1
|
Andries E, Lorens A, Skarżyński PH, Skarżyński H, Calvino M, Gavilán J, Lassaletta L, Tavora-Vieira D, Acharya A, Kurz A, Hagen R, Anderson I, Koinig K, Abdelsamad Y, Van de Heyning P, Van Rompaey V, Mertens G. Holistic assessment of cochlear implant outcomes using the international classification of functioning disability and health model: data analysis of a longitudinal prospective multicenter study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:4161-4173. [PMID: 38573516 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08600-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study outcome after cochlear implantation using the Cochlear Implant (CI) outcome assessment protocol based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model (CI-ICF). METHODS Raw data of a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study was analyzed. Seventy-two CI candidates were assessed preoperatively and six months postoperatively using the CI-ICF protocol. Following tools were used: (1) Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ), (2) Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), (3) Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ), (4) Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ12), (5) Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19), (6) Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) (7) pure tone audiometry, (8) speech audiometry, (9) sound localization. RESULTS There was a significant improvement of speech discrimination in quiet (p = 0.015; p < 0.001) and in noise (p = 0.041; p < 0.001), sound detection (p < 0.001), tinnitus (p = 0.026), listening (p < 0.001), communicating with-receiving-spoken messages (p < 0.001), conversation (p < 0.001), family relationships (p < 0.001), community life (p = 0.019), NCIQ total score and all subdomain scores (p < 0.001). Subjective sound localization significantly improved (p < 0.001), while psychometric sound localization did not. There was no significant subjective deterioration of vestibular functioning and no substantial change in sound aversiveness. CI users reported a high level of implant satisfaction postoperatively. CONCLUSION This study highlights the positive impact of cochlear implantation on auditory performance, communication, and subjective well-being. The CI-ICF protocol provides a holistic and comprehensive view of the evolution of CI outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Andries
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium.
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium.
| | - Artur Lorens
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarżyński
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Warsaw, Poland
- Center of Hearing and Speech 'Medincus', Kajetany, Poland
- Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Warsaw, Poland
- Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland
| | - Henryk Skarżyński
- World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Kajetany, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Miryam Calvino
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER-U761), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Gavilán
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otolaryngology, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Institute for Health Research, Madrid, Spain
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre On Rare Diseases (CIBERER-U761), Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Dayse Tavora-Vieira
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospital Group, Perth, Australia
- Medical School, Division of Surgery, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Aanand Acharya
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Fiona Stanley Fremantle Hospital Group, Perth, Australia
| | - Anja Kurz
- Comprehensive Hearing Center, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Rudolf Hagen
- Comprehensive Hearing Center, Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Plastic, Aesthetic and Reconstructive Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Ilona Anderson
- Clinical Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Karin Koinig
- Clinical Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Antwerp, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fan CJ, Mavrommatis MA, Wanna GB, Cosetti MK. Impact of Cochlear Implantation on Quality of Life in Chinese Americans. Otol Neurotol 2024; 45:e472-e477. [PMID: 38865724 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000004207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans after cochlear implantation (CI) using the cross-culturally adapted Chinese Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global. STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional. SETTING Tertiary care neurotology practice in New York City. PATIENTS Thirty adult Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans (22.8-89.4 yr, mean 48.9 yr) with prelingual (12) or postlingual (18) deafness who underwent CI between 1995 and 2020. All patients were at least 1 year from CI activation. INTERVENTION CI. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES Chinese CIQOL-10 Global score. RESULTS There were no detectable differences in mean Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores between the prelingual (mean 51.9, SD 11.0) and postlingual (mean 44.0, SD 16.4) cohorts (p = 0.1; 95% CI, -2.3 to 18.1; Hedges' g = 0.5). Comparison of the overall cohort (mean 47.1, SD 14.8) with previously published CIQOL-10 Global scores of English-speaking American CI users (mean 51.5, SD 10.4) demonstrated a significant difference (p = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.4-8.4; Hedges' g = 0.4). For the overall cohort, multivariable analysis demonstrated that combined household income (p = 0.007, β = 7.4; 95% CI, 0.7-14.0) was positively associated with Chinese CIQOL-10 Global scores. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to evaluate QOL after CI in Mandarin-speaking Chinese American adults. The CIQOL-10 Global scores of Mandarin-speaking Chinese Americans CI users are significantly worse than those of English-speaking American CI users. Combined household income may be positively associated with QOL in the Mandarin-speaking Chinese American CI population. More resources are needed to assess outcomes and support rehabilitation in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caleb J Fan
- Michigan Ear Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan
| | - Maria A Mavrommatis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - George B Wanna
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Maura K Cosetti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang D, Tran Y, Lo C, Lee JN, Turner J, McAlpine D, McMahon C, Gopinath B. The Benefits of Cochlear Implantation for Adults: A Systematic Umbrella Review. Ear Hear 2024; 45:801-807. [PMID: 38233980 DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000001473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The uptake of cochlear implants among adults who could benefit (based on pure-tone audiometry) in developed countries is estimated to be less than 10%. Concerns about potential surgical complications, fear of losing residual hearing, and limited awareness about the benefits of this intervention contribute to the low adoption rate. To enhance quality of life and improve the uptake of cochlear implants, it is essential to have a clear understanding of their benefits. DESIGN This umbrella review aims to summarize the major benefits of cochlear implant usage in adults, by synthesizing findings from published review articles. A comprehensive search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar, was conducted. The search was limited to English-language review articles published between 1990 and 2022, focusing on cochlear implant outcomes in at least 5 adults (aged ≥18 years). Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, and conducted a quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses. RESULTS Forty-two articles were included in this review. There were 15 systematic reviews with meta-analysis, 25 systematic reviews without meta-analysis, and 2 systematic scoping reviews. All 42 articles underwent quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses, of which 40% (n = 17) satisfied 9 out of 11 quality criteria. This umbrella review shows that cochlear implants are associated with improvements in speech perception and recognition as well as improved quality of life and cognition. These benefits are observed in a significant proportion of adults undergoing the procedure, highlighting its effectiveness as a viable intervention for individuals with severe to profound hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS The potential benefits of cochlear implantation appear to outweigh the risks and complications associated with the procedure. It is recommended that adults with severe to profound hearing loss in particular, engage in informed discussions with healthcare professionals to consider cochlear implantation as a viable treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Tang
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Tran
