Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in Japanese and Caucasian subjects after oral administration of dabigatran etexilate

Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate after Single and Multiple Oral Doses in Healthy Chinese Subjects

Background and Objective

Dabigatran etexilate is a non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant (NOAC) that is used to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in adults with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and one or more risk factors. Pharmacokinetic data on this anticoagulant in Chinese subjects are limited. This study aimed to provide further information on the pharmacokinetic profile of dabigatran in healthy Chinese subjects, together with its safety profile.

Methods

This was an open-label, single-centre, phase I study. Subjects were randomized into 110 and 150 mg dabigatran etexilate treatment groups. Each subject received 7 days of treatment: a single dose on day 1, no dose on days 2–3, and then multiple doses on days 4–10. Blood samples were collected to analyze the pharmacokinetic profile of dabigatran. All adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Routine clinical laboratory tests, a physical examination, vital signs, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) measurements were performed.

Results

A total of 28 subjects (14 males and 14 females) were randomized in this trial. The plasma concentration of total dabigatran reached its maximum measured concentration at a median time of 3–4 h from the dose of interest (either the initial single dose on day 1 or the final dose on day 10) under fed conditions, and declined with an elimination half-life of 10.7–10.9 h following the dose of interest. There was a modest difference in pharmacokinetic profile between male and female subjects. None of the subjects experienced a serious adverse event (SAE) or an AE of moderate or severe intensity. The investigator reported that 17 of the 28 subjects had mild treatment-emergent AEs that resolved without any concomitant treatment or intervention. No clinically significant changes in vital signs or ECG parameters were observed.

Conclusions

This study revealed the pharmacokinetic characteristics and good safety profile of dabigatran in healthy Chinese subjects.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s13318-020-00626-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ethnoracial variations in venous thrombosis: Implications for management, and a call to action

Despite decades of improvement in its diagnosis and management, venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains a significant cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Clinically relevant differences exist in the risk of symptomatic VTE among ethnoracial groups. Underlying these differences in rates of VTE are patterns of known genetic thrombophilias, which may also influence the risks of major bleeding related to vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants. In addition, social factors, differential access to care, and disease awareness differ between ethnoracial groups, which contributes to disparities in VTE outcomes that include higher fatal events. The vast majority of participants included in clinical trials for the prevention and treatment of VTE have been White Caucasian, which limits our understanding of the differential impact of these agents in non-White ethnoracial groups. Increasing the participation in clinical trials of diverse ethnoracial groups should be a priority, especially those groups who are disproportionately affected by the burden of VTE, or possible bleeding complications when exposed to anticoagulants. Advocacy by patients, researchers, and regulatory bodies is crucial to ensure adequate enrolment of diverse ethnoracial groups in order to best inform clinical decisions to optimize VTE prevention and treatment for non-White populations.

The East Asian Paradox: An Updated Position Statement on the Challenges to the Current Antithrombotic Strategy in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease

East Asian patients have reduced anti-ischemic benefits and increased bleeding risk during antithrombotic therapies compared with Caucasian patients. As potent P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors (e.g., ticagrelor and prasugrel) and direct oral anticoagulants are commonly used in current daily practice, the unique risk-benefit trade-off in East Asians has been a topic of emerging interest. In this article, we propose updated evidence and future directions of antithrombotic treatment in East Asian patients.

Predicted effect of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran etexilate using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

Dabigatran etexilate (DABE) is a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and may be combined with ticagrelor, a P2Y₁₂ inhibitor with antiplatelet effects. This combination of antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants would increases the risk of bleeding in patients. In addition, the potential drug interaction may further increase the risk of bleeding. At present, there is scarce research to clarify the results of the interaction between the two. Therefore, we conducted this study to identify the potential impact of ticagrelor on the pharmacokinetics of DABE using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling. The models reasonably predicted the concentration-time profiles of dabigatran (DAB), the transformation form after DABE absorption, and ticagrelor. For pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction (DDI), exposure to DAB at steady state was increased when co-administrated with ticagrelor. The C_max and AUC_0-t of DAB were raised by approximately 8.7% and 7.1%, respectively. Meanwhile, a stable-state ticagrelor co-administration at 400 mg once-daily increased the C_max and AUC_0-t of DAB by approximately 12.8% and 18.8%, respectively. As conclusions, Ticagrelor slightly increased the exposure of DAB. It is possible to safely use ticagrelor in a double or triple antithrombotic regimen containing DABE, only considering the antithrombotic efficacy, but not need to pay much attention on the pharmacokinetic DDI.

