Comparative field study: impact of laboratory assay variability on the assessment of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

IDELVION: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data

Hemophilia B is a bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of coagulation factor IX (FIX). Treatment with FIX replacement products can increase FIX activity levels to minimize or prevent bleeding events. However, frequent dosing with standard-acting FIX products can create a high treatment burden. Long-acting products have been developed to maintain bleed protection with extended dosing intervals. Recombinant factor IX–albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) is a long-acting product indicated for the treatment and prophylaxis of bleeding events and perioperative management in adult and pediatric patients. This review outlines data from all previously treated patients in the Prophylaxis and On-Demand Treatment using Longer Half-Life rIX-FP (PROLONG-9FP) clinical trial program and summarizes real-world data evaluating the use of rIX-FP in routine clinical practice. In the PROLONG-9FP program, rIX-FP demonstrated effective hemostasis in all patients at dose regimens of up to 21 days in patients aged ≥ 18 years and up to 14 days in patients aged < 12 years. rIX-FP has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and an excellent safety and tolerability profile. Extended dosing intervals with rIX-FP led to high levels of adherence and reduced consumption compared with other FIX therapies. Data from real-world practice are encouraging and reflect the results of the clinical trials.

External quality assessment for one-stage and chromogenic factor IX assays in samples containing Alprolix (rFIXFc) or Idelvion (rIX-FP) and evidence that UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme for blood coagulation samples are commutable with patient samples

INTRODUCTION

There may be clinically relevant differences between results of different FIX assays in samples containing extended half life FIX concentrates requiring regular surveillance of assay results through proficiency testing exercises. Control materials used in proficiency testing must be commutable, that is have the same inter-assay properties as those demonstrated by authentic clinical samples when measured by different analytical methods.

METHODS

We assessed relationships between results with different FIX assays and commutability of UK National External Quality Assessment Scheme (NEQAS) materials containing rIX-FP (Idelvion) or rFIXFc (Alprolix) by comparing results obtained using widely used one-stage and chromogenic assays during a proficiency testing exercise with results obtained when analysing a series of individual patient samples using the same assay systems. NEQAS samples prepared by addition of either Idelvion or Alprolix to FIX deficient plasma were sent to 76 haemophilia centres in Europe. A total of 18 Idelvion and 22 Alprolix patient samples were assayed in a single centre. Two chromogenic and two one-stage assays were compared.

RESULTS

The pattern of results obtained for NEQAS samples and patient samples was similar. In all cases, the NEQAS sample data point was within the scatter of patient sample data in plots of patient sample results showing one-stage assay results using Synthasil or Actin FS plotted against chromogenic assay results with Biophen or Rox chromogenic FIX kits.

CONCLUSION

This indicates that the NEQAS samples containing Idelvion or Alprolix were commutable and therefore suitable for use in proficiency testing exercises.

Considerations on activity assay discrepancies in factor VIII and factor IX products

New modified coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) products have been designed to improve the treatment of individuals with hemophilia A and B by increasing the interval between dosing. Although these FVIII and FIX molecules have been structurally modified to improve the circulation time, the changes have also influenced their behavior in functional assays in comparison with traditional plasma-derived or recombinant coagulation factors. The assignment of potencies for these products can be problematic because discordance in factor activity values between the commonly used one-stage clotting and chromogenic substrate assays is often observed. Discrepancies in potency assay values also exist when different assay kits and reagents are used in the same assay type. Ideally, all FVIII and FIX products should be calibrated against the World Health Organization (WHO) International Standards (IS) because the assignment of potencies in international units (IU) helps maintain treatment tradition and meaningful references for manufacturers, patients, and clinicians. The discrepant measurements, attributed to the modified structural and functional properties of these products, are manifested in their lack of commutability with the WHO IS for FVIII or FIX. Herein, we discuss the considerations upon which an assay is chosen for potency assignment and postadministration monitoring of a new factor product, which include the validity of the assay calibrated with the IS, the meaning of the potency values in IU, standards of care for patients, clinical relevance between the assigned potency value and recovery value from clinical laboratories, and patient safety.

Factor IX assay discrepancies in the setting of liver gene therapy using a hyperfunctional variant factor IX-Padua

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists regarding the factor IX (FIX) coagulant activity (FIX:C) measured by different assays following FIX-Padua gene therapy.

OBJECTIVE

Assess for the first time FIX:C in five commonly used coagulation assays in plasma samples from hemophilia B subjects receiving FIX-Padua gene transfer.

METHODS

FIX:C was compared between central (n = 1) and local laboratories (n = 5) in the study, and across four commonly used FIX:C one-stage assays and one FIX:C chromogenic assay. For comparison, samples of pooled congenital FIX-deficient plasma spiked with purified recombinant human FIX (rHFIX)-Padua protein or rHFIX (nonacog alfa) to obtain FIX:C concentrations from ~20% to ~40% were tested.

RESULTS

FIX:C results at local laboratories strongly correlated with central laboratory results. However, absolute values at the central laboratory were consistently lower than those at local laboratories. Across five different FIX:C assays, a consistent pattern of FIX:C was observed for subjects receiving fidanacogene elaparvovec-expressed gene transfer. Use of Actin FSL activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) reagent in the central laboratory resulted in lower FIX:C values compared with other APTT reagents tested. The chromogenic assay determined lower FIX:C than any of the one-stage assays. The rHFIX-Padua protein-spiked samples showed similar results. In contrast, FIX:C results for rHFIX-nonacog alfa measured within 25% of expected for all one-stage assays and below 25% in the chromogenic assay.

CONCLUSIONS

Assay-based differences in FIX:C were observed for fidanacogene elaparvovec transgene product and rHFIX-Padua protein, suggesting the variable FIX:C determined with different assay reagents is inherent to the FIX-Padua protein and is not specific to gene therapy-derived FIX-Padua.

