Effect of epicardial or biventricular pacing to prolong QT interval and increase transmural dispersion of repolarization: does resynchronization therapy pose a risk for patients predisposed to long QT or torsade de pointes?

Arrhythmic Risk in Biventricular Pacing Compared With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Results From the I-CLAS Study

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) may be associated with greater improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction and reduction in death or heart failure hospitalization compared with biventricular pacing (BVP) in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy. We sought to compare the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) and new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients undergoing BVP and LBBAP.

METHODS

The I-CLAS study (International Collaborative LBBAP Study) included patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% who underwent BVP or LBBAP for cardiac resynchronization therapy between January 2018 and June 2022 at 15 centers. We performed propensity score-matched analysis of LBBAP and BVP in a 1:1 ratio. We assessed the incidence of VT/VF and new-onset AF among patients with no history of AF. Time to sustained VT/VF and time to new-onset AF was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards survival model.

RESULTS

Among 1778 patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (BVP, 981; LBBAP, 797), there were 1414 propensity score-matched patients (propensity score-matched BVP, 707; propensity score-matched LBBAP, 707). The occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (4.2% versus 9.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.29-0.74]; P<0.001). The incidence of VT storm (>3 episodes in 24 hours) was also significantly lower with LBBAP compared with BVP (0.8% versus 2.5%; P=0.013). Among 299 patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (BVP, 111; LBBAP, 188), VT/VF occurred in 8 patients in the BVP group versus none in the LBBAP group (7.2% versus 0%; P<0.001). In 1194 patients with no history of VT/VF or antiarrhythmic therapy (BVP, 591; LBBAP, 603), the occurrence of VT/VF was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (3.2% versus 7.3%; hazard ratio, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.26-0.81]; P=0.007). Among patients with no history of AF (n=890), the occurrence of new-onset AF >30 s was significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (2.8% versus 6.6%; hazard ratio, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.16-0.73]; P=0.008). The incidence of AF lasting >24 hours was also significantly lower with LBBAP than with BVP (0.7% versus 2.9%; P=0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP was associated with a lower incidence of sustained VT/VF and new-onset AF compared with BVP. This difference remained significant after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics between patients with BVP and LBBAP. Physiological resynchronization by LBBAP may be associated with lower risk of arrhythmias compared with BVP.

QRS Morphology and the Risk of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Recipients

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting data on the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on the risk of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia in heart failure patients.

OBJECTIVES

The authors aimed to assess whether QRS morphology is associated with risk of ventricular arrhythmias in CRT recipients.

METHODS

The study population comprised 2,862 patients implanted with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/CRT-D for primary prevention who were enrolled in 5 landmark primary prevention ICD trials (MADIT-II [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial], MADIT-CRT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy], MADIT-RIT [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy], MADIT-RISK [Multicenter Automated Defibrillator Implantation Trial-RISK], and RAID [Ranolazine in High-Risk Patients With Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators]). Patients with QRS duration ≥130 ms were divided into 2 groups: those implanted with an ICD only vs CRT-D. The primary endpoint was fast ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) (defined as VT ≥200 beats/min or VF), accounting for the competing risk of death. Secondary endpoints included appropriate shocks, any sustained VT or VF, and the burden of fast VT/VF, assessed in a recurrent event analysis.

RESULTS

Among patients with left bundle branch block (n = 1,792), those with CRT-D (n = 1,112) experienced a significant 44% (P < 0.001) reduction in the risk of fast VT/VF compared with ICD-only patients (n = 680), a significantly lower burden of fast VT/VF (HR: 0.55; P = 0.001), with a reduced burden of appropriate shocks (HR: 0.44; P < 0.001). In contrast, among patients with non-left bundle branch block (NLBBB) (N = 1,070), CRT-D was not associated with reduction in fast VT/VF (HR: 1.33; P = 0.195). Furthermore, NLBBB patients with CRT-D experienced a statistically significant increase in the burden of fast VT/VF events compared with ICD-only patients (HR: 1.90; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest a potential proarrhythmic effect of CRT among patients with NLBBB. These data should be considered in patient selection for treatment with CRT.

Left bundle branch area pacing reduces epicardial dispersion of repolarization compared with biventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Biventricular endocardial pacing (BiV-endo) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) are novel methods of delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy. These techniques are associated with improved activation times and acute hemodynamic response compared with conventional biventricular epicardial pacing (BiV-epi); however, the effects on repolarization and arrhythmic risk are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of temporary BiV-epi, BiV-endo, and LBBAP on epicardial left ventricular (LV) repolarization using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).

METHODS

Eleven patients indicated for cardiac resynchronization therapy underwent a temporary pacing protocol with ECGi. BiV-endo was delivered via endocardial stimulation of the LV lateral wall. LBBAP was delivered by pacing the LV septum. Epicardial LV repolarization time (LVRT-95; time taken for 95% of the LV to repolarize), LV RT dispersion, mean LV activation recovery interval (ARI), LV ARI dispersion, and RT gradients were calculated.

RESULTS

The protocol was completed in 10 patients. During LBBAP, there were significant reductions in LVRT-95 (94.9 ± 17.4 ms vs 125.0 ± 29.4 ms; P = .03) and LV RT dispersion (29.4 ± 6.3 ms vs 40.8 ± 11.4 ms; P = .015) compared with BiV-epi. In contrast, there were no significant differences between baseline, BiV-epi, or BiV-endo. There was a nonsignificant reduction in mean RT gradients between LBBAP and baseline rhythm (0.74 ± 0.22 ms/mm vs 1.01 ± 0.31 ms/mm; P = .07). There were no significant differences in mean LV ARI or LV ARI dispersion between groups.

CONCLUSION

Temporary LBBAP reduces epicardial dispersion of repolarization compared with conventional BiV-epi. Further study is required to determine whether these repolarization changes on ECGi translate into a reduced risk of ventricular arrhythmia in clinical practice.

Comparison of electrocardiographic parameters between left bundle optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT) and left bundle branch pacing-cardiac resynchronization therapy (LBBP-CRT)

BACKGROUND

In patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy using left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP-CRT), the addition of a coronary sinus lead, that is, Left bundle optimized CRT (LOT-CRT) might confer additional benefits.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the electrocardiographic characteristics between LBBP-CRT and LOT-CRT MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICMP) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% who underwent implantation of an atrial lead, a left bundle lead, and a coronary sinus lead were included in this prospective study. Digital 12-lead electrocardiograms were recorded in three pacing modes-AAI, DDD with pacing from the LBB lead (LBBP-CRT), and DDD with pacing from both left bundle and coronary sinus leads (LOT-CRT). QRS duration (QRSd), QRS area, QT interval, and T peak-T end (TpTe) intervals were compared.

