1
|
Jespersen E, Soo WK, Minet LR, Eshoj HR, King MT, Pfeiffer P, Möller S. External validation and diagnostic value of the Elderly Functional Index version 2.0 for assessing functional status and frailty in older Danish patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy: A prospective, clinical study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101675. [PMID: 38070322 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient perspectives on functioning are often overlooked in oncology practice. This study externally validates the ELderly Functional Index (ELFI), a patient-reported measure for assessing multidimensional functioning, in older patients with gastrointestinal cancer receiving chemotherapy. The study compares ELFI scoring methods, evaluates its diagnostic value with geriatric oncology tools, and proposes a cut-off point for clinical use. MATERIALS AND METHODS Danish patients aged ≥70 years with gastrointestinal cancer undergoing chemotherapy from a prospective, observational study were included. Two ELFI scoring methods, item-based and domain-based, were compared. Internal consistency reliability, validity, and correlations between ELFI, its component scales, and measures of functioning/frailty (including Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status [ECOG-PS], Geriatric-8 [G8], Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 [VES-13], Timed-Up-and-Go [TUG], and 30-s chair stand test [30CST]) were investigated. Sensitivity and specificity analyses evaluated the ability of ELFI to predict frailty outcomes and identified frailty thresholds. Receiver operating characteristic analyses assessed the diagnostic ability of ELFI, alongside other measures, for oncological outcomes and frailty differentiation. Equipercentile equating methods enabled ECOG-PS, ELFI, and G8 mapping. RESULTS One hundred fifty-four patients (median age 73.5 years, range 70-85) undergoing curative- or palliative-intent chemotherapy (49%) were included. ELFI demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.82) and acceptable convergent, structural, and discriminant validity. ELFI showed moderate to very strong correlations with its component scales (r = 0.40-0.93), and weaker correlations with frailty measures (r = 0.02-0.60). ELFI score < 80 indicated frailty risk, with almost fivefold risk of ECOG-PS 2 at follow-up (odds ratio[OR] = 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-15.9), and predicted G8, VES-13, TUG, and 30CST frailty at follow-up, not completing planned chemotherapy (OR = 3.1; 95%CI 1.5-6.2), mono-therapy (OR = 3.5; 95%CI 1.5-8.1), initial dose reduction (OR = 4.9; 95%CI 2.0-12.1), and shorter overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.0, 95%CI 1.4-3.0). A preliminary crosswalk between ECOG-PS, ELFI, and G8 was established. DISCUSSION ELFI was validated as a concise patient-reported measure of functional status in older patients with cancer and its relationship to frailty. ELFI demonstrated comparable predictive ability to other tools for oncological outcomes. Both scoring methods yielded similar results, with the domain-based method (ELFI v2.0) endorsed for consistency. ELFI v2.0 score of 80 was suggested as the frailty threshold in this population, supporting its clinical utility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Jespersen
- Department of Oncology, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research, AgeCare, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Wee Kheng Soo
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3128, Australia; Aged Medicine Program, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Lisbeth R Minet
- Geriatric Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik R Eshoj
- Department of Hematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research, AgeCare, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sören Möller
- OPEN - Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital and Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christodoulidis G, Kouliou MN, Koumarelas KE, Giakoustidis D, Athanasiou T. Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Upper GI Malignancies. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1910. [PMID: 37763313 PMCID: PMC10532582 DOI: 10.3390/life13091910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) conditions vastly affect each individual's physical, social, and emotional status. The decision-making process by the medical personnel about these patients is currently based on a patient's life quality evaluation scale, HRQL scales. By utilizing HRQL scales, a better understanding of the various surgical and non-surgical treatment options, as well as their long-term consequences, can be achieved. In our study, an organ-based approach is used in an attempt to examine and characterized the effect of upper GI surgery on HRQL. Therefore, HRQL scales' function as a prognostic tool is useful, and the need for future research, the creation of valid training programs, and modern guidelines is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grigorios Christodoulidis
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (M.-N.K.); (K.-E.K.)
| | - Marina-Nektaria Kouliou
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (M.-N.K.); (K.-E.K.)
| | - Konstantinos-Eleftherios Koumarelas
- Department of General Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece; (M.-N.K.); (K.-E.K.)
| | - Dimitris Giakoustidis
- Department of Surgery, General Hospital Papageorgiou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 56429 Thessaloniki, Greece;
| | - Thanos Athanasiou
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, University of Thessaly, Biopolis, 41110 Larissa, Greece;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Striving towards normality in an unpredictable situation. A qualitative interview study of how persons newly diagnosed with incurable oesophageal and gastric cancer manage everyday life. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2023; 63:102302. [PMID: 36893571 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2023.102302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Getting an incurable oesophageal or gastric cancer diagnosis is a major stressful life event associated with severe physical, psychosocial and existential challenges. To provide timely and efficient support, based on patients' experiences, the aim of the study was to explore how patients newly diagnosed with incurable oesophageal and gastric cancer manage everyday life. METHOD Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 patients 1-3 months after being diagnosed with incurable oesophageal or gastric cancer. Four participants were interviewed twice, which resulted in 16 interviews. Data were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS An overall theme, "Striving towards normality in an unpredictable situation", with three related themes - "Trying to comprehend the disease", "Dealing with the consequences of illness" and "Re-evaluating what is important in everyday life" - and seven sub-themes were identified. The participants described an unexpected and unpredictable situation, in which they strived to maintain their normal life. Amidst struggling to manage problems related to eating, fatigue and an incurable diagnosis the participants talked about the importance of focusing on the positive and normal aspects of life. CONCLUSIONS The findings in this study point to the importance of supporting patients' confidence and skills, particularly with regard to managing eating, so that they can hold on to their normal life as much as possible. The findings further point to the possible benefit of integrating an early palliative care approach and could provide guidance for nurses and other professionals on how to support patients post diagnosis.
Collapse
|
4
|
Dalhammar K, Kristensson J, Falkenback D, Rasmussen BH, Malmström M. Symptoms, problems and quality of life in patients newly diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer - a comparative study of treatment strategy. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:434. [PMID: 35448961 PMCID: PMC9022327 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09536-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer have a low likelihood of being cured and suffer from a broad spectrum of symptoms and problems that negatively affect their quality-of-life (QOL). Although the majority (67–75%) of patients at the time of diagnosis suffer from an incurable disease, research has primarily focused on the pre- and postoperative phase among patients treated with curative intent, with little attention to symptoms and problems in the diagnostic phase, especially in those who cannot be offered a cure. Methods In this cross-sectional study 158 patients newly diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer visiting the surgical outpatient department for a preplanned care visit were included consecutively during 2018–2020. The validated instruments QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25, developed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), and selected items from the Integrated Patient Outcome Scale (IPOS) were used to assess QOL, symptoms and problems. Differences between patients with a curative and a palliative treatment strategy were analysed using t-test and Mann–Whitney U test. The QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 scores were compared to published reference data on the general Swedish population. Results Among all, the QOL was markedly lower, compared with general Swedish population (mean ± SD, 55.9 ± 24.7 vs 76.4 ± 22.8, p < 0.001). Compared to general population, the patients had significant impairment in all QOL aspects, particularly for role and emotional functioning and for symptoms such as eating-related problems, fatigue, insomnia and dyspnea. Majority of patients also reported severe anxiety among family and friends. Among patients with oesophageal cancer those with a palliative treatment strategy, compared with curative strategy, reported significantly lower QOL (mean ± SD, 50.8 ± 28.6 vs 62.0 ± 22.9 p = 0.030), physical (65.5 ± 22.6 vs 83.9 ± 16.5, p < 0.001) and role functioning (55.7 ± 36.6 vs 73.9 ± 33.3, p = 0.012), and a higher burden of several symptoms and problems. No significant differences between treatment groups were shown among patients with gastric cancer. Conclusions Patients newly diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer, and especially those with incurable oesophageal cancer, have a severely affected QOL and several burdensome symptoms and problems. To better address patients’ needs, it seems important to integrate a palliative approach into oesophageal and gastric cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Dalhammar
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Jimmie Kristensson
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dan Falkenback
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Birgit H Rasmussen
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Marlene Malmström
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bennett S, Murphy CF, Fanning M, Reynolds JV, Doyle SL, Donohoe CL. The impact of Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Symptoms on Health-related Quality of Life in Survivorship after Oesophageal Cancer Surgery. CLINICAL NUTRITION OPEN SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.nutos.2021.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
|
6
|
Akezaki Y, Nakata E, Kikuuchi M, Sugihara S, Katayama Y, Katayama H, Hamada M, Ozaki T. Factors Affecting the Quality of Life of Patients with Painful Spinal Bone Metastases. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9111499. [PMID: 34828545 PMCID: PMC8625781 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9111499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examined changes in the quality of life (QOL), as well as the factors affecting QOL, among patients with painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis for 1 month after radiotherapy. Methods: This study included 79 participants (40 male and 39 female; median age, 65 (42–88) years) who had undergone radiotherapy for painful spinal bone metastases without paralysis. Patients’ age, sex, activities of daily living (Barthel index), pain, spinal instability (spinal instability neoplastic score [SINS]), and QOL (EORTC QLQ-C30) were investigated. Results: Having an unstable SINS score was a positive factor for global health status (p < 0.05). The improvement in activities of daily living and response to pain were positive factors for physical function (p < 0.05). A positive effect on emotional function was confirmed among female patients (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Engaging in rehabilitation along with radiotherapy leads to improvements in QOL for patients with spinal bone metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiteru Akezaki
- Division of Physical Therapy, Kochi Professional University of Rehabilitation, Kochi 781-1102, Japan;
| | - Eiji Nakata
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (H.K.); (T.O.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Masato Kikuuchi
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime 791-0280, Japan; (M.K.); (S.S.)
