Physiological, psychological, and behavioral factors and white coat hypertension

Evaluation of 30-Minute Office Blood Pressure in a Diverse Urban Population

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown benefits of 30-minute office blood pressure (OBP-30) but did not report on race and gender. The purpose of this study was to determine if similar effects are seen in a diverse urban population.

METHODS

Patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease (age 18-89) were invited to participate. Blood pressure was measured using standard procedure (SOBP). Patients were left alone in an exam room connected to an automated office blood pressure monitor which obtained BP readings every 5 minutes for 30 minutes. The last 5 measurements were averaged for the OBP-30 measurement. Primary outcomes were BPs measured using SOBP and OBP-30. Multivariate logit methods were used to estimate the average probability of having a BP measured <140/90 mm Hg (BPM <140/90) for the 2 measurement methods. Differences were computed across methods, in total and by sex and race, all other factors held constant.

RESULTS

The adjusted probability of having a BPM <140/90 was 47.1% using SOBP and 66.7% using OBP-30 (P < 0.01). Using SOBP, females had a 26.2 PP lower probability of having a BPM <140/90 (P < 0.001) than males. Relative to white patients, Black patients had a 43.9 PP lower (P < 0.001) and other races a 38.5 PP lower (P < 0.001) probability of having a BPM <140/90 using SOBP. Using OBP-30, these differences narrowed and became statistically insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

OBP-30 may increase the probability of BPM meeting goals, especially in females and patients who are Black, indigenous, or persons of color.

Prescriptive analytics for impulsive behaviour prevention using real-time biometrics

The present biometric market segment has been captured by compact, lightweight sensors which are capable of reading the biometric fluctuations of a user in real-time. This biometric market segment has further facilitated rise of a new ecosystem of wearable devices helpful in tracking the real-time physiological data for Healthcare-related analysis. However, the devices in the smart-wearable ecosystem are limited to capturing and displaying the biometrics without any prescriptive analytics. This paper addresses this gap to analyse the human emotion space based on an individual’s state of mind over the past 60 min and employs Deep Learning and Bayesian prediction techniques to predict the possibility of an impulsive outburst within upcoming few minutes. A lightweight smart processing device mounted with sensors captures the biometrics of the user and calibrate the same to the mental state of the user on a scale of zero to hundred. The results reveal that the deep learning algorithm along with the Bayesian probability module can predict the future mood fluctuations of the user with lower error than the other contemporary models. The predicted mood fluctuations has matched with the actual mood changes of the experimental subject within \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \pm 10 $$\end{document}±10 min of the predicted time index in 93% of the cases and within \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$ \pm 5 $$\end{document}±5 min in 82% of the cases.

Differences in personality between sustained hypertension, isolated clinic hypertension and normotension

The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences in personality between hypertension and normotension. Forty‐two male patients with essential hypertension were divided into two groups after self‐assessment of blood pressure, 18 with sustained hypertension and 24 with isolated clinic (white coat) hypertension, and were compared with 25 men with normotension on Spielberger's State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Jenkins Activity Survey. In line with hypotheses, the sustained hypertensive group showed higher levels of trait anxiety, Type A behaviour pattern, and hard‐driving behaviours/competitiveness than the normotensive group, whereas isolated clinic hypertensives occupied an intermediate position between those two groups. Results provide support to the hypothesised relationship between personality and hypertension and stress the need of distinguishing sustained hypertension from isolated clinic hypertension. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Current status of white coat hypertension: where are we?

White coat hypertension (WCH) is characterised by an elevated clinic blood pressure (BP) with normal ambulatory or home BP. It is well recognised in clinical practice and occurs in approximately one-third of untreated patients with elevated clinic BP. Current evidence suggests that WCH is associated with cardiovascular risk factors, including the development of sustained hypertension and the presence of target organ damage. However, its effects on cardiovascular outcomes remain a matter of debate. There is also insufficient evidence from randomised controlled trials to determine whether WCH warrants treatment. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the current understanding of WCH. It focuses on the clinical characteristics and potential implications of WCH, its relationship to cardiovascular risk and the evidence regarding treatment. Gaps in existing research are also highlighted.

Ambulatory monitoring unmasks hypertension among kidney transplant patients: single center experience and review of the literature

Background

Disagreements between clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurements are well-described in the general population. Though hypertension is frequent in renal transplant recipients, only a few studies address the clinic-ambulatory discordance in this population. We aimed to describe the difference between clinic and ambulatory BP in kidney transplant patients at our institution.

Methods

We compared the clinic and ambulatory BP of 76 adult recipients of a kidney allograft followed at our transplant center and investigated the difference between these methods, considering confounding by demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Clinic systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) were 128 ± 13/79 ± 9 mmHg. Awake SBP and DBP were 147 ± 18/85 ± 10 mmHg. The clinic-minus-awake SBP and DBP differences were − 18 and − 6 mmHg, respectively. The negative clinic-awake ΔSBP was more pronounced at age > 60 years (p = 0.026) and with tacrolimus use compared to cyclosporine (p = 0.046). Sleep SBP and DBP were 139 ± 21/78 ± 11 mmHg. A non-dipping sleep BP pattern was noted in 73% of patients and was associated with tacrolimus use (p = 0.020).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest pervasive underestimation of BP when measured in the kidney transplant clinic, emphasizes the high frequency of a non-dipping pattern in this population and calls for liberal use of ambulatory BP monitoring to detect and manage hypertension.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1442-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Rise of blood pressure value in young patients at first visit at a dental university hospital in Japan

Background/purpose

Hypertension is a risk factor for stroke and heart disease. Psycho-social reasons are thought to influence blood pressure fluctuation in the dental clinic, but no previous studies have investigated these relationships. In this study, we analyzed a correlation between patients' blood pressure values and their backgrounds.

Materials and methods

We measured blood pressure in 4990 outpatients at our hospital. After determining the age groups in which blood pressure deviated from national averages, patients were classified into the Hypertension group and Normal group. Differences between these groups with regard to the prevalence of systemic disease, dental history and reasons for dental consultation were analyzed.

Results

Average systolic blood pressure of males in their 20's, 30's, 40's and females in their 20's, 30's, 40's, 50's was significantly higher than national averages. In these age groups, disease prevalence was significantly higher in the Hypertension group than in the Normal group. Furthermore, the Hypertension group expressed psycho-social reasons for dental consultation more frequently than the Normal group.