RESULTS

Among 24 patients, QRSd reduced from 167 ± 21.2 ms to 134.5 ± 23.6 ms with LBBP-CRT (p < .001) and 129.5 ± 18.6 ms with LOT-CRT (p < .001) without a significant difference between LBBP-CRT and LOT-CRT (p = .15). Patients with QRS duration with LBBP-CRT > 131 ms showed a significant reduction in QRSd with LOT-CRT (p = .03). QT interval was reduced with both modes of CRT. LOT-CRT was associated with a greater reduction in QRS area (p = .001), TpTe interval (p = .03), and TpTe/QT ratio (p = .013) compared to LBBP-CRT.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with NICMP and LBBB, there was no significant difference in QRSd with LOT-CRT compared to LBBP-CRT. However, in patients with QRSd > 131 ms after LBBP-CRT, LOT-CRT resulted in a significantly narrower QRS.

Mechanically induced electrical storm as a complication of cardiac resynchronization therapy: A case report

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to improve both the functional status and mortality of heart failure patients with left bundle branch block. Multiple recent studies suggest several mechanisms for proarrhythmia associated with CRT device.

CASE SUMMARY

A 51-year-old male with symptomatic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and no previous history of ventricular arrhythmias underwent placement of a biventricular cardioverter-defibrillator. The patient developed sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) soon after implantation. The VT recurred despite reprogramming to right ventricular only pacing. The electrical storm resolved only after a subsequent discharge from the defibrillator caused inadvertent dislodgement of the coronary sinus lead. No recurrent VT occurred throughout 10-years follow up after urgent coronary sinus lead revision.

DISCUSSION

We describe the first reported case of mechanically induced electrical storm due to the physical presence of the CS lead in a patient with a new CRT-D device. It is important to recognize mechanical proarrhythmia as a potential mechanism of electrical storm, as it may be intractable to device reprogramming. Urgent coronary sinus lead revision should be considered. Further studies on this mechanism of proarrhythmia are needed.

Proarrhythmic effect of bipolar epicardial left ventricular stimulation in CRT resolved maintaining biventricular pacing with unipolar-cathodical configuration: A peculiar case report

Background

The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on the risk of ventricular arrhythmias is controversial. Several studies reported a decreased risk, but some studies reported a potential proarrhythmic effect of epicardial left ventricular pacing resolved upon discontinuation of biventricular pacing (BiVp).

Case Summary

A 67-year-old woman with a history of heart failure due to nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle branch block was hospitalized for CRT device implantation. Unpredictably, as soon as the leads have been connected to the generator, an electrical storm (ES) occurred with relapsing self-resolving polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (PVT) triggered by ventricular extra beats with short-long-short sequences. The ES was resolved without interrupting BiVp switching to unipolar left ventricular (LV) pacing. This allowed to keep CRT active with extreme clinical benefit for the patient and to demonstrate that the cause of the PVT was the anodic capture of bipolar LV stimulation. Reverse electrical remodeling was also demonstrated after 3 months of effective BiVp.

Discussion

Proarrhythmic effect of CRT is a rare but significant complication of CRT, and it may compel to discontinuation of the BiVp. The reversal of the physiological transmural activation sequence of epicardial LV pacing and subsequent prolonging of corrected QT interval have been speculated as the most probable explanation, but our case highlights the possibility that the anodic capture may play a relevant role in PVT genesis.

Arrhythmogenic Effects of Cardiac Memory

Cardiac memory is the term used to describe an interesting electrocardiographic phenomenon. Whenever a QRS complex is wide and abnormal, such as during ventricular pacing, the T waves will also be abnormal and will point to the opposite direction of the wide QRS. If the QRS then normalizes, such as after cessation of ventricular pacing, the T waves will normalize as well, but at a later stage. The period of cardiac memory is the phase between the sudden normalization of the QRS and the eventual and gradual return of the T waves to their baseline morphology. Cardiac memory is assumed to be an innocent electrocardiographic curiosity. However, during cardiac memory, reduction of repolarizing potassium currents increases left ventricular repolarization gradients. Therefore, when cardiac memory occurs in patients who already have a prolonged QT interval (for whatever reason), it can lead to a frank long QT syndrome with QT-related ventricular arrhythmias (torsades de pointes). These arrhythmogenic effects of cardiac memory are not generally appreciated and are reviewed here for the first time.

Synchronization of repolarization after cardiac resynchronization therapy: A combined clinical and modeling study

INTRODUCTION

The changes in ventricular repolarization after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are poorly understood. This knowledge gap is addressed using a multimodality approach including electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measurements in patients and using patient-specific computational modeling.

METHODS

In 33 patients electrocardiographic and echocardiographic measurements were performed before and at various intervals after CRT, both during CRT-ON and temporary CRT-OFF. T-wave area was calculated from vectorcardiograms, and reconstructed from the 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). Computer simulations were performed using a patient-specific eikonal model of cardiac activation with spatially varying action potential duration (APD) and repolarization rate, fit to a patient's ECG.

RESULTS

During CRT-ON T-wave area diminished within a day and remained stable thereafter, whereas QT-interval did not change significantly. During CRT-OFF T-wave area doubled within 5 days of CRT, while QT-interval and peak-to-end T-wave interval hardly changed. Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction only increased significantly increased after 1 month of CRT. Computer simulations indicated that the increase in T-wave area during CRT-OFF can be explained by changes in APD following chronic CRT that are opposite to the change in CRT-induced activation time. These APD changes were associated with a reduction in LV dispersion in repolarization during chronic CRT.

CONCLUSION

T-wave area during CRT-OFF is a sensitive marker for adaptations in ventricular repolarization during chronic CRT that may include a reduction in LV dispersion of repolarization.

Impact of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate on risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND

The adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm automatically produces synchronized left ventricular pacing (sLVP) with intrinsic atrioventricular conduction to improve clinical outcomes. However, relationship between sLVP percentage and risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF) remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of sLVP rate on VT/VF occurrence.

METHODS

In total, 1,419 device interrogation data from 42 consecutive patients who underwent new aCRT device implantation were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was the first time VT/VF episode after aCRT device implantation.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 34 months, 15 patients had VT/VF episodes. Patients were divided into a high sLVP (the average sLVP percentage of ≥ 51.5%, n = 27) or low sLVP group (< 51.5%, n = 15). The high sLVP group had a significantly lower VT/VF incidence (22% vs. 60%; p = 0.014) and an independent predictor for VT/VF occurrence on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.21; p = 0.007). LV ejection fraction improvements after 6 months (12.3 ± 8.7% vs. 2.8 ± 10.3%; p = 0.004) and 12 months (13.8 ± 9.3% vs. 6.2 ± 11.1%; p = 0.030) were significantly greater in the high sLVP group than in the low sLVP group. Age, PR interval, and left atrial diameter were significantly associated with the sLVP rate after aCRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with high sLVP percentage after aCRT had lower long-term risk of VT/VF incidence with a favorable response to CRT. A synchronized pacing algorithm using intrinsic conduction may prevent malignant arrhythmias, as well as recover cardiac functions.

