Reassessment of sst(5) somatostatin receptor expression in normal and neoplastic human tissues using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody UMB-4

Cushing's Disease Manifestation in USP8-Mutated Corticotropinoma May Be Mediated by Interactions Between WNT Signaling and SST Trafficking

In the current work, we aimed to evaluate the association of clinical data of Cushing's disease (CD) patients with USP8 mutation status and to study USP8-related molecular mechanisms connected to the regulation of corticotropinoma growth and activity. 35 CD patients were enrolled; the sequencing of exon 14 in USP8 revealed variants in eighteen adenomas, two of which were described for the first time in CD. USP8 variants were more common in women (94% vs. 76%; p = 0.001), and microadenomas and tumor recurrence were prevalent in the USP8-mutant group (44% vs. 29%; p = 0.04 and 44% vs. 22%; p = 0.0015). Preoperative ACTH and serum cortisol did not differ in the USP8-WT and USP8-mutant patients. All USP8-mutant adenomas were SST5-positive, and 73% of them were double-positive (SST5+/SST2+). A total of 50% of USP8-WT adenomas were double-negative (SST5-/SST2-), and 40% of them were SST5-positive. Analysis of transcriptome was performed for nine USP8-mutant and six USP8-WT adenomas and revealed the that the bidirectional dysregulation of Wnt signaling, including both the agonist RSPO2 and antagonist SFRP1, in the USP8-mutant corticotropinomas was downregulated. These alterations may indicate the existence of regulatory connections between USP8 enzyme activity, Wnt signaling, EGFR signaling and somatostatin receptors' trafficking, which can explain, at least in part, the clinical manifestations of CD in patients with corticotropinomas harboring USP8 variants.

Agonists, Antagonists and Receptors of Somatostatin: Pathophysiological and Therapeutical Implications in Neoplasias

Somatostatin is a peptide that plays a variety of roles such as neurotransmitter and endocrine regulator; its actions as a cell regulator in various tissues of the human body are represented mainly by inhibitory effects, and it shows potent activity despite its physiological low concentrations. Somatostatin binds to specific receptors, called somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which have different tissue distributions and associated signaling pathways. The expression of SSTRs can be altered in various conditions, including tumors; therefore, they can be used as biomarkers for cancer cell susceptibility to certain pharmacological agents and can provide prognostic information regarding disease evolution. Moreover, based on the affinity of somatostatin analogs for the different types of SSTRs, the therapeutic range includes conditions such as tumors, acromegaly, post-prandial hypotension, hyperinsulinism, and many more. On the other hand, a number of somatostatin antagonists may prove useful in certain medical settings, based on their differential affinity for SSTRs. The aim of this review is to present in detail the principal characteristics of all five SSTRs and to provide an overview of the associated therapeutic potential in neoplasias.

Expression prevalence and dynamics of GPCR somatostatin receptors 2 and 3 as cancer biomarkers beyond NET: a paired immunohistochemistry approach

Somatostatin receptors are clinically validated GPCR biomarkers for diagnosis and treatment of various neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Among the five somatostatin receptors, SST2 and SST3 are associated with apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, making these receptor subtypes better differentiated targets in precision oncology. In this study we performed immunohistochemistry of paired tissue microarrays containing 1125 cores, representing 43 tumor types, each stained for SST2 and SST3. A 12-point immunoreactive scoring (IRS) range was used for interpretation of the staining results. We analyzed the results twice, using the conventional positivity IRS cutoffs ≥ 3 and more stringent ≥ 6. Evaluation of receptors expression dynamics was performed for tumor-nodes-metastases (TNM) defined subgroups (ovarian and hepatocellular adenocarcinomas) as a function of their tumor stage. Our results indicate that two-thirds of tested cores exhibit clinically significant expression of at least SST2 or SST3 (IRS ≥ 6). The expression prevalence of both receptors tends to decline with tumor progression. However, an unexpected upregulation of both SST2 and SST3 reemerged in metastases suggesting conserved receptors genetic potential during tumor life cycle. We suggest that SST2 and SST3 should be further explored as potential biomarkers and therapeutic tools for maximizing the efficiency of somatostatin-based precision oncology of solid tumors beyond NET.

Comparative evaluation of somatostatin and CXCR4 receptor expression in different types of thyroid carcinoma using well-characterised monoclonal antibodies

Background

Papillary and follicular thyroid carcinomas can be treated surgically and with radioiodine therapy, whereas therapeutic options for advanced stage IV medullary and for anaplastic tumours are limited. Recently, somatostatin receptors (SSTs) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 have been evaluated for the treatment of thyroid carcinomas, however, with contradictory results.

Methods

The expression of the five SSTs and of CXCR4 was assessed in 90 samples from 56 patients with follicular, papillary, medullary, or anaplastic thyroid carcinoma by means of immunohistochemistry using well-characterised monoclonal antibodies. The stainings were evaluated using the Immunoreactivity Score (IRS) and correlated to clinical data. In order to further substantiate the immunohistochemistry results, in serial sections of a subset of the samples receptor expression was additionally examined at the mRNA level using qRT-PCR.

Results

Overall, SST and CXCR4 protein expression was low in all four entities. In single cases, however, very high IRS values for SST2 and CXCR4 were observed. SST2 was the most frequently expressed receptor, found in 38% of cases, followed by SST5 and SST4, found in 14 and 9% of tumours, respectively. SST1 and SST3 could not be detected to any significant extent. CXCR4 was present in 12.5% of medullary and 25% of anaplastic carcinomas. Expression SST3, SST4, SST5 and CXCR4 was positively correlated with expression of the proliferation marker Ki-67. Additionally, a negative interrelationship between SST4 or SST5 expression and patient survival and a positive association between SST3 expression and tumour diameter were observed. qRT-PCR revealed a similar receptor expression pattern to that seen at the protein level. However, probably due to the low overall expression, no correlation was found for the SSTs or the CXCR4 between the IRS and the mRNA values.

Conclusions

SST- or CXCR4-based diagnostics or therapy in thyroid carcinomas should not be considered in general but may be feasible in single cases with high levels of expression of these receptors.

Differences in somatostatin receptor subtype expression in patients with acromegaly: new directions for targeted therapy?

PURPOSE

To analyze the expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR)2a and 5 by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in surgically resected somatotrophic pituitary adenomas and to associate expression rates with tumor size and clinical, biochemical, and histological parameters and response to somatostatin analog (SA) therapy.

METHODS

Forty-three microsurgically treated patients with histopathologically proven growth hormone (GH)-producing pituitary adenoma were included (WHO 2017). SSTR subtype expression was analyzed in adenoma tissues using monoclonal antibodies (Abcam, SSTR2a-UMB1, SSTR5-UMB4). Expression rates were classified as low (≤ 20% staining positivity), moderate (21-50%), and high (> 50%). Furthermore, biochemical parameters such as human growth hormone (hGH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels were measured and clinical, biochemical, radiological, and histological data were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of the 43 patients included in this study, 28 were female and 15 were male. The median age was 52 years (range 17-72 years). The median tumor size was 1.2 cm (range: 0.13-3.93 cm). All resected tumors showed positivity for somatotrophic hormone (STH). In all tissue samples, SSTR2a signal expression was detectable in immunohistochemistry, while only 39 samples were positive for SSTR5. Thirty-six samples had a high expression of SSTR2a, while three had a moderate and four a low SSTR2a signal. In comparison, SSTR5 signal was high in 26 out of 43 samples, while seven adenomas showed a moderate and six cases a low expression rate of SSTR5. The median IGF-1 was 714.2 µg/l and the median GH 19.6 mU/l (= 6.53 µg/l). The present study indicates that there is no significant relationship between the expression rates of receptor subtypes and the parameters we analyzed. However, our study revealed that smaller adenomas have a lower baseline GH level (p = 0.015), CONCLUSION: IHC with monoclonal antibodies appears to be a suitable method to determine the expression rates of SSTR2a and 5 at protein levels, as it is not possible to draw conclusions regarding receptor subtypes solely on the basis of the parameters analyzed.

