High-Dose Inhaled Nitric Oxide as Adjunct Therapy in Cystic Fibrosis Targeting Burkholderia multivorans

Development of nitric oxide generators to produce high-dose nitric oxide for inhalation therapy

BACKGROUND

Several nitric oxide (NO) generating devices have been developed to deliver NO between 1 part per million (ppm) and 80 ppm. Although inhalation of high-dose NO may exert antimicrobial effects, the feasibility and safety of producing high-dose (more than 100 ppm) NO remains to be established. In the current study, we designed, developed, and tested three high-dose NO generating devices.

METHODS

We constructed three NO generating devices: a double spark plug NO generator, a high-pressure single spark plug NO generator, and a gliding arc NO generator. The NO and NO2 concentrations were measured at different gas flows and under various atmospheric pressures. The double spark plug NO generator was designed to deliver gas through an oxygenator and mixing with pure oxygen. The high-pressure and gliding arc NO generators were used to deliver gas through a ventilator into artificial lungs to mimic delivering high-dose NO in the clinical settings. The energy consumption was measured and compared among the three NO generators.

RESULTS

The double spark plug NO generator produced 200 ± 2 ppm (mean ± SD) of NO at gas flow of 8 L/min (or 320 ± 3 ppm at gas flow of 5 L/min) with electrode gap of 3 mm. The nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels were below 3.0 ± 0.1 ppm when mixing with various volumes of pure oxygen. The addition of a second generator increased the delivered NO from 80 (with one spark plug) to 200 ppm. With the high-pressure chamber, the NO concentration reached 407 ± 3 ppm with continuous air flow at 5 L/min when employing the 3 mm electrode gap under 2.0 atmospheric pressure (ATA). When compared to 1 ATA, NO production was increased 22% at 1.5 ATA and 34% at 2 ATA. The NO level was 180 ± 1 ppm when connecting the device to a ventilator with a constant inspiratory airflow of 15 L/min, and NO2 levels were below 1 (0.93 ± 0.02) ppm. The gliding arc NO generator produced up to 180 ± 4 ppm of NO when connecting the device to a ventilator, and the NO2 level was below 1 (0.91 ± 0.02) ppm in all testing conditions. The gliding arc device required more power (in watts) to generate the same concentrations of NO when compared to double spark plug or high-pressure NO generators.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that it is feasible to enhance NO production (more than 100 ppm) while maintaining NO2 level relatively low (less than 3 ppm) with the three recently developed NO generating devices. Future studies might include these novel designs to deliver high doses of inhaled NO as an antimicrobial used to treat upper and lower respiratory tract infections.

High Doses of Inhaled Nitric Oxide as an Innovative Antimicrobial Strategy for Lung Infections

Since the designation of nitric oxide as “Molecule of the Year” in 1992, the scientific and clinical discoveries concerning this biomolecule have been greatly expanding. Currently, therapies enhancing the release of endogenous nitric oxide or the direct delivery of the exogenous compound are recognized as valuable pharmacological treatments in several disorders. In particular, the administration of inhaled nitric oxide is routinely used to treat patients with pulmonary hypertension or refractory hypoxemia. More recently, inhaled nitric oxide has been studied as a promising antimicrobial treatment strategy against a range of pathogens, including resistant bacterial and fungal infections of the respiratory system. Pre-clinical and clinical findings have demonstrated that, at doses greater than 160 ppm, nitric oxide has antimicrobial properties and can be used to kill a broad range of infectious microorganisms. This review focused on the mechanism of action and current evidence from in vitro studies, animal models and human clinical trials of inhaled high-dose nitric oxide as an innovative antimicrobial therapy for lung infections.

Multiresistant organisms: bacteria and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Infections with multiresistant organisms are an emerging problem, cause early mortality post lung transplantation and are sometimes associated with graft dysfunction. Frequently they raise questions about the selection of lung transplant candidates and therapeutic management post lung transplantation. There are no guidelines and management must be individualized. This review summarizes the available therapeutic options in cases of multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms and outcomes after lung transplant.

RECENT FINDINGS

Improvements in diagnosis, new and more effective drugs and the experience gained in the management of these infections in lung transplantation, lead to a more optimistic horizon than that found a decade ago.