Activity of transgene-produced B-domain-deleted factor VIII in human plasma following AAV5 gene therapy

Adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based gene therapies can restore endogenous factor VIII (FVIII) expression in hemophilia A (HA). AAV vectors typically use a B-domain-deleted FVIII transgene, such as human FVIII-SQ in valoctocogene roxaparvovec (AAV5-FVIII-SQ). Surprisingly, the activity of transgene-produced FVIII-SQ was between 1.3 and 2.0 times higher in one-stage clot (OS) assays than in chromogenic-substrate (CS) assays, whereas recombinant FVIII-SQ products had lower OS than CS activity. Transgene-produced and recombinant FVIII-SQ showed comparable specific activity (international units per milligram) in the CS assay, demonstrating that the diverging activities arise in the OS assay. Higher OS activity for transgene-produced FVIII-SQ was observed across various assay kits and clinical laboratories, suggesting that intrinsic molecular features are potential root causes. Further experiments in 2 participants showed that transgene-produced FVIII-SQ accelerated early factor Xa and thrombin formation, which may explain the higher OS activity based on a kinetic bias between OS and CS assay readout times. Despite the faster onset of coagulation, global thrombin levels were unaffected. A correlation with joint bleeds suggested that both OS and CS assay remained clinically meaningful to distinguish hemophilic from nonhemophilic FVIII activity levels. During clinical development, the CS activity was chosen as a surrogate end point to conservatively assess hemostatic efficacy and enable comparison with recombinant FVIII-SQ products. Relevant trials are registered on clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02576795 and #NCT03370913 and, respectively, on EudraCT (European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database; https://eudract.ema.europa.eu) as #2014-003880-38 and #2017-003215-19.

Outcome measures in Haemophilia: Beyond ABR (Annualized Bleeding Rate)

Options for management of haemophilia are increasing rapidly with completely novel therapeutic approaches that cannot be compared using traditional factor assays. In addition, as prophylaxis regimens have improved, bleeding rates have decreased, and consequently, it is difficult to show an impact of novel therapies on rates of spontaneous bleeding. There is currently an urgent need for a panel of outcome measures to compare therapies that are dissimilar in many essential ways. Conventional objective outcome measures including joint physical examination and joint imaging continue to hold a central importance. Factor assays are essential for evaluation of products derived from native factor genes, but are not applicable to some extended half-life factors or non-factor bypassing agents. Global assays including thrombin generation and chromogenic assays of factor X activation are under investigation for their usefulness in haemophilia assessment. Bleeding rate is a conventional subjective patient-reported outcome that, while decreasing in frequency, is indispensable as an outcome given that the primary manifestation of haemophilia is bleeding. Other patient-reported outcomes such as pain intensity and interference, health-related quality of life and activities and participation are increasingly important to distinguish superior outcomes in comparative trials. This review of outcome measures for haemophilia presents examples of existing outcome measures with an emphasis on their strengths and limitations.

Performance of factor IX extended half-life product measurements in external quality control assessment programs

BACKGROUND

Patients with hemophilia B are increasingly treated with extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) concentrates. For the laboratory, introduction of these EHL concentrates presents a major challenge. To understand the variation in FIX activity levels, all available diagnostic assays need to be directly compared.

METHODS

The ECAT, UKNEQAS, and RCPAQAP have collaboratively performed a global survey to evaluate the quality of FIX measurements using FIX deficient plasma samples spiked with recombinant FIX (rFIX), rFIXFP, rFIXFc, and N9-GP to levels at typical FIX trough (6 IU/dL) and peak levels (60 IU/dL). Participants were asked to use their routine protocols, using one-stage assays (OSA) or chromogenic assays (CA).

RESULTS

In samples spiked with 6 IU/dL product, median (25%-75% range) FIX activity levels (OSA), were 8.0 IU/dL (7.0-9.2) for rFIX, 6.0 IU/dL (4.0-7.1) for rFIXFP, 6.6 IU/dL (5.5-8.0) for rFIXFc, and 4.9 IU/dL (3.5-8.4) for N9-GP. In samples spiked with 60 IU/dL, FIX activity levels measured (using OSA) was 63.0 IU/dL (59.9-67.0) for rFIX, 42.5 IU/dL (28.2-47.0) for rFIXFP, 50.0 IU/dL (45.0-55.0) for rFIXFc, and 34.0 IU/dL (24.8-67.5) for N9-GP. Considerable differences were observed between reagents for all samples. With CA, there was also quite some variation, but no differences between reagents.

CONCLUSION

Large variation is observed in the measurement of FIX activity levels after administration of rFIX and EHL FIX products. For N9-GP, most silica-based assays show especially high levels. It is essential to standardize and improve reliability of measurements of these concentrates as diagnosis and treatment monitoring is based on these results.

Laboratory testing in hemophilia: Impact of factor and non-factor replacement therapy on coagulation assays

The advent of extended half-life (EHL) recombinant clotting factors and innovative non-factor replacement therapeutics, such as emicizumab, offers several advantages over existing products for the prophylactic treatment of people living with hemophilia (PwH). These include low annual bleeding rates with less frequent dosing, higher trough plasma concentrations, and a more convenient route of administration. However, increasing use of these therapies poses challenges to clinicians and coagulation laboratories due to the lack of standardized assays for monitoring of hemostatic parameters, and the potential for misinterpretation of test results, which may jeopardize patient safety. Definitive diagnosis of hemophilia and treatment monitoring is reliant on demonstrating factor VIII (FVIII; hemophilia A) or factor IX (FIX; hemophilia B) deficiency using a functional coagulation assay. The most frequently used assays are based on activated partial thromboplastin time, using a one-stage or two-stage process. While one-stage and chromogenic assays have performed well with human-derived FVIII and FIX and full-length recombinant products, EHL recombinant factors are heterogeneous in structure and mode of action and therefore show wide variation in activity levels between different one-stage assays, and between one-stage and chromogenic assays. In the context of the recommended stepwise approach for laboratory diagnosis of hemophilia, we examine the diagnostic challenges associated with the use of EHL factors and novel non-factor therapeutics and consider the optimal diagnostic approach in PwH who are receiving these treatments. Ultimately, accurate diagnostic solutions are a prerequisite for personalized therapy to minimize treatment burden and improve quality of life in PwH.

