Lonidamine: a hyperthermic sensitizer of HeLa cells in culture and of the Meth-A tumor in vivo

The Potential of Lonidamine in Combination with Chemotherapy and Physical Therapy in Cancer Treatment

Simple Summary

The unique characteristics of tumor energy metabolism (highly dependent on aerobic glycolysis, namely, the Warburg effect) make it an interesting and attractive target for drug discovery. Radio- and chemoresistance are closely associated with the Warburg effect. Lonidamine (LND), as a glycolytic inhibitor, although having low anticancer activity when used alone, exhibits selectivity to various tumors, and its adverse effects do not overlap when combined with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, LND may be very promising as a sensitizer of tumors to chemotherapeutic agents and physical therapies. This review summarizes the advance of LND in combination with chemotherapy and physical therapy over the past several decades, as well as the promising LND derivative adjudin (ADD). The underlying sensitizing mechanisms were also analyzed and discussed, which may contribute to an improved therapeutic effect in future clinical cancer treatment.

Abstract

Lonidamine (LND) has the ability to resist spermatogenesis and was first used as an anti-spermatogenic agent. Later, it was found that LND has a degree of anticancer activity. Currently, LND is known to target energy metabolism, mainly involving the inhibition of monocarboxylate transporter (MCT), mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC), respiratory chain complex I/II, mitochondrial permeability transition (PT) pore, and hexokinase II (HK-II). However, phase II clinical studies showed that LND alone had a weak therapeutic effect, and the effect was short and reversible. Interestingly, LND does not have the common side effects of traditional chemotherapeutic drugs, such as alopecia and myelosuppression. In addition, LND has selective activity toward various tumors, and its toxic and side effects do not overlap when combined with other chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, LND is commonly used as a chemosensitizer to enhance the antitumor effects of chemotherapeutic drugs based on its disruption of energy metabolism relating to chemo- or radioresistance. In this review, we summarized the combination treatments of LND with several typical chemotherapeutic drugs and several common physical therapies, such as radiotherapy (RT), hyperthermia (HT), and photodynamic therapy (PDT), and discussed the underlying mechanisms of action. Meanwhile, the development of novel formulations of LND in recent years and the research progress of LND derivative adjudin (ADD) as an anticancer drug were also discussed.

Effect of Differences in Metabolic Activity of Melanoma Models on Response to Lonidamine plus Doxorubicin

Lonidamine (LND), a metabolic modulator, sensitizes DB-1 human melanoma to doxorubicin (DOX) chemotherapy by acidifying and de-energizing the tumor. This report compares the effects of LND on two human melanoma lines, DB-1 and WM983B, which exhibit different metabolic properties. Using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and Seahorse analysis, we show that DB-1 was more glycolytic than WM983B in vitro. ³¹P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) indicates that LND (100 mg/kg, i.p.) induces similar selective acidification and de-energization of WM983B xenografts in immunosuppressed mice. Over three hours, intracellular pH (pHi) of WM983B decreased from 6.91 ± 0.03 to 6.59 ± 0.10 (p = 0.03), whereas extracellular pH (pHe) of this tumor changed from 7.03 ± 0.05 to 6.89 ± 0.06 (p = 0.19). A decline in bioenergetics (β-NTP/Pi) of 55 ± 5.0% (p = 0.03) accompanied the decline in pHi of WM983B. Using ¹H MRS with a selective multiquantum pulse sequence and Hadamard localization, we show that LND induced a significant increase in tumor lactate levels (p < 0.01). LND pre-treatment followed by DOX (10 mg/kg, i.v.) produced a growth delay of 13.7 days in WM983B (p < 0.01 versus control), a growth delay significantly smaller than the 25.4 days that occurred with DB-1 (p = 0.03 versus WM983B). Differences in relative levels of glycolysis may produce differential therapeutic responses of DB-1 and WM983B melanomas.

