Effect of Altered Retinal Cones/Opsins on Refractive Development under Monochromatic Lights in Guinea Pigs

Effects of intermittent lighting program and light colour on ocular health variables as welfare indicators in broiler chickens

1. The objective of the present study was to examine the effect of lighting programs and light colour on ocular health variables as welfare indicators in Ross 308 broilers.2. A total of 384, male, one-d-old broiler chickens (Ross 308) were placed in a completely randomised design with a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement of lighting program (continuous or intermittent) and light colour (white and green LED light). Ross 308 broilers under restricted lighting had 18 h of light (18 L:6D), while those under intermittent lighting had cycles of 17 L:3D:1 L:3D throughout the experimental period, which lasted 42 d.3. At the end of the experiment, all eyes of birds (n = 96 birds) underwent a complete ophthalmic examination, which included the Schirmer tear test I, intraocular pressure and eye dimensions. In addition, 32 broilers (eight birds per trial groups) aged 42 d underwent ophthalmic examination to include assessment of ocular ultrasound biometry.4. Light colour had a significant influence on the mean intraocular pressure (p < 0.001). The Ross 308 broilers kept with intermittent lighting had lower eye weights (2.29 g; p < 0.05), palpebral fissure length (14.39 mm; p < 0.01), eye dorsoventral diameter (17.46 mm; p < 0.05), anteroposterior size (13.70 mm; p < 0.01) and corneal dorsoventral diameter (7.81 mm; p < 0.05) compared to those reared under restricted lighting.5. In conclusion, these values for Ross 308 broilers may be applied in poultry ophthalmology to detect early eye disease symptoms and to help the diagnosis of tear disorders that could cause economic losses and welfare issues. Intermittent lighting and green LED light may help reduce eye health problems thus contributing to improved welfare in broilers.

Influence of Aberration-Free, Narrowband Light on the Choroidal Thickness and Eye Length

Purpose

To determine whether light chromaticity without defocus induced by longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) is sufficient to regulate eye growth.

Methods

An interferometric setup based on a spatial light modulator was used to illuminate the dominant eyes of 23 participants for 30 minutes with three aberration-free stimulation conditions: (1) short wavelength (450 nm), (2) long wavelength (638 nm), and (3) broadband light (450-700 nm), covering a retinal area of 12°. The non-dominant eye was occluded and remained as the control eye. Axial length and choroidal thickness were measured before and after the illumination period.

Results

Axial length increased significantly from baseline for short-wavelength (P < 0.01, 7.4 ± 2.2 µm) and long-wavelength (P = 0.01, 4.8 ± 1.7 µm) light. The broadband condition also showed an increase in axial length with no significance (P = 0.08, 5.1 ± 3.5 µm). The choroidal thickness significantly decreased in the case of long-wavelength light (P < 0.01, -5.7 ± 2.2 µm), but there was no significant change after short-wavelength and broadband illumination. The axial length and choroidal thickness did not differ significantly between the test and control eyes or between the illumination conditions (all P > 0.05). Also, the illuminated versus non-illuminated choroidal zone did not show a significant difference (all P > 0.05).

Conclusions

All stimulation conditions with short- and long-wavelength light and broadband light led to axial elongation and choroidal thinning. Therefore, light chromaticity without defocus induced by LCA is suggested to be insufficient to regulate eye growth.

Translational Relevance

This study helps in understanding if light chromaticity alone is a sufficient regulator of eye growth.

The impact of light properties on ocular growth and myopia development

The objective of this article is to comprehensively review the effect of environmental lighting on ocular growth and refractive status in both animal and clinical studies, with an emphasis on the underlying mechanisms. This review was performed by searching research articles and reviews utilizing the terms "myopia," "light therapy," "axial length," "refractive error," and "emmetropization" in PubMed datasets. The review was finalized in December 2023. In the animal studies, high lighting brightness, illumination periods aligning with circadian rhythm, and color contrast signals including multiple wavelengths all help regulate ocular growth against myopia. Long wavelengths have been found to induce myopia in chicks, mice, fish, and guinea pigs, whereas shorter wavelengths lead to hyperopia. In contrast, red light has been observed to have a protective effect against myopia in tree shrews and rhesus monkeys. Apart from wavelength, flicker status also showed inconsistent effects on ocular growth, which could be attributed to differences in ocular refractive status, evolutionary disparities in retinal cone cells across species, and the selection of myopia induction models in experiments. In the clinical studies, current evidence suggests a control effect with red light therapy. Although the lighting conditions diverge from those in animal experiments, further reports are needed to assess the long-term effects. In conclusion, this review encompasses research related to the impact of light exposure on myopia and further explores the retinoscleral signaling pathway in refractive development. The aim is to establish a theoretical foundation for optimizing environmental factors in lighting design to address the epidemic of childhood myopia.

