1
|
Cao S, Zhang J, Dong C, Que Y, Gao X, Guo R. Reproducibility of liver iron concentration measured by R2* method based on 1.5-T MRI: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2025:10.1007/s00330-024-11334-x. [PMID: 39751630 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2024] [Revised: 11/11/2024] [Accepted: 12/01/2024] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the reproducibility of the 1.5-T MR imaging (MRI)-based R2* method in measuring the liver iron concentration (LIC) across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases and identified studies that used the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method to measure the LIC. The original data were extracted from the selected studies. Reproducibility was assessed in terms of the ability to replicate the measured LIC with the 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method across different scanning instruments, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. We used the scanner equipment, scan parameters, and postprocessing technique as random effects to determine whether the R2* values obtained in the different studies were significantly different after the effects of the measured LIC were excluded. The calibration curve that best fit the R2* value to the LIC was estimated via univariate regression. RESULTS Twenty-one studies (1147 participants) were included. The seven studies (435 participants) in which the initial TE was ≤ 1.0 ms and the TE spacing was ≤ 1.4 ms did not have significant differences in the measured R2* value in pairwise comparisons (p > 0.05). Calibration of R2* to LIC was as follows: LIC (mg/g) = 0.042 + 2.85 × 10-2 R2* (s-1) (R2 = 0.79). CONCLUSION The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method in estimating LIC was reproducible across different MRI scanners, scan parameters, and postprocessing techniques. KEY POINTS Question The R2* method is widely used to quantify LIC, but the reproducibility of R2*-based LIC estimation remains unknown. Findings In scan sequences with an initial echo time (TE) ≤ 1.0 ms and a TE spacing ≤ 1.4 ms, the R2*-based LIC quantification at 1.5 T achieved good reproducibility. Clinical relevance The 1.5-T MRI-based R2* method enables reproducible quantification of the LIC; its reproducibility spares patients from unnecessary trauma and economic burdens while promoting the extensive clinical dissemination of R2*-based LIC quantification methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sue Cao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chenyu Dong
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yutao Que
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Gao
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruomi Guo
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang H, Li H, Ali R, Jia W, Pan W, Reeder SB, Harris D, Masch W, Aslam A, Shanbhogue K, Parikh NA, Dillman JR, He L. Development and Validation of a Modality-Invariant 3D Swin U-Net Transformer for Liver and Spleen Segmentation on Multi-Site Clinical Bi-parametric MR Images. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024:10.1007/s10278-024-01362-w. [PMID: 39707114 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01362-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 11/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/28/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024]
Abstract
To develop and validate a modality-invariant Swin U-Net Transformer (UNETR) deep learning model for liver and spleen segmentation on abdominal T1-weighted (T1w) or T2-weighted (T2w) MR images from multiple institutions for pediatric and adult patients with known or suspected chronic liver diseases. In this IRB-approved retrospective study, clinical abdominal axial T1w and T2w MR images from pediatric and adult patients were retrieved from four study sites, including Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), New York University (NYU), University of Wisconsin (UW) and University of Michigan / Michigan Medicine (UM). The whole liver and spleen were manually delineated as the ground truth masks. We developed a modality-invariant 3D Swin UNETR using a modality-invariant training strategy, in which each patient's T1w and T2w MR images were treated as separate training samples. We conducted both internal and external validation experiments. A total of 241 T1w and 339 T2w MR sequences from 304 patients (age [mean ± standard deviation], 31.8 ± 20.3 years; 132 [43%] female) were included for model development. The Swin UNETR achieved a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.95 ± 0.02 on T1w images and 0.93 ± 0.05 on T2w images for liver segmentation. This is significantly better than the U-Net model (0.90 ± 0.05, p < 0.001 and 0.90 ± 0.13, p < 0.001, respectively). The Swin UNETR achieved a DSC of 0.88 ± 0.12 on T1w images and 0.93 ± 0.10 on T2w images for spleen segmentation, and it significantly outperformed a modality-invariant U-Net model (0.80 ± 0.18, p = 0.001 and 0.88 ± 0.12, p = 0.002, respectively). Our study demonstrated that a modality-invariant Swin UNETR model can segment the liver and spleen on routinely collected clinical bi-parametric abdominal MR images from children and adult patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huixian Zhang
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hailong Li
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Artificial Intelligence Imaging Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders Prevention Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Redha Ali
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Wei Jia
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Wen Pan
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - David Harris
- Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Medicine, Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - William Masch
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Anum Aslam
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Nehal A Parikh
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders Prevention Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Jonathan R Dillman
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Artificial Intelligence Imaging Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Lili He
- Imaging Research Center, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Department of Computer Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Artificial Intelligence Imaging Research Center, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders Prevention Center, Perinatal Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maino C, Vernuccio F, Cannella R, Cristoferi L, Franco PN, Carbone M, Cortese F, Faletti R, De Bernardi E, Inchingolo R, Gatti M, Ippolito D. Non-invasive imaging biomarkers in chronic liver disease. Eur J Radiol 2024; 181:111749. [PMID: 39317002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024]
Abstract
Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a global and worldwide clinical challenge, considering that different underlying liver entities can lead to hepatic dysfunction. In the past, blood tests and clinical evaluation were the main noninvasive tools used to detect, diagnose and follow-up patients with CLD; in case of clinical suspicion of CLD or unclear diagnosis, liver biopsy has been considered as the reference standard to rule out different chronic liver conditions. Nowadays, noninvasive tests have gained a central role in the clinical pathway. Particularly, liver stiffness measurement (LSM) and cross-sectional imaging techniques can provide transversal information to clinicians, helping them to correctly manage, treat and follow patients during time. Cross-sectional imaging techniques, namely computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have plenty of potential. Both techniques allow to compute the liver surface nodularity (LSN), associated with CLDs and risk of decompensation. MRI can also help quantify fatty liver infiltration, mainly with the proton density fat fraction (PDFF) sequences, and detect and quantify fibrosis, especially thanks to elastography (MRE). Advanced techniques, such as intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), T1- and T2- mapping are promising tools for detecting fibrosis deposition. Furthermore, the injection of hepatobiliary contrast agents has gained an important role not only in liver lesion characterization but also in assessing liver function, especially in CLDs. Finally, the broad development of radiomics signatures, applied to CT and MR, can be considered the next future approach to CLDs. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the current advancements and applications of both invasive and noninvasive imaging techniques in the evaluation and management of CLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cesare Maino
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy.
