Effectiveness and Safety of Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant (Ozurdex) in Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: A Real-World Experience

Real-world effectiveness of intravitreal dexamethasone implants - Comparison between eyes eligible and ineligible for clinical trials and their associated outcomes

BACKGROUND

Concerns about the generalizability of pivotal randomized controlled trials (pRCTs) findings have been raised. We aimed to compare intravitreal dexamethasone implants' (IDIs) effectiveness for diabetic macular edema (DME) and central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO), between eyes eligible and ineligible for pRCTs.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed Taiwan's Chang Gung Research Database, including DME or CRVO eyes initiating IDIs during 2015-2020. We classified all treated eyes as eligible or ineligible for pRCTs following major selection criteria of the MEAD and GENEVA trials, and evaluated three-, six-, and twelve-month changes in central retinal thickness (CRT) and visual acuity (VA) after initiating IDIs.

RESULTS

We included 177 IDI-treated eyes (DME: 72.3%; CRVO: 27.7%), of which 39.8% and 55.1% were ineligible for DME and CRVO pRCTs, respectively. LogMAR-VA and CRT changes at different times were comparable in DME eyes eligible (LogMAR-VA difference: 0.11 to 0.16; CRT difference: -32.7 to -96.9 μm) and ineligible (LogMAR-VA difference: -0.01 to 0.15; CRT difference: -54.5 to -109.3 μm) for the MEAD trial. By contrast, CRVO eyes ineligible for the GENEVA trial had greater LogMAR-VA changes (0.37 ~ 0.50) than those eligible (0.05 ~ 0.13), with comparable CRT reductions (eligible eyes: -72.3 to -106.4 μm; ineligible eyes: -61.8 to -110.7 μm) (all p-values <0.05 of the mean differences between eligible and ineligible CRVO eyes for all follow-ups).

CONCLUSIONS

IDIs had similar VA and CRT outcomes among DME eyes, regardless of pRCT-eligibility. However, among CRVO eyes, those ineligible for pRCTs showed greater deterioration in VA than those eligible.

Influence of prior treatment protocol on intravitreal dexamethasone implant behavior in patients with diabetic macular edema in real-world practice

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEXI) has been placed as an effective option to treat diabetic macular edema (DME). However, there is no consensus on the best time to introduce it. We conducted a study to evaluate anatomical and functional behavior after the first DEXI according to previous treatment.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective, real-world study between 2013 and 2020 investigated changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT at months 2 and 6 after the first DEXI in DME. Patients were divided into naive, early switch (≤3 anti-VEGF injections), or late switch (>3 anti-VEGF injections) groups.

RESULTS

Among 112 consecutive eyes, mean BCVA and CMT improved significantly in all groups at month 2, with no difference between them. However, this improvement was not maintained at 6 months. The Naíve group presented better BCVA all over the study period. The previously treated groups, which started with worse initial visual acuity, showed more visual gain without reaching the BCVA of the naive group. CMT performance was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There was similar anatomical and functional behavior in all groups. Poorer visual acuity at baseline was associated with worse functional outcome despite good anatomic response.

Safety and Efficacy of Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant Given Either First-Line or Second-Line in Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common sight-threatening complication of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the leading cause of severe visual impairment among the working-age population. Several therapeutic options are available for the management of DME, including intravitreal corticosteroids. They have been traditionally used as second-line treatment, due to the risk of intraocular pressure increase and cataract-related adverse events. However, attention has recently been focused on the primary or early use of intravitreal corticosteroids, due to growing evidence of the crucial role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of DME. Furthermore, intravitreal steroid implants offer the additional advantage of a longer duration of action compared to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents (anti-VEGF). This review aims to summarize the available evidence on the efficacy and safety profile of dexamethasone (DEX) intravitreal implant, with a specific focus on clinical scenarios in which it might be considered or even preferred as first-line treatment option by adequate selection of patients, considering both advantages and possible adverse events. Patients with contraindications to anti-VEGF, DME with high inflammatory OCT biomarkers, pseudophakic patients and phakic patients' candidates to cataract surgery as well as vitrectomized eyes may all benefit from first-line DEX implant. Additionally, DME not responders to anti-VEGF should be considered for a switch to DEX implant and a combination therapy of DEX implant and anti-VEGF could be a valid option in severe and persistent DME.

Accuracy of biomicroscopy, ultrasonography and spectral-domain OCT in detection of complete posterior vitreous detachment

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the accuracy of preoperative biomicroscopy (BM), ultrasonography (US), and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) to determine complete posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) confirmed by intraoperative findings of triamcinolone acetonide-assisted pars plana vitrectomy (PPV).

METHODS

This prospective study included all consecutive patients admitted for surgical treatment of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) and macular hole (MH). The presence of complete PVD was determined one day before PPV using BM, US, SD-OCT. The preoperative findings were compared to the PVD status determined during PPV.

RESULTS

A total of 123 eyes from 123 patients were included in the study. Indications for PPV included ERM in 57 (46.3%), full thickness macular hole in 57 (46.3%) and lamellar macular hole in 9 (7.3%) patients. Complete PVD during PPV was observed in 18 (31.6%; 95%CI:18.7-49.9) patients with ERM and 13 (19.7%; 95%CI:10.4-33.7) patients with MH. The sensitivity of preoperative BM, US, SD-OCT was 48.4% (95%CI:30.2-66.9), 61.3% (95%CI:42.2-78.2) and 54.8% (95%CI:36.0-72.7) respectively. The specificity of preoperative BM, US, SD-OCT was 81.5% (95%CI:72.1-88.9), 90.2% (95%CI:82.2-95.4) and 85.9% (95%CI:77.0-92.3) respectively. With a prevalence of 25.2% of PVD in our sample the positive predictive value of preoperative BM, US, SD-OCT was 46.9% (95%CI:29.1-65.3), 67.9% (95%CI:47.6-84.1) and 56.7% (95%CI:37.4-74.5) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative BM, US, and SD-OCT showed relatively low sensitivity but also good specificity in assessing complete PVD. A combination of all three diagnostic methods can provide a good assessment of the vitreoretinal interface state.

Anterior segment complications after dexamethasone implantations:real world data

PURPOSE

We aim to contribute to the literature in terms of treatment safety with our real world data by examining the anterior segment complications and follow-up results of patients who underwent dexamethasone implants in our clinic.

METHODS

The records of patients treated with at least one intravitreal dexamethasone implant for various retinal diseases: diabetic macular edema (265 eyes), central retinal vein occlusion (45 eyes), retinal vein branch occlusion (91 eyes), postoperative cystoid macular edema (18 eyes), non-infectious uveitis (37 eyes) and other (14 eyes) between July 2013 and April 2020 were reviewed.

RESULTS

After 925 injections were applied to 470 eyes of a total of 383 patients, the eyes were controlled during a mean follow-up of 24 months. No complications were detected in 328 eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) above 25 mmHg was detected in 97 eyes (20.6%) that had no previous history of ocular hypertension. Of these 97 eyes, 71 (73.1%) eyes with increased IOP were treated with topical monotherapy, 26 (26.8%) eyes were treated with topical combined therapy and 1 (1.03%) patient had glaucoma surgery. Cataracts requiring surgical intervention developed in 55 (%21.73) of 253 phakic eyes. Three patients have anterior chamber dislocation of dexamethasone, 1 patient was hospitalized with sterile endophthalmitis on the 7th day after the injection, and pars plana vitrectomy was performed.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first long-term follow-up study in our country evaluating the safety of dexamethasone implant injections in various retinal diseases and presenting the first real world data. Cataract progression and increased IOP were found to be the most common side effects. We observed that the patient's diagnosis did not cause a statistically significant change in the observation of side effects. As a result of our findings, close follow-up of IOP after the injection of dexamethasone implants would be appropriate.

Efficacy and safety of pan retinal photocoagulation combined with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

High-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (HR-PDR) is the advanced stage of diabetic retinopathy progression with poor prior treatment efficacy and high rates of blindness. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP) combined with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (aVEGF) (PRP + aVEGF) versus PRP monotherapy in HR-PDR patients.

METHODS

A thorough search was performed through PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochran Library from inception to December 18, 2022. Outcome measures included change in central macular thickness, best-corrected visual acuity, fluorescein angiography, incidence of undergoing vitrectomy, and adverse events during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

Eight studies (6 randomized controlled trials and 2 retrospective studies) with 375 eyes were included in this meta-analysis. There were no obvious differences in the changes of best-corrected visual acuity and fluorescein angiography between the PRP + aVEGF and PRP monotherapy groups. However, PRP + aVEGF group had a significant reduction in the change of central macula thickness (standard mean deviations = -1.44, 95%CI = -2.55 to -0.32, P = .01) and the rate of undergoing vitrectomy (odds ratio = 0.20, 95%CI = 0.05-0.83, P = .01). Additionally, the risks of vitreous hemorrhage and other complications were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS

Our meta-analysis indicated that PRP + aVEGF might have potential benefits in the treatment of HR-PDR patients. However, given several limitations of this study, more research is needed to confirm our findings.

