Bile salts induce or blunt cell proliferation in Barrett's esophagus in an acid-dependent fashion

The role of smoking and alcohol in mediating the effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on lung cancer: A Mendelian randomization study

Observational studies have suggested a positive association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and lung cancer, but due to the existence of confounders, it remains undetermined whether gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a causal association with lung cancer. Therefore, Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were applied to investigate the relationship between the two conditions. Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was utilized with summary genetic data from the European Bioinformatics Institute (602,604 individuals) and International Lung Cancer Consortium, which provides information on lung cancer and its histological subgroups. Furthermore, we used two-step Mendelian randomization and multivariable Mendelian randomization to estimate whether smoking initiation (311,629 cases and 321,173 controls) and alcohol intake frequency (n = 462,346) mediate any effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on lung cancer risk. The Mendelian randomization analyses indicated that gastroesophageal reflux disease was associated with and significantly increased the risk of lung cancer (ORIVW = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.18-1.54; p = 1.36 × 10-5). Smoking initiation and alcohol intake frequency mediated 35% and 3% of the total effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on lung cancer, respectively. The combined effect of these two factors accounted for 60% of the total effect. In conclusion, gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with an increased risk of lung cancer, and interventions to reduce smoking and alcohol intake may reduce the incidence of lung cancer.

HDAC6/HNF4α loop mediated by miR-1 promotes bile acids-induced gastric intestinal metaplasia

BACKGROUND

Gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) is considered a precancerous lesion, and bile acids (BA) play a critical role in the induction of IM. Ectopic expression of HNF4α was observed in a BA-induced IM cell model. However, the mechanisms underlying the upregulation of the protein in IM cells remains to be elucidated.

METHODS

The effects of HNF4α on gastric mucosal cells in vivo were identified by a transgenic mouse model and RNA-seq was used to screen downstream targets of deoxycholic acid (DCA). The expression of pivotal molecules and miR-1 was detected by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization in normal, gastritis and IM tissue slides or microarrays. The transcriptional regulation of HDAC6 was investigated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays.

RESULTS

The transgenic mouse model validated that HNF4α stimulated the HDAC6 expression and mucin secretion in gastric mucosa. Increased HDAC6 and HNF4α expression was also detected in the gastric IM cell model and patient specimens. HNF4α could bind to and activate HDAC6 promoter. In turn, HDAC6 enhanced the HNF4α protein level in GES-1 cells. Furthermore, miR-1 suppressed the expression of downstream intestinal markers by targeting HDAC6 and HNF4α.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the HDAC6/HNF4α loop regulated by miR-1 plays a critical role in gastric IM. Blocking the activation of this loop could be a potential approach to preventing BA-induced gastric IM or even gastric cancer (GC).

Esophageal 3D Culture Systems as Modeling Tools in Esophageal Epithelial Pathobiology and Personalized Medicine

The stratified squamous epithelium of the esophagus shows a proliferative basal layer of keratinocytes that undergo terminal differentiation in overlying suprabasal layers. Esophageal pathologies, including eosinophilic esophagitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma, cause perturbations in the esophageal epithelial proliferation-differentiation gradient. Three-dimensional (3D) culture platforms mimicking in vivo esophageal epithelial tissue architecture ex vivo have emerged as powerful experimental tools for the investigation of esophageal biology in the context of homeostasis and pathology. Herein, we describe types of 3D culture that are used to model the esophagus, including organotypic, organoid, and spheroid culture systems. We discuss the development and optimization of various esophageal 3D culture models; highlight the applications, strengths, and limitations of each method; and summarize how these models have been used to evaluate the esophagus under homeostatic conditions as well as under the duress of inflammation and precancerous/cancerous conditions. Finally, we present future perspectives regarding the use of esophageal 3D models in basic science research as well as translational studies with the potential for personalized medicine.

Chemoprevention in Barrett's Esophagus: Current Status

Chemoprevention in Barrett's esophagus is currently applied only in research settings. Identifying pathways that can be targeted by safe, pharmaceutical or natural compounds is key to expanding the scope of chemoprevention. Defining meaningful surrogate markers of cancer progression is critical to test the efficacy of chemopreventive approaches. Combinatorial chemoprevention that targets multiple components of the same pathway or parallel pathways could reduce the risk and improve the efficacy of chemoprevention. Here we discuss the role of chemoprevention as an independent or an adjuvant management option in BE-associated esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Chemoprevention in Barrett's oesophagus

Increasing incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma along with poor survival entails novel preventive strategies. Agents that target pro-oncogenic pathways in Barrett's mucosa could halt this neoplastic transformation. In this review, we will use epidemiological associations and molecular mechanisms to identify novel chemoprevention targets in Barrett's oesophagus. We will also discuss recent chemoprevention trials.

Operatively induced chronic reflux in rats: a suitable model for studying esophageal carcinogenesis?

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of esophageal reflux leading to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA) remain poorly understood. This study appraises critically an operatively induced chronic reflux rat model.

METHODS

We randomized 108 Sprague-Dawley rats into 2 experimental groups; one was performing esophagoduodenal (ED) anastomosis with or without gastrectomy to induce duodeno-esophageal reflux (DER group; n = 63), and the other involved duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER group; n = 45). Control groups included (i) Roux-en-Y esophagojejunal anastomosis, (ii) laparotomy alone, (iii) subtotal gastrectomy to induce duodenogastric reflux (DGR group), and (iv) the same procedure as in the DGER group plus proton pump inhibition (PPI group). The esophagus underwent histologic and molecular analyses.

RESULTS

The prevalence of Barrett's esophagus (BE), dysplasia, and EA in the experimental groups was 41%, 7%, and 11%, respectively. Histologic and molecular analyses in groups DER, DGER, and DGR suggested that BE occurred through de novo intestinal metaplasia and proximal migration of duodenal cells. No distant metastases were identified. The molecular characteristics of both BE and EA were similar to humans. BE was more common, and dysplasia and EA less frequent in the DER group when compared with the DGER group (44% vs 24% [P = .038] and 7% vs 25% [P = .012], respectively). Compared with the DGER group, carcinogenic sequence occurred less frequently in the PPI-treated group (P = .019).

CONCLUSION

Despite pathophysiologic differences with humans, the rat model of esophagoduodenostomy reproduces accurately histologic and molecular lesions in the carcinogenetic sequence of BE and allowed us to identify novel, tumor-associated proteins that may be potential biomarkers and new therapeutic targets in EA.

A combination of esomeprazole and aspirin reduces tissue concentrations of prostaglandin E(2) in patients with Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND& AIMS: Proton pump inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs might prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE), but there are limited data from clinical trials to support this concept. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial to assess the effects of the combination of aspirin (3 different doses) and esomeprazole on tissue concentrations of prostaglandin (PG) E(2) in patients with BE with no dysplasia or low-grade dysplasia.