Conclusion

Relatively younger patients tended to show higher systolic blood pressure. It was suggested that psycho-social backgrounds as well as medical causes influenced the blood pressure increase.

Decoding white coat hypertension

There is arguably no less understood or more intriguing problem in hypertension that the "white coat" condition, the standard concept of which is significantly blood pressure reading obtained by medical personnel of authoritative standing than that obtained by more junior and less authoritative personnel and by the patients themselves. Using hospital-initiated ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, the while effect manifests as initial and ending pressure elevations, and, in treated patients, a low daytime profile. The effect is essentially systolic. Pure diastolic white coat hypertension appears to be exceedingly rare. On the basis of the studies, we believe that the white coat phenomenon is a common, periodic, neuro-endocrine reflex conditioned by anticipation of having the blood pressure taken and the fear of what this measurement may indicate concerning future illness. It does not change with time, or with prolonged association with the physician, particularly with advancing years, it may be superimposed upon essential hypertension, and in patients receiving hypertensive medication, blunting of the nighttime dip, which occurs in about half the patients, may be a compensatory mechanisms, rather than an indication of cardiovascular risk. Rather than the blunted dip, the morning surge or the widened pulse pressure, cardiovascular risk appears to be related to elevation of the average night time pressure.

Estimation of heart rate variability using a compact radiofrequency motion sensor

Physiological indices that reflect autonomic nervous activity are considered useful for monitoring peoples' health on a daily basis. A number of such indices are derived from heart rate variability, which is obtained by a radiofrequency (RF) motion sensor without making physical contact with the user's body. However, the bulkiness of RF motion sensors used in previous studies makes them unsuitable for home use. In this study, a new method to measure heart rate variability using a compact RF motion sensor that is sufficiently small to fit in a user's shirt pocket is proposed. To extract a heart rate related component from the sensor signal, an algorithm that optimizes a digital filter based on the power spectral density of the signal is proposed. The signals of the RF motion sensor were measured for 29 subjects during the resting state and their heart rate variability was estimated from the measured signals using the proposed method and a conventional method. A correlation coefficient between true heart rate and heart rate estimated from the proposed method was 0.69. Further, the experimental results showed the viability of the RF sensor for monitoring autonomic nervous activity. However, some improvements such as controlling the direction of sensing were necessary for stable measurement.

Appropriate Time Interval to Repeat Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients With White-Coat Resistant Hypertension

Resistant hypertension is defined as uncontrolled office blood pressure, despite the use of ≥3 antihypertensive drugs. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is mandatory to diagnose 2 different groups, those with true and white-coat resistant hypertension. Patients are found to change categories between controlled/uncontrolled ambulatory pressures without changing their office blood pressures. In this way, ABPM should be periodically repeated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the most appropriate time interval to repeat ABPM to assure sustained blood pressure control in patients with white-coat resistant hypertension. This prospective study enrolled 198 patients (69% women; mean age: 68.9±9.9 years) diagnosed as white-coat resistant hypertension on ABPM. Patients were submitted to a second confirmatory examination 3 months later and repeated twice at 6-month intervals. Statistical analyses included Bland-Altman repeatability coefficients and multivariate logistic regression. Mean office blood pressure was 163±20/84±17 mm Hg, and mean 24-hour blood pressure was 118±8/66±7 mm Hg. White-coat resistant hypertension diagnosis presented a moderate reproducibility and was confirmed in 144 patients after 3 months. In the third and fourth ABPMs, 74% and 79% of patients sustained the diagnosis. In multivariate regression, a daytime systolic blood pressure ≤115 mm Hg in the confirmatory ABPM triplicated the chance of white-coat resistant hypertension status persistence after 1 year. In conclusion, a confirmatory ABPM is necessary after 3 months of the first white-coat–resistant hypertension diagnosis, and the procedure should be repeated at 6-month intervals, except in patients with daytime systolic blood pressure ≤115 mm Hg, in whom it may be repeated annually.

Biofeedback-assisted cardiovascular control in hypertensives exposed to emotional stress: a pilot study

The study was aimed at examining the effect of a short Heart Rate-Biofeedback (HR-BF) protocol on systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure levels and BP emotional reactivity. Twenty-four unmedicated outpatients with pre- and stage 1 hypertension, were randomly assigned to active treatment (BF-Training) or control (BP-Monitoring) group. Subjects in BF-Training Group underwent four BF sessions. Guided imagery of stressful events was introduced during sessions 3 and 4. Control participants self-monitored their BP at home for 4 weeks. Subjects in both groups performed an emotional Speech Test before and after the training (or monitoring) period. SBP and mean arterial pressure responses to the emotional Speech Test were significantly smaller after the BF-training than the BP-monitoring. Moreover, clinic SBP and DBP were significantly reduced by about 10 mmHg in BF-Training Group, whereas they remained unchanged in control group. Self-monitored BP decreased significantly in the active treatment group and not in control group. A short BF-training, including guided imagery of stressful events, was effective in reducing BP reactions to a psychosocial stressor. BP measured in the clinic, and self-monitored at home were also significantly reduced in the BF-Training Group. HR-BF appears to be a suitable intervention for hypertensive patients, mostly when BP increase is associated with emotional activation.

Serum phosphate in white-coat hypertensive patients: focus on dipping status and metabolic syndrome

Recent studies indicate an association between serum phosphate levels and blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A growing body of evidence suggests that white-coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with target organ damage. Furthermore, metabolic syndrome (MS) and a non-dipping pattern are associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to explore the nocturnal blood pressure fall in patients with WCH according to their serum phosphate levels and number of MS components fulfilled. The study included 2600 patients with WCH who attended our outpatient clinics. All patients underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. Dipping pattern was defined as follows: 'dippers' had a nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) fall > or =10% but <20%; 'non-dippers' had an NSBP fall <10%; 'extreme dippers' had an NSBP fall > or =20% and 'reverse dippers' had an NSBP increase. There were 314 extreme dippers, 1337 dippers, 734 non-dippers and 116 reverse dippers. Reverse dippers presented with significantly lower levels of serum phosphate, whereas extreme dippers had significantly higher levels (3.39+/-3.29 vs. 3.58+/-3.52 mg per 100 ml, P<0.0001). The patients were classified according to the number of MS components and the main observation was the inverse relationship of serum phosphate with MS components (3.53+/-0.36, 3.50+/-0.38, 3.49+/-0.38, 3.44+/-0.36 and 3.35+/-0.31 mg per 100 ml, respectively, P=0.003). Patients with WCH and low serum phosphate levels appear to have a higher incidence of a non-dipping NSBP profile and an impaired metabolic profile. This observation may be important for the stratification of the cardiovascular risk in WCH patients.