Dimerization of GPCRs: Novel insight into the role of FLNA and SSAs regulating SST2 and SST5 homo- and hetero-dimer formation

The process of GPCR dimerization can have profound effects on GPCR activation, signaling, and intracellular trafficking. Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are class A GPCRs abundantly expressed in pituitary tumors where they represent the main pharmacological targets of somatostatin analogs (SSAs), thanks to their antisecretory and antiproliferative actions. The cytoskeletal protein filamin A (FLNA) directly interacts with both somatostatin receptor type 2 (SST₂) and 5 (SST₅) and regulates their expression and signaling in pituitary tumoral cells. So far, the existence and physiological relevance of SSTs homo- and hetero-dimerization in the pituitary have not been explored. Moreover, whether octreotide or pasireotide may play modulatory effects and whether FLNA may participate to this level of receptor organization have remained elusive. Here, we used a proximity ligation assay (PLA)-based approach for the in situ visualization and quantification of SST₂/SST₅ dimerization in rat GH3 as well as in human melanoma cells either expressing (A7) or lacking (M2) FLNA. First, we observed the formation of endogenous SST₅ homo-dimers in GH3, A7, and M2 cells. Using the PLA approach combined with epitope tagging, we detected homo-dimers of human SST₂ in GH3, A7, and M2 cells transiently co-expressing HA- and SNAP-tagged SST₂. SST₂ and SST₅ can also form endogenous hetero-dimers in these cells. Interestingly, FLNA absence reduced the basal number of hetero-dimers (-36.8 ± 6.3% reduction of PLA events in M2, P < 0.05 vs. A7), and octreotide but not pasireotide promoted hetero-dimerization in both A7 and M2 (+20.0 ± 11.8% and +44.1 ± 16.3% increase of PLA events in A7 and M2, respectively, P < 0.05 vs. basal). Finally, immunofluorescence data showed that SST₂ and SST₅ recruitment at the plasma membrane and internalization are similarly induced by octreotide and pasireotide in GH3 and A7 cells. On the contrary, in M2 cells, octreotide failed to internalize both receptors whereas pasireotide promoted robust receptor internalization at shorter times than in A7 cells. In conclusion, we demonstrated that in GH3 cells SST₂ and SST₅ can form both homo- and hetero-dimers and that FLNA plays a role in the formation of SST₂/SST₅ hetero-dimers. Moreover, we showed that FLNA regulates SST₂ and SST₅ intracellular trafficking induced by octreotide and pasireotide.

Evaluation of a New 177Lu-Labeled Somatostatin Analog for the Treatment of Tumors Expressing Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes 2 and 5

Targeted radionuclide therapy of somatostatin receptor (SST)-expressing tumors is only partially addressed by the established somatostatin analogs having an affinity for the SST subtype 2 (SST2). Aiming to target a broader spectrum of tumors, we evaluated the bis-iodo-substituted somatostatin analog ST8950 ((4-amino-3-iodo)-d-Phe-c[Cys-(3-iodo)-Tyr-d-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys]-Thr-NH2), having subnanomolar affinity for SST2 and SST5, labeled with [177Lu]Lu3+ via the chelator DOTA (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid). Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) cells stably transfected with the human SST2 (HEK-SST2) and SST5 (HEK-SST5) were used for in vitro and in vivo evaluation on a dual SST2- and SST5-expressing xenografted mouse model. natLu-DOTA-ST8950 showed nanomolar affinity for both subtypes (IC50 (95% confidence interval): 0.37 (0.22-0.65) nM for SST2 and 3.4 (2.3-5.2) for SST5). The biodistribution of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 was influenced by the injected mass, with 100 pmol demonstrating lower background activity than 10 pmol. [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 reached its maximal uptake on SST2- and SST5-tumors at 1 h p.i. (14.17 ± 1.78 and 1.78 ± 0.35%IA/g, respectively), remaining unchanged 4 h p.i., with a mean residence time of 8.6 and 0.79 h, respectively. Overall, [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-ST8950 targets SST2-, SST5-expressing tumors in vivo to a lower extent, and has an effective dose similar to clinically used radiolabeled somatostatin analogs. Its main drawbacks are the low uptake in SST5-tumors and the persistent kidney uptake.

Evaluation of Somatostatin and CXCR4 Receptor Expression in a Large Set of Prostate Cancer Samples Using Tissue Microarrays and Well-Characterized Monoclonal Antibodies

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common type of cancer among men in Western countries. Despite numerous therapeutic options, few treatments are available for patients with end-stage disease. In the present study, different somatostatin receptors (SSTs) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 were evaluated for their suitability as novel therapeutic targets in PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The expression of SST subtypes 1, 2A, 3, and 5 and of CXCR4 was evaluated in 276 PCa tumor samples on a tissue microarray (TMA) in 23 whole-block tumor samples and in 3 PCa cell lines by immunohistochemistry using well-characterized monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Overall, the frequency and intensity of expression of SSTs and CXCR4 were very low among the PCa samples investigated. Specifically, SST5, SST2A, and SST3 were expressed, albeit at low intensity, in 10.5%, 9.1%, and 0.7% of the TMA samples, respectively. None of the TMA samples showed SST1 or CXCR4 expression. Only a single small-cell-type neuroendocrine carcinoma that was coincidentally included among the whole-block samples exhibited strong SST2A, SST5, and CXCR4 and moderate SST3 expression. Independent of the tumor cells, the tumor capillaries in many of the PCa samples were strongly positive for SST2A, SST3, SST5, or CXCR4 expression. SST expression in the tumor cells was associated with advanced tumor grade and stage. CONCLUSION: Overall, SST and CXCR4 expression levels are clearly of no therapeutic relevance in PCa. SST- or CXCR4-based therapy might be feasible, however, in rare cases of small-cell-type neuroendocrine carcinoma of the prostate.

Somatostatin receptor expression and mTOR pathway activation in glioneuronal tumours of childhood

PURPOSE

To investigate the expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) and markers of mTOR pathway in paediatric glioneuronal tumours and correlate these findings with tumour type, BRAFV600E mutational status and clinical characteristics such as tumour location, seizure frequency and duration, and age.

METHOD

37 children and adolescents with a neuropathological diagnosis of glioneuronal tumour were identified over a 22-year period. Immunohistochemical analyses for SSTRs type 1, 2A, 3, 5 and ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM) and phosphorylated S6 (pS6), which are indicators of mTOR pathway activation, were performed in tumour specimens from 33 patients and evaluated using the immunoreactive score (IRS). The IRS were compared to tumour type, BRAFV600E status and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

Ganglioglioma (GG) was the most frequently encountered subgroup (n = 27), followed by dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour (DNET; n = 4). GGs expressed SSTR2A and SSTR3 to a high extent, 56 % and 44 % respectively. Expression of SSTR2A was also found in DNETs. Signs of mTOR pathway activation were abundant in GGs, but only present in one DNET. No correlations with BRAFV600E presence or clinical characteristics were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Expression of SSTRs and activation of mTOR pathway in paediatric glioneuronal tumour suggest that somatostatin analogues and mTOR inhibitors may have potential therapeutic implications in a subset of inoperable childhood glioneuronal tumours causing medically refractory epilepsy and/or tumour growth. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Somatostatin and chemokine CXCR4 receptor expression in pancreatic adenocarcinoma relative to pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours

PURPOSE

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) represents one of the most fatal types of cancer with an exceptionally poor prognosis, underscoring the need for improved diagnostic and treatment approaches. An over-expression of somatostatin receptors (SST) as well as of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been shown for many tumour entities. Respective expression data for PAC, however, are scarce and contradictory.

METHODS

Overall, 137 tumour samples from 70 patients, 26 of whom were diagnosed with PAC and 44 with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour (PanNET), were compared in terms of SST and CXCR4 expression by immunohistochemical analysis using well-characterized rabbit monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

Only SST1 and CXCR4 expression was detected in PAC tumours, with SST1 present in 42.3% and CXCR4 in 7.7% of cases. However, the overall staining intensity was very weak. In contrast to the tumour cells, in many PAC cases, tumour capillaries exhibited strong SST3, SST5, or CXCR4 expression. In PanNETs, SST2 was the most-prominently expressed receptor, observed in 75.0% of the tumours at medium-strong intensity. SST5, SST1, and CXCR4 expression was detected in 20.5%, 15.9%, and 11.4% of PanNET cases, respectively, but the staining intensity was only weak. SST2 positivity in PanNET, but not in PAC, was associated with favourable patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SST or CXCR4 expression in PAC is clearly of no therapeutic relevance. However, indirect targeting of these tumours via SST3, SST5, or CXCR4 on tumour microvessels may represent a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Somatostatin receptor expression in parathyroid neoplasms

INTRODUCTION

Parathyroid carcinoma represents a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism. Distinguishing carcinoma from the benign tumors underlying primary hyperparathyroidism remains challenging. The diagnostic criteria for parathyroid carcinoma are local and/or metastatic spreading. Atypical parathyroid adenomas share other histological features with carcinomas but lack invasive growth. Somatostatin receptors are commonly expressed in different neuroendocrine tumors, but whether this also holds for parathyroid tumors remains unknown.