METHODS

Participants were recruited through the multicenter Cancer Prevention Network and randomly assigned to groups that were given 40 mg esomeprazole twice daily in combination with an aspirin placebo once daily (arm A; n = 30), with 81 mg aspirin once daily (arm B; n = 47), or with 325 mg aspirin once daily (arm C; n = 45) for 28 days. We collected esophageal biopsy specimens before and after the intervention period to determine the absolute change in mean concentration of PGE(2) (the primary end point).

RESULTS

Based on data from 114 patients, baseline characteristics were similar among groups. The absolute mean tissue concentration of PGE(2) was reduced by 67.6 ± 229.68 pg/mL in arm A, 123.9 ± 284.0 pg/mL in arm B (P = .10 vs arm A), and 174.9 ± 263.62 pg/mL in arm C (P = .02 vs arm A).

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with esomeprazole, short-term administration of higher doses of aspirin, but not lower doses or no aspirin, significantly reduced tissue concentrations of PGE(2) in patients with BE with either no dysplasia or low-grade dysplasia. These data support further evaluation of higher doses of aspirin and esomeprazole to prevent esophageal adenocarcinoma in these patients. Clinical trial registration number NCT00474903.

Systematic review: the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and related neoplasia

BACKGROUND

Factors other than acid may play a role in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its complications.

AIM

To assessed the role of bile acids in the pathogenesis of GERD, Barrett's oesophagus and Barrett's-related neoplasia.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of computerised bibliographic databases for original articles involving humans or human oesophageal tissue or cells that assessed exposure to or manipulation of bile acids. Outcomes assessed included GERD symptoms; gross oesophageal injury; Barrett's oesophagus and related neoplasia; and intermediate markers of inflammation, proliferation or neoplasia.

RESULTS

Eighty-three original articles were included. In in vivo studies, bile acids concentrations were higher in the oesophageal aspirates of patients with GERD than controls, and bile acids infusions triggered GERD symptoms, especially in high concentrations or in combination with acid. In ex vivo/in vitro studies, bile acids stimulated squamous oesophageal cells and Barrett's epithelial cells to produce inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-8 and COX-2) and caused oxidative stress, DNA damage and apoptosis. They also induced squamous cells to change their gene expression pattern to resemble intestinal-type cells and caused Barrett's cells to increase expression of intestinal-type genes.

CONCLUSIONS

In aggregate, these studies suggest that bile acids may contribute to the pathogenesis of symptoms, oesophagitis and Barrett's metaplasia with related carcinogenesis in patients with GERD. However, all study results are not uniform and substantial differences in study parameters may explain at least some of this variation.

miR-200 family expression is downregulated upon neoplastic progression of Barrett’s esophagus

AIM: To investigate miR-200 family expression in Barrett’s epithelium, gastric and duodenal epithelia, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS: Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used to measure miR-200, ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of miR-200 targets was used to predict biological outcomes.

RESULTS: Barrett’s epithelium expressed lower levels of miR-141 and miR-200c than did gastric and duodenal epithelia (P < 0.001). In silico analysis indicated roles for the miR-200 family in molecular pathways that distinguish Barrett’s epithelium from gastric and duodenal epithelia, and which control apoptosis and proliferation. All miR-200 members were downregulated in adenocarcinoma (P < 0.02), and miR-200c expression was also downregulated in non-invasive epithelium adjacent to adenocarcinoma (P < 0.02). The expression of all miR-200 members was lower in Barrett’s epithelium derived high-grade dysplastic cell lines than in a cell line derived from benign Barrett’s epithelium. We observed significant inverse correlations between miR-200 family expression and ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression in Barrett’s epithelium and esophageal adenocarcinoma (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION: miR-200 expression might contribute to the anti-apoptotic and proliferative phenotype of Barrett’s epithelium and regulate key neoplastic processes in this epithelium.

Diagnosis and management of Barrett's esophagus: What's next?

The past decade has led to marked improvements in our understanding regarding the pathogenesis and risk of progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE), enhanced imaging technology to improve dysplasia detection, and the development and refinement of endoscopic techniques, such as mucosal ablation and endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR), to eradicate BE. However, many questions remain including identifying which, if any, candidates are most appropriate for screening for BE; how to improve current surveillance protocols; predicting which patients with BE will develop neoplastic progression; identifying the most appropriate candidates for endoscopic eradication therapy; developing algorithms for appropriate management posteradication; and understanding the potential role of chemoprophylaxis. This article describes potential future advances regarding screening, surveillance, risk stratification, endoscopic eradication therapies, and chemoprevention and provides a potential future management strategy for patients with BE.

Characteristics of gastro-esophageal reflux episodes in Barrett's esophagus, erosive esophagitis and healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Gastro-esophageal reflux is considered a major culprit in the pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Still, there is controversy on the role of weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux in BE. To compare characteristics of reflux episodes patients with BE, erosive esophagitis (EE), and healthy volunteers (HV).

METHODS

One hundred consecutive patients with BE (75 short-segment BE, 25 long-segment BE), 50 with EE and 48 HV underwent multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH off-therapy. We quantified esophageal acid exposure, characteristics, and proximal extension of reflux episodes.

KEY RESULTS

Total and acid reflux episodes gradually increased from HV [28 (17.5-43) and 18 (8-31)] to EE [73.5 (54-96) and 52 (39-68)], short-segment BE (SSBE) [83 (73.2-131) and 65 (43.3-95)] and long-segment BE (LSBE) [105 (102-187) and 77 (75-107)]. Weakly acidic reflux episodes were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in LSBE [36 (27.5-50.5)] and SSBE [34 (18.5-41)] compared to EE [21.5 (15-37)] and HV [19 (14-25)]. No differences in terms of proportion of acid, weakly acidic and weakly alkaline reflux were found [HV (49%-49%-2%) vs EE (68%-32%-1%) vs SSBE (65%-34%-1%) vs LSBE (69%-30%-1%); P = ns]. In LSBE, a higher percentage of reflux episodes (P < 0.05) reached the proximal esophagus (59%) compared with SSBE (43%).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

 Barrett esophagus patients have more severe reflux as shown by the number of acid and weakly acidic reflux episodes, re-reflux episodes and proximal migration. Given that PPI change only the pH of the refluxate, the role of weakly acidic reflux in Barrett's patients on acid suppressive therapy warrants further investigation.

The case for endoscopic treatment of non-dysplastic and low-grade dysplastic Barrett's esophagus

Non-dysplastic mucosa (ND-) in Barrett's esophagus (BE) shows clonal molecular aberrations, loss of cell cycle control, and other features of "neoplasia." These changes occur prior to morphologic expression of neoplasia (dysplasia). Morphologic evaluation of dysplasia is fraught with error, and, as a result, often leads to false-negative and false-positive diagnoses. Early "crypt dysplasia" is difficult to detect, and is often missed in routine biopsy specimens. Some studies show substantial progression rates of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), and crypt dysplasia, to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). Dysplasia, even when fully developed, may, in certain circumstances, be difficult to differentiate from non-dysplastic (regenerating) BE. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a safe and effective method for removing mucosa at risk of cancer. Given the difficulties of dysplasia assessment in mucosal biopsies, and the molecular characteristics of ND-BE, this technique should be considered for treatment of all BE patients, including those with ND or LGD. Post-ablation neo-squamous epithelium reveals no molecular abnormalities, and is biologically stable. Given that prospective randomized controlled trials of ablative therapy for ND-BE aiming at reducing EAC incidence and mortality are unlikely to be completed in the near future, endoscopic ablation is a valid management option. The success of RFA in achieving safe, uniform, reliable, and predictable elimination of BE allows surgeons to combine fundoplication with RFA. Currently, there is no type of treatment for dysplastic or non-dysplastic BE that achieves a complete response in 100% of patients, eliminates all risk of developing cancer, results in zero adverse events, is less expensive in terms of absolute costs than surveillance, is durable for 20+ years, or eliminates the need for surveillance. Regardless, RFA shows established safety, efficacy, durability, and cost-effective profiles that should be considered in the management of patients with non-dysplastic or low-grade dysplastic BE.

