1
|
Choi HJ, Kyong JS, Lee JH, Han SH, Shim HJ. The Impact of Spectral and Temporal Degradation on Vocoded Speech Recognition in Early-Blind Individuals. eNeuro 2024; 11:ENEURO.0528-23.2024. [PMID: 38811162 PMCID: PMC11137809 DOI: 10.1523/eneuro.0528-23.2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024] Open
Abstract
This study compared the impact of spectral and temporal degradation on vocoded speech recognition between early-blind and sighted subjects. The participants included 25 early-blind subjects (30.32 ± 4.88 years; male:female, 14:11) and 25 age- and sex-matched sighted subjects. Tests included monosyllable recognition in noise at various signal-to-noise ratios (-18 to -4 dB), matrix sentence-in-noise recognition, and vocoded speech recognition with different numbers of channels (4, 8, 16, and 32) and temporal envelope cutoff frequencies (50 vs 500 Hz). Cortical-evoked potentials (N2 and P3b) were measured in response to spectrally and temporally degraded stimuli. The early-blind subjects displayed superior monosyllable and sentence recognition than sighted subjects (all p < 0.01). In the vocoded speech recognition test, a three-way repeated-measure analysis of variance (two groups × four channels × two cutoff frequencies) revealed significant main effects of group, channel, and cutoff frequency (all p < 0.001). Early-blind subjects showed increased sensitivity to spectral degradation for speech recognition, evident in the significant interaction between group and channel (p = 0.007). N2 responses in early-blind subjects exhibited shorter latency and greater amplitude in the 8-channel (p = 0.022 and 0.034, respectively) and shorter latency in the 16-channel (p = 0.049) compared with sighted subjects. In conclusion, early-blind subjects demonstrated speech recognition advantages over sighted subjects, even in the presence of spectral and temporal degradation. Spectral degradation had a greater impact on speech recognition in early-blind subjects, while the effect of temporal degradation was similar in both groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyo Jung Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul 01830, Republic of Korea
- Eulji Tinnitus and Hearing Research Institute, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul 01830, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Sug Kyong
- Sensory Organ Institute, Medical Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hee Lee
- Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Hallym University of Graduate Studies, Seoul 06197, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Ho Han
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, School of Medicine, Eulji University, Daejeon 34824, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Joon Shim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul 01830, Republic of Korea
- Eulji Tinnitus and Hearing Research Institute, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Seoul 01830, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brilliant, Yaar-Soffer Y, Herrmann CS, Henkin Y, Kral A. Theta and alpha oscillatory signatures of auditory sensory and cognitive loads during complex listening. Neuroimage 2024; 289:120546. [PMID: 38387743 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The neuronal signatures of sensory and cognitive load provide access to brain activities related to complex listening situations. Sensory and cognitive loads are typically reflected in measures like response time (RT) and event-related potentials (ERPs) components. It's, however, strenuous to distinguish the underlying brain processes solely from these measures. In this study, along with RT- and ERP-analysis, we performed time-frequency analysis and source localization of oscillatory activity in participants performing two different auditory tasks with varying degrees of complexity and related them to sensory and cognitive load. We studied neuronal oscillatory activity in both periods before the behavioral response (pre-response) and after it (post-response). Robust oscillatory activities were found in both periods and were differentially affected by sensory and cognitive load. Oscillatory activity under sensory load was characterized by decrease in pre-response (early) theta activity and increased alpha activity. Oscillatory activity under cognitive load was characterized by increased theta activity, mainly in post-response (late) time. Furthermore, source localization revealed specific brain regions responsible for processing these loads, such as temporal and frontal lobe, cingulate cortex and precuneus. The results provide evidence that in complex listening situations, the brain processes sensory and cognitive loads differently. These neural processes have specific oscillatory signatures and are long lasting, extending beyond the behavioral response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brilliant
- Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
| | - Y Yaar-Soffer
- Department of Communication Disorder, Tel Aviv University, 5262657 Tel Aviv, Israel; Hearing, Speech and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, 5265601 Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - C S Herrmann
- Experimental Psychology Division, University of Oldenburg, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Y Henkin
- Department of Communication Disorder, Tel Aviv University, 5262657 Tel Aviv, Israel; Hearing, Speech and Language Center, Sheba Medical Center, 5265601 Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - A Kral
- Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Amaral MSAD, Zamberlan-Amorin NE, Mendes KDS, Bernal SC, Massuda ET, Hyppolito MA, Reis ACMB. The P300 Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users: A Scoping Review. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 27:e518-e527. [PMID: 37564465 PMCID: PMC10411132 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1744172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The P300 auditory evoked potential is a long-latency cortical potential evoked with auditory stimulation, which provides information on neural mechanisms underlying the central auditory processing. Objectives To identify and gather scientific evidence regarding the P300 in adult cochlear implant (CI) users. Data Synthesis A total of 87 articles, 20 of which were selected for this study, were identified and exported to the Rayyan search software. Those 20 articles did not propose a homogeneous methodology, which made comparison more difficult. Most articles (60%) in this review compare CI users with typical hearing people, showing prolonged P300 latency in CI users. Among the studies, 35% show that CI users present a smaller P300 amplitude. Another variable is the influence of the kind of stimulus used to elicit P300, which was prolonged in 30% of the studies that used pure tone stimuli, 10% of the studies that used pure tone and speech stimuli, and 60% of the studies that used speech stimuli. Conclusion This review has contributed with evidence that shows the importance of applying a controlled P300 protocol to diagnose and monitor CI users. Regardless of the stimuli used to elicit P300, we noticed a pattern in the increase in latency and decrease in amplitude in CI users. The user's experience with the CI speech processor over time and the speech test results seem to be related to the P300 latency and amplitude measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral
- Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Nelma Ellen Zamberlan-Amorin
- Centro Especializado de Otorrinolaringologia e Fonoaudiologia (CEOF), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Karina Dal Sasso Mendes
- Department of General and Specialized Nursing, Faculdade de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Sarah Carolina Bernal
- Health Sciences Department, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Tanaka Massuda
- Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
- Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Head and Neck Surgery, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burkhardt P, Müller V, Meister H, Weglage A, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Sandmann P. Age effects on cognitive functions and speech-in-noise processing: An event-related potential study with cochlear-implant users and normal-hearing listeners. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:1005859. [PMID: 36620447 PMCID: PMC9815545 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.1005859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
A cochlear implant (CI) can partially restore hearing in individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss. However, electrical hearing with a CI is limited and highly variable. The current study aimed to better understand the different factors contributing to this variability by examining how age affects cognitive functions and cortical speech processing in CI users. Electroencephalography (EEG) was applied while two groups of CI users (young and elderly; N = 13 each) and normal-hearing (NH) listeners (young and elderly; N = 13 each) performed an auditory sentence categorization task, including semantically correct and incorrect sentences presented either with or without background noise. Event-related potentials (ERPs) representing earlier, sensory-driven processes (N1-P2 complex to sentence onset) and later, cognitive-linguistic integration processes (N400 to semantically correct/incorrect sentence-final words) were compared between the different groups and speech conditions. The results revealed reduced amplitudes and prolonged latencies of auditory ERPs in CI users compared to NH listeners, both at earlier (N1, P2) and later processing stages (N400 effect). In addition to this hearing-group effect, CI users and NH listeners showed a comparable background-noise effect, as indicated by reduced hit rates and reduced (P2) and delayed (N1/P2) ERPs in conditions with background noise. Moreover, we observed an age effect in CI users and NH listeners, with young individuals showing improved specific cognitive functions (working memory capacity, cognitive flexibility and verbal learning/retrieval), reduced latencies (N1/P2), decreased N1 amplitudes and an increased N400 effect when compared to the elderly. In sum, our findings extend previous research by showing that the CI users' speech processing is impaired not only at earlier (sensory) but also at later (semantic integration) processing stages, both in conditions with and without background noise. Using objective ERP measures, our study provides further evidence of strong age effects on cortical speech processing, which can be observed in both the NH listeners and the CI users. We conclude that elderly individuals require more effortful processing at sensory stages of speech processing, which however seems to be at the cost of the limited resources available for the later semantic integration processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Burkhardt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,*Correspondence: Pauline Burkhardt, ; orcid.org/0000-0001-9850-9881
| | - Verena Müller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hartmut Meister
- Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT-Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Weglage
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ruth Lang-Roth
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Walger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany,Jean-Uhrmacher-Institute for Clinical ENT-Research, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Pascale Sandmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Audiology and Pediatric Audiology, Cochlear Implant Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Electrophysiological differences and similarities in audiovisual speech processing in CI users with unilateral and bilateral hearing loss. CURRENT RESEARCH IN NEUROBIOLOGY 2022; 3:100059. [DOI: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
6
|
Amaral MSAD, Calderaro VG, Pauna HF, Massuda ET, Reis ACMB, Hyppolito MA. Is there a change in P300 evoked potential after 6 months in cochlear implant users? Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 88 Suppl 3:S50-S58. [PMID: 34799269 PMCID: PMC9761001 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There are few studies on long-latency auditory evoked potential (P300) in people with hearing loss who use a cochlear implant. Central auditory system evaluation with behavioral and electrophysiological tests is believed to help understand the neuroplasticity mechanisms involved in auditory functioning after cochlear implant surgery. This study investigated the electrophysiological processing of cortical level acoustic signals in a group of 21 adult individuals with postlingual bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss who were submitted to cochlear implant surgery. METHODS Data were collected in three phases: pre-cochlear implant surgery, at cochlear implant activation, and 6 months after surgery. P300 measures were also registered during all phases. Tone-burst and speech stimuli were used to elicit P300 and were presented in free field. RESULTS Mean P3 component latency with tone-burst and speech stimuli were 352.9 and 321.9 ms in the pre-cochlear implant phase, 364.9 and 368.7 ms in the activation phase, 336.2 and 343.6 ms 6 months after the surgery. The P3 component mean latency values using tone-burst at activation were significantly different from those 6 months after cochlear implant. They were also significantly different using speech, between pre-cochlear implant and activation phases. Lower P3 component latency occurred 6 months after cochlear implant activation with tone-burst and pre-cochlear implant with speech stimulus. There was a weak correlation between mean P3 component latency with speech stimulus and time of hearing loss. There was no difference in amplitude between phases or in the comparison with the other variables. CONCLUSION There were changes in P3 component latency during the period assessed, for both speech and pure-tone stimuli, with increased latency in the activation phase and similar lower results in the two other phases, Pre-CI and 6 months after CI use. Mean amplitude measures did not vary in the three phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