Arrhythmic Recurrence and Outcomes in Patients Hospitalized With First Episode of Electrical Storm

Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition that may lead to recurrent arrhythmias, need for ventricular mechanical support, and death. The study aimed to assess the burden of arrhythmia recurrence and in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted for ES in a large urban hospital. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients admitted with ventricular arrhythmias from January 2018 to June 2021 and identified 61 patients with ES, defined as 3 or more episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) within 24 hours. We reviewed the in-hospital outcomes and compared outcomes between patients who had no recurrence of VT/VF after the first 24 hours (34 [56%]), those with recurrence of 1 or 2 episodes of VT/VF within a 24-hour period (15 [24%]), and patients with 3 or more recurrent VT/VF events consistent with recurrent ES after the first 24 hours (12 [20%]). Patients with recurrent ES had significantly higher in-hospital mortality as compared with those with recurrent VT/VF not meeting criteria for ES or no recurrences of VT/VF (3 [25%] vs 0 [0%] vs 0 [0%]; p = 0.002). Moreover, patients with recurrent ES also had higher rates of the combined end points of ventricular mechanical support and death (7 [58%] vs 1 [6%] vs 1 [3%], p <0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation and death (10 [83%] vs 2 [13%] vs 2 [6%], p <0.001), catheter ablation or death (12 [100%] vs 7 [47%] vs 12 [35%], p <0.001) and heart transplantation and death (3 [25%] vs 2 [13%] vs 0 [0%], p = 0.018). In conclusion, patients admitted with ES have a high risk of in-hospital recurrence, associated with extremely poor outcomes.

Dispersion of repolarization increases with cardiac resynchronization therapy and is associated with left ventricular reverse remodeling

PURPOSE

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces ventricular activation times and electrical dyssynchrony, however the effect on repolarization is unclear. In this study, we sought to investigate the effect of CRT and left ventricular (LV) remodeling on dispersion of repolarization using electrocardiographic imaging (ECGi).

METHODS

11 patients with heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony underwent ECGi 1-day and 6-months post CRT. Reconstructed epicardial electrograms were used to create maps of activation time, repolarization time (RT) and activation recovery intervals (ARI) and calculate measures of RT, ARI and their dispersion. ARI was corrected for heart rate (cARI).

RESULTS

Compared to baseline rhythm, LV cARI dispersion was significantly higher at 6 months (28.2 ± 7.7 vs 36.4 ± 7.2 ms; P = 0.03) but not after 1 day (28.2 ± 7.7 vs 34.4 ± 6.8 ms; P = 0.12). There were no significant differences from baseline to CRT for mean LV cARI or RT metrics. Significant LV remodeling (>15% reduction in end-systolic volume) was an independent predictor of increase in LV cARI dispersion (P = 0.04) and there was a moderate correlation between the degree of LV remodeling and the relative increase in LV cARI dispersion (R = -0.49) though this was not statistically significant (P = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

CRT increases LV cARI dispersion, but this change was not fully apparent until 6 months post implant. The effects of CRT on LV cARI dispersion appeared to be dependent on LV reverse remodeling, which is in keeping with evidence that the risk of ventricular arrhythmia after CRT is higher in non-responders compared to responders.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ventricular arrhythmias after continous-flow left ventricular assist device implant

Background

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are observed in 25%–50% of continuous‐flow left ventricular assist device (CF‐LVAD) recipients, but their role on mortality is debated.

Methods

Sixty‐nine consecutive patients with a CF‐LVAD were retrospectively analyzed. Study endpoints were death and occurrence of first episode of VAs post CF‐LVAD implantation. Early VAs were defined as VAs in the first month after CF‐LVAD implantation.

Results

During a median follow‐up of 29.0 months, 19 patients (27.5%) died and 18 patients (26.1%) experienced VAs. Three patients experienced early VAs, and one of them died. Patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT‐D) showed a trend toward more VAs (p = 0.076), compared to patients without CRT‐D; no significant difference in mortality was found between patients with and without CRT‐D (p = 0.63). Patients with biventricular (BiV) pacing ≥98% experienced more frequently VAs (p = 0.046), with no difference in mortality (p = 0.56), compared to patients experiencing BiV pacing <98%. There was no difference in mortality among patients with or without VAs after CF‐LVAD [5 patients (27.8%) vs. 14 patients (27.5%), p = 0.18)], and patients with or without previous history of VAs (p = 0.95). Also, there was no difference in mortality among patients with a different timing of implant of implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator (ICD), before and after CF‐LVAD (p = 0.11).

Conclusions

VAs in CF‐LVAD are a common clinical problem, but they do not impact mortality. Timing of ICD implantation does not have a significant impact on patients' survival. Patients with BiV pacing ≥98% experienced more frequently VAs.

Conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing: Reduced repolarization heterogeneity in addition to improved depolarization

INTRODUCTION

His-bundle pacing (HBP) and left-bundle-area pacing (LBAP) are conduction system pacing (CSP) modalities increasingly used as alternatives to conventional biventricular pacing (BiVP). While effects of CSP on ventricular depolarization have been reported, effects on ventricular repolarization have not.

METHODS

QRS duration (QRSd) and validated ECG parameters of ventricular repolarization associated with arrhythmic risk (T-peak-to-T-end_Transmural , T-peak-to-T-end_Total , T-peak dispersion, QTc, QTc dispersion) were analyzed post-implant in 107 patients: 60 with CSP (HBP: n = 35, LBAP: n = 25) and 47 with BiVP. T-wave memory resolution and QTc shortening were analyzed on ECGs obtained ≥25 days post-implant. Twenty blinded measurements were obtained by both authors to assess Interobserver variability.

RESULTS

Although QRSd was shorter with HBP versus LBAP (119 ± 7 ms vs. 132 ± 9 ms, p = .02), there were no significant differences in any repolarization parameters between these methods of CSP. However, when comparing CSP (HBP + LBAP) to BiVP, both QRSd (125 ± 5 ms vs. 147 ± 7 ms, p < .0001) and repolarization parameters (T-peak-to-T-end_Transmural : 83 ± 5 ms vs. 107 ± 8 ms; T-peak-to-T-end_Total : 110 ± 7 ms vs. 137 ± 10 ms; QTc: 470 ± 12 ms vs. 506 ± 12 ms; all p ≤ .0001) were significantly shorter with CSP. Improved T-peak-to-T-end values were unrelated to pre-implant QRSd or LV function. Interobserver variability was 4.6 ± 1.9 ms. Frontal QRS-T angle narrowing (132° to 104°, p = .001) and QTc shortening (483 ± 13 ms to 464 ± 12 ms, p = .008) were seen only with CSP.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to improved depolarization, CSP reduced repolarization heterogeneity and provided greater T-wave memory resolution as compared to BiVP. Both modalities of CSP (HBP + LBAP) resulted in comparably reduced repolarization heterogeneity regardless of baseline QRSd and LV function. These observations may confer lower arrhythmogenic risk and warrant further study.