Nitric oxide-mediated invasion in Barrett's high-grade dysplasia and adenocarcinoma

Nitric oxide (NO) has been shown to induce double strand DNA breaks in Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and in other cancers has a role in invasion. The specific aims of this study were to investigate whether NO can induce invasion in cells representative of different stages of Barrett's progression and to determine possible underlying mechanisms. Physiological concentrations of NO that mimic luminal production of NO from dietary sources enhanced invasion in cell lines from high-grade dysplasia (GihTERT) and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (FLO) but not a non-dysplastic Barrett's cell line (QhTERT). Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction revealed that NO induced expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1, -3, -7, -9 and -10 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, -2 and -3 in these cell lines. Furthermore, ex vivo treatment of Barrett's biopsy samples with NO induced increases in MMP-1 and TIMP-1 expression, suggesting that NO enhances invasion through deregulating MMP and TIMP expression in epithelial cells. In keeping with these findings, microarray analysis and immunohistochemistry performed on biopsy samples showed enhanced expression of MMP-1, -3, -7 and -10 and TIMP-1 in the progression from non-dysplastic BO to adenocarcinoma, although this could not be directly attributed to the effect of NO. Thus, NO may play a role in Barrett's carcinogenesis through deregulating MMP and TIMP expression to enhance invasive potential.

Differences in the molecular biology of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, gastric cardia, and upper gastric third

Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus, gastric cardia, and upper gastric third are grouped in type I-III by the Siewert classification. This classification is based on the endoscopic localisation of the tumor center, and is the most important diagnostic tool to group these tumors. On a molecular level, there is currently no marker that would allow to differentiate the three different types. Furthermore, the Siewert classification was not uniformly used in the recent literature, making interpretation and generalization of these results difficult. However, several potential targets have been identified that may help to separate these tumors by molecular markers, and are summarized in this chapter.

Central nervous system plus autonomic nervous system disorders responsible for gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary diseases

Clinical digestive disorders depend on the non-adequate coupling of functioning of the gastrointestinal tract with that of its affluent systems, namely, the pancreatic exocrine and the hepato-biliary secretions. The secretion of gastrointestinal hormones is monitored by the peripheral autonomic nervous system. However, the latter is regulated by the central nervous system (CNS) circuitry localized at the medullary pontine segment of the CNS. In turn, both parasympathetic and adrenergic medullary circuitries are regulated by the pontine A5 noradrenergic (NA) and the dorsal raphe serotonergic nuclei, respectively. DR-5HT is positively correlated with the C1-Ad medullary nuclei (responsible for adrenal gland secretion), whereas the MR-5HT nucleus is positively correlated with the A5-NA pontomedullary nucleus. The latter is responsible for neural sympathetic activity (sympathetic nerves). Both types of sympathetic activities maintain an alternation with the peripheral parasympathetic branch, which is positively correlated with the enterochromaffin cells that secrete serotonin. Serotonin displays hormonal antagonism to the circulating catecholamines.

Induction of intestinalization in human esophageal keratinocytes is a multistep process

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is the replacement of normal squamous esophageal mucosa with an intestinalized columnar epithelium. The molecular mechanisms underlying its development are not understood. Cdx2 is an intestine-specific transcription factor that is ectopically expressed in BE, but its role in this process is unclear. Herein, we describe a novel cell culture model for BE. Retroviral-mediated Cdx2 expression in immortalized human esophageal keratinocytes [EPC-human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)] could transiently be established but not maintained and was associated with a reduction in cell proliferation. Coexpression of cyclin D1, but not a dominant-negative p53, rescued proliferation in the Cdx2-expressing cells. Cdx2 expression in the EPC-hTERT.D1 cells decreased cell proliferation but did not induce intestinalization. We investigated for other treatments to enhance intestinalization and found that acidic culture conditions uniformly killed EPC-hTERT.D1.Cdx2 cells. However, treatment with 5-aza-2-deoxycytidine (5-AzaC) to demethylate epigenetically silenced genes did appear to be tolerated. Multiple Cdx2 target genes, markers of intestinal differentiation and markers of BE, were induced by this 5-AzaC treatment. More interestingly, the expression level of several of these genes was enhanced only in the EPC-hTERT.D1-Cdx2 cells treated with 5-AzaC. Two of these, SLC26a3/DRA (downregulated in adenoma) and Na+/H+ exchanger 2 (NHE2), were not previously known to be elevated in BE; however, we confirmed their elevation in BE tissue samples. 5-AzaC treatment also induced cell senescence, even at low doses. We conclude that ectopic proliferation signals, alterations in epigenetic gene regulation and the inhibition of tumor suppressor mechanisms are required for Cdx2-mediated intestinalization of human esophageal keratinocytes in BE.

Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus is an important step in the pathway to esophageal adenocarcinoma. Since most patients with Barrett's esophagus are undiagnosed and patients present with advanced adenocarcinoma de novo, prognosis for this disease remains poor. To identify those people with Barrett's esophagus who are at particular risk many new technologies are being developed. In association with these advances in risk stratification, progress is being made in the endoscopic treatment of Barrett's. Chemoprevention is also an area of interest and trials are underway.

Physiological and molecular analysis of acid loading mechanisms in squamous and columnar-lined esophagus

Barrett's esophagus (BE) may be an adaptive cellular response to repeated acid exposure. The aims of this study were to compare intracellular acid loading in BE cells with normal squamous esophageal cells. Primary squamous and BE cells were obtained endoscopically and cultured for up to 24 h. Barrett's adenocarcinoma cell lines TE7 and OE-33 were compared with a normal esophageal (NE) cell line OE-21. Extracellular pH was lowered to 6.0 using HCl; specific ion exchangers were blocked pharmacologically and pH microfluorimetry was performed using 2'7'-bis(carboxyethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein. The effect of prolonged acid preincubations and repeated acid exposure on acid loading and recovery were examined. Acid loading was greater in primary BE than NE cells (DeltapHi -0.22 +/- 0.08 vs.-0.13 +/- 0.01) and maximal in the BE carcinoma cell line TE7 (DeltapHi -0.30 +/- 0.01). Whereas TE7 cells were able to recover fully from repeated acid exposure, OE-21 cells remained profoundly acidic. BE primary and transformed cells utilize DIDS inhibitable sodium-independent chloride/bicarbonate exchange as well as sodium/hydrogen ion exchange for acid loading. In contrast, SE only requires sodium-independent chloride/bicarbonate exchange for acidification. The degree of acid loading is greater in BE than NE cells and it occurs via dual ion exchangers similar to gastric mucosa. Only Barrett's epithelial cells can maintain a physiological pHi following prolonged and repeated reflux exposure, which may confer a teleological advantage.