Potentiation of Adriamycin Cytotoxicity in P388 Murine Leukemia Sensitive and Resistant to Adriamycin by use of Lonidamine and Hyperthermia

The in vitro effect of adriamycin (ADR) and lonidamine alone and in combination, at 37 °C and 43 °C, was investigated on murine leukemia P388 sensitive (P388/S) and resistant (P388/ADR) to adriamycin. The sensitive and the resistant cells were exposed in vitro with and without the drugs for 1 h at 37 °C and 43 °C. These cells were inoculated ip (106 cells/mouse) into groups of BDF, mice. Cytotoxic effect of the treatment was assessed on the basis of percentage increase in life span (% ILS) of these animals, compared to the animals receiving cells which did not receive any treatment but exposed only to 37 °C for 1 h. It was observed that exposure of P388/ADR cells to lonidamine or adriamycin alone at 43 °C for 1 h resulted in greater cell kill, thus enhancing the % ILS of the experimental animals receiving those cells, compared to that of mice receiving the cells exposed to the same drugs for 1 h at 37 °C. However, the combination of lonidamine (0.02 mM) and adriamycin (10 μg/ml) at 43 °C for 1 h showed more than a synergistic effect, resulting in a % ILS of 120. Similar results were seen in the case of P388/S; however, the observations pertaining to P388/ADR are encouraging, since the mode of treatment has reversed the acquired resistance of P388 leukemia cells to adriamycin.

NMR-based metabolomics of prostate cancer: a protagonist in clinical diagnostics

Advances in the application of NMR spectroscopy-based metabolomic profiling of prostate cancer comprises a potential tactic for understanding the impaired biochemical pathways arising due to a disease evolvement and progression. This technique involves qualitative and quantitative estimation of plethora of small molecular weight metabolites of body fluids or tissues using state-of-the-art chemometric methods delivering an important platform for translational research from basic to clinical, to reveal the pathophysiological snapshot in a single step. This review summarizes the present arrays and recent advancements in NMR-based metabolomics and a glimpse of currently used medical imaging tactics, with their role in clinical diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Lonidamine induces intracellular tumor acidification and ATP depletion in breast, prostate and ovarian cancer xenografts and potentiates response to doxorubicin

We demonstrate that the effects of lonidamine (LND, 100 mg/kg, i.p.) are similar for a number of xenograft models of human cancer including DB-1 melanoma and HCC1806 breast, BT-474 breast, LNCaP prostate and A2870 ovarian carcinomas. Following treatment with LND, each of these tumors exhibits a rapid decrease in intracellular pH, a small decrease in extracellular pH, a concomitant monotonic decrease in nucleoside triphosphate and an increase in inorganic phosphate over a 2-3 h period. We have previously demonstrated that selective intracellular tumor acidification potentiates response of this melanoma model to melphalan (7.5 mg/kg, i.v.), producing an estimated 89% cell kill based on tumor growth delay analysis. We now show that, in both DB-1 melanoma and HCC1806 breast carcinoma, LND potentiates response to doxorubicin, producing 95% cell kill in DB-1 melanoma at 7.5 mg/kg, i.v. doxorubicin and 98% cell kill at 10.0 mg/kg doxorubicin, and producing a 95% cell kill in HCC1806 breast carcinoma at 12.0 mg/kg doxorubicin. Potentiation of doxorubicin may result from cation trapping of the weakly basic anthracycline. Recent experience with the clinical treatment of melanoma and other forms of human cancer suggests that these diseases will probably not be cured by a single therapeutic procedure other than surgery. A multimodality therapeutic approach will be required. As a potent modulator of tumor response to N-mustards and anthracyclines as well as tumor thermo- and radiosensitivity, LND promises to play an important clinical role in the management and possible complete local control of a number of prevalent forms of human cancer.

Effects of hyperglycemia on lonidamine-induced acidification and de-energization of human melanoma xenografts and sensitization to melphalan

