Mechanisms of the Synergistic Interaction between the Bisphosphonate Zoledronic Acid and the Chemotherapy Agent Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer Cells in vitro

Development of pH-Responsive Hyaluronic Acid-Conjugated Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles for Chemo-/CO-Gas Dual Therapy

In this study, we fabricated γ-cyclodextrin (γCD)-based nanoparticles (NPs) for dual antitumor therapy. First, γCD (the backbone biopolymer) was chemically conjugated with low-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid (HA; a tumoral CD44 receptor-targeting molecule) and 3-(diethylamino)propylamine (DEAP; a pH-responsive molecule), termed as γCD-(DEAP/HA). The obtained γCD-(DEAP/HA) self-assembled in aqueous solution, producing the γCD-(DEAP/HA) NPs. These NPs efficiently entrapped paclitaxel (PTX; an antitumor drug) and triiron dodecacarbonyl (FeCO; an endogenous cytotoxic gas molecule) via hydrophobic interactions between PTX and FeCO with the unprotonated DEAP molecules in γCD-(DEAP/HA) and a possible host-guest interaction in the γCD rings. The release of PTX and FeCO from the NPs resulted from particle destabilization at endosomal pH, probably owing to the protonation of DEAP in the NPs. In vitro studies using MCF-7 tumor cells demonstrated that these NPs were efficiently internalized by the cells expressing CD44 receptors and enhanced PTX/FeCO-mediated tumor cell apoptosis. Importantly, local light irradiation of FeCO stimulated the generation of cytotoxic CO, resulting in highly improved tumor cell death. We expect that these NPs have potential as dual-modal therapeutic candidates with enhanced antitumor activity in response to acidic pH and local light irradiation.

Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase: Role in human health, disease and potential therapeutic target

Geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGDPS), an enzyme in the isoprenoid biosynthesis pathway, is responsible for the production of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). GGPP serves as a substrate for the post-translational modification (geranylgeranylation) of proteins, including those belonging to the Ras superfamily of small GTPases. These proteins play key roles in signalling pathways, cytoskeletal regulation and intracellular transport, and in the absence of the prenylation modification, cannot properly localise and function. Aberrant expression of GGDPS has been implicated in various human pathologies, including liver disease, type 2 diabetes, pulmonary disease and malignancy. Thus, this enzyme is of particular interest from a therapeutic perspective. Here, we review the physiological function of GGDPS as well as its role in pathophysiological processes. We discuss the current GGDPS inhibitors under development and the therapeutic implications of targeting this enzyme.

The Antineoplastic Effect of Carboplatin Is Potentiated by Combination with Pitavastatin or Metformin in a Chemoresistant High-Grade Serous Carcinoma Cell Line

The combination of Carboplatin with Paclitaxel is the mainstay treatment for high-grade serous carcinoma; however, many patients with advanced disease undergo relapse due to chemoresistance. Drug repurposing coupled with a combination of two or more compounds with independent mechanisms of action has the potential to increase the success rate of the antineoplastic treatment. The purpose of this study was to explore whether the combination of Carboplatin with repurposed drugs led to a therapeutic benefit. Hence, we assessed the cytotoxic effects of Carboplatin alone and in combination with several repurposed drugs (Pitavastatin, Metformin, Ivermectin, Itraconazole and Alendronate) in two tumoral models, i.e., Carboplatin (OVCAR8) and Carboplatin-Paclitaxel (OVCAR8 PTX R P) chemoresistant cell lines and in a non-tumoral (HOSE6.3) cell line. Cellular viability was measured using the Presto Blue assay, and the synergistic interactions were evaluated using the Chou-Talalay, Bliss Independence and Highest Single Agent reference models. Combining Carboplatin with Pitavastatin or Metformin displayed the highest cytotoxic effect and the strongest synergism among all combinations for OVCAR8 PTX R P cells, resulting in a chemotherapeutic effect superior to Carboplatin as a single agent. Concerning HOSE6.3 cells, combining Carboplatin with almost all the repurposed drugs demonstrated a safe pharmacological profile. Overall, we propose that Pitavastatin or Metformin could act synergistically in combination with Carboplatin for the management of high-grade serous carcinoma patients with a Carboplatin plus Paclitaxel resistance profile.

Nanoparticle-mediated synergistic chemoimmunotherapy for tailoring cancer therapy: recent advances and perspectives

Nowadays, a potent challenge in cancer treatment is considered the lack of efficacious strategy, which has not been able to significantly reduce mortality. Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as a promising approach in both for the first-line and relapsed therapy demonstrated particular benefit from two key gating strategies, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy to cancer therapy; therefore, the discernment of their participation and role of potential synergies in CIT approach is determinant. In this study, in addition to balancing the pros and cons of CIT with the challenges of each of two main strategies, the recent advances in the cancer CIT have been discussed. Additionally, immunotherapeutic strategies and the immunomodulation effect induced by chemotherapy, which boosts CIT have been brought up. Finally, harnessing and development of the nanoparticles, which mediated CIT have expatiated in detail.

Prognostic effects of cytokine levels on patients treated with taxane and zoledronic acid for metastatic breast cancer in bone (BEAT-ZO) (KCSG BR 10-13)

Advanced breast cancer frequently metastasizes to the skeleton causing major mobility issues and hazards to quality of life. To manage osteolytic bone metastasis, bone-modifying agents and chemotherapy are recommended as the standard of care. Here, we investigated serologic biomarkers that might be associated with prognosis in breast cancer patients treated with zoledronic acid (ZA) and taxane-based chemotherapy. We collected serum samples from breast cancer patients with bone metastasis who received taxane plus ZA as palliative treatment. Fourteen biomarkers of angiogenesis, immunogenicity, and apoptosis were assessed, and the correlation between serum cytokine levels and patient's prognosis was statistically analyzed. Sixty-six patients were enrolled, and samples from 40 patients were analyzed after laboratory quality control. Patients with low baseline PDGF-AA, high IFN-γ, low MCP-2, low TGF-β1, and low TNF-α were significantly associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS). Decreasing VEGF and TNF-α and increasing FGF-2 and PDGF-AA in the early treatment phase indicated longer PFS. In univariate and multivariate analyses, low TGF-β1 and TNF-α and high IFN-γ at baseline were associated with a significantly low hazard ratio for disease progression. Further, we designed a risk score with TGF-β1, TNF-α, and IFN-γ levels, which could prognosticate patients for PFS. In conclusion, serum cytokine level, such as TGF-β1, TNF-α, and IFN-γ, could be a potential prognostic biomarker for breast cancer patients with bone metastasis treated with ZA and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Breast cancer outcome in relation to bone mineral density and bisphosphonate use: a sub-study of the DATA trial

Purpose

The phase III DATA study compared 6 and 3 years of adjuvant anastrozole following 2–3 years of tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. This pre-planned side-study assessed the relationship between a reduced bone mineral density (BMD) and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and evaluated the effect of bisphosphonates on DRFS.