The influence of the environment and lifestyle on myopia

BACKGROUND

Myopia, commonly known as near-sightedness, has emerged as a global epidemic, impacting almost one in three individuals across the world. The increasing prevalence of myopia during early childhood has heightened the risk of developing high myopia and related sight-threatening eye conditions in adulthood. This surge in myopia rates, occurring within a relatively stable genetic framework, underscores the profound influence of environmental and lifestyle factors on this condition. In this comprehensive narrative review, we shed light on both established and potential environmental and lifestyle contributors that affect the development and progression of myopia.

MAIN BODY

Epidemiological and interventional research has consistently revealed a compelling connection between increased outdoor time and a decreased risk of myopia in children. This protective effect may primarily be attributed to exposure to the characteristics of natural light (i.e., sunlight) and the release of retinal dopamine. Conversely, irrespective of outdoor time, excessive engagement in near work can further worsen the onset of myopia. While the exact mechanisms behind this exacerbation are not fully comprehended, it appears to involve shifts in relative peripheral refraction, the overstimulation of accommodation, or a complex interplay of these factors, leading to issues like retinal image defocus, blur, and chromatic aberration. Other potential factors like the spatial frequency of the visual environment, circadian rhythm, sleep, nutrition, smoking, socio-economic status, and education have debatable independent influences on myopia development.

CONCLUSION

The environment exerts a significant influence on the development and progression of myopia. Improving the modifiable key environmental predictors like time spent outdoors and engagement in near work can prevent or slow the progression of myopia. The intricate connections between lifestyle and environmental factors often obscure research findings, making it challenging to disentangle their individual effects. This complexity underscores the necessity for prospective studies that employ objective assessments, such as quantifying light exposure and near work, among others. These studies are crucial for gaining a more comprehensive understanding of how various environmental factors can be modified to prevent or slow the progression of myopia.

L-opsin expression in chickens is similarly reduced with diffusers and negative lenses

Previous studies have shown that the expression of L- and M-opsins was reduced in chicken retina when eyes were covered with diffusers. The purpose of the current study was to find out whether this is a result of altered spatial processing during development of deprivation myopia or merely a consequence of light attenuation by the diffusers. Therefore, retinal luminances were matched by neutral density filters in fellow eyes that served as controls for diffuser-treated eyes. Furthermore, the effects of negative lenses on opsins expression were studied. Chickens wore diffusers or -7D lenses for a period of 7 days and refractive state and ocular biometry were measured at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. Retinal tissue was extracted from both eyes to quantify L-, M- and S-opsins expression by qRT-PCR. It was found that L-opsin expression was significantly lower in eyes wearing diffusers, compared to fellow eyes covered with neutral density filters. Interestingly, L-opsin was also reduced in eyes wearing negative lenses. In summary, this study shows that L-opsin expression is reduced due to the loss of high spatial frequencies and general contrast reduction in the retinal image, rather than by a decline in retinal luminance. Moreover, the fact that L-opsin was similarly reduced in eyes treated with negative lenses and diffusers suggests the existence of a common pathway for emmetropization, but it could also be just a consequence of reduced high spatial frequencies and lower contrast.

IMI 2023 Digest

Myopia is a dynamic and rapidly moving field, with ongoing research providing a better understanding of the etiology leading to novel myopia control strategies. In 2019, the International Myopia Institute (IMI) assembled and published a series of white papers across relevant topics and updated the evidence with a digest in 2021. Here, we summarize findings across key topics from the previous 2 years. Studies in animal models have continued to explore how wavelength and intensity of light influence eye growth and have examined new pharmacologic agents and scleral cross-linking as potential strategies for slowing myopia. In children, the term premyopia is gaining interest with increased attention to early implementation of myopia control. Most studies use the IMI definitions of ≤-0.5 diopters (D) for myopia and ≤-6.0 D for high myopia, although categorization and definitions for structural consequences of high myopia remain an issue. Clinical trials have demonstrated that newer spectacle lens designs incorporating multiple segments, lenslets, or diffusion optics exhibit good efficacy. Clinical considerations and factors influencing efficacy for soft multifocal contact lenses and orthokeratology are discussed. Topical atropine remains the only widely accessible pharmacologic treatment. Rebound observed with higher concentration of atropine is not evident with lower concentrations or optical interventions. Overall, myopia control treatments show little adverse effect on visual function and appear generally safe, with longer wear times and combination therapies maximizing outcomes. An emerging category of light-based therapies for children requires comprehensive safety data to enable risk versus benefit analysis. Given the success of myopia control strategies, the ethics of including a control arm in clinical trials is heavily debated. IMI recommendations for clinical trial protocols are discussed.