In Vivo Electroporation Improves Retinal Delivery of Intravitreally Injected Exosomes

Purpose: Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes are promising therapeutic agents and natural nanoscale delivery platforms for treating degenerative retinal diseases. This study investigated the effect of electroporation on the retinal delivery of intravitreally administered MSC-derived exosomes in a murine model. Methods: Exosomes isolated from adipose tissue-derived MSCs were stained with ExoGlow exosome-specific dye and administered to the right eyes of 40 Sprague-Dawley rats. Electroporation was performed in 20 rats immediately after intravitreal injection (electroporation group); 5 square pulses of 40 V/cm for 50 ms each with 950-ms intervals were administered. The remaining 20 rats were assigned to the no-electroporation group. The eyeballs were harvested 24 h later for evaluation. The total number of fluorescent particles per hyperfield was counted from the retinal flat mounts to quantify the retinal delivery of exosomes. Tissue damage after electroporation was evaluated using retinal histological sections and a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Results: A significantly higher number of fluorescent particles per hyperfield were observed in the retinal flat mounts of the electroporation group compared with that in the no-electroporation group (599.0 ± 307.5 vs. 376.9 ± 175.4; P = 0.013). Retinal histological sections and TUNEL assays showed no signs of tissue damage after electroporation. Conclusions: In vivo electroporation can improve the retinal delivery of intravitreally injected exosomes.

Objective perimetry identifies regional functional progression and recovery in mild Diabetic Macular Oedema

PURPOSE

Retinal function beyond foveal vision is not routinely examined in the clinical screening and management of diabetic retinopathy although growing evidence suggests it may precede structural changes. In this study we compare optical coherence tomography (OCT) based macular structure with function measured objectively with the ObjectiveFIELD Analyzer (OFA), and with Matrix perimetry. We did that longitudinally in Type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with mild Diabetic Macular Oedema (DMO) with good vision and a similar number of T2D patients without DMO, to evaluate changes in retinal function more peripherally over the natural course of retinopathy.

METHODS

Both eyes of 16 T2D patients (65.0 ± 10.1, 10 females), 10 with baseline DMO, were followed for up longitudinally for 27 months providing 94 data sets. Vasculopathy was assessed by fundus photography. Retinopathy was graded using to Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) guidelines. Posterior-pole OCT quantified a 64-region/eye thickness grid. Retinal function was measured with 10-2 Matrix perimetry, and the FDA-cleared OFA. Two multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry (mfPOP) variants presented 44 stimuli/eye within either the central 30° or 60° of the visual field, providing sensitivities and delays for each test-region. OCT, Matrix and 30° OFA data were mapped to a common 44 region/eye grid allowing change over time to be compared at the same retinal regions.

RESULTS

In eyes that presented with DMO at baseline, mean retinal thickness reduced from 237 ± 25 μm to 234.2 ± 26.7 μm, while the initially non-DMO eyes significantly increased their mean thickness from 250.7 ± 24.4 μm to 255.7 ± 20.6 μm (both p<0.05). Eyes that reduced in retinal thickness over time recovered to more normal OFA sensitivities and delays (all p<0.021). Matrix perimetry quantified fewer regions that changed significantly over the 27 months, mostly presenting in the central 8 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in retinal function measured by OFA possibly offer greater power to monitor DMO over time than Matrix perimetry data.

Prospective, Observational, Multicenter, Real-World Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Pattern of Use of the Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant in Diabetic Macular Edema in France: Short-Term Outcomes of LOUVRE 3

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate real-world efficacy, safety, and treatment patterns with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX) in diabetic macular edema (DME) in France.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, observational, noncomparative, post-reimbursement study, consecutively enrolled patients with DME had a baseline evaluation on day 0. Those treated with DEX on day 0 were to be reevaluated at week 6 and months 6, 12, 18, and 24. DEX retreatment and/or alternative therapies were allowed during follow-up. The primary outcome measure was the maximum best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) gain from baseline during follow-up. Secondary outcome measures included time to maximum BCVA gain, patients (%) with prespecified BCVA gains from baseline at each visit, maximum central retinal thickness (CRT) reduction from baseline, patients (%) with CRT reduction ≥ 20% from baseline at each visit, patients (%) with DME resolution (per investigator judgement), and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Of 112 patients/eyes with DME for 3.5 years (mean) at baseline, 80 (including 86.1% previously treated) received DEX on day 0 and were analyzed for efficacy. Early study termination precluded collection of ≥ 12-month efficacy data. Patients received 1.4 DEX injections over 8.3 months (averages). The maximum BCVA gain from baseline was 3.6 letters, reached after 77.2 days (averages); 24.6% (week 6) and 15.0% (month 6) of patients experienced ≥ 10-letter BCVA gains from baseline. The mean maximum CRT reduction from baseline was -146.4 µm; 61.4% (week 6) and 36.0% (month 6) of patients had CRT reductions ≥ 20% from baseline, and 68.1% reported DME resolution at least once during follow-up. Ocular hypertension (n = 8, 12.1%) was the most frequent treatment-related AE.

CONCLUSIONS

LOUVRE 3 confirmed that DEX improves BCVA and CRT, even in a patient population that had predominantly received DEX before enrollment in the study, and showed that DME resolution was observed during follow-up. DEX tolerability was consistent with published data, supporting treatment benefits in DME.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03003416.

Diabetic Macular Oedema Guidelines: An Australian Perspective

The number of people living with diabetes is expected to rise to 578 million by 2030 and to 700 million by 2045, exacting a severe socioeconomic burden on healthcare systems around the globe. This is also reflected in the increasing numbers of people with ocular complications of diabetes (namely, diabetic macular oedema (DMO) and diabetic retinopathy (DR)). In one study examining the global prevalence of DR, 35% of people with diabetes had some form of DR, 7% had PDR, 7% had DMO, and 10% were affected by these vision-threatening stages. In many regions of the world (Australia included), DR is one of the top three leading causes of vision loss amongst working age adults (20-74 years). In the management of DMO, the landmark ETDRS study demonstrated that moderate visual loss, defined as doubling of the visual angle, can be reduced by 50% or more by focal/grid laser photocoagulation. However, over the last 20 years, antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and corticosteroid therapies have emerged as alternative options for the management of DMO and provided patients with choices that have higher chances of improving vision than laser alone. In Australia, since the 2008 NHMRC guidelines, there have been significant developments in both the treatment options and treatment schedules for DMO. This working group was therefore assembled to review and address the current management options available in Australia.

Intralenticular Ozurdex injection in an eye with thicker lens and the therapeutic effect maintained for 15 months

Introduction

To report a case of accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection in an eye with thicker lens. During the follow-up period of 15 months, the therapeutic effect of intralenticular Ozurdex was maintained.

Case description

Ozurdex was accidently injected into the lens of an eye with uveitis, and the lens thickness was measured to be 5.70 mm. The uveitis was under good control, and no significant development of cataract was observed until 7 months after the intralenticular Ozurdex injection. Then due to the outbreak of COVID-19, follow-up was suspended. Fifteen months after the injection, the patient returned to the doctor. At this time, significant cataract development was observed, whereas uveitis was still under good control. Accordingly, cataract surgery and Ozurdex extraction were performed. Two months after surgery, a mild recurrence of uveitis occurred.

Conclusions

A thicker lens might be an important risk factor for accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injections. However, after intralenticular Ozurdex injection, the development of cataract was slow, and Ozurdex could still have a therapeutic effect on uveitis in this case. Thus, immediate surgery might be unnecessary for certain accidental intralenticular Ozurdex injection cases, and a follow-up strategy could be chosen to maintain the effect of Ozurdex.

Metformin therapy as a strategy to compensate anti-VEGF resistance in patients with diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the complication of diabetic retinopathy, the leading cause of vision loss among diabetic patients. Metformin is the main antidiabetic treatment. It is preferable for its great anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory effects. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy is the preferable treatment for DME despite its lack of convincing results in some patients. To assess whether the combination of metformin and anti-VEGF drugs may decrease the risk of anti-VEGF resistance among DME patients. We included DME patients with a central retinal thickness (CRT) ≥ 250 μm who consecutively underwent at least 3 anti-VEGF therapies from January 1, 2020, to December 30, 2021. Anti-VEGF resistance was defined as persistent macular edema with decreased CRT ≤ 25% after 3 anti-VEGF injections. 109 patients were considered for this research, of whom 65 (59.6%) were resistant to anti-VEGF therapy. The mean CRT of the non-metformin group decreased from 344.88 ± 129.48 to 318.29 ± 123.23 (20.85%) and from 415.64 ± 144.26 to 277.11 ± 99.25 (31.51%) (P = .031) in the metformin group. Moreover, the metformin group had fewer resistant patients than the non-metformin, 24 (45.3%) versus 41 (73.2%). Furthermore, a considerable gain in visual acuity was observed in both groups, with a BCVA gain of 40.41% in the metformin group and 39.9% in the non-metformin group. Metformin may be combined with an anti-VEGF drug to minimize the risk of anti-VEGF resistance among DME patients. Moreover, it can serve to design effective therapeutic deliveries.

