Management of retinal vein occlusion--consensus document

Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment Burden of Aflibercept 2 mg and Ranibizumab in Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated evidence base for clinical decision-making by comparing the efficacy and safety of aflibercept 2 mg and ranibizumab in treating retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using eight databases up to December 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world studies (RWSs) comparing aflibercept and ranibizumab in patients with RVO were evaluated. The primary outcomes assessed were efficacy, number of injections administered, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Three RCTs (424 patients) and 11 RWSs (1415 patients) were included. For central RVO (CRVO), RCTs demonstrated a comparable efficacy, whereas RWSs showed that mean changes from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were significantly greater with aflibercept compared to ranibizumab; the number of injections of aflibercept was fewer than that of ranibizumab in RCTs, but similar in RWSs. For branch RVO (BRVO), no statistically significant difference in efficacy between the two drugs in RCTs/RWSs was observed, with fewer injections of aflibercept at 12 months in RWSs. The safety profiles of both drugs were similar for both CRVO and BRVO.

CONCLUSIONS

For CRVO, aflibercept had similar efficacy and safety profile but with fewer injections versus ranibizumab in RCTs; RWSs showed greater BCVA improvement and CRT reduction with aflibercept than ranibizumab. For BRVO, RCTs showed similar in efficacy, safety, and injection numbers for both drugs, while RWSs demonstrated that aflibercept required fewer injections at 12 months of follow-up. Overall, this study provides updated evidence for clinical decision-making in the treatment of RVO.

The risk of retinal vein occlusion among patients with neovascular age related macular degeneration: a large-scale cohort study

PURPOSE

To examine the risk for retinal-vein-occlusion (RVO) in patients with neovascular age-related-macular-degeneration (AMD) as compared to age- and sex-matched controls.

METHOD

This is a population-based, cohort study. The study encompassed 24,578 consecutive patients with neovascular AMD and 66,129 control subjects. Multivariate cox regression analysis was utilized to detect the risk of RVO among patients with neovascular AMD. Predictors of RVO in patients with neovascular AMD were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Mortality of patients was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The incidence rate of RVO was estimated at 1.25 (95% CI, 1.06-1.45) per 1000 person-years among patients with neovascular AMD and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.20-0.31) per 1000 person-years among controls. Patients with neovascular AMD were associated with an increased risk of RVO (adjusted HR, 4.35; 95% CI, 3.34-5.66; P < 0.001). Among patients with neovascular AMD, older age (≥79.0 years) was associated with a decreased risk of RVO (adjusted OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.37-0.70; P < 0.001), whilst a history of glaucoma increased the likelihood of RVO (adjusted OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.94-3.65; P < 0.001). Patients with neovascular AMD and comorbid RVO had a comparable risk of all-cause mortality relative to other patients with neovascular AMD (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.67-1.22; P = 0.500) CONCLUSIONS: An increased risk of RVO was found among patients with neovascular AMD. Younger age and glaucoma predicted the development of RVO in patients with neovascular AMD. Awareness of this comorbidity is of benefit for clinicians as patients with neovascular AMD might be carefully examined for RVO signs and complications.

Update on Retinal Vein Occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion represents the second leading cause of retinal vascular disorders, with a uniform sex distribution worldwide. A thorough evaluation of cardiovascular risk factors is required to correct possible comorbidities. The diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion have changed tremendously in the last 30 years, but the assessment of retinal ischemia at baseline and during follow-up examinations remains crucial. New imaging techniques have shed light on the pathophysiology of the disease and laser treatment, once the only therapeutic option, is now only one of the possible approaches with antivascular endothelial growth factors and steroid injections being preferred in most cases. Nowadays long-term outcomes are better than those achievable 20 years ago and yet, many new therapeutic options are under development, including new intravitreal drugs and gene therapy. Despite this, some cases still develop sight-threatening complications deserving a more aggressive (sometimes surgical) approach. The purpose of this comprehensive review is to reappraise some old but still valid concepts and to integrate them with new research and clinical data. The work will provide an overview of the disease's pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical features along with a detailed discussion on the advantages of multimodal imaging and of the different treatment strategies with the aim of providing retina specialists with the most updated knowledge in the field.

[Retinal vein occlusion : Intravitreal pharmacotherapies and treatment strategies for the management of macular edema]

Intravitreal injection treatment for the management of macular edema as an expression of increased capillary permeability and leakage constitute the mainstay of treatment in retinal vein occlusion. In contrast to diabetic retinopathy or neovascular age-related macular degeneration, permanent and complete functional and morphological restoration can be achieved, as retinal vein occlusions are usually associated with risk factors, but do not represent the manifestation form of an underlying systemic or degenerative chronic disorder; however, successful long-term management of retinal vein occlusion -associated macular edema usually requires intensive and also long-term continued treatment with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors or with a less favorable side effect profile, dexamethasone. A functional treatment success can be maintained over the long term by both pro re nata (PRN) or treat and extend (T&E) regimens. In contrast, according to the currently available data, the combination of anti-VEGF administration and grid laser treatment has no additional benefit compared to monotherapy. In patients with recalcitrant macular edema, switching to another intravitreal agent may be considered during the course of treatment, although a true therapeutic benefit with respect to the development of visual acuity has not yet been proven. The current review summarizes the relevant aspects in the management of RVO-associated macular edema and provides the foundations for the application of successful treatment strategies.

Altered White Matter Integrity in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Study

Background

To investigate microstructural alterations of white matter in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients by tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Material/Methods. DTI was performed on 14 RVO patients and 14 normal controls (HCs). We measured and recorded fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) of white matter fibers and classified them through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and correlation analysis, respectively.

Results

The mean FA value of white matter in RVO patients is lower than the HCs, and the mean RD value in RVO patients increased, especially in the bilateral posterior thalamic, bilateral sagittal stratum, body of corpus callosum, cingulum, and fornix. The ROC curve of different brain regions showed high accuracy. Moreover, the mean FA and RD values were significantly correlated with visual and psychological disorders.

Conclusion

TBSS could be regarded as an important method to reveal the alterations of white matter in RVO patients, indicating the underlying neurological mechanism of the RVO.

The role of inflammation and neurodegeneration in diabetic macular edema

The pathogenesis of diabetic macular edema (DME) is complex. Persistently high blood glucose activates multiple cellular pathways and induces inflammation, oxidation stress, and vascular dysfunction. Retinal ganglion cells, macroglial and microglial cells, endothelial cells, pericytes, and retinal pigment epithelium cells are involved. Neurodegeneration, characterized by dysfunction or apoptotic loss of retinal neurons, occurs early and independently from the vascular alterations. Despite the increasing knowledge on the pathways involved in DME, only limited therapeutic strategies are available. Besides antiangiogenic drugs and intravitreal corticosteroids, alternative therapeutic options tackling inflammation, oxidative stress, and neurodegeneration have been considered, but none of them has been currently approved.