Blue Light Exposure: Ocular Hazards and Prevention-A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Exposure to blue light has seriously increased in our environment since the arrival of light emitting diodes (LEDs) and, in recent years, the proliferation of digital devices rich in blue light. This raises some questions about its potential deleterious effects on eye health. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an update on the ocular effects of blue light and to discuss the efficiency of methods of protection and prevention against potential blue light-induced ocular injury.

METHODS

The search of relevant English articles was conducted in PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar databases until December 2022.

RESULTS

Blue light exposure provokes photochemical reactions in most eye tissues, in particular the cornea, the lens, and the retina. In vitro and in vivo studies have shown that certain exposures to blue light (depending on the wavelength or intensity) can cause temporary or permanent damage to some structures of the eye, especially the retina. However, currently, there is no evidence that screen use and LEDs in normal use are deleterious to the human retina. Regarding protection, there is currently no evidence of a beneficial effect of blue blocking lenses for the prevention of eye diseases, in particular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In humans, macular pigments (composed of lutein and zeaxanthin) represent a natural protection by filtering blue light, and can be increased through increased intake from foods or food supplements. These nutrients are associated with lower risk for AMD and cataract. Antioxidants such as vitamins C, E, or zinc might also contribute to the prevention of photochemical ocular damage by preventing oxidative stress.

CONCLUSION

Currently, there is no evidence that LEDs in normal use at domestic intensity levels or in screen devices are retinotoxic to the human eye. However, the potential toxicity of long-term cumulative exposure and the dose-response effect are currently unknown.

Ubiquitous light-emitting diodes: Potential threats to retinal circadian rhythms and refractive development

The use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) has increased considerably in the 21st century with humans living in a modern photoperiod with brighter nights and dimmer days. Prolonged exposure to LEDs, especially at night, is considered a new source of pollution because it may affect the synthesis and secretion of retinal melatonin and dopamine, resulting in negative impacts on retinal circadian clocks and potentially disrupting retinal circadian rhythms. The control of ocular refraction is believed to be related to retinal circadian rhythms. Moreover, the global prevalence of myopia has increased at an alarming rate in recent decades. The widespread use of LEDs and the rapid increase in the prevalence of myopia overlap, which is unlikely to be a coincidence. The connection among LEDs, retinal circadian rhythms, and refractive development is both fascinating and confusing. In this review, we aim to develop a systematic framework that includes LEDs, retinal circadian rhythms and refractive development. This paper summarizes the possible mechanisms by which LEDs may disrupt retinal circadian rhythms. We propose that prolonged exposure to LEDs may induce myopia by disrupting retinal circadian rhythms. Finally, we suggest several possible countermeasures to prevent LED interference on retinal circadian rhythms, with the hope of reducing the onset and progression of myopia.

Short-Term Exposure to Blue Light Shows an Inhibitory Effect on Axial Elongation in Human Eyes Independent of Defocus

Purpose

Given the potential role of light and its wavelength on ocular growth, we investigated the effect of short-term exposure to the red, green, and blue light on ocular biometry in the presence and absence of lens-induced defocus in humans.

Methods

Twenty-five young adults were exposed to blue (460 nm), green (521 nm), red (623 nm), and white light conditions for 1-hour each on 4 separate experimental sessions conducted on 4 different days. In each light condition, hyperopic defocus (3D) was induced to the right eye with the fellow eye experiencing no defocus. Axial length and choroidal thickness were measured before and immediately after the light exposure with a non-contact biometer.

