Antiphospholipid Antibodies and Recurrent Thrombotic Events: Persistence and Portfolio

Antiphospholipid antibodies as potential prognostic indicators of recurrent ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND

Immunity play a pivotal role in the risk of ischemic stroke, and studies have also shown a relationship between ischemic stroke and autoimmune diseases. In light of this we conducted a prospective cohort study to elucidate the impact of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs), antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and anti-extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies (anti-ENA) on the prognosis of ischemic stroke.

METHODS

245 stroke patients were recruited in this single-center study and followed up with for 3 years. Autoantibodies, including aPLs (ACA, anti-β2GPI, LA), ANA and anti-ENA were evaluated in recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) and nonrecurrent ischemic stroke (nonRIS). Stroke severity was judged using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). For preventive treatment, 42 IS patients with positive aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA were randomized 1:1 into a hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) treatment group and a control group, and the prognoses were compared.

RESULTS

The positive rate of ACA IgG (p = 0.018), anti-β2GPI IgG (p = 0.047), LA (p = 0.023), and aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (p = 0.000) were significantly higher in patients with RIS compared to patients with nonRIS, and aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (HR2.31, 95 % CI1.02-5.25, p = 0.046) and hypertension (HR2.50, 95 % CI1.17-5.35, p = 0.018) were the independent risk factors of recurrence. There were differences in NIHSS at month 36 between those positive and negative for aPLs + ANA/anti-ENA (p = 0.001, Eta2 = 0.052), anti-ENA (p = 0.016, Eta2 = 0.030), ANA (p = 0.035, Eta2 = 0.022), and LA (p = 0.016, Eta2 = 0.028). Furthermore, the recurrence rate of the HCQ treatment group was lower than that of the control group (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

Co-positivity of aPLs and ANA/anti-ENA is an independent risk factor for RIS. However, HCQ therapy may reduce the recurrence rate of IS for these patients.

Deciphering the clinical significance of longitudinal antiphospholipid antibody titers

In antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), the risk of clinical manifestations increases with higher titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Despite the adoption of aPL titers in the classification approach to aPL-positive subjects, the value of longitudinal monitoring of those titers in the follow-up is still debated, being well studied only in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The literature suggests that the rate of aPL positivity decreases during follow-up in primary APS, estimating that seroconversion occurs in between 8.9 and 59% of patients over time. Negativisation of aPL occurs more frequently in asymptomatic aPL carriers than in patients with full-blown APS as well as in subjects with single aPL positivity or low aPL antibody titers. In patients with SLE, aPL typically behave fluctuating from positive to negative and back again in the course of follow-up. The few studies assessing the longitudinal course of aPL positivity with no associated systemic connective tissue disease reported a progressive decrement of aPL titers over time, in particular of antibodies against β2 glycoprotein I (antiβ2GPI) and cardiolipin (aCL) of IgG isotype. After a thrombotic event, aPL titers tend to decrease, as emerged from cohorts of both primary and secondary APS. Hydroxychloroquine has been identified as the most effective pharmacological agent to reduce aPL titers, with multiple studies demonstrating a parallel reduction in thrombosis rate. This review addresses available evidence on the significance of aPL titer fluctuation from clinical, therapeutic and pathogenic perspectives.

Lupus, antiphospholipid syndrome, and stroke: An attempt to crossmatch

Cerebrovascular accidents (CVAs) or strokes are part of the common thrombotic manifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLEs) and Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Such neurological thrombotic events tend to occur in patients with SLE at a higher frequency when Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) are present, and tend to involve the large cerebral vessels. The mechanism of stroke in SLE can be driven by complement deposition and neuroinflammation involving the blood-brain barrier although the traditional cardiovascular risk factors remain major contributing factors. Primary prevention with antiplatelet therapy and disease activity controlling agent is the basis of the management. Anticoagulation via warfarin had been a tool for secondary prevention, especially in stroke recurrence, although the debate continues regarding the target international normalized ratio (INR). The presence of either of the three criteria antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and certain non-criteria aPL can be an independent risk factor for stroke. The exact mechanism for the involvement of the large cerebral arteries, especially in lupus anticoagulant (LAC) positive cases, is still to be deciphered. The data on the role of non-criteria aPL remain very limited and heterogenous, but IgA antibodies against β2GPI and the D4/5 subunit as well as aPS/PT IgG might have a contribution. Anticoagulation with warfarin has been recommended although the optimal dosing or the utility of combination with antiplatelet agents is still unknown. Minimal data is available for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs).

