Plasma fibrinopeptide A levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase. Correlation with concomitant heparin, coronary artery patency, and recurrent ischemia. The European Cooperative Study Group

Effect of warfarin withdrawal on thrombolytic treatment in patients with ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

  Abruptly discontinuing warfarin may induce a rebound prothrombotic state. Thrombolytic agents may also paradoxically induce prothrombotic conditions, which include platelet activation and thrombin generation. Therefore, prothrombotic states may be enhanced by withdrawing warfarin in patients under thrombolytic treatment. This study was aimed to determine whether patients with warfarin withdrawal have different clinical outcomes from those without warfarin use after thrombolytic treatment.

METHODS

  A total of 148 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who were not on anticoagulants at admission and who received thrombolysis were included in this study. We compared the outcomes between a warfarin withdrawal group and a no-warfarin group.

RESULTS

  Fourteen patients (9.5%) were included in the warfarin withdrawal group. Although baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, recanalization rates, and hemorrhage frequencies did not differ between the groups, the warfarin withdrawal group showed poorer outcomes. Increased NIHSS scores during the first 7days were more frequent in the warfarin withdrawal group (57.1% vs. 26.9%, P=0.029). The median percent improvement in NIHSS scores at 24h after thrombolysis was also lower in the warfarin withdrawal group. After adjusting for covariates, warfarin withdrawal was a strong predictor of poor functional outcome at 3months (modified Rankin score≥3) (odds ratio, 17.067, 95% CI 2.703-107.748).

CONCLUSIONS

  Discontinuing warfarin was associated with early neurologic deterioration and poor long-term outcomes after thrombolytic treatment.

Antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease (CAD) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we recommend immediate and then daily oral aspirin (Grade 1A). For patients with an aspirin allergy, we recommend immediate treatment with clopidogrel, 300-mg bolus po, followed by 75 mg/d indefinitely (Grade 1A). In all NSTE ACS patients in whom diagnostic catheterization will be delayed or when coronary bypass surgery will not occur until > 5 days, we recommend clopidogrel as bolus therapy (300 mg), followed by 75 mg/d for 9 to 12 months in addition to aspirin (Grade 1A). In NSTE ACS patients in whom angiography will take place within 24 h, we suggest beginning clopidogrel after the coronary anatomy has been determined (Grade 2A). For patients who have received clopidogrel and are scheduled for coronary bypass surgery, we recommend discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). In moderate- to high-risk patients presenting with NSTE ACS, we recommend either eptifibatide or tirofiban for initial (early) treatment in addition to treatment with aspirin and heparin (Grade 1A). For the acute treatment of NSTE ACS, we recommend low molecular weight heparins over unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 1B] and UFH over no heparin therapy use with antiplatelet therapies (Grade 1A). We recommend against the direct thrombin inhibitors as routine initial antithrombin therapy (Grade 1B). For patients after myocardial infarction, after ACS, and with stable CAD, we recommend aspirin in doses from 75 to 325 mg as initial therapy and in doses of 75 to 162 mg as indefinite therapy (Grade 1A). For patients with contraindications to aspirin, we recommend long-term clopidogrel (Grade 1A). For primary prevention in patients with at least moderate risk for a coronary event, we recommend aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d, over either no antithrombotic therapy or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [Grade 2A]; for patients at particularly high risk of events in whom the international normalized ratio (INR) can be monitored without difficulty, we suggest low-dose VKA (target INR, 1.5) [Grade 2A].

Activation of the contact system and inflammation after thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Thrombolytic therapy activates the contact system, and factor XII activation may activate the coagulation cascade and inflammation. It is not known whether an early inflammatory response is induced by thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We prospectively measured the plasma levels of activated factor XII, cleaved kininogen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (as indexes of the contact phase and coagulation activation), and interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) (as indexes of inflammation) in 39 patients hospitalized for AMI within 12 hours of symptom onset: 26 receiving thrombolytic therapy and 13 heparin alone. Blood samples were collected at baseline and after 90 minutes and 24 hours. Patients undergoing thrombolysis had a significant early increase in activated factor XII (from 2.2 ng/ml at baseline to 4.7 ng/ml after 90 minutes; p = 0.0001), cleaved kininogen (from 26% to 37%; p = 0.001), and fragment 1 + 2 (from 1.4 to 2.1 nmol/L; p = 0.0001), whereas the 24-hour levels were similar to baseline levels. The levels of interleukin-6 significantly increased during the first 90 minutes (from 3.9 to 6.3 microg/ml; p = 0.001), and were even higher after 24 hours (11.9 ng/ml, p = 0.0001). CRP levels increased only after 24 hours (p = 0.0001). There were no changes in these parameters in patients receiving heparin alone, except for a 24-hour increase in interleukin-6 and CRP levels. Thus, in patients with AMI receiving thrombolytic therapy, early activation of inflammation parallels the activation of the contact system and the coagulation cascade, which might contribute to microvascular obstruction and reperfusion injury.

Engineering of a staphylokinase-based fibrinolytic agent with antithrombotic activity and targeting capability toward thrombin-rich fibrin and plasma clots

Current clinically approved thrombolytic agents have significant drawbacks including reocclusion and bleeding complications. To address these problems, a staphylokinase-based thrombolytic agent equipped with antithrombotic activity from hirudin was engineered. Because the N termini for both staphylokinase and hirudin are required for their activities, a Y-shaped molecule is generated using engineered coiled-coil sequences as the heterodimerization domain. This agent, designated HE-SAKK, was produced and assembled from Bacillus subtilis via secretion using an optimized co-cultivation approach. After a simple in vitro treatment to reshuffle the disulfide bonds of hirudin, both staphylokinase and hirudin in HE-SAKK showed biological activities comparable with their parent molecules. This agent was capable of targeting thrombin-rich fibrin clots and inhibiting clot-bound thrombin activity. The time required for lysing 50% of fibrin clot in the absence or presence of fibrinogen was shortened 21 and 30%, respectively, with HE-SAKK in comparison with staphylokinase. In plasma clot studies, the HE-SAKK concentration required to achieve a comparable 50% clot lysis time was at least 12 times less than that of staphylokinase. Therefore, HE-SAKK is a promising thrombolytic agent with the capability to target thrombin-rich fibrin clots and to minimize clot reformation during fibrinolysis.