Bioequivalence and pharmacodynamics of a generic dabigatran etexilate capsule in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions

To assess bioequivalence of a generic dabigatran etexilate capsule in healthy Chinese subjects under fasting and fed conditions. This was an open-label, single-center, randomized four-period crossover study with a 7-day washout period. A single oral dose of 150 mg generic dabigatran etexilate capsule (test drug) or a commercial dabigatran etexilate capsule (Pradaxa® , reference drug) was given to healthy volunteers under the fasting and fed conditions. Plasma concentrations of total and free dabigatran were detected using a validated HPLC-MS/MS method. A noncompartmental method was used for pharmacokinetic analysis and established coagulation assays were applied for pharmacodynamic analysis. The 90% CIs of the test/reference ratios of Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-∞ for the total dabigatran concentration were 92.57%-106.58%, 91.63%-106.32%, and 92.54%-106.17%, respectively, under fasting condition, and 99.30%-110.74%, 98.58%-105.37%, and 97.75%-103.99%, respectively, under fed conditions. The 90% CIs of the ratios of the parameters for the free dabigatran were 93.18%-106.98%, 92.13%-107.10%, 92.89%-106.48%, respectively, under fasting condition, and 100.05%-110.89%, 99.37%-106.23%, 97.59%-103.98%, respectively, under the fed condition. Additionally, the upper limit of the 90% CIs for σWT/σWR was below 2.5. There were no significant differences in the coagulation parameters including thrombin clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-IIa activity between the two preparations. The generic dabigatran etexilate capsule is bioequivalent to the brand-named product in healthy Chinese volunteers under fasting and fed conditions. The two products have comparable pharmacodynamic parameters, with a good safety profile. In addition, food intake influences absorption of both products in a similar way.

Drug Class, Renal Elimination, and Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have a better risk benefit profile in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether treatment effects could be modified by drug class and dependency on renal elimination of studied agents has not yet been explored.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, CENTRAL, and CINAHL databases through November 2016 for phase III randomized controlled trials comparing DOACs with warfarin in patients with AF. Efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled according to drug class and dependency on renal elimination of DOACs and were compared with the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Effect differences were assessed with Bucher's indirect comparisons using common estimates, once heterogeneity was low, and with the Bayesian method.

RESULTS

Among 6496 Asian patients from 6 trials, both direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors, compared with warfarin, were associated with lower risks of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding (risk ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.51 [0.33-0.78], 0.74 ([0.58-0.96], 0.60 [0.41-0.86], and 0.59 [0.47-0.76], respectively). There was no between-group difference in direct thrombin inhibitors and factor Xa inhibitors or in DOACs with renal elimination less than 50% and 50% or greater (all I² < 25% and interaction P > .05). Indirect comparisons within strata of drug class and dependency on renal elimination showed no preferential effect of any given regimen over another. There was no difference in effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality between DOACs stratified by pharmacologic characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs, as a therapeutic class, outperform warfarin in efficacy and safety in Asian patients with AF.

A combined pharmacometric analysis of dabigatran etexilate in healthy volunteers and patients with atrial fibrillation or undergoing orthopaedic surgery

Dabigatran etexilate is the orally bioavailable pro-drug of dabigatran, a direct thrombin inhibitor. Using data from eight clinical studies in healthy volunteers and patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) or undergoing orthopaedic surgery (OS), population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) models were developed to investigate whether the PK and PD of dabigatran differ across different populations. In both healthy volunteers (n=80) and patients (n=1,965), the PK of dabigatran was best described by a two-compartment disposition model with first-order absorption and elimination. Renal function was the only covariate shown to have a clinically relevant impact on dabig-atran exposure. The patient PK model was successfully applied in predicting exposure observed in the RE-LY trial evaluating dabigatran treatment in patients with non-valvular AF. The relationship between dabigatran plasma concentrations and activated partial thromboplastin time in healthy volunteers and patients (n=762) was best described with a combination of a linear model and a maximum effect (Emax) model, consistent with previous reports. PK/PD relationships were robust across the various populations tested and were not affected by any of the covariates examined. In summary, the PK of dabigatran is sufficiently consistent to allow extrapolation of data generated in healthy volunteers to patients with AF or undergoing OS.

