1
|
Leonardi MC, Zerella MA, Lazzeroni M, Fusco N, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Corso G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Lorubbio C, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Magnoni F. Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:795. [PMID: 38610216 PMCID: PMC11011767 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12070795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Matteo Lazzeroni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Viviana Enrica Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Marianna Alessandra Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Chiara Lorubbio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miodownik D, Bierman D, Thornton C, Moo T, Feigin K, Damato A, Le T, Williamson M, Prasad K, Chu B, Dauer L, Saphier N, Zanzonico P, Morrow M, Bellamy M. Radioactive seed localization is a safe and effective tool for breast cancer surgery: an evaluation of over 25,000 cases. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2024; 44:011511. [PMID: 38295404 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad246a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Radioactive seed localization (RSL) provides a precise and efficient method for removing non-palpable breast lesions. It has proven to be a valuable addition to breast surgery, improving perioperative logistics and patient satisfaction. This retrospective review examines the lessons learned from a high-volume cancer center's RSL program after 10 years of practice and over 25 000 cases. We provide an updated model for assessing the patient's radiation dose from RSL seed implantation and demonstrate the safety of RSL to staff members. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of various aspects of presurgical evaluation, surgical techniques, post-surgical management, and regulatory compliance for a successful RSL program. Notably, the program has reduced radiation exposure for patients and medical staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Miodownik
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - D Bierman
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - C Thornton
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - T Moo
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - K Feigin
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - A Damato
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - T Le
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Williamson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - K Prasad
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - B Chu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - L Dauer
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - N Saphier
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - P Zanzonico
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Morrow
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - M Bellamy
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nishida J, Cristea S, Bodapati S, Puleo J, Bai G, Patel A, Hughes M, Snow C, Borges V, Ruddy KJ, Collins LC, Feeney AM, Slowik K, Bossuyt V, Dillon D, Lin NU, Partridge AH, Michor F, Polyak K. Peripheral blood TCR clonotype diversity as an age-associated marker of breast cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2023; 120:e2316763120. [PMID: 38011567 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2316763120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Immune escape is a prerequisite for tumor growth. We previously described a decline in intratumor activated cytotoxic T cells and T cell receptor (TCR) clonotype diversity in invasive breast carcinomas compared to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), implying a central role of decreasing T cell responses in tumor progression. To determine potential associations between peripheral immunity and breast tumor progression, here, we assessed the peripheral blood TCR clonotype of 485 breast cancer patients diagnosed with either DCIS or de novo stage IV disease at younger (<45) or older (≥45) age. TCR clonotype diversity was significantly lower in older compared to younger breast cancer patients regardless of tumor stage at diagnosis. In the younger age group, TCR-α clonotype diversity was lower in patients diagnosed with de novo stage IV breast cancer compared to those diagnosed with DCIS. In the older age group, DCIS patients with higher TCR-α clonotype diversity were more likely to have a recurrence compared to those with lower diversity. Whole blood transcriptome profiles were distinct depending on the TCR-α Chao1 diversity score. There were more CD8+ T cells and a more active immune environment in DCIS tumors of young patients with higher peripheral blood TCR-α Chao1 diversity than in those with lower diversity. These results provide insights into the role that host immunity plays in breast cancer development across different age groups.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Aged
- Female
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/genetics
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/pathology
- Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics
- Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell/genetics
- Neoplastic Processes
- Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-beta/genetics
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Nishida
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Simona Cristea
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Sudheshna Bodapati
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Julieann Puleo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Gali Bai
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Ashka Patel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Melissa Hughes
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Craig Snow
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Virginia Borges
- Medicine-Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, CO 80045
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
| | - Laura C Collins
- Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Anne-Marie Feeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Kara Slowik
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02138
| | - Veerle Bossuyt
- Mass General Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
| | - Deborah Dillon
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Nancy U Lin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Franziska Michor
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02138
- The Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA 02115
- Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
- Mass General Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- The Ludwig Center at Harvard, Boston, MA 02115
- Center for Cancer Evolution, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Barrios-Rodríguez R, Garde C, Pérez-Carrascosa FM, Expósito J, Peinado FM, Fernández Rodríguez M, Requena P, Salcedo-Bellido I, Arrebola JP. Associations of accumulated persistent organic pollutants in breast adipose tissue with the evolution of breast cancer after surgery. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 897:165373. [PMID: 37419338 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/09/2023]
Abstract
Chronic exposure to persistent organic pollutants (POPs) is suspected to contribute to the onset of breast cancer, but the impact on the evolution of patients after diagnosis is unclear. We aimed to analyze the contribution of long-term exposure to five POPs to overall mortality, cancer recurrence, metastasis, and development of second primary tumors over a global follow-up of 10 years after surgery in breast cancer patients in a cohort study. Between 2012 and 2014, a total of 112 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were recruited from a public hospital in Granada, Southern Spain. Historical exposure to POPs was estimated by analyzing their concentrations in breast adipose tissue samples. Sociodemographic data were collected through face-to-face interviews, while data on evolution tumor were retrieved from clinical records. Statistical analyses were performed using Cox regression (overall survival, breast cancer recurrence or metastasis) and binary logistic regression models (joint outcome variable). We also tested for statistical interactions of POPs with age, residence, and prognostic markers. The third vs first tertile of hexachlorobenzene concentrations was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratio, HR = 0.26; 95 % Confidence Interval, CI = 0.07-0.92) and of the appearance of any of the four events (Odds Ratio = 0.37; 95 % CI = 0.14-1.03). Polychlorinated biphenyl 138 concentrations were significantly and inversely associated with risk of metastasis (HR = 0.65; 95 % CI = 0.44-0.97) and tumor recurrence (HR = 0.69; 95 % CI = 0.49-0.98). Additionally, p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene showed inverse associations with risk of metastasis in women with ER-positive tumors (HR = 0.49; 95 % CI = 0.25-0.93) and in those with a tumor size <2.0 cm (HR = 0.39; 95 % CI = 0.18-0.87). The observed paradoxical inverse associations of POP exposure with breast cancer evolution might be related to either a better prognosis of hormone-dependent tumors, which have an approachable pharmacological target, or an effect of sequestration of circulating POPs by adipose tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Barrios-Rodríguez
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - C Garde
- San Cecilio University Hospital, Avenida del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Granada, Spain
| | - F M Pérez-Carrascosa
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | - J Expósito
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Virgen de las Nieves University Hospital, Radiation Oncology Department, Oncology Unit, Granada, Spain
| | - F M Peinado
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain
| | - M Fernández Rodríguez
- Universidad de Granada, Facultad de Farmacia, Departamento de Farmacia y Tecnología Farmacéutica, Granada, Spain
| | - P Requena
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - I Salcedo-Bellido
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
| | - J P Arrebola
- Universidad de Granada, Departamento de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Khalid A, Mehmood A, Alabrah A, Alkhamees BF, Amin F, AlSalman H, Choi GS. Breast Cancer Detection and Prevention Using Machine Learning. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3113. [PMID: 37835856 PMCID: PMC10572157 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a common cause of female mortality in developing countries. Early detection and treatment are crucial for successful outcomes. Breast cancer develops from breast cells and is considered a leading cause of death in women. This disease is classified into two subtypes: invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) techniques have made it possible to develop more accurate and reliable models for diagnosing and treating this disease. From the literature, it is evident that the incorporation of MRI and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is helpful in breast cancer detection and prevention. In addition, the detection strategies have shown promise in identifying cancerous cells. The CNN Improvements for Breast Cancer Classification (CNNI-BCC) model helps doctors spot breast cancer using a trained deep learning neural network system to categorize breast cancer subtypes. However, they require significant computing power for imaging methods and preprocessing. Therefore, in this research, we proposed an efficient deep learning model that is capable of recognizing breast cancer in computerized mammograms of varying densities. Our research relied on three distinct modules for feature selection: the removal of low-variance features, univariate feature selection, and recursive feature elimination. The craniocaudally and medial-lateral views of mammograms are incorporated. We tested it with a large dataset of 3002 merged pictures gathered from 1501 individuals who had digital mammography performed between February 2007 and May 2015. In this paper, we applied six different categorization models for the diagnosis of breast cancer, including the random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), k-nearest neighbors (KNN), logistic regression (LR), support vector classifier (SVC), and linear support vector classifier (linear SVC). The simulation results prove that our proposed model is highly efficient, as it requires less computational power and is highly accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arslan Khalid
- Faculty of Computing, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan; (A.K.); (A.M.)
| | - Arif Mehmood
- Faculty of Computing, Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur 63100, Punjab, Pakistan; (A.K.); (A.M.)