Methods

We selected all patients with a BMD measurement within 3 years after randomisation (landmark) without any DRFS events. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used for analyses.

Results

Of 1860 eligible patients, 1142 had a DEXA scan before the landmark. The BMD was normal in 436 (38.2%) and showed osteopenia in 565 (49.5%) and osteoporosis in 141 (12.3%) patients. After a median follow-up of 5.0 years from the landmark, neither osteopenia nor osteoporosis (compared with normal BMD) were associated with DRFS in both the 6-year [osteopenia HR 0.82 (95% CI 0.45–1.49), osteoporosis HR 1.10 (95% CI 0.26–4.67)] and the 3-year arm [osteopenia HR 0.75 (95% CI 0.40–1.42), osteoporosis HR 1.86 (95% CI 0.43–8.01)]. Moreover, bisphosphonate use did not impact DRFS.

Conclusion

No association was observed between a reduced BMD and DRFS. Neither did we observe an impact of bisphosphonates on DRFS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05567-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Long-term outcomes of prolonged bisphosphonates more than 2 years in bone metastatic breast cancer: risk vs benefit

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates are the mainstay therapeutic options for prevention of skeletal-related events and generally used for up to 2 years in bone metastatic cancer patients.

AIM

We aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of prolonged (> 2 years) bisphosphonate usage in bone metastatic breast cancer (BMBC) patients.

METHODS

Ninety-nine BMBC patients who had prolonged bisphosphonates were evaluated retrospectively for long-term outcomes and survival rates.

RESULTS

Median duration of bisphosphonate therapy was 46.8 (24-198) months. Seven patients had bisphosphonate-related adverse events (osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) (n = 6), ONJ and renal failure (n = 1)). Bisphosphonate was switched to another one because of bone metastasis progression in more than one-third of the patients (n = 36, 36.3%). The patients who had bisphosphonate switch therapy had statistically significant longer overall survival (p < 0.01). Neither duration nor type of bisphosphonates had effect on frequency of bisphosphonate-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Bisphosphonates might be prolonged for more than 2 years in BMBC patients with an acceptable toxicity profile. In addition, bisphosphonates switch therapy should be preferred in those with progressive bone metastasis since it might contribute to better survival despite bisphosphonates could not have been shown to have survival benefit in previous studies.

Efficacy and acceptability of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal sequence of endocrine therapy in a neoadjuvant setting for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer is unclear. Our study evaluated the efficacy and acceptability of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for HR+ breast cancer.

METHODS

We identified studies based on titles and abstracts that were published before 22 June 2018 in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials with at least one arm that evaluated the effectiveness of one or a combination of anastrozole, letrozole, palbociclib, tamoxifen, fulvestrant, abemaciclib, everolimus, gefitinib, ribociclib, taselisib, and exemestane. We pooled effect sizes using the odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% credibility interval (95% CrI). The primary outcomes were response rate and treatment completion.

RESULTS

Our network meta-analysis included 3,306 participants and 16 eligible studies, which assessed 15 treatments. In terms of response rates, compared with letrozole combined therapy, tamoxifen was associated with a significant reduction in response rate (OR, 0.34; 95% CrI, 0.13-0.85; OR, 0.32; 95% CrI, 0.13-0.80; OR, 0.26; 95% CrI, 0.09-0.83; and OR, 0.30; 95% CrI, 0.09-0.96; for letrozole plus everolimus, letrozole plus taselisib, letrozole plus zoledronic acid, and letrozole plus lapatinib, respectively). Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves ranking, letrozole plus zoledronic acid was associated with the highest rate of response (87.6%), followed by letrozole plus lapatinib (85.2%), and letrozole plus taselisib (79.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultimately, our study established that letrozole plus zoledronic acid may be an optimal treatment based on its current rank in a neoadjuvant setting for HR+ breast cancer.

Prognostic effects of osteoclast inhibitors in extensive stage small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases

Bone metastases (BM) often induce skeletal-related events (SREs) and contribute to poor prognoses in patients with cancer. Osteoclast inhibitors (OIs), such as bisphosphonates (BPs) and denosumab, reportedly prevent SREs and improve quality of life in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and BM, but have not been tested in extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients. From 238 SCLC patient records, the present study reviewed those of 58 BM patients, including 23 who were treated with OIs (OIs group) and 35 who were untreated (untreated group). Patient backgrounds were balanced between groups using propensity score matching, and survival curves were compared using the log-rank test. The median overall survival (OS) times were 8.41 and 12.52 months in untreated and OIs groups, respectively, but these did not differ significantly between groups (log-rank test, P=0.409). The 1-year OS rate was higher in the OIs group (56.1%) when compared with the control group (22.6%). The results indicated that OIs tend to prolong the short term survival of ES-SCLC patients with BM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the prognostic effects of OIs in SCLC patients. The results of the present study may highlight the possibility that OIs improve the prognosis of ES-SCLC patients with BM.

