma cell proliferation and survival [2-6], and enhance the drug resistance by anti-apoptotic mechanisms [1,7-9]. Novel therapeutic agents target not only the myeloma cells but also the interaction between MM cells and the bone marrow microenvironment [8]. Bisphosphonates (Bps) interfere as well with bone microenvironment inhibiting the survival of stromal cells and hampering the contact between plasma and stromal cells. In this review we will revise preclinical evidences, and the potential mechanisms of the antitumor activity of zoledronic acid.

Zoledronic acid enhances lipopolysaccharide-stimulated proinflammatory reactions through controlled expression of SOCS1 in macrophages

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is a serious side effect of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate (NBP) use. Many studies have shown that BRONJ is limited to the jawbone and does not occur in the other bones. We hypothesized that BRONJ is related to local bacterial iections and involves the innate immune system. To examine the relationship between BRONJ and innate immunity, we examined the effects of NBPs on macrophages, one of the important cell types in innate immunity. The expression of toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) in cells after pretreatment with zoledronic acid (ZOL) did not considerably differ from that in untreated control cells. However, cytokine levels and nitric oxide (NO) production increased after pretreatment with ZOL. Furthermore, ZOL induced NF-κB activation by enhancing IκB-α degradation. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced apoptosis also increased after pretreatment with ZOL. This effect was mediated by a reduction of suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS1), which is a negative regulator of myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD 88)-dependent signaling. These results suggest that ZOL induced excessive innate immune response and proinflammatory cytokine production and that these processes may be involved in the bone destruction observed in BRONJ.

Enhanced anti-tumor activity and safety profile of targeted nano-scaled HPMA copolymer-alendronate-TNP-470 conjugate in the treatment of bone malignances

Bone neoplasms, such as osteosarcoma, exhibit a propensity for systemic metastases resulting in adverse clinical outcome. Traditional treatment consisting of aggressive chemotherapy combined with surgical resection, has been the mainstay of these malignances. Therefore, bone-targeted non-toxic therapies are required. We previously conjugated the aminobisphosphonate alendronate (ALN), and the potent anti-angiogenic agent TNP-470 with N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer. HPMA copolymer-ALN-TNP-470 conjugate exhibited improved anti-angiogenic and anti-tumor activity compared with the combination of free ALN and TNP-470 when evaluated in a xenogeneic model of human osteosarcoma. The immune system has major effect on toxicology studies and on tumor progression. Therefore, in this manuscript we examined the safety and efficacy profiles of the conjugate using murine osteosarcoma syngeneic model. Toxicity and efficacy evaluation revealed superior anti-tumor activity and decreased organ-related toxicities of the conjugate compared with the combination of free ALN plus TNP-470. Finally, comparative anti-angiogenic activity and specificity studies, using surrogate biomarkers of circulating endothelial cells (CEC), highlighted the advantage of the conjugate over the free agents. The therapeutic platform described here may have clinical translational relevance for the treatment of bone-related angiogenesis-dependent malignances.

Cytotoxic effect of clodronate and zoledronate on the chondrosarcoma cell lines HTB-94 and CAL-78

The wide surgical tumour resection is the only effective treatment in chondrosarcoma. However, a major problem remains the high rate of local recurrences and metastases due to the lack of adjuvant therapies. In this study the cytotoxic effect of the bisphosphonate clodronate (0.1-1000 μM) and zoledronate (0.1-1000 μM) in different concentrations on two chondrosarcoma cell lines (HTB-94 and CAL-78) has been investigated. After an incubation period of 48, 72 and 96 hours the chondrosarcoma cell viability was measured as the MTT-proliferation rate. In concentrations of >1 μm zoledronate the cell activity was reduced by up to 95% for the CAL-78 cells. Further, zoledronate has been more effective in lower concentrations than clodronate in the reduction of cell viability for both cell lines. However, clodronate showed significant cytotoxic effects in high concentrations and after longer incubation periods. Further research is necessary, but in the light of these results bisphosphonates may also play a role in the treatment of chondrosarcomas.