The effect of oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid and high-dose proton pump inhibitors on the histology of Barrett's esophagus

Bile acids may play a role in the pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Bile composition can be influenced by oral administration of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). We prospectively investigated the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) supplemented with UDCA in vivo in patients with BE. Patients with no or low-grade dysplasia who were clinically asymptomatic on PPI were eligible for the study. In order to exclude the effects of acid reflux, all patients were initially treated with 40 mg esomeprazole (ESO) twice daily for 6 months and continued on this dose till the end of the study (t = 12 months). During a period of 6 months (t = 6 month - t = 12 month) patients were treated with oral UDCA (600 mg twice daily). Patients underwent endoscopy at t = 0 months, t = 6 months and t = 12 months with multiple biopsies of the distal and proximal BE segment, normal squamous and gastric cardia. In addition, pH was measured at t = 0 months and t = 6 months using a BRAVO wireless pH capsule. Bile was sampled at the beginning of the UDCA treatment and 6 months later (t = 6 month and t = 12 month). All biopsies were reviewed for the extent of metaplasia, dysplasia, and acute and chronic inflammation. In addition, proliferation (Ki67), differentiation (villin, cytokeratins 7 and 20) and inflammation (COX-2) were investigated by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Nine patients (mean age 60 years, median BE length 7 cm) were included, of whom six had no dysplasia and three had low-grade dysplasia. pH measurements revealed a normal acid exposure in most patients at t = 0 and t = 6 months. In addition, bile composition analysis demonstrated the efficacy of UDCA. Combining the results of both phases of the study, no significant changes were seen in any of the histological or IHC parameters. Differentiation and proliferation parameters showed no significant changes. In this study, in BE patients who were clinically asymptomatic on PPI, increasing the PPI dose to the maximum for 6 months followed by the addition of UDCA for 6 months did not result in significant histological or IHC changes in their BE.

Prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in individuals without typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND: Barrett’s esophagus, the major risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, is detected in approximately 10%-14% of individuals submitted to upper endoscopy for the assessment of gastroesophageal reflux disease related symptoms. Prevalence studies of Barrett’s esophagus in individuals without typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease have reported rates ranging from 0.6% to 25%. AIM: To determine the prevalence of Barrett’s in a Brazilian population older than 50 years without typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. METHODS: A total of 104 patients (51 men), mean age of 65 years, with an indication for upper endoscopy but without symptoms of heartburn and/or acid regurgitation (determined with a validated questionnaire) were recruited. Subjects submitted to upper endoscopic examination in the last 10 years or using antisecretory medication (proton pump inhibitors) during the last 6 months were not included. Methylene blue chromoscopy was performed during the endoscopic exam to facilitate identification of the metaplastic epithelium. RESULTS: Barrett’s esophagus was diagnosed endoscopically and confirmed by histology in four patients, all of them males. The metaplastic segment was short (less than 3 cm) and free of dysplasia in all patients. The prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus was 7.75% in the male population and 3.8% in the general population studied. CONCLUSION: Due to the low prevalence of Barrett’s esophagus found in the present study, associated with the finding of short-segment Barrett’s esophagus in all cases diagnosed and the absence of dysplasia in the material analyzed, endoscopic screening for Barrett’s esophagus in patients above the age of 50 without the classical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease is not indicated for the Brazilian population.

Nitric oxide and acid induce double-strand DNA breaks in Barrett's esophagus carcinogenesis via distinct mechanisms

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The luminal microenvironment including acid and nitric oxide (NO) has been implicated in Barrett's esophagus carcinogenesis. We investigated the ability of acid and NO to induce DNA damage in esophageal cells.

METHODS

Transformed and primary Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma cells were exposed to either acid, (pH 3.5), +/- antioxidant or NO from a donor or generated by acidification of nitrite in the presence of ascorbate +/- NO scavenger. Phosphorylation of histone H2AX and the neutral comet assay were used to detect DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species and NO were detected with fluorescent dyes. Mitochondrial viability was measured with a rhodamine dye. Long-term survival was assessed by clonogenic assay.

RESULTS

Exposure to acid (pH 3.5) for > or =15 minutes induced DSBs in all cell lines (P < .05). There was a concomitant increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species in the absence of mitochondrial damage, and pretreatment with antioxidants inhibited DNA damage. Exposure to physiologic concentrations of NO produced from the NO donor or acidification of salivary nitrite induced DSBs in a dose- (>25 micromol/L) and cell-dependent manner (adenocarcinoma >Barrett's esophagus, P < .05). This occurred preferentially in S-phase cells consistent with stalled replication forks and was blocked with a NO scavenger. NO also induced DSBs in primary Barrett's esophagus cells treated ex vivo. Cells were able to survive when exposed to acid and NO.

CONCLUSIONS

Both acid and NO have the potential to generate DSBs in the esophagus and via distinct mechanisms.

Consortium approach to identifying genes for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma

Consortium approaches are becoming increasingly more common for a variety of chronic diseases and conditions. The Familial Barrett's Esophagus Consortium began in 1998 and was originally designed to investigate the evidence for familial aggregation of Barrett's esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, or esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma. The authors have shown that this phenotype does in fact aggregate in families; therefore, linkage analyses are currently underway. The Consortium, whose goals and membership are growing, has been successfully established and maintained. In this article, details about the research design and membership are provided, as are the current and future goals of the Consortium. The authors believe that this time is especially exciting for research in this area, and they look forward to answering more questions relevant to these diseases with regard to both genetic and environmental risk factors to ultimately design more effective treatment and prevention strategies.

Downregulation of p63 upon exposure to bile salts and acid in normal and cancer esophageal cells in culture

p63 is a member of the p53 protein family that regulates differentiation and morphogenesis in epithelial tissues and is required for the formation of squamous epithelia. Barrett's mucosa is a glandular metaplasia of the squamous epithelium that develops in the lower esophagus in the context of chronic, gastroesophageal reflux and is considered as a precursor for adenocarcinoma. Normal or squamous cancer esophageal cells were exposed to deoxycholic acid (DCA, 50, 100, or 200 microM) and chenodeoxycholic and taurochenodeoxycholic acid at pH 5. p63 and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expressions were studied by Western blot and RT-PCR. DCA exposure at pH 5 led to a spectacular decrease in the levels of all isoforms of the p63 proteins. This decrease was observed within minutes of exposure, with a synergistic effect between DCA and acid. Within the same time frame, levels of p63 mRNA were relatively unaffected, whereas levels of COX-2, a marker of stress responses often induced in Barrett's mucosa, were increased. Similar results were obtained with chenodeoxycholic acid but not its taurine conjugate at pH 5. Proteasome inhibition by lactacystin or MG-132 partially blocked the decrease in p63, suggesting a posttranslational degradation mechanism. These results show that combined exposure to bile salt and acid downregulates a critical regulator of squamous differentiation, providing a mechanism to explain the replacement of squamous epithelium by a glandular metaplasia upon exposure of the lower esophagus to gastric reflux.