QT interval measurement in ventricular pacing: Implications for assessment of drug effects and pro-arrhythmia risk

QT interval prolongation is a known risk factor for development of malignant ventricular arrhythmias. Measurement of the QT interval is difficult in the setting of ventricular pacing (VP), which can prolong depolarization and increase the QT interval, overestimating repolarization time. VP and cardiac resynchronization therapies have become commonplace in modern cardiac care and may contribute to repolarization heterogeneity and subsequent increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias including Torsades de Pointes. It is imperative for the clinician caring for acutely ill cardiac patients to understand the relationship between QT interval prolongation, both drug-induced and pacing-induced, and repolarization changes with subsequent ventricular arrhythmia risk. In this review, we discuss the components of QT interval assessment for arrhythmogenic risk including arrhythmogenic QT prolongation, methods for adjusting the QT interval to identify repolarization changes, methods to adjust for heart rate, and propose a framework for medication management to assess for drug-induced long QT syndrome in patients with VP.

Endocardial left ventricular pacing

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for dyssynchronous heart failure; however, 30–50% of patients fail to improve after implant. Endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing is an alternative therapy for patients who do not respond to conventional CRT or in whom placement of a lead via the coronary sinus is not possible. It enables pacing at a wide variety of sites, without restrictions due to coronary sinus anatomy, and there is evidence of superior electrical resynchronization and hemodynamic response compared with conventional epicardial CRT. In this article, we discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of endocardial LV pacing compared with conventional CRT, review the evidence for the delivery of endocardial LV pacing using both lead-based and leadless systems, and explore possible future directions of this novel technology.

His-bundle pacing versus cardiac resynchronisation therapy: Effect on ECG parameters of repolarization

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) by biventricular pacing (BiV) may worsen indices of ventricular repolarization. The impact of His bundle pacing (HBP) on repolarization is not well studied in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The aim of the study is to compare the repolarization parameters in ECG between these two pacing modalities.

METHODS

Baseline and post implant parameters of 20 patients who had undergone HBP were compared with 18 patients who underwent CRT (BiV) implantation. Repolarization parameters were monitored before implantation, within 24  hours and after 6 weeks of implantation. Patients were followed up till 6 months with clinical and echocardiographic parameters.

RESULT

Baseline clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were similar in both groups. Significant differences were noted in QT_c, T_p-e and T_p-e/QT_c between HBP and CRT groups both on immediate post implant and after 6 weeks of implantation. Compared to pre-implantation,significant shortening of T_p-e and T_p-e/QT_c was observed immediately (90.54 ± 24.35 vs 69.62 ± 12.92, p < 0.05 and 0.20 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.03, p < 0.05) and after 6 weeks (90.54 ± 24.35 vs 66.08 ± 14.95, p < 0.05 and 0.20 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.02, p < 0.05) in HBP implant (group A). However, these changes were not present in CRT cohort (group B). During a follow up of 6 months, NYHA class and LV function between two groups remain comparable.

CONCLUSION

HBP is associated with significant reduction of T_p-e and T_p-e/QT_c compared to CRT. Further evaluation is needed to determine whether this improvement in indices of repolarization is associated with reduction in clinical arrhythmic events or not.

Risk factors for ventricular tachyarrhythmic events in patients without left bundle branch block who receive cardiac resynchronization therapy

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be pro-arrhythmic in patients with non-left bundle branch block (non-LBBB). We hypothesized that combined assessment of risk factors (RF) for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTAs) can be used to stratify non-LBBB patients for CRT implantation.

METHODS

The study comprised 412 non-LBBB patients from MADIT-CRT randomized to CRT-D (n = 215) versus ICD only (n = 197). Best-subset regression analysis was performed to identify RF associated with increased VTA risk in CRT-D patients without LBBB. The primary end point was first occurrence of sustained VTA during follow-up. Secondary end points included VTA/death and appropriate shock.

RESULTS

Four RFs were associated with increased VTA risk: blood urea nitrogen >25mg/dl, ejection fraction <20%, prior nonsustained VT, and female gender. Among CRT-D patients, 114 (53%) had no RF, while 101 (47%) had ≥1 RF. The 4-year cumulative probability of VTA was higher among those with ≥1 RF compared with those without RF (40% vs. 14%, p < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that in patients without RF, treatment with CRT-D was associated with a 61% reduction in VTA compared with ICD-only therapy (p = .002), whereas among patients with ≥1 RF, treatment with CRT-D was associated with a corresponding 73% (p = .025) risk increase. Consistent results were observed when the secondary end points of VTA/death and appropriate ICD shocks were assessed.

CONCLUSION

Combined assessment of factors associated with increased risk for VTA can be used for improved selection of non-LBBB patients for CRT-D.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy and ventricular tachyarrhythmia burden

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) may reduce the incidence of first ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of CRT-D on VTA burden in LBBB patients.

METHODS

We included 1281 patients with LBBB from MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). VTA was defined as any treated or monitored sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT ≥180 bpm) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Life-threatening VTA was defined as VT ≥200 bpm or VF. VTA recurrence was assessed using the Andersen-Gill model.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, 964 VTA episodes occurred in 264 patients (21%). The VTA rate per 100 person-years was significantly lower in the CRT-D group compared with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) group (20 vs 34; P <.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CRT-D treatment was associated with a 32% risk reduction for VTA recurrence (hazard ratio 0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.82; P <.001), 57% risk reduction for recurrent life-threatening VTA, 54% risk reduction for recurrent appropriate ICD shocks, and 25% risk reduction for the combined endpoint of VTA and death. The effect of CRT-D on VTA burden was consistent among all tested subgroups but was more pronounced among patients in New York Heart Association functional class I. Landmark analysis showed that at 2 years, the cumulative probability of death subsequent to year one was highest (16%) among patients who had ≥2 VTA events during their first year.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LBBB and HF, early intervention with CRT-D reduces mortality, VTA burden, and frequency of multiple appropriate ICD shocks. VTA burden is a powerful predictor of subsequent mortality.

Concomitant changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization and long-term outcomes of biventricular pacing

BACKGROUND

Biventricular (BiV) pacing increases transmural repolarization heterogeneity due to epicardial to endocardial conduction from the left ventricular (LV) lead. However, limited evidence is available on concomitant changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization and long-term outcomes of BiV pacing. Therefore, we investigated associations of BiV pacing-induced concomitant changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization with mortality (i.e., LV assist device, heart transplantation, or all-cause mortality) and sustained ventricular arrhythmia endpoints.

