Efficacy and Biomarker Analysis of Camrelizumab in Combination with Apatinib in Patients with Advanced Nonsquamous NSCLC Previously Treated with Chemotherapy

Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy as third- or further-line therapy for stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients with ECOG performance status 2: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2 probably cannot tolerate chemotherapy or other antitumor therapies. Some studies have reported that immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity. However, the efficacy of this combination as a later-line therapy in patients with ECOG PS 2 is unclear. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this combination strategy as third- or further-line therapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ECOG PS 2.

METHODS

In this retrospective study, patients treated with camrelizumab plus antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab, anlotinib, or recombinant human endostatin) were included. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) assessed by ECOG PS, and safety were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between January 10, 2019, and February 28, 2024, a total of 59 patients were included. The ORR was 35.6% (21/59) and the DCR was 86.4%. With a median follow-up of 10.5 months (range: 0.7-23.7), the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.8-7.3) and the median OS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 11.2-13.6). QOL was improved (≥1 reduction in ECOG PS) in 39 patients (66.1%). The most common Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were hepatic dysfunction (6 [10%]), hypertension (5 [8%]), and hypothyroidism (3 [5%]). There were no treatment-related deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Third- or further-line immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic therapy is well-tolerated and shows good antitumor activity in stage IV NSCLC patients with ECOG PS 2. Future large-scale prospective studies are required to confirm the clinical benefits of this combination therapy.

Immunotherapy combined with apatinib in the treatment of advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy or apatinib alone has been used as third-line adjuvant therapy for advanced or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) tumors, but the efficacy of combining them with each other for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ is unknown; therefore, we further evaluated the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy combined with apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ.

METHODS

The main search was conducted on published databases: Embase, Cochrane library, PubMed.The search was conducted from the establishment of the database to December 2023.Clinical trials with patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ and immunotherapy combined with apatinib as the study variable were collected. Review Manager 5.4 software as well as stata 15.0 software were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 651 patients from 19 articles were included in this meta-analysis. In the included studies, immunotherapy combined with apatinib had a complete response (CR) of 0.03 (95% CI: 0.00 -0.06), partial response (PR) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.19-0.49), stable disease (SD) of 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32-0.55), objective response rate (ORR) was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.23-0.48), disease control rate (DCR) was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.74-0.86), and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.29 (95% CI: 4.05-4.52), median Overall survival (OS) was 8.79 (95% CI: 7.92-9.66), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 TRAEs was 0.34 (95% CI: 0:19-0.49). PR, ORR, DCR, median PFS and median OS were significantly higher in the immunotherapy and apatinib combination chemotherapy group (IAC) than in the immunotherapy combination apatinib group (IA). And the difference was not significant in the incidence of SD and grade ≥ 3 TRAEs.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis shows that immunotherapy combined with apatinib is safe and effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic G/GEJ, where IAC can be a recommended adjuvant treatment option for patients with advanced or metastatic G/GEJ. However, more large multicenter randomized studies are urgently needed to reveal the long-term outcomes of immunotherapy combined with apatinib treatment.

Camrelizumab plus famitinib in previously chemo-immunotherapy treated patients with advanced NSCLC: results from an open-label multicenter phase 2 basket study

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents has been effective in treating multiple cancers. This was further explored in an open-label, multicenter phase 2 basket study (NCT04346381), which evaluated the antitumor activity and safety of camrelizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) plus famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with advanced solid tumors. We herein report the findings from the cohort of advanced NSCLC patients who progressed after treatment with platinum-doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were enrolled and treated with camrelizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion) and oral famitinib (20 mg once daily). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled in this cohort, with a median follow-up duration of 11.5 months. Three patients (7.5%) achieved a partial response, and 29 patients (72.5%) achieved stable disease. The ORR and DCR with this combination regimen were 7.5% (95% CI, 1.6-20.4) and 80.0% (95% CI, 64.4-90.9), respectively. The median DoR was 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.3-not reached). The median PFS was 5.4 months (95% CI, 4.1-7.5), and the median OS was 12.1 months (95% CI, 9.1-16.7). The estimated 12-month OS rate was 51.5% (95% CI, 34.9-65.9). The most frequent grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurring in more than 5% of patients included hypertension (27.5%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (10%), decreased neutrophil count (10%), and proteinuria (7.5%).

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus famitinib demonstrated favorable benefits in PFS and OS, along with manageable safety profiles, in patients with advanced NSCLC who progressed after platinum-doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This finding warrants further exploration.

Tumor-associated macrophages affect the treatment of lung cancer

As one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, lung cancer has limited benefits for patients despite its diverse treatment methods due to factors such as personalized medicine targeting histological type, immune checkpoint expression, and driver gene mutations. The high mortality rate of lung cancer is partly due to the immune-suppressive which limits the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs and induces tumor cell resistance. The currently widely recognized TAM phenotypes include the anti-tumor M1 and pro-tumor M2 phenotypes. M2 macrophages promote the formation of an immune-suppressive microenvironment and hinder immune cell infiltration, thereby inhibiting activation of the anti-tumor immune system and aiding tumor cells in resisting treatment. Analyzing the relationship between different treatment methods and macrophages in the TME can help us better understand the impact of TAMs on lung cancer and confirm the feasibility of targeted TAM therapy. Targeting TAMs to reduce the M2/M1 ratio and reverse the immune-suppressive microenvironment can improve the clinical efficacy of conventional treatment methods and potentially open up more efficient combination treatment strategies, maximizing the benefit for lung cancer patients.

Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation following camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy for multi-cancers: a large-scale pooled analysis of 10 studies in China

Background

Skin toxicities are the most common adverse events related to immunotherapy, such as reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) following treatment with the anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody camrelizumab.

Objective

This study aimed to comprehensively analyze the clinical features and prognostic value of RCCEP in patients with malignancies who received camrelizumab alone (Camre) or in combination with the angiogenesis-targeted agent apatinib (Camre-Apa) or chemotherapy (Camre-Chemo).

Design

A large-scale pooled analysis.

Methods

Individual patient-level data were derived from 10 clinical trials of camrelizumab monotherapy, camrelizumab plus apatinib, or camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (n = 1305).

Results

RCCEP occurred in 77.0% (516/670) of patients with Camre, 23.6% (70/296) with Camre-Apa, and 67.8% (230/339) with Camre-Chemo. Most RCCEP lesions were grade 1 or 2 in severity. The median time to onset was 0.8 months [interquartile range (IQR), 0.6-1.2] with Camre, 5.0 months (IQR, 2.7-8.0) with Camre-Apa, and 1.6 months (IQR, 1.0-4.2) with Camre-Chemo; and the median duration was 4.8 months (IQR, 2.6-8.8), 4.4 months (IQR, 1.7-8.9), and 7.2 months (IQR, 4.1-14.3), respectively. In all the three groups, patients with RCCEP showed significantly better clinical outcomes compared with those without [objective response rate: 23.8% versus 1.9% with Camre, 48.6% versus 21.2% with Camre-Apa, and 78.7% versus 54.1% with Camre-Chemo; median progression-free survival: 3.2 versus 1.7 months (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.36), 10.2 versus 4.5 months (HR = 0.39), and 12.7 versus 7.3 months (HR = 0.38); median overall survival: 13.3 versus 3.8 months (HR = 0.34), 29.2 versus 13.5 months (HR = 0.46), and not reached versus 12.8 months (HR = 0.19); all p < 0.0001].

Conclusion

Although RCCEP occurred frequently with camrelizumab, most lesions were mild and self-limiting. The occurrence of RCCEP was strongly associated with the antitumor activity and survival of camrelizumab, both as monotherapy and in combination therapy.

Mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: promising strategies to overcoming challenges

Resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a significant challenge in the treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of resistance are multifactorial and include molecular target alterations and activation of alternative pathways, tumor heterogeneity and tumor microenvironment change, immune evasion, and immunosuppression. Promising strategies for overcoming resistance include the development of combination therapies, understanding the resistance mechanisms to better use novel drug targets, the identification of biomarkers, the modulation of the tumor microenvironment and so on. Ongoing research into the mechanisms of resistance and the development of new therapeutic approaches hold great promise for improving outcomes for patients with NSCLC. Here, we summarize diverse mechanisms driving resistance to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in NSCLC and the latest potential and promising strategies to overcome the resistance to help patients who suffer from NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with apatinib as third-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of sintilimab and apatinib for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. This retrospective study analyzed data from 34 patients who had advanced or metastatic GC/GEJ cancer and received the combination therapy of sintilimab and apatinib as a third-line or above treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Among the 34 patients, none achieved a complete response (CR), 3 patients (8.8%) achieved a partial response, 23 patients (67.6%) had stable disease, and 8 patients (23.5%) experienced progressive disease. The ORR and DCR were 8.8% and 76.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.6-8.4), and the median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI: 8.1-15.1). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in OS between patients with high and low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores and between patients with and without a history of gastrectomy. Common adverse events (AEs) during treatment included fatigue (52.9%), anemia (47.1%), leukopenia (26.5%), hypothyroidism (23.5%), nausea and vomiting (20.6%), neutropenia (20.6%), and thrombocytopenia (17.6%), most of which were grade 1 and 2 AEs. No deaths occurred due to AEs. These findings indicate that the combination of sintilimab and apatinib has a favorable therapeutic effect in patients with advanced GC. Moreover, the AEs associated with this therapy are generally manageable.

Endostar acts as a pneumonitis protectant in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

CCRT is presently the standard treatment for LA-NSCLC. RP is one of the main obstacles to the completion of thoracic radiation therapy, resulting in limited survival benefits in NSCLC patients. This research aims to explore the role of Endostar in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP and clinical curative effect in LA-NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 122 patients with stage III NSCLC who received CCRT from December 2008 to December 2017, or Endostar intravenous drip concurrently with chemoradiotherapy (Endostar + CCRT group). Standard toxicity of the pneumonitis endpoint was also collected by CTCAE V5.0. We further summarized other available studies on the role of Endostar in the prognosis of NSCLC patients and the incidence of RP.

RESULTS

There were 76 cases in the CCRT group and 46 cases in the CCRT+ Endostar group. In the CCRT+ Endostar group, the occurrence of grade ≥2 RP in patients with V20Gy ≥25% was significantly higher than that in patients with V20Gy < 25% (p = 0.001). In the cohorts with V20Gy < 25%, 0 cases of 29 patients treated with Endostar developed grade ≥2 RP was lower than in the CCRT group (p = 0.026). The re-analysis of data from other available studies indicated that Endostar plus CCRT could be more efficient and safely in the occurrence of grade≥2 RP with LA-NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

When receiving CCRT for LA-NSCLC patients, simultaneous combination of Endostar is recommended to enhance clinical benefit and reduce pulmonary toxicity.

First-line treatment with camrelizumab plus famitinib in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%: results from a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The combination of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents can synergistically modulate the tumor microenvironment and represents a promising treatment option. Here, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus famitinib (a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor) as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients with a programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥1%, in an open-label, multicenter, phase 2 basket trial.

METHODS

Eligible patients received camrelizumab (200 mg once every 3 weeks via intravenous infusion) plus oral famitinib at an initial dose of 20 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1. Key secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of respons, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), 12-month OS rate, and safety profile.

RESULTS

Of the enrolled 41 patients, 21 (51.2%) had a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. As of the cut-off date on June 22, 2022, the combination regimen of camrelizumab and famitinib achieved an ORR of 53.7% (95% CI 37.4% to 69.3%) and a DCR of 92.7% (95% CI 80.1% to 98.5%). The median PFS was 16.6 months (95% CI 8.3 to not reached), and OS data were not yet mature, with an estimated 12-month OS rate of 76.8% (95% CI 60.0% to 87.3%). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher included hypertension (22.0%), increased alanine aminotransferase (12.2%), decreased neutrophil count (9.8%), proteinuria (7.3%), decrease platelet count (7.3%), and hypokalemia (7.3%). One (2.4%) patient died from grade 5 hemoptysis, which was considered possibly related to the study treatment by the investigator.

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus famitinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients and had an acceptable safety profile. These findings suggest that this combination regimen could be an alternative therapeutic option and warrant further investigation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04346381.

A phase Ib/II study of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody) plus anlotinib as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Cadonilimab is a bispecific antibody that simultaneously targets programmed cell death receptor-1 and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of cadonilimab plus anlotinib for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without sensitizing EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutations.

METHODS

Patients received cadonilimab 15 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg every three weeks (Q3W) plus anlotinib at doses of 10 or 12 mg once daily for two weeks on a one-week-off schedule. The primary endpoints included safety and objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Sixty-nine treatment-naïve patients received cadonilimab 15 mg/kg Q3W combination (n = 49) and 10 mg/kg Q3W combination (n = 20). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 48 (98.0%) and 19 (95.0%) patients, with grade ≥3 TRAEs occurring in 29 (59.2%) and five (25.0%) patients, respectively. TRAEs leading to cadonilimab discontinuation occurred in eight (16.3%) and one (5.0%) patients in the cadonilimab 15 mg/kg Q3W and 10 mg/kg Q3W dosing groups. The confirmed ORRs were 51.0% (25/49) and 60.0% (12/20) accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

Cadonilimab 10 mg/kg Q3W plus anlotinib showed manageable safety and promising efficacy as a first-line chemo-free treatment for advanced NSCLC.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04646330.

Camrelizumab combined with apatinib and nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel in lung adenocarcinoma (CAPAP-lung): a single-arm phase II study

Background

Platinum-doublet chemotherapy plus immunotherapy has been the standard of care for the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer lacking actional driver mutations. However, optimization of drug combinations is still needed to find a better balance between therapeutic efficacy and safety in the immunotherapy era. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of platinum-free albumin bound paclitaxel (nab-paclitaxel) combined with camrelizumab and apatinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma.

Methods

In this multicenter open-label, single-arm phase II trial, patients with systemic treatment-naïve advanced lung adenocarcinoma without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations received a rational-based combination of camrelizumab (200 mg intravenously, day one), apatinib (250 mg, q.d., five continuous days per week), and nab-paclitaxel (135 mg/m2 intravenously, days one and eight) every three weeks for four to six cycles in China. Patients with controlled disease were maintained with camrelizumab and apatinib. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT04459078).

Findings

Between August 26, 2020 and May 20, 2022, 64 patients were enrolled. The median PFS was 14.3 (95% CI: 9.9, not reached) months. The confirmed objective response rate was 64.1% (95% CI: 51.1, 75.7). The grade 3-4 hematologic treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were decreased neutrophil count (14.1%), decreased white blood cell count (7.8%), and anemia (3.1%). The most common non-hematologic TRAEs of grade 3-4 were increased alanine transaminase (18.8%) and aspartate transaminase (15.6%). No treatment-related death occurred. The quality of life was on average not clinically meaningful worse through treatment cycle 14.

Interpretation

Nab-paclitaxel plus camrelizumab and apatinib showed clinically meaningful anti-tumor activity and manageable safety, with few hematologic toxicities, and might be a potential treatment option in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma lacking EGFR/ALK mutations.

Funding

Heath Research Foundation of Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology, Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China, Hunan Cancer Hospital Climb Plan, Sister Institution Network Fund of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, The Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province, and Suzhou Sheng Diya Biomedical Co., Ltd, a subsidiary of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).

Insight into intermolecular binding mechanism of apatinib mesylate and human alpha-1-acid glycoprotein: combined multi-spectroscopic approaches with in silico

Apatinib mesylate (APM), an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has a good anti-tumor activity in the treatment of various cancers, particularly in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. In this study, the intermolecular binding mechanism between APM and human alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (HAG) was investigated by combining multi-spectroscopic approaches with in silico techniques. The findings revealed that APM gave rise to the fluorescence quenching of HAG by forming a ground-state complex between APM and HAG with a stoichiometric ratio of 1:1, and APM has a moderate affinity for HAG as the binding constant of APM and HAG of approximately 105 M-1, which was larger than the APM-HAG complex. The findings from thermodynamic parameter analysis indicated that the dominant driving forces for the formation of the APM-HAG complex were van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, which were also verified with site-probe studies and molecular docking. The findings from in silico study indicated that APM inserted into the opening of the hydrophobic cavity of HAG, leads to a slight conformational change in the HAG, which was verified by circular dichroism (CD) measurements, that was, the beta sheet level of HAG decreased. Additionally, the results of synchronous and 3D fluorescence spectroscopies confirmed the decline in hydrophobicity of the microenvironment around Trp and Tyr residues. Moreover, some common metal ions such as Cu2+, Mg2+, Fe3+, Ca2+, and Zn2+ could cause the alteration in the binding constant of APM with HAG, leading to the change in the efficacy of APM. It will be expected that these study findings are to provide useful information for further understanding pharmacokinetic and structural modifications of APM.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

STK11/LKB1-Deficient Phenotype Rather Than Mutation Diminishes Immunotherapy Efficacy and Represents STING/Type I Interferon/CD8+ T-Cell Dysfunction in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the association between STK11/LKB1 mutations and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICB) efficacy in NSCLC. It has been reported that tumors could exhibit impaired STK11/LKB1 function even without STK11 mutations. We hypothesized that STK11 phenotype rather than mutation may better stratify ICB outcomes.