AIM

Our aim is to examine the immunohistochemical expression of somatostatin receptor 1-5 in parathyroid typical adenomas, atypical adenomas and carcinomas.

METHODS

We used a tissue microarray construct from a nationwide cohort of parathyroid carcinomas (n = 32), age- and gender-matched typical parathyroid adenomas (n = 72) and atypical parathyroid adenomas (n = 27) for immunohistochemistry of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5. We separately assessed cytoplasmic, membrane and nuclear expression and also investigated the associations with histological, biochemical and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

All parathyroid tumor subgroups expressed somatostatin receptors, although membrane expression appeared negligible. Except for somatostatin receptor 1, expression patterns differed between the three tumor types. Adenomas exhibited the weakest and carcinomas the strongest expression of somatostatin receptor 2, 3, 4 and 5. We observed the largest difference for cytoplasmic somatostatin receptor 5 expression.

CONCLUSIONS

Parathyroid adenomas, atypical adenomas and carcinomas all express somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5. Somatostatin receptor 5 may serve as a potential tumor marker for malignancy. Studies exploring the role of somatostatin receptor imaging and receptor-specific therapies in patients with parathyroid carcinomas are needed.

Immunohistochemical Expression of Somatostatin Receptor Subtypes in a Panel of Neuroendocrine Neoplasias

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NENs) are known to express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) 1-5, which are G-protein-coupled cell membrane receptors. Somatostatin receptor imaging and therapy utilizes the SSTR expression. Synthetic somatostatin analogs with radioligands are used to detect primary tumors, metastases, and recurrent disease. Receptor analogs are also used for treating NENs. Furthermore, commercially available SSTR antibodies can be used for the immunohistochemical (IHC) detection of SSTRs. We investigated different SSTR antibody clones applying diverse IHC protocol settings to identify reliable clones and feasible protocols for NENs. A tissue microarray including NENs from 12 different primary sites were stained. Only UMB clones were able to localize SSTR on the cell membranes of NENs. SSTR2 (UMB1) emerged as the most common subtype followed by SSTR5 (UMB4) and SSTR1 (UMB7). SSTR3 (UMB5) expression was mainly cytoplasmic. Yet, SSTR4 expression was weak and located primarily in the cytoplasm. Thus, appropriate IHC protocols, including proper positive and negative controls, represent requirements for high-quality NEN diagnostics and for planning personalized therapy.

Somatostatin analogs regulate tumor corticotrophs growth by reducing ERK1/2 activity

Pasireotide has been associated with tumor shrinkage in patients with Cushing's disease subjected to long term treatment. However, to date the implicated molecular mechanisms are poorly elucidated. Here, we tested pasireotide-mediated cytostatic and cytotoxic effects in ACTH-secreting primary tumor cultures and murine corticotroph tumor cell line, AtT-20 cells. We found somatostatin receptor type 5 (SST5) expressed in 17 different ACTH-secreting tumors and SST2 detectable in 15 out of the 17 tissues. Pasireotide caused a slight but significant in vitro inhibition of cell growth in 3 out of 6 ACTH-secreting primary cultures (-12.1 ± 4.3%, P < 0.01 at 10 nM), remarkably reduced phospho-ERK1/2 levels in 5 out of 8 samples (-36.4 ± 20.5%, P < 0.01 at 1 μM) and triggered an increase of caspase 3/7 activity in 2 of 4 tumors (17 ± 3.6%, P < 0.05 at 1 μM). Accordingly, in AtT-20 cells, pasireotide significantly inhibited cell proliferation (-10.5 ± 7.7% at 10 nM, P < 0.05; -13.9 ± 10.9% at 100 nM, P < 0.05; -26.8 ± 8.9% at 1 μM, P < 0.01). Similar antiproliferative actions were exerted by BIM23206 and BIM23120 (SST5&2 selective ligands, respectively), whereas octreotide was effective when used at 1 μM (-13.3 ± 9.1%, P < 0.05). Moreover, a reduction of phospho-ERK1/2 was observed upon pasireotide and BIM23206 treatment (-8.4 ± 28.6%, P < 0.01 and -51.4 ± 15.9%, P < 0.001 at 10 nM, respectively) but not after octreotide and BIM23120 incubation. Finally, pasireotide was able to induce cell apoptosis in AtT-20 cells at lower concentration than octreotide. Altogether these data indicate a downstream implication of SST5-mediated phospho-ERK1/2 inhibition by pasireotide resulting in ACTH-secreting tumor cells proliferation reduction. Moreover, we describe for the first time a pro-apoptotic effect of pasireotide in corticotrophs.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

Somatostatin receptor subtype 5 modifies hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis stress function

Pituitary corticotroph somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (SSTR5) signals to inhibit adrenocorticotrophin (ACTH) secretion. As ACTH deficiency results in attenuated adrenal cortisol production and an impaired stress response, we sought to clarify the role of SSTR5 in modifying the hypothalamic/pituitary/adrenal (HPA) axis. We generated Tg HP5 mice overexpressing SSTR5 in pituitary corticotrophs that produce the ACTH precursor proopiomelanocortin (POMC). Basal ACTH and corticosterone were similar in HP5 and WT mice, while HP5 mice showed attenuated ACTH and corticosterone responses to corticotrophin releasing hormone (CRH). HP5 mice exhibited attenuated corticosterone responses upon a restraint stress test and inflammatory stress following LPS injection, as well as increased anxiety-like and depressive-like behavior on open field and forced swim tests. Pituitary corticotroph CRH receptor subtype 1 (CRHR1) mRNA expression and ACTH responses to CRH were also attenuated in HP5 mice. In AtT20 cells stably overexpressing SSTR5, CRHR1 expression and cAMP response to CRH were reduced, whereas both were increased after SSTR5 KO. In elucidating mechanisms for these observations, we show that SSTR5-induced miR-449c suppresses both CRHR1 expression and function. We conclude that corticotroph SSTR5 attenuates HPA axis responses via CRHR1 downregulation, suggesting a role for SSTR5 in the pathogenesis of secondary adrenal insufficiency.

Somatostatin and CXCR4 expression patterns in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the lung relative to small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Lung cancer is highly prevalent and has an especially poor prognosis. Thus, new diagnostic and therapeutic targets are necessary. Two potential targets are somatostatin receptors (SST), which are overexpressed in well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms, and the chemokine receptor CXCR4, which is present mainly in highly proliferative and advanced tumours. Although their expression is relatively well characterized in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), data on SST and CXCR4 expression are scarce and contradictory.

METHODS

We comparatively evaluated 83 tumour samples from a total of 57 lung cancer patients, of which 22 had adenocarcinoma (ADC), 21 had squamous cell carcinoma (SQC), and 15 had SCLC. Samples were evaluated for SST and CXCR4 expression using immunohistochemistry with well-characterized rabbit monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

In the samples investigated, the most prominently expressed receptors were CXCR4 and SST5. Specifically, CXCR4 was detected with high expression intensity in more than 60% of ADC samples, about 90% of SQC, and 100% of SCLC. SST5 was present in about 75% of ADC and SQC samples and in more than 90% of SCLC. Although not noticeably expressed in ADC and SQC samples, SST2 was detected in 50% of SCLC cases, with a subset of patients displaying exceptionally high expression. The comparison of the three tumour entities revealed that SCLC samples had higher SST2, SST5, and CXCR4 expression, but lower SST3 and SST1 relative to ADC or SQC samples.

CONCLUSION

CXCR4 may be a promising target for diagnostics and therapy in both SCLC and NSCLC.

Differential somatostatin, CXCR4 chemokine and endothelin A receptor expression in WHO grade I-IV astrocytic brain tumors

PURPOSE

Glioblastomas represent the most common primary malignant tumor of the nervous system and the most frequent type of astrocytic tumors. Despite improved therapeutic options, prognosis has remained exceptionally poor over the last two decades. Therefore, new treatment approaches are urgently needed. An overexpression of somatostatin (SST) as well as chemokine CXCR4 and endothelin A (ETA) receptors has been shown for many types of cancer. Respective expression data for astrocytic brain tumors, however, are scarce and contradictory.

METHODS

SST subtype, CXCR4 and ETA expression was comparatively evaluated in a total of 57 grade I-IV astrocytic tumor samples by immunohistochemistry using well-characterized monoclonal antibodies.