| | - Amerah Alabrah
- Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Bader Fahad Alkhamees
- Department of Information Systems, College of Computer and Information Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Farhan Amin
- Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea;
| | - Hussain AlSalman
- Department of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia;
| | - Gyu Sang Choi
- Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schmitz RSJM, Engelhardt EG, Gerritsma MA, Sondermeijer CMT, Verschuur E, Houtzager J, Griffioen R, Retèl V, Bijker N, Mann RM, van Duijnhoven F, Wesseling J, Bleiker EMA. Active surveillance versus treatment in low-risk DCIS: Women's preferences in the LORD-trial. Eur J Cancer 2023; 192:113276. [PMID: 37657228 PMCID: PMC10632767 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) can progress to invasive breast cancer (IBC), but most DCIS lesions remain indolent. However, guidelines recommend surgery, often supplemented by radiotherapy. This implies overtreatment of indolent DCIS. The non-randomised patient preference LORD-trial tests whether active surveillance (AS) for low-risk DCIS is safe, by giving women with low-risk DCIS a choice between AS and conventional treatment (CT). Here, we aim to describe how participants are distributed among both trial arms, identify their motives for their preference, and assess factors associated with their choice. METHODS Data were extracted from baseline questionnaires. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the distribution and characteristics of participants; thematic analyses to extract self-reported reasons for the choice of trial arm, and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate associations between patient characteristics and chosen trial arm. RESULTS Of 377 women included, 76% chose AS and 24% CT. Most frequently cited reasons for AS were "treatment is not (yet) necessary" (59%) and trust in the AS-plan (39%). Reasons for CT were cancer worry (51%) and perceived certainty (29%). Women opting for AS more often had lower educational levels (OR 0.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22-0.93) and more often reported experiencing shared decision making (OR 2.71; 95% CI, 1.37-5.37) than women choosing CT. CONCLUSION The LORD-trial is the first to offer women with low-risk DCIS a choice between CT and AS. Most women opted for AS and reported high levels of trust in the safety of AS. Their preferences highlight the necessity to establish the safety of AS for low-risk DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renée S J M Schmitz
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Miranda A Gerritsma
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Ellen Verschuur
- Dutch Breast Cancer Society ('Borstkanker Vereniging Nederland'), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Julia Houtzager
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rosalie Griffioen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Valesca Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nina Bijker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ritse M Mann
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Frederieke van Duijnhoven
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| | - Eveline M A Bleiker
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Family Cancer Clinic, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hutten SJ, de Bruijn R, Lutz C, Badoux M, Eijkman T, Chao X, Ciwinska M, Sheinman M, Messal H, Herencia-Ropero A, Kristel P, Mulder L, van der Waal R, Sanders J, Almekinders MM, Llop-Guevara A, Davies HR, van Haren MJ, Martin NI, Behbod F, Nik-Zainal S, Serra V, van Rheenen J, Lips EH, Wessels LFA, Wesseling J, Scheele CLGJ, Jonkers J. A living biobank of patient-derived ductal carcinoma in situ mouse-intraductal xenografts identifies risk factors for invasive progression. Cancer Cell 2023; 41:986-1002.e9. [PMID: 37116492 PMCID: PMC10171335 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive breast cancer (IBC). Due to a lack of biomarkers able to distinguish high- from low-risk cases, DCIS is treated similar to early IBC even though the minority of untreated cases eventually become invasive. Here, we characterized 115 patient-derived mouse-intraductal (MIND) DCIS models reflecting the full spectrum of DCIS observed in patients. Utilizing the possibility to follow the natural progression of DCIS combined with omics and imaging data, we reveal multiple prognostic factors for high-risk DCIS including high grade, HER2 amplification, expansive 3D growth, and high burden of copy number aberrations. In addition, sequential transplantation of xenografts showed minimal phenotypic and genotypic changes over time, indicating that invasive behavior is an intrinsic phenotype of DCIS and supporting a multiclonal evolution model. Moreover, this study provides a collection of 19 distributable DCIS-MIND models spanning all molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan J Hutten
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Roebi de Bruijn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Catrin Lutz
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Madelon Badoux
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Timo Eijkman
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Xue Chao
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marta Ciwinska
- Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael Sheinman
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrik Messal
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andrea Herencia-Ropero
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Petra Kristel
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lennart Mulder
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rens van der Waal
- Core Facility Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joyce Sanders
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mathilde M Almekinders
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alba Llop-Guevara
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helen R Davies
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, CB2 0XZ Cambridge, UK
| | - Matthijs J van Haren
- Biological Chemistry Group, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, 2302 BH Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Nathaniel I Martin
- Biological Chemistry Group, Institute of Biology Leiden, Leiden University, 2302 BH Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Fariba Behbod
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66103, USA
| | - Serena Nik-Zainal
- Academic Department of Medical Genetics, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, CB2 0QQ Cambridge, UK; Early Cancer Institute, University of Cambridge, CB2 0XZ Cambridge, UK
| | - Violeta Serra
- Experimental Therapeutics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, 08035 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jacco van Rheenen
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Esther H Lips
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lodewyk F A Wessels
- Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Molecular Carcinogenesis, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Diagnostic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Colinda L G J Scheele
- Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jos Jonkers
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Oncode Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Bekkum S, Drukker C, van Rosmalen J, Menke-Pluijmers MBE, Westenend PJ. A low risk of recurrence after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS: A single-institution experience. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2023; 35:100706. [PMID: 37058969 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2023.100706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previously published studies report up to 30% recurrence rates after DCIS, so it would be desirable to identify those women at risk for recurrence and adapt adjuvant management. This study aimed to identify the locoregional recurrence rate after breast conserving surgery (BCS) for DCIS, and to evaluate the possible role of immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in predicting the risk of recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS In a retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent BCS for pure DCIS were identified. Data on well-established clinical-pathological risk factors and development of locoregional recurrence was gathered from patient files. In addition, IHC stains of ER, PR, HER2, p53, and ki67 were performed on original tumor samples. Univariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify possible risk factors for locoregional recurrence. RESULTS 190 patients were included. At a median follow-up time of 12.8 years fifteen (8%) patients developed locoregional recurrence: 7 invasive cancer and 8 DCIS. These recurrences were diagnosed within a range of 1.7 to 19.6 years after the initial diagnosis. Univariable Cox regression analysis did only show a significant association between p53 and locoregional recurrence. Our re-excision rate to obtain free margins was 30.5%, and 90% received radiotherapy. Endocrine treatment was not used. CONCLUSIONS At 12.8 years follow-up, patients with DCIS treated with BCS have a very low locoregional recurrence of 8%. Although we could demonstrate that increased p53 expression is a risk factor for locoregional recurrence, we think this is of little clinical value in our population with such a low recurrence rate. MICROABSTRACT With a published recurrence rate up to 30% after DCIS, it would be desirable to identify those at risk to adapt treatment and follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the role of immunohistochemical staining to determine the risk of locoregional recurrence, in addition to established clinical and pathological risk factors. At a median follow-up of 12.8 years, we found a locoregional recurrence rate of 8%. Increased expression of p53 is associated with an increased risk of locoregional recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara van Bekkum
- Department of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht the Netherlands
| | - Caroline Drukker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Joost van Rosmalen
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter J Westenend