Loss of antiphospholipid antibody positivity post-thrombosis in SLE

Background/Purpose

Loss of positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies has been observed in clinical practice post-thrombosis in patients with SLE with secondary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Our study defined the frequency of this loss and the duration before positivity recurred.

Methods

In this prospective study, patients with SLE having at least two positive antiphospholipid markers prior to thrombosis and at least 1 year of follow-up after thrombosis were included. Antiphospholipid markers included lupus anticoagulant (dilute Russell viper venom test >45 s followed by mixing and confirmatory tests) and/or anticardiolipin titre (aCL IgG ≥20, aCL IgM ≥20 and/or aCL IgA ≥20). The percentage of visits with positive antiphospholipid markers after thrombosis was calculated. For patients with a negative antiphospholipid marker any time after thrombosis, survival estimates were performed to calculate the time to return of antiphospholipid positivity.

Results

In APS due to SLE, complete loss of antiphospholipid positivity post-thrombosis was up to 41% for aCL IgG, 51% for IgM and 50% for IgA, but only 20% for those with lupus anticoagulant. Of those who at some point lost aCL IgG or became negative for lupus anticoagulant, the majority (60% and 76%, respectively) reacquired the antibody within 5 years. In contrast, of those who lost aCL IgM or IgA, fewer reacquired it within 5 years (37% and 17%, respectively).

Conclusion

Intermittent positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies is present in APS due to SLE. These fluctuations make it difficult to decide on length of anticoagulation. Lupus anticoagulant is more likely to persist post-thrombosis.

Changes in stroke presentation in neo-Covid patients: A case study

A 35 year old male had a generalized seizure a week after symptoms of daily fever, rigors, and throat discomfort. He was hospitalized. Magnetic resonance imaging brain showed multiple bilateral scattered infarcts. COVID-19 swab test came positive. An elaborate panel of tests for young strokes, cardiac work-up was normal. At home, he complained of some visual blurring, slowing in thought processing, occasional loss of words. His face became significantly pigmented. A young male, COVID-19 positive, showed multiple scattered infarcts. Exaggerated pro-thrombotic activity of the nature of a cytokine storm, is the probable cause.

Management of patients with antiphospholipid antibodies: what to do in laboratory scenarios that do not fit the guidelines

Introduction: Some patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have not been included in randomized clinical trials or observational registries and, therefore, information on their risk of obstetric or thrombotic recurrence and optimal treatment is scarce.Areas covered: In the present review, the existing evidence regarding the management of two laboratory scenarios not covered by the guidelines is presented: (1) patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) clinical manifestations and aPL positivity not fulfilling APS laboratory criteria, and (2) the possibility of discontinuing anticoagulation in APS patients whose aPL become persistently negative.Expert opinion: Growing evidence suggests a role for low titers and 'non-criteria' aPL, especially in obstetric APS. Treatment is not formally recommended but might be considered according to the individual's risk profile. Regarding the question of whether or not to discontinue anticoagulants after the 'spontaneous' disappearance of aPL, there is no definite answer. Retrospective studies seem to suggest that withdrawal of anticoagulation could be safe in certain patients with APS, especially in those with a first provoked venous thrombosis and whose aPL became persistently negative during follow-up. Still, before the withdrawal can be recommended in routine clinical practice, multicenter and prospective studies are required to validate this hypothesis.

Thrombophilia Testing After Ischemic Stroke: Why, When, and What?

Thrombophilia testing is frequently performed after an ischemic stroke, particularly when cryptogenic. However, there is minimal evidence supporting a significant association between most conditions assessed through thrombophilia testing and ischemic stroke, and the rationale for thrombophilia testing in many clinical situations remains uncertain. In this topical review, we review and contextualize the existing data on the risks, predictors, and outcomes of thrombophilic conditions in patients with ischemic stroke. We report that inherited thrombophilias have an uncertain relationship with ischemic stroke. Conversely, antiphospholipid syndrome, an acquired immune-mediated thrombophilia, seems to be a strong risk factor for arterial thromboembolic events, including ischemic stroke, and especially among young patients. Our findings suggest that certain circumstances may warrant targeted thrombophilia testing, such as stroke in the young, cryptogenic stroke, and high estrogen states. Future prospective studies should investigate the utility and cost effectiveness of thrombophilia testing in various stroke settings, including among patients with patent foramen ovale; as well as the optimal secondary stroke prevention regimen in patients with confirmed thrombophilia, particularly if no other potential stroke mechanism is identified.