Results

Axial length increased from baseline after red light (mean difference ± standard error in the defocussed eye and non-defocussed eye = 11.2 ± 2 µm and 6.4 ± 2.3 µm, P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively) and green light exposure (9.2 ± 3 µm and 7.0 ± 2.5 µm, P < 0.001 and P < 0.001) with a significant decrease in choroidal thickness (P < 0.05, both red and green light) after 1-hour of exposure. Blue light exposure resulted in a reduction in axial length in both the eyes (−8.0 ± 3 µm, P < 0.001 in the defocussed eye and −6.0 ± 3 µm, P = 0.11 in the non-defocused eye) with no significant changes in the choroidal thickness.

Conclusions

Exposure to red and green light resulted in axial elongation, and blue light resulted in inhibition of axial elongation in human eyes. Impact of such specific wavelength exposure on children and its application in myopia control need to be explored.

Effect of Violet Light-Transmitting Eyeglasses on Axial Elongation in Myopic Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The fact that outdoor light environment is an important suppressive factor against myopia led us to invent violet light-transmitting eyeglasses (VL glasses) which can transmit violet light (VL), 360-400 nm in wavelength, for the suppression of myopia, and can meanwhile block harmful ultraviolet waves from sunlight. The current study is a double-blinded randomized clinical trial to investigate the myopia-suppressive effect of VL glasses compared to conventional eyeglasses (placebo glasses) that do not transmit VL. The subjects were children aged from 6 to 12 years old, the population in which myopia progression is generally accelerated, and the myopia suppressive effect was followed up for two years in a city in Japan. Periodical ophthalmic examinations, interviews, and measurements of reflection and axial length under mydriasis were performed at the initial visit (the baseline) and at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The mean change in axial length in the VL glasses group was significantly smaller than in the placebo glasses group when time for near-work was less than 180 min and when the subjects were limited to those who had never used eyeglasses before this trial (p < 0.01); however, this change was not significant without subgrouping. The suppressive rate for axial elongation in the VL glasses group was 21.4% for two years.

Long-Wavelength-Filtered Light Transiently Inhibits Negative Lens-Induced Axial Eye Growth in the Chick Myopia Model

Purpose

Eye growth and myopia development in chicks, and some other animal models, can be suppressed by rearing under near-monochromatic, short-wavelength blue light. We aimed to determine whether similar effects could be achieved using glass filters that transmit a broader range of short and middle wavelengths.

Methods

On day 6 or 7 post-hatch, 169 chicks were assigned to one of three monocular lens conditions (−10 D, +10 D, plano) and reared for 7 or 10 days under one of four 201-lux lighting conditions: (1) B410 long-wavelength–filtered light, (2) B460 long-wavelength–filtered light, (3) Y48 short-wavelength–filtered light, or (4) HA50 broadband light.

Results

At 7 days, B410 (but not B460) long-wavelength–filtered light had significantly inhibited negative lens induced axial growth relative to Y48 short-wavelength–filtered light (mean difference in experimental eye = −0.249 mm; P = 0.006) and HA50 broadband light (mean difference = −0.139 mm; P = 0.038). B410 filters also inhibited the negative lens-induced increase in vitreous chamber depth relative to all other filter conditions. Corresponding changes in refraction did not occur, and biometric measurements in a separate cohort of chicks suggested that the axial dimension changes were transient and not maintained at 10 days.

Conclusions

Chromatic effects on eye growth can be achieved using filters that transmit a broad range of wavelengths even in the presence of strong cues for myopia development.

Translational Relevance

Broad-wavelength filters that provide a more “naturalistic” visual experience relative to monochromatic light have potential to alter myopia development, although the effects shown here were modest and transient and require exploration in further species.

Effects of screen-based retinal light stimulation measured with a novel contrast sensitivity test