RESULTS

Overall, receptor expression on the tumor cells was only very low. SST5 was the most prominently expressed receptor, followed by SST3, ETA, SST2 and CXCR4. In contrast, tumor capillaries displayed strong SST2, SST3, SST5, CXCR4 and ETA expression. Presence of SST5, CXCR4 and ETA on tumor cells and of SST3, CXCR4 and ETA on microvessels gradually increased from grade II to grade IV tumors. Ki-67 values correlated significantly with CXCR4 expression on tumor cells and with vascular SST3, CXCR4 or ETA positivity. SST5 or CXCR4 positivity of tumor cells and vascular SST3 or CXCR4 expression negatively correlated with patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Though having some prognostic value, SST, CXCR4 or ETA expression on astrocytic tumor cells is clearly of no therapeutic relevance. Indirect targeting of these highly vascularized tumors via SST3, SST5, CXCR4 or ETA on the microvessels, in contrast, may represent a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinomas: tumor capillaries as promising targets

Background

Hepatocellular (HCC) and cholangiocellular carcinomas (CCC) display an exceptionally poor prognosis. Especially for advanced disease no efficient standard therapy is currently available. Recently, somatostatin analogs have been evaluated for the treatment of HCC, however, with contradictory results. Besides, for both malignancies the chemokine receptor CXCR4 has been discussed as a possible new target structure.

Methods

Expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes 1, 2A, 3, 4, and 5, and of CXCR4 was evaluated in a total of 71 HCCs and 27 CCCs by immunohistochemistry using well-characterized novel monoclonal antibodies.

Results

In HCC tumor cells, frequency and intensity of expression of SSTRs and CXCR4 were only low. CXCR4 was present in about 40% of the HCCs, although at a low intensity. SSTR5, SSTR2, and SSTR3 were detected in about 15%, 8%, and 5% of the HCC tumors, respectively. SSTR and CXCR4 expression was much higher in CCC than in HCC. CXCR4 and SSTR1 were present in 60% and 67% of the CCC samples, respectively, followed by SSTR2 and SSTR5, which were detected in 30% and 11% of the tumors, respectively. Most notably, CXCR4 was intensely expressed on the tumor capillaries in about 50% of the HCCs and CCCs. CXCR4 expression on tumor vessels was associated with poor patient outcomes.

Conclusions

CCC, but not HCC, may be suitable for SSTR-based treatments. Because of the predominant expression of SSTR1, pan-somatostatin analogs should be preferred. In both HCC and CCC, indirect targeting of tumors via the CXCR4-positive tumor capillaries may represent a promising additional therapeutic strategy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3911-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cyto-histology in NET: what is necessary today and what is the future?

The carcinoid as originally described is part of the relatively large family of neuroendocrine neoplasia found in almost every organ. Historical reasons back their current definitions. Neuroendocrine cancer is most frequently observed in the lung and the digestive tract. In the lung is defined as carcinoid (typical and atypical) for well differentiated, low to intermediate grade, and small cell and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma for poorly differentiated, high grade. In the digestive system are respectively defined as neuroendocrine tumor (NET) and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) of small and large cell types. Grading and staging are developed for their clinical classification by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). In both anatomical sites the morphological features are overlapping, with bland histology for carcinoid and NET, and aggressive features with extensive necrosis, severe atypia and abundant, atypical mitoses for high grade cancer types. Such features are also essential diagnostic clues in cytological preparations. The confirmation of the neuroendocrine signature by immunohistochemistry is mandatory for the diagnosis; a minimum panel comprising chromogranin A and synaptophysin is recommended in the digestive system. In addition, the application of grading requires the mitotic count and or spotty necrosis assessment for lung, or the mitotic count and the Ki67 assessment in the digestive system.

High interlaboratory and interobserver agreement of somatostatin receptor immunohistochemical determination and correlation with response to somatostatin analogs

Monoclonal antibodies to somatostatin receptors 2A (SSTR2A, UMB-1) and 5 (SSTR5, UMB-4) were reported to be highly reliable for immunohistochemical detection of these receptors in neuroendocrine neoplasms. However, the standardization of either the immunohistochemical procedure and the methods of evaluation has yet to be established. Fifty-two tissues from 38 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm were retrieved from 2 institutions in Italy and Japan. The tissues were immunostained using 3 staining methodologies: 1 automated and 2 manual protocols from the Italian and Japanese institutions. The slides were independently evaluated by 3 observers (2 experienced pathologists and 1 medical student) using 3 scoring systems (Volante-Score, HER2-Score, and H-Score). The scores obtained from the staining methods were highly correlated with each other (r>0.85, P<.0001). Especially, the Volante- and HER2-Scores were highly concordant (r≥0.95, P≤.0001). Very high interobserver agreement was obtained irrespective of the method used and the experience of the evaluator, with the best concordance obtained by experienced pathologists evaluating automated system-stained slides (SSTR2A, r>0.97; SSTR5, r>0.96). HER2- and H-Scores were reliable to represent the characteristics of the patients. SSTR2A expression evaluated by the HER2-Score was significantly associated with clinical efficacy to somatostatin analogs (P=.04). SSTRs determination is an easily standardizable tool in different laboratories and is highly reproducible irrespective of the method of evaluation used. Given the positive association with clinical efficacy to somatostatin analogs, as well as the simple and widespread use, HER2-Score can be proposed as a standard evaluation procedure of SSTR2A and SSTR5 expression in neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Evaluation of somatostatin, CXCR4 chemokine and endothelin A receptor expression in a large set of paragangliomas

Paragangliomas are predominantly benign tumors, but in some cases invasive growth and also metastasis are observed. Given the limited number of nonsurgical treatment options, novel target structures for diagnostics and therapy of this tumor entity are urgently needed. In the present study, expression of all five somatostatin receptor (SST) subtypes, chemokine receptor CXCR4 and endothelin receptor type A (ETA) was assessed by means of immunohistochemistry in a total of 66 paraffin-embedded paraganglioma samples from 55 patients. The stainings were rated by means of the Immunoreactive Score and correlated to clinical data and to succinate dehydrogenase subunit B (SDHB) expression. SST2A was by far the most prominent receptor in the paragangliomas investigated. It was present in 89% of the tumors at a high intensity, followed by SST5, SST3, SST1 and SST4, which were detected in 47%, 35%, 35% and 13% of the samples, respectively. SDHB positive tumors exhibited significantly higher SST2A and SST3 expression as compared to SDHB negative cases. There was no correlation between SST and Ki-67 expression or grading of the tumors and no difference in SST expression between primary tumors and metastases. Cell surface expression of CXCR4 and ETA was detected only in few samples. On tumor capillaries, however, exceptionally strong staining for these two receptors was noticed in the vast majority of the tumors. In conclusion, paragangliomas are well suited for SST2A-based diagnostics and treatment modalities. An indirect targeting of these highly vascularized tumors via CXCR4 or ETA may also represent a promising future strategy.

The components of somatostatin and ghrelin systems are altered in neuroendocrine lung carcinoids and associated to clinical-histological features

BACKGROUND

Lung carcinoids (LCs) are rare tumors that comprise 1-5% of lung malignancies but represent 20-30% of neuroendocrine tumors. Their incidence is progressively increasing and a better characterization of these tumors is required. Alterations in somatostatin (SST)/cortistatin (CORT) and ghrelin systems have been associated to development/progression of various endocrine-related cancers, wherein they may become useful diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic biomarkers.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the expression levels of ghrelin and SST/CORT system components in LCs, as well as to explore their putative relationship with histological/clinical characteristics.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational retrospective study was performed; 75 LC patients with clinical/histological characteristics were included. Samples from 46 patients were processed to isolate mRNA from tumor and adjacent non-tumor region, and the expression levels of SST/CORT and ghrelin systems components, determined by quantitative-PCR, were compared to those of 7 normal lung tissues.

RESULTS

Patient cohort was characterized by mean age 53±15 years, 48% males, 34% with tobacco exposure; 71.4/28.6% typical/atypical carcinoids, 21.7% incidental tumors, 4.3% functioning tumors, 17.7% with metastasis. SST/CORT and ghrelin system components were expressed at variable levels in a high proportion of tumors, as well as in adjacent non-tumor tissues, while a lower proportion of normal lung samples also expressed these molecules. A gradation was observed from normal non-neoplastic lung tissues, non-tumor adjacent tissue and LCs, being SST, sst4, sst5, GHS-R1a and GHS-R1b overexpressed in tumor tissue compared to normal tissue. Importantly, several SST/CORT and ghrelin system components displayed significant correlations with relevant clinical parameters, such as necrosis, peritumoral and vascular invasion, or metastasis.