Retinal Vein Occlusion Following Two Doses of mRNA-1237 (Moderna) Immunization for SARS-Cov-2: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Published data on possible ocular adverse events potentially associated with vaccination with the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine are scarce. In this report, we describe the case of a patient who had a hemispheric retinal vein occlusion potentially associated with being vaccinated with the second dose of the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine.

METHODS

Case report including a discussion on multimodal imaging.

RESULTS

A 74-year-old woman presented with painless vision loss in the right eye experienced 48 hours after receiving a second dose of the mRNA-1237 vaccine. The patient was receiving oral anticoagulant therapy for atrial fibrillation. Her best-corrected visual acuity (VA) was 20/32, and fundus examination showed venous congestion and widespread blot haemorrhages in the inferior quadrants. Based on multimodal imaging evaluation, the diagnosis of hemispheric retinal vein occlusion was made. Due to the development of cystoid macular oedema with intraretinal fluid and the decline in VA, the patient was treated with two injections of intravitreal ranibizumab, leading to functional improvement and regression of oedema.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a case with retinal vein occlusion 48 hours after vaccination with the SARS-Cov-2 mRNA-1237 vaccine; however, the relationship between these two events remains unclear. Further research is warranted to better understand the potential link between retinal thrombotic events and vaccination.

Optical coherence tomographic patterns in patients with retinal vein occlusion and macular edema treated by ranibizumab: a predictive and personalized approach

Purpose

To establish the morphological and functional parameters to predict the effectiveness of intravitreal injections (IVI) of ranibizumab in macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion and to develop a mathematical model for personalized treatment algorithms.

Material and methods

This is a retrospective study of 98 patients (98 eyes) with macular edema, who received IVI of ranibizumab and were followed up for 12 months. Spectral optical coherence tomography scans and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) assessments were conducted every 3 months. Treatment outcome predictors were calculated based on logistic regression analysis.

Results

The most significant prognostic factors for the long-term BCVA were baseline BCVA (OR 11.1, p = 0.001), foveal volume (OR 10.8, p = 0.001), destruction of external limiting membrane (OR 15.8, p = 0.001), photoreceptor inner/outer segments (OR 11.1, p = 0.001) and retinal pigment epithelium (OR 9.1, p = 0.001). It has also been discovered that post-treatment BCVA correlated with the height of serous retinal detachment (SRD) (r = -0.4, p = 0.001), ganglion cell complex thickness (r =  + 0.3, p = 0.01) and focal loss of ganglion cells (r =-0.3, p = 0.005). Patients without SRD required fewer ranibizumab injections (3.8 ± 1.1) for macular edema fluid resorption compared to those with SRD (5.7 ± 1.2, p = 0.03). A mathematical model for predicting and personalized approach therapy of ranibizumab has been obtained (accuracy of 89%).

Conclusion

The effectiveness of IVI of ranibizumab depends on baseline morphological and functional changes. The obtained mathematical model allows for predicting the outcomes of therapy, determining individualized algorithms to increase the treatment effectiveness and to prevent low vision that corresponds to the principles of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.

Relationship between metamorphopsia and inner retinal microstructure following intravitreal ranibizumab injection for branch retinal vein occlusion

To evaluate the effects of intravitreal ranibizumab injection (IVR) on metamorphopsia in patients with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), and to assess the relationship between metamorphopsia and inner retinal microstructure and other factors. Thirty-three treatment-naïve eyes of 33 patients with macular edema caused by BRVO with at least 12 months of follow-up were included. The degree of metamorphopsia was quantified using the M-CHARTS. Retinal microstructure was assessed with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL) at the first month after resolution of the macular edema (early DRIL) and at 12 months after treatment (after DRIL) was studied. Central retinal thickness (CRT), and status of the external limiting membrane as well as ellipsoid zone were also evaluated. IVR treatment significantly improved best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and CRT, but the mean metamorphopsia score did not improve even after 12 months. Post-treatment metamorphopsia scores showed a significant correlation with pre-treatment metamorphopsia scores (P < 0.005), the extent of early DRIL (P < 0.05) and after DRIL (P < 0.05), and the number of injections (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the post-treatment mean metamorphopsia score was significantly correlated with the pre-treatment mean metamorphopsia score (P < 0.05). IVR treatment significantly improved BCVA and CRT, but not metamorphopsia. Post-treatment metamorphopsia scores were significantly associated with pre-treatment metamorphopsia scores, the extent of DRIL, and the number of injections. Prognostic factor of metamorphopsia was the degree of pre-treatment metamorphopsia.

Retinal disease in the neurology clinic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Retinal disease can manifest with visual symptoms similar to those which result from central nervous system disorders. We provide a framework for considering retinal causes of common visual complaints presenting to a neurology clinic.

RECENT FINDINGS

Technological advances have afforded quicker detection and a more thorough understanding of these retinal entities and are crucial to consider when evaluating visual complaints in the neurology clinic.

SUMMARY

It is essential to maintain a working knowledge of common retinal conditions that symptomatically overlap with common neurologic conditions. Furthermore, the ophthalmoscopic exam and retinal imaging modalities can both aid in the diagnosis and workup of visual complaints and neurologic disease.

ASSESSMENT OF HYPERREFLECTIVE FOCI AFTER BEVACIZUMAB OR DEXAMETHASONE TREATMENT ACCORDING TO DURATION OF MACULAR EDEMA IN PATIENTS WITH BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

PURPOSE

To evaluate the association between hyperreflective foci (HRF) on spectral domain optical coherence tomography and therapeutic effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) or intravitreal dexamethasone implants (IVD) according to macular edema (ME) duration in branch retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Consecutive treatment-naive patients received IVB or IVD for at least 6 months. Each group was subdivided according to ME duration (<3 months vs. ≥3 months). Hyperreflective foci and best-corrected visual acuity were compared.

RESULTS

Of 139 eyes (139 patients), 69 received IVB and 70 received IVD. At baseline, eyes with ME ≥ 3 months had more outer and total retinal HRF than eyes with ME < 3 months (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001). At 6 months, the IVD group exhibited a greater reduction in outer retinal HRF than the IVB group in both ME duration subgroups (P = 0.015 and P < 0.001). In the ME ≥ 3 months group, IVD resulted in greater best-corrected visual acuity improvement than IVB (P = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

Increased outer retinal HRF at baseline in eyes with ME ≥ 3 months together with a greater reduction in HRF at 6 months and better visual outcomes after IVD suggests that the inflammatory aspect of disease should be considered in the treatment of ME. Thus, IVD injection could be more appropriate for patients with a longer ME duration after branch retinal vein occlusion.