- Department of Pathology, Laboratory of Pathology, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fang WB, Medrano M, Cote P, Portsche M, Rao V, Hong Y, Behbod F, Knapp JR, Bloomer C, Noel-Macdonnell J, Cheng N. Transcriptome analysis reveals differences in cell cycle, growth and migration related genes that distinguish fibroblasts derived from pre-invasive and invasive breast cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1130911. [PMID: 37091166 PMCID: PMC10118028 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1130911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Introduction As the most common form of pre-invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) affects over 50,000 women in the US annually. Despite standardized treatment involving lumpectomy and radiation therapy, up to 25% of patients with DCIS experience disease recurrence often with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), indicating that a subset of patients may be under-treated. As most DCIS cases will not progress to invasion, many patients may experience over-treatment. By understanding the underlying processes associated with DCIS to IDC progression, we can identify new biomarkers to determine which DCIS cases may become invasive and improve treatment for patients. Accumulation of fibroblasts in IDC is associated with disease progression and reduced survival. While fibroblasts have been detected in DCIS, little is understood about their role in DCIS progression. Goals We sought to determine 1) whether DCIS fibroblasts were similar or distinct from normal and IDC fibroblasts at the transcriptome level, and 2) the contributions of DCIS fibroblasts to breast cancer progression. Methods Fibroblasts underwent transcriptome profiling and pathway analysis. Significant DCIS fibroblast-associated genes were further analyzed in existing breast cancer mRNA databases and through tissue array immunostaining. Using the sub-renal capsule graft model, fibroblasts from normal breast, DCIS and IDC tissues were co-transplanted with DCIS.com breast cancer cells. Results Through transcriptome profiling, we found that DCIS fibroblasts were characterized by unique alterations in cell cycle and motility related genes such as PKMYT1, TGF-α, SFRP1 and SFRP2, which predicted increased cell growth and invasion by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Immunostaining analysis revealed corresponding increases in expression of stromal derived PKMYT1, TGF-α and corresponding decreases in expression of SFRP1 and SFRP2 in DCIS and IDC tissues. Grafting studies in mice revealed that DCIS fibroblasts enhanced breast cancer growth and invasion associated with arginase-1+ cell recruitment. Conclusion DCIS fibroblasts are phenotypically distinct from normal breast and IDC fibroblasts, and play an important role in breast cancer growth, invasion, and recruitment of myeloid cells. These studies provide novel insight into the role of DCIS fibroblasts in breast cancer progression and identify some key biomarkers associated with DCIS progression to IDC, with important clinical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Bin Fang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Marcela Medrano
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Paige Cote
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Mike Portsche
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Vinamratha Rao
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Yan Hong
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Fariba Behbod
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jennifer R. Knapp
- Center for Genes Environment and Health, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, United States
- Kansas Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Clark Bloomer
- Kansas Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Janelle Noel-Macdonnell
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Core, Health Services and Outcomes Research Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC) School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, United States
| | - Nikki Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
- Department of Cancer Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Skjerven HK, Myklebust EM, Korvald C, Porojnicu AC, Kaaresen R, Hofvind S, Schlicting E, Sahlberg KK. Oncological outcomes after simple and skin-sparing mastectomy of ductal carcinoma in situ: A register-based cohort study of 576 Norwegian women. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:575-582. [PMID: 36509629 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.11.594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS), recurrence is shown to be higher after skin-sparing (SSM) versus simple (SM) mastectomy. This study aimed to compare the two groups recurrence rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall (OS) survival. METHODS We conducted a retrospective register-based cohort study of women operated with SSM (n = 338) or SM (n = 238) for DCIS between 2007 and 2017. Data from the Norwegian Breast Cancer Registry was used to estimate recurrences rates, DFS and OS. RESULTS Mean age was 51 and 61 years in the SSM and SM groups, respectively. Median follow-up time was 77 months for SSM (range: 21-152 months) vs 84 months for SM (range: 7-171 months). After five years of follow-up, the overall recurrence rate (OR) was 2.1%; 3.9% for SSM and 0.9% for SM. After ten years, the rates were 3.0%, 6.2% for SSM and still 0.9% for SM. DFS was after ten years 92.2%; 91.8% for SSM, and 92.4% for SM. OS was 95.0%; 97.5% for SSM and 93.3% for SM at ten years. For SSM, involved margins represented a significant risk for recurrence. CONCLUSION The recurrence rate was higher in the SSM versus the SM group. Whether the difference is due to the operating procedures or underlying risk factors remains unknown. When stratifying for the difference in age, there was no statistical difference in DFS or OS. Involved margins in the SSM group were associated with an increased risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helle Kristine Skjerven
- Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Drammen Hospital, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Even Moa Myklebust
- Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Innovation, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| | - Christian Korvald
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Rolf Kaaresen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Solveig Hofvind
- Department of Health and Care Sciences, The Artic University, UiT, Tromsø, Norway; Section for Breast Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Schlicting
- Section for Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristine Kleivi Sahlberg
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Research and Innovation, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Takeuchi Y, Gotoh N. Inflammatory cytokine-enriched microenvironment plays key roles in the development of breast cancers. Cancer Sci 2023; 114:1792-1799. [PMID: 36704829 PMCID: PMC10154879 DOI: 10.1111/cas.15734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
As the incidence of breast cancer continues to increase, it is critical to develop prevention strategies for this disease. Inflammation underlies the onset of the disease, and NF-κB is a master transcription factor for inflammation. Nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) is activated in a variety of cell types, including normal epithelial cells, cancer cells, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and immune cells. Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is the earliest stage of breast cancer, and not all DCIS lesions develop into invasive breast cancers (IBC). Currently, most patients with DCIS undergo surgery with postoperative therapy, although there is a risk of overtreatment. In BRCA mutants, receptor activator of NF-κB (RANK)-positive progenitors serve as the cell of origin, and treatment using the RANK monoclonal antibody reduces the risk of IBC. There is still an unmet need to diagnose malignant DCIS, which has the potential to progress to IBC, and to establish appropriate prevention strategies. We recently demonstrated novel molecular mechanisms for NF-κB activation in premalignant mammary tissues, which include DCIS, and the resultant cytokine-enriched microenvironment is essential for breast cancer development. On the early endosomes in a few epithelial cells, the adaptor protein FRS2β, forming a complex with ErbB2, carries the IκB kinase (IKK) complex and leads to the activation of NF-κB, thereby inducing a variety of cytokines. Therefore, the FRS2β-NFκB axis in the inflammatory premalignant environment could be targetable to prevent IBC. Further analysis of the molecular mechanisms of inflammation in the premalignant microenvironment is necessary to prevent the risk of IBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuto Takeuchi
- Division of Cancer Cell Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa City, Japan.,Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa City, Japan
| | - Noriko Gotoh
- Division of Cancer Cell Biology, Cancer Research Institute, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa City, Japan.,Institute for Frontier Science Initiative, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Balac N, Tungate RM, Jeong YJ, MacDonald H, Tung L, Schechter NR, Larsen L, Sener SF, Lang JE, Brownson KE. Is palpable DCIS more aggressive than screen-detected DCIS? Surg Open Sci 2022; 11:83-87. [PMID: 36589700 PMCID: PMC9798160 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2022.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Palpable ductal carcinoma in-situ (pDCIS) is a subset of DCIS presenting with a clinical mass. We hypothesized pDCIS would have more aggressive clinical and pathological features, and higher rates of recurrence and upgrade to invasive disease compared to screen-detected DCIS. Materials and methods We performed a retrospective analysis of female patients (age 28-76) with DCIS on core-needle biopsy. pDCIS patients had a physician documented palpable mass prior to initial biopsy. Descriptive statistics were performed to compare groups. Results This study included 83 patients, 26 had pDCIS and 57 had screen-detected DCIS. Mean duration of follow-up was 49.4 months. pDCIS patients had significantly larger lesions (p = 0.03) which were more frequently biopsied via ultrasound (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, pDCIS was associated with ultrasound guided core needle biopsy, size of DCIS >2 cm, and comedo pattern (p = 0.001, p = 0.007 and p = 0.022, respectively). 7.7 % of pDCIS cases versus 3.5 % of screen-detected cases were upgraded to invasive cancer (p = 0.59). There was no difference in local recurrence (p = 0.55) between groups. Neither group experienced regional or distant recurrence. Conclusions pDCIS was associated with some aggressive pathologic and clinical features and was more frequently diagnosed by ultrasound guided core-needle biopsy than screen-detected DCIS. However, there was no significant difference in rate of recurrence or upgrade to invasive disease between groups. Key message Although pDCIS was associated with some aggressive pathologic and clinical features, there was no significant difference in rate of recurrence or upgrade to invasive disease compared to screen-detected DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Balac
- Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA,Corresponding author at: 1245 Park Avenue Apt 7A, New York, NY 10128, USA.
