Body mass index and mortality in kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Fueling the success of transplantation through nutrition: recent insights into nutritional interventions, their interplay with gut microbiota and cellular mechanisms

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of nutrition in organ health including solid organ transplantation is broadly accepted, but robust data on nutritional regimens remains scarce calling for further investigation of specific dietary approaches at the different stages of organ transplantation. This review gives an update on the latest insights into nutritional interventions highlighting the potential of specific dietary regimens prior to transplantation aiming for organ protection and the interplay between dietary intake and gut microbiota.

RECENT FINDINGS

Nutrition holds the potential to optimize patients' health prior to and after surgery, it may enhance patients' ability to cope with the procedure-associated stress and it may accelerate their recovery from surgery. Nutrition helps to reduce morbidity and mortality in addition to preserve graft function. In the case of living organ donation, dietary preconditioning strategies promise novel approaches to limit ischemic organ damage during transplantation and to identify the underlying molecular mechanisms of diet-induced organ protection. Functioning gut microbiota are required to limit systemic inflammation and to generate protective metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids or hydrogen sulfide.

SUMMARY

Nutritional intervention is a promising therapeutic concept including the pre- and rehabilitation stage in order to improve the recipients' outcome after solid organ transplantation.

Impact of pretransplantation malnutrition risk on the clinical outcome and graft survival of kidney transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of malnourished patients before transplantation and the influence of malnutrition on graft and patient outcomes remain underestimated, despite being associated with higher postoperative morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to develop an easy nutritional screening tool and evaluate the impact of nutritional status on clinical outcome, graft survival (GS) and mortality risk in kidney transplant patients (KTP).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study including 451 KTP, we developed a score by using anthropometric, clinical, and laboratory measures performed in the pretransplant evaluation. The patients were stratified into 3 groups according to the final score: G1 (0 or 1 point)=low risk, G2 (2 to 4 points)=moderate risk, and G3 (>5 points)=high risk of malnutrition. The patients were monitored after transplantation at least 1 to 10 years.

RESULTS

Stratifying the 451 patients based on the pretransplant risk score, G1, G2, and G3 were composed of 90, 292, and 69 patients, respectively. Patients from G1 maintained the lowest serum creatinine levels at hospital discharge when compared with others (p = 0.012). The incidence of infection in the patients from G3 was higher than patients from G1 and G2 (p = 0.030). G3 recipients showed worse GS than G1 patients (p = 0.044). G3 patients showed almost threefold higher risk for graft loss (HR 2.94, 95% CI 1.084-7.996).

CONCLUSIONS

KTP with higher malnutrition risk score were associated with worse outcomes and GS. The nutritional screening tool is easy to be used in clinical practice to evaluate the patient in preparation for kidney transplant.

Obesity is Associated With Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Paired Kidney Analysis

Obesity is increasingly prevalent among candidates for kidney transplantation. Existing studies have shown conflicting post-transplant outcomes for obese patients which may relate to confounding bias from donor-related characteristics that were unaccounted for. We used ANZDATA Registry data to compare graft and patient survival between obese (BMI >27.5 kg/m2 Asians; >30 kg/m2 non-Asians) and non-obese kidney transplant recipients, while controlling for donor characteristics by comparing recipients of paired kidneys. We selected transplant pairs (2000-2020) where a deceased donor supplied one kidney to an obese candidate and the other to a non-obese candidate. We compared the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), graft failure and death by multivariable models. We identified 1,522 pairs. Obesity was associated with an increased risk of DGF (aRR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.11-1.44, p < 0.001). Obese recipients were more likely to experience death-censored graft failure (aHR = 1.25, 95% CI 1.05-1.49, p = 0.012), and more likely to die with function (aHR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.15-1.56, p = 0.001), versus non-obese recipients. Long-term patient survival was significantly worse in obese patients with 10- and 15-year survival of 71% and 56% compared to 77% and 63% in non-obese patients. Addressing obesity is an unmet clinical need in kidney transplantation.

An ethical analysis of obesity as a contraindication of pediatric kidney transplant candidacy

The inclusion of body mass index (BMI) as a criterion for determining kidney transplant candidacy in children raises clinical and ethical challenges. Childhood obesity is on the rise and common among children with kidney failure. In addition, obesity is reported as an independent risk factor for the development of CKD and kidney failure. Resultantly, more children with obesity are anticipated to need kidney transplants. Most transplant centers around the world use high BMI as a relative or absolute contraindication for kidney transplant. However, use of obesity as a relative or absolute contraindication for pediatric kidney transplant is controversial. Empirical data demonstrating poorer outcomes following kidney transplant in obese pediatric patients are limited. In addition, pediatric obesity is distributed inequitably among groups. Unlike adults, most children lack independent agency to choose their food sources and exercise opportunities; they are dependent on their families for these choices. In this paper, we define childhood obesity and review (1) the association and impact of obesity on kidney disease and kidney transplant, (2) existing adult guidelines and rationale for using high BMI as a criterion for kidney transplant, (3) the prevalence of childhood obesity among children with kidney failure, and (4) the existing literature on obesity and pediatric kidney transplant outcomes. We then discuss ethical considerations related to the use of obesity as a criterion for kidney transplant.

Obesity and renal disease: Benefits of bariatric surgery

The prevalence of obesity, a preventable and reversible condition with a high impact on health, continues to rise, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic. Severe overweight is well recognized as a risk factor for diabetes and hypertension, among other conditions, that may increase cardiovascular risk. Obesity has grown simultaneously with a rise in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease, and a pathophysiological link has been established, which explains its role in generating the conditions to facilitate the emergence and maximize the impact of the risk factors of chronic kidney disease and its progression to more advanced stages. Knowing the mechanisms involved and having different tools to reverse the overweight and its consequences, bariatric surgery has arisen as a useful and efficient method, complementary or alternative to others, such as lifestyle changes and/or pharmacotherapy. In a detailed review, the mechanisms involved in the renal consequences of obesity, the impact on risk factors, and the potential benefit of bariatric surgery at different stages of the disease and its progression are exposed and analyzed. Although the observational evidence supports the value of bariatric surgery as a renoprotective measure in individuals with obesity, diabetic or not, randomized studies are expected to establish evidence-based recommendations that demonstrate its positive risk-benefit balance as a complementary or alternative therapeutic tool.