We seek to exploit the natural tendency of melanomas and other tumors to convert glucose to lactate as a method for the selective intracellular acidification of cancer cells and for the potentiation of the activity of nitrogen-mustard antineoplastic agents. We performed this study to evaluate whether the induction of hyperglycemia (26 mM) could enhance the effects of lonidamine (LND, 100 mg/kg; intraperitoneally) on the induction of intracellular acidification, bioenergetic decline and potentiation of the activity of melphalan (LPAM) against DB-1 melanoma xenografts in mice. Intracellular pH (pHi ), extracellular pH (pHe ) and bioenergetics (β-nucleoside triphosphate to inorganic phosphate ratio, β-NTP/Pi) were reduced by 0.7 units (p < 0.001), 0.3 units (p > 0.05) and 51.4% (p < 0.05), respectively. The therapeutic response to LPAM (7.5 mg/kg; intravenously) + LND (100 mg/kg; intraperitoneally) was reduced by about a factor of three under hyperglycemic conditions relative to normoglycemia, producing a growth delay of 7.76 days (tumor doubling time, 5.31 days; cell kill, 64%) compared with LND alone of 1.70 days and LPAM alone of 0.29 days. Under normoglycemic conditions, LND plus LPAM produced a growth delay of 17.75 days, corresponding to a cell kill of 90% at the same dose for each of these agents. The decrease in tumor cell kill under hyperglycemic conditions correlates with an increase in tumor ATP levels resulting from increased glycolytic activity. However, hyperglycemia substantially increases lactic acid production in tumors by a factor of approximately six (p < 0.05), but hyperglycemia did not increase the effects of LND on acidification of the tumor, most probably because of the strong buffering action of carbon dioxide (the pKa of carbonic acid is 6.4). Therefore, this study demonstrates that the addition of glucose during treatment with LND diminishes the activity of this agent.

Potential complications associated with normothermic lonidamine infusion and with systemic acidosis in dogs receiving lonidamine during whole body hyperthermia (WBH)

The vascular toxicosis of lonidamine (40 mg/h) or vehicle infusion was investigated in six dogs. Vasculitis and thrombosis were observed in veins infused with lonidamine but not in veins infused with vehicle. This finding suggests that it may not be possible to use lonidamine infusion to circumvent therapeutic limitations associated with the oral lonidamine formulation currently used in patients. We also investigated the systemic toxicosis of lonidamine (400 mg/m2; rapid intravenous bolus) or vehicle in six other dogs that developed systemic acidosis (pH < or = 7.0) during whole body hyperthermia (42 degrees C x 90 min). Gross and histologic haemorrhage was observed in all dogs; however, haemorrhagic lesions in acidotic dogs receiving lonidamine + WBH were more severe than changes observed in acidotic dogs receiving vehicle + WBH. These observations confirm the results of in vitro studies which suggest that the combined effect of lonidamine and hyperthermia is enhanced under acidic conditions. Furthermore, these findings indicate that acid-base status of patients receiving lonidamine during WBH must be monitored carefully to avoid serious complications.

Mechanism of action of lonidamine in the 9L brain tumor model involves inhibition of lactate efflux and intracellular acidification

Malignant gliomas have been associated with a high rate of glycolytic activity which is believed necessary to sustain cellular function and integrity. Since lonidamine (LND) is believed to reduce tumor glucose utilization by inhibition of the mitochondrially-bound glycolytic enzyme hexokinase (HK), 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) was used to noninvasively follow the effects of LND on both tumor pH and the high-energy phosphate metabolites: ATP, phosphocreatine (PCr) and inorganic phosphate (Pi) in subcutaneous rat 9L gliosarcomas. 31P tumor spectra acquired in 5 min intervals pre- and post LND administration of 50 and 100 mg/kg, i.p. revealed an acidotic pH shift of -0.25 and -0.45 pH units, respectively within 30 min post administration. The ATP/Pi ratio of 9L tumors decreased to 40% of control and Pi levels increased to 280% of control over a 3 hr period. LND exerted no effect on tumor blood flow and mean arterial blood pressure. Brain and muscle metabolite levels and pH were also unaffected by LND. In vitro measurements of cultured 9L tumor cell intra- and extracellular lactate, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) and hexokinase (HK) activities suggest that the mode of action of LND involves inhibition of lactate efflux and intracellular acidification. The selective reduction of tumor energy metabolites and pH by LND may be exploitable for sensitizing gliomas to radiation, chemotherapy or hyperthermia.