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charles Lo
- Department of Management, Australian College of Applied Professions, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jien Nien Lee
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jessica Turner
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David McAlpine
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Catherine McMahon
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bamini Gopinath
- Macquarie University Hearing Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Genuchten S, Gilles A, Mertens G, Andries E, Cardon E, Van Rompaey V, Lammers M, Vanderveken OM, Jacquemin L. Tinnitus suppression by means of cochlear implantation: does it affect cognition? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 281:2281-2291. [PMID: 38052757 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-08339-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recent literature suggests that tinnitus can impact cognition, but results were varied due to a diversity in investigated aspects of cognition and utilized tests, as well as the possible influence of confounding factors. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of tinnitus loudness on cognition by use of a within-subjects design in patients with a cochlear implant (CI). In this population, tinnitus loudness can be modulated by switching the CI on or off as CI is known to highly suppress tinnitus. METHODS A total of 18 CI users completed two versions of the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for Hearing Impaired individuals (RBANS-H), once in unaided condition and once in best aided condition. Tinnitus suppression was defined as a difference in score on a visual-analogue scale (VAS) of at least one point out of ten between these two conditions. RESULTS No significant differences in RBANS-H scores were found between the suppression and no suppression group, nor for the suppression group alone. No significant correlations between tinnitus loudness and RBANS-H were found, neither for the suppression group alone, nor for the group as a whole. CONCLUSION The current study shows no significant effect of tinnitus loudness on cognition, which contradicts previous literature. This discrepancy could be explained by the use of a within-subjects design, which controls for confounding factors. Future research should include a larger and more diverse study sample to draw definitive conclusions on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah van Genuchten
- Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Annick Gilles
- Department of Education, Health and Social Work, University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Ellen Andries
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Emilie Cardon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Marc Lammers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Olivier M Vanderveken
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Laure Jacquemin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium
- Department of Translational Neurosciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Swords C, Ghedia R, Blanchford H, Arwyn–Jones J, Heward E, Milinis K, Hardman J, Smith ME, Bance M, Muzaffar J. Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities associated with access to cochlear implantation for severe-to-profound hearing loss: A multicentre observational study of UK adults. PLoS Med 2024; 21:e1004296. [PMID: 38573882 PMCID: PMC10994380 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss may benefit from management with cochlear implants. These patients need a referral to a cochlear implant team for further assessment and possible surgery. The referral pathway may result in varied access to hearing healthcare. This study aimed to explore referral patterns and whether there were any socioeconomic or ethnic associations with the likelihood of referral. The primary outcome was to determine factors influencing referral for implant assessment. The secondary outcome was to identify factors impacting whether healthcare professionals had discussed the option of referral. METHODS AND FINDINGS A multicentre multidisciplinary observational study was conducted in secondary care Otolaryngology and Audiology units in Great Britain. Adults fulfilling NICE (2019) audiometric criteria for implant assessment were identified over a 6-month period between 1 July and 31 December 2021. Patient- and site-specific characteristics were extracted. Multivariable binary logistic regression was employed to compare a range of factors influencing the likelihood of implant discussion and referral including patient-specific (demographics, past medical history, and degree of hearing loss) and site-specific factors (cochlear implant champion and whether the hospital performed implants). Hospitals across all 4 devolved nations of the UK were invited to participate, with data submitted from 36 urban hospitals across England, Scotland, and Wales. Nine hospitals (25%) conducted cochlear implant assessments. The majority of patients lived in England (n = 5,587, 86.2%); the rest lived in Wales (n = 419, 6.5%) and Scotland (n = 233, 3.6%). The mean patient age was 72 ± 19 years (mean ± standard deviation); 54% were male, and 75·3% of participants were white, 6·3% were Asian, 1·5% were black, 0·05% were mixed, and 4·6% were self-defined as a different ethnicity. Of 6,482 submitted patients meeting pure tone audiometric thresholds for cochlear implantation, 311 already had a cochlear implant. Of the remaining 6,171, 35.7% were informed they were eligible for an implant, but only 9.7% were referred for assessment. When adjusted for site- and patient-specific factors, stand-out findings included that adults were less likely to be referred if they lived in more deprived area decile within Indices of Multiple Deprivation (4th (odds ratio (OR): 2·19; 95% confidence interval (CI): [1·31, 3·66]; p = 0·002), 5th (2·02; [1·21, 3·38]; p = 0·05), 6th (2·32; [1·41, 3·83]; p = 0.05), and 8th (2·07; [1·25, 3·42]; p = 0·004)), lived in London (0·40; [0·29, 0·57]; p < 0·001), were male (females 1·52; [1·27, 1·81]; p < 0·001), or were older (0·97; [0·96, 0·97]; p < 0·001). They were less likely to be informed of their potential eligibility if they lived in more deprived areas (4th (1·99; [1·49, 2·66]; p < 0·001), 5th (1·75; [1·31, 2·33], p < 0·001), 6th (1·85; [1·39, 2·45]; p < 0·001), 7th (1·66; [1·25, 2·21]; p < 0·001), and 8th (1·74; [1·31, 2·31]; p < 0·001) deciles), the North of England or London (North 0·74; [0·62, 0·89]; p = 0·001; London 0·44; [0·35, 0·56]; p < 0·001), were of Asian or black ethnic backgrounds compared to white patients (Asian 0·58; [0·43, 0·79]; p < 0·001; black 0·56; [0·34, 0·92]; p = 0·021), were male (females 1·46; [1·31, 1·62]; p < 0·001), or were older (0·98; [0·98, 0·98]; p < 0·001). The study methodology was limited by its observational nature, reliance on accurate documentation of the referring service, and potential underrepresentation of certain demographic groups. CONCLUSIONS The majority of adults meeting pure tone audiometric threshold criteria for cochlear implantation are currently not appropriately referred for assessment. There is scope to target underrepresented patient groups to improve referral rates. Future research should engage stakeholders to explore the reasons behind the disparities. Implementing straightforward measures, such as educational initiatives and automated pop-up tools for immediate identification, can help streamline the referral process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Swords
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
| | - Reshma Ghedia
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
- Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hannah Blanchford
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
- Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - James Arwyn–Jones
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
- Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elliot Heward
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
- Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Kristijonas Milinis
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
- Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - John Hardman
- INTEGRATE (The Otolaryngology Trainee Research Network), United Kingdom
- Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew E. Smith
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Manohar Bance
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jameel Muzaffar