Orienting-Defense Responses and Psychophysiological Reactivity in Isolated Clinic versus Sustained Hypertension

This study sought to determine whether patients with white-coat or isolated clinic hypertension (ICH) show, in comparison to patients with sustained hypertension (SH), a defense response pattern to novel stimuli and an enhanced psychophysiological reactivity to stress. Forty-three patients with essential hypertension were divided into two groups after 16 days of self-monitoring blood pressure (BP): ICH (24 men; self-measured BP < 135/85 mmHg) and SH (19 men; self-measured BP >or= 135/85 mmHg). Defense responses were measured as the cardiac changes to phasic non-aversive auditory stimuli. Psychophysiological reactivity (heart and breath rate, blood volume pulse, electromyography, and skin conductance) was measured during mental arithmetic and video game tasks. The standard deviation of self-measured BPs and the difference between mean BPs at work and at home were used as indicators of cardiovascular reactivity to daily stress. No significant differences were seen in defense responses or psychophysiological reactivity to laboratory or naturally occurring stressors. These results do not support the hypothesis that ICH can be explained in terms of a generalized hyperreactivity to novel or stressful stimuli.

Nocturnal blood pressure fall and metabolic syndrome score in patients with white coat hypertension

BACKGROUND

Accumulating data report that white coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with target organ damage. Metabolic syndrome (MS), and nondipping pattern is also associated with increased cardiovascular risk. The purpose of this study was to explore the nocturnal blood pressure fall in WCH patients according to their MS score.

METHODS

The study comprised 2300 patients with WCH who attended our outpatient clinics. All underwent repeated office blood pressure measurements, 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, full clinical and laboratory evaluation. The diagnosis of MS was made according to the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria and patients were classified into five groups: group I (hypertension), group II (hypertension and any one component), group III (hypertension and any two components), group IV (hypertension and any three components), and group V (all five components). Dipping pattern was defined as 'dippers' with nocturnal systolic blood pressure (NSBP) fall greater than or equal to 10% but less than 20%, 'nondippers' with NSBP fall greater than or equal to 0% but less than 10%, 'extreme dippers' with NSBP fall greater than or equal to 20%, and 'reverse dippers' with NSBP increase.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into two groups according to the presence (n=522) and absence (n=1778) of MS. The overall prevalence of MS in the study population was 22.7%. Comparing the non-MS group with the MS we observed significant differences for nondippers (24.5% vs. 38.9%, P<0.001), dippers (54.4% vs. 43.5%, P<0.001), extreme dippers (17.8% vs. 11.3%, P<0.001), and reverse dippers (3.3% vs. 6.3%, P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Patients with WCH and increased number of MS components present with elevated nighttime SBP levels. This observation is of a great significance in the assessment of the cardiovascular risk in these patients.

Franz Volhard lecture: should doctors still measure blood pressure? The missing patients with masked hypertension

The traditional reliance on blood pressure (BP) measurement in the medical setting misses a significant number of individuals with masked hypertension, who have normal clinic BP but persistently high daytime BP when measured out of the office. We suggest that masked hypertension may be a precursor of clinically recognized sustained hypertension and is associated with increased cardiovascular risk compared with consistent normotension. We discuss factors that may contribute to clinic-daytime BP differences as well as the changing relationship between these two measures over time. Anxiety at the time of BP measurement and having been diagnosed as hypertensive appear to be two possible mechanisms. The identification of individuals with masked hypertension is of great clinical importance and requires out-of-office BP screening. Ambulatory BP monitoring is the best established technique for doing this, but home monitoring may be applicable in the future.

Blood pressure measurements taken by patients are similar to home and ambulatory blood pressure measurements

OBJECTIVE

To compare blood pressure measurements taken at home by physicians, nurses, and patients with office blood pressure measurement , ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and home blood pressure measurement.

METHODS

A total of 44 patients seen by a home care program were studied. Protocol 1 a) blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician and a nurse during a regular home visit (Home1); b) home blood pressure measurement was measured for 4 days (HBPM1); c) office blood pressure measurement was measured by a physician, a nurse, and the patient; and by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Protocol 2 blood pressure was measured by the patient, a physician, and a nurse during a special home visit in the presence of a physician and a nurse only (Home2); and b) home blood pressure measurement was taken for the second time (HBPM2). Echocardiography, guided by a two-dimensional echocardiograph, was performed.

RESULTS

Protocol 1: a) office blood pressure measurement and Home1 were significantly higher than ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, except for systolic and diastolic office blood pressure measurement taken by the patient or a family member, systolic blood pressure taken by a nurse, and diastolic blood pressure taken by a physician. b) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and HBPM1 were similar. Protocol 2: a) HBPM2 and Home2 were similar. b) Home2 was significantly lower than Home1, except for diastolic blood pressure taken by a nurse or the patient. There were significant relationships between: a) diastolic blood pressure measured by the patient and the thickness of the interventricular septum, posterior wall, and left ventricular mass; and b) ambulatory and HBPM2 diastolic and systolic blood pressure taken by a physician (home2) and left ventricular mass. Therefore, the data indicate that home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring had good prognostic values relative to "office measurement."

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the measurement most similar to home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was blood pressure measured by the patient, and that home blood pressure measurement and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring had good prognostic value relative to "office measurements".

The impact of perceived hypertension status on anxiety and the white coat effect

BACKGROUND

The white coat effect can lead to overdiagnosis of hypertension and unnecessary pharmacologic treatment. Mechanisms underlying the white coat effect remain poorly understood but are critical to improving the accuracy of clinic blood pressure measurement.

PURPOSE

This study investigated whether perceived hypertension status was associated with state anxiety levels during a clinic visit and the magnitude of the white coat effect, independent of true blood pressure status.

METHODS

This observational study included 214 normotensive and mildly hypertensive participants who were 18 to 80 years old, had no cardiac history, and were willing to discontinue antihypertensive medications for 8 weeks. Participants underwent 36 hr ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and physician blood pressure measurement. Outcome measures were state anxiety reported during the clinic visit and the white coat effect.