Quantitative analysis of microvascular network with optical coherence tomography angiography and its correlation with visual acuity in retinal vein occlusion

Purpose:

Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

Bilateral Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in a 40-Year-Old Man with Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia

BACKGROUND COVID-19 is the disease caused by the novel virus, severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The spectrum of disease seen in patients with COVID-19 infection ranges from asymptomatic or mild symptoms to severe pneumonia and even acute respiratory distress syndrome, which often requires invasive ventilation and intensive care. COVID-19-associated infection can be catastrophic, leading to both arterial and venous occlusion, microinfarcts, and multiorgan failure, although retinal vein occlusion has not yet been reported. CASE REPORT We present the case of a 40-year-old man who presented with a 3-day history of shortness of breath, cough, and fever. He also reported right calf pain and blurring of vision in both eyes. His medical history included hypertension and morbid obesity. The patient was found to have severe COVID-19 pneumonia on high-resolution computed tomography of the chest, right leg deep venous thrombosis on Doppler ultrasonography, and bilateral central retinal vein occlusion (RVO) on fundal examination. He was started on full-dose anticoagulation and discharged on rivaroxaban for 3 months. After 2 weeks of therapy, he had fully recovered from his COVID-19 symptoms and had near-normal vision. CONCLUSIONS COVID-19 infection can cause RVO. Early full-dose anticoagulation should be considered in high-risk patients with severe COVID-19 infection. Ophthalmologists and other clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for RVO in patients with COVID-19 infection who presenting with blurred vision and severe pneumonia.

Quantitative assessment of macular microvasculature and radial peripapillary capillary plexus in the fellow eyes of patients with retinal vein occlusion using OCT angiography

PURPOSE

To evaluate the macular microvasculature and radial peripapillary capillary (RPC) plexus in the fellow eyes of patients diagnosed with unilateral retinal vein occlusion (RVO), using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

METHODS

Seventy-two fellow eyes of patients with unilateral RVO and 74 healthy control eyes were consecutively enrolled. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmological assessment, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCTA measurements. Foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, macular vessel density (VD), and perfusion density (PD) of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) were measured. The perfusion and flux index (FI) of the RPC plexus were measured using a 4.5mm×4.5mm ONH angiography scan acquisition protocol.

RESULTS

The mean macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL), and retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) in the inferior quadrant were significantly thinner in the fellow eyes of RVO patients compared to control eyes (P=0.010 and P=0.043, respectively). The mean macular VD in the outer ring was significantly lower in fellow eyes of RVO patients compared to control eyes (P=0.027). The mean RPC perfusion showed no significant difference between fellow eyes of RVO patients and control eyes in the four quadrants (P>0.05, all). The mean peripapillary global, inferior and nasal FI were significant lower in the fellow eyes of RVO patients compared to control eyes (P=0.033, P=0.008, P=0.009, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the fellow eyes of RVO patients, macular VD was significantly lower in the outer region, and peripapillary structural and microvascular alterations were remarkable in the inferior quadrant. The results of this study showed that the presence of RVO might be related to retinal microvasculature changes in both the macular and peripapillary regions of the unaffected fellow eyes.

Ranibizumab for Macular Edema Secondary to Central and Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion in Patients Younger Than 50 Years of Age

Background

To determine the effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) approach over 1-year follow-up in patients younger than 50 years old with central and branch retinal vein occlusion (RVO) complicated by macular edema (ME).

Methods

Prospective, open-label case series. Patients initiating IVR injections from January 2015 to May 2017 were consecutively recruited. Each patient underwent monthly ophthalmic examination and structural OCT over 12 months. A single IVR injection was administered at baseline, followed by a PRN regimen. Outcome measures are best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA); central foveal thickness (CFT); number of IVR injections; subretinal fluid (SRF); epiretinal membrane; and outer retinal layer (ORL) status.

Results

Thirty-eight patients (27 males) were included in the study. At follow-up, mean BCVA improved from 0.40 ± 0.17 to 0.10 ± 0.10 LogMAR in patients with central RVO and from 0.39 ± 0.19 to 0.19 ± 0.07 LogMAR in those with branch RVO, with 20 eyes gaining ≥3 ETDRS lines. In addition, mean CFT significantly decreased in both subgroups at the end of follow-up. All patients with SRF at baseline (9) disclosed complete resolution after 1 year. Likewise, ORL appeared reconstituted in most cases. At 12 months, 3.6 ± 2.4 and 4.4 ± 2.4 IVR injections were required for central and branch RVO, respectively, with only 5 eyes showing ME persistence.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that IVR injections can be a valid therapeutic option in patients under 50 years of age with ME secondary to RVO.

Can the dexamethasone intravitreal implant Ozurdex be safely administered in an out-of-operating room setting?

Purpose

To describe a standardized protocol of the dexamethasone intravitreal (DEX) implant Ozurdex (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) performed in a controlled environment surgical cabin (CESC).

Methods

Retrospective and observational study conducted on patients who underwent a DEX implant between May 2011 and June 2019, in a third level University Hospital. The controlled environment surgical cabin (ArcSterile, Imex, Valencia, Spain) used in this study was the MB 20 (2 m width, 1.60 m depth, and 2 m height) with an uninterrupted power system (ARSSAI1) to keep the cabin working for 20 min. The cabin was used in the open mode. A standardized protocol of intravitreal injections in controlled environment surgical cabin was designed.

Results

From May 2011 to February 2015, a total of 454 DEX implants were performed in the operating room, whereas from March 2015 to June 2019, 1054 DEX devices were implanted using the CESC. The mean number of DEX implants/per week was significantly lower in the operating room than in the CESC [2.3 (2.1 to 2.5) versus 3.8 (3.6 to 4.1), mean difference 1.5 (1.2 to 1.8), p < 0.0001]. The incidence of endophthalmitis was similar in the two populations, 0/454 (0.0%; 95% CI 0.0 to 0.81%) and 0/1054 (0.0%; 95% CI 0.0 to 0.35%) in the operating room and in the CESC, respectively.

Conclusions

The CESC may be a good alternative to the conventional operating room for the administration of the intravitreal DEX implant.

Different Factors Associated with 2-Year Outcomes in Patients with Branch versus Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Treated with Ranibizumab

PURPOSE

To investigate characteristics associated with visual and anatomic outcomes in branch and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO and CRVO) patients treated with ranibizumab.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of patients with BRVO and CRVO from 2 multicenter clinical trials who completed month 12 of the HORIZON extension trial.

PARTICIPANTS

205 patients with BRVO and 181 patients with CRVO who completed month 12 of the extension trial.

