Combination of docetaxel and recombinant vaccine enhances T-cell responses and antitumor activity: effects of docetaxel on immune enhancement

PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with distant metastasis: a real-world retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with distant metastasis in the real world are as effective and safe as in clinical trials.

Patients and methods

From July 2019 to July 2023, a total of 422 patients with distant metastasis of ESCC were included and divided into the PD-1 inhibitor combined chemotherapy group (PC group) and the chemotherapy alone group (C group) according to the treatment regimen. There were 278 patients in the PC group and 144 patients in the C group. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the PC group were 44.60% (124/278) and 91.00% (253/278), respectively, which were 18.9% and 3.5% higher than those of the C group. The median PFS and median OS of the PC group were significantly better than those of the C group (median PFS: 6.5 vs. 5.5 months, P < 0.001; median OS: 16.6 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.002). Further univariate and multivariate Cox analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score and the number of metastatic sites were potential predictors of PFS in PC patients. The combination of PD-1 inhibitors with cisplatin and paclitaxel (TP) was more beneficial for patients with PFS compared to the combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF). Furthermore, the presence of bone metastasis, body mass index (BMI), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LWR) before treatment may be potential predictive factors for patient OS. The adverse reactions that occurred in the PC group can be tolerated or alleviated after both prevention and active treatment.

Conclusions

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ESCC patients with distant metastasis still has good efficacy and safety compared to clinical trials in the real world.

PD-1 inhibitors combined with paclitaxel and cisplatin in first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The combinations of PD-1 inhibitors with paclitaxel/cisplatinum (PD-1 + TP) and fluoropyrimidine/cisplatinum (PD-1 + FP) both have been shown to improve overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with previously untreated, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). However, there is no consensus on which chemotherapy regimen combined with PD-1 has better efficacy. To deal with this important issue in the first-line treatment of patients with ESCC, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed.

METHODS

Data were collected from eligible studies searched in Medline, Web of Science, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for the OS, and PFS, odds ratio (OR) for the objective response rate (ORR) and ≥ 3 grade treatment-related adverse events (≥ 3TRAEs) were estimated to evaluate the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors combined with TP or FP.

RESULTS

Five RCTs and one retrospective study involving 3685 patients and evaluating four treatments were included in this NMA. Compared to other treatments, PD-1 + TP was better. For the PFS, the HRs for PD-1 + TP compared to PD-1 + FP, TP and FP were 0.59 (0.44, 0.80), 0.56 (0.51, 0.61) and 0.45 (0.37, 0.56) respectively. For the OS, PD-1 + TP was also a better treatment compared to other treatments. The HRs were 0.74 (0.56, 0.96), 0.64 (0.57, 0.71), 0.53 (0.43, 0.67) respectively. For the ORR, there was no significant difference between PD-1 + TP and PD-1 + FP, and the ORs were 1.2 (0.69, 2.11). Compare with TP and FP, PD-1 + TP had an obvious advantage, ORs were 2.5 (2.04, 3.04) and 2.95 (1.91, 4.63). For ≥ 3TRAEs, PD-1 + TP compared to other treatments, ORs were 1.34 (0.74, 2.46) and 1.13 (0.92, 1.38) and 2.23 (1.35, 3.69).

CONCLUSION

PD-1 + TP significantly improved both PFS and OS compared to PD-1 + FP. Taking into account both efficacy and safety, PD-1 + TP may be a superior first-line treatment option for ESCC.

Direct immunoactivation by chemotherapeutic drugs in cancer treatment

The immune system plays a crucial role in recognizing and eliminating pathogenic substances and malignant cells in the body. For cancer treatment, immunotherapy is becoming the standard treatment for many types of cancer and is often combined with chemotherapy. Although chemotherapeutic agents are often reported to have adverse effects, including immunosuppression, they can also play a positive role in immunotherapy by directly stimulating the immune system. This has been demonstrated in preclinical and clinical studies in the past decades. Chemotherapeutics can activate immune cells through different immune receptors and signaling pathways depending on their chemical structure and formulation. In this review, we summarize and discuss the direct immunoactivation effects of chemotherapeutics and possible mechanisms behind these effects. Finally, we prospect chemo-immunotherapeutic combinations for the more effective and safer treatment of cancer.

A review of strategies to overcome immune resistance in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

Immunotherapy has become integral in cancer therapeutics over the past two decades and is now part of standard-of-care treatment in multiple cancer types. While various biomarkers and pathway alterations such as dMMR, CDK12, and AR-V7 have been identified in advanced prostate cancer to predict immunotherapy responsiveness, the vast majority of prostate cancer remain intrinsically immune-resistant, as evidenced by low response rates to anti-PD(L)1 monotherapy. Since regulatory approval of the vaccine therapy sipuleucel-T in the biomarker-unselected population, there has not been much success with immunotherapy treatment in advanced prostate cancer. Researchers have looked at various strategies to overcome immune resistance, including the identification of more biomarkers and the combination of immunotherapy with existing effective prostate cancer treatments. On the horizon, novel drugs using bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) and chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) technology are being explored and have shown promising early efficacy in this disease. Here we discuss the features of the tumour microenvironment that predispose to immune resistance and rational strategies to enhance antitumour responsiveness in advanced prostate cancer.

Peptide-based vaccine for cancer therapies

Different strategies based on peptides are available for cancer treatment, in particular to counter-act the progression of tumor growth and disease relapse. In the last decade, in the context of therapeutic strategies against cancer, peptide-based vaccines have been evaluated in different tumor models. The peptides selected for cancer vaccine development can be classified in two main type: tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and tumor-specific antigens (TSAs), which are captured, internalized, processed and presented by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to cell-mediated immunity. Peptides loaded onto MHC class I are recognized by a specific TCR of CD8+ T cells, which are activated to exert their cytotoxic activity against tumor cells presenting the same peptide-MHC-I complex. This process is defined as active immunotherapy as the host's immune system is either de novo activated or restimulated to mount an effective, tumor-specific immune reaction that may ultimately lead to tu-mor regression. However, while the preclinical data have frequently shown encouraging results, therapeutic cancer vaccines clinical trials, including those based on peptides have not provided satisfactory data to date. The limited efficacy of peptide-based cancer vaccines is the consequence of several factors, including the identification of specific target tumor antigens, the limited immunogenicity of peptides and the highly immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). An effective cancer vaccine can be developed only by addressing all such different aspects. The present review describes the state of the art for each of such factors.

Exploiting docetaxel-induced tumor cell necrosis with tumor targeted delivery of IL-12

There is strong evidence that chemotherapy can induce tumor necrosis which can be exploited for the targeted delivery of immuno-oncology agents into the tumor microenvironment (TME). We hypothesized that docetaxel, a chemotherapeutic agent that induces necrosis, in combination with the bifunctional molecule NHS-IL-12 (M9241), which delivers recombinant IL-12 through specific targeting of necrotic regions in the tumor, would provide a significant antitumor benefit in the poorly inflamed murine tumor model, EMT6 (breast), and in the moderately immune-infiltrated tumor model, MC38 (colorectal). Docetaxel, as monotherapy or in combination with NHS-IL-12, promoted tumor necrosis, leading to the improved accumulation and retention of NHS-IL-12 in the TME. Significant antitumor activity and prolonged survival were observed in cohorts receiving docetaxel and NHS-IL-12 combination therapy in both the MC38 and EMT6 murine models. The therapeutic effects were associated with increased tumor infiltrating lymphocytes and were dependent on CD8+ T cells. Transcriptomics of the TME of mice receiving the combination therapy revealed the upregulation of genes involving crosstalk between innate and adaptive immunity factors, as well as the downregulation of signatures of myeloid cells. In addition, docetaxel and NHS-IL-12 combination therapy effectively controlled tumor growth of PD-L1 wild-type and PD-L1 knockout MC38 in vivo, implying this combination could be applied in immune checkpoint refractory tumors, and/or tumors regardless of PD-L1 status. The data presented herein provide the rationale for the design of clinical studies employing this combination or similar combinations of agents.

The interactions of docetaxel with tumor microenvironment

There are several interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME) that affect the response of cancer cells to therapy. There are also a large number of cells and secretions in TME that increase resistance to therapy. Following the release of immunosuppressive, pro-angiogenic, and metastatic molecules by certain cells such as tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), and cancer cells, immune evasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis may be induced. However, natural killer (NK) cells and cytotoxic CD8 + T lymphocytes (CTLs) can responsively release anticancer molecules. In addition, anticancer drugs can modulate these cells and their interactions in favor of either cancer resistance or therapy. Docetaxel belongs to taxanes, a class of anti-tumor drugs, which acts through the polymerization of tubulin and the induction of cell cycle arrest. Also, it has been revealed that taxanes including docetaxel affect cancer cells and the other cells within TME through some other mechanisms such as modulation of immune system responses, angiogenesis, and metastasis. In this paper, we explain the basic mechanisms of docetaxel interactions with malignant cells. Besides, we review the diverse effects of docetaxel on TME and cancer cells in consequence. Lastly, the modulatory effects of docetaxel alone or in conjunction with other anticancer agents on anti-tumor immunity, cancer cell resistance, angiogenesis, and metastasis will be discussed.