Recurrent thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and an initial venous or arterial thromboembolic event: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and thromboembolism (TE) are at risk for recurrent TE. Few studies, however, distinguish patients based on the initial event.

OBJECTIVES

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate patients with aPL and venous TE (VTE), provoked or unprovoked, and patients with arterial TE (ATE).

PATIENTS/METHODS

We conducted searches in PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were prospective trials or cohort studies investigating patients with aPL and ATE or VTE. Excluded studies did not provide estimated recurrence rates, did not specify whether the incident event was ATE or VTE, included patients with multiple events, or included <10 patients. Two-year summary proportions were estimated using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies described patients with VTE, 2 with ATE, and 5 with VTE or ATE. The 2-year proportion for recurrent TE in patients with VTE who were taking anticoagulant therapy was 0.054 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.079); the 2-year proportion for patients not taking anticoagulant therapy was 0.178 (95% CI, 0.150-0.209). Most studies did not distinguish whether VTE were provoked or unprovoked. The 2-year proportion for recurrent TE in patients with ATE who were taking anticoagulant therapy was 0.220 (95% CI, 0.149-0.311); the 2-year proportion for patients taking antiplatelet therapy was 0.216 (95% CI, 0.177-0.261).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with aPL and ATE may benefit from a different antithrombotic approach than patients with aPL and VTE. Prospective studies with well-defined cohorts with aPL and TE are necessary to determine optimal antithrombotic strategies.

Antiphospholipid syndrome and its role in pediatric cerebrovascular diseases: A literature review

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) or Hughes syndrome is an acquired thromboinflammatory disorder. Clinical criteria of APS diagnosis are large- and small-vessel thrombosis as well as obstetric problems; laboratory criteria are the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-β2-glycoprotein-1). The presence of at least 1 clinical and 1 laboratory criterion allows definitive diagnosis of APS. Primary APS is diagnosed in patients without features of connective tissue disease; secondary APS is diagnosed in patients with clinical signs of autoimmune disease. A high frequency of catastrophic APS as well as a high tendency to evolve from primary APS to secondary syndrome during the course of lupus and lupus-like disease is a feature of pediatric APS. The most characteristic clinical presentation of APS in the pediatric population is venous thrombosis, mainly in the lower limbs, and arterial thrombosis causing ischemic brain stroke. Currently, no diagnostic criteria for pediatric APS exist, which probably results in an underestimation of the problem. Similarly, no therapeutic procedures for APS specific for children have yet been established. In the present literature review, we discussed data concerning APS in children and its role in cerebrovascular diseases, including pediatric arterial ischemic stroke, migraine and cerebral venous thrombosis.

Profiles of criteria and non-criteria anti-phospholipid autoantibodies are associated with clinical phenotypes of the antiphospholipid syndrome

Background

Specific anti-phospholipids antibodies (aPLs) are used as classification criteria of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). These aPLs, although essential for diagnosis, do not predict disease phenotypes, which may require specific therapies. Non-criteria aPLs are rarely evaluated and their role is yet to be defined. In the current study, we aimed to examine the association between criteria and non-criteria aPLs and APS phenotypes.

Methods

Serum samples from 188 subjects, 130 APS patients and 58 controls were analyzed for the presence of 20 aPLs (IgG and IgM isotypes to cardiolipin (CL), beta2-glycoprotein1 (β2GP1), phosphatidic acid (P-acid), phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylglycerol (PG), phosphatidylinositol (PI), phosphatidylserine (PS), annexin-5 (AN) and prothrombin (PT) using a line immunoassay (GA Generic Assays, Germany). Sero-positivity to the different aPLs/aPLs profiles was correlated to APS phenotypes (i.e. arterial thrombosis, CNS manifestations, venous thrombosis, relapsing disease, obstetric morbidity).