METHODS

With the use of logistic regression, covariates with a P value < 0.20 from univariate analysis were included in multivariate models to identify independent factors associated with a given outcome (at P < 0.05), with preset variables of disease duration and original treatment assignment.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≥20/40 (≥70 letters), gain ≥15 letters, and central subfield thickness (CST) ≤250 μm at HORIZON month 12.

RESULTS

In patients with BRVO, good baseline BCVA (odds ratio [OR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.79), male sex (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.20-5.13), and normal hematocrit (low vs. normal, OR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.59) predicted BCVA ≥20/40; high central foveal thickness (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) and normal hematocrit (low vs. normal, OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.15-0.66) predicted BCVA improvement ≥15 letters; and extensive baseline subretinal fluid modestly predicted CST ≤250 μm (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.00-1.16). In patients with CRVO, good baseline BCVA (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.35-1.89), never smoking (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.27-6.17), and young age (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82) predicted BCVA ≥20/40; never smoking (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.03-4.39), young age (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.59), poor baseline BCVA (OR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.73-0.93), hypertension (OR, 4.47; 95% CI, 1.70-11.75), and low diastolic ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) throughout the study (OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.21-0.72) predicted BCVA improvement ≥15 letters; and young age (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.90), lower mean hematocrit (low vs. normal, OR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.06-7.49), high systolic OPP throughout the study (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.14-2.27), large areas of central hemorrhage (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.04-2.00), and no subretinal fluid (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.06-4.40) predicted CST ≤250 μm.

CONCLUSIONS

There are substantial differences in good outcome factors in CRVO versus BRVO, suggesting differences in pathophysiology. Young age, never smoking, hemodilution, and hypertension/high systolic perfusion pressure are more beneficial in CRVO, suggesting that avoidance of sluggish blood flow and maintenance of perfusion may be particularly important in CRVO.

Prospective study of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions in eyes not responsive to long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab

IMPORTANCE

To examine the effect of switching from intravitreal bevacizumab or ranibizumab to aflibercept in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

BACKGROUND

We report the results of a prospective interventional study on the effect of aflibercept 2 mg in eyes with persistent macular oedema after long-term treatment with bevacizumab or ranibizumab.

DESIGN

Non-randomized, prospective clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen eyes of eighteen patients were included.

METHODS

Eyes with persistent macular oedema despite a minimum of four previous intravitreal bevacizumab/ranibizumab injections were recruited into this 48-week trial. Three loading doses of intravitreal aflibercept were administered every 4-weeks, thereafter every 8-weeks until week 48.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mean change from baseline in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as measured by early treatment diabetic retinopathy score (ETDRS) and central macular thickness (CMT) as measured by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at 48 weeks.

RESULTS

Patients had received a mean of 40.0 ± 17.8 bevacizumab/ranibizumab intravitreal injections prior to switching to aflibercept. The mean number of previous injections administered in the 12-months preceding entry into the study was 10.2 ± 2.4. Mean vision change at week 48 was +21.1 ± 5.1 ETDRS letters in the BRVO group and +18.8 ± 5.9 letters at in the CRVO group (P < .001 for both groups). Mean decrease in CMT was 87.6 ± 48.8 μm and 191.0 ± 128.3 μm, in the BRVO and CRVO groups, respectively (P < .001). Using linear regression analyses, a higher number of previous intravitreal ranibizumab/bevacizumab injections and thicker pre-switch CMT were correlated with greater visual gains.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Switching to aflibercept from bevacizumab or ranibizumab in eyes with persistent macular oedema due to RVO can lead to functional and anatomical improvement. This effect was more obvious in eyes with a greater CMT prior to the switch.

Guidelines for the Management of Retinal Vein Occlusion by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA)

The high prevalence of cardiovascular disease particularly in the elderly population is associated with retinal vascular disease. Retinal vein occlusions represent severe disturbances of the hypoxia-sensitive neurosensory retina. Acute and excessive leakage leads to the diagnostic hallmarks of retinal hemorrhage and edema with substantial retinal thickening. Advanced diagnostic tools such as OCT angiography allow to evaluate retinal ischemia and identify the risk for late complications and will soon reach clinical routine besides fluorescein angiography. Accordingly, the duration of non-perfusion is a crucial prognostic factor requiring timely therapeutic intervention. With immediate inhibition of vascular leakage, anti-VEGF substances excel as treatment of choice. Multiple clinical trials with optimal potential for functional benefit or a lesser regenerative spectrum have evaluated aflibercept, ranibizumab, and bevacizumab. As retinal vein occlusion is a chronic disease, long-term monitoring should be individualized to combine maintenance with practicability. While steroids may be considered in patients with systemic cardiovascular risk, surgery remains advisable only for very few patients. Destructive laser treatment is an option if reliable monitoring is not feasible. Ophthalmologists are also advised to perform a basic systemic workup to recognize systemic concomitants. The current edition of the EURETINA guidelines highlights the state-of-the-art recommendations based on the literature and expert opinions in retinal vein occlusion.

First-line treatment algorithm and guidelines in center-involving diabetic macular edema

Management of center-involving diabetic macular edema represents a real therapeutic challenge. Diabetic macular edema is the leading cause of visual acuity impairment in diabetic patients. Since the advent of intravitreal drugs, management of diabetic macular edema has significantly evolved. The historical grid laser photocoagulation is no longer recommended as first-line treatment of diabetic macular edema owing to the findings of the pivotal randomized controlled trials, and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy has emerged as first-line therapy. Steroids also represent a valid treatment option in the management of naïve diabetic macular edema and their efficacy has also been confirmed in several studies. The optimal treatment for diabetic macular edema should consider both general and ophthalmological comorbidities. Patient compliance and motivation should also be carefully evaluated as some treatments require monthly follow-up. Based on recent literature evidence, the present review provides clinicians with a first-line treatment algorithm for center-involving diabetic macular edema tailored to the patient’s individual characteristics.