| | - Federica Vernuccio
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, Palermo 90127, Italy
| | - Roberto Cannella
- Section of Radiology - Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, Palermo 90127, Italy
| | - Laura Cristoferi
- Department of Gastroenterlogy, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Paolo Niccolò Franco
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Marco Carbone
- Department of Gastroenterlogy, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Pizza dell'Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20100 Milano, MI, Italy
| | - Francesco Cortese
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Faletti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Elisabetta De Bernardi
- Department of Medicine and Surgery - University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 33, 20090 Monza, MB, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Marco Gatti
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Davide Ippolito
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900 Monza, MB, Italy; Department of Medicine and Surgery - University of Milano Bicocca, Via Cadore 33, 20090 Monza, MB, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hao W, Xu Z, Lin H, Yan F. Using Dual-source Photon-counting Detector CT to Simultaneously Quantify Fat and Iron Content: A Phantom Study. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:4119-4128. [PMID: 38772799 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 04/21/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/23/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate the feasibility of using photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD CT) to simultaneously quantify fat and iron content MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phantoms with pure fat, pure iron and fat-iron deposition were scanned by two tube voltages (120 and 140 kV) and two image quality (IQ) settings (80 and 145). Using an iron-specific three-material decomposition algorithm, virtual noniron (VNI) and virtual iron content (VIC) images were generated at quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) strength levels 1-4. RESULTS Significant linear correlations were observed between known fat content (FC) and VNI for pure fat phantoms (r = 0.981-0.999, p < 0.001) and between known iron content (IC) and VIC for pure iron phantoms (r = 0.897-0.975, p < 0.001). In fat-iron phantoms, the measurement for fat content of 5-30% demonstrated good linearity between FC and VNI (r = 0.919-0.990, p < 0.001), and VNI were not affected by 75, 150, and 225 µmol/g iron overload (p = 0.174-0.519). The measurement for iron demonstrated a linear range of 75-225 µmol/g between IC and VIC (r = 0.961-0.994, p < 0.001) and VIC was not confounded by the coexisting 5%, 20%, and 30% fat deposition (p = 0.943-0.999). The Bland-Altman of fat and iron measurements were not significantly different at varying tube voltages and IQ settings (all p > 0.05). No significant difference in VNI and VIC at QIR 1-4. CONCLUSION PCD CT can accurately and simultaneously quantify fat and iron, including scan parameters with lower radiation dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanting Hao
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China.
| | - Zhihan Xu
- CT Collaboration, Siemens Healthcare Ltd., No. 278 Zhouzhu Road, Shanghai 200025, China.
| | - Huimin Lin
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China.
| | - Fuhua Yan
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China; Faculty of Medical Imaging Technology, College of Health Science and Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takayama Y, Sato K, Tanaka S, Murayama R, Jingu R, Yoshimitsu K. Effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction for improvement of image quality and liver tumor detectability in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3450-3463. [PMID: 38755452 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04374-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR -) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test. RESULTS BH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR - (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR - (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR - (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR - (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR - (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR - (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukihisa Takayama
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan.
| | - Keisuke Sato
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Ryo Murayama
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Ryotaro Jingu
- Radiology Center, Fukuoka University Hospital, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| | - Kengo Yoshimitsu
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-Ku, Fukuoka City, Fukuoka, 814-0180, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chatterjee D, Kanhere A, Doo FX, Zhao J, Chan A, Welsh A, Kulkarni P, Trang A, Parekh VS, Yi PH. Children Are Not Small Adults: Addressing Limited Generalizability of an Adult Deep Learning CT Organ Segmentation Model to the Pediatric Population. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024:10.1007/s10278-024-01273-w. [PMID: 39299957 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01273-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024]
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) tools developed on adult data sets may not generalize well to pediatric patients, posing potential safety risks. We evaluated the performance of TotalSegmentator, a state-of-the-art adult-trained CT organ segmentation model, on a subset of organs in a pediatric CT dataset and explored optimization strategies to improve pediatric segmentation performance. TotalSegmentator was retrospectively evaluated on abdominal CT scans from an external adult dataset (n = 300) and an external pediatric data set (n = 359). Generalizability was quantified by comparing Dice scores between adult and pediatric external data sets using Mann-Whitney U tests. Two DL optimization approaches were then evaluated: (1) 3D nnU-Net model trained on only pediatric data, and (2) an adult nnU-Net model fine-tuned on the pediatric cases. Our results show TotalSegmentator had significantly lower overall mean Dice scores on pediatric vs. adult CT scans (0.73 vs. 0.81, P < .001) demonstrating limited generalizability to pediatric CT scans. Stratified by organ, there was lower mean pediatric Dice score for four organs (P < .001, all): right and left adrenal glands (right adrenal, 0.41 [0.39-0.43] vs. 0.69 [0.66-0.71]; left adrenal, 0.35 [0.32-0.37] vs. 0.68 [0.65-0.71]); duodenum (0.47 [0.45-0.49] vs. 0.67 [0.64-0.69]); and pancreas (0.73 [0.72-0.74] vs. 0.79 [0.77-0.81]). Performance on pediatric CT scans improved by developing pediatric-specific models and fine-tuning an adult-trained model on pediatric images where both methods significantly improved segmentation accuracy over TotalSegmentator for all organs, especially for smaller anatomical structures (e.g., > 0.2 higher mean Dice for adrenal glands; P < .001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devina Chatterjee
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Adway Kanhere
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Florence X Doo
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jerry Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Andrew Chan
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexander Welsh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Pranav Kulkarni
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Annie Trang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vishwa S Parekh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul H Yi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, 262 Danny Thomas Place, Memphis, 38105 TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jeon SK, Joo I, Park J, Yoo J. Automated hepatic steatosis assessment on dual-energy CT-derived virtual non-contrast images through fully-automated 3D organ segmentation. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:967-976. [PMID: 38869829 PMCID: PMC11252222 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01833-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of volumetric CT attenuation-based parameters obtained through automated 3D organ segmentation on virtual non-contrast (VNC) images from dual-energy CT (DECT) for assessing hepatic steatosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included living liver donor candidates having liver DECT and MRI-determined proton density fat fraction (PDFF) assessments. Employing a 3D deep learning algorithm, the liver and spleen were automatically segmented from VNC images (derived from contrast-enhanced DECT scans) and true non-contrast (TNC) images, respectively. Mean volumetric CT attenuation values of each segmented liver (L) and spleen (S) were measured, allowing for liver attenuation index (LAI) calculation, defined as L minus S. Agreements of VNC and TNC parameters for hepatic steatosis, i.e., L and LAI, were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Correlations between VNC parameters and MRI-PDFF values were assessed using the Pearson's correlation coefficient. Their performance to identify MRI-PDFF ≥ 5% and ≥ 10% was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS Of 252 participants, 56 (22.2%) and 16 (6.3%) had hepatic steatosis with MRI-PDFF ≥ 5% and ≥ 10%, respectively. LVNC and LAIVNC showed excellent agreement with LTNC and LAITNC (ICC = 0.957 and 0.968) and significant correlations with MRI-PDFF values (r = - 0.585 and - 0.588, Ps < 0.001). LVNC and LAIVNC exhibited areas under the ROC curve of 0.795 and 0.806 for MRI-PDFF ≥ 5%; and 0.916 and 0.932, for MRI-PDFF ≥ 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION Volumetric CT attenuation-based parameters from VNC images generated by DECT, via automated 3D segmentation of the liver and spleen, have potential for opportunistic hepatic steatosis screening, as an alternative to TNC images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Kyung Jeon
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ijin Joo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea.