A bispecific antibody demonstrates limited measurability in routine coagulation assays

: Accurate monitoring of coagulation, needed for optimal management of patients with haemophilia A with inhibitors, presents a challenge for treating physicians. Although global haemostatic assays may be used in this population, their utility with nonfactor therapies has yet to be established in the clinical setting. The aim of this study was to assess options for potential haemostatic activity monitoring and feasibility for factor VIII (FVIII)-equivalency measurement with a sequence identical analogue (SIA) to emicizumab using different coagulation assays. SIA was analysed using five commercial chromogenic assays and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assays including clot waveform analysis using five different triggers. Recombinant FVIII served as a comparator in all assays. Thrombin generation in haemophilia A plasma was measured using extrinsic and intrinsic trigger conditions (tissue factor or Factor XIa). Of the five chromogenic assays, a concentration-dependent increase in Factor Xa was observed with one assay, with human Factor IXa and X reagents. The SIA dose-response signal plateaued at therapeutically relevant concentrations and was nonparallel with FVIII reference, thereby not permitting FVIII-equivalence assessment. aPTT varied between reagents, with aPTT normalization occurring at low and below-therapeutic SIA concentrations. SIA [600 nmol/l (90 μg/ml)] only partially restored thrombin generation in individual haemophilia A patient plasma. FVIII-equivalence of SIA could not be determined using standard FVIII protocols and was found to be highly influenced by assay type, analytical conditions and parameters used for calculation. New and/or modified methodology and standard reagents specific for use with nonfactor therapies are required for their utilization in the clinical setting.

Measurements of eftrenonacog alfa by 19 different combinations reagents/instrument: A single-centre study

INTRODUCTION

Recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) is an extended half-life concentrate for the treatment of haemophilia B (HB). rFIXFc activity monitoring is crucial in several clinical situations. However, differences were observed between one-stage clotting (OSC) and chromogenic assays, but not for all factor IX (FIX) concentrations.

AIMS

To compare rFIXFc measurements obtained using different instruments and common OSC and chromogenic asssays.

METHODS

FIX:C measurements were performed in rFIXFc-spiked plasma aliquots (targeted FIX levels of 1.5, 1, 0.5, 0.2, 0.05, 0.02 and 0.01 IU/mL) and plasma samples collected from two patients with HB at various time points after rFIXFc infusion, using three instruments (STA-R MAX, ACLTOP700 and CS2100i) and common clotting and chromogenic FIX:C assays.

RESULTS

The same reagent could give different FIX:C measurements when adapted to different instruments. Moreover, the same reagent/instrument combination could give different results depending of the FIX concentration. For OSC assays, only STA-Cephascreen on STA-R MAX and CS2100i, SynthAFax on ACLTOP 700 and Actin on CS2100i provided acceptable recoveries for all rFIXFc concentrations. The chromogenic assays ROX-FIX and Biophen FIX:C underestimated rFIXFc for concentrations lower than 0.05 and 0.2 IU/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that the same reagent adapted to different instruments could lead to different rFIXFc values. As rFIXFc under/overestimation could be associated with inappropriate treatment or biased calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters, the reagent/instrument combination used by haemostasis laboratories should be considered and regularly evaluated by external quality assessment programmes.

Factor VIII and IX assays for post-infusion monitoring in hemophilia patients: Guidelines from the French BIMHO group (GFHT)

Replacement therapy with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII and FIX (pdFVIII/pdFIX or rFVIII/rFIX) concentrates is the standard of treatment in patients with haemophilia A and B, respectively. Measurement of factor VIII (FVIII:C) or factor IX (FIX:C) levels can be done by one-stage clotting assay (OSA) or chromogenic substrate assay (CSA). The French study group on the Biology of Hemorrhagic Diseases (a collaborative group of the GFHT and MHEMO network) presents a literature review and proposals for the monitoring of FVIII:C and FIX:C levels in treated haemophilia A and B patients, respectively. The use of CSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFVIII or rFVIII including extended half-life (EHL) rFVIII. Except for rFVIII-Fc, great caution is required when measuring FVIII:C levels by OSA in patients substituted by EHL-rFVIII. The OSA is recommended for the monitoring of patients treated with pdFIX or rFIX. Large discordances in the FIX:C levels measured for extended half-life rFIX (EHL-rFIX), depending on the method and reagents used, must lead to great attention when OSA is used for measuring FIX:C levels in patients substituted by EHL-rFIX. Data of most of recent studies, obtained with spiked plasmas, deserve to be confirmed in plasma samples of treated patients.

Recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein activity assessment with the one-stage clotting assay: A multicenter, assessor-blinded, prospective study in Japan (J-Field Study)

INTRODUCTION

The one-stage clotting assay is used to measure factor IX (FIX) activity in patients' plasma samples and in FIX products for hemophilia treatment. However, the diversity of reagents and instruments has resulted in significant FIX assay variability.

METHODS

The accuracy of the one-stage clotting assay to measure recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity was evaluated by major Japanese hemophilia treatment centers and commercial laboratories that measure factor IX activity for a majority of hemophilia B patients in Japan. Plasma-derived FIX (pdFIX) and recombinant FIX (rFIX) products were used as comparators. FIX-deficient plasma was spiked with four levels of FIX products based on label potency and measured under blinded conditions by routine one-stage clotting assay procedures in 19 participating laboratories. Interlaboratory coefficient of variation and spike recovery were calculated.

RESULTS

Interlaboratory coefficient of variation of rFIXFc was not significantly different from that of rFIX, but appeared larger than that of pdFIX. Mean spike recovery for rFIXFc was generally comparable to rFIX and pdFIX. However, larger discrepancies between pdFIX and rFIX were observed in three of nine laboratories using ellagic acid-based activated partial thromboplastin time reagents.