| | - Shinsuke Sugihara
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime 791-0280, Japan; (M.K.); (S.S.)
| | - Yoshimi Katayama
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (Y.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Haruki Katayama
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (H.K.); (T.O.)
| | - Masanori Hamada
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (Y.K.); (M.H.)
| | - Toshifumi Ozaki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama 700-8558, Japan; (H.K.); (T.O.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dalhammar K, Malmström M, Sandberg M, Falkenback D, Kristensson J. Health care utilization among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer: the impact of initial treatment strategy and assignment of a contact nurse. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:1019. [PMID: 34579714 PMCID: PMC8477461 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07042-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients diagnosed with oesophageal and gastric cancer face a poor prognosis and numerous challenges of symptom management, lifestyle adjustments and complex treatment regimens. The multifaceted care needs and rapid disease progression reinforce the need for proactive and coherent health care. According to the national cancer strategy, providing coherent health care and palliative support is an area of priority. More knowledge is needed about health care utilization and the characteristics of the health care service in order to understand the readiness, accessibility and quality of current health care. The aim of this study was to describe individuals’ health care use from the time of treatment decision until death, and investigate the impact of the initial treatment strategy and assignment of a contact nurse (CN) on health care use among patients with oesophageal and gastric cancer. Methods This population-based cohort study included patients who died from oesophageal and gastric cancer in Sweden during 2014–2016. Through linking data from the National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer, the National Cause of Death Register, and the National Patient Register, 2614 individuals were identified. Associations between the initial treatment strategy and CN assignment, and health care use were investigated. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Poisson regression. Results Patients receiving palliative treatment and those receiving no tumour-directed treatment had a higher IRR for unplanned hospital stays and unplanned outpatient care visits compared with patients who received curative treatment. Patients receiving no tumour-directed treatment also had a lower IRR for planned hospital stays and planned outpatient care visits compared with patients given curative treatment. Compared with this latter group, patients with palliative treatment had a higher IRR for planned outpatient care visits. Patients assigned a CN had a higher IRR for unplanned hospital stays, unplanned outpatient care visits and planned outpatient care visits, compared with patients not assigned a CN. Conclusions A palliative treatment strategy and no tumour-directed treatment were associated with higher rates of unplanned health care compared with a curative treatment strategy, suggesting that a proactive approach is imperative to ensure quality palliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karin Dalhammar
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden. .,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Marlene Malmström
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Magnus Sandberg
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dan Falkenback
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Jimmie Kristensson
- Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yamaguchi K, Shimada Y, Hironaka S, Sugimoto N, Komatsu Y, Nishina T, Omuro Y, Tamura T, Piao Y, Homma G, Jen MH, Liepa AM, Muro K. Quality of Life Associated with Ramucirumab Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer in Japan: Exploratory Analysis from the Phase III RAINBOW Trial. Clin Drug Investig 2021; 41:53-64. [PMID: 33355909 PMCID: PMC7815617 DOI: 10.1007/s40261-020-00979-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Gastric cancer has been associated with notable geographic heterogeneity in previous multi-regional studies. In particular, patients from Japan have better outcomes compared with patients from other regions. Here, we assess patient-focused outcomes for the subgroup of Japanese patients in the global RAINBOW study. METHODS Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) at baseline and 6-week intervals. Investigators assessed performance status before each 4-week cycle. Time-to-deterioration in each QLQ-C30 scale was defined as randomization to first worsening of ≥ 10 points (on a 100-point scale). Time-to-deterioration in performance status was defined as first worsening to ≥ 2. Hazard ratios were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS The Japan subgroup contained 140 patients (ramucirumab plus paclitaxel, n = 68; placebo plus paclitaxel, n = 72); baseline QoL data were available for all patients. At baseline, QLQ-C30 scores were similar between study arms. Of the 15 QLQ-C30 scales, nine had a hazard ratio < 1, indicating similar or numerically longer time-to-deterioration in QoL for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel; all 95% confidence intervals included 1. Best mean change from baseline numerically favored ramucirumab plus paclitaxel in most QoL scales. The hazard ratios for time-to-deterioration of performance status to ≥ 2 were 0.64 in the Japan subgroup and 0.88 in the non-Asian subgroup. The Japan subgroup had better QoL at baseline compared with the non-Asian subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with ramucirumab plus paclitaxel maintained QoL and performance status over time compared with placebo plus paclitaxel in the Japan subgroup of the RAINBOW trial. These data suggest that the heterogeneity in gastric cancer between geographic regions includes multiple measures of QoL. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01170663 (first submitted 21 July, 2010).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimada
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Japan
| | - Shuichi Hironaka
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Oita, Japan
- Clinical Trial Promotion Department, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naotoshi Sugimoto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshito Komatsu
- Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Nishina
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan
| | - Yasushi Omuro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Tamura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Yongzhe Piao
- Medicines Developmental Unit, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
| | - Gosuke Homma
- Medicines Developmental Unit, Eli Lilly Japan K.K., Chuo-ku, Kobe, Japan
| | - Min-Hua Jen
- Eli Lilly and Company, Downshire Way, Bracknell, UK
| | | | - Kei Muro
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8681, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rupp SK, Stengel A. Influencing Factors and Effects of Treatment on Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer-A Systematic Review. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:656929. [PMID: 34276435 PMCID: PMC8280526 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.656929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. It is associated with several disease-related impairments contributing to the psycho-social burden of those patients, such as deterioration of well-being and overall quality of life (QOL). The aim of this study is to present the wide range of factors potentially impacting patients' overall well-being and possible preventive interventions. Methods: This systematic review was conducted in October 2020 with a search in the PubMed, MedLine, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar databases. We used the keywords "gastric cancer," "gastric neoplasm," and each of them combined with "quality of life," "depression," and "anxiety" to identify all relevant articles reporting about potential impact factors influencing the overall well-being of patients suffering from gastric cancer. Results: Finally, 125,490 articles were found, of which 125,431 were excluded in several steps of screening. Inclusion criteria were studies carried out on human ≥18 years of age, studies in English or German language, clinical trials, registry-based studies, cohort studies, population-based studies, and certain titles and abstracts. After screening for eligibility 35 potential factors influencing overall well-being in patients with GC were identified and classified into 9 important categories: genetic condition, treatment method, blood markers, nutritional status, daily living, state of health, mental state, supportive care, and alternative treatment. Conclusion: Since various factors are involved in the development of patients' overall well-being, timely treatment of psycho-social impairments by physicians and psychologists is of enormous importance. Preventing psycho-social burden by improving patients' QOL should be of high importance in the treatment regimen of patients with GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Kristina Rupp
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Stengel
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Section Psychooncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center Tübingen Stuttgart, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Department for Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité Center for Internal Medicine and Dermatology, Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Does it matter how we evaluate HRQOL? Longitudinal comparison of the EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E. J Cancer Surviv 2020; 15:641-650. [PMID: 33106994 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-020-00957-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine whether EORTC QLQ-C30/QLQ-OG25 and FACT-E compared longitudinally provide similar reflections of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS Eighty-six esophageal cancer patients treated with curative intent, scheduled to complete both questionnaires at baseline and post-treatment time points until 36 months. A generalized estimating equation model utilizing a Gaussian family compared instruments longitudinally. The two-one-sided-test (TOST) method assessed equivalence between the instruments. RESULTS Trajectories for social domain and overall quality of life differed significantly between instruments. Also, FACT-G's functional well-being post-treatment returns to baseline 3-6 months earlier than the EORTC QLQ-C30's role functioning subscale, suggesting measurement of different components. Trajectories for physical and esophageal symptom subscales are similar and are deemed equivalent. Emotional domains are comparable and bear little resemblance to the physical domain trajectories indicating reflection of emotional experience rather than a physical proxy. EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales have a trajectory similar to its physical functioning scale except for the emotional and esophageal symptoms scales. Overall HRQOL in both instruments showed a consistent return to baseline/pre-treatment levels by 6 months post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS Overall HRQOL recovers earlier after curative-intent treatment than previously reported despite persistence of physical symptoms, with a consistent return to pre-treatment levels by 6 months after treatment. This supports the concept that HRQOL is not primarily defined by physical function. Based on this longitudinal comparison, FACT-E provides a more multidimensional assessment of HRQOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Curative intent treatment for esophageal cancer has adverse effects on HRQOL but despite intense treatment, overall HRQOL recovers within 6 months.
