Esophageal Endosonography for the Diagnosis of Intrapulmonary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Added value of EUS-B-FNA to bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer

Background

Bronchoscopy and EBUS are standard procedures in lung cancer work-up but have low diagnostic yield in lesions outside the central airways and hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes. Growing evidence on introducing the EBUS endoscope into the oesophagus (EUS-B) in the same session as bronchoscopy/EBUS gives access to new anatomical areas that can be safely biopsied.

Objective

To summarize the current evidence of the added value of EUS-B-FNA to bronchoscopy and EBUS-TBNA in lung cancer work-up.

Methods

A narrative review.

Results

Few randomized trials or prospective studies are available. Prospective studies show that add-on EUS-B-FNA increases diagnostic yield when sampling abnormal mediastinal lymph nodes, para-oesophageal lung and left adrenal gland. A large retrospective series on EUS-B-FNA from retroperitoneal lymph nodes suggests high diagnostic yield without safety concerns, as do casuistic reports on EUS-B-FNA from mediastinal pleural thickening, pancreatic lesions, ascites fluid and pericardial effusions. No study has systematically assessed both diagnostic yield, safety, patient reported outcomes, adverse events and costs.

Conclusion

The diagnostic value of add-on EUS-B to standard bronchoscopy and EBUS in lung cancer work-up appears very promising without safety concerns, giving the pulmonologist access to a variety of sites out of reach with other minimally invasive techniques. Little is known on patient-reported outcomes and costs. Future and prospective research should focus on effectiveness aspects to clarify whether overall benefits of add-on EUS-B sufficiently exceed overall downsides.

Improved Accuracy and Sensitivity in Diagnosis and Staging of Lung Cancer with Systematic and Combined Endobronchial and Endoscopic Ultrasound (EBUS-EUS): Experience from a Tertiary Center

BACKGROUND

Combined endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) are accurate procedures for the diagnosis and staging of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) in lung cancer. However, the respective contribution of separate and combined procedures in diagnosis and staging has not been fully studied. The aim of this study was to assess their respective performances.

METHODS

Patients with suspected malignant MLNs in lung cancer or recurrence identified by PET-CT who underwent combined EBUS-TBNA and EUS-TA were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients underwent both procedures. Correct diagnosis was obtained in 82% with EBUS-TBNA, 91% with EUS-TA, and 94% with the combined procedure. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of EBUS-TBNA, EUS-TA, and the combined procedure for diagnosing malignancy were [75%, 100%, 100%, 58%], [87%, 100%, 100%, 75%], and [93%, 100%, 100%, 80%], respectively, with a significantly better sensitivity of the combined procedure (p < 0.0001). Staging (82/141 patients) was correctly assessed in 74% with EBUS-TBNA, 68% with EUS-TA, and 85% with the combined procedure. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EBUS-TBNA, EUS-TA, and the combined procedure for lung cancer staging were [62%, 100%, 100%, 55%], [54%, 100%, 100%, 50%], and [79%, 100%, 100%, 68%], respectively, significantly better in terms of sensitivity for the combined procedure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combined EBUS-EUS approach in lung cancer patients showed better accuracy and sensitivity in diagnosis and staging when compared with EBUS-TBNA and EUS-TA alone.

Performance of EUS-FNA and EUS-B-FNA for the diagnosis of left adrenal glands metastases in patients with lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