Results

In this cohort, arterial thrombosis was associated with accumulative number of ≥ 7/20 aPLs evaluated (OR 4.1; CI 95% 1.9–96, p = 0.001) as well as the sole presence of aPT (IgG) (OR 2.3;CI 95% 1.1–5.1, p = 0.03). CNS manifestations were linked with a profile of 4 aPLs (IgG): aPT, aPG, aPI and aAN (OR 2.6;CI 95% 1.1–6.3, p = 0.03). Symptom-free period of ≥ 3 years was linked with lower number of aPLs and the presence of aPI (IgG) (OR 3.0;CI 95% 1.08–8.1, p < 0.05) or aAN (IgG) (OR 3.4;CI 95% 1.08–10.9, p < 0.05). APS related pregnancy morbidity correlated with a profile of 2 aPLs (IgG): aCL and aPS (OR 2.9; CI 95% 1.3–6.5, p < 0.05) or the sole presence of aAN (IgG) (OR 2.8; CI 95% 1.02–8, p = 0.05).

Conclusion

In this study, we observed an association between specific criteria/non-criteria aPLs or aPLs profiles and clinical phenotypes of APS. Our data suggest that examination of a wider variety of aPLs may allow better characterization of APS.

Recommendations of the Spanish Rheumatology Society for Primary Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Part I: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

OBJECTIVE

The difficulty in diagnosis and the spectrum of clinical manifestations that can determine the choice of treatment for primary antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has fostered the development of recommendations by the Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), based on the best possible evidence. These recommendations can serve as a reference for rheumatologists and other specialists involved in the management of APS.

METHODS

A panel of four rheumatologists, a gynaecologist and a haematologist with expertise in APS was created, previously selected by the SER through an open call or based on professional merits. The stages of the work were: identification of the key areas for drafting the document, analysis and synthesis of the scientific evidence (using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN] levels of evidence) and formulation of recommendations based on this evidence and formal assessment or reasoned judgement techniques (consensus techniques).

RESULTS

46 recommendations were drawn up, addressing five main areas: diagnosis and evaluation, measurement of primary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for APS or secondary thromboprophylaxis, treatment for obstetric APS and special situations. These recommendations also include the role of novel oral anticoagulants, the problem of recurrences or the key risk factors identified in these subjects. This document reflects the first 21, referring to the areas of: diagnosis, evaluation and treatment of primary APS. The document provides a table of recommendations and treatment algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

An update of the SER recommendations on APS is presented. This document corresponds to partI, related to diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. These recommendations are considered tools for decision-making for clinicians, taking into consideration both the decision of the physician experienced in APS and the patient. A partII has also been prepared, which addresses aspects related to obstetric SAF and special situations.

Association of Autoimmune Connective Tissue Disease and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Patients with autoimmune connective tissue disease (CTD) are at higher risk for developing aortic valve pathology, but the safety and value of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in this population has not been investigated. This study evaluated mortality, complication, and readmission rates along with length of stay and total costs after TAVI in patients with CTD. We retrospectively reviewed 47,216 patients who underwent TAVI from the National Readmissions Database between January 2011 and September 2015. Patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, rheumatoid arthritis, and other autoimmune CTD comprised the cohort. The primary outcome was mortality at index hospitalization. The 2,557 CTD patients (5.4%) had a higher Elixhauser co-morbidity index (7.1 vs 6.1, p <0.001) than non-CTD patients. CTD and non-CTD patients had similar mortality (2.8 vs 4.1%, p = 0.052), 30-day readmission (19.3 vs 17.0%, p = 0.077), length of stay (8.2 vs 8.3 days, p = 0.615), and total adjusted costs ($57,202 vs $58,309, p = 0.196), respectively. However, CTD patients were more frequently readmitted for postoperative infection (9.4 vs 5.6%, p = 0.042) and septicemia (8.2 vs 4.5%, p = 0.019). After multivariable adjustment, CTD patients faced lower mortality at index hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 0.56 [0.38 to 0.82], p = 0.003) but were more frequently readmitted for septicemia (OR = 1.95 [1.10 to 3.45], p = 0.023) and postoperative infection (OR = 3.10 [1.01 to 9.52], p = 0.048) relative to non-CTD patients. In conclusion, CTD is not a risk factor for in-hospital mortality but is an independent risk factor for infectious complications post-TAVI.