Collapse
|
11
|
Schmitz SM, Alizai PH, Eickhoff RM, Schooren L, Kroh A, Roeth AA, Neumann UP, Klink CD. Minimally Invasive Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy Is Superior to Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy in Terms of Health-Related Quality of Life. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 31:306-313. [PMID: 32960143 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: There are two operative approaches for adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction: thoracoabdominal esophagectomy or transhiatal extended gastrectomy. Both procedures can be performed minimally invasively. Dependent on the exact localization of the tumor, both approaches are feasible. Aim of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) with patients who underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy (MIG). Methods: All patients who underwent MIE or gastrectomy for malignoma since 2014 were identified from our clinical database. The identified patients were contacted and asked to fill out a quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) for general and gastrointestinal QOL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25). Results: Global HRQOL scores were higher in patients after MIE than after MIG. After MIE, global HRQOL scores were close to the control population. In cancer-specific syndromes, patients after MIE reported lower symptom scores for financial problems, eating, reflux, and eating with others than patients after MIG. Conclusion: In terms of HRQOL, MIE proved superior to MIG in long-term follow-up in this study. Patients after MIE reported a HRQOL close to that of a healthy reference population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia M Schmitz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Patrick H Alizai
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Roman M Eickhoff
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Lena Schooren
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Andreas Kroh
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Anjali A Roeth
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Christian D Klink
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van den Boorn HG, Stroes CI, Zwinderman AH, Eshuis WJ, Hulshof MCCM, van Etten-Jamaludin FS, Sprangers MAG, van Laarhoven HWM. Health-related quality of life in curatively-treated patients with esophageal or gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 154:103069. [PMID: 32818901 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgery and chemoradiotherapy can potentially cure esophageal and gastric cancer patients, although they may impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We aim to systemically review and meta-analyze literature to determine the effect of curative treatments on HRQoL in esophageal and gastric cancer.- A systematic search was performed identifying studies assessing HRQoL. Meta-analyses were performed on baseline and subsequent time-points.- From the 6067 articles retrieved, 49 studies were included (61 % low quality). Meta-analyses showed short-term HRQoL differences between esophageal cancer patients receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT), neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy (nC(R)T), or surgery alone (p < 0.001), with better HRQoL with nC(R)T and surgery compared to dCRT. Over the course of 12 months, no HRQoL difference was identified between treatments in esophageal cancer (p = 0.633). Esophagectomy, but not gastrectomy, resulted in a clinically relevant decline in HRQoL. No long-term HRQoL differences were identified between curative treatments in esophageal and gastric cancer. More high-quality HRQoL studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héctor G van den Boorn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte I Stroes
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology (LEXOR), Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Aeilko H Zwinderman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wietse J Eshuis
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiotherapy, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Mirjam A G Sprangers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Psychology, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Davies A, Waylen A, Leary S, Thomas S, Pring M, Janssen B, Beynon R, Lang S, Schimansky S, Hurley K, Ness A. Assessing the validity of EQ-5D-5L in people with head & neck cancer: Does a generic quality of life measure perform as well as a disease-specific measure in a patient population? Oral Oncol 2019; 101:104504. [PMID: 31835074 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Head and neck cancer (HNC) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Radical treatment methods may result in facial disfigurement and/or functional difficulties with subsequent adverse impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Guidelines suggest that HRQoL should be measured repeatedly throughout treatment to enable refined treatment protocols and tailored follow-up support but questionnaires are often long and burdensome. We compared condition-specific and generic metrics to assess HRQoL for people with this condition. METHODS We used data from the prospective Head and Neck 5000 clinical cohort study - 5511 participants with a new diagnosis of HNC between 2011 and 2014. HRQoL data were collected at baseline from 2065 people who completed both the condition-specific EORTC-QLQ-C30 and the shorter, generic EQ-5D-5L questionnaires. RESULTS There was strong evidence of association between comparable scales on each questionnaire at baseline: higher levels of functioning and lower levels of reported symptoms assessed with EQ-5D-5L were associated with lower EORTC-QLQ-C30 symptom scores. A moderate relationship (0.61) was found between overall QoL in the EQ-5D-5L index and self-perceived health (EQ VAS). CONCLUSIONS HRQoL data collected from the generic EQ-5D-5L and cancer-specific EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires are comparable at baseline for people diagnosed with HNC. This would allow a reduced burden of data collection but the EQ-5D-5L may not be sensitive to some condition-specific symptoms. Clinicians and researchers must clarify their aims and outcomes of interest before choosing their HRQoL measures. Further work is required to examine the ability to detect change in these measures over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Davies
- Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
| | - A Waylen
- Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK.
| | - S Leary
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK
| | - S Thomas
- Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
| | - M Pring
- Bristol Dental School, Lower Maudlin Street, Bristol BS1 2LY, UK
| | - B Janssen
- EuroQoL Research Foundation, Marten Meesweg 107, 3068 AV Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Beynon
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom; Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - S Lang
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK
| | - S Schimansky
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK
| | - K Hurley
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK
| | - A Ness
- NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8AE, UK; Bristol Medical School, 1(st) Floor, 5 Tyndall Ave, Bristol BS8 1UD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Deressa BT, Tigeneh W, Bogale N, Buwenge M, Morganti AG, Farina E. Short-Course 2-Dimensional Radiation Therapy in the Palliative Treatment of Esophageal Cancer in a Developing Country: A Phase II Study (Sharon Project). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 106:67-72. [PMID: 31622698 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Revised: 09/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer are usually affected by cancer-related symptoms, which worsen their performance status and quality of life. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of short-course accelerated radiation therapy for symptomatic palliation in a low resourced setting where only a 2-dimensional radiation therapy (RT) technique was available. METHODS AND MATERIALS A phase II trial based on Simon's 2-stage design was planned. A total dose of 12 Gy in 4 fractions, twice per day, over 2 days, ≥8 hours apart, using a 2-dimensional conventional RT technique was delivered with a Cobalt 60 unit (Equinox, Best Theratronics, Ottawa, Ontario). Symptoms were graded using the International Atomic Energy Agency scoring system. RESULTS A total of 17 patients were treated (male/female = 10/7; median age, 50.0 years; range, 27-78 years; histology: 6 adenocarcinomas and 11 squamous cell carcinomas; tumor site: 4 gastresophageal junction and 13 esophagus). The most frequent baseline symptoms were dysphagia or regurgitation (100%), odynophagia (76%), and chest or back pain (53%). At 1 month after RT, all patients were alive with palliative response rates (complete plus partial) for dysphagia, regurgitation, odynophagia, and chest or back pain of 76%, 82%, 69%, and 56%, respectively. No patients presented acute ≥G3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Short-course accelerated radiation therapy treatment, planned and delivered using a conventional 2-dimensional RT technique, was effective and well tolerated for the symptomatic palliation of locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer. This schedule may be useful for RT centers in developing countries to reduce treatment times, costs, and patient waiting times before treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biniyam Tefera Deressa
- Radiotherapy Department, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia; Department of Clinical Oncology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia
| | | | - Netsanet Bogale
- Radiotherapy Department, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Eleonora Farina
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola (RA), Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee KE, Lim KH. Differences in Factors Affecting the Quality of Life Over Time After the Gastrectomy in Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer. Gastroenterol Nurs 2019; 43:241-248. [PMID: 32487956 PMCID: PMC7329215 DOI: 10.1097/sga.0000000000000416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with Stage I gastric cancer experience decreased postgastrectomy quality of life (QoL) despite the excellent surgical outcomes. We need to find foundational data required to develop effective nursing care plans designed to improve their QoL. This study examined QoL of patients with Stage I gastric cancer over time following gastrectomy and the effects of QoL subdomains on the patients' overall QoL over time after surgery. Data were collected from 138 patients with Stage I gastric cancer who had undergone gastrectomy within the previous 3 years. Data were classified into 3 groups according to the length of postsurgery time: 12 months or less (Group 1), 13-24 months (Group 2), and 25-36 months (Group 3). A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to examine the effects of QoL subdomains. Quality of life of patients with Stage I gastric cancer improves over time following gastrectomy. Postoperative physical symptoms influenced QoL most in Group 1 patients, whereas physical well-being and emotional well-being were the highest contributors to QoL in Groups 2 and 3, respectively. Nursing interventions must be tailored to meet the particular needs of patients at each period of recovery in order to improve QoL of patients with Stage I gastric cancer after a gastrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyung Eun Lee
- Kyung Eun Lee, PhD, RN, KOCN (Korean Oncology Certification Nurse), is Assistant Professor, Department of Nursing, Keimyung College University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
- Kyung Hee Lim, PhD, RN, is Assistant Professor, College of Nursing, Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Lim
- Correspondence to: Kyung Hee Lim, PhD, RN, College of Nursing, Keimyung University, 1095 Dalgubeol-daero, Dalseo-gu, Daegu 42601, Republic of Korea ()
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
O'Connell L, Coleman M, Kharyntiuk N, Walsh TN. Quality of life in patients with upper GI malignancies managed by a strategy of chemoradiotherapy alone versus surgery. Surg Oncol 2019; 30:33-39. [PMID: 31500782 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2019.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 04/09/2019] [Accepted: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) induces a pathological complete response (pCR) in 25-85% of oesophago-gastric cancer. As surgery entails morbidity and mortality risks and quality of life (QL) impairment, its avoidance in patients without residual disease is desirable. This study aimed to compare quality of life of patients with a cCR who chose surveillance with those who chose surgery. METHODS Four groups of patients were studied. Group 1(n = 31) were controls; Group 2 (n = 26) had chemoradiotherapy only; Group 3 (n = 31) had oesophagectomy after nCRT; Group 4 (n = 26) had gastrectomy alone. A 33-point novel questionnaire was administered at two 3 month time points. Participants were also interviewed with a validated questionnaire. RESULTS Mean(±sd) quality of life scores in cCR patients offered surveillance (28.9 ± 4.5) were superior to patients undergoing oesophagectomy (32.3 ± 58. p=0.042) or gastrectomy (33.19 ± 5.9, p=0.004). This result was replicated in the validated questionnaire (p=0.017). There was a trend towards increased reflux-related respiratory symptoms in the oesophagectomy group (7.3 ± 2.2 vs 6.5 ± 1.9; p=0.396) and towards early dumping (8.2 ± 1.4 vs 7.1 ± 1.; p=0.239) and vagotomy-related symptoms (1.82 ± 0.9 vs 1.4 ± 0.6; p=0.438) in the gastrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS Avoidance of surgery in cCR patients is rewarded with a superior quality of life to those undergoing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren O'Connell
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
| | - Mary Coleman
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
| | - N Kharyntiuk
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
| | - Thomas N Walsh
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland; Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ericson J, Lundell L, Klevebro F, Kamiya S, Nilsson M, Rouvelas I. Long-term weight development after esophagectomy for cancer-comparison between open Ivor-Lewis and minimally invasive surgical approaches. Dis Esophagus 2019; 32:5142515. [PMID: 30351390 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Esophagectomy is an extensive procedure with severe postoperative effects. It can be assumed that the greater the trauma, the longer the nutritional recovery. This retrospective observational single-center cohort study compared weight development after esophagectomy with open and minimally invasive techniques. Three groups were compared in this study, one representing the first 41 patients who underwent the minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIMK). The second group included the first 84 consecutive patients operated with the minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (MIIL). The third group comprised 100 consecutive patients operated with open thoracoabdominal Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy (IL). Virtually all patients submitted to a minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and the majority with an IL had a jejunal catheter inserted during operation for postoperative enteral feeding. All together 225 patients were included in this study. The mean weight loss during the first year was 13.1% (±4.1), 11.2% (±6.1), and 9.6% (±7.5) in the IL, MIIL, and MIMK group, respectively (P = 0.85 and P = 0.95, respectively). The median duration of postoperative enteral nutrition support varied substantially within the groups and was 23.5 days in the IL group (range: 0-2033 days), 54.5 days in those having an MIIL (range: 0-308 days; P ≤ 0.001) and 57.0 days among patients in the MIMK group (range: 0-538 days; P ≤ 0.022). There was no difference in the risk of losing at least 10% of the preoperative weight at 3 or 6 months postoperatively between the groups. However, in patients who suffered severe complications (Clavien-Dindo score ≥ IIIb) after MIIL, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower risk of a 10% or greater weight loss, 3 months postoperatively. In conclusion, the greater surgical trauma associated with the traditional open esophagectomy was not followed by more severe weight loss, or other signs of poorer nutritional recovery, when compared to minimal invasive surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Ericson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet.,Function area Clinical Nutrition