SUMMARY

Update on the management of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Mycobacterium abscessus complex, Aspergillus spp., Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora prolificans infections. This review clarifies current posttransplant outcomes and adds a little hope in these scenarios.

Therapeutic Effects of Inhaled Nitric Oxide Therapy in COVID-19 Patients

The global COVID-19 pandemic has become the largest public health challenge of recent years. The incidence of COVID-19-related acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) occurs in up to 15% of hospitalized patients. Antiviral drugs currently available to clinicians have little to no effect on mortality, length of in-hospital stay, the need for mechanical ventilation, or long-term effects. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) administration is a promising new non-standard approach to directly treat viral burden while enhancing oxygenation. Along with its putative antiviral affect in COVID-19 patients, iNO can reduce inflammatory cell-mediated lung injury by inhibiting neutrophil activation, lowering pulmonary vascular resistance and decreasing edema in the alveolar spaces, collectively enhancing ventilation/perfusion matching. This narrative review article presents recent literature on the iNO therapy use for COVID-19 patients. The authors suggest that early administration of the iNO therapy may be a safe and promising approach for the treatment of COVID-19 patients. The authors also discuss unconventional approaches to treatment, continuous versus intermittent high-dose iNO therapy, timing of initiation of therapy (early versus late), and novel delivery systems. Future laboratory and clinical research is required to define the role of iNO as an adjunct therapy against bacterial, viral, and fungal infections.

High-Dose Nitric Oxide From Pressurized Cylinders and Nitric Oxide Produced by an Electric Generator From Air

BACKGROUND

High-dose (≥ 80 ppm) inhaled nitric oxide (INO) has antimicrobial effects. We designed a trial to test the preventive effects of high-dose NO on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in health care providers working with patients with COVID-19. The study was interrupted prematurely due to the introduction of COVID-19 vaccines for health care professionals. We thereby present data on safety and feasibility of breathing 160 ppm NO using 2 different NO sources, namely pressurized nitrogen/NO cylinders (INO) and electric NO (eNO) generators.

METHODS

NO gas was inhaled at 160 ppm in air for 15 min twice daily, before and after each work shift, over 14 d by health care providers (NCT04312243). During NO administration, vital signs were continuously monitored. Safety was assessed by measuring transcutaneous methemoglobinemia (SpMet) and the inhaled nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) concentration.

RESULTS

Twelve healthy health care professionals received a collective total of 185 administrations of high-dose NO (160 ppm) for 15 min twice daily. One-hundred and seventy-one doses were delivered by INO and 14 doses by eNO. During NO administration, SpMet increased similarly in both groups (P = .82). Methemoglobin decreased in all subjects at 5 min after discontinuing NO administration. Inhaled NO₂ concentrations remained between 0.70 ppm (0.63-0.79) and 0.75 ppm (0.67-0.83) in the INO group and between 0.74 ppm (0.68-0.78) and 0.88 ppm (0.70-0.93) in the eNO group. During NO administration, peripheral oxygen saturation and heart rate did not change. No adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study testing high-dose INO (160 ppm) for 15 min twice daily using eNO seems feasible and similarly safe when compared with INO.

Recent Developments in Nitric Oxide Donors and Delivery for Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Applications

The use of nitric oxide (NO) is emerging as a promising, novel approach for the treatment of antibiotic resistant bacteria and biofilm infections. Depending on the concentration, NO can induce biofilm dispersal, increase bacteria susceptibility to antibiotic treatment, and induce cell damage or cell death via the formation of reactive oxygen or reactive nitrogen species. The use of NO is, however, limited by its reactivity, which can affect NO delivery to its target site and result in off-target effects. To overcome these issues, and enable spatial or temporal control over NO release, various strategies for the design of NO-releasing materials, including the incorporation of photo-activable, charge-switchable, or bacteria-targeting groups, have been developed. Other strategies have focused on increased NO storage and delivery by encapsulation or conjugation of NO donors within a single polymeric framework. This review compiles recent developments in NO drugs and NO-releasing materials designed for applications in antimicrobial or anti-biofilm treatment and discusses limitations and variability in biological responses in response to the use of NO for bacterial eradiation.