Pro‑atherogenic activation of A7r5 cells induced by the oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex

A previous study has revealed that oxidized low‑density lipoprotein (oxLDL)/β2‑glycoprotein I (β2GPI)/anti‑β2‑glycoprotein I (anti‑β2GPI), an immune complex, is able to activate the Toll‑like receptor 4 (TLR4)/nuclear factor κβ (NF‑κβ) inflammatory signaling pathway in macrophages, and consequently enhance foam cell formation and the secretion of prothrombin activators. However, the effects of the oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex on vascular smooth muscle cells have yet to be investigated. The present study investigated whether the oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex was able to reinforce the pro‑atherogenic activities of a rat thoracic aorta smooth muscle cell line (A7r5) and examined the underlying molecular mechanisms. The results revealed that the oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex treatment significantly (P<0.05 vs. the media, oxLDL, oxLDL/β2GPI and β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI groups) enhanced the pro‑atherogenic activation of A7r5 cells, including intracellular lipid loading, Acyl‑coenzyme A cholesterol acyltransferase mRNA expression, migration, matrix metalloproteinase‑9 and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 secretion, all via TLR4. In addition, the expression of TLR4 and the phosphorylation of NF‑κβ p65, p38 and ERK1/2 were also upregulated in oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex‑treated A7r5 cells. Pre‑treatment with TAK‑242, a TLR4 inhibitor, was able to partly attenuate the oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex‑induced phosphorylation of NF‑κβ p65; however, it had no effect on the phosphorylation of extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and p38. Meanwhile, the NF‑κβ p65 inhibitor ammonium pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate and the ERK1/2 inhibitor U0126, but not the p38 inhibitor SB203580, were able to block oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex‑induced foam cell formation and migration in A7r5 cells. Hence, it was demonstrated that the oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex is able to enhance the lipid uptake, migration and active molecule secretion of A7r5 cells via TLR4, and finally deteriorate atherosclerosis plaques. Additionally, it was demonstrated that oxLDL/β2GPI/anti‑β2GPI complex‑induced foam cell formation and migration may be partly mediated by the TLR4/NF‑κβ signaling pathway and that ERK1/2 may also participate in the process.

Subsequent Thrombotic Outcomes in Patients with Ischemic Stroke with Antiphospholipid Antibody Positivity

PURPOSE

International consensus criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) require persistently positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and medium or high titers in association with clinical manifestations. However, the clinical relevance of persistence and titers of aPL in patients with stroke has not been identified. We aimed to investigate the risk of subsequent thrombotic events in patients with ischemic stroke with aPL positivity in terms of aPL status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 99 patients with ischemic stroke with at least one or more aPL-positivity (i.e., positivity for aCL, anti-β2-glycoprotein-1, and/or lupus anticoagulants). The patients were divided into two groups: "definite APS" who fulfilled the laboratory criteria and "indefinite APS" who fell short of the criteria. We compared the risk of subsequent thrombotic events between the two groups. Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used for the analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 99 patients, 46 (46%) were classified as having definite APS and 53 (54%) as having indefinite APS. The mean follow-up was 51.6 months. Overall event numbers were 14 (30.4%) in definite APS and 16 (30.2%) in indefinite APS. Increased subsequent thrombotic events (hazard ratio 1.039; 95% confidence interval 0.449-2.404; p=0.930) and decreased time to thrombotic events (log-rank p=0.321) were not associated with aPL status.

CONCLUSION

There was no increased risk of subsequent thrombotic events in ischemic stroke patients with definite APS, compared with those with indefinite APS.

The impact of antibody profile in thrombosis associated with primary antiphospholipid syndrome