| | - L Lundell
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet.,Department of Surgery, Centre of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Klevebro
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet.,Department of Surgery, Centre of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - S Kamiya
- Department of Surgery, Centre of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - M Nilsson
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet.,Department of Surgery, Centre of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - I Rouvelas
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Technology and Intervention (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet.,Department of Surgery, Centre of Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Vivir después de una gastrectomía: experiencia de pacientes con cáncer gástrico. ENFERMERIA CLINICA 2019; 29:27-33. [DOI: 10.1016/j.enfcli.2018.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2017] [Revised: 06/06/2018] [Accepted: 06/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
19
|
van Zweeden AA, van Groeningen CJ, Honeywell RJ, Giovannetti E, Ruijter R, Smorenburg CH, Giaccone G, Verheul HMW, Peters GJ, van der Vliet HJ. Randomized phase 2 study of gemcitabine and cisplatin with or without vitamin supplementation in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2018; 82:39-48. [PMID: 29696360 PMCID: PMC6010482 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-018-3588-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Preclinical research and prior clinical observations demonstrated reduced toxicity and suggested enhanced efficacy of cisplatin due to folic acid and vitamin B12 suppletion. In this randomized phase 2 trial, we evaluated the addition of folic acid and vitamin B12 to first-line palliative cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer (AEGC). Methods Patients with AEGC were randomized to gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 (i.v. days 1, 8) and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (i.v. day 1) q 3 weeks with or without folic acid (450 µg/day p.o.) and vitamin B12 (1000 µg i.m. q 9 weeks). The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), toxicity, and exploratory biomarker analyses. Cisplatin sensitivity and intracellular platinum levels were determined in adenocarcinoma cell lines cultured under high and low folate conditions in vitro. Results Adenocarcinoma cells cultured in medium with high folate levels were more sensitive to cisplatin and this was associated with increased intracellular platinum levels. In the randomized phase 2 clinical trial, which ran from October 2004 to September 2013, treatment was initiated in 78 of 82 randomized pts, 39 in each study arm. The RR was similar; 42.1% for supplemented patients vs. 32.4% for unsupplemented patients; p = 0.4. Median OS and TTP were 10.0 and 5.9 months for supplemented vs. 7.7 and 5.4 months for unsupplemented patients (OS, p = 0.9; TTP, p = 0.9). Plasma homocysteine was lower in the supplemented group [n = 20, 6.9 ± 1.6 (mean ± standard error of mean, SEM) µM; vs. 12.5 ± 4.0 µM; p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the Cmax of gemcitabine and cisplatin in the two treatment groups. Conclusion Folic acid and vitamin B12 supplementation do not improve the RR, PFS, or OS of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with AEGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A A van Zweeden
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - C J van Groeningen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amstelland Hospital, Amstelveen, The Netherlands
| | - R J Honeywell
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Giovannetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Ruijter
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C H Smorenburg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - G Giaccone
- Department of Medical Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - H M W Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G J Peters
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans J van der Vliet
- Department of Medical Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Room 3A38, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Trenerry C, Peters MDJ, Corsini N, Damarell RA, Wilson C, Flight I. Patient-reported outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treatment for esophageal cancer: a scoping review protocol. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [PMID: 28628507 DOI: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
REVIEW OBJECTIVE The objective of this scoping review is to identify, describe and compare studies investigating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in esophageal cancer patients following neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy (CT) and surgery or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery.After preliminary searching of the literature and consultation with experts in the fields of esophageal cancer surgery, behavioral science, information systems and scoping review methodology, the following research objectives were defined as follows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Trenerry
- 1The Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia 2The Joanna Briggs Institute, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia 3Cancer Council SA, Australia 4School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kanatas AN, Rogers SN. A Guide of the Questionnaires Used in the Measurement of Health-Related Quality of Life in Head and Neck Oncology. TUMORI JOURNAL 2018; 94:724-31. [DOI: 10.1177/030089160809400514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Aims and background There is a plethora of instruments which measure health-related quality of life (HRQOL), although only a fraction of these have been used in surgical studies and palliative care. Clinicians involved in the management of head and neck pathology face the difficult task of selecting the instrument most suited to the aspect of the patients’ perspective that they want to measure. The aim of this article is to guide head and neck trainees in deciding on the use of the appropriate instrument for evaluation of the patient's perspective. Methods and study design The two authors independently searched and scrutinized the literature. The ISI search engine with cross-reference using PubMed and Ovid was searched with the terms “quality of life”, “questionnaire” and specific specialty terms. Studies written in the English language were selected and the abstracts searched for evidence of patient self-completed questionnaires and HRQOL outcome. Results There are five broad category headings into which quality of life studies in head and neck oncology can be divided. These include: patient performance questionnaires, generic quality of life questionnaires, generic cancer questionnaires, head and neck cancer questionnaires, and head and neck functional questionnaires. Conclusions Patient perspective can be assessed using a number of instruments, including open interview, semi-structured interview, and the simple questionnaire. The choice of instrument depends somewhat on personal preference, the outcomes being measured, and available resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasios N Kanatas
- Specialty registrar in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leeds and St. James University Hospitals NHS Trust, Great George Street, Leeds, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon N Rogers
- Regional Maxillofacial Unit, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool, UK and Edge Hill University, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Allum W, Lordick F, Alsina M, Andritsch E, Ba-Ssalamah A, Beishon M, Braga M, Caballero C, Carneiro F, Cassinello F, Dekker JW, Delgado-Bolton R, Haustermans K, Henning G, Hutter B, Lövey J, Netíková IŠ, Obermannová R, Oberst S, Rostoft S, Saarto T, Seufferlein T, Sheth S, Wynter-Blyth V, Costa A, Naredi P. ECCO essential requirements for quality cancer care: Oesophageal and gastric cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2018; 122:179-193. [PMID: 29458786 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.12.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2017] [Accepted: 12/31/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ECCO essential requirements for quality cancer care (ERQCC) are checklists and explanations of organisation and actions that are necessary to give high-quality care to patients who have a specific type of cancer. They are written by European experts representing all disciplines involved in cancer care. ERQCC papers give oncology teams, patients, policymakers and managers an overview of the elements needed in any healthcare system to provide high quality of care throughout the patient journey. References are made to clinical guidelines and other resources where appropriate, and the focus is on care in Europe. OESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRIC ESSENTIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR QUALITY CARE: CONCLUSION: Taken together, the information presented in this paper provides a comprehensive description of the essential requirements for establishing a high-quality OG cancer service. The ERQCC expert group is aware that it is not possible to propose a 'one size fits all' system for all countries, but urges that access to multidisciplinary units or centres must be guaranteed for all those with OG cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Allum
- European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO); Department of Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Florian Lordick
- European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO); University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maria Alsina
- Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL); Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Elisabeth Andritsch
- International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS); Clinical Department of Oncology, University Medical Centre of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah
- European Society of Radiology (ESR); Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Marco Braga
- European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); Department of Surgery, San Raffaele University Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Carmela Caballero
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Fatima Carneiro
- European Society of Pathology (ESP); Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Centro Hospitalar de São João and Ipatimup/i3S, Porto, Portugal
| | - Fernando Cassinello
- European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA); Anaesthesia Department, Candelaria University Hospital, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Jan Willem Dekker
- European CanCer Organisation (ECCO) Oncopolicy Committee; Department of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Delgado-Bolton
- European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM); Department of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, San Pedro University Hospital and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), University of La Rioja, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain
| | - Karin Haustermans
- European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Geoffrey Henning
- European CanCer Organisation (ECCO) Patient Advisory Committe, EuropaColon, Salisbury, UK
| | - Bettina Hutter
- European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA); Anaesthesia Department, Hirslanden Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - József Lövey
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Irena Štenglová Netíková
- European Society of Oncology Pharmacy (ESOP); Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, General Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radka Obermannová
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC); Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Simon Oberst
- Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI); Cambridge Cancer Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | - Siri Rostoft
- International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG); Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tiina Saarto
- European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC); Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Palliative Care, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- United European Gastroenterology (UEG); Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Sapna Sheth
- European CanCer Organisation, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Venetia Wynter-Blyth
- European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS); Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Peter Naredi
- European CanCer Organisation (ECCO); Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Carrillo GM, Bayona HA, Arias EM. Perfil y carga de la enfermedad de personas con cáncer gástrico sometidas a gastrectomía. REVISTA DE LA FACULTAD DE MEDICINA 2018. [DOI: 10.15446/revfacmed.v66n1.60273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Introducción. Los tratamientos quirúrgicos del cáncer gástrico implican adaptaciones a un nuevo estilo de vida ligado a la limitación que pueden ocasionar carga.Objetivos. Determinar el perfil y la carga de adultos con cáncer gástrico que han sido sometidos a gastrectomía en una institución de oncología en Bogotá.Materiales y métodos. Estudio de abordaje cuantitativo y corte transversal que incluyó 60 pacientes con cáncer gástrico posgastrectomía, en su mayoría hombres de estratos socioeconómicos bajos y mínimos niveles de escolaridad, con una edad promedio de 56.33 años. Se utilizó una encuesta de caracterización y el instrumento carga de la enfermedad para el paciente.Resultados. Predomina el adenocarcinoma gástrico intestinal avanzado y la gastrectomía total como cirugía de elección que genera mayor carga. Se identifica alta carga emocional por angustia, tristeza e incertidumbre y baja carga física por síntomas como molestias gastrointestinales, agotamiento y debilidad. Las dificultades económicas y la alteración del rol laboral generan carga sociofamiliar y cultural. Hay relación inversa y estadísticamente significativa entre el estado funcional del paciente y el agotamiento, la fatiga, la alteración del equilibrio y las alteraciones del sueño.Conclusiones. Los sobrevivientes de cáncer gástrico posgrastectomía presentan carga emocional, sociofamiliar y cultural que requiere ser atendida.