Establishing the applicability of cancer vaccines in combination with chemotherapeutic entities: current aspect and achievable prospects

Cancer immunotherapy is one of the recently developed cancer treatment modalities. When compared with conventional anticancer drug regimens, immunotherapy has shown significantly better outcomes in terms of quality of life and overall survival. It incorporates a wide range of immunomodulatory modalities that channel the effects of the immune system either by broadly modulating the host immune system or by accurately targeting distinct tumor antigens. One such treatment modality that has gained interest is cancer vaccine therapy which acts by developing antibodies against tumor cells. Cancer vaccines target individual peptides or groups of antigens that are released by tumor cells and presented by the APCs. This also initiates an effective process to activate the host immune responses. Studies on various types of cancer vaccines are conducted, out of which only few are approved by FDA for clinical uses. Despite of documented safety and efficacy of conventional chemotherapy and cancer vaccines, individually they did not produce substantial results in eradication of the cancer as a monotherapy. Hence, the combination approach holds the extensive potential to provide significant improvement in disease outcomes. Certain chemotherapy has immunomodulatory effects and is proven to synergize with cancer vaccines thereby enhancing their anti-tumor activities. Chemotherapeutic agents are known to have immunostimulatory mechanisms apart from its cytotoxic effect and intensify the anti-tumor activities of vaccines by various mechanisms. This review highlights various cancer vaccines, their mechanism, and how their activity gets affected by chemotherapeutic agents. It also aims at summarizing the evidence-based outcome of the combination approach of a cancer vaccine with chemotherapy and a brief on future aspects.

Identification of Potential Serum Protein Biomarkers in Thymoma with Myasthenia Gravis After Docetaxel Treatment

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a devastating acquired autoimmune disease that can seriously affect the patient's quality of life. It is also a common complication of thymoma. Previous studies have shown that docetaxel alleviates myasthenic symptoms in thymoma with MG (TMG). However, little is known about the protein expression profiles and biomarkers for efficacy after docetaxel treatment.

METHODS

We recruited 9 healthy controls and 30 patients with TMG for the serum proteomics study with data-independent acquisition (DIA) technology. We further recruited additional 30 patients for the key protein validation by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

We identified 43 proteins by trend analysis and analyzed the interaction between these proteins and MG pathogenic proteins from the DisGNET database and the correlation analysis with clinical data of patients with TMG. Among these, KRAS and SELP were screened out and validated. KRAS and SELP increased in patients with TMG and decreased significantly after docetaxel treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that the serum proteins were differentially expressed after docetaxel treatment, suggesting their important role in patients with TMG, as well as the critical role of KRAS and SELP as biomarkers in evaluating the efficacy of docetaxel treatment.

Glioblastoma immuno-endothelial multicellular microtissue as a 3D in vitro evaluation tool of anti-cancer nano-therapeutics

Despite being the most prevalent and lethal type of adult brain cancer, glioblastoma (GBM) remains intractable. Promising anti-GBM nanoparticle (NP) systems have been developed to improve the anti-cancer performance of difficult-to-deliver therapeutics, with particular emphasis on tumor targeting strategies. However, current disease modeling toolboxes lack close-to-native in vitro models that emulate GBM microenvironment and bioarchitecture, thus partially hindering translation due to poorly predicted clinical responses. Herein, human GBM heterotypic multicellular tumor microtissues (MCTMs) are generated through high-throughput 3D modeling of U-251 MG tumor cells, tissue differentiated macrophages isolated from peripheral monocytes, and brain microvascular primary endothelial cells. GBM MCTMs mimicked tumor spatial organization, extracellular matrix production and necrosis areas. The bioactivity of a model drug, docetaxel (DTX), and of tumor-targeted DTX-loaded polymeric NPs with a surface L-Histidine moiety (H-NPs), were assessed in the MCTMs. MCTMs cell uptake and anti-proliferative effect was 8- and 3-times higher for H-NPs, respectively, compared to the non-targeted NPs and to free DTX. H-NPs provided a decrease of MCTMs anti-inflammatory M2-macrophages, while increasing their pro-inflammatory M1 counterparts. Moreover, H-NPs showed a particular biomolecular signature through reduced secretion of an array of medium cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-8, TGF-β). Overall, MCTMs provide an in vitro biomimetic model to recapitulate key cellular and structural features of GBM and improve in vivo drug response predictability, fostering future clinical translation of anti-GBM nano-therapeutic strategies.

Dying of Stress: Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy, and Small-Molecule Inhibitors in Immunogenic Cell Death and Immunogenic Modulation

Innovative strategies to re-establish the immune-mediated destruction of malignant cells is paramount to the success of anti-cancer therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests that radiotherapy and select chemotherapeutic drugs and small molecule inhibitors induce immunogenic cell stress on tumors that results in improved immune recognition and targeting of the malignant cells. Through immunogenic cell death, which entails the release of antigens and danger signals, and immunogenic modulation, wherein the phenotype of stressed cells is altered to become more susceptible to immune attack, radiotherapies, chemotherapies, and small-molecule inhibitors exert immune-mediated anti-tumor responses. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of immunogenic cell death and immunogenic modulation and their relevance in the anti-tumor activity of radiotherapies, chemotherapies, and small-molecule inhibitors. Our aim is to feature the immunological aspects of conventional and targeted cancer therapies and highlight how these therapies may be compatible with emerging immunotherapy approaches.

Sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ORIENT-15): multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate sintilimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy (cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil) as first line treatment of unresectable locally advanced, recurrent, or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

DESIGN

Multicentre, randomised, double blind, phase 3 trial.

SETTING

66 sites in China and 13 sites outside of China between 14 December 2018 and 9 April 2021.

PARTICIPANTS

659 adults (aged ≥18 years) with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who had not received systemic treatment.

INTERVENTION

Participants were randomised 1:1 to receive sintilimab or placebo (3 mg/kg in patients weighing <60 kg or 200 mg in patients weighing ≥60 kg) in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m² plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m² every three weeks. The trial was amended to allow investigators to choose the chemotherapy regimen: cisplatin plus paclitaxel or cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m² continuous infusion on days 1-5).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival in all patients and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 for expression of programmed cell death ligand 1.

RESULTS

659 patients were randomly assigned to sintilimab (n=327) or placebo (n=332) with chemotherapy. 616 of 659 patients (93%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel and 43 of 659 patients (7%) received sintilimab or placebo in combination with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil. At the interim analysis, sintilimab with chemotherapy showed better overall survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (median 16.7 v 12.5 months, hazard ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 0.78, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (17.2 v 13.6 months, 0.64, 0.48 to 0.85, P=0.002). Sintilimab and chemotherapy significantly improved progression free survival compared with placebo and chemotherapy in all patients (7.2 v 5.7 months, 0.56, 0.46 to 0.68, P<0.001) and in patients with combined positive scores of ≥10 (8.3 v 6.4 months, 0.58, 0.45 to 0.75, P<0.001). Adverse events related to treatment occurred in 321 of 327 patients (98%) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy group versus 326 of 332 (98%) patients in the placebo-chemotherapy group. Rates of adverse events related to treatment, grade ≥3, were 60% (196/327) and 55% (181/332) in the sintilimab-chemotherapy and placebo-chemotherapy groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with placebo, sintilimab in combination with cisplatin plus paclitaxel showed significant benefits in overall survival and progression free survival as first line treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Similar benefits of sintilimab with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil seem promising.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03748134.

Paclitaxel and Cisplatin with or without Cetuximab in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A randomized, multicenter, open-label Phase II trial

Lack of effective targeted therapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) underscores the urgent need for identifying new treatment approaches for this challenging disease. We sought to assess the addition of cetuximab to paclitaxel-cisplatin chemotherapy for first-line treatment in patients with metastatic ESCC. In this randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase II clinical trial, patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel-cisplatin (TP) (paclitaxel [175 mg/m² intravenously (i.v.) on day 1 of every 3-week cycle] and cisplatin [75 mg/m² i.v. on day 1 of every 3-week cycle]) and TP plus cetuximab (CTP) (cetuximab, 400 mg/m² i.v. on day 1 of week 1, followed by 250 mg/m² weekly), respectively. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on 89 tumor samples for biomarker exploration. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 22.6 months, median PFS was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.8–7.0) in patients administered CTP versus 4.2 months (95% CI: 3.0–5.3) in the TP group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40–0.93; p = 0.02). Median overall survival was 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.9–13.1) in the CTP group and 10.5 months (95% CI: 9.0–13.2) in the TP arm (HR = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.67–1.44; p = 0.91). The most common reported greater than or equal to grade 3 adverse events were neutropenia (35.2% versus 22.4%) and leukopenia (25.4% versus 13.2%). In patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification tumors (15.7%), PFS was improved with CTP compared with TP treatment (HR = 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01–0.98; p = 0.018). First-line CTP significantly improves PFS, with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic ESCC.

