1
|
Casauria S, Lewis S, Lynch F, Saffery R. Australian parental perceptions of genomic newborn screening for non-communicable diseases. Front Genet 2023; 14:1209762. [PMID: 37434950 PMCID: PMC10330815 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1209762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) programs have improved neonatal healthcare since the 1960s. Genomic sequencing now offers potential to generate polygenic risk score (PRS) that could be incorporated into NBS programs, shifting the focus from treatment to prevention of future noncommunicable disease (NCD). However, Australian parents' knowledge and attitudes regarding PRS for NBS is currently unknown. Methods: Parents with at least one Australian-born child under 18 years were invited via social media platforms to complete an online questionnaire aimed at examining parents' knowledge of NCDs, PRS, and precision medicine, their opinions on receiving PRS for their child, and considerations of early-intervention strategies to prevent the onset of disease. Results: Of 126 participants, 90.5% had heard the term "non-communicable disease or chronic condition," but only 31.8% and 34.4% were aware of the terms "polygenic risk score" and "precision medicine" respectively. A large proportion of participants said they would consider screening their newborn to receive a PRS for allergies (77.9%), asthma (81.0%), cancer (64.8%), cardiovascular disease (65.7%), mental illness (56.7%), obesity (49.5%), and type 2 diabetes (66.7%). Additionally, participants would primarily consider diet and exercise as interventions for specific NCDs. Discussion: The results from this study will inform future policy for genomic NBS, including expected rate of uptake and interventions that parents would consider employing to prevent the onset of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Casauria
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Genomics, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sharon Lewis
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Fiona Lynch
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Richard Saffery
- Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nurchis MC, Raspolini GM, Heidar Alizadeh A, Altamura G, Radio FC, Tartaglia M, Dallapiccola B, Damiani G. Organizational Aspects of the Implementation and Use of Whole Genome Sequencing and Whole Exome Sequencing in the Pediatric Population in Italy: Results of a Survey. J Pers Med 2023; 13:899. [PMID: 37373888 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This study explores the organizational aspects of whole genome sequencing (WGS) implementation for pediatric patients with suspected genetic disorders in Italy, comparing it with whole exome sequencing (WES). Health professionals' opinions were collected through an internet-based survey and analyzed using a qualitative summative content analysis methodology. Among the 16 respondents, most were clinical geneticists performing only WES, while 5 also used WGS. The key differences identified include higher needs for analyzing genome rearrangements following WES, greater data storage and security requirements for WGS, and WGS only being performed in specific research studies. No difference was detected in centralization and decentralization issues. The main cost factors included genetic consultations, library preparation and sequencing, bioinformatic analysis, interpretation and confirmation, data storage, and complementary diagnostic investigations. Both WES and WGS decreased the need for additional diagnostic analyses when not used as last-resort tests. Organizational aspects were similar for WGS and WES, but economic evidence gaps may exist for WGS in clinical settings. As sequencing costs decline, WGS will likely replace WES and traditional genetic testing. Tailored genomic policies and cost-effectiveness analyses are needed for WGS implementation in health systems. WGS shows promise for enhancing genetics knowledge and expediting diagnoses for pediatric patients with genetic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Cesare Nurchis
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- School of Economics, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gian Marco Raspolini
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Aurora Heidar Alizadeh
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Gerardo Altamura
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Marco Tartaglia
- Molecular Genetics and Functional Genomics, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Dallapiccola
- Molecular Genetics and Functional Genomics, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù IRCCS, 00146 Rome, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Damiani
- Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
How does the genomic naive public perceive whole genomic testing for health purposes? A scoping review. Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:35-47. [PMID: 36257982 PMCID: PMC9822972 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-022-01208-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The benefits of genomic testing are primarily reported in rare disease, cancer diagnosis and disease management. However, as research into its application in common, more complex conditions grows, as well as the increased prevalence of carrier screening programs, the genomic naive public is more likely to be offered testing in future. To promote social acceptability and ethical application of this technology, it is essential that public perceptions of genomics are considered. Previous studies, however, have primarily focussed on the views of those with genetic conditions or those undergoing genetic testing. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the genomic naive public's perceptions of clinical genomics and clinical genomic testing. Embase, MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched, with a total of 3460 articles identified. Data analysis was organised according to the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework. Sixteen full-text articles were included in the final analysis. Most of the studies used questionnaires to determine attitudes of the public toward clinical genomics (n = 12). Public perceptions were found to underpin technology (Domain 2), value proposition (Domain 3), the adopter system (Domain 4) and the wider context (Domain 6) of the NASSS framework, highlighting its importance when considering implementation of an innovative technology such as genomic testing. Our study shows public perceptions are diverse, and highlights the need for more studies on the views of underrepresented groups and the impact of cultural contexts on perceptions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Armstrong B, Christensen KD, Genetti CA, Parad RB, Robinson JO, Blout Zawatsky CL, Zettler B, Beggs AH, Holm IA, Green RC, McGuire AL, Smith HS, Pereira S. Parental Attitudes Toward Standard Newborn Screening and Newborn Genomic Sequencing: Findings From the BabySeq Study. Front Genet 2022; 13:867371. [PMID: 35571041 PMCID: PMC9091188 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: With increasing utility and decreasing cost of genomic sequencing, augmentation of standard newborn screening (NBS) programs with newborn genomic sequencing (nGS) has been proposed. Before nGS can be integrated into newborn screening, parents' perspectives must be better understood. Objective: Using data from surveys administered to parents of healthy newborns who were enrolled in the BabySeq Project, a randomized clinical trial of nGS alongside NBS, this paper reports parents' attitudes regarding population-based NBS and nGS assessed 3 months after results disclosure. Methods: Parental attitudes regarding whether all newborns should receive, and whether informed consent should be required for, NBS and nGS, as well as whether nGS should be mandated were assessed using 5-point scales from strongly disagree (=1) to strongly agree (=5). Parents' interest in receiving types of results from nGS was assessed on a 5-point scale from not at all interested (=1) to very interested (=5). Survey responses were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests, paired t-tests, and repeated measures ANOVA. Results: At 3 months post-disclosure, 248 parents of 174 healthy newborns submitted a survey. Support for every newborn receiving standard NBS (mean 4.67) was higher than that for every newborn receiving nGS (mean 3.60; p < 0.001). Support for required informed consent for NBS (mean 3.44) was lower than that for nGS (mean 4.27, p < 0.001). Parents' attitudes toward NBS and nGS were not significantly associated with self-reported political orientation. If hypothetically receiving nGS outside of the BabySeq Project, most parents reported being very interested in receiving information on their baby's risk of developing a disease in childhood that can be prevented, treated, or cured (86.8%) and their risk of developing a disease during adulthood that can be prevented, treated, or cured (84.6%). Discussion: Parents' opinions are crucial to inform design and delivery of public health programs, as the success of the program hinges on parents' trust and participation. To accommodate parents' preferences without affecting the current high participation rates in NBS, an optional add-on consent to nGS in addition to NBS may be a feasible approach. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02422511.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittan Armstrong
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kurt D. Christensen
- PRecisiOn Medicine Translational Research (PROMoTeR) Center, Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Casie A. Genetti
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Richard B. Parad
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Jill Oliver Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Carrie L. Blout Zawatsky
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Medical and Population Genetics, The Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- The MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Bethany Zettler
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Alan H. Beggs
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Ingrid A. Holm
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, The Manton Center for Orphan Disease Research, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Robert C. Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
- Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA, United States
- The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Amy L. McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Hadley Stevens Smith
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stacey Pereira
- Center for Medical Ethics and Heath Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Public interest in unexpected genomic findings: a survey study identifying aspects of sequencing attitudes that influence preferences. J Community Genet 2022; 13:235-245. [DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00577-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
|
6
|
Etchegary H, Pullman D, Simmonds C, Rabie Z, Rahman P. Identifying Aspects of Public Attitudes Toward Whole Genome Sequencing to Inform the Integration of Genomics into Care. Public Health Genomics 2021; 24:229-240. [PMID: 34038902 DOI: 10.1159/000515952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The growth of global sequencing initiatives and commercial genomic test offerings suggests the public will increasingly be confronted with decisions about sequencing. Understanding public attitudes can assist efforts to integrate sequencing into care and inform the development of public education and outreach strategies. METHODS A 48-item online survey was advertised on Facebook in Eastern Canada and hosted on SurveyMonkey in late 2018. The survey measured public interest in whole genome sequencing and attitudes toward various aspects of sequencing using vignettes, scaled, and open-ended items. RESULTS While interest in sequencing was high, critical attitudes were observed. In particular, items measuring features of