Increased prevalence of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw with vitamin D deficiency in rats

Necrotic bone exposure in the oral cavity has recently been reported in patients treated with nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates as part of their therapeutic regimen for multiple myeloma or metastatic cancers to bone. It has been postulated that systemic conditions associated with cancer patients combined with tooth extraction may increase the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). The objective of this study was to establish an animal model of bisphosphonate-related ONJ by testing the combination of these risk factors. The generation of ONJ lesions in rats resembling human disease was achieved under the confluence of intravenous injection of zoledronate (ZOL; 35 microg/kg every 2 weeks), maxillary molar extraction, and vitamin D deficiency [VitD(-)]. The prevalence of ONJ in the VitD(-)/ZOL group was 66.7%, which was significantly higher (p < .05, Fisher exact test) than the control (0%), VitD(-) (0%), and ZOL alone (14.3%) groups. Similar to human patients, rat ONJ lesions prolonged the oral exposure of necrotic bone sequestra and were uniquely associated with pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia. The number of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick-end label-positive (TUNEL(+)) osteoclasts significantly increased on the surface of post-tooth extraction alveolar bone of the VitD(-)/ZOL group, where sustained inflammation was depicted by [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose micro-positron emission tomography (microPET). ONJ lesions were found to be associated with dense accumulation of mixed inflammatory/immune cells. These cells, composed of neutrophils and lymphocytes, appeared to juxtapose apoptotic osteoclasts. It is suggested that the pathophysiologic mechanism(s) underpinning ONJ may involve the interaction between bisphosphonates and compromised vitamin D functions in the realm of skeletal homeostasis and innate immunity.

Targeting angiogenesis-dependent calcified neoplasms using combined polymer therapeutics

BACKGROUND

There is an immense clinical need for novel therapeutics for the treatment of angiogenesis-dependent calcified neoplasms such as osteosarcomas and bone metastases. We developed a new therapeutic strategy to target bone metastases and calcified neoplasms using combined polymer-bound angiogenesis inhibitors. Using an advanced "living polymerization" technique, the reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT), we conjugated the aminobisphosphonate alendronate (ALN), and the potent anti-angiogenic agent TNP-470 with N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) copolymer through a Glycine-Glycine-Proline-Norleucine linker, cleaved by cathepsin K, a cysteine protease overexpressed at resorption sites in bone tissues. In this approach, dual targeting is achieved. Passive accumulation is possible due to the increase in molecular weight following polymer conjugation of the drugs, thus extravasating from the tumor leaky vessels and not from normal healthy vessels. Active targeting to the calcified tissues is achieved by ALN's affinity to bone mineral.

METHODS AND FINDING

The anti-angiogenic and antitumor potency of HPMA copolymer-ALN-TNP-470 conjugate was evaluated both in vitro and in vivo. We show that free and conjugated ALN-TNP-470 have synergistic anti-angiogenic and antitumor activity by inhibiting proliferation, migration and capillary-like tube formation of endothelial and human osteosarcoma cells in vitro. Evaluation of anti-angiogenic, antitumor activity and body distribution of HPMA copolymer-ALN-TNP-470 conjugate was performed on severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) male mice inoculated with mCherry-labeled MG-63-Ras human osteosarcoma and by modified Miles permeability assay. Our targeted bi-specific conjugate reduced VEGF-induced vascular hyperpermeability by 92% and remarkably inhibited osteosarcoma growth in mice by 96%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report to describe a new concept of a narrowly-dispersed combined polymer therapeutic designed to target both tumor and endothelial compartments of bone metastases and calcified neoplasms at a single administration. This new approach of co-delivery of two synergistic drugs may have clinical utility as a potential therapy for angiogenesis-dependent cancers such as osteosarcoma and bone metastases.

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and its associated risk factors: a Belgian case series

OBJECTIVES

Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BROJ) is a serious oral complication of bisphosphonate (BP) treatment involving the exposure of necrotic maxillary or mandibular bone. Our purpose is to describe the clinical presentation of 34 cases of BROJ and to identify potential risk factors.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed in four Belgian institutions.