A preliminary observation on rod cell photobiomodulation in treating diabetic macular edema

Purpose

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of photobiomodulation (PBM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

Methods

It was a single-center, self-controlled prospective study. The clinical records of 12 diabetic retinopathy patients (5 males and 7 females, 20 eyes in total) who were treated with PBM for DME at the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, were analyzed. The mean age was 56 (26-68) years. All the participants received PBM treatment during darkness at night in no less than 5 days per week and no less than 8 ​h per day. In the baseline check and follow-up checks (1, 2, 6, 10, and 12 months after the start of treatment), the best-corrected visual acuity, the thickness of the retina in the macula, and the changes of the fundus lesions were observed. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the results before and after treatment. P ​< ​0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

No fundus complication was observed during follow-up checks. In baseline and 12-month follow-up checks, the best-corrected visual acuity was 71.75 ​± ​12.47 and 79.50 ​± ​10.85, maximal retinal thickness in macular area was 390.95 ​± ​77.12 ​μm and 354.13 ​± ​55.03 ​μm, average retinal thickness in macular area was 334.25 ​± ​36.45 ​μm and 314.31 ​± ​33.28 ​μm, foveal thickness was 287.00 ​± ​46.79 ​μm and 265.63 ​± ​67.14 ​μm. The best-corrected visual acuity, average retinal thickness in macular area in consecutive follow-up results except that in the 1st month showed significant difference compared with baseline results. There were significant difference between every follow-up result and baseline result of maximal retinal thickness in macular area (P ​< ​0.05). All follow-up results of foveal thickness were not significantly different (P ​> ​0.05) from the baseline result, except that in the 6th month (P ​= ​0.049). Obvious improvement could be observed in retinal fundus fluorescein angiography images.

Conclusions

PBM is a safe and effective treatment of DME, which deserves further investigation.

Initial observation or treatment for diabetic macular oedema with good visual acuity: two-year outcomes comparison in routine clinical practice: data from the Fight Retinal Blindness! Registry

Purpose

To compare visual acuity (VA) change at 24 months in eyes with clinically significant DME (CSDME) and good VA initially treated versus initially observed in routine clinical practice.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of treatment‐naïve eyes with CSDME and good VA (baseline VA ≥ 79 letters), with at least 24 months of follow‐up and initially managed with treatment (intravitreal treatment and/or macular laser) or observation with possible treatment after 4 months that were tracked in a prospectively designed observational registry.

Results

We identified 150 eligible eyes (98 initially observed, 52 initially treated) of 130 patients. The proportion of eyes with at least a 5‐letter VA loss at 24 months was not significantly different between the groups: 65% with initial observation and 42% with initial treatment (p = 0.39). However, initially observed eyes were more likely to have a 10‐letter VA loss at 24 months (OR = 4.6, p = 0.022). Most of eyes in the initial observation group received at least one treatment (an intravitreal injection in 66% and macular laser in 20%) during the 24‐month period.

Conclusions

The risk of 5 letters loss was similar between both management groups. However, initially observed eyes were more at risk of developing moderate visual loss and more than 80% of them required treatment over 24 months.

Proteome changes associated with the VEGFR pathway and immune system in diabetic macular edema patients at different diabetic retinopathy stages

PURPOSE

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of vision loss in all stages of diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, there is limited recognition of aqueous humor (AH) proteome profiles of DME patients at different DR stages. In this study, we aimed to investigate the AH proteome changes between DME patients at the nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) stage and those at the proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) stage.

METHODS

A label-free data-independent acquisition based liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis was performed to profile the abundances of AH proteins in 73 eyes from DME patients at different DR stages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to confirm the proteomics results with AH samples from non-diabetic patients and DME patients at the NPDR or PDR stage.

RESULTS

LC-MS/MS results showed significantly changed expression of 308 proteins between DME patients in the NPDR and PDR groups. Compared to the NPDR group, the proteins relatively up-regulated in the PDR group are involved in the immune system and/or negative regulation of the cell cycle, while proteins relatively down-regulated in the PDR group are associated with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) pathway and/or metabolism. ELISA results further verified the proteomic result of down-regulated expression of the immune-associated protein cystatin C (CST3) in the PDR group compared to that in the NPDR and non-diabetic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we reported for the first time the decreased abundances of AH proteins associated with the VEGFR pathway and both down- and up-regulated expression of AH proteins associated with the immune system in the PDR group compared to that in the NPDR group. Furthermore, we found negative correlations of immune-associated protein, CST3 concentration in AH with DR severity and central retinal thickness, suggesting CST3 as a promising target independent of the VEGFR pathway in DME-involved DR treatment.

Association of metformin treatment with enhanced effect of anti-VEGF agents in diabetic macular edema patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of metformin combined with anti-VEGF agents in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

This study was a prospective, nonrandomized case-control study. Patients were included in with a diagnosis of DME who received anti-VEGF agents injection. Basic information, medical history, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), the number of intravitreal injections, panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and macular grid photocoagulation treatment during the 6-month follow-up, were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS

A total of 50 DME patients were collected (24 patients with a history of oral metformin ≥ 6 months and 26 patients who had not taken metformin). The BCVA and the CMT were significantly improved after anti-VEGF treatment in two groups (F1 = 19.35, F2 = 26.78; F1 = 65.45, F2 = 76.23; P < 0.05). The BCVA in the metformin group was better than that in non-metformin group at every point after treatment (F = 34.45, P < 0.05). The CMT in metformin group decreased much more than that in non-metformin group during the follow-up period (F = 87.05, P < 0.05). The injection numbers decreased in the metformin group compared with the non-metformin group (t = 5.14, P < 0.05). However, there was no difference in PRP and macular grid photocoagulation therapy between the two groups during the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Metformin can enhance the therapeutic effect of anti-VEGF agents on DME patients to improve their visual acuity, improve the structure of the macular area, and reduce the number of intravitreal injections 90.

Optical coherence tomography and imaging biomarkers as outcome predictors in diabetic macular edema treated with dexamethasone implant

In this retrospective, multicenter study, we determined the predictive value of imaging biomarkers in diabetic macular edema (DME) outcomes following dexamethasone (DEX) implant(s). Sixty-seven eyes of 47 patients' best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central foveal thickness (CFT) on optical coherence tomography (OCT) before and after intravitreal DEX implants were evaluated. Baseline imaging biomarkers were graded using fundus photography and OCT, and the predictive value of biomarkers for significant treatment effects at six months was analyzed. Six months after 2.0 ± 0.8 (mean ± SD) DEX implants, 35 (52%) and 16 (24%) eyes had CFT reduction ≥ 10% from baseline and decreased to < 300 µm, respectively. BCVA improved ≥ 3 lines in 15 (22%) and remained stable in 38 (57%) eyes. At six months, eyes with severe intraretinal cyst (IRC), abundant hyperreflective dots (HRD), and moderate or severe hard exudate had a significantly higher chance of CFT reduction ≥ 10%. Eyes with abundant HRD at baseline and those underwent three DEX implants were more likely to achieve CFT < 300 µm. Eyes with DME and severe IRC, abundant HRD, or moderate-to-severe hard exudate at baseline were more likely to show a significant reduction in CFT six months after DEX implant.

Intravitreal Administration Effect of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Combined with Anti-VEGF Nanocarriers, in a Pharmaceutically Induced Animal Model of Retinal Vein Occlusion

Antiangiogenic therapeutic agents (anti-VEGF) have contributed to the treatment of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) while mesenchymal stromal cell- (MSCs-) mediated therapies limit eye degeneration. The aim of the present study is to determine the effect of adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs) combination with nanocarriers of anti-VEGF in a pharmaceutically induced animal model of RVO. Nanoparticles (NPs) of thiolated chitosan (ThioCHI) with encapsulated anti-VEGF antibody were prepared. ASCs were isolated and genetically modified to secrete the green fluorescence GFP. Twenty-four New Zealand rabbits were divided into the I-IV equal following groups: ASCs, ASCs + nanoThioCHI-anti-VEGF, RVO, and control. For the RVO induction, groups I-III received intravitreal (iv) injections of MEK kinase inhibitor, PD0325901. Twelve days later, therapeutic regiments were administered at groups I-II while groups III-IV received BSS. Two weeks later, the retinal damage evaluated via detailed ophthalmic examinations, histological analysis of fixed retinal sections, ELISA for secreted cytokines in peripheral blood or vitreous fluid, and Q-PCR for the expression of related to the occlusion and inflammatory genes. Mild retinal edema and hemorrhages, limited retinal detachment, and vasculature attenuation were observed in groups I and II compared with the pathological symptoms of group III which presented a totally disorganized retinal structure, following of positive immunostaining for neovascularization and related to RVO markers. Important reduction of the high secreted levels of inflammatory cytokines was quantified in groups I and II vitreous fluid, while the expression of the RVO-related and inflammatory genes has been significantly decreased especially in group II. GFP+ ASCs, capable of being differentiated towards neural progenitors, detected in dissociated retina tissues of group II presenting their attachment to damaged area. Conclusively, a stem cell-based therapy for RVO is proposed, accompanied by sustained release of anti-VEGF, in order to combine the paracrine action of ASCs and the progressive reduction of neovascularization.

Intraprocedural OCT monitoring of the immediate treatment response during indocyanine green angiography-guided laser therapy of teleangiectatic capillaries in diabetic macular edema

In this retrospective study the morphological response of teleangiectatic capillaries (TCs) to focal laser treatment and the functional and morphological outcome after Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA)-guided laser therapy was evaluated. TCs in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) were treated with laser therapy. The immediate and subsequent reaction of the TCs lumina to direct photocoagulation was monitored with customized OCT single scans. Additionally, patients were treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF as needed. 12 eyes of 9 patients with treatment naive (6 eyes) and pretreated (6 eyes) DME were followed-up for a mean of 24 months (± 8.1SD). Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.25 logMar (± 0.2SD) to 0.12 (± 0.10SD; p = 0.06) at each patient’s last visit. During laser treatment a darkening of the TCs lumina was achieved in 91.3% of lesions. All these lesions fully resolved, whereas TCs, which showed no darkening of their lumen in OCT persisted and required re-treatment with laser. Additional anti-VEGF injections were indicated in only one eye (8.3%). The darkening of the TCs lumina visible in OCT might provide an image-biomarker that indicates successful coagulation of aneurysmatic lesions. Consequently, a significant functional and morphological improvement with need for anti-VEGF treatment in only one eye, was achieved.