Management of Multidrug Resistant Infections in Lung Transplant Recipients with Cystic Fibrosis

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an inherited multisystem disease characterised by bronchiectasis and chronic respiratory infections which eventually cause end stage lung disease. Lung transplantation (LTx) is a well-established treatment option for patients with CF-associated lung disease, improving survival and quality of life. Navigating recurrent infections in the setting of LTx is often difficult, where immune suppression must be balanced against the constant threat of infection. Sepsis/infections are one of the major contributors to post-LTx mortality and multiresistant organisms (eg, Burkholderia cepacia complex, Mycobacterium abscessus complex, Scedosporium spp. and Lomentospora spp.) pose a significant threat to survival. This review will summarize current and novel therapies to assist with the management of multiresistant bacterial, mycobacterial, viral and fungal infections which threaten the CF LTx cohort.

Non-nuberculous mycobacteria infection treated with intermittently inhaled high-dose nitric oxide

Mycobacterium abscessus is an emerging multidrug-resistant non-tuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) with high prevalence in patients with cystic fibrosis. However, studies on antimicrobial susceptibilities and effective treatments against M. abscessus are still limited. Nitric oxide (NO) is important in innate immune response to various infections, including mycobacterial infections. In this case study, we describe a compassionate treatment of inhaled NO (iNO) at 150–250 ppm for 4 weeks. The dosing strategy proposed for this treatment was selected to minimise the potential of adverse events, while maximising the antibacterial effectiveness of NO, and was found to be safe, well tolerated and resulted in positive clinical findings including improvement in patient well-being, CT scan values, quality of life and bacterial load. Taken together, these observations may indicate that iNO could play a crucial role and potentially serve as a reliable option in the treatment of patients with chronic refractory NTM lung infection.

A novel pre-clinical strategy to deliver antimicrobial doses of inhaled nitric oxide

Effective treatment of respiratory infections continues to be a major challenge. In high doses (≥160 ppm), inhaled Nitric Oxide (iNO) has been shown to act as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent, including its efficacy in vitro for coronavirus family. However, the safety of prolonged in vivo implementation of high-dose iNO therapy has not been studied. Herein we aim to explore the feasibility and safety of delivering continuous high-dose iNO over an extended period of time using an in vivo animal model. Yorkshire pigs were randomized to one of the following two groups: group 1, standard ventilation; and group 2, standard ventilation + continuous iNO 160 ppm + methylene blue (MB) as intravenous bolus, whenever required, to maintain metHb <6%. Both groups were ventilated continuously for 6 hours, then the animals were weaned from sedation, mechanical ventilation and followed for 3 days. During treatment, and on the third post-operative day, physiologic assessments were performed to monitor lung function and other significative markers were assessed for potential pulmonary or systemic injury. No significant change in lung function, or inflammatory markers were observed during the study period. Both gas exchange function, lung tissue cytokine analysis and histology were similar between treated and control animals. During treatment, levels of metHb were maintained <6% by administration of MB, and NO2 remained <5 ppm. Additionally, considering extrapulmonary effects, no significant changes were observed in biochemistry markers. Our findings showed that high-dose iNO delivered continuously over 6 hours with adjuvant MB is clinically feasible and safe. These findings support the development of investigations of continuous high-dose iNO treatment of respiratory tract infections, including SARS-CoV-2.

Nitric oxide for the prevention and treatment of viral, bacterial, protozoal and fungal infections