Comparison of action of the anti-neoplastic drug lonidamine on drug-sensitive and drug-resistant human breast cancer cells: 31P and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance studies

Lonidamine (LND) is a relatively new anti-cancer drug, and several clinical trials have indicated that it may be effective in combinations with other therapeutic modalities. LND is classified within the metabolic inhibitor agents. Multidrug resistance (MDR) phenomenon is often associated with increased energy requirements, and enhanced glycolysis rate. These studies were performed to delineate the mechanism of action of LND on MDR human breast cancer cells, and to investigate whether LND as a single agent, or in combination with another anti-metabolism drug, 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG), may be useful against MDR tumors. The effects of LND on intact perfused drug-sensitive (WT) and 33-fold resistant to Adriamycin (Adr) MCF-7 cells, embedded in alginate micro capsules, were continuously monitored by 31P and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. 31P NMR studies showed that LND induced intracellular acidification and depletion of NTP in both WT and Adr cells. However, pH and NTP levels decreased less in the Adr cells than in the WT cells (p < 0.05 for both parameters). 13C NMR demonstrated that LND inhibited lactate transport, and lactate signals were elevated in both cell lines. However, the intracellular lactate levels increased to a greater extent in the WT than in the Adr cells (p < 0.05). There were major differences in the effects of LND on metabolism between sensitive and resistant cells. While LND enhanced glucose uptake in the WT cells, and its administration was followed by continuous increase of lactate signal, both processes were not affected by LND in the Adr cells. 2-DG is a glucose analogue that inhibits both cellular uptake and utilization of glucose, leading to cell starvation. Combined treatment with LND and 2-DG yielded at best additive, but not synergistic, cellular toxicity, and the metabolic effects of LND were attenuated by 2-DG. These results showed that the principal mechanism of action of LND is inhibition of lactate transport leading to intracellular lactate accumulation and acidification in both WT and Adr cells. The Adr cells were only 2-fold resistant to LND (compared to the WT cells), and since cellular uptake of alkaloid chemotherapy is improved in acidic environment, LND may have a role in the treatment protocols of MDR tumors, especially when given as the initial means for induction of intracellular acidification.

Effects of the inhibitors of energy metabolism, lonidamine and levamisole, on 5-aminolevulinic-acid-induced photochemotherapy

The ability of endogenously synthesized protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) to damage Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts of the line V79 by exposure to light was examined. This treatment induced reduction of cellular ATP, GTP, of the NADH/NAD+ ratio and of oxygen consumption. The present results indicate a close relationship between inhibition of respiration of irradiated cells and their ability to survive, e.g. 1 min of light exposure induced 90% inhibition of oxygen consumption and inactivation of approximately 95% of the cells, while the cellular content of ATP was reduced by only 15%. This indicates that the mitochondria are one of the primary targets of 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-mediated photochemotherapy (PCT). In the present study, ALA-PCT was combined with the modulators of the glycolysis and the respiration chain, levamisole (LEV) and lonidamine (LND). A synergistic effect of combining ALA-PCT with non-toxic concentrations of LND was observed when LND was given prior to light exposure. This synergism was observed despite a substantial LND-induced inhibition of PpIX formation. At increasing doses of LND (>0.15 mM) the combination treatment becomes less efficient. This is due to the inhibition of PpIX synthesis induced by LND. A synergistic effect of ALA-PDT and LEV was found when LEV was given prior to light exposure. This was at least partly due to an LEV-stimulated effect on ALA-induced PpIX formation. However, it is not clear from the present results whether LEV may perturb energy metabolism in V79 cells since LEV alone did not reduce the energy charge or the NADH/NAD+ ratio. When LEV or LND were given after ALA-PCT, these 2 treatment modalities acted in an additive or slightly synergistic manner.

Effect of whole-body hyperthermia on lonidamine and doxorubicin pharmacokinetics and toxicity in dogs

Six cycles of the maximum tolerable intravenous doses of lonidamine (400 mg/m2) and doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) were administered to three normothermic dogs and three dogs undergoing whole-body hyperthermia (WBH) (42 degrees C X 90 min), at 3-week intervals. Lonidamine pharmacokinetics was unaltered by WBH. WBH increased doxorubicin clearance 1.6-fold, however this trend was not statistically significant. WBH resulted in a 2.4-fold increase in the volume of distribution (Vdss) of doxorubicin relative to dogs treated under euthermic conditions (p < 0.001). This finding suggests tissue extraction of doxorubicin was increased by WBH. The specific tissues in which this occurred is unknown, but myelosuppression and cardiotoxicity were only minimally increased. Therefore, doxorubicin uptake in critical normal tissues was probably unaffected. The biochemical and haematologic toxicities observed 6 h and 1 week after each treatment did not appear to differ in character or severity from that reported in dogs receiving lonidamine +/- WBH or doxorubicin +/- WBH. These results suggest WBH did not decrease the maximum tolerable dose of doxorubicin when given with lonidamine, and that the antitumour activity of this combination should be assessed.