Cognitive-behavioral and dietary weight loss intervention in adult kidney transplant recipients with overweight and obesity: Results of a pilot RCT study (Adi-KTx)

The obesity epidemic and its health consequences have not spared the population of kidney transplant (KTx) candidates and recipients. In addition, KTx recipients are susceptible to weight gain after transplantation. Overweight and obesity after KTx are strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled, mono-center study to specifically test the effectiveness of a primarily cognitive-behavioral approach supplemented by nutritional counseling for weight reduction following KTx as the intervention group (IG) in comparison to a brief self-guided intervention as control group (CG). The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS-ID: DRKS00017226). Fifty-six KTx patients with a BMI from 27 to 40 kg/m² were included in this study and randomized to the IG or CG. Main outcome was the number of participants achieving a 5% weight loss during the treatment phase. Additionally, participants were assessed 6 and 12 months after the end of the 6-month treatment phase. Participants significantly lost weight without group differences. 32.0% (n = 8) of the patients in the IG and 16.7% (n = 4) of the patients in the CG achieved a weight loss of 5% or more. Weight loss was largely maintained during follow-up. Retention and acceptance rate in the IG was high, with 25 (out of 28) patients completing all 12 sessions and one patient completing 11 sessions. Short-term, cognitive-behaviorally oriented weight loss treatment seems to be feasible and acceptable for patients after KTx who suffer from overweight or obesity. This clinical trial was ongoing at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic which might have influenced study conduct and results. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ DRKS-ID: DRKS00017226.

Nutrition Disturbances and Metabolic Complications in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Etiology, Methods of Assessment and Prevention-A Review

Nutrition disturbances occur at all stages of chronic kidney disease and progress with the decrease of the kidney filtration rate. Kidney transplantation (KTx) as the best form of kidney replacement therapy poses various nutritional challenges. Prior to transplantation, recipients often present with mild to advanced nutrition disturbances. A functioning allograft not only relieves uremia, acidosis, and electrolyte disturbances, but also resumes other kidney functions such as erythropoietin production and vitamin D3 metabolism. KTx recipients represent a whole spectrum of undernutrition and obesity. Since following transplantation, patients are relieved of most dietary restrictions and appetite disturbances; they resume old nutrition habits that result in weight gain. The immunosuppressive regimen often predisposes them to dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance, and hypertension. Moreover, most recipients present with chronic kidney graft disease at long-term follow-ups, usually in stages G2-G3T. Therefore, the nutritional status of KTx patients requires careful monitoring. Appropriate dietary and lifestyle habits prevent nutrition disturbances and may improve kidney graft function. Despite many nutritional guidelines and recommendations targeted at chronic kidney disease, there are few targeted at KTx recipients. We aimed to provide a brief review of nutrition disturbances and known nutritional recommendations for kidney transplant recipients based on the current literature and dietary trends.

Balancing Equity and Efficiency in Kidney Allocation: An Overview

Organs for transplantation are a scarce resource. Markedly, the transplant community's primary challenge is the stark disparity between the number of patients awaiting deceased donor organ transplants and the rate at which organs become available. However, the allocation of a limited number of organs poses another constant challenge: maintaining an equilibrium between renal transplant utility and equity, that is, striking a balance between the utilitarian argument of medical efficiency and the principle of equity. In this comprehensive overview, the authors delve into the challenge of maintaining an acceptable balance between equity and efficiency and elaborate on some of the factors that might inform a decisionmaker's evaluation of the extent to which a given allocation scheme is efficient or equitable.

Kidney Transplantation in Patients After Bariatric Surgery: High-Volume Bariatric and Transplant Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation (KTx) is the best type of treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Unfortunately, obesity may be a contraindication for transplantation. Our study aimed to evaluate the results of KTx in patients who had bariatric surgery (BS) prior to transplantation.

METHODS

A single center, with experience in bariatric and transplant surgery, presents a retrospective study of 13 patients who received a kidney transplant after a gastric bypass (GB) operation between 2012 and 2019.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients, who were potential candidates for KTx, were previously qualified for BS because of a body mass index (BMI) > 35 kg/m². Additionally, all patients had arterial hypertension, 60% of patients had diabetes, and 30% of patients had coronary artery disease. Patients were activated on the waiting list when their BMI was < 35 kg/m². KTx was performed between 5 and 29 months after BS. One patient needed reoperation due to a urinary leak and another patient needed reoperation because of a high-pressure lymphocele. We diagnosed 2 delayed graft functions (DGFs) and 1 acute rejection. One patient died for reasons independent of surgery. The KTx observation period ranged from 3 to 8 years. Currently, 11 patients has stable renal function: creatinine concentration is 0.8-1.8 mg/dL and BMI is between 23 and 35 kg/m².

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the small group of patients, we can assume that kidney transplantation can be safely performed in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) who have previously undergone gastric bypass (GB) as a graft bridging procedure. In some cases, BS may be the only chance of getting an organ.

Effect of pre and post-transplant body mass index on pediatric kidney transplant outcomes

Introduction

Kidney transplantation (KT) has been established as an efficient treatment of end stage renal disease (ESRD) with the advantage of allowing the patient to live a nearly healthy life. We aimed to determine whether pre-transplant body mass index (BMI) affects renal allograft function and survival in pediatric KT recipients.

Methods

cross sectional cohort study included 50 post KT recipients (more than 3 years) with an age range of 10 to 15 years, regularly following at the Kidney Transplantation Outpatient Clinic, Cairo University Children’s Hospital, were subjected to a detailed history and physical examination, laboratory investigation in the form of fasting blood glucose (FBG),oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), lipid profile, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and microalbuminuria.

Results

Pre- post- kidney transplant BMI has significant positive correlation with graft rejection episodes, HbA1c, FBG, BMI post-KT, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein (p < 0.01). There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the mean difference of BMI (post – pre) and graft survival in years (p = 0.036). Obese patients displayed lower survival compared with non-obese subjects at 5 years, but this was statistically not significant (p-value = 0.165).

Conclusion

obesity is an independent risk factor for graft loss and patient death in kidney transplantation. Careful patient selection with pre-transplantation weight reduction is mandatory to reduce the rate of early post-transplantation complications and to improve long-term outcomes.

Impact of Size Matching Based on Donor-Recipient Height on Kidney Transplant Outcomes

Transplantation of kidneys from shorter donors into taller recipients may lead to suboptimal allograft survival. The effect of discrepancy in donor and recipient heights (ΔHeight) on long term transplant outcomes is not known. Adult patients ≥18 years undergoing living or deceased donor (LD or DD) kidney transplants alone from donors ≥18 years between 2000 and 2016 in the United States were included in this observational study. The cohort was divided into three groups based on ΔHeight of 5 inches as 1) Recipient &lt; Donor (DD: 31,688, LD: 12,384), 2) Recipient = Donor (DD: 84,711, LD: 54,709), and 3) Recipient &gt; Donor (DD: 21,741, LD: 18,753). Univariate analysis showed a higher risk of DCGL and mortality in both DD and LD (p &lt; 0.001 for both). The absolute difference in graft and patient survival between the two extremes of ΔHeight was 5.7% and 5.7% for DD, and 0.4% and 1.4% for LD. On multivariate analysis, the HR of DCGL for Recipient &lt; Donor and Recipient &gt; Donor was 0.95 (p = 0.05) and 1.07 (p = 0.01) in DD and 0.98 (p = 0.55) and 1.14 (p &lt; 0.001) in LD. Similarly, the corresponding HR of mortality were 0.97 (p = 0.07) and 1.07 (p = 0.003) for DD and 1.01 (p &lt; 0.001) and 1.05 (p = 0.13) for LD. For DGF, the HR were 1.04 (p = 0.1) and 1.01 (p = 0.7) for DD and 1.07 (p = 0.45) and 0.89 (p = 0.13) for LD. Height mismatch between the donor and recipient influences kidney transplant outcomes.