| | - Victor G Calderaro
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Henrique Furlan Pauna
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Oftalmologia, Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia de Cabeça e Pescoço, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo T Massuda
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Hospital das Clínicas, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Ana Cláudia M B Reis
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
- Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anbuhl KL, Yao JD, Hotz RA, Mowery TM, Sanes DH. Auditory processing remains sensitive to environmental experience during adolescence in a rodent model. Nat Commun 2022; 13:2872. [PMID: 35610222 PMCID: PMC9130260 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-30455-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Elevated neural plasticity during development contributes to dramatic improvements in perceptual, motor, and cognitive skills. However, malleable neural circuits are vulnerable to environmental influences that may disrupt behavioral maturation. While these risks are well-established prior to sexual maturity (i.e., critical periods), the degree of neural vulnerability during adolescence remains uncertain. Here, we induce transient hearing loss (HL) spanning adolescence in gerbils, and ask whether behavioral and neural maturation are disrupted. We find that adolescent HL causes a significant perceptual deficit that can be attributed to degraded auditory cortex processing, as assessed with wireless single neuron recordings and within-session population-level analyses. Finally, auditory cortex brain slices from adolescent HL animals reveal synaptic deficits that are distinct from those typically observed after critical period deprivation. Taken together, these results show that diminished adolescent sensory experience can cause long-lasting behavioral deficits that originate, in part, from a dysfunctional cortical circuit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey L Anbuhl
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
| | - Justin D Yao
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Robert A Hotz
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA
| | - Todd M Mowery
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Dan H Sanes
- Center for Neural Science, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
- Neuroscience Institute at NYU Langone School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The timecourse of multisensory speech processing in unilaterally stimulated cochlear implant users revealed by ERPs. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 34:102982. [PMID: 35303598 PMCID: PMC8927996 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Both normal-hearing (NH) and cochlear implant (CI) users show a clear benefit in multisensory speech processing. Group differences in ERP topographies and cortical source activation suggest distinct audiovisual speech processing in CI users when compared to NH listeners. Electrical neuroimaging, including topographic and ERP source analysis, provides a suitable tool to study the timecourse of multisensory speech processing in CI users.
A cochlear implant (CI) is an auditory prosthesis which can partially restore the auditory function in patients with severe to profound hearing loss. However, this bionic device provides only limited auditory information, and CI patients may compensate for this limitation by means of a stronger interaction between the auditory and visual system. To better understand the electrophysiological correlates of audiovisual speech perception, the present study used electroencephalography (EEG) and a redundant target paradigm. Postlingually deafened CI users and normal-hearing (NH) listeners were compared in auditory, visual and audiovisual speech conditions. The behavioural results revealed multisensory integration for both groups, as indicated by shortened response times for the audiovisual as compared to the two unisensory conditions. The analysis of the N1 and P2 event-related potentials (ERPs), including topographic and source analyses, confirmed a multisensory effect for both groups and showed a cortical auditory response which was modulated by the simultaneous processing of the visual stimulus. Nevertheless, the CI users in particular revealed a distinct pattern of N1 topography, pointing to a strong visual impact on auditory speech processing. Apart from these condition effects, the results revealed ERP differences between CI users and NH listeners, not only in N1/P2 ERP topographies, but also in the cortical source configuration. When compared to the NH listeners, the CI users showed an additional activation in the visual cortex at N1 latency, which was positively correlated with CI experience, and a delayed auditory-cortex activation with a reversed, rightward functional lateralisation. In sum, our behavioural and ERP findings demonstrate a clear audiovisual benefit for both groups, and a CI-specific alteration in cortical activation at N1 latency when auditory and visual input is combined. These cortical alterations may reflect a compensatory strategy to overcome the limited CI input, which allows the CI users to improve the lip-reading skills and to approximate the behavioural performance of NH listeners in audiovisual speech conditions. Our results are clinically relevant, as they highlight the importance of assessing the CI outcome not only in auditory-only, but also in audiovisual speech conditions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Radecke JO, Schierholz I, Kral A, Lenarz T, Murray MM, Sandmann P. Distinct multisensory perceptual processes guide enhanced auditory recognition memory in older cochlear implant users. Neuroimage Clin 2022; 33:102942. [PMID: 35033811 PMCID: PMC8762088 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Congruent audio-visual encoding enhances later auditory processing in the elderly. CI users benefit from additional congruent visual information, similar to controls. CI users show distinct neurophysiological processes, compared to controls. CI users show an earlier modulation of event-related topographies, compared to controls.