patient control and choice regarding genomic data were strongly endorsed by respondents. Majority wanted to specify upfront how their data could be used, retain the ability to withdraw their sample at a later date, sign a written consent form, and speak to a genetic counselor prior to sequencing. Concerns about privacy and unauthorized access to data were frequently observed. Education level was the sociodemographic variable most often related to attitude statements such that those with higher levels of education generally displayed more critical attitudes. CONCLUSIONS Attitudes identified here could be used to inform the development of implementation strategies for genomic medicine. Findings suggest health systems must address patient concerns about privacy, consent practices, and the strong desire to control what happens to their genomic data through public outreach and education. Specific oversight procedures and policies that are clearly communicated to the public will be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Etchegary
- Assistant Professor Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Daryl Pullman
- Professor of Medicine (Bioethics), Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Charlene Simmonds
- Manager, Health Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Zoha Rabie
- Research Assistant, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| | - Proton Rahman
- Professor of Medicine (Rheumatology), Memorial University and Rheumatologist, Eastern Regional Health Authority, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang S, Johnson RA, Novembre J, Freeland E, Conley D. Public attitudes toward genetic risk scoring in medicine and beyond. Soc Sci Med 2021; 274:113796. [PMID: 33684700 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Advances in genomics research have led to the development of polygenic risk scores, which numerically summarize genetic predispositions for a wide array of human outcomes. Initially developed to characterize disease risk, polygenic risk scores can now be calculated for many non-disease traits and social outcomes, with the potential to be used not only in health care but also other institutional domains. In this study, we draw on a nationally-representative survey of U.S. adults to examine three sets of lay attitudes toward the deployment of genetic risk scores in a variety of medical and non-medical domains: 1. abstract belief about whether people should be judged on the basis of genetic predispositions; 2. concrete attitudes about whether various institutions should be permitted to use genetic information; and 3. personal willingness to provide genetic information to various institutions. Results demonstrate two striking differences across these three sets of attitudes. First, despite almost universal agreement that people should not be judged based on genetics, there is support, albeit varied, for institutions being permitted to use genetic information, with support highest for disease outcomes and in reproductive decision-making. We further find significant variation in personal willingness to provide such information, with a majority of respondents expressing willingness to provide information to health care providers and relative finder services, but less than a quarter expressing willingness to do so for an array of other institutions and services. Second, while there are no demographic differences in respondents' abstract beliefs about judging based on genetics, demographic differences emerge in permissibility ratings and personal willingness. Our results should inform debates about the deployment of polygenic scores in domains within and beyond medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Zhang
- Princeton University, Department of Sociology, 107 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA.
| | - Rebecca A Johnson
- Dartmouth College, Quantitative Social Science and affiliate, Sociology, 301E Blunt Hall, Hanover, NH, 03755, USA.
| | - John Novembre
- University of Chicago, Department of Human Genetics, 920 E 58th Street, Chicago, IL, 60616, USA.
| | - Edward Freeland
- Princeton University, Survey Research Center, 169 Nassau Street, Princeton, NJ, 08542, USA.
| | - Dalton Conley
- Princeton University, Department of Sociology and Office of Population Research, 157 Wallace Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA; National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Participant mothers' attitudes toward genetic analysis in a birth cohort study. J Hum Genet 2021; 66:671-679. [PMID: 33495570 PMCID: PMC8225506 DOI: 10.1038/s10038-020-00894-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
To conduct a long-term birth cohort study that includes genetic analysis, it is crucial to understand the attitudes of participants to genetic analysis and then take appropriate approaches for addressing their ambiguous and negative attitudes. This study aimed to explore participants’ attitudes toward genetic analysis and associated background factors among mothers who were enrolled in a large Japanese birth cohort. A questionnaire was sent to participants’ households, and the responses of 1762 mothers (34.0%) were used for the study. The majority of mothers recognized genetic analysis for themselves and their children and sharing of genetic data as beneficial. A low knowledge level of genomic terminology was associated with ambiguous attitudes toward genetic analysis and data sharing. Education level was positively associated with the recognition of the benefits of genetic analysis. Concern about handling genetic information was associated with the unacceptability of data sharing. Trust was associated with the approval of genetic analysis. Most mothers preferred that genetic analysis results be returned. These findings suggest the need for multiple efforts to maximize participants’ acceptance of genetic analysis, such as utilizing an educational approach to encourage familiarity with genetics/genomics, optimizing explanations for different educational levels, and explicitly disclosing the handling policy for genetic information.