METHODS

Selected functional STK11 events and LKB1 protein data were leveraged to establish a transcriptomics-based classifier of STK11 phenotype (STK11-deficient [-def] or -proficient [-prof]). We analyzed in-house and Genentech/Roche's data of three randomized trials of programmed cell death protein-1 or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibition in NSCLC (ORIENT-11, n = 171; OAK, n = 699; POPLAR, n = 192) and The Cancer Genome Atlas-NSCLC cohort.

RESULTS

Tissue STK11 mutation did not affect ICB outcomes. However, the survival benefit of ICB versus chemotherapy were lost or reversed in STK11-def tumors (hazard ratios for death, 95% confidence interval: OAK [0.97, 0.69-1.35]; POPLAR [1.61, 0.88-2.97]; ORIENT-11 [1.07, 0.50-2.29]), while remaining in STK11-prof tumors (hazard ratios for death, 95% confidence interval: OAK [0.81, 0.66-0.99]; POPLAR [0.66, 0.46-0.95]; ORIENT-11 [0.59, 0.37-0.92]). In tumors differentially classified by phenotype and mutation status, STK11-wild-type/def tumors had significantly worse ICB outcomes than STK11-mutated (STK11-MUT)/prof tumors (p < 0.05). The deleterious impact of STK11 deficiency was independent of STK11/KRAS/KEAP1 status or PD-L1 expression. The STING/interferon-I signaling, which was previously shown to be suppressed in STK11-MUT models, was perturbed in patients with STK11-def tumors rather than those with STK11-MUT tumors. Surprisingly, whereas high CD8+ T-cell infiltration was significantly associated with prolonged survival with ICB in STK11-prof tumors (p < 0.05 for 3 trials), it predicted an opposite trend toward worse ICB outcomes in STK11-def tumors across three trials. This suggested an association between STK11 deficiency and CD8+ T-cell dysfunction, which might not be reversed by programmed cell death protein 1 or PD-L1 blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

STK11 phenotype rather than mutation status can accurately identify patients with ICB-refractory NSCLC and reflect immune suppression. It can help refine stratification algorithms for future clinical research and also provide a reliable resource aiding basic and translational studies in identifying therapeutic targets.

A case report and literature review on reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation induced by camrelizumab in a nasopharyngeal carcinoma patient

Camrelizumab, a monoclonal antibody, blocks programmed cell death protein-1 from binding to T cells and programmed cell death ligand 1 on tumor cells, thereby ensuring sustained T cell activation and blocking immune escape of various types of cancer, including nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial hyperplasia (RCCEP) is the most common immune-related adverse event in patients treated with camrelizumab. We report a case nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a patient with camrelizumab-induced RCCEP. A 68-year-old man diagnosed with nasopharyngeal carcinoma developed RCCEP at multiple locations after 3 months of camrelizumab treatment. RCCEP of the right lower eyelid affected closure of the right eye. In this report, we also reviewed previous literature on camrelizumab-induced RCCEP. In summary, the mechanism underlying camrelizumab-induced RCCEP remains unclear. RCCEP typically gradually subsides after discontinuing camrelizumab treatment. Larger nodules can be treated with lasers, ligation, or surgery. Although surgical excision is effective, RCCEP may recur in patients undergoing camrelizumab treatment. RCCEP management may not be required in the absence of adverse effects on the patient's daily life.

Targeting tumor-associated macrophage: an adjuvant strategy for lung cancer therapy

The emergence of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment landscape for various types of cancer. Nevertheless, lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide due to the development of resistance in most patients. As one of the most abundant groups of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play crucial and complex roles in the development of lung cancer, including the regulation of immunosuppressive TME remodeling, metabolic reprogramming, neoangiogenesis, metastasis, and promotion of tumoral neurogenesis. Hence, relevant strategies for lung cancer therapy, such as inhibition of macrophage recruitment, TAM reprograming, depletion of TAMs, and engineering of TAMs for drug delivery, have been developed. Based on the satisfactory treatment effect of TAM-targeted therapy, recent studies also investigated its synergistic effect with current therapies for lung cancer, including immunotherapy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) treatment, or photodynamic therapy. Thus, in this article, we summarized the key mechanisms of TAMs contributing to lung cancer progression and elaborated on the novel therapeutic strategies against TAMs. We also discussed the therapeutic potential of TAM targeting as adjuvant therapy in the current treatment of lung cancer, particularly highlighting the TAM-centered strategies for improving the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1) treatment.

Lymph node and bone metastasis of pulmonary intestinal adenocarcinoma: A case report

Pulmonary enteric adenocarcinoma (PEAC) is a rare pathological type of lung adenocarcinoma, accounting for ~0.6% of primary lung adenocarcinoma, which has similar morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics to colorectal adenocarcinoma. Making a certain differential diagnosis of PEAC based on morphological and immunohistochemical results is difficult. It is known that PEAC may metastasize to the pancreas, skin, soleus muscle and intestine, but no bone metastasis has been reported. At our department, a rare case of PEAC with bone and lymph node metastasis was previously diagnosed. The present case study reports on a 58-year-old male patient encountered at our hospital with pain in the lumbar, back and right iliac with no obvious cause. Chest CT indicated a space-occupying lesion in the left upper lung lobe, enlarged lymph nodes in the mediastinum and left lung, and partial vertebral bone destruction. Enhanced CT results indicated multiple foci of active bone metabolism in the body, while rectal colonoscopy showed no obvious abnormalities. Histopathological and immunohistochemical results after right iliac bone puncture suggested stage IV PEAC with secondary malignancies in bones, mediastinal lymph node, hilar lymph node and left supraclavicular lymph node.

Research advances in mechanism of antiangiogenic therapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

Immunotherapy has changed the treatment strategy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, among which anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are the most used. However, the majority of patients with NSCLC do not derive benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Vascular abnormalities are a hallmark of most solid tumors and facilitate immune evasion. Thus, combining antiangiogenic therapies might increase the effectiveness of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. In this paper, the mechanisms of anti-angiogenic agents combined with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are illustrated, moreover, relevant clinical studies and predictive immunotherapeutic biomarkers are summarized and analyzed, in order to provide more treatment options for NSCLC patients.

Treatment-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with angiogenesis inhibitors have been used to treat advanced lung cancer. Their associated treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) are currently considered acceptable; however, no conclusion has been reached. We aimed to summarize the trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with advanced lung cancer.

METHODS

Pulled studies met the following criteria: patients with advanced lung cancer who received treatment involving ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors (with or without chemotherapy) in interventional or observational studies. Results included the type and number of trAEs or immune-related adverse events (irAEs), treatment-associated discontinuation and mortality, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

PROSPERO

CRD42022337656.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 32 trials involving 2313 patients who had 7768 any-grade trAEs and 1078 grade ≥3 trAEs. The pooled incidences were 87.33% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 79.49-93.65; I2 = 94.04%) for any-grade trAEs, and 38.63% (95% CI: 28.28-49.50; I2 = 95.61%) for grade ≥3 trAEs. There were 132 kinds of any-grade trAEs involving 18 systems, and 99 kinds of grade ≥3 trAEs involving 16 systems. For all trAEs, we observed significant differences in the line of therapy, trial design, therapy combination, and types of angiogenesis inhibitors (all P < 0.05). The rate of trAEs increased with dosage and frequency of medication. Pooled incidences of discontinuation and mortality were 10.64% and 0.81%, respectively. Nearly 647 patients experienced irAEs, including 636 any-grade irAEs and 154 grade ≥3 irAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the incidence of trAEs caused by ICIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is generally acceptable. These trAEs have a wide spectrum nearly covering the full range of adverse events. Grade ≥3 trAEs are more closely associated with angiogenesis inhibitors than any grade. However, treatment-associated mortality remains concerning.