RESULTS

An analysis of covariance indicated that participants who perceived themselves as hypertensive reported greater state anxiety (p<.001) and showed larger white coat effects (ps<.01) compared with those who perceived themselves as normotensive. True hypertension status based on ambulatory blood pressure was not related to either outcome. Anxiety accounted for approximately 19% of the association between perceived hypertension status and the white coat effect.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the perception of being hypertensive is associated with greater anxiety during clinic blood pressure measurement and a larger white coat effect, independent of the true blood pressure level. Anxiety appears to be a mechanism by which perceived hypertension status contributes to the white coat effect.

The Take Control of Your Blood pressure (TCYB) study: Study design and methodology

BACKGROUND

Among the 65 million Americans with hypertension, only approximately 31% have their blood pressure under control (<140/90 mm/Hg). Despite the damaging impact of hypertension and the availability of evidence-based target values for blood pressure, interventions to improve blood pressure control have had limited success.

OBJECTIVES

A randomized controlled health services intervention trial with a two by two design is being conducted to improve blood pressure control. This five-year trial evaluates two patient-directed interventions designed to improve blood pressure control among patients diagnosed with hypertension in a community-based primary care setting.

METHODS

Patients are randomized to one of four groups: usual care, home blood pressure monitoring, tailored behavioral self-management intervention that is administered via telephone by a nurse, or a combination of the home blood pressure monitoring and tailored behavioral intervention. Patients receiving the home blood pressure monitoring are trained in the use of an electronic blood pressure measurement device, are asked to measure their blood pressure 3 times/week, and send in two-month blood pressure recordings throughout the 24-month study duration. The behavioral intervention incorporates patients' need assessments and involves tailored behavioral and education modules to promote medication adherence and improve specific health behaviors. A nurse delivers all behavioral self-management modules over the telephone bi-monthly for 24 months. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who achieve control of their blood pressure based on evidence-based guidelines (for patients without diabetes <140/90 mm/Hg, for patients with diabetes <130/80 mm/Hg) evaluated at six-month intervals over 24 months (five measurements) using a random-zero sphygmomanometer.

CONCLUSION

Despite the known risk of poor blood pressure control, and the wide availability of effective treatment strategies, a majority of adults still do not have their blood pressure controlled. This study will be an important step in defining two explicit interventions to improve blood pressure control. To our knowledge, this study is the first to combine both a tailored behavioral self-management intervention and self-monitoring home blood pressure intervention to improve blood pressure control among patients in a primary care setting.

Physiological reaction to work in cold microclimate

OBJECTIVES

In Poland, occupational exposure to cold microclimate is quite common (5.1 workers/1000 occupationally active people). Reports on health effects of this exposure are rather scarce. The aim of the study was to evaluate the physiological reaction in workers occupationally exposed to cold microclimate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Examinations were performed in a group of 102 workers (41 women and 61 men) employed at cold storage units. The mean age in the group was 39.1 +/- 9.9 years and the duration of employment under conditions of cold environment was over 12 years. The study population was divided into four groups, according to microclimate conditions (group I, ambient temperature -26 degrees C; group II, 10-14 degrees C; group III, 18-20 degrees C, control group; and group IV, 0-10 degress C). The workers underwent the following procedures: general medical examinations, cold pressor test, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and heart rate variability (HRV) analysis (time- and frequency-domain parameters).

RESULTS

The results were adjusted for confounding factors (age, smoking and drinking habits). The analysis of HRV parameters did not reveal any significant differences between the study groups. However, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in the daytime and at night was significantly higher in group IV compared to group II. Mean heart rate (HR) in the daytime and at night and the BP and HR day/night ratio did not differ between the groups. The analysis of BP by gender revealed that in women, systolic BP during the day and at night was significantly higher in group IV than in group II. In the group of workers with hypertension (18 men and 5 women), men reacted to the cold pressor test either by increased or decreased BP while all the women reacted by the increased BP.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicated that in workers exposed to cold microclimate, the physiological reaction was dependent on gender and ambient temperature. Women seemed to be more sensitive to cold stress than men. However, this finding must be further investigated.

Estimation of base blood pressure by using a new device in the outpatient clinic

Direct measurement of intra-arterial blood pressure (BP) for 24-h provides approximately 100,000 values that vary enormously, but each (BPi) can be expressed by the equation BPi = BP0 + DeltaBPi (BP0, base BP; DeltaBPi, BP increment, i=1, 2, ..., 100 x 10(3)). About 20% of outpatients with hypertension exhibit white-coat hypertension (WCH). In such patients, DeltaBPc (i = c; c, time at the clinic) is surmised to be large. A method for explaining the physiological factors in DeltaBPc and the estimation of base BP in the outpatient clinic is important. This study addresses this issue. A total of 293 subjects were divided into four groups: 1) WCH group, 45 individuals (office BP > or = 140/90 mmHg and 24-h indirect BP < 125/80 mmHg); 2) normotensive (NT) group, 84 controls matched for age and sex; 3) WHO-I group, 95 hypertensive patients with WHO stage I (office BP > or = 140/90 mmHg and 24-h BP > or = 125/80 mmHg); and 4) WHO-II group, 69 hypertensive patients with WHO stage II. Their BPc and heart rate (HR; HRc, clinic HR) values were measured by a BP-ECG monitoring device in the outpatient clinic. Power-spectral analysis was used to obtain the ratio between the low-frequency component (LF) and high-frequency component (HF) of ECG-RR variability (LF/HF = LH). Twenty-four-hour indirect BP (and BP0) and base HR (HR0) were measured by a portable device (TM2425) at 30-min intervals. Then, DeltaBPc (= BPc - BP0) was estimated by performing linear multivariate analysis applying the model equation DeltaBPc = (BPc -alphaLH)(1-betaHR0/HRc) + epsilon to the above variables (alpha and beta, constant values; epsilon, error). This model equation made it possible to estimate BP0 (and DeltaBPc) with a high coefficient of correlation (r > or = 0.85, mean of error less than 0.82 +/- 5.9 mmHg). The predictive accuracy for discrimination between WCH and sustained hypertension (WHO-I and WHO-II groups) by this equation was 88%. The new DeltaBP-estimation device (BP-ECG monitor) enabled us to infer BP0 and is therefore useful in estimating WCH in the outpatient clinic.