•

Compare the effect of Cetuximab + chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone in ESCC

•

CTP regimen improves progression-free survival with a manageable safety profile

•

ESCC patients with EGFR amplification obtain greater therapeutic benefit from CTP

•

CTP regimen represents a new treatment option for ESCC

Cancer Vaccine in Cold Tumors: Clinical Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities

The idea of cancer immunotherapy is to stimulate the immune system to fight tumors without destroying normal cells. One of the anticancer therapy methods, among many, is based on the use of cancer vaccines that contain tumor antigens in order to induce immune responses against tumors. However, clinical trials have shown that the use of such vaccines as a monotherapy is ineffective in many cases, since they do not cause a strong immune response. Particular tumors are resistant to immunotherapy due to the absence or insufficient infiltration of tumors with CD8+ T cells, and hence, they are called cold or non-inflamed tumors. Cold tumors are characterized by a lack of CD8+ T cell infiltration, the presence of anti-inflammatory myeloid cells, tumor-associated M2 macrophages, and regulatory T cells. It is very important to understand which stage of the antitumor response does not work properly in order to use the right strategy for the treatment of patients. Applying other therapeutic methods alongside cancer vaccines can be more rational for cold tumors which do not provoke the immune system strongly. Herein, we indicate some combinational therapies that have been used or are in progress for cold tumor treatment alongside vaccines.

Pembrolizumab plus docetaxel for the treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer: A prospective phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

Taxane-based checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy might improve the outcome in recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (HNSCC) patients. Thus, we investigated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel (DTX) plus pembrolizumab (P) in a prospective phase I/II trial.

METHODS

Platinum-resistant R/M HNSCC patients received DTX 75 mg/m^2 plus P 200 mg for up to six cycles followed by P maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and safety. Secondary endpoints comprised disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled. Nine patients (40.9%) had a primary tumor in the oropharynx, 8 (36.4%) in the oral cavity, 3 (13.6%) in the hypopharynx and 2 (9.1%) in the larynx. The ORR was 22.7% (95% CI 10.1%-43.4%) and one (4.5%) complete response was achieved. The DCR was 54.6% (95% 34.7%-73.1%). The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 2.7-11.6) and the median OS 21.3 months (95% CI 6.3-31.1). The 1-year PFS and OS rates were 27.3% and 68.2%, respectively. While the most frequent adverse event (AE) was myelosuppression, which was reported in all 22 patients, 3 (13.6%) patients experienced grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The most common immune-related AEs were grade skin rash (40.9%) and hypothyroidism (40.9%). One patient (4.5%) experienced grade 5 immune thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSION

DXT in combination with P shows promising activity accompanied with a manageable side effect profile in pre-treated R/M HNSCC patients.

Combining inhibition of galectin-3 with and before a therapeutic vaccination is critical for the prostate-tumor-free outcome

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major health problem worldwide. Taxol derivatives-based chemotherapies or immunotherapies are usually proposed depending on the symptomatic status of the patient. In the case of immunotherapy, tumors develop robust immune escape mechanisms that abolish any protective response, and to date why prostate cancer is one of the most resistant diseases remains unresolved.

METHODS

By using a combination of clinical data to study the transcriptome of metastasis samples from patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer, and state of the art cellular and molecular biology assays in samples from tumor-bearing mice that have been submitted to surgical resection of the tumor before receiving a vaccination, we answered several essential questions in the field of immunotherapy for prostate cancer. We also used two different methods to inhibit the expression of galectin-3 (Gal-3) in tumor cells: a stable RNA interference method to control the expression of this galectin efficiently only in tumor cells, and low and non-cytotoxic doses of docetaxel to easily transfer our findings to clinical settings.

RESULTS

Herein, we show for the first time that Gal-3 expressed by prostate tumor cells is the main immune checkpoint responsible for the failure of vaccine-based immunotherapy. Our results show that low and non-cytotoxic doses of docetaxel lead to the inhibition of Gal-3 expression in PCa cells as well as in clinical samples of patients with metastatic and castration-resistant PCa promoting a Th1 response. We thus optimized a prostate cancer animal model that undergoes surgical resection of the tumor to mimic prostatectomy usually performed in patients. Importantly, using Gal-3-knocked down-PCa cells or low and non-cytotoxic doses of taxane before vaccination, we were able to highly control tumor recurrence through a direct impact on the proliferation and infiltration of CD8+ cytotoxic T.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, Gal-3 expression by PCa cells is a crucial inhibitor for the success of immunotherapy, and low doses of docetaxel with non-cytotoxic effect on leukocyte survival could be used before immunotherapy for all patients with PCa to reduce the expression of this critical negative immune checkpoint, pre-conditioning the tumor-microenvironment to activate an antitumor immune response and promote tumor-free outcome.

How to turn up the heat on the cold immune microenvironment of metastatic prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Advanced prostate cancer remains one of the most common and deadly cancers, despite advances in treatment options. Immunotherapy has provided little benefit to a majority of patients, largely due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment that gives rise to inherently "cold tumors". In this review, we discuss the immunopathology of the prostate tumor microenvironment, strategies for treating prostate cancer with immunotherapies, and a perspective on potential approaches to enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapies.

METHODS

Databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane, were searched for articles relevant to the immunology of prostate cancer. We discuss the impact of different types of treatments on the immune system, and potential mechanisms through which prostate cancer evades the immune system.

RESULTS

The tumor microenvironment associated with prostate cancer is highly immunosuppressive due to (1) the function of regulatory T cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), (2) the cytokine milieu secreted by tumor stromal cells and fibroblasts, and (3) the production of adenosine via prostatic acid phosphatase. Both adenosine and tumor growth factor beta (TGF-beta) serve as potent immunosuppressive molecules that could also represent potential therapeutic targets. While there have been many immunotherapy trials in prostate cancer, the majority of these trials have targeted a single immunosuppressive mechanism resulting in limited clinical efficacy. Future approaches will require the integration of improved patient selection as well as use of combination therapies to address multiple mechanisms of resistance.

CONCLUSION

Prostate cancer inherently gives rise to multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms that have been difficult to overcome with any one immunotherapeutic approach. Enhancing the clinical activity of immunotherapies will require strategic combinations of multiple therapies to address the emerging mechanisms of tumor immune resistance.

Exploiting off-target effects of estrogen deprivation to sensitize estrogen receptor negative breast cancer to immune killing

Background

There are highly effective treatment strategies for estrogen receptor (ER)+, progesterone receptor (PR)+, and HER2+ breast cancers; however, there are limited targeted therapeutic strategies for the 10%–15% of women who are diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer. Here, we hypothesize that ER targeting drugs induce phenotypic changes to sensitize breast tumor cells to immune-mediated killing regardless of their ER status.

Methods

Real-time cell analysis, flow cytometry, qRT-PCR, western blotting, and multiplexed RNA profiling were performed to characterize ER+ and ER− breast cancer cells and to interrogate the phenotypic effects of ER targeting drugs. Sensitization of breast cancer cells to immune cell killing by the tamoxifen metabolite 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and fulvestrant was determined through in vitro health-donor natural killer cell ¹¹¹IN-release killing assays. A syngeneic tumor study was performed to validate these findings in vivo.

Results

Pretreatment with tamoxifen metabolite 4-OHT or fulvestrant resulted in increased natural killer (NK)–mediated cell lysis of both ER+ and ER− breast cancer cells. Through multiplexed RNA profiling analysis of 4-OHT-treated ER+ and ER− cells, we identified increased activation of apoptotic and death receptor signaling pathways and identified G protein-coupled receptor for estrogen (GPR30) engagement as a putative mechanism for immunogenic modulation. Using the specific GPR30 agonist G-1, we demonstrate that targeted activation of GPR30 signaling resulted in increased NK cell killing. Furthermore, we show that knockdown of GPR30 inhibited 4-OHT and fulvestrant mediated increases to NK cell killing, demonstrating this is dependent on GPR30 expression. Moreover, we demonstrate that this mechanism remains active in a 4-OHT-resistant MCF7 cell line, showing that even in patient populations with ER+ tumors that are resistant to the cytotoxic effects of tamoxifen, 4-OHT treatment sensitizes them to immune-mediated killing. Moreover, we find that fulvestrant pretreatment of tumor cells synergizes with the IL-15 superagonist N-803 treatment of NK cells and sensitizes tumor cells to killing by programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) targeting high-affinity natural killer (t-haNK) cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the combination of fulvestrant and N-803 is effective in triple-negative breast cancer in vivo.