Sintilimab plus anlotinib as second- or third-line therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and uncommon EGFR alterations typically have worse treatment outcomes than patients with classically EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade with sintilimab plus anti-angiogenic treatment with anlotinib in patients with NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring uncommon EGFR mutations after two previous treatments, including a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen and a targeted treatment (or chemotherapy only for patients harboring EGFR ex20ins), received sintilimab combined with anlotinib. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

At data cutoff (September 27, 2022), median follow-up was 22.3 months (range, 1.2-37.6). Among 21 enrolled patients, 12 had EGFR ex20ins and nine had other uncommon EGFR mutations such as L861Q, G719A, and G709X. Overall, eight patients (38.1%) achieved an objective response, and 18 (85.7%) achieved disease control. Median (95% CI) progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.0 (5.4-8.6) months, and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 (15.6-24.4) months. The 12-month PFS rate (95% CI) was 22.2% (7.4-42.0), and the 12-month OS rate was 66.7% (42.5-82.5). Patients harboring EGFR ex20ins had similar ORR and PFS to those with other mutations. Six patients (28.6%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); hand-foot syndrome was the most common grade 3 TRAE (2 patients; 9.5%). No grade ≥4 TRAEs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sintilimab and anlotinib demonstrated durable efficacy and was generally well tolerated in patients with NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations who had received prior standard-of-care treatments. (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04790409).

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CARES-310): a randomised, open-label, international phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) has been shown to improve overall survival versus anti-angiogenic therapy alone in advanced solid tumours, but not in hepatocellular carcinoma. Therefore, a clinical study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab plus the VEGFR2-targeted TKI rivoceranib (also known as apatinib) versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

This randomised, open-label, international phase 3 trial (CARES-310) was done at 95 study sites across 13 countries and regions worldwide. Patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma who had not previously received any systemic treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus rivoceranib 250 mg orally once daily or sorafenib 400 mg orally twice daily. Randomisation was done via a centralised interactive response system. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival, as assessed by the blinded independent review committee per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1, and overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. We report the findings from the prespecified primary analysis for progression-free survival and interim analysis for overall survival. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03764293).

FINDINGS

Between June 28, 2019, and March 24, 2021, 543 patients were randomly assigned to the camrelizumab-rivoceranib (n=272) or sorafenib (n=271) group. At the primary analysis for progression-free survival (May 10, 2021), median follow-up was 7·8 months (IQR 4·1-10·6). Median progression-free survival was significantly improved with camrelizumab-rivoceranib versus sorafenib (5·6 months [95% CI 5·5-6·3] vs 3·7 months [2·8-3·7]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·52 [95% CI 0·41-0·65]; one-sided p<0·0001). At the interim analysis for overall survival (Feb 8, 2022), median follow-up was 14·5 months (IQR 9·1-18·7). Median overall survival was significantly extended with camrelizumab-rivoceranib versus sorafenib (22·1 months [95% CI 19·1-27·2] vs 15·2 months [13·0-18·5]; HR 0·62 [95% CI 0·49-0·80]; one-sided p<0·0001). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were hypertension (102 [38%] of 272 patients in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib group vs 40 [15%] of 269 patients in the sorafenib group), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (33 [12%] vs 41 [15%]), increased aspartate aminotransferase (45 [17%] vs 14 [5%]), and increased alanine aminotransferase (35 [13%] vs eight [3%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 66 (24%) patients in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib group and 16 (6%) in the sorafenib group. Treatment-related death occurred in two patients: one patient in the camrelizumab-rivoceranib group (ie, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome) and one patient in the sorafenib group (ie, respiratory failure and circulatory collapse).

INTERPRETATION

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in progression-free survival and overall survival compared with sorafenib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, presenting as a new and effective first-line treatment option for this population.

FUNDING

Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals and Elevar Therapeutics.

Effectiveness and Safety of Apatinib Plus Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockades for Patients with Treatment-refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockades for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) who were refractory to the standard regimens. In this retrospective study, patients with metastatic CRC who received apatinib plus PD-1 blockades in clinical practice were included. The initial dosage of apatinib was 250 mg or 500 mg, and PD-1 blockades were comprised of camrelizumab, sintilimab and pembrolizumab. Efficacy and safety data were collected through the hospital's electronic medical record system. From October 2018 to March 2022, a total of 43 patients with metastatic CRC were evaluated for efficacy and safety. The results showed an objective response rate of 25.6% (95% CI, 13.5%-41.2%) and a disease control rate of 72.1% (95% CI, 56.3%-84.7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the cohort was 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.81-7.79), and the median overall survival (OS) was 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.75-14.85). The most common adverse reactions were fatigue (76.7%), hypertension (72.1%), diarrhea (62.8%), and hand-foot syndrome (51.2%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and location of CRC (left or right-side) were independent factors to predict PFS of patients with metastatic CRC treated with the combination regimen. Consequently, the combination of apatinib and PD-1 blockades demonstrated potential efficacy and acceptable safety for patients with treatment-refractory metastatic CRC. This conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

The benefit and risk of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials

Background

Previous studies revealed that Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/Programmed cell death-Ligand protein 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents had extensive anti-tumor activities. However, almost all studies on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer are non-randomized controlled trials with small sample sizes, which might lead to a lack of effective metrics to assess the effectiveness and safety of the therapeutic regimen. Here, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents as second or later-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A single-arm meta-analysis was performed, and published literature from PubMed, Web of Science and Embase databases as of January 13, 2023, was systematically retrieved. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS) Methodological items to evaluate the quality of eligible clinical trials. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for further analysis. The random effect model is used to calculate the pooled parameters.

Results

19 studies (16 were non-comparative single-arm clinical trials and 3 were randomized controlled trials) were enrolled in this meta-analysis. In terms of tumor response, the pooled ORR and DCR were 22.4% (95% CI, 16.6-28.1%) and 76.8% (95% CI, 72.6-81.1%), respectively. With regard to survival analysis, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.20 (95% CI, 4.46-5.93) months and 14.09 (95% CI, 13.20-14.97) months, respectively. The pooled grade ≥3 adverse effect (AE) rate was 47.6% (95% CI, 33.1-62.0%).

Conclusion

PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic agents has promising efficacy and safety as second or later-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42023407559.

Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib and Temozolomide as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Acral Melanoma: The CAP 03 Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Acral melanoma, known for low tumor mutation burden, responds poorly to immunotherapy. A standard therapy is still lacking.

Objective

To investigate the activity and safety of camrelizumab (an anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody) plus apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor) and temozolomide as first-line treatment in patients with advanced acral melanoma.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial, patients with treatment-naive unresectable stage III or IV acral melanoma were enrolled at Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute between June 4, 2020, and August 24, 2021. The data cutoff date was April 10, 2022.

Interventions

Patients received 4-week cycles of intravenous camrelizumab, 200 mg, every 2 weeks; oral apatinib 250 mg, once daily; and intravenous temozolomide, 200 mg/m2, once daily on days 1 to 5 until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was objective response rate as assessed by investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (version 1.1). Secondary end points included progression-free survival, time to response, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety.

Results

A total of 50 patients (32 men [64%]; median age, 57 years [IQR, 52-62 years]) were enrolled and received treatment. The median follow-up duration was 13.4 months (IQR, 9.6-16.2 months). The objective response rate was 64.0% (32 of 50; 95% CI, 49.2%-77.1%). The median time to response and duration of response were 2.7 months (IQR, 0.9-2.9 months) and 17.5 months (95% CI, 12.0 to not reached), respectively. The disease control rate was 88.0% (44 of 50; 95% CI, 75.7%-95.5%). The estimated median progression-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI, 10.6 to not reached). The median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events were increased gamma-glutamyltransferase levels (15 [30%]), decreased neutrophil count (11 [22%]), increased conjugated bilirubin levels (10 [20%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase levels (10 [20%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this nonrandomized clinical trial suggest that camrelizumab plus apatinib and temozolomide may be a potential first-line treatment option for patients with advanced acral melanoma, which warrants further validation in a randomized clinical trial.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04397770.