Efficacy and safety of dexamethasone intravitreal implant in patients with retinal vein occlusion resistant to anti-VEGF therapy: a 12-month prospective study

Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of repeated intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) injections administrated on an "as-needed" protocol for retinal vein occlusion patients with macular oedema, previously subjected to at least five anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections with poor or no response. Methods: Prospective interventional case series of 13 branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) and 10 central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) patients with persistent macular oedema (>250 μm) after at least five anti-VEGF injections. Exclusion criteria included: baseline visual acuity worse than 1.5 logMAR, previous intravitreal implant, history of vitreoretinal surgery, manifest glaucoma or ocular hypertension, epiretinal membrane, retinal neovascularization, massive retinal or macular ischaemia, vitreous haemorrhage or severe lens opacity, previous laser photocoagulation treatment. Each patient received an initial intraocular dexamethasone implant and the procedure was repeated at 6 months "as needed." Patients were followed up at months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 with spectral domain optical coherence tomography and best corrected visual acuity measurements. Exclusion criteria included: baseline visual acuity worse than 1.5 logMAR, previous intravitreal implant, history of vitreoretinal surgery, manifest glaucoma or ocular hypertension, epiretinal membrane, retinal neovascularization, retinal or macular ischaemia, vitreous haemorrhage or severe lens opacity, previous laser photocoagulation treatment. Patients on topical or systemic corticosteroid therapy (during the last 3 months), and known steroid responders as well as diabetic patients were also excluded. Results: In the BRVO group, the mean central retinal thickness (CRT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved from 482.92 ± 139.99 μm (0.55 ± 0.12 logMAR) at baseline, to 369.31 ± 119.72 μm (0.43 ± 0.18 logMAR) at 6 months (p = 0.011/p = 0.019). At 12 months CRT was 295.82 ± 135.48 μm (p = 0.026) and BCVA 0.29 ± 0.17 logMAR (p = 0.002). Minimum CRT values were achieved at 3.45 months after the first injection, and 2.46 months after the second injection (197.00 ± 84.27 and 180.00 ± 76.89 μm, respectively). Best BCVA values were achieved at a mean of 4 ± 0.853 months after the first injection, and 4 months after the second injection (0.219 ± 0.129 and 0.222 ± 0.078 logMAR, respectively). In the CRVO group, neither the mean CRT nor BCVA improved significantly at 6 months: from 669.70 ± 203.20 μm (0.80 ± 0.231 logMAR) at baseline, to 586.20 ± 237.63 μm (0.740 ± 0.268 logMAR) at 6 months (p = 0.131/p = 0.333). At 12 months CRT was significantly improved: 549.90 ± 191.26 μm (p = 0.047), but BCVA lacked significant improvement: 0.690 ± 0.285 logMAR (p = 0.072). Minimum CRT values were achieved at a mean of 2 months after the first injection, and also 2 months after the second injection (261.60 ± 121.31 and 280.00 ± 177.43 μm, respectively). Best BCVA values were achieved at a mean of 2 months after the first injection, and 2 months after the second injection and were 0.390 ± 0.173 and 0.385 ± 0.233 logMAR, respectively. Cataract progression was a rare event (2/23 eyes), while transient steroid-induced ocular hypertension (5/23 eyes) was managed successfully with IOP-lowering medication Conclusion: Dexamethasone implant should be considered as an effective and safe alternative in patients with BRVO and CRVO who have failed anti-VEGF therapy. Shortening the re-injection interval especially for CRVO cases should be considered.

Biomarkers of Peripheral Nonperfusion in Retinal Venous Occlusions Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Purpose

To study the association between the assessment of central macular vascular layers by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) and peripheral nonperfusion evaluated by fluorescein angiography (FA) in patients with retinal venous occlusion (RVO).

Methods

Retrospective review of RVO patients without macular edema. Patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including FA, spectral-domain OCT, and OCT-A. Significant ischemia was defined as nonperfusion areas superior or equal to the equivalent of one retinal quadrant on FA. Vascular density (VD) and foveal avascular zone were measured using AngioAnalytics software. Fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity (LAC) were computed using an algorithm designed by MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA). These variables were used to build a model that translates their association with OCT-A parameters.

Results

There were 48 eyes (48 patients) of which 19 had significant peripheral nonperfusion. Deep capillary plexus FD, VD, and LAC were associated with significant ischemia. In fact, regarding the association with this outcome, LAC alone had the highest area under the curve (AUC = 0.88) followed by FD (AUC = 0.85) and VD (AUC = 0.73). The multivariable model that included LAC and VD, adjusted by best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) achieved the best performance for the identification of severe nonperfusion on wide-field FA (AUC = 0.93).

Conclusions

The characteristics of the central macular deep capillary plexus on OCT-A may be associated with peripheral nonperfusion on FA, particularly the combination of LAC and vessel density after adjusting by BCVA.

Translational Relevance

Fractal-based metrics applied to OCT-A may become a valuable marker of ischemia in RVO and help guide the clinical decision to perform invasive angiography.

Impact of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant on Vessel Diameters in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion

PURPOSE

To investigate the vasomotor responses and diameter of retinal vessels in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) who were treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant.

METHODS

We enrolled 17 eyes of 17 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO. All patients were evaluated through optical coherence tomography and dynamic and static retinal vessel analysis, using the Dynamic Vessel Analyzer (Imedos, Jena, Germany) before administration (baseline) and 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months after administration of intravitreal dexamethasone. Measurements of patients were compared to those of 17 eyes of age- and sex-matched control subjects.

RESULTS

In static analysis, arteriovenous ratio (AVR) in control subjects was 0.86 (0.80-0.88). In RVO patients, baseline AVR was 0.71 (0.54-0.84) and significantly lower than that in control subjects (p=0.016). Baseline AVR in the RVO group was significantly lower than AVR at month 1 and month 2 (p=0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). CRVE in healthy control subjects was 183.59 ± 21.79 measurement units (MU) which was significantly different from CRVE of RVO eyes at baseline (207.00 ± 26.35 MU) (p=0.008). Static analysis showed a significant decrease of central retinal vein equivalent (CRVE) from baseline to 1 week, 1 month, and 2 months (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CRAE in the control group was 176.24 ± 22.45 MU. CRAE in the RVO group was significantly lower at baseline, week 1, month 1, and month 2 compared to that in the control group (p=0.008, p=0.003, p=0.013, and p=0.011, respectively). Dynamic analysis showed that maximum venous and arterial dilations did not statistically differ from baseline to 1 week, 1 month, or 2 months.

CONCLUSION

Using the Dynamic Vessel Analyzer, we found that retinal veins in patients with RVO were significantly larger compared to those in the control group, and intravitreal dexamethasone treatment reduced the diameters of these veins.

A meta-analysis of patients with treatment-resistant macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions following switching to aflibercept

To systematically review anatomical and functional outcomes of switching therapy from bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab to aflibercept in patients with persistent macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusions (RVO). A systematic search of aflibercept for the treatment of persistent macular oedema secondary to branch and central RVO was performed in EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane databases prior to June 2017. The main outcome variables described were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). All results were analysed and pooled using random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Eight studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 137 eyes, incorporating both branch and central RVO. Meta-analysis demonstrated a nonsignificant change in BCVA at 6 and 12 months following switch to aflibercept (4.40 letters, 95% CI: -3.10 to 11.90, p = 0.25 and 3.10 letters, 95% CI: -1.74 to 7.94, p = 0.21, respectively). Significant improvement in mean CMT was observed after switch to aflibercept at 6 (-256.00 μm, 95% CI: -318.00 to -194.00, p < 0.001) but not 12 months (-118.00 μm, 95% CI: -261.00 to 25.00, p = 0.11). Switching from bevacizumab/ranibizumab to aflibercept may improve persistent macular oedema secondary to RVO. However, there may be a limitation in the potential of visual recovery.