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Junghoan Park
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeongin Yoo
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 03080, Korea
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Santoro S, Khalil M, Abdallah H, Farella I, Noto A, Dipalo GM, Villani P, Bonfrate L, Di Ciaula A, Portincasa P. Early and accurate diagnosis of steatotic liver by artificial intelligence (AI)-supported ultrasonography. Eur J Intern Med 2024; 125:57-66. [PMID: 38490931 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2024.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Steatotic liver disease is the most frequent chronic liver disease worldwide. Ultrasonography (US) is commonly employed for the assessment and diagnosis. Few information is available on the possible use of artificial intelligence (AI) to ameliorate the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS An AI-based algorithm was developed using a dataset of US images. We prospectively enrolled 134 patients for algorithm validation. Patients underwent abdominal US and Proton Density Fat Fraction MRI scans (MRI-PDFF), assumed as reference technique. The hepatorenal index was manually calculated (HRIM) by 4 operators. An automatic hepatorenal index (HRIA) was obtained by the algorithm. The accuracy of HRIA to discriminate steatosis grades was evaluated by ROC analysis using MRI-PDFF cut-offs. RESULTS Overweight was 40 % of subjects (BMI 26.4 kg/cm2). The median HRIA was 1.11 (IQR 0.32) and the average of 4 manually calculated HRIM was 1.08 (IQR 0.26), with a 15 % inter-operator variability. Both HRIA (R = 0.79, P < 0.0001) and HRIM (R = 0.69, P < 0.0001) significantly correlated with liver fat percentage (MRI-PDFF). According to MRI-PDFF, 32 % of enrolled subjects had steatosis. Discrimination capacity by AUC between patient with steatosis and patient without steatosis was better for HRIA than HRIM (AUC: 0.87 vs. 0.82, respectively). ROC analysis showed an AUC = 0.98 for HRIA with 1.64 cut-off in distinguishing between mild and moderate/severe groups. CONCLUSIONS The use of AI improves accuracy and speed of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of liver steatosis. Further studies should evaluate the routine use of this technique in the management of liver steatosis at high cardio-metabolic risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Santoro
- PhD Program in Public Health, Clinical Medicine and Oncology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Eurisko Technology srl, Modugno, BA, Italy
| | - Mohamad Khalil
- Clinica Medica "A. Murri", Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro" Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Hala Abdallah
- PhD Program in Public Health, Clinical Medicine and Oncology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Clinica Medica "A. Murri", Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro" Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Ilaria Farella
- PhD Program in Public Health, Clinical Medicine and Oncology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Clinica Medica "A. Murri", Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro" Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Antonino Noto
- Clinica Medica "A. Murri", Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro" Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | - Leonilde Bonfrate
- Clinica Medica "A. Murri", Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro" Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Agostino Di Ciaula
- PhD Program in Public Health, Clinical Medicine and Oncology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Clinica Medica "A. Murri", Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro" Medical School, Bari, Italy
| | - Piero Portincasa
- PhD Program in Public Health, Clinical Medicine and Oncology, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePre-J), University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marti-Aguado D, Pazó J, Diaz-Gonzalez A, de Las Heras Páez de la Cadena B, Conthe A, Gallego Duran R, Rodríguez-Gandía MA, Turnes J, Romero-Gomez M. LiverAI: New tool in the landscape for liver health. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024; 47:646-648. [PMID: 38582150 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- David Marti-Aguado
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Javier Pazó
- AI and IT Solutions Manager, Spanish Association for the Study of the Liver (AEEH), Spain
| | - Alvaro Diaz-Gonzalez
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Clinical and Translational Research in Digestive Diseases Group, Valdecilla Research Institute (IDIVAL), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain
| | | | - Andres Conthe
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rocio Gallego Duran
- Digestive Diseases Unit and CIBERehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Miguel A Rodríguez-Gandía
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Turnes
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Pontevedra & IIS Galicia Sur, Spain
| | - Manuel Romero-Gomez
- Digestive Diseases Unit and CIBERehd, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (HUVR/CSIC/US), University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lian Z, Lu Q, Lin B, Chen L, Gong J, Hu Q, Wang H, Feng Y. A fully automatic parenchyma extraction method for MRI T2* relaxometry of iron loaded liver in transfusion-dependent patients. Magn Reson Imaging 2024; 109:18-26. [PMID: 38430975 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.02.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a fully automatic parenchyma extraction method for the T2* relaxometry of iron overload liver. METHODS A retrospective multicenter collection of liver MR examinations from 177 transfusion-dependent patients was conducted. The proposed method extended a semiautomatic parenchyma extraction algorithm to a fully automatic approach by introducing a modified TransUNet on the R2* (1/T2*) map for liver segmentation. Axial liver slices from 129 patients at 1.5 T were allocated to training (85%) and internal test (15%) sets. Two external test sets separately included 1.5 T data from 20 patients and 3.0 T data from 28 patients. The final T2* measurement was obtained by fitting the average signal of the extracted liver parenchyma. The agreement between T2* measurements using fully and semiautomatic parenchyma extraction methods was assessed using coefficient of variation (CoV) and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS Dice of the deep network-based liver segmentation was 0.970 ± 0.019 on the internal dataset, 0.960 ± 0.035 on the external 1.5 T dataset, and 0.958 ± 0.014 on the external 3.0 T dataset. The mean difference bias between T2* measurements of the fully and semiautomatic methods were separately 0.12 (95% CI: -0.37, 0.61) ms, 0.04 (95% CI: -1.0, 1.1) ms, and 0.01 (95% CI: -0.25, 0.23) ms on the three test datasets. The CoVs between the two methods were 4.2%, 4.8% and 2.0% on the internal test set and two external test sets. CONCLUSIONS The developed fully automatic parenchyma extraction approach provides an efficient and operator-independent T2* measurement for assessing hepatic iron content in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zifeng Lian
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing & Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence & Key Laboratory of Mental Health of the Ministry of Education & Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for Psychiatric Disorders, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiqi Lu
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing & Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence & Key Laboratory of Mental Health of the Ministry of Education & Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for Psychiatric Disorders, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bingquan Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lingjian Chen
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, China
| | - Jian Gong
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qiugen Hu
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, China
| | - Huafeng Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, China
| | - Yanqiu Feng
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing & Guangdong Province Engineering Laboratory for Medical Imaging and Diagnostic Technology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence & Key Laboratory of Mental Health of the Ministry of Education & Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for Psychiatric Disorders, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University (The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tamada D, van der Heijden RA, Weaver J, Hernando D, Reeder SB. Confidence maps for reliable estimation of proton density fat fraction and R 2 * in the liver. Magn Reson Med 2024; 91:2172-2187. [PMID: 38174431 PMCID: PMC10950533 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29986] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE The objective was to develop a fully automated algorithm that generates confidence maps to identify regions valid for analysis of quantitative proton density fat fraction (PDFF) andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ maps of the liver, generated with chemical shift-encoded MRI (CSE-MRI). Confidence maps are urgently needed for automated quality assurance, particularly with the emergence of automated segmentation and analysis algorithms. METHODS Confidence maps for both PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ maps are generated based on goodness of fit, measured by normalized RMS error between measured complex signals and the CSE-MRI signal model. Based on Cramér-Rao lower bound and Monte-Carlo simulations, normalized RMS error threshold criteria were developed to identify unreliable regions in quantitative maps. Simulation, phantom, and in vivo clinical studies were included. To analyze the clinical data, a board-certified radiologist delineated regions of interest (ROIs) in each of the nine liver segments for PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ analysis in consecutive clinical CSE-MRI data sets. The percent area of ROIs in areas deemed unreliable by confidence maps was calculated to assess the impact of confidence maps on real-world clinical PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ measurements. RESULTS Simulations and phantom studies demonstrated that the proposed algorithm successfully excluded regions with unreliable PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ measurements. ROI analysis by the radiologist revealed that 2.6% and 15% of the ROIs were placed in unreliable areas of PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ maps, as identified by confidence maps. CONCLUSION A proposed confidence map algorithm that identifies reliable areas of PDFF andR 2 * $$ {R}_2^{\ast } $$ measurements from CSE-MRI acquisitions was successfully developed. It demonstrated technical and clinical feasibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daiki Tamada
