Contribution of the cerebellar flocculus to gaze control during active head movements

The cervico-ocular reflex changes following treatment in individuals with subclinical neck pain: a randomized control trial

Individuals with subclinical neck pain (SCNP) exhibit altered cerebellar processing, likely due to disordered sensorimotor integration of inaccurate proprioceptive input. This association between proprioceptive feedback and SMI has been captured in cervico-ocular reflex (COR) differences where SCNP showed higher gain than healthy participants. Previous neurophysiological research demonstrated improved cerebellar processing in SCNP participants following a single treatment session, but it is unknown whether these neurophysiological changes transfer to cerebellar function. In a parallel group, randomized control trial conducted at Ontario Tech University, 27 right-hand dominant SCNP participants were allocated to the 8-week chiropractic care (n = 15; 7M & 8 F) or 8-week control (n = 12; 6M & 6 F) group. COR gain (ratio of eye movement to trunk movement) was assessed using an eye-tracking device at baseline and at post 8-weeks (treatment vs. no treatment). COR gain (10 trials): participants gazed at a circular target that disappeared after 3 s, while a motorized chair rotated their trunk at a frequency of 0.04 Hz, with an amplitude of 5º, for 2 minutes. A 2 × 2 repeated measures ANOVA was performed. COR gain was significantly reduced following 8-weeks of chiropractic care compared to the SCNP control (8-weeks of no treatment) group (p = 0.012, ηp2 = 0.237). The decrease in COR gain following treatment is likely due to normalized proprioceptive feedback from the neck, enabling improved processing and integration within the flocculonodular lobe of the cerebellum.

Cervico-Ocular and Vestibulo-Ocular Reflexes in Subclinical Neck Pain and Healthy Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study

Alterations in neck sensory input from recurrent neck pain (known as subclinical neck pain (SCNP)) result in disordered sensorimotor integration (SMI). The cervico-ocular (COR) and vestibulo-ocular (VOR) reflexes involve various neural substrates but are coordinated by the cerebellum and reliant upon proprioceptive feedback. Given that proprioception and cerebellar processing are impaired in SCNP, we sought to determine if COR or VOR gain is also altered. COR and VOR were assessed using an eye-tracking device in 20 SCNP (9 M and 11 F; 21.8 (SD = 2.35) years) and 17 control (7 M and 10 F; 22.40 (SD = 3.66) years) participants. COR gain (10 trials): A motorized chair rotated the trunk at a frequency of 0.04 Hz and an amplitude of 5° while participants gazed at a circular target that disappeared after three seconds. VOR gain (30 trials): Rapid bilateral head movements away from a disappearing circular target while eyes fixated on the last observed target. Independent t-tests on COR and VOR gain were performed. SCNP had a significantly larger COR gain (p = 0.006) and smaller VOR gain (p = 0.487) compared to healthy controls. The COR group differences suggest an association between proprioceptive feedback and SMI, indicating COR may be a sensitive marker of altered cerebellar processing.

[Study on normal reference range of smooth tracking gain for healthy young people]

Objective:Analysis of normal reference value of smooth pursuit test for normal young people. Method:Thirty normal young volunteers were tested by Synapsys videonystagmography. The maximum horizontal tracking angle was 30 °, the vertical maximum tracking angle was 20°, and the frequency was 0.30 Hz, 0.45 Hz and 0.60 Hz, respectively， and the gain under different conditions is used as the observation index. Result:When the frequency is 0.3 Hz, 0.45 Hz, 0.60 Hz, the left and right horizontal gain is 0.92±0.07/0.93±0.07, 0.87±0.08/0.88±0.11, 0.79±0.11/0.78±0.13, respectively, and the asymmetry of left/right gain is 0.021±0.017, 0.031±0.026, 0.037±0.040; the up and down vertical gain is 0.82±0.16/0.80±0.16, 0.78±0.17/0.72±0.15, 0.68±0.20/0.61±0.15, and the asymmetry of the upper/lower gain is 0.046±0.045, 0.069±0.058, 0.109±0.076. Comparing and analyzing the paired left and right gain values of the three frequencies by paired t test, the differences were not statistically significant （P>0.05）. Paired t -test of gain value for different frequency of up and down stationary tracking, the difference was not statistically significant at 0.30 Hz（P>0.05）, but the gain at 0.45 Hz and 0.60 Hz has significant difference（P<0.05）. Comparing the gains of different frequencies in the same direction, the differences in analysis of variance were statistically significant（P<0.05）. Conclusion:The gain value of smooth pursuit test for normal young people can be affected by tracking frequency and direction. At the same frequency, the left/right tracking of 3 frequencies and the up/down tracking gain values of 0.30 Hz are symmetrical, but at 0.45 Hz and 0.6 Hz, the up tracking gain is greater than the down tracking gain, and the gain value in the same direction gradually decreases with the increase of frequency, is the clinical smooth pursuit test is mainly based on 0.30 Hz.