An update on the currently available and future chemotherapy for treating bone metastases in breast cancer patients

INTRODUCTION

Bone metastases in breast cancer patients are a common clinical problem. Many factors influence the treatment decision, including tumor characteristics, previous treatment and tumor burden in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

AREAS COVERED

This present review summarizes the new treatment strategies and the chemotherapeutic agents currently available in the management of metastatic breast cancer with bone metastases.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients with bone metastases more often have hormone receptor-positive tumours. Although new treatment agents for metastatic breast cancer have been investigated, endocrine therapy is still considered as the treatment of choice for patients with bone metastases although chemotherapy still has an important place. In recent years, new chemotherapeutic agents such as etirinotecan and nab-paclitaxel have been established though there are few studies that have looked at particular types of metastases. In the last decade, therapies for bone metastasis resistant to endocrine therapy have predominantly focused on radiotherapy, surgical resection, chemotherapy, bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals and targeted therapeutics. New targeted agents include: Src inhibitors, cathepsin K inhibitors, CXCR4 inhibitors, TGF-B blockade and integrin antagonists while drug delivery systems for chemotherapy have also been developed. These new treatment options could be future treatment options for bone metastatic disease if early promising results are confirmed by clinical trials.

Standardization of the infusion sequence of antineoplastic drugs used in the treatment of breast and colorectal cancers

The definition of antineoplastic administration sequences can help planning of therapeutic regimens in a more rational way, and thus optimize chemotherapy effects on patients, increasing efficacy and reducing toxic effects. In this way, this study aimed to evaluate the infusion order of antineoplastic agents of the main therapeutic protocols used in the treatment of colorectal and breast cancer which are used in a tertiary hospital, identifying possible interactions dependent on the infusion sequence. For the definition of protocols adopted in the hospital, medical prescriptions were used in the period of January to March 2016 and a literature review was conducted to search for studies assessing the sequence of administering the selected regimens. The databases used were SciELO, LILACS and MEDLINE, in addition to Micromedex Solutions® and UpToDate®. A total of 19 protocols were identified for antineoplastic therapy, 11 for colorectal cancer and 8 for breast cancer. The selected articles provided evidence for administration order of 19 protocols, and three protocols did no report relevance of infusion sequence. Sequence-dependent interactions were mainly related to toxicity, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of the drug combination. The definition of the infusion sequence has a great impact on the optimization of therapy, increasing efficacy and safety of the protocols containing combined antineoplastic therapies.

Estradiol impairs the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect of Zoledronic acid in hormone sensitive breast cancer cells in vitro

Background

Zoledronic acid (ZA) has antiresorptive effects and protects from bone metastasis in women with early breast cancer. In addition, in postmenopausal women with endocrine responsive breast cancer ZA prolongs DFS. The exact mechanism is still unclear. We have therefore investigated the effect of increasing concentrations of ZA in breast cancer cell lines in the absence or presence of estradiol to mimic the hormonal environment in vitro.

Materials and methods

Using assays for cell proliferation (EZ4U, BrdU) and cell death (Annexin/PI), we have analyzed the dose-dependent antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of ZA in two hormone sensitive cell lines (MCF-7 and T47D) and a hormone insensitive, triple negative cell line (MDA-MB-231) in the presence of 0, 1 and 10 nM estradiol.

Results

In the absence of estradiol, ZA exerts dose-dependent antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic antitumor effects in both, hormone sensitive (MCF-7, T47D) and -insensitive (MDA-MB-231) breast cancer cell lines (p<0.0001). In the presence of estradiol, the antitumoral effect of ZA was significantly decreased only in the hormone sensitive MCF-7 and T47D cell lines (p = 0.0008 and p = 0.0008, respectively).

Conclusion

We have demonstrated that estradiol impairs the antiproliferative and proapoptotic effect of ZA in hormone sensitive, but not in hormone insensitive breast cancer cell lines. Our findings provide a possible explanation for the differential effect of ZA on DFS in pre- and postmenopausal patients with hormone sensitive early breast cancer, which has been demonstrated clinically. We further hypothesize that endocrine insensitive tumors such as triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) should benefit from ZA irrespective of their menopausal status.

Physiologic Activity of Bisphosphonates – Recent Advances

Background:

Bisphosphonates are drugs commonly used for the medication and prevention of diseases caused by decreased mineral density. Despite such important medicinal use, they display a variety of physiologic activities, which make them promising anti-cancer, anti-protozoal, antibacterial and antiviral agents.

Objective:

To review physiological activity of bisphosphonates with special emphasis on their ongoing and potential applications in medicine and agriculture.

Method:

Critical review of recent literature data.

Results:

Comprehensive review of activities revealed by bisphosphonates.

Conclusion:

although bisphosphonates are mostly recognized by their profound effects on bone physiology their medicinal potential has not been fully evaluated yet. Literature data considering enzyme inhibition suggest possibilities of far more wide application of these compounds. These applications are, however, limited by their low bioavailability and therefore intensive search for new chemical entities overcoming this shortage are carried out.

The miR-21/PTEN/Akt signaling pathway is involved in the anti-tumoral effects of zoledronic acid in human breast cancer cell lines

Preclinical data indicate a direct anti-tumor effect of zoledronic acid (ZA) outside the skeleton, but its molecular mechanism is still not completely clarified. The aim of this study was to investigate the anti-cancer effects of ZA in human breast cancer cell lines, suggesting that they may in part be mediated via the miR-21/PTEN/Akt signaling pathway. The effect of ZA on cell viability was measured by MTT assay, and cell death induction was analyzed using either a double AO/EtBr staining and M30 ELISA assay. A Proteome Profiler Human Apoptosis Array was executed to evaluate the molecular basis of ZA-induced apoptosis. Cell cycle analysis was executed by flow cytometry. The effect of ZA on miR-21 expression was quantified by qRT-PCR, and the amount of PTEN protein and its targets were analyzed by Western blot. ZA inhibited cell growth in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, through the activation of cell death pathways and arrest of cell cycle progression. ZA downregulated the expression of miR-21, resulting in dephosphorilation of Akt and Bad and in a significant increase of p21 and p27 proteins expression. These results were observed also in MDA-MB-231 cells, commonly used as an experimental model of bone metastasis of breast cancer. This study revealed, for the first time, an involvement of the miR-21/PTEN/Akt signaling pathway in the mechanism of ZA anti-cancer actions in breast cancer cells. We would like to underline that this pathway is present both in the hormone responsive BC cell line (MCF-7) as well as in a triple negative cell line (MDA-MB-231). Taken together these results reinforce the use of ZA in clinical practice, suggesting the role of miR-21 as a possible mediator of its therapeutic efficacy.