Collapse
|
24
|
Trudel JG, Sulman J, Atenafu EG, Kidane B, Darling GE. Longitudinal Evaluation of Trial Outcome Index Scores in Patients With Esophageal Cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 2016; 102:269-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Revised: 01/17/2016] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
25
|
McCall MD, Graham PJ, Bathe OF. Quality of life: A critical outcome for all surgical treatments of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:1101-1113. [PMID: 26811650 PMCID: PMC4716023 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i3.1101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Revised: 08/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgery represents the main curative therapeutic modality for gastric cancer, and it is occasionally considered for palliation as well as prophylaxis. Most frequently, surgical outcomes are conveyed in terms of oncological outcomes such as recurrence and survival. However, quality of life (QoL) is also important and should be considered when making treatment decisions - including the extent of and approach to surgery. Measurement of QoL usually involves the application of questionnaires. While there are multiple QoL questionnaires validated for use in oncology patients, there are very few that have been validated for use in those with gastric cancer. In this review, we discuss and compare the current status of QoL questionnaires in gastric cancer. More importantly, the impact of surgery for treatment, palliation and prophylaxis of gastric cancer on QoL will be described. These data should inform the surgeon on the optimal approach to treating gastric cancer, taking into account oncological outcomes. Knowledge gaps are also identified, providing a roadmap for future studies.
Collapse
|
26
|
Hauser C, Patett C, von Schoenfels W, Heits N, Schafmayer C, Malchow B, Hampe J, Schniewind B, Becker T, Egberts JH. Does neoadjuvant treatment before oncologic esophagectomy affect the postoperative quality of life? A prospective, longitudinal outcome study. Dis Esophagus 2015; 28:652-9. [PMID: 25059631 DOI: 10.1111/dote.12257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To evaluate the cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) following esophagectomy the focus was placed on the impact of neoadjuvant treatment before surgery. For patients undergoing oncologic surgery, the QoL is generally accepted as an important outcome parameter in addition to clinical parameters. This prospective nonrandomized study evaluated QoL in patients treated by preoperative chemo(radio)therapy followed by either surgery or surgery alone with special focus on the postoperative course. QoL was assessed in 131 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. The EORTC-QLQ-C30 and a tumor-specific module were administered before surgery, at discharge, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Clinical data were collected prospectively and a follow up was performed every 6 months. The histological type of cancer was squamous cell carcinoma in 49.6% and adenocarcinoma in 50.4%. There was no significant difference between patients that were treated neoadjuvantly and those that were first operated on with regard to morbidity, mortality, and survival rates (5-year survival rate of 34%). Most QoL scores dropped significantly below the baseline in the early postoperative period and recovered slowly during the follow-up period to almost preoperative levels in many scores. There was no statistically significant difference in any of the QoL scales between neoadjuvantly treated or primary operated patients. Esophageal resections are associated with significant deterioration of QoL, which slowly recovers during the follow-up period to an almost preoperative level. Neoadjuvant treatment seems to not further negatively affect the QoL deterioration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Hauser
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - C Patett
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - W von Schoenfels
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - N Heits
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - C Schafmayer
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - B Malchow
- Reference Center for Quality of Life, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - J Hampe
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - B Schniewind
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum, Lüneburg, Germany
| | - T Becker
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - J-H Egberts
- Department of General Surgery and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Straatman J, van der Wielen N, Joosten PJ, Terwee CB, Cuesta MA, Jansma EP, van der Peet DL. Assessment of patient-reported outcome measures in the surgical treatment of patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:1920-9. [PMID: 26310527 PMCID: PMC4848335 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4415-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Gastric cancer is responsible for 10 % of all cancer-related deaths worldwide. With improved operative techniques and neo-adjuvant therapy, survival rates are increasing. Outcomes of interest are shifting to quality of life (QOL), with many different tools available. The aim of this study was to assess which patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are used to measure QOL after a gastrectomy for cancer. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted for original articles investigating QOL after gastrectomy. Two authors independently selected relevant articles, conducted clinical appraisal and extracted data (P.J. and J.S.). Results Out of 3414 articles, 26 studies were included, including a total of 4690 patients. These studies included ten different PROMs, which could be divided into generic, symptom-specific and disease-specific questionnaires. The EORTC and the FACT questionnaires use an oncological overall QOL module and an organ-specific module. Only one validation study regarding the use of the EORTC after surgery for gastric cancer was available, demonstrating good psychometric properties and clinical validity. Conclusions A great variety of PROMs are being used in the measurement of QOL after surgery for gastric cancer. A questionnaire with a general module along with a disease-specific module for the assessment of QOL seems most desirable, such as the EORTC and the FACT with their specific modules. Both are developed in different treatment modalities, such as in surgical patients. EORTC is the most widely used questionnaire and therefore allows for comparison of new studies to existing data. Future studies are needed to assess content validity in surgical gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer Straatman
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, ZH 7F020, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Nicole van der Wielen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, ZH 7F020, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J Joosten
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, ZH 7F020, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline B Terwee
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, ZH 7F020, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elise P Jansma
- Medical Library, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donald L van der Peet
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, ZH 7F020, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Secondary gastrectomy for stage IV gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after induction-chemotherapy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014; 399:773-81. [PMID: 24898674 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-014-1217-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2014] [Accepted: 05/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE With improved chemotherapeutic regimens, metastasized gastric cancer may show a good response rendering an initially unresectable tumor resectable. We performed a retrospective analysis on the outcome of stage IV gastric cancer patients treated by chemotherapy followed by oncologic resection in a western institution. METHODS From August 1988 to December 2010, a total number of 1,817 patients underwent surgery for gastric cancer at the Department of Surgery, Technical University of Munich. A retrospective analysis of our prospective gastric cancer database identified 58 patients with stage IV gastric cancer having undergone induction chemotherapy followed by surgery in an individualized treatment concept. After induction chemotherapy usually consisting of 2 cycles of PLF (cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin), resection was performed with or without removal of metastases in patients without disease progression. Patients were followed up until death or loss to follow up. RESULTS The three most common metastatic locations were liver (27.6 %), distant lymph nodes (22.4 %), and peritoneum (19.0 %). Of patients, 13.8 % had metastases in more than one location. Thirty-day mortality was 5.2 %, 90-day mortality was 13.8 %, while overall postoperative morbidity accounted for 24 %. In 19 (32.8 %) patients, a complete resection without any macroscopic tumor residues was achieved. In 39 (67.2 %) patients, tumors could not be completely removed with either local residual disease or residual disease at distant sites. Overall median survival was 20 months, while patients without residual tumor survived significantly longer (72 months) than patients with residual disease (12 months, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION Secondary surgery of metastasized gastric cancer may be justified in selected cases without progression under induction chemotherapy. An achievable complete removal of the primary tumor and metastases appears the main selection criterion for patients benefitting from this approach.