Synchronizing the tracking eye movements with the motion of a visual target: Basic neural processes

In primates, the appearance of an object moving in the peripheral visual field elicits an interceptive saccade that brings the target image onto the foveae. This foveation is then maintained more or less efficiently by slow pursuit eye movements and subsequent catch-up saccades. Sometimes, the tracking is such that the gaze direction looks spatiotemporally locked onto the moving object. Such a spatial synchronism is quite spectacular when one considers that the target-related signals are transmitted to the motor neurons through multiple parallel channels connecting separate neural populations with different conduction speeds and delays. Because of the delays between the changes of retinal activity and the changes of extraocular muscle tension, the maintenance of the target image onto the fovea cannot be driven by the current retinal signals as they correspond to past positions of the target. Yet, the spatiotemporal coincidence observed during pursuit suggests that the oculomotor system is driven by a command estimating continuously the current location of the target, i.e., where it is here and now. This inference is also supported by experimental perturbation studies: when the trajectory of an interceptive saccade is experimentally perturbed, a correction saccade is produced in flight or after a short delay, and brings the gaze next to the location where unperturbed saccades would have landed at about the same time, in the absence of visual feedback. In this chapter, we explain how such correction can be supported by previous visual signals without assuming "predictive" signals encoding future target locations. We also describe the basic neural processes which gradually yield the synchronization of eye movements with the target motion. When the process fails, the gaze is driven by signals related to past locations of the target, not by estimates to its upcoming locations, and a catch-up is made to reinitiate the synchronization.

Magnetic eye tracking in mice

Eye movements provide insights about a wide range of brain functions, from sensorimotor integration to cognition; hence, the measurement of eye movements is an important tool in neuroscience research. We describe a method, based on magnetic sensing, for measuring eye movements in head-fixed and freely moving mice. A small magnet was surgically implanted on the eye, and changes in the magnet angle as the eye rotated were detected by a magnetic field sensor. Systematic testing demonstrated high resolution measurements of eye position of <0.1°. Magnetic eye tracking offers several advantages over the well-established eye coil and video-oculography methods. Most notably, it provides the first method for reliable, high-resolution measurement of eye movements in freely moving mice, revealing increased eye movements and altered binocular coordination compared to head-fixed mice. Overall, magnetic eye tracking provides a lightweight, inexpensive, easily implemented, and high-resolution method suitable for a wide range of applications.

Isolated Vestibular Suppression Impairment With Vestibular Migraine: A Phenotypic CANVAS Variant

HYPOTHESIS

Cerebellar Ataxia with Neuropathy and Vestibular Areflexia (CANVAS) is likely to have a genetic basis. We describe the unique eye movement features of a possible phenotypic CANVAS variant.

BACKGROUND

The patient comes from a large CANVAS kindred (four out of nine siblings) and has sensory neuropathy, cerebellar eye signs, and vestibular migraine (VM), but otherwise normal vestibular function.

METHODS

We recorded eye and head movements using the gold standard scleral search coil technique: in the patient, a close relative with mild sensory neuropathy, and a normal control.

RESULTS

At ≥ 0.8 Hz vestibulo-ocular reflex suppression (VORS) was significantly smaller in the patient. At 1 Hz, the patient's VORS was almost two times worse than the control, and five times worse at 1.6 Hz. The patient's VORS deficiency was observed with the naked eye as an inability to keep the eye stationary during imposed sinusoidal head rotation at ∼ 1 Hz. At ≤ 0.8 Hz the patient had 10 to 20% lower smooth pursuit function compared with both the patient-relative and control subjects. This difference was difficult to detect by the naked eye. Saccadic oculomotor and vestibular function was normal.

CONCLUSION

We propose that impaired VORS and VM are because of similar, but distinct, consequences of selective partial cerebellar dysfunction. The patient's VORS data are consistent with a CANVAS neuropathological study showing selective degeneration of the dorsal vermis of the cerebellum, a region thought to be important for VORS. Taken together our findings suggest the patient is a CANVAS variant. We hypothesise VORS impairment is part of CANVAS, but not revealed because of vestibular loss.