METHODS

Complete medical histories were recorded and analyzed. These data include age, gender, initial disease requiring BP, type and duration of BP treatment, symptomatology and location of BROJ, prior dental procedures, treatment of the BROJ and treatment outcome, and radiographic, histological, and microbiological data.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonates (BP) were used in the management of disseminated cancers in 30 patients (88.5% of total studied), while four patients received BP due to osteoporosis (11.5%). The most frequently used BP was zoledronic acid in 29 patients (83%). Microbiological data obtained in 25 patients demonstrated that 72% of these patients were infected or colonized by an actinomyces. Eight of the 14 patients (57%) who received only medical treatment were cured. Of the 20 patients who underwent surgical treatments, only four were completely cured (20%). BROJ lesions smaller than 1 cm are associated with better prognosis in terms of treatment outcomes (P = .0009). Local treatments combined with long-term antibiotics are also correlated with better prognosis (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions smaller than 1 cm and lesions that were subject to medical treatments are associated with a better outcome. Surgical treatments appear to be non-beneficial for BROJ.

Oncologic emergencies: diagnosis and treatment

Patients with malignancies are subject to developing a unique set of complications that require emergent evaluation and treatment. With the increasing incidence of cancer in the general population and improved survival, these emergencies will be more frequently encountered. Physicians must be able to recognize these conditions and institute appropriate therapy after a focused initial evaluation. The approach to definitive therapy is commonly multidisciplinary, involving surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and other medical specialists. Prompt interventions can be lifesaving and may spare patients considerable morbidity and pain. In this review, we discuss the diagnosis of and initial therapy for common emergencies in hematology and oncology.

How myeloma cells escape bisphosphonate-mediated killing: development of specific resistance with preserved sensitivity to conventional chemotherapeutics

Although amino-bisphosphonates (N-BPs) induce apoptosis of myeloma cells in vitro, most in-vivo studies fail to demonstrate a corresponding antitumour effect. This discrepancy might reflect the development of resistance to the antitumour effects of N-BP in myeloma cells when they are exposed to N-BP for a prolonged time. To test this hypothesis, two N-BP-sensitive human myeloma cell lines were continuously exposed to increasing concentrations of the N-BP alendronate for 6 weeks. During this treatment period, 10 out of 10 sublines developed reduced apoptotic and antiproliferative responses to alendronate treatment. This de novo alendronate resistance was accompanied by resistance to another N-BP (zoledronate) but not to an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase or Fas ligand. Importantly, N-BP-resistant myeloma cells also remained sensitive to conventional myeloma chemotherapeutics (melphalan, doxorubicin and vincristine). Further analysis of the N-BP-resistant cells revealed an increased activity of the N-BP-specific target enzyme farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase, without upregulation of its gene transcription. Our results suggest that continuous exposure of myeloma cells to alendronate leads to the development of N-BP resistance. This is associated with an increased activity of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase and does not evolve from defective apoptotic pathways. Importantly, the antitumour effects of conventional myeloma chemotherapeutics are preserved in the N-BP-resistant myeloma cells.

Bisphosphonates: expanded roles in the treatment of patients with cancer

Bisphosphonates are important inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption seen in patients with bone metastases associated with malignancy. Bisphosphonates are used in the treatment of patients with bone metastases and have been shown to reduce skeletal-related events and symptoms, contributing to improved patient outcomes and quality of life. These agents first were approved in the treatment of patients with osteoporosis and have been used for the past two decades in this role. Because bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, the bone remodeling cycle slows down and an increase in bone mineral density occurs. These agents are useful in treatment for both hypercalcemia and pain, although they have not definitively shown improvement in survival time. Considerable interest exists in the use of bisphosphonates for prevention of bone metastases and their potential antitumor activity. These drugs are well tolerated and have minimal side effects, but they are not inexpensive. This article discusses the role of bisphosphonates in patients with cancer and future directions for further research.

Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates represent the agents of choice for most patients with osteoporosis. They are the best studied of all agents for the prevention of bone loss and reduction in fractures. They increase BMD, primarily at the lumbar spine, but also at the proximal femur. In patients who have established osteoporosis, bisphosphonates reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, and are the only agents in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fracture quickly. The risk of radiographic vertebral deformities is reduced after 1 year of treatment with risedronate [68]. The risk of clinical vertebral fractures is reduced after 1 year of treatment with alendronate [69] and just 6 months' treatment with risedronate [157]. The antifracture effect of risedronate has been shown to continue through 5 years of treatment [158]. Alendronate and risedronate are approved by the FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for prevention (risedronate) and treatment (alendronate and risedronate) of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Alendronate is also approved for treatment of osteoporosis in men. Other bisphosphonates (etidronate for oral use, pamidronate and zoledronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Although bisphosphonates combined with estrogen or raloxifene produce greater gains in bone mass compared with single-agent treatment, the use of two antiresorptive agents in combination cannot be recommended because the benefit on fracture risk has not been demonstrated and because of increased cost and side effects.