Effect of whole-body hyperthermia on the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of lonidamine in dogs

The pharmacokinetics and toxicity of intravenous lonidamine were investigated in dogs receiving four cycles of lonidamine (400 or 800 mg/m2) +/- whole-body hyperthermia (WBH). Clearance and volume of distribution in dogs receiving lonidamine during WBH increased 1.6-2.3 and 1.9-3.5-fold respectively, relative to dogs receiving lonidamine under euthermic conditions (p < 0.02). In dogs receiving lonidamine under euthermic conditions or 400 mg/m2 + WBH, the area under the lonidamine concentration versus time curve (AUC) measured during the fourth treatment was 21-58% lower than the first treatment AUC. However, in dogs receiving 800 mg/m2 + WBH, the fourth treatment AUC was four-fold higher than the first treatment AUC (p < 0.02). This suggests repeated exposure to 800 mg/m2 lonidamine and WBH impairs lonidamine metabolism. Weakness, hypoglycaemia, and elevations in amylase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin were more severe or occurred exclusively in dogs receiving 800 mg/m2 + WBH. Since these changes were attributable to marked AUC increases, which occurred secondary to repeated exposure to 800 mg/m2 lonidamine during WBH, 400 mg/m2 was identified as the maximum tolerable dose to be administered intravenously to dogs during WBH.

Relative cytotoxicities of adriamycin and epirubicin in combination with lonidamine against human bladder cancer cell lines

We have used a panel of bladder cancer cell lines to compare the toxicities of Adriamycin and epirubicin, two drugs used intravesically to treat superficial transitional cell cancer (TCC) of the bladder, alone and in combination with lonidamine, an agent known to be active against anthracycline-resistant disease. Comparing concentrations reducing colony-forming ability by 50%, epirubicin and Adriamycin were similar in their cytotoxicities, although epirubicin was more potent against every line except an Adriamycin-resistant subline. Combinations of the two drugs with a non-cytotoxic concentration (1 microgram/ml) of lonidamine were tested using the Adriamycin-resistant subline MGH-U1R and its sensitive parental line MGH-U1. The addition of lonidamine caused a two-fold increase in the sensitivity of the resistant subline to both drugs, while having no effect on the sensitivity of the parental line. The data indicate that this combination might be of value in anthracycline-resistant disease.

A prospective randomized comparison of radiation therapy plus lonidamine versus radiation therapy plus placebo as initial treatment of clinically localized but nonresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

By means of a multicenter, prospective randomized, placebo-controlled study, to assess the impact of adding the radiation-enhancing agent lonidamine to standard "curative-intent" radiation therapy upon overall survival, progression-free survival, and local progression-free survival of patients with clinically localized but nonresectable nonsmall cell lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Lonidamine, or the lonidamine-placebo, was administered at a dose of 265 mg/m2 in three divided daily doses. Drug therapy began 2 days prior to the initiation of radiation therapy and continued until progression of disease mandated a change in therapy. The radiation therapy dose was 55-60 Gy, at a daily dose of 1.8 Gy and five treatments per week. Patients with clinical Stage II or III nonsmall cell lung cancer were stratified within the treatment center, and within two histologic strata: epidermoid vs. other nonsmall cell cancers.

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were enlisted on study, 152 on the placebo arm and 158 on the lonidamine arm. The median survival durations were 326 days and 392 days for the placebo and lonidamine-treated groups respectively, p = 0.41 for a comparison of the survival curves. Median progression-free survival and median local progression-free survival durations were 197 days and 341 days for placebo + radiation therapy vs. 230 days and 300 days for lonidamine + radiation therapy; p-values for the respective curves were 0.75 and 0.42. Although there were proportionately more lonidamine-treated patients than placebo-treated patients demonstrating continued local control in excess of 12 months, the numbers of patients still at risk after 24 months were too small for meaningful statistical analysis.