Collapse
|
9
|
Calabrò GE, Sassano M, Tognetto A, Boccia S. Citizens' Attitudes, Knowledge, and Educational Needs in the Field of Omics Sciences: A Systematic Literature Review. Front Genet 2020; 11:570649. [PMID: 33193671 PMCID: PMC7644959 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.570649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The huge development of omics sciences is changing the classical medical approach and making new technologies available. In this context, education of citizens is essential to allow appropriate decisions about their own health. Hence, we aimed to summarize existing literature regarding citizens' knowledge, attitudes, and educational needs on omics sciences. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review (SLR) using Pubmed, ISI Web of Science, and Embase databases. The eligibility criteria for inclusion in this review required that the studies investigated knowledge, attitudes, or educational needs regarding omics sciences among the general population. Results: We included 54 studies, published between 2006 and 2020. Most of the included studies (72%) investigated citizens' knowledge, half of them (56%) attitudes, and 20% educational needs in the field of omics sciences, while 52% investigated attitudes and perceptions about genetic and/or omics tests. Most studies (64%) reported a limited knowledge level among citizens, even though most (59%) reported participants understood the benefits of the use of omics sciences into medicine. As for omics tests, a controversial opinion toward their use into practice was reported among citizens. Most of the studies (82%) investigating citizens' educational needs highlighted a clear gap to be filled. Conclusions: Our SLR summarizes current knowledge on citizens' literacy, attitudes, and educational needs on omics science, underlining the need for strengthening public engagement on this topic. Further research is needed, however, to identify appropriate methods and models to achieve such an improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Elisa Calabrò
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Sassano
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessia Tognetto
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Boccia
- Section of Hygiene, University Department of Life Sciences and Public Health, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,Department of Woman and Child Health and Public Health-Public Health Area, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saastamoinen A, Hyttinen V, Kortelainen M, Aaltio J, Auranen M, Ylikallio E, Lönnqvist T, Sainio M, Suomalainen A, Tyynismaa H, Isohanni P. Attitudes towards genetic testing and information: does parenthood shape the views? J Community Genet 2020; 11:461-473. [PMID: 32248430 PMCID: PMC7475141 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00462-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
This study examines how parents of pediatric patients might differ in their views and attitudes towards genetic technology and information when compared to adult patients. There is surprisingly little evidence on how parents compare to other parts of population in their attitudes. Previous empirical studies often relate health-related preferences and attitudes to factors such as age, education, and income instead of parental status, thus evading comparison of parents to others as health-related decision makers. Findings related to the parental status can be useful when implementing genetic technology in clinical practice. We conducted a survey of views on genetic technology and information for groups of adult neurology patients (n = 68) and parents of pediatric neurology patients (n = 31) to shed some light on this issue. In addition to our own survey instrument, we conducted other surveys to gain insight on psychosocial factors that might affect these attitudes. The results suggest that parents are more concerned about their children's genetic risk factors when compared to the attitudes of adult patients about their own risk. For both groups, negative emotional state was associated with more concerns towards genetic information. Our study provides insights on how parental views might affect the acceptance of genetic technology and information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Virva Hyttinen
- VATT Institute for Economic Research, PO Box 1279, 00100, Helsinki, Finland.
- Department of Health and Social Management, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
| | - Mika Kortelainen
- VATT Institute for Economic Research, PO Box 1279, 00100, Helsinki, Finland
- Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Juho Aaltio
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mari Auranen
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Emil Ylikallio
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tuula Lönnqvist
- Department of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Markus Sainio
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anu Suomalainen
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Neuroscience Center, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Henna Tyynismaa
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pirjo Isohanni
- Research Programs Unit, Stem Cells and Metabolism, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Department of Child Neurology, Children's Hospital, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Etchegary H, Wilson B, Rahman P, Simmonds C, Pullman D. Public interest in whole genome sequencing and information needs: an online survey study. Per Med 2020; 17:283-293. [DOI: 10.2217/pme-2019-0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Aim: To survey the general public about whole genome sequencing interest, including pharmacogenomic testing, and to identify information important for sequencing decisions. Patients & methods: An online survey of 901 members of the general public in an eastern Canadian province. Results: Interest in whole genome sequencing, including pharmacogenomic testing, was high with few differences among demographic variables. Issues identified as very important to sequencing decisions included familial implications of testing, whether treatment was available for conditions tested and knowing who could access genomic information. Most respondents would value support when interpreting sequencing results. Conclusion: Findings reveal the kind of information and support users of sequencing services would value and could inform the implementation of sequencing into care in ways that accord with public preferences and needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Etchegary
- Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St John's, NL, Canada; Craig L. Dobbin Centre for Genetics, Rm 4M210, St John's, NL, A1B 3V6
| | - Brenda Wilson
- Professor of Medicine and Associate Dean, Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, St John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Proton Rahman
- Professor of Medicine (Rheumatology), Memorial University and Rheumatologist, Eastern Regional Health Authority, St John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Charlene Simmonds