Laboratory Assessment of the Anticoagulant Activity of Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are the treatment of choice for most patients with atrial fibrillation and/or noncancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease. Although routine monitoring of these agents is not required, assessment of anticoagulant effect may be desirable in special situations. The objective of this review was to summarize systematically evidence regarding laboratory assessment of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for studies reporting relationships between drug levels and coagulation assay results.

RESULTS

We identified 109 eligible studies: 35 for dabigatran, 50 for rivaroxaban, 11 for apixaban, and 13 for edoxaban. The performance of standard anticoagulation tests varied across DOACs and reagents; most assays, showed insufficient correlation to provide a reliable assessment of DOAC effects. Dilute thrombin time (TT) assays demonstrated linear correlation (r2 = 0.67-0.99) across a range of expected concentrations of dabigatran, as did ecarin-based assays. Calibrated anti-Xa assays demonstrated linear correlation (r2 = 0.78-1.00) across a wide range of concentrations for rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban.

CONCLUSIONS

An ideal test, offering both accuracy and precision for measurement of any DOAC is not widely available. We recommend a dilute TT or ecarin-based assay for assessment of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran and anti-Xa assays with drug-specific calibrators for direct Xa inhibitors. In the absence of these tests, TT or APTT is recommended over PT/INR for assessment of dabigatran, and PT/INR is recommended over APTT for detection of factor Xa inhibitors. Time since last dose, the presence or absence of drug interactions, and renal and hepatic function should impact clinical estimates of anticoagulant effect in a patient for whom laboratory test results are not available.

Drug-drug interactions of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants

INTRODUCTION

The approval of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) as antithrombotic alternatives to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) has changed clinical practice. However, the efficacy and safety of the four most commonly used NOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban) might be compromised by co-administration of other medications used for various major comorbidities. Dose adjustment of the NOACs may be needed to avert cases of concomitant medication affecting NOACs absorption, metabolism and coagulation. Areas covered: This review summarizes the current knowledge regarding drug-drug interactions of NOACs in order to guide health professionals regarding the dose modification required if the NOACs are co-administered with other medication with potential significant interactions. The data were acquired from searches of PubMed and also from the NOAC reports to the European Medicines Agency and Food and Drug Administration Agency. Expert opinion: Most of the studies in this field have been organized by pharmaceutical companies. Independent research and registries will provide more information in the near future about the drug-drug interactions of NOACs. P-glycoprotein transporter and cytochrome P450 enzyme complexes appear to be the main pathways where the most drug-drug interactions with NOACs occur.

Relationship between plasma dabigatran concentration and activated partial thromboplastin time in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is recommended for monitoring anticoagulant activity in dabigatran-treated patients; however, there are limited data in Japanese patients. To clarify the relationship between plasma dabigatran concentration and aPTT, we analyzed plasma dabigatran concentration and aPTT at various time points following administration of oral dabigatran in a Japanese hospital.

METHODS

We enrolled 149 patients (316 blood samples) with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who were taking dabigatran. Patients had a mean age of 66.6±10.0 years (range: 35-84) and 66% were men. Plasma dabigatran concentrations and aPTT were measured using the Hemoclot(®) direct thrombin inhibitor assay and Thrombocheck aPTT-SLA(®), respectively. Samples were classified into eight groups according to elapsed times in hours since oral administration of dabigatran.

RESULTS

Significantly higher dabigatran concentrations were observed in samples obtained from patients with low creatinine clearance (CLCr) (CLCr<50 mL/min). Dabigatran concentrations and aPTT were highest in the 4-h post-administration range. Additionally, there was a significant correlation between plasma dabigatran concentrations and aPTT (y=0.063x+32.596, r (2)=0.648, p<0.001). However, when plasma dabigatran concentrations were 200 ng/mL or higher, the correlation was lower (y=0.040x+38.034 and r (2)=0.180); these results were evaluated by a quadratic curve, resulting in an increased correlation (r (2)=0.668).