- Departments of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
| | - Rianne A. van der Heijden
- Departments of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jayse Weaver
- Departments of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
| | - Diego Hernando
- Departments of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
- Departments of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
| | - Scott B Reeder
- Departments of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
- Departments of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
- Departments of Biomedcal Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
- Departments of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison
- Departments of Emergency Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Fischer AM, Lechea N, Coxson HO. This Is What Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Looks Like: Potential of a Multiparametric MRI Protocol. Semin Liver Dis 2024; 44:226-238. [PMID: 38806158 DOI: 10.1055/a-2334-8525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is a prevalent condition with a broad spectrum defined by liver biopsy. This gold standard method evaluates three features: steatosis, activity (ballooning and lobular inflammation), and fibrosis, attributing them to certain grades or stages using a semiquantitative scoring system. However, liver biopsy is subject to numerous restrictions, creating an unmet need for a reliable and reproducible method for MASLD assessment, grading, and staging. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), offer the potential to assess quantitative liver parameters. This review aims to provide an overview of the available MRI techniques for the three criteria evaluated individually by liver histology. Here, we discuss the possibility of combining multiple MRI parameters to replace liver biopsy with a holistic, multiparametric MRI protocol. In conclusion, the development and implementation of such an approach could significantly improve the diagnosis and management of MASLD, reducing the need for invasive procedures and paving the way for more personalized treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja M Fischer
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany
| | - Nazim Lechea
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany
| | - Harvey O Coxson
- Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Biberach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zecevic M, Hasenstab KA, Wang K, Dhyani M, Cunha GM. Signal Intensity Trajectories Clustering for Liver Vasculature Segmentation and Labeling (LiVaS) on Contrast-Enhanced MR Images: A Feasibility Pilot Study. JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE 2024; 37:873-883. [PMID: 38319438 PMCID: PMC11031533 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-00970-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
This study aims to develop a semiautomated pipeline and user interface (LiVaS) for rapid segmentation and labeling of MRI liver vasculature and evaluate its time efficiency and accuracy against manual reference standard. Retrospective feasibility pilot study. Liver MR images from different scanners from 36 patients were included, and 4/36 patients were randomly selected for manual segmentation as referenced standard. The liver was segmented in each contrast phase and masks registered to the pre-contrast segmentation. Voxel-wise signal trajectories were clustered using the k-means algorithm. Voxel clusters that best segment the liver vessels were selected and labeled by three independent radiologists and a research scientist using LiVaS. Segmentation times were compared using a paired-sample t-test on log-transformed data. The agreement was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively using DSC for hepatic and portal vein segmentations. The mean segmentation time among four readers was significantly shorter than manual (3.6 ± 1.4 vs. 70.0 ± 29.2 min; p < 0.001), even when using a higher number of clusters to enhance accuracy. The DSC for portal and hepatic veins reached up to 0.69 and 0.70, respectively. LiVaS segmentations were overall of good quality, with variations in performance related to the presence/severity of liver disease, acquisition timing, and image quality. Our semi-automated pipeline was robust to different MRI vendors in producing segmentation and labeling of liver vasculature in agreement with expert manual annotations, with significantly higher time efficiency. LiVaS could facilitate the creation of large, annotated datasets for training and validation of neural networks for automated MRI liver vascularity segmentation. HIGHLIGHTS: Key Finding: In this pilot feasibility study, our semiautomated pipeline for segmentation of liver vascularity (LiVaS) on MR images produced segmentations with simultaneous labeling of portal and hepatic veins in good agreement with the manual reference standard but at significantly shorter times (mean LiVaS 3.6 ± 1.4 vs. mean manual 70.0 ± 29.2 min; p < 0.001). Importance: LiVaS was robust in producing liver MRI vascular segmentations across images from different scanners in agreement with expert manual annotations, with significant ly higher time efficiency, and therefore potential scalability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mladen Zecevic
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific St, BB308, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Kyle A Hasenstab
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kang Wang
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Manish Dhyani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific St, BB308, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Guilherme Moura Cunha
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1705 NE Pacific St, BB308, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Marti-Aguado D, Arnouk J, Liang JX, Lara-Romero C, Behari J, Furlan A, Jimenez-Pastor A, Ten-Esteve A, Alfaro-Cervello C, Bauza M, Gallen-Peris A, Gimeno-Torres M, Merino-Murgui V, Perez-Girbes A, Benlloch S, Pérez-Rojas J, Puglia V, Ferrández-Izquierdo A, Aguilera V, Giesteira B, França M, Monton C, Escudero-García D, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Serra MA, Bataller R, Romero-Gomez M, Marti-Bonmati L. Development and validation of an image biomarker to identify metabolic dysfunction associated steatohepatitis: MR-MASH score. Liver Int 2024; 44:202-213. [PMID: 37904633 DOI: 10.1111/liv.15766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Diagnosis of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) requires histology. In this study, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score was developed and validated to identify MASH in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Secondarily, a screening strategy for MASH diagnosis was investigated. METHODS This prospective multicentre study included 317 patients with biopsy-proven MASLD and contemporaneous MRI. The discovery cohort (Spain, Portugal) included 194 patients. NAFLD activity score (NAS) and fibrosis were assessed with the NASH-CRN histologic system. MASH was defined by the presence of steatosis, lobular inflammation, and ballooning, with NAS ≥4 with or without fibrosis. An MRI-based composite biomarker of Proton Density Fat Fraction and waist circumference (MR-MASH score) was developed. Findings were afterwards validated in an independent cohort (United States, Spain) with different MRI protocols. RESULTS In the derivation cohort, 51% (n = 99) had MASH. The MR-MASH score identified MASH with an AUC = .88 (95% CI .83-.93) and strongly correlated with NAS (r = .69). The MRI score lower cut-off corresponded to 88% sensitivity with 86% NPV, while the upper cut-off corresponded to 92% specificity with 87% PPV. MR-MASH was validated with an AUC = .86 (95% CI .77-.92), 91% sensitivity (lower cut-off) and 87% specificity (upper cut-off). A two-step screening strategy with sequential MR-MASH examination performed in patients with indeterminate-high FIB-4 or transient elastography showed an 83-84% PPV to identify MASH. The AUC of MR-MASH was significantly higher than that of the FAST score (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS The MR-MASH score has clinical utility in the identification and management of patients with MASH at risk of progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Marti-Aguado
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
| | - Joud Arnouk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Center for Liver Diseases, Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jia-Xu Liang
- Digestive Diseases Department, CIBERehd, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (HUVR/CSIC/US), Department of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Carmen Lara-Romero
- Digestive Diseases Department, CIBERehd, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (HUVR/CSIC/US), Department of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Jaideep Behari
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Center for Liver Diseases, Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alessandro Furlan
- Division of Abdominal Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ana Jimenez-Pastor
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain
| | - Amadeo Ten-Esteve
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
| | - Clara Alfaro-Cervello
- Pathology Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mónica Bauza