METHODS

Consecutive BiV-defibrillator recipients with digital preimplantation and postimplantation electrocardiograms recorded between 2006 and 2015 at Duke University Medical Center were included. We calculated changes in QRS duration and corrected JT (JTc) interval and split them by median values. For simplicity, these variables were named QRS_decreased (≤ -12 ms), QRS_increased (> -12 ms), JTc_decreased (≤22 ms), and JTc_increased (> 22 ms) and subsequently used to construct four mutually exclusive groups.

RESULTS

We included 528 patients (median age, 68 years; male, 69%). No correlation between changes in QRS duration and JTc interval was observed (P = .295). Compared to QRS_decreased /JTc_increased , increased risk of the composite mortality endpoint was associated with QRS_decreased /JTc_decreased (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.09-2.43), QRS_increased /JTc_decreased (HR = 1.86; 95% CI = 1.27-2.71), and QRS_increased /JTc_increased (HR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.52-3.35). No QRS/JTc group was associated with excess sustained ventricular arrhythmia risk (P = .400).

CONCLUSION

Among BiV-defibrillator recipients, QRS_decreased /JTc_increased was associated with the most favorable long-term survival free of LV assist device, heart transplantation, and sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Our findings suggest that improved electrical resynchronization may be achieved by assessing concomitant changes in ventricular depolarization and repolarization.

Left ventricular pacing induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia via the adaptive left ventricle pacing algorithm

Providers should be aware of the possibility of cardiac resynchronization therapy-related proarrhythmia which could be life-threatening. His-bundle pacing may serve as an alternative, more physiological, option in the management as it preserves the normal sequence of depolarization from the septum to the lateral wall, and from endocardium to epicardium.

Caudocranial transseptal approach for placement of endocardial left ventricular leads

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with improvement in the quality of life, hospitalization rates, and mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and evidence of the right ventricle-left ventricle (RV-LV) desynchrony. Implant failure rates and patient outcomes have improved with the advent of quadripolar leads, yet alternatives to traditional coronary sinus (CS) LV lead placement is sought for in a subset of advanced heart failure patients with difficult CS anatomy, phrenic nerve stimulation or in nonresponders. Endocardial left ventricular pacing (EnLVP) in chronically anticoagulated patients has been reported as an alternative using different approaches, techniques, and tools with acceptable short and long term adverse events. We present a case of successful EnLVP achieved for CRT using standard techniques and commonly available tools in a patient on chronic direct oral anticoagulation with recurrent heart failure admissions who failed traditional epicardial LV pacing.

Preimplantation interlead ECG heterogeneity is superior to QRS complex duration in predicting mechanical super-response in patients with non-left bundle branch block receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Reliable quantitative preimplantation predictors of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) are needed.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the utility of preimplantation R-wave and T-wave heterogeneity (RWH and TWH, respectively) compared to standard QRS complex duration in identifying mechanical super-responders to CRT and mortality risk.

METHODS

We analyzed resting 12-lead electrocardiographic recordings from all 155 patients who received CRT devices between 2006 and 2018 at our institution and met class I and IIA American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines with echocardiograms before and after implantation. Super-responders (n=35, 23%) had ≥20% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and/or ≥20% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic diameter and were compared with non-super-responders (n=120, 77%), who did not meet these criteria. RWH and TWH were measured using second central moment analysis.

RESULTS

Among patients with non-left bundle branch block (LBBB), preimplantation RWH was significantly lower in super-responders than in non-super-responders in 3 of 4 lead sets (P=.001 to P=.038) and TWH in 2 lead sets (both, P=.05), with the corresponding areas under the curve (RWH: 0.810-0.891, P<.001; TWH: 0.759-0.810, P≤.005). No differences were observed in the LBBB group. Preimplantation QRS complex duration also did not differ between super-responders and non-super-responders among patients with (P=.856) or without (P=.724) LBBB; the areas under the curve were nonsignificant (both, P=.69). RWH_V1-3LILII ≥ 420 μV predicted 3-year all-cause mortality in the entire cohort (P=.037), with a hazard ratio of 7.440 (95% confidence interval 1.015-54.527; P=.048); QRS complex duration ≥ 150 ms did not predict mortality (P=.27).

CONCLUSION

Preimplantation interlead electrocardiographic heterogeneity but not QRS complex duration predicts mechanical super-response to CRT in patients with non-LBBB.

Left ventricular endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than conventional epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar

Background

Epicardial pacing increases risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) when pacing in proximity to scar. Endocardial pacing may be less arrhythmogenic as it preserves the physiological sequences of activation and repolarization.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to determine the relative arrhythmogenic risk of endocardial compared to epicardial pacing, and the role of the transmural gradient of action potential duration (APD) and pacing location relative to scar on arrhythmogenic risk during endocardial pacing.

Methods

Computational models of ICM patients (n = 24) were used to simulate left ventricular (LV) epicardial and endocardial pacing 0.2–3.5 cm from a scar. Mechanisms were investigated in idealized models of the ventricular wall and scar. Simulations were run with/without a 20-ms transmural APD gradient in the physiological direction and with the gradient inverted. Dispersion of repolarization was computed as a surrogate of VT risk.

Results

Patient-specific models with a physiological APD gradient predict that endocardial pacing decreases VT risk (34%; P <.05) compared to epicardial pacing when pacing in proximity to scar (0.2 cm). Endocardial pacing location does not significantly affect VT risk, but epicardial pacing at 0.2 cm compared to 3.5 cm from scar increases it (P <.05). Inverting the transmural APD gradient reverses this trend. Idealized models predict that propagation in the direction opposite to APD gradient decreases VT risk.

Conclusion

Endocardial pacing is less arrhythmogenic than epicardial pacing when pacing proximal to scar and is less susceptible to pacing location relative to scar. The physiological repolarization sequence during endocardial pacing mechanistically explains reduced VT risk compared to epicardial pacing.

Predictive value of Tpeak-Tend interval for ventricular arrhythmia and mortality in heart failure patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Tpeak-Tend interval (TpTe), a measurement of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR), has been shown to predict ventricular tachyarrhythmia in cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) patients. However, the ability of TpTe to predict ventricular tachyarrhythmia and mortality for heart failure patients with a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is not clear. The purpose of this study was to assess the predictive ability of TpTe in heart failure patients with ICD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 318 heart failure patients treated after ICD. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to their post-implantation TpTe values and were evaluated every 6 months. The primary endpoint was appropriate ICD therapy. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality. During long-term follow-up, the TpTe > 110 ms group (n = 111) experienced more VT/VF episodes (45%) and all-cause mortality (25.2%) than the TpTe 90-110 ms group (n = 109) (26.4%, 14.5%) and TpTe < 90 ms group (n = 98) (11.3%, 11.3%) (overall P < .05, respectively). In Cox regression, longer post-implantation TpTe was associated with an increased number of VT/VF episodes [HR: 1.017; 95% CI: 1.008-1.026; P < .001], all-cause mortality [HR: 1.015; 95% CI: 1.004-1.027; P = .010] and the combined endpoint [HR: 1.018; 95%CI: 1.010-1.026; P < .001].