| | - Robert M. Tungate
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Young Ju Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu 42472, Republic of Korea
| | | | - Lily Tung
- Department of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Naomi R. Schechter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Linda Larsen
- Department of Radiology, Division of Women's Imaging, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Stephen F. Sener
- Division of Breast, Endocrine, and Soft Tissue Surgery, Department of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA,Department of Surgery, LAC+USC (LA County) Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Julie E. Lang
- Division of Breast, Endocrine, and Soft Tissue Surgery, Department of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA,Department of Surgery, LAC+USC (LA County) Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Kirstyn E. Brownson
- Division of Breast, Endocrine, and Soft Tissue Surgery, Department of Surgery, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA,Department of Surgery, LAC+USC (LA County) Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tesch ME, Rosenberg SM, Collins LC, Wong JS, Dominici L, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi R, Schapira L, Borges VF, Warner E, Come SE, Partridge AH. Clinicopathologic Features, Treatment Patterns, and Disease Outcomes in a Modern, Prospective Cohort of Young Women Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8048-8057. [PMID: 35960452 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12361-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is uncommon and understudied in young women. The objective of this study is to describe clinicopathologic features, treatment, and oncologic outcomes in a modern cohort of women aged ≤ 40 years with DCIS. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with DCIS were identified from the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multisite prospective cohort of women diagnosed with stage 0-IV breast cancer at age ≤ 40 years, enrolled from 2006 to 2016. Clinical data were collected from patient surveys and medical records. Pathologic features were examined by central review. Data were summarized with descriptive statistics and groups were compared with χ2 and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS Among the 98 patients included, median age of diagnosis was 38 years; 36 (37%) patients were symptomatic on presentation. DCIS nuclear grade was high in 35%, intermediate in 50%, and low in 15% of lesions; 36% of lesions had comedonecrosis. The majority of patients underwent bilateral mastectomy (57%), 16 (16%) underwent unilateral mastectomy, and 26 (27%) underwent lumpectomy, most of whom received radiation. Few (13%) patients were receiving tamoxifen therapy 1 year postdiagnosis. Over a median follow-up of 8.4 years, six patients (6%) had disease recurrence, including five locoregional and one distant event. CONCLUSIONS A high proportion of young women with DCIS underwent mastectomy with or without contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Although DCIS was frequently symptomatic on presentation and exhibited unfavorable pathologic factors, clinicopathologic features were overall heterogeneous and few recurrences occurred. This underscores the need for careful consideration of treatment options in young women with DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Laura C Collins
- Beth Israel Deaconess, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Julia S Wong
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura Dominici
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Lidia Schapira
- Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Ellen Warner
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Steven E Come
- Beth Israel Deaconess, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA. .,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Akrida I, Mulita F. The clinical significance of HER2 expression in DCIS. MEDICAL ONCOLOGY (NORTHWOOD, LONDON, ENGLAND) 2022; 40:16. [PMID: 36352293 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-022-01876-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
HER2 is an established prognostic and predictive marker for patients with invasive breast cancer. The clinical and biological significance of HER2 overexpression in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains poorly defined. DCIS is a heterogeneous disease and some patients with DCIS will not progress to invasive breast cancer. However, clinically significant recurrence rates have been reported after breast-conserving surgery for DCIS and approximately half of these cases will be life-threatening invasive recurrences. Since the incidence of DCIS is rising due to the widespread use of screening mammography, there is robust interest in selecting high-risk DCIS patients that may benefit from adjuvant therapies. Molecular prognostic and predictive models in early invasive breast cancer help clinicians identify patients that will benefit from chemotherapy. Molecular subtyping and profiling could also be useful in treating DCIS patients. According to current practice guidelines, HER2 testing is not recommended in DCIS patients. Nevertheless, evidence suggests that HER2-positive DCIS cases may be associated with adverse clinicopathological parameters and increased recurrence rates. This review summarizes the existing body of evidence linking HER2 expression and ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence in DCIS. HER2, as well as its correlation with other clinicopathological markers might be a useful prognostic and predictive marker, helping clinical decision-making in DCIS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioanna Akrida
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Patras, Rion, Greece. .,Department of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, University of Patras Medical School, 26504, Rion, Greece.
| | - Francesk Mulita
- Department of General Surgery, University General Hospital of Patras, Rion, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Healy NA, Parag Y, Soppelsa G, Wignarajah P, Benson JR, Agrawal A, Forouhi P, Kilburn-Toppin F, Gilbert FJ. Does pre-operative breast MRI have an impact on surgical outcomes in high-grade DCIS? Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220306. [PMID: 35819920 PMCID: PMC9815730 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES High-grade DCIS (HG DCIS) is associated with upgrade to invasive disease but few studies evaluate the role of MRI in this subset of DCIS. This study compared surgical outcomes of females with HG DCIS on biopsy who had pre-operative MRI with those that proceeded directly to surgery. METHODS This single-centre retrospective, observational study identified patients with pure HG DCIS on pre-operative biopsy from the pathology database. Surgical outcomes, clinicopathological and radiological features were obtained for all patients. RESULTS From August 2015 to February 2020, 217 patients had HG DCIS on biopsy. Pre-operative MRI was performed in 40 (MRI group) and not in 88 (No MRI group) patients. Initial mastectomy was performed in 25/40 (63%) women in the MRI group and 20/88 (23%) women in the no MRI group (p < 0.0001). No difference was observed in re-operation rate between the two groups, 15% in MRI group vs 22% in No MRI group (p = 0.4749). Mean tumour size on histology was larger in mastectomy cases in the MRI group (73.4 mm, range 6-140 mm), than the total MRI group, (58.3 mm, range 0-140 mm) or no MRI group (30.7 mm, range 0-130 mm) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Pre-operative MRI in HG DCIS is associated with higher mastectomy rates, possibly due to patient selection for MRI, as tumours on final histology were significantly larger. Fewer re-operations were observed in the MRI group although this was not significant. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Breast MRI performed pre-operatively in HG DCIS is associated with higher mastectomy rates and fewer re-operation rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuala A. Healy
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yethiksha Parag
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Giorgia Soppelsa
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Primee Wignarajah
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - John R. Benson
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amit Agrawal
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Parto Forouhi
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fleur Kilburn-Toppin
- Cambridge Breast Unit, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrookes’ Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona J. Gilbert
- Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 218, Level 5, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ramezani-Aliakbari M, Varshosaz J, Mirian M, Khodarahmi G, Rostami M. pH-responsive Glucosamine Anchored Polydopamine Coated Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for delivery of Anderson-type Polyoxomolybdate in Breast Cancer. J Microencapsul 2022; 39:433-451. [PMID: 35762905 DOI: 10.1080/02652048.2022.2096139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study aimed to develop novel pH-sensitive Glucosamine (Glu) targeted Polydopamine (PDA) coated mesoporous silica (SBA-15) nanoparticles (NPs) for selective delivery of anticancer Anderson-type manganese polyoxomolybdate (POMo) to breast cancer. METHODS The POMo@SBA-PDA-Glu NPs were prepared via direct hydrothermal synthesis of SBA, POMo loading, in situ PDA post functionalization, and Glu anchoring; the chemical structures were fully studied by different characterization methods. The anticancer activity was studied by MTT method and Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit. RESULTS The optimized NPs had a hydrodynamic size (HS) of 195 nm, a zeta potential (ZP) of -18.9 mV, a loading content percent (LC%) of 45%, and a pH-responsive release profile. The targeted NPs showed increased anticancer activity against breast cancer cell lines compared to the free POMo with the highest cellular uptake and apoptosis level in the MDA-MB-231 cells. CONCLUSIONS POMo@SBA-PDA-Glu NPs could be a promising anticancer candidate for further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Ramezani-Aliakbari
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Ph.D student of Medicinal chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Jaleh Varshosaz
- Ph.D student of Medicinal chemistry, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mina Mirian
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Ghadamali Khodarahmi
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Mahboubeh Rostami
- Novel Drug Delivery Systems Research Center and Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences and, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wang G, Kumar A, Ding W, Korangath P, Bera T, Wei J, Pai P, Gabrielson K, Pastan I, Sukumar S. Intraductal administration of transferrin receptor-targeted immunotoxin clears ductal carcinoma in situ in mouse models of breast cancer-a preclinical study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2200200119. [PMID: 35675429 PMCID: PMC9214490 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2200200119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The human transferrin receptor (TFR) is overexpressed in most breast cancers, including preneoplastic ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). HB21(Fv)-PE40 is a single-chain immunotoxin (IT) engineered by fusing the variable region of a monoclonal antibody (HB21) against a TFR with a 40 kDa fragment of Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE). In humans, the administration of other TFR-targeted immunotoxins intrathecally led to inflammation and vascular leakage. We proposed that for treatment of DCIS, intraductal (i.duc) injection of HB21(Fv)-PE40 could avoid systemic toxicity while retaining its potent antitumor effects on visible and occult tumors in the entire ductal tree. Pharmacokinetic studies in mice showed that, in contrast to intravenous injection, IT was undetectable by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in blood following i.duc injection of up to 3.0 μg HB21(Fv)-PE40. We demonstrated the antitumor efficacy of HB21(Fv)-PE40 in two mammary-in-duct (MIND) models, MCF7 and SUM225, grown in NOD/SCID/gamma mice. Tumors were undetectable by In Vivo Imaging System (IVIS) imaging in intraductally treated mice within 1 wk of initiation of the regimen (IT once weekly/3 wk, 1.5 μg/teat). MCF7 tumor-bearing mice remained tumor free for up to 60 d of observation with i.duc IT, whereas the HB21 antibody alone or intraperitoneal IT treatment had minimal/no antitumor effects. These and similar findings in the SUM225 MIND model were substantiated by analysis of mammary gland whole mounts, histology, and immunohistochemistry for the proteins Ki67, CD31, CD71 (TFR), and Ku80. This study provides a strong preclinical foundation for conducting feasibility and safety trials in patients with stage 0 breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guannan Wang