CONCLUSION

Recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein activity was found to be similar to that of rFIX or pdFIX by the one-stage clotting assay. However, minimizing interlaboratory variability is vital for optimizing future patient care.

Real-world assay variability between laboratories in monitoring of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein activity in plasma samples

Introduction

Monitoring of factor IX (FIX) replacement therapy in haemophilia B relies on accurate coagulation assays. However, considerable interlaboratory variability has been reported for one‐stage clotting (OSC) assays. This study aimed to evaluate the real‐world, interlaboratory variability of routine FIX activity assays used in clinical haemostasis laboratories for the measurement of recombinant FIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) activity.

Methods

Human FIX‐depleted plasma was spiked with rFIXFc at 0.80, 0.20 or 0.05 IU/mL based on label potency. Participating laboratories tested samples using their own routine OSC or chromogenic substrate (CS) assay protocols, reagents and FIX plasma standards. Laboratories could perform more than one measurement and method, and were not fully blinded to nominal activity values.

Results

A total of 142 laboratories contributed OSC results from 175 sample kits using 11 different activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents. The median recovered FIX activity for the 0.80, 0.20 and 0.05 IU/mL samples was 0.72 IU/mL, 0.21 IU/mL and 0.060 IU/mL, respectively. Across all OSC reagents, interlaboratory variability (% CV) per aPTT reagent ranged from 9.4% to 32.1%, 8.2% to 32.6% and 12.2% to 42.0% at the 0.80, 0.20 and 0.05 IU/mL levels, respectively. CS results showed excellent median recoveries at all nominal levels (87.5% to 115.0%; n = 11) with low interlaboratory variability (CV 3.6% to 15.4%).

Conclusion

This large, real‐world data set indicates that rFIXFc activity in plasma samples can be accurately measured with the majority of routine OSC and CS assay methods. Given the variation in FIX assay procedures between sites, it is important that individual laboratories qualify their in‐house methods for monitoring of rFIXFc activity.

Activity measurements of dalcinonacog alfa

INTRODUCTION

Many recombinant and modified FIX products have been, and continue to be, developed with the aim of improving treatment for patients with haemophilia B. One such new product is dalcinonacog alfa, a recombinant FIX with modifications to provide improved features such as subcutaneous administration.

AIM

In view of previously observed assay discrepancies with modified FIX therapeutics, the aim of this study was to assess potential discrepancies in potency measurement of dalcinonacog alfa between and within different assay methods.

METHODS

Potency of dalcinonacog alfa was measured against the 5th International Standard (IS) for FIX Concentrate and the 4th IS for FIX Plasma by One-Stage Clotting Assay, using 9 different APTT reagents and 2 commercially available FIX chromogenic kits. Plasma-derived concentrate and recombinant FIX samples were also included for comparison in every assay.

RESULTS

Substantial discrepancies were observed when assaying dalcinonacog alfa using the one-stage clotting assay against both standards. No statistically valid results were obtained when testing dalcinonacog alfa using either chromogenic kit. Increasing the incubation time with the activation reagent in both chromogenic kits resulted in valid assays and increased the potency to become more in line with potencies by one-stage clotting assays. Increasing the incubation time in the chromogenic kits had no effect on the potencies of the plasma-derived or recombinant samples. However, incubation time influenced in the one-stage clotting assay using Dapttin.

CONCLUSIONS

Within and between assay method discrepancy was found when assaying dalcinonacog alfa. Methods for potency labelling and clinical monitoring should be given careful consideration.

A field study evaluating the activity of N8-GP in spiked plasma samples at clinical haemostasis laboratories

AIM

N8-GP (turoctocog alfa pegol) is a glycoPEGylated, extended half-life human recombinant factor VIII (FVIII) shown to be an efficacious treatment for patients with haemophilia A. Accurate monitoring of replacement therapy helps ensure proper dosing, leading to better patient care. The objective of this field study was to evaluate the accuracy and intra- and inter-laboratory variabilities of N8-GP and rAHF (Advate^® ) FVIII activity (FVIII:C) measurements in clinical laboratories using their routine methods and reagents.

METHODS

Laboratories measured plasma samples spiked with 0.03, 0.2, 0.6 and 0.9 IU/mL N8-GP or rAHF. Samples were blinded, and laboratories were instructed to perform evaluations using their routine FVIII activity assays and calibrators.

RESULTS

Of the 67 participating laboratories from 25 countries, 60 used a one-stage assay, 36 used a chromogenic assay, and 29 used both one-stage and chromogenic assays. Participating laboratories used nine different activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents, the most common being SynthASil^® and Actin^® FS. Most aPTT reagents recovered N8-GP close to target. Three silica-based aPTT reagents (APTT-SP, TriniCLOT™ and STA^® PTT-Automate) underestimated N8-GP, recovering 40%-83% of target concentration. For chromogenic assays, N8-GP and rAHF recoveries were comparable at all concentrations, with overall mean recoveries for both products close to 130%. Assay variability was similar for both assay types and both products; inter-laboratory variability was greater than intra-laboratory variability and highest at 0.03 IU/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Most clinical laboratories accurately measured N8-GP and rAHF when using their in-house one-stage or chromogenic FVIII:C assays. However, three silica-based aPTT reagents underestimated N8-GP recovery.

Extended Half-Life Coagulation Factors: A New Era in the Management of Hemophilia Patients

Despite effective factor replacement and various treatment schedules, there remain several challenges and unmet needs in the prophylactic treatment of hemophilia limiting its adoption and thereby posing an increased risk of spontaneous bleeding. In this regard, extended half-life (EHL) recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) and factor IX (rFIX) products promise optimal prophylaxis by decreasing the dose frequency, increasing the compliance, and improving the quality of life without compromising safety and efficacy. EHL products might lead to higher trough levels without increasing infusion frequency, or could facilitate the ability to maintain trough levels while reducing infusion frequency. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of the rationale for developing EHL coagulation factors and their utility in the management of hemophilia, with special emphasis on optimal techniques for half-life extension and criteria for defining EHL coagulation factors, as well as indications, efficacy, and safety issues of the currently available EHL-rFVIII and EHL-rFIX products. Potential impacts of these factors on quality of life, health economics, and immune tolerance treatment will also be discussed alongside the challenges in pharmacokinetic-driven prophylaxis and difficulties in monitoring the EHL products with laboratory assays.