Novel antiangiogenic effects of the bisphosphonate compound zoledronic acid

Bisphosphonate drugs inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption and are widely used to treat skeletal complications in patients with tumor-induced osteolysis. We now show that zoledronic acid, a new generation bisphosphonate with a heterocyclic imidazole substituent, is also a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis. In vitro, zoledronic acid inhibits proliferation of human endothelial cells stimulated with fetal calf serum, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (IC(50) values 4.1, 4.2, and 6.9 microM, respectively), and modulates endothelial cell adhesion and migration. In cultured aortic rings and in the chicken egg chorioallantoic membrane assay, zoledronic acid reduces vessel sprouting. When administered systemically to mice, zoledronic acid potently inhibits the angiogenesis induced by subcutaneous implants impregnated with bFGF [ED(50), 3 microg/kg (7.5 nmol/kg) s.c.]. These findings indicate that zoledronic acid has marked antiangiogenic properties that could augment its efficacy in the treatment of malignant bone disease and extend its potential clinical use to other diseases with an angiogenic component.

American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines: the role of bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma

PURPOSE

To determine clinical practice guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of lytic bone disease in multiple myeloma and to determine their respective role relative to other conventional therapies for this condition.

METHODS

An expert multidisciplinary Panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature through January 2002. Values for levels of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned by expert reviewers and approved by the Panel. Expert consensus was used if there were insufficient published data. The Panel addressed which patients to treat and when to treat them in the course of their disease. Additionally, specific drug delivery issues, duration of therapy, initiation of treatment and management of treatment of lytic bone disease was reviewed and compared with other forms of therapy for lytic bone lesions. Finally, the Panel discussed patient and physician expectations associated with this therapy for bony metastases, as well as public policy implications related to the use of bisphosphonates. The guidelines underwent external review by selected physicians, by the Health Services Research Committee members, and by the ASCO Board of Directors.

RESULTS

The available evidence involving randomized controlled trials is modest but supports that oral clodronate, intravenous pamidronate, and intravenous zoledronic acid are superior to placebo in reducing skeletal complications. A reduction in vertebral fractures has consistently been seen across all studies. No agent has shown a definitive survival benefit. Intravenous zoledronic acid has recently been shown to be as effective as intravenous pamidronate. Because there are no direct comparisons between clodronate and pamidronate or zoledronic acid, the superiority of one agent cannot be definitively established. However, the panel recommends only intravenous pamidronate or zoledronic acid in light of the use of the time to first skeletal event as the primary end point and more complete assessment of bony complications in studies evaluating it. Additionally, clodronate is not available in the United States. The choice between pamidronate and zoledronic acid will depend on choosing between the higher drug cost of zoledronic acid, with its shorter, more convenient infusion time (15 minutes), versus the less expensive drug, pamidronate, with its longer infusion time (2 hours).

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates provide a meaningful supportive benefit to multiple myeloma patients with lytic bone disease. However, further research on bisphosphonates is warranted, including the following: (1) when to start and stop therapy, (2) how to integrate their use with other treatments for lytic bone disease, (3) how to evaluate their role in myeloma patients without lytic bone involvement, (4) how to distinguish between symptomatic and asymptomatic bony events, and (5) how to better determine their cost-benefit consequence.

Bisphosphonates in bone diseases other than osteoporosis

The range of bone diseases in which bisphosphonates are used has extended far beyond osteoporosis during the last few years. Bisphosphonate therapy is now so well validated as to be the reference standard in Paget's disease and in the prevention of bone complications related to malignant osteolysis. Promising preliminary findings warrant the use of bisphosphonates in conditions that are either rare (fibrous dysplasia) or severe (pediatric osteogenesis imperfecta). The third category of indications encompasses many conditions in which the limited available data do not warrant widespread use: examples include reflex sympathetic dystrophy syndrome, acute back pain after a vertebral crush fracture, and chronic inflammatory joint disease not treated by glucocorticoids.