Gene expression changes associated with Barrett's esophagus and Barrett's-associated adenocarcinoma cell lines after acid or bile salt exposure

BACKGROUND

Esophageal reflux and Barrett's esophagus represent two major risk factors for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Previous studies have shown that brief exposure of the Barrett's-associated adenocarcinoma cell line, SEG-1, or primary cultures of Barrett's esophageal tissues to acid or bile results in changes consistent with cell proliferation. In this study, we determined whether similar exposure to acid or bile salts results in gene expression changes that provide insights into malignant transformation.

METHODS

Using previously published methods, Barrett's-associated esophageal adenocarcinoma cell lines and primary cultures of Barrett's esophageal tissue were exposed to short pulses of acid or bile salts followed by incubation in culture media at pH 7.4. A genome-wide assessment of gene expression was then determined for the samples using cDNA microarrays. Subsequent analysis evaluated for statistical differences in gene expression with and without treatment.

RESULTS

The SEG-1 cell line showed changes in gene expression that was dependent on the length of exposure to pH 3.5. Further analysis using the Gene Ontology, however, showed that representation by genes associated with cell proliferation is not enhanced by acid exposure. The changes in gene expression also did not involve genes known to be differentially expressed in esophageal adenocarcinoma. Similar experiments using short-term primary cultures of Barrett's esophagus also did not result in detectable changes in gene expression with either acid or bile salt exposure.

CONCLUSION

Short-term exposure of esophageal adenocarcinoma SEG-1 cells or primary cultures of Barrett's esophagus does not result in gene expression changes that are consistent with enhanced cell proliferation. Thus other model systems are needed that may reflect the impact of acid and bile salt exposure on the esophagus in vivo.

Bile acids and Barrett's oesophagus: a sine qua non or coincidence?

BACKGROUND

Barrett's oesophagus (BO), a premalignant condition associated with the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), is thought to be a consequence of chronic duodeno-gastro-oesophageal reflux. Of the refluxates, bile acids, either alone or in combination with acid, are probably the most important.

METHODS

Analysis of the literature on the role played by bile acids in inducing BO and/or progression to OAC.

RESULTS

Combined pH and Bilitec 2000 (as a measure of bile reflux) monitoring and oesophageal aspiration studies in humans suggest a combined role for bile acids, particularly taurine conjugated bile acids, in causing oesophageal mucosal injury. Evidence from animal models has demonstrated that duodenal juice alone is also able to induce BO and/or OAC. Likewise, ex vivo studies with biopsies from BO patients show that increased proliferation and cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression are present after a pulsed exposure to acid or conjugated bile acids, but not if acid and bile acids are combined. Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been shown to decrease the biliary component of the refluxate. There is some evidence that PPIs are able to reduce neoplastic progression in BO. On the other hand, chronic PPIs can also stimulate bacterial overgrowth, which can result in increased production of secondary bile acids, particularly deoxycholic acid, in the stomach. Deoxycholic acid has been demonstrated to have a tumour-promoting capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

It is unknown what factors of the refluxate (acid and/or bile) induce BO and/or promote carcinogenesis, but there is evidence that secondary bile acids play a role. A better understanding of the molecular steps involved in the induction of BO, and the role of bile acids herein, may identify targets at which preventive therapies can be directed.

Multistage carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus

The multistage carcinogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma is a process of clonal evolution within Barrett's esophagus neoplasms. The initiating event for Barrett's esophagus is unknown, but is associated with chronic gastric reflux which probably also promotes progression. Inactivation of both alleles of CDKN2A appear to be early events causing clonal expansion. Clones with TP53 inactivated expand if they have already inactivated CDKN2A. After TP53 has been inactivated, tetraploid and aneuploid clones tend to develop. The final events that lead to invasion and metastasis are unknown. Evolutionary biology provides important tools to understand clonal evolution in progression and cancer prevention.

Bile salt exposure increases proliferation through p38 and ERK MAPK pathways in a non-neoplastic Barrett's cell line

Bile reflux has been implicated in the neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus (BE). Bile salts increase proliferation in a Barrett's-associated adenocarcinoma cell line (SEG-1 cells) by activating ERK and p38 MAPK pathways. However, it is not clear that these findings in cancer cells are applicable to non-neoplastic cells of benign BE. We examined the effect of bile salts on three human cell lines: normal esophageal squamous (NES) cells, non-neoplastic Barrett's cells (BAR cells), and SEG-1 cells. We hypothesized that bile salt exposure activates proproliferative and antiapoptotic pathways to promote increased growth in BE. NES, BAR, and SEG-1 cells were exposed to glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDA) at a neutral pH for 5 min. Proliferation was measured by Coulter counter cell counts and a 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation assay. GCDA-induced MAPK activation was examined by Western blot analysis for phosphorylated ERK and p38. Apoptosis was measured by TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling and annexin V staining after GCDA and UV-B exposure. Statistical significance was determined by ANOVA. NES cells exposed to 5 min of GCDA did not increase cell number. In BAR cells, GCDA exposure increased cell number by 31%, increased phosphorylated p38 and ERK levels by two- to three-fold, increased BrdU incorporation by 30%, and decreased UV-induced apoptosis by 15-20%. In conclusion, in a non-neoplastic Barrett's cell line, GCDA exposure induces proliferation by activation of both ERK and p38 MAPK pathways. These findings suggest a potential mechanism whereby bile reflux may facilitate the neoplastic progression of BE.

Regression of intestinal metaplasia to cardiac or fundic mucosa in patients with Barrett's esophagus submitted to vagotomy, partial gastrectomy and duodenal diversion. A prospective study of 78 patients with more than 5 years of follow up

BACKGROUND

Regression of intestinal metaplasia to cardiac mucosa in patients with Barrett's (BE) esophagus could alter the natural history of BE.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the regression of intestinal metaplasia to cardiac mucosa in patients followed more than 5 years after operation, by repeated endoscopy with biopsy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 78 patients with BE submitted to combined vagotomy, antrectomy (an antireflux procedure), and Roux-en-Y gastrointestinal reconstruction with more than 60 months follow up. Patients were divided in 3 groups: (1) 31 with short-segment BE (< or =30 mm length); (2) 42 with long-segment BE (31 to 99 mm length); and (3) 5 with extra-long-segment BE (> or =100 mm). Each patient had at least three endoscopic procedures with multiple biopsies during a mean follow up of 95 months (range, 60-220 months). Acid and duodenal reflux were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent of patients with short segment BE had regression to cardiac mucosa at a mean of 40 months after operation. Sixty-two percent of patients with long segment BE had regression to cardiac mucosa at a mean of 47 months postoperatively. No regression occurred in the 5 patients with extra-long segment BE. In 20% of patients, regression to fundic mucosa occurred between 78 to 94 months after surgery. One patient progressed to low grade dysplasia, but no patient progressed to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Acid and duodenal reflux studies demonstrated that in asymptomatic patients, reflux was abolished; 90% of the patients had a Visick grade of 1 or 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Vagotomy and antrectomy combined with duodenal bile diversion abolish acid and duodenal reflux into the distal esophagus in patients with BE, which is accompanied by a regression of BE from intestinal to cardiac or fundic mucosa in about 60% of patients. This regression is time dependent and varies directly with the length of BE. The potential for an antineoplastic effect, especially in young patients with long segment BE, suggests that this operation may become an attractive option as a definitive surgical treatment. Patients with short segment BE submitted to this procedure behave similar to patients submitted to Nissen fundoplication, and therefore in these patients, we do not advocate this complex operation.