Favorable pharmacokinetics in hemophilia B for nonacog beta pegol versus recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) and recombinant factor IX-Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) are extended half-life rFIX compounds. We report the first single-dose pharmacokinetic trial of N9-GP and rFIXFc.

PATIENTS/METHODS

Paradigm 7 was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, crossover trial in previously treated (>150 exposure days) adults with congenital hemophilia B (FIX activity ≤2%). Patients received single intravenous injections (50 IU/kg) of N9-GP and rFIXFc with at least 21 days between doses. Plasma FIX activity, predose, and at serial time points up to 240 hours postdose, was measured using validated one-stage clotting assays (SynthAFax for N9-GP; Actin FSL for rFIXFc) and a chromogenic assay (ROX factor IX) with normal human plasma as calibrator. The primary endpoint was area under the FIX activity-time curve from 0 to infinity, dose-normalized to 50 IU/kg (AUC0-inf,norm).

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received study treatment. Based on FIX activity results from the one-stage clotting assays, estimated AUC0-inf,norm was significantly greater for N9-GP than rFIXFc (ratio: 4.39; P < 0.0001, based on a two-sided test on 5% significance level). In addition, N9-GP had a longer terminal half-life, two times higher incremental recovery at 30 minutes and maximum FIX activity (dose-normalized to 50 IU/kg) and six times higher FIX activity at 168 hours than rFIXFc. These findings were largely comparable with the chromogenic assay data and are consistent with published data for each compound.

CONCLUSIONS

In this comparison, N9-GP demonstrated favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics versus rFIXFc, helping clinicians to understand differences between N9-GP and rFIXFc.

REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03075670) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT: 2016-001149-25).

Laboratory assay measurement of modified clotting factor concentrates: a review of the literature and recommendations for practice

Over the past several years, novel modified clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) have been introduced into practice and are now widely prescribed in the countries where they are licensed. These products allow for less frequent infusions of CFC, thereby providing improved convenience and/or higher trough levels. They have been extensively studied for prophylaxis, episodic treatment of bleeding and for surgical prophylaxis. One issue that has emerged regarding the clinical application of these products revolves around the measurement of infused CFC in the clinical coagulation laboratory. Recent studies have demonstrated significant problems with the measurement of correct FVIII/IX levels following infusion of novel CF VIII/IX concentrates. The source of this problem appears to be related to the tremendous variability of the APTT reagents that are used in the one-stage clotting assay, the most commonly used assay for determining factor levels. More specifically, the issue is related to the type of activator used in the reagents. Depending on the combination of the CFC and the APTT activator, the observed results may be either under- or overestimated to degrees that would be clinically relevant. Recommendations based on a review of published information regarding the potential for incorrect measurements of factor VIII/IX levels following infusion of recently developed, novel factor VIII/IX CFCs are presented for the clinician to use in clinical practice.

Performance of a recombinant fusion protein linking coagulation factor IX with recombinant albumin in one-stage clotting assays

Essentials Performance of the one-stage clotting (OSC) assay varies with the clotting activator used. Recombinant FIX-albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) was reliably monitored with most OSC reagents. rIX-FP shows comparable reagent-dependent variability to other rFIX products in the OSC assay. Actin® FS and kaolin-based reagents underestimated rIX-FP activity by around 50% in the OSC assay. SUMMARY: Background Measuring factor IX activity (FIX:C) with one-stage clotting (OSC) assays, based on the activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), is the current mainstay of diagnostic techniques for hemophilia B. Assessing the performance of new recombinant FIX (rFIX) products in OSC assays is essential, as APTT reagents from different manufacturers yield different potency estimates for rFIX. Objectives To evaluate the extent to which choice of reagent composition influences rFIX potency measurements of recombinant FIX-albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP, IDELVION) activity in OSC assays. Methods rIX-FP was added to FIX-deficient plasma, and FIX:C was assessed centrally and locally in a multicenter international field study with a variety of commercial OSC APTT reagents. Paired sample analysis of clinical samples was performed to compare values of FIX:C from local and central laboratories. In-house bioanalytical investigations with spiked samples were conducted to compare the APTT-reagent dependent variability of rIX-FP with unmodified rFIX and rFIX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc). Results Central and local assessments of FIX:C from 10 countries and 21 participating centers showed comparable results to those from the central laboratory across the majority of 18 different APTT reagents from both clinical and spiked samples. There was a consistent underestimation of rIX-FP activity of ≈ 50% with OSC assays using Actin FS or kaolin-based APTT reagents. In the bioanalytical study, rIX-FP showed comparable variability in OSC assays to unmodified rFIX and rFIXFc. Conclusions rIX-FP activity can be accurately measured by the use of OSC assays with the majority of commercial reagents. Actin FS or kaolin-based reagents will probably lead to a 50% underestimation of activity.

New challenges and best practices for the laboratory monitoring of factor VIII and factor IX replacement

Several recombinant factor VIII and factor IX concentrates with extended half-life (EHL) have recently been validated by clinical studies. The availability of these novel concentrates is expected to significantly facilitate the treatment of patients with hemophilia A and B. However, the modification applied to these molecules has introduced variations in their activity measurement in routine coagulation assays. Depending on the assays, underestimations of up to 10-fold or overestimations of up to approximately 30-fold in the measurements of the recovery have been reported in some factor concentrates. Such biases in monitoring may lead to major under- or overtreatment, as well as unnecessary searching for inhibitor antibodies. In this review, we discuss the guidelines and recommendations that allow the selection of optimal strategies to monitor patients treated with these novel factor concentrates. Based on the specificities of the assays and on local regulations, different chromogenic substrate assays in addition to one-stage clotting assays may be validated to allow the accurate measurement of all novel products. An efficient communication between the clinical laboratory and the clinicians is essential to ensure that the appropriate assays are carried out in laboratories and that the clinicians correctly evaluate the data. Further laboratory and clinical studies are still required for the optimization of the laboratory assays that can be used in the measurement of novel factor VIII and factor IX concentrates with EHL.