In naturalistic situations, sounds are often perceived in conjunction with matching visual impressions. For example, we see and hear the neighbor’s dog barking in the garden. Still, there is a good chance that we recognize the neighbor’s dog even when we only hear it barking, but do not see it behind the fence. Previous studies with normal-hearing (NH) listeners have shown that the audio-visual presentation of a perceptual object (like an animal) increases the probability to recognize this object later on, even if the repeated presentation of this object occurs in a purely auditory condition. In patients with a cochlear implant (CI), however, the electrical hearing of sounds is impoverished, and the ability to recognize perceptual objects in auditory conditions is significantly limited. It is currently not well understood whether CI users – as NH listeners – show a multisensory facilitation for auditory recognition. The present study used event-related potentials (ERPs) and a continuous recognition paradigm with auditory and audio-visual stimuli to test the prediction that CI users show a benefit from audio-visual perception. Indeed, the congruent audio-visual context resulted in an improved recognition ability of objects in an auditory-only condition, both in the NH listeners and the CI users. The ERPs revealed a group-specific pattern of voltage topographies and correlations between these ERP maps and the auditory recognition ability, indicating a different processing of congruent audio-visual stimuli in CI users when compared to NH listeners. Taken together, our results point to distinct cortical processing of naturalistic audio-visual objects in CI users and NH listeners, which however allows both groups to improve the recognition ability of these objects in a purely auditory context. Our findings are of relevance for future clinical research since audio-visual perception might also improve the auditory rehabilitation after cochlear implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Ole Radecke
- Department of Neurophysiology and Pathophysiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; Institute of Audioneurotechnology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Irina Schierholz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andrej Kral
- Institute of Audioneurotechnology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Experimental Otology, ENT Clinics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Institute of Audioneurotechnology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Micah M Murray
- The LINE (The Laboratory for Investigative Neurophysiology), Department of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland; CIBM Center for Biomedical Imaging of Lausanne and Geneva, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Ophthalmology, Fondation Asile des aveugles, Lausanne, Switzerland; Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Pascale Sandmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
More Than Words: the Relative Roles of Prosody and Semantics in the Perception of Emotions in Spoken Language by Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users. Ear Hear 2022; 43:1378-1389. [PMID: 35030551 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The processing of emotional speech calls for the perception and integration of semantic and prosodic cues. Although cochlear implants allow for significant auditory improvements, they are limited in the transmission of spectro-temporal fine-structure information that may not support the processing of voice pitch cues. The goal of the current study is to compare the performance of postlingual cochlear implant (CI) users and a matched control group on perception, selective attention, and integration of emotional semantics and prosody. DESIGN Fifteen CI users and 15 normal hearing (NH) peers (age range, 18-65 years) 1istened to spoken sentences composed of different combinations of four discrete emotions (anger, happiness, sadness, and neutrality) presented in prosodic and semantic channels-T-RES: Test for Rating Emotions in Speech. In three separate tasks, listeners were asked to attend to the sentence as a whole, thus integrating both speech channels (integration), or to focus on one channel only (rating of target emotion) and ignore the other (selective attention). Their task was to rate how much they agreed that the sentence conveyed each of the predefined emotions. In addition, all participants performed standard tests of speech perception. RESULTS When asked to focus on one channel, semantics or prosody, both groups rated emotions similarly with comparable levels of selective attention. When the task was called for channel integration, group differences were found. CI users appeared to use semantic emotional information more than did their NH peers. CI users assigned higher ratings than did their NH peers to sentences that did not present the target emotion, indicating some degree of confusion. In addition, for CI users, individual differences in speech comprehension over the phone and identification of intonation were significantly related to emotional semantic and prosodic ratings, respectively. CONCLUSIONS CI users and NH controls did not differ in perception of prosodic and semantic emotions and in auditory selective attention. However, when the task called for integration of prosody and semantics, CI users overused the semantic information (as compared with NH). We suggest that as CI users adopt diverse cue weighting strategies with device experience, their weighting of prosody and semantics differs from those used by NH. Finally, CI users may benefit from rehabilitation strategies that strengthen perception of prosodic information to better understand emotional speech.