For diagnosing left adrenal gland metastasis in lung cancer, clinical guidelines recommend to perform EUS, but EUS-B (EUS using an EBUS-scope) is increasingly being used. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of both procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We did a systematic review (PROSPERO, CRD42023416205) and searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 04-July-2023 for studies evaluating EUS and/or EUS-B in diagnosing left adrenal gland metastases in adults with (suspected) lung cancer. Outcomes were: (1) ability to visualize the left adrenal gland, (2) ability to sample (in those with successful visualization and in whom sampling was attempted), (3) ability to obtain adequate material (in those with successful sampling), (4) malignancy detection rate (in those with successful sampling), and (5) remaining risk of malignancy (in those with a negative EUS(-B)-FNA and undergoing a reference standard). We performed random-effects meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We included 19 studies (EUS: n = 11, EUS-B: n = 6, both: n = 2), covering 1712 patients. All studies had high (n = 18) or unclear (n = 1) risk of bias (QUADAS-2). Average ability to visualize the left adrenal gland was 0.94 (95 %CI 0.82-0.98; n = 7 studies). Average ability to sample was 1.00 (95 %CI 0.99-1.00; n = 9). Average ability to obtain adequate material was 0.96 (95 %CI 0.93-0.98; n = 18). Average malignancy detection rate was 0.42 (95 %CI 0.34-0.49; n = 18). Remaining risk of malignancy was 0.07 (95 %CI 0.04-0.12; n = 8). Ability to visualize was slightly higher for EUS (0.99; 95 %CI 0.90-1.00) than EUS-B (0.84; 95 %CI 0.70-0.92; p = 0.025), but the other performance characteristics were similar. No major complications were reported.

CONCLUSION

Both EUS and EUS-B have good performance and are safe for left adrenal gland analysis in patients with lung cancer, but the number of high-quality studies is limited and further well-constructed prospective studies are needed.

[Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy, and Follow-up of Lung Cancer - Interdisciplinary Guideline of the German Respiratory Society and the German Cancer Society - Abridged Version]

The current S3 Lung Cancer Guidelines are edited with fundamental changes to the previous edition based on the dynamic influx of information to this field:The recommendations include de novo a mandatory case presentation for all patients with lung cancer in a multidisciplinary tumor board before initiation of treatment, furthermore CT-Screening for asymptomatic patients at risk (after federal approval), recommendations for incidental lung nodule management , molecular testing of all NSCLC independent of subtypes, EGFR-mutations in resectable early stage lung cancer in relapsed or recurrent disease, adjuvant TKI-therapy in the presence of common EGFR-mutations, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibitors in resected lung cancer with PD-L1 ≥ 50%, obligatory evaluation of PD-L1-status, consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition after radiochemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-pos. tumor, adjuvant consolidation treatment with checkpoint inhibition in patients withPD-L1 ≥ 50% stage IIIA and treatment options in PD-L1 ≥ 50% tumors independent of PD-L1status and targeted therapy and treatment option immune chemotherapy in first line SCLC patients.Based on the current dynamic status of information in this field and the turnaround time required to implement new options, a transformation to a "living guideline" was proposed.

Safety and feasibility of oesophageal ultrasound for the work-up of thoracic malignancy in patients with respiratory impairment

Biopsying lung tumours with endobronchial access in patients with respiratory impairment is challenging. However, fine needle aspiration with the endobronchial ultrasound-endoscope via the oesophagus (EUS-B-FNA) makes it possible to obtain tissue samples without entering the airways. Safety of EUS-B-FNA in these patients has not earlier been investigated prospectively. Therefore, this study aimed at assessing feasibility and safety of EUS-B-FNA from centrally located tumours suspected of thoracic malignancy in patients with respiratory insufficiency. The study is a prospective observational study. Patients with indication of EUS-B-FNA of centrally located tumours and respiratory impairment defined as modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea scale score of ≥3, saturation ≤90% or need of continuous oxygen supply were included prospectively in three centres. Any adverse events (AEs) were recorded during procedure and 1-hour recovery. AEs were defined as hypoxemia (saturation <90% or need for increased oxygen supply) or any kind of events needing intervention. Late procedure-related events were recorded during 30-day follow-up. Between April 1, 2020 and January 30, 2021, 16 patients were included. No severe AEs (SAEs) occurred, but AEs were seen in 50% (n=8) and 13% (n=2) of the patients during procedure and recovery respectively. AEs included hypoxemia corrected with increased oxygen supply and in two cases reversal of sedation. Late procedure-related events were seen in 13% (n=2) and included prolonged need of oxygen and one infection treated with oral antibiotics. In this cohort, EUS-B-FNA of centrally located tumours was safe and feasible in patients with respiratory impairment, when examined in the bronchoscopy suite. A variety of mostly mild and manageable complications may occur, a few even up to 30 days post-procedure.

Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of lung masses: a case series with systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The diagnosis of intraparenchymal lung masses is challenging when lesions are located at sites inaccessible through bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA)-fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or fine-needle biopsy-provides a potentially useful diagnostic tool for lesions located adjacent to the esophagus. This study was conducted to analyze the diagnostic outcome and safety of EUS-guided tissue sampling of lung masses.

Methods

Data were retrieved for patients who underwent transesophageal EUS-guided TA between May 2020 and July 2022 at 2 tertiary care centers. A meta-analysis was performed after pooling these data with studies obtained from a comprehensive search of Medline, Embase, and ScienceDirect from January 2000 to May 2022. Pooled event rates across studies were expressed with summative statistics.

Results

After screening, 19 studies were identified and, after their data had been combined with those of 14 patients from our centers, a total of 640 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled rate of sample adequacy was 95.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 93.1-97.8), while the pooled rate of diagnostic accuracy was 93.4% (95%CI 90.7-96.1). The pooled rate of adverse events with transesophageal EUS-guided TA from lung masses was 0.7% (95%CI 0.0-1.6%). There was no significant heterogeneity with respect to various outcomes and results were comparable on sensitivity analysis.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA offers a safe and accurate diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of paraesophageal lung masses. Future studies are needed to determine the needle type and techniques for improving outcomes.

EUS-B-FNA Enhances the Diagnostic Yield of EBUS Bronchoscope for Intrathoracic Lesions

INTRODUCTION

Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) bronchoscopes have been used mainly through the airway for EBUS-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA); however, they can also be used through the esophagus. The esophageal approach, endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA), has gradually become popular, as it can evaluate lesions that cannot be accessed through the airway.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the value of adding EUS-B-FNA to EBUS-TBNA performed by pulmonologists for intrathoracic lesions in the clinical setting.

METHODS

Between March 2009 and March 2020, all patients who underwent EUS-B-FNA and EBUS-TBNA for diagnostic purposes were included and retrospectively analyzed at a single institution.

RESULTS

A total of 1794 procedures using an EBUS bronchoscope including, EBUS-TBNA, EUS-B-FNA, and the combination of EBUS-TBNA and EUS-B-FNA for evaluating intrathoracic lesions, were performed. We finally analyzed 276 patients who underwent EUS-B-FNA for diagnostic purposes. EUS-B-FNA provided diagnostic materials from only EBUS-TBNA-inaccessible lesions in 26 patients and in 18 patients whose conditions were inappropriate for bronchoscopy (e.g., respiratory failure, airway stenosis, etc.). EUS-B-FNA provided diagnostic results in four patients with non-diagnostic EBUS-TBNA results. EUS-B-FNA was preferable to EBUS-TBNA in 4.4% (48 of 1091) of patients; therefore, adding EUS-B-FNA to EBUS-TBNA increased the diagnostic yield from 72.6% (1043 of 1437) to 75.9% (1091 of 1437).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonologists are able to enhance diagnostic yields by acquiring the EUS-B-FNA technique.

Transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of the lung masses: a multicenter experience with fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy needles

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Intraparenchymal lung masses inaccessible through bronchoscopy or endobronchial ultrasound guidance pose a diagnostic challenge. Furthermore, some fragile or hypoxic patients may be poor candidates for transbronchial approaches. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/FNB) offers a potential diagnostic approach to lung cancers adjacent to the esophagus. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of trans-esophageal EUS-FNA/FNB for tissue sampling of pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with pulmonary lesions who underwent EUS-FNA/FNB between March 2015 and August 2021 at eight Italian endoscopic referral centers.