Practical aspects of extended half-life products for the treatment of haemophilia

Haemophilia A and haemophilia B are congenital X-linked bleeding disorders caused by deficiency of coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) and IX (FIX), respectively. The preferred treatment option for patients with haemophilia is replacement therapy. For patients with severe disease, prophylactic replacement of coagulation factor is the treatment of choice; this has been shown to reduce arthropathy significantly, reduce the frequency of bleeds and improve patients' quality of life. Prophylaxis with standard recombinant factor requires regular intravenous infusion at least two (FIX) to three (FVIII) times a week. Recombinant FVIII and FIX products with an extended half-life are in development, or have been recently licensed. With reported mean half-life extensions of 1.5-1.8 times that of standard products for FVIII and 3-5 times that of standard products for FIX, these products have the potential to address many of the unmet needs of patients currently treated with standard factor concentrates. For example, they may encourage patients to switch from on-demand treatment to prophylaxis and improve the quality of life of patients receiving prophylaxis. Indeed, extended half-life products have the potential to reduce the burden of frequent intravenous injections, reducing the need for central venous lines in children, promote adherence, improve outcomes, potentially allow for more active lifestyles and, depending on the dosing regimen, increase factor trough levels. Members of the Zürich Haemophilia Forum convened for their 19th meeting to discuss the practicalities of incorporating new treatments into the management of people with haemophilia. This review of extended half-life products considers their introduction in haemophilia treatment, including the appropriate dose and schedule of infusions, laboratory monitoring, patient selection, safety considerations, and the economic aspects of care.

Potency estimates for recombinant factor IX in the one-stage clotting assay are influenced by more than just the choice of activated partial thromboplastin time reagent

The activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) one-stage clotting (OSC) assay is used to potency label factor IX (FIX) therapeutics and to monitor the treatment of deficient patients. Studies have highlighted differences in potency estimates for FIX therapeutics depending on what activator type the APTT reagent contains. During the study to replace the 4th International Standard (IS) for FIX Concentrate, it was noted that for the recombinant FIX (rFIX) candidates, a potency difference of 20% was obtained by some between laboratories using the reagent DAPTTIN. This study was designed to investigate this discrepancy. Two plasma-derived (pdFIX) and 2 rFIX materials were assayed against the 4th IS for FIX concentrate (07/182) using the OSC assay. Three different APTT reagents were used (DAPTTIN, SynthAFax and SynthASil), plus 4 different activation times. The pdFIX samples were not affected by activation time or APTT reagent, with expected potencies recovered in all assays and at all activation times. For rFIX, expected potencies were recovered using SynthASil, but SynthAFax generated potencies around 20% lower. This was consistent across the activation times. For DAPTTIN, potencies for rFIX dropped progressively and by up to 30% as activation time increased from 120 to 300 seconds. This study demonstrates that activation time as well as choice of APTT reagent can result in discrepancies in the potency estimation of rFIX. These factors should be taken into account when assaying rFIX.

Performing and interpreting individual pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with Hemophilia A or B: Rationale and general considerations

OBJECTIVES

In a separate document, we have provided specific guidance on performing individual pharmacokinetic (PK) studies using limited samples in persons with hemophilia with the goal to optimize prophylaxis with clotting factor concentrates. This paper, intended for clinicians, aims to describe how to interpret and apply PK properties obtained in persons with hemophilia.

METHODS

The members of the Working Party on population PK (PopPK) of the ISTH SSC Subcommittee on Factor VIII and IX and rare bleeding disorders, together with additional hemophilia and PK experts, completed a survey and ranking exercise whereby key areas of interest in the field were identified. The group had regular web conferences to refine the manuscript's scope and structure, taking into account comments from the external feedback to the earlier document.

RESULTS

Many clinical decisions in hemophilia are based on some form of explicit or implicit PK assessment. Individual patient PK profiles can be analyzed through traditional or PopPK methods, with the latter providing the advantage of fewer samples needing to be collected on any prophylaxis regimen, and without the need the for a washout period. The most useful presentation of PK results for clinical decision making are a curve of the factor activity level over time, the time to achieve a certain activity level, or related parameters like half-life or exposure (AUC). Software platforms have been developed to deliver this information to clinicians at the point of care. Key characteristics of studies measuring average PK parameters were reviewed, outlining what makes a credible head-to-head comparison among different concentrates. Large data collections of PK and treatment outcomes currently ongoing will advance care in the future.

CONCLUSIONS

Traditionally used to compare different concentrates, PK can support tailoring of hemophilia treatment by individual profiling, which is greatly simplified by adopting a PopPK/Bayesian method and limited sampling protocol.

Advances and innovations in haemophilia treatment

Haemophilia is a rare disease for which the approved therapeutic options have remained virtually unchanged for 50 years. In the past decade, however, there has been an explosion of innovation in the treatment options that are either in development or have been approved for haemophilia, including engineered clotting factors and an extensive pipeline of new approaches and modalities. Several of these new modalities, especially gene therapy, demonstrate proof of principle in haemophilia but could have broader applications. These advances, in combination with better diagnostics, are now enabling clinicians to improve the standard of care for people with haemophilia. The different mechanisms of action and modifications used in these therapies have implications for their safe and efficacious use, which must be balanced with their therapeutic utility. This Review focuses on the biological aspects of the most advanced and innovative approaches for haemophilia treatment and considers their future use.