- Manager, Health Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| | - Daryl Pullman
- Professor of Medicine (Bioethics), Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
LePoire E, Basu B, Walker L, Bowen DJ. What do people think about genetics? A systematic review. J Community Genet 2018; 10:171-187. [PMID: 30406598 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-018-0394-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetics is increasingly becoming a part of modern medical practice. How people think about genetics' use in medicine and their daily lives is therefore essential. Earlier studies indicated mixed attitudes about genetics. However, this might be changing. Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) as a guideline, we initially reviewed 442 articles that looked at awareness, attitudes, knowledge, and perception of risks among the general and targeted recruitment populations. After fitting our criteria (from the last 5 years, conducted in the USA, non-provider populations, quantitative results reported, and assessed participants 18 years and older), finally 51 eligible articles were thematically coded and presented in this paper. Awareness is reported as relatively high in the studies reviewed. Attitudes are mixed but with higher proportions reporting positive attitudes towards genetic testing and counseling. Self-reported knowledge is reasonably high, specifically with the effects of specific programs developed to raise knowledge levels of the general and targeted recruited populations. Perception of risk is somewhat aligned with actual risk. With the reasonable positive reports of genetic awareness and knowledge, there is similar positive attitude and perception of risk, supporting the need for continued dissemination of such knowledge. Given interest in incorporating community participation in genomic educational strategies, we provide this review as a baseline from which to launch community-specific educational supports and tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin LePoire
- University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Baishakhi Basu
- University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Lorelei Walker
- Health Equity Circle, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Deborah J Bowen
- University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Okita T, Ohashi N, Kabata D, Shintani A, Kato K. Public attitudes in Japan toward participation in whole genome sequencing studies. Hum Genomics 2018; 12:21. [PMID: 29653595 PMCID: PMC5899336 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0153-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Recent innovations in gene analysis technology have allowed for rapid and inexpensive sequencing of entire genomes. Thus, both conducting a study using whole genome sequencing (WGS) in a large population and the clinical application of research findings from such studies are currently feasible. However, to promote WGS studies, understanding and voluntary participation by the general public is needed. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the general public’s attitude toward and understanding of WGS studies. The primary goal of our research is to investigate these issues and to discover how they relate to research participation in WGS studies. Methods A survey of awareness regarding WGS and studies using WGS was conducted with a sample of 2000 or more participants using a self-administered questionnaire posted on the Internet between February 20 and 21, 2015. Prior to the survey, we briefly explained WGS and WGS study-related issues to the respondents in order to provide them with the minimum knowledge required to answer the questionnaire. We then conducted an analysis, including cross-classification. Results For the question regarding interest in WGS, 46.6% of participants responded “Yes.” 70.7% of all respondents said that they were interested in some kinds of findings that could be obtained from WGS studies. Regarding participation in WGS studies, 29.0% were interested in participating. The demographic factors significantly related to attitudes toward research participation were age, level of education, and employment status. The results also suggest that concerns about WGS have a positive effect on people’s willingness to participate. Furthermore, it was shown that for people who were not interested in their gene-related information, concerns about WGS negatively impacted their willingness to participate. However, for people who were interested in their gene-related information, their concerns might not have impacted their willingness to participate. Discussion and conclusions This research has shown several key factors that affect the willingness of the general public for the participation to the WGS studies. One of the unexpected findings is that concerns toward WGS studies generally have positive effect on the peoples’ attitude. It will be interesting to further investigate into the various types of concerns that people in different groups have about WGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taketoshi Okita
- Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
| | - Noriko Ohashi
- Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| | - Daijiro Kabata
- Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi, Abeno, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Ayumi Shintani
- Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka City University, 1-4-3, Asahi, Abeno, Osaka, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Kazuto Kato
- Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sundby A, Boolsen MW, Burgdorf KS, Ullum H, Hansen TF, Mors O. Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research. Hum Genomics 2018; 12:12. [PMID: 29506557 PMCID: PMC5839067 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-018-0144-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genomic sequencing of children in research raises complex ethical issues. This study aims to gain more knowledge on the attitudes towards the inclusion of children as research subjects in genomic research and towards the disclosure of pertinent and incidental findings to the parents and the child. METHODS Qualitative data were collected from interviews with a wide range of informants: experts engaged in genomic research, clinical geneticists, persons with mental disorders, relatives, and blood donors. Quantitative data were collected from a cross-sectional web-based survey among 1227 parents and 1406 non-parents who were potential stakeholders in psychiatric genomic research. RESULTS Participants generally expressed positive views on children's participation in genomic research. The informants in the qualitative interviews highlighted the age of the child as a critical aspect when disclosing genetic information. Other important aspects were the child's right to an autonomous choice, the emotional burden of knowing imposed on both the child and the parents, and the possibility of receiving beneficial clinical information regarding the future health of the child. Nevertheless, there was no consensus whether the parent or the child should receive the findings. A majority of survey stakeholders agreed that children should be able to participate in genomic research. The majority agreed that both pertinent and incidental findings should be returned to the parents and to the child when of legal age. Having children does not affect the stakeholder's attitudes towards the inclusion of children as research subjects in genomic research. CONCLUSION Our findings illustrate that both the child's right to autonomy and the parents' interest to be informed are important factors that are found valuable by the participants. In future guidelines governing children as subjects in genomic research, it would thus be essential to incorporate the child's right to an open future, including the right to receive information on adult-onset genetic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Sundby