- Cambridge Hearing Group, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cuda D, Manrique M, Ramos Á, Marx M, Bovo R, Khnifes R, Hilly O, Belmin J, Stripeikyte G, Graham PL, James CJ, Greenham PV, Mosnier I. Improving quality of life in the elderly: hearing loss treatment with cochlear implants. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:16. [PMID: 38178036 PMCID: PMC10768457 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04642-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing loss impacts health-related quality of life and general well-being and was identified in a Lancet report as one of the largest potentially modifiable factors for the prevention of age-related dementia. There is a lack of robust data on how cochlear implant treatment in the elderly impacts quality of life. The primary objective was to measure the change in health utility following cochlear implantation in individuals aged ≥ 60 years. METHODS This study uniquely prospectively recruited a large multinational sample of 100 older adults (mean age 71.7 (SD7.6) range 60-91 years) with severe to profound hearing loss. In a repeated-measures design, pre and post implant outcome measures were analysed using mixed-effect models. Health utility was assessed with the Health Utilities Index Mark III (HUI3). Subjects were divided into groups of 60-64, 65-74 and 75 + years. RESULTS At 18 months post implant, the mean HUI3 score improved by 0.13 (95%CI: 0.07-0.18 p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the HUI3 between age groups (F[2,9228] = 0.53, p = 0.59). The De Jong Loneliness scale reduced by an average of 0.61 (95%CI: 0.25-0.97 p < 0.014) and the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale improved on average (1.25, 95%CI: 0.85-1.65 p < 0.001). Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening reduced by an average of 8.7 (95%CI: 6.7-10.8, p < 0.001) from a significant to mild-moderate hearing handicap. Age was not a statistically significant factor for any of the other measures (p > 0.20). At baseline 90% of participants had no or mild depression and there was no change in mean depression scores after implant. Categories of Auditory perception scale showed that all subjects achieved a level of speech sound discrimination without lip reading post implantation (level 4) and at least 50% could use the telephone with a known speaker. CONCLUSIONS Better hearing improved individuals' quality of life, ability to communicate verbally and their ability to function independently. They felt less lonely and less handicapped by their hearing loss. Benefits were independent of age group. Cochlear implants should be considered as a routine treatment option for those over 60 years with bilateral severe to profound hearing loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS gov/ ), 7 March 2017, NCT03072862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Cuda
- Ospedale Guglielmo da Saliceto, Piacenza, Italy
| | - M Manrique
- Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Á Ramos
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario Insular Materno Infantil, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
| | - M Marx
- Hôpital Purpan, CHU, Toulouse, France
| | - R Bovo
- Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - R Khnifes
- Bnai Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel
| | - O Hilly
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | - J Belmin
- Sorbonne Université Pierre and Hôpital Charles Foix, Paris, France
| | | | | | - C J James
- Cochlear France SA, Toulouse, France
| | - P V Greenham
- Greenham Research Consulting Ltd, Ashbury, SN6 8LP, UK.
| | - I Mosnier
- Unité Fonctionnelle Implants Auditifs, ORL, GH Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP Sorbonne Université - Technologies et thérapie génique pour la surdité, Institut de l'audition, Institut Pasteur/Inserm, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Völter C, Götze L, Ballasch I, Harbert L, Dazert S, Thomas JP. Third-party disability in cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol 2023; 62:1059-1066. [PMID: 36411948 DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2125913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To date, auditory rehabilitation mainly focuses on the person with hearing impairment (PHI). This study aimed to analyse the burden of hearing loss on significant others (SOs), and to explore the impact of contextual and mediating psychosocial co-factors and auditory rehabilitation by cochlear implantation (CI). DESIGN AND STUDY SAMPLE Third-party disability (SOS-HEAR) and quality of life (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire) were evaluated in 41 PHI scheduled for CI surgery and their close partners pre- and 6-month post-implantation. Further, age, hearing status, educational level, depressive symptoms (GDS-15), coping strategies (Brief-COPE), resilience (RS-13), stress (PSQ) of SOs and PHI were studied. RESULTS Hearing loss imposes a burden on SOs, particularly in relation to changes in communication and socialisation. Third-party disability was higher in SOs of PHI with lower educational background (p = 0.04) and of advanced age (p = 0.008). Hearing status of SOs negatively correlated with SOS-HEAR (p = 0.04). After CI, quality of life of PHI and third-party disability of SOs improved (p < 0.001), except in relationship changes. SOs with higher pre-operative burden also experienced more third-party disability afterwards (p ≤ 0.003). CONCLUSION Audiological rehabilitation should expand to include SOs in the rehabilitation process, as the burden experienced by SOs might persist even after CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Völter
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Centre at Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Lisa Götze
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Centre at Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Isabel Ballasch
- The Department for Neuropsychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lisa Harbert
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Centre at Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Dazert
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Comprehensive Hearing Centre at Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jan Peter Thomas
- The Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St. Johannes-Hospital Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, Skarzynski PH, Cywka KB, Czajka N, Kutyba J, Tavora-Vieira D, Van de Heyning P, Mertens G, Staecker H, Humphrey B, Zernotti M, Zernotti M, Magele A, Ploder M, Zabeu JS. QoL, CIs, QALYs, and Individualized Rehabilitation: The Clinical and Practical Benefits of Regularly Assessing the Quality of Life of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6906. [PMID: 37887644 PMCID: PMC10605987 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20206906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to report quality of life (QoL) scores in unilateral cochlear implant (CI) users and to generate guidance for clinicians on using QoL measures to individualize CI counselling and rehabilitation and to increase access to CIs as a mode of rehabilitation. Participants (n = 101) were unilateral CI users with single-sided deafness (SSD; n = 17), asymmetrical hearing loss (AHL; n = 26), or bilateral hearing loss (Uni; n = 58). Generic QoL was assessed via the Health Utilities Index (HUI-3), and disease-specific QoL was assessed via the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and Nijmegen CI Questionnaire (NCIQ) at preimplantation and at 6 and 12 months of CI use. All groups had significantly increased HUI-3 scores at both intervals. The SSD group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 at visit 3, the AHL group showed significant benefit on the SSQ12 and most NCIQ subdomains at both intervals, and the Uni group showed significant benefit with both tests at both intervals. Unilateral CI recipients demonstrate improved QoL within the first 12 months of device use. Regular assessment with generic and disease-specific questionnaires has the potential to play an important role in personalizing treatment and possibly in increasing access to CI provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Lassaletta
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Miryam Calvino
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
- Biomedical Research Networking Centre on Rare Diseases (CIBERER), Institute of Health Carlos III, (CIBERER-U761), 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Sanchez-Cuadrado
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital La Paz. IdiPAZ Research Institute, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (M.C.); (I.S.-C.)
| | - Piotr Henryk Skarzynski
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Katarzyna B. Cywka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Natalia Czajka
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | - Justyna Kutyba
- Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, World Hearing Center, 05-830 Kajetany, Poland; (P.H.S.); (K.B.C.); (N.C.); (J.K.)
| | | | - Paul Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; (P.V.d.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Antwerp, Belgium; (P.V.d.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Hinrich Staecker
- ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Bryan Humphrey
- ENT Department, University of Kansas Medical Centre, Kansas City, KS 66160, USA; (H.S.); (B.H.)
| | - Mario Zernotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; (M.Z.); (M.Z.)
| | - Maximo Zernotti
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sanatorio Allende de Córdoba, Córdoba 5000, Argentina; (M.Z.); (M.Z.)
| | - Astrid Magele
- ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria; (A.M.)