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
- Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007
| | - Alok Kumar
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Wanjun Ding
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
- Department of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, China
| | - Preethi Korangath
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Tapan Bera
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Junxia Wei
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Priya Pai
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| | - Kathleen Gabrielson
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
- Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205
| | - Ira Pastan
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892
| | - Saraswati Sukumar
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
El Masri J, Phadke S. Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Contemporary Breast Cancer Care: A Review of the Literature and Clinical Applications. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 65:461-481. [PMID: 35703213 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Substantial progress has been made in contemporary breast cancer care, resulting in a consistently declining breast cancer mortality rate and an improvement in quality of life. Advancements include deescalation of therapy in low-risk populations and refining systemic therapy options. Research into molecular biomarkers continues to evolve and holds the promise of achieving the goal of precision medicine, while guidelines for supportive care and survivorship have been created to address the needs of an ever-increasing number of breast cancer survivors. A collaborative, multidisciplinary team approach is essential for patients and survivors to achieve optimal outcomes and enjoy productive high-quality lives. Gynecologists, in particular, play a key role in screening and survivorship care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad El Masri
- Department of Internal Medicine, UIHC Cancer Services-Quad Cities, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
| | - Sneha Phadke
- Department of Internal Medicine, Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wilson GM, Dinh P, Pathmanathan N, Graham JD. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Molecular Changes Accompanying Disease Progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 2022; 27:101-131. [PMID: 35567670 PMCID: PMC9135892 DOI: 10.1007/s10911-022-09517-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a non-obligate precursor of invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), whereby if left untreated, approximately 12% of patients develop invasive disease. The current standard of care is surgical removal of the lesion, to prevent potential progression, and radiotherapy to reduce risk of recurrence. There is substantial overtreatment of DCIS patients, considering not all DCIS lesions progress to invasive disease. Hence, there is a critical imperative to better predict which DCIS lesions are destined for poor outcome and which are not, allowing for tailored treatment. Active surveillance is currently being trialed as an alternative management practice, but this approach relies on accurately identifying cases that are at low risk of progression to invasive disease. Two DCIS-specific genomic profiling assays that attempt to distinguish low and high-risk patients have emerged, but imperfections in risk stratification coupled with a high price tag warrant the continued search for more robust and accessible prognostic biomarkers. This search has largely turned researchers toward the tumor microenvironment. Recent evidence suggests that a spectrum of cell types within the DCIS microenvironment are genetically and phenotypically altered compared to normal tissue and play critical roles in disease progression. Uncovering the molecular mechanisms contributing to DCIS progression has provided optimism for the search for well-validated prognostic biomarkers that can accurately predict the risk for a patient developing IDC. The discovery of such markers would modernize DCIS management and allow tailored treatment plans. This review will summarize the current literature regarding DCIS diagnosis, treatment, and pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma M Wilson
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Phuong Dinh
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - Nirmala Pathmanathan
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
| | - J Dinny Graham
- Centre for Cancer Research, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
- Westmead Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes add prognostic information for patients with low-risk DCIS: findings from the SweDCIS randomised radiotherapy trial. Eur J Cancer 2022; 168:128-137. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
21
|
Pinder SE, Thompson AM, Wesserling J. Low-risk DCIS. What is it? Observe or excise? Virchows Arch 2022; 480:21-32. [PMID: 34448893 PMCID: PMC8983540 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-021-03173-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The issue of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of lesions detected by breast screening mammography has been debated in both international media and the scientific literature. A proportion of cancers detected by breast screening would never have presented symptomatically or caused harm during the patient's lifetime. The most likely (but not the only) entity which may represent those overdiagnosed and overtreated is low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). In this article, we address what is understood regarding the natural history of DCIS and the diagnosis and prognosis of low-grade DCIS. However, low cytonuclear grade disease may not be the totality of DCIS that can be considered of low clinical risk and we outline the issues regarding active surveillance vs excision of low-risk DCIS and the clinical trials exploring this approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Pinder
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, Comprehensive Cancer Centre At Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Alastair M Thompson
- Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jelle Wesserling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Negoita S, Ramirez-Pena E. Prevention of Late Recurrence: An Increasingly Important Target for Breast Cancer Research and Control. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:340-341. [PMID: 34747495 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Serban Negoita
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Esmeralda Ramirez-Pena
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hwang KT, Suh YJ, Park CH, Lee YJ, Kim JY, Jung JH, Kim S, Min J. Hormone Receptor Subtype in Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Prognostic and Predictive Roles of the Progesterone Receptor. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1939-e1950. [PMID: 34402131 PMCID: PMC8571738 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We investigated the prognostic and predictive roles of the hormone receptor (HRc) subtype in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We focused on identifying the roles of the progesterone receptor (PR) independent of estrogen receptor (ER) status. Methods Nationwide data of 12,508 female patients diagnosed with DCIS with a mean follow‐up period of 60.7 months were analyzed. HRc subtypes were classified as ER−/PR−, ER−/PR+, ER+/PR−, and ER+/PR+ based on ER and PR statuses. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results The ER+/PR+ group showed better prognoses than the ER+/PR− and ER−/PR− groups in the patients who received tamoxifen therapy (p = .001 and p = .031, respectively). HRc subtype was an independent prognostic factor (p = .028). The tamoxifen therapy group showed better survival than the patients who did not receive tamoxifen, but only in the ER+/PR+ subgroup (p = .002). Tamoxifen therapy was an independent prognostic factor (HR, 0.619; 95% CI, 0.423 − 0.907; p = .014). PR status was a favorable prognostic factor in patients with DCIS who received tamoxifen therapy (p < .001), and it remained a prognostic factor independent of ER status (HR, 0.576; 95% CI, 0.349 − 0.951; p = .031). Conclusion The HRc subtype can be used as both a prognostic and predictive marker in patients with newly diagnosed DCIS. Tamoxifen therapy can improve overall survival in the ER+/PR+ subtype. PR status has significant prognostic and predictive roles independent of ER status. Testing for the PR status in addition to the ER status is routinely recommended in patients with DCIS to determine the HRc subtype in clinical settings. Implications for Practice The hormone receptor (HRc) subtype was an independent prognostic factor, and the estrogen receptor (ER)+/progesterone receptor (PR) + subtype showed a better survival in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who received tamoxifen therapy. PR was an independent prognostic factor independent of ER, and PR was a favorable prognostic factor in patients with DCIS who received tamoxifen therapy. The HRc subtype could be used as both a prognostic and predictive marker in patients with newly diagnosed DCIS. Testing of PR status in addition to ER status is routinely recommended for patients with DCIS to determine the HRc subtype in clinical settings. This study investigated the prognostic and predictive roles of the hormone receptor subtype in patients with newly diagnosed ductal carcinoma in situ, focusing on the prognostic and predictive values of progesterone receptor status independent of estrogen receptor status. The prognostic effect of tamoxifen therapy was also investigated
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ki-Tae Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Jin Suh
- Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chan-Heun Park
- Department of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Joo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jee Ye Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Hyang Jung
- Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Seeyeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, SaeGyaeRo Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Junwon Min
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bragg A, Candelaria R, Adrada B, Huang M, Rauch G, Santiago L, Scoggins M, Whitman G. Imaging of Noncalcified Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. J Clin Imaging Sci 2021; 11:34. [PMID: 34221643 PMCID: PMC8247756 DOI: 10.25259/jcis_48_2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a commonly encountered malignancy, accounting for approximately 20% of new breast cancer diagnoses in the United States. DCIS is characterized by a proliferation of tumor cells within the terminal duct lobular unit with preservation of the basement membrane. Typically nonpalpable and asymptomatic, DCIS is most often detected as calcifications on screening mammography. However, DCIS may also be noncalcified. When compared to calcified DCIS, noncalcified DCIS is more likely to be symptomatic, with patients most often presenting with nipple discharge or a palpable mass. Diagnosing noncalcified DCIS is challenging since it may be occult or subtle on mammography, and ultrasound findings can be nonspecific and may be interpreted as benign fibrocystic changes. In cases with a calcified component of DCIS, the extent of DCIS may be underestimated by mammography because not all involved areas may calcify. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although less readily available than mammography and ultrasound, is advantageous in detecting noncalcified DCIS, especially high grade DCIS, which may not develop microcalcifications. MRI relies on abnormal contrast uptake due to tumor vascularity and changes in vessel density and permeability. This pictoral review presents the spectrum of imaging findings of noncalcified DCIS to assist radiologists in accurately detecting and describing its key imaging findings. Utilizing different modalities, we review the differential diagnoses for noncalcified DCIS, show illustrative cases of noncalcified DCIS, and discuss the importance of this entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Bragg