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Skovagervej 2, 8240, Risskov, Denmark. .,The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Henrik Ullum
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Folkmann Hansen
- The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute for Biological Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Sct. Hans, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ole Mors
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Skovagervej 2, 8240, Risskov, Denmark.,The Lundbeck Foundation Initiative for Integrative Psychiatric Research, iPSYCH, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lewis MA, Stine A, Paquin RS, Mansfield C, Wood D, Rini C, Roche MI, Powell CM, Berg JS, Bailey DB. Parental preferences toward genomic sequencing for non-medically actionable conditions in children: a discrete-choice experiment. Genet Med 2018; 20:181-189. [PMID: 28771249 PMCID: PMC5868968 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2017.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Accepted: 03/16/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PurposeApplication of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing is likely to increase in clinical practice, public health contexts, and research. We investigated how parental preference for acquiring information from genome-scale testing is influenced by the characteristics of non-medically actionable genetic disorders in children, as well as whether the preferences differed by gender and between African-American and white respondents.MethodsWe conducted a Web-based discrete-choice experiment with 1,289 parents of young children. Participants completed "choice tasks" based on pairs of profiles describing sequencing results for hypothetical genetic disorders, selected the profile in each pair that they believed represented the information that would be more important to know, and answered questions that measured their level of distress.ResultsKnowing the likelihood that the disorder would develop given a true-positive test result was most important to parents. Parents showed greater interest in learning sequencing results for disease profiles with more severe manifestations. This was associated with greater distress. Differences by gender and race reflected small differences in magnitude, but not direction.ConclusionParents preferred to learn results about genetic disorders with more severe manifestations, even when this knowledge was associated with increased distress. These results may help clinicians support parental decision making by revealing which types of sequencing results parents are interested in learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Lewis
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alex Stine
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan S Paquin
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Carol Mansfield
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dallas Wood
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Christine Rini
- Department of Health Behavior and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Myra I Roche
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cynthia M Powell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jonathan S Berg
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Donald B Bailey
- RTI International, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Malek J, Slashinski MJ, Robinson JO, Gutierrez AM, Parsons DW, Plon SE, McCullough LB, McGuire AL. Parental Perspectives on Whole Exome Sequencing in Pediatric Cancer: A Typology of Perceived Utility. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 1. [PMID: 31886451 DOI: 10.1200/po.17.00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore how parents of pediatric cancer patients perceived the utility of clinical tumor and germline whole-exome sequencing (WES) results. Patients and Methods We conducted longitudinal interviews with parents of a diverse pediatric cancer population before disclosure of WES results (n=64), then one to eight months (n=33) after disclosure. Interview transcripts were analyzed using a thematic qualitative approach. Results Parents identified a broad range of types of utility for their child's WES results. Even when results did not affect their child's current treatment, they expressed optimism about future clinical utility for their child, themselves, and other family members. Parents also reported experiencing psychological utility including peace of mind, relief of guilt, and satisfaction of curiosity. Pragmatic utility, such as the ability to plan for the future and make better reproductive decisions, was also described. Conclusion Parents of pediatric cancer patients perceive WES to have broad utility, including psychological and pragmatic utility, even if there is no direct impact on clinical care. Further work will need to consider how the value of genomic information should be characterized, how risks and benefits should be described, and how these results should inform recommendations and decisions about using WES.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Malek
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Melody J Slashinski
- School of Public Health & Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA
| | - Jill O Robinson
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Amanda M Gutierrez
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - D Williams Parsons
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Sharon E Plon
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.,Texas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX
| | - Laurence B McCullough
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| | - Amy L McGuire
- Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lewis J, Snyder M, Hyatt-Knorr H. Marking 15 years of the Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 2:77-88. [PMID: 29152459 PMCID: PMC5685198 DOI: 10.3233/trd-170011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center (GARD), a program of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, was established in 2002 to assist the public in finding reliable, timely, and easy-to-understand information about genetic and/or rare diseases in English or Spanish. OBJECTIVE: A review of longitudinal data on GARD inquiries from 2002 to 2016 and assessment of the results of two user satisfaction surveys were conducted to understand the demographics and needs of GARD customers over time. METHODS: Since 2002, GARD has collected anonymized data while responding to questions received via e-mail, website, telephone, fax, letter, or TTY. Between 2002 and 2016 GARD received a total of 60,106 inquiries. User satisfaction surveys were conducted in 2006 and 2014, in which users self-selected to participate. RESULTS: The annual number of inquiries has risen steadily since 2002. Inquiries are overwhelmingly from educated female patients, family, and friends seeking disease-specific information, treatment options, referrals, and research studies. Most users report satisfaction with the experience. CONCLUSIONS: Rare disease patients and their families face challenges in finding information about their symptoms or diagnosis, prognosis, treatment options, significance for family members, and research opportunities. Lack of available clinical expertise can leave patients, their family, and friends with little choice but to become knowledgeable on their own. GARD fills a critical need by providing the public with vetted, evidence-based information that empowers people to engage in their own health care and seek research studies of relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Henrietta Hyatt-Knorr
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Office of Rare Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wade CH, Elliott KR. Preferences for the provision of whole genome sequencing services among young adults. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174131. [PMID: 28334023 PMCID: PMC5363863 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives As whole genome sequencing (WGS) becomes increasingly available, clinicians will be faced with conveying complex information to individuals at different stages in life. The purpose of this study is to characterize the views of young adults toward obtaining WGS, learning different types of genomic information, and having choice about which results are disclosed. Methods A mixed-methods descriptive study was conducted with a diverse group of 18 and 19-years-olds (N = 145). Participants watched an informational video about WGS and then completed an online survey. Results Participants held a positive attitude toward obtaining WGS and learning about a range of health conditions and traits. Increased interest in learning WGS information was significantly associated with anticipated capacity to handle the emotional consequences if a serious risk was found (β = 0.13, P = .04). Young adults wanted the ability to choose what types of genomic risk information would be returned and expressed decreased willingness to undergo WGS if clinicians made these decisions (t(138) = -7.14, P <.01). Qualitative analysis showed that young adults emphasized procedural factors in WGS decision-making and that perceived health benefits of WGS had a substantial role in testing preferences and anticipated usage of WGS results. Conclusions Clinicians are likely to encounter enthusiasm for obtaining WGS results among young adults and may need to develop strategies for ensuring that this preference is adequately informed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher H. Wade
- School of Nursing & Health Studies, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, Washington, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Kailyn R. Elliott
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chokoshvili D, Belmans C, Poncelet R, Sanders S, Vaes D, Vears D, Janssens S, Huys I, Borry P. Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2017; 21:195-201. [PMID: 28306397 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2016.0418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To explore the views of the Belgian public on various topics surrounding genetics and genetic testing (GT). MATERIALS AND METHODS A written questionnaire was administered to visitors of the annual cartoon festival in Knokke-Heist, Belgium, during the summer of 2014. The main theme of the festival was challenges and progress in human genetics and it was attended by more than 100,000 visitors. RESULTS The survey was completed by 1182 respondents, resulting in a demographically diverse sample with a mean age of 48.5 years. Our respondents expressed moderate interest in predictive GT, with 39.1% willing to learn about their predisposition to diseases through GT and 49.5% indicating interest in getting tested exclusively for treatable/preventable diseases. We observed higher interest in GT for reproductive purposes, such as preconception screening for recessive disorders (53.8%) and prenatal GT (60.7%). A substantial minority (46.4%) of the respondents were worried that GT could further stigmatize people with disabilities, while 39.7% believed that carrier screening for recessive diseases would lead to an inferior image of people affected by them. CONCLUSION Paying due attention to the attitudes, beliefs, and concerns of the general public is important to ensure ethically sound and socially acceptable implementation of new genetic technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davit Chokoshvili
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carmen Belmans
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roxanne Poncelet
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sofie Sanders
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deborah Vaes
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Danya Vears
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sandra Janssens
- 2 Centre for Medical Genetics Ghent, University Hospital Ghent , Ghent, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pascal Borry
- 1 Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Marshall DA, Gonzalez JM, Johnson FR, MacDonald KV, Pugh A, Douglas MP, Phillips KA. What are people willing to pay for whole-genome sequencing information, and who decides what they receive? Genet Med 2016; 18:1295-1302. [PMID: 27253734 PMCID: PMC5133139 DOI: 10.1038/gim.2016.61] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/30/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can be used as a powerful diagnostic tool as well as for screening, but it may lead to anxiety, unnecessary testing, and overtreatment. Current guidelines suggest reporting clinically actionable secondary findings when diagnostic testing is performed. We examined preferences for receiving WGS results. METHODS A US nationally representative survey (n = 410 adults) was used to rank preferences for who decides (an expert panel, your doctor, you) which WGS results are reported. We estimated the value of information about variants with varying levels of clinical usefulness by using willingness to pay contingent valuation questions. RESULTS The results were as follows: 43% preferred to decide themselves what information is included in the WGS report. 38% (95% confidence interval (CI): 33-43%) would not pay for actionable variants, and 3% (95% CI: 1-5%) would pay more than $1,000. 55% (95% CI: 50-60%) would not pay for variants for which medical treatment is currently unclear, and 7% (95% CI: 5-9%) would pay more than $400. CONCLUSION Most people prefer to decide what WGS results are reported. Despite valuing actionable information more, some respondents perceive that genetic information could negatively impact them. Preference heterogeneity for WGS information should be considered in the development of policies, particularly to integrate patient preferences with personalized medicine and shared decision making.Genet Med 18 12, 1295-1302.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DA Marshall