Myopia is increasing worldwide hence it exists a pressing demand to find effective myopia control strategies. Previous studies have shown that light, spectral composition, spatial frequencies, and contrasts play a critical role in refractive development. The effects of light on multiple retinal processes include growth regulation, but also visual performance and perception. Changes in subjective visual performance can be examined by contrast sensitivity (CS). This study was conducted to investigate whether retinal light stimulation of different wavelength ranges is able to elicit changes in CS and, therefore, may be used for myopia control purposes. In total, 30 right eyes were stimulated with the light of different wavelength ranges, including dominant wavelengths of ∼480 nm, ∼530 nm, ∼630 nm and polychromatic light via a commercial liquid crystal display (LCD) screen. Stimulation was performed screen full-field and on the optic nerve head only. CS was measured before any stimulation and after each stimulation condition using a novel and time-efficient CS test. Post-stimulation CS changes were analyzed by ANOVA regarding the influencing factors spatial frequency, stimulation wavelength and stimulation location. A priorly conducted verification study on a subset of five participants compared the newly developed CS test to a validated CS test. The novel CS test exhibited good reliability of 0.94 logCS and repeatability of 0.13 logCS with a duration of 92 sec ± 17 sec. No clinically critical change between pre- and post-stimulation CS was detected (all p>0.05). However, the results showed that post-stimulation CS differed significantly at 18 cpd after stimulation with polychromatic light from short-wavelength light (p<0.0001). Location of illumination (screen full-field vs. optic nerve head) or any interactions with other factors did not reveal significant influences (all p>0.05). To summarize, a novel CS test measures the relationship between retinal light stimulation and CS. However, using retinal illumination via LCD screens to increase CS is inconclusive.

Contribution of M-opsin-based color vision to refractive development in mice

M-opsin, encoded by opn1mw gene, is involved in green-light perception of mice. The role of M-opsin in emmetropization of mice remains uncertain. To answer the above question, 4-week-old wild-type (WT) mice were exposed to white light or green light (460-600 nm, a peak at 510 nm) for 12 weeks. Refractive development was estimated biweekly. After treatment, retinal function was assessed using electroretinogram (ERG). Dopamine (DA) in the retina was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography, M-opsin and S-opsin protein levels by Western blot and ELISA, and mRNA expressions of opn1mw and opn1sw by RT-PCR. Effects of M-opsin were further verified in Opn1mw^-/- and WT mice raised in white light for 4 weeks. Refractive development was examined at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after birth. The retinal structure was estimated through hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Retinal wholemounts from WT and Opn1mw^-/- mice were co-immunolabeled with M-opsin and S-opsin, their distribution and quantity were then assayed by immunofluorescence staining (IF). Expression of S-opsin protein and opn1sw mRNA were determined by Western blot, ELISA, or RT-PCR. Retinal function and DA content were analyzed by ERG and liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), respectively. Lastly, visual cliff test was used to evaluate the depth perception of the Opn1mw^-/- mice. We found that green light-treated WT mice were more myopic with increased M-opsin expression and decreased DA content than white light-treated WT mice after 12-week illumination. No electrophysiologic abnormalities were recorded in mice exposed to green light compared to those exposed to white light. A more hyperopic shift was further observed in 8-week-old Opn1mw^-/- mice in white light with lower DA level and weakened cone function than the WT mice under white light. Neither obvious structural disruption of the retina nor abnormal depth perception was found in Opn1mw^-/- mice. Together, these results suggested that the M-opsin-based color vision participated in the refractive development of mice. Overexposure to green light caused myopia, but less perception of the middle-wavelength components in white light promoted hyperopia in mice. Furthermore, possible dopaminergic signaling pathway was suggested in myopia induced by green light.

Short Wavelength (Blue) Light Is Protective for Lens-Induced Myopia in Guinea Pigs Potentially Through a Retinoic Acid-Related Mechanism

Purpose

To investigate the effect of short-wavelength light (SL) on guinea pigs with lens-induced myopia (LIM) and the possible retinoic acid (RA)–related mechanisms.

Methods

Two-week-old guinea pigs (n = 60) with monocular −5D lenses were reared under white light (WL, 580 lux) or SL (440 nm, 500 lux). The left eyes were uncovered as control. Refractive error (RE) and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline, one week, two weeks, and four weeks after intervention. Retinal RA was measured from four guinea pigs after two and four weeks of treatment with HPLC. Two-week-old guinea pigs (n = 52) with monocular −5D lens were fed with either RA or its synthesis inhibitor citral every third day in the morning, and half from each group were reared under WL or SL conditions. RE and AL were recorded at baseline and two and four weeks after intervention. Retinal RA was measured after four weeks of intervention.

Results

At the end of treatment, guinea pigs exposed to SL were less myopic than to WL (2.06 ± 1.69D vs. −1.00 ± 1.88D), accompanied with shorter AL (P = 0.01) and less retinal RA (P = 0.02). SL reduced retinal RA even after exogenous RA supplementation (P = 0.02) and decelerated LIM compared to WL (1.66 ± 1.03D vs. −3.53 ± 0.90D). Citral slowed ocular growth, leading to similar RE in W+CI and S+CI groups (3.39 ± 1.65D vs. 5.25 ± 0.80D).