Cerebellum-dependent motor learning: lessons from adaptation of eye movements in primates

In order to ameliorate the consequences of ego motion for vision, human and nonhuman observers generate reflexive, compensatory eye movements based on visual as well as vestibular information, helping to stabilize the images of visual scenes on the retina despite ego motion. And in order to fully exploit the advantages of foveal vision, they make saccades to shift the image of an object onto the fovea and smooth pursuit eye movements to stabilize it there despite continuing object movement relative to the observer. With the exception of slow visually driven eye movements, which can be understood as manifestations of relatively straightforward feedback systems, most eye movements require a direct conversion of sensory input into appropriate motor responses in the absence of immediate sensory feedback. Hence, in order to generate appropriate oculomotor responses, the parameters linking input and output must be chosen suitably. Moreover, as the parameters may change from one manifestation of a movement to the next, for instance because of oculomotor fatigue, the choices should also be quickly modifiable. This chapter will present evidence showing that this fast parametric optimization, understood as a functionally distinct example of motor learning, is an accomplishment of specific parts of the cerebellum devoted to the control of eye movements. It will also discuss recent electrophysiological results suggesting how this specific form of motor learning may emerge from information processing in cerebellar circuits.

Contribution of olivofloccular circuitry developmental defects to atypical gaze in autism

Individuals with autism demonstrate atypical gaze, impairments in smooth pursuit, altered movement perception and deficits in facial perception. The olivofloccular neuronal circuit is a major contributor to eye movement control. This study of the cerebellum in 12 autistic and 10 control subjects revealed dysplastic changes in the flocculus of eight autistic (67%) and two control (20%) subjects. Defects of the oculomotor system, including avoidance of eye contact and poor or no eye contact, were reported in 88% of autistic subjects with postmortem-detected floccular dysplasia. Focal disorganization of the flocculus cytoarchitecture with deficit, altered morphology, and spatial disorientation of Purkinje cells (PCs); deficit and abnormalities of granule, basket, stellate and unipolar brush cells; and structural defects and abnormal orientation of Bergmann glia are indicators of profound disruption of flocculus circuitry in a dysplastic area. The average volume of PCs was 26% less in the dysplastic region than in the unaffected region of the flocculus (p<0.01) in autistic subjects. Moreover, the average volume of PCs in the entire cerebellum was 25% less in the autistic subjects than in the control subjects (p<0.001). Findings from this study and a parallel study of the inferior olive (IO) suggest that focal floccular dysplasia combined with IO neurons and PC developmental defects may contribute to oculomotor system dysfunction and atypical gaze in autistic subjects.

Vestibular-related frontal cortical areas and their roles in smooth-pursuit eye movements: representation of neck velocity, neck-vestibular interactions, and memory-based smooth-pursuit

Smooth-pursuit eye movements are voluntary responses to small slow-moving objects in the fronto-parallel plane. They evolved in primates, who possess high-acuity foveae, to ensure clear vision about the moving target. The primate frontal cortex contains two smooth-pursuit related areas; the caudal part of the frontal eye fields (FEF) and the supplementary eye fields (SEF). Both areas receive vestibular inputs. We review functional differences between the two areas in smooth-pursuit. Most FEF pursuit neurons signal pursuit parameters such as eye velocity and gaze-velocity, and are involved in canceling the vestibulo-ocular reflex by linear addition of vestibular and smooth-pursuit responses. In contrast, gaze-velocity signals are rarely represented in the SEF. Most FEF pursuit neurons receive neck velocity inputs, while discharge modulation during pursuit and trunk-on-head rotation adds linearly. Linear addition also occurs between neck velocity responses and vestibular responses during head-on-trunk rotation in a task-dependent manner. During cross-axis pursuit-vestibular interactions, vestibular signals effectively initiate predictive pursuit eye movements. Most FEF pursuit neurons discharge during the interaction training after the onset of pursuit eye velocity, making their involvement unlikely in the initial stages of generating predictive pursuit. Comparison of representative signals in the two areas and the results of chemical inactivation during a memory-based smooth-pursuit task indicate they have different roles; the SEF plans smooth-pursuit including working memory of motion-direction, whereas the caudal FEF generates motor commands for pursuit eye movements. Patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease were asked to perform this task, since impaired smooth-pursuit and visual working memory deficit during cognitive tasks have been reported in most patients. Preliminary results suggested specific roles of the basal ganglia in memory-based smooth-pursuit.

Cerebellum and ocular motor control

An intact cerebellum is a prerequisite for optimal ocular motor performance. The cerebellum fine-tunes each of the subtypes of eye movements so they work together to bring and maintain images of objects of interest on the fovea. Here we review the major aspects of the contribution of the cerebellum to ocular motor control. The approach will be based on structural–functional correlation, combining the effects of lesions and the results from physiologic studies, with the emphasis on the cerebellar regions known to be most closely related to ocular motor function: (1) the flocculus/paraflocculus for high-frequency (brief) vestibular responses, sustained pursuit eye movements, and gaze holding, (2) the nodulus/ventral uvula for low-frequency (sustained) vestibular responses, and (3) the dorsal oculomotor vermis and its target in the posterior portion of the fastigial nucleus (the fastigial oculomotor region) for saccades and pursuit initiation.