Thrombin generation and fibrinolytic activities among patients receiving reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab or undergoing direct angioplasty plus abciximab for acute myocardial infarction

The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of these 2 reperfusion strategies (reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab or direct angioplasty plus abciximab) on fibrinolytic and thrombin generation activities. The effect of reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab and direct angioplasty plus abciximab on hemostatic factors is unknown. Of 70 patients with acute myocardial infarction of < or = 6 hours, 34 were randomized to reduced-dose alteplase (35 to 50 mg in 1 hour) and 36 to direct angioplasty. A standard bolus and infusion dose of abciximab was administered to all patients. Blood specimens were collected at baseline, and at 1, 4, 12, and 24 hours. The following parameters were assayed: fibrinogen, plasminogen and antiplasmin activities, tissue plasminogen activator antigen, D-dimer, prothrombin fragments F1 + 2, and thrombin/antithrombin III complexes. Among patients treated with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab, the fibrinogen level decreased by 28.4% in the first hour (11.7 +/- 3.4 vs 7.8 +/- 2.5 micromol/L, p <0.001). Correspondingly, plasminogen and antiplasmin activities decreased by 43.8% (p <0.001) and 59.1% (p <0.001), respectively. Prothrombin fragments F1 + 2 increased from 2.2 +/- 1.7 to 4.2 +/- 1.6 nmol/L (1 hour) (p <0.001) and thrombin/antithrombin III increased from 16.3 +/- 15.0 to 33.5 +/- 19.9 microg/L (1 hour) (p <0.001). Conversely, in the direct angioplasty group, there was a marginal elevation in fibrinogen level at 1 hour (10.2 +/- 2.4 vs 10.6 +/- 2.0 micromol/L, p = 0.064) despite a significant reduction in plasminogen and an increase in tissue plasminogen activator levels. There was no significant change in prothrombin fragments F1 + 2 and thrombin/antithrombin III levels. Thus, there was considerable fibrinolytic activity with reduced-dose alteplase plus abciximab; thrombin generation was not prevented. Among patients treated with direct angioplasty, there was some endogenous fibrinolytic activity, but there was no significant thrombin generation.

Influence on coagulation activity by subcutaneous LMW heparin as an adjuvant treatment to fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction

In this study, which includes 101 patients with acute ST segment-elevated myocardial infarction, we investigated the influence on the increased coagulation activity after streptokinase treatment by adding low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin or placebo and the relation between the coagulation activity and ischemic episodes, coronary patency, and mortality. The expected increase of prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2), thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), and D-dimer were significantly attenuated at 2, 6, and 18 h (D-dimer only at 18 h) in the dalteparin group compared to placebo. Ischemic episodes during the first 24 h appeared significantly more often in patients with F1+2 levels above the median at 18 h. There was a tendency to a lower frequency of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction Trial (TIMI) grade 3 flow in the infarct-related artery in patients with TAT and D-dimer levels above the median at 18 h. F1+2, TAT, and D-dimer were significantly higher after 18, 6, and 18 h, respectively, in the deceased compared to surviving patients. Also, the lack of reduction of the levels of F1+2 between 6 and 18 h was related to a raised mortality. In conclusion, adjuvant treatment with LMW heparin to streptokinase attenuates increased coagulation activity. This might be of importance as remaining high coagulation activity is associated with signs of early reocclusion and raised mortality.

The thrombolytic paradox

Thrombolytic drugs do not only stimulate the plasmin system but also induce thrombin activation additionally to the preexisting hypercoagulative state in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Testing the in vitro-derived hypothesis of a plasmin-mediated activation of the contact phase of the coagulation leading to the procoagulant effect, several thrombolytic regimen have been evaluated. Paradoxical thrombin activation (referred to as "thrombolytic paradox") was related to absence of fibrin specificity. Highly fibrin-specific drugs like tenecteplase did not cause additional thrombin activation, while non-fibrin-specific drugs like streptokinase caused a marked additional activation of the contact phase and of thrombin. It could be shown that the thrombolytic paradox was related to the extent of systemic plasmin activation confirming the hypothesis of a plasmin-mediated factor XII/kallikrein system activation as cause of the thrombolytic paradox.

Anticoagulation: the present and future

Thrombin is a central bioregulator of coagulation and is therefore a key target in the therapeutic prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. The current mainstays of anticoagulation treatment are heparins, which are indirect thrombin inhibitors, and coumarins, such as warfarin, which modulate the synthesis of vitamin K-dependent proteins. Although efficacious and widely used, heparins and coumarins have limitations because their pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant effects are unpredictable, with the risk of bleeding and other complications resulting in the need for close monitoring with their use. Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) provide a more predictable anticoagulant response, but their use is limited by the need for subcutaneous administration. In addition, discontinuation of heparin treatment can result in a thrombotic rebound due to the inability of these compounds to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) are able to target both free and clot-bound thrombin. The first to be used was hirudin, but DTIs with lower molecular weights, such as DuP 714, PPACK, and efegatran, have subsequently been developed, and these agents are better able to inhibit clot-bound thrombin and the thrombotic processes that take place at sites of arterial damage. Such compounds inhibit thrombin by covalently binding to it, but this can result in toxicity and nonspecific binding. The development of reversible noncovalent DTIs, such as inogatran and melagatran, has resulted in safer, more specific and predictable anticoagulant treatment. Oral DTIs, such as ximelagatran, are set to provide a further breakthrough in the prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis.