| | - Marlene Ploder
- ENT Department, Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten, 3100 St. Pölten, Austria; (A.M.)
| | - Julia Speranza Zabeu
- Hospital de Reabilitacão de Anomalias Craniofaciais da Universidade de Sao Paulo, Campus Bauru, Bauru 17012-230, Brazil;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haanes GG. Multidisciplinary Approaches and Community-Based Interventions: Adaptable Strategies for Managing Sensory Impairments in Older Adults. J Multidiscip Healthc 2023; 16:2701-2705. [PMID: 37724317 PMCID: PMC10505404 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s416762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Sensory impairments including hearing and vision loss are becoming increasingly prevalent among older adults worldwide, and are adversely affecting their quality of life, independence and cognitive health. This article focuses on the global rise of sensory impairments in the ageing population and evaluates the efficacy of multidisciplinary interventions for management and prevention, including assistive-technology-based medicine, exercise programs and cognitive strategies. Drawing from a wide range of studies, we emphasize the importance of developing globally adaptable, community-based solutions that not only address the direct challenges posed by sensory impairments but also their broader implications for cognitive decline. Additionally, we highlight the need for continuous international research to fine-tune these interventions, to ensure they are holistic and responsive to the diverse needs of older adults across different regions worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gro Gade Haanes
- Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Institute for Nursing and Health Science, University of South-Eastern Norway, Campus Vestfold, Horten, Norway
- USN Research Group of Older Peoples’ Health, University of South-Eastern Norway Department of Nursing and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Drammen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bekele Okuba T, Lystad RP, Boisvert I, McMaugh A, Moore RC, Walsan R, Mitchell RJ. Cochlear implantation impact on health service utilisation and social outcomes: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:929. [PMID: 37649056 PMCID: PMC10468908 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09900-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hearing loss can have a negative impact on individuals' health and engagement with social activities. Integrated approaches that tackle barriers and social outcomes could mitigate some of these effects for cochlear implants (CI) users. This review aims to synthesise the evidence of the impact of a CI on adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. METHODS Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC, CINAHL and PsychINFO) were searched from 1st January 2000 to 16 January 2023 and May 2023. Articles that reported on health service utilisation or social outcomes post-CI in adults aged ≥ 18 years were included. Health service utilisation includes hospital admissions, emergency department (ED) presentations, general practitioner (GP) visits, CI revision surgery and pharmaceutical use. Social outcomes include education, autonomy, social participation, training, disability, social housing, social welfare benefits, occupation, employment, income level, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QoL), communication and cognition. Searched articles were screened in two stages ̶̶̶ by going through the title and abstract then full text. Information extracted from the included studies was narratively synthesised. RESULTS There were 44 studies included in this review, with 20 (45.5%) cohort studies, 18 (40.9%) cross-sectional and six (13.6%) qualitative studies. Nine studies (20.5%) reported on health service utilisation and 35 (79.5%) on social outcomes. Five out of nine studies showed benefits of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation including reduced use of prescription medication, reduced number of surgical and audiological visits. Most of the studies 27 (77.1%) revealed improvements for at least one social outcome, such as work or employment 18 (85.7%), social participation 14 (93.3%), autonomy 8 (88.9%), education (all nine studies), perceived hearing disability (five out of six studies) and income (all three studies) post-CI. None of the included studies had a low risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS This review identified beneficial impacts of CI in improving adults' health service utilisation and social outcomes. Improvement in hearing enhanced social interactions and working lives. There is a need for large scale, well-designed epidemiological studies examining health and social outcomes post-CI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolesa Bekele Okuba
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Reidar P Lystad
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Isabelle Boisvert
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne McMaugh
- Macquarie School of Education, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Ramya Walsan
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rebecca J Mitchell
- Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Spitzer ER, Waltzman SB. Cochlear implants: the effects of age on outcomes. Expert Rev Med Devices 2023; 20:1131-1141. [PMID: 37969071 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2023.2283619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cochlear implants (CIs) provide access to sound for children and adults who do not receive adequate benefit from hearing aids. Age at implantation is known to affect outcomes across the lifespan. AREAS COVERED The effects of age on CI outcomes are examined for infants, children, adolescents, and older adults. A variety of outcome measures are considered, including speech perception, language, cognition, and quality of life measures. EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY For those meeting candidacy criteria, CIs are beneficial at any age. In general, younger age is related to greater benefit when considering pre-lingual deafness. Other factors such as additional disabilities, may mitigate this effect. Post-lingually deafened adults demonstrate similar benefit regardless of age, though the oldest individuals (80+) may see smaller degrees of improvement from preoperative scores. Benefit can be measured in many ways, and the areas of greatest benefit may vary based on age: young children appear to see the greatest effects of age at implantation on language measures, whereas scores on cognitive measures appear to be most impacted for the oldest population. Future research should consider implantation at extreme ages (5-9 months or > 90 years), unconventional measures of CI benefit including qualitative assessments, and longitudinal designs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily R Spitzer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Susan B Waltzman
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Andries E, Bosmans J, Engelborghs S, Cras P, Vanderveken OM, Lammers MJW, Van de Heyning PH, Van Rompaey V, Mertens G. Evaluation of Cognitive Functioning Before and After Cochlear Implantation in Adults Aged 55 Years and Older at Risk for Mild Cognitive Impairment. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:310-316. [PMID: 36795400 PMCID: PMC9936380 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.5046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Importance Given the rapidly rising dementia incidence, management of modifiable risk factors, such as hearing loss, is vital. Multiple studies have demonstrated an improvement of cognitive functioning in older adults with severe hearing loss after cochlear implantation; however, few of these studies, to the authors' knowledge, specifically analyzed participants achieving poor cognitive results preoperatively. Objective To evaluate the cognitive functioning of older adults with severe hearing loss at risk for mild cognitive impairment (MCI) before and after cochlear implantation. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, longitudinal cohort study performed at a single center reports data obtained over a 6-year period (April 2015 to September 2021) of an ongoing prospective, longitudinal cohort study on cochlear implant outcomes in older adults. A consecutive sample of older adults with severe hearing loss eligible for cochlear implantation was included. All participants obtained a Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status for hearing-impaired patients (RBANS-H) total score indicative of MCI preoperatively. Participants were assessed before cochlear implant activation and 12 months after cochlear implant activation. Intervention The intervention consisted of cochlear implantation. Main Outcome and Measure The primary outcome measure was cognition, measured by the RBANS-H. Results A total of 21 older adult cochlear implant candidates were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 72 [9] years; 13 [62%] men). Cochlear implantation was associated with an improvement of overall cognitive functioning 12 months after activation (median [IQR] percentile, 5 [2-8] vs 12 [7-19]; difference, 7 [95% CI, 2-12]). Eight participants (38%) surpassed the MCI cutoff (16th percentile) postoperatively, while the overall median cognitive score remained under this cutoff. In addition, participants' speech recognition in noise improved, with a lower score indicating improvement (mean [SD] score, +17.16 [5.45] vs +5.67 [6.3]; difference, -11.49 [95% CI, -14.26 to -8.72]), after cochlear implant activation. Improvement of speech recognition in noise was positively associated with improvement in cognitive functioning (rs, -0.48 [95% CI, -0.69 to -0.19]). Years of education, sex, RBANS-H version, and symptoms of depression and anxiety were not related to the evolution in RBANS-H scores. Conclusions and Relevance In this prospective, longitudinal cohort study, cognitive functioning and speech perception in noise showed a clinically meaningful improvement 12 months after cochlear implant activation in older adults with severe hearing loss at risk for MCI, suggesting that cochlear implantation is not contraindicated in cochlear implant candidates with cognitive decline and should be considered after multidisciplinary evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Andries