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - JM Gonzalez
- Research Triangle Institute, North Carolina, USA
| | - FR Johnson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, North Carolina, USA
| | - KV MacDonald
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - A Pugh
- Research Triangle Institute, North Carolina, USA
| | - MP Douglas
- University of California at San Francisco, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS), California, USA
| | - KA Phillips
- University of California at San Francisco, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine (TRANSPERS); UCSF Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy; and UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Waisbren SE, Weipert CM, Walsh RC, Petty CR, Green RC. Psychosocial Factors Influencing Parental Interest in Genomic Sequencing of Newborns. Pediatrics 2016; 137 Suppl 1:S30-5. [PMID: 26729701 PMCID: PMC9923974 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND When parents of newborns are presented with the hypothetical possibility of obtaining genomic sequencing (GS) for their newborn infants immediately after birth, they express substantial interest. This study examined associations between expressed interest in GS and demographic and psychosocial variables some months after birth. METHODS A total of 1096 parents were enrolled in a study on GS of newborns shortly after the birth of their infants, before discharge from the postpartum floor. Of these parents, 663 (60.5%) completed a follow-up survey 2 to 28 months later that queried their interest in GS for their infant and whether they received worrisome health information during pregnancy, labor, and delivery. They were also administered the Parenting Stress Index. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with interest in GS of newborns. RESULTS Of parents, 76.1% indicated at least some interest in GS. A 10-point increase on the Parenting Stress Index was associated with an increase in the odds of having some interest in GS (odds ratio: 1.15; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.32). Age, gender, race, ethnicity, marital status, education, anxiety, and whether this was the first biological child were not significantly associated with interest in GS. Receiving worrisome health information was associated with greater interest in GS but this did not reach significance (odds ratio: 1.42; 95% confidence interval: 0.95-2.12). CONCLUSIONS This hypothetical survey study suggests that previous experiences leading to worrisome health information and parenting stress need to be considered when GS is offered. Additional research, currently underway, is exploring factors associated with real-life parental choices around whether to obtain GS of their newborns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E. Waisbren
- Boston Children’s Hospital;,Harvard Medical School; and,Address correspondence to Susan E. Waisbren, PhD, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail:
| | - Caroline M. Weipert
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rebecca C. Walsh
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Robert C. Green
- Harvard Medical School; and,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Caminiti CB, Hesdorffer DC, Shostak S, Goldsmith J, Sorge ST, Winawer MR, Phelan JC, Chung WK, Ottman R. Parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in multiplex epilepsy families. Epilepsia 2015; 57:279-87. [PMID: 26693851 DOI: 10.1111/epi.13287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate parents' interest in genetic testing of their offspring in families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy. METHODS Seventy-seven parents with affected offspring and 173 parents without affected offspring from families containing multiple individuals with epilepsy completed a questionnaire asking about their interest in genetic testing of their offspring. Interest in testing was ascertained in four scenarios defined by clinical utility and penetrance of the gene in the test (100% vs. 50%). Pairwise agreement in interest was assessed between parents for testing themselves versus their offspring, and between mothers and fathers for their offspring. RESULTS Among parents with affected offspring, the proportion interested in genetic testing of offspring ("diagnostic testing") was 86% in the 100% penetrance, clinical utility scenario, and 71% in the 100% penetrance, no clinical utility scenario (p = 0.007). Among parents without affected offspring, comparable proportions interested in genetic testing of offspring ("predictive testing") were 74% and 53% (p < 0.001), and were significantly lower than in parents with affected offspring (clinical utility, p = 0.02; no clinical utility, p = 0.01). Interest in testing did not differ by gene penetrance. Parents' agreement in testing interest for themselves versus their offspring was "substantial" (90% agreement, κ = 0.72) for a test with clinical utility, and "almost perfect" for a test without clinical utility (94% agreement, κ = 0.88). Agreement in testing interest between mothers and fathers was "moderate" for a test with clinical utility (85% agreement, κ = 0.48,), and "fair" for a test without clinical utility (67% agreement, κ = 0.30). SIGNIFICANCE Interest in diagnostic genetic testing is strong among parents with offspring with epilepsy, particularly when the test offers clinical utility. Testing interest is lower for a diagnostic test without clinical utility, or for a predictive test in offspring at risk of developing epilepsy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney B Caminiti
- GH Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Dale C Hesdorffer
- GH Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Sara Shostak
- Department of Sociology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S.A
| | - Jeff Goldsmith
- Department of Biostatistics, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Shawn T Sorge
- GH Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Melodie R Winawer
- GH Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Jo C Phelan
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Wendy K Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A
| | - Ruth Ottman
- GH Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, U.S.A.,Division of Epidemiology, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|