Combination of a direct thrombin inhibitor and a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocking peptide facilitates and maintains reperfusion of platelet-rich thrombus with alteplase

We sought to determine the efficacy of the combination of argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, and G4120, a platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blocker, to enhance thrombolysis with alteplase. Platelet-rich thrombus in the rabbit arterial thrombosis model is relatively resistant to alteplase despite the addition of aspirin and heparin. The adjunctive use of either direct thrombin inhibitors or GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in thrombolysis has been investigated with encouraging, but limited, success. The usefulness of combining both agents as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis has not been fully explored. Following platelet-rich thrombus formation in the rabbit, argatroban (3 mg/kg), G4120 (0.5 mg/kg), G4120 plus heparin (200 U/kg), or G4120 plus argatroban were intravenously infused over 60 minutes. Alteplase was given as intravenous boluses (0.45 mg/kg) at 15-minute intervals up to 4 doses or until reperfusion. Blood flow and bleeding time were monitored for 2 hours. The combination of G4120 plus argatroban resulted in a persistent patency in 5 of 7 animals compared with 0 of 6 for argatroban alone (p=0.02), 1 of 6 for G4120 alone (p=0.08), and 2 of 6 for G4120 plus heparin (p=0.2). Although during the infusion the bleeding times were longer in the groups that received G4120 (26+/-7.7 minutes vs. 14+/-10 minutes, p<0.05), by the end of the experiment there were no statistically significant differences. Similarly, during the infusion the activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT) was higher in groups that received heparin or argatroban (99+/-51 seconds vs. 32+/-7.6 seconds, p<0.001), but by the end of the experiment the aPTTs had returned to close to baseline in all groups except the G4120 plus heparin group. These results suggest that lysis of platelet-rich thrombus with alteplase requires the addition of both potent platelet and thrombin inhibitors. Specifically designed agents, G4120 and argatroban, are effective without additional increased risk for bleeding.

Fibrin specificity and procoagulant effect related to the kallikrein-contact phase system and to plasmin generation with double-bolus reteplase and front-loaded alteplase thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction

This study was undertaken to compare the effects of reteplase and alteplase regimens on hemostasis and fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Thrombolytic treatment in patients with AMI is hampered by paradoxical procoagulant effects that favor early reocclusion. In vivo data comparing this effect and the fibrin specificity of double-bolus reteplase and front-loaded alteplase regimens are not available. In a prospective, randomized study, 50 patients with AMI were either treated with double bolus (10 + 10 U) reteplase or with front-loaded alteplase (up to 100 mg) within 6 hours of symptom onset. Thirty apparently healthy persons served as controls. Molecular markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis were serially examined for up to 5 days. Paradoxical thrombin activation at 3 hours after initiation of therapy was comparable between reteplase and alteplase. Reteplase (65 +/- 5 U/L) and alteplase (72 +/- 8 U/L) caused significantly elevated kallikrein activity at 3 hours after adminstration (p <0.01 vs controls 30 +/- 1 U/L). Fibrin specificity was less for reteplase (p <0.05) with a decrease in fibrinogen at 3 hours to 122 +/- 27 mg/dl versus 224 +/- 28 mg/dl for alteplase (p <0.01 and p <0.05 vs controls). D-Dimer levels at 3 hours were higher (p <0.05) after reteplase (5,459 +/- 611 ng/ml) versus alteplase (3,445 +/- 679 ng/ml) (both p <0.01 vs controls 243 +/- 17 ng/ml). Plasmin generation (plasmin-antiplasmin complexes) was significantly (p <0.01) increased at 3 hours with both regimens to 27,079 +/- 3,964 microg/L (reteplase) and 19,522 +/- 2,381 microg/L (alteplase). The data from 3 hours after start of thrombolytic therapy proved less marked fibrin specificity of the reteplase regimen (in vivo) compared with front-loaded alteplase. Both regimens have a moderate procoagulant effect without differences in activation of the kallikrein system.

Physicians' Use of Heparin Following Thrombolytic Therapy: An International Perspective

Background: The current prevalence, timing, and route of heparin use after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction both within and outside the United States (U.S.) have not been extensively studied. Method: An 18-item questionnaire was mailed to cardiologists and emergency medicine practitioners in the U.S. and to physicians in 5 countries considering participation in an international trial of thrombolytic therapy. Results: Almost all used some form of heparin after recombinant tissue-plasminogen activator; 8% withheld heparin after streptokinase. Non-U.S. physicians used subcutaneous heparin more frequently than did U.S. physicians (26% vs. 4%). Time to heparin initiation varied greatly. Most physicians used the activated partial thromboplastin time to monitor anticoagulation, although there was little consensus about the appropriate way to determine the efficacy of heparin therapy. Conclusions: This survey shows considerable disagreement about the preferred administration of heparin among physicians treating patients with myocardial infarction. This lack of agreement reflects uncertainty about how heparin therapy should be used. When the results of well-designed clinical trials examining the optimal dosing, timing, and monitoring of heparin therapy have been published, perhaps the clinical community can reach a consensus.

Laboratory Measurement of Thrombin Activity--What Every Clinician Scientist Needs to Know

Advances in our knowledge of the biochemistry of coagulation and fibrinolysis have facilitated the development of sensitive and specific assays that detect platelet activation, the generation of coagulation enzymes, and products of intravascular fibrin formation and dissolution. This review focuses on activation markers of blood coagulation and, in particular, on mechanistic information on the pathophysiology of blood coagulation they have provided. The methodological problems faced in employing these moieties in clinical studies are examined. Only the proper use of coagulation activation markers will enable us to establish their real clinical usefulness.

Novel Antithrombotic Strategies for the Treatment of Coronary Artery Thrombosis: A Critical Appraisal

Large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina with antithrombotic agents significantly improves outcome. Despite the proven benefit of current therapies, there is a widespread perception that outcome could be enhanced further with novel antithrombotic agents. Enthusiasm for novel antithrombotic strategies has been stimulated by recent advances in the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for coronary artery thrombosis, which has led to the development of diverse inhibitors of platelet function and coagulation factors. In experimental models of coronary artery thrombosis, aspirin and heparin have been ineffective in preventing recurrent thrombosis after coronary thrombolysis and in preventing the progression of thrombosis in response to strong thrombogenic stimuli. In contrast, inhibitors of the platelet fibrinogen receptor, direct-acting thrombin inhibitors, and inhibitors of coagulation factors that promote elaboration of thrombin have been shown to be effective in attenuating arterial thrombosis in a variety of experimental preparations. Initial clinical trials with these agents have also documented efficacy in attenuating thrombotic events in patients treated with coronary thrombolysis and in those with unstable angina. However, optimal doses of novel antithrombotic agents, the degree to which combination antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies are needed, and the risk/benefit ratio associated with specific novel antithrombotic drugs are still relatively undefined. With regard to the latter, it is possible that the large-scale clinical trials now in progress may show an increase in bleeding complications with novel anticoagulants compared with conventional therapy. Nonetheless, there are considerable data that suggest that treatment with aspirin and heparin is not completely effective in preventing the progression of thrombosis or its recurrence after interventions in high-risk subgroups of patients with coronary artery thrombosis and unstable coronary artery disease. Accordingly, continued investigation of a large variety of antithrombotic agents, both currently available and in development, should improve the treatment of high-risk patients with coronary disease if regimens with appropriate efficacy but without serious hemorrhagic effects can be designed.