A Quebec survey of issues in cancer pain management

We report the results of a cancer pain survey mailed to Quebec hematologist-oncologists and palliative care physicians in 1999. The survey was designed to sample views on the current status of pain management and on obstacles to the provision of adequate pain relief for patients. The survey, formulated by an ethics network centered at the Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, was distributed to all members of the Association of Hematologist-Oncologists of Quebec and to all physician members of the Quebec Palliative Care Association. Responses were obtained from 138 Palliative Care Association members (response rate 61%) and 76 hematologist-oncologists (response rate 45%). Major obstacles reported included inadequate assessment of both contributory psychosocial issues and severity of pain, patient reluctance to take opioids, and inadequate access to non-drug techniques for pain relief. Access to opioids was not regarded as a problem. Both groups felt generally competent in their ability to manage various aspects of cancer pain therapy. They gave little credit to their formal medical school or residency training. Fifty-six percent of the palliative care group and 57% of the hemato-oncologists rated their medical school experience as only "poor" or "fair" on a 4-point scale. Residency ratings were modestly better. We conclude that medical faculties should assign a high priority to teaching health professionals patient assessment techniques. Simple symptom assessment scales should be routinely used in oncology/palliative care practice. Medical school training in pain management is not highly regarded and should be enhanced. We also note that, based on response to the scenario of a patient presenting with severe pain, many physicians, while feeling competent in the use of opioids, may be overly conservative in their initial use.

Severe osteopenia in a young boy with Kostmann's congenital neutropenia treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: suggested therapeutic approach

Kostmann's syndrome is a congenital disorder that causes an impairment of myeloid differentiation in the bone marrow characterized by severe neutropenia, which can be treated with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We present the case of a 13-year-old boy with Kostmann's syndrome who was treated with recombinant human G-CSF from age 3.5 years. His growth and development was normal, although complicated by intermittent infections. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement revealed severe osteopenia at the spine and hips (lumbar spine BMD 0.486 g/cm(2); Z score -3.6), and he was referred to the Endocrine Service. Relevant laboratory evaluation showed a pretreatment ionized calcium level at the upper limit of normal (1.28 mmol/L; range: 1.13-1.32 mmol/L), suppressed intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level (12 pg/mL; range: 10-65 pg/mL), and a low 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D level (21 pg/mL; range: 24-65 pg/mL). He had evidence of increased bone turnover evidenced by elevated urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD) cross-links (46.9 nmol/mmol creatinine; range: 2-34 nmol/mmol creatinine) and a simultaneous increase in markers of bone formation with elevated osteocalcin level (200 ng/mL; normal: 20-80 ng/mL) and alkaline phosphatase level (236 IU/mL; normal: 38-126 IU/mL). Because of clinical concern for his skeletal health, bisphosphonate therapy with intravenous pamidronate was initiated. One month after treatment, the iPTH and DPD cross-links were in the normal range (54 pg/mL and 17.7 nmol/mmol creatinine, respectively) and the 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D level was elevated (111 pg/mL). Four months after treatment, there was a striking increase in BMD at the lumbar spine (+30.86%), femoral necks (left, +20.02%; right, +17.98%), and total hips (left, +18.40%; right, +15.94%). Seven months after bisphosphonate therapy, his biochemical parameters showed a return toward pretreatment levels with increasing urinary DPD cross-links (28.7 nmol/mmol creatinine) and decreasing iPTH (26 pg/mL). However, the BMD continued to increase (8 months posttreatment), but the magnitude of the increment was attenuated (lumbar-spine, +4.8%; left total hip, +1.2% and right total hip +2.4%), relative to BMD at 4 months. Eight months after the initial treatment, his iPTH was suppressed at 14 pg/mL and he again received pamidronate (at a lower dose); 3 months later, he had an additional increase in BMD (lumbar spine +7.4%, left total hip +3.9%, right total hip +2.7%), relative to the previous study. We hypothesize that prolonged administration of G-CSF as treatment for Kostmann's syndrome is associated with increased bone resorption, mediated by osteoclast activation and leading to bone loss. In children, the resulting osteopenia can be successfully managed with antisreorptive bisphosphonate therapy with significant improvement in bone density. Measurements of biochemical parameters of bone turnover can be used to monitor the magnitude and duration of the therapeutic response and the need for BMD reassessment and, perhaps, retreatment.