Information concerning the registration of the trial: date of registration: 11th of december, 2019. Trial registration number: 107/2019.

Intravitreal Corticosteroid Implantation in Diabetic Macular Edema: Updated European Consensus Guidance on Monitoring and Managing Intraocular Pressure

Intravitreal therapy for diabetic macular edema can, in susceptible patients, increase intraocular pressure (IOP). As uncontrolled IOP can potentially be sight threatening, monitoring is an essential component of patient management. It can be challenging for retina specialists to ensure that monitoring is rigorous enough to detect and resolve any potential problems at the earliest opportunity without it also being overburdensome for patients who have the lowest risk of developing an IOP rise. We have developed dynamic algorithms that: (1) tailor the frequency and extent of monitoring according to individual susceptibility and current IOP and (2) assist retina specialists in deciding when they should consider a referral to a glaucoma specialist. One algorithm is for patients with a relatively low susceptibility to developing an IOP rise (those whose baseline IOP is < 22 mmHg and who do not have a history of IOP events). Depending on their first post-implantation IOP check, the algorithm classifies them as: low risk if IOP remains < 22 mmHg; medium risk if IOP is 22-25 mmHg and any rise from baseline is < 10 mmHg; or high risk if IOP is > 25 mmHg or any rise from baseline is ≥ 10 mmHg. Thereafter, the algorithm guides on the frequency and extent of monitoring required in each of these groups and, if IOP rises or falls during treatment, patients may move up or down the risk groups accordingly. A different algorithm is provided for patients who are more susceptible to developing an IOP rise (those with a baseline IOP of ≥ 22 mmHg or a prior history of an IOP event). These patients need monitoring more closely so this algorithm has only medium- or high-risk classifications. These algorithms update the previous monitoring guidance by Goñi et al. (Goñi et al. in Ophthalmol Ther 5:47-61, 2016).

INTERNAL DRAINAGE OF SUBRETINAL FLUID DURING CHANDELIER-ASSISTED SCLERAL BUCKLING

PURPOSE

To describe the surgical technique of internal drainage of subretinal fluid as an adjunct to chandelier-assisted scleral buckling for the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

METHODS

The technique of internal drainage with a sharp needle or cannula through a trocar is described and shown in a Supplemental Digital Content 1 (see Video, http://links.lww.com/ICB/A87).

RESULTS

Three patients (3 eyes) underwent scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair. Subretinal fluid was drained using the internal drainage approach in all cases. All three patients had successful reattachment of retina with improvement in visual function. No complications were reported related to vitreous loss, retinal incarceration, or redetachment following primary surgery.

CONCLUSION

Internal drainage of subretinal fluid during chandelier-assisted scleral buckling is a useful technique that can be considered for repairing rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Intravitreal Ranibizumab Alone or in Combination with Calcium Dobesilate for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients: 12-Month Outcomes of a Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

This study investigates the efficacy of CaD combined with intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME) in patients with nonproliferative DR.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational, case-control study enrolled consecutive patients newly diagnosed with DME. The patients were treated with 3-monthly loading dose injections of intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) followed by pro re nata injections (3 + PRN), with or without daily oral CaD. The patients were treated and followed up for 12 months. We reviewed their medical records to determine the optical coherence tomography (OCT) findings, number of injections, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and central macular thickness (CMT) at 3, 6, and 12 months after the first injection.

RESULTS

We reviewed 102 eyes of 102 patients; 54 patients received IVR combined with oral CaD (IVR + CaD group) and 48 received only IVR (IVR group). In both groups, BCVA was higher, and CMT was lower, at 3, 6, and 12 months after the injection compared to those at the baseline (p < 0.05 for all), while there were no significant differences in BCVA improvement or CMT reduction between the two groups (p > 0.05). The mean number of IVR injections was significantly lower in the IVR + CaD group than the IVR group (5.4 ± 1.1 vs. 6.7 ± 1.6 injections, p < 0.05) during 1 year of treatment. No adverse events were noted in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to IVR alone, the addition of oral CaD to IVR in DME patients was safe and effective for improving visual function and restoring the retinal anatomy and was associated with the need for fewer injections.

Coats' disease: trends and long-term treatment outcomes in a tertiary referral centre

Background:

The long-term treatment outcomes in Coat’s disease – particularly in the era of newer pharmacotherapies such as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and depot steroids – are poorly understood.

Aim:

To describe the clinical features and treatment outcomes of 148 eyes with Coats’ disease assessed in a referral centre over 30 years.

Materials and methods:

We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with Coats’ disease between 1 June 1987 and 31 July 2017. The demographic, clinical and treatment data were collected and long-term functional and anatomical outcomes were analysed based on the treatment either with conventional therapy (cryo/laser) or along with adjuvants like intravitreal steroids or anti-VEGFs.

Results:

The mean age at presentation was 15.22 years (median 11). Familial exudative vitreoretinopathy was the most common referral diagnosis, 76/148 (51.5%), followed by Coats’ disease, 37/148 (25%), and retinoblastoma, 35/148 (23.6%). Stage 3B was most common at presentation (31.8%), followed by 2B (22.3%) and 2A (16.9%). A total of 107 patients were treated either with conventional therapy or in combination with adjuvants. The mean follow-up period was 24.95 months. The visual acuity improved from baseline logMAR 2.17 (Snellen-20/2958) to logMAR 1.88 (Snellen-20/1517) at final follow-up (p = 0.004). The improvement in visual acuity was better when the presenting BCVA was <1 logMAR (Snellen 20/200), p = 0.004. No statistically significant change in BCVA was noted between conventional and adjuvant groups, p = 0.5. However, the final anatomical outcome was good in 78/99 (78.8%) in the conventional group and 45/49 (91.8%) in the adjuvant group, respectively (p = 0.046).

Conclusion:

In this series of patients with Coats’ disease over three decades, the use of intravitreal steroids or anti-VEGFs as adjuvants resulted in better anatomical outcomes. A better baseline visual acuity, lower stage of the disease, and older age at presentation were found to be the factors leading to favourable visual outcomes.

Summary

In the current series of 148 eyes with Coats’ disease, adjuvant treatment with intravitreal steroids or anti-VEGFs resulted in better outcomes as compared with conventional cryotherapy or laser photocoagulation alone. Patients with Coats’ disease who had presented with better visual acuity at baseline, lower stage of the disease and older age had better final visual outcomes.

Intravitreal Ozurdex has no short term influence on choroidal thickness and vascularity index in eyes with diabetic macular edema: A pilot study

AIM:

To analyze choroidal parameters in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with intravitreal Ozurdex.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Twenty eyes of 14 patients were included in this prospective study. Optical coherence tomography images were obtained before and 8–10 weeks after intravitreal Ozurdex injection; binarized and subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and choroidal vascularity index (CVI) were calculated.

RESULTS:

Mean SFCT (treatment naïve; 242.22 ± 32.87 reduced to 218.10 ± 22.10, P = 0.158 and previously treated; 330.4 ± 56.72 reduced to 328.93 ± 50.55, P = 0.833) and mean CVI (treatment naïve; 0.64 ± 0.03 changed to 0.65 ± 0.04, P = 0.583 and previously treated; 0.65 ± 0.05 reduced to 0.64 ± 0.03, P = 0.208) showed no significant change.

CONCLUSION:

Intravitreal Ozurdex showed no significant effects on SFCT and CVI in eyes with DME over short term. Larger studies with longer follow-up may allow a better understanding.

Feasibility of Therapeutic Ultrasound Application in Topical Scleral Delivery of Avastin

Purpose

Macromolecules have been shown to be effective in vision-saving treatments for various ocular diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. The current delivery of macromolecules requires frequent intraocular injections and carries a risk of serious adverse effects.

Methods

We tested the application of therapeutic ultrasound as a minimally invasive approach for the delivery of Avastin into the diseased regions of the eye. Avastin (bevacizumab) is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody with a molecular weight of 149 kDa. We tested the effectiveness and safety of Avastin delivery through rabbit sclera in vitro using a standard diffusion cell model. Ultrasound at frequencies of 400 kHz or 3 MHz with an intensity of 1 W/cm2 was applied for the first 5 minutes of 1-hour drug exposure. Sham treatments mimicked the ultrasound treatments, but ultrasound was not turned on. Absorbance measurements of the receiver compartment solution were performed at 280 nm using a spectrophotometer.

Results

Absorbance measurements indicated no statistical difference between the sham (n = 13) and 400 kHz ultrasound group (n = 15) in the delivery of Avastin through the sclera. However, the absorbance values were statistically different (P < 0.01) between the 3 MHz ultrasound group (0.004, n = 8) and the matched sham group (0.002, n = 7). There was 2.3 times increase in drug delivery in the 3 MHz ultrasound when compared to the corresponding sham group. Histological studies indicated no significant damage in the ultrasound-treated sclera due to ultrasound application.