Mechanisms of disease: Carcinogenesis in Barrett's esophagus

The pathogenesis of cancer in Barrett's esophagus is multifactorial. Gastroesophageal reflux seems to be important in the initiation of Barrett's esophagus, but its role in promoting carcinogenesis has yet to be established. Diet, lifestyle and carcinogens, especially the nitrates, may be important in the development of carcinogenesis, and require further investigation. Inhibition of reflux-stimulated inflammatory changes, for example by inhibiting cyclooxygenase, holds promise for decreasing cancer progression. Similarly, dietary and lifestyle modification used in the management of reflux may also help to prevent the development of esophageal cancer. The molecular changes that are associated with the development of cancer in Barrett's esophagus offer several potential areas of intervention to prevent and manage esophageal cancer. Limiting cell growth, increasing apoptosis of damaged cells, limiting cell invasion and angiogenesis factors could be useful to accomplish this goal. Having a greater understanding of the pathogenesis of this condition can only help to develop more management options in the future.

Systematic review: the chemoprevention of oesophageal adenocarcinoma

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing in the UK faster than any other malignancy. Despite its relatively poor prognosis and the limited success of existing treatments, there is enthusiasm that chemopreventive agents might be able to stem the transition from normal squamous epithelium to adenocarcinoma. We discuss gastro-oesophageal reflux as the main risk factor for the development of Barrett's metaplasia, the only known precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Treatment options for reflux disease are considered with regard to their effects on cancer risk. Recent advances in the molecular and cell biology of Barrett's are outlined, and potential targets for chemoprevention examined. Available treatments for reflux disease have not convincingly altered the likelihood of cancer development. Epidemiological and animal studies support the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs as potential chemopreventive agents. Dietary agents, however, have a more favourable side-effect profile and may prove to be an attractive alternative, although more work is needed to fully explore this prospect.

Risk factors, DNA damage, and disease progression in Barrett's esophagus

Esophageal adenocarcinoma develops on a background of Barrett's esophagus. A number of risk factors have been linked to both conditions, including gastroesophageal reflux and smoking. However, the molecular mechanisms by which these factors influence disease progression remain unclear. One possibility is that risk factors generate promutagenic DNA damage in the esophagus. The comet assay was used to measure DNA damage in esophageal (Barrett's and squamous) and gastric mucosa of Barrett's patients with (n = 24) or without (n = 50) associated adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia in comparison with control patients (squamous mucosa) without Barrett's esophagus (n = 64). Patients completed a questionnaire detailing exposure to some of the known risk factors for Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma. In Barrett's esophagus patients, DNA damage was higher in Barrett's mucosa compared with normal esophageal and gastric mucosa (P < 0.001). In addition, the highest quartile of DNA damage in Barrett's mucosa was associated with an increased risk (odds ratio, 9.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-83.4; P = 0.044) of developing adenocarcinoma or high-grade dysplasia compared with DNA damage levels in the lowest quartile. Smoking was associated with higher DNA damage in squamous epithelium in all patient groups (P < 0.01) and in Barrett's mucosa (P < 0.05) in Barrett's esophagus patients only. In controls only, current reflux was associated with higher DNA damage, whereas anti-inflammatory drug use resulted in lower levels. Collectively, these data imply a genotoxic insult to the premalignant Barrett's mucosa that may explain the genetic instability in this tissue and the progression to adenocarcinoma. There is an indication for a role for smoking in inducing DNA damage in esophageal mucosa but an understanding of the role of reflux requires further investigation.

Barrett's esophagus in females: a comparative analysis of risk factors in females and males

OBJECTIVES

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms occur with similar frequency in males and females, yet Barrett's esophagus is less common in females. The reason for this disparity is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the factors related to Barrett's in females.

METHODS

The records of 796 patients (462 male, 334 female) evaluated from 1990 to 2000 for symptoms of reflux were retrospectively reviewed. Physiologic abnormalities based on results of endoscopic, motility, pH, and Bilitec testing were identified, and factors related to the presence of Barrett's were determined using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Females with reflux symptoms were significantly less likely to have a positive 24-h pH test, a defective lower esophageal sphincter, or a hiatal hernia than males with reflux symptoms. Further, females with reflux on the basis of an abnormal 24-h pH test had significantly less esophageal acid exposure than males with reflux. In contrast, esophageal exposure to refluxed acid and bilirubin was similar in females (n = 50) and males (n = 136) with Barrett's. On multivariable analysis increased esophageal bilirubin exposure was the only significant factor associated with the presence of Barrett's in male and female patients with reflux disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Females with reflux symptoms have less esophageal acid exposure on average than males. However, females and males with Barrett's have a similar severity of reflux, and the female gender does not protect against the development of Barrett's in the setting of advanced reflux disease. Esophageal bilirubin exposure is the major risk factor for the presence of Barrett's in patients with reflux disease.

Gene therapy for esophageal carcinoma: the use of an explant model to test adenoviral vectors ex vivo

Adenoviral gene therapy might be a promising therapeutic strategy for esophageal carcinoma. However, adenoviral transduction efficacy in vivo is still limited. This efficacy can be improved by the insertion of an Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide in the HI-loop of the viral fiber knob. Indeed in established esophageal cell lines, we observed an up to six-fold improved transduction using the RGD-targeted adenovirus. Established cell lines, however, are easily transformed and do not represent the more complex in vivo histology and anatomy. Therefore, we set up an esophageal explant model using esophageal biopsies from patients. Viability is a limiting factor for this system. Cultured squamous epithelium, intestinal metaplasia and squamous cell carcinoma had a sufficient viability to study adenoviral transduction. Viability of the cultured adenocarcinoma biopsies was poor. Adenoviral transduction in the explant model was poor and was localized in particular cells. The transduction of the nontargeted and RGD-targeted adenovirus was similar in localization and efficacy. In conclusion, we established an esophageal explant system to test the transduction of adenoviral vectors ex vivo. The transduction was limited and localized in specific cells. RGD-targeted adenovirus did not show an improved transduction in this system.