Bone disease in myeloma

The major clinical manifestation of multiple myeloma results from osteolytic bone destruction. The only currently Food and Drug Administration-approved drug for the treatment of the bony complications of multiple myeloma is monthly intravenous pamidronate at a dose of 90 mg infused over 4 hours. Recent studies have shown the safety of 2-hour infusions. A randomized trial comparing pamidronate to placebo continued to show benefits throughout the 21-month trial. Although the duration of therapy has not been firmly determined, it is likely that discontinuation of this drug will be met by enhanced bone loss and an increased risk of bony complications for these patients. Thus, it is recommended that the drug be continued indefinitely. Support for this recommendation also comes from the reduced bone density observed in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis following the withdrawal of bisphosphonate treatment. Recent attempts to give higher doses, more frequent infusions (every 2 weeks or less), or more rapid infusions (1 hour or less) of pamidronate have occasionally been associated with albuminuria and azotemia. These modifications should therefore be avoided. Importantly, the drug can be safely administered at 90 mg monthly to patients with poor renal function. The use of pamidronate for myeloma patients without lytic bone involvement or with Durie-Salmon stages I or II disease has not been evaluated. However, it is recognized that most patients with earlier stages of disease or without lytic bone involvement also develop bony complications. There is no reason to believe that these patients would not benefit from monthly intravenous infusions of pamidronate. The potential antimyeloma effect of this agent is another reason to administer this drug in these types of patients. Thus, it is our practice to administer monthly pamidronate to myeloma patients regardless of stage or bone involvement. However, trials evaluating oral bisphosphonates have produced inconsistent clinical results, probably as a result of the erratic and scanty poor absorption as well as poor oral tolerability of these drugs. Although these oral agents may be useful in some patients, it is impossible to identify which myeloma patients will benefit from orally administered bisphosphonates. The more potent nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid more effectively reverses hypercalcemia of malignancy than pamidronate, and it appears promising in reducing bone loss in cancer patients. However, its efficacy in preventing skeletal complications is still being evaluated. Many other types of new agents are in early clinical trials, but their efficacy remains unproven at the present time.

Treatment of osteoporosis with bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are safe and effective agents for treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. Alendronate and risedronate are the best studied of all agents for osteoporosis in terms of efficacy and safety. They increase bone mass. In patients who have established osteoporosis, they reduce the risk of vertebral fractures. They are the only agents shown in prospective trials to reduce the risk of hip fractures and other nonvertebral fractures. They are approved by the US FDA for prevention of bone loss in recently menopausal women, for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, and for management of glucocorticoid-induced bone loss. Other bisphosphonates (e.g., etidronate for oral use, pamidronate for intravenous infusion) are also available and can be used off-label for patients who cannot tolerate approved agents. Bisphosphonates combined with estrogen produce greater gains in bone mass compared with either agent used alone; whether there is a greater benefit of combination therapy on fracture risk is not clear. Combining a bisphosphonate with raloxifene or calcitonin is probably safe, although data on effectiveness are lacking.

Treatment of bone diseases with bisphosphonates, excluding osteoporosis

The main biologic action of bisphosphonates consists of the inhibition of osteoclastic bone resorption, and, at least, for the drugs introduced after etidronate, without any significant inhibition of bone mineralization. Bisphosphonates therefore play a major role in conditions that are characterized, at least partly, by an increased bone resorption. Primary and secondary osteoporosis by far constitute the most widespread indications for bisphosphonates, mostly because recent published trials have demonstrated their ability to prevent fractures. Potentially crippling conditions such as symptomatic Paget disease of bone remain a major therapeutic challenge for bisphosphonates, but the prevention of the major complications such as sarcoma has still to be proven. The availability of more potent bisphosphonates, less toxic for bones, has certainly widened the therapeutic interventions to asymptomatic patients, bearing in mind the various potential troublesome complications. Fibrous dysplasia resembles, in certain aspects, Paget disease; it is therefore not surprising that bisphosphonate therapy has been proposed in this indication. With the aging of world populations, more and more cancers will be diagnosed. For those with a bone metastatic propensity or malignant hematologic condition, such as multiple myeloma, the most recent generation of more potent bisphosphonates may bring more comfort to crippled patients and even, hopefully, have a direct antitumoral activity, if used synergistically with the armamentarium already available to the clinician. New indications for bisphosphonates include osteogenesis imperfecta both in children and adults. In the future, they might be used in the prevention of erosions in rheumatoid arthritis and of loosening of joint prostheses, as well as possibly in osteoarthritis. Now that the fear of theoretically freezing bone remodeling has been reasonably dismissed, potential uses for bisphosphonates might be considered nearly infinite.