Improving the Efficacy and Stability of Coronary Reperfusion Following Thrombolysis: Exploring the Thrombin Hypothesis

A major assumption in the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) implies that the speed of coronary arterial reperfusion correlates directly with the overall extent of myocardial salvage, and that the extent of mycardial salvage, in turn, determines the absolute reduction in patient mortality. While a growing experience has made it clear that myocardial salvage-independent (time-independent) mechanisms of benefit also exist, few would argue with the hypothesis that the greatest benefit derived from coronary thrombolysis occurs with early (time-dependent) treatment. Thus, improvements in the efficacy of reperfusion and the stability of reperfusion are likely to have considerable impact on patient outcome.

Effect of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition without thrombolytic therapy on reperfusion in acute myocardial infarction: results of ReoMI pilot study

The efficacy of abciximab and moderate dose heparin in attaining reperfusion in acute MI was tested in a multicenter pilot study. Patients with acute MI of less than 6-hr onset triaged to primary PTCA received intravenous abciximab bolus and infusion and heparin (70 u/kg) in the emergency room. Mean time to angiography from administration of abciximab was 34 +/- 23 min. TIMI flow rates were: grade 0-62%, grade I-20%, grade II-9%, and grade III-9%. Primary PTCA was performed with 100% success rate. Access site bleeding occurred in 10% of patients with no incidence of intracranial bleeding. TIMI II/III flow rates were 50% in a patient subset where angiography was delayed by 45 min. While not an alternative to thrombolytics in AMI, abciximab administration in the emergency room in patients triaged to PTCA may be beneficial in situation where door to needle time is delayed as TIMI II/III flows may be attained in some patients. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 48:430-434, 1999.

Activation markers of coagulation

Advances in our understanding of the biochemistry of the haemostatic mechanism have led to the development of sensitive methods for measuring peptides, enzyme-inhibitor complexes, and enzymes that are liberated with the activation of the coagulation system in vivo. Studies employing these markers have provided important mechanistic information regarding haemostatic mechanism function both under normal conditions and in response to pathogenic stimuli. While assays for particular components can denote the presence of a 'biochemical' hypercoagulable state prior to the appearance of overt thrombotic phenomena, most of these markers thus far have not been shown to be useful in managing individual patients. Properly designed prospective studies will be required to determine whether these assay techniques will aid in the identification of patients predisposed to thrombotic events or the monitoring of antithrombotic therapy.

Management of high-risk subsets in unstable angina

This article focuses on the optimal treatment of postinfarction, refractory, or recurrent angina based on the results of recent clinical trials. Many of our recommendations hold true for the general management of unstable angina, but special considerations for the high-risk subsets are emphasized. Specifically, we discuss acute medical management and suggest that an early aggressive strategy that leads to early coronary angiography with the goal of revascularization when feasible best serves this subset. A special emphasis on the emerging role of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa antagonists is made because the important role of platelets in coronary thrombosis has dominated recent views on the pathophysiology of unstable angina.

Heparin management in acute myocardial infarction (AMI)

Antithrombotic agents have been shown to be beneficial in the setting of acute coronary syndromes, and as an adjunct to thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The optimal type and dosing of antithrombotic drug, however, remains elusive. Heparin, the agent most commonly used, has several limitations, the most important of which may be its inability to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Newer, direct thrombin inhibitors (such as hirudin) provide potent and predictable thrombin inhibition and are able to inhibit clot-bound thrombin. Both heparin and hirudin can carry a substantial risk of haemorrhage, however, and thrombin activity is likely to rebound after discontinuation of either agent. Further, the relationships of antithrombotic/thrombolytic dosing, measures of anticoagulation (such as APTT), and clinical outcomes are not always clear. Nonetheless, from the data available from large, randomised trials, intravenous heparin should remain a standard adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for AMI.

Thrombin Generation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Front-Loaded rt-PA and Recombinant Hirudin (HBW 023)

Thrombin contributes to the pathogenesis of acute myocardial infarction and reocclusion after thrombolysis. Thrombolytic therapy is known to induce a paradoxic increase in thrombin generation. Specific thrombin inhibition enhances thrombolytic therapy in experimental models. The aim of this study was to determine thrombin generation in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with rt-PA and conjunctive therapy with the specific thrombin inhibitor, recombinant hirudin. Thrombin generation was determined in 17 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with front-loaded rt-PA (100 mg/90 min) and conjunctive therapy with recombinant hirudin (HBW 023 bolus 0.4 mg/kg, infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h) over 48 hours. Mean free hirudin plasma levels of 1320-1545 ng/mL produced a stable anticoagulation with mean aPTT values between 63 and 81 seconds throughout the treatment period. Thrombin generation increased during thrombolysis, indicated by a transient elevation of prothrombin fragment 1.2 levels, which were 3.0 nmol/L at baseline, 11.1 nmol/L after 30 minutes, 8.3 nmol/L after 60 minutes, 3.1 nmol/L after 12 hours, and 1.5 nmol/L after 24 hours, respectively. In contrast, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels during and after thrombolysis did not exceed the baseline level of 21.8 ug/L. Thrombin-hirudin complex levels increased constantly during the 48-hour treatment period from 3.1 ug/L at baseline to 64.2 ug/L. All patients had an open infarct vessel (TIMI 2/3 potency) after 36-48 hours. Thrombolysis with rt-PA is associated with a significant increase in thrombin generation, which is not blocked by r-hirudin, whereas circulating thrombin seems to be effectively inhibited by r-hirudin.