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Rosalind Candelaria
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Beatriz Adrada
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Monica Huang
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Gaiane Rauch
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Lumarie Santiago
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Marion Scoggins
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Gary Whitman
- Department of Breast Imaging, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Patterns of invasive recurrence among patients originally treated for ductal carcinoma in situ by breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 186:617-624. [PMID: 33675490 PMCID: PMC8019411 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06129-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Local recurrence after treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is more common than after mastectomy, but it is unclear if patterns of invasive recurrence vary by initial surgical therapy. Among patients with invasive recurrence after treatment for DCIS, we compared patterns of first recurrence between those originally treated with BCS vs. mastectomy. Methods From 2000 to 2016, women with an invasive recurrence occurring ≥ 6 months after initial treatment for DCIS were retrospectively identified. Clinicopathologic features and adjuvant treatment of the initial DCIS, as well as characteristics of first invasive recurrences, were compared between patients who had undergone BCS vs. mastectomy. Results 452 patients with an invasive recurrence after surgery for DCIS were identified: 367 patients (81%) had initially undergone BCS and 85 patients (19%) mastectomy. Patients originally treated with mastectomy were younger and were more likely to have had high grade, necrosis, and multifocal or multicentric DCIS (p < 0.001) compared with the BCS group. A higher proportion of invasive recurrences were local after BCS (93%; 343/367), whereas 88% (75/85) of recurrences after mastectomy were regional or distant (p < 0.001). The median time to first invasive recurrence was not different between surgical groups (BCS: 6.4 years vs. mastectomy: 5.5 years; p = 0.12). Conclusions Among women who experienced a first invasive recurrence after treatment for DCIS, those who had originally undergone mastectomy more commonly presented with advanced disease compared to those treated with BCS, likely related to the absence of the breast and the higher risk profile of their initial DCIS. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-021-06129-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
26
|
Byng D, Retèl VP, Schaapveld M, Wesseling J, van Harten WH. Treating (low-risk) DCIS patients: What can we learn from real-world cancer registry evidence? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 187:187-196. [PMID: 33389397 PMCID: PMC8062323 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-06042-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Results from active surveillance trials for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) will not be available for > 10 years. A model based on real-world data (RWD) can demonstrate the comparative impact of non-intervention for women with low-risk features. METHODS Multi-state models were developed using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER) data for three treatment strategies (no local treatment, breast conserving surgery [BCS], BCS + radiotherapy [RT]), and for women with DCIS low-risk features. Eligible cases included women aged ≥ 40 years, diagnosed with primary DCIS between 1992 and 2016. Five mutually exclusive health states were modelled: DCIS, ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) ≤ 5 years and > 5 years post-DCIS diagnosis, contralateral IBC, death preceded by and death not preceded by IBC. Propensity score-weighted Cox models assessed effects of treatment, age, diagnosis year, grade, ER status, and race. RESULTS Data on n = 85,982 women were used. Increased risk of iIBC ≤ 5 years post-DCIS was demonstrated for ages 40-49 (Hazard ratio (HR) 1.86, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.34-2.57 compared to age 50-69), grade 3 lesions (HR 1.42, 95%CI 1.05-1.91) compared to grade 2, lesion size ≥ 2 cm (HR 1.66, 95%CI 1.23-2.25), and Black race (HR 2.52, 95%CI 1.83-3.48 compared to White). According to the multi-state model, propensity score-matched women with low-risk features who had not died or experienced any subsequent breast event by 10 years, had a predicted probability of iIBC as first event of 3.02% for no local treatment, 1.66% for BCS, and 0.42% for BCS+RT. CONCLUSION RWD from the SEER registry showed that women with primary DCIS and low-risk features demonstrate minimal differences by treatment strategy in experiencing subsequent breast events. There may be opportunity to de-escalate treatment for certain women with low-risk features: Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women aged 50-69 at diagnosis, with ER+, grade 1 + 2, < 2 cm DCIS lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danalyn Byng
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gil Del Alcazar CR, Alečković M, Polyak K. Immune Escape during Breast Tumor Progression. Cancer Immunol Res 2020; 8:422-427. [PMID: 32238387 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-19-0786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors is one of the most promising current cancer treatment strategies. However, in breast cancer, its success has been limited to a subset of patients with triple-negative disease, whose durability of observed responses remain unclear. The lack of detailed understanding of breast tumor immune evasion mechanisms and the treatment of patients with highly heterogeneous metastatic disease contribute to these disappointing results. Here we discuss the current knowledge about immune-related changes during breast tumor progression, with special emphasis on the in situ-to-invasive breast carcinoma transition that may represent a key step of immunoediting in breast cancer. Comprehensive characterization of early-stage disease and better understanding of immunologic drivers of disease progression will likely expand the tools available for immunotherapy and improve patient stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos R Gil Del Alcazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maša Alečković
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kornelia Polyak
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lakeman IMM, Rodríguez-Girondo M, Lee A, Ruiter R, Stricker BH, Wijnant SRA, Kavousi M, Antoniou AC, Schmidt MK, Uitterlinden AG, van Rooij J, Devilee P. Validation of the BOADICEA model and a 313-variant polygenic risk score for breast cancer risk prediction in a Dutch prospective cohort. Genet Med 2020; 22:1803-1811. [PMID: 32624571 PMCID: PMC7605432 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-0884-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated the performance of the recently extended Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm (BOADICEA version 5) in a Dutch prospective cohort, using a polygenic risk score (PRS) based on 313 breast cancer (BC)-associated variants (PRS313) and other, nongenetic risk factors. METHODS Since 1989, 6522 women without BC aged 45 or older of European descent have been included in the Rotterdam Study. The PRS313 was calculated per 1 SD in controls from the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the association between the PRS313 and incident BC risk. Cumulative 10-year risks were calculated with BOADICEA including different sets of variables (age, risk factors and PRS313). C-statistics were used to evaluate discriminative ability. RESULTS In total, 320 women developed BC. The PRS313 was significantly associated with BC (hazard ratio [HR] per SD of 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.40-1.73]). Using 10-year risk estimates including age and the PRS313, other risk factors improved the discriminatory ability of the BOADICEA model marginally, from a C-statistic of 0.636 to 0.653. CONCLUSIONS The effect size of the PRS313 is highly reproducible in the Dutch population. Our results validate the BOADICEA v5 model for BC risk assessment in the Dutch general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge M M Lakeman
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Mar Rodríguez-Girondo
- Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew Lee
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rikje Ruiter
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bruno H Stricker
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sara R A Wijnant
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Bioanalysis, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maryam Kavousi
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Pathology, the Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André G Uitterlinden
- Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen van Rooij
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Devilee
- Department of Human Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hewitt K, Son J, Glencer A, Borowsky AD, Cooperberg MR, Esserman LJ. The Evolution of Our Understanding of the Biology of Cancer Is the Key to Avoiding Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 29:2463-2474. [PMID: 33033145 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been a tremendous evolution in our thinking about cancer since the 1880s. Breast cancer is a particularly good example to evaluate the progress that has been made and the new challenges that have arisen due to screening that inadvertently identifies indolent lesions. The degree to which overdiagnosis is a problem depends on the reservoir of indolent disease, the disease heterogeneity, and the fraction of the tumors that have aggressive biology. Cancers span the spectrum of biological behavior, and population-wide screening increases the detection of tumors that may not cause harm within the patient's lifetime or may never metastasize or result in death. Our approach to early detection will be vastly improved if we understand, address, and adjust to tumor heterogeneity. In this article, we use breast cancer as a case study to demonstrate how the approach to biological characterization, diagnostics, and therapeutics can inform our approach to screening, early detection, and prevention. Overdiagnosis can be mitigated by developing diagnostics to identify indolent disease, incorporating biology and risk assessment in screening strategies, changing the pathology rules for tumor classification, and refining the way we classify precancerous lesions. The more the patterns of cancers can be seen across other cancers, the more it is clear that our approach should transcend organ of origin. This will be particularly helpful in advancing the field by changing both our terminology for what is cancer and also by helping us to learn how best to mitigate the risk of the most aggressive cancers.See all articles in this CEBP Focus section, "NCI Early Detection Research Network: Making Cancer Detection Possible."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Hewitt
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jennifer Son
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexa Glencer
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alexander D Borowsky
- Department of Pathology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.,Athena Breast Health Network
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.,Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Laura J Esserman
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. .,Athena Breast Health Network