Novel Targets, Novel Treatments: The Changing Landscape of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has undergone a paradigm shift. Once a disease with limited potential therapies, treatment options for patients have exploded with the availability of molecular testing to direct management and targeted therapies to treat tumors with specific driver mutations. New in vitro diagnostics allow for the early and non-invasive detection of disease, and emerging in vivo imaging techniques allow for better detection and monitoring. The development of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has arguably been the biggest advance in lung cancer treatment, given that the vast majority of NSCLC tumors can be treated with these therapies. Specific targeted therapies, including those against KRAS, EGFR, RTK, and others have also improved the outcomes for those individuals bearing an actionable mutation. New and emerging therapies, such as bispecific antibodies, CAR T cell therapy, and molecular targeted radiotherapy, offer promise to patients for whom none of the existing therapies have proved effective. In this review, we provide the most up-to-date survey to our knowledge regarding emerging diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for lung cancer to provide clinicians with a comprehensive reference of the options for treatment available now and those which are soon to come.

New advances in the research of clinical treatment and novel anticancer agents in tumor angiogenesis

In 1971, Folkman proposed that tumors could be limited to very small sizes by blocking angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is the generation of new blood vessels from pre-existing vessels, considered to be one of the important processes in tumor growth and metastasis. Angiogenesis is a complex process regulated by various factors and involves many secreted factors and signaling pathways. Angiogenesis is important in the transport of oxygen and nutrients to the tumor during tumor development. Therefore, inhibition of angiogenesis has become an important strategy in the clinical management of many solid tumors. Combination therapies of angiogenesis inhibitors with radiotherapy and chemotherapy are often used in clinical practice. In this article, we will review common targets against angiogenesis, the most common and up-to-date anti-angiogenic drugs and clinical treatments in recent years, including active ingredients from chemical and herbal medicines.

Camrelizumab for cancers in patients living with HIV: one-single center experience

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to evaluate the safety of the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in people living with HIV (PLWH); the secondary objective was to evaluate tumor response.

METHODS

From May 8, 2018, to December 10, 2021, twenty-four patients with HIV and advanced cancer as well as a CD4⁺ T-cell count greater than or equal to 100 cells/µL were treated with camrelizumab in daily practice. We describe the demographic characteristics, safety, and clinical course of these 24 PLWH with cancer treated with camrelizumab. Safety was assessed using the current Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1).

RESULTS

The median number of cycles was 8 (4-26). Only two grade 3 adverse reactions were reported (no toxic deaths or immune-related deaths). Among the 24 patients, 2 (8%) complete responses and 6 (25%) partial responses were observed. 7 patients (29%) were at stable tumor status and others progressed.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from the present study strongly support the use of camrelizumab (monoclonal antibodies targeting the PD-1 pathway) in this population, as it appears to be a feasible approach with no deleterious effects on PLWH and tolerability and acceptable efficacy. In addition, these findings further support the inclusion of PLWH with cancer in clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of ICIs on cancer.

Antitumor activity and safety of camrelizumab combined with apatinib in patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma: An open-label, multicenter, phase II study

Introduction

The treatment for relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (r/r PTCL) is suboptimal. This open-label, multicenter, single-arm study aimed to investigate the antitumor activity and safety of camrelizumab (a PD-1 blockade) plus apatinib (an antiangiogenic agent) for patients with r/r PTCL.

Methods

Eligible patients with r/r PTCL were enrolled and received camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks and apatinib 500 or 250 mg orally once daily, 4 weeks as a cycle. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR).

Results

A total of 20 patients were enrolled and received study medications in the study, with a median number of prior treatment line of 3 (range 1-6). At the cutoff date of March 4, 2022, the median follow-up was 27.2 months (range: 0.5-39.9), and three patients remained on treatment. Six patients had early discontinuation without tumor response evaluation. For all patients, the ORR was 30% (6/20) (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9% to 54.3%), with two patients (10%) achieving complete response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival for all patients were 5.6 months (95% CI, 1.8 to not reached) and 16.7 months (95% CI, 2.8 to not reached), respectively. Patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% (3 patients) had a numerically higher ORR and longer median PFS than those with PD-L1 expression &lt; 50% (5 patients). The most commonly reported grade 3 or higher adverse events were hyperlipidemia (15%), hypokalemia (15%) and anemia (15%). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Discussion

In this study, PD-1 inhibitors plus low-dose antiangiogenic drugs presented preliminary antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with r/r PTCL.

Anti-angiogenic agents for NSCLC following first-line immunotherapy: Rationale, recent updates, and future perspectives

The implementation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), with or without chemotherapy, as first-line treatment for patients who do not have actionable mutations has proved to be a major paradigm shift in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the transition of ICIs, such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab, to a first-line setting has left an unmet need for effective second-line treatment options, which is an area of intense research. In 2020, we reviewed the biological and mechanistic rationale for anti-angiogenic agents in combination with, or following, immunotherapy with the aim of eliciting a so called 'angio-immunogenic' switch in the tumor microenvironment. Here, we review the latest clinical evidence of the benefits of incorporating anti-angiogenic agents into treatment regimens. While there is a paucity of prospective data, several recent observational studies indicate that the marketed anti-angiogenic drugs, nintedanib or ramucirumab, are effective in combination with docetaxel following immuno-chemotherapy. Addition of anti-angiogenics, like bevacizumab, have also demonstrated clinical benefit when combined with first-line immuno-chemotherapy regimens. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing these agents in combination with ICIs, with encouraging early results (e.g., ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in LUNG-MAP S1800A). Also, several emerging anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs are currently being assessed in phase III trials following immunotherapy, including lenvatinib (LEAP-008), and sitravatinib (SAPPHIRE) It is hoped that these trials will help expand second-line treatment options in patients with NSCLC. Areas of focus in the future will include further molecular dissection of the mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy and the various response-progression profiles to immunotherapy observed in the clinic and the monitoring of the dynamics of immunomodulation over the course of treatment. Improved understanding of these phenomena may help identify clinical biomarkers and inform the optimal use of anti-angiogenics in the treatment of individual patients.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenic inhibitors in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

To report the efficacy and safety data of immunotherapy plus angiogenic inhibitors treatment in lung adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

Eligible patients with pathological or cytological confirmed locally advanced or metastatic lung adenocarcinoma and treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus angiogenic inhibitors were enrolled. The primary endpoints were progressive free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

A total of 46 consecutive enrolled patients received ICI plus angiogenic inhibitor, and the median follow-up was 9.6 months (range 1.5-32.5). The ORR and DCR were 8.7% (n = 4) and 50% (n = 23), respectively. Median PFS and OS were 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.7) and 12.3 months (95% CI 7.6-17.0), respectively. Patients at stage IVB had an inferior PFS than stage IIIC or IVA (2.8 months vs 4.4 months, P = 0.003). The median PFS of patients who were treated with ICI plus bevacizumab was shorter than ICI plus anlotinib or apatinib (1.2 months vs 3.3 months, P = 0.005). The occurrence of hypertension during the combination treatment has been related to a tendency for prolonged PFS (5.5 months vs 2.6 months; P = 0.05). The overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) was 89.1% (n = 41), and grade 3-4 TRAE was occupied 21.4% (n = 10).

CONCLUSION

This study objectively demonstrated that the treatment of ICI and antiangiogenic agents in lung adenocarcinoma could be a promising alternative therapeutic regimen, and the toxic effects were manageable. Subgroup analysis revealed that small molecular angiogenic inhibitors plus ICI and low tumor burden during treatment were better prognostic factors.