CONCLUSION

Altogether, these data reveal a prominent, widespread expression of key SST/CORT/ghrelin system components in LCs, where they display clinical-histological correlations, which could provide novel, valuable markers for NET patient management.

In Vitro Head-to-Head Comparison Between Octreotide and Pasireotide in GH-Secreting Pituitary Adenomas

CONTEXT

First-generation somatostatin analogs (SSAs), such as octreotide (OCT), are the first line medical therapy for acromegaly. Pasireotide (PAS), a newly developed SSA, has shown promising results in the treatment of acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antisecretory effect of OCT and PAS in primary cultures of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas (GH-omas). To correlate responses with the adenoma somatostatin receptor (SSTR) profile.

DESIGN

The effect of OCT and PAS on GH (and PRL) secretion was tested in 33 GH-oma cultures. SSTR expression was evaluated in adenoma samples.

SETTING AND PATIENTS

Patients with acromegaly referred to the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands).

INTERVENTIONS

OCT and PAS treatment for 72 hours (10 nM).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

GH (and PRL) concentrations in cell culture media. SSTR expression in adenoma samples.

RESULTS

The overall effect of OCT (-36.8%) and PAS (-37.1%) on GH secretion was superimposable. We identified three adenoma groups: PAS+ (PAS more effective than OCT), n = 6; PAS = OCT, n = 22; and OCT+ (OCT more effective than PAS), n = 5. PAS+ adenomas showed lower somatostatin receptor subtype (sst)2 messenger RNA (mRNA) and sst2/sst5 mRNA ratio, compared with the other groups (P < 0.05). PAS inhibited PRL hypersecretion more than OCT (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, OCT and PAS equally reduced GH secretion in vitro. Adenomas with lower sst2 mRNA expression and lower sst2/sst5 mRNA ratio were better responders to PAS compared with OCT. SSTR evaluation in GH-omas may become a tool for tailored SSA treatment in acromegaly.

Differential somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptor expression in MALT-type lymphoma of gastric and extragastric origin

PURPOSE

Whereas the different somatostatin receptor (SSTR) subtypes and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 are known to be expressed in a wide variety of human malignancies, comprehensive data are still lacking for MALT-type lymphomas.

METHODS

Overall, 55 cases of MALT-type lymphoma of both gastric and extragastric origin were evaluated for the SSTR subtype and CXCR4 expression by means of immunohistochemistry using novel monoclonal rabbit antibodies. The stainings were rated by means of the immunoreactive score and correlated with clinical data.

RESULTS

While the CXCR4 was detected in 92 % of the cases investigated, the SSTR subtypes were much less frequently present. The SSTR5 was expressed in about 50 % of the cases, followed by the SSTR3, the SSTR2A, the SSTR4 and the SSTR1, which were present in 35, 27, 18 or 2 %, respectively, of the tumors only. Gastric lymphomas displayed a significantly higher SSTR3, SSTR4 and SSTR5 expression than extragastric tumors. A correlation between CXCR4 and Ki-67 expression was seen in gastric lymphomas, whereas primarily in extragastric tumors SSTR5 negativity was associated with poor patient outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The CXCR4 may serve as a promising target for diagnostics and therapy of MALT-type lymphomas, while the SSTRs appear not suitable in this respect.

Inverse expression of somatostatin and CXCR4 chemokine receptors in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms of different malignancy

INTRODUCTION

Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) are widely distributed in well-differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) and serve as primary targets for diagnostics and treatment. An overexpression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4, in contrast, is considered to be present mainly in highly proliferative and advanced tumors. Comparative data are still lacking, however, for neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC).

METHODS

SSTR subtype (1, 2A, 3, 5) and CXCR4 expression was evaluated in G1 (n = 31), G2 (n = 47), and low (G3a; Ki-67: 21-49%; n = 21) and highly proliferative (G3b; Ki-67: >50%, n = 22) G3 (total n = 43) gastroenteropancreatic NEN samples by performing immunohistochemistry with monoclonal rabbit anti-human anti-SSTR and anti-CXCR4 antibodies, respectively, and was correlated with clinical data.

RESULTS

Both CXCR4 and SSTR were widely expressed in all tumors investigated. CXCR4 expression differed significantly between the G1 and G3 specimens and within the G3 group (G3a to G3b), and was positively correlated with Ki-67 expression. SSTR2A, in contrast, exhibited an inverse association with Ki-67. SSTR2A was highly expressed in G1 and G2 tumors, but was significantly less abundant in G3 carcinomas. Additionally, SSTR1 expression was higher in G3a than in G3b tumors.

CONCLUSION

We observed an elevation in CXCR4 and a decrease in SSTR2A expression with increasing malignancy. Interestingly, 23% of the G3 specimens had strong SSTR2A expression. Because CXCR4 was strongly expressed in highly proliferative G3 carcinomas, it is an interesting new target and needs to be validated in larger studies.

Low beta-arrestin expression correlates with the responsiveness to long-term somatostatin analog treatment in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

The high expression of somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (SSTR2 also known as sst2) usually present in growth hormone (GH)-secreting adenomas is the rationale for therapy with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in acromegaly. Although SSTR2 expression is a good predictor for biochemical response to SSA treatment, we still face tumors resistant to SSAs despite high SSTR2 expression. Recently, beta-arrestins (β-arrestins) have been highlighted as key players in the regulation of SSTR2 function.

DESIGN

To investigate whether β-arrestins might be useful predictors of responsiveness to long-term SSA treatment in acromegaly, we retrospectively evaluated 35 patients with acromegaly who underwent adenomectomy in two referral centers in The Netherlands.

METHODS

β-arrestin mRNA levels were evaluated in adenoma samples, together with SSTR2 (and SSTR5) mRNA and protein expression. Biochemical response to long-term SSA treatment (median 12 months) was assessed in 32 patients.

RESULTS

β-arrestin 1 and 2 mRNA was significantly lower in adenoma tissues from patients who achieved insulin-like growth factor 1 normalization (P = 0.024 and P = 0.047) and complete biochemical control (P = 0.047 and P = 0.039). The SSTR2 mRNA was higher in SSA responder patients compared with the resistant ones (P = 0.026). This difference was more evident when analyzing the SSTR2/β-arrestin 1 and SSTR2/β-arrestin 2 ratio (P = 0.011 and P = 0.010). β-arrestin 1 and 2 expression showed a significant trend of higher median values from full responders, partial responders to resistant patients (P = 0.045 and P = 0.021, respectively). Interestingly, SSTR2 protein expression showed a strong inverse correlation with both β-arrestin 1 and 2 mRNA (ρ = -0.69, P = 0.0011 and ρ = -0.67, P = 0.0016).

CONCLUSIONS

Low β-arrestin expression and high SSTR2/β-arrestin ratio correlate with the responsiveness to long-term treatment with SSAs in patients with acromegaly.

Research Resource: Real-Time Analysis of Somatostatin and Dopamine Receptor Signaling in Pituitary Cells Using a Fluorescence-Based Membrane Potential Assay

Stable somatostatin analogues and dopamine receptor agonists are the mainstay for the pharmacological treatment of functional pituitary adenomas; however, only a few cellular assays have been developed to detect receptor activation of novel compounds without disrupting cells to obtain the second messenger content. Here, we adapted a novel fluorescence-based membrane potential assay to characterize receptor signaling in a time-dependent manner. This minimally invasive technique provides a robust and reliable read-out for ligand-induced receptor activation in permanent and primary pituitary cells. The mouse corticotropic cell line AtT-20 endogenously expresses both the somatostatin receptors 2 (sst2) and 5 (sst5). Exposure of wild-type AtT-20 cells to the sst2- and sst5-selective agonists BIM-23120 and BIM-23268, respectively, promoted a pertussis toxin- and tertiapin-Q-sensitive reduction in fluorescent signal intensity, which is indicative of activation of G protein-coupled inwardly rectifying potassium (GIRK) channels. After heterologous expression, sst1, sst3, and sst4 receptors also coupled to GIRK channels in AtT-20 cells. Similar activation of GIRK channels by dopamine required overexpression of dopamine D2 receptors (D2Rs). Interestingly, the presence of D2Rs in AtT-20 cells strongly facilitated GIRK channel activation elicited by the sst2-D2 chimeric ligand BIM-23A760, suggesting a synergistic action of sst2 and D2Rs. Furthermore, stable somatostatin analogues produced strong responses in primary pituitary cultures from wild-type mice; however, in cultures from sst2 receptor-deficient mice, only pasireotide and somatoprim, but not octreotide, induced a reduction in fluorescent signal intensity, suggesting that octreotide mediates its pharmacological action primarily via the sst2 receptor.