CONCLUSIONS

Post-implantation TpTe was an independent predictor of both ventricular arrhythmias and all-cause mortality in heart failure patients with an implanted ICD.

Association left ventricular lead and ventricular arrhythmias after upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators

BACKGROUND

There are some controversial reports related to the pro-arrhythmic or anti-arrhythmic potential of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and little is known about the relationship between ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and left ventricular (LV)-lead threshold.

HYPOTHESIS

Upgrade CRT is anti-arrhythmic effect of VA with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients and has a relationship with the incident of VA and LV-lead threshold.

METHODS

Among 384 patients with the implantation of CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D), 102 patients underwent an upgrade from ICD to CRT-D. We divided patients into three groups; anti-arrhythmic effect after upgrade (n = 22), pro-arrhythmic effect (n = 14), and unchanging-VA events (n = 66). The VA event was determined by device reports. We described the electrocardiography parameters, LV-lead characteristics, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Before upgrade, the numbers of VA were 305 episodes and the numbers of ICD therapy were 157 episodes. While after upgrade, the numbers of VA were 193 episodes and the number of ICD therapy were 74 episodes. Ventricular tachycardia cycle length (VT-CL) after upgrade was significantly slower as compared to those with before upgrade. Pro-arrhythmic group was significantly higher with delta LV-lead threshold (after 1 month-baseline) as compared to those with anti-arrhythmic group (0.74 vs -0.21 V). Furthermore, pro-arrhythmic group was significantly bigger with delta VT-CL (after 3 months-before 3 months) as compared to those with anti-arrhythmic group (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

We described upgrade-CRT was associated with reduction of VA, ICD therapies and VT-CL. While 14 patients had a pro-arrhythmic effect and LV lead threshold might be associated with VA-incidents.

Can cardiac resynchronization therapy be used as a tool to reduce sudden cardiac arrest risk?

Patients with cardiomyopathy and reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction are at risk of heart failure (HF) symptoms and sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). In selected HF patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) provides LV reverse remodeling and improves the cellular and molecular function. However controversial results have been published regarding the effect of CRT on the residual ventricular arrhythmia risk. Indeed, the decrease in SCA risk is inconsistent and some factors strongly influence the residual post implantation arrhythmic risk. Conversely, proarrhythmic effect of CRT has been previously described. In this review we aim to describe the relationship between CRT implantation and the SCA risk decrease and discuss the patients who only require cardiac resynchronization therapy-pacemaker and those who need a concomitant implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing/Leadless Pacing

Several clinical trials have established the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure, impaired left ventricular function and dyssynchrony. Challenges to traditional therapy include coronary sinus anatomy and failure to respond. Left ventricular endocardial pacing could overcome anatomic constraints, provide more flexibility, and allow for more physiologic activation. Cases and case series have demonstrated the promise of the approach. Preclinical studies support the superior hemodynamic effects of left ventricular endocardial pacing. Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing is a recent innovation that is undergoing prospective testing. Successful delivery may be associated with clinical response and positive cardiac structural remodeling.

Mid-term feasibility and safety of downgrade procedure from defibrillator to pacemaker with cardiac resynchronization therapy

Backgrounds

Some patients who undergo implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) survive long enough, thus requiring CRT-D battery replacement. Defibrillator therapy might become unnecessary in patients who have had significant clinical improvement and recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CRT-D implantation.

Methods

Forty-nine patients who needed replacement of a CRT-D battery were considered for exchange of CRT-D for cardiac resynchronization therapy with pacemaker (CRT-P) if they met the following criteria: LVEF >45%; the indication for an implantable cardioverter defibrillator was primary prevention at initial implantation and no appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy was documented after initial implantation of the CRT-D.

Results

Seven patients (14.2%) were undergone a downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-P without any complications. No ventricular tachyarrhythmic events were observed during a mean follow-up of 39.7 ± 21.1 months and there was no significant change in LVEF between before and 1 year after device replacement (53.5% ± 6.2% vs. 56.4% ± 7.3%, P = 0.197).

Conclusions

This study confirmed mid-term feasibility and safety of downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-P alternative to conventional replacement with CRT-D.

•

Downgrade from CRT-D to CRT-P is feasible for patients with improved LVEF of >45%.

•

Patients without VT/VF after initial CRT-D implantation are suitable for downgrade.

•

Patients had no ventricular arrhythmias or HF hospitalization after the downgrade.

Understanding non-response to cardiac resynchronisation therapy: common problems and potential solutions

Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome associated with a significant morbidity and mortality burden. Reductions in left ventricular (LV) function trigger adaptive mechanisms, leading to structural changes within the LV and the potential development of dyssynchronous ventricular activation. This is the substrate targeted during cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT); however, around 30-50% of patients do not experience benefit from this treatment. Non-response occurs as a result of pre-implant, peri-implant and post implant factors but the technical constraints of traditional, transvenous epicardial CRT mean they can be challenging to overcome. In an effort to improve response, novel alternative methods of CRT delivery have been developed and of these endocardial pacing, where the LV is stimulated from inside the LV cavity, appears the most promising.

Cardiac resynchronization is pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to reduce mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization but its effects on the rate of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) appears to be neutral. We hypothesize that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation is inherently pro-arrhythmic and increases VA rates in the absence of reverse ventricular remodelling while conferring an anti-arrhythmic effect in mechanical responders.

Methods and results

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we considered retrospective cohort, prospective cohort, and randomized controlled trials comparing VA rates between cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) non-responders, CRT-D responders and those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) only. Studies were eligible if they defined CRT-D responders using a discrete left ventricular volumetric value as assessed by any imaging modality. Studies were identified through searching electronic databases from their inception to July 2017. We identified 2579 citations, of which 23 full-text articles were eligible for final analysis. Our results demonstrated that CRT-D responders were less likely to experience VA than CRT-D non-responders, relative risk (RR) 0.49 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-0.58, P < 0.01] and also less than patients with ICD only: RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.50-0.69, P < 0.01). However, CRT-D mechanical non-responders had a greater likelihood of VA compared with ICD only, RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.92, P = 0.004).

Conclusion

CRT-D non-responders experienced more VA than CRT-D responders and also more than those with ICD only, suggesting that CRT with LV epicardial stimulation may be inherently pro-arrhythmic in the absence of reverse remodelling.

Reduced T wave alternans in heart failure responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy: Evidence of electrical remodeling

Background

T-wave alternans (TWA), a marker of electrical instability, can be modulated by cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The relationship between TWA and heart failure response to CRT has not been clearly defined.