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Joyce Bosmans
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Sebastiaan Engelborghs
- Department of Neurology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel and Center for Neurosciences (C4N), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Institute Born-Bunge, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Patrick Cras
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Neurology, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
| | - Olivier M. Vanderveken
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Marc J. W. Lammers
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Paul H. Van de Heyning
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Vincent Van Rompaey
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Griet Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital (UZA), Edegem, Belgium
- Experimental Laboratory of Translational Neurosciences and Dento-Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp (UA), Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee YH, Ho PH, Chen PY, Chen XX, Sun YC, Chu CH, Lin HC. Long-term auditory performance and psychosocial benefits of cochlear implantation in Mandarin-speaking older adults. Am J Otolaryngol 2023; 44:103876. [PMID: 37084611 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2023.103876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although previous studies have shown the efficacy of cochlear implants (CIs) in older adults, no study written in English has focused on Mandarin-speaking older recipients. Mandarin is a tonal language, it is hard to lip-read and tone recognition for CI users. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term post-CI outcomes in Mandarin-speaking older adults and the difference between them and younger recipients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-six post-lingually deafened adults were included. Speech perception tests (vowel, consonant, disyllable words, Mandarin monosyllable recognition test, and categories of audiology performance were evaluated) and psychosocial scale were evaluated. RESULTS There were no significant differences between older and younger recipients in post-CI open-set speech perception. However, older recipients had significantly lower social and total scores in the subjective questionnaire than younger recipients. In both duration of deafness less than seven years and hearing years in life over 92.6 %, older recipients had no less capable speech perception than in younger. CONCLUSION Mandarin-speaking older recipients can improve not only speech perception but also psychosocial benefits. Well hearing experience may confer an advantage to older recipients, despite their older implanted age. These results can help provide pre-CI consultation guidelines for older Mandarin-speaking recipients.
Collapse
|
14
|
Olze H, Ketterer MC, Péus D, Häußler SM, Hildebrandt L, Gräbel S, Szczepek AJ. Effects of auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implant on tinnitus prevalence and distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing and psychological comorbidities: Comparative analysis of patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), double-sided (bilateral) deafness (DSD), and single-sided (unilateral) deafness (SSD). Front Neurol 2023; 13:1089610. [PMID: 36712436 PMCID: PMC9877424 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1089610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Auditory rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI), in many cases, positively impacts tinnitus. However, it is unclear if the tinnitus-related benefit of CI is equal for patients with various indications for CI. Therefore, this study aimed to determine differences in tinnitus prevalence and distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing, perceived stress, and psychological comorbidities between patients diagnosed with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), single-sided (unilateral) deafness (SSD), and double-sided (bilateral) deafness (DSD) before and six months after cochlear implantation. Methods One hundred-one CI candidates were included in this prospective study (39 AHL patients, 23 DSD patients, and 39 SSD patients). The patients completed questionnaires measuring tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing, perceived stress, and psychological comorbidities before and 6 months after CI. Results The prevalence of tinnitus in the entire cohort (80.2% before CI) decreased 6 months after CI to 71.3%. The DSD group had the lowest tinnitus prevalence at both time points. The degree of tinnitus-induced distress decreased significantly in all three groups after CI. Differences in quality of life, subjective hearing, and psychological comorbidities between the groups at the study onset disappeared after CI. Significant correlations existed between anxiety, depression, and tinnitus distress in AHL and SSD but not in DSD patients before and after CI. Discussion Our results demonstrate significant differences between the three groups of CI candidates, which might affect the implantation outcome. These differences suggest a need for personalized psychological counseling during the auditory rehabilitation process, focusing on anxiety and depressive symptoms for SSD and AHL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,*Correspondence: Heidi Olze ✉
| | - Manuel Christoph Ketterer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Péus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Marie Häußler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Skull Base Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lynn Hildebrandt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Gräbel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnieszka J. Szczepek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lee E, Pisa J, Hochman J. Comorbidity associated with worse outcomes in a population of limited cochlear implant performers. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2022; 8:230-235. [PMID: 36846419 PMCID: PMC9948576 DOI: 10.1002/lio2.985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Most patients significantly benefit from cochlear implantation (CI). However, speech understanding varies widely, with a small proportion of patients demonstrating limited audiometric outcomes. While there are well-documented determinants of poor performance, there remains a cohort of patients that do not meet expected outcomes. Preoperative prognostication is desirable to manage expectations, ensure value of the intervention, and reduce risk. The objective of the study is to evaluate variables found within a single CI center's most limited functioning cohort following implantation. Methods A retrospective review of a single CI program's cohort of (344 ears) patients implanted between 2011 and 2018 whose 1-year postimplantation AzBio scores fall 2 SDs below the mean was performed. Exclusion criteria includes skullbase pathology, pre/peri-lingual deafness, cochlear anatomic abnormalities, English as an additional language, and limited electrode insertion depth. Overall, 26 patients were identified. Results The study population's postimplantation net benefit AzBio score is 18% compared to the entire program's 47% (p < 0.05). This group is older (71.8 vs. 59.0 years, p < 0.05) with a longer duration of hearing loss (26.4 vs. 18.0 years, p < 0.05) and with a lower preoperative AzBio score [14% lower (p < 0.05)]. A host of medical conditions were identified in the subpopulation, with a trend towards significance in those suffering from either malignancy or cardiac condition. Escalating comorbid status was associated with worse performance (p < 0.05). Conclusion Within a cohort of limited-performing CI users, benefit tended to decrease with escalating number of comorbid conditions. This information may serve to inform preoperative patient counseling. Level of evidence Level IV (evidence from a case control study).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erika Lee
- University of Manitoba Faculty of MedicineOtolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck SurgeryWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Justyn Pisa
- University of Manitoba Faculty of MedicineSurgical Hearing Implant Program, Department of Otolaryngology‐Head and Neck SurgeryWinnipegManitobaCanada
| | - Jordan Hochman
- University of Manitoba Faculty of MedicineNeurotologic Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology ‐ Head and Neck SurgeryWinnipegManitobaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Psychometric properties of the English version of the Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ). PLoS One 2022; 17:e0273390. [PMID: 36048757 PMCID: PMC9436034 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
The Audio Processor Satisfaction Questionnaire (APSQ) is a standardized tool to measure a user’s satisfaction with their audio processor(s). It was first developed and validated in the German language. The purpose of the current study was to validate the English version of the APSQ.