Factors predicting pasireotide responsiveness in somatotroph pituitary adenomas resistant to first-generation somatostatin analogues: an immunohistochemical study

AIM

To gather data regarding factors predicting responsiveness to pasireotide in acromegaly.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SSTR2a, SSTR3, SSTR5, AIP, Ki-67 and the adenoma subtype were evaluated in somatotroph adenomas from 39 patients treated post-operatively with somatostatin analogues (SSAs). A standardized SSTR scoring system was applied (scores 0-3). All patients received first-generation SSAs, and 11 resistant patients were subsequently treated with pasireotide LAR.

RESULTS

None of the patients with negative or cytoplasmic-only SSTR2a expression (scores 0-1) were responsive to first-generation SSAs, as opposed to 20% (score 2) and 50% of patients with a score of 3 (P=0.04). None of the patients with an SSTR5 score of 0-1 were responsive to pasireotide, as opposed to 5/7 cases with a score of 2 or 3 (P=0.02). SSTR3 expression did not influence first-generation SSAs or pasireotide responsiveness. Tumours with low AIP were resistant to first-generation SSAs (100 vs 60%; P=0.02), while they had similar responsiveness to pasireotide compared to tumours with conserved AIP expression (50 vs 40%; P=0.74). Tumours with low AIP displayed reduced SSTR2 (SSTR2a scores 0-1 44.4 vs 6.7%; P=0.006) while no difference was seen in SSTR5 (SSTR5 scores 0-1 33.3 vs 23.3%; P=0.55). Sparsely granulated adenomas responded better to pasireotide compared to densely granulated ones (80 vs 16.7%; P=0.04).

CONCLUSION

The expression of SSTR5 might predict responsiveness to pasireotide in acromegaly. AIP deficient and sparsely granulated adenomas may benefit from pasireotide treatment. These results need to be confirmed in larger series of pasireotide-treated patients.

Specific biology of neuroendocrine tumors: Peptide receptors as molecular targets

Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are characterized by a high over-expression of many different peptide hormone receptors. These receptors represent important molecular targets for imaging and therapy, using either radiolabeled or cold peptide analogs. The clinically best established example is somatostatin receptor targeting. A relatively new application is glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor-targeted imaging of insulinomas, which is highly sensitive. A potential future candidate for peptide receptor targeting is the gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) receptor. It was recently found to exhibit a very wide expression in NET and may be a particularly suitable target in somatostatin and GLP-1 receptor negative tumors. With increasing use of peptide receptor targeting, reliable morphologic in vitro tools to assess peptide receptors in tissues are mandatory, such as in vitro receptor autoradiography or thoroughly established immunohistochemical procedures.

Analysis of somatostatin receptor 2A immunohistochemistry, RT-qPCR, and in vivo PET/CT data in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm

OBJECTIVE

Gallium 68 somatostatin receptor (SSTR) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is one of the most sensitive imaging methods for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The aim of the study was to correlate the receptor density generated from the static PET/CT (maximum standard uptake values [SUVmax], mean standard uptake values [SUVmean]) with subtype 2A SSTR (SSTR2A) immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) gene-expression data.

METHODS

Thirty-nine tumor specimens (17 primary pancreatic tumors [PTs], 22 metastases [MTS]) of 19 patients with PET/CT scans preoperatively were evaluated. Subtype 2A SSTR expression was quantified immunohistochemically (immunoreactive score [IRS]) and on messenger RNA (mRNA) level by RT-qPCR.

RESULTS

The PT and MTS did not differ significantly in their SUVmax (P = 0.07) but displayed a dissimilarity with respect to their SSTR2A expression (mean [SD] IRS PT, 8.8 [3.6] vs mean [SD] IRS MTS, 5.1 [4.5]; P = 0.02).The SUVmean was highly significantly correlated to SSTR2A mRNA expression (C = 0.85, P < 0.001) and moderately to SSTR2A protein expression (C = 0.53, P = 0.05). Moreover, the SUVmax correlated moderately with SSTR2A protein expression (C = 0.44, P = 0.03) and mRNA expression (C = 0.64, P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

The SUVmax and SUVmean are reliable ex vivo parameters for in vivo quantification of SSTR expression in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Both immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR are comparable methods for SSTR2A quantification. The PT and MTS differ significantly in their SSTR2A expression. This fact should be taken into account when treating patients with somatostatin analogs or peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Comparison of immunoreactive score, HER2/neu score and H score for the immunohistochemical evaluation of somatostatin receptors in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms

AIMS

Due to the growing number of somatostatin receptor (SSTR) targeting analogues and radiopeptides used for the diagnosis and therapy of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), the assessment of SSTR subtype status has increasingly gained predictive value. In pathology, the SSTR protein levels are detected routinely by immunohistochemistry (IHC); however, a lack of a standardized evaluation system persists. Thus, in the present investigation, three well-established semi-quantitative scoring systems [immunoreactive score (IRS), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu score, H score] used commonly for SSTR-IHC evaluation in NEN were compared.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 240 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour samples from 90 patients with bronchopulmonary NEN were examined by IHC and quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for SSTR1, 2A, 3, 4 and 5 expression. Using both methods, SSTR1, 2A and 5 were the most frequently expressed subtypes. For all SSTR subtypes, all three scores correlated well with each other and with qRT-PCR data. However, the IRS was the most meaningful score with the best correlation to mRNA levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Because a unified IHC scoring system for SSTR analysis is needed urgently to optimize the theranostics of NEN, among the scores tested, the IRS seems to be the most suitable according to our results. It provides sufficient accuracy combined with high practicability.

Somatostatin receptors in bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms: new diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic markers

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are known for their overexpression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), which provide the molecular basis for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. In contrast, few data on the SSTR expression profile exist for bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine neoplasms (BP-NEN).

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

A total of 240 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens from 26 typical carcinoid (TC), 30 atypical carcinoid (AC), and 34 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients were examined retrospectively by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using specific rabbit monoclonal antibodies and evaluated by the immunoreactive score. Adjacent slides from 20 samples of each tumor type were subjected to additional RT-quantitative PCR mRNA analysis.

RESULTS

With different expression patterns, SSTRs were present in most of the tumor sections, at both the protein and mRNA levels. The RT-quantitative PCR data correlated with the IHC scores. SSTR1 was detected in approximately 65% of the TC and AC, but hardly in the SCLC, whereas both SSTR2A and SSTR5 were present in approximately 45% of each entity. Furthermore, the SSTR1 expression level was positively correlated with patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that SSTRs can be used as novel diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic markers of BP-NEN. The differences in the SSTR expression profile between the three types of BP-NEN may help to set a diagnostic cutoff and predict patient prognosis. Similar to TC and AC, our results also revealed a previously unappreciated high level of SSTR2A expression in SCLC within a subgroup of patients. However, in most cases, pan-somatostatin analogs may represent an additional therapeutic option.

VPAC2 receptor expression in human normal and neoplastic tissues: evaluation of the novel MAB SP235

The vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 2 (VPAC2) is widely distributed throughout the body and is also overexpressed in a variety of human neoplastic tissues. However, little is known about its precise tissue distribution, regulation and function, which is in part be due to the lack of specific monoclonal anti-VPAC2 antibodies. In this study, we extensively characterised the novel rabbit monoclonal anti-VPAC2 antibody (clone SP235) using transfected cells and mouse, rat and human tissues. SP235 was then subjected to a comparative immunohistochemical study on a series of 167 histological specimens from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human tumours and adjacent normal tissues. SP235 detected a broad band migrating at a molecular weight of 50-70 kDa in western blotting analyses of various mouse tissues as well as VPAC2- but not VPAC1-transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells. SP235 yielded an efficient immunostaining of distinct cell populations in human tissue samples with a predominance of plasma membrane staining, which was completely abolished by preadsorption with its immunising peptide. SP235 immunohistochemistry detected VPAC2 receptors in lymphocytes present in spleen, tonsils, lymph nodes and Peyer's patches, chief cells of gastric mucosa, exocrine and endocrine pancreas, kidney tubules and blood vessels. In addition, VPAC2 was observed in thyroid, gastric and lung carcinomas, pancreatic adenocarcinomas, sarcomas and neuroendocrine tumours. SP235 may prove of great value in the identification of VPAC2 receptors during routine histopathological examination. VPAC2 visualisation with this simple and rapid immunohistochemical method will facilitate identification of candidate tumours for vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP)-based diagnostics or therapeutic interventions.