Conclusions

Our preliminary results provided support that therapeutic ultrasound may be effective in the delivery of Avastin through the sclera.

Translational Relevance

Our study offers clinical potential for a minimally invasive retinopathy treatment.

Teprotumumab in Clinical Practice: Recommendations and Considerations From the OPTIC Trial Investigators

BACKGROUND

Thyroid eye disease (TED) is a vision-threatening and debilitating condition that until very recently had no Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medical therapies. Teprotumumab has recently been approved to treat TED. We aim to provide guidance for its use, based on the input of the US investigators who participated in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened on October 11th and November 16th of 2019. All panel members had extensive experience as investigators in the Phase 2 and/or Phase 3 clinical trials of teprotumumab. Consensus among those investigators was reached to determine patient characteristics most appropriate for teprotumumab treatment. Safety guidelines were also reviewed and agreed on.

RESULTS

The authors recommend that teprotumumab be considered first-line therapy for patients with clinically significant ophthalmopathy, including those with disease duration exceeding 9 months. The clinical activity score (CAS) may be useful for longitudinal monitoring but should not be used to determine treatment eligibility. Criteria will likely be expanded after more experience with the drug. Using teprotumumab for patients with TED with substantial signs, symptoms, or morbidity without a CAS score of >4 (e.g., progressive proptosis, diplopia, and early compressive optic neuropathy) or more, could be considered. Diabetes mellitus and inflammatory bowel disease comorbidities should not be exclusionary, but stringent monitoring in these patients is recommended. Drug dosing, administration interval, and duration should adhere to the study protocol: 8 infusions, separated by 3 weeks. Patients with more severe disease may benefit from additional doses. Corticosteroids can be used before or during teprotumumab therapy. Clinical and laboratory monitoring should be consistent with good clinical practice for patients receiving teprotumumab.

CONCLUSIONS

Confirming the efficacy of teprotumumab usage outside the narrow parameters of the completed clinical trials will require rigorous scientific validation. As a step in that direction, we believe its on-label usage is appropriately applied to all patients with TED with substantial symptoms or morbidity, as judged by their physician.

Place of intravitreal dexamethasone implant in the treatment armamentarium of diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a very important and well-known cause of visual loss in diabetics. Blood–retina barrier disruption and consequent intraretinal fluid accumulation may lead to retinal thickening at the posterior pole namely DME. Even though it is not clearly understood, current evidence suggests that chronic low-grade inflammation characterized with various cytokines has a major role in the occurrence of DME. Clinical trials are continuously shaping our treatment approaches for the eyes with DME. Today, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor and steroid administrations are the main alternatives in DME treatment. Dexamethasone (DEX) implant (Ozurdex^®; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, United States) was approved by the United States Food & Drug Administration in 2014 for DME treatment. The implant is made up of a biodegradable solid copolymer that is broken down by releasing its active ingredient into the vitreous cavity over time. Biphasic release feature of this sustained-release drug delivery system ensures its efficacy for up to 6 mo with an acceptable and manageable safety profile. DEX implant provides a favorable anatomical and functional outcome in DME as shown in several randomized-controlled studies but has a relatively higher ocular side-effect profile such as increased risk of cataract formation and raised intraocular pressure when compared to the gold standard anti-VEGF agents. Thus, DEX implant becomes the second-line treatment option demonstrating inadequate clinical response to anti-VEGF therapy. However, it can be preferred as the first-line treatment in vitrectomized and pseudophakic eyes. Even in some selected conditions DEX implant is favored over anti-VEGF agents where the use of VEGF-inhibitors is either inappropriate or contraindicated such as the patients with a recent history of a major cardiovascular or cerebrovascular event, pregnancy and noncompliant to frequent visits. This mini-review briefly overviews the efficacy, safety profile and complications of DEX implant and summarizes the outcome of DEX implant administration in major clinical studies on DME treatment.

Treatment outcomes of optic disc pit maculopathy over two decades

Aim

To study the long-term outcomes of optic disc pit maculopathy.

Methods

Electronic medical records of 154 patients with optic disc pit were reviewed and 50 patients with optic disc pit maculopathy who met the study criteria were included in the study. Demographic profile of patients, along with clinical characteristics, optical coherence tomography (OCT) features and change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded. Patients were treated either by observation, barrage laser alone or pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with optional additional surgical procedures. The primary outcome measures were the change in BCVA and resolution of fluid on OCT.

Results

The mean age of patients was 29.96 years (3-62 years) with a follow-up of 27.16 months. The mean baseline BCVA in observation, laser and vitrectomy group was log MAR 0.94, 0.76 and 0.87 and final BCVA was log MAR 0.9, 0.67 and 0.46, respectively. There was a statistically significant improvement in the final BCVA and reduction in subretinal fluid with resolution of the schisis cavity in vitrectomy group than in other groups. On regression analysis significant association was found between final BCVA with baseline BCVA (R ² = 0.815, p = 0.002), use of C3 F8 endotempanode (p = 0.004) ILM peeling (p = 0.012) and use of triamcinolone (TA; p = 0.003). No significant association was found with juxtapapillary endolaser (p = 0.062).

Conclusions

In patients with disc pit maculopathy, PPV lead to better functional and anatomical outcomes as compared to laser or observation alone. Use of surgical adjuvants like ILM peeling, TA and C3F8 tamponade improved the outcomes, unlike juxtapapillary endolaser treatment.

Early treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implants in diabetic macular edema: Naïve versus refractory patients

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 0.7 mg implants (DEX-I) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) either naïve to therapy or refractory to anti-VEGF treatment, in a single-center, real-world setting.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with DME and treated with DEX-I were retrospectively enrolled in the study and split in two groups: naïve (Group 1, n = 64) and refractory (Group 2, n = 64) to treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, at 1 month, and every 3 months after each DEX-I implant. Main outcome measures were change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline to follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in BCVA were observed in treatment-naïve patients at 6 months following the first and second DEX-I injection (p = 0.0023 and p = 0.0063, respectively), with significant reductions in mean CMT at 6 months after all DEX implants. In treatment-refractory patients, mean CMT was significantly reduced from baseline to 6 months (p < 0.05) after all DEX-I injections, although no changes were observed in BCVA.

CONCLUSIONS

DEX-I improved visual acuity and macular edema mostly in treatment-naïve patients, suggesting DEX-I may be a viable first-line treatment option in DME.

Brolucizumab: a novel anti-VEGF humanized single-chain antibody fragment for treating w-AMD

INTRODUCTION

Wet age-related macular degeneration (w-AMD) represents the leading cause of visual impairment in the elderly in the developed countries. Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs are currently considered as the first-line treatment option for treating w-AMD; however, the frequent injection intervals have lit the way to investigate novel anti-VEGF agents allowing a more extended treatment regimen. Brolucizumab is a single-chain antibody fragment targeting all the isoforms of VEGF-A. Phase III HAWK and HARRIER trials have shown a longer durability and superior anatomical outcomes as compared with the standard of care by adopting a quarterly regimen for treating w-AMD. Brolucizumab has been approved in Europe, USA, and Japan for the management of w-AMD.

AREAS COVERED

This article presents an overview of w-AMD and investigates the progress of brolucizumab through clinical trials. It offers insights into where brolucizumab may be placed in the current market of anti-VEGF agents and its potential advantages over the previous molecules adopted for treating w-AMD.

EXPERT OPINION

The possibility of administering brolucizumab with more dilated treatment intervals represents an important advantage to decrease the treatment burden and improve patient compliance. Brolucizumab represents a possible drug switching option in non-responding patients to other anti-VEGF drugs.

Effect of Dexamethasone Implant on Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness in Early Period in Vitrectomized Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema

Aim

To investigate the change in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) in vitrectomized eyes with intravitreal dexamethasone (IVD) implant injection for the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME).

Method

In this prospective and controlled study, the vitrectomized eyes of diabetic patients were included. The study group (Group 1) was formed by diabetic vitrectomized eyes with DME. The control group (Group 2) was formed by diabetic vitrectomized eyes without DME. Only one intravitreal IVD implant was injected into the eyes in Group 1. In the first, second, and fourth months, choroidal layers were measured by optical coherence tomography and complete ophthalmologic examinations were performed for all cases.

Results

Ninety-six eyes of 96 cases were included in the study. There were 48 eyes of 48 different patients in each group. After IVD injection, statistically significant improvement was observed in the best corrected visual acuity in Group 1. The mean SFCT in eyes with DME was statistically significantly thinner (p < 0.01) and thinness became more pronounced during the four-month follow-up period after IVD implant injection (p < 0.01).

Conclusion

In the presence of DME in vitrectomized eyes, the thinness of the SFCT may become evident after dexamethasone implant injection.