Design
The 15 items of the APSQ were translated into English. Item and scale analyses assessed the quality of individual items and of the questionnaire in its entirety.
Study sample
Sixty-seven adults with hearing implants participated. Forty-six of them completed the questionnaire twice within 2–4 weeks.
Results
High mean values were obtained with total scores and with scores of the comfort, social life, and usability domains, indicating that users are generally satisfied with their audio processors. The questionnaire achieved good test-retest reliability with high internal consistency. A significant positive correlation between time since implantation and user satisfaction was found.
Conclusion
Results of the item and reliability analyses suggest that the English version of the APSQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess user satisfaction with their audio processor(s).
Collapse
|
17
|
Evolution of Type D Personality Traits After Cochlear Implantation in Severely Hearing Impaired Adults 55 Years and Older: An Exploratory Prospective, Longitudinal, Controlled, Multicenter Study. Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e865-e871. [PMID: 35970164 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the evolution of type D personality traits in older adults after cochlear implantation compared with a control group of severely hearing impaired older adults who did not receive a cochlear implant (CI). The influence of COVID-19 on this evolution was also explored. Type D personality combines a high degree of negative affectivity (NA) and social inhibition (SI). METHODS In this prospective, longitudinal, controlled multicenter exploratory study, 76 older CI users and 21 severely hearing impaired controls without CI were included. The CI group and the control group did not differ significantly regarding age, formal education, residual hearing, Type D Scale-14 (DS14) total score, NA, and SI at baseline. Type D personality traits were assessed with the DS14 at baseline (T0) and 14 months later (T14). RESULTS Type D personality traits differed significantly over time between the CI group and the control group (p < 0.001). In the CI group, the DS14 total score (mean delta T = -6.63; p < 0.001), NA (mean delta T = -3.26; p < 0.001), and SI (mean delta T = -3.37; p < 0.001) improved significantly over time (delta T = T14-T0), whereas no significant difference was found in the control group. Significantly fewer subjects were categorized as type D personalities in the CI group (delta T = -12; p = 0.023) at T14, whereas no significant change was found in the control group (delta T = 3; p = 0.250). COVID-19 did not influence the evolution of type D personality traits significantly in the CI group. CONCLUSION Cochlear implantation has a positive effect on type D personality traits in older adults with a severe-to-profound hearing impairment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Völter C, Oberländer K, Mertens S, Ramseyer FT. Nonverbal synchrony in subjects with hearing impairment and their significant others. Front Psychol 2022; 13:964547. [PMID: 36059730 PMCID: PMC9434370 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.964547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Hearing loss has a great impact on the people affected, their close partner and the interaction between both, as oral communication is restricted. Nonverbal communication, which expresses emotions and includes implicit information on interpersonal relationship, has rarely been studied in people with hearing impairment (PHI). In psychological settings, non-verbal synchrony of body movements in dyads is a reliable method to study interpersonal relationship. Material and methods A 10-min social interaction was videorecorded in 39 PHI (29 spouses and 10 parent-child dyads) and their significant others (SOs). Nonverbal synchrony, which means the nonverbal behaviors of two interacting persons (referring to both general synchrony and the role of leading) and verbal interaction (percentage of speech, frequency of repetitions, and queries) were analyzed by computer algorithms and observer ratings. Hearing-related quality of life, coping mechanisms, general psychopathology, quality of relationship, and burden of hearing loss experienced by SOs were assessed using questionnaires. Results In the 39 dyads, true nonverbal synchrony differed from pseudosynchrony [t(43.4) = 2.41; p = 0.02] with a medium effect size (d = 0.42). Gender of PHI had a significant effect on general synchrony (p = 0.025) and on leading by SOs (p = 0.017). Age gap correlated with synchronic movements (p = 0.047). Very short duration of hearing impairment was associated with lower nonverbal synchrony in the role of leading by SOs (p = 0.031). Feeling of closeness by PHI correlated negatively with the role of leading by SOs (p > 0.001) and feeling of closeness by SOs was positively associated with leading by PHI (p = 0.015). No correlation was detected between nonverbal synchrony and other questionnaires. Burden experienced by the SOs was higher in SOs who reported less closeness (p = 0.014). Discussion A longer hearing impairment leads to more nonverbal leading by SOs compared to PHI with very short duration of hearing loss, possibly because of the long-lasting imbalance in communication. If PHI felt more closeness, SOs led less and vice versa. Burden experienced by SOs negatively correlated with closeness reported by SOs. Use of nonverbal signals and communication might help to improve benefits of auditory rehabilitation for PHI and decrease burden experienced by SOs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- *Correspondence: Christiane Völter
| | - Kirsten Oberländer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Sophie Mertens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Fabian T. Ramseyer
- Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Dietz A, Heinrich A, Törmäkangas T, Iso-Mustajärvi M, Miettinen P, Willberg T, Linder PH. The Effectiveness of Unilateral Cochlear Implantation on Performance-Based and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Finnish Recipients. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:786939. [PMID: 35733938 PMCID: PMC9207276 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.786939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding speech is essential for adequate social interaction, and its functioning affects health, wellbeing, and quality of life (QoL). Untreated hearing loss (HL) is associated with reduced social activity, depression and cognitive decline. Severe and profound HL is routinely rehabilitated with cochlear implantation. The success of treatment is mostly assessed by performance-based outcome measures such as speech perception. The ultimate goal of cochlear implantation, however, is to improve the patient’s QoL. Therefore, patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) would be clinically valuable as they assess subjective benefits and overall effectiveness of treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the patient-reported benefits of unilateral cochlear implantation in an unselected Finnish patient cohort of patients with bilateral HL. The study design was a prospective evaluation of 118 patients. The patient cohort was longitudinally followed up with repeated within-subject measurements preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were one performance-based speech-in-noise (SiN) test (Finnish Matrix Sentence Test), and two PROMs [Finnish versions of the Speech, Spatial, Qualities of Hearing questionnaire (SSQ) and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ)]. The results showed significant average improvements in SiN scores, from +0.8 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) preoperatively to −3.7 and −3.8 dB SNR at 6 and12 month follow-up, respectively. Significant improvements were also found for SSQ and NCIQ scores in all subdomains from the preoperative state to 6 and 12 months after first fitting. No clinically significant improvements were observed in any of the outcome measures between 6 and 12 months. Preoperatively, poor SiN scores were associated with low scoring in several subdomains of the SSQ and NCIQ. Poor preoperative SiN scores and low PROMs scoring were significantly associated with larger postoperative improvements. No significant association was found between SiN scores and PROMs postoperatively. This study demonstrates significant benefits of cochlear implantation in the performance-based and patient-reported outcomes in an unselected patient sample. The lack of association between performance and PROMs scores postoperatively suggests that both capture unique aspects of benefit, highlighting the need to clinically implement PROMs in addition to performance-based measures for a more holistic assessment of treatment benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aarno Dietz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- *Correspondence: Aarno Dietz,