Automated macular segmentation with spectral domain optical coherence tomography in the fellow eyes of patients with unilateral retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To assess the change in the macular layers in the fellow eyes of unilateral retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients and to evaluate whether certain layers are more affected based on RVO type.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 87 fellow eyes of patients with unilateral RVO (26 central, 61 branch) and 105 eyes of 105 subjects without RVO. Spectral domain optical coherence tomography was used for automatized retinal segmentation. The thicknesses of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cells, inner plexiform, inner nuclear, outer plexiform, outer nuclear, photoreceptor layers, overall inner retinal layers and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) were documented.

RESULTS

Inner plexiform layer was thinner in inferior sector in RVO group compared with the control group (p = 0.047). The subgroup analysis showed that the retina was thinner in RVO group compared with the controls without systemic diseases in some sectors of the following layers: inferior retina, RNFL, ganglion cell layer, inner plexiform layer, inner retinal layers and RPE (p < 0.05). Retinal thickness was decreased in the fellow eyes of branch RVO group compared to that in the central RVO group in the some sectors (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The fellow eyes of unilateral RVO patients did not show major structural differences compared with the controls; however, they revealed significant sectoral thinning in many retinal layers when compared with the eyes of healthy subjects without systemic diseases. Central macula was thinner in the fellow eyes of patients with branch RVO compared to that in central RVO.

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Treatment with Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Cystoid Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion

Purpose

To evaluate retinal functional improvement by means of visual acuity and retinal sensibility examination after intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients affected by cystoid macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion.

Methods

Twenty-six consecutive patients affected by retinal vein occlusion complicated by cystoid macular edema were enrolled in this prospective interventional study. All patients underwent a baseline complete ophthalmological evaluation as well as retinal angiography, OCT examination, and microperimetry evaluation. Each patient was treated with intravitreal injection of a long-term steroid implant (Ozurdex, Allergan). Follow-up evaluations were performed at months 1, 3, and 6 and completed by OCT and MP1 examination. Clinical data underwent statistical analysis.

Results

Baseline functional evaluation showed mean visual acuity of 0,63±0,42 LogMAR and retinal sensitivity of 7,93±4,73 dB (mean±standard deviation); after treatment, at day 30 we found, respectively, 0,43±0,38 LogMAR (p<0.05, compared to baseline) and 10,15±4,410 dB (p<0.05); at day 90, we found 0,44±0,32 (p<0.05) and 9.61±4,29 dB (p<0.05); at day 180, we found 0,41±0,31 (p<0.05) and 9,95±3,79 dB (p<0.05). Fixation pattern improved significantly (p<0.05), showing a stable fixation in 30% of patients at baseline, increasing to 77% of patients at day 180. Baseline morphological evaluation showed a central retinal thickness (CRT) of 398,21±181,65 μm after treatment; we found a CRT of 222,64±95,21 μm at day 30 (p<0.05, compared to baseline), 307,50±120,25 μm (p<0.05) at day 90, and 294,93±135,86 μm (p<0.05) at day 180. About 15,3% patients showed already at month 3 a recurrence of macular edema. They underwent a retreatment before month 6 as for treatment guidelines.

Conclusion

Our detailed analysis showed the significative increase in retinal function in the early phases of the follow-up. Retinal sensibility showed a stronger correlation than VA in macular edema reabsorption, better underlying the progressive functional recovery and increase in quality of vision and life for the patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03559491.

Baseline morphological characteristics as predictors of final visual acuity in patients with branch retinal vein occlusions: MARVEL report no. 3

Purpose:

To determine the predictive values of baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) abnormalities on 12-month visual acuity changes in eyes with macular edema (ME) caused by branch retinal vein occlusions (BRVO).

Methods:

We performed a post hoc analysis of data from 75 participants in the 12-month MARVEL trial. OCT abnormalities at baseline, including ganglion cell layer cystoid spaces (GCL), intraretinal hyper-reflective dots, and central subfield thickness (CST), were correlated with improvements in visual acuity and the number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections required using a multivariate regression model.

Results:

Eyes with baseline CST > 500 μm had greater visual gains compared to those with CST <500 μm (+21.09 vs +16.08 letters, P = 0.04). Eyes with hyper-reflective dots (+13.97 vs +19.93 letters, P = 0.02), and GCL cysts (+9.8 vs +18.9, P = 0.003) had inferior gains in visual acuity. Neurosensory macular detachments at the baseline did not affect gains in visual acuity. Ninety percent of the gain in visual acuity was recorded after two injections and was maintained until month 12.

Conclusion:

Baseline OCT of <500 μm, hyper-reflective dots, and GCL cystoid spaces are associated with poorer gains in visual acuity. Most of the visual gain occurs after two injections.

Optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal vein occlusions

PURPOSE

To examine the vascular density in different retinal layers and in the choriocapillaris in eyes with retinal vein occlusions (RVO).

METHODS

Applying optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), we examined patients with unilateral RVOs and normal individuals of a control group.

RESULTS

The study group included 48 patients with unilateral RVO and the control group 17 normal individuals. Eyes affected by RVO as compared to the contralateral unaffected eyes (all P < 0.001), and the contralateral unaffected eyes as compared to the eyes of the control group (P < 0.05), showed a lower vessel density in the superficial and deep retinal layers in all regions except for the foveal region. Choriocapillaris density was lower (P < 0.001), foveal retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness (P < 0.001) were thicker, and the foveal avascular zone was larger (P = 0.003) in the RVO eyes than in the contralateral eyes. For 29 eyes undergoing OCTA and fluorescein angiography, two examiners independently rated the retinas to be ischemic in fluorescein angiography in 14 eyes and in OCTA in 9 of these 14 eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Upon OCTA, unaffected eyes of patients with unilateral RVOs showed vascular abnormalities in the superficial and deep retinal layers when compared to those of healthy individuals.

CAPILLARY NONPERFUSION AND PHOTORECEPTOR LOSS IN BRANCH RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION: Spatial Correlation and Morphologic Characteristics

PURPOSE

To evaluate the photoreceptor layer in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion associated with macular ischemia, using a method of en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) representation of the ellipsoid zone.