Triple positivity (TP) for antiphospholipid antibodies(aPL) may identify aPL carriers with poorer prognosis. The clinical impact of TP in primary antiphospholipid syndrome(PAPS) remains unclear and further clinical evidences are needed to validate TP as a marker of severity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of TP on the clinical course of PAPS with thrombosis(t-PAPS). We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort of t-PAPS patients, comparing groups of patients with TP and non-TP profiles according to their demographic, clinical and laboratory features. We included 105 patients with t-PAPS, the median follow-up time of 3.7 years. Twenty-two patients(21%) had TP; the demographic distribution, the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and the site of thrombosis were similar between TP and non-TP patients. The frequency of thrombotic events did not differ between TP and non-TP patients during the study period. Pregnancy morbidities were more frequent in women with t-PAPS and TP than in those with non-TP profile (80% vs. 52.8%, P = 0.05). Patients with t-PAPS and TP presented, at diagnosis, higher dRVVT ratio (median R = 2.44 vs. 1.57, P < 0.0001), higher aCL titer (median = 50UI vs. 35 UI, P < 0.0001), lower C3 levels (median = 1.08 vs. 1.30 mg dL^-1 , P = 0.001), lower C4 levels (median = 0.22 vs. 0.25 mg dL^-1 , P = 0.05) and higher frequency of positive ANA test (50% vs. 20%, P = 0.008) than patients with t-PAPS and non-TP. Lower-than-normal levels of C3 was independently associated with TP (OR = 5.1, P = 0.02). The presence of TP in patients with t-PAPS was associated with immune derangement, with no effect on the clinical course of the disease.

Cardiovascular risk factors are major determinants of thrombotic risk in patients with the lupus anticoagulant

BACKGROUND

Patients with the lupus anticoagulant (LA) are at an increased risk of thrombotic events, which in turn increase the risk of death. Understanding the determinants of thrombotic risk in patients with LA may pave the way towards targeted thromboprophylaxis. In the Vienna Lupus Anticoagulant and Thrombosis Study (LATS), we systematically evaluate risk factors for thrombotic events in patients with LA.

METHODS

We followed 150 patients (mean age: 41.3 years, female gender: n = 122 (81.3%), history of thrombosis or pregnancy complications: n = 111 (74.0%)), who tested repeatedly positive for LA until development of thrombosis, death, or censoring. The primary endpoint was a composite of arterial or venous thrombotic events (TEs).

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 9.5 years (range: 12 days-13.6 years) and 1076 person-years, 32 TEs occurred (arterial: n = 16, venous: n = 16; cumulative 10-year TE incidence: 24.3%). A prolonged lupus-sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT-LA) (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.07--5.02), diabetes (adjusted SHR = 4.39, 95% CI: 1.42-13.57), and active smoking (adjusted SHR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.14-5.02) emerged as independent risk factors of both arterial and venous thrombotic risk. A risk model that includes a prolonged lupus-sensitive aPTT, smoking, and diabetes enabled stratification of LA patients into subgroups with a low, intermediate, and high risk of thrombosis (5-year TE risk of 9.7% (n = 77), 30.9% (n = 51), and 56.8% (n = 22).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term thrombotic risk in patients with LA is clustered within subjects harboring typical cardiovascular risk factors in addition to a prolonged lupus-sensitive aPTT, whereas patients with none of these risk factors represent a large subgroup with a low risk of thrombosis.

Antiphosphatidylserine Antibodies and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Background and Purpose—

Antiphosphatidylserine antibodies (aPS) have been associated with the risk of ischemic stroke. However, it remains unclear whether aPS will influence clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Methods—

A total of 3013 patients with acute ischemic stroke recruited from 26 hospitals across China from August 2009 to May 2013 were included in the study The primary outcome was a combination of death and major disability (modified Rankin Scale score ≥3) at 3 months after stroke. Secondary outcomes included death, major disability, recurrent stroke, and vascular events.

Results—

Composite outcome of death and major disability rates were 29.1% versus 23.9% in aPS-positive and aPS-negative groups. Compared with aPS-negative, adjusted odds ratios or hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) associated with aPS-positive were 1.35 (1.07–1.71), 1.63 (0.99–2.69), and 1.25 (0.98–1.59) for composite outcome of death or major disability, death, and major disability, respectively. For 1 interquartile range increase of aPS, the adjusted odds ratios or hazard ratios were 1.10 (1.01–1.20), 1.19 (1.05–1.35), and 1.05 (0.96–1.14), respectively. Adding aPS status to a model containing conventional risk factors improved risk prediction for composite outcome of death or major disability (net reclassification improvement index=11.3%, P =0.006; integrated discrimination improvement=0.2%, P =0.04). There was no significant association between aPS and risks of recurrent stroke and vascular events.

Conclusions—

We found that positive aPS increased risks of death or major disability at 3 months after an acute ischemic stroke, suggesting that aPS might be a prognostic marker for ischemic stroke.