Thrombin generation, inhibition and clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy and heparin: results from the GUSTO-I Trial. GUSTO-I Hemostasis Substudy Group. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and TPA for Occluded Coronary Arteries

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the effects of antithrombotic therapy after thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction on markers of thrombin generation and activity and to determine the relation of these markers with clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND

Thrombin activation and generation often occur with thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. Antithrombotic regimens have been developed to reduce the resulting thrombotic complications.

METHODS

We sampled plasma markers of thrombin generation and activity after thrombolysis in 292 patients. We assessed the relations of these markers with clinical outcomes at 30 days.

RESULTS

Fibrinopeptide A (FPA), a marker of thrombin activity toward fibrinogen, was elevated at baseline (12.3 ng/ml) and increased to 18.4 ng/ml by 90 min after streptokinase and subcutaneous heparin treatment. With intravenous heparin, this increase was attenuated, but intravenous heparin did not prevent thrombin generation, as measured by prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2). Heparin level, measured by anti-Xa activity, correlated with activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT, r = 0.62 to 0.67). Thrombin activity, measured by FPA, was as closely related to aPTT as to the heparin level. Baseline levels of F1.2 were significantly related to the risk of death or reinfarction at 30 days (p = 0.008); values 12 h after enrollment also were related to 30-day mortality (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although intravenous heparin partly suppresses the increased thrombin activity associated with thrombolysis, it does not inhibit thrombin generation. The aPTT was as good a measure of suppression of thrombin activity as the heparin level itself. Hematologic markers of thrombin generation were found to be related to the subsequent risk of thrombotic events.

Thrombin activation and late restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty

BACKGROUND

Mechanisms of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have not been defined yet. Experimental studies have shown that thrombin, by stimulating platelet growth factor secretion and smooth muscle cell proliferation, can play a major role.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 34 patients with single-vessel coronary disease undergoing PTCA, thrombin activity was evaluated through serial fibrinopeptide A (FPA) plasma determinations. Samples were performed before PTCA, immediately after and 24 hours, 72 hours, and 6 months later. Patients were grouped according to the development (group 1, n = 13) or nondevelopment (group 2, n = 21 ) of restenosis at a 6-month angiographic control. No difference in the two groups was found concerning baseline FPA values. In patients in group 1, soon after PTCA higher FPA levels (27.3 +/- 13.7 ng/ml) than those in group 2 (9.2 +/- 5.6 ng/ml; p < 0.05 vs pre-PTCA, and p < 0.01 between the two groups) were observed. No differences in FPA levels were detected at the other steps between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that thrombin plays a role in the process of restenosis after PTCA; acute FPA response to the procedure seems to have a predictive value.

Usefulness of fibrinogenolytic and procoagulant markers during thrombolytic therapy in predicting clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. TIMI-5 Investigators. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction

Thrombin activity is increased in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and has been shown to increase further after the administration of thrombolytic therapy for acute infarction. This increase in thrombin activity may play an important role in the 15% to 25% rate of failure to achieve initial reperfusion and in the 5% to 15% rate of early reocclusion after initially successful thrombolysis. To investigate potential mechanisms of thrombin formation in vivo, to understand better the balance of coagulation and fibrinolysis during treatment with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA), and to investigate the role of hemostatic markers as predictors of clinical events, we measured 3 markers of procoagulant activity: fibrinopeptide A (FPA), thrombin-antithrombin III complexes (TAT), and prothrombin fragment 1.2 (F1.2), and a marker of fibrinogenolytic activity (B beta 1-42) in patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI)-5 study. This trial was a randomized, dose-ranging, pilot trial of hirudin versus heparin as adjunctive antithrombotic therapy with rt-PA administered to patients with AMI. Correlation of markers at 1 hour with clinical outcomes revealed that increased FPA and TAT levels were associated with increased mortality and TIMI grades 0, 1, or 2 flow at 90 minutes; increased F1.2 levels were associated with TIMI grade 0 or 1 flow at 90 minutes; and increased levels of all 3 procoagulant markers were associated with hemorrhagic events. Late (12 to 24 hours) increases in F1.2, TAT, and B beta 1-42 may be predictive of recurrent ischemia. These results suggest that selected markers of procoagulant and fibrinogenolytic activity may be useful in predicting clinical outcomes in patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for AMI.

Overview of randomized trials of intravenous heparin in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy

Intravenous heparin is routinely given after thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction in the United States and in some, but by no means all, other countries. Several trials have documented improved infarct-artery patency in patients treated with heparin; however, none was large enough individually to assess the effect of heparin on clinical outcomes. We performed a systematic overview of the 6 randomized controlled trials (1,735 patients) to summarize the available data concerning the risks and benefits of intravenous heparin versus no heparin after thrombolytic therapy. Mortality before hospital discharge was 5.1% for patients allocated to intravenous heparin compared with 5.6% for controls (relative risk reduction of 9%, odds ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 1.39). Similar rates of recurrent ischemia and reinfarction were observed among those allocated to heparin therapy or control. The rates of total stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and severe bleeding were similar in patients allocated to heparin; however, the risk of any severity of bleeding was significantly higher (22.7% vs 16.2%; odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.21 to 1.98). There was no significant difference in the observed effects of heparin between patients receiving tissue-type plasminogen activator and those receiving streptokinase or anisoylated plasminogen streptokinase activator complex, or between patients who did and did not receive aspirin. The findings of this overview demonstrate that insufficient clinical outcome data are available to support or to refute the routine use of intravenous heparin therapy after thrombolysis. It is not known if these findings are due to lack of statistical power, inappropriate levels of anticoagulation, or lack of benefit of intravenous heparin. Large randomized studies of heparin (and of new antithrombotic regimens) are needed to establish the role of such therapy.