Development of Barrett's esophagus six months after total gastrectomy

Barrett's esophagus (BE) is an acquired disease of the esophagus, in which esophageal squamous epithelium is changed by injury from reflux to metaplastic intestinal type columnar epithelium. BE is the premalignant lesion of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. It is widely accepted that the long-standing reflux of gastric acid is a catalyst for the development of BE. More recent work points toward the reflux of duodenal secretions as a catalyst in this disease process as well. Moreover, the time course for the development of BE once a patient has reflux is not known. Our case challenges the currently defined time course of "long-standing" reflux symptoms for the development of BE, and supports the role of duodenal secretions alone in the development of BE. A 68-yr-old Caucasian man was admitted with weight loss, left upper quadrant pain, a hemoglobin of 6.8, and heme-positive stool. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed normal esophageal mucosa and a mass in the gastric cardia. Biopsies showed moderately differentiated gastric adenocarcinoma. The patient underwent a total gastrectomy, distal esophagectomy, and a Roux-en-Y esophagojejunostomy. Pathology confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma (T1 N0 Mx). The distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in the resected specimen were grossly and microscopically normal. Six months later an EGD, prompted by new complaints of regurgitation and dyspepsia, revealed distal esophageal mucosa lined by red-colored columnar tissue. Biopsies showed intestinal type epithelium. Thus, our case report's contribution to the current literature is twofold. It provides evidence of development of BE solely from duodenal reflux, and it documents a relatively short time span to development of BE.

Review article: management of oesophageal adenocarcinoma -- control of acid, bile and inflammation in intervention strategies for Barrett's oesophagus

Oesophagitis is associated with Barrett's metaplasia in about 10% of individuals. The UK has one of the highest world-wide prevalences of Barrett's metaplasia, with 1% of adults having the condition, resulting in an incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma two to three times that seen in either Europe or North America. In addition, the conversion rate to cancer in individuals with Barrett's metaplasia in UK surveillance programmes is twice that observed in the USA (0.96% per year vs. 0.4% per year), lending further support to the notion that the UK is a high-risk region. The evidence base on what can be achieved with medical therapy to reduce the risk of dysplasia or the development of adenocarcinoma needs to be strengthened with data from randomized controlled trials, as existing data have many limitations. Patients with Barrett's metaplasia respond variably to proton pump inhibitor therapy (even high-dose therapy 'normalizes' acid reflux in only 85% of cases), and symptom control is a poor determinant of the adequacy of suppression of acid reflux. Gastro-oesophageal reflux is implicated in the pathogenesis of Barrett's metaplasia, and ex vivo and in vitro evidence suggests that its attenuation reverses proliferation and biological variables over days, and perhaps the metaplastic histology to a degree over years. The effect of proton pump inhibitor therapy on cancer risk in the long term is essentially unknown. Acid suppressant therapy or anti-reflux surgery on its own does not result in the complete regression of the metaplastic epithelium. Bile acids, present especially frequently in the refluxate of Barrett's oesophagus patients, are also likely to influence the development and persistence of metaplasia. Barrett's metaplasia is replaced by a squamous epithelium when acid reflux is well controlled and the epithelium is physically destroyed by ablation with argon plasma coagulation or photodynamic therapy. These modalities are invasive and are not likely to be useful in the routine management of patients with Barrett's oesophagus without dysplasia or cancer. Why metaplasia does not fully regress once external initiating stimuli are removed is a mystery. There is some evidence to implicate a variety of molecules, including cyclo-oxygenase-2, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, beta-catenin nuclear translocation and mitogen-activated protein kinase signalling, because they are expressed preferentially in metaplastic rather than normal or inflamed squamous oesophageal mucosa. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including aspirin, is associated with a decreased incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. There is therefore a great need for randomized controlled trials to assess the outcomes of such chemopreventive therapy in patients with Barrett's metaplasia.

Bile salt exposure causes phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase-mediated proliferation in a Barrett's adenocarcinoma cell line

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms by which gastroesophageal reflux promotes malignant progression in Barrett's esophagus are poorly understood. The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3 kinase)/Akt pathway regulates proliferation and apoptosis. We hypothesized that the PI3 kinase/Akt pathway mediates the pro-proliferative and antiapoptotic effects of bile.

METHODS

The Barrett's adenocarcinoma cell line, SEG-1, was exposed to the conjugated bile salt, glycochenodeoxycholic acid (GCDA). Cell number was measured by the MTT incorporation assay and by Coulter counter. PI3 kinase/Akt activity was inferred from Western blots of phosphorylated and total Akt. Proliferation and apoptosis were determined by BrdU incorporation and cell death ELISA.

RESULTS

A dose-dependent cell number increase was seen with a 20-minute exposure to GCDA. On Western blot, 200 micromol/L GCDA caused a 3-fold increase in Akt phosphorylation within 20 minutes, which was inhibited by 90% with the addition of PI3 kinase inhibitor, LY294002. LY294002 produced dose-dependent inhibition of GCDA-induced cell number increases. 200 micromol/L GCDA decreased apoptosis by 25%. Addition of LY294002 did not completely inhibit the antiapoptotic effect of bile.

CONCLUSIONS

Bile salts activate the PI3 kinase/Akt signaling pathway and stimulate cell growth in SEG-1. The majority of this PI3 kinase-mediated effect is secondary to increases in proliferation rather than to decreases in apoptosis.

Management of Barrett's esophagus with and without dysplasia

Barrett's esophagus (BE), a premalignant lesion to esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with long-standing, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). BE is a multi-phase process: during the initiation phase, genetically predisposed individuals (mostly white men) suffering from clinical or occult reflux damage their distal esophagus and form a new cell phenotype (incomplete intestinal metaplasia). During the formation phase, this phenotype occupies an area of variable surface (short or long-segment BE). During the progression phase, the metaplastic epithelium either remains dormant or progresses to dysplasia and adenocarcinoma. We review the recent clinical and basic research literature that explores the interaction of the refluxate (acid, bile, etc.) with BE. Acid and bile reflux variably affect BE and may cause dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Regardless of the underlying biology, a patient with BE may suffer from GERD symptoms or may remain asymptomatic. Acid may be synergistic to bile or it could be antagonistic and protective. Acid suppressive therapy, if profound and continuous enough to abolish symptoms and esophageal acid exposure, may decrease proliferation, increase differentiation and reduce BE surface. Overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), not entirely independent of acid/bile reflux, may increase proliferation and increase the invasiveness and metastatic potential of Barrett's metaplasia and neoplasia. Clinically, both acid and bile reflux need to be inhibited, either with potent acid-suppressing drugs or anti-reflux surgery. Cyclooxygenase inhibition using aspirin, NSAIDs or the safer COX-2 inhibitors added to these anti-reflux therapies may enhance the therapeutic benefit. Many questions remain unanswered. We still do not know why only a fraction of patients with GERD develop BE, what factors of the refluxate (acid, bile, etc.) initiate metaplasia and/or promote carcinogenesis, which patients are at risk for malignancy, and what is the best chemopreventive strategy. Ablation therapies and endoscopic mucosal resection are still under study.