Osteoporosis due to cancer treatment: pathogenesis and management

Many therapeutic regimens in cancer treatment carry the risk of causing or favoring the development of osteoporosis. Therapies in which hypogonadism may occur are most relevant in this respect. Prompt hormone replacement therapy is indicated in these patients. In patients in whom this is undesirable because of a hormone-dependent tumor, the risk of osteoporosis should be assessed by means of osteodensitometry, and prophylactic or therapeutic measures should be instituted if necessary. Early intervention improves outcome because osteoporosis therapy is most effective in preventing deterioration of bone mass. There remains much uncertainty in assessing the risk of combination chemotherapy with regard to the development of osteoporosis. Negative effects on the skeleton have, however, been demonstrated for individual drugs, such as methotrexate and ifosfamide. Negative effects of the tumor itself on bone metabolism may aggravate the degree of osteoporosis. Detailed data and long-term experience to assess the risk are urgently needed in this area and constitute an important research topic for the coming years and decades. This review discusses the most prevalent mechanisms of osteoporosis caused by cancer treatment and outlines therapeutic strategies for the prevention and treatment of therapy-induced bone loss.

American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the role of bisphosphonates in breast cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Bisphosphonates Expert Panel

PURPOSE

To determine clinical practice guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in the prevention and treatment of bone metastases in breast cancer and their role relative to other therapies for this condition.

METHODS

An expert multidisciplinary panel reviewed pertinent information from the published literature and meeting abstracts through May 1999. Additional data collected as part of randomized trials and submitted to the United States Food and Drug Administration were also reviewed, and investigators were contacted for more recent information. Values for levels of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned by expert reviewers and approved by the panel. Expert consensus was used if there were insufficient published data. The panel addressed which patients to treat and when in their course of disease, specific drug delivery issues, duration of therapy, management of bony metastases with other therapies, and the public policy implications. The guideline underwent external review by selected physicians, members of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Health Services Research Committee, and the ASCO Board of Directors.

RESULTS

Bisphosphonates have not had an impact on the most reliable cancer end point: overall survival. The benefits have been reductions in skeletal complications, ie, pathologic fractures, surgery for fracture or impending fracture, radiation, spinal cord compression, and hypercalcemia. Intravenous (IV) pamidronate 90 mg delivered over 1 to 2 hours every 3 to 4 weeks is recommended in patients with metastatic breast cancer who have imaging evidence of lytic destruction of bone and who are concurrently receiving systemic therapy with hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. For women with only an abnormal bone scan but without bony destruction by imaging studies or localized pain, there is insufficient evidence to suggest starting bisphosphonates. Starting bisphosphonates in patients without evidence of bony metastasis, even in the presence of other extraskeletal metastases, is not recommended. Studies of bisphosphonates in the adjuvant setting have yielded inconsistent results. Starting bisphosphonates in patients at any stage of their nonosseous disease, outside of clinical trials, despite a high risk for future bone metastasis, is currently not recommended. Oral bisphosphonates are one of several options which can be used for preservation of bone density in premenopausal patients with treatment-induced menopause. The panel suggests that, once initiated, IV bisphosphonates be continued until evidence of substantial decline in a patient's general performance status. The panel stresses that clinical judgment must guide what is a substantial decline. There is no evidence addressing the consequences of stopping bisphosphonates after one or more adverse skeletal events. Symptoms in the spine, pelvis, or femur require careful evaluation for spinal cord compression and pathologic fracture before bisphosphonate use and if symptoms recur, persist, or worsen during therapy. The panel recommends that current standards of care for cancer pain, analgesics and local radiation therapy, not be displaced by bisphosphonates. IV pamidronate is recommended in women with pain caused by osteolytic metastasis to relieve pain when used concurrently with systemic chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, since it was associated with a modest pain control benefit in controlled trials.

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates provide a meaningful supportive but not life-prolonging benefit to many patients with bone metastases from cancer. Further research is warranted to identify clinical predictors of when to start and stop therapy, to integrate their use with other treatments for bone metastases, to identify their role in the adjuvant setting in preventing bone metastases, and to better determine their cost-benefit consequences.