Frequency, significance, and cost of recurrent ischemia after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. TAMI Study Group

Early postinfarction angina implies an unfavorable prognosis. Most published information on this outcome represents data collected in the prethrombolytic era, in which definitions and populations differed considerably. Our purpose was to evaluate the incidence and importance of recurrent ischemia after administration of thrombolytic therapy. We studied patients enrolled in the Thrombolysis and Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction studies. Patients were enrolled into 5 studies with similar entry criteria; 552 patients were treated with tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), 293 were treated with urokinase, and 385 received both thrombolytic agents. Recurrent ischemia was defined as symptoms in association with electrocardiographic changes; reinfarction was defined as a reelevation of creatine kinase myocardial band isoenzyme in an appropriate clinical setting. Both recurrent ischemia and reinfarction occurred in 42 patients (3.4%), recurrent ischemia alone occurred in 226 (18%), whereas neither occurred in 964 (78%). Although baseline characteristics were similar among the 3 groups, in-hospital cardiac events (total 73 deaths, 253 heart failure episodes) were not: in-hospital mortality in patients with reinfarction was 21%; with recurrent ischemia, 11%; and with neither event, 4% (p < 0.0001). The in-hospital heart failure rate of patients with reinfarction was 50%; with recurrent ischemia alone, 31%; and with neither event, 17% (p < 0.0001). As expected, median in-hospital costs were highest in patients with reinfarction ($26,802), intermediate for those with recurrent ischemia alone ($18,422), and lowest in patients with neither event ($15,623). Recurrent myocardial ischemia after thrombolytic therapy is a frequent, important, and expensive adverse clinical outcome, making it a critical target for therapeutic intervention.

Contemporary use of and future roles for heparin in antithrombotic therapy

Although heparin therapy is an established component of the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease, recent advances have resulted in improvements in the clinical use of this agent. Studies have shown that weight-based dosing influences significantly both the time to reach a therapeutic intensity of anticoagulation and the incidence of thromboembolic recurrence. It is now considered the standard of care. A growing understanding of the variability among activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) reagents and the influence of these differences on aPTT outcomes has led to the use of reagent-specific therapeutic ranges for heparin monitoring. Many practitioners now choose to adjust the therapeutic range to correspond to heparin serum concentrations of 0.2-0.4 U/mL rather than the more common practice of prolonging aPTT to 1.5-2.5 times the mean normal aPTT. Pharmaceutical companies have developed low molecular weight heparins to minimize adverse effects associated with unfractionated heparin. More specific thrombin inhibitors are also under investigation with the aim of improving clinical outcomes in coronary syndromes now treated with heparin. Low molecular weight heparins or specific thrombin inhibitors are unlikely to replace unfractionated heparin in the near future. Therefore, optimum dosing and appropriate monitoring of heparin are critically important in the management of thromboembolic disease.

Changes in circulatory indices of thrombosis and fibrinolysis during total knee arthroplasty performed under tourniquet

Deep vein thrombosis may begin during surgery with the tourniquet inflated. Arterial levels of fibrinopeptide A, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimer, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) activity, and t-PA antigen were measured before surgery, during surgery with the tourniquet inflated, and following deflation of the tourniquet in 12 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Minimal increases in fibrinopeptide A, thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and D-dimer were noted during surgery with the tourniquet inflated, but significant increases occurred immediately following deflation of the tourniquet. In 10 patients, intravenous heparin administration significantly suppressed the rise in fibrinopeptide A, but did not significantly alter the increases in either thrombin-antithrombin complexes, D-dimer, t-PA antigen, or t-PA activity. This study provides further evidence that deep vein thrombosis begins during surgery.

Angioscopic identification of coronary thrombus in patients with postinfarction angina

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of intracoronary thrombus and associated anatomic abnormalities in patients with postinfarction angina using coronary angioscopy and angiography.

BACKGROUND

Postinfarction angina, previously studied by angiographic methods only, identifies patients at high risk for sudden death, recurrent angina and refractory angina. The recent development of coronary angioscopy, which permits direct observation of a thrombus or atheroma and is especially used for the detection of intraluminal changes, encourages a reexamination of the pathogenesis of postinfarction angina.

METHODS

Fifty-one consecutive patients with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction underwent cardiac catheterization. Coronary angiography followed immediately by coronary angioscopy was performed in 17 patients with and 34 without postinfarction angina during the same period of time (10.2 +/- 3.7 or 15.7 +/- 5.5 days [mean +/- SD]) after the onset of acute myocardial infarction.

RESULTS

The frequency of thrombus, as observed by angioscopy, was significantly higher in patients with than without postinfarction angina (17 of 17 vs. 5 of 34, respectively, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between groups with respect to degree of stenosis in the infarct-related artery, number of vessels with significant stenosis, presence of collateral flow, type of therapy and risk factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Infarct-related artery thrombus is universally present in postinfarction angina and may be the primary pathogenic factor. Angioscopy is much more sensitive than coronary angiography for the detection of coronary thrombus.

Thrombin generation and activity during thrombolysis and concomitant heparin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study investigated the behavior of thrombin generation and activity during thrombolysis and concomitant heparin administration.

BACKGROUND

It has been shown that during thrombolytic therapy there is an increase in thrombin generation and activity. Increased thrombin activity is suppressed by concomitant intravenous heparin, but it is unknown whether thrombin generation is also affected.

METHODS

Thrombin generation was assessed by measuring prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 and thrombin-antithrombin complex plasma levels and thrombin activity by measuring fibrinopeptide A plasma levels. Serial blood samples were obtained before and at 90 min and 24 and 48 h after the administration of streptokinase (15 patients), recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (15 patients) or anistreplase (13 patients). An intravenous bolus of heparin (5,000 IU) was administered before the start of thrombolytic therapy, followed by an infusion of 1,000 U/h to maintain an activated partial thromboplastin time > 1.5 times baseline.

RESULTS

During thrombolytic and concomitant heparin therapy, there was an increase in the plasma levels of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (baseline 1.08 vs. 2.73 nmol/liter, p < 0.001) and thrombin-antithrombin complex (baseline 6.5 vs. 17.1 micrograms/ml, p < 0.01) at 90 min, whereas no change was observed in fibrinopeptide A at 90 min (baseline 2.8 vs. 3.0 nmol/liter, p = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

During thrombolytic therapy with both fibrin-specific and non-fibrin-specific drugs, there is an increase in thrombin generation despite concomitant administration of intravenous heparin.