Association of obesity with mortality and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents with transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Obesity might be associated with mortality and clinical outcomes following transplantation; however, the direction of this relationship has not been well-recognized in youth. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association of obesity with post-transplant mortality and clinical outcomes in children and adolescents. Following a systematic search of observational studies published by December 2018 in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane library, 15 articles with total sample size of 50,498 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The main outcome was mortality and secondary outcomes included acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), acute rejection, and overall graft loss. The pooled data analyses showed significantly higher odds of long term mortality (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.15-1.48, P < 0.001, I² = 50.3%), short term mortality (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.19-2.70, P = 0.005, I² = 59.6%), and acute GVHD (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.5-3.02, P < 0.001, I² = 1.7%) in children with obesity. There were no significant differences between patients with and without obesity in terms of acute rejection (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.16, P = 0.132, I² = 7.5%) or overall graft loss (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.84-1.28, P = 0.740, I² = 51.6%). This systematic review and meta-analysis has stated higher post-transplant risk of short and long term mortality and higher risk of acute GVHD in children with obesity compared to those without obesity. Future clinical trials are required to investigate the effect of pre-transplant weight management on post-transplant outcomes to provide insights into the clinical application of these findings. This may in turn lead to establish guidelines for the management of childhood obesity in transplantations.

Nonlinear relationship between body mass index and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation: A dose-response meta-analysis of 50 observational studies

BACKGROUND

Exact dose-response relationship between body mass index at transplantation and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation remained unclear, and no specific body mass index threshold and pretransplant weight loss aim were recommended for kidney transplantation candidates among transplant centers.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched for literature published up to December 31, 2019. The two-stage, random effect meta-analysis was performed to estimate the dose-response relationship between body mass index and clinical outcomes after kidney transplantation.

RESULTS

Ninety-four studies were included for qualitative assessment and 50 for dose-response meta-analyses. There was a U-shaped relationship between graft loss, patient death, and body mass index. Body mass index with the lowest risk of graft loss was 25.2 kg/m², and preferred body mass index range was 22-28 kg/m². Referring to a body mass index of 22 kg/m², the risk of graft loss was 1.088, 0.981, 1.003, and 1.685 for a body mass index of 18, 24, 28, and 40 kg/m², respectively. Body mass index with the lowest risk of patient death was 24.7 kg/m², and preferred body mass index range was 22-27 kg/m². Referring to a body mass index of 22 kg/m², the patient death risk was 1.115, 0.981, 1.032, and 2.634 for a body mass index of 18, 24, 28, and 40 kg/m², respectively. J-shaped relationships were observed between body mass index and acute rejection, delayed graft function, primary graft nonfunction, and de novo diabetes. Pair-wise comparisons showed that higher body mass index was also a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, infection, longer length of hospital stay, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate level.

CONCLUSION

Underweight and severe obesity at transplantation are associated with a significantly increased risk of graft loss and patient death. A target body mass index at kidney transplantation is 22-27 kg/m².

Management of obesity in kidney transplant candidates and recipients: A clinical practice guideline by the Descartes working group of ERA

The clinical practice guideline Management of Obesity in Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients was developed to guide decision-making in caring for people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) living with obesity. The document considers the challenges in defining obesity, weighs interventions for treating obesity in kidney transplant candidates as well as recipients and reflects on the impact of obesity on the likelihood of wait-listing as well as its effect on transplant outcomes. It was designed to inform management decisions related to this topic and provide the backdrop for shared decision-making. This guideline was developed by the European Renal Association’s Developing Education Science and Care for Renal Transplantation in European States working group. The group was supplemented with selected methodologists to supervise the project and provide methodological expertise in guideline development throughout the process. The guideline targets any healthcare professional treating or caring for people with ESKD being considered for kidney transplantation or having received a donor kidney. This includes nephrologists, transplant physicians, transplant surgeons, general practitioners, dialysis and transplant nurses. Development of this guideline followed an explicit process of evidence review. Treatment approaches and guideline recommendations are based on systematic reviews of relevant studies and appraisal of the quality of the evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Limitations of the evidence are discussed and areas of future research are presented.

Impact of obesity in kidney transplantation: a prospective cohort study from French registries between 2008 and 2014

BACKGROUND

The access of obese patients to kidney transplantation is limited despite several studies showing that obese transplant recipients had a better survival rate than those undergoing dialysis. The aim of this study was to compare patient and graft survival rates and post-renal transplant complications in obese patients and non-obese patients and to assess the effect of pre-transplant weight loss in obese patients on transplant outcomes.

METHODS

We carried out a prospective cohort study using two French registries REIN and CRISTAL on 7 270 kidney transplant patients between 2008 and 2014 in France. We compared obese patients with non-obese patients and obese patients who lost more than 10% of weight before the transplant (Obese WL and Obese nWL).

RESULTS

The mean BMI in our obese patients was 32 kg/m2. Graft survival was lower in obese patients than in non-obese patients (HR = 1.40, IC 95% [1.09; 1.78], P = 0.007) whereas patient survival was similar (HR = 0.94, IC 95% [0.73; 1.23], P = 0.66). Graft survival was significantly lower in Obese WL than in Obese nWL (HR = 2.17, CI 95% [1.02; 4.63], P = 0.045) whereas patient survival was similar in the two groups (HR = 0.79, IC 95% [0.35; 1.77], P = 0.56).

CONCLUSION

Grade I obesity does not seem to be a risk factor for excess mortality after kidney transplantation and should not be an obstacle to having access to a graft. Weight loss before a kidney transplant in this patients should not be essential for registration on waiting list.

The Prognostic Significance of Body Mass Index and Metabolic Parameter Variabilities in Predialysis CKD: A Nationwide Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The association between variabilities in body mass index (BMI) or metabolic parameters and prognosis of patients with CKD has rarely been studied.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study on the basis of South Korea's national health screening database, we identified individuals who received ≥3 health screenings, including those with persistent predialysis CKD (eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m² or dipstick albuminuria ≥1). The study exposure was variability in BMI or metabolic parameters until baseline assessment, calculated as the variation independent of the mean and stratified into quartiles (with Q4 the highest quartile and Q1 the lowest). We used Cox regression adjusted for various clinical characteristics to analyze risks of all-cause mortality and incident myocardial infarction, stroke, and KRT.