Altered vision during motion: an unusual symptom of cerebellar dysfunction, quantifiable by a simple clinical test

PURPOSE

To report a series of patients with cerebellar dysfunction and altered vision during motion, and to quantify their visual impairment in motion with a simple clinical test.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients suffering from cerebellar dysfunction and altered vision during motion were examined between 1994 and 2007. A control group consisted of 20 age- and sex-matched healthy people. All patients had a full neuro-ophthalmic examination. Near visual acuity (NVA) was measured at rest (static NVA) and during chair rotation (dynamic NVA). Distance visual acuity (DVA) was measured at rest (static DVA) and during rotation of the patient's head (dynamic DVA).

RESULTS

Only four of the 20 patients reported altered vision during motion spontaneously. The remaining 16 patients admitted this unusual visual disturbance only when asked specifically. All patients exhibited abnormal eye movements, including saccadic smooth pursuit (20/20), dysmetric saccades (15/20), nystagmus (19/20) and impaired suppression of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) (20/20). During rotation of the examination chair (dynamic NVA), the drop in NVA averaged 5.6 lines (range 1-10 lines). During rotation of the patient's head (dynamic DVA), the drop in DVA averaged only 2.5 lines (range 0-10 lines). For the control group, there was no significant drop in NVA under dynamic conditions.

CONCLUSION

Patients with cerebellar dysfunction rarely complain spontaneously of altered vision during motion. However, specific questioning may bring up this unusual symptom. The use of a simple clinical test, consisting of NVA measurement during rotation of the examination chair (dynamic NVA), allows practitioners to quantify the level of visual impairment in patients presenting altered VOR modulation.

Internal models of eye movement in the floccular complex of the monkey cerebellum

Internal models are a key feature of most modern theories of motor control. Yet, it has been challenging to localize internal models in the brain, or to demonstrate that they are more than a metaphor. In the present review, I consider a large body of data on the cerebellar floccular complex, asking whether floccular output has features that would be expected of the output from internal models. I argue that the simple spike firing rates of a single group of floccular Purkinje cells could reflect the output of three different internal models. (1) An eye velocity positive feedback pathway through the floccular complex provides neural inertia for smooth pursuit eye movements, and appears to operate as a model of the inertia of real-world objects. (2) The floccular complex processes and combines input signals so that the dynamics of its average simple spike output are appropriate for the dynamics of the downstream brainstem circuits and eyeball. If we consider the brainstem circuits and eyeball as a more broadly conceived "oculomotor plant," then the output from the floccular complex could be the manifestation of an inverse model of "plant" dynamics. (3) Floccular output reflects an internal model of the physics of the orbit where head and eye motion sum to produce gaze motion. The effects of learning on floccular output suggest that it is modeling the interaction of the visually-guided and vestibular-driven components of eye and gaze motion. Perhaps the insights from studying oculomotor control provide groundwork to guide the analysis of internal models for a wide variety of cerebellar behaviors.

Eye-pursuit and reafferent head movement signals carried by pursuit neurons in the caudal part of the frontal eye fields during head-free pursuit

Eye and head movements are coordinated during head-free pursuit. To examine whether pursuit neurons in frontal eye fields (FEF) carry gaze-pursuit commands that drive both eye-pursuit and head-pursuit, monkeys whose heads were free to rotate about a vertical axis were trained to pursue a juice feeder with their head and a target with their eyes. Initially the feeder and target moved synchronously with the same visual angle. FEF neurons responding to this gaze-pursuit were tested for eye-pursuit of target motion while the feeder was stationary and for head-pursuit while the target was stationary. The majority of pursuit neurons exhibited modulation during head-pursuit, but their preferred directions during eye-pursuit and head-pursuit were different. Although peak modulation occurred during head movements, the onset of discharge usually was not aligned with the head movement onset. The minority of neurons whose discharge onset was so aligned discharged after the head movement onset. These results do not support the idea that the head-pursuit–related modulation reflects head-pursuit commands. Furthermore, modulation similar to that during head-pursuit was obtained by passive head rotation on stationary trunk. Our results suggest that FEF pursuit neurons issue gaze or eye movement commands during gaze-pursuit and that the head-pursuit–related modulation primarily reflects reafferent signals resulting from head movements.