RESULTS

A total of 47 patients (36 male; mean age 64.47 ± 9.05 years) were included (22 EUS-FNAs and 25 EUS-FNBs). Overall diagnostic accuracy rate was 88.9% (76.3-96.2%). The sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were superior for EUS FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.73%); P = 0.05, and (100% vs. 78.57%); P = 0.05, respectively. Additionally, sample adequacy was superior for EUS-FNB sampling versus EUS-FNA (100% vs. 78.5%); P = 0.05. Multivariate logistic regression analysis for diagnostic accuracy showed nodule size at the cutoff of 15 mm (OR 2.29, 1.04-5.5, P = 0.05) and use of FNB needle (OR 4.33, 1.05-6.31, P = 0.05) as significant predictors of higher diagnostic accuracy. There were no procedure-related adverse events.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the efficacy and safety of EUS-FNA/FNB as a minimally invasive procedure for diagnosing and staging peri-esophageal parenchymal lung lesions. The diagnostic yield of EUS-FNB was superior to EUS-FNA.

Practical approach to linear EUS examination of the mediastinum

EUS has become a substantial diagnostic and therapeutic modality for many anatomical regions. The extent of endosonographic assessment is wide, and among others, allows for the evaluation of the mediastinal anatomy and related pathologies such as mediastinal lymphadenopathy and staging of central malignant lung lesions. Moreover, EUS assessment has proved more accurate in detecting small lesions missed by standard imaging examinations such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance. Endosonographically, various mediastinal anatomical landmarks and stations can be visualized by transesophageal scanning, thus providing arranged systematic examination of the mediastinum. In addition, the correct position during the examination is crucial for EUS-guided procedures such as tissue sampling and drainage of mediastinal abscesses. The evolution of EUS-guided diagnostic and interventional procedures has contributed to the increasing importance of understanding the mediastinal anatomy during the EUS examination.

Endobronchial ultrasound in diagnosing and staging of lung cancer by Acquire 22G TBNB versus regular 22G TBNA needles: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Accurate diagnosis and staging of lung cancer is crucial because it directs treatment and prognosis. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) are important in this process by sampling hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes and centrally located lung tumours. With the upcoming of immunotherapy and targeted therapies, assessment of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and molecular profiling has become important but is often impossible in cytological samples obtained through standard 22G TBNA needles. Recently, a three-pronged cutting edge 22G needle was developed that allows for transbronchial needle biopsy (TBNB). Our objective is to determine if EBUS/EUS-B-guided nodal/lung tumour sampling with Acquire 22G TBNB needles results in an improved suitability rate for the assessment of PD-L1 expression in comparison to standard 22G TBNA needles in patients with a final diagnosis of lung cancer.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an investigator-initiated, parallel group randomised clinical trial. Patients are recruited at respiratory medicine outpatient clinics of participating university and general hospitals in the Netherlands, Poland and Italy. In total 158 adult patients with (suspected) lung cancer are included if they have an indication for mediastinal/hilar lymph node or lung tumour sampling by EBUS-TBNA and/or EUS-B-FNA based on current clinical guidelines. Web-based randomisation between the two needles will be performed. Samples obtained from mediastinal/hilar lymph nodes and/or primary tumour will be processed for cytology smears and cell block analysis and reviewed by blinded reference pathologists. An intention-to-treat analysis will be applied. Patients with missing data will be excluded from analysis for that specific variable but included in the analysis of other variables. This study is financially supported by Boston Scientific.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (Medisch Ethische Toetsingscommissie Amsterdam Medical Center (AMC)). Dissemination will involve publication in a peer-reviewed biomedical journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL7701; Pre-results.

Endobronchial ultrasound for T4 staging in patients with resectable NSCLC

BACKGROUND

In lung cancer patients, accurate assessment of mediastinal and vascular tumor invasion (stage T4) is crucial for optimal treatment allocation and to prevent unnecessary thoracotomies. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) for T4-status in patients with centrally located lung cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study among consecutive patients who underwent EBUS for diagnosis and staging of lung cancer in four hospitals in The Netherlands (Amsterdam, Leiden), Italy (Bologna) and Poland (Zakopane) between 04-2012 and 04-2019. Patients were included if the primary tumor was detected by EBUS and subsequent surgical-pathological staging was performed, which served as the reference standard. T4-status was extracted from EBUS and pathology reports. Chest CT's were re-reviewed for T4-status.