Failure of fixed dose intravenous heparin to suppress increases in thrombin activity after coronary thrombolysis with streptokinase

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to define the extent of inhibition of thrombin activity achieved with conjunctive fixed dose intravenous sodium heparin compared with fixed dose subcutaneous calcium heparin in patients receiving intravenous streptokinase for acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

The role of heparin therapy during coronary thrombolysis with streptokinase is controversial, in part because the efficacy of different conjunctive heparin regimens in inhibiting early increases of thrombin activity is not known.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients treated with 1.5 million U of streptokinase and 165 mg of aspirin for acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to receive fixed dose subcutaneous heparin therapy (12,500 U every 12 h delayed until 4 h after the end of streptokinase therapy [n = 14]) or fixed dose intravenous heparin (5,000-U bolus followed by 1,000-U/h infusion [n = 14]). Anticoagulation was assessed with serial measurements of activated partial thromboplastin time, and thrombin activity by measuring fibrinopeptide A and thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels. Plasma concentrations of creatine kinase (CK) MM isoforms were measured for 3 h to determine recanalization (increase in activity > 0.18%/min).

RESULTS

Recanalization occurred in 27%, 64% and 79% of patients given subcutaneous heparin versus 43%, 76% and 86% of those given intravenous heparin at 1, 2 and 3 h, respectively (p = 0.6). Concentrations of fibrinopeptide A (mean +/- SEM) at 1 h were higher in patients without (n = 5) than in those with (n = 23) CK-MM isoform criteria for recanalization (76.4 +/- 25.7 vs. 25.2 +/- 5.2 nmol/liter, p = 0.02), and at 1, 2 and 3 h were significantly lower with fixed dose intravenous heparin (18.4 +/- 4.8 vs. 46.7 +/- 10.2 nmol/liter at 1 h, p = 0.004) than without heparin. After fixed dose subcutaneous heparin at 4 h, fibrinopeptide A levels were similar in both groups despite lower activated partial thromboplastin times in patients who received fixed dose subcutaneous heparin. However, fibrinopeptide A was not consistently suppressed in either group (fixed dose subcutaneous heparin 8.7 +/- 1.8 nmol/liter vs. fixed dose intravenous heparin 11.8 +/- 5.2 nmol/liter) at 48 h (p = 0.4). No significant changes in the concentration of thrombin-antithrombin III complexes were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Fixed dose intravenous heparin attenuates increases in fibrinopeptide A early after streptokinase. Subsequent fixed dose intravenous and subcutaneous heparin have similar effects but are relatively ineffective in suppressing thrombin activity, suggesting a role for more potent antithrombin agents during coronary thrombolysis with streptokinase.

Activation of the hemostatic system during thrombolytic therapy

Activation of the hemostatic mechanism has been described during thrombolytic therapy. This phenomenon has been detected by new methods of assessing hemostatic system function, based on immunoenzymatic or radioimmunoassays. However, these methods are extremely sensitive and, unless they are performed in expert laboratories, carefully following the recommended procedures, they generate in vitro artifacts. A description of these methods is provided, as well as a critical review of the available studies. The correct use of these methods will provide us with an understanding of the complex response of the hemostatic system to pharmacologic thrombolysis.

Plasma level changes of fibrinopeptide A after uncomplicated coronary angioplasty

Fibrinopeptide A (FPA) is a small polypeptide cleaved from fibrinogen by thrombin, has a short half-life, and is considered a sensitive biochemical marker of thrombin activity, fibrin generation, and ongoing thrombosis. Increased plasma levels of FPA have been reported in various procoagulable and thrombotic medical and cardiovascular disorders, including acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and sudden cardiac death. However, activation of thrombosis by the arterial injury incurred during coronary angioplasty has not been systematically examined with use of plasma FPA measurements. To detect and monitor activation of thrombosis by coronary angioplasty, plasma levels of FPA were obtained by venipuncture and measured by radioimmunoassay before, immediately after, 24 to 48 h later, and 1 and 3 months after uncomplicated coronary angioplasty. From December 1990 through June 1991, FPA was measured in 30 patients (28 men and 2 women, aged 54 +/- 9 years) with coronary artery disease who were undergoing coronary angioplasty. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 +/- 7%. The dilated vessel was the left anterior descending coronary artery in 20 patients (together with a second vessel in 2), the right coronary artery in 9, and the left circumflex in 1. The procedure was successful and free of major complications in all patients. Before angioplasty the FPA levels averaged 6.50 +/- 1.18 ng/ml. Shortly after angioplasty they rose to 20.20 +/- 7.91 ng/ml (p = 0.08) despite intravenous heparin. At 24 to 48 h and after heparin had been discontinued for at least 4 h, the mean FPA levels were significantly higher (32.33 +/- 10.86 ng/ml) compared with baseline values (p = 0.025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anticoagulant effects of hirulog, a novel thrombin inhibitor, in patients with coronary artery disease

Selective thrombin inhibitors are a new class of antithrombotic drugs that, unlike heparin, can effectively inhibit clot-bound thrombin and escape neutralization by activated platelets. Hirulog is a 20 amino acid hirudin-based synthetic peptide that has shown promise in experimental models of thrombosis. Little information is available about the effects of hirulog in patients with coronary artery disease. Forty-five patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, who were taking aspirin, were randomized to receive either (1) hirulog, 0.05 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 0.2 mg/kg/hour intravenous infusion until the end of the catheterization; (2) hirulog, 0.15 mg/kg intravenous bolus followed by 0.6 mg/kg/hour intravenous infusion; or (3) heparin; 5,000 U intravenous bolus. Serial activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time, activated clotting time and fibrinopeptide A were measured. Hirulog produced a dose-dependent prolongation of all coagulation parameters; the 0.6 mg/kg/hour dose prolonged the APTT to 218 +/- 50% of baseline after 2 minutes and 248 +/- 50% of baseline after 15 minutes. The half-life of the effect on APTT was 40 minutes. The hirulog blood level correlated well with the APTT, prothrombin time and activated clotting time (r = 0.77, 0.73, and 0.82 respectively, all p < 0.001). Both doses of hirulog potently suppressed the generation of fibrinopeptide A (p < 0.05). There were no major hemorrhagic, thrombotic or allergic complications in patients treated with hirulog or heparin. Thus, hirulog, a direct thrombin inhibitor, provides a predictable level of anticoagulation and appears to have a potent yet well-tolerated anticoagulant profile in patients with coronary artery disease.