Conclusion

Together, these findings demonstrate a novel effect of ER targeting drugs on the interaction of ER+ and, surprisingly, ER− tumors cells with the immune system. This study is the first to demonstrate the potential use of ER targeting drugs as immunomodulatory agents in an ER agnostic manner and may inform novel immunotherapy strategies in breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 inhibitor combined with nab-paclitaxel in Chinese patients with refractory melanoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the combined effect of anti-PD-1 inhibitor and nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel for refractory melanoma among Chinese patients.

METHODS

Data from January 2018 to March 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Sixty-four patients were eligible for analysis from a single Chinese cancer center.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 16.0 months at data cutoff. The objective response rate (ORR) was 29.7%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 67.2% in all patients. Treatment-naïve patients had significantly higher ORR than pretreated patients (42.9% vs 13.8%, p = 0.011). Cutaneous melanoma patients with NRAS gene mutation benefited more than non-mutated patients (DCR of 100% vs. 54.5%) (p = 0.030). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of all patients was 5.2 months and the duration of response was 10.8 months. Median duration of disease control was 7.7 months. Prior treatment-naïve patients had significantly longer PFS than those who accepted prior treatments (7.2 vs. 5.1 months, p = 0.024). Patients with abnormally high LDH level had shorter mPFS (3.6 months vs. 6.6 months, p = 0.020). Median overall survival was not reached in this study. Most patients experienced adverse events (AEs), but only 17.2% of patients experienced grade 3 severe AEs. The most common AEs were alopecia (89.1%), neutropenia (18.8%), pruritus (15.6%), and arthralgia (14.1%). Some patients had immune related AEs (irAEs). No grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed. Patients with ≥ 3 AEs or with irAEs had longer mPFS (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Nab-paclitaxel combined with PD-1 antibody is a well-tolerated and effective regimen for Chinese patients with refractory melanoma.

Chitosan-based nanoparticle co-delivery of docetaxel and curcumin ameliorates anti-tumor chemoimmunotherapy in lung cancer

The application of traditional chemotherapy drugs for lung cancer has obvious limitations, such as toxic side effects, uncontrolled drug-release, poor bioavailability, and drug-resistance. Thus, to address the limitations of free drugs and improve treatment effects, we developed novel T7 peptide-modified nanoparticles (T7-CMCS-BAPE, CBT) based on carboxymethyl chitosan (CMCS), which is capable of targeted binding to the transferrin receptor (TfR) expressed on lung cancer cells and precisely regulating drug-release according to the pH value and reactive oxygen species (ROS) level. The results showed that the drug-loading content of docetaxel (DTX) and curcumin (CUR) was approximately 7.82% and 6.48%, respectively. Good biosafety was obtained even when the concentration was as high as 500 μg/mL. More importantly, the T7-CMCS-BAPE-DTX/CUR (CBT-DC) complexes exhibited better in vitro and in vivo anti-tumor effects than DTX monotherapy and other nanocarriers loaded with DTX and CUR alone. Furthermore, we determined that CBT-DC can ameliorate the immunosuppressive micro-environment to promote the inhibition of tumor growth. Collectively, the current findings help lay the foundation for combinatorial lung cancer treatment.

The immune microenvironment and relation to outcome in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with docetaxel with or without gemcitabine

Preclinical studies suggest that some effects of conventional chemotherapy, and in particular, gemcitabine, are mediated through enhanced antitumor immune responses. The objective of this study was to use material from a randomized clinical trial to evaluate whether patients with preexisting immune infiltrates responded better to treatment with gemcitabine + docetaxel (GD) compared to docetaxel alone. Formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded breast cancer tissues from SBG0102 phase 3 trial patients randomly assigned to treatment with GD or docetaxel were used. Immunohistochemical staining for CD8, FOXP3, LAG3, PD-1, PD-L1 and CD163 was performed. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumor associated macrophages were evaluated. Prespecified statistical analyses were performed in a formal prospective-retrospective design. Time to progression was primary endpoint and overall survival secondary endpoint. Correlations between biomarker status and endpoints were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models. Biomarker data was obtained for 237 patients. There was no difference in treatment effect according to biomarker status for the whole cohort. In planned subgroup analysis by PAM50 subtype, in non-luminal (basal-like and HER2E) breast cancers FOXP3 was a significant predictor of treatment effect with GD compared to docetaxel, with a HR of 0.22 (0.09–0.52) for tumors with low FOXP3 compared to HR 0.92 (0.47–1.80) for high FOXP3 TILs (P_interaction = 0.01). Immune biomarkers were not predictive of added benefit of gemcitabine in a cohort of mixed breast cancer subtypes. However, in non-luminal breast cancers, patients with low FOXP3+ TILs may have significant benefit from added gemcitabine.

Differential combination immunotherapy requirements for inflamed (warm) tumors versus T cell excluded (cool) tumors: engage, expand, enable, and evolve

Background

Different types of tumors have varying susceptibility to immunotherapy and hence require different treatment strategies; these cover a spectrum ranging from ‘hot’ tumors or those with high mutational burden and immune infiltrates that are more amenable to targeting to ‘cold’ tumors that are more difficult to treat due to the fewer targetable mutations and checkpoint markers. We hypothesized that an effective anti-tumor response requires multiple agents that would (1) engage the immune response and generate tumor-specific effector cells; (2) expand the number and breadth of the immune effector cells; (3) enable the anti-tumor activity of these immune cells in the tumor microenvironment; and (4) evolve the tumor response to widen immune effector repertoire.

Methods

A hexatherapy combination was designed and administered to MC38-CEA (warm) and 4T1 (cool) murine tumor models. The hexatherapy regimen was composed of adenovirus-based vaccine and IL-15 (interleukin-15) superagonist (N-803) to engage the immune response; anti-OX40 and anti-4-1BB to expand effector cells; anti-PD-L1 (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) to enable anti-tumor activity; and docetaxel to promote antigen spread. Primary and metastatic tumor growth inhibition were measured. The generation of anti-tumor immune effector cells was analyzed using flow cytometry, ELISpot (enzyme-linked immunospot), and RNA analysis.

Results

The MC38-CEA and 4T1 tumor models have differential sensitivities to the combination treatments. In the ‘warm’ MC38-CEA, combinations with two to five agents resulted in moderate therapeutic benefit while the hexatherapy regimen outperformed all these combinations. On the other hand, the hexatherapy regimen was required in order to decrease the primary and metastatic tumor burden in the ‘cool’ 4T1 model. In both models, the hexatherapy regimen promoted CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cell proliferation and activity. Furthermore, the hexatherapy regimen induced vaccine-specific T cells and stimulated antigen cascade. The hexatherapy regimen also limited the immunosuppressive T cell and myeloid derived suppressor cell populations, and also decreased the expression of exhaustion markers in T cells in the 4T1 model.

Conclusion

The hexatherapy regimen is a strategic combination of immuno-oncology agents that can engage, expand, enable, and evolve the immune response and can provide therapeutic benefits in both MC38-CEA (warm) and 4T1 (cool) tumor models.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade for Prostate Cancer: Niche Role or Next Breakthrough?

A number of trials have evaluated the use of single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The benefit appears to be limited to a small subset of patients, such as those with tumors with microsatellite instability, highlighting the importance of biomarkers to identify which patients may be more likely to respond. Given the lack of efficacy for most patients with mCRPC, our understanding of the mechanisms of primary resistance to checkpoint inhibitors and of the tumor immune microenvironment in prostate cancer is critical. Knowledge gained in these key areas will allow for the identification of novel combination therapies that will circumvent resistance mechanisms and should be tested in clinical trials. Improving our understanding of the effects of androgen deprivation therapy on immune cells and of the most favorable disease setting (e.g., biochemically recurrent vs. castration-resistant prostate cancer) may aid in the optimal use of checkpoint inhibitors in combination with other agents. If successful, this may move immune checkpoint inhibitors into the treatment armamentarium of prostate cancer management.

Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Metastatic Castration Refractory Prostate Cancer

Immunotherapies have shown remarkable success in the treatment of multiple cancer types; however, despite encouraging preclinical activity, registration trials of immunotherapy in prostate cancer have largely been unsuccessful. Sipuleucel-T remains the only approved immunotherapy for the treatment of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer based on modest improvement in overall survival. This immune evasion in the case of prostate cancer has been attributed to tumor-intrinsic factors, an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and host factors, which ultimately make it an inert 'cold' tumor. Recently, multiple approaches have been investigated to turn prostate cancer into a 'hot' tumor. Antibodies directed against programmed cell death protein 1 have a tumor agnostic approval for a small minority of patients with microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair-deficient metastatic prostate cancer. Herein, we present an overview of the current immunotherapy landscape in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with a focus on immune checkpoint inhibitors. We describe the results of clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; either as single agents or in combination with other checkpoint inhibitors, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, novel hormonal therapies, chemotherapies, and radioligands. Finally, we review upcoming immunotherapies, including novel monoclonal antibodies, chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, Bi-Specific T cell Engagers (BiTEs), therapies targeting the adenosine pathway, and other miscellaneous agents.