White coat phenomenon, anxiety and endothelial function in healthy normotensive elderly subjects

OBJECTIVE

The white coat phenomenon (WCP) is a blood pressure (BP) elevation specifically observed in the clinical setting. Though WCP has been suggested to associate with emotional responses such as anxiety or with cardiovascular complications, its pathogenesis and clinical significance are unclear. We studied the possible association between WCP and anxiety or vascular function in normotensive elderly subjects without major cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

As a parameter of anxiety, the State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) was used. WCP was evaluated by calculating the difference between the clinic BP and mean daytime ambulatory BP. As parameters of vascular function, brachial artery endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and the endothelium-independent dilation response to sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) were measured using high-resolution ultrasound.

RESULTS

Using confounding factors as covariates, no association was observed between WCP and the STAI-trait or STAI-state score. There was a significant negative association between WCP and the percent change of FMD but no association between WCP and the percent change of GTN.

CONCLUSION

WCP in the healthy normotensive elderly subjects may reflect a decrease in endothelial function, i.e. initial stage atherosclerosis, rather than anxiety.

Anxiety and outcome expectations predict the white-coat effect

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether elevated clinic blood pressure compared with daytime ambulatory blood pressure, referred to as the white-coat effect, is associated with anxiety and increased blood pressure expectancy in the doctor's office.

METHODS

The 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements and physicians' blood pressure measurements were obtained in 226 normotensive and hypertensive study participants. Anxiety levels were assessed multiple times during the clinic visit using a Visual Analog Scale. Participants' expectations regarding the clinic visit were assessed using a six-item scale (Expectations of Outcomes Scale). The white-coat effect was computed as the difference between the mean clinic blood pressure and the mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure. Multiple regression analysis was performed to examine the association between anxiety, outcome expectations and the white-coat effect, adjusting for age, sex, and ambulatory blood pressure level.

RESULTS

As predicted, outcome expectations and anxiety during the clinic visit were significantly associated with the white-coat effect. Results of the regression analysis indicated that only expectancy had an independent effect on the systolic white-coat effect; however, both anxiety and expectancy had independent effects on the diastolic white-coat effect.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide empirical support to the hypothesis that anxiety and blood pressure expectancy may elevate clinic blood pressure.

White-coat hypertension in adults

White-coat hypertension is defined by the coexistence of persistently high office blood pressure (BP) with normal self-measured or ambulatory blood pressure. The prognostic impact of white-coat hypertension is a subject of debate. Cardiovascular morbidity seems to be lower in white-coat hypertension than in ambulatory hypertension, and, according to some but not all studies, is not dissimilar between white-coat hypertension and clinical normotension. In a large collaborative study including individual data from four prospective cohort studies, the incidence of stroke tended to increase in the white-coat hypertension group in the long run, crossing the hazard curve of the ambulatory hypertension by the ninth year of follow-up. These data raise the hypothesis, to be tested in future studies, that white-coat hypertension might not be a benign condition for stroke in the long term. Further studies are needed in order to: (1) test whether white-coat hypertension is really a benign condition for stroke in the long term; (2) compare, in patients with white-coat hypertension, a regimen based on life-style measures without drugs and a standard regimen consisting of life-style measures with the possible addition of drugs. On the basis of current evidence, it is reasonable to suggest a treatment based on life-style measures in the low-risk stratum of patients with white-coat hypertension under the conditions of correct definition, absence of comorbid conditions and target-organ damage, and adequate follow-up

Improving patient outcomes with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in elderly with hypertension

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge regarding ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) use in clinical practice and to provide example cases for its use in a hypertension (HTN) specialty clinic.

DATA SOURCES

Published research trials, medical literature, and cases from the Center for Senior Hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

The knowledge of ABPM benefits to using ABPM are substantial and improves the care and management of many conditions, including white coat HTN, white coat normotension, resistant, borderline, episodic, paroxysmal HTN, and finally orthostatic hypotension. Third-party payers only cover ABPM for "white coat" HTN.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This article reviews previous studies and explains the benefit to changing our current practice to match the knowledge we have gained through research through case studies.

Prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure value: from the Japan Home versus Office Measurement Evaluation Study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of masked uncontrolled and treated white-coat hypertension defined according to the average of morning and evening home blood pressure values.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 3303 essential hypertensive outpatients receiving antihypertensive treatment in Japan. Information on the characteristics of the patients was collected by a physician's self-administrated questionnaire. The office blood pressure value was calculated as the average of the four readings in two visits. All patients were asked to measure their blood pressure once every morning and once every evening. In the study, we included patients with at least three measurements in the morning and in the evening, respectively. The average of all home blood pressure values was taken as the home blood pressure value.

RESULTS

The mean value of home systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 136.8/79.3 mmHg, and the mean value of office systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 142.8/80.6 mmHg. Of the 3303 patients, 758 (23.0%) had controlled hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 628 (19.0%) had masked uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office <140/90 mmHg), 640 (19.4%) had treated white-coat hypertension (home <135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg), and 1277 (38.7%) had uncontrolled hypertension (home > or =135/85 mmHg and office > or =140/90 mmHg).

CONCLUSIONS

Treated white-coat hypertension and masked uncontrolled hypertension were often observed in clinical settings. Physicians need to understand the prevalence of such patients to prevent inadequate diagnosis and treatment in them.

Significance of Mean Blood Pressure for Blood Pressure Control

The significance of pulse pressure (PP) and mean blood pressure (MBP) for blood pressure (BP) control is unclear. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between PP and MBP and BP control. We obtained home BP measurements for 117 patients aged 40-75 years with either office systolic BP (SBP) >or= 140 mmHg or office diastolic BP (DBP) >or= 90 mmHg. Patients were treated with 1 to 2 antihypertensive drugs for 6 months to achieve home SBP < 135 mmHg and home DBP < 85 mmHg. At follow-up, 72 patients were taking a single drug with good BP control, 23 were taking two drugs with good BP control, and 22 were taking two drugs without good BP control. Although office SBP and DBP at baseline were similar in the three groups, home SBP and DBP at baseline in the single drug group were lowest among the three groups (P < 0.01). Home MBP at baseline in the single drug group was lowest among the three groups (P < 0.01). Home PP at baseline was highest in the two-drug without good control group (P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only home MBP at baseline was significantly correlated with a lack of BP control. Home MBP rather than home PP is associated with achieving adequate BP control.