CONCLUSIONS

There was a significant correlation between plasma dabigatran concentrations and aPTT. Additionally, in daily clinical practice in Japan, plasma dabigatran concentrations and aPTT reached a peak in the 4-h post administration range. Considering the pharmacokinetics of dabigatran, aPTT can be used as an index for risk screening for excess dabigatran concentrations in Japanese patients with NVAF.

Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major public health burden worldwide, and its prevalence is set to increase owing to widespread population ageing, especially in rapidly developing countries such as Brazil, China, India, and Indonesia. Despite the availability of epidemiological data on the prevalence of AF in North America and Western Europe, corresponding data are limited in Africa, Asia, and South America. Moreover, other observations suggest that the prevalence of AF might be underestimated-not only in low-income and middle-income countries, but also in their high-income counterparts. Future studies are required to provide precise estimations of the global AF burden, identify important risk factors in various regions worldwide, and take into consideration regional and ethnic variations in AF. Furthermore, in response to the increasing prevalence of AF, additional resources will need to be allocated globally for prevention and treatment of AF and its associated complications. In this Review, we discuss the available data on the global prevalence, risk factors, management, financial costs, and clinical burden of AF, and highlight the current worldwide inadequacy of its treatment.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in cardiovascular disease management: evidence and unanswered questions

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Anticoagulation is important in the management of cardiovascular disorders; however, traditional anticoagulants such as heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) have limitations, including parenteral administration with the former and the need for coagulation monitoring and dose adjustments with the latter. Three non-VKA oral anticoagulants (OACs), dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban, are available for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and may change clinical practice. This article reviews current knowledge and important unanswered questions on the use of these agents in patients with cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed and the search terms dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, AF and acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Peer-reviewed, published clinical trials, review articles, relevant treatment guidelines and prescribing information documents were identified and reviewed for relevance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Dabigatran is an oral direct thrombin inhibitor; rivaroxaban and apixaban are oral direct Factor Xa inhibitors. These agents have a quicker onset and offset of action, more predictable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and fewer drug-drug interactions than VKAs, allowing use of fixed doses. For the prevention of stroke in patients with AF, the non-VKA OACs were either non-inferior or superior to warfarin with similar or improved bleeding profiles, particularly with respect to reductions in intracranial haemorrhage. In patients with ACS receiving dual antiplatelet therapy, the addition of rivaroxaban significantly reduced the rate of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction or stroke without increasing fatal bleeding, but led to higher rates of major bleeding. Dose reductions with non-VKA OACs are mandated in certain circumstances in patients with AF, such as moderate renal impairment. Contraindications include creatinine clearance <15 mL/min (<30 mL/min for dabigatran in Europe and Canada) and moderate or severe hepatic impairment, but patients can be transitioned to other anticoagulants if appropriate. It is unknown which non-VKA OAC is optimal for stroke prevention in patients with AF, although factors such as co-medications (e.g. dabigatran may be preferred if a patient is taking a co-medication that is a strong cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitor) and renal function (rivaroxaban and apixaban depend less on renal clearance than dabigatran) will be important for individual patients. Addition of rivaroxaban to antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent events in patients with recent ACS is approved in Europe for patients at the highest risk (with elevated cardiac biomarkers) and must take into account the increased risk of major bleeding. Although routine coagulation monitoring is not required, an understanding of which assays are appropriate for each non-VKA OAC and how they are affected is important. In a bleeding emergency, non-specific prohaemostatic agents are suggested to reverse the action of the non-VKA OACs, but more clinical data are needed.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Non-VKA OACs provide similar or improved efficacy and, on current evidence, improved safety. They provide greater convenience, compared with traditional anticoagulants for the prevention of stroke in patients with AF. Rivaroxaban may be of benefit to selected high-risk patients with ACS. Selection of the most appropriate non-VKA OAC will depend on individual patient factors.

Performance of coagulation tests in patients on therapeutic doses of dabigatran: a cross-sectional pharmacodynamic study based on peak and trough plasma levels

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of anticoagulation status during dabigatran therapy may be desirable in certain clinical situations.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the coagulation tests that are most useful for assessing dabigatran's anticoagulant effect.