RESULTS

The study included 84,636 patients with predialysis CKD. Comparing Q4 versus Q1, higher BMI variability was significantly associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.53 to 1.81), P [for trend] <0.001), KRT (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.33; P<0.001), myocardial infarction (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.36, P=0.003), and stroke (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.33, P=0.01). The results were similar in the subgroups divided according to positive or negative trends in BMI during the exposure assessment period. Variabilities in certain metabolic syndrome components (e.g., fasting blood glucose) also were significantly associated with prognosis of patients with predialysis CKD. Those with a higher number of metabolic syndrome components with high variability had a worse prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher variabilities in BMI and certain metabolic syndrome components are significantly associated with a worse prognosis in patients with predialysis CKD.

Obesity and bariatric surgery in kidney transplantation: A clinical review

Obesity is increasing worldwide, and this has major implications in the setting of kidney transplantation. Patients with obesity may have limited access to transplantation and increased posttransplant morbidity and mortality. Most transplant centers incorporate interventions aiming to target obesity in kidney transplant candidates, including dietary education and lifestyle modifications. For those failing nutritional restriction and medical therapy, the use of bariatric surgery may increase the transplant candidacy of patients with obesity and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and may potentially improve the immediate and late outcomes. Bariatric surgery in ESRD patients is associated with weight loss ranging from 29.8% to 72.8% excess weight loss, with reported mortality and morbidity rates of 2% and 7%, respectively. The most commonly performed bariatric surgical procedures in patients with ESRD and in transplant patients are laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. However, the correct timing of bariatric surgery and the ideal type of surgery have yet to be determined, although pretransplant LSG seems to be associated with an acceptable risk-benefit profile. We review the impact of obesity on kidney transplant candidates and recipients and in potential living kidney donors, exploring the potential impact of bariatric surgery in addressing obesity in these populations, thereby potentially improving posttransplant outcomes.

Association of overweight and obesity with the prevalence and incidence of pressure ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIM

Pressure ulcers challenge the health status, complicate medical conditions, and affect quality of life. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the role of obesity and body weight status, as potentially modifiable risk factors, in the incidence and prevalence of pressure ulcers.

METHODS

A systematic search of observational studies was performed to assess documents published between January 1990 and December 2019 in PubMed and Scopus. Finally, 17 articles with total sample size of 2228724 in the prevalence and 218178 in the incidence study were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The pooled data analysis showed no significant effect of obesity on odds of pressure ulcers' prevalence (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.27, P = 0.579, I² = 84.8%) or incidence (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.66, P = 0.905, I² = 89.8%) compared with non-obese individuals. Overweight was associated with significantly lower odds of prevalence of pressure ulcers compared to non-overweight individuals (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.88, P = 0.014, I² = 90.2%). The subgroup analyses showed significantly higher odds of prevalence (OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.29, P < 0.001, I² = 63.4%) and incidence (OR 2.28, 95% CI 1.77 to 2.94, P < 0.001, I² = 27.9%) of pressure ulcers in the underweight compared to normal weight groups. Pooled data analyses showed significantly lower odds of prevalence (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.96, P = 0.034, I² = 82%) and incidence (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.98, P = 0.039, I² = 67.1%) of pressure ulcers in the overweight than normal weight individuals. The findings showed no significant differences in the odds of prevalence or incidence of pressure ulcers in the obese and morbidly obese compared to normal weight individuals.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed no significant effect of obesity or morbid obesity on the odds of pressure ulcers. Additionally, overweight was associated with lower odds of pressure ulcers while underweight significantly increased the odds of pressure injuries.

Sleep Apnea as a Cardiorenal Risk Factor in CKD and Renal Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a public health priority of increasing concern worldwide. Sleep apnea (SA) of moderate-to-severe degree has a 3-9% prevalence in women and 10-17% in men in the general population.

SUMMARY

In CKD patients, the prevalence of SA parallels the decline of the GFR being 27% in CKD patients with a GFR of >60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 57% in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). In the early CKD stages, fluid overload is probably the sole risk factor for SA in this population. At more severe CKD stages, disturbed central and peripheral chemosensitivity and the accumulation of uremic toxins might contribute to SA. Still, there is no direct evidence supporting this hypothesis in human studies. Observational studies coherently show that SA is a risk factor for CKD incidence and CKD progression as well as for cardiovascular disease and death in this population. However, there is no randomized clinical trial testing continuous positive airway pressure or other interventions documenting that attenuation of SA may have a favorable effect on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in CKD and ESKD patients. However, most likely, the causal nature of the association between SA and cardiorenal outcomes remains unproven. Renal transplantation is the most effective treatment of SA in patients with ESKD, but this disturbance re-emerges on long-term observation in this population. However, after renal transplantation, SA does not seem to be a predictor of adverse health outcomes.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Nutrition in CKD: 2020 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for nutrition in kidney diseases since 1999. Since the publication of the first KDOQI nutrition guideline, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence regarding the management of nutritional aspects of kidney disease and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2020 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Nutrition in CKD was developed as a joint effort with the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy). It provides comprehensive up-to-date information on the understanding and care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially in terms of their metabolic and nutritional milieu for the practicing clinician and allied health care workers. The guideline was expanded to include not only patients with end-stage kidney disease or advanced CKD, but also patients with stages 1-5 CKD who are not receiving dialysis and patients with a functional kidney transplant. The updated guideline statements focus on 6 primary areas: nutritional assessment, medical nutrition therapy (MNT), dietary protein and energy intake, nutritional supplementation, micronutrients, and electrolytes. The guidelines primarily cover dietary management rather than all possible nutritional interventions. The evidence data and guideline statements were evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

ABO blood group relationships to kidney transplant recipient and graft outcomes

Introduction

Certain ABO blood types have been linked to cardiovascular disease, infection and cancers. The effect of recipient ABO blood group on patient and graft survival has not been studied in ABO-matched kidney transplantation. This study aims to determine the association between kidney transplant recipient ABO blood groups with patient and graft survival in Australian and New Zealand.

Methods

All Australian and New Zealand transplant recipients who received ABO-compatible primary kidney transplants between 1995–2016 were analysed using a de-identified dataset from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. Primary analysis was undertaken of recipient ABO blood group O versus non-O blood groups. The primary outcome was patient survival post kidney transplantation and the secondary outcome was death censored graft survival. Recipient age at first transplant, gender, ethnicity, body mass index, smoking status, vascular disease, presence of diabetes mellitus, chronic lung disease, primary kidney disease, donor source, donor age and gender, and era of transplants were included in the multivariate model as confounders.

Results and conclusions

On analysis of 15,523 kidney transplant recipients, blood group O was not associated with patient survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89–1.04) nor death censored graft survival (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.89–1.05) compared to non-blood group O recipients. Competing risks analyses showed an increased risk of cancer-related mortality in blood group O recipients on univariate analyses (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01–1.37) however, this became insignificant on multivariate analyses. On secondary analyses, recipient blood group AB (4.11% participants) was associated with inferior death censored graft survival compared to those with blood group O (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02–1.50). Although recipient ABO blood groups were not associated with patient nor graft survival, differences in cause-specific mortality between individual blood groups cannot be excluded based on current analyses.