Methods and results

In 40-patients (age 65±11 years, left ventricular ejection-fraction [LVEF] 23±7%), TWA was evaluated prospectively at median of 2 months (baseline) and 8 months (follow-up) post-CRT implant. TWA-magnitude (V_alt >0μV, k≥3), its duration (d), and burden (V_alt ·d) were quantified in moving 128-beat segments during incremental atrial (AAI, native-TWA) and atrio-biventricular (DDD-CRT) pacing. The immediate and long-term effect of CRT on TWA was examined. Clinical response to CRT was defined as an increase in LVEF of ≥5%. Native-TWA was clinically significant (V_alt ≥1.9μV, k≥3) in 68% of subjects at baseline. Compared to native-TWA at baseline, DDD-CRT pacing at baseline and follow-up reduced the number of positive TWA segments, peak-magnitude, longest-duration and peak-burden of TWA (44±5 to 33±5 to 28±4%, p = 0.02 and 0.002; 5.9±0.8 to 4.1±0.7 to 3.8±0.7μV, p = 0.01 and 0.01; 97±9 to 76±8 to 67±8sec, p = 0.004 and <0.001; and 334±65 to 178±58 to 146±54μV.sec, p = 0.01 and 0.004). In addition, the number of positive segments and longest-duration of native-TWA diminished during follow-up (44±5 to 35±6%, p = 0.044; and 97±9 to 81±9sec, p = 0.02). Clinical response to CRT was observed in 71% of patients; the reduction in DDD-CRT paced TWA both at baseline and follow-up was present only in responders (interaction p-values <0.1).

Conclusion

Long-term CRT reduces the prevalence and magnitude of TWA. This CRT induced beneficial electrical remodeling is a marker of clinical response after CRT.

Association of cardiac resynchronization therapy with the incidence of appropriate implantable cardiac defibrillator therapies in ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Aims

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces the incidence of sudden cardiac death and the use of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies (AICDTs); however, this antiarrhythmic effect is only observed in certain groups of patients. To gain insight into the effects of CRT on ventricular arrhythmia (VA) burden, we compared the incidence of AICDT use in four groups of patients: patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy vs. non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDC) and patients implanted with an ICD vs. CRT-ICD.

Methods and results

We analysed 689 consecutive patients (mean follow-up 37 ± 16 months) included in the Umbrella registry, a multicentre prospective registry including patients implanted with ICD or CRT-ICD devices with remote monitoring capabilities in 48 Spanish Hospitals. The primary outcome was the time to first AICDT. Despite a worse clinical risk profile, NIDC patients receiving a CRT-ICD had a lower cumulative probability of first AICDT use at 2 years compared with patients implanted with an ICD [24.7 vs. 41.6%, hazard ratio (HR): 0.49, P = 0.003]; on the other hand, there were no significant differences in the incidence of first AICDT use at 2 years in ischaemic patients (22.6 vs. 21.9%, P = NS). Multivariate analysis confirmed the association of CRT with lower AICDT rates amongst NIDC patients (Adjusted HR: 0.55, CI 95% 0.35-0.87).

Conclusions

These data suggest that CRT is associated with significantly lower rates of first AICDT use in NIDC patients, but not in ischaemic patients. This study suggests that ICD patients with NIDC and left bundle branch block experiencing VAs may benefit from an upgrade to CRT-ICD despite being in a good functional class.

Repolarization heterogeneity in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and its relation to ventricular tachyarrhythmias

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been shown to induce left ventricular reverse remodeling, but little is known about its influence on ventricular repolarization.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in ventricular repolarization of native conduction after CRT and its relation to ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) during long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We prospectively included 64 patients with heart failure treated with CRT. QT interval, TpTe, and TpTe/QT ratio were analyzed from 20-minute high-resolution ECGs that were recorded at baseline and 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after CRT implantation. CRT was temporary inhibited during follow-up to record intrinsic ECG. Patients with a decrease of left ventricular end-systolic volume ≥15% at 12-month follow-up (mid-term follow-up) were considered as responders. Occurrences of VT/VF during follow-up were noted.

RESULTS

Significant increase of repolarization heterogeneity in the first months after implantation was observed (P <.05) but then declined during 12 months of follow-up. Patients with VT/VF during long-term follow-up had higher repolarization heterogeneity at mid-term follow-up than patients without VT/VF (TpTe/QT ratio: 0.263 [0.204-0.278] vs 0.225 [0.204-0.239]; P = .045). Echocardiographic response at mid-term follow-up did not significantly influence the rate of VT/VF (log-rank P = .252). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, only high repolarization heterogeneity at mid-term follow-up (TpTe/QT ratio >0.260) was independently associated with high risk of VT/VF (hazard ratio 4.29; 95% confidence interval 1.40-13.15; P = .011).

CONCLUSION

CRT induces time-dependent changes in repolarization parameters in the first year after implantation. High repolarization heterogeneity at mid-term follow-up was associated with higher rate of VT/VF during long-term follow-up.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy is associated with a reduction in ICD therapies as it improves ventricular function

BACKGROUND

Repeated implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies cause myocardial damage and, thus, an increased risk of arrhythmias and mortality.

HYPOTHESIS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) reduces the number of appropriate therapies in patients with left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%).

METHODS

The retrospective study involved 175 consecutive patients (mean age, 64.6 ±10.4 years; 86.9% males) with reduced LVEF of 27.9% ±7.6% treated with an ICD (56.6%) or CRT-D (43.4%), according to standard indications, between January 2009 and July 2014. Devices were placed for either primary (54.3%) or secondary prevention (45.7%). Mean follow-up was 2.5 ±1.5 years. Predictors of first appropriate therapy were assessed using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four (25.1%) patients received ≥1 appropriate therapy. Although patients treated with CRT-D had lower LVEF and poorer New York Heart Association class, CRT-D patients with LVEF improvement >35% at the end of follow-up had a significantly lower risk of receiving a first appropriate therapy relative to those with an ICD (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.24, 95% confidence interval: 0.07-0.83, P = 0.025), independently of ischemic cardiomyopathy, baseline LVEF, and secondary prevention. There were no differences in mortality between the ICD and the CRT-D groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients receiving CRT-D had a worse clinical profile, they received fewer device therapies in comparison with those receiving an ICD. This reduction is associated with a significant improvement in LVEF.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device replacement considerations: upgrade or downgrade? A complex decision in the current clinical setting

There are limited data about the management of patients presenting for elective generator replacements in the setting of previously implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices that are nearing end-of-life. The individual patient's clinical status and concomitant morbidities may evolve so that considerations may include not only replacement of the pulse generator, but also potentially changing the type of device [e.g. downgrading CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) to CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P) or ICD or upgrading of CRT-P to CRT-D]. Moreover, the clinical evidence for CRT-D/CRT-P implantation may change over time, with ongoing research and availability of new trial data. In this review we discuss the ethical, clinical and financial implications related to CRT generator replacements and the need for additional clinical trials to better understand which patients should undergo CRT device downgrading or upgrading at the time of battery depletion.