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Groen EJ, Hudecek J, Mulder L, van Seijen M, Almekinders MM, Alexov S, Kovács A, Ryska A, Varga Z, Andreu Navarro FJ, Bianchi S, Vreuls W, Balslev E, Boot MV, Kulka J, Chmielik E, Barbé E, de Rooij MJ, Vos W, Farkas A, Leeuwis-Fedorovich NE, Regitnig P, Westenend PJ, Kooreman LFS, Quinn C, Floris G, Cserni G, van Diest PJ, Lips EH, Schaapveld M, Wesseling J. Prognostic value of histopathological DCIS features in a large-scale international interrater reliability study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 183:759-770. [PMID: 32734520 PMCID: PMC7497690 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05816-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE For optimal management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), reproducible histopathological assessment is essential to distinguish low-risk from high-risk DCIS. Therefore, we analyzed interrater reliability of histopathological DCIS features and assessed their associations with subsequent ipsilateral invasive breast cancer (iIBC) risk. METHODS Using a case-cohort design, reliability was assessed in a population-based, nationwide cohort of 2767 women with screen-detected DCIS diagnosed between 1993 and 2004, treated by breast-conserving surgery with/without radiotherapy (BCS ± RT) using Krippendorff's alpha (KA) and Gwet's AC2 (GAC2). Thirty-eight raters scored histopathological DCIS features including grade (2-tiered and 3-tiered), growth pattern, mitotic activity, periductal fibrosis, and lymphocytic infiltrate in 342 women. Using majority opinion-based scores for each feature, their association with subsequent iIBC risk was assessed using Cox regression. RESULTS Interrater reliability of grade using various classifications was fair to moderate, and only substantial for grade 1 versus 2 + 3 when using GAC2 (0.78). Reliability for growth pattern (KA 0.44, GAC2 0.78), calcifications (KA 0.49, GAC2 0.70) and necrosis (KA 0.47, GAC2 0.70) was moderate using KA and substantial using GAC2; for (type of) periductal fibrosis and lymphocytic infiltrate fair to moderate estimates were found and for mitotic activity reliability was substantial using GAC2 (0.70). Only in patients treated with BCS-RT, high mitotic activity was associated with a higher iIBC risk in univariable analysis (Hazard Ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 1.05-6.11); grade 3 versus 1 + 2 (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.35-5.14) and a cribriform/solid versus flat epithelial atypia/clinging/(micro)papillary growth pattern (HR 3.70, 95% CI 1.34-10.23) were independently associated with a higher iIBC risk. CONCLUSIONS Using majority opinion-based scores, DCIS grade, growth pattern, and mitotic activity are associated with iIBC risk in patients treated with BCS-RT, but interrater variability is substantial. Semi-quantitative grading, incorporating and separately evaluating nuclear pleomorphism, growth pattern, and mitotic activity, may improve the reliability and prognostic value of these features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma J. Groen
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Hudecek
- Department of Research IT, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lennart Mulder
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje van Seijen
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mathilde M. Almekinders
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stoyan Alexov
- Department of Pathology, Oncology Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Anikó Kovács
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ales Ryska
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
| | - Zsuzsanna Varga
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Simonetta Bianchi
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Willem Vreuls
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Eva Balslev
- Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Max V. Boot
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Janina Kulka
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ewa Chmielik
- Tumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
| | - Ellis Barbé
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Winand Vos
- Department of Pathology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Location Sittard-Geleen, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Farkas
- Department of Pathology, Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden
| | | | - Peter Regitnig
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Loes F. S. Kooreman
- Department of Pathology and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Cecily Quinn
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Giuseppe Floris
- Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gábor Cserni
- Department of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Paul J. van Diest
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther H. Lips
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael Schaapveld
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Wesseling
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Grand Challenge PRECISION consortium
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research IT, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Oncology Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
- The Fingerland Department of Pathology, Charles University Medical Faculty and University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
- Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Atryshealth Co, S.L., Barcelona, Spain
- Division of Pathological Anatomy, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Pathology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Herlev University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- 2nd Department of Pathology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
- Tumor Pathology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Gliwice, Poland
- Symbiant Pathology Expert Centre, Location ZMC, Zaandam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Location Sittard-Geleen, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Gävle Hospital, Gävle, Sweden
- Department of Pathology, Deventer Hospital, Deventer, The Netherlands
- Diagnostic and Research Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
- Laboratory for Pathology Dordrecht, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Laboratory of Translational Cell & Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Pathology, Bács-Kiskun County Teaching Hospital, Kecskemét, Hungary
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mannu GS, Wang Z, Broggio J, Charman J, Cheung S, Kearins O, Dodwell D, Darby SC. Invasive breast cancer and breast cancer mortality after ductal carcinoma in situ in women attending for breast screening in England, 1988-2014: population based observational cohort study. BMJ 2020; 369:m1570. [PMID: 32461218 PMCID: PMC7251423 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m1570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long term risks of invasive breast cancer and death from breast cancer after ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed through breast screening. DESIGN Population based observational cohort study. SETTING Data from the NHS Breast Screening Programme and the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. PARTICIPANTS All 35 024 women in England diagnosed as having DCIS by the NHS Breast Screening Programme from its start in 1988 until March 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Incident invasive breast cancer and death from breast cancer. RESULTS By December 2014, 13 606 women had been followed for up to five years, 10 998 for five to nine years, 6861 for 10-14 years, 2620 for 15-19 years, and 939 for at least 20 years. Among these women, 2076 developed invasive breast cancer, corresponding to an incidence rate of 8.82 (95% confidence interval 8.45 to 9.21) per 1000 women per year and more than double that expected from national cancer incidence rates (ratio of observed rate to expected rate 2.52, 95% confidence interval 2.41 to 2.63). The increase started in the second year after diagnosis of DCIS and continued until the end of follow-up. In the same group of women, 310 died from breast cancer, corresponding to a death rate of 1.26 (1.13 to 1.41) per 1000 women per year and 70% higher than that expected from national breast cancer mortality rates (observed:expected ratio 1.70, 1.52 to 1.90). During the first five years after diagnosis of DCIS, the breast cancer death rate was similar to that expected from national mortality rates (observed:expected ratio 0.87, 0.69 to 1.10), but it then increased, with values of 1.98 (1.65 to 2.37), 2.99 (2.41 to 3.70), and 2.77 (2.01 to 3.80) in years five to nine, 10-14, and 15 or more after DCIS diagnosis. Among 29 044 women with unilateral DCIS undergoing surgery, those who had more intensive treatment (mastectomy, radiotherapy for women who had breast conserving surgery, and endocrine treatment in oestrogen receptor positive disease) and those with larger final surgical margins had lower rates of invasive breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS To date, women with DCIS detected by screening have, on average, experienced higher long term risks of invasive breast cancer and death from breast cancer than women in the general population during a period of at least two decades after their diagnosis. More intensive treatment and larger final surgical margins were associated with lower risks of invasive breast cancer.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use
- Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/epidemiology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy
- Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy
- Cohort Studies
- England/epidemiology
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Incidence
- Mammography/methods
- Margins of Excision
- Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data
- Mass Screening/trends
- Mastectomy/methods
- Mastectomy, Segmental/methods
- Middle Aged
- Mortality/trends
- Risk
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurdeep S Mannu
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Zhe Wang
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - John Broggio
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jackie Charman
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shan Cheung
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - Olive Kearins
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Dodwell
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Sarah C Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hwang ES, Malek V. Estimating the magnitude of clinical benefit of local therapy in patients with DCIS. Breast 2020; 48 Suppl 1:S34-S38. [PMID: 31839157 DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(19)31120-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
DCIS represents a heterogeneous disease with a wide range of outcomes according to biology. Without treatment, it is estimated that only 20-30% of DCIS will progress to invasive cancer. Long-term outcomes following treatment are at least as favorable as those for some other early stage cancer types such as prostate cancer, for which active surveillance is routinely offered as a standard of care option. However, active surveillance has not yet been tested in relation to DCIS. Worldwide, there are three international trials (LORIS, COMET, LORD) which are evaluating whether DCIS with favorable biologic features may be managed with close monitoring, with treatment only undertaken upon disease progression. These trials will determine whether there may be some women with low-risk DCIS who do not substantially benefit from treatment and who could thus be safely managed with close surveillance. If active monitoring for DCIS is deemed to be safe and feasible, additional work must be done to optimally implement this approach, involving effective communication between patients and their physicians about the risks and benefits of treatment versus surveillance. Importantly, these treatment decisions must take into account patient factors such as risk tolerance, age, and competing causes of mortality. Tailoring treatment to biology for early screen-detected cancers such as DCIS is an important goal of ongoing research. An improved understanding of the biology and clinical implications of this heterogeneous disease will improve the overall health and quality of life for hundreds of thousands of future women who will be diagnosed with DCIS.