A biologically inspired model of binocular control on a free head

A single layer, symmetrical bilateral controller with dual modalities has been developed for a robotic head, based on symmetries in brainstem circuits for the oculomotor control system (OCS). This robotic head controller is unique in the biological approach during its development, and its structural elegance afforded by the single layer organization. Extensions to this controller are based on connections between brainstem and cerebellar structures, and the OCS circuit. To make the robotic head better reflect biology: 1. velocity feedback is added to account for floccular projections to the brainstem OCS, and 2. integral feedback is added to represent findings of vector averaging mechanisms in superior colliculus. The resulting OCS controller has a structure better matched with what has been reported in brainstem premotor-circuit topology. The new bilateral OCS not only retains the structural and analytical simplicity of its precursor, but it now has an improved bandwidth for its pursuit mode, and can track faster objects with smaller errors, while requiring fewer saccades.

An internally switched model of ocular tracking with prediction

Ocular tracking of targets in biological systems involves switching between two strategies: slow pursuit and fast corrective saccades producing pursuit nystagmus. Here, a symmetric (bilateral) controller is used as a model for the oculomotor control system (OCS) to drive two cameras on a robotic head. It relies, as in biology, on internal switching in shared premotor circuits to alternate automatically between the two types of movements comprising nystagmus. The symmetric structural concept is gaining acceptance as evidence points to sharing of both fast phase and slow phase control in brainstem structures previously thought to be solely involved in one mode alone. This bilateral OCS model is a parsimonious design that is at once biomimetic and analytically simple. We extend prior results by incorporating more biological clues from floccular projections to establish rudimentary prediction mechanisms for both slow and fast phases; prediction is achieved by using retinal slip, which contains target velocity information. This provides a more accurate replication of the difference between fast phase and slow phase dynamics, and considers neural activity profiles in the superior colliculus to refine the controller performance. The resulting controller eliminates the need for saccades in steady state for low frequency inputs, and each saccade now has better accuracy, despite visual delays.

Gaze-Related Response Properties of DLPN and NRTP Neurons in the Rhesus Macaque

The dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) and nucleus reticularis tegmenti pontis (NRTP) are basilar pontine nuclei important for control of eye movements. The aim of this study was to compare the response properties of neurons in DLPN and rostral NRTP (rNRTP) during visual, oculomotor, and vestibular testing. We tested 51 DLPN neurons that were modulated during smooth pursuit (23/51) or during motion of a large-field visual stimulus (28/51). Following vestibular testing, we found that the majority of smooth pursuit–related neurons in DLPN were best classified as gaze (13/23) or eye velocity (7/23) related. Only a small percentage (3/51) of DLPN neurons responded during vestibular ocular reflex in the dark (VORd). We tested rNRTP neurons as described above and found the majority of neurons (35/43) were modulated during smooth pursuit or during motion of a large-field stimulus only (4/43). A significant proportion of our rNRTP gaze velocity neurons (10/18) were also modulated during VORd. We found that the majority of smooth pursuit related neurons in rNRTP were best classified as gaze velocity (18/35) or gaze acceleration (11/35) sensitive. The remaining neurons were classified as eye position or eye/head related. We used multiple linear-regression modeling to determine the relative contributions of eye, head and visual inputs to the responses of DLPN and rNRTP neurons. Our results support the suggestion that both DLPN and rNRTP play significant roles not only in control of smooth pursuit but also in control of gaze.

Context contingent signal processing in the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus during gaze saccades

The vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) functions to stabilize gaze when the head moves. The flocculus region (FLR) of the cerebellar cortex, which includes the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus, plays an essential role in modifying signal processing in VOR pathways so that images of interest remain stable on the retina. In squirrel monkeys, the firing rate of most FLR Pk cells is modulated during VOR eye movements evoked by passive movement of the head. In this study, the responses of 48 FLR Purkinje cells, the firing rates of which were strongly modulated during VOR evoked by passive whole body rotation or passive head-on-trunk rotation, were compared to the responses generated during compensatory VOR eye movements evoked by the active head movements of eye-head saccades. Most (42/48) of the Purkinje cells were insensitive to eye-head saccade-related VOR eye movements. A few (6/48) generated bursts of spikes during saccade-related VOR but only during on-direction eye movements. Considered as a population FLR Pk cells were <5% as responsive to the saccade-related VOR as they were to the VOR evoked by passive head movements. The observations suggest that the FLR has little influence on signal processing in VOR pathways during eye-head saccade-related VOR eye movements. We conclude that the image-stabilizing signals generated by the FLR are highly dependent on the behavioral context and are called on primarily when external forces unrelated to self-generated eye and head movements are the cause of image instability.