- Pathology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Gallen-Peris
- Digestive Disease Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - Marta Gimeno-Torres
- Digestive Disease Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Víctor Merino-Murgui
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alexandre Perez-Girbes
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Radiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Salvador Benlloch
- Digestive Disease Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
- CIBERehd, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Judith Pérez-Rojas
- Pathology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Víctor Puglia
- Pathology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Ferrández-Izquierdo
- Pathology Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Victoria Aguilera
- CIBERehd, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Bruno Giesteira
- Radiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuela França
- Radiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Cristina Monton
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Desamparados Escudero-García
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel A Serra
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ramon Bataller
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Center for Liver Diseases, Pittsburgh Liver Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Manuel Romero-Gomez
- Digestive Diseases Department, CIBERehd, Virgen del Rocio University Hospital, Seville, Spain
- Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (HUVR/CSIC/US), Department of Medicine, University of Seville, Seville, Spain
- University of Seville, Seville, Spain
| | - Luis Marti-Bonmati
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Radiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Servin F, Collins JA, Heiselman JS, Frederick-Dyer KC, Planz VB, Geevarghese SK, Brown DB, Jarnagin WR, Miga MI. Simulation of Image-Guided Microwave Ablation Therapy Using a Digital Twin Computational Model. IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2023; 5:107-124. [PMID: 38445239 PMCID: PMC10914207 DOI: 10.1109/ojemb.2023.3345733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Emerging computational tools such as healthcare digital twin modeling are enabling the creation of patient-specific surgical planning, including microwave ablation to treat primary and secondary liver cancers. Healthcare digital twins (DTs) are anatomically one-to-one biophysical models constructed from structural, functional, and biomarker-based imaging data to simulate patient-specific therapies and guide clinical decision-making. In microwave ablation (MWA), tissue-specific factors including tissue perfusion, hepatic steatosis, and fibrosis affect therapeutic extent, but current thermal dosing guidelines do not account for these parameters. This study establishes an MR imaging framework to construct three-dimensional biophysical digital twins to predict ablation delivery in livers with 5 levels of fat content in the presence of a tumor. Four microwave antenna placement strategies were considered, and simulated microwave ablations were then performed using 915 MHz and 2450 MHz antennae in Tumor Naïve DTs (control), and Tumor Informed DTs at five grades of steatosis. Across the range of fatty liver steatosis grades, fat content was found to significantly increase ablation volumes by approximately 29-l42% in the Tumor Naïve and 55-60% in the Tumor Informed DTs in 915 MHz and 2450 MHz antenna simulations. The presence of tumor did not significantly affect ablation volumes within the same steatosis grade in 915 MHz simulations, but did significantly increase ablation volumes within mild-, moderate-, and high-fat steatosis grades in 2450 MHz simulations. An analysis of signed distance to agreement for placement strategies suggests that accounting for patient-specific tumor tissue properties significantly impacts ablation forecasting for the preoperative evaluation of ablation zone coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frankangel Servin
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
| | - Jarrod A. Collins
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
| | - Jon S. Heiselman
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary ServiceMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | | | - Virginia B. Planz
- Department of RadiologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTN37235USA
| | | | - Daniel B. Brown
- Department of RadiologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTN37235USA
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Hepatopancreatobiliary ServiceMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterNew YorkNY10065USA
| | - Michael I. Miga
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
- Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleTN37235USA
- Department of RadiologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTN37235USA
- Department of Neurological SurgeryVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTN37235USA
- Department of OtolaryngologyVanderbilt University Medical CenterNashvilleTN37235USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xu Q, Feng M, Ren Y, Liu X, Gao H, Li Z, Su X, Wang Q, Wang Y. From NAFLD to HCC: Advances in noninvasive diagnosis. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 165:115028. [PMID: 37331252 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2023] [Revised: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has gradually become one of the major liver health problems in the world. The dynamic course of the disease goes through steatosis, inflammation, fibrosis, and carcinoma. Before progressing to carcinoma, timely and effective intervention will make the condition better, which highlights the importance of early diagnosis. With the further study of the biological mechanism in the pathogenesis and progression of NAFLD, some potential biomarkers have been discovered, and the possibility of their clinical application is gradually being discussed. At the same time, the progress of imaging technology and the emergence of new materials and methods also provide more possibilities for the diagnosis of NAFLD. This article reviews the diagnostic markers and advanced diagnostic methods of NAFLD in recent years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qinchen Xu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China
| | - Maoxiao Feng
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 250021, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yidan Ren
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China
| | - Xiaoyan Liu
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 250021, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Huiru Gao
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China
| | - Zigan Li
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China
| | - Xin Su
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China
| | - Qin Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, 107 Wenhua Xi Road, Jinan 250012, China.
| | - Yunshan Wang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 250021, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Solomon A, Cipăian CR, Negrea MO, Boicean A, Mihaila R, Beca C, Popa ML, Grama SM, Teodoru M, Neamtu B. Hepatic Involvement across the Metabolic Syndrome Spectrum: Non-Invasive Assessment and Risk Prediction Using Machine Learning. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5657. [PMID: 37685725 PMCID: PMC10488813 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are inextricably linked conditions, both of which are experiencing an upward trend in prevalence, thereby exerting a substantial clinical and economic burden. The presence of MetS should prompt the search for metabolic-associated liver disease. Liver fibrosis is the main predictor of liver-related morbidity and mortality. Non-invasive tests (NIT) such as the Fibrosis-4 index (FIB4), aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), aspartate aminotransferase-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (AAR), hepatic steatosis index (HIS), transient elastography (TE), and combined scores (AGILE3+, AGILE4) facilitate the detection of liver fibrosis or steatosis. Our study enrolled 217 patients with suspected MASLD, 109 of whom were diagnosed with MetS. We implemented clinical and biological evaluations complemented by transient elastography (TE) to discern the most robust predictors for liver disease manifestation patterns. Patients with MetS had significantly higher values of FIB4, APRI, HSI, liver stiffness, and steatosis parameters measured by TE, as well as AGILE3+ and AGILE4 scores. Machine-learning algorithms enhanced our evaluation. A two-step cluster algorithm yielded three clusters with reliable model quality. Cluster 1 contained patients without significant fibrosis or steatosis, while clusters 2 and 3 showed a higher prevalence of significant liver fibrosis or at least moderate steatosis as measured by TE. A decision tree algorithm identified age, BMI, liver enzyme levels, and metabolic syndrome characteristics as significant factors in predicting cluster membership with an overall accuracy of 89.4%. Combining NITs improves the accuracy of detecting patterns of liver involvement in patients with suspected MASLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adelaida Solomon
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Călin Remus Cipăian
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Mihai Octavian Negrea
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Adrian Boicean
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Romeo Mihaila
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Corina Beca
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Mirela Livia Popa
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Sebastian Mihai Grama
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
| | - Minodora Teodoru
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- County Clinical Emergency Hospital of Sibiu, 2–4 Corneliu Coposu Str., 550245 Sibiu, Romania;
| | - Bogdan Neamtu
- Faculty of Medicine, “Lucian Blaga” University, 550024 Sibiu, Romania; (A.S.); (A.B.); (R.M.); (M.L.P.); (S.M.G.); (M.T.); (B.N.)