Somatostatin Receptors 2A and 5 Are Expressed in Merkel Cell Carcinoma with No Association with Disease Severity

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine tumour of the skin. It has been speculated that MCCs express somatostatin receptors (SSTRs), but this has never been assessed in a large series of MCCs. The main aim of this study was to assess the expression of SSTR2A and SSTR5 in MCC tumours. The secondary aims were to assess whether expression of SSTR was associated with the Ki67 proliferative index, Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) status, clinical characteristics and outcome.

METHODS

Clinical data and tumours were collected from an ongoing cohort of French patients with MCC. Immunohistochemistry was performed with anti-SSTR2A and anti-SSTR5 monoclonal antibodies, and tumours were classified into 3 groups: 'no expression', 'low expression' and 'moderate expression' using an SSTR staining score.

RESULTS

SSTR expression was assessed for 105 MCC tissue samples from 98 patients, and clinical characteristics were available for 87 of them. SSTR expression was consistent between the primary skin tumour and the corresponding metastases for SSTR2A and SSTR5 in 3/7 and 6/7 cases, respectively. SSTR2A and SSTR5 were expressed in 58 cases (59.2%) and in 44 cases (44.9%), respectively. Overall, at least one SSTR was expressed in 75 tumours (76.5%). SSTR expression was not associated with clinical characteristics, Ki67 proliferative index, recurrence-free survival or MCC-specific survival. Expression of SSTR2A was associated with MCPyV status in MCC tumours but not SSTR5.

CONCLUSION

SSTRs were expressed in a high proportion of MCCs, although expression was heterogeneous between tumours and was not associated with disease severity.

Fine-tuning somatostatin receptor signalling by agonist-selective phosphorylation and dephosphorylation: IUPHAR Review 5

The biological actions of somatostatin are mediated by a family of five GPCRs, named sst1 to sst5 . Somatostatin receptors exhibit equally high-binding affinities to their natural ligand somatostatin-14 and largely overlapping distributions. The overexpression of somatostatin receptors in human tumours is the molecular basis for diagnostic and therapeutic application of the stable somatostatin analogues octreotide, lanreotide and pasireotide. The efficiency of somatostatin receptor signalling is tightly regulated and ultimately limited by the coordinated phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of intracellular carboxyl-terminal serine and threonine residues. Here, we review and discuss recent progress in the generation and application of phosphosite-specific antibodies for human sst2 and sst5 receptors. These phosphosite-specific antibodies are unique tools to monitor the spatial and temporal dynamics of receptors phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Using a combined approach of phosphosite-specific antibodies and siRNA knock-down screening, relevant kinases and phosphatases were identified. Emerging evidence suggests distinct mechanisms of agonist-selective fine-tuning for individual somatostatin receptors. The recently uncovered differences in phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of these receptors may hence be of physiological significance in mediating responses to acute, persistent or repeated stimuli in a variety of target tissues.

Somatostatin analogs: does pharmacology impact antitumor efficacy?

Somatostatin is an endogenous inhibitor of secretion and cell proliferation. These features render somatostatin a logical candidate for the management of neuroendocrine tumors that express somatostatin receptors. Synthetic somatostatin analogs (SSAs) have longer half-lives than somatostatin, but have similar activities, and are used for the treatment of these types of disorders. Interest has focused on novel multireceptor analogs with broader affinity to several of the five somatostatin receptors, thereby presenting putatively higher antitumor activities. Recent evidence indicates that SSAs cannot be considered mimics of native somatostatin in regulating signaling pathways downstream of receptors. Here we review this knowledge, discuss the concept of biased agonism, and highlight what considerations need to be taken into account for the optimal clinical use of SSAs.

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs): new diagnostic and therapeutic challenges

This paper summarizes the current understanding of the biology of somatostatin receptor (sst), role of immunotherapy in neuroendocrine tumor (NET), new agents for PPRT, and methods to assess response and clinical benefit in NET. One of the most interesting aspects of sst biology is the recent discovery of truncated variants of the sst5 receptor subtype with unique tissue distribution and response to somatostatin (SST). These truncated receptors are associated with bad patient prognosis, decreased response to SST analogs, and may be new targets for diagnoses and treatment. IFN remains a cost-effective agent, particularly in classic mid gut carcinoids, and there is interest to continue examining immunotherapy's in this disease. PRRT remains a key strategy for treatment and imaging. In addition to the classic agents, there are a series of new agents targeting other receptors such as the incretin receptors (GLP-1R; GIPR) and other G-protein coupled receptors with great potential. With regards to therapy monitoring, the most commonly used criteria are Response Criteria Evaluation in Solid Tumors (RECIST). However, for different reasons, these criteria are not very useful in NET. Incorporation of other criteria such as Choi as well as functional imaging assessment with PET would be of great interest in this area.

The somatostatin receptor in human pancreatic β-cells

The peptide hormone somatostatin (SST) is produced in the brain, the gut, and in δ-cells in pancreatic islets of Langerhans. SST secretion from δ-cells is stimulated by glucose, amino acids, and glucagon-like peptide-1. Exogenous SST strongly inhibits the secretion of the blood glucose-regulating hormones insulin and glucagon from pancreatic β-cells and α-cells, respectively. Endogenous SST secreted from δ-cells is a paracrine regulator of insulin and glucagon secretion, although the exact physiological significance of this regulation is unclear. Secreted SST binds to specific receptors (SSTRs), which are coupled to Gi/o proteins. In both β- and α-cells, activation of SSTRs suppresses hormone secretion by reducing cAMP levels, inhibiting electrical activity, decreasing Ca²⁺ influx through voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channels and directly reducing exocytosis in a Ca²⁺ and cAMP-independent manner. In rodents, β-cells express predominantly SSTR5, whereas α-cells express SSTR2. In human islets, SSTR2 is the dominant receptor in both β- and α-cells, but other isoforms also contribute to the SST effects. Evidence from rodent models suggests that SST secretion from δ-cells is dysregulated in diabetes mellitus, which may contribute to the metabolic disturbances in this disease. SST analogues are currently used for the treatment of hyperinsulinism and other endocrine disorders, including acromegaly and Cushing's syndrome.

Somatostatin receptors type 2 and 5 expression and localization during human pituitary development

Somatostatin (SRIF), by acting mainly through sst2 and sst5 receptors, is a potent inhibitor of hormonal secretion by the human anterior pituitary gland. However, the pattern of protein expression of these SRIF receptors remains unknown during pituitary development. To get further insights into the physiological role of SRIF receptors in human development and pituitary function, the present study examined the developmental expression of the sst2 and sst5 receptors in the individual cell types of the anterior human pituitary. Thirteen fetal human pituitaries were investigated between 13 to 38 weeks of gestation (WG) by double-labeling immunofluorescence with antibodies raised against sst2 or sst5 receptors and GH, LH, FSH, TSH, or pro-opiomelanocortin proteins. SRIF immunoreactivity in the hypothalamus and median eminence was investigated at the same developmental ages. Immunoreactivity for the sst2 receptor was evident as early as 13 to 15 WG and onward mainly in TSH-, LH-, and FSH-expressing cells, whereas sst5 immunoreactivity was apparent at the late development stages (35-38 WG). GH-expressing cells mainly expressed sst5 immunoreactivity. SRIF-positive fibers and cells were detected as soon as 13 to 16 WG in the hypothalamus and median eminence and their densities increased with gestational age. The early appearance of hypothalamic SRIF cells and fibers suggests a physiological link between SRIF and its receptors during pituitary development. Whereas sst2 receptors might play a primary role in the differentiation and regulation of TSH, LH, and FSH cells, sst5 receptors appear to be mainly involved in GH regulation from birth onward.

Evaluation of somatostatin receptor subtype expression in human neuroendocrine tumors using two sets of new monoclonal antibodies

INTRODUCTION

The expression and reliable detection of somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5) is a prerequisite for the successful use of somatostatin analogs in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Two sets of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against human SSTR1, 2A, 3 and 5 have recently been developed by two independent laboratories using rabbit and mouse hybridomas. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of both sets of mAbs for detection of SSTRs in NET samples as they are routinely collected in clinical practice.