Lymph-directed immunotherapy - Harnessing endogenous lymphatic distribution pathways for enhanced therapeutic outcomes in cancer

The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment of some cancers. Harnessing the immune system to improve tumour cell killing is now standard clinical practice and immunotherapy is the first line of defence for many cancers that historically, were difficult to treat. A unifying concept in cancer immunotherapy is the activation of the immune system to mount an attack on malignant cells, allowing the body to recognise, and in some cases, eliminate cancer. However, in spite of a significant proportion of patients that respond well to treatment, there remains a subset who are non-responders and a number of cancers that cannot be treated with these therapies. These limitations highlight the need for targeted delivery of immunomodulators to both tumours and the effector cells of the immune system, the latter being highly concentrated in the lymphatic system. In this context, macromolecular therapies may provide a significant advantage. Macromolecules are too large to easily access blood capillaries and instead typically exhibit preferential uptake via the lymphatic system. In contexts where immune cells are the therapeutic target, particularly in cancer therapy, this may be advantageous. In this review, we examine in brief the current immunotherapy approaches in cancer and how macromolecular and nanomedicine strategies may improve the therapeutic profiles of these drugs. We subsequently discuss how therapeutics directed either by parenteral or mucosal administration, can be taken up by the lymphatics thereby accessing a larger proportion of the body's immune cells. Finally, we detail drug delivery strategies that have been successfully employed to target the lymphatics.

Treatment Combinations with DNA Vaccines for the Treatment of Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

Simple Summary

The only vaccine approved by FDA as a treatment for cancer is sipuleucel-T, a therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Most investigators studying anti-tumor vaccines believe they will be most effective as parts of combination therapies, rather than used alone. Unfortunately, the cost and complexity of sipuleucel-T makes it difficult to feasibly be used in combination with many other agents. In this review article we discuss the use of DNA vaccines as a simpler vaccine approach that has demonstrated efficacy in several animal species. We discuss the use of DNA vaccines in combination with traditional treatments for mCRPC, and other immune-modulating treatments, in preclinical and early clinical trials for patients with mCRPC.

Abstract

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is a challenging disease to treat, with poor outcomes for patients. One antitumor vaccine, sipuleucel-T, has been approved as a treatment for mCRPC. DNA vaccines are another form of immunotherapy under investigation. DNA immunizations elicit antigen-specific T cells that cause tumor cell lysis, which should translate to meaningful clinical responses. They are easily amenable to design alterations, scalable for large-scale manufacturing, and thermo-stable for easy transport and distribution. Hence, they offer advantages over other vaccine formulations. However, clinical trials with DNA vaccines as a monotherapy have shown only modest clinical effects against tumors. Standard therapies for CRPC including androgen-targeted therapies, radiation therapy and chemotherapy all have immunomodulatory effects, which combined with immunotherapies such as DNA vaccines, could potentially improve treatment. In addition, many investigational drugs are being developed which can augment antitumor immunity, and together with DNA vaccines can further enhance antitumor responses in preclinical models. We reviewed the literature available prior to July 2020 exploring the use of DNA vaccines in the treatment of prostate cancer. We also examined various approved and experimental therapies that could be combined with DNA vaccines to potentially improve their antitumor efficacy as treatments for mCRPC.

Nanoparticle cancer vaccines: Design considerations and recent advances

Vaccines therapeutics manipulate host's immune system and have broad potential for cancer prevention and treatment. However, due to poor immunogenicity and limited safety, fewer cancer vaccines have been successful in clinical trials. Over the past decades, nanotechnology has been exploited to deliver cancer vaccines, eliciting long-lasting and effective immune responses. Compared to traditional vaccines, cancer vaccines delivered by nanomaterials can be tuned towards desired immune profiles by (1) optimizing the physicochemical properties of the nanomaterial carriers, (2) modifying the nanomaterials with targeting molecules, or (3) co-encapsulating with immunostimulators. In order to develop vaccines with desired immunogenicity, a thorough understanding of parameters that affect immune responses is required. Herein, we discussed the effects of physicochemical properties on antigen presentation and immune response, including but not limited to size, particle rigidity, intrinsic immunogenicity. Furthermore, we provided a detailed overview of recent preclinical and clinical advances in nanotechnology for cancer vaccines, and considerations for future directions in advancing the vaccine platform to widespread anti-cancer applications.

Natural Born Killers: NK Cells in Cancer Therapy

Cellular therapy has emerged as an attractive option for the treatment of cancer, and adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells has gained FDA approval in hematologic malignancy. However, limited efficacy was observed using CAR-T therapy in solid tumors. Natural killer (NK) cells are crucial for tumor surveillance and exhibit potent killing capacity of aberrant cells in an antigen-independent manner. Adoptive transfer of unmodified allogeneic or autologous NK cells has shown limited clinical benefit due to factors including low cell number, low cytotoxicity and failure to migrate to tumor sites. To address these problems, immortalized and autologous NK cells have been genetically engineered to express high affinity receptors (CD16), CARs directed against surface proteins (PD-L1, CD19, Her2, etc.) and endogenous cytokines (IL-2 and IL-15) that are crucial for NK cell survival and cytotoxicity, with positive outcomes reported by several groups both preclinically and clinically. With a multitude of NK cell-based therapies currently in clinic trials, it is likely they will play a crucial role in next-generation cell therapy-based treatment. In this review, we will highlight the recent advances and limitations of allogeneic, autologous and genetically enhanced NK cells used in adoptive cell therapy.

Nanomedicine-mediated alteration of the pharmacokinetic profile of small molecule cancer immunotherapeutics

The advent of immunotherapy is a game changer in cancer therapy with monoclonal antibody- and T cell-based therapeutics being the current flagships. Small molecule immunotherapeutics might offer advantages over the biological drugs in terms of complexity, tissue penetration, manufacturing cost, stability, and shelf life. However, small molecule drugs are prone to rapid systemic distribution, which might induce severe off-target side effects. Nanotechnology could aid in the formulation of the drug molecules to improve their delivery to specific immune cell subsets. In this review we summarize the current efforts in changing the pharmacokinetic profile of small molecule immunotherapeutics with a strong focus on Toll-like receptor agonists. In addition, we give our vision on limitations and future pathways in the route of nanomedicine to the clinical practice.

Mixed 20-peptide cancer vaccine in combination with docetaxel and dexamethasone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomized phase II trial

A novel cancer vaccine consisting of 20 mixed peptides (KRM-20) was designed to induce cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) against twelve different tumor-associated antigens. The aim of this phase II trial was to examine whether KRM-20 in combination with docetaxel and dexamethasone enhances the antitumor effects in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II study, we enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with CRPC from ten medical centers in Japan. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 1:1 centrally to receive either KRM-20 combined with docetaxel and dexamethasone (n = 25) or placebo with docetaxel and dexamethasone (n = 26). The primary endpoint was the difference in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline between each treatment. The rates of > 50% PSA decline in the two arms were similar (56.5% versus 53.8%; P = 0.851). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched peptide-specific immunoglobulin G (P = 0.018) and CTL (P = 0.007) responses in the KRM-20 arm significantly increased after treatment. The addition of KRM-20 did not increase toxicity. There were no between-group differences in progression-free or overall survival (OS). The addition of KRM-20 was safe, and similar PSA decline and HLA-matched peptide-specific CTL and IgG responses increased in combination with docetaxel and dexamethasone in CRPC patients. Subgroup analysis suggested that this treatment is favorable for CRPC patients with ≥ 26% lymphocytes or PSA levels of < 11.2 ng/ml, but further clinical trials comparing OS are required.

Modulating tumor immunity by metronomic dosing of oxaliplatin incorporated in multiple oral nanoemulsion

In this study, a system for oral delivery of oxaliplatin (OXA) was prepared for metronomic chemotherapy to enhance antitumor efficacy and modulate tumor immunity. OXA was complexed with N^α-deoxycholyl-l-lysyl-methylester (DCK) (OXA/DCK) and formulated as a nanoemulsion (OXA/DCK-NE). OXA/DCK-NE showed 3.35-fold increased permeability across a Caco-2 cell monolayer, resulting in 1.73-fold higher oral bioavailability than free OXA. In addition, treatment of the B16F10.OVA cell line with OXA/DCK-NE resulted in successful upregulation of immunogenic cell death (ICD) markers both in vitro and in vivo. In a B16F10.OVA tumor-bearing mouse model, treatment with OXA/DCK-NE substantially impeded tumor growth by 63.9 ± 13.3% compared to the control group, which was also greater than the intravenous (IV) OXA group. Moreover, treatment with a combination of oral OXA/DCK-NE and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (αPD-1) antibody resulted in 78.3 ± 9.67% greater inhibition compared to controls. More important, OXA/DCK-NE alone had immunomodulatory effects, such as enhancement of tumor antigen uptake, activation of dendritic cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes, and augmentation of both the population and function of immune effector cells in tumor tissue as well as in the spleen; no such effects were seen in the OXA IV group. These observations provide a rationale for combining oral metronomic OXA with immunotherapy to elicit synergistic antitumor effects.