Collapse
|
11
|
Pierotti E, Coffey-Corina S, Schaefer T, Corina DP. Semantic word integration in children with cochlear implants: Electrophysiological evidence. LANGUAGE, COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE 2021; 37:224-240. [PMID: 35187189 PMCID: PMC8849536 DOI: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1957954] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Differential auditory experiences of children with hearing-loss who receive cochlear implants (CIs) may influence the integration of lexical and conceptual information. Here we measured event-related potentials during a word-picture priming task in CI-using children (n = 29, mean age = 81 months) and typically-hearing children (n = 19, mean age = 75 months) while they viewed audiovisual-word primes and picture targets that were semantically congruent or incongruent. In both groups, semantic relatedness modulated ERP amplitude 300-500ms after picture onset, signifying an N400 semantic effect. Critically, the CI-using children's responses to unrelated pairs were significantly more negative than hearing children's responses. Group differences were mirrored in an earlier 150-275ms time window associated with a P2 response. The present findings suggest attentional and/or strategic differences impact semantic processing and contribute to the N400 differences observed between groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Pierotti
- Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA
| | | | - Tristan Schaefer
- Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA
- Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, CA
| | - David P. Corina
- Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, CA
- Department of Linguistics, University of California, Davis, CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wedekind A, Távora-Vieira D, Nguyen AT, Marinovic W, Rajan GP. Cochlear implants in single-sided deaf recipients: Near normal higher-order processing. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 132:449-456. [PMID: 33450565 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Single-sided deafness (SSD) is a condition where an individual has a severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss in one ear and normal hearing on the contralateral side. The use of cochlear implants in individuals with SSD leads to functional improvements in hearing. However, it is relatively unclear how sounds incoming via the cochlear implant (independent of the hearing ear) are processed and interpreted by higher-order processes in the brain. METHODS Scalp electroencephalography and auditory event-related potentials were recorded monaurally from nine experienced single sided cochlear implant users. Speech-in-noise and localisation tests were used to measure functional changes in hearing. RESULTS cochlear implant use was associated with improvement in speech-in-noise and localisation tests (compared to cochlear implant off). Significant N2 and P3b effects were observed in both cochlear implant and normal hearing ear conditions, with similar waveform morphology and scalp distribution across conditions. Delayed response times and a reduced N2 (but not P3b) effect was measured in the CI condition. CONCLUSION The brain is capable of using processes similar to those in normal hearing to discriminate sounds presented to the cochlear implant. There was evidence of processing difficulty in the cochlear implant condition which could be due to the relatively degraded signals produced by the cochlear implant compared to the normal hearing ear. SIGNIFICANCE Understanding how the brain processes sound provided by a cochlear implant highlights how cortical responses can be used to guide implantation candidacy guidelines and influence rehabilitation recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Wedekind
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical School. University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia.
| | - Dayse Távora-Vieira
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical School. University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Department of Audiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - An T Nguyen
- School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | | | - Gunesh P Rajan
- Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical School. University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia; Deptartment of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kessler M, Schierholz I, Mamach M, Wilke F, Hahne A, Büchner A, Geworski L, Bengel FM, Sandmann P, Berding G. Combined Brain-Perfusion SPECT and EEG Measurements Suggest Distinct Strategies for Speech Comprehension in CI Users With Higher and Lower Performance. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:787. [PMID: 32848560 PMCID: PMC7431776 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Cochlear implantation constitutes a successful therapy of inner ear deafness, with the majority of patients showing good outcomes. There is, however, still some unexplained variability in outcomes with a number of cochlear-implant (CI) users, showing major limitations in speech comprehension. The current study used a multimodal diagnostic approach combining single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and electroencephalography (EEG) to examine the mechanisms underlying speech processing in postlingually deafened CI users (N = 21). In one session, the participants performed a speech discrimination task, during which a 96-channel EEG was recorded and the perfusions marker 99mTc-HMPAO was injected intravenously. The SPECT scan was acquired 1.5 h after injection to measure the cortical activity during the speech task. The second session included a SPECT scan after injection without stimulation at rest. Analysis of EEG and SPECT data showed N400 and P600 event-related potentials (ERPs) particularly evoked by semantic violations in the sentences, and enhanced perfusion in a temporo-frontal network during task compared to rest, involving the auditory cortex bilaterally and Broca's area. Moreover, higher performance in testing for word recognition and verbal intelligence strongly correlated to the activation in this network during the speech task. However, comparing CI users with lower and higher speech intelligibility [median split with cutoff + 7.6 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the Göttinger sentence test] revealed for CI users with higher performance additional activations of parietal and occipital regions and for those with lower performance stronger activation of superior frontal areas. Furthermore, SPECT activity was tightly coupled with EEG and cognitive abilities, as indicated by correlations between (1) cortical activation and the amplitudes in EEG, N400 (temporal and occipital areas)/P600 (parietal and occipital areas) and (2) between cortical activation in left-sided temporal and bilateral occipital/parietal areas and working memory capacity. These results suggest the recruitment of a temporo-frontal network in CI users during speech processing and a close connection between ERP effects and cortical activation in CI users. The observed differences in speech-evoked cortical activation patterns for CI users with higher and lower speech intelligibility suggest distinct processing strategies during speech rehabilitation with CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariella Kessler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Irina Schierholz
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martin Mamach
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Florian Wilke
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Anja Hahne
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Saxonian Cochlear Implant Center, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Lilli Geworski
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Frank M. Bengel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Pascale Sandmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Georg Berding
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
- Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Hannover Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Balkenhol T, Wallhäusser-Franke E, Rotter N, Servais JJ. Changes in Speech-Related Brain Activity During Adaptation to Electro-Acoustic Hearing. Front Neurol 2020; 11:161. [PMID: 32300327 PMCID: PMC7145411 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Hearing improves significantly with bimodal provision, i.e., a cochlear implant (CI) at one ear and a hearing aid (HA) at the other, but performance shows a high degree of variability resulting in substantial uncertainty about the performance that can be expected by the individual CI user. The objective of this study was to explore how auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) of bimodal listeners in response to spoken words approximate the electrophysiological response of normal hearing (NH) listeners. Study Design: Explorative prospective analysis during the first 6 months of bimodal listening using a within-subject repeated measures design. Setting: Academic tertiary care center. Participants: Twenty-seven adult participants with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who received a HiRes 90K CI and continued use of a HA at the non-implanted ear. Age-matched NH listeners served as controls. Intervention: Cochlear implantation. Main Outcome Measures: Obligatory auditory evoked potentials N1 and P2, and the event-related N2 potential in response to monosyllabic words and their reversed sound traces before, as well as 3 and 6 months post-implantation. The task required word/non-word classification. Stimuli were presented within speech-modulated noise. Loudness of word/non-word signals was adjusted individually to achieve the same intelligibility across groups and assessments. Results: Intelligibility improved significantly with bimodal hearing, and the N1-P2 response approximated the morphology seen in NH with enhanced and earlier responses to the words compared to their reversals. For bimodal listeners, a prominent negative deflection was present between 370 and 570 ms post stimulus onset (N2), irrespective of stimulus type. This was absent for NH controls; hence, this response did not approximate the NH response during the study interval. N2 source localization evidenced extended activation of general cognitive areas in frontal and prefrontal brain areas in the CI group. Conclusions: Prolonged and spatially extended processing in bimodal CI users suggests employment of additional auditory-cognitive mechanisms during speech processing. This does not reduce within 6 months of bimodal experience and may be a correlate of the enhanced listening effort described by CI listeners.