Bone Tumor Environment as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Ewing Sarcoma

Ewing sarcoma is the second most common pediatric bone tumor, with three cases per million worldwide. In clinical terms, Ewing sarcoma is an aggressive, rapidly fatal malignancy that mainly develops not only in osseous sites (85%) but also in extra-skeletal soft tissue. It spreads naturally to the lungs, bones, and bone marrow with poor prognosis in the two latter cases. Bone lesions from primary or secondary (metastases) tumors are characterized by extensive bone remodeling, more often due to osteolysis. Osteoclast activation and subsequent bone resorption are responsible for the clinical features of bone tumors, including pain, vertebral collapse, and spinal cord compression. Based on the “vicious cycle” concept of tumor cells and bone resorbing cells, drugs, which target osteoclasts, may be promising agents as adjuvant setting for treating bone tumors, including Ewing sarcoma. There is also increasing evidence that cellular and molecular protagonists present in the bone microenvironment play a part in establishing a favorable “niche” for tumor initiation and progression. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential therapeutic value of drugs targeting the bone tumor microenvironment in Ewing sarcoma. The first part of the review will focus on targeting the bone resorbing function of osteoclasts by means of bisphosphonates or drugs blocking the pro-resorbing cytokine receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand. Second, the role of this peculiar hypoxic microenvironment will be discussed in the context of resistance to chemotherapy, escape from the immune system, or neo-angiogenesis. Therapeutic interventions based on these specificities could be then proposed in the context of Ewing sarcoma.

Myeloma bone disease: pathogenesis, current treatments and future targets

INTRODUCTION

Patients with myeloma develop localized and generalized bone loss leading to hypercalcaemia, accelerated osteoporosis, vertebral wedge fractures, other pathological fractures, spinal cord compression and bone pain. Bone loss is mediated by a variety of biological modifiers including osteoclast-activating factors (OAF) and osteoblast (OB) inhibitory factors produced either directly by malignant plasma cells (MPCs) or as a consequence of their interaction with the bone marrow microenvironment (BMM). Raised levels of OAFs such as receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL), macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha, tumour necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin 6 stimulate bone resorption by recruiting additional osteoclasts. Via opposing mechanisms, increases in OB inhibitory factors, such as dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1), soluble frizzled-related protein-3 and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), suppress bone formation by inhibiting the differentiation and recruitment of OBs. These changes result in an uncoupling of physiological bone remodelling, leading to myeloma bone disease (MBD). Moreover, the altered BMM provides a fertile ground for the growth and survival of MPCs. Current clinical management of MBD is both reactive (to pain and fractures) and preventive, with bisphosphonates (BPs) being the mainstay of pharmacological treatment. However, side effects and uncertainties associated with BPs warrant the search for more targeted treatments for MBD. This review will summarize recent developments in understanding the intimate relationship between MBD and the BMM and the novel ways in which they are being therapeutically targeted.

SOURCES OF DATA

All data included were sourced and referenced from PubMed.

AREAS OF AGREEMENT

The clinical utility of BP therapy is well established. However, there is general acknowledgement that BPs are only partially successful in the treatment of MBD. The number of skeletal events attributable to myeloma are reduced by BPs but not totally eliminated. Furthermore, existing damage is not repaired. It is widely recognized that more effective treatments are needed.

AREAS OF CONTROVERSY

There remains controversy concerning the duration of BP therapy. Whether denosumab is a viable alternative to BP therapy is also contested. Many of the new therapeutic strategies discussed are yet to translate to clinical practice and demonstrate equal efficacy or superiority to BP therapy. It also remains controversial whether reported anti-tumour effects of bone-modulating therapies are clinically significant.

GROWING POINTS

The potential clinical utility of bone anabolic therapies including agents such as anti-Dkk-1, anti-sclerostin and anti-HGF is becoming increasingly recognized.

AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH

Further research effectively targeting the mediators of MBD, targeting both bone resorption and bone formation, is urgently needed. This should translate promptly to clinical trials of combination therapy comprising anti-resorptives and bone anabolic therapies to demonstrate efficacy and improved outcomes over BPs.

Zoledronic acid to prevent and treat cancer metastasis: new prospects for an old drug

Zoledronic acid (zoledronate, Zometa™; Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate. Zoledronate rapidly binds to bone mineral where it is then ingested by osteoclasts. Once internalized, zoledronate inhibits the mevalonate pathway, which stops osteoclast function, and thus slows bone resorption. Zoledronate is approved for the prevention of skeletal morbidity in metastatic bone disease from solid tumors and multiple myeloma. Zoledronate is also recommended as an option for the treatment of cancer therapy-induced bone loss. In recent large Phase III studies in early breast cancer, zoledronate reduced both local and distant recurrences in women with induced or established natural menopause. Postulated mechanisms underlying the anticancer properties of zoledronate include antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory effects. A clearer understanding of these mechanisms will enable the full potential of zoledronate to be realized.

Prognostic factors for patients with bone-only metastasis in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Bone is the most frequent site of metastasis among breast cancer patients. We investigated prognostic factors affecting survival following bone-only metastasis in breast cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of breast cancer patients who were treated and followed at Gangnam Severance Hospital retrospectively reviewed to identify patients with bone-only metastasis.

RESULTS

The median time from the diagnosis of bone-only metastasis to the last follow-up or death was 55.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 38.6-71.9] months. The Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimate at 10 years for all patients was 34.9%. In the multivariate Cox regression model, bisphosphonate treatment [hazard ratio=0.18; 95% CI, 0.07-0.43], estrogen receptor positivity (hazard ratio=0.51; 95% CI, 0.28-0.94), and solitary bone metastasis (hazard ratio=0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.72) were significantly associated with longer overall survival in the bone-only recurrence group. Among the treatment modalities, only bisphosphonate treatment was identified as a significant prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

Identifying the factors influencing breast cancer mortality after bone-only metastasis will help clarify the clinical course and improve the treatment outcome for patients with breast cancer and bone-only metastasis. Bisphosphonates, as a significant prognostic factor, warrant further investigation.