METHODS

Mouse and rabbit mAbs were characterized in SSTR1, 2A, 3 and 5-transfected HEK293 cells and human archival samples of pancreatic tissue and NET. Comparative analysis of mAbs was also conducted by immunostaining of a tissue microarray composed of 75 cores of NET.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical analysis of HEK293 cells showed that both rabbit and mouse mAbs specifically detect their cognate receptor subtype, with mild cytoplasmic cross-reactivity observed for rabbit mAbs. Both sets of mAbs labeled normal pancreatic islets and showed similar patterns of immunoreactivity in NET controls. Direct comparison of mAb sets using a NET tissue microarray revealed strong correlation between rabbit and mouse mAbs against SSTR1 and 5, and moderate correlation for SSTR3. The rabbit mAb against SSTR2A showed higher affinity for its cognate receptor than the corresponding mouse mAb, resulting in a more reliable detection of this SSTR.

CONCLUSIONS

mAbs from both sets are reliable tools for the detection of SSTR1, 3 and 5, whereas the rabbit mAb against SSTR2A is recommended for use in routine clinical testing due to its superior binding affinity.

Expression of SSTR2a, but not of SSTRs 1, 3, or 5 in somatotroph adenomas assessed by monoclonal antibodies was reduced by octreotide and correlated with the acute and long-term effects of octreotide

CONTEXT

Reduced expression of somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) in somatotroph adenomas and their potential down-regulation after medical treatment may explain the unsatisfactory response to octreotide in particular acromegalic patients. The expression of SSTRs other than SSTR2a has not been studied in large, unselected cohorts using novel rabbit monoclonal antibodies.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the expression of SSTRs 1, 2a, 3, and 5 in somatotroph adenomas, to correlate expression with clinical characteristics and the response to octreotide, and to ascertain whether preoperative octreotide treatment affected SSTR expression.

DESIGN, SETTING, PATIENTS

The study included 78 adenomas from patients operated on consecutively during 2000 to 2010. After exclusion of 13 patients, immunohistochemical analysis with rabbit monoclonal antibodies against SSTRs 1, 2a, 3, and 5 (clones UMB-7, -1, -5, and -4) was performed on 65 adenomas.

INTERVENTION

Twenty-eight patients received preoperative octreotide, and 37 patients were operated on without pretreatment. Twenty-six patients were randomized to direct surgery (n = 13) or to octreotide pretreatment (n = 13).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

SSTR expression was evaluated using a 12-grade scoring system. The responses to the octreotide test dose (GH reduction) and to 6 months of octreotide (IGF-I reduction) were measured.

RESULTS

The majority of adenomas showed membranous expression of SSTRs 2a and 5. SSTR2a expression was reduced in the pretreated group and correlated with the acute octreotide test results and the effect of octreotide treatment. In a linear regression model with SSTR2a expression as the determinant, the correlation with the acute test response improved after adjustment for medical pretreatment.

CONCLUSION

Rabbit monoclonal antibodies are reliable markers of SSTRs in somatotroph adenomas. SSTR2a expression correlated with the response to octreotide and was reduced after octreotide treatment, indicating the need for adjustment when SSTR2a expression is correlated with baseline characteristics. Evaluation of SSTR subtypes may be an important aspect of improving the medical treatment for acromegaly.

Illuminating somatostatin analog action at neuroendocrine tumor receptors

Somatostatin analogs for the diagnosis and therapy of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) have been used in clinical applications for more than two decades. Five somatostatin receptor subtypes have been identified and molecular mechanisms of somatostatin receptor signaling and regulation have been elucidated. These advances increased understanding of the biological role of each somatostatin receptor subtype, their distribution in NETs, as well as agonist-specific regulation of receptor signaling, internalization, and phosphorylation, particularly for the sst2 receptor subtype, which is the primary target of current somatostatin analog therapy for NETs. Various hypotheses exist to explain differences in patient responsiveness to somatostatin analog inhibition of tumor secretion and growth as well as differences in the development of tumor resistance to therapy. In addition, we now have a better understanding of the action of both first generation (octreotide, lanreotide, Octreoscan) and second generation (pasireotide) FDA-approved somatostatin analogs, including the biased agonistic character of some agonists. The increased understanding of somatostatin receptor pharmacology provides new opportunities to design more sophisticated assays to aid the future development of somatostatin analogs with increased efficacy.

Reevaluation of sst₁ somatostatin receptor expression in human normal and neoplastic tissues using the novel rabbit monoclonal antibody UMB-7

BACKGROUND

The somatostatin receptor 1 (sst1) is widely distributed throughout the body and is also present in neoplastic tissues. However, little is known about its precise tissue distribution, regulation and function, which may in part be due to the lack of specific monoclonal anti-sst1 antibodies.

METHODS

We have characterized the novel rabbit monoclonal anti-human sst1 antibody UMB-7 using sst1-expressing cells and human pituitary samples. The antibody was then used for immunohistochemical staining of a large panel of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human tissues.

RESULTS

Western blot analyses of BON-1 cells and human pituitary revealed a broad band migrating at a molecular weight of 45,000-60,000. After enzymatic deglycosylation the size of this band decreased to a molecular weight of 45,000. UMB-7 yielded an efficient immunostaining of distinct cell populations in the human tissue samples with a predominance of plasma membrane staining, which was completely abolished by preadsorption of UMB-7 with its immunizing peptide. The sst1 receptor was detected in anterior pituitary, pancreatic islets, distal tubules, enteric ganglion cells and nerve fibers, chief cells of the gastric mucosa, macrophages and mast cells. In addition, sst1 was observed in pituitary adenomas, gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors and pheochromocytoma as well as in pancreatic adenocarcinomas, gastric carcinomas, urinary bladder carcinomas and sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

UMB-7 may prove of great value in the identification of sst1-expressing tumors during routine histopathological examinations. This may open up new routes for diagnostic and therapeutic intervention.

Phosphorylation of threonine 333 regulates trafficking of the human sst5 somatostatin receptor

The frequent overexpression of the somatostatin receptors sst2 and sst5 in neuroendocrine tumors provides the molecular basis for therapeutic application of novel multireceptor somatostatin analogs. Although the phosphorylation of the carboxyl-terminal region of the sst2 receptor has been studied in detail, little is known about the agonist-induced regulation of the human sst5 receptor. Here, we have generated phosphosite-specific antibodies for the carboxyl-terminal threonines 333 (T333) and 347 (T347), which enabled us to selectively detect either the T333-phosphorylated or the T347-phosphorylated form of sst5. We show that agonist-mediated phosphorylation occurs at T333, whereas T347 is constitutively phosphorylated in the absence of agonist. We further demonstrate that the multireceptor somatostatin analog pasireotide and the sst5-selective ligand L-817,818 but not octreotide or KE108 were able to promote a detectable T333 phosphorylation. Interestingly, BIM-23268 was the only sst5 agonist that was able to stimulate T333 phosphorylation to the same extent as natural somatostatin. Agonist-induced T333 phosphorylation was dose-dependent and selectively mediated by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. Similar to that observed for the sst2 receptor, phosphorylation of sst5 occurred within seconds. However, unlike that seen for the sst2 receptor, dephosphorylation and recycling of sst5 were rapidly completed within minutes. We also identify protein phosphatase 1γ as G protein-coupled receptor phosphatase for the sst5 receptor. Together, we provide direct evidence for agonist-selective phosphorylation of carboxyl-terminal T333. In addition, we identify G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2-mediated phosphorylation and protein phosphatase 1γ-mediated dephosphorylation of T333 as key regulators of rapid internalization and recycling of the human sst5 receptor.

Molecular mechanisms of somatostatin receptor trafficking

The neuropeptide somatostatin (SRIF) is an important modulator of neurotransmission in the central nervous system and acts as a potent inhibitor of hormone and exocrine secretion. In addition, SRIF regulates cell proliferation in normal and tumorous tissues. The six somatostatin receptor subtypes (sst1, sst2A, sst2B, sst3, sst4, and sst5), which belong to the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, share a common molecular topology: a hydrophobic core of seven transmembrane-spanning α-helices, three intracellular loops, three extracellular loops, an amino-terminus outside the cell, and a carboxyl-terminus inside the cell. For most of the GPCRs, intracytosolic sequences, and more particularly the C-terminus, are believed to interact with proteins that are mandatory for either exporting neosynthesized receptor, anchoring receptor at the plasma membrane, internalization, recycling, or degradation after ligand binding. Accordingly, most of the SRIF receptors can traffic not only in vitro within different cell types but also in vivo. A picture of the pathways and proteins involved in these processes is beginning to emerge.