CONCLUSION

This multicenter Phase III study failed to demonstrate a significant advantage in the lonidamine-treated population in overally patient survival, in progression-free survival, or in the median duration of local control.

Double-blind randomized study of lonidamine and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies showed lonidamine to potentiate the effects of x-irradiation by inhibiting the repair of potentially lethal damage. This Phase III double blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to evaluate whether lonidamine can increase the tumor control of radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced head and neck cancer without any synergistic toxic effects on the exposed normal tissues.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-seven patients with Stages II-IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled. Separate analyses were done on the 96 eligible patients and the 90 patients who completed the prescribed treatment regimen. Patients received radiotherapy up to a planned total of 60-66 Gy, in 2 daily fractions of 1.5 Gy each and either lonidamine (450 mg p.o. in three divided daily doses) or placebo, given continuously for 3 months or up to 1 month after the end of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The rate of tumor clearance was 66% (32/48) in the lonidamine group and 65% (31/48) in the placebo group, while the subsequent failure rate was 50% and 77%, respectively (p < 0.05). The 3 and 5 year locoregional control rates in the adequately treated patients achieving complete tumor clearance were 66% and 63% for lonidamine vs. 41% and 37% for placebo. The disease-free survival in adequately treated patients was significantly better in the lonidamine group (p < 0.03), with 3 and 5 year rates of 44% and 40%, respectively, vs. 23% and 19% in the placebo group. The overall survival rate for all eligible patients at both 3 and 5 years was 44% in the lonidamine group and 44% and 31%, respectively, in the placebo group. Both acute and late radiation reactions were similar in the two groups. Myalgia and testicular pain were the most frequent side effects of lonidamine with an incidence of 8.5% and 4.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The addition of lonidamine to hyperfractionated radiotherapy was correlated with a statistically and clinically significant proportion of long-term disease-free patients. The toxicity of radiotherapy was not aggravated by the drug and the overall tolerance of the combined regimen was acceptable.

Modulation of antitumor alkylating agents by novobiocin, topotecan, and lonidamine

Topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II allow a metabolically active cell to mobilize its supercoiled chromosomal DNA and undergo replication, transcription, recombination, and repair. Several topoisomerase inhibitors have recently been shown to be active in preclinical systems. Topotecan (SK&F 104,864), a water-soluble camptothecin analog, is an inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Novobiocin is an inhibitor of topoisomerase II. Lonidamine depletes cellular adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) and may impede energy-dependent DNA repair, MCF-7 human breast-cancer cells were treated in vitro with topotecan, novobiocin, and lonidamine alone, in paired combinations, and in combination with CDDP and melphalan. The three enzyme inhibitors alone and in combination did not increase tumor cell sensitivity to CDDP. However, the combinations of topotecan/novobiocin and lonidamine/novobiocin did enhance the cytotoxicity of melphalan. Mice bearing the FSaII fibrosarcoma were treated in vivo with topotecan, novobiocin, and lonidamine alone, in paired combinations, and in combination with CDDP, melphalan, BCNU, and cyclophosphamide. The combination of topotecan/novobiocin had the greatest impact on tumor cell sensitivity to each cytotoxic agent tested in both tumor cell-survival and tumor growth-delay assays. This sensitization was greatest at the highest concentrations of the cytotoxic agent tested. Combinations of topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II inhibitors may be useful as modulators of antitumor alkylating agents.

Enhancement of sensitivity to hyperthermia by lonidamine in human cancer cells

Human glioma (87MG) and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck UMSCC-1 were shown to be sensitized to hyperthermia by Lonidamine treatment before and during hyperthermia. The degree of thermal sensitization increased with increasing heating times and temperatures. In addition, the thermal sensitization by Lonidamine as well as cellular thermal sensitivity were dependent on pH and increased with the more acidic pH. Even though plateau phase cells were more thermally resistant than exponentially growing cells, Lonidamine treatment caused thermal sensitization under both conditions. These data show that Lonidamine may hold potential to enhance the effectiveness of hyperthermia in cancer treatment and that especially in tumours with low pH an enhanced therapeutic gain may be achieved.