Reflux, Barrett's oesophagus and adenocarcinoma: burning questions

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing rapidly in Western populations. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease is a strong risk factor for both this tumour and the pre-cancerous lesion Barrett's oesophagus, but the underlying disease mechanisms remain unclear. Developing a better understanding of the aetiology and pathogenesis of Barrett's oesophagus, including the induction of DNA damage and genetic alterations, might provide opportunities for improved management of individuals with this disease. This could include a better rationale for screening and surveillance programmes, as well as targeted intervention strategies.

Chronic acid exposure leads to activation of the cdx2 intestinal homeobox gene in a long-term culture of mouse esophageal keratinocytes

To explore mechanisms whereby Malpighian keratinocytes can transdifferentiate into an intestinal-like epithelium, as observed in the early steps of Barrett's esophagus (BE) development, long-standing cultures of esophageal keratinocytes derived from normal mouse esophageal explants were developed. These cells were able to form multilayers and to differentiate on filter support by the formation of differentiated layers of basal cells (cytokeratine 14 positive) on which secondary suprabasal cell layers (cytokeratine 4 positive) spontaneously developed. Thus, these cultured cells, referred to as P3E6, reproduced, at least in part, the proliferation and stratification pattern existing in the normal esophagus. Because chronic exposure to acid pH is known to be a critical factor for BE development, culture medium at pH 3.5 was added into the apical chamber of cell cultures. This led to a decrease in the overall number of cells but it did not affect cell proliferation. Furthermore, external acid environment triggered expression of the GFP reporter gene fused downstream of the cdx2 intestinal homeogene regulatory sequences in P3E6 transfected cells. Expression of the endogenous CDX2 protein, detected by western blot and immunocytochemical analysis, correlated with promoter activation. These findings demonstrate that chronic exposure of esophageal keratinocytes to acid pH induces transcription of cdx2, an intestinal specific homeobox gene known to play a critical role in the differentiation and maintenance of intestinal epithelial functions. The results suggest that chronic acid exposure can modify the fate of P3E6 esophageal keratinocytes towards an intestinal program. This can be a key step in the development of intestinal metaplasia often observed in esophagus-cardia junction.

The pathogenesis of Barrett's esophagus

Significant progress has been made in clinicians' understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of BE, and the laboratory findings are beginning to lead to hypothesis-driven clinical studies; however, the following questions remain unanswered: (1) how can clinicians identify the persons most at risk for the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma, (2) what are the environmental gene interactions in esophageal carcinogenesis, and (3) can clinicians prevent the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the population at risk? As esophageal adenocarcinoma starts to reach epidemic proportions, further research in these areas is urgently required. With the advent of the genomic era and an explosion in studies in BE, significant progress can be made.

Angiogenic markers, neovascularization and malignant deformation of Barrett's esophagus

The molecular events underlying progression of Barrett's esophagus to adenocarcinoma remain an area of active investigation. Neovascularization and angiogenesis have been studied in esophageal adenocarcinomas by counting of microvessels after staining with vascular markers, and by immunohistochemistry for vascular endothelial growth factor. Angiogenesis appears to be increased early in the neoplastic process, but has poor prognostic value. We have demonstrated that expression levels of two important genes that regulate cell growth, namely inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase (COX)-2, are frequently upregulated in Barrett's esophagus and associated adenocarcinomas. COX-2 expression may be related to reflux of bile salts, which induce COX-2 expression in Barrett's tissues and esophageal adenocarcinoma cells in vitro. COX-2 inhibition induces apoptosis and blocks proliferation in COX-2-expressing esophageal adenocarcinoma cells in vitro, and blocks angiogenesis in both in vivo and in vitro models. Although controversial, recent evidence suggest that iNOS-derived NO can inhibit angiogenesis in some model systems. In conclusion, both iNOS and COX-2 appear to be involved in Barrett's-associated neoplastic progression, but COX-2 inhibition is more promising as a chemopreventive strategy. COX-2 inhibition may exert beneficial effects by decreasing angiogenesis and epithelial proliferation, and by facilitating apoptosis of epithelial cells that have undergone DNA damage.

Acid- and bile-induced PGE(2) release and hyperproliferation in Barrett's esophagus are COX-2 and PKC-epsilon dependent

Barrett's esophagus (BE) results from acid and bile reflux and predisposes to cancer. To further understand the mechanisms of acid- and bile-induced hyperproliferation in BE, we investigated the release of PGE(2) in response to acid or bile salt exposure. Biopsies of esophagus, BE, and duodenum were exposed to a bile salt mixture as a 1-h pulse and compared with exposure to pH 7.4 for up to 24 h, and PGE(2) release, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and protein kinase C (PKC) expression were compared. Similar experiments were also performed with acidified media (pH 3.5) alone, in the presence or absence of bisindolylmaleimide (BIM), a selective PKC inhibitor, and NS-398, a COX-2 inhibitor. One-hour pulses of bile salts or acid significantly enhanced proliferation, COX-2 expression, and PGE(2) release in BE. In contrast, the combination pulse of acid and bile salts had no such effect. Treatment with either BIM or NS-398 led to a dramatic decrease in PGE(2) release in BE explants and a suppression of proliferation. The acid- or bile salt-mediated hyperproliferation is related to PGE(2) release. Acid- and bile salt-induced induction of COX-2 and PKC may explain, at least in part, the tumor-promoting effects of acid and bile in BE.

Rofecoxib inhibits cyclooxygenase 2 expression and activity and reduces cell proliferation in Barrett's esophagus

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) is overexpressed in Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma and up-regulated by acid or bile salt exposure. COX-2 inhibition with the selective inhibitor rofecoxib may be important in chemoprevention of esophageal adenocarcinoma by decreasing cell proliferation.

METHODS

Biopsy specimens of esophagus, Barrett's esophagus, and duodenum were obtained at baseline from 12 patients and were compared with biopsy specimens obtained after 10 days of therapy with rofecoxib 25 mg orally daily. All patients were maintained asymptomatic on their proton pump inhibitor therapy throughout the study. COX-2 expression, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression (proliferation marker), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) biopsy content (marker of COX activity) were assessed by immunoblotting and enzyme immunoabsorbence assays.

RESULTS

At baseline, COX-2 expression was 3-fold higher in Barrett's esophagus than esophagus and duodenum (P < 0.05). After rofecoxib therapy, COX-2 expression in Barrett's esophagus decreased by 77% (P < 0.005). Similarly at baseline, PGE2 content was 2-fold higher in Barrett's esophagus than esophagus or duodenum. After rofecoxib therapy, PGE2 content decreased in Barrett's esophagus by 59% (P < 0.005). At baseline, PCNA expression was also 2-fold higher in Barrett's esophagus than squamous esophagus and duodenum (P < 0.005). After rofecoxib therapy, PCNA expression in Barrett's esophagus decreased by 62.5% (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Rofecoxib 25 mg orally once daily reduces COX-2 expression, PGE2 release, and cell proliferation in Barrett's esophagus. Together with acid suppressive therapy, rofecoxib may be a promising chemoprevention agent against dysplasia and esophageal adenocarcinoma.