Evaluation of chromogenic factor IX assays by automated protocols

INTRODUCTION

Chromogenic substrate assays (CSA) to measure Factor IX (FIX) have recently become commercially available. However, information on their performance characteristics and use in diagnostic haemostasis laboratories remains limited.

AIM

To evaluate the Hyphen Biomed (Hyphen) and Rossix FIX CSAs on fully automated coagulation analysers and compare them to the FIX one-stage assay (OSA). This study was conducted in a tertiary referral haemostasis laboratory associated with a haemophilia treatment centre.

METHODS

Automated CSA protocols were adapted to the Sysmex CS2500 (CS2500) and Diagnostica Stago STA-R (STA-R) analysers. Samples assayed were from healthy volunteers, haemophilia B patients and FIX deficient plasma spiked with either plasma derived, recombinant or extended half-life FIX products.

RESULTS

Reference intervals for Hyphen and Rossix assays were 73 IU/dL to 164 IU/dL and 73 IU/dL to 168 IU/dL, respectively, on the CS2500 analyser; and 84 IU/dL to 165 IU/dL for the Rossix assay on the STA-R. Repeatability across all method/analyser combinations resulted in CVs ranging from 0.8% to 5.4%. Between run reproducibility gave CVs <6.7% for all method/analyser combinations. In spiked samples, FIX recoveries were mostly within an acceptable limit of 100 ± 25% for BeneFIX^® , Rixubis^® and Alprolix^® with some differences between CSAs.

CONCLUSION

Both commercial factor FIX CSA kits can be adapted for Stago and Sysmex automated coagulation analysers. Reagent cost and workflow practices will need to be considered. These assays are potentially more consistent than OSA in measurement of replacement FIX products in haemophilia B patients.

Qualification of a select one-stage activated partial thromboplastin time-based clotting assay and two chromogenic assays for the post-administration monitoring of nonacog beta pegol

Essentials Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is an extended half-life, recombinant human factor IX (FIX). One-stage clotting (OSC) and chromogenic FIX activity assays were assessed for N9-GP recovery. OSC STA® -Cephascreen® , ROX FIX and BIOPHEN FIX chromogenic assays were qualified for N9-GP. Other extended half-life factor products should be assessed in a similar way prior to approval.

SUMMARY

Background Nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) is an extended half-life, glycoPEGylated recombinant human factor IX that is under development for the prophylaxis and treatment of bleeding episodes in hemophilia B patients. Considerable reagent-dependent variability has been observed when one-stage clotting assays are used to measure the recovery of recombinant FIX products, including N9-GP. Objective To qualify select one-stage clotting and chromogenic FIX activity assays for measuring N9-GP recovery. Methods The accuracy and precision of the one-stage clotting assay (with the STA-Cephascreen activated partial thromboplastin [APTT] reagent) and the ROX Factor IX and BIOPHEN Factor IX chromogenic assays for measuring N9-GP recovery were assessed in N9-GP-spiked hemophilia B plasma samples in a systematic manner at three independent sites, with manufacturer-recommended protocols and/or site-specific assay setups, including different instruments. Results For each of the three FIX activity assays qualified on five different reagent-instrument systems, acceptable intra-assay and interassay accuracy and precision, dilution integrity, reagent robustness and freeze-thaw and short-term sample stabilities were demonstrated. The STA-Cephascreen assay showed a limited reportable range at one of the three qualification sites, and the BIOPHEN Factor IX assay showed suspect low-end sensitivity at one of the three qualification sites. An individual laboratory would account for these limitations by adjusting the assay's reportable range; thus, these findings are not considered to impact the respective assay qualifications. Conclusion The one-stage clotting assay with the STA-Cephascreen APTT reagent, the ROX Factor IX chromogenic assay and the BIOPHEN Factor IX chromogenic assay are considered to be qualified for the measurement of N9-GP in 3.2% (0.109 m) citrated human plasma.

Tailoring treatment of haemophilia B: accounting for the distribution and clearance of standard and extended half-life FIX concentrates

The prophylactic administration of factor IX (FIX) is considered the most effective treatment for haemophilia B. The inter-individual variability and complexity of the pharmacokinetics (PK) of FIX, and the rarity of the disease have hampered identification of an optimal treatment regimens. The recent introduction of extended half-life recombinant FIX molecules (EHL-rFIX), has prompted a thorough reassessment of the clinical efficacy, PK and pharmacodynamics of plasma-derived and recombinant FIX. First, using longer sampling times and multi-compartmental PK models has led to more precise (and favourable) PK for FIX than was appreciated in the past. Second, investigating the distribution of FIX in the body beyond the vascular space (which is implied by its complex kinetics) has opened a new research field on the role for extravascular FIX. Third, measuring plasma levels of EHL-rFIX has shown that different aPTT reagents have different accuracy in measuring different FIX molecules. How will this new knowledge reflect on clinical practice? Clinical decision making in haemophilia B requires some caution and expertise. First, comparisons between different FIX molecules must be assessed taking into consideration the comparability of the populations studied and the PK models used. Second, individual PK estimates must rely on multi-compartmental models, and would benefit from adopting a population PK approach. Optimal sampling times need to be adapted to the prolonged half-life of the new EHL FIX products. Finally, costs considerations may apply, which is beyond the scope of this manuscript but might be deeply connected with the PK considerations discussed in this communication.