The effect of lonidamine (LND) on radiation and thermal responses of human and rodent cell lines

Rodent and human cells were tested for response to Lonidamine (LND) (1-(2,4 dichlorobenzyl) 1-indazol-3-carboxylic acid) combined with radiation or hyperthermia. Lonidamine exposure before, during, and after irradiation caused varying degrees of inhibition of potentially lethal damage (PLD) repair which was cell line dependent. In human glioma, melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and fibroblasts, LND exposure did not inhibit or only partially inhibited repair of potentially lethal damage. LND up to 100 micrograms/ml produced only a low level of toxicity in these cells and only slightly inhibited glucose consumption at the maximum concentration. In human glioma cells, LND treatment alone did not inhibit PLD repair, but when combined with hyperthermia treatment at moderate levels easily achievable in the clinic, there was complete inhibition of potentially lethal damage repair. These data suggest that LND effectiveness is cell type dependent. Combinations of LND, hyperthermia, and radiation may be effective in cancer therapy especially in tumors such as glioma in which repair of potentially lethal damage may be extensive.

Adjunctive therapy (whole body hyperthermia versus lonidamine) to total body irradiation for the treatment of favorable B-cell neoplasms: a report of two pilot clinical trials and laboratory investigations

Based on earlier clinical and preclinical investigations, we designed two different pilot trials for patients with nodular lymphoma or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. These studies evaluated the use of either 41.8 degrees C whole body hyperthermia (WBH), or the nonmyelosuppressive chemotherapeutic drug, lonidamine (LON), as an adjunct to total body irradiation (TBI) (12.5 cGy twice a week, every other week for a planned total dose of 150 cGy). Whole body hyperthermia was initiated approximately 10 min after total body irradiation; lonidamine was administered orally (420 mg/m2) on a daily basis. Although entry to the studies was nonrandomized, the two patient populations were accrued during the same time frame and were comparable in terms of histology, stage of disease, performance status, and prior therapy. Of 8 patients entered on the TBI/WBH study, we observed 3 complete responses (CR), 4 partial responses (PR), and 1 improvement (i.e., a 48% decrease in tumor burden). Of 10 patients entered in the TBI/LON study, there was 1 CR and 4 PR. For the TBI/WBH study, myelosuppression was not treatment-limiting; there were no instances of infection or bleeding and platelet support was never required. The median survival time for the TBI/WBH study is 52.5 months based on Kaplan Meir estimates. Two patients remain in a CR. The median time to treatment failure (MTTF) is 9.4 months (90% confidence interval = 7-15.4 months). In the TBI/LON study, 50% of patients receiving TBI required treatment modification due to platelet-count depression during therapy, but there were no instances of infection or bleeding. Frequently observed LON-related toxicities included myalgias, testicular pain, photophobia and ototoxicity. For the TBI/LON study, median survival is 7.6 months; MTTF was 2.4 months. In analyzing the results of these pilot studies, our subjective clinical impressions lead to the hypothesis that WBH protected against TBI-induced thrombocytopenia during therapy, whereas LON had no effect on TBI-induced myelosuppression. This speculation was tested and confirmed in a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments.

In vitro pharmacological purging of human bone marrow is enhanced by the use of lonidamine

Lonidamine (LND), previously reported as a useful antitumor substance in combination with physical or chemical agents, has been studied for its capacity in increasing pharmacological elimination in vitro of residual tumor cells from human bone marrow. Different drugs were tested in association with LND against mixtures of human bone marrow and a tumor cell line, clonogenic human leukemic blast progenitors, and normal human bone marrow precursors. The results demonstrated that LND increased the efficacy of anthracycline derivatives (Adriamycin, Mitoxantrone) both on the tumor cell line and on the leukemic blast progenitors, while VP-16 or ASTA-Z 7654 was not affected by the same substance. The toxicity on normal stem cells reflected that of each drug and was not modified by the addition of LND. While a consistent dose-dependent CFU-GM reduction was observed immediately after treatment with the different drugs, a complete recovery was reached after 7 and 14 days of long-term marrow cultures. Because of the low toxicity and the efficacy demonstrated in association with certain agents in increasing tumor cell elimination in vitro, LND could play an important role in in vitro purging prior to autologous bone marrow transplantation.