Conclusions

Overall, SL reduced LIM in guinea pigs, even in those supplemented with oral RA, accompanied by reduced retinal RA levels. Oral RA accelerated eye elongation, but citral equally decelerated eye elongation under SL and WL with no significant retinal RA reduction.

Quantitative proteomic analysis of scleras in guinea pig exposed to wavelength defocus

Myopia is the most common optical disorder in the world, and wavelength defocus induced ametropia and myopia have attracted great attention. The objective was to identify and quantify scleral proteins involved in the response to the wavelength defocus. Guinea pigs were randomly divided into 3 groups that received different lighting conditions for 8 weeks: white light, short wavelength light, and long wavelength light. Refraction and axial length were measured, Hematoxylin-Eosin staining and transmission electron microscope were adopted to observe the scleral structure, and scleral proteome was also detected to analyze protein abundance by employing TMT labeling method. After light stimulation, the long- and short -wavelength light induced myopic and hyperopic effect on the guinea pig's eye and induced distinct protein signature, respectively. 186 dyregulated proteins between the short- and long-wavelength group were identified, which were mainly located in extracellular region and involved in metabolic process. We also found that 5 proteins in the guinea pigs scleras in response to wavelength defocus were also human myopic candidate targets, suggesting functional overlap between dyregulated proteins in scleral upon exposure to wavelength defocus and genes causing myopia in humans. SIGNIFICANCE: Wavelength defocus induces refractive errors and leads to myopia or hyperopia. However, sclera proteomics respond to wavelength defocus is lacking, which is crucial to understanding how wavelength defocus influences refractive development and induces myopia. In this proteome analysis, we identified unique protein signatures response to wavelength defocus in sclera of guinea pigs, identified potential mechanisms contributing to myopia formation, and found that several human myopia-related genes may involve in response to wavelength defocus. The results of this study provide a foundation to understand the mechanisms of myopia and wavelength defocus induced ametropia.

Ocular growth and metabolomics are dependent upon the spectral content of ambient white light

Myopia results from an excessive axial growth of the eye, causing abnormal projection of remote images in front of the retina. Without adequate interventions, myopia is forecasted to affect 50% of the world population by 2050. Exposure to outdoor light plays a critical role in preventing myopia in children, possibly through the brightness and blue-shifted spectral composition of sunlight, which lacks in artificial indoor lighting. Here, we evaluated the impact of moderate levels of ambient standard white (SW: 233.1 lux, 3900 K) and blue-enriched white (BEW: 223.8 lux, 9700 K) lights on ocular growth and metabolomics in a chicken-model of form-deprivation myopia. Compared to SW light, BEW light decreased aberrant ocular axial elongation and accelerated recovery from form-deprivation. Furthermore, the metabolomic profiles in the vitreous and retinas of recovering form-deprived eyes were distinct from control eyes and were dependent on the spectral content of ambient light. For instance, exposure to BEW light was associated with deep lipid remodeling and metabolic changes related to energy production, cell proliferation, collagen turnover and nitric oxide metabolism. This study provides new insight on light-dependent modulations in ocular growth and metabolomics. If replicable in humans, our findings open new potential avenues for spectrally-tailored light-therapy strategies for myopia.

Influence of Circadian Rhythm in the Eye: Significance of Melatonin in Glaucoma

Circadian rhythm and the molecules involved in it, such as melanopsin and melatonin, play an important role in the eye to regulate the homeostasis and even to treat some ocular conditions. As a result, many ocular pathologies like dry eye, corneal wound healing, cataracts, myopia, retinal diseases, and glaucoma are affected by this cycle. This review will summarize the current scientific literature about the influence of circadian patterns on the eye, focusing on its relationship with increased intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations and glaucoma. Regarding treatments, two ways should be studied: the first one, to analyze if some treatments could improve their effect on the ocular disease when their posology is established in function of circadian patterns, and the second one, to evaluate new drugs to treat eye pathologies related to the circadian rhythm, as it has been stated with melatonin or its analogs, that not only could be used as the main treatment but as coadjutant, improving the circadian pattern or its antioxidant and antiangiogenic properties.