Collapse
|
33
|
Karakatsanis A, Markopoulos C. The challenge of avoiding over- and under-treatment in older women with ductal cancer in situ: A scoping review of existing knowledge gaps and a meta-analysis of real-world practice patterns. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:917-925. [PMID: 32146094 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Revised: 01/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) is mainly a screen-detected disease and although the risk for breast cancer is age-dependent, most screening programs do not include women over the age of 75 years. Older women are usually excluded from clinical trials and treatment practices are largely based on observational studies or extrapolation of trial results from younger patients, leading to either over- or under-treatment of this population. We systematically reviewed available electronic databases for DCIS treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients 15 years. Inclusion criteria allowed for randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control and cross-sectional studies, as well as meta-analyses, systematic reviews and position papers. Results showed that, although elderly are not necessarily frail, they are generally treated as such by physicians, aiming to de-escalate therapeutic interventions. After adjusting for frailty, age seems to be a significant factor for less surgery; however, older women with DCIS are more probable to receive surgery than their counterparts with early invasive cancer. DCIS biology and subtypes are independent risk factors for local recurrence or progression to invasive carcinoma, if DCIS is under-treated. The end-benefit of surgery, radio- and endocrine-therapy depend on additional parameters, such as life expectancy, co-morbidities and competing risks of death. Screen-detected DCIS in older women is a challenging clinical problem, mainly due to the lack of high-level data. Therapeutic strategies should be tailored to life expectancy and performance status, DCIS features and patient preference, aiming at combining optimal oncological outcomes with maintenance of quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Karakatsanis
- Section for Endocrine and Breast Surgery, Department for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Zhang XM, Dou QL, Zeng Y, Yang Y, Cheng ASK, Zhang WW. Sarcopenia as a predictor of mortality in women with breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:172. [PMID: 32131764 PMCID: PMC7057618 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-6645-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Recently, studies have been published with inconsistent findings regarding whether sarcopenia is a risk factor for mortality in breast cancer patients. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to systematically assess and quantify sarcopenia as a risk factor for mortality in breast cancer patients. METHODS In a systematic literature review of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Library, we searched for observational studies written in English (from database inception until April 30, 2019) that reported an association between sarcopenia and breast cancer in women who were 18 years or older. RESULTS A total of six studies (5497 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. Breast cancer patients with sarcopenia were associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality, compared to breast cancer patients without sarcopenia (pooled HR-hazard ratio = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.25-2.33, I2 = 59.1%). In addition, the results of age subgroup analysis showed that participants younger than 55 years with sarcopenia had a lower risk of mortality than participants aged 55 years and older with sarcopenia (pooled HR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.24-1.72 versus pooled HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.05-3.78), whereas both have an increased risk of mortality compared to non-sarcopenic patients. Subgroup analyses regarding stage at diagnosis revealed an increased risk of mortality in non-metastatic patients compared to participants without sarcopenia (pooled HR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.32-2.78), whereas the association was not significant in metastatic breast cancer patients. Other subgroup analyses were performed using different follow-up periods (> 5 years versus ≤5 years) and the results were different (pooled HR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.23-2.65 versus pooled HR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.80-3.62). CONCLUSIONS The present study found that sarcopenia is a risk factor for mortality among female early breast cancer patients. It is imperative that more research into specific interventions aimed at treating sarcopenia be conducted in the near future in order to provide evidence which could lead to decreased mortality rates in breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Ming Zhang
- Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing-Li Dou
- Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Yingchun Zeng
- Department of Nursing, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yunzhi Yang
- Department of Nursing, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, China
| | - Andy S. K. Cheng
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Wen-Wu Zhang
- Department of Emergency, The Affiliated Baoan Hospital of Southern Medical University, The People’s Hospital of Baoan ShenZhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bertrand KA, Bethea TN, Rosenberg L, Bandera EV, Khoury T, Troester MA, Ambrosone CB, Palmer JR. Risk factors for estrogen receptor positive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in African American women. Breast 2020; 49:108-114. [PMID: 31786415 PMCID: PMC7012668 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Compared to U.S. white women, African American women are more likely to die from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Elucidation of risk factors for DCIS in African American women may provide opportunities for risk reduction. Methods We used data from three epidemiologic studies in the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk Consortium to study risk factors for estrogen receptor (ER) positive DCIS (488 cases; 13,830 controls). Results were compared to associations observed for ER+ invasive breast cancer (n = 2,099). Results First degree family history of breast cancer was associated with increased risk of ER+ DCIS [odds ratio (OR): 1.69, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31, 2.17]. Oral contraceptive use within the past 10 years (vs. never) was also associated with increased risk (OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.03, 1.97), as was late age at first birth (≥25 years vs. <20 years) (OR: 1.26, 95%CI: 0.96, 1.67). Risk was reduced in women with older age at menarche (≥15 years vs. <11 years) (OR: 0.62, 95%CI: 0.42, 0.93) and higher body mass index (BMI) in early adulthood (≥25 vs. <20 kg/m2 at age 18 or 21) (OR: 0.75, 95%CI: 0.55, 1.01). There was a positive association of recent BMI with risk in postmenopausal women only. In general, associations of risk factors for ER+ DCIS were similar in magnitude and direction to those for invasive ER+ breast cancer. Conclusions Our findings suggest that most risk factors for invasive ER+ breast cancer are also associated with increased risk of ER+ DCIS among African American women. Few studies of risk factors for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have evaluated associations for African American women. We analyzed data from the African American African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium. Family history of breast cancer, reproductive factors, and anthropometric factors were associated with risk of ER+ DCIS. In general, risk factor associations for ER+ DCIS were similar to those for ER+ invasive breast cancer. Our findings support a common etiology and pathogenesis between ER+ DICS and ER+ invasive cancer in African American women.
Collapse
|
36
|
Shehata M, Grimm L, Ballantyne N, Lourenco A, Demello LR, Kilgore MR, Rahbar H. Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Current Concepts in Biology, Imaging, and Treatment. JOURNAL OF BREAST IMAGING 2019; 1:166-176. [PMID: 31538141 DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbz039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a group of heterogeneous epithelial proliferations confined to the milk ducts that nearly always present in asymptomatic women on breast cancer screening. A stage 0, preinvasive breast cancer, increased detection of DCIS was initially hailed as a means to prevent invasive breast cancer through surgical treatment with adjuvant radiation and/or endocrine therapies. However, controversy in the medical community has emerged in the past two decades that a fraction of DCIS represents overdiagnosis, leading to unnecessary treatments and resulting morbidity. The imaging hallmarks of DCIS include linearly or segmentally distributed calcifications on mammography or nonmass enhancement on breast MRI. Imaging features have been shown to reflect the biological heterogeneity of DCIS lesions, with recent studies indicating MRI may identify a greater fraction of higher-grade lesions than mammography does. There is strong interest in the surgical, imaging, and oncology communities to better align DCIS management with biology, which has resulted in trials of active surveillance and therapy that is less aggressive. However, risk stratification of DCIS remains imperfect, which has limited the development of precision therapy approaches matched to DCIS aggressiveness. Accordingly, there are opportunities for breast imaging radiologists to assist the oncology community by leveraging advanced imaging techniques to identify appropriate patients for the less aggressive DCIS treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Shehata
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA
| | - Lars Grimm
- Duke University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC
| | - Nancy Ballantyne
- Duke University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Durham, NC
| | - Ana Lourenco
- Brown University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Providence, RI
| | - Linda R Demello
- Brown University Medical School, Department of Radiology, Providence, RI
| | - Mark R Kilgore
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Seattle, WA.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | - Habib Rahbar
- University of Washington School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle, WA.,Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Overall survival is improved when DCIS accompanies invasive breast cancer. Sci Rep 2019; 9:9934. [PMID: 31289308 PMCID: PMC6616329 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46309-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) often presents alone or with a co-existing ductal carcinoma in situ component (IDC + DCIS). Studies have suggested that pure IDC may exhibit different biological behavior than IDC + DCIS, but whether this translates to a difference in outcomes is unclear. Here, utilizing the National Cancer Database we identified 494,801 stage I-III breast cancer patients diagnosed with either IDC alone or IDC + DCIS. We found that IDC + DCIS was associated with significantly better overall survival (OS) compared to IDC alone (5-year OS, 89.3% vs. 85.5%, p < 0.001), and this finding persisted on multivariable Cox modeling adjusting for demographic, clinical, and treatment-related variables. The significantly superior OS observed for IDC + DCIS was limited to patients with invasive tumor size < 4 cm or with node negative disease. A greater improvement in OS was observed for tumors containing ≥25% DCIS component. We also found IDC + DCIS to be associated with lower T/N stage, low/intermediate grade, ER/PR positivity, and receipt of mastectomy. Thus, the presence of a DCIS component in patients with IDC is associated with favorable clinical characteristics and independently predicts improved OS. IDC + DCIS could be a useful prognostic factor for patients with breast cancer, particularly if treatment de-escalation is being considered for small or node negative tumors.
Collapse
|
38
|
van der Borden CL, Stoffers S, Lips EH, Wesseling J. Avoiding Overtreatment of Ductal Carcinoma in situ. Trends Cancer 2019; 5:391-393. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2019.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|