Dril Influences Short-term Visual Outcome after Intravitreal Corticosteroid Injection for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

Purpose: Intravitreal injections (IVI) of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) are considered the gold standard for diabetic macular edema (DME). Despite adequate anti-VEGF treatments, many patients present persistent DME. The aim of this study is to identify systemic, ocular and anatomical characteristics influencing functional and anatomical outcomes in refractory DME patients treated with IVI of corticosteroid.Materials and Methods: Retrospective multicenter hospital-based cohort study including type 2 diabetic adult patients with refractory DME that switched from intravitreal anti-VEGF to intravitreal corticosteroid between January 2017 and September 2018. Sociodemographic, clinical data, DME and treatment characteristics were collected at baseline (visit before switch), as well as spectral domain OCT features.Results: A total of 101 eyes were included. The median number of anti-VEGF injections before switch was 5.0 (min-max: 4.0-9.0) and the median anti-VEGF treatment duration before switch was 33.2 (min-max: 19.5-50.3) months. More than half of the patients (56; 54.9%) were diagnosed with diffuse DME. At baseline, 80 (88%) patients had cystoid DME, 55 (62.5%) patients had disorganization of retinal inner layers (DRIL) and 16 (17.6%) had subretinal fluid. Dexamethasone was the corticosteroid more commonly used (71.4%), followed by triamcinolone (24.4%) and fluocinolone (4.2%). Regarding best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), post-switch results showed no statistically significant improvement at three-month follow-up (p = .048/0.096), but the mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly from 486.3 (SD = 159) µm to 369.3 (SD = 129) µm at three-month follow-up (p < .001). DRIL was the tomographic characteristic able to influence significantly both CMT and BCVA final results (p = .02 and 0.012, respectively).Conclusions: Subfoveal DRIL on structural OCT was the DME factor influencing significantly clinical and imaging outcomes in refractory DME patients treated with intravitreal corticosteroid. Portuguese care trend towards DME shows preference for the use of dexamethasone implant after therapeutic failure with ranibizumab or bevacizumab injection.

Three-year outcomes of vitrectomy combined with intraoperative dexamethasone implantation for non-tractional refractory diabetic macular edema

This retrospective, consecutive interventional study investigated the long-term clinical outcomes of combined vitrectomy with intraoperative dexamethasone implants for non-tractional refractory diabetic macular edema (DME). The study included 43 eyes from 39 participants with DME that had continued for more than 6 months despite repeated non-surgical treatment. Postoperative changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were evaluated over 3 years. A Kaplan-Meier curve was obtained for any additional non-surgical treatment, and the average number of non-surgical treatments required for DME before and after surgery was compared. Other postsurgical complications were also investigated. The logMAR BCVA improved from 0.526 ± 0.417 (20/67) preoperatively to 0.294 ± 0.374 (20/39) 3 years postoperatively (p < 0.001, generalized estimating equation). The CMT improved from 478 ± 122 μm preoperatively to 314 ± 90 μm 3 years postoperatively (p < 0.001, generalized estimating equation). Additional non-surgical treatment was not required for 29 (67%) eyes. The average number of annual non-surgical treatments decreased from 5.04 times preoperatively to 0.34 times postoperatively. Seventeen (40%) eyes developed temporary ocular hypertension after surgery, which normalized after antihypertensive eye drop instillation. In conclusion, vitrectomy combined with intraoperative dexamethasone implantation provides satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes for non-tractional refractory DME while reducing the number of intraocular injections for DME.

Behavior of SD-OCT Detectable Hyperreflective Foci in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients after Therapy with Anti-VEGF Agents and Dexamethasone Implants

PURPOSE

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of blindness in the working-age population. Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) allows detection and monitoring of the edema and a detailed analysis of the retinal structure. Hyperreflective foci (HF) are small, circumscribed lesions on OCT, and their origin is yet to be determined. Our study was aimed to shed light on HF pathophysiology, by analyzing their number and location in DME patients at baseline and after therapy.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study on 59 eyes of 51 DME patients who were treated with antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (VEGF group, n = 40 eyes) or dexamethasone implant (DEX group, n = 19). HF and hard exudates (HE) were discriminated by their appearance on fundus photographs and their size on OCT. Quantity and location of HF and HE were analyzed at baseline and after therapy.

RESULTS

DME decreased in 75% of patients in the VEGF (455.5 μm vs. 380.8 μm, p = 0.02) and in 95% of patients in the DEX group (471.6 μm vs. 381.9 μm, p = 0.007). The number of foci decreased in 62.5% of patients after anti-VEGF (130.6 vs. 111.1, p = 0.07) and in 68% of patients after dexamethasone injection ((123.4 vs. 94.9, p = 0.02) 5.1). A subgroup of 15% of eyes, all treated with anti-VEGF, showed accumulation of larger HF in outer retinal layers to visible HE during DME resolution, whereas smaller HF, found in all retinal layers, remained unchanged. There was a trend towards a dynamic shift of the foci from inner to outer retinal layers.

CONCLUSION

The dynamic rearrangement of the small HF and their slightly greater reduction after anti-inflammatory therapy suggest inflammatory cells as their origin, whereas larger HF in the outer retinal layers correspond to microexudates. Furthermore, we found a more favourable outcome in patients with HF after treatment with dexamethasone implants compared to anti-VEGF agents.

Comparisons of One to Three Monthly Injections of Aflibercept for Diabetic Macular Edema by Practical Protocol

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacies of one initial intravitreal injection of aflibercept followed by a pro re nata (PRN; 1+PRN) regimen to those of three consecutive monthly injections followed by the PRN (3+PRN) regimen for diabetic macular edema (DME) with practical protocols. The medical records of 95 eyes of 71 cases that were diagnosed with DME and had received intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) injections were reviewed. Fifty-seven eyes had received IVA with the 1+PRN regimen, and 38 eyes had received IVA with the 3+PRN regimen. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and the central macular thickness (CMT) were measured at the baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the IVA. The mean number of injections of the 1+PRN group was 2.9 ± 1.7, which was significantly fewer than that of the 3+PRN group at 4.6 ± 1.4 (P < 0.001). The change of the mean BCVA before and after the IVA at 12 months of the 3+PRN group was -0.14 ± 0.17 logMAR units which was significantly better than that of the 1+PRN group of -0.045 ± 0.25 logMAR units (P = 0.02). The change of the CMT before and after the IVA at 6 months of the 3+PRN group was -141.3 ± 152.4 μm which was significantly more than that of the 1+PRN group at -86.1 ± 117.8 μm (P = 0.013). Although the mean number of injections was more than that in the 1+PRN regimen, the 3+PRN regimen had better visual outcomes at 12 months. In a practical protocol, we recommend the 3+PRN regimen for patients with DME (IRB#3541).

Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant versus Intravitreal Ranibizumab Injection for Treatment of Non-Proliferative Diabetic Macular Edema: A Prospective, Randomized and Blinded Trial

INTRODUCTION

In the working age population, Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) is the most common cause of visual loss.

PURPOSE

The present study is aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of intravitreal injection of Ranibizumab (IVR) versus intravitreal Dexamethasone implant (IVD) in patients with DME in a tertiary care centre upto 4 months.

METHODS

This is a comparative, prospective, randomized study that was done on 140 patients with macular edema confirmed on optical coherence tomography (OCT). IVD group received Ozurdex® (Allergan, Inc, Ireland) while the IVR group received Lucentis® (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland); the groups were followed up at day-1 and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16. Patients were divided into Group A, in which patients were given 3 doses (monthly) of IVR 0.3 mg in 0.05 ml (n=70). Group B patients were given a single dose of IVD implant 0.7 mg (n=70).

RESULTS

The mean number of injections given was 1 Ozurdex® per patient vs. 3 Lucentis® per patient. The maximum reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) with IVD was 167.8 μm and 138.8μm in the 2nd and 3rd months, respectively, with IVR. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the 4th month was 0.34 logMAR and 0.33 logMAR, in IVD and IVR groups, respectively, with consistent improvement. Patients with 0-5 letters, 6-10 letters and 10-15 letters, and >15 letters visibility in IVD group were 9.5, 20.6, 4.8, 6.4%, and 20.4, 18.8, 20.3 20.3% in IVR groups, respectively. The maximum intraocular pressure (IOP) rise with IVD was found to be 16 mmHg in 2 patients (3.17%). IOP rise >10 mmHg was observed in 14/63 patients (22.22%); the majority of patients indicated a high rise at 2nd month with all returning to baseline by 4th month. No reports of infectious endophthalmitis or new cataracts were detected in either of the treated groups.

CONCLUSION

Both intravitreal Ranibizumab injection and Dexamethasone implants were found to be safe and effective in lowering CMT and improving BCVA at the 4-month follow up in patients with DME. Since there was no recurrence of CMT in the Dexamethasone implant group, we suggest that early administration before the 4th month may indicate superior efficacy over the ranibizumab injection. Further randomized trials in a large sample size with a longer period follow- up would be performed to justify the obtained results in the present study.

A case report of exudative retinal detachment derived from orbital cellulitis in mainland China

Background

Orbital cellulitis is a rare cause of exudative retinal detachment. Hereby, we aimed to report the first case of exudative retinal detachment derived from orbital cellulitis in mainland China.

Case presentation

A 16-year-old girl developed severe left orbital cellulitis in 4 days. Two exudative retinal detachment lesions were presented in her left eye retina. Blood cultures were performed which identified Staphylococcus aureus. However, the cause for the orbital cellulitis was not idenitfied in this patient. Systemic application of antibiotics together with topical antibiotics and corticosteroid was effective to the improvement of orbital cellulitis and resolution of exudative retinal detachment.

Conclusions

The treatment of such clinical condition is that of orbital cellulitis in general. The exudative retinal detachment can resolve to a great extent upon cure of the underlying disease, followed by visual acuity recovery.