Collapse
|
29
|
Jacobs M, Macefield RC, Elbers RG, Sitnikova K, Korfage IJ, Smets EMA, Henselmans I, van Berge Henegouwen MI, de Haes JCJM, Blazeby JM, Sprangers MAG. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 2014; 23:1155-76. [PMID: 24293086 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0576-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to (1) estimate the direction, clinical relevance, and duration of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) change in the first year following esophageal cancer surgery and (2) to assess the robustness of the estimates by subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and an exploration of publication bias. METHODS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL to identify randomized and non-randomized studies was performed. We compared the baseline HRQL data with 3-, 6-, 9-, or 12-month follow-ups to estimate the magnitude and duration of HRQL change. These estimates were then classified as trivial, small, medium, or large. Primary outcomes were role functioning, eating, and fatigue. Secondary outcomes were physical and social functioning, dysphagia, pain, and coughing problems. We conducted subgroup analysis for open surgery, open surgery preceded by neoadjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive surgery. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of study design, transformation/imputation of the data, and HRQL questionnaire used. RESULTS We included the data from 15 studies to estimate the change in 28 HRQL outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery. The main analysis showed that patients' social functioning deteriorated. Symptoms of fatigue, pain, and coughing problems increased. These changes lasted for 9-12 months, although some symptoms persisted beyond the first year after surgery. For many other HRQL outcomes, estimates were only robust after subgroup or sensitivity analyses (e.g., role and physical functioning), or remained too heterogeneous to interpret (e.g., eating and dysphagia). CONCLUSIONS Patients will experience a clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in HRQL after esophageal cancer surgery. However, for many HRQL outcomes, more and better quality evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jacobs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 5, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Im MH, Kim JW, Kim WS, Kim JH, Youn YH, Park H, Choi SH. The impact of esophageal reflux-induced symptoms on quality of life after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. J Gastric Cancer 2014; 14:15-22. [PMID: 24765533 PMCID: PMC3996245 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.1.15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2014] [Revised: 02/22/2014] [Accepted: 02/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the prevalence of esophageal reflux-induced symptoms after gastrectomy owing to gastric cancer and assess the relationship between esophageal reflux-induced symptoms and quality of life. Materials and Methods From January 2012 to May 2012, 332 patients were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The patients had a history of curative resection for gastric cancer at least 6 months previously without recurrence, other malignancy, or ongoing chemotherapy. Esophageal reflux-induced symptoms were evaluated with the GerdQ questionnaire. The quality of life was evaluated with the European Organization for Research and Treatment QLQ-C30 and STO22 questionnaires. Results Of the 332 patients, 275 had undergone subtotal gastrectomy and 57 had undergone total gastrectomy. The number of GerdQ(+) patients was 58 (21.1%) after subtotal gastrectomy, and 7 (12.3%) after total gastrectomy (P=0.127). GerdQ(+) patients showed significantly worse scores compared to those for GerdQ(-) patients in nearly all functional and symptom QLQ-C30 scales, with the difference in the mean score of global health status/quality of life and diarrhea symptoms being higher than in the minimal important difference. Additionally, in the QLQ STO22, GerdQ(+) patients had significantly worse scores in every symptom scale. The GerdQ score was negatively correlated with the global quality of life score (r=-0.170, P=0.002). Conclusions Esophageal reflux-induced symptoms may develop at a similar rate or more frequently after subtotal gastrectomy compared to that after total gastrectomy, and decrease quality of life in gastric cancer patients. To improve quality of life after gastrectomy, new strategies are required to prevent or reduce esophageal reflux.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Hye Im
- Gangnam Severance Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Whan Sik Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jie-Hyun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Youn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyojin Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Ho Choi
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Su X, Dong C, Zhang J, Su L, Wang X, Cui H, Chen Z. Combination therapy of anti-cancer bioactive peptide with Cisplatin decreases chemotherapy dosing and toxicity to improve the quality of life in xenograft nude mice bearing human gastric cancer. Cell Biosci 2014; 4:7. [PMID: 24507386 PMCID: PMC3930002 DOI: 10.1186/2045-3701-4-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A great challenge of cancer chemotherapy is to eliminate cancer cells and concurrently maintain the quality of life (QOL) for cancer patients. Previously, we identified a novel anti-cancer bioactive peptide (ACBP), a peptide induced in goat spleen or liver following immunization with human gastric cancer protein extract. ACBP alone exhibited anti-tumor activity without measurable side effects. Thus, we hypothesize that ACBP and combined chemotherapy could improve the efficacy of treatment and lead to a better QOL. Results In this study, ACBP was isolated and purified from immunized goat liver, and designated as ACBP-L. The anti-tumor activity was investigated in a previously untested human gastric cancer MGC-803 cell line and tumor model. ACBP-L inhibited cell proliferation in vitro in a dose and time dependent manner, titrated by MTT assay. The effect of ACBP-L on cell morphology was observed through light and scanning electron microscopy. In vivo ACBP-L alone significantly inhibited MGC-803 tumor growth in a xenograft nude mouse model without measurable side effects. Treatment with the full dosage of Cisplatin alone (5 mg/kg every 5 days) strongly suppressed tumor growth. However, the QOL in these mice had been significantly affected when measured by food intakes and body weight. The combinatory regiment of ACBP-L with a fewer doses of Cisplatin (5 mg/kg every 10 days) resulted in a similar anti-tumor activity with improved QOL. 18F-FDG PET/CT scan was used to examine the biological activity in tumors of live animals and indicated the consistent treatment effects. The tumor tissues were harvested after treatment, and ACBP-L and Cisplatin treatment suppressed Bcl-2, and induced Bax, Caspase 3, and Caspase 8 molecules as detected by RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. The combinatory regiment induced stronger Bax and Caspase 8 protein expression. Conclusion Our current finding in this gastric cancer xenograft animal model demonstrated that ACBP-L could lower Cisplatin dose to achieve a similar anti-tumor efficacy as the higher dose of Cisplatin alone, through enhanced modulation of apoptotic molecules. This newly developed combination regiment improved QOL in tumor bearing hosts, which could lead to clinical investigation for the new strategy of combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiulan Su
- Clinical Medicine Research Center of The Affiliated Hospital, Inner Mongolia Medical University, No 1 Tongdao North Street, Huimin District, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010050, China.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Shen C, Yang H, Zhang B, Chen H, Chen Z, Chen J. Changes of quality of life after gastric tube reconstruction in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. Pak J Med Sci 2013; 29:1193-8. [PMID: 24353718 PMCID: PMC3858926 DOI: 10.12669/pjms.295.3879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2013] [Accepted: 07/25/2013] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate changes of quality of life (QOL) of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) after gastric tube anastomosis. Methods: From January 2009 to December 2011, eighty-seven patients with Types II and III AEG were selected for gastric tube reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy. The QOL of the patients was assessed using the Chinese versions of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-STO22 preoperatively, as well as one and two years postoperatively. Results: The QLQ-C30 showed that the global health of the respondents decreased at one year after the surgery (P=0.02). The preoperative score for physical function was significantly better than the one- and two-year post-operation scores. The preoperative scores for pain, nausea and vomiting, and economic difficulties were worse than the one- and two-year post-operation scores (P<0.05). Diarrhea was worse at one year post-operation than during pre-operation (P = 0.00), but improved at two years after the operation. The QLQ-STO22 scales showed that the preoperative dysphagia score was better than one-year post-operation, and no significant differences were observed in terms of dysphagia between the pre-operation and two-year postoperative periods. Preoperative reflux and taste scores were better than those after the operation (P<0.05). The hair loss score at one-year post-operation was worse than at either pre-operation or two-year post-operation. Conclusions: Most QOL scales worsened after surgery, particularly at postoperative year one. However, the scales can be gradually recovered to preoperative levels. The physical function, nausea and vomiting, reflux, taste, and financial difficulties did not fully recover two years after the operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoyong Shen
- Chaoyong Shen, Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Hongxin Yang
- Hongxin Yang, Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Bo Zhang
- Bo Zhang, Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Haining Chen
- Haining Chen, Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Zhixin Chen
- Zhixin Chen, Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Jiaping Chen
- Jiaping, Chen. Department of Gastrointestinal surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Jacobs M, Macefield RC, Elbers RG, Sitnikova K, Korfage IJ, Smets EMA, Henselmans I, van Berge Henegouwen MI, de Haes JCJM, Blazeby JM, Sprangers MAG. Meta-analysis shows clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in health-related quality of life after esophageal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 2013; 23:1097-115. [PMID: 24129668 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0545-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2013] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study is to (1) estimate the direction, clinical relevance, and duration of health-related quality of life (HRQL) change in the first year following esophageal cancer surgery and (2) to assess the robustness of the estimates by subgroup and sensitivity analyses, and an exploration of publication bias. METHODS A systematic literature search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL to identify randomized and non-randomized studies was performed. We compared the baseline HRQL data with 3-, 6-, 9-, or 12-month follow-ups to estimate the magnitude and duration of HRQL change. These estimates were then classified as trivial, small, medium, or large. Primary outcomes were role functioning, eating, and fatigue. Secondary outcomes were physical and social functioning, dysphagia, pain, and coughing problems. We conducted subgroup analysis for open surgery, open surgery preceded by neo-adjuvant therapy, and minimally invasive surgery. Sensitivity analyses assessed the influence of study design, transformation/imputation of the data, and HRQL questionnaire used. RESULTS We included data from 15 studies to estimate the change in 28 HRQL outcomes after esophageal cancer surgery. The main analysis showed that patients' social functioning deteriorated. Symptoms of fatigue, pain, and coughing problems increased. These changes lasted for 9-12 months, although some symptoms persisted beyond the first year after surgery. For many other HRQL outcomes, estimates were only robust after subgroup or sensitivity analyses (e.g., role and physical functioning), or remained too heterogeneous to interpret (e.g., eating and dysphagia). CONCLUSIONS Patients will experience a clinically relevant and long-lasting deterioration in HRQL after esophageal cancer surgery. However, for many HRQL outcomes, more and better quality evidence is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jacobs
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, Meibergdreef 5, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Main influencing factors and health-related quality of life issues in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer - as measured by EORTC tools. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2013; 17:311-6. [PMID: 24596521 PMCID: PMC3934069 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2013.35280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2012] [Revised: 01/18/2013] [Accepted: 02/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM OF THE STUDY To assess influencing factors and main health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues in patients with cancers of the oesophago-gastric region using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30) and its oesophago-gastric module (QLQ-OG25). MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients were qualified for this study based on the histological confirmation of oesophageal, oesophago-gastric or gastric cancers. Each patient filled out the Polish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30, the QLQ-OG25 module and a personal questionnaire. Patients were divided into groups based on gender, age, treatment intention, tumour localization, working status and level of education. RESULTS Our study included 112 patients - 39 women (35%) and 73 men (mean age ± SD; 60.2 ±10.9). Thirty-five patients (31.3%) completed the questionnaires twice. Eighty-four (75%) patients had gastric cancer (GC), twenty-six (23.2%) oesophageal cancer (OC) and two (1.8%) cancer of the oesophago-gastric junction (OGJC). Eighty (71.4%) patients underwent surgical treatment prior to either chemo-, radio- or chemoradiotherapy. The Global Health Status scale of the QLQ-C30 inversely correlated with all the other QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25 symptom scales (r = -0.26 to -0.61; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The main HRQoL problems of Polish OC, OGJC and GC patients are fatigue, insomnia, anxiety, and appetite and weight loss. Older age, receiving palliative treatment, having gastric cancer, being on retirement and having lower education are factors associated with higher symptom scores (worse symptoms) and thus poorer HRQoL.