Management of recurrent and metastatic oral cavity cancer: Raising the bar a step higher

In recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M-SCCHN), the armamentarium of systemic anti-cancer modalities continues to grow in parallel with innovations in and better integration of local approaches. The backbone of cytotoxic chemotherapy remains cisplatin with 5-fluorouracil or a taxane. In contrast to cisplatin, the tumoricidal activity of carboplatin monotherapy is debatable. Adding the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab to a platinum/5-fluorouracil doublet (the so-called EXTREME regimen) produced a statistically but also clinically significant improvement of survival and became thus the standard first-line palliative treatment in adequately fit patients. Interestingly, three large randomized trials (EXTREME, SPECTRUM, and ZALUTE) evaluating different anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (cetuximab, panitumumab, and zalutumumab, respectively) demonstrated preferential anti-tumour efficacy in patients with primary cancer in the oral cavity. Modern immunotherapy with immunomodulating antibodies, dubbed immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD-1) inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, showed unprecedented activity in one first-line (KEYNOTE-048) and several second-line trials (CheckMate-141, KEYNOTE-012, KEYNOTE-055, and KEYNOTE-040). In a minority of also heavily-pretreated patients, these agents generate long-lasting responses without the typical chemotherapy-related toxicity, however, at a price of a low overall response rate, rare but potentially life-threatening immune-related adverse events, the risk of hyperprogression, and high costs. In oligometastatic disease, emerging data indicate long-term benefit with locally ablative techniques including metastasectomy and stereotactic radiotherapy of pulmonary but also hepatic and other distant lesions. In the frame of highly-individualized cancer care, a particularly intriguing approach is a combination of systemic and local therapies.

Low-dose docetaxel enhances the anti-tumour efficacy of a human umbilical vein endothelial cell vaccine

Our previous studies have indicated that human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) vaccination appears to be a potentially promising anti-angiogenesis therapy, but the modest therapeutic anti-tumour efficiency limits its clinical use. This highlights the importance of identifying more potent therapeutic HUVEC vaccine strategies for clinical testing. In the present study, the immune-modulating doses of docetaxel (DOC) was combined with 1 × 10⁶ viable HUVECs as a means to enhance the therapeutic anti-tumour efficiency of the HUVEC vaccine. Our results demonstrated that 5 mg/kg DOC administrated prior to HUVEC vaccine could most effectively assist HUVEC vaccine to display a remarkable suppression of tumour growth and metastasis as wells as a prolongation of survival time in a therapeutic procedure. CD31 immunohistochemical analysis of the excised tumours confirmed a significant reduction in vessel density after treatment with the HUVEC vaccine with 5 mg/kg DOC. Additionally, an increased HUVEC-specific antibody level, activated CTLs and an elevated IFN-γ level in cultured splenocytes were revealed after treatment with HUVEC vaccine with 5 mg/kg DOC. Finally, 5 mg/kg DOC coupled with the HUVEC vaccine led to induction of significant increases in CD8⁺T cells and decrease in Tregs in the tumour microenvironment. Taken together, all the results verified that 5 mg/kg DOC could assist HUVEC vaccine to elicit strong HUVEC specific humoral and cellular responses, which could facilitate the HUVEC vaccine-mediated inhibition of cancer growth and metastasis. These findings provide the immunological rationale for the combined use of immune-modulating doses of DOC and HUVEC vaccines in patients with cancer.

The Evolving Role of Taxanes in Combination With Cetuximab for the Treatment of Recurrent and/or Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Evidence, Advantages, and Future Directions

The addition of cetuximab to platinum-based chemotherapy (cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-fluorouracil [5-FU]), followed by maintenance cetuximab until disease progression (EXTREME), resulted in the first regimen to yield significantly improved survival outcomes in the first-line treatment of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN) in over 30 years. Currently, the EXTREME regimen is a guideline-recommended treatment in the first-line R/M setting, and, therefore, it is used as a control arm in all new first-line, phase 3 immunotherapy trials. More recently, new checkpoint inhibitor approaches have emerged and are changing the treatment landscape for PD-L1-positive patients with R/M SCCHN. Additionally, alternative chemotherapy backbones in R/M SCCHN are continually investigated. Replacing 5-FU with a taxane in the EXTREME regimen seeks to take advantage of the potential immunogenic and proapoptotic synergy between cetuximab and docetaxel or paclitaxel. These cetuximab-, platinum-, and taxane-based treatments have demonstrated promising survival results and cytoreductive properties in single-arm studies. Thus, these combination treatments may be of importance to patients with high tumor burden and dangerous site involvements (e.g., causing bleeding, suffocation, dysphagia, or ulceration), in whom symptom relief is a key treatment goal. TPExtreme is the first large, randomized trial comparing a cetuximab, platinum, and taxane combination regimen with EXTREME. Currently, the substitution of 5-FU with a taxane is a feasible and clinically beneficial option for patients with contraindications to 5-FU. The TPEx regimen appears to be a new option in first-line R/M SCCHN, with a shorter time on CT and significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. For patients with R/M disease in whom further cisplatin- or carboplatin-based treatment is unsuitable, or whose disease has already progressed on first-line R/M therapy, treatment options such as cetuximab plus a taxane, which capitalize on the combinative ability of the 2 agents, can be considered. Notably, it is as of yet unknown what second-line treatments may be suitable to follow a checkpoint inhibitor-based first-line therapy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in mCRPC - rationales, challenges and perspectives

The advancement of immune-therapeutics in cancer treatment has proven to be promising in various malignant diseases. However, in castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) major Phase III trials have been unexpectedly disappointing. To contribute to a broader understanding of the role and use of immune-therapeutics in mCRPC, we conducted a systematic review. We searched the websites ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed and ASCO Meeting Library for clinical trials employing immune checkpoint inhibitors in mCRPC. This article not only describes the rationale of individual trials, but it also summarizes the current status of the field and sheds light on strategies for future success.

Approach to the Patient with Recurrent/Metastatic Disease

OPINION STATEMENT

For most of patients with a recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the treatment remains palliative: The main objective is to reduce the symptoms related to the locoregional relapse, prolong life while maintaining quality of life, which is a big challenge. The systemic treatment needs to be adapted to the performance status, comorbidities, and sequelae of patients. For fit patients, the combination of platinum-based chemotherapy and cetuximab (EXTREME) is the standard of care in first-line treatment since 2008, as no other targeted therapy has been approved in this setting until now. The replacement of 5-FU with a taxane (docetaxel) in the EXTREME regimen has been explored in the large randomized international study TPExtreme which results are awaited in a few months. Depending on the study results on survival, response rate, and tolerance, the TPEx regimen may become a treatment option for patients with R/M HNSCC. Unfit patients are usually treated with platinum-free combinations or with the monotherapies which are recommended in second-line setting (methotrexate, taxanes, cetuximab). However, the irruption of new immunotherapies (e.g., checkpoint inhibitors (CPI)) is changing the guidelines. The tolerance of anti-PD-1 CPI is better than that of chemotherapy, and they seem to be a good option for unfit patients. Anti-PD-1 nivolumab and pembrolizumab are now approved for platinum refractory patients, providing prolonged survival in the case of response, and improvement in quality of life. New options arise in first-line setting with pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy. Patients with a high PD-L1 biomarker level seem to benefit more from immunotherapy. Other situations (e.g., PD-L1-low, PD-L1-negative, high tumor burden) may more likely to benefit from other combinations, such as cetuximab plus chemotherapy, to avoid local failures and life-threatening fast progression. In terms of perspectives, chemo-free and CPI-free approaches, using other immune oncology agents, should be the next steps.

Surrogates of immunologic cell death (ICD) and chemoradiotherapy outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

OBJECTIVES

Chemoradiation can induce immunogenic (ICD) or tolerogenic cell death. ICD relies on the generation of damage-associated molecular patterns which can stimulate toll-like receptors (TLRs). We sought to determine whether we can predict responses to chemoradiation by measuring surrogate biomarkers of ICD in a cohort of patients with locally advanced (LA) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a cohort of 113 LA HNSCC pts we evaluated expression of TLR4, TLR7 and TLR9 in the EpCAM + circulating tumor cell (CTC) fraction at baseline and after cisplatin chemoradiation. We also quantified changes in chemokines CXCL10, CXCL16 and IL-2R in the serum.