RESULTS

104 patients with lung cancer in whom EBUS detected the primary tumour, and who underwent subsequent surgical-pathological staging were included. 36 patients (35 %) had T4-status, based on vascular (n = 17), mediastinal (n = 15), both vascular and mediastinal (n = 3), or oesophageal invasion (n = 1). For EBUS, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for T4-status were (n = 104): 63.9 % (95 %CI 46.2-79.2 %), 92.6 % (83.7-97.6 %), 82.1 % (65.6-91.7 %), and 82.9 % (75.7-88.2 %), respectively. For chest CT (n = 72): 61.5 % (95 %CI 40.6-79.8 %), 37.0 % (23.2-52.5 %), 35.6 % (27.5-44.6 %), and 63.0 % (47.9-75.9 %), respectively. When combining CT and EBUS with concordant T4 status (n = 33): 90.9 % (95 %CI 58.7-99.8 %), 77.3 % (54.6-92.20 %), 66.7 % (47.5-81.6 %), and 94.4 % (721-99.1%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Both EBUS and CT alone are inaccurate for assessing T4-status as standalone test. However, combining a negative EBUS with a negative CT may rule out T4-status with high certainty.

Complications of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration: A Narrative Review

Considerable progress has been made recently in the use of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) to diagnose intra-luminal gastrointestinal lesions and extra-luminal lesions near the gastrointestinal tract. Numerous reports have indicated that EUS-FNA has high diagnostic performance and safety, which has led to the routine use of EUS-FNA and an increasing number of cases. Thus, while EUS-FNA has a low rate of complications, endoscopists may encounter these complications as the number of cases increases. Infrequent reports have also described life-threatening complications. Therefore, endoscopists should possess a comprehensive understanding of the complications of EUS-FNA, which include hemorrhage, perforation, infection, and acute pancreatitis, as well as their management. This review examines the available evidence regarding the complications associated with EUS-FNA, and the findings will be useful for ensuring that endoscopists perform EUS-FNA safely and appropriately.

Endoscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal melanoma

Background: Gastrointestinal (GI) melanoma can be diagnosed by endoscopy combined with biopsy and subsequent pathological examination. However, the disease may be misdiagnosed due to the limited awareness of GI melanoma.Objective: We aimed to describe characteristics of GI melanoma that can be detected by endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with GI melanoma diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy or postoperative pathology between August 2008 and January 2017. Images of endoscopic examinations, including endoscopy and EUS, were reviewed to characterize GI melanomas.Results: A total of 21 patients (9 males, 12 females) with GI melanoma were enrolled in this study. Several types of melanoma were identified: anorectal melanoma (n = 15), esophageal melanoma (n = 3), gastric melanoma (n = 2), and melanoma of the small intestine (n = 1). EUS was performed for one case of esophageal melanoma, one case of gastric melanoma, and seven cases of anorectal melanoma.Conclusions: GI melanoma is a rare disease. Most GI melanomas showed typical endoscopic manifestations, including black plaques. EUS is a reliable tool for evaluating the depth of infiltration of GI melanoma.

EUS-B for suspected left adrenal metastasis in lung cancer

Background

Several studies have reported the efficacy of esophageal ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for the detection of metastases in the left adrenal gland (LAG) in patients with lung cancer. Currently we have only limited evidence based on small studies on the usefulness of EUS-B [endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) scope into the esophagus] to provide tissue proof of suspected LAG metastases. The objectives of this study are to investigate feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of EUS-B-FNA in LAG analysis in patients with proven or suspected lung cancer.

Methods

In two Danish hospitals, a systematic search in the electronic database for patients who underwent EUS-B-FNA of the LAG for suspected or proven lung cancer was performed retrospectively between January 1st, 2015 and December 31st, 2017. Computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography-CT, endoscopy, pathology and follow-up data were acquired.