METHODS

Customized macular OCT scans of 9 patients (10 eyes) with branch retinal vein occlusion and macular ischemia were exported and subsequently postprocessed (removal of vascular and cystic spaces' shadows, segmentation, and alignment to the retinal pigment epithelium). The ellipsoid band was then isolated, aligned, and used to produce an en face OCT image. Areas with photoreceptor loss (hyporeflective ellipsoid) were compared with ischemic areas as identified in an early-phase fluorescein angiography.

RESULTS

The areas of capillary nonperfusion (as detected in fluorescein angiography) were closely associated with disruption of the ellipsoid zone (depicted as areas of low reflectance in the en face reconstruction of the OCT images). The ellipsoid zone disruption had a patchy appearance and either sharp or fuzzy borders, depending on the grade of the loss of reflectance.

CONCLUSION

En face OCT reconstruction and subsequent representation of ellipsoid zone revealed a close association between capillary nonperfusion and photoreceptor disruption in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion. It seems that the deep capillary plexus plays an important role on the metabolic demands of outer retina and, consequently, an ischemia at the level of deep capillary plexus has significant impact on the integrity of the photoreceptors.

Comparison of treatment response to intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, bevacizumab and combined form in patients with central retinal vein occlusion: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), is the second-most common disorder after diabetic retinopathy that threatens the vision related to retinal vessels. One of the main reasons of vision loss is CRVO in acute and chronic forms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the response to intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, bevacizumab, and a combined form in patients with CRVO.

METHODS

This study was a double-blinded randomized clinical trial conducted on patients with CRVO who were referred to the ophthalmology clinic of Urmia Imam Khomeini Hospital from May 2015 to May 2016. In total, ninety patients were divided into three groups using random numbers table. The first group received intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVT) for treatment of macular edema due to CRVO, the second group received intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) and the third group received a combination of IVT and IVB. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were recorded and analyzed using optical coherence tomography system.

RESULTS

In this study a total of 90 eyes were studied, 41 case (45.55%) were male and 49 cases (54.44%) were female. The mean age of patients was 68.41±8.32 years. The mean score of final visual acuity was 0.293±0.11 in the IVT group, 0.25±0.10 in the IVB group and 0.48±0.15 in the IVB+IVT group. The differences between groups considering final visual acuity was significant (p<0.001). The mean thickness of final macular was 383.33±97.70 micrometer in IVT group, 386.33±136.79 micrometers in IVB group and 307.33±110.79 micrometers in IVT+IVB group which were significant (p=0.014).

CONCLUSION

Using a combination of bevacizumab and triamcinolone in the treatment of central retinal vein occlusion compared with using each of them separately, had a better result and can be used as a solution in this disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial was registered at the Thai Registry of Clinical Trials (http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th) with the TCTR ID: TCTR20170612005.

FUNDING

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Switch of Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion from Anti-VEGF to Dexamethasone Implant and Vice Versa

PURPOSE

To evaluate the anatomical and functional outcome of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for macular edema secondary to central (C) or branch (B) retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in patients with persistent macular edema (ME) refractory to intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment compared to treatment naïve patients and to dexamethasone-refractory eyes switched to anti-VEGF.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study including 30 eyes previously treated with anti-VEGF (8 CRVO, 22 BRVO, mean age 69 ± 10 yrs), compared to 11 treatment naïve eyes (6 CRVO, 5 BRVO, 73 ± 11 yrs) and compared to dexamethasone nonresponders (2 CRVO, 4 BRVO, 69 ± 12). Outcome parameters were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Mean BCVA improvement after switch to dexamethasone implant was 4 letters (p = 0.08), and treatment naïve eyes gained 10 letters (p = 0.66), while we noted no change in eyes after switch to anti-VEGF (p = 0.74). Median CFT decrease was most pronounced in treatment naïve patients (-437 μm, p = 0.002) compared to anti-VEGF refractory eyes (-170 μm, p = 0.003) and dexamethasone-refractory eyes (-157, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexamethasone significantly reduced ME secondary to RVO refractory to anti-VEGF. Functional gain was limited compared to treatment naïve eyes, probably due to worse BCVA and CFT at baseline in treatment naïve eyes.

[Current approach and the role of laser photocoagulation in the treatment of retinal vein occlusions]

Despite the emergence of new approaches in the treatment of retinal vein thrombosis and post-thrombotic complications, namely, intravitreal pharmacotherapy and surgical treatment, laser photocoagulation continues to play a significant role in the management of patients with this pathology. Although the method of laser photocoagulation has been used for quite a long time, different views exist on its indications and execution in specific clinical situations. At that, not all opinions regarding the use of laser photocoagulation in thrombosis are based on convincing clinical studies. The aim of this work was to summarize current literature data on the use of laser photocoagulation in the integrated treatment of retinal vein occlusions and, also, to show which aspects of the treatment of thromboses can be considered well-established and reasonable and which remain a subject of debate.

Imaging of macrophage dynamics with optical coherence tomography in anterior ischemic optic neuropathy

Anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION) is a relatively common cause of visual loss and results from hypoperfusion of the small arteries of the anterior portion of the optic nerve. AION is the leading cause of sudden optic nerve related vision loss with approximately 10 cases per 100'000 in the population over 50 years. To date there is no established treatment for AION and therefore a better understanding of the events occurring at the level of the optic nerve head (ONH) would be important to design future therapeutic strategies. The optical properties of the eye allow imaging of the optic nerve in vivo, which is a part of the CNS, during ischemia. Experimentally laser induced optic neuropathy (eLiON) displays similar anatomical features as anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in humans. After laser induced optic neuropathy we show that hyperreflective dots in optical coherence tomography correspond to mononuclear cells in histology. Using fluorescence-activated flow cytometry (FACS) we found these cells to peak one week after eLiON. These observations were translated to OCT findings in patients with AION, where similar dynamics of hyperreflective dots at the ONH were identified. Our data suggests that activated macrophages can be identified as hyperreflective dots in OCT.

Safety Assessment and Power Analyses in Published Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To investigate a certain set of methodological limitations in published anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DESIGN

Descriptive methodological study.

METHODS

We did a PubMed search with the terms "bevacizumab OR ranibizumab OR pegaptanib OR aflibercept" and the limitations "humans" and "randomized controlled trials" in 15 of the highest-impact-factor general medicine and ophthalmology journals. We included only RCTs published as original articles, where an anti-VEGF agent was used to treat eye disease. Two independent observers (O.A., P.K.) read through each article and classified the articles according to a predefined set of criteria.