Interdigitation and Ellipsoid Zones Disruption Correlate with Visual Outcomes among Treatment-Naive Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema

INTRODUCTION

We have recently shown that defects in interdigitation and ellipsoid zones (IZ and EZ) can predict response to anti-VEGF therapy in a small group of treatment-naive diabetic macular edema (DME) patients. The aim of the current study is to further evaluate this association in a larger study group of patients over a longer follow-up time.

METHODS

Thirty eyes of 30 treatment-naive DME patients were analyzed in this retrospective study. The integrity of foveal IZ and EZ was evaluated using optical coherence tomography at the diagnosis of DME and following anti-VEGF injections. The defect size was correlated with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT).

RESULTS

The mean patients' age at baseline was 63.0 ± 10.0 years. Patients underwent 3.9 ± 2.9 anti-VEGF injections for a mean of 9.1 ± 4.8 months. Following treatment, the mean Snellen visual acuity (VA) improved from 20/52 to 20/44 (p = 0.05), CMT decreased from 432.5 ± 141.4 μm to 375.2 ± 121.4 µm (p = 0.05) and IZ/EZ defect size decreased from 259.83 ± 375.94 µm to 65.34 ± 143.97 µm (p = 0.001). In patients with no IZ/EZ defects at baseline, the mean Snellen VA was better when compared to those with IZ/EZ defects (20/36 vs. 20/70, p = 0.031). The number of eyes with IZ/EZ defects decreased from 17 (57%) at baseline to 6 (20%) at end of follow-up (p < 0.01). BCVA gain correlated with IZ/EZ defect size reduction (r = 0.41, p = 0.02) but not with improvement in CMT (r = 0.28, p = 0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

IZ/EZ defect size correlated not only with baseline BCVA but also predicted the change in BCVA after anti-VEGF treatment. Possible future automatic measurement of IZ/EZ defect size might prove helpful for the evaluation of treatment response.

Initial Ten Years of Experience with the Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: A Retrospective Chart Review

Purpose

To evaluate the initial ten years of results from the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) in patients treated for retinal vein occlusion (RVO), diabetic macular edema (DME) or uveitis.

Methods

Retrospective chart review of patients receiving DEX since its FDA approval. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) on optical coherence tomography, intraocular pressure and cataract status were collected. Baseline data were collected from the initial DEX and post-treatment data at the visit at least four weeks after the last DEX.

Results

In total, 315 eyes received 1216 DEX over 63.9±4.6 weeks. In the branch RVO (n=90), central RVO (n=59) and DME (n=62) cohorts, BCVA improved significantly (p<0.05). The uveitis (n=154) cohort did not have a significant change in BCVA, 0.62±0.04 to 0.61±0.04 logMAR (p=0.34). Younger patients, vitrectomized eyes, and eyes without a history of glaucoma were associated with significantly better BCVA outcomes in the uveitis cohort (p<0.05). Overall, CMT decreased significantly from 376.6±6.8 to 322.7±5.0 µm (p<0.05). Intraocular pressure increased significantly (p<0.001) and the percentage of patients requiring anti-glaucoma medications increased from 33.0% to 67.6%. Of phakic eyes, 58.8% (n=63) had cataract progression or underwent surgery with those who underwent surgery experiencing a significant improvement in BCVA (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Repeated DEX over extended follow-up offers significant anatomic benefits to all cohorts. Visual benefits are only seen in RVO, DME and select uveitis demographics.

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant in naïve and previously treated patients with diabetic macular edema: a retrospective study

AIM

To assess the effect of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) Ozurdex on the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME).

METHODS

Totally 43 eyes (24 naïve and 19 previously treated) were included in the study. Retrospective and single-center study involved patients with a clinical diagnosed of DME, who received treatment with DEX implant and had a follow-up of at least 12mo. Primary endpoints included changes in BCVA and CRT.

RESULTS

At month 12, mean improvement in BCVA from baseline was 20.4±20.8 letters and 6.8±6.9 letters in naïve and previously treated patients, respectively (P=0.0132). The naïve patients achieved the BCVA improvement significantly faster (2.4±1.5mo) than the previously treated ones (3.5±2.4mo, P=0.0298; Mann-Whitney test). The proportion of eyes gaining ≥15 letters was 54.2% and 21.1% in the non-previously treated and previously treated groups, respectively (P=0.0293). CRT was significantly reduced from 484.0±119.8 and 487.5±159.9 µm to 272.0±39.2 and 233.5±65.7 µm in the naïve and previously treated patients, respectively; P<0.0001 each, respectively. The presence of subretinal fluid was significantly associated with the proportion of patients achieving a BCVA improvement ≥5 letters [HR (95%CI), 1.23 (1.04 to 1.45), P=0.0145]; ≥10 letters [HR (95%CI), 1.75 (1.10 to 2.77), P=0.0182]; and ≥15 letters [HR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.03 to 4.02), P=0.0407]. Naïve patients received less DEX implants throughout the study than the previously treated ones (1.8±0.6 vs 2.3±0.6, P=0.0172, respectively). Totally 9 patients (20.9%) have developed ocular hypertension, which was successfully controlled with topical hypotensive drugs. Of the 23 phakic eyes at baseline, 5 eyes (21.7%) either had new onset lens opacity or progression of an existing opacity during the study follow-up. Four of them (2 in the naïve group and 2 in the previously treated one) required cataract surgery at months 4, 6, 6, and 6, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained in this study may support the early use of DEX Ozurdex as first line therapy in naïve patients.

A Real-World Study of Dexamethasone Implant in Treatment-Naïve Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema: Efficacy and Correlation Between Inflammatory Biomarkers and Treatment Outcome

Purpose

There has been an increasing clinical interest in specific retinal parameters as non-invasive biomarkers of retinal inflammation in diabetic macular edema (DME) that have been shown to have prognostic value, such as hyperreflective retinal fields (HRFs) and subfoveal neuroretinal detachment (SND).

Methods

We conducted a prospective, non-comparative study of treatment-naïve patients with DME to evaluate the efficacy of a Pro Re Nata (PRN) regimen of intravitreal dexamethasone implant 0.7 mg (DexI, Ozurdex™). After administration, patients underwent subsequent injections according to PRN criteria in case of edema relapse, but not earlier than 4 months after the previous treatment. Patients were evaluated at baseline, within 15 days of injection, and every month thereafter. During all visits, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was recorded; central retinal thickness (CRT), type of edema, presence of SND, and presence and number of HRFs were evaluated using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) 3D. Treatment outcome was defined as changes in BCVA, CRT, SND and HRFs at 12 (T12) and 24 (T24) months compared with baseline (T0).

Results

The study enrolled 24 eyes of 18 patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 18±6.6 months; for all eyes, T12 data were available, while follow-up reached T24 for 12 eyes. BCVA improved significantly and CRT decreased significantly during treatment; the edema was no longer detectable in 13/24 eyes at T12 and 8/12 eyes at T24. No patient presented SND at T12 and T24, and the mean number of HRFs decreased significantly during treatment. Results with CRT and HRFs correlated with BCVA at 12 and 24 months. No significant adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

In patients with DME, the intravitreal dexamethasone implant was effective and safe in improving both functional and tomographic parameters. This result is consistent with improvement in biomarkers of inflammation.

Subthreshold Micro-Pulse Yellow Laser and Eplerenone Drug Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorio-Retinopathy Patients: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To study the outcomes of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (SML) and eplerenone (EP) therapy in central serous chorio-retinopathy (cCSCR).

METHODS

Retrospective study of 28 eyes of 27 patients undergoing SML and 20 eyes of 19 patients undergoing EP therapy.

RESULTS

Median duration of follow-up was 8 months for SML and 4.5 months for EP group. Complete SRF resolution was seen in 12/28 (42.8%) eyes in SML and 4/20 (20%) in EP group. Six eyes in SML group and two eyes in EP group needed additional SML. No EP patients demonstrated hyperkalemia warranting stopping of therapy. Baseline visual acuity (VA) was correlated positively with final VA in both groups. Presence/absence of focal leaks had differing outcomes in both treatment groups in terms of anatomical resolution.

CONCLUSION

Both treatment modalities were effective in the management of cCSCR showing comparable favorable anatomical outcomes, but visual outcomes were not significant, probably due to chronicity of the pathology.

Adherence of patients with diabetic macular oedema to intravitreal injections: A systematic review

The purpose of this study was to review adherence rates to intravitreal injections in the treatment of diabetic macula oedema and to identify factors associated with adherence. A systematic search of Embase, Medline, PsycINFO and CINAHL was conducted up to May 2020. Two authors independently screened, selected and appraised the studies. Seven articles on anti-VEGF treatment were found to meet the inclusion criteria. No studies were found on intravitreal corticosteroids or dexamethasone implants. Attendance rates varied between studies from 35% to 85%. The rate of missed or delayed attendance ranged from 14% to 51%, whereas 25% of patients were lost to follow-up at 12 months. Non-adherence was found to be multifactorial and included patient related reasons, demographic characteristics and clinical factors. Enablers to adherence included patient understanding of the disease and treatment. Further research in this area is warranted in order to better understand adherence in these patients and to improve patient outcomes.

Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus nonsurgical treatment for diabetic macular edema with massive hard exudates

Purpose

To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of severe diabetic macular edema (DME) with massive hard exudates managed by pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or nonsurgical treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 40 eyes with DME and massive hard exudates treated with either PPV with ILM peeling (vitrectomy group, 21 eyes) or nonsurgical treatment with anti-vascular endothelium growth factor (VEGF) and/or steroids (nonsurgical group, 19 eyes). Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) and resolution of macular hard exudates were compared between the two groups.

Results

After treatment, CRT decreased steadily in the vitrectomy group but fluctuated in the nonsurgical group. Compared with eyes in the nonsurgical group, eyes in the vitrectomy group had better visual improvement (P < 0.05 at 6 and 12 months and the final visit) and greater decrease in CRT (P < 0.05 at 3 and 6 months and the final visit) after adjustment for baseline BCVA. Hard exudates resolved more rapidly in the vitrectomy group than in the nonsurgical group, with 94.1% versus 47.4% eyes showing significant absorption after 6 months of the treatment (P = 0.003). In the vitrectomy group, 62% eyes did not require any further injections for treating DME after the operation.

Conclusions

PPV with ILM peeling resulted in rapid resolution of hard exudates with significant anatomical and functional improvement in DME with massive hard exudates.

Baseline SD-OCT characteristics of diabetic macular oedema patterns can predict morphological features and timing of recurrence in patients treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implants

AIMS

To evaluate the timing and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features of diabetic macular oedema (DME) recurrence according to baseline OCT patterns in patients treated with dexamethasone implant (DEX-I).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study (72 eyes/65 patients). Best-corrected visual acuity, timing of DME recurrence, and SD-OCT pattern [intraretinal cysts (IRC), IRC plus subretinal fluid (mixed), external limiting membrane (ELM), ellipsoid (IS/OS) layer integrity] were assessed at baseline and monthly until first DME recurrence.

RESULTS

Forty-two (58.3%) and 30 (41.6%) DME eyes had an IRC and mixed DME pattern at baseline, respectively. Twenty-four out of thirty mixed eyes (80%) relapsed without subretinal fluid. At baseline, mixed eyes showed similar changes in ELM and IS/OS (60 and 76.6% of eyes, respectively) versus IRC eyes (42.8 and 80.9% of eyes). After DME recurrence, more mixed eyes at baseline showed ELM and IS/OS changes (63.3 and 86.6%) than IRC eyes (50 and 76.2%). 33.3% of mixed eyes had DME recurrence at ≥ 6 months from first DEX-I implant versus 19% of IRC eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Mixed DME eyes were treated with DEX-I relapse later and more frequently without subretinal fluid than IRC eyes. SD-OCT characteristics of different DME patterns at baseline can predict morphological features and timing of DME recurrence.

Regulation of the Ocular Cell/Tissue Response by Implantable Biomaterials and Drug Delivery Systems

Therapeutic advancements in the treatment of various ocular diseases is often linked to the development of efficient drug delivery systems (DDSs), which would allow a sustained release while maintaining therapeutic drug levels in the target tissues. In this way, ocular tissue/cell response can be properly modulated and designed in order to produce a therapeutic effect. An ideal ocular DDS should encapsulate and release the appropriate drug concentration to the target tissue (therapeutic but non-toxic level) while preserving drug functionality. Furthermore, a constant release is usually preferred, keeping the initial burst to a minimum. Different materials are used, modified, and combined in order to achieve a sustained drug release in both the anterior and posterior segments of the eye. After giving a picture of the different strategies adopted for ocular drug release, this review article provides an overview of the biomaterials that are used as drug carriers in the eye, including micro- and nanospheres, liposomes, hydrogels, and multi-material implants; the advantages and limitations of these DDSs are discussed in reference to the major ocular applications.

Effectiveness of 190 µg Fluocinolone Acetonide and 700 µg Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implants in Diabetic Macular Edema Using the Area-Under-the-Curve Method: The CONSTANT Analysis

Purpose

Calculations of area-under-the-curve (AUC) provide the average letters gained across the entire treatment period, which may be a better estimate of long-term effectiveness than single time-point outcomes, particularly when it comes to sustained-release therapies.

Materials and Methods

The AUC method was used to compare the efficacy of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (total dose of 0.19 mg; FAc) and dexamethasone (DEX) 700 µg implants based on published data from their respective Phase 3 FAME (Fluocinolone Acetonide for Macular Edema) and MEAD pivotal clinical trials in diabetic macular edema (DME). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) letter scores were collated from the FAME trial and compared with those reported in MEAD. The trapezoidal rule was then used to calculate AUC, based on BCVA letter score, from baseline to Month 36 (FAME)/Month 39 (MEAD) and presented as an overall mean visual acuity change per day.

Results

Treatment with either the FAc or DEX implant resulted in an improved BCVA over the treatment period compared with sham. This effect was statistically greater (p=0.029) for the FAc implant than the DEX implant (5.2 vs 3.5 letters/day, respectively) and even greater in the recurrent DME subgroup (p<0.001; 6.9 vs 3.5 letters/day, respectively).

Conclusion

Although direct comparisons between trial cohorts cannot be performed, this analysis indicated that, in their respective pivotal clinical trial cohorts, treatment with the FAc implant provides better long-term visual acuity outcomes and a lower treatment burden than achieved with the DEX implant.

Clinical impact of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant: outcomes from the ILUVIEN® clinical evidence study in Portugal

Introduction:

The ILUVIEN^® (fluocinolone acetonide) Clinical Evidence in Portugal (ICE-PT) study is a retrospective, multicenter, observational study evaluating the effectiveness and safety of the FAc implant in patients with diabetic macular edema.

Methods:

Patients included in this study had received the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of diabetic macular edema and had measurements of visual acuity and retinal thickness assessed by optical coherence tomography for at least 12 months pre- and post-fluocinolone acetonide implant administration, with ⩾2 follow-up visits. Outcomes measured included visual acuity, central foveal thickness, and intraocular pressure.

Results:

There was a significant increase in mean visual acuity compared with baseline at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-fluocinolone acetonide in both the overall study population and the pseudophakic subgroup (p < 0.05 at all time points in both groups). A significant reduction in mean central foveal thickness compared with baseline was seen in the overall study population at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-fluocinolone acetonide (p < 0.05 at all time points). At 12-month post-fluocinolone acetonide, a small but significant intraocular pressure increase of 1.0 mmHg was seen in the overall study population.

Conclusion:

The results of this analysis show that switching from the current standard of care to the fluocinolone acetonide implant leads to beneficial effects in terms of vision and retinal structure in patients with diabetic macular edema and that patients benefited from FAc implant administration, regardless of lens status.

Therapeutic Effect of Abelmoschus manihot on Type 2 Diabetic Nonproliferative Retinopathy and the Involvement of VEGF

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy of Abelmoschus manihot in treating type 2 diabetic nonproliferative retinopathy.

Methods

It was a randomized controlled clinical trial. The recruited eighty subjects with type 2 diabetic nonproliferative retinopathy were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. The two groups received basic treatments including control of blood glucose, blood pressure and blood lipid, management of diet, exercise and health education, and monitoring of relevant indicators. Additionally, the treatment group was given oral administration of Abelmoschus manihot. All subjects were followed up on monthly basis for consecutive six months. The related parameters including diabetic retinopathy (DR) incidence rates, “Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study” (ETDRS) vision scores, retinal thicknesses in macular region, serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels, and biochemical indicators of both groups before and after treatment were accurately collected and statistically analyzed.

Results

There were no significant differences of DR severity levels, ETDRS vision scores, macular retinal thicknesses such as cube average thickness (CAT), central subfield thickness (CST), and cube volume (CV), and serum VEGF levels between two groups before treatment. Meanwhile, there were no significant differences of demographic characteristics, case terminations, blood glucose, blood lipid, blood pressure, biochemical indicators of hepatorenal function, hypoglycemic drugs, hypotensive drugs, and other basic treatments between two groups during six months treatment. The present study suggested that the remission rate of DR and the ETDRS vision score in the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the control group (remission rate: 25.4% vs 9.3%, P=0.01; ETDRS score: 78 (72, 82) vs 72 (67, 80), P=0.0002) while the progression rate of DR in the treatment group was significantly lower than that of the control group (progression rate: 4.2% vs 18.7%, P=0.007) after six months treatment. In addition, the CAT, CST, CV, and serum VEGF levels of the treatment group were significantly improved after the treatment (CAT: 286 (278, 302) vs 282 (270, 295) μm, P < 0.0001; CST: 251 (239, 274) vs 248 (235, 265) μm, P < 0.0001; CV: 10.3 (10.0, 10.9) vs 10.1 (9.7, 10.6) mm³, P < 0.0001; VEGF: 0.21 (0.14, 0.58) vs 0.16 (0.10, 0.23) ng/ml, P=0.0026), while there were no significant differences of the control group before and after treatment (CAT: 287 (279, 294) vs 287 (279, 295) μm, P=0.27; CST: 250 (240, 266) vs 252 (238, 266) μm, P=0.72; CV: 10.4 (10.1, 10.6) vs 10.4 (10.1, 10.7) mm³, P=0.53; VEGF: 0.21 (0.13, 0.66) vs 0.23 (0.12, 0.64) ng/ml, P=0.85).

Conclusion

The study offered the novel evidence for the therapeutic effect of Abelmoschus manihot on type 2 diabetic nonproliferative retinopathy, which was associated with improved VEGF. This trial is registered with ChiCTR1800019292.