Long-term effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy on electrical remodeling in heart failure-A prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on arrhythmogenicity and sudden death have not been fully ascertained. CRT has been shown to increase transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) immediately on implantation, which may favorably remodel on long-term follow-up. However, such a hypothesis has not been prospectively evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 35 consecutive patients who underwent CRT implantation between September 2013 and August 2014 (mean age 56.8 ± 11.09 years; 71.43% males). QT and Tpeak-Tend (Tp-e) intervals were measured during endocardial (RVendoP), epicardial (LVepiP), and biventricular pacing (BiVP) at CRT implantation and 1-year follow-up. Compared to RVendoP (130.41 ± 16.75 ms), Tp-e was significantly prolonged during BiVP (142.06 ± 21.98 ms; P < 0.001) and LVepiP (183.45 ± 27.87 ms; P < 0.001) at baseline. There was a significant decrease in Tp-e during BiVP on follow-up (117.93 ± 15.03 ms; P < 0.001). High responders had significantly lower Tp-e at 1 year compared to low responders (113.16 ± 14.3 ms vs 129.59 ± 9.75 ms, P  =  0.004). Tp-e at 1 year had strong negative correlation with reduction in LV end-systolic volumes (r  =  - 0.51; P  =  0.003). Seven patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias during follow-up had significantly longer baseline Tp-e compared to those without arrhythmias (158.19 ± 17.59 ms vs 139.72 ± 20.94 ms, P  =  0.043). A baseline Tp-e value of ≥ 148 ms had a specificity of 75% and sensitivity of 71% to predict ventricular arrhythmias.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline TDR is greater during BiVP and LV epiP compared with RVendoP in patients with heart failure. However, BiVP causes a significant reduction in TDR reflective of reverse electrical remodeling on long-term follow-up.

Acute and Chronic Changes and Predictive Value of Tpeak-Tend for Ventricular Arrhythmia Risk in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Patients

BACKGROUND

Prolongation of the Tpeak-Tend (TpTe) interval as a measurement of transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) is an independent risk factor for chronic heart failure mortality. However, the cardiac resynchronization therapy's (CRT) effect on TDR is controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate CRTs acute and chronic effects on repolarization dispersion. Furthermore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between TpTe changes and ventricular arrhythmia.

METHODS

The study group consisted of 101 patients treated with CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D). According to whether TpTe was shortened, patients were grouped at immediate and 1-year follow-up after CRT, respectively. The echocardiogram index and ventricular arrhythmia were observed and compared in these subgroups.

RESULTS

For all patients, TpTe slightly increased immediately after CRT-D implantation, and then decreased at the 1-year follow-up (from 107 ± 23 to 110 ± 21 ms within 24 h, to 94 ± 24 ms at 1-year follow-up, F = 19.366,P< 0.001). No significant difference in the left ventricular reverse remodeling and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) episodes between the TpTe immediately shortened and TpTe immediately nonshortened groups. However, patients in the TpTe at 1-year shorten had a higher rate of the left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling (65% vs. 44%, χ2 = 4.495, P = 0.038) and less VT/VF episodes (log-rank test, χ2 = 10.207, P = 0.001) compared with TpTe 1-year nonshortened group. TpTe immediately after CRT-D independently predicted VT/VF episodes at 1-year follow-up (hazard ratio [HR], 1.030; P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TpTe shortened at 1-year after CRT had a higher rate of LV reverse remodeling and less VT/VF episodes. The acute changes of TpTe after CRT have minimal value on mechanical reverse remodeling and ventricular arrhythmia.

Role of abnormal repolarization in the mechanism of cardiac arrhythmia

In cardiac patients, life-threatening tachyarrhythmia is often precipitated by abnormal changes in ventricular repolarization and refractoriness. Repolarization abnormalities typically evolve as a consequence of impaired function of outward K⁺ currents in cardiac myocytes, which may be caused by genetic defects or result from various acquired pathophysiological conditions, including electrical remodelling in cardiac disease, ion channel modulation by clinically used pharmacological agents, and systemic electrolyte disorders seen in heart failure, such as hypokalaemia. Cardiac electrical instability attributed to abnormal repolarization relies on the complex interplay between a provocative arrhythmic trigger and vulnerable arrhythmic substrate, with a central role played by the excessive prolongation of ventricular action potential duration, impaired intracellular Ca²⁺ handling, and slowed impulse conduction. This review outlines the electrical activity of ventricular myocytes in normal conditions and cardiac disease, describes classical electrophysiological mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmia, and provides an update on repolarization-related surrogates currently used to assess arrhythmic propensity, including spatial dispersion of repolarization, activation-repolarization coupling, electrical restitution, TRIaD (triangulation, reverse use dependence, instability, and dispersion), and the electromechanical window. This is followed by a discussion of the mechanisms that account for the dependence of arrhythmic vulnerability on the location of the ventricular pacing site. Finally, the review clarifies the electrophysiological basis for cardiac arrhythmia produced by hypokalaemia, and gives insight into the clinical importance and pathophysiology of drug-induced arrhythmia, with particular focus on class Ia (quinidine, procainamide) and Ic (flecainide) Na⁺ channel blockers, and class III antiarrhythmic agents that block the delayed rectifier K⁺ channel (dofetilide).

Echocardiography and Electrocardiography Variables Correlate With the New York Heart Association classification: An Observational Study of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients

The aim of our study was to determine whether combinations of ultrasound echocardiography (UCG) and electrocardiography (EKG) parameters correlated with the functional status of ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) patients according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification system.We assessed 536 elderly Chinese ICM patients according to the NYHA criteria, which included 196 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). All of the patients underwent UCG. Transmural dispersion of ventricular repolarization was examined using EKG. Cumulative odds logistic regression was performed to evaluate associations between NYHA class and the demographic, clinical, UCG, and EKG variables based on the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). A Pearson analysis was also performed to examine correlations between the NYHA classification and the UCG and EKG variables.Based on the NYHA assessment, 140, 147, 138, and 111 patients were identified as class I, II, III and IV, respectively. A comparison of UCG and EKG variables based on T2DM status showed that CO and Tp-e differed significantly between all NYHA classes (P < .05 for all), with values of each increasing with increasing NYHA class regardless of T2DM status. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the disease course (OR: 1.30; 95% CI: 1.20-1.40), heart rate (OR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.12-1.21), T wave peak to endpoint (Tp-e; OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.18-1.27), dispersion of the QT interval (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.95-1.22), left ventricular fractional shortening (OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.78-0.87), cardiac output (CO; OR: 5.58; 95% CI: 3.08-10.13) were significantly associated with the NYHA class (P < .0001 for all). A Pearson correlation analysis showed that Tp-e (r = 0.75982, P < .0001), CO (r = 0.56072, P < .0001), and stroke volume (r = -0.14839, P = .0006) significantly correlated with the NYHA class.An index consisting of Tp-e and CO will be useful for corroborating the results of the NYHA assessment of ICM patients.