- Department of Clinical Research, Pediatric Clinical Hospital Sibiu, 550166 Sibiu, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marti-Aguado D, Ten-Esteve A, Baracaldo-Silva CM, Crespo A, Coello E, Merino-Murgui V, Fernandez-Paton M, Alfaro-Cervello C, Sánchez-Martín A, Bauza M, Jimenez-Pastor A, Perez-Girbes A, Benlloch S, Pérez-Rojas J, Puglia V, Ferrández A, Aguilera V, Latorre M, Monton C, Escudero-García D, Bosch-Roig I, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Marti-Bonmati L. Pancreatic steatosis and iron overload increases cardiovascular risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1213441. [PMID: 37600695 PMCID: PMC10436077 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1213441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/18/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the prevalence of pancreatic steatosis and iron overload in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and their correlation with liver histology severity and the risk of cardiometabolic diseases. Method A prospective, multicenter study including NAFLD patients with biopsy and paired Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed. Liver biopsies were evaluated according to NASH Clinical Research Network, hepatic iron storages were scored, and digital pathology quantified the tissue proportionate areas of fat and iron. MRI-biomarkers of fat fraction (PDFF) and iron accumulation (R2*) were obtained from the liver and pancreas. Different metabolic traits were evaluated, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk was estimated with the atherosclerotic CVD score, and the severity of iron metabolism alteration was determined by grading metabolic hiperferritinemia (MHF). Associations between CVD, histology and MRI were investigated. Results In total, 324 patients were included. MRI-determined pancreatic iron overload and moderate-to severe steatosis were present in 45% and 25%, respectively. Liver and pancreatic MRI-biomarkers showed a weak correlation (r=0.32 for PDFF, r=0.17 for R2*). Pancreatic PDFF increased with hepatic histologic steatosis grades and NASH diagnosis (p<0.001). Prevalence of pancreatic steatosis and iron overload increased with the number of metabolic traits (p<0.001). Liver R2* significantly correlated with MHF (AUC=0.77 [0.72-0.82]). MRI-determined pancreatic steatosis (OR=3.15 [1.63-6.09]), and iron overload (OR=2.39 [1.32-4.37]) were independently associated with high-risk CVD. Histologic diagnosis of NASH and advanced fibrosis were also associated with high-risk CVD. Conclusion Pancreatic steatosis and iron overload could be of utility in clinical decision-making and prognostication of NAFLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Marti-Aguado
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
| | - Amadeo Ten-Esteve
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Department of Technologies for Health and Well-Being, Polytechnic University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Ana Crespo
- Digestive Disease Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - Elena Coello
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Víctor Merino-Murgui
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Matias Fernandez-Paton
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
| | - Clara Alfaro-Cervello
- Pathology Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Alba Sánchez-Martín
- Pathology Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Mónica Bauza
- Pathology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ana Jimenez-Pastor
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Salvador Benlloch
- Digestive Disease Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
- CIBERehd, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Judith Pérez-Rojas
- Pathology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Víctor Puglia
- Pathology Department, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | - Antonio Ferrández
- Pathology Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Victoria Aguilera
- Hepatology and Liver Transplantation Unit, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
- CIBERehd, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes Latorre
- Hepatology Unit, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Cristina Monton
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
| | - Desamparados Escudero-García
- Digestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Bosch-Roig
- Universitat Politècnica de València, Institute of Telecommunications and Multimedia Applications (iTEAM), Valencia, Spain
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM SL, Valencia, Spain
| | - Luis Marti-Bonmati
- Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230), La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain
- Radiology Department, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schattenberg JM, Chalasani N, Alkhouri N. Artificial Intelligence Applications in Hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:2015-2025. [PMID: 37088460 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
Over the past 2 decades, the field of hepatology has witnessed major developments in diagnostic tools, prognostic models, and treatment options making it one of the most complex medical subspecialties. Through artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning, computers are now able to learn from complex and diverse clinical datasets to solve real-world medical problems with performance that surpasses that of physicians in certain areas. AI algorithms are currently being implemented in liver imaging, interpretation of liver histopathology, noninvasive tests, prediction models, and more. In this review, we provide a summary of the state of AI in hepatology and discuss current challenges for large-scale implementation including some ethical aspects. We emphasize to the readers that most AI-based algorithms that are discussed in this review are still considered in early development and their utility and impact on patient outcomes still need to be assessed in future large-scale and inclusive studies. Our vision is that the use of AI in hepatology will enhance physician performance, decrease the burden and time spent on documentation, and reestablish the personalized patient-physician relationship that is of utmost importance for obtaining good outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörn M Schattenberg
- Metabolic Liver Research Program, I. Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Naga Chalasani
- Indiana University School of Medicine and Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Naim Alkhouri
- Arizona Liver Health and University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cebula M, Kufel J, Gruszczyńska K. A single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study comparing the number of non-diagnostic measurements ratio in the pSWE and SSI ultrasound elastography methods. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e33964. [PMID: 37266598 PMCID: PMC10237685 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000033964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The point shear wave elastography and supersonic shear imaging methods were compared regarding incorrect measurements during the liver examinations. A report-based, single-center, retrospective analysis of 425 liver elastography examinations was performed. A lower success ratio was observed for the point shear wave elastography method, as well as the older and obese patients pre-dominated in non-diagnostic studies. In our center experience, it is easier to obtain diagnostic data using the supersonic shear imaging method. However, further investigation of the subject is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Cebula
- Department of Radiodiagnostics, Invasive Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Jakub Kufel
- Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Gruszczyńska
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Yamada A, Kamagata K, Hirata K, Ito R, Nakaura T, Ueda D, Fujita S, Fushimi Y, Fujima N, Matsui Y, Tatsugami F, Nozaki T, Fujioka T, Yanagawa M, Tsuboyama T, Kawamura M, Naganawa S. Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2023:10.1007/s11547-023-01638-1. [PMID: 37165151 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-023-01638-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 04/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023]
Abstract
This review outlines the current status and challenges of the clinical applications of artificial intelligence in liver imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging based on a topic analysis of PubMed search results using latent Dirichlet allocation. LDA revealed that "segmentation," "hepatocellular carcinoma and radiomics," "metastasis," "fibrosis," and "reconstruction" were current main topic keywords. Automatic liver segmentation technology using deep learning is beginning to assume new clinical significance as part of whole-body composition analysis. It has also been applied to the screening of large populations and the acquisition of training data for machine learning models and has resulted in the development of imaging biomarkers that have a significant impact on important clinical issues, such as the estimation of liver fibrosis, recurrence, and prognosis of malignant tumors. Deep learning reconstruction is expanding as a new technological clinical application of artificial intelligence and has shown results in reducing contrast and radiation doses. However, there is much missing evidence, such as external validation of machine learning models and the evaluation of the diagnostic performance of specific diseases using deep learning reconstruction, suggesting that the clinical application of these technologies is still in development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Yamada
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
| | - Koji Kamagata
- Department of Radiology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenji Hirata
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Rintaro Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nakaura
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Daiju Ueda
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Abeno-Ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shohei Fujita