Light and myopia: from epidemiological studies to neurobiological mechanisms

Myopia is far beyond its inconvenience and represents a true, highly prevalent, sight-threatening ocular condition, especially in Asia. Without adequate interventions, the current epidemic of myopia is projected to affect 50% of the world population by 2050, becoming the leading cause of irreversible blindness. Although blurred vision, the predominant symptom of myopia, can be improved by contact lenses, glasses or refractive surgery, corrected myopia, particularly high myopia, still carries the risk of secondary blinding complications such as glaucoma, myopic maculopathy and retinal detachment, prompting the need for prevention. Epidemiological studies have reported an association between outdoor time and myopia prevention in children. The protective effect of time spent outdoors could be due to the unique characteristics (intensity, spectral distribution, temporal pattern, etc.) of sunlight that are lacking in artificial lighting. Concomitantly, studies in animal models have highlighted the efficacy of light and its components in delaying or even stopping the development of myopia and endeavoured to elucidate possible mechanisms involved in this process. In this narrative review, we (1) summarize the current knowledge concerning light modulation of ocular growth and refractive error development based on studies in human and animal models, (2) summarize potential neurobiological mechanisms involved in the effects of light on ocular growth and emmetropization and (3) highlight a potential pathway for the translational development of noninvasive light-therapy strategies for myopia prevention in children.

A role of color vision in emmetropization in C57BL/6J mice

Spectral composition affects emmetropization in both humans and animal models. Because color vision interacts the effects of chromatic defocus, we developed a method to bypass the effects of longitudinal chromatic aberration by placing a spectral filter behind the optics of the eye, using genetic tools. Newborn C57BL/6J (B6) mice were reared in quasi-monochromatic red (585–660 nm) or blue (410–510 nm) light beginning before eye-opening. Refractive states and ocular dimensions were compared at 4, 6, 8, and 10 weeks with mice reared in normal white light. Cre recombinase-dependent Ai9 reporter mice were crossed with Chx10-Cre to obtain Chx10-Cre;Ai9 mice, expressing red fluorescent protein in retinal Cre-positive cells. Ai9 offsprings, with and without Cre, were reared under a normal visual environment. Refraction and axial components were measured as described above. Expression levels of M and S opsin were quantified by western blotting at 10 weeks. Compared with those reared in white light, B6 mice reared in red light developed relative hyperopia, principally characterized by flattening of corneal curvature. Emmetropization was not affected by blue light, possibly because the reduction in vitreous chamber depth compensated for the increase in corneal curvature. Compared with Cre-negative littermates, the refraction and axial dimensions of Chx10-Cre;Ai9 mice were not significantly different at the follow-up timepoints. M opsin levels were higher in Chx10-Cre;Ai9 mice at 10 weeks while S opsin levels were not different. Red light induced a hyperopic shift in mouse refractive development. Emmetropization was not impacted in mice with perturbed color vision caused by intrinsic red-fluorescent protein, suggesting that color vision may not be necessary in mouse emmetropization when other mechanisms are present.

Short-Wavelength (Violet) Light Protects Mice From Myopia Through Cone Signaling

Purpose

Exposure to short-wavelength light influences refractive development and inhibits myopic development in many animal models. Retinal mechanisms underlying this response remain unknown. This study used a mouse model of lens-induced myopia to evaluate the effect of different wavelength light on refractive development and dopamine levels in the retina. A possible retinal pathway is tested using a mutant mouse with dysfunctional cones.

Methods

Wild-type C57BL/6J (WT) and ALS/LtJ/Gnat2^cpfl3 (Gnat2^−/−) mice were exposed to one of three different light conditions beginning at postnatal day 28: broad-spectrum “white” (420-680 nm), medium wavelength “green” (525 ± 40 nm), and short wavelength “violet” (400 ± 20 nm). One-half of the mice received hyperopic lens defocus. All mice were exposed to the light for 4 weeks; animals were measured weekly for refractive error and axial parameters. Retinal dopamine and the dopamine metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid were measured by HPLC.

Results

In WT mice, short-wavelength violet light induced hyperopia and violet light inhibited lens-induced myopia when compared with mice exposed to white light. Hyperopia could be attributed to shallower vitreous chambers in WT animals. There were no changes in the levels of dopamine or its metabolite. In Gnat2^−/− mice, violet light did not induce hyperopia or inhibit lens-induced myopia.

Conclusions

These findings show that short-wavelength light slows refractive eye growth, producing hyperopic responses in mice and inhibiting lens-induced myopia. The lack of inhibition in mice with dysfunctional cones suggests that cone signaling plays a role in the hyperopic response to short-wavelength (violet) light.