Case Report: Chemotherapy-free treatment with camrelizumab and anlotinib for elderly patients with KRAS and TP53 mutated advanced lung cancer

Background: Lung cancer is a major public health issue and an enormous burden on society in China. Most lung cancers occur in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and many factors limit their treatment options. Chemotherapy-free therapy can avoid psychological fear, treatment pain, and adverse reactions caused by chemotherapy. Patients with non-small cell lung cancer with tumour protein p53 (TP53) gene mutations or Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRAS) gene mutations tend to be more sensitive to anlotinib or programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) drugs. However, Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue is a proto-oncogene downstream of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene; therefore, if the Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue gene has an activating mutation, EGFR-targeted drug resistance may occur. Further studies are needed to explore whether patients with dual Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53 mutations can be treated with targeted immunotherapy without chemotherapy. Case presentation: A 74-year-old man was referred to the Lanzhou University Second Hospital due to chest tightness, shortness of breath, and weight loss for 2 months and was diagnosed with moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Laboratory examinations showed increased alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen (CA)-125, and CA199 levels, and gene sequencing indicated mutations in Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53. Immunohistochemical analysis showed positive PD-L1 and PD-1 expression. Peripheral blood immune checkpoint test using flow cytometry indicated that the PD-1 + CD8 levels were positive. After multi-disciplinary treatment, therapy with a combination of anlotinib and camrelizumab was initiated. Camrelizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks. Anlotinib 12 mg was administered orally daily before breakfast for 2 weeks with a week of rest in every cycle of 21 days. A reduction in alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, CA125, CA199, and CA724 levels was observed up to the first cycle, which decreased within the normal limits up to the second cycle and continued until the eighteenth cycle. The patient's chest tightness, shortness of breath, weight loss, and other symptoms significantly improved following treatment. Computed tomography imaging showed that the neoplastic lesion was dramatically reduced. The patient is currently being followed-up for more than 2 years to evaluate the duration of the response. Conclusion: Chemotherapy-free immunotherapy combined with targeted therapy is an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients with Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue and tumour protein p53 mutations. Such therapies should be supported with further clinical studies with larger sample sizes.

A subset of VEGFR-TKIs activates AMPK in LKB1-mutant lung cancer

The mutation of tumor suppressor gene liver kinase B1 (LKB1) has a prevalence of about 20% in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LKB1-mutant lung cancer is characterized by enhanced aggressiveness and immune escape and is associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, it is urgent to develop effective therapeutic methods for LKB1-mutant NSCLC. Recently, apatinib, a VEGFR-TKI, was found to significantly improve the outcome of LKB1-mutant NSCLC, but the mechanism is not completely clear. In this study, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), the crucial downstream kinase of LKB1 was excavated as the potential target of apatinib. Biochemical experiments verified that apatinib is a direct AMPK activator. Moreover, clinically available VEGFR-TKIs were found to regulate AMPK differently: Apatinib and anlotinib can directly activate AMPK, while axitinib and sunitinib can directly inhibit AMPK. Activation of AMPK by apatinib leads to the phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) and inhibition of de novo fatty acid synthesis (FAsyn), which is upregulated in LKB1-null cancers. Moreover, the killing effect of apatinib was obviously enhanced under delipidated condition, and the combination of exogenous FA restriction with apatinib treatment can be a promising method for treating LKB1-mutant NSCLC. This study discovered AMPK as an important off-target of apatinib and elucidated different effects of this cluster of VEGFR-TKIs on AMPK. This finding can be the basis for the accurate and combined application of these drugs in clinic and highlights that the subset of VEGFR-TKIs including apatinib and anlotinib are potentially valuable in the treatment of LKB1-mutant NSCLC.

The efficacy and safety of Apatinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective trial

Background

As a potent inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway, Apatinib has been used in antitumor treatment for some time. The study aimed to research the therapeutic effects and toxicity of Apatinib in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 128 NSCLC patients treated with Apatinib in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria was adopted to evaluate the treatment effect, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 was conducted to determine the Adverse Events (AEs). Cox proportional hazard model and Kaplan-Meier function were applied to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

Among 128 NSCLC patients, partial response (PR) were observed in 15 patients, stable disease (SD) in 66 patients and progressive disease (PD) in 47 patients. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) accounted for 11.7% and 63.3% respectively. The median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) were 4.4 months and 17.2 months. Common side effects of Apatinib were hypertension (n=48), proteinuria (n=35), and hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (n=30), all of the side effects were controllable. No significant difference was observed in efficacy and AEs between the higher dose group (Apatinib>500mg/d) and the lower dose group (Apatinib=500mg/d).

Conclusions

The study suggested that Apatinib with a lower dose (=500mg/d) has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of advanced NSCLC after first-line chemotherapy.

Effects of Camrelizumab Combined with First-Line Chemotherapy on Serum SCC, VEGF Levels, and Adverse Reactions in Patients with Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung

Objective

To study the effects of camrelizumab accompanied by first-line chemotherapy on serum SCC, VEGF levels, and adverse reactions in people undergoing advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

Data sources of the study subjects were 60 people suffering from advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung hospitalized from January 2018 to October 2019. They were assigned to two groups, including the control group and the observation group in a random manner, and each consisted of 30 patients. Those in the observation group received camrelizumab (SHR-1210), and gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy were treated in the control group. Finally, according to the results, we compare the data of patients in both groups so as to find out the similarities and differences.

Results

Among them, the effective efficiency of clinical treatment in the control group reached 36.67%, and that in the observation group reached 56.67%. Intuitively, it can be concluded that the control group showed lower results than the observed group. The observed group turned out to have higher periodic survival and progression free survival (PFS) of patients than the other group. During and after the cycle treatment, the data of SCC and VEGF were reduced to some extent, but the control group appeared to have a more evident reduction rate than the other group.

Conclusion

SHR-1210 combined with chemotherapy has a considerable effect in practical application and has excellent clinical performance.

Neoadjuvant camrelizumab and chemotherapy in patients with resectable stage IIIA squamous non-small-cell lung cancer: Clinical experience of three cases

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy has attracted much attention as a treatment for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. However, there is scarce evidence of the safety and efficacy of camrelizumab as neoadjuvant in lung cancer. Here, we present three patients who were diagnosed with IIIA squamous non-small-cell lung cancer from September to December in 2020 and received two cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and nedaplatin, followed by surgical resection. All three patients had a reduction in the tumor size on CT image and not delayed planned surgery. We did not observe grade 3 or 4 adverse events. Two of the three patients achieved a major pathological response (MPR), including one complete tumor regression of the primary lung tumor. Multiplex fluorescent immunohistochemistry revealed that CD8+ T cells, FoxP3+ regulatory T cells, and PD-L1 expression on immune cells in the surgical specimen were much higher than in the pretreatment biopsy sample in patients with MPR. This was not observed in the patient without MPR. Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy could potentially be a neoadjuvant regimen for resectable IIIA squamous non-small-cell lung cancer, with a high MPR proportion, and did not compromise surgical procedure. Our findings should be validated in a future randomized clinical trial.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in advanced drive-gene-negative non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A real-world study

Objective

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor has been in the market in China for several years, which lacks sufficient domestic evidence regarding its application in lung cancer. Thus, this study intended to assess the treatment outcome and tolerance of PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy in advanced, driver-gene-negative, nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in a real clinical setting.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study analyzed 68 advanced driver-gene-negative nonsquamous NSCLC patients, among which 38 cases received PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy and 30 cases adopted chemotherapy alone. Disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were reviewed.

Results

Generally, PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy achieved a more satisfying ORR compared with chemotherapy alone (52.6% vs. 30.0%, P = 0.061), while the DCR did not vary between PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy (84.2% vs. 73.3%, P = 0.271). Patients receiving PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy exhibited favorable PFS (median: 10.1 vs. 7.1 months, P = 0.040) and OS (median: 17.4 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.049) than patients adopting chemotherapy alone. Additionally, after adjustment using multivariable Cox's analyses, PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (vs. chemotherapy) could independently realize prolonged PFS (P = 0.020) and OS (P = 0.029). Moreover, the majority of adverse events were manageable; meanwhile, grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia (13.2%), neutropenia (13.2%), nausea and vomiting (7.9%), anemia (5.3%), elevated transaminase (5.3%), thrombopenia (2.6%), anorexia (2.6%), peripheral neuropathy (2.6%), and rash (2.6%).

Conclusion

PD-1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy exhibits a better efficacy and equal tolerance compared with chemotherapy alone in advanced driver-gene-negative nonsquamous NSCLC patients.

Microwave ablation plus camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

Immunotherapy has become widely applied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, the relatively low response rate of immunotherapy monotherapy restricts its application. Combination therapy improves the response rate and prolongs patient survival; however, adverse events (AEs) associated with immunotherapies increase with combination therapy. Therefore, exploring combination regimens with equal efficacy and fewer AEs is urgently required. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) plus camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy in NSCLC.