Time-Varying Covariates and Risk Factors for Graft Loss in Kidney Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

The present study was designed to evaluate the factors involved in long-term graft survival in recipients of kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 755 Iranian adult recipients who underwent kidney transplantation at Shahid Labbafinejad Medical Center in Tehran, Iran. Patients were followed for 5 years after transplantation. The primary outcome was the time between transplantation and graft loss. Using Cox regression, we studied the effect of time-independent variables (recipients' age and sex, donors' age, and type of donor), time-dependent covariates (body mass index [BMI], systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, proteinuria and serum creatinine level), and immunosuppressive drugs on graft loss 60 months after transplantation. The results are presented as the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Result from Cox proportional hazards model showed that the HR of graft loss was 1.62 (95% CI: 1.03-2.54) in cadaveric donor compared with living donor kidney recipients. The HR of graft loss for recipient age was 1.02 (95% CI: 1.002-1.030). Moreover, according to obtained results, the risk of losing functional transplant increased for each mg/dL rise in serum creatinine at least 9% and at most 40%. Our results also showed that 1 unit increase of BMI has at least a 2% and at most a 15% decremented effect on the hazard ratio of graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

Having lower levels of creatinine and receiving a kidney from a younger living donor were associated with a decreased risk of graft loss. Graft loss is more likely to occur in patients with lower BMI.

Obesity After Kidney Transplantation-Results of a KTx360°Substudy

OBJECTIVE

There is solid evidence that kidney transplant (KTx) patients are susceptible to weight gain after transplantation. Post-transplantation obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2] seems to be associated with higher risks of hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular events, while there are contradicting findings regarding the association between obesity and mortality, graft failure after transplantation as well as other variables. We aimed to evaluate the course of weight after KTx and to assess the prevalence of post-transplant obesity in a large sample of German KTx patients. Further, we focused on potential associations between weight gain, obesity, and BMI after transplantation with sociodemographic, medical, psychological [levels of anxiety and depression measured with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)], and donation-specific variables.

METHODS

In a structured post-transplant care program 433 KTx patients were evaluated at Hannover Medical School. Information on the pre-transplant body weight/dry weight of dialysis patients was taken from the electronic patient charts. At post-transplant assessment body weight was measured in the transplant center. For statistical analyses, descriptive statistics, analyses of variance, tests for correlations, and regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Mean age was 51.3 years, 59% were male and 26.3% had ≥12 years of school attendance. Regarding somatic conditions 6.0% were suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus, 6.9% were affected by new-onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT), and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 47.7 ml/min/1.73m2. The prevalence rates of obesity before and after kidney transplantation were 14.8 and 19.9%, respectively. This represents an increase of 34%. Obesity after transplantation was associated with higher rates of type 2 diabetes mellitus and of NODAT. Additionally, there was an association between increasing pre-transplant as well as post-transplant BMI and decreasing eGFR. Higher age and female sex were associated with higher rates of post-transplant obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that obesity represents a serious problem in KTx patients, especially regarding the association between increasing BMI and decreasing graft functioning (eGFR). However, this aspect is often overlooked and information on effective treatment options for these patients are scarce making further research on this topic necessary.

Body mass index, weight-adjusted immunosuppression and the risk of acute rejection and infection after kidney transplantation: a cohort study

BACKGROUND

Body mass index (BMI) is associated with patient outcomes after kidney transplantation. We hypothesized that immunosuppression (IS) dosing is a contributing factor.

METHODS

Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry data, we included all adult kidney-only transplant recipients over 2000-14 treated with prednisolone, mycophenolate and tacrolimus/cyclosporin (n = 7919). The exposure was BMI and the outcomes were time to: (i) acute rejection, (ii) fatal infection, (iii) cancer and (iv) graft; and (v) patient survival. We modelled BMI and IS dosing (in quartiles) as time-varying covariates in extended Cox models.

RESULTS

Compared with a BMI of 25 kg/m2, a BMI of 35 was associated with acute rejection after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.49]. This association virtually disappeared after correcting for IS (aHR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.93-1.29). A BMI of 35 was non-significantly associated with fewer fatal infections (aHR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.66-1.25), but this reversed after adjusting for IS (aHR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.03-2.28). Results for cancer were not significantly altered after adjusting for IS. Results for lower BMI were similarly not significantly altered though generally associated with worse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that the associations between high BMI, acute rejection and fatal infection after kidney transplantation were significantly altered after correcting for IS suggesting that relative under-dosing of obese patients may partially explain these associations.

Comparison of a Behavioral Versus an Educational Weight Management Intervention After Renal Transplantation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

In the first year following renal transplantation, preventing weight gain to minimize overweight or obesity is particularly important. The aim of this study is to test the effect of an 8-month behavioral intervention BMI and physical activity.

Methods.

This randomized controlled study included 123 adult kidney or kidney-pancreas recipients. Patients were randomized to usual (1 educational session, then weight self-monitoring) and intervention care (usual care plus 7–8 counseling sessions). Alongside weight, body composition, and physical activity, satisfaction and perceptions regarding care were measured at weeks 2–6 (baseline), then at months 8 and 12.

Results.

Both groups reported comparably high satisfaction. The intervention group (IG) reported more chronic care-related activities. In patients with BMIs ≥ 18.5, mean weight gain (from baseline) was unexpectedly low in both groups: at month 8, +0.04 kg/m² in IG patients and +0.14 kg/m² in the control group (P = 0.590), and respectively, +0.03 kg/m² and +0.19 kg/m² at month 12 (P = 0.454). Both groups were physically active, walking averages of 10 807 (IG) and 11 093 (control group) steps per day at month 8 (P = 0.823), and respectively 9773 and 11 217 at month 12 (P = 0.195).

Conclusions.

The behavioral intervention had high patient acceptance and supported patients in maintaining their weight, but had no superior effect on a single educational session. Further research is needed to assess patient weight gain risk profiles to stratify the intervention.

UK renal transplant outcomes in low and high BMI recipients: the need for a national policy

INTRODUCTION

We assessed the effect of recipient body mass index (BMI) on the outcomes of renal transplantation and the management of obese patients with end-stage renal disease across the UK.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 25539 adult renal transplants (2007-2016) from the UK Transplant Registry. Patients were divided in BMI groups [underweight: < 18.5, normal: 18.5-24.9 (reference group), overweight: 25-29.9, class I obese: 30-34.9, class II/III obese: ≥ 35]. We also conducted a national survey of all UK renal transplant centers on the influence of BMI on decisions regarding management of renal transplant candidates.

RESULTS

BMI ≥ 25 was an independent risk factor for delayed graft function and primary non-function (p ≤ 0.001). Underweight (p = 0.001), class I obese (p = 0.017) and class II/III obese recipients (p < 0.001) had poorer graft survival, however, 5- and 10-year graft survival rates were good. Patient survival was shorter for underweight recipients (p < 0.001) and longer for overweight (p = 0.028) and class I obese recipients (p = 0.013). The national survey revealed significant variability among transplant centers in BMI threshold for listing patients on transplant waiting list and limited support with conservative or surgical procedures for weight control.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity alone should not be a barrier for renal transplantation. A national strategy is required to give all patients equal chances in transplantation.