Psychologic treatment for hypertension can be efficacious

The traditional view of psychologic treatments and their efficacy for treating primary hypertension is that they may be of some benefit for borderline hypertension and that they can be potentially useful adjuncts to medical treatment. This review challenges such cautious conclusions by critically analyzing previous reviews and by also considering innovative, newer clinical trials. One reason for cautious conclusions has been selective reviewing and a lack of well-designed trials. Measurement and study protocol differences as well as differences in treatment modality have all been shown to have major effects on observed outcomes. Studies that promise better results have the following characteristics: 1) use of 24-hour ambulatory monitoring as an end point to rule out white coat hypertension that does not need treatment in the first place; 2) inclusion of patients with truly elevated blood pressure at pretreatment; and 3) multicomponent treatments that are tailored to individual patient needs.

The white-coat effect is unrelated to the difference between clinic and daytime blood pressure and is associated with greater reactivity to public speaking

OBJECTIVE

To compare the blood pressure (BP) response to doctor's visit with the BP reaction to a psycho-social challenge and with the difference between clinic and daytime BP (DeltaC-D).

SUBJECTS

We studied 64 young stage-1 hypertensive subjects and 33 normotensive controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Relationship between direct and surrogate measure of white-coat effect (WCE) and assessment of BP response to public speaking in subjects with normal or increased reaction to BP measurement.

METHODS

The responses to BP measurement by a doctor and to public speaking were assessed with beat-to-beat Finapres recording. DeltaC-D was calculated on the basis of two BP monitorings and used as a surrogate measure of WCE.

RESULTS

BP and heart rate changes elicited by the visit were unrelated to DeltaC-D and were correlated to the changes caused by the speech test [P <0.001 for systolic BP (SBP), P = 0.01 for diastolic BP (DBP), and P <0.001 for heart rate]. Hypertensive subjects with SBP response to doctor's visit above the median (hyper-reactive) showed increased reactivity also to public speaking (61 +/- 15 mmHg), while those with BP response below the median (normo-reactive) had a response to the psycho-social challenge (40 +/- 21 mmHg, 0.001 versus hyper-reactive) similar to that of the normotensive controls (38 +/- 17 mmHg). Epinephrine urinary output was greater in the hyper-reactive than the normo-reactive subjects (23 versus 12 microg/24 h, = 0.01). The SBP response to public speaking was greater in the hypertensive subjects with higher systolic daytime BP than in those with lower daytime BP (55.3 +/- 20.9 versus 45.1 +/- 20.6 mmHg, = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with increased WCE have an exaggerated response also to psycho-social stimuli. Average daytime BP, which incorporates the BP reactions to many psycho-social triggers can, thus, not be taken as the basal BP of an individual. This helps explain why DeltaC-D does not reflect the true WCE.

What is the white-coat effect and how should it be measured?

The white coat effect is conceived as a measure of the blood pressure response to a clinic visit, but there is no agreement as to exactly how it should be defined. The most widely used definition is the difference between the average clinic and daytime ambulatory blood pressures, but other methods that have been used include the difference between clinic and home pressures, measurements using ambulatory blood pressures only, clinic measurements only, and laboratory (reactivity) testing. Few studies have compared the different methods, but the reactivity method has reported bigger changes of blood pressure and heart rate than the others. The effect tends to be greater in older than younger patients, in women than in men, but is present to a greater or lesser degree in almost all hypertensive patients. It is diminished but not obliterated by drug treatment. It is not closely related to overall blood pressure variability, and does not predict cardiovascular risk. The white coat effect appears to be idiosyncratic to the clinic setting.

[Predictive factors of hypertension in patients with diagnostic doubts of persistent hypertension]

BACKGROUND

White coat hypertension (WCH) is a prevalent clinical situation which requires a therapeutic management different from persistent hypertension (PH). To distinguish between patients with WCH and uncertain hypertension from patients with PH, an ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is usually indicated, yet it is not available in primary care. Thereby, predictors of WCH on the basis of pre-test (pre-ABPM) clinical characteristics have been suggested. However, little is known about the predictors of PH. The aim of this study was to ascertain predictors of PH in patients referred from the primary care due to suspicion of WCH or uncertain hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A 24-hours ABPM was performed in 230 consecutive patients referred from primary care because of suspicion of WCH or uncertain hypertension. WCH was defined as an increased office BP with a mean daytime BP, as measured by ABPM, < 135/85 mmHg. Uncertain hypertension was diagnosed when patients had had episodic (2 or more) office BP >140 and/or 90 mmHg together with normal BP determinations. Patients with increased office BP with a mean daytime BP [by ABPM]3 135/85 mmHg were considered as having PH.

RESULTS

In 178 patients, ABPM was successful. Eighty-six patients (48.3%) had PH and the remainder (92 patients; 51.7%) were considered as having WCH. In the PH group, there were more males (67.4% vs 43.5%; p < 0.001), patients were older (42.8 [11.8] years vs 35.7 [11.2] years), there were more smokers (39.5 vs 26.1%; p = 0.056), they consumed more alcohol (p = 0.001) and coffee (p < 0.001) and they had higher levels of hemoglobin (p = 0.001) and creatinine (p = 0.003) and lower levels of uric acid (p<0.001) than the WCH group. Also they had an office BP and an ambulatory BP higher than WCH patients. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that PH was significantly associated with a male gender (odds ratio [OR] = 3.26; confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-6.88; p = 0.001), office systolic BP > 145 mmHg (OR = 6.53; CI, 2.67-16.11; p < 0.001), age (> 35 years) (OR = 5.03; CI, 2.35-10.78; p < 0.001) and smoking (OR = 3.07; CI, 1.38-6.84; p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that in patients referred from primary care due to suspicion of WCH or uncertain hypertension, the prevalence of PH was 48.3%. PH was more frequent among men older than 35 years, smokers and those with an ambulatory systolic BP > 145 mmHg.

Ambulatory blood pressure characteristics in normotensive and treated hypertensive older people

The objective of this study was to determine the normal values and characteristics of 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and to describe the ABP level of treated hypertensive subjects in an older Finnish population. ABP was measured in 502 randomly selected subjects aged 64 years or over living in a Finnish municipality (mean age 70 years, range 64-87 years). A total of 211 subjects did not have blood pressure (BP) affecting medication. ABP measurements were taken every 30 min for 24 h, and the day- and night-time periods were diary-based. The results were that in untreated subjects, the average office BP was 134/82 +/- 16/9 (s.d.) mm Hg for men and 140/81 +/- 18/8 mm Hg for women. The 24-h average BP was 120/75 +/- 14/8 mm Hg (95th percentile upper limit 145/93 mm Hg) for men and 125/75 +/- 15/7 (95th = 154/89 mm Hg) for women. The daytime averages were 127/78 +/- 12/7 mm Hg (95th = 154/99 mm Hg) and 131/78 +/- 15/7 mm Hg (95th = 158/91 mm Hg) for men and women, respectively. The ABP daytime value of 130/83 mm Hg corresponded best to the office BP value of 140/90 mm Hg. All BP values were significantly higher in the treated hypertensive group compared to the normotensive group. Night-time BP was markedly lower than daytime BP, and no difference in circadian variability was found between the normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Both office and ambulatory BPs were significantly higher in women than in men. This study provides sex-specific normal values for ABP in a 64 to 87-year-old age group. The normal values of ABP were markedly lower than the office BP values. Hypertensives, even when treated, tended to have elevated values.