Materials and methods

Patients with pathologically confirmed, epidermal growth factor receptor/anaplastic lymphoma kinase-wild-type NSCLC were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Patients underwent MWA to the pulmonary lesions first, followed by camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy 5–7 days later. Camrelizumab was administered with the dose of 200 mg every 2 to 3 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicities. The technical success and technique efficacy of ablation, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complications of ablation, and AEs were recorded.

Results

From January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021, a total of 77 patients underwent MWA and camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy. Technical success was achieved in all patients (100%), and the technique efficacy was 97.4%. The ORR was 29.9%. The PFS and OS were 11.8 months (95% confidence interval, 9.5–14.1) and not reached, respectively. Smoking history and response to camrelizumab were correlated with PFS, and response to camrelizumab was correlated with OS in both the univariate and multivariate analyses. No periprocedural deaths due to ablation were observed. Complications were observed in 33 patients (42.9%). Major complications included pneumothorax (18.2%), pleural effusion (11.7%), pneumonia (5.2%), bronchopleural fistula (2.6%), and hemoptysis (1.3%). Grade 3 or higher AEs of camrelizumab, including reactive capillary endothelial proliferation, fatigue, pneumonia, edema, and fever, were observed in 10.4%, 6.5%, 5.2%, 2.6%, and 2.6% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

MWA combined with camrelizumab monotherapy or combination therapy is effective and safe for the treatment of NSCLC.

Treatment response, survival, and safety profile of camrelizumab plus apatinib regimen as third-line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Camrelizumab, as a PD-1 inhibitor on the market recently, presents favorable therapeutic efficacy in several advanced cancers, while its application in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) lacks data. This study aimed to assess treatment response, survival profile, and adverse events of camrelizumab plus apatinib regimen as third-line treatment in mGC patients.

METHODS

Nineteen mGC patients who received camrelizumab plus apatinib as third-line treatment were analyzed in this observational study. Subsequently, treatment response and adverse events were documented, then progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

RESULTS

No (0.0%) patient achieved complete response; 5 (26.3%) patients achieved partial response; 8 (42.1%) patients had stable disease; 6 (31.6%) patients had progressive disease, resulting in objective response rate and disease control rate of 26.3% and 68.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, the median PFS and OS were 7.0 (95%CI: 2.9-11.0) months and 10.0 (95%CI: 7.4-12.6) months, accordingly. Besides, multiple metastases linked with worse PFS (P = 0.029) and OS (P = 0.021); Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score 1 (vs. 0) related to shorter OS (P = 0.030). Worth noting, the common adverse events were fatigue (42.1%), anemia (42.1%), neutropenia (42.1%), leukopenia (36.8%), pruritus (31.6%), proteinuria (31.6%), nausea and vomiting (31.6%), reactive capillary hemangioma (31.6%) and thrombocytopenia (31.6%). Meanwhile, grade 3-4 adverse events only included: thrombocytopenia (5.3%), hypertension (5.3%), and proteinuria (5.3%).

CONCLUSION

Camrelizumab plus apatinib as third-line treatment achieves satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and survival profile with generally manageable adverse events in mGC patients.

Efficacy and safety of combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenesis with or without chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis from 23 prospective studies

Purpose: Immune checkpoint and antiangiogenic inhibitors have a potentially synergistic antitumor effect. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in combination with antiangiogenesis therapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, Google Scholar, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for eligible trials. ClinicalTrials.gov and meeting abstracts were also searched for qualified clinical studies. The inclusion criteria were as follows: prospective studies (including single-arm studies) that evaluated efficacy and/or toxicity of immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic agents (A + I) with or without chemotherapy (A + I + chemo) in patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC; and primary outcome of each study reported at least one of these endpoints: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or adverse events (AEs).

Results: Twenty three prospective studies comprising 1,856 patients with advanced NSCLC were included. The pooled ORR, median PFS and estimated overall survival were 39%, 6.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.53–8.13], and 18.6 months in the overall group. Similar ORR and median PFS with A + I + chemo versus A + I were observed in patients treated in first-line setting [59% and 9.47 months (95% CI, 6.45–12.49) versus 52% and 10.9 months (95% CI, 1.81–19.98), respectively]. We also observed improved ORR and mPFS with A + I + chemo versus A + I in subsequent-line setting [56% and 8.1 months (95% CI, 5.00–11.26) versus 22% and 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.01–6.15), respectively]. Efficacy of A + I + chemo therapy was evident across different PD-L1 subgroups, especially in patients with EGFR mutations [ORR: 59%; mPFS: 8.13 months (95% CI: 5.00–11.26)] or baseline liver metastases. The incidence of AEs with a major grade of ≥3 in the overall, A + I, and A + I + chemo groups were 4.1% vs. 5.5% vs. 3.4% for proteinuria, 13.7% vs. 16.2% vs. 9.7% for hypertension, and 1.9% vs. 1.2% vs. 2.8% for rash, respectively. No new safety signals were identified in this pooled analysis.

Conclusion: Immunotherapy combined with antiangiogenic agents with or without chemotherapy showed encouraging antitumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in treatment-naïve or pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Doublet treatment with immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents might be a new option for patients with advanced NSCLC, especially those who are treatment-naive or cannot tolerate chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant Chemoimmunotherapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm Phase 2 Clinical Trial

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the antitumor activity and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial, patients with resectable stage III-IVB HNSCC received chemotherapy [albumin-bound paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 (or docetaxel 75 mg/m2) plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2] and camrelizumab 200 mg on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for three cycles, followed by surgery, and adjuvant radiotherapy. Co-primary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate and safety.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled and completed the neoadjuvant therapy, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 96.7% (29/30). Twenty-seven patients underwent surgery without delay, with an R0 resection rate of 92.6% (25/27). The clinical to pathological downstaging rate was 100% (27/27). The pCR rate was 37.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.4%-57.6%], and the major pathological response (MPR) rate was 74.1% (95% CI, 53.7%-88.9%). The median follow-up duration was 16.1 months (range, 8.3-28.5), and the disease-free survival rate at 12 months was 95.8% (95% CI, 73.9%-99.4%). Grade 3 neoadjuvant therapy-related adverse events included rash (1; 3.3%), pruritis (1; 3.3%), and thrombocytopenia (1; 3.3%), and no grade 4 or 5 treatment-related events occurred. The most common surgical complication was delayed wound healing (5; 18.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus camrelizumab for locally advanced HNSCC showed high ORR, pCR, and MPR rates, with an acceptable safety profile. These data support further evaluation of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced HNSCC.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR or ALK genetic aberration

Background

Camrelizumab plus apatinib shows encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in chemotherapy-pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, clinical benefits from this combination regimen in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements (EGFR+/ALK+) have not been reported. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC and defined EGFR/ALK status (EGFR+/ALK+) in a phase 1b/2 trial.

Methods

Previously treated patients with advanced EGFR+/ALK+ NSCLC were enrolled and given camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus apatinib at the recommended dose of 250 mg orally once daily. Patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations or ALK fusion genes had received at least one EGFR/ALK TKI and a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen before the enrollment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).

Results

All 43 enrolled patients comprised the efficacy and safety analysis population. The confirmed ORR was 18.6% (95% CI: 8.4–33.4%) and the clinical benefit response rate was 27.9% (95% CI: 15.3–43.7%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.9–5.5 months) and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI: 7.3 months–not reached), with a median follow-up period of 15.7 months (range, 0.5–24.4 months). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypertension (16.3%), proteinuria (11.6%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (9.3%). No unexpected adverse events were recorded.

Conclusions

Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed moderate antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR or ALK genetic aberrations, which warranted further validation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03083041. Registered March 17, 2017.

Feasibility and Tolerance of Apatinib plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Previously Treated Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Background

Apatinib is established to be the standard of care as third-line therapy for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (GC). Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockades also exhibited promising efficacy and safety for patients with treatment-refractory advanced GC.

Objective

This study was to explore the feasibility and tolerance of apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors for patients with previously treated advanced GC.