Good long-term renal graft survival and low incidence of cardiac pathology in adults after short dialysis period and renal transplantation in early childhood - a cohort study

Over the past 30 years, there has been an improvement in both patient and graft survival after pediatric renal transplantation (RTX). Despite this success, these patients still carry an elevated risk for untimely death, partly through premature aging of the vasculature. The aim of this study was thus to investigate the long-term outcome of individuals with RTX in childhood, as well as to explore the cardiovascular health of these adults more than a decade later. We studied 131 individuals who had undergone a RTX between the years 1979 and 2005. Furthermore, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), coronary artery calcifications (CAC), and related metabolic factors were investigated in a cross-sectional study including 52 individuals as part of the initial cohort. The mortality rate (n = 131) was 12.2%. The median estimated graft survival was 17.5 years (95% CI 13.6-21.3), being significantly better in children transplanted below the age of 5 years (18.6 vs. 14.3 years, P < 0.01) compared with older ones. CAC were found in 9.8% and LVH in 13% of the patients. Those with cardiac calcifications had longer dialysis vintage and higher values of parathyroid hormone (PTH) during dialysis. Left ventricular mass correlated positively with systolic blood pressure, PTH, and phosphate measured at the time of the study.

Obesity in Kidney Transplantation: Impact on Transplant Candidates, Recipients, and Donors

Obesity is now common among children and adults who are kidney transplant candidates and recipients. It is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease and kidney failure. This also pertains to potential living kidney donors with obesity. Obese patients with end-stage renal disease benefit from transplantation as do nonobese patients, but obesity is also associated with more risk. A complicating factor is that obesity is also associated with increased survival on maintenance dialysis in adults, but not in children. The assessment of obesity and body habitus should be individualized. Body mass index is a common but imperfect indicator of obesity. The medical management of obesity in renal failure patients is often unsuccessful. Bariatric surgery, specifically laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, can result in significant weight loss with reduced morbidity, but many patients do not agree to undergo this treatment. The best approach to manage obese transplant candidates and recipients is yet unresolved.

Survival benefit in bariatric surgery kidney recipients may be mediated through effects on kidney graft function and improvement of co-morbidities: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Data on the benefits of bariatric surgery for morbid obesity among kidney transplant recipients are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of bariatric surgery on graft function and survival and on obesity-related co-morbidities.

SETTING

University hospital.

METHODS

This case-control study used retrospectively collected data of all kidney recipients who underwent bariatric surgery in our institution between November 2011 and August 2016 (n = 30, 11 females). Nonbariatric operated kidney recipients matched for age, sex, and time elapsed since transplantation served as controls (n = 50, 23 females). Main outcomes were renal function, graft loss events, mortality, and obesity-related co-morbidities.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up duration was 2.4 ± 1.3 years for both groups. At final follow-up, there was an increase in estimated glomerular filtration rates for the bariatric surgery group, and a decrease for the controls (13.4 ± 19.9 and -3.9 ± 15.8 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively, P < .001). The chronic kidney disease classification improved in 9 bariatric surgery group patients and in 6 controls (P = .1). Two patients in the bariatric surgery group and 6 controls died. Total death or graft function loss during the follow-up was 6.7% and 16.7%, respectively (P = .3). The total numbers of co-morbidities and medications were lower in the bariatric surgery patients (-.7 and -2, respectively) and higher in the controls (+.3 and +1.1; P < .001) at study closure.

CONCLUSIONS

There was an improvement in renal function, graft survival, and obesity-related co-morbidities among kidney transplant recipients who underwent bariatric surgery compared with those who did not. These findings support bariatric surgery in this population and warrant prospective studies.

Renal Transplant in Obese Patients and Impact of Weight Loss Before Surgery on Surgical and Medical Outcomes: A Single-Center Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have linked obesity to poor outcomes in renal transplant recipients, prompting many transplant centers to encourage weight loss pretransplant in obese patients. Here, we performed a single-center retrospective study to assess the effects of weight loss on graft and patient outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 893 renal transplant recipients at our center from 2007 to 2011 were analyzed. First, renal transplant recipients with a history of obesity before transplant (42%) were compared with nonobese patients. Second, in the obese group, renal transplant recipients with significant weight loss (> 10%) before transplant were compared with other obese renal transplant recipients without significant weight loss.

RESULTS

Renal transplant recipients were predominantly white, with 74% having undergone living-donor transplant. Obese patients were older (56.6 vs 46.7 y old) and had more comorbidities and more surgical complications, in particular wound complications and incisional hernias, posttransplant than nonobese patients (14.7 vs 5.5%, respectively). Patient and graft survival rates were similar to those in nonobese patients. In the obese group, patient characteristics and medical or surgical complications after transplant did not differ between those with or without significant weight loss. However, obese patient and graft survival rates were lower in patients with weight loss than in obese patients without weight loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, weight loss before transplant surgery in obese patients had no influence on surgical outcomes but was associated with a higher mortality rate. A prospective assessment of the impact of weight loss before surgery is needed to establish its usefulness.

Association of Kidney Donor Risk Index with the Outcome after Kidney Transplantation in the Eurotransplant Senior Program

Background

We evaluated the Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) scoring system for kidney transplantation in the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) that allocates kidneys from older donors to older recipients (≥65 years).

Material/Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data of 37 kidney transplant recipients and 36 kidney donors who participated in kidney transplantation program according to the ESP at our center from January 2004 until December 2013.

Results

Mean recipient and donor age was 67.9±2.6 and 70.5±4.0 years respectively. The mean KDRI score was 1.7±0.27. Uncensored graft survival after 1 year and 5 years was 64.2% and 53.7% respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that in kidney transplantation with KDRI >1.83, graft survival was significantly reduced compared to lower KDRI subgroups. KDRI was significantly correlated with serum creatinine level at discharge (r=0.4).

Conclusions

ESP kidneys represent a group of high-risk grafts with high KDRI scores. Higher KDRI scores in ESP kidneys was associated with reduced postoperative short-term and long-term graft outcomes. KDRI might be useful in decision-making for selecting donors for ESP kidney transplantation.