Brain stem pursuit pathways: dissociating visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive inputs during combined eye-head gaze tracking

Eye-head (EH) neurons within the medial vestibular nuclei are thought to be the primary input to the extraocular motoneurons during smooth pursuit: they receive direct projections from the cerebellar flocculus/ventral paraflocculus, and in turn, project to the abducens motor nucleus. Here, we recorded from EH neurons during head-restrained smooth pursuit and head-unrestrained combined eye-head pursuit (gaze pursuit). During head-restrained smooth pursuit of sinusoidal and step-ramp target motion, each neuron's response was well described by a simple model that included resting discharge (bias), eye position, and velocity terms. Moreover, eye acceleration, as well as eye position, velocity, and acceleration error (error = target movement - eye movement) signals played no role in shaping neuronal discharges. During head-unrestrained gaze pursuit, EH neuron responses reflected the summation of their head-movement sensitivity during passive whole-body rotation in the dark and gaze-movement sensitivity during smooth pursuit. Indeed, EH neuron responses were well predicted by their head- and gaze-movement sensitivity during these two paradigms across conditions (e.g., combined eye-head gaze pursuit, smooth pursuit, whole-body rotation in the dark, whole-body rotation while viewing a target moving with the head (i.e., cancellation), and passive rotation of the head-on-body). Thus our results imply that vestibular inputs, but not the activation of neck proprioceptors, influence EH neuron responses during head-on-body movements. This latter proposal was confirmed by demonstrating a complete absence of modulation in the same neurons during passive rotation of the monkey's body beneath its neck. Taken together our results show that during gaze pursuit EH neurons carry vestibular- as well as gaze-related information to extraocular motoneurons. We propose that this vestibular-related modulation is offset by inputs from other premotor inputs, and that the responses of vestibuloocular reflex interneurons (i.e., position-vestibular-pause neurons) are consistent with such a proposal.

Gaze-, eye-, and head-movement dynamics during closed- and open-loop gaze pursuit

Horizontal step-ramp stimuli were used to examine gaze-, eye-, and head-movement dynamics during head-unrestrained pursuit in two rhesus monkeys. In a first series of experiments, we characterized and compared head-restrained (HR) and -unrestrained (HU) pursuit responses to unpredictable, nonperiodic, constant velocity (20-80 degrees/s) stimuli. When the head was free to move, both monkeys used a combination of eye and head motion to initially fixate and then pursue the target. The pursuit responses (i.e., gaze responses) were highly stereotyped and nearly identical among the HR and HU conditions for a given step-ramp stimulus. In the HU condition, initial eye and initial head acceleration tended to increase as a function of target velocity but did not vary systematically with initial target eccentricity. In a second series of experiments, step-ramp stimuli (40 degrees/s) were presented, and, approximately 125 ms after pursuit onset, a constant retinal velocity error (RVE) was imposed for a duration of 300 ms. In each monkey, HR and HU gaze velocity was similarly affected by stabilizing the target with respect to the monkey's fovea (i.e., RVE = 0 degrees/s) and by moving the target with constant retinal velocity errors (i.e., RVE = +/- 10 degrees/s). In the HU condition, changes in both eye and head velocity trajectories contributed to the observed gaze velocity responses to imposed RVEs. We conclude that eye and head movements are not independently controlled during HU pursuit but rather are controlled, at least in part, by a shared upstream controller within the pursuit pathways.

The great gate: control of sensory information flow to the cerebellum

An evident feature of the physiology of the inferior olivary nucleus is modulation of the responsiveness of neurons to peripheral stimulation by the behavioral state of the subject animal. The olivary response to self-generated sensory inputs, as well as to input predictable from association with other stimuli, is suppressed. This suppression occurs in part at the level of the inferior olivary nucleus itself. On the other hand, the cells respond readily to sensory inputs that are not anticipated. On a cellular level inferior olivary neurons exhibit two properties that might account for information gating. The first one is the organization of synaptic inputs on olivary spines in glomerular structures, where extrinsic inhibitory and excitatory inputs, confined to the same olivary dendritic spine, can efficiently cancel each other if they arrive within a certain time window. About half of the inhibitory inputs to olivary glomeruli originate in the deep cerebellar nuclei and are regarded as an inhibitory feedback. The second property is subthreshold membrane potential oscillations, a property of the electrotonically coupled olivary network. Extrinsic synaptic inputs to the nucleus modulate the subthreshold oscillations, and consequently, the response properties of olivary neurons. A considerable amount of indirect evidence indicates that the occurrence of oscillations corresponds to states of increased responsiveness of the neurons to peripheral stimulation. The sensory filtering role of the inferior olivary nucleus invites comparison between the cerebellum and cerebellar-like structures. This comparison sheds important light on the function of the cerebellum.