Does estrogen play a role in response to adjuvant bone-targeted therapies?

Bone remains the most common site of breast cancer recurrence. The results of population studies, pre-clinical research and clinical studies in patients with metastatic disease provided a rationale for testing bone-targeted agents in the adjuvant setting. Despite the initial optimism, results from eight prospectively designed, randomized control studies powered to assess the value of adjuvant bone-targeted therapy in early breast cancer are conflicting. Data have shown that, where benefit exists, it tends to be in women with a “low estrogen environment”, either through menopause or suppression of ovarian function. In this manuscript, we review clinical data supporting the hypothesis that estrogen levels may play a part in explaining the response of patients to bone-targeted agents in the adjuvant setting. The results presented to date suggest that there may be data supporting a unifying role for estrogen in adjuvant trials. However, in the absence of any prospective randomized trials in which estrogen data has been systematically collected we cannot specifically answer this question. We await the results of the Oxford overview analysis of individual patient data with interest.

Cisplatin in combination with zoledronic acid: a synergistic effect in triple-negative breast cancer cell lines

Zoledronic acid (ZA) is the most widely used bisphos-phonate to treat cancer-induced bone disease. There is evidence that bisphosphonates have direct antitumor activity and that their combination with anticancer agents can significantly enhance the effect of treatment. We evaluated whether the combination of ZA with different platinum compounds exerts a synergistic effect in breast cancer cell lines and we investigated the mechanisms of action involved. This study was performed on four breast cancer cell lines, MCF-7, SKBR3, MDA-MB-231 and BRC-230, and confirmed on a primary culture obtained from a breast cancer bone metastasis specimen. ZA (50 µM) was administered for 72 h alone or in combination with cisplatin (Cis) or carboplatin. Drug-induced growth inhibition was detected by sulforhodamine B assay, apoptosis and cell cycle regulation were detected by flow cytometry, and protein expression was evaluated by western blot analysis. MCF-7 and SKBR3 showed very low sensitivity to the three drugs tested. The ZA + Cis combination exerted a high antitumor activity in the two triple-negative lines MDA-MB-231 and BRC-230. An important synergistic effect was obtained in MDA-MB-231 and an additive effect was observed in BRC-230. The p21, pMAPK and m-TOR pathways were regulated by this combined treatment, particularly at lower Cis doses. Carboplatin did not show antitumor activity either alone or in combination with ZA. In conclusion, the potential novel treatment schedule identified for triple-negative breast cancer could prove beneficial in view of the limited therapeutic options available for patients and also since the synergism with ZA would enable lower Cis doses to be used, thus reducing toxicity. Although further research in a clinical setting is warranted, our results on cell lines has been confirmed on a human primary bone metastasis culture.

Current approaches to bone-targeted therapy in genitourinary malignancies

Bone metastases in patients with genitourinary cancers are associated with increased risk for skeletal-related events including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, and the requirement for surgery or palliative radiotherapy to bone. The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and the monoclonal antibody against RANK, denosumab, are approved for the prevention of skeletal-related events in genitourinary cancers. These agents have different mechanisms of action and pharmacokinetic profiles, and while both are effective in reducing the risk of skeletal-related events, other clinical effects differ. There is evidence for direct and indirect anticancer activity with zoledronic acid from preclinical studies and emerging data from clinical studies suggesting an effect on patient survival. Potential anticancer mechanisms include inhibition of angiogenesis, enhanced immune surveillance via stimulation of γδ T cells, and reduction of circulating tumor cells. A synergistic effect of chemotherapy plus zoledronic acid has also been suggested. Further research is ongoing regarding the roles of these antiresorptive therapies in patients with bone metastases or at high risk for malignant spread to skeletal sites.

Denosumab: a new option in the treatment of bone metastases from urological cancers

BONE METASTASES OFTEN CREATE SERIOUS CLINICAL PROBLEMS: they lead to poor performance status due to pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression and intractable pain, commonly referred to as skeletal-related events. The receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB (RANK), the RANK ligand (RANKL), and osteoprotegerin, a decoy receptor for RANK, regulate osteoclastogenesis and may play a key role in bone metastasis. Denosumab (XGEVA; Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA), a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes RANKL, inhibits osteoclast function, prevents generalized bone resorption and local bone destruction, and has become a therapeutic option for preventing or delaying first on-study skeletal-related events in various malignancies. In the context of urological cancer, three main Phase III clinical studies have been published in prostate cancer. This article provides a brief overview of the characteristics of bone metastasis in urological cancers, reviews the mechanisms of bone metastasis, including the RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin axis, the current standard of care, zoledronic acid, and describes the efficacy of the novel bone-targeted agent denosumab in bone metastasis. Denosumab is emerging as a key therapeutic option in the treatment of bone metastases from urological cancers.

Antitumor activity of zoledronic acid in primary breast cancer cells determined by the ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay

BACKGROUND

The NeoAzure study has demonstrated that the use of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (Zol) in the neoadjuvant setting increases the rate of complete response in primary breast cancer and therefore indicates direct antitumor activity. The purpose of this study was to compare the antitumor effect of Zol with standard chemotherapy in primary breast cancer cells using ATP-tumor chemosensitivity assay (ATP-TCA).

METHODS

Breast cancer specimens were obtained from patients with breast cancer who underwent primary breast cancer surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tübingen, Germany, between 2006 through 2009. Antitumor effects of Zol, TAC (Docetaxel, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide) and FEC (5-Fluorouracil, Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide) were tested in 116 fresh human primary breast cancer specimens using ATP-TCA. ATP-TCA results were analyzed with different cut-off levels for the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), for IC90 and for the sensitivity index (IndexSUM). Each single agent or combination was tested at six doubling dilutions from 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200% of test drug concentrations (TDC) derived from the plasma peak concentrations determined by pharmacokinetic data. The assay was carried out in duplicate wells with positive and negative controls.