Collapse
|
15
|
Han JH, Lee J, Lee HJ. Noise-Induced Change of Cortical Temporal Processing in Cochlear Implant Users. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 13:241-248. [PMID: 31902201 PMCID: PMC7435438 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2019.01081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cochlear implant (CI) users typically report impaired ability to understand speech in noise. Speech understanding in CI users decreases with noise due to reduced temporal processing ability, and speech perceptual errors involve stop consonants distinguished by voice onset time (VOT). The current study examined the effects of noise on various speech perception tests while at the same time used cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to quantify the change of neural processing of speech sounds caused by noise. We hypothesized that the noise effects on VOT processing can be reflected in N1/P2 measures, the neural changes relate to behavioral speech perception performances. METHODS Ten adult CI users and 15 normal-hearing (NH) people participated in this study. CAEPs were recorded from 64 scalp electrodes in both quiet and noise (signal-to-noise ratio +5 dB) and in passive and active (requiring consonant discrimination) listening. Speech stimulus was synthesized consonant-vowels with VOTs of 0 and 50 ms. N1-P2 amplitudes and latencies were analyzed as a function of listening condition. For the active condition, the P3b also was analyzed. Behavioral measures included a variety of speech perception tasks. RESULTS For good performing CI users, performance in most speech test was lower in the presence of noise masking. N1 and P2 latencies became prolonged with noise masking. The P3b amplitudes were smaller in CI groups compared to NH. The degree of P2 latency change (0 vs. 50 ms VOT) was correlated with consonant perception in noise. CONCLUSION The effects of noise masking on temporal processing can be reflected in cortical responses in CI users. N1/P2 latencies were more sensitive to noise masking than amplitude measures. Additionally, P2 responses appear to have a better relationship to speech perception in CI users compared to N1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Hye Han
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Jihyun Lee
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Hyo-Jeong Lee
- Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Anyang, Korea.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sorrentino T, Donati G, Nassif N, Pasini S, Redaelli de Zinis LO. Cognitive function and quality of life in older adult patients with cochlear implants. Int J Audiol 2019; 59:316-322. [DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1696993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Tommaso Sorrentino
- Adult Otorhinolaryngology Head Neck Surgery Division, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giulia Donati
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Nader Nassif
- Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Head Neck Surgery Division, Children Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Sara Pasini
- Adult Otorhinolaryngology Head Neck Surgery Division, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca O. Redaelli de Zinis
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Section of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
- Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Head Neck Surgery Division, Children Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Andries E, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G. Commentary: Assessing Cognitive Abilities in High-Performing Cochlear Implant Users. Front Neurosci 2019; 13:564. [PMID: 31231181 PMCID: PMC6558634 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Andries
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Lab of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Lab of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Lab of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.,Experimental Lab of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hillyer J, Elkins E, Hazlewood C, Watson SD, Arenberg JG, Parbery-Clark A. Assessing Cognitive Abilities in High-Performing Cochlear Implant Users. Front Neurosci 2019; 12:1056. [PMID: 30713488 PMCID: PMC6346679 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.01056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite being considered one of the most successful neural prostheses, cochlear implants (CIs) provide recipients with a wide range of speech perception performance. While some CI users can understand speech in the absence of visual cues, other recipients exhibit more limited speech perception. Cognitive skills have been documented as a contributor to complex auditory processing, such as language understanding; however, there are no normative data for existing standardized clinical tests assessing cognitive abilities in CI users. Here, we assess the impact of modality of presentation (i.e., auditory-visual versus visual) for the administration of working memory tests in high-performing CI users in addition to measuring processing speed, cognitive efficiency and intelligence quotient (IQ). Second, we relate performance on these cognitive measures to clinical CI speech perception outcomes. Methods: Twenty one post-lingually deafened, high-performing, adult CI users [age range: 52–88 years; 3 unilateral CI, 13 bimodal (i.e., CI with contralateral hearing aid), 5 bilateral CI] with clinical speech perception scores (i.e., AzBio sentences in quiet for the first-ear CI) of ≥60% were recruited. A cognitive test battery assessing auditory-visual working memory (AVWM), visual working memory (VWM), processing speed, cognitive efficiency and IQ was administered, in addition to clinical measures of speech perception in quiet (i.e., AzBio sentences in quiet). AzBio sentences were assessed in two conditions: first-ear CI only, and best-aided everyday wearing condition. Subjects also provided self-reported measures of performance and benefit from their CI using standardized materials, including the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant questionnaire (NCIQ). Results: High-performing CI users demonstrated greater VWM than AVWM recall. VWM was positively related to AzBio scores when measured in the first-ear CI only. AVWM, processing speed, cognitive efficiency, and IQ did not relate to either measure of speech perception (i.e., first-ear CI or best-aided conditions). Subjects’ self-reported benefit as measured by the GBI predicted best-aided CI speech perception performance. Conclusion: In high-performing CI recipients, visual presentation of working memory tests may improve our assessment of cognitive function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Hillyer