Collapse
|
36
|
Tomaszewski KA, Püsküllüoğlu M, Biesiada K, Bochenek J, Nieckula J, Krzemieniecki K. Validation of the Polish Version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-OG25 for the Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Esophagi-Gastric Cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2013; 31:191-203. [DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2012.761323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
|
37
|
van der Schaaf M, Rutegård M, Lagergren P. The influence of surgical factors on persisting symptoms 3 years after esophageal cancer surgery: a population-based study in Sweden. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 20:1639-45. [PMID: 23271489 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2690-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2012] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the long-term effects of surgical approach and type of anastomosis in the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS A Swedish nationwide, population-based cohort study included patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in 2001-2005. The predefined exposures included surgical approach (transhiatal or transthoracic) and anastomotic technique (hand-sewn or mechanical). The outcomes were esophageal-specific symptoms 3 years after the surgery. Symptoms were measured using the cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire, the QLQ-C30, supplemented by an esophageal cancer-specific module (QLQ-OES18), both developed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Logistic regression models were used to estimate relative risk, expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI), of experiencing symptoms as assessed by the questionnaires. RESULTS Among the 178 included patients, there was an 84 % participation rate. No statistically significant differences were found regarding surgical approach. However, point estimates indicate that patients operated on with a transhiatal approach had a lower risk for symptoms of nausea and vomiting (OR = 0.5, 95 % CI 0.1-1.9), diarrhea (OR = 0.5, 95 % CI 0.2-1.8), and trouble swallowing (OR = 0.4, 95 % CI 0-3), and a slightly higher risk for loss of appetite (OR = 2, 95 % CI 0.7-5.6) compared with patients operated on with a transthoracic approach. Anastomotic technique did not seem to influence the risk for any of the selected symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Surgical approach and type of anastomosis do not seem to influence the risk of general and esophageal-specific cancer symptoms 3 years after surgery for esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje van der Schaaf
- Unit of Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer. Qual Life Res 2012; 22:1787-803. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0290-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2012] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
39
|
Haverkort EB, Binnekade JM, de Haan RJ, Busch ORC, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gouma DJ. Suboptimal intake of nutrients after esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112:1080-7. [PMID: 22889637 DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2010] [Accepted: 03/26/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction results in a variety of postoperative nutrition-related complaints that can impair nutritional intake and nutritional status. The aim of this study was to determine to what extent patients reached the recommended intake of various nutrients at 6 and 12 months after esophagectomy. It was also analyzed whether a suboptimal intake could be explained by the most clinically significant nutrition-related complaints after esophagectomy. In a prospective cohort study (2002 to 2006), the nutrient intake of 96 patients, recorded in preprinted nutritional diaries, was compared with the recommended energy intake in The Netherlands and Recommended Dietary Allowance of protein and micronutrients. Energy and protein intake remained below recommendations in 24% and 7% of the patients, respectively. Less than 10% of the patients had a sufficient intake of all micronutrients. Folic acid, vitamin D, copper, calcium, and vitamin B-1 were the micronutrients most often reported to have a suboptimal intake. Multivariate logistic regression, corrected for preoperative epigastric pain and energy intake, showed that the number of nutrition-related complaints was not an independent risk factor for the presence of a suboptimal intake of nutrients (adjusted odds ratio=1.11; 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.31; P = 0.22). This study shows that the intake of micronutrients remains below recommendations in the majority of patients 12 months after esophagectomy. This problem requires special attention and care by registered dietitians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth B Haverkort
- Department of Dietetics, The Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22660, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Smets EMA, van Heijl M, van Wijngaarden AKS, Henselmans I, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Addressing patients' information needs: a first evaluation of a question prompt sheet in the pretreatment consultation for patients with esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 2012; 25:512-9. [PMID: 22054056 DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2011.01274.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This study aims to develop and pilot a question prompt sheet to assist esophageal cancer patients to obtain desired information in the consultation in which potentially curative esophagectomy is discussed. Whether a prompt sheet affected patients' question asking, the number and scope of topics discussed, the length of the consultation, and patients' satisfaction is investigated. Patients (n= 30) were randomized either to receive care as usual (control group) or to receive a prompt sheet (intervention group). All patients completed a baseline questionnaire, their consultations were audio-recorded and content-coded, and they received a structured telephone interview 2 days after the consultation to assess satisfaction. Patients provided with the prompt sheet marked a median of 19 questions. They asked significantly more questions as compared with patients in the control group (median of 12 vs. 8 questions). Questions mainly addressed treatment options and procedures. No differences were found with regard to consultation length and patient satisfaction. Our results suggest that providing patients with a simple, easy-to-implement tool such as a question prompt is appreciated and helps patients to ask more questions during the consultation without increasing the length of the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Henselmans I, Jacobs M, van Berge Henegouwen MI, de Haes HCJM, Sprangers MAG, Smets EMA. Postoperative information needs and communication barriers of esophageal cancer patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2012; 88:138-146. [PMID: 22244819 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2011] [Revised: 11/24/2011] [Accepted: 12/11/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Given the poor prognosis of esophageal cancer and the impact of surgery on health-related quality of life (HRQL), addressing patients' postoperative information needs is important. This study aimed to examine (1) the content and type of patients' information needs and (2) patient perceived facilitators and barriers to patient participation. METHODS Interviews were conducted with 20 purposefully selected esophageal cancer patients. Open and structured questions were alternated. The transcribed interviews were analysed inductively and deductively, using MAXqda. RESULTS Patients' post-operative information needs concerned HRQL, medical care and prognosis, covering several sub-domains. Different types of needs were identified, e.g., requests for information about cause, course and self-management. Barriers to patient participation mostly reflected beliefs and skills, and could be categorized into agenda and communication barriers. Facilitators of patient participation reflected physician, patient and interaction characteristics, companion support and pre-visit preparation. Many patients saw merit in pre-visit preparation interventions; few endorsed skill-building interventions. CONCLUSION This study listed the postoperative information needs of esophageal cancer patients. Moreover, it gained insight into patient-perceived barriers and facilitators of patient participation. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS The findings demonstrate what information physicians should have available and informs interventions to support patients in meeting their information needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Esophageal cancer is an aggressive and physically and emotionally devastating disease. It has one of the poorest survival rates among all malignant tumors, mainly due to late symptom presentation and early metastatic dissemination. Cure is possible through extensive surgery, typically followed by a long recovery period, affecting general well-being, as well as basic aspects of life, such as eating, drinking and socializing. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) is a multidimensional concept assessing symptoms and functions related to a disease or its treatment from the patient's perspective. HRQL is a fundamental part of treatment in surgical oncology, particularly in esophageal cancer. This review assesses the scientific data regarding some HRQL aspects after esophageal cancer surgery, for example, postoperative recovery time, determinants of postoperative HRQL and long-term HRQL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Therese Djärv
- Upper Gastrointestinal Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
"How do you live without a stomach?": a multiple case study examination of total gastrectomy for palliation or prophylaxis. Palliat Support Care 2012; 9:305-13. [PMID: 21838951 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951511000253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The number of diagnosed cases of stomach cancer in Western countries is relatively small compared to prevalence rates in Eastern populations. This disparity creates a general lack of information and understanding of the experience of patients treated for this disease in North America. Surgical removal of the stomach, also called total gastrectomy (TG), is presently the only curative treatment available to patients with stomach cancer. Considering the impact such a procedure may have, very little is known about what factors influence an individual's postsurgical quality of life (QL). METHOD This article reviews current literature and examines three unique case studies. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using content analysis, a qualitative analytic approach for reporting combined subject responses. RESULTS Participants included one 37-year-old man with multiple polyps in his stomach and a family history of stomach cancer, one 18 year-old man with a confirmed CDH1 mutation and a family history of stomach cancer, and one 33-year-old man with confirmed metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. Subjective patient experience was categorized into: (1) making the decision, (2) treatment impact, and (3) life after TG. Prior to surgery, all patients carefully evaluated their perceived risk compared to the treatment consequences and indicated that a certain event triggered their decision. The largest treatment impacts were learning to eat again and adjusting to the physical changes. Each patient endorsed that their experience made them appreciate and make the most of life. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS This currently represents the only study to investigate the lived experience of TG for prophylaxis or palliation in individuals with and without genetic risk for stomach cancer. Understanding this process will allow all members of the cancer care team, and the patients themselves, to better understand the factors involved in decision making and postoperative adjustment. Fruitful avenues for future research are discussed.