RESULTS

Seventy three patients had evaluable specimens. Among cases with biomarker assessment at baseline and post treatment, 36.8% had an increase in CXCL10 levels (p = 0.022), 73.7% had an increase in CXCL16 levels (p = 0.002) and 63.8% had an increase in IL2Ra levels (p = 0.032) with treatment. 52.0% of evaluable cases at baseline and post-treatment had an increase in TLR4 levels (p = 0.996), 42.9% had an increase in TLR7 levels (p = 0.042) and 27.7% had increase in TLR9 levels (p = 0.011) with treatment. CXCL10 levels at baseline were significantly associated with PFS and OS (p = 0.010 and p = 0.032, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that chemoradiation leads to quantifiable effects in surrogate markers of ICD. These effects may inform trials combining chemoradiation with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In addition, CXCL10 has prognostic effect in pts treated with chemoradiation.

Cancer-cell-secreted CXCL11 promoted CD8+ T cells infiltration through docetaxel-induced-release of HMGB1 in NSCLC

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy becomes the main trend in lung cancer intervention; however, how chemotherapy promotes the immune function remains elusive. Therefore, we sought to determine how chemotherapy promotes the immune function.

METHODS

We determined in 100 NSCLC patients the expression of CD8, functional markers (IFN-γ, Granzyme B, and Perforin) and specific chemokines by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR. Functional experiments were carried out to check whether docetaxel (DOC), a chemotherapeutic agent, modifies the expression of HMGB1 and CXCL11, and influences the infiltration properties of CD8⁺ T cells to the tumor microenvironment. The mechanism of the release of HMGB1 and CXCL11 was determined by flow cytometry, immunofluorescence and western blotting. In in vivo experiment, we confirmed how DOC enhanced the recruitment of HER2-CAR T cells to tumor sites.

RESULTS

We found that DOC upregulated the expression of chemokine receptor ligand CXCL11 in tumor microenvironment and subsequently enhanced CD8⁺ T cell recruitment. DOC treatment significantly increased HMGB1 release in an ROS-dependent manner. Recombinant protein HMGB1 stimulated the secretion of CXCL11 via NF-κB activation in vitro. Tumors from DOC-treated mice exhibited higher expression of HMGB1 and CXCL11, more HER2-CAR T cell infiltration, and reduced progression, relative to control. Increased HMGB1 and CXCL11 expressions were positively correlated with prolonged overall survival of lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that DOC induces CD8⁺ T cell recruitment to the tumor microenvironment by enhancing the secretion of HMGB1 and CXCL11, thus improving the anti-tumor efficacy, indicating that modulating the HMGB1-CXCL11 axis might be helpful for NSCLC treatment.

Folated pH-degradable nanogels for the simultaneous delivery of docetaxel and an IDO1-inhibitor in enhancing cancer chemo-immunotherapy

Floated pH-degradable PVA nanogels (FA-NGs) are developed for simultaneous delivery of DTX and IDO1-inhibitor N9 to enhance cancer chemo-immunotherapy.

Rational combination immunotherapeutic approaches for effective cancer treatment

Immunotherapy is an important mode of cancer treatment. Over the past decades, immunotherapy has improved the clinical outcome for cancer patients. However, in many cases, mutations in cancer cells, lack of selectivity, insufficiency of tumor-reactive T cells, and host immunosuppression limit the clinical benefit of immunotherapy. Combination approaches in immunotherapy may overcome these obstacles. Accumulating evidence demonstrates that combination immunotherapy is the future of cancer treatment. However, designing safe and rational combinations of immunotherapy with other treatment modalities is critical. This review will discuss the optimal immunotherapy-based combinations mainly with respect to the mechanisms of action of individual therapeutic agents that target multiple steps in evasion and progression of tumor.

Antigen-specific active immunotherapy for ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

This is the second update of the review first published in the Cochrane Library (2010, Issue 2) and later updated (2014, Issue 9).Despite advances in chemotherapy, the prognosis of ovarian cancer remains poor. Antigen-specific active immunotherapy aims to induce tumour antigen-specific anti-tumour immune responses as an alternative treatment for ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective• To assess the clinical efficacy of antigen-specific active immunotherapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer as evaluated by tumour response measured by Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and/or cancer antigen (CA)-125 levels, response to post-immunotherapy treatment, and survival differences◦ In addition, we recorded the numbers of observed antigen-specific humoral and cellular responsesSecondary objective• To establish which combinations of immunotherapeutic strategies with tumour antigens provide the best immunological and clinical results SEARCH METHODS: For the previous version of this review, we performed a systematic search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2009, Issue 3), in the Cochrane Library, the Cochrane Gynaecological Cancer Group Specialised Register, MEDLINE and Embase databases, and clinicaltrials.gov (1966 to July 2009). We also conducted handsearches of the proceedings of relevant annual meetings (1996 to July 2009).For the first update of this review, we extended the searches to October 2013, and for this update, we extended the searches to July 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), as well as non-randomised studies (NRSs), that included participants with epithelial ovarian cancer, irrespective of disease stage, who were treated with antigen-specific active immunotherapy, irrespective of type of vaccine, antigen used, adjuvant used, route of vaccination, treatment schedule, and reported clinical or immunological outcomes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviews authors independently extracted the data. We evaluated the risk of bias for RCTs according to standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane, and for NRSs by using a selection of quality domains deemed best applicable to the NRS.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 67 studies (representing 3632 women with epithelial ovarian cancer). The most striking observations of this review address the lack of uniformity in conduct and reporting of early-phase immunotherapy studies. Response definitions show substantial variation between trials, which makes comparison of trial results unreliable. Information on adverse events is frequently limited. Furthermore, reports of both RCTs and NRSs frequently lack the relevant information necessary for risk of bias assessment. Therefore, we cannot rule out serious biases in most of the included trials. However, selection, attrition, and selective reporting biases are likely to have affected the studies included in this review. GRADE ratings were high only for survival; for other primary outcomes, GRADE ratings were very low.The largest body of evidence is currently available for CA-125-targeted antibody therapy (17 studies, 2347 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Non-randomised studies of CA-125-targeted antibody therapy suggest improved survival among humoral and/or cellular responders, with only moderate adverse events. However, four large randomised placebo-controlled trials did not show any clinical benefit, despite induction of immune responses in approximately 60% of participants. Time to relapse with CA-125 monoclonal antibody versus placebo, respectively, ranged from 10.3 to 18.9 months versus 10.3 to 13 months (six RCTs, 1882 participants; high-certainty evidence). Only one RCT provided data on overall survival, reporting rates of 80% in both treatment and placebo groups (three RCTs, 1062 participants; high-certainty evidence). Other small studies targeting many different tumour antigens have presented promising immunological results. As these strategies have not yet been tested in RCTs, no reliable inferences about clinical efficacy can be made. Given the promising immunological results and the limited side effects and toxicity reported, exploration of clinical efficacy in large well-designed RCTs may be worthwhile.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that despite promising immunological responses, no clinically effective antigen-specific active immunotherapy is yet available for ovarian cancer. Results should be interpreted cautiously, as review authors found a significant dearth of relevant information for assessment of risk of bias in both RCTs and NRSs.

Potentiating cancer vaccine efficacy in liver cancer

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common liver malignancy with a poor prognosis and an overall 5-year survival rate of approximately 5-6%. This is due because standard of care treatment options are limited and none of them shows a sufficient efficacy. HCC is an "inflammation-induced cancer" and preliminary preclinical and clinical data suggest that immunotherapeutic approaches may be a good alternative candidate for the treatment of HCC patients improving the dismal prognosis associated with this cancer. However, recent findings strongly suggest that an optimal immunotherapy in HCC requires the combination of an immune activator with immune modulators, aiming at compensating the strong liver immune suppressive microenvironment. One of the most promising strategy could be represented by the combination of a cancer vaccine with immunomodulatory drugs, such as chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors. Very limited examples of such combinatorial strategies have been evaluated in HCC to date, because HCC easily develops resistance to standard chemotherapy, which is also poorly tolerated by patients with liver cirrhosis. The present review describes the most update knowledge in this field.

Prostate cancer immunotherapy: the path forward

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of current strategies being investigated in the development of immunotherapy in prostate cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Development of immunotherapy in prostate cancer actually began in 2010 with FDA approval of sipuleucel-T. Given that immune checkpoint inhibitor trials have either been negative at the phase III level or underwhelming in smaller studies, it is likely that combination strategies will be required to further maximize the impact immune-based therapies on the clinical course of the disease. Emerging data suggests the presence of multiple checkpoint inhibitors in the prostate cancer tumor microenvironment highlighting the need for combination immunotherapy platforms that would potentially include androgen deprivation, chemotherapy, or radiation.

SUMMARY

Preclinical and clinical data support immune-based combinations in prostate cancer and several trials are underway to better define the future of immunotherapy in prostate cancer.