RESULTS

The median IndexSUM value was lower for Zol than for the combined regimen FEC (36.8%) and TAC (12.9%), respectively, indicating increased antitumor activity of Zol in primary breast cancer cells. The difference regarding Zol and FEC was significant (p < 0.05). The median IC50 value for Zol (8.03% TDC) was significantly lower than the IC50 values for FEC (33.5% TDC) and TAC (19.3% TDC) treatment (p < 0.05). However, the median IC90 value for Zol (152.5% TDC) was significantly higher than the IC90 value obtained with TAC (49.5% TDC; p < 0.05), but similar to the IC90 value for FEC (180.9% TDC). In addition a significant positive correlation was observed for the IndexSum of Zol and the ER status (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Zoledronic acid has a strong antitumor effect on primary breast cancer cells in vitro which is equal or superior to commonly used chemotherapeutic regimens for treating breast cancer.

Combinations of bisphosphonates and classical anticancer drugs: a preclinical perspective

Bone metastases are frequent complications in advanced breast and prostate cancer among others, resulting in increased risk of fractures, pain, hypercalcaemia of malignancy and a reduction in patient independence and mobility. Bisphosphonates (BPs) are in wide clinical use for the treatment of cancer-induced bone disease associated with advanced cancer, due to their potent ability to reduce skeletal-related events (SREs) and improve quality of life. Despite the profound effect on bone health, the majority of clinical studies have failed to demonstrate an overall survival benefit of BP therapy. There is increasing preclinical evidence to suggest that inclusion of the most potent nitrogen-containing BPs (NBPs) in combination therapy results in increased antitumour effects and improved survival, but that the particular schedules used are of key importance to achieve optimal benefit. Recent clinical data have suggested that there may be effects of adjuvant NBP therapy on breast tumours outside the skeleton. These findings have led to renewed interest in the use of BPs in cancer therapy, in particular how they can be included as part of adjuvant protocols. Here we review the key data reported from preclinical model systems investigating the effects of combination therapy including BPs with particular emphasis on breast and prostate cancer.

Lipid metabolic pathways as lung cancer therapeutic targets: a computational study

Inhibitors of lipid metabolic pathways, particularly drugs targeting the mevalonate pathway, have been suggested to be valuable in enhancing the effectiveness of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and these compounds may also be effective in patients with inherent or acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The present study examined gene expression profiles in lung adenocarcinoma to characterize the interaction between growth factor signals and lipid metabolic pathways at the transcriptional level. Gene expression correlation analysis showed that genes involved in the mevalonate pathway and unsaturated fatty acid synthesis were negatively correlated with the expression of EGFR, MET and other growth factor receptor genes, as well as with the expression of genes involved in cell migration and adhesion. On the other hand, the expression of genes related to cell cycle progression, DNA repair and DNA replication were positively correlated with the metabolic pathway genes mentioned above, and a significant number of such genes had promoter domains for nuclear factor Y (NFY). Genes whose expression showed a positive correlation with NFY expression and mevalonate pathway genes were found to exhibit protein-protein interactions with several 'hub' genes, including BRCA1, that have been associated with both lung cancer and cell division. These results support the idea that inhibition of lipid metabolic pathways may be valuable as an alternative therapeutic option for the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma, and suggest that NFY is a possible molecular target for such efforts.

Retrospective analysis of antitumor effects of zoledronic acid in breast cancer patients with bone-only metastases

BACKGROUND

Bisphosphonates have been used successfully in the treatment of hypercalcemia and to reduce skeletal complications of bone metastasis, but have not been shown to prevent bone metastasis or to prolong survival time in metastatic breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to determine whether the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with bone-only breast cancer metastasis differed based on whether patients received zoledronic acid, pamidronate, or no bisphosphonate upon diagnosis of their metastases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively identified 314 patients diagnosed with bone-only metastasis at the time of initial staging or who developed bone metastasis as the first recurrence site during follow-up from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2008, at The MD Anderson Cancer Center. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazards models were used to assess the effects of each treatment on PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Patients who had more than 1 bone metastasis and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 and 3 were more likely to receive zoledronic acid in this analysis. Compared with no bisphosphonate use, the use of zoledronic acid was not significantly associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, P = .058 in univariate analysis, and HR = 0.80, P = .235 in multivariate analysis) nor with longer OS (HR = 1.04, P = .863 in univariate analysis and HR = 1.34, P = .192 in multivariate analysis).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that for patients with bone-only metastases, zoledronic acid did not prolong PFS or OS. In patients with bone-only metastasis, we could not demonstrate antitumor effects of zoledronic acid.

Direct and indirect anticancer activity of bisphosphonates: a brief review of published literature

The bone marrow microenvironment provides a site for cancer cells to evade systemic anticancer therapy. Dormant tumor micrometastases are believed to be the source of disease persistence and relapse; however, the exact characteristics of cancer stem cells vs. cancer cells with limited metastatic potential have yet to be elucidated. Bisphosphonates inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, are approved for treating malignant bone disease from advanced cancers, and have shown efficacy for preventing cancer treatment-induced bone loss. Altering the bone marrow microenvironment to make it less conducive to cancer cell survival is now emerging as an important means to prevent cancer recurrence. This review aims to distill the diverse literature and provide a brief overview of the numerous preclinical and early clinical studies of bisphosphonates demonstrating a variety of direct and indirect anticancer activities that affect both the tumor cell (the "seed") and surrounding microenvironment (the "soil"). Recently, zoledronic acid was found to improve disease-free survival and overall survival in some adjuvant breast cancer settings and prolonged survival in patients with multiple myeloma and other advanced cancers. In the prostate cancer setting, antiresorptive therapy was reported to delay the development of overt bone metastases. Ongoing studies will provide further insight regarding the anticancer potential of bisphosphonates and other antiresorptive agents.