Effect of duration, and temporal modulation, of monochromatic light on emmetropization in chicks

Previous experiments disagree on the effect of monochromatic light on emmetropization. Some species respond to wavelength defocus created by longitudinal chromatic aberration and become more myopic in monochromatic red light and more hyperopic in monochromatic blue light, while other species do not. Using the chicken model, we studied the effect of the duration of light exposure, modes of lighting, and circadian interruption on emmetropization in monochromatic light. To achieve this goal, we exposed one-week-old chicks to flickering or steady monochromatic red or blue light for a short (10 days) or long (17 days) duration; other chicks were exposed to white light for 10 days. Refraction and ocular biometry were measured. Activity was measured via a motion detection algorithm and an IR camera. The results showed that in both steady and flickering light, there was a greater increase in axial length and vitreous chamber depth in chicks exposed to red or white light compared to chicks exposed to blue light. With a longer duration of exposure, axial length and vitreous chamber depth differences were no longer observed, except at an intermediate time point. Chicks exposed to red light were more active during the day compared to chicks exposed to blue light. We conclude that our results indicate that with short duration monochromatic light exposure, chicks rely on wavelength defocus to guide emmetropization. With longer exposure from hatching, our results support the notion that responses to wavelength defocus can be transient and that the difference between species may be due to differences in experimental duration and/or interference with circadian activity rhythms.

How does spending time outdoors protect against myopia? A review

Myopia is an increasingly common condition that is associated with significant costs to individuals and society. Moreover, myopia is associated with increased risk of glaucoma, retinal detachment and myopic maculopathy, which in turn can lead to blindness. It is now well established that spending more time outdoors during childhood lowers the risk of developing myopia and may delay progression of myopia. There has been great interest in further exploring this relationship and exploiting it as a public health intervention aimed at preventing myopia in children. However, spending more time outdoors can have detrimental effects, such as increased risk of melanoma, cataract and pterygium. Understanding how spending more time outdoors prevents myopia could advance development of more targeted interventions for myopia. We reviewed the evidence for and against eight facets of spending time outdoors that may protect against myopia: brighter light, reduced peripheral defocus, higher vitamin D levels, differing chromatic spectrum of light, higher physical activity, entrained circadian rhythms, less near work and greater high spatial frequency (SF) energies. There is solid evidence that exposure to brighter light can reduce risk of myopia. Peripheral defocus is able to regulate eye growth but whether spending time outdoors substantially changes peripheral defocus patterns and how this could affect myopia risk is unclear. Spectrum of light, circadian rhythms and SF characteristics are plausible factors, but there is a lack of solid evidence from human studies. Vitamin D, physical activity and near work appear unlikely to mediate the relationship between time spent outdoors and myopia.

Monochromatic and white light and the regulation of eye growth

Experiments employing monochromatic light have been used to investigate the role of longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) as possible signals for emmetropization for many years. LCA arising from the dispersion of light, causes differences in the focal length at different wavelengths and can impose defocus (wavelength defocus). Short-wavelength light focuses with a shorter focal length than long-wavelength light and, as such, would be expected to produce a smaller, more hyperopic eye. Emmetropization can respond to wavelength defocus since animals reared in monochromatic light adjust their refractive state relative to that measured in white light. In many species, animals reared in monochromatic light respond as predicted by wavelength defocus, becoming more hyperopic in blue light and more myopic in red light. However, tree shrews and rhesus monkey become more hyperopic in red light, and while tree shrews initially become more hyperopic in blue light, they later become more myopic. This review examines the experiments performed in monochromatic light and highlights the potential differences in protocols affecting the results, including experiment duration, circadian rhythm stimulation, light intensity, bandwidth, humoral factors and temporal sensitivity.

Research progress about the effect and prevention of blue light on eyes

In recent years, people have become increasingly attentive to light pollution influences on their eyes. In the visible spectrum, short-wave blue light with wavelength between 415 nm and 455 nm is closely related to eye light damage. This high energy blue light passes through the cornea and lens to the retina causing diseases such as dry eye, cataract, age-related macular degeneration, even stimulating the brain, inhibiting melatonin secretion, and enhancing adrenocortical hormone production, which will destroy the hormonal balance and directly affect sleep quality. Therefore, the effect of Blu-rays on ocular is becoming an important concern for the future. We describe blue light's effects on eye tissues, summarize the research on eye injury and its physical prevention and medical treatment.