| | - Antje Heinrich
- Division of Human Communication, Development and Hearing, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Timo Törmäkangas
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland
| | | | - Petrus Miettinen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Tytti Willberg
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pia H. Linder
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Evaluating the Revised Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire in Cochlear Implant Users Cochlear Implant Outcome Assessment Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Otol Neurotol 2022; 43:e571-e577. [PMID: 35283464 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The 59-item Work Rehabilitation Questionnaire (WORQ) was developed based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for vocational rehabilitation to assess work related functioning. It was revised to include 17 questions, assigned to 14 ICF categories relevant to cochlear implant (CI) users. This cross-sectional multicenter study aimed to evaluate CI users' responses on the WORQ questions to describe and generate ICF qualifiers for the revised WORQ in CI users, forming part of a broader framework of CI outcome measures linked to the ICF. METHODS One hundred seventy-seven adults over the age of 18 years with a minimum of one year's device experience were included in the analysis. The WORQ was completed by the participants at a routine visit to the clinic, via email, or via post. RESULTS Most of the CI users perceived no problem on the WORQ questions (53.7%-91%), finished secondary school (54.2%) or obtained a college or university degree (32.8%) and are either employed (41.2%) or retired (34.5%). CI users that are currently working mostly have a full-time position (34.5%). Subjects reported no problem (91%) with sensation of falling, while handling communication devices and techniques (10.9%) and tinnitus (9.6%) showed the highest number of subjects reporting a complete problem. CONCLUSIONS Overall, most of the CI users experienced no impairment, restriction or limitation on the WORQ questions and their assigned ICF categories. Their education level resembles the education level of the general population and they seem to integrate or reintegrate well in professional life postoperatively.
Collapse
|
21
|
Caldara M, Belgiovine C, Secchi E, Rusconi R. Environmental, Microbiological, and Immunological Features of Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Implanted Medical Devices. Clin Microbiol Rev 2022; 35:e0022120. [PMID: 35044203 PMCID: PMC8768833 DOI: 10.1128/cmr.00221-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The spread of biofilms on medical implants represents one of the principal triggers of persistent and chronic infections in clinical settings, and it has been the subject of many studies in the past few years, with most of them focused on prosthetic joint infections. We review here recent works on biofilm formation and microbial colonization on a large variety of indwelling devices, ranging from heart valves and pacemakers to urological and breast implants and from biliary stents and endoscopic tubes to contact lenses and neurosurgical implants. We focus on bacterial abundance and distribution across different devices and body sites and on the role of environmental features, such as the presence of fluid flow and properties of the implant surface, as well as on the interplay between bacterial colonization and the response of the human immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Caldara
- Interdepartmental Center on Safety, Technologies, and Agri-food Innovation (SITEIA.PARMA), University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Cristina Belgiovine
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano–Milan, Italy
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Microbiologia e Virologia, Università degli Studi di Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Eleonora Secchi
- Institute of Environmental Engineering, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Roberto Rusconi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano–Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele–Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Völter C, Götze L, Bajewski M, Dazert S, Thomas JP. Cognition and Cognitive Reserve in Cochlear Implant Recipients. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:838214. [PMID: 35391751 PMCID: PMC8980358 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.838214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
At present, dementia is a hot topic. Hearing loss is considered to be a modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline. The underlying mechanism remains unclear and might be mediated by socioeconomic and psychosocial factors. Cochlear implantation has been shown not only to restore auditory abilities, but also to decrease mental distress and to improve cognitive functions in people with severe hearing impairment. However, the promising results need to be confirmed. In a prospective single-center study, we tested the neurocognitive abilities of a large group of 71 subjects with bilateral severe hearing impairment with a mean age of 66.03 (SD = 9.15) preoperatively and 6, 12, and 24 months after cochlear implantation using a comprehensive non-auditory computer-based test battery, and we also assessed the cognitive reserve (CR) [Cognitive Reserve Index (CRI)], health-related quality of life (QoL) (Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire), and depression (Geriatric Depression Scale-15). Cognitive functions significantly increased after 6 months in attention (p = 0.00004), working memory (operation span task; p = 0.002), and inhibition (p = 0.0002); and after 12 months in recall (p = 0.003) and verbal fluency (p = 0.0048), and remained stable up to 24 months (p ≥ 0.06). The CR positively correlated with cognitive functions pre- and post-operatively (both p < 0.005), but postoperative improvement in cognition was better in subjects with poor CR (p = 0.003). Depression had only a slight influence on one subtest. No correlation was found among cognitive skills, quality of life, and speech perception (each p ≥ 0.05). Cochlear implantation creates an enriched environment stimulating the plasticity of the brain with a global positive impact on neurocognitive functions, especially in subjects with poor preoperative cognitive performance and low cognitive reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Völter
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
- *Correspondence: Christiane Völter,
| | - Lisa Götze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Marcel Bajewski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Stefan Dazert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Hospital Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jan Peter Thomas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St.-Johannes-Hospital, Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Piromchai P, Tanamai N, Kiatthanabumrung S, Kaewsiri S, Thongyai K, Atchariyasathian V, Thanawirattananit P, Wacharasindhu C, Mukkun T, Isipradit P, Yimtae K. Multicentre cohort study of cochlear implantation outcomes in Thailand. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e054041. [PMID: 34845075 PMCID: PMC8634017 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To report the status and outcomes of cochlear implantation in Thailand. DESIGN Cohort study. SETTING Tertiary care and university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent cochlear implant surgery in Thailand. INTERVENTIONS This project collected data from all government and university hospitals in Thailand where cochlear implant surgery was performed between 2016 and 2020. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Baseline characteristics, operation data, complications, audiological outcomes and quality of life were reported. RESULTS This study included 458 patients, and nearly half of the patients were children and adolescents (46.94%). The mean age of the patients was 2.96±5.83 years. At 1 year postoperatively, the mean pure tone average of the hearing threshold in the implanted ear significantly improved from unaided preoperative baseline (mean difference (MD) 64.23 dB HL; 95% CI 59.81 to 68.65; p<0.001). The mean speech recognition threshold also improved (MD 55.96 dB HL; 95% CI 49.50 to 62.42, p<0.001). The quality-of-life scores of the EQ-5D-5L, PedsQL and HUI3 questionnaires at 1 year showed improved mobility (range, 0-5; MD 0.65; 95% CI 0.05 to 1.25; p=0.037), hearing (range, 0-6; MD 0.96; 95% CI 0.30 to 1.61; p=0.006) and speech (range, 0-5; MD 0.44; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.84; p=0.031). Common complications included electrode dislodgement (2.18%), vertigo (1.23%) and meningitis (1.93%). CONCLUSIONS Excellent audiological outcomes and improvement in the quality of life in the mobility, hearing and speech domains were observed in patients who underwent cochlear implantation in Thailand.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patorn Piromchai