Effect of lonidamine on the cytotoxicity of four alkylating agents in vitro

We examined the ability of lonidamine, which has been described as an inhibitor of cellular respiration and glycolysis, to enhance the cytotoxicity of alkylating agents to MCF-7 human breast-carcinoma cells. Lonidamine was increasingly cytotoxic to MCF-7 cells with increasing time of exposure. With a 12-h exposure, the IC50 for lonidamine was about 365 microM, and with a 24-h exposure it was about 170 microM. A drug concentration of 250 microM was chosen for use in the drug combination studies. Lonidamine appeared to have a dose-modifying effect on cisplatin (CDDP), producing increasingly supra-additive cell kill with increasing CDDP concentration. When simultaneously incubated with lonidamine for 1 h, 500 microM CDDP yielded a cell kill that was 2 log greater than additive cytotoxicity. Extending the exposure to lonidamine for 12 h after CDDP treatment led to a small, additional aliquot of cell kill of about 2.5-fold over the CDDP concentration range. Lonidamine also appeared to have a dose-modifying effect on melphalan cytotoxicity in the melphalan concentration range of 100-500 microM. Between concentrations of 10 and 100 microM melphalan, the drug combination survival after 1 h exposure fell within the envelope of additivity for the two agents. However, maintaining the presence of lonidamine for an additional 12 h increased the effect such that the combination was supra-additive over the entire concentration range of melphalan. Simultaneous exposure to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4-HC) and lonidamine for 1 h resulted in greater than additive cell kill, and extending the lonidamine exposure period such that lonidamine was present during and 12 h after 4-HC treatment further increased this effect. Lonidamine had a moderate effect on the cytotoxicity of carmustine (BCNU) with a 1 h simultaneous exposure; however, this treatment combination reached greater than additive cytotoxicity only at the highest concentration of BCNU tested. Extending the lonidamine exposure time for an additional 12 h resulted in supra-additive cell kill over the BCNU concentration range. Therefore, when lonidamine was present during exposure to the alkylating agent and its presence was then extended for an additional 12 h, a synergistic cell kill was produced with all four alkylating agents tested.

Kinetic and survival response of the M14 cell line to lonidamine associated with adriamycin or hyperthermia

Lonidamine (LND), an indazole-carboxylic acid derivative, was delivered alone and together with adriamycin (ADM) or hyperthermia to the human melanoma cell line M14, and cell survival was assessed. Cell cycle-specific effects were investigated by analyzing sequences of DNA content histograms by means of a suitable mathematical procedure. LND delivered for 1 h at a dose of 50 micrograms/ml did not affect proliferation and survival of the cells. Exposure of the cells for 1 h to ADM (1.0 microgram/ml) followed by LND for 1 h (50 micrograms/ml) produced the highest effect on the survival. Kinetic parameters were affected by the combined treatment slightly more than by ADM exposure alone. Simultaneous delivery of LND (50 micrograms/ml) with hyperthermia (42 degrees C, 1 h) reduced the survival and enhanced the block of cells in the G2M phase, as compared with the heat treatment alone. The effect of the treatments on cell survival appeared to be related to the perturbation of the G2M phase of the cycle.

Hyperthermia for cancer: a practical perspective

A causal relationship between hyperpyrexia and tumor regression was first suggested in 1866, when Busch reported the cure of a histologically diagnosed sarcoma in a middle-aged woman, following a bout of erysipelas. Over the years, interest in the effect of heat on cancer has remained alive, but this interest has increased dramatically in recent years. The literature on this subject is broadly reviewed and the clinical results discussed. It is apparent from clinical studies thus far that it is a relatively simple undertaking to treat superficial neoplasms with hyperthermia. However, the major challenges in clinical thermotherapy pertain to patients with deeply situated tumors. The lack of safe and reliable methods of monitoring temperature in deep tissues is a major impediment to a thorough understanding of thermal dosimetry in clinical hyperthermia, and routine thermal dosimetry in clinical hyperthermia will have to await the development of reliable noninvasive thermometry. As responses have been reported with modest levels of hyperthermia, the need for thermometry is somewhat lessened, given that invasive monitoring is imperfect and somewhat risky when used in deeply seated tumours. The eventual place of thermotherapy in the treatment of malignant tumours in man is as yet unclear and must be rigourously and thoroughly assessed in well-designed, prospective, randomized patient trials.