- Department of Radiology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Fushimi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Sakyoku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Fujima
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Matsui
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Kita-Ku, Okayama, Japan
| | - Fuminari Tatsugami
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Hiroshima University, Minami-Ku, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Taiki Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Fujioka
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yanagawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Tsuboyama
- Department of Radiology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita-City, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Fowler KJ. Gastrointestinal Imaging: What Has Shaped and What Will Shape Our Field Going Forward. Radiology 2023; 307:e223251. [PMID: 36916893 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.223251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Division of Body Imaging, University of California-San Diego, 6206 Lakewood St, San Diego, CA 92122
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Reeder SB, Yokoo T, França M, Hernando D, Alberich-Bayarri Á, Alústiza JM, Gandon Y, Henninger B, Hillenbrand C, Jhaveri K, Karçaaltıncaba M, Kühn JP, Mojtahed A, Serai SD, Ward R, Wood JC, Yamamura J, Martí-Bonmatí L. Quantification of Liver Iron Overload with MRI: Review and Guidelines from the ESGAR and SAR. Radiology 2023; 307:e221856. [PMID: 36809220 PMCID: PMC10068892 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.221856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
Accumulation of excess iron in the body, or systemic iron overload, results from a variety of causes. The concentration of iron in the liver is linearly related to the total body iron stores and, for this reason, quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) is widely regarded as the best surrogate to assess total body iron. Historically assessed using biopsy, there is a clear need for noninvasive quantitative imaging biomarkers of LIC. MRI is highly sensitive to the presence of tissue iron and has been increasingly adopted as a noninvasive alternative to biopsy for detection, severity grading, and treatment monitoring in patients with known or suspected iron overload. Multiple MRI strategies have been developed in the past 2 decades, based on both gradient-echo and spin-echo imaging, including signal intensity ratio and relaxometry strategies. However, there is a general lack of consensus regarding the appropriate use of these methods. The overall goal of this article is to summarize the current state of the art in the clinical use of MRI to quantify liver iron content and to assess the overall level of evidence of these various methods. Based on this summary, expert consensus panel recommendations on best practices for MRI-based quantification of liver iron are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott B. Reeder
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Takeshi Yokoo
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Manuela França
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Diego Hernando
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Ángel Alberich-Bayarri
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - José María Alústiza
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Yves Gandon
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Benjamin Henninger
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Claudia Hillenbrand
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Kartik Jhaveri
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Musturay Karçaaltıncaba
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Jens-Peter Kühn
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Amirkasra Mojtahed
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Suraj D. Serai
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Richard Ward
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - John C. Wood
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Jin Yamamura
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| | - Luis Martí-Bonmatí
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.B.R., D.H.), Medical Physics
(S.B.R., D.H.), Biomedical Engineering (S.B.R.), Medicine (S.B.R.), and
Emergency Medicine (S.B.R.), University of Wisconsin, Room 2472, 1111 Highland
Ave, Madison, WI 53705; Department of Radiology and Advanced Imaging Research
Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (T.Y.);
Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto,
Oporto, Portugal (M.F.); Biomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI),
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
(Á.A.B.); Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, Quibim SL,
Valencia, Spain (Á.A.B.); Osatek, Magnetic Resonance Unit, Donostia
University Hospital, San Sebastián, Spain (J.M.A.); Department of
Radiology, University Hospital and University of Rennes 1, Rennes, France
(Y.G.); Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck,
Austria (B.H.); Research Imaging NSW, Division of Research & Enterprise,
University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia (C.H.); Joint Department of
Medical Imaging (K.J.) and Department of Medicine (R.W.), University Health
Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Liver Imaging Team, Department
of Radiology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey (M.K.);
Institute and Policlinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University
Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden,
Germany (J.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (A.M.);
Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University
of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pa (S.D.S.); Division of
Pediatric Cardiology, Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles,
Calif (J.C.W.); Center of Radiology & Endoscopy, Department of Diagnostic
& Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf,
Hamburg, Germany (J.Y.); and Medical Imaging Department and Biomedical Imaging
Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe and Health
Research Institute, Valencia, Spain (L.M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Park HJ, Kim KW, Lee SS. Artificial intelligence in radiology and its application in liver disease. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, MACHINE LEARNING, AND DEEP LEARNING IN PRECISION MEDICINE IN LIVER DISEASES 2023:53-79. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-99136-0.00002-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
25
|
Liu X, Wang R, Zhu Z, Wang K, Gao Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang X, Zhang X, Wang X. Automatic segmentation of hepatic metastases on DWI images based on a deep learning method: assessment of tumor treatment response according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1285. [PMID: 36476181 PMCID: PMC9730687 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10366-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of treated tumors according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria is an important but time-consuming task in medical imaging. Deep learning methods are expected to automate the evaluation process and improve the efficiency of imaging interpretation. OBJECTIVE To develop an automated algorithm for segmentation of liver metastases based on a deep learning method and assess its efficacy for treatment response assessment according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. METHODS One hundred and sixteen treated patients with clinically confirmed liver metastases were enrolled. All patients had baseline and post-treatment MR images. They were divided into an initial (n = 86) and validation cohort (n = 30) according to the examined time. The metastatic foci on DWI images were annotated by two researchers in consensus. Then the treatment responses were assessed by the two researchers according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. A 3D U-Net algorithm was trained for automated liver metastases segmentation using the initial cohort. Based on the segmentation of liver metastases, the treatment response was assessed automatically with a rule-based program according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volumetric similarity (VS), and Hausdorff distance (HD). The area under the curve (AUC) and Kappa statistics were used to assess the accuracy and consistency of the treatment response assessment by the deep learning model and compared with two radiologists [attending radiologist (R1) and fellow radiologist (R2)] in the validation cohort. RESULTS In the validation cohort, the mean DSC, VS, and HD were 0.85 ± 0.08, 0.89 ± 0.09, and 25.53 ± 12.11 mm for the liver metastases segmentation. The accuracies of R1, R2 and automated segmentation-based assessment were 0.77, 0.65, and 0.74, respectively, and the AUC values were 0.81, 0.73, and 0.83, respectively. The consistency of treatment response assessment based on automated segmentation and manual annotation was moderate [K value: 0.60 (0.34-0.84)]. CONCLUSION The deep learning-based liver metastases segmentation was capable of evaluating treatment response according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, with comparable results to the junior radiologist and superior to that of the fellow radiologist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Zemin Zhu
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhuzhou Central Hospital, Zhuzhou, 412000, China
| | - Kexin Wang
- School of Basic Medical Sciences, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China
| | - Yue Gao
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Jialun Li
- Beijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100011, China
| | - Yaofeng Zhang
- Beijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100011, China
| | - Xiangpeng Wang
- Beijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Beijing, 100011, China
| | - Xiaodong Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No.8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