Relationship between time- and frequency-domain analyses of angular head movements in the squirrel monkey

We used the three-dimensional magnetic search-coil recording technique to study the range of active angular head movements made by squirrel monkeys. There were two goals in this study: (1) to determine the range of angular velocities and accelerations as well as the bandwidth and other frequency characteristics of active head movements and (2) to compare analyses of transients of velocity and acceleration that are studied by residual analysis, Fourier transform, and wavelet transform of the head velocity signal. The residual analysis showed that the shape and duration of the transients affected the bandwidth. During the time after the head had begun to accelerate, the frequency content of the head movement extended into the range of 6 to 12 Hz. When considering all three planes of rotation, approximately 75% of the transients had peak acceleration between 2,000 and 10,000 deg/s(2) and a peak velocity of 50 to 400 deg/s. A peak acceleration of >10,000 deg/s(2) was recorded in 10% of the transients. These findings indicate that active head movements in squirrel monkeys cover a higher range of frequencies, accelerations, and velocities than have typically been used in previous eye-movement and neuronal studies of the reflexes that control gaze. We further conclude that the choice of a method for analyzing transient, time-varying biological signals is dependent on the desired information. Residual analysis provides detailed resolution in the time domain, but estimation of the frequency content of the signal is dependent on the portions selected for analysis and the choice of filters. Fourier transform provides a representation of the power spectrum in the frequency domain but without any inherent temporal resolution. We show that the wavelet transform, a novel method as applied to the signal analysis goals of this study, is the most useful technique for relating time- and frequency-domain information during a continuous signal.

The role of the cerebellum in voluntary eye movements

In general the cerebellum is crucial for the control but not the initiation of movement. Voluntary eye movements are particularly useful for investigating the specific mechanisms underlying cerebellar control because they are precise and their brain-stem circuitry is already well understood. Here we describe single-unit and inactivation data showing that the posterior vermis and the caudal fastigial nucleus, to which it projects, provide a signal during horizontal saccades to make them fast, accurate, and consistent. The caudal fastigial nucleus also is necessary for the recovery of saccadic accuracy after actual or simulated neural or muscular damage causes horizontal saccades to be dysmetric. Saccade-related activity in the interpositus nucleus is related to vertical saccades. Both the caudal fastigial nucleus and the flocculus/paraflocculus are necessary for the normal smooth eye movements that pursue a small moving spot. By using eye movements, we have begun to uncover basic principles that give us insight into how the cerebellum may control movement in general.

Three-dimensional binocular kinematics of torsional vestibular nystagmus during convergence on head-fixed targets in humans

When a human subject is oscillated about the nasooccipital axis and fixes upon targets along the horizontal head-fixed meridian, angular eye velocity includes a vertical component that increases with the horizontal eccentricity of the line-of-sight. This vertical eye movement component is necessary to prevent retinal slip. We asked whether fixation on a near head-fixed target during the same torsional vestibular stimulation would lead to differences of vertical eye movements between the right and the left eye, as the directions of the two lines-of-sight are not parallel during convergence. Healthy human subjects (n = 6) were oscillated (0.3 Hz, +/-30 degrees) about the nasooccipital axis on a three-dimensional motor-driven turntable. Binocular movements were recorded using the dual search coil technique. A head-fixed laser dot was presented 1.4 m (far head-fixed target) or 0.25 m (near head-fixed target) in front of the right eye. We found highly significant (P < 0.01) correlations (R binocular = 0.8, monocular = 0.59) between the convergence angle and the difference of the vertical eye velocity between the two eyes. The slope of the fitted linear regression between the two parameters (s = 0.45) was close to the theoretical slope necessary to prevent vertical retinal slippage (predicted s = 0.5). Covering the left eye did not significantly change the slope (s = 0.52). In addition, there was a marked gain reduction (approximately 35%) of the torsional vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) between viewing the far and the near targets, confirming earlier results by others. There was no difference in torsional gain reduction between the two eyes. Lenses of +3 dpt positioned in front of both eyes to decrease the amount of accommodation did not further change the gain of the torsional VOR. In conclusion, ocular convergence on a near head-fixed target during torsional vestibular stimulation leads to deviations in vertical angular velocity between the two eyes necessary to prevent vertical double vision. The vertical deviation velocity is mainly linked to the amount of convergence, since it also occurs during monocular viewing of the near head-fixed target. This suggests that convergence during vestibular stimulation automatically leads to an alignment of binocular rotation axes with the visual axes independent of retinal slip.