Bisphosphonates significantly increase the activity of doxorubicin or vincristine against canine malignant histiocytosis cells

Canine malignant histiocytosis (MH) is an aggressive neoplasm of macrophages and dendritic cells. It carries a poor prognosis because of the development of widespread metastasis and poor sensitivity to chemotherapy. Thus, there is a large need for new treatments for MH. We hypothesized that bisphosphonates might be useful to increase the effectiveness of cytotoxic chemotherapy against MH. To address this question, we conducted in vitro screening studies using MH cell lines and a panel of 6 chemotherapy and 5 bisphosphonate drugs. The combination of clodronate with vincristine was found to elicit synergistic killing which was associated with a significant increase in cell cycle arrest. Second, zoledronate combined with doxorubicin also significantly increased cell killing. Zoledronate significantly increased the uptake of doxorubicin by MH cells. On the basis of these findings, we conclude that certain bisphosphonate drugs may increase the overall effectiveness of chemotherapy for MH in dogs.

Zoledronic acid use in cancer patients: more than just supportive care?

Bone is the most common site for metastasis from solid tumors, and the majority of patients will develop bone metastases during the natural course of their disease. Bisphosphonates are an effective treatment for preventing skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases and may preserve functional independence and quality of life. Although several bisphosphonates have been investigated in patients with solid tumors, only zoledronic acid (ZOL) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for preventing skeletal-related events in patients across a broad range of solid tumors. In addition, bisphosphonates, notably ZOL, prevent cancer treatment-induced bone loss in breast and prostate cancer patients who are receiving endocrine therapy. It also has been demonstrated that ZOL directly and indirectly inhibits cancer cell growth in vitro and growth and tumorigenesis in animal model systems. These properties may produce clinically meaningful benefits. In recent clinical studies in patients with cancer, ZOL improved overall and prolonged disease-free survival. Ongoing clinical trials in patients with solid tumors will provide further insight into the potential of ZOL to prevent distant metastases and improve survival.

Anticancer properties of zoledronic acid

Zoledronic acid effectively reduces/delays skeletal-related events in patients with metastatic disease or skeletal-related cancers. Emerging data suggest that zoledronic acid may also exhibit anticancer properties. Zoledronic acid ± anticancer therapies in animal models inhibits soft-tissue tumor growth, decreases tumor cell proliferation, increases apoptosis, inhibits angiogenesis, alters tumor-associated macrophage function, and enhances immune surveillance. Data from in vitro and pilot studies suggest that zoledronic acid inhibits tumor cell dissemination in bone marrow, and early clinical data show that it may improve disease-related outcomes. Ongoing studies will further elucidate the role of zoledronic acid in cancer patients.

Zoledronic acid as a new adjuvant therapeutic strategy for Ewing's sarcoma patients

Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is the second most frequent pediatric bone tumor also arising in soft tissues (15% of cases). The prognosis of patients with clinically detectable metastases at diagnosis, not responding to therapy or with disease relapse, is still very poor. Among new therapeutic approaches, bisphosphonates represent promising adjuvant molecules to chemotherapy to limit the osteolytic component of bone tumors and to protect from bone metastases. The combined effects of zoledronic acid and mafosfamide were investigated on cell proliferation, viability, apoptosis, and cell cycle distribution of human ES cell lines differing in their p53 and p16/ink4 status. ES models were developed to reproduce both soft tissue and intraosseous tumor development. Mice were treated with 100 μg/kg zoledronic acid (two or four times per week) and/or ifosfamide (30 mg/kg, one to three cycles of three injections). ES cell lines showed different sensitivities to zoledronic acid and mafosfamide at the cell proliferation level, with no correlation with their molecular status. Both drugs induced cell cycle arrest, but in the S or G(2)M phase, respectively. In vivo, zoledronic acid had no effect on soft tissue tumor progression, although it dramatically inhibited ES development in bone. When combined with ifosfamide, zoledronic acid exerted synergistic effects in the soft tissue model: Its combination with one cycle of ifosfamide resulted in an inhibitory effect similar to three cycles of ifosfamide alone. This very promising result could allow clinicians to diminish the doses of chemotherapy.

Effect of zoledronic acid on disseminated tumour cells in women with locally advanced breast cancer: an open label, randomised, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Treatment with bisphosphonates decreases bone loss and can increase disease-free survival in patients with breast cancer. The aim of our study was to assess the effect of zoledronic acid on clearance of disseminated tumour cells (DTCs) from the bone marrow in women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

Patients were recruited for this open-label, phase 2 randomised trial between March 17, 2003, and May 19, 2006, at a single centre. Eligible patients had clinical stage II-III (> or = T2 and/or > or = N1) newly diagnosed breast cancer, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and normal cardiac, renal, and liver function. 120 women were randomly assigned, using allocation concealment, to receive 4 mg zoledronic acid intravenously every 3 weeks (n=60), or no zoledronic acid (n=60), for 1 year concomitant with four cycles of neoadjuvant epirubicin (75 mg/m(2)) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m(2)) and two cycles of adjuvant epirubicin plus docetaxel. The primary endpoint was the number of patients with detectable DTCs at 3 months. Final analysis was done 1 year after the last patient was enrolled. Analyses were done for all patients with available data at 3 months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00242203.

FINDINGS

Of the 120 patients initially enrolled, one withdrew after signing consent and one patient's baseline bone marrow was not available. Both of these patients were in the control group. At 3 months, 109 bone-marrow samples were available for analysis. In the zoledronic acid group, bone marrow was not collected from one patient because of disease progression, one patient was taken off study because of severe diarrhoea, and two patients had not consented at the time of surgery. In the control group, bone marrow was not collected from two patients because of disease progression, one patient withdrew consent, and three patients were not consented at the time of surgery. At baseline, DTCs were detected in 26 of 60 patients in the zoledronic acid group and 28 of 58 patients in the control group. At 3 months, 17 of 56 patients receiving zoledronic acid versus 25 of 53 patients who did not receive zoledronic acid had detectable DTCs (p=0.054). The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were infection (five of 60 patients in the zoledronic acid group and six of 59 in the control group) and thrombosis (five of 60 in the zoledronic acid and two of 59 in the control group). There was one documented case of osteonecrosis in the zoledronic acid group.