Collapse
|
44
|
Dorcaratto D, Grande L, Ramón JM, Pera M. [Quality of life of patients with cancer of the oesophagus and stomach]. Cir Esp 2011; 89:635-44. [PMID: 21907976 DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2011.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/27/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The study of the health related quality of life in patients with digestive tract cancer, and particularly in those with tumours of the oesophagus and stomach, provides useful information for selecting the most suitable therapeutic option. It may also be used to predict the impact of the disease and its possible treatments on the physical, emotional and social condition of the patient. Various sensitive and reliable tools have been developed over the past decades that are capable of measuring the quality of life of patients; the use of questionnaires has made it easier to exchange information between the patient and the doctor. The pre- and post-operative variations in the quality of life in patients with oesophageal-gastric cancer are of prognostic value on the outcome of the disease. For all these reasons, the health related quality of life is currently considered, along with disease free survival and absence of recurrences, one of the most important parameters in order to assess the impact on the patients of a particular oncological treatment. The aim of this article is to review the role of the health related quality of life assessment, as well as the various tools which are available to measure it in patients with oesophageal-gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitri Dorcaratto
- Sección de Cirugía Gastrointestinal, Servicio de Cirugía General y Digestiva, Hospital Universitario del Mar, Institut de Recerca IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Presence and persistence of nutrition-related symptoms during the first year following esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction in clinically disease-free patients. World J Surg 2011; 34:2844-52. [PMID: 20842361 PMCID: PMC2982950 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0786-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction results in a variety of postoperative nutrition-related symptoms that may influence the patient's nutritional status. METHODS We developed a 15-item questionnaire, focusing on the nutrition-related complaints the first year after an esophagectomy. The questionnaire was filled out the first week after discharge and 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The use of enteral nutrition, meal size and frequency, social aspects related to eating, defecation pattern, and body weight were recorded at the same time points. We analyzed the relationship between the baseline characteristics and the number of nutrition-related symptoms, as well as the relationship between those symptoms and body weight with linear mixed models. RESULTS We found no significant within-patient change for the total number of nutrition-related symptoms (P = 0.67). None of the baseline factors were identified as predictors of the complaint scores. The most frequently experienced complaints were early satiety, postprandial dumping syndrome, inhibited passage due to high viscosity, reflux, and absence of hunger. One year after surgery, meal sizes were still smaller, the social aspects of eating were influenced negatively, and patients experienced an altered stool frequency. Directly after the surgical procedure 78% of the patients lost weight, and the entire postoperative year the mean body weight remained lower (P = 0.47). We observed no association between the complaint scores and body weight (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS After an esophagectomy, most patients struggle with nutrition-related symptoms, are confronted with nutrition-related adjustments and a reduced body weight.
Collapse
|
46
|
Diamantis G, Scarpa M, Bocus P, Realdon S, Castoro C, Ancona E, Battaglia G. Quality of life in patients with esophageal stenting for the palliation of malignant dysphagia. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17:144-50. [PMID: 21245986 PMCID: PMC3020367 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i2.144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2010] [Revised: 10/16/2010] [Accepted: 10/23/2010] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) is rising more rapidly in the Western world than that of any other cancer. Despite advances in therapy, more than 50% of patients have incurable disease at the time of presentation. This precludes curative treatment and makes palliative treatment a more realistic option for most of these patients. Dysphagia is the predominant symptom in more than 70% of patients with EC and although several management options have been developed in recent years to palliate this symptom, the optimum management is not established. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are a well-established palliation modality for dysphagia in such patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic or palliative intervention. To date, only a few published studies can be found on Medline examining HRQoL in patients with advanced EC treated with SEMS implantation. The aim of this study was to review the impact on HRQoL of SEMS implantation as palliative treatment in patients with EC. All Medline articles regarding HRQoL in patients with advanced EC, particularly those related to SEMS, were reviewed. In most studies, relief of dysphagia was the only aspect of HRQoL being measured and SEMS implantation was compared with other palliative treatments such as brachytherapy and laser therapy. SEMS insertion provides a swift palliation of dysphagia compared to brachytherapy and no evidence was found to suggest that stent implantation is different to laser treatment in terms of improving dysphagia, recurrent dysphagia and better HRQoL, although SEMS insertion has a better technical success rate and also reduces the number of repeat interventions.
Collapse
|
47
|
Wijnhoven BPL, Siersema PD, Haustermans PDK, Tilanus PDHW, Lerut T. Oesofaguscarcinoom. ONCOLOGIE 2011. [DOI: 10.1007/978-90-313-8476-1_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
48
|
Garland SN, Pelletier G, Lawe A, Biagioni BJ, Easaw J, Eliasziw M, Cella D, Bathe OF. Prospective evaluation of the reliability, validity, and minimally important difference of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-gastric (FACT-Ga) quality-of-life instrument. Cancer 2010; 117:1302-12. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2010] [Revised: 06/22/2010] [Accepted: 06/29/2010] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
49
|
Miller RC, Atherton PJ, Kabat BF, Fredericksen MB, Geno DM, Deschamps C, Jatoi A, Sloan JA, Romero Y. Marital status and quality of life in patients with esophageal cancer or Barrett's esophagus: the mayo clinic esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus registry study. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55:2860-8. [PMID: 20094784 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-1100-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2009] [Accepted: 12/04/2009] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC) report deficits in quality of life (QOL), depending on the extent of malignant disease and the goals of treatment at the time of QOL measurement. AIMS To quantify the association of marital status and changes in QOL over time in patients with EC and patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). METHODS Eligible patients in the Mayo Clinic Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Barrett's Esophagus Registry completed QOL assessments at baseline and approximately 1 year later. QOL was determined with a ten-point linear analog self-assessment scale evaluating overall QOL and 12 subscales. RESULTS Overall, 489 BE patients and 212 EC patients were evaluated. Married EC patients reported higher baseline QOL in legal concerns (8.1 vs. 7.1; p = .04) and friend and family support (9.3 vs. 8.4; p = .02) than single EC patients. Over time, married EC patients had a decrease in pain frequency QOL compared to single EC patients (-0.9 vs. +0.6; p = .02), with other QOL measures being stable. Married BE patients showed higher social activity QOL at baseline than single BE patients (7.5 vs. 6.9; p = .02); QOL was stable over time between the marital status groups. CONCLUSIONS Minor, but statistically significant, changes were reported regarding QOL in two categories at baseline and over time among married and single patients with EC. Minor differences may be present between married and single EC patients regarding spiritual QOL at baseline and in overall physical well-being QOL at baseline and over time, although these differences did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert C Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Courrech Staal EFW, Aleman BMP, Boot H, van Velthuysen MLF, van Tinteren H, van Sandick JW. Systematic review of the benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2010; 97:1482-96. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 111] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Surgery alone for locally advanced oesophageal cancer is associated with low cure rates. The benefits and risks of neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with oesophageal cancer were evaluated.
Methods
A systematic review of publications between 2000 and 2008 on neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer was undertaken.
Results
Thirty-eight papers comprising 3640 patients met the inclusion criteria. Chemoradiation regimens varied widely with a predominance of 5-fluorouracil/cisplatin chemotherapy. Chemoradiation-related toxicity was reported in only ten studies and consisted mainly of neutropenia. The chemoradiation-related mortality rate was 2·3 per cent. The mean R0 resection rate and pathological complete response (pCR) rate were 88·4 and 25·8 per cent respectively. Postoperative morbidity was not uniformly reported. The in-hospital mortality rate after oesophagectomy following chemoradiation was 5·2 per cent. Five-year survival rates varied from 16 to 59 per cent in all patients and from 34 to 62 per cent in those with a pCR. Chemoradiation had a temporary negative effect on quality of life.
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant chemoradiation regimens for oesophageal cancer vary widely. Besides traditional outcome variables (such as survival), other parameters should be analysed (for example toxicity) to assess whether the risks of chemoradiation are sufficiently compensated for by the benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E F W Courrech Staal
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B M P Aleman
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H Boot
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M-L F van Velthuysen
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H van Tinteren
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute–Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|