Vestibular signals can distort the perceived spatial relationship of retinal stimuli

The flash-lag phenomenon is an illusion that affects the perceived relationship of a moving object and a briefly visible one: the moving object appears to be ahead of the flashed one. In practically all studies of this phenomenon, the image of the object moves on the retina as the object moves in space. Therefore, explanations of the illusion were sought in terms of purely visual mechanisms. Here we set up a situation in which the object's motion in space is entirely produced by passive rotation of the subject. No motion occurred on the retina. The visual display (a continuously lit stimulus and a flashed one) was mounted on a vestibular chair. While the subjects fixated this display, they were rotated in the dark at a constant speed and suddenly stopped. Perceptual misalignment (flash-lag) was robust and consistent during both the initial phase of rotation and the postrotary period when neither chair, subject, nor stimulus was actually moving. As a vestibular signal can cause an illusory spatial dissociation in the visual domain, we conclude that the mechanism of the flash-lag must be more general than was thought up-to-now.

Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in the coordination of eye and head movements during gaze pursuit

The contribution of the flocculus region of the cerebellum to horizontal gaze pursuit was studied in squirrel monkeys. When the head was free to move, the monkeys pursued targets with a combination of smooth eye and head movements; with the majority of the gaze velocity produced by smooth tracking head movements. In the accompanying study we reported that the flocculus region was necessary for cancellation of the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) evoked by passive whole body rotation. The question addressed in this study was whether the flocculus region of the cerebellum also plays a role in canceling the VOR produced by active head movements during gaze pursuit. The firing behavior of 121 Purkinje (Pk) cells that were sensitive to horizontal smooth pursuit eye movements was studied. The sample included 66 eye velocity Pk cells and 55 gaze velocity Pk cells. All of the cells remained sensitive to smooth pursuit eye movements during combined eye and head tracking. Eye velocity Pk cells were insensitive to smooth pursuit head movements. Gaze velocity Pk cells were nearly as sensitive to active smooth pursuit head movements as they were passive whole body rotation; but they were less than half as sensitive ( approximately 43%) to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements. Considered as a whole, the Pk cells in the flocculus region of the cerebellar cortex were <20% as sensitive to smooth pursuit head movements as they were to smooth pursuit eye movements, which suggests that this region does not produce signals sufficient to cancel the VOR during smooth head tracking. The comparative effect of injections of muscimol into the flocculus region on smooth pursuit eye and head movements was studied in two monkeys. Muscimol inactivation of the flocculus region profoundly affected smooth pursuit eye movements but had little effect on smooth pursuit head movements or on smooth tracking of visual targets when the head was free to move. We conclude that the signals produced by flocculus region Pk cells are neither necessary nor sufficient to cancel the VOR during gaze pursuit.

Role of the cerebellar flocculus region in cancellation of the VOR during passive whole body rotation

A series of studies were carried out to investigate the role of the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in the ability to voluntarily cancel the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Squirrel monkeys were trained to pursue moving visual targets and to fixate a head stationary or earth stationary target during passive whole body rotation (WBR). The firing behavior of 187 horizontal eye movement-related Purkinje (Pk) cells in the flocculus region was recorded during smooth pursuit eye movements and during WBR. Half of the Pk cells encountered were eye velocity Pk cells whose firing rates were related to eye movements during smooth pursuit and WBR. Their sensitivity to eye velocity during WBR was reduced when a visual target was not present, and their response to unpredictable steps in WBR was delayed by 80-100 ms, which suggests that eye movement sensitivity depended on visual feedback. They were insensitive to WBR when the VOR was canceled. The other half of the Purkinje cells encountered were sensitive to eye velocity during pursuit and to head velocity during VOR cancellation. They resembled the gaze velocity Pk cells previously described in rhesus monkeys. The head velocity signal tended to be less than half as large as the eye velocity-related signal and was observable at a short ( approximately 40 ms) latency when the head was unpredictably accelerated during ongoing VOR cancellation. Gaze and eye velocity type Pk cells were found to be intermixed throughout the ventral paraflocculus and flocculus. Most gaze velocity Pk cells (76%) were sensitive to ipsilateral eye and head velocity, but nearly half (48%) of the eye velocity Pk cells were sensitive to contralateral eye velocity. Thus the output of flocculus region is modified in two ways during cancellation of the VOR. Signals related to both ipsilateral and contralateral eye velocity are removed, and in approximately half of the cells a relatively weak head velocity signal is added. Unilateral injections of muscimol into the flocculus region had little effect on the gain of the VOR evoked either in the presence or absence of visual targets. However, ocular pursuit velocity and the ability to suppress the VOR by fixating a head stationary target were reduced by approximately 50%. These observations suggest that the flocculus region is an essential part of the neural substrate for both visual feedback-dependent and nonvisual mechanisms for canceling the VOR during passive head movements.