RESULTS

The PubMed search yielded 209 articles, and 93 were classified as eligible. In most of the studies, the study drug was bevacizumab (52.6%, n = 49), followed by ranibizumab (44.1%, n = 41), pegaptanib (7.5%, n = 7), and aflibercept (5.4%, n = 5). Basic epidemiologic data, including sex distribution (2.2%, n = 2) and mean age (3.2%, n = 3), were missing in 3.2% of the published RCTs. The power calculation for efficacy was mentioned in 48% (n = 45) of the published work, and a power calculation for safety was considered in only 1 study (1.1%). Only 6 RCTs (6.5%) reported negative results.

CONCLUSIONS

Power calculations for efficacy, an important component of an RCT, were missing in 51% of the RCTs we surveyed, while a power calculation for safety was only present in 1.1%. Around 60% of the published RCTs were labeled as an "efficacy and safety trial," and none of those studies had a power calculation for safety.

Selective Thrombophilia Screening in Young Patients with Retinal Artery Occlusion

Purpose: To investigate the prevalence of various thrombophilic disorders among young patients with retinal artery occlusion (RAO). Procedures: We retrospectively reviewed thrombophilia screening data of young patients ≤60 years of age with RAO and healthy controls matched for gender and age. Results: Thrombophilia screening data of 25 young patients and 62 healthy controls were analyzed. Mean patient age by the time of the RAO was 43.3 ± 10.8 years. Overall, thrombophilic defects were found to be present in 17 patients (68%) compared with 11 of 62 controls (17.7%; p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed a statistically significant association between the development of RAO and increased levels of lipoprotein(a) (odds ratio: 9.48; p = 0.001) and factor VIII (odds ratio: 6.41; p = 0.024). There was a strong association between the presence of thrombophilic disorders and a personal or family history of thromboembolism (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Our results indicate that screening for thrombophilic disorders among selected young patients with RAO yields positive results in a high percentage of cases.

DYNAMIC AND STATIC RETINAL VESSEL ANALYSES IN PATIENTS WITH MACULAR EDEMA SECONDARY TO RETINAL VEIN OCCLUSION

PURPOSE

To investigate the vasomotor responses and diameter of retinal vessels in patients with macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

A total of 18 eyes of 18 RVO patients were consecutively included and compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Participants underwent an examination with optical coherence tomography and dynamic and static retinal vessel analyses using the Dynamic Vessel Analyzer.

RESULTS

Dynamic vessel analysis in RVO showed mean maximum venous and arterial dilation of 2.22 ± 1.23% and 1.87 ± 1.41%, respectively, as compared with 5.05 ± 2.75% (P = 0.001) and 3.95 ± 1.44% (P = 0.0004), respectively, in controls. Static retinal vessel analysis in RVO revealed a mean arteriovenous ratio (AVR) of 0.74 ± 0.09 versus 0.90 ± 0.04 (P < 0.0001) in controls. Mean AVRs of occluded and nonoccluded quadrants in RVO were 0.71 ± 0.13 and 0.85 ± 0.19, respectively; in the corresponding quadrants of controls, mean AVRs were 0.90 ± 0.19 (P < 0.0001) and 0.86 ± 0.17 (P = 0.89), respectively. In branch RVO patients, mean AVRs of occluded versus nonoccluded quadrants were 0.70 ± 0.06 and 0.90 ± 0.22 (P = 0.002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with macular edema secondary to RVO, dynamic vessel analysis showed an impairment of both venous and arterial motility and/or reactivity and static vessel analysis showed a reduced AVR indicating a general enlargement of the retinal venous network. Moreover, in branch RVO patients, static analysis demonstrated that retinal vessels could actually be uninvolved by the occlusive process in areas spared by disease.

Investigational drugs for retinal vein occlusion

INTRODUCTION

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disorder. This multifactorial disease frequently leads to visual impairment. Some risk factors for RVO can be managed prophylactically. Given the complex physiopathology of RVO, most of the latest therapeutic strategies focus on secondary clinical features (such as macular oedema and neovascularization).

AREAS COVERED

This author reviews ongoing, prospective, open-label Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of novels treatments for RVO (primarily intravitreal steroids and anti-VEGF agents). Specifically, they review the pharmacokinetics, safety profile, study design and adverse events associated with innovative drugs in clinical development.

EXPERT OPINION

A number of innovative, early-phase clinical trials are based on combination therapy with an anti-VEGF agent and steroids. There is good evidence that early treatment of RVO has clinical benefits. Larger, randomized studies are now required for a better understanding of patient selection, treatment timing and dosing, and thus the optimized use of novel drugs and medical devices.

Comparison of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors, laser treatments and a combination of the both for treatment of central retinal vein occlusion

AIM

To compare changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab, macular grid photocoagulation combined with pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP), or both (bevacizumab+grid+PRP).

METHODS

Our study is a retrospective cohort clinical study that examined patients that suffered from ischemic CRVO with macular edema. Study inclusion criteria were ischemic CRVO with macula edema and the availability of complete medical records for at least 12mo after treatment. Excluded were patients with diabetes or any other retinal disease. We reviewed the medical records of patients treated in one ophthalmology department-comparing changes in visual acuity and macular edema in patients treated with intravitreal injections of bevacizumab vs those that were treated with macular grid photocoagulation and PRP or both. The main outcome measures were the differences in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and in macular thickness, as assessed by optical coherence tomography, between the enrollment and the final follow up visits.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients met inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences among the three groups in the mean changes in macular thickness as measured by ocular coherence tomography (131.5±41.2, 108.6±29.2, and 121.1±121.1, P=0.110), or in visual acuity (0.128±0.077, 0.088±0.057, and 0.095±0.065), for intravitreal injections, macular grid photocoagulation+PRP and a combination of the treatments, respectively, P=0.111. The proportions of patients with macular edema after treatment were: 26.1%, 28.6%, and 14.3%, respectively, P=0.499.

CONCLUSION

Similar benefit was observed for intravitreal injections, laser photocoagulation, or a combined regimen in the treatment of CRVO. A non-statistically significant trend for reduction in macular edema was observed following combined treatment.

Update in the Management of Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusions

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a common retinal vascular disease classified according to the anatomical location of the occlusion in central (CRVO) or branch (BRVO) retinal vein occlusion. RVO is an important cause of visual loss worldwide and frequently results in visual impairment and ocular complications. Major causes of vision loss in BRVO and CRVO include macular edema (ME), capillary non-perfusion, and neovascularization, causing glaucoma, vitreous hemorrhage and/or tractional retinal detachment.[1-4] Macular edema is the leading cause of decreased central visual acuity in RVO.[5] Recently, there was a paradigm shift in the treatment of ME due to RVO with the advent of new pharmacotherapy treatment strategies and combination therapies. This paper reviews the current thinking and discusses the evidence behind the emerging treatment options for ME following RVO, including laser photocoagulation, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), intravitreal corticosteroid-based pharmacotherapies, and surgical management.