Pilot study of WT1 peptide-pulsed dendritic cell vaccination with docetaxel in esophageal cancer

In the present study, the immune response to Wilms tumor gene 1 (WT1) peptide-pulsed dendritic cell (DC) vaccination combined with docetaxel (DCDOC) in advanced esophageal cancer patients who had already received first-line chemotherapy was investigated. Ten HLA-A*2402 patients were treated with docetaxel (50 mg/m²) on day 1 and WT1 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination (1×10⁷ cells) on days 15 and 22 (repeated every 4 weeks for 3 cycles). The delayed-type hypersensitivity skin test, HLA tetramer assay and interferon-γ enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay were used to evaluate the induction of a WT1-specific immune response. Median overall survival was 5 months (range, 1.1-11.6). The clinical effect of DCDOC therapy was not observed and only 1 patient could complete the protocol therapy. Disease progression was observed in 9 patients and 1 patient succumbed to fatality during the second cycle of therapy. As a pilot study, it was not possible to evaluate the safety of WT1 peptide-pulsed DCDOC therapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer. However, a WT1-specific response in 6 patients, as indicated by the ELISPOT or HLA/WT1-tetramer assay, was demonstrated. The results suggested that the positive immune response had significant relevance on the low percentage of CD11b⁺ and CD66b⁺ granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in CD15⁺ cells. Furthermore, DCDOC elicited a WT1-specific immune response regardless of the myelosuppression associated with docetaxel. The present findings support future studies and further work to assess DCDOC as an adjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer will be performed. The present clinical trial was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry on November 11th, 2011, no. UMIN000006704.

The inducers of immunogenic cell death for tumor immunotherapy

Immunotherapy is a promising treatment modality that acts by selectively harnessing the host immune defenses against cancer. An effective immune response is often needed to eliminate tumors following treatment which can trigger the immunogenicity of dying tumor cells. Some treatment modalities (such as photodynamic therapy, high hydrostatic pressure or radiotherapy) and agents (some chemotherapeutic agents, oncolytic viruses) have been used to endow tumor cells with immunogenicity and/or increase their immunogenicity. These treatments and agents can boost the antitumor capacity by inducing immune responses against tumor neoantigens. Immunogenic cell death is a manner of cell death that can induce the emission of immunogenic damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). DAMPs are sufficient for immunocompetent hosts to trigger the immune system. This review focuses on the latest developments in the treatment modalities and agents that can induce and/or enhance the immunogenicity of cancer cells.

Definitive activation of endogenous antitumor immunity by repetitive cycles of cyclophosphamide with interspersed Toll-like receptor agonists

Many cancers both evoke and subvert endogenous anti-tumor immunity. However, immunosuppression can be therapeutically reversed in subsets of cancer patients by treatments such as checkpoint inhibitors or Toll-like receptor agonists (TLRa). Moreover, chemotherapy can leukodeplete immunosuppressive host elements, including myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T-cells (Tregs). We hypothesized that chemotherapy-induced leukodepletion could be immunopotentiated by co-administering TLRa to emulate a life-threatening infection. Combining CpG (ODN 1826) or CpG+poly(I:C) with cyclophosphamide (CY) resulted in uniquely well-tolerated therapeutic synergy, permanently eradicating advanced mouse tumors including 4T1 (breast), Panc02 (pancreas) and CT26 (colorectal). Definitive treatment required endogenous CD8+ and CD4+ IFNγ-producing T-cells. Tumor-specific IFNγ-producing T-cells persisted during CY-induced leukopenia, whereas Tregs were progressively eliminated, especially intratumorally. Spleen-associated MDSCs were cyclically depleted by CY+TLRa treatment, with residual monocytic MDSCs requiring only continued exposure to CpG or CpG+IFNγ to effectively attack malignant cells while sparing non-transformed cells. Such tumor destruction occurred despite upregulated tumor expression of Programmed Death Ligand-1, but could be blocked by clodronate-loaded liposomes to deplete phagocytic cells or by nitric oxide synthase inhibitors. CY+TLRa also induced tumoricidal myeloid cells in naive mice, indicating that CY+TLRa's immunomodulatory impacts occurred in the complete absence of tumor-bearing, and that tumor-induced MDSCs were not an essential source of tumoricidal myeloid precursors. Repetitive CY+TLRa can therefore modulate endogenous immunity to eradicate advanced tumors without vaccinations or adoptive T-cell therapy. Human blood monocytes could be rendered similarly tumoricidal during in vitro activation with TLRa+IFNγ, underscoring the potential therapeutic relevance of these mouse tumor studies to cancer patients.

Taxane-based Combination Therapies for Metastatic Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

Multiple single-agent therapies improving survival are approved for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), including two chemotherapies, two androgen-signaling axis-targeting agents, an immunotherapeutic vaccine, and a radiopharmaceutical. Combination therapy can target multiple oncogenic pathways simultaneously, while potentially curbing the development of treatment resistance.

OBJECTIVE

To provide a succinct overview of taxane-based combination therapies currently being evaluated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched MEDLINE/PubMed^® and relevant congress databases for literature focused on taxane-based combination therapies being evaluated for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. In addition, a systematic search of www.clinicaltrials.gov was performed to gather information regarding ongoing taxane-based combination trials in prostate cancer. This search included phase II or III trials starting after January 1, 2010, which included the terms "docetaxel" or "cabazitaxel" and "prostate", and was then manually filtered for combination studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Single-agent therapy yields modest increments in survival. The success of combining docetaxel with androgen deprivation to improve overall survival (OS) for metastatic hormone-sensitive disease suggests the potential of similar approaches in mCRPC. Several classes of biological drugs have previously been combined with docetaxel for mCRPC in clinical trials without improvement in OS. However, combining docetaxel or cabazitaxel with newer agents with established single-agent benefit, such as radium-223, second-generation androgen pathway-targeted agents, or other chemotherapies, has the potential to benefit patients when compared with taxane chemotherapy alone. Our search revealed that the majority of trials currently assessing taxanes are focused on combination therapies: a combination approach is being evaluated in 37 of 47 trials assessing docetaxel and in 18 of 34 trials assessing cabazitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite prior failures, novel taxane-based combination therapies have the potential to improve outcomes in mCRPC. Challenges include the absence of validated predictive biomarkers for the selection of suitable patients and the potential for enhanced toxicity.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Patients with metastatic prostate cancer have access to multiple therapies improving survival. Many advanced epithelial cancers are treated with combinations of drugs; however, prostate cancer has remained an exception. A number of clinical studies have shown that combining chemotherapy with other classes of therapy may improve patient outcomes in prostate cancer. Here, we summarize the various combinations that are tested in the clinic and review the results.

Current and Future Applications of Novel Immunotherapies in Urological Oncology: A Critical Review of the Literature

CONTEXT

Immunotherapies promote anticancer responses with varying levels of success based on the tumor type.

OBJECTIVE

In this narrative review article, we searched the literature regarding immunotherapies in genitourinary malignancies to define the state of the field, explore future applications of immune checkpoint inhibitors, cytokines, vaccines, and cellular therapies in urological oncology and evaluate possible strategies to improve the selection of patients who might benefit from such approaches.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We reviewed related literature, with a focus on recent studies about immunotherapies, predictors of response, and ongoing clinical trials.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Immunotherapies based on immune checkpoint blockade are approved as first- and second-line therapies for urothelial carcinoma (UC) and second-line therapies for renal cell carcinoma with limited success in prostate cancer. Programmed death-ligand 1 is the most commonly used predictive biomarker outside of UC; however, a substantial proportion of patients with tumors negative for programmed death-ligand 1 expression benefit from checkpoint inhibition, limiting its sensitivity. A high mutational load and molecular subtypes of UC are emerging as additional potential predictors. Genomic sequencing and gene expression analysis associate alterations of genes implicated in DNA repair pathways, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2, with immune checkpoint therapies. In prostate cancer, the vaccine, sipuleucel-T, is the only Food and Drug Administration-approved immunotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapies are emerging as exciting new treatment options with a tolerable toxicity profile in urological cancers. Checkpoint inhibitors are effective only in a subset of patients, demanding personalized approaches that consider various clinical and molecular parameters to predict patient response. Clinical trials investigating the optimal timing, sequence, and combination of immunotherapies with standard of care and novel agents will guide therapy choices and improve patient outcome.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Clinical data supports the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination with other therapies in urological cancers.

Cancer vaccines: Enhanced immunogenic modulation through therapeutic combinations

Therapeutic cancer vaccines have gained significant popularity in recent years as new approaches for specific oncologic indications emerge. Three therapeutic cancer vaccines are FDA approved and one is currently approved by the EMA as monotherapy with modest treatment effects. Combining therapeutic cancer vaccines with other treatment modalities like radiotherapy (RT), hormone therapy, immunotherapy, and/or chemotherapy have been investigated as a means to enhance immune response and treatment efficacy. There is growing preclinical and clinical data that combination of checkpoint inhibitors and vaccines can induce immunogenic intensification with favorable outcomes. Additionally, novel methods for identifying targetable neoantigens hold promise for personalized vaccine development. In this article, we review the rationale for various therapeutic combinations, clinical trial experiences, and future directions. We also highlight the most promising developments that could lead to approval of novel therapeutic cancer vaccines.