Although the antimicrobial potential of nitric oxide (NO) is widely published, it is little used clinically. NO is a key signalling molecule modulating vascular, neuronal, inflammatory and immune responses. Endogenous antimicrobial activity is largely mediated by high local NO concentrations produced by cellular inducible nitric oxide synthase, and by derivative reactive nitrogen oxide species including peroxynitrite and S-nitrosothiols. NO may be taken as dietary substrate (inorganic nitrate, L-arginine), and therapeutically as gaseous NO, and transdermal, sublingual, oral, intranasal and intravenous nitrite or nitrate. Numerous preclinical studies have demonstrated that NO has generic static and cidal activities against viruses (including β-coronaviruses such as SARS-CoV-2), bacteria, protozoa and fungi/yeasts  in vitro. Therapeutic effects have been seen in animal models  in vivo, and phase II trials have demonstrated that NO donors can reduce microbial infection. Nevertheless, excess NO, as occurs in septic shock, is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In view of the dose-dependent positive and negative effects of NO, safety and efficacy trials of NO and its donors are needed for assessing their role in the prevention and treatment of infections. Trials should test dietary inorganic nitrate for pre- or post-exposure prophylaxis and gaseous NO or oral, topical or intravenous nitrite and nitrate for treatment of mild-to-severe infections, including due to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). This review summarises the evidence base from  in vitro, in vivo and early phase clinical studies of NO activity in viral, bacterial, protozoal and fungal infections.

NO donors and NO delivery methods for controlling biofilms in chronic lung infections

Nitric oxide (NO), the highly reactive radical gas, provides an attractive strategy in the control of microbial infections. NO not only exhibits bactericidal effect at high concentrations but also prevents bacterial attachment and disperses biofilms at low, nontoxic concentrations, rendering bacteria less tolerant to antibiotic treatment. The endogenously generated NO by airway epithelium in healthy populations significantly contributes to the eradication of invading pathogens. However, this pathway is often compromised in patients suffering from chronic lung infections where biofilms dominate. Thus, exogenous supplementation of NO is suggested to improve the therapeutic outcomes of these infectious diseases. Compared to previous reviews focusing on the mechanism of NO-mediated biofilm inhibition, this review explores the applications of NO for inhibiting biofilms in chronic lung infections. It discusses how abnormal levels of NO in the airways contribute to chronic infections in cystic fibrosis (CF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) patients and why exogenous NO can be a promising antibiofilm strategy in clinical settings, as well as current and potential in vivo NO delivery methods. KEY POINTS : • The relationship between abnormal NO levels and biofilm development in lungs • The antibiofilm property of NO and current applications in lungs • Potential NO delivery methods and research directions in the future.

Ideation and assessment of a nitric oxide delivery system for spontaneously breathing subjects

Background

There is an increasing interest in safely delivering high dose of inhaled nitric oxide (NO) as an antimicrobial and antiviral therapeutics for spontaneously breathing patients. A novel NO delivery system is described.

Methods

We developed a gas delivery system that utilizes standard respiratory circuit connectors, a reservoir bag, and a scavenging chamber containing calcium hydroxide. The performance of the system was tested using a mechanical lung, assessing the NO concentration delivered at varying inspiratory flows. Safety was assessed in vitro and in vivo by measuring nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) levels in the delivered NO gas. Lastly, we measured the inspired and expired NO and NO₂ of this system in 5 healthy subjects during a 15-min administration of high dose NO (160 parts-per-million, ppm) using our delivery system.

Results

The system demonstrated stable delivery of prescribed NO levels at various inspiratory flow rates (0–50 L/min). The reservoir bag and a high flow of entering air minimized the oscillation of NO concentrations during inspiration on average 4.6 ppm for each 10 L/min increment in lung inspiratory flow.

The calcium hydroxide scavenger reduced the inhaled NO₂ concentration on average 0.9 ppm (95% CI -1.58, −0.22; p = .01). We performed 49 NO administrations of 160 ppm in 5 subjects. The average concentration of inspired NO was 164.8±10.74 ppm, with inspired NO₂ levels of 0.7±0.13 ppm. The subjects did not experience any adverse events; transcutaneous methemoglobin concentrations increased from 1.05±0.58 to 2.26±0.47%.

Conclusions

The system we developed to administer high-dose NO for inhalation is easy to build, reliable, was well tolerated in healthy subjects.

•

We conceived and tested a NO delivery system for spontaneously breathing subjects.

•

A scavenger containing calcium hydroxide reduces the inspired NO₂ concentration.

•

A reservoir bag reduces variations of NO concentration during breathing.

•

In five healthy subjects breathing 164.8±10.74 ppm of NO, inspired NO₂ was 0.7±0.13 ppm.

•

In a healthy subject breathing 153 ppm of NO, the exhaled NO₂ was 0.03 ppm.