Obesity Paradox in Advanced Kidney Disease: From Bedside to the Bench

While obesity is associated with a variety of complications including diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease and premature death, observational studies have also found that obesity and increasing body mass index (BMI) can be linked with improved survival in certain patient populations, including those with conditions marked by protein-energy wasting and dysmetabolism that ultimately lead to cachexia. The latter observations have been reported in various clinical settings including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and have been described as the "obesity paradox" or "reverse epidemiology", engendering controversy. While some have attributed the obesity paradox to residual confounding in an effort to "debunk" these observations, recent experimental discoveries provide biologically plausible mechanisms in which higher BMI can be linked to longevity in certain groups of patients. In addition, sophisticated epidemiologic methods that extensively adjusted for confounding have found that the obesity paradox remains robust in ESRD. Furthermore, novel hypotheses suggest that weight loss and cachexia can be linked to adverse outcomes including cardiomyopathy, arrhythmias, sudden death and poor outcomes. Therefore, the survival benefit observed in obese ESRD patients can at least partly be derived from mechanisms that protect against inefficient energy utilization, cachexia and protein-energy wasting. Given that in ESRD patients, treatment of traditional risk factors has failed to alter outcomes, detailed translational studies of the obesity paradox may help identify innovative pathways that can be targeted to improve survival. We have reviewed recent clinical evidence detailing the association of BMI with outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease, including ESRD, and discuss potential mechanisms underlying the obesity paradox with potential for clinical applicability.

[Impact of obesity in kidney transplantation: Monocentric cohort study and review of the literature]

Post-kidney transplantation outcomes in obese patients remain uncertain. The aim of this study is to compare patient and graft survival and post-transplant complications in obese patients and non-obese patients. We performed a retrospective analysis of a sample of 245kidney transplantations performed between 2008 and 2014 in Clermont-Ferrand. Obese patients and non-obese patients have been compared. Then we compared obese patients who have lost at least 5% of their weight (OPP) with obese patients who did not lose weight (OPS), and non-obese patients who have lost at least 5% of their weight (NOPP) with non-obese patients who did not lose weight (NOPS). Patient survival at 5years is similar between obese and non obese (84.06% versus 90.96%; P=0.49), between OPP and OPS (88.89% versus 81.82%; P=0.34) and between NOPP and NOPS (89.19% versus 91.05%; P=0.73). At 5years, graft survival is also comparable between obese and non obese (88.82% versus 81.86%; P=0.58), between OPP and OPS (85.56% versus 91.06%; P=0.98) and between NOPP and NOPS (88% versus 80.12%; P=0.31). The length of hospitalization and the rate of complications seem similar between obese and non obese and between OPP and OPS. Post-transplantation outcomes are similar between obese and non-obese patients and a weight loss for obese patients does not seem to decrease the risk of post-transplant complication.

Obesity in the Kidney Transplant Process

Obesity, which has become an increasing problem worldwide, poses a risk for kidney transplant recipients both before and after surgery. In this literature review, we studied the effects of obesity before and after kidney transplant. There are numerous studies and different opinions on the effects of obesity on graft function before and after transplant. Obesity prolongs surgery time and the ischemic process. A large cohort study of 11 836 recipients noted a close association between body mass index and delayed renal transplant and delayed graft function. However, another study found that being overweight or obese before transplant did not have any effects over the medium and long term. A 20-year follow-up study indicated that the firstyear body mass index in recipients after renal transplant had a greater effect on graft function and survival than body mass index before transplant. Still, another study found that body mass index had no effects on graft function and survival. In the study, 3-year graft function and mortality rates of morbidly obese people without diabetes, the functional status without dialysis, and living-donor transplant were reported to be much lower than in those with normal weight. In conclusion, there is no consensus on the effects of obesity before and after transplant, and it has been pointed out that more research should be done on this subject.

Effect of Changes in Body Mass Index on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

A higher body mass index (BMI) before kidney transplantation (KT) is associated with increased mortality and allograft loss in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, the effect of changes in BMI after KT on these outcomes remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of baseline BMI and changes in BMI on clinical outcomes in KTRs.

METHODS

A total of 869 KTRs were enrolled from a multicenter observational cohort study from 2012 to 2015. Patients were divided into low and high BMI groups before KT based on a BMI cutoff point of 23 kg/m². Differences in acute rejection and cardiovascular disease (CVD) between the 2 groups were analyzed. In addition, clinical outcomes across the 4 BMI groups divided by BMI change 1 year after KT were compared. Associations between BMI change and laboratory findings were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients with a higher BMI before KT showed significantly increased CVD after KT (P = .027) compared with patients with a lower BMI. However, among the KTRs with a higher baseline BMI, only persistently higher BMI was associated with increased CVD during the follow-up period (P = .003). Patients with persistently higher BMI had significantly decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and increased hemoglobin, triglyceride, and hemoglobin A1c levels. Baseline BMI and post-transplantation change in BMI were not related to acute rejection in KTRs.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI in the 1st year after KT as well as baseline BMI were associated with CVD in KTRs. More careful monitoring of obese KTRs who do not undergo a reduction in BMI after KT is required.

One-year Allograft and Patient Survival in Renal Transplant Recipients Receiving Antiplatelet Therapy at the Time of Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is common in patients on the waiting list for kidney transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of post-operative bleeding in patients with antiplatelet therapy undergoing kidney transplantation and analyze the impact on the outcome.

METHODS

We studied all patients with concomitant antiplatelet therapy undergoing kidney transplantation in our center from January 2007 to June 2012. Data were collected by chart review. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model were used to identify risk factors for the long-term outcome.

RESULTS

Of 744 kidney transplant recipients during the study period, 161 received oral antiplatelet therapy and were included in the study. One-third of the patients demonstrated signs of bleeding, half of which requiring surgical treatment. Coronary artery disease, deceased donor kidney transplantation, and dual antiplatelet medication were independent risk factors for post-operative bleeding. One-year allograft survival was significantly better in the non-bleeding group (91.4% vs 75.9%, p=0.023). Multivariable analysis found that post-operative bleeding, recipient age, and biopsy-proven rejection were independent risk factors for graft survival. Recipient age and biopsy-proven rejection were also identified as independent risk factors for patient survival.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicated a high risk for post-operative bleeding in renal transplant patients under antiplatelet therapy. The associated negative effect on allograft survival underscored the need to reduce any risk factors for post-operative bleeding.

Weight Loss in Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease: Should We Consider Individualised, Qualitative, ad Libitum Diets? A Narrative Review and Case Study

In advanced chronic kidney disease, obesity may bring a survival advantage, but many transplant centres demand weight loss before wait-listing for kidney graft. The case here described regards a 71-year-old man, with obesity-related glomerulopathy; referral data were: weight 110 kg, Body Mass Index (BMI) 37 kg/m², serum creatinine (sCr) 5 mg/dL, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 23 mL/min, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 75 mg/dL, proteinuria 2.3 g/day. A moderately restricted, low-protein diet allowed reduction in BUN (45–55 mg/dL) and good metabolic and kidney function stability, with a weight increase of 6 kg. Therefore, he asked to be enrolled in a weight-loss program to be wait-listed (the two nearest transplant centres required a BMI below 30 or 35 kg/m²). Since previous low-calorie diets were not successful and he was against a surgical approach, we chose a qualitative, ad libitum coach-assisted diet, freely available in our unit. In the first phase, the diet is dissociated; he lost 16 kg in 2 months, without need for dialysis. In the second maintenance phase, in which foods are progressively combined, he lost 4 kg in 5 months, allowing wait-listing. Dialysis started one year later, and was followed by weight gain of about 5 kg. He resumed the maintenance diet, and his current body weight, 35 months after the start of the diet, is 94 kg, with a BMI of 31.7 kg/m², without clinical or biochemical signs of malnutrition. This case suggests that our patients can benefit from the same options available to non-CKD (chronic kidney disease) individuals, provided that strict multidisciplinary surveillance is assured.