deSouza NM, van der Lugt A, Deroose CM, Alberich-Bayarri A, Bidaut L, Fournier L, Costaridou L, Oprea-Lager DE, Kotter E, Smits M, Mayerhoefer ME, Boellaard R, Caroli A, de Geus-Oei LF, Kunz WG, Oei EH, Lecouvet F, Franca M, Loewe C, Lopci E, Caramella C, Persson A, Golay X, Dewey M, O'Connor JPB, deGraaf P, Gatidis S, Zahlmann G. Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:159. [PMID: 36194301 PMCID: PMC9532485 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01287-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lesion/tissue segmentation on digital medical images enables biomarker extraction, image-guided therapy delivery, treatment response measurement, and training/validation for developing artificial intelligence algorithms and workflows. To ensure data reproducibility, criteria for standardised segmentation are critical but currently unavailable. METHODS A modified Delphi process initiated by the European Imaging Biomarker Alliance (EIBALL) of the European Society of Radiology (ESR) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Imaging Group was undertaken. Three multidisciplinary task forces addressed modality and image acquisition, segmentation methodology itself, and standards and logistics. Devised survey questions were fed via a facilitator to expert participants. The 58 respondents to Round 1 were invited to participate in Rounds 2-4. Subsequent rounds were informed by responses of previous rounds. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS Items with ≥ 75% consensus are considered a recommendation. These include system performance certification, thresholds for image signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and tumour-to-background ratios, spatial resolution, and artefact levels. Direct, iterative, and machine or deep learning reconstruction methods, use of a mixture of CE marked and verified research tools were agreed and use of specified reference standards and validation processes considered essential. Operator training and refreshment were considered mandatory for clinical trials and clinical research. Items with a 60-74% agreement require reporting (site-specific accreditation for clinical research, minimal pixel number within lesion segmented, use of post-reconstruction algorithms, operator training refreshment for clinical practice). Items with ≤ 60% agreement are outside current recommendations for segmentation (frequency of system performance tests, use of only CE-marked tools, board certification of operators, frequency of operator refresher training). Recommendations by anatomical area are also specified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandita M deSouza
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Aad van der Lugt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Luc Bidaut
- College of Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK
| | - Laure Fournier
- INSERM, Radiology Department, AP-HP, Hopital Europeen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, PARCC, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Lena Costaridou
- School of Medicine, University of Patras, University Campus, Rio, 26 500, Patras, Greece
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elmar Kotter
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Marion Smits
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marius E Mayerhoefer
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Caroli
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Edwin H Oei
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederic Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Manuela Franca
- Department of Radiology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Christian Loewe
- Division of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Department for Bioimaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS - Humanitas Research Hospital, via Manzoni 56, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Caroline Caramella
- Radiology Department, Hôpital Marie Lannelongue, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Plessis-Robinson, France
| | - Anders Persson
- Department of Radiology, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Xavier Golay
- Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marc Dewey
- Department of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pim deGraaf
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam, UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sergios Gatidis
- Department of Radiology, University of Tubingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Gudrun Zahlmann
- Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Oak Brook, IL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Deep Learning for the Automatic Segmentation of Extracranial Venous Malformations of the Head and Neck from MR Images Using 3D U-Net. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195593. [PMID: 36233460 PMCID: PMC9573069 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: It is difficult to characterize extracranial venous malformations (VMs) of the head and neck region from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) manually and one at a time. We attempted to perform the automatic segmentation of lesions from MRI of extracranial VMs using a convolutional neural network as a deep learning tool. Methods: T2-weighted MRI from 53 patients with extracranial VMs in the head and neck region was used for annotations. Preprocessing management was performed before training. Three-dimensional U-Net was used as a segmentation model. Dice similarity coefficients were evaluated along with other indicators. Results: Dice similarity coefficients in 3D U-Net were found to be 99.75% in the training set and 60.62% in the test set. The models showed overfitting, which can be resolved with a larger number of objects, i.e., MRI VM images. Conclusions: Our pilot study showed sufficient potential for the automatic segmentation of extracranial VMs through deep learning using MR images from VM patients. The overfitting phenomenon observed will be resolved with a larger number of MRI VM images.
Collapse
|
28
|
Imaging-based deep learning in liver diseases. Chin Med J (Engl) 2022; 135:1325-1327. [PMID: 35837673 PMCID: PMC9433077 DOI: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000002199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
|
29
|
Cao D, Li M, Liu Y, Jin H, Yang D, Xu H, Lv H, Liu JI, Zhang P, Zhang Z, Yang Z. Comparison of reader agreement, correlation with liver biopsy, and time-burden sampling strategies for liver proton density fat fraction measured using magnetic resonance imaging in patients with obesity: a secondary cross-sectional study. BMC Med Imaging 2022; 22:92. [PMID: 35581577 PMCID: PMC9112589 DOI: 10.1186/s12880-022-00821-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based proton density fat fraction (PDFF) has become popular for quantifying liver fat content. However, the variability of the region-of-interest (ROI) sampling strategy may result in a lack of standardisation of this technology. In an effort to establish an accurate and effective PDFF measurement scheme, this study assessed the pathological correlation, the reader agreement, and time-burden of different sampling strategies with variable ROI size, location, and number. Methods Six-echo spoiled gradient-recalled-echo magnitude-based fat quantification was performed for 50 patients with obesity, using a 3.0-T MRI scanner. Two readers used different ROI sampling strategies to measure liver PDFF, three times. Intra-reader and inter-reader agreement was evaluated using intra-class correlation coefficients and Bland‒Altman analysis. Pearson correlations were used to assess the correlation between PDFFs and liver biopsy. Time-burden was recorded. Results For pathological correlations, the correlations for the strategy of using three large ROIs in Couinaud segment 3 (S3 3L-ROI) were significantly greater than those for all sampling strategies at the whole-liver level (P < 0.05). For inter-reader agreement, the sampling strategies at the segmental level for S3 3L-ROI and using three large ROIs in Couinaud segment 6 (S6 3L-ROI) and the sampling strategies at the whole-liver level for three small ROIs per Couinaud segment (27S-ROI), one large ROI per Couinaud segment (9L-ROI), and three large ROIs per Couinaud segment (27S-ROI) had limits of agreement (LOA) < 1.5%. For intra-reader agreement, the sampling strategies at the whole-liver level for 27S-ROI, 9L-ROI, and 27L-ROI had both intraclass coefficients > 0.995 and LOAs < 1.5%. The change in the time-burden was the largest (100.80 s) when 9L-ROI was changed to 27L-ROI. Conclusions For hepatic PDFF measurement without liver puncture biopsy as the gold standard, and for general hepatic PDFF assessment, 9L-ROI sampling strategy at the whole-liver level should be used preferentially. For hepatic PDFF with liver puncture biopsy as the gold standard, 3L-ROI sampling strategy at the puncture site segment is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Cao
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Mengyi Li
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - He Jin
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Dawei Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Hui Xu
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Han Lv
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - JIa Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China
| | - Zhongtao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University and National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
| | - Zhenghan Yang
- Department of Radiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 95 Yong-an Road, Xi-Cheng District, Beijing, 100050, China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cunha GM, Fowler KJ. Automated Liver Segmentation for Quantitative MRI Analysis. Radiology 2021; 302:355-356. [PMID: 34783598 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021212306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Guilherme Moura Cunha
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195-0005 (G.M.C.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (K.J.F.)
| | - Kathryn J Fowler
- From the Department of Radiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195-0005 (G.M.C.); and Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, Calif (K.J.F.)
| |
Collapse
|