Methods

This study was performed as a real-world study; patients with advanced GC who were treated with previous systemic chemotherapy were screened retrospectively. Eligible patients were administered with apatinib combined with PD-1 blockade treatment. Efficacy of the patients was assessed with the change of target lesion using radiological evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and follow-up was carried out regularly. A safety profile was collected and documented during the combination treatment. Univariate analysis based on baseline characteristic subgroup was implemented in univariate analysis to identify the potential factor that might contribute to progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Between August 2018 and October 2021, a total of 39 patients with advanced GC or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma participated in this study consecutively and all the patients were available for efficacy and safety assessment. The best overall response during apatinib plus PD-1 blockade administration exhibited that PR was observed in 8 patients, SD was noted in 19 patients, and PD was found in 12 patients, which yielded an ORR of 20.5% (95% CI: 9.3%-36.5%), and DCR was 69.2% (95% CI: 52.4%-83.0%). Furthermore, the relatively enough follow-up had resulted in the mature PFS and overall survival (OS) data, suggesting that the median PFS of the 39 patients with advanced GC was 3.9 months (95% CI: 2.74-5.06). Additionally, the median OS of the 39 patients with advanced GC was 7.8 months (95% CI: 4.82-10.78). Furthermore, the most common adverse reactions of the 39 patients who received apatinib plus PD-1 blockades treatment were fatigue (61.5%), nausea and vomiting (56.4%), diarrhea (48.7%), hypertension (46.2%), hand-foot syndrome (38.5%), and rash (28.2%). Furthermore, performance status was independently associated with PFS of apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitor combination administration in baseline characteristic subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

Apatinib plus PD-1 inhibitors exhibited promising effectiveness and acceptable tolerance for previously treated advanced GC preliminarily. And this conclusion should be confirmed in clinical trials in the future.

Anti-angiogenesis revisited: reshaping the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Although anti-angiogenic agents have been of limited use in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) until recently, further roles for the use of angiogenesis inhibition have emerged in the era of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Given the shared common downstream signals of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with their complementary roles in tumorigenesis and tumor angiogenesis, the dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGF pathways represents a rational strategy to maximize clinical efficacy and overcome resistance in the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. VEGF-driven angiogenesis is a potent driver of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), with the recruited immunosuppressive cells driving angiogenesis, highlighting the interplay between the tumor vasculature and the anticancer immunity. Anti-angiogenic therapy can normalize the tumor vasculature and reprogram the TME from immunosuppressive into immunosupportive. Intensive research is under way to utilize the anti-angiogenic combination therapy to its full potential in diverse clinical settings in urgent unmet needs for the treatment of NSCLC. In this review, we present an overview of tumor angiogenesis and summarize the scientific background and preclinical and clinical evidence of anti-angiogenic therapy in combination with target therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant apatinib combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of stomach or gastroesophageal junction: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Adding anti-angiogenics to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer is recognized as a promising strategy, but its clinical value remains to be defined.

METHODS

This single-center, single-arm, phase 2 trial included patients with locally advanced (cT3/4aN+M0) adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) who received three cycles of intravenous oxaliplatin (135 mg/m² on day 1), oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m² twice daily on days 1 to 14), and oral apatinib for 21 days (250 mg once daily in the first two cycles, and further increased to 500 mg daily in the third cycle based on whether any adverse event of grade 3 or worse occurred), and an additional cycle of oxaliplatin plus capecitabine, followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved an objective response according to RECIST version 1.1.

RESULTS

Between April 28, 2017, and October 23, 2019, 37 patients were screened and 35 participants were included. Of the 32 patients assessable for efficacy and safety, objective responses were achieved in 25 (78.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60.0% to 90.7%) patients. Thirty-one (96.9%) patients received R0 resection, two (6.3%) patients achieved pathological complete response, and 11 (34.4%) patients achieved pathological response. At the data cutoff date (September 30, 2021), the median event-free survival was 42.6 (95% CI, 16.2 to not reached) months, and the median overall survival was not reached. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were hypertension (9/32, 28.1%), thrombocytopenia (7/32, 21.9%), and neutropenia (5/32, 15.6%). Seven (21.9%) patients developed surgical complications, and the most common one was intra-abdominal abscess (4/32, 12.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The concomitant use of apatinib, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine as neoadjuvant therapy showed promising efficacy and manageable safety profile in patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach or GEJ, and further phase 3 study is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered with ClinicalTrial.gov ( NCT03229096 ).

Multimodality Treatment of Pulmonary Sarcomatoid Carcinoma: A Review of Current State of Art

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is an unconventional non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is currently managed under guidelines used for conventional NSCLC and has poor survival. Surgery is the optimal choice for resectable PSC, and the prevalence of mutations in this type of tumor laid the foundation for novel systemic therapies such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy. PSC is resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and the effects of the 2 therapies are controversial. Targeted therapies have been reported to confer survival benefits, and savolitinib, an oral selective MET tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has been approved in metastatic patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutations. Expression and positive rate of programmed death ligand 1 in PSC are high; our previous research has also revealed a high mutational burden and a T-cell-inflamed microenvironment of PSC. Correspondingly, immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown preliminary antitumor effects (overall response rates of 40.5% (15/37) and 31.6% (6/19) in two retrospective studies, respectively) in PSC patients. In summary, patients should receive operations at an early stage and multimodality treatments are needed to maximize the benefits of patients with advanced disease.

Identification and validation of Osteopontin and receptor for hyaluronic acid-mediated motility (RHAMM, CD168) for potential immunotherapeutic significance of in lung squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic approach, but the population best suited to immunotherapy is yet to be determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) was chosen as the object for the present study. Four gene expression profiles were retrieved from the GEO database. 141 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected in LUSC tissues and normal tissues by the GEO2R tool and Venn diagram software.

RESULTS

34 candidate genes were selected for further analysis. A Kaplan-Meier survival plot further isolated 29 of 34 genes and after re-validation using gene expression profiling interactive analysis and pathway enrichment, Bonferroni correction was used to adjust P values, results showed that two genes (CD168 and OPN) were markedly enriched in the extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interaction pathway. We believe this pathway and genes may be tightly involved in the LUSC tumor immune microenvironment. We conducted a further cellular study to knock-down OPN in H520 cells using siRNA. The expression of CD168 was reduced in siRNA-OPN H520 cells (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that the arrest of CD168 occurs after the downregulation of the OPN protein, suggesting that OPN participates in ECM-receptor interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

By using integrated bioinformatics, we have identified CD168 and OPN as DEGs with poor prognosis in LUSC and have validated their interaction in the ECM receptor pathway. These genes could be potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for LUSC patients undergoing immunotherapy.

Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody Combined With Anti-VEGF Agent Is Safe and Effective in Patients With Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cancer as Second-Line or Beyond Treatment

Background

Numerous preclinical studies have revealed the complex regulatory mechanisms between anti-angiogenesis and immune inhibition in the tumor immune microenvironment and have proposed the efficacy of combined immunotherapy and anti-angiogenic treatment. Moreover, the combination strategy had been confirmed in a number of clinical trials. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this combination strategy in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods

In this real-world study, 43 patients who received the combination of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents in Zhejiang cancer hospitals between March 2019 and December 2020 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics and follow-up data were collected, and the preliminary efficacy and safety of the combination therapy were assessed.

Results

The median follow-up time was 12.4 months (range, 3.7-25.3 months), and the follow-up rate was 100%. The median duration of exposure was 9.5 months. Thirty-seven patients (86.0%) reported treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade. The most frequently reported events were fatigue, decreased appetite, and hypertension. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 8 patients (18.6%), and no grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. Twenty-four patients (55.9%) had an overall response to treatment: 6 (14.0%) had a complete response and 18 (41.9%) had a partial response. In addition, 5 (11.6%) patients had stable disease, and the disease control rate 12 was 67.4%. The median time to response was 1.6 months (range, 1.1-2.8 months). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, and the 1-year PFS rate was 69.1%. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 87.7%. Patients with primary tumors located in the nasopharynx had better OS than those with tumors outside the nasopharynx. ECOG PS were related to PFS; patients with an ECOG PS of 0 had a slight survival advantage.

Conclusion

The combination strategy of anti–PD-1 monoclonal antibodies and anti-VEGF agents was tolerable in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer. This treatment exhibited antitumor potential despite the heavily pretreated population.