METHODS

Peak and trough blood samples from 35 patients taking dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, and one sample each from 30 non-anticoagulated individuals, were collected. Mass spectrometry and various coagulation assays were performed. 'Therapeutic range' was defined as the range of plasma dabigatran concentrations determined by mass spectrometry between the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles of all values.

RESULTS

The therapeutic range was 27-411 ng mL(-1) . The prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), determined with multiple reagents, and activated clotting time (ACT) were insensitive to therapeutic dabigatran: 29%, 18% and 40% of samples had a normal PT, APTT, and ACT, respectively. However, normal PT, ACT and APTT ruled out dabigatran levels above the 75th percentile. The thrombin clotting time (TCT) correlated well and linearly with dabigatran levels below the 50th percentile, but was unmeasurable above it. The dilute thrombin time, ecarin clotting time and ecarin chromogenic assay showed linear correlations with dabigatran levels over a broad range, and identified therapeutic and supratherapeutic levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The prothrombin time, APTT and ACT are often normal in spite of therapeutic dabigatran plasma levels. The TCT is useful for detecting minimal dabigatran levels. The dilute thrombin time and chromogenic and clotting ecarin assays accurately identify therapeutic and supratherapeutic dabigatran levels. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (#NCT01588327).

Novel oral anticoagulants: clinical pharmacology, indications and practical considerations

BACKGROUND

Novel oral anticoagulants are approved in several indications: rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after elective hip or knee replacement surgery, and edoxaban for hip or knee replacement surgery and hip fracture surgery (in Japan only); rivaroxaban for the treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), and prevention of recurrent DVT and PE; and rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. These agents overcome some limitations of traditional anticoagulants, are suggested to have no requirement for routine coagulation monitoring, and are administered orally. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran have different pharmacological characteristics, and guidance is needed on optimum doses and dosing intervals and the effects of renal or hepatic impairment, age, food, and other drugs. Dabigatran has stricter prescribing advice than rivaroxaban or apixaban for patients with moderate-to-severe renal impairment. All three drugs have restrictions on use in patients with hepatic impairment. Apixaban requires twice-daily dosing in all indications, whereas rivaroxaban and dabigatran are dosed once- or twice-daily depending on indication. Although head-to-head comparisons are lacking, the novel oral anticoagulants may show favorable cost-benefit relations compared with traditional vitamin K antagonists or no therapy.

AIM

This review summarizes the pharmacology of rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran, and the indications for which they are approved. Issues regarding the optimization of the use of these anticoagulants for the management of thromboembolic disorders will also be discussed.

Dabigatran etexilate: a review of its use for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip or knee replacement surgery

Dabigatran etexilate (Pradaxa®, Pradax™, Prazaxa®) is indicated for the primary prevention of venous thromboembolic (VTE) events in adults who have undergone elective total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of oral dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, as well as summarizing its pharmacological properties and results of a cost-utility analysis. The discussion of clinical trial data focuses on comparative trials with the EU approved dosage regimen of once-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral prodrug of the potent, rapidly acting, reversible, competitive inhibitor of thrombin, dabigatran. Dabigatran has predictable and consistent anticoagulant effects and does not require routine coagulation monitoring or dose titration. In the large, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trials, RE-MODEL, RE-NOVATE and RE-NOVATE II, oral dabigatran etexilate, at dosages of 150 and 220 mg once daily, initiated postoperatively was shown to be noninferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily (initiated prior to surgery) with regard to the incidence of the composite of total VTE events and all-cause mortality in patients undergoing TKR or THR surgery. In general, oral dabigatran etexilate was well tolerated in clinical trials of patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery. There were no significant between-group differences in bleeding complications, including major bleeding, clinically relevant non-major bleeding or minor bleeding between the dabigatran etexilate or enoxaparin sodium groups. In addition, a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the UK National Health Service indicated that dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily is dominant (i.e. more effective and less costly) to enoxaparin sodium 40 mg once daily in patients undergoing THR or TKR. Additional head-to-head comparisons would be beneficial to more definitively position dabigatran etexilate relative to other available oral treatment options for VTE prophylaxis, such as rivaroxaban and apixaban. In the meantime, dabigatran etexilate offers a convenient, effective and generally well tolerated treatment option for the prophylaxis of VTE in patients undergoing TKR and THR surgery.