Ambulatory blood pressure measurements

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has emerged as a valuable clinical and research tool in the assessment of pediatric hypertension. Large databases of 24-hour blood pressure monitorings in healthy children are under development for establishing normal reference values analogous to the Task Force data for casual blood pressure. In the clinical setting, pediatric studies using ABPM to evaluate elevated blood pressure have shown that the prevalence of white coat hypertension in children is similar to that reported in adults. Furthermore, 24-hour blood pressure parameters are correlated with hypertensive end-organ injury such as left ventricular hypertrophy. ABPM has allowed detailed assessment of circadian blood pressure patterns that show early subtle abnormalities in some high-risk groups and normal patterns in other groups previously thought to be at high risk. These studies will assist in the practice of evidence-based medicine regarding pediatric hypertension that will improve the long-term care that pediatricians provide to their patients.

Early sexual abuse and low cortisol

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health disorder precipitated by a stressful event that produces fear or terror in the individual. Post-traumatic stress disorder studies, particularly in early sexual abuse, have been associated with neuroendocrine dysfunction, most notably the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. Since the literature on PTSD and neuroendocrine factors in young subjects has been sparse, the present studies were designed to look at the basal functioning of the HPA axis in response to early sexual abuse in girls aged 5 to 7 years. Morning salivary samples were collected for cortisol determination from subjects and controls who were scheduled for a physical exam by their pediatrician. The present study shows that subjects who had been abused within the last couple of months had significantly lower cortisol in comparison to control subjects (age, social economic status and race matched). The data suggest that children may have an impaired HPA axis after early trauma.

Isolated office hypertension: are there any markers of future blood pressure status?

BACKGROUND

The introduction of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring into clinical practice has defined a clinical condition called 'isolated office hypertension'.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term systolic and diastolic blood pressure changes in patients with isolated office hypertension and to identify the presence of markers capable of identifying which patients will develop sustained hypertension.

METHODS

All the 407 patients enrolled had a random office systolic or/and diastolic blood pressure of over 140/90mmHg and a mean daytime ambulatory blood pressure of 130/84mmHg or less. At enrollment, each patient underwent a 'baseline examination' made up of a physical evaluation, a 24h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and a mental arithmetic test performed at the end of the 24h ambulatory monitoring.

RESULTS

Of the 173 patients finally studied, 102 (58.9%) developed sustained hypertension with an increase in both ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure. At the time of the baseline examination, the patients were divided into two groups. Group A included patients with mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the first hour of 130/84mmHg or less; group B included patients with mean ambulatory systolic and diastolic pressures in the first hour of greater than 130/84mmHg. During the mental arithmetic test, the systolic and heart rate values increased significantly only in group B patients. Of the 102 patients who had become hypertensive by the time of the follow-up examination, 84 (82%) belonged to group B.

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that isolated office hypertension may indeed be a transitional state towards the development of sustained hypertension. Moreover, the mean ambulatory blood pressure value during the first hour can be considered to be a marker of a higher risk of developing sustained hypertension.

White coat hypertension in children with elevated casual blood pressure

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed our experience using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in children referred to a hypertension clinic to determine the frequency of pediatric white coat hypertension (WCH).

STUDY DESIGN

WCH was defined by 3 different diagnostic criteria: (1) mean 24-hour blood pressure (BP) less than Task Force-defined 95th percentile, (2) mean 24-hour BP less than 95th percentile from pediatric normative ABPM data, and (3) mean 24-hour BP less than ABPM 95th percentile and BP load (percentage of BP readings during 24-hour period exceeding the 95th percentile) less than 25%.

RESULTS

Clinic BP values were available in 67 otherwise healthy children who underwent ABPM; 51 had confirmed clinic hypertension by Task Force criteria. WCH frequency in these 51 patients with the stated criteria was 53%, 45%, and 22%, respectively. Elevated BP load was found in 52% (12/23) of patients with normal mean BP.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that many children referred for casual BP elevation have WCH even by strict diagnostic criteria. ABPM may help differentiate WCH from persistent hypertension, thereby avoiding unnecessary diagnostic evaluation and identifying children most likely to benefit from early intervention.

White coat hypertension in children

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) has become more widely used in the assessment of elevated blood pressure in children. The accurate diagnosis of white coat hypertension (WCH) is particularly important in children because detection of elevated blood pressure often results in expensive and invasive diagnostic procedures to detect underlying disease. Recent normative pediatric data have both enhanced our ability to interpret ABPM results in pediatric patients and increased awareness that children suffer from WCH as has already been reported in adults. The few studies of WCH in children report a prevalence ranging from 44-88%, depending on the choice of threshold values for normalcy. When persistent hypertension is confirmed by three blood pressure measurements on three different occasions, ABPM should be performed as part of the initial evaluation. If hypertension is confirmed by ABPM, further evaluation should be tailored to the individual patient depending on the age, severity of hypertension, associated risk factors, and presence of end-organ injury.

Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure : current evidence and clinical implications

This article is a critical review of the available evidence on the prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). Several event-based cohort studies have shown that ABP improves cardiovascular risk stratification over and beyond traditional risk factors, including office BP. Most of these studies have been conducted in subjects with essential hypertension who were untreated at the time of execution of ABP monitoring; other studies have been conducted in subjects who were poorly controlled with treatment or in the general population. In these studies, ABP was examined as a continuous variable or with operational risk categories. Cardiovascular risk showed a direct and independent association with the observed ABP (systolic, diastolic, and pulse) and an inverse association with the degree of BP reduction from day to night. Cardiovascular risk was also directly associated with the difference between the observed value of ABP and that predicted from the office BP. White-coat hypertension versus ambulatory hypertension and dippers versus nondippers are 2 classifications based on arbitrary operational risk categories. A blunted or absent BP reduction from day to night, defined with ABP as a continuous variable or with operational thresholds, was also associated with a worse outcome regardless of the average value of ABP during the 24 hours. Overall, these studies indicate that ABP monitoring is particularly valuable to refine cardiovascular risk stratification in untreated subjects with office hypertension and in those with resistant hypertension. Intervention studies targeted at ABP are now needed.