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- Khon Kaen Ear, Hearing and Balance Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Napas Tanamai
- Center of Excellence in Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Sivaporn Kiatthanabumrung
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Suwicha Kaewsiri
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Kanthong Thongyai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Panida Thanawirattananit
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- Khon Kaen Ear, Hearing and Balance Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | | | - Tulakan Mukkun
- Department of Otolaryngology, Trang Hospital, Trang, Thailand
| | - Permsarp Isipradit
- Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kwanchanok Yimtae
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
- Khon Kaen Ear, Hearing and Balance Research Group, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mauch H, Kaur J, Irwin C, Wyss J. Design, implementation, and management of an international medical device registry. Trials 2021; 22:845. [PMID: 34823566 PMCID: PMC8613936 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05821-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Registries are powerful clinical investigational tools. Although in hospitals registries may be mandated, industry-sponsored, international registries are voluntary and therefore can require clearer objectives and more planning. The registry also needs sufficient resources and appropriate measurement tools to motivate long-term participation and ensure success. METHODS We summarize our learnings from 10 years of running a medical device registry that surveys patient-reported benefits of hearing implants. RESULTS We enlisted 77 participating clinics globally, who actively recruited a total of more than 1500 hearing implant users. We identified the stages in developing a registry specific to hearing loss. Furthermore, we report the challenges and successes in design and implementation and make recommendations for future registries. CONCLUSIONS Data collection infrastructure needs to be kept up to date throughout the defined registry lifetime, and it is essential to oversee data quality and completeness. Compliance at registry sites is important for data quality and needs to be weighed against the cost of site monitoring. To motivate sites to enter data accurately and expeditiously, we facilitated easy access to their own data which helped to support their clinical routine. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02004353. 9th December 2013.
Collapse
|
25
|
McGuire K, Firestone GM, Zhang N, Zhang F. The Acoustic Change Complex in Response to Frequency Changes and Its Correlation to Cochlear Implant Speech Outcomes. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:757254. [PMID: 34744668 PMCID: PMC8566680 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.757254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the biggest challenges that face cochlear implant (CI) users is the highly variable hearing outcomes of implantation across patients. Since speech perception requires the detection of various dynamic changes in acoustic features (e.g., frequency, intensity, timing) in speech sounds, it is critical to examine the ability to detect the within-stimulus acoustic changes in CI users. The primary objective of this study was to examine the auditory event-related potential (ERP) evoked by the within-stimulus frequency changes (F-changes), one type of the acoustic change complex (ACC), in adult CI users, and its correlation to speech outcomes. Twenty-one adult CI users (29 individual CI ears) were tested with psychoacoustic frequency change detection tasks, speech tests including the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word recognition, Arizona Biomedical Sentence Recognition in quiet and noise (AzBio-Q and AzBio-N), and the Digit-in-Noise (DIN) tests, and electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. The stimuli for the psychoacoustic tests and EEG recordings were pure tones at three different base frequencies (0.25, 1, and 4 kHz) that contained a F-change at the midpoint of the tone. Results showed that the frequency change detection threshold (FCDT), ACC N1' latency, and P2' latency did not differ across frequencies (p > 0.05). ACC N1'-P2 amplitude was significantly larger for 0.25 kHz than for other base frequencies (p < 0.05). The mean N1' latency across three base frequencies was negatively correlated with CNC word recognition (r = -0.40, p < 0.05) and CNC phoneme (r = -0.40, p < 0.05), and positively correlated with mean FCDT (r = 0.46, p < 0.05). The P2' latency was positively correlated with DIN (r = 0.47, p < 0.05) and mean FCDT (r = 0.47, p < 0.05). There was no statistically significant correlation between N1'-P2' amplitude and speech outcomes (all ps > 0.05). Results of this study indicated that variability in CI speech outcomes assessed with the CNC, AzBio-Q, and DIN tests can be partially explained (approximately 16-21%) by the variability of cortical sensory encoding of F-changes reflected by the ACC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelli McGuire
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Gabrielle M. Firestone
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Nanhua Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| | - Fawen Zhang
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
The impact of cochlear implantation on health-related quality of life in older adults, measured with the Health Utilities Index Mark 2 and Mark 3. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:739-750. [PMID: 33683447 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06727-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the usefulness of the Health Utilities Index (HUI) in older cochlear implant (CI) recipients, the primary aims were: (1) to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured with HUI, in older CI candidates while comparing with age- and gender-matched normal-hearing controls; (2) to compare HRQoL after CI with the pre-operative situation, using HUI and the Nijmegen cochlear implant questionnaire (NCIQ). The difference between pre- and postoperative speech intelligibility in noise (SPIN) and in quiet (SPIQ) and the influence of pre-operative vestibular function on HRQoL in CI users were also studied. METHODS Twenty CI users aged 55 years and older with bilateral severe-to-profound postlingual sensorineural hearing loss and an age- and gender-matched normal-hearing control group were included. HRQoL was assessed with HUI Mark 2 (HUI2), HUI Mark 3 (HUI3) and NCIQ. The CI recipients were evaluated pre-operatively and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS HUI3 Hearing (p = 0.02), SPIQ (p < 0.001), SPIN (p < 0.001) and NCIQ (p = 0.001) scores improved significantly comparing pre- and postoperative measurements in the CI group. No significant improvement was found comparing pre- and postoperative HUI3 Multi-Attribute scores (p = 0.07). The HUI3 Multi-Attribute score after CI remained significantly worse (p < 0.001) than those of the control group. Vestibular loss was significantly related to a decrease in HUI3 Multi-Attribute (p = 0.037) and HUI3 Emotion (p = 0.021) scores. CONCLUSION The HUI is suitable to detect differences between normal-hearing controls and CI users, but might underestimate HRQoL changes after CI in CI users over 55.
Collapse
|