Blood derived products in pediatrics: New laboratory tools for optimizing potency assignment and reducing side effects

Neonates and children can develop rare bleeding disorders due to congenital/acquired coagulation Factor deficiencies, or allo-immune/autoimmune complications, or can undergo surgeries at high haemorrhagic risk. They then need specialized transfusion of blood components/products, or purified blood extracted products or recombinant proteins. Blood-derived therapies conventionally used for management of affected infants with genetic/acquired deficiencies, bleeding problems (coagulation Factor reduced or missing) or thrombotic disorders (reduced or missing anticoagulant proteins) pose some additional risks. These remedial therapies can cause tolerance when used very early in life and, sometimes needed, repeatedly. The introduction of recombinant proteins has allowed manufacturers to produce large amounts of the proteins usually present at very low concentration in blood. This has also changed the risk pattern of plasma-extracted products, especially in terms of continual reduction of viral transmission. Many efforts have been made over these past decades to reduce the risks associated with the use of all these products in terms of viral and bacterial safety, as well as immune disorders but they are not the objective of this article. Other associated side effects are the presence of undesired activities in blood products, which can produce thrombotic events or adverse reactions. The progressive introduction of blood derived products has greatly improved the prognosis and quality of life of affected patients. This concerns whole blood, but also blood cell concentrates, mainly platelets and red blood cells, plasma, while the blood extracted products are increasingly replaced by recombinant proteins. All these therapeutic products, i.e. blood extracted drugs, improve health and quality of life for hemophiliac's A or B, or patients with auto/allo-immune thrombocytopenias or with rare bleeding disorders, and those with thrombotic events occurring in childhood, which are mainly due to Protein C or Protein S deficiencies (congenital or acquired). Progress in analytical methods and biotechnology allow better control of the manufacturing processes for all blood derived or plasma extracted products and recombinant proteins, and contribute to improved manufacturing processes to minimize the occurrence of side effects. These adverse events can be due to the aging of the blood cell concentrate with release of their granule content, and generation of EVs, which can produce anaphylactic reactions and risk of thrombosis, but also to the presence of activated coagulation Factors in purified products, such as Factor Xia as recently identified in immunoglobulin concentrates. Characterization and measurement of contaminant products is of special usefulness during product preparation and for optimization of manufacturing processes for purified extracted products, but also for recombinant proteins. The pharmaceutical industry introduces these new methods for validating manufacturing processes, or for quality control assessments. The objective is first to warrant the full quality and safety of the lots produced, and assure the highest efficacy with the lowest risks when used in patients. For cell concentrates and fresh blood, storage conditions are critical and measurement of analytes such as EVs or Annexin V allows evaluation of quality of each individual transfused pouch. In addition to all the rules around viral and bacterial transmission risk, and immune tolerance, our available laboratory methods contribute to reducing the side effects of blood cell concentrates and derived plasma products, as well as those of the therapeutic recombinant proteins.

Measuring factor IX activity of nonacog beta pegol with commercially available one-stage clotting and chromogenic assay kits: a two-center study

Essentials Validated assays are required to precisely measure factor IX (FIX) activity in FIX products. N9-GP and two other FIX products were assessed in various coagulation assay systems at two sites. Large variations in FIX activity measurements were observed for N9-GP using some assays. One-stage and chromogenic assays accurately measuring FIX activity for N9-GP were identified.

SUMMARY

Background Measurement of factor IX activity (FIX:C) with activated partial thromboplastin time-based one-stage clotting assays is associated with a large degree of interlaboratory variation in samples containing glycoPEGylated recombinant FIX (rFIX), i.e. nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP). Validation and qualification of specific assays and conditions are necessary for the accurate assessment of FIX:C in samples containing N9-GP. Objectives To assess the accuracy of various one-stage clotting and chromogenic assays for measuring FIX:C in samples containing N9-GP as compared with samples containing rFIX or plasma-derived FIX (pdFIX) across two laboratory sites. Methods FIX:C, in severe hemophilia B plasma spiked with a range of concentrations (from very low, i.e. 0.03 IU mL(-1) , to high, i.e. 0.90 IU mL(-1) ) of N9-GP, rFIX (BeneFIX), and pdFIX (Mononine), was determined at two laboratory sites with 10 commercially available one-stage clotting assays and two chromogenic FIX:C assays. Assays were performed with a plasma calibrator and different analyzers. Results A high degree of variation in FIX:C measurement was observed for one-stage clotting assays for N9-GP as compared with rFIX or pdFIX. Acceptable N9-GP recovery was observed in the low-concentration to high-concentration samples tested with one-stage clotting assays using SynthAFax or DG Synth, or with chromogenic FIX:C assays. Similar patterns of FIX:C measurement were observed at both laboratory sites, with minor differences probably being attributable to the use of different analyzers. Conclusions These results suggest that, of the reagents tested, FIX:C in N9-GP-containing plasma samples can be most accurately measured with one-stage clotting assays using SynthAFax or DG Synth, or with chromogenic FIX:C assays.

A computer-based model to assess costs associated with the use of factor VIII and factor IX one-stage and chromogenic activity assays

BACKGROUND

Measurement of coagulation factor factor VIII (FVIII) and factor IX (FIX) activity can be associated with a high level of variability using one-stage assays based on activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT). Chromogenic assays show less variability, but are less commonly used in clinical laboratories. In addition, one-stage assay accuracy using certain reagent and instrument combinations is compromised by some modified recombinant factor concentrates. Reluctance among some in the hematology laboratory community to adopt the use of chromogenic assays may be partly attributable to lack of familiarity and perceived higher associated costs.

OBJECTIVES

To identify and characterize key cost parameters associated with one-stage APTT and chromogenic assays for FVIII and FIX activity using a computer-based cost analysis model.

METHODS

A cost model for FVIII and FIX chromogenic assays relative to APTT assays was generated using assumptions derived from interviews with hematologists and laboratory scientists, common clinical laboratory practise, manufacturer list prices and assay kit configurations.

RESULTS

Key factors that contribute to costs are factor-deficient plasma and kit reagents for one-stage and chromogenic assays, respectively. The stability of chromogenic assay kit reagents also limits the cost efficiency compared with APTT testing. Costs for chromogenic assays might be reduced by 50-75% using batch testing, aliquoting and freezing of kit reagents.

CONCLUSIONS

Both batch testing and aliquoting of chromogenic kit reagents might improve cost efficiency for FVIII and FIX chromogenic assays, but would require validation. Laboratory validation and regulatory approval as well as education and training in the use of chromogenic assays might facilitate wider adoption by clinical laboratories.