Results

One hundred and thirty-five patients were included; the prevalence of biopsy proven LAG malignancy was 30% (40/135). A total of 87% (117/135) of EUS-B-FNA samples were adequate (i.e., containing adrenal or malignant cells). No complications were observed.

Conclusions

We present the largest cohort of patients ever reported showing that EUS-B-FNA of the LAG is a safe and feasible procedure and should therefore be used for staging purposes in patients with lung cancer and a suspicious LAG.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy in the hands of the pulmonologist

The use of the endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) endoscope in the oesophagus, the so-called EUS-B procedure, for the diagnosis and staging of thoracic malignancy is quickly gaining ground. Pleural lesions located close to the oesophagus can be inaccessible to transthoracic biopsy and endoscopic procedures can be the only option. We here present two cases demonstrating that EUS-B-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) of pleural lesions is possible. The first case demonstrates a EUS-B-FNA with malignant mesothelioma of a pleural lesion in a 70-year-old patient. In the second case, EUS-B-FNA diagnosed a pleural metastasis from adenoid cystic adenocarcinoma in a 75-year-old-patient. In conclusion, we hereby demonstrate that EUS-B-FNA from pleural lesions is feasible and appears to be safe.

EUS-B-FNA for Diagnosing Liver and Celiac Metastases in Lung Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

In patients with suspected or proven lung cancer, assessment of regional nodal and distant metastases is key before treatment planning. By introducing the endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided scope into the esophagus and stomach (EUS-B), liver lesions and celiac nodes can be visualized. To date, the utility of EUS-B in diagnosing liver lesions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of sampling of liver lesions and retroperitoneal nodes by EUS-B fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in a lung cancer staging setting.

METHOD

Consecutive patients suspected of lung cancer in 2 Danish centers between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2017 were included retrospectively when a lesion in the liver or a retroperitoneal lymph node was visualized and biopsied with EUS-B-FNA.

RESULTS

23 left liver lobe lesions and 19 retroperitoneal lymph nodes were sampled by EUS-B-FNA. Sensitivity and diagnostic yield of sampled liver lesions were 86 and 83%, respectively. In 19/23 patients, there was a cytopathological diagnosis of malignancy. Sensitivity and diagnostic yield from retroperitoneal lymph node samples were 83 and 63%, respectively. In 10/19 patients, the diagnosis was malignancy. No complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

EUS-B-FNA enables safe sampling of left liver lobe lesions and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. EUS-B should be considered as a minimally invasive technique to provide tissue proof of distant metastases lung cancer patients.

Sampling Utility of the Convex Probe Endobronchial Ultrasound Visible Intrapulmonary Lesion

BACKGROUND

The value of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the mediastinal staging of lung cancer has been well established. However, data regarding its utility in the diagnosis of intrapulmonary lesions has been sparse. This study assesses the sampling utility of convex probe EBUS-visible intrapulmonary lesions not visualized by the white-light bronchoscopy.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of EBUS-TBNA of EBUS-visible intrapulmonary lesions was performed between January 2010 and March 2015. Patients with visible endobronchial lesions by white-light bronchoscopy were excluded from analysis.

RESULTS

Among 108 procedures, the diagnostic yield of EBUS-TBNA for EBUS-visible intrapulmonary lesions was 87%. Following diagnoses were established: lung cancer (73/67.6%), lung metastases (10/9.2%), infection (5/4.6%), lymphoma (1/<1%), sarcoma/spindle cell sarcoma or neoplasm (3/2.8%), unspecified malignancy (1<1%), and hamartoma (1/<1%). EBUS-TBNA was nondiagnostic in 14 (13%); among these, 9 turned out to have benign disease based on additional bronchoscopy samples or other testing and/or follow-up imaging. Five were ultimately diagnosed with a malignant condition: lymphoma (1), epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (1), and non-small cell lung cancer (3). The sensitivity and the negative predicted value of EBUS-TBNA for differentiating malignancy from benign disease was 94.7% and 75%, respectively, while the accuracy for diagnosing the neoplastic disease was 95.3%. There was one major bleeding requiring bronchial artery embolization and 1 pneumothorax requiring chest tube drainage.