Body mass index as a predictor of outcomes among pediatric kidney transplant recipient

Controversies exist regarding the impact of obesity on patients undergoing kidney transplantation. We sought to estimate the association between BMI and patient outcomes (survival and graft function) among pediatric kidney transplant patients in the USA. We conducted a retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database (1987-2013), which revealed 13 014 pediatric patients (<18 years old) who underwent primary kidney transplantation. Patients were stratified into five BMI categories established by the World Health Organizations according to their Z score, which is based on age, gender and BMI. The -2, 0, and +2 categories were collapsed and served as the reference group, while the -3 (thin) and +3 (obese) categories were evaluated for differences in graft and patient survival. The survival rates between these categories were compared using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to adjust for recipient and donor characteristics to estimate the risk of graft loss and mortality associated with BMI. Logistic regression models were estimated to evaluate whether there was an association between BMI and DGF. There were no differences in overall patient (P=.1655) or graft (P=.1688) survival between the severely thin, normal, and obese patients. Adjusted models also revealed no statistically significant differences in graft or patient survival. There were no differences in the odds of DGF (both unadjusted and adjusted) among the three groups. The prevalence of obesity is increasing among children who present for kidney transplant in the USA. In this national study of pediatric kidney transplant recipients, there was no difference in graft or patient survival and no differences in rates of DGF among obese children compared to normal and underweight children undergoing kidney transplantation.

Obesity in pediatric kidney transplant recipients and the risks of acute rejection, graft loss and death

BACKGROUND

Obesity is prevalent in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but the health consequences of this combination of comorbidities are uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of obesity on the outcomes of children following kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Using data from the ANZDATA Registry (1994-2013), we assessed the association between age-appropriate body mass index (BMI) at the time of transplantation and the subsequent development of acute rejection (within the first 6 months), graft loss and death using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Included in our analysis were 750 children ranging in age from 2 to 18 (median age 12) years with a total of 6597 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up 8.4 years). Overall, at transplantation 129 (17.2%) children were classified as being overweight and 61 (8.1%) as being obese. Of the 750 children, 102 (16.2%) experienced acute rejection within the first 6 months of transplantation, 235 (31.3%) lost their allograft and 53 (7.1%) died. Compared to children with normal BMI, the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for graft loss in children who were underweight, overweight or diagnosed as obese were 1.05 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70-1.60], 1.03 (95% CI 0.71-1.49) and 1.61 (95% CI 1.05-2.47), respectively. There was no statistically significant association between BMI and acute rejection [underweight: HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.54-2.09; overweight: HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.86-2.34; obese: HR 1.83, 95% CI 0.95-3.51) or patient survival (underweight: HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.54-2.58, overweight: HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.38-1.92; obese: HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.25-2.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 10 years of follow-up, pediatric transplant recipients diagnosed with obesity have a substantially increased risk of allograft failure but not acute rejection of the graft or death.

A Kidney Graft Survival Calculator that Accounts for Mismatches in Age, Sex, HLA, and Body Size

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Outcomes for transplants from living unrelated donors are of particular interest in kidney paired donation (KPD) programs where exchanges can be arranged between incompatible donor-recipient pairs or chains created from nondirected/altruistic donors.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we analyzed 232,705 recipients of kidney-alone transplants from 1998 to 2012. Graft failure rates were estimated using Cox models for recipients of kidney transplants from living unrelated, living related, and deceased donors. Models were adjusted for year of transplant and donor and recipient characteristics, with particular attention to mismatches in age, sex, human leukocyte antigens (HLA), body size, and weight.

RESULTS

The dependence of graft failure on increasing donor age was less pronounced for living-donor than for deceased-donor transplants. Male donor-to-male recipient transplants had lower graft failure, particularly better than female to male (5%-13% lower risk). HLA mismatch was important in all donor types. Obesity of both the recipient (8%-18% higher risk) and donor (5%-11% higher risk) was associated with higher graft loss, as were donor-recipient weight ratios of <75%, compared with transplants where both parties were of similar weight (9%-12% higher risk). These models are used to create a calculator of estimated graft survival for living donors.

CONCLUSIONS

This calculator provides useful information to donors, candidates, and physicians of estimated outcomes and potentially in allowing candidates to choose among several living donors. It may also help inform candidates with compatible donors on the advisability of joining a KPD program.

Waitlist Hospital Admissions Predict Resource Utilization and Survival After Renal Transplantation

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether fitness for transplant can be determined by candidates' hospitalizations although waitlisted.

BACKGROUND

Renal transplantation must increasingly serve a population of multiply comorbid patients in an environment defined by organ scarcity and premiums on value-based care. Determining those at excess risk for transplant is critical to these imperatives.

METHODS

United States Renal Data Systems patient and claims data for all adult renal transplant recipients between 2000 and 2010 with continuous primary Medicare coverage for 1 year before and after transplantation were examined. Outcomes included readmissions within the first-year post-transplant and 3-year graft and patient survival. Chi-square statistics, Kaplan-Meier methods (log-rank test), and goodness of fit calculations (c-statistics) were performed for models of transplant outcome.

RESULTS

Among 37,623 patients, the percentages of patients admitted for 0, 1 to 7, 8 to 14, or 15 or more days in the pretransplant year were 51%, 25%, 11%, and 13%. Overall readmission-free survival at 1 year was 31%. Heavily preadmitted patients were more likely to have a greater length of stay during their transplant admission, and had a greater service needs at discharge. Pretransplant admission strongly predicted more frequent post-transplant admission. Among all factors studied, preadmission was the strongest predictor of post-transplant death, and had a dose-dependent effect on both death and graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, hospitalization in the year before transplant is an objective, readily ascertainable, and powerful predictor of excess resource utilization and inferior outcome. Incorporation of a rolling assessment of patient hospitalization has potential policy implications for maximizing value in renal transplantation.

Obesity and listing for renal transplantation: weighing the evidence for a growing problem

A 56-year-old female patient was referred to the transplant assessment clinic in July 2016. She started haemodialysis in 2012 for renal failure due to urinary tract infections. She is doing very well on dialysis and has an excellent exercise tolerance without shortness of breath or angina. She has had no infections since starting dialysis and no other comorbidity, except well-controlled hypertension and hyperparathyroidism requiring treatment with cinacalcet. Clinical examination is essentially normal except for truncal obesity with height 167 cm and weight 121 kg, giving her a body mass index of 43.4. Can she be listed for a renal transplant? If not, which target weight should be given to the patient before she can be transplant listed? Which interventions, if any, should be recommended to achieve weight loss?