Blood pressure biofeedback treatment of white-coat hypertension

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to compare blood pressure (BP) biofeedback treatment (BF) effects between white-coat hypertension and essential hypertension.

METHODS

Fifteen white-coat hypertensive out-patients and 23 essential hypertensive out-patients were randomly assigned to groups A or B. Subjects in group A underwent BF once a week for a total of four sessions. Those in group B visited the clinic only to measure BP and later underwent the same BF.

RESULTS

In group A, BPs of white-coat hypertensives and essential hypertensives were significantly reduced by 22/11 and 14/8 mmHg, respectively. In group B, they were unchanged during the same period but later suppressed by BF. Under BF, pulse and respiratory rates were significantly higher, and elevation of diastolic BP due to mental stress testing was better suppressed in white-coat hypertensives than in essential hypertensives.

CONCLUSION

This treatment was effective in both types of hypertension, and pressor response to stress seems to be important in the differentiated BF effect.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and echocardiography--noninvasive techniques for evaluation of the hypertensive patient

Clinic blood pressure measurements have only limited ability to determine which hypertensive patients are at greatest risk of cardiovascular events. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring allows for noninvasive measurement of blood pressure throughout the 24-hour period. This may help to clarify discrepancies between blood pressure values obtained in and out of the clinic and confirm the presence of white-coat hypertension, broadly defined as an elevated clinic blood pressure but a normal ambulatory blood pressure. Ambulatory blood pressure values have been shown to have a better relationship to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and end-organ damage than clinic blood pressure values. Further, patients with white-coat hypertension appear to be at greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity and end-organ damage than a normotensive population, although they are at less overall risk than a hypertensive population. Hypertensive heart disease is characterized by diastolic dysfunction, increased left ventricular mass, and coronary flow abnormalities. Left ventricular hypertrophy increases the risk of coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, stroke, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death. A variety of invasive and noninvasive techniques are described herein that measure left ventricular mass, diastolic function, and coronary blood flow abnormalities. Most antihypertensive treatments promote regression of left ventricular hypertrophy and reversal of diastolic dysfunction, which may decrease symptoms of congestive heart failure and improve survival.

Differences in behavior profile between normotensive subjects and patients with white-coat and sustained hypertension

It has been hypothesized that white-coat hypertensives (WCHs) have lower cardiovascular risk than sustained hypertensives (HTs), but higher emotional reactivity. We evaluated 92 HT patients (clinic and daytime BP>140/90 mmHg), 52 WCHs (clinic BP>140190 and ambulatory daytime BP<134/ 85 mmHg), and 74 normotensive subjects (NTs, clinic BP<140/90 and ambulatory daytime BP<134/85 mmHg), aged between 24 and 72 years, and matched for educational level, age, gender, and weight for depression, psychopathology, well-being, and quality of life. HTs showed worse scores than WCHs and NTs on most of the psychological variables; no differences were found between WCHs and NTs except on physical mobility. Daytime BP variability was HTs>WCHs>NTs, whereas nighttime BP variability was HTs>WCHs=NTs. We conclude that HTs have worse psychological profiles than the other two groups. WCHs and NTs have similar psychological profiles, although WCHs have a higher daytime BP variability, which is not associated with higher emotional reactivity.

Changes in left ventricular structure and function in patients with white coat hypertension: cross sectional survey

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relation between white coat hypertension and alterations of left ventricular structure and function.

DESIGN

Cross sectional survey.

SETTING

Augsburg, Germany.

SUBJECTS

1677 subjects, aged 25 to 74 years, who participated in an echocardiographic substudy of the monitoring of trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease Augsburg study during 1994-5.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Blood pressure measurements and M mode, two dimensional, and Doppler echocardiography. After at least 30 minutes' rest blood pressure was measured three times by a technician, and once by a physician after echocardiography. Subjects were classified as normotensive (technician <140/90 mm Hg, physician <160/95 mm Hg; n=849), white coat hypertensive (technician <140/90 mm Hg, physician >=160/95 mm Hg; n=160), mildly hypertensive (technician >=140/90 mm Hg, physician <160/95 mm Hg; n=129), and sustained hypertensive (taking antihypertensive drugs or blood pressure measured by a technician >=140/90 mm Hg, and physician >=160/95 mm Hg; n=538).

RESULTS

White coat hypertension was more common in men than women (10.9% versus 8.2% respectively) and positively related to age and body mass index. After adjustment for these variables, white coat hypertension was associated with an increase in left ventricular mass and an increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 3.2; P=0.009) compared with normotensive patients. The increase in left ventricular mass was secondary to significantly increased septal and posterior wall thicknesses whereas end diastolic diameters were similar in both groups with white coat hypertension or normotension. Additionally, the systolic white coat effect (difference between blood pressures recorded by a technician and physician) was associated with increased left ventricular mass and increased prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (P<0.05 each). Values for systolic left ventricular function (M mode fractional shortening) were above normal in subjects with white coat hypertension whereas diastolic filling and left atrial size were similar to those in normotension.

CONCLUSION

About 10% of the general population show exaggerated inotropic and blood pressure responses when mildly stressed. This is associated with an increased risk of left ventricular hypertrophy.

Psychosocial influences on blood pressure during daily life

Ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitoring allows frequent non-invasive blood pressure (BP) recordings in a variety of settings. Emerging evidence suggests that ABP is a better predictor of cardiovascular morbidity than clinic BP. Ambulatory blood pressure is influenced by a variety of physical, psychological and behavioral factors that comprise an individual's daily life. The present article reviews psychosocial research relating ABP to psychological factors (e.g. Type A behavior pattern, anger/hostility) and environmental influences (e.g. job strain). Psychological factors and environmental factors alone and in interaction with each other appear to substantially influence ABP. Interacting physical, psychosocial and behavioral factors that comprise daily life provide unique methodological challenges to ABP research. Methodological considerations (e.g. activity patterns, caffeine and alcohol consumption) for performing ABP research are discussed. Evidence outlined in this review suggests that psychosocial factors contribute to ABP level. To the extent that psychosocial factors contribute to ABP cardiac disease, it will be important to analyze their effects on underlying disease processes.