CONCLUSION

EBUS-TBNA is safe and effective in the diagnosis of EBUS-visible intrapulmonary lesions. It should be considered as the diagnostic test of choice in patients with these lesions undergoing EBUS-TBNA for the staging of suspected lung cancer.

Endoscopic Ultrasound with Bronchoscope-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Paraesophageally Located Lung Lesions

BACKGROUND

Diagnosing centrally located lung tumors without endobronchial abnormalities and not located near the major airways is a diagnostic challenge. Tumors near or adjacent to the esophagus can be aspirated and detected with esophageal ultrasound (EUS) using gastrointestinal endoscopes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA) in paraesophageally located lung tumors and its added value to bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS).

METHODS

Retrospective, multicenter international study (from January 1, 2015 until January 1, 2018) of patients with suspected lung cancer, undergoing bronchoscopy, EBUS, and endoscopic ultrasound bronchoscopy (EUS-B) in one session by a single operator (pulmonologist), in whom the primary lung tumor was detected and aspirated by EUS-B. In the absence of malignancy following endoscopy, transthoracic ultrasound needle aspiration, clinical and radiological follow-up of at least 6 months was performed. The yield and sensitivity of EUS-B-FNA and its added value to bronchoscopy and EBUS was assessed.

RESULTS

58 patients were identified with the following diagnosis: non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 43), small-cell lung cancer (n = 6), mesothelioma (n = 2), metastasis (n = 1), nonmalignant (n = 6). The yield and sensitivity of EUS-B-FNA for detecting lung cancer was 90%. In 26 patients (45%), the intrapulmonary tumor was exclusively detected by EUS-B. Adding EUS-B to conventional bronchoscopy and EBUS increased the diagnostic yield for diagnosing lung cancer in para-esophageally located lung tumors from 51 to 91%. No EUS-B-related complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

EUS-B-FNA is a feasible and safe technique for diagnosing centrally located intrapulmonary tumors that are located near or adjacent to the esophagus. EUS-B should be considered in the same endoscopy session following nondiagnostic bronchoscopy and EBUS.

Present status and perspectives of endosonography 2017 in gastroenterology

Endoscopic ultrasound has become an essential tool in modern gastroenterology and abdominal surgery. Compared with all other endoscopic methods, it has the most potential for innovation and its future looks bright. Thus, we compiled this summary of established and novel applications of endoscopic ultrasound methods to inform the reader about what is already possible and where future developments will lead in improving patient care further. This review is structured in four parts. The first section reports on developments in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound, the second looks at semi-invasive endoscopic ultrasound, and the third discusses advances in therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound. An overview on the future prospects of endoscopic ultrasound methods concludes this article.

Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration by experienced pulmonologists: a cusum analysis

Endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS TBNA) is an established, minimally invasive way to sample intrathoracic abnormalities. The EBUS scope can be passed into the oesophagus to perform endoscopic ultrasound with bronchoscope-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-B-FNA). In cases of suspected lung cancer, a combination of the two techniques is now recommended by consensus guidelines. EBUS TBNA is usually performed by pulmonologists; however, the learning curve for EUS-B-FNA, which may be performed during the same procedure, has not been described.A multicentre, observational Australian study, using prospectively collected data from three experienced pulmonologists was conducted. Cumulative sum (cusum) analysis was used to generate visual learning curves.A total of 152 target lesions were sampled in 137 patients, with an overall sensitivity for malignancy of 94.8%. The sensitivity for malignant lesions outside of the 2009 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer lymph node map (largely intraparenchymal lesions) was 92.9%. All three operators were competent by conventional cusum criteria. There was one case of pneumothorax, and no episodes of mediastinitis or oesophageal perforation were observed.Our data suggest that experienced pulmonologists can safely and accurately perform EUS-B-FNA, with a high diagnostic sensitivity for both lymph node and non-nodal lesions.