- School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States
| | - Elizabeth Elkins
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, Unites States
| | - Chantel Hazlewood
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, Unites States
| | - Stacey D Watson
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, Unites States
| | - Julie G Arenberg
- Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alexandra Parbery-Clark
- Auditory Research Laboratory, Center for Hearing and Skull Base Surgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, WA, Unites States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bönitz H, Kopp B, Büchner A, Lunner T, Lyxell B, Finke M. Event-related neuronal responses to acoustic novelty in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users: Initial findings. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 129:133-142. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.10.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2017] [Revised: 10/24/2017] [Accepted: 10/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
|
20
|
Schierholz I, Finke M, Kral A, Büchner A, Rach S, Lenarz T, Dengler R, Sandmann P. Auditory and audio-visual processing in patients with cochlear, auditory brainstem, and auditory midbrain implants: An EEG study. Hum Brain Mapp 2017; 38:2206-2225. [PMID: 28130910 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2016] [Revised: 12/26/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
There is substantial variability in speech recognition ability across patients with cochlear implants (CIs), auditory brainstem implants (ABIs), and auditory midbrain implants (AMIs). To better understand how this variability is related to central processing differences, the current electroencephalography (EEG) study compared hearing abilities and auditory-cortex activation in patients with electrical stimulation at different sites of the auditory pathway. Three different groups of patients with auditory implants (Hannover Medical School; ABI: n = 6, CI: n = 6; AMI: n = 2) performed a speeded response task and a speech recognition test with auditory, visual, and audio-visual stimuli. Behavioral performance and cortical processing of auditory and audio-visual stimuli were compared between groups. ABI and AMI patients showed prolonged response times on auditory and audio-visual stimuli compared with NH listeners and CI patients. This was confirmed by prolonged N1 latencies and reduced N1 amplitudes in ABI and AMI patients. However, patients with central auditory implants showed a remarkable gain in performance when visual and auditory input was combined, in both speech and non-speech conditions, which was reflected by a strong visual modulation of auditory-cortex activation in these individuals. In sum, the results suggest that the behavioral improvement for audio-visual conditions in central auditory implant patients is based on enhanced audio-visual interactions in the auditory cortex. Their findings may provide important implications for the optimization of electrical stimulation and rehabilitation strategies in patients with central auditory prostheses. Hum Brain Mapp 38:2206-2225, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Schierholz
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.,Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Mareike Finke
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.,Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andrej Kral
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.,Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Institute of AudioNeuroTechnology and Department of Experimental Otology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
| | - Andreas Büchner
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.,Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Stefan Rach
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Thomas Lenarz
- Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.,Department of Otolaryngology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Reinhard Dengler
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany
| | - Pascale Sandmann
- Department of Neurology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all,", Hannover, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Glick H, Sharma A. Cross-modal plasticity in developmental and age-related hearing loss: Clinical implications. Hear Res 2017; 343:191-201. [PMID: 27613397 PMCID: PMC6590524 DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2016] [Revised: 08/16/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
This review explores cross-modal cortical plasticity as a result of auditory deprivation in populations with hearing loss across the age spectrum, from development to adulthood. Cross-modal plasticity refers to the phenomenon when deprivation in one sensory modality (e.g. the auditory modality as in deafness or hearing loss) results in the recruitment of cortical resources of the deprived modality by intact sensory modalities (e.g. visual or somatosensory systems). We discuss recruitment of auditory cortical resources for visual and somatosensory processing in deafness and in lesser degrees of hearing loss. We describe developmental cross-modal re-organization in the context of congenital or pre-lingual deafness in childhood and in the context of adult-onset, age-related hearing loss, with a focus on how cross-modal plasticity relates to clinical outcomes. We provide both single-subject and group-level evidence of cross-modal re-organization by the visual and somatosensory systems in bilateral, congenital deafness, single-sided deafness, adults with early-stage, mild-moderate hearing loss, and individual adult and pediatric patients exhibit excellent and average speech perception with hearing aids and cochlear implants. We discuss a framework in which changes in cortical resource allocation secondary to hearing loss results in decreased intra-modal plasticity in auditory cortex, accompanied by increased cross-modal recruitment of auditory cortices by the other sensory systems, and simultaneous compensatory activation of frontal cortices. The frontal cortices, as we will discuss, play an important role in mediating cognitive compensation in hearing loss. Given the wide range of variability in behavioral performance following audiological intervention, changes in cortical plasticity may play a valuable role in the prediction of clinical outcomes following intervention. Further, the development of new technologies and rehabilitation strategies that incorporate brain-based biomarkers may help better serve hearing impaired populations across the lifespan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Glick
- Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Science; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2501 Kittredge Loop Road, 409 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
| | - Anu Sharma
- Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Science; Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado at Boulder, 2501 Kittredge Loop Road, 409 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Finke M, Sandmann P, Bönitz H, Kral A, Büchner A. Consequences of Stimulus Type on Higher-Order Processing in Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users. Audiol Neurootol 2016; 21:305-315. [DOI: 10.1159/000452123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2016] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Single-sided deaf subjects with a cochlear implant (CI) provide the unique opportunity to compare central auditory processing of the electrical input (CI ear) and the acoustic input (normal-hearing, NH, ear) within the same individual. In these individuals, sensory processing differs between their two ears, while cognitive abilities are the same irrespectively of the sensory input. To better understand perceptual-cognitive factors modulating speech intelligibility with a CI, this electroencephalography study examined the central-auditory processing of words, the cognitive abilities, and the speech intelligibility in 10 postlingually single-sided deaf CI users. We found lower hit rates and prolonged response times for word classification during an oddball task for the CI ear when compared with the NH ear. Also, event-related potentials reflecting sensory (N1) and higher-order processing (N2/N4) were prolonged for word classification (targets versus nontargets) with the CI ear compared with the NH ear. Our results suggest that speech processing via the CI ear and the NH ear differs both at sensory (N1) and cognitive (N2/N4) processing stages, thereby affecting the behavioral performance for speech discrimination. These results provide objective evidence for cognition to be a key factor for speech perception under adverse listening conditions, such as the degraded speech signal provided from the CI.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kallioinen P, Olofsson J, Nakeva von Mentzer C, Lindgren M, Ors M, Sahlén BS, Lyxell B, Engström E, Uhlén I. Semantic Processing in Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Children: Large N400 Mismatch Effects in Brain Responses, Despite Poor Semantic Ability. Front Psychol 2016; 7:1146. [PMID: 27559320 PMCID: PMC4978721 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Difficulties in auditory and phonological processing affect semantic processing in speech comprehension for deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children. However, little is known about brain responses related to semantic processing in this group. We investigated event-related potentials (ERPs) in DHH children with cochlear implants (CIs) and/or hearing aids (HAs), and in normally hearing controls (NH). We used a semantic priming task with spoken word primes followed by picture targets. In both DHH children and controls, cortical response differences between matching and mismatching targets revealed a typical N400 effect associated with semantic processing. Children with CI had the largest mismatch response despite poor semantic abilities overall; Children with CI also had the largest ERP differentiation between mismatch types, with small effects in within-category mismatch trials (target from same category as prime) and large effects in between-category mismatch trials (where target is from a different category than prime), compared to matching trials. Children with NH and HA had similar responses to both mismatch types. While the large and differentiated ERP responses in the CI group were unexpected and should be interpreted with caution, the results could reflect less precision in semantic processing among children with CI, or a stronger reliance on predictive processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petter Kallioinen
- Department of Linguistics, Stockholm UniversityStockholm, Sweden; Lund University Cognitive Science, Lund UniversityLund, Sweden
| | - Jonas Olofsson
- Department of Psychology, Stockholm University Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Nakeva von Mentzer
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linkoping University Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Magnus Lindgren
- Linneaus Centre, Cognition, Communication and Learning, Lund UniversityLund, Sweden; Department of Psychology, Lund UniversityLund, Sweden
| | - Marianne Ors
- Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Lund UniversityLund, Sweden; Division of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Skåne University HospitalLund, Sweden
| | - Birgitta S Sahlén
- Linneaus Centre, Cognition, Communication and Learning, Lund UniversityLund, Sweden; Logopedics, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund UniversityLund, Sweden
| | - Björn Lyxell
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linkoping University Linkoping, Sweden
| | - Elisabet Engström
- Department of Hearing and Balance, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet (CLINTEC) Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Inger Uhlén
- Department of Hearing and Balance, Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet (CLINTEC) Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Finke M, Büchner A, Ruigendijk E, Meyer M, Sandmann P. On the relationship between auditory cognition and speech intelligibility in cochlear implant users: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia 2016; 87:169-181. [DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Revised: 05/09/2016] [Accepted: 05/18/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
25
|
Schierholz I, Finke M, Schulte S, Hauthal N, Kantzke C, Rach S, Büchner A, Dengler R, Sandmann P. Enhanced audio–visual interactions in the auditory cortex of elderly cochlear-implant users. Hear Res 2015; 328:133-47. [DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2015] [Revised: 08/12/2015] [Accepted: 08/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|