Evidence for a rebound coagulation phenomenon after cessation of a 4-hour infusion of a specific thrombin inhibitor in patients with unstable angina pectoris

OBJECTIVES

In a Phase I clinical trial, we studied the antithrombotic and clinical effects of the synthetic competitive thrombin inhibitor, argatroban, in 43 patients with unstable angina pectoris.

BACKGROUND

Thrombin has a pivotal role in platelet-mediated thrombosis associated with atheromatous plaque rupture in patients with an acute ischemic coronary syndrome. However, the efficacy of conventional heparin therapy to prevent ischemic events is limited and has been surpassed by that of specific thrombin inhibitors in experimental models of arterial thrombosis.

METHODS

Intravenous infusion of the drug (0.5 to 5.0 micrograms/kg per min) for 4 h was monitored by sequential measurements of coagulation times and of indexes of thrombin activity in vivo followed by a 24-h clinical observation period.

RESULTS

Significant dose-related increases in plasma drug concentrations and activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTT), but no bleeding time prolongation or spontaneous bleeding, was observed. Myocardial ischemia did not occur during therapy but, surprisingly, 9 of the 43 patients experienced an episode of unstable angina 5.8 +/- 2.6 h (mean +/- SD) after infusion. This early recurrent angina was correlated significantly with a higher argatroban dose and with greater prolongation of aPTT but not with other demographic, clinical, laboratory and angiographic characteristics. Pretreatment plasma concentrations of thrombin-antithrombin III complex and fibrinopeptide A were elevated two to three times above normal values. During infusion, thrombin-antithrombin III complex levels remained unchanged, whereas a significant 2.3-fold decrease in fibrinopeptide A concentrations was observed. By contrast, 2 h after infusion, thrombin-antithrombin III complex concentrations increased 3.9-fold over baseline measurements together with return of fibrinopeptide A levels to values before treatment with argatroban.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with unstable angina, argatroban inhibits clotting (aPTT prolongation) and thrombin activity toward fibrinogen (fibrinopeptide A decrease), but in vivo thrombin (thrombin-antithrombin III complex) formation is not suppressed. However, cessation of infusion is associated with rebound thrombin (thrombin-antithrombin III complex) generation and with an early dose-related recurrence of unstable angina. Although the mechanism of this clinical and biochemical rebound phenomenon remains to be determined, its implication for the clinical use of specific thrombin inhibitors in the management of ischemic coronary syndromes may be significant.

Correlation between level of heparinization and patency of the infarct-related coronary artery after treatment of acute myocardial infarction with alteplase (rt-PA)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The conjunctive use of intravenous heparin may influence the efficacy of alteplase for coronary thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. In this study we examined the relation between the level of intravenous anticoagulation with heparin and sustained coronary artery patency in a subgroup of patients of the European Cooperative Study Group (ECSG) trial.

METHODS

In the ECSG trial, patients treated with alteplase and aspirin were randomized to concomitant fixed doses of intravenous heparin (a bolus dose of 5,000 U followed by a continuous infusion of 1,000 U/h or placebo). The current study group comprised 149 of 324 ECSG patients allocated to heparin therapy and 132 of 320 ECSG patients allocated to placebo administration who had both an interpretable coronary angiogram obtained within 6 days of treatment and sufficient plasma samples to assess the level of anticoagulation. Activated partial thromboplastin times, fibrinogen and D-dimer levels were determined on plasma samples at baseline and at 45 min and 3, 12, 24 and 36 h after the start of alteplase administration.

RESULTS

The coronary artery patency rate was higher in patients allocated to heparin therapy than in those allocated to placebo (80% and 71%, respectively, p = 0.05). Patients allocated to heparin were classified into three subgroups: 48 patients (32%) with all activated partial thromboplastin times at least twice their own baseline value (optimal anticoagulation), 40 patients (27%) with the lowest activated partial thromboplastin time at 3, 12, 24 or 36 h between 130% and 200% of the baseline value (suboptimal anticoagulation) and 61 patients with at least one activated partial thromboplastin time less than 130% of baseline (inadequate anticoagulation). In the heparin group, coronary artery patency correlated with the level of anticoagulation: 90%, 80% and 72%, respectively, in patients with optimal, suboptimal and inadequate anticoagulation (p = 0.02, optimal vs. inadequate anticoagulation). Heparin administration was associated with a smaller reduction in fibrinogen and a smaller increase in D-dimer level during and after alteplase administration. No correlation was found between fibrinogen or D-dimer levels and coronary artery patency. No intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in these patients; however, bleeding was more frequent in the subgroup with optimal anticoagulation (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intense anticoagulation with intravenous heparin enhances coronary artery patency after alteplase treatment of acute myocardial infarction.

Advances in thrombolytic therapy

Alteplase and saruplase are more fibrin-specific thrombolytic drugs than anistreplase. These and the thrombolytic drugs of the first generation (streptokinase and urokinase) have shortcomings and limitations. The prolonged intravenous maintenance infusions have been replaced by a bolus injection, accelerated infusions, or the combined intravenous administration of thrombolytic agents. Numerous truncated alteplase or saruplase molecules have been constructed by deletion and domain substitution or hybrids made of the two molecules without gaining in thrombolytic potency. Recombinant staphylokinase and plasminogen activator from bat saliva have some interesting properties and are being investigated. Thrombus-targeted thrombolytic drugs were constructed using monoclonal antibodies against fibrin fragments or against epitopes of activated platelets. Fibrin-specific thrombolytic drugs require the concomitant use of a potent antithrombotic drug to prevent reocclusion. Whether hirudin or synthetic thrombin inhibitors are superior to heparin and whether novel antiplatelet agents, including monoclonal antibodies to platelet receptors and disintegrins, are more effective than aspirin is under clinical investigation. The place of stable analogues of prostacyclin during thrombolytic treatment is still unsettled.