INTERPRETATION

Zoledronic acid administered with chemotherapy resulted in a decreased proportion of patients with DTCs detected in the bone marrow at the time of surgery. Our study supports the hypothesis that the antimetastatic effects of zoledronic acid may be through effects on DTCs.

FUNDING

Novartis Pharmaceuticals and Pfizer Inc.

Bisphosphonates and RANK ligand inhibitors for the treatment and prevention of metastatic bone disease

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are potent inhibitors of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption, which is increased when cancer cells invade bone. BPs are an established treatment for cancer that has spread to bone, and effectively reduce pain and other skeletal-related events. New directions in metastatic bone disease (MBD) include personalised BP therapy, such as using bone markers to guide frequency of BP administration and bone targeting agents such as denosumab (AMG 162). Clinical trials strongly suggest that denosumab might play a defined role in the future management of MBD. In terms of potential anti-cancer activity, early data tentatively suggest that zoledronic acid might have a role to play in the prevention of metastatic disease, though whether this is a direct effect on cancer cells, or indirect via the bone marrow micro-environment, or both, is as yet undiscovered. The definitive answer as to the role of adjuvant BP in early cancer is being addressed, with over 20,000 patients with breast, prostate or lung cancer currently participating in adjuvant BP randomised trials. The results of these trials should be available in the next few years, and this will establish whether BPs given early in the course of cancer will be able to prevent the formation of metastases, bone or otherwise.

Combined effects of the bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid and the aromatase inhibitor letrozole on breast cancer cells in vitro: evidence of synergistic interaction

Background:

Aromatase inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive post-menopausal breast cancer. These patients may also be receiving the bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (ZA) to prevent bone loss or reduce skeletal morbidity in the setting of advanced disease. The potential biological interaction of these two drugs in breast cancer has not been assessed.

Methods:

Aromatase-expressing breast cancer cells were treated with letrozole and ZA either simultaneously or in sequence, and the resulting apoptosis was assessed by staining with Hoechst 33342 and propidium iodide and examined using a fluorescent inverted Leica DMIRB microscope and a UV filter.

Results:

We found that letrozole and ZA induce levels of apoptosis in breast cancer cells in vitro that are significantly greater compared with treatment with each drug alone. However, this potentially, synergistic relationship is drug-sequence dependent, occurring only when cells are treated with letrozole, followed by ZA. The converse sequence, or administering drugs simultaneously, induces levels of apoptosis no greater than each drug alone.

Conclusion:

Owing to the enhanced anti-tumour efficacy of sequential drug administration, our findings may indicate that, for post-menopausal women who require treatment with letrozole, ZA should also be considered.

The impact of zoledronic acid therapy in survival of lung cancer patients with bone metastasis

Bone metastases occur in 20-40% of patients with lung cancer. Recent studies demonstrate a direct antiproliferative effect of 3rd generation bisphosphonates (BPs) on lung tumors, which may influence the survival. Therefore, we examined the clinical impact of zoledronic acid (ZOL; Zometa), a 3rd generation BP, with a focus on the survival, time to progression and pain effect in lung cancer patients with bone metastases. Lung cancer patients (n = 144, Stage IV) with evidence of metastasis bone scan were included. Eighty-seven of 144 experienced bone pain and received ZOL, 4 mg i.v. every 21 days (Group A), whereas the other 57 patients received no ZOL (Group B). All patients were treated with a combination chemotherapy consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) and carboplatin AUC = 6. It was found that Group A had a statistically significant longer survival (p < 0.01) when compared to Group B. A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the number of cycles of therapy with ZOL and total patient survival (p < 0.01, Pearson correlation) and time to progression (p < 0.01). Pain effect of ZOL had no significant difference between the 2 groups of patients (p > 0.05). Urine N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx) levels decreased in patients with NTx < or = 29 nM BCE/mM creatinine at baseline after treatment with ZOL. The results of our study suggest that the addition of ZOL increases overall survival in lung cancer patients with bone metastases. The longer period of receiving ZOL, the better effect on survival and time to progression.

[Bisphosphonates for malignant bone tumors]

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are able to prevent, reduce, or delay skeletal complications caused by tumors. Since the introduction of BPs, there has been a marked reduction of skeletal events. Today we can choose from a variety of BPs with different potency, efficacy, dosing, and administration regimens, as well as BPs for different indications. For patients with tumors who have a risk of developing osteoporosis induced by the tumor or antitumor treatment, we should think of prevention. In general, BPs are well tolerated. But there are also side effects: flulike syndrome, arthralgias, or, when administered orally, gastrointestinal symptoms. In a number of cases, the dosing regime must be adjusted according to renal function and baseline creatinine clearance. This paper reviews the current evidence-based use of BPs in solid tumors and the recommendations for treatment.

The evolving role of zoledronic acid in early breast cancer

Most women with early breast cancer (BC) have an excellent prognosis and will remain disease-free for many years after treatment. However, bone-specific side effects of cancer therapies can have a negative effect on patients' long-term bone health. The accelerated bone loss associated with BC therapies, especially endocrine therapy, can put women at risk for osteoporosis and fractures later in life. Recent treatment guidelines have now begun to address the need for bone-preserving measures to be included in adjuvant therapy regimens. Bisphosphonates have long been used to treat osteoporosis, as well as bone metastases in patients with advanced cancers. Furthermore, in the adjuvant BC setting, the intravenous bisphosphonate zoledronic acid has emerged to play an important role. Several large, randomized phase III trials involving a total of approximately 4,000 premenopausal and postmenopausal women with early BC demonstrated the bone-protective effects of adjuvant zoledronic acid (4 mg every 6 months). Additionally, these same trials also showed significant improvement in disease-free survival for patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy plus zoledronic acid that was over and above the benefit achieved with endocrine therapy alone. The results of these zoledronic acid trials will be reviewed herein, and evidence supporting